View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

1

In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.

Confidential (FR) Class II FOMC

March 23, 1983

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
By the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Page

II

Industrial production ...............................................
Labor market.................... o...........................
Personal income and consumption.................................
Housing markets............
.....
........
...................
Business fixed investment....................................
Inventory investment.............. ...................
.........
Federal government ..........
...............................
State and local government......................................
Wages and labor costs...........................................

1
3
3
9
9
15
15
17
17

Prices..........................................................

20

TABLES:
Industrial production...............................

2

Capacity utilization rates: manufacturing and materials.........
Changes in employment..........................................

2
4

Selected unemployment rates....................................

.

Personal income.................................................
...........
Retail sales........................................
Auto sales......................................................
.
Private housing activity..................................
Business capital spending indicators............................
Business capital spending commitments...........................
.Surveys of plant and equipment expenditures ....................
Changes in manufacturing and trade inventories..................
............
Inventories relative to sales .....................
Hourly earnings index...........................................
Labor productivity and costs: nonfarm business sector..........
Recent changes in consumer prices...............................
Recent changes in producer prices...............................

4

5
8
8
10
12
12
13
14
14
18
18
21
21

CHARTS:
6

Indicators of discretionary spending...........................

Total private housing starts and construction activity..........
DOMESTIC FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

10

III

Monetary aggregatee and bank credit.............................

3

**. *********

7

Business finance..........................*.....*
Government finance
.....................
.........
Federal sector...........
State and local sector......................................

9
11

III

DOMESTIC FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Mortgage market.......................
Consumer credit.................

.
.....

...........................

13
15

TABLES:
Balances in Super NOW accounts and MMDAS ......................
Recent growth rates of the velocity of money,..................

3
3

Monetary aggregates.........................................

4

Commercial bank credit and short- and intermediate-term
business credit....................,.............

6

Gross offerings of securities by U.S. corporations..............
Treasury and agency financing.................................
State and local government securities volume....................

8
10
12

Consumer installment credit.....................................

16

APPENDIX A:

Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank
Lending Practices...............................III-A-1

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

IV

Foreign exchange markets......................................

1

U.S. banks' claims on foreign borrowers..........................
U.S. international financial transactions........................
U.S. merchandise trade................................... .......

4
8
14

U.S. current account.............................................

17

Foreign economic developments.................................

18

TABLES:
Realignments of the EMS currency band............................
U.S.-chartered banks' claims on foreigners, 1979-82..............
U.S. official reserve assets...................................

2
5
8

International banking data.................................... .
Publicized borrowing in the international bond market............
Summary of U.S. international transactions.......................

10
12
13

U.S. merchandise trade...........................................
Oil Imports......................................................
U.S. current account............................................
.

14
15
16

Major industrial countries
Real GNP and IP...............................................

27

Consumer and wholesale prices................................
Trade and current-account balances............................
Growth of targeted monetary aggregates........................

28
29
30

CHARTS:
Weighted-average exchange value of the U.S. dollar..............
Selected exchange rates..........................

..............

2
2

II - T - 1

March 23, 1983

SELECTED DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL DATA
(Seasonally adjusted)
Latest data
Period

Release
date

Data

Percent change from
Three
Preceding
periods
Year
period
earlier
earlier
(At annual rate)

Civilian labor force
Unemployment rate (%) 1/
Insured unemployment rate (%) 1/
Nonfarm employment, payroll (mil.)
Manufacturing
Nonmanufacturing
Private nonfarm:
Average weekly hours (hr.) 1/
Hourly earnings ($) 1/
Manufacturing:
Average weekly hours (hr.) 1/
Unit labor cost (1967=100)

Feb.
Feb.
Dec.
Feb.
Feb.
Feb.

3-4-83
3-4-83
2-23-83
3-4-83
3-4-83
3-4-83

Feb.
Feb.

Industrial production (1967=100)
Consumer goods
Business equipment
Defense & space equipment
Materials

110.6
10.4
5.0
88.7
18.2
70.5

.1
10.4
5.3
-2.4
1.6
-3.5

-1.8
10.7
5.0
-. 2
.9
-. 4

1.1
8.8
4.7
-1.9
-6.3
-. 7

3-4-83
3-4-83

34.4
7.88

35.1
7.86

34.7
7.79

35.0
7.53

Feb.
Jan.

3-4-83
3-2-83

38.9
97.4

39.8
-6.1

38.9
-7.7

39.4
-6.3

Feb.
Feb.
Feb.
Feb.
Feb.

3-15-83
3-15-83
3-15-83
3-15-83
3-15-83

137.3
144.4
145.0
116.3
131.5

Consumer prices all items (1967=100) Feb.
All items, excluding food & energy Feb.
Food
Feb.

3-23-83
3-23-83
3-23-83

293.2
282.3
288.3

Producer prices: (1967=100)
Finished goods
Intermediate materials, nonfood
Crude foodstuffs & feedstuffs

Feb.
Feb.
Feb.

3-18-83
3-18-83
3-18-83

Personal income ($ bil.) 2/

Feb.

3-18-83

3.5
5.8
-13.9
4.1
6.4

7.1
8.8
9.5
9.7

-3.9
1.8
-15.5
9.2
-6.3

-2.5
4.3
.0

-1.2
2.7
.1

3.5
4.6
2.0

283.4
315.8
248.8

1.7
-1.9
28.6

-2.9
-2.3
15.7

2.1
-. 2
.4

2,643.1

1.3

2.3

5.1

-3.8

(Not at annual rates)
Mfgrs. new orders dur. goods ($ bil.)Feb.
Capital goods industries
Feb.
Nondefense
Feb.
Defense
Feb.

3-22-83
3-22-83
3-22-83
3-22-83

77.7
24.9
19.0
6.0

-4.0
-15.1
-7.3
-33.0

10.0
-1.4
-6.0
16.9

1.8
-13.4
-12.0
-17.5

Inventories to sales ratio: 1/
Manufacturing and trade, total
Manufacturing
Trade

3-17-83
3-2-83
3-17-83

1.47
1.67
1.30

1.51
1.74
1.32

1.54
1.78
1.34

1.54
1.81
1.31

3-2-83

.603

.621

.640

.640

91.7
19.9

-. 8
3.1

4.2
4.3

Ratio:

Jan.
Jan.
Jan.

Mfgrs.' durable goods inventories to unfilled orders 1/ Jan.

Retail sales, total ($ bil.)
GAF 3/

Feb.
Feb.

3-17-83
3-17-83

Auto sales, total (mil. units.) 2/
Domestic models
Foreign models

Feb.
Feb.
Feb.

3-3-83
3-3-83
3-3-83

Plant & Equipment expen. ($ bil.)4/
Total nonfarm business
Manufacturing
Nonmanufacturing

1983
1983
1983

3-10-83
3-10-83
3-10-83

310.92

Capital Appropriations, Mfg.
Housing starts, private (thous.) 2/
Leading indicators (1967-100)

1982-Q4
Feb.
Jan.

3-4-83
3-16-83
3-2-83

21,517
1,756

1/
T/
3/

W/

-2.0
-.2
-6.0

-10.9
-11.7
-8.7

-1.7

115.90

--

195.02

--

146.3

-. 2
-2.2
5.4

16 4
2.9
3.6

Actual data used in lieu of percent changes for earlier periods.
At annua 1 rate.
Excludes mail order houses.
Planned-Commerce January and February 1983 Survey.

-3.2
-. 9

--29.0

-6.4
92.8

4.8

8.3

DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

The long-awaited recovery in economic activity appears to be
clearly under way.

Both employment and production increased during

the first two months of the year.

In addition, housing starts con-

tinued to rise rapidly, and consumer spending advanced further.

News

about inflation remains favorable, partly reflecting the downward price
adjustment in energy markets.
Industrial Production
Industrial production increased 0.3 percent in February after a
rise of 1.3 percent in January.

As a result, industrial output in

February was 1-3/4 percent above its trough in November 1982, although
it was still about 11 percent below the peak in July 1981.
recovery has been quite moderate.

So far, the

Since November, production has risen

at an annual rate of 7-1/4 percent, well below the average rate of
increase for the first three months following a cyclical trough.
Production of consumer goods increased 0.5 percent in February
with automotive output rising for the third consecutive month.

Autos

were assembled at an annual rate of 6.3 million units, up considerably
from the 4.5 million unit November rate; however, current industry
schedules indicate a reduction in assemblies for March.

Output of home

goods fell back a bit in February, but was still more than 3 percent
above its December low.

Production of defense and space equipment

continued to rise in February, and output of construction supplies
advanced moderately after a large gain in January.

In contrast, produc-

tion of business equipment declined again in February, reflecting a
sharp contraction in oil and gas well drilling.
II-1

II-2

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
(Percentage change from preceding period;
based on seasonally adjusted data)

--------Q2

1982--------Q3
Q4

----- annual rate-----Total

1982
Dec.

--- 1983---Jan.
Feb.

----monthly rate---

-6.5

-3.4

-8.2

.2

Final products
-3.0
Consumer goods
-7.3
Durable
27.9
Nondurable
1.0
Business equipment
-22.3
Defense and space equipment
4.8

-3.0
2.6
3.6
2.3
-17.2
7.8

-6.6
-6.8
-21.9
-.9
-14.4
15.3

.9
.6
1.3
.4
1.3
1.2

.4
1.1
4.1
.1
-1.1
.8

.1
.5
2.0
.0
-1.2
.3

-8.6

8.7

-8.2

-.5

2.3

.5

-11.1
-11.2
-10.0
-12.5

-6.0
-7.3
-4.3
-5.3

-11.2
-22.5
5.4
-6.7

-.5
-.2
-.9
-.3

2.3
3.7
1.2
1.2

.5
1.1
.1
.0

Construction supplies
Materials
Durable goods
Nondurable goods
Energy materials

1.3

.3

CAPACITY UTILIZATION RATES: MANUFACTURING AND MATERIALS
(Percent, seasonally adjusted)

1975
Low
Manufacturing industries
Primary processing
Advanced processing
Motor vehicles & parts

Materials producers
Durable goods materials
Raw steel
Nondurable goods materials
Energy materials

1978-80
High

------ 1982----Average
Dec.

---1983---Jan.
Feb.

69.0

87.2

69.8

67.5

68.3

68.5

68.2
69.4
51.3

90.1
86.2
94.5

66.4
71.7
52.9

63.7
69.6
52.3

65.0
70.0
54.5

65.2
70.2
59.2

69.4

88.8

68.9

65.2

66.6

66.9

63.6
68.0
67.2
84.8

88.4
100.7
91.6
88.8

63.2
48.9
72.7
79.5

58.2
37.9
71.1
76.4

60.3
45.1
71.8
77.2

60.9
48.8
71.7
77.1

II-3

Labor Market
Rising output in the industrial sector over the DecemberFebruary period has been mirrored in recent labor market developments.
After bottoming out in December, payroll employment showed a net gain
of 150,000 over the first two months of the year.

Factory employment

rose in both January and February as increased activity in the auto
and housing sectors led to rehires in transportation equipment, metals,
lumber, and other related industries.

So far, employment gains have

been entirely among production workers while supervisors continue to
be laid off, suggesting that firms are still scaling back white-collar
overhead.

Employment in retail trade improved over the first two

months of the year after declining during 1982; hiring in other serviceproducing industries continued at about last year's slow pace.
The civilian unemployment rate was unchanged at 10.4 percent
in February.

As usual after a cyclical trough, all of the reduction

in unemployment since December has been for the short-duration jobless.
The number of workers unemployed longer than six months continued near
its cyclical high.

The labor force participation rate remained fairly

low in February after a sharp drop a month earlier.

This decline was

unusual because it occurred almost entirely among adult men.
Personal Income and Consumption
Income generated by the private sector began to step up early
this year.

Despite a weather-induced decline in February, payrolls

were still $14 billion above the December level.

However, total person-

al income was up considerably less as a number of temporary factors
reduced the non-labor components:

farm subsidy payments dropped back,

II-4
CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT 1
(Thousands of employees; based
on seasonally adjusted data)

1982

Nonfarm payroll employment 2
Manufacturing
Durable
Nondruable
Construction
Trade
Finance and services
Total government
Private nonfarm production
workers
Manufacturing production
workers

Total employment 3
Nonagricultural

1983
Feb.
Jan.

1981

1982

Q3

Q4

-7

-173

-192

-233

330

-180

-40
-32
-8
-22
16
56
-26

-129
-100
-28
-17
-17
30
-14

-119
-101
-18
-19
-34
37
-23

-147
-127
-20
-22
-59
25
-3

66
44
22
98
184
44
-29

24
39
-15
-134
-69
9
11

-8

-147

-152

-223

325

-205

-48

-110

-95

-131

66

40

2
25

-49
-65

-46
-43

-150
-166

10
9

-40
-21

1. Average change from final month of preceding period to final
month of period indicated.
2. Survey of establishments.
3. Survey of households.
SELECTED UNEMPLOYMENT RATES
(Percent; based on seasonally adjusted data)

Q3

1982
Q4

1983
Jan. Feb.

9.7

10.0

10.7

10.4

10.4

19.6
12.3
5.1
5.9

23.2
14.9
7.5
7.3

23.9
15.1
7.8
7.3

24.3
16.1
8.6
7.9

22.7
16.1
8.2
7.9

22.2
16.3
8.5
7.7

6.7
14.2

8.6
17.3

8.8
17.7

9.5
18.6

9.1
19.0

9.2
13.0

7.3

9.6

9.8

10.6

10.3

10.4

7.5

9.5

9.8

10.5

10.2

10.2

1981

1982

Civilian, 16 years and older

7.6

Teenagers
20-24 years old
Men, 25 years and older
Women, 25 years and older
White
Black and other
Fulltime workers
Memo:
Total nationall
1.

Includes resident Armed Forces as employed.

II-5

PERSONAL INCOME
(Based on seasonally adjusted data)
1982
1981

1982

Q3

Q4

1983
Jan. Feb.

- - percentage changes at annual rates 1 - Total personal income
Wage and salary
disbursements
Private
Disposable personal income
Nominal
Real

10.4

5.2

6.4

5.0

2.4

8.4
8.7

2.8
2.1

3.5
3.2

1.2
-.3

11.9
13.7

-1.3
-2.8

10.4
2.6

5.9
.7

9.0
1.3

4.9
.3

3.9
-.1

0.3
n.a.

2
- - changes in billions of dollars - -

Total personal income
Wage and salary disbursements
Private
Manufacturing
Other income
Transfer payments

17.9

11.5

10.3

12.6

5.2

2.9

8.8
7.1
1.1

4.1
2.7
-.9

2.4
1.6
-1.7

3.3
.9
-2.3

15.6
14.5
5.5

-1.7
-3.0
1.8

10.3
2.9

7.8
4.0

8.1
5.5

9.5
6.0

-6.8
-6.1

4.2
.6

.5

.2

.1

3.5

-.3

15.2
1.7

10.8
1.2

15.7
2.4

9.9
2.2

7.3
-.1

.5
n.a.

6.4

6.5

6.9

6.0

5.6

5.6

Less: personal contributions
for social insurance
Disposable personal income
Nominal
Real
Memorandum:
Personal saving rate

1. Changes over periods longer than one quarter are measured from
final quarter of preceding period to final quarter of period
indicated. Changes for quarterly periods are compounded rates of
change; monthly changes are not compounded.
2. Average monthly changes are from the final month of the preceding
period to the final month of period indicated; monthly figures are
changes from the preceding month.

II-6

INDICATORS OF DISCRETIONARY SPENDING

Millions of Units,
Annual Rate

Auto Sales

Domestic

Foreign
..

Real Retail Sales of
Merchandise, Apparel and
Furniture and Appliance Stores

SGeneral

4

1

Billions of 1972 Dollars

-

12.50

12.25

- 2.00

"11.75

I
1979

I
1980

I
1981

I
1982

1. February level.
2. Historical data deflated by the BEA-GAF deflator.
price change based on staff estimate.

1983
February 1983

II-7

unemployment insurance transfers declined, and the social security
taxable wage base was raised.

Given these developments, real dis-

posable income appears to have been about unchanged since the fourth
quarter.

Nonetheless, the February level of real outlays for per-

sonal consumption is estimated to have been about 3/4 percent above
the fourth-quarter average, and the personal saving rate fell to 5.6
percent from 6 percent in the fourth quarter.
Sales of domestic automobiles have averaged about 6 million units
a year since December.

These sales, boosted by extended interest-rate

concessions, have remained about 7 percent above their level in the
first three quarters of 1982, but are still low by historical standards.

Purchases of foreign cars also have been higher in recent

months than last year.

The small decline in February to a 2.4 million

unit annual rate was probably the result of limited supplies of Japanese
models; these reduced stocks, which can be attributed to export restrictions and unusually strong sales in previous months, are likely to
further constrain sales in near term.
Retail sales excluding automobiles, gasoline, and nonconsumption items, continued to improve in January and February.

Re-

vised data now show increases of 0.5 percent in nominal terms in
each month.

In February sales at the general merchandise, apparel,

and furniture and appliance (GAF) group of stores, often considered
an indicator of discretionary spending, stood 2.6 percent above
fourth quarter level.

Consumer surveys point toward further improve-

ment in consumer demand; both the Conference Board and the Michigan

II-8
RETAIL SALES
(Percent change from preceding period;
based on seasonally adjusted data)

1982
Q2
Q3
Q4
---quarterly rate--Total sales

2.1

(Real)1

2.3

nonconsumption items

.2

Feb.
Q4

1982
1983
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.
---monthly rate---

2.8

-.2

.0

-.4

-1.2

2.3

...

-.9

-.3

.7

1.4

1.0

.7

.4

.3

.1

Total, less autos,
nonconsumption items,
and gasoline

1.4

1.2

1.2

1.5

.6

.5

.5

GAF2

1.2

-.1

1.8

2.6

3.0

-.7

.8

5.5
8.4

-3.0
-4.3

7.7
11.8

-1.3
-6.5

.0
-2.2

-1.4
-4.4

-1.7
-3.4

1.8

-1.4

2.6

2.2

6.0

-.4

-1.5

-.4

Total, less autos and

Durable goods
Automotive
Furniture &
appliances
Nondurable goods
Apparel
Food
General merchandise 3

Gasoline

.7
-1.5
1.9
2.1

1.6
.2
1.3
.3

.7
.2
.6
2.1

.2
2.1
-.6
2.9

-.1
-.3
.4
3.3

.1
-1.8
-1.7
-.4

.2
3.6
.9
.6

-4.0

2.6

-.7

-4.8

-1.2

-1.1

-2.8

1. BCD series 59. Data are available approximately three weeks following
the retail sales release.
2. General merchandise, apparel, and furniture and appliance stores.
3. General merchandise excludes mail-order nonstores; mail-order sales
are also excluded in the GAF composite sales summary.

AUTO SALES
(Millions of units; seasonally adjusted annual rates)
1982

1982

1983

Q4

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

7.8

8.6

8.7

8.6

8.4

2.0

2.2

2.5

2.6

2.6

2.4

5.9

5.5

5.6

6.1

6.1

6.1

6.0

Small

3.0

2.5

2.6

2.8

2.9

2.7

2.5

Intermediate
& standard

2.8

3.0

2.9

3.3

3.3

3.4

3.8

9l

Q2

Q3

8.1

7.5

Foreign-made

2.2

U.S.-made

Total

Note:

Components may not add to totals due to rounding.

II-9

Survey Research Center indexes of consumer sentiment rose in February to their highest levels since 1981.
Housing Markets
Housing markets strengthened markedly in early 1983.

Total

private housing starts averaged a 1.7 million unit annual rate during
the first two months of the year, up nearly 40 percent from the pace
in the fourth quarter.

Newly-issued building permits also rose.

Within the single-family market, starts in both January and February were above a million units for the first time since 1979.
Through January the recent rise in starts was in excess of the recovery in sales and may have reflected in part an attempt by builders to increase depleted inventories in anticipation of a strong
spring sales season.

In particular, starts of single-family units

in the first two months of the year were 35 percent above their
fourth quarter average; in comparison, in January, new and existing
home sales were up 12 and 22 percent respectively.
Multifamily housing starts also surged during the first two
months of 1983, with the February rate, 716,000 units, the highest pace
in almost a decade.

This increase came despite the fact that vacancy

rates for units in multifamily structures backed up steadily late last
year from the extremely low levels of 1981.
Business Fixed Investment
Outlays for business fixed investment have continued to decline.
In the equipment sector, shipments of nondefense capital goods edged
down in February to a level about two percent below their fourth
quarter average after dropping about 3 percent per quarter during the

II-10
PRIVATE HOUSING ACTIVITY
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates, millions of units)

All units
Permits
Starts
Single-family units
Permits
Starts
Sales
New homes
Existing homes
Multifamily units
Permits
Starts
Mobile home shipments

1983

Annual

Q2

1982
Q3

Q4

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

.99
1.06

.92
.95

.98
1.12

1.22
1.26

1.31
1.28

1.48
1.71

1.49
1.76

.54
.66

.49
.61

.52
.65

.71
.81

.74
.84

.90
1.14

.83
1.04

.41
1.99

.37
1.95

.41
1.89

.52
2.13

.52
2.26

.58
2.61

n.a.
n.a.

.45
.40

.43
.34

.47
.47

.52
.45

.57
.44

.58
.57

.67
.72

.24

.25

.23

.24

.24

.28

n.a.

n.a.--Not available.

Total Private Housing Starts and
Construction Activity

Millions
of units

Billions
(1972$)

~1

Total Private
Housing Starts
(right hand
scale)

--

1.85

1.45

,

%

%I

S%

// ,,

"

Construction on New Dwelling Units
(left hand scale)
_ I I I I Il I
S1 1

1981
1981

1982

1982

1.05

1983
1983
---

.65

II-11

last half of 1982.

New orders for nondefense capital goods fell

sharply in February, but most of the decline was in the aircraft
industry, where bookings vary widely from month to month.
New construction put-in-place, which comprises about threefourths of total expenditures for nonresidential structures, rose 6
percent in January, following a 1.2 percent decline in December.

Much

of the rise in outlays in January may have been due to the unseasonably
warm weather that month.

Although there were increases in most major

categories of building construction, one notable exception was office
building for which spending has leveled off.

This is consistent with

a continued rise in national office vacancy rates (which were above 10
percent in December according to a survey by Coldwell Banker) and
reports that prices of office buildings have fallen.

Outlays for

petroleum drilling and mining, the other major component of nonresidential structures, continue to be weak.

The index of rotary rigs in

operation declined 14 percent in February, after firming in the previous
few months.
Recent surveys of 1983 capital spending plans have shown little
change from those taken at the end of last year.

According to the

February McGraw-Hill survey, businesses plan to reduce outlays by
2.9 percent in 1983, compared with the 2.1 percent decline expected in
November.

The February Commerce Department survey, which showed a

similar downward revision, indicates an anticipated 1.7 percent decline
in 1983 spending, with a reduction in expenditures in the first half
of the year combined with an increase in the second half.

The Con-

ference Board Survey of net capital appropriations for the nation's

II-12

BUSINESS CAPITAL SPENDING INDICATORS
(Percentage change from preceding comparable period;
based on seasonally adjusted data)

Q2
Nondefense capital goods
shipments

1982
Q3

Q4

1982
Dec.

1983
Feb.
Jan.

-3.1

-3.5

-2.7

2.4

-3.4

Addendum: Sales of heavyweight trucks (thousands)1

173

168

162

194

169

Nonresidential construction

1.8

.2

-1.0

-1.2

5.9

-5.9

8.1

-.8

Addendum: Rotary rigs
in operation

-21.2

-20.7

-.4

167

-14.1

1. Annual rate.

BUSINESS CAPITAL SPENDING COMMITMENTS
(Percentage change from preceding comparable period;
based on seasonally adjusted data)

Q2
Nondefense capital goods orders
Machinery

1982
Q3

Q4

1982
Dec.

1983
Feb.
Jan.

-4.9

-4.4

1.7

-.1

1.5

-7.3

-4.2

-5.1

-.7

-3.9

3.4

-2.0

5.84
4.25

5.73
4.04

5.69
4.03

5.60
3.96

5.76
4.03

5.68
3.98

-4.7

-4.0

2.5

18.3

....

Addenda: Ratio of current
dollar unfilled orders
to shipments
Total
Machinery
Contracts for commercial and
industrial buildings
(mil. sq. ft.)

-6.8

II-13
SURVEYS OF PLANT AND EQUIPMENT EXPENDITURES
(Percent change from prior year)

Planned for 1983

19821

All Business
Manufacturing
Durables
Nondurables
Nonmanufacturing
Mining
Transportation

Utilities
Trade and Services
Communications and
other
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Commerce
Dec. Feb.

McGraw-Hill 2
Nov.
Feb.

-1.6
-5.6
-8.7
-2.6
1.1
-8.4
-.8

-1.3
-2.6
-1.0
-3.9
-.6
2.5
1.0

-1.7
-3.2
-3.9
-2.4
-.9
.0
-7.9

-2.1
-2.5
-.7
-4.1
-1.8
-13.5
-10.4

-2.9
-3.8
-5.8
-2.0
-2.4
-9.8
-5.9

9.3

-3.9

-2.3

-3.8

-3.1

.7
-1.5

.5

1.0

-1.1

-1.7

4.63
-7.0

Merrill-Lynch2
Nov.
-1.7
-.1
-1.3
1.1
-2.8
10.1
5.5

-5.1

.1

-10.2

4

-3.2

15.3

5

Growth in actual expenditures reported in the January Commerce Survey.
Not strictly comparable to Commerce Survey.
Includes only commercial category.
Includes commercial and other.
Includes communication only.

II-14

CHANGES IN MANUFACTURING AND TRADE INVENTORIES
(Billions of dollars at annual rates)

1982
1981

1982

Q3

36.3
19.1
13.8
5.4
6.7
10.4
2.1

-15.1
-17.9
-11.5
-6.5
1.4
1.4
-.2

7.1
2.6
1.5
3.1
.7

-8.5
-8.1
-.1
-.2
-.3

1982
Dec.(r)

1983
Jan.(p)

Q4

Nov.

5.7
-10.6
-6.0
-4.6
2.3
14.0
11.2

-40.3
-29.0
-23.3
-5.8
-5.1
-6.2
-10.2

-58.0
-29.0
-30.2
1.3
-14.3
-14.8
-14.7

-43.0
-49.0
-28.2
-20.8
-1.5
7.6
-3.5

-40.2
-31.2
-35.6
4.4
-7.6
-1.4
-3.9

3.4
-5.0
1.3
7.1
5.5

-20.1
-14.4
-.6
-5.2
-6.0

-35.8
-19.2
-4.9
-11.7
-9.8

-15.0
-15.4
.4
.0
-2.9

-22.9
-18.5
-2.4
-2.0
-2.1

Book Value Basis
Total
Manufacturing
Durable
Nondurable
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Automotive
Constant Dollar Basis
Total
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Automotive

INVENTORIES RELATIVE TO SALES 1
1981
Cyclical
Trough 2

1982
Cyclical
Peak 2

1.40
1.61
2.09
1.09
1.04
1.37
1.61

1.54

Total
Manufacturing
Wholesale trade

1.61
1.92

1.77
2.15

1.32

Retail trade

1.33
1.47

1.50
1.46
1.94

1982

1982
1983
Dec.(r) Jan.(p)

Q4

Nov.

1.51
1.71
2.36
1.09
1.23
1.45
1.96

1.51
1.74

1.52
1.77
2.47
1.13
1.24
1.38
1.56

1.51
1.74

1.47

2.41

2.26

1.11
1.25
1.39

1.12
1.20
1.39

1.58

1.63

1.73
2.05
1.46
1.46
1.95

1.73
2.11
1.47

1.73
2.12
1.46
1.39
1.53

1.72
2.08
1.47
1.40
1.61

1.67
2.00

Q3

Book Value Basis
Total
Manufacturing
Durable
Nondurable
Wholesale trade
Retail trade
Automotive

1.81
2.48
1.18

1.26
1.45

1.92

2.43

1.11
1.25
1.40

1.60

1.68

Constant Dollar Basis

Automotive

1.

1.41

1.61

1.41
1.39
1.62

Ratio of end-of-period inventories to average monthly sales for the period.
Peaks and troughs are specific to each series and are not necessarily coincident.
Revised estimates.
Preliminary estimates.

II-15

1,000 largest manufacturers also suggests some strengthening in the
future.

In the fourth quarter of last year, manufacturers increased

appropriations by 27 percent from the depressed third quarter level.
Because the lag between appropriations and outlays is two to four
quarters, this may signal some upturn in investment in the second half
of 1983.
Inventory Investment
Businesses continued to liquidate inventories at a rapid
pace in January.

Total manufacturing and trade inventories, in con-

stant dollars, fell at a $23 billion annual rate, compared with a
decline of $20 billion in the fourth quarter.

The January inventory

contraction was accompanied by a 2.4 percent rise in total real shipAs a result, the ratio of inventories to sales fell

ments and sales.
appreciably.

Although the recent liquidation has brought the stock-

sales ratio from its cyclical peak, it still is above its prerecession average.
The January decline in inventories was concentrated in the
manufacturing sector.

All major durable goods industries reduced their

inventories, with large reductions reported for the primary metals and
nonelectrical machinery industries, where imbalances have been persistent.

In the trade sector, domestic auto stocks at dealers rose a

little in February, but still represented a relatively comfortable 61
days' supply.
Federal Government
The federal government budget deficit on a unified basis is
tentatively estimated to be about $60 billion (not an annual rate) in
the first quarter, around $36 billion more than the deficit recorded a

II-16

year earlier.

The widening in the deficit largely reflects the lower

level of economic activity and the continuing effects of tax law changes
made in 1981 and 1982; in addition, more than $10 billion was due to a
shift in the timing of social security benefits payments.
On the expenditure side, quarterly outlays for unemployment compensation are estimated to be about $4 billion higher than a year
earlier.

In addition, defense outlays appear to be running around $6

billion, or 13 percent, above their year-earlier levels.

Revenues are

estimated to be about 5 percent lower than a year earlier.

However,

expectations that there will be considerably higher than usual growth
in personal tax refunds this year have not been confirmed by the data
available through mid-March.
Federal budget deficits in FY 1983 and FY 1984 could be affected by two bills expected to be signed into law soon.

A "jobs bill"

that, among other things, accelerates spending for a number of federal
projects, could increase outlays by $4-1/2 billion over the next three
years.

The social security bill incorporates most of the recommenda-

tions of the National Commission on Social Security Reform.

These

include a postponement of the July 1983 COLA for retirement and disability benefits to January 1, 1984, an acceleration of payroll tax
increases to 1984, the taxation of social security benefits for higher
income recipients, and the extention of social security coverage to
newly employed federal workers beginning in 1984.

These reforms would

reduce the unified budget deficit by about $1-1/2 billion in fiscal
year 1983 and by $9-1/2 billion in fiscal year 1984.

In addition, the

II-17

social security bill would extend the supplemental unemployment benefits program another six months to September 30.
State and Local Government
State and local government spending appears to have risen a
little in recent months.

Employment fell slightly in the first two

months of this year, continuing its two year decline.

In contrast,

state and local government construction expenditures (which comprise
10 percent of total state and local purchases) jumped a surprising 17
percent in January.

Although some of this increase is attributable to

January's mild weather, the rise also may signal the beginning of an
upward trend in state and local construction, which could be supported in part by the large amount of new debt issued in the closing
months of 1982 as well as the prospect of increased federal highway
grants.
Many state governments project sizable deficits for the current
fiscal year and beyond.

Because most states are not allowed to run

a deficit in their general funds, legislative actions to reduce expenditures and/or raise revenues are required.

However, a majority of

states already have taken measures to reduce expenditures in fiscal
year 1983, and current proposals center on raising revenues.

Eight

states have raised sales and income taxes, and California has adopted a
standby sales tax increase.

In addition, Michigan and Illinois are

considering large tax increases to cover substantial projected deficits.
Wages and Labor Costs
Increases in wage rates have continued to slow for most
workers.

Over the three months ended in February, the hourly earnings

II-18
HOURLY EARNINGS INDEX 1
(Percentage change at annual rates
based on seasonally adjusted data)
1982

Total private nonfarm
Manufacturing
Durable
Nondurable
Contract construction
Transportation and
public utilities
Total trade
Services

1981

1982

8.4

Q4

1983
Jan.
Feb.

6.2

4.8

4.5

1.6

4.5

6.6
6.2
7.3
2.3

6.4
7.5
4.3
3.4

2.9
1.6
5.4
5.1

7.0
9.2
3.0
-2.7

4.8
4.2
5.8
15.1

4.8
4.5
5.4
12.6

6.0
6.4
7.6

4.5
4.5
8.5

7.1
4.9
5.5

7.8
2.6
-1.2

4.6
2.6
-7.6

7.2
3.2
.9

Q1

Q2

6.0

6.5

6.4

8.8
8.8
8.7
8.1

6.1
6.1
6.3
4.9

8.7
9.0
8.2
9.0

8.5
7.1
9.1

6.2
4.9
6.7

7.4
3.8
5.1

Q3

Last three
months

1. Excludes the effect of interindustry shifts in employment and fluctuations in overtime
pay in manufacturing.
2. Changes over periods longer than one quarter are measured from final quarter of preceding period to final quarter of period indicated. Quarterly changes are at compound
rates; monthly changes are at simple annual rates.

LABOR PRODUCTIVITY AND COSTS: NONFARM BUSINESS SECTOR
(Percent change from preceding period at compound
annual rates; based on seasonally adjusted data)
1973-Q4
to 1980-Q1 1
Output per hour

.6

1980

1981

1982

Q1

Q2

.3

-.1

1.7

.6

.8

1982
Q3

Q4

3.5

2.0

Compensation per hour

9.0

10.6

8.8

6.5

7.7

6.1

6.6

5.6

Unit labor costs

8.3

10.2

8.9

4.7

7.1

5.2

3.1

3.5

1.

1973-Q4 and 19 8 0-Q1 were business cycle peaks.

II-19

index--a measure of wage rate changes for production and nonsupervisory
workers--rose at a 4-1/2 percent annual rate.

This increase represents

a slight moderation from the fourth-quarter pace and is well below the
6-1/4 percent rate over the first three quarters of last year.
Recent union settlements generally have continued to result in
smaller wage increases than last year, with some key union contracts
calling for pay cuts or freezes.

The master steel agreement, which

went into effect March 1 at eight major steel producers, reduced wage
rates about 9 percent and limited cost-of-living payments.

The wage

cut will be restored during the next three years; assuming a 4 percent
inflation rate, the average hourly wage, including COLAs, is expected
to be only about 3 percent higher at the end of the contract period in
1986 than prior to the settlement.

Typically, the master steel contract

has set the pattern for other steel contracts and also has influenced
the outcomes of talks in the aluminum, copper, and metal container
industries.

The median first-year settlement has been running 5-1/2

percent (excluding COLA) so far this year, compared with 7 percent
last year, according to a private survey of contracts involving 50 or
more workers.
Revised data on nonfarm productivity and costs showed a
somewhat smaller increase in output per hour at the end of 1982 than
was initially reported.

Even so, productivity was up 1.7 percent over

the four quarters of last year despite the decline in output, and unit
labor costs rose 4.7 percent, down from nearly 9 percent in 1981.

The

rise in hourly compensation for the fourth quarter was revised down to
a 5.6 percent annual rate.

II-20

Prices [February CPI data due Wednesday morning.]
Inflation reports show low or negative rates so far this year,
largely reflecting sharp declines in energy prices.

The consumer price

index for all urban consumers (CPI-U), which is now based on a rental
equivalence measure of homeowners' costs, rose only 0.2 percent in
January and fell 0.2 percent in February.

Over the same months, the

CPI for wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W) edged down; this
index, which is still used in calculating most cost-of-living adjustments, retains the old homeownership measure.

At the producer level,

the index of finished goods prices fell nearly 1 percent between
December and February.
Prices of petroleum products have been falling rapidly at
all levels.

For example, the price of retail gasoline tumbled 9-3/4

percent from December to February.

The recent OPEC agreement is expected

to bring stability to the international crude oil market, and should
result in a firming of refined product prices in coming months.

In

addition, the April 1 increase of 5 cents per gallon in the federal
excise tax is likely to put upward pressure on gasoline prices.
Movements in food prices also have continued to exert a
moderating influence on inflation.

At the consumer level, food prices

have remained about constant since mid-1982.

However, producer prices

of finished foods turned up in February and crude food prices have
been rising since late last October--although, in the case of grains,
from very low levels--suggesting a firming in retail prices in coming
months.

The recent severe weather in California appears to have delayed

II-21
RECENT CHANGES IN CONSUMER PRICES
(Percentage change at annual rates; based on seasonally adjusted data) 1

All items 2
Food
Energy
All items less food and
energy 3
Commodities 3
Services 3
Memorandum:
CPI-W 4

Relative
Importance
Dec. 1982

1981

1982

100.0
19.0
12.4

8.9
4.3
11.9

3.9
3.1
1.3

68.6
26.2
42.4

9.4
7.9
10.6

100.0

8.7

1982
Q3

1983
Q4

Jan.

4.1
.6
8.1

.5
.8
10.2

2.0
.8
-30.0

6.0
5.0
7.0

6.1
4.3
8.4

5.8
5.7
5.1

3.9

4.2

.7

6.0
6.6
5.8

.0

Feb.
-2.5
.0
-44.5
4.3
5.6
3.6

-2.9

1. Changes are from final month of preceding period to final month of
period indicated; monthly changes are not compounded.
2. Official index for all urban consumers, based on a rental equivalence
measure for owner-occupied housing after December 1982.
3. Data not strictly comparable. Before 1983, they are based on unofficial
series that exclude the major components of homeownership; beginning in
1983, data include a rental equivalence measure of homeowners' costs.
4. Index for urban wage earners and clerical workers.

RECENT CHANGES IN PRODUCER PRICES
(Percentage change at annual rates; based on seasonally adjusted data) 1
Relative
Importance
Dec. 1982

1982
1981

1982

Q3

100.0
23.7
13.2
40.5
22.5

7.1
1.4
14.1
7.1
9.2

3.5
2.1
-. 1
5.0
4.0

4.2
-7.7
30.9
4.2
3.5

4.6
.6
7.1
6.5
3.9

Intermediate materials 2
Exc. energy

95.2
78.8

7.3
6.6

.3
.6

2.3
1.0

1.5
1.2

Crude food materials
Crude energy
Other crude materials

51.2
34.4
14.4

-14.0
22.8
-11.4

1.4
2.4
-7.6

-26.4
8.7
2.9

1.3
5.8
-7.9

Finished goods
Consumer foods
Consumer energy
Other consumer goods
Capital equipment

Q4

1983
Jan. Feb.
1.7
-12.6
7.4
-2.3
-50.5 -35.1
8.1
-12.6
5.5
-1.3
-4.5
-1.2

-1.9
5.4

28.6
13.5
-7.7
-14.8
-35.1 -34.0

1. Changes are from final month of preceding period to final month of
period indicated; monthly changes are not compounded.
2. Excludes materials for food manufacturing and animal feeds.

II-22

planting of vegetable crops; such disruptions often have been associated
with temporary price hikes several months later.
Outside the food and energy sectors, consumer prices rose at
about a 5-1/4 percent annual rate over the first two months of this year,
a bit better than in 1982.

The commodities component was boosted in

January by a hike in cigarette prices associated with the higher
federal excise tax.

In contrast, the rise in service costs has slowed

significantly.
At the producer level, capital equipment prices posted a net
increase of less than 1/2 percent so far this year.

There has been,

however, a significant rise since late last year in the prices of some
industrial commodities, notably scrap metals.

Prices of these materials--

which account for a very small share of total final product costs--have
been extremely depressed as a result of inventory overhangs and slack
demand.

The price index for intermediate materials (nonfood, nonenergy)--

items which have a much larger share of "value added"--turned up in
February, reflecting large increases in prices of steel mill products,
nonferrous metals, and lumber.

However, prices of many other intermediate

materials declined, and the index level remained only a little higher
than a year earlier.

III-T-1
SELECTED FINANCIAL MARKET QUOTATIONS1
(Percent)
1982

1983

highs

FOMC
Dec. 21

Federal funds2

15.61

8.69

8.50

8.74p

Treasury bills
3-month
6-month
1-year

14.57
14.36
13.55

7.90
8.01
8.11

8.28
8.40
8.48

8.61
8.62
8.59

Comercial paper
1-month
3-month

15.73
15.61

8.48
8.43

8.36
8.46

8.64
8.66

Large negotiable CDs 3
1-month
3-month
6-month

15.94
16.14
16.18

8.59
8.62
8.78

8.46
8.68
9.01

8.78
8.92
9.12

16.36
16.53

9.44
9.56

8.95
9.30

9.27p
9.42p

17.00

11.50

11.00

10.50

13.97
13.97

8.25
8.98

8.60
9.07

8.70

U.S. Treasury (constant maturity)
3-year
15.16
14.95
10-year
14.80
30-year

9.87
10.54
10.53

10.14
11.00
11.14

10.08
10.62
10.71

FOMC
Feb. 9

Mar. 22

Change from:
FOMC
FOMC
Feb. 9
Dec. 21

Short-term rates

Eurodollar deposits
1-month
3-month

2

Bank prime rate
Treasury bill futures
June 1983 contract
Dec. 1983 contract

-.17
-. 14
-1.00

-. 50
.10
.02

9.09

Intermediate- and longterm rates
.21
.08
.18

-.06
-.38
-.43

Municipal (Bond Buyer)

13.44

10.054

9.744

9.19 4

-.86

-.55

Corporate--Aaa utility
Recently offered

16.34

11.96e

12.26e

11. 77 p

-.19

-.49

17.66
1982

13.635

13.065
1983

12.815

S&L fixed-rate mortgage commitment

-.82
-.25
Percent change from:
FOMC
1982
lows
Feb. 9

Feb. 9
Mar. 22
lows
Stock Prices
5.2
44.5
1122.97
776.92
1067.42
Dow-Jones Industrial
3.5
47.5
86.71
83.79
58.80
NYSE Composite
3.2
61.2
382.43
370.53
237.29
AMEX Composite
6.4
68.1
267.52
251.38
159.14
NASDAO (OTC)
4. One-day quotes for preceding Thursday.
1. One-day quotes except as noted.
2. Averages for statement week closest to date shown. 5. One-day quotes for preceding Friday.
3. Secondary market.

p--preliminary.

e--estimated.

DOMESTIC FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS
M1 and M2 grew at extraordinarily rapid rates in February, and early
indications for March suggest continued strong expansion, albeit not at the
pace of the prior month.

The February surge in M1 marked the seventh con-

secutive month of double-digit (or near double-digit) growth, and this
aggregate apparently was affected only minimally, if at all, by shifting
associated with the new deposit instruments.

Inflows to MMDAs continued

to bolster M2 growth in February, though the pace of inflows to this new
account has slowed week by week.

M3 growth in recent months has been well

below that of the narrower monetary aggregates, primarily reflecting runoffs of large CDs.
Short-term interest rates have increased 10 to 30 basis points, on
balance, since the last FOMC meeting, while longer-term rates have declined
40 to 50 basis points.

Interest rates across the maturity spectrum declined

in the last half of February as financial market participants reacted favorably to the System's Humphrey-Hawkins report and the prospect of lower oil
prices.

In March, however, short-term interest rates more than retraced

their declines, reflecting in part an uneasiness about the uptrend in the
monetary aggregates and its implications for System policy.

Most major

commercial banks reduced their prime rate at the end of February from 11
to 10-1/2 percent, the lowest level since October 1978.

Mortgage rates

also are lower than at the time of the last FOMC meeting.
In the first quarter, the U.S. Treasury has continued to be a massive borrower, tapping both the short-term and long-term markets in large
volume.

The pace of borrowing by state and local governments has slowed

considerably from its fourth-quarter record, despite a growing volume of
III-1

III-2

BALANCES IN SUPER NOW ACCOUNTS AND MMDAS
(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)
MMDAs

Super NOWs
Monthly levels:
1982--Dec.

43.2

1983--Jan.
Feb.

13.3
22.7

189.1
277.6

19.5
21.6
22.7
23.5

242.8
261.3
276.2
289.5

24.5
25.5

299.4
310.3

Weekly levels:
1983--Feb. 2
Feb. 9
Feb. 16
Feb. 23
Mar.
Mar.

2P
9P

p--preliminary.

RECENT GROWTH RATES OF THE VELOCITY OF MONEY
(Percent, annualized growth rates)
M1 Velocity

M2 Velocity

1981-Q1
02
03
04

13.3
-3.7
7.8
-.2

11.3
-4.7
.9
-6.5

1982-Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4

-11.3
3.4
-.5
-10.1

-9.5
-.4
-5.1
-6.6

1983-01e

-4.9

Period

e--estimated.

-10.9

III-3

advance refunding issues prompted by the lower interest rates now prevailing.

Nonfinancial businesses have continued to raise only a moderate

volume of new funds in the current quarter, and while the replacement
of short-term debt with long-term debt has slowed, firms have been achieving significant balance sheet improvements by stepping up offerings of
equity shares.

Data on household borrowing thus far in 1983 are scanty,

but the strong January growth of installment credit and upward movement in
housing activity and mortgage commitments suggest that overall credit use
by this sector has been on the increase.
Monetary Aggregates and Bank Credit
M1 grew at a 21-1/4 percent annual rate in February, well above the
already rapid rate experienced over the preceding six months.

The accele-

ration was accounted for by a surge in other checkable deposits (on a seasonally adjusted basis) while currency growth continued at the elevated
January pace.

The adjustments by the public to the new deposit instruments

appear to have had little, if any, effect on the February strength in M1
balances.

Data for early March suggest another sizable monthly increase in

M1, even though increases in super NOWs appear to have diminished considerably.
The downward trend in M1 velocity that began in 1981 evidently has
continued in the first quarter, with shifts to super NOW accounts from
sources outside M1 playing a modest role at most.

The decrease in velocity

is greater than experienced on average at comparable stages of earlier business cycles and is much weaker than predicted by the Board's econometric
models.

III-4
MONETARY AGGREGATES
(Based on seasonally adjusted data unless otherwise noted) 1
1982
Q2

Q3

Q4

1983
Dec.

Jan.

Feb.P

Feb. '82
to
Feb. '83P

--Percentage change at annual ratesMoney stock measures
1. M1

2. (M1)
3. M2
4. M3

2

Selected components
5. Currency

3.2
(4.2)
7.0
8.5

6.1
(4.3)
10.9
12.5

8.7

7.2

13.1
(14.5)
9.3
9.5

10.6
(9.4)
8.9
3.8

9.8
(6.3)
29.8
12.2

21.2
(23.0)
23.8
13.1

9.5
(9.6)
12.8
10.8

7.4

8.2

12.7

12.5

8.7
1.4

6.

Demand deposits

-5.4

0.0

8.4

11.1

-2.0

-3.5

7.

Other checkable deposits

19.3

21.6

34.0

14.4

36.7

90.8

34.7

8.

M2 minus M1 (9+10+11+14)

8.3

12.4

8.1

8.3

36.2

24.6

13.8

2.1

28.6

23.9

-21.3

84.0

48.1

29.7

15.1
9.9

-56.5
37.8

-102.1
102.8

-50.4
44.2

25.2

169.0
-18.2
4.9

479.7
-83.6
15.5

189.0
-63.9
22.5

92.2

56.3
-12.4

9.
10.
11.
12.

3

Overnight RPs and Eurodollars, NSA
General purpose and broker/dealer
money market mutual fund shares, NSA
Commercial banks
savings deposits, SA, plus
MMDAs, NSA

13.
14.
15.
16.
17.

small time deposits
Thrift institutions
savings deposits, SA, plus
MMDAs, NSA
small time deposits
M3 minus M2 (18+21+22)
Large time deposits
at commercial banks, net 5
at thrift institutions
Institution-only money market
mutual fund shares, NSA
Term RPs, NSA

22.4
11.2
-1.7

-1.8

2.3

2.8

5.7

35.3
-0.4
4.1

0.4
3.7

2.8
6.9

30.1
-5.9

72.6
-23.0

248.3
-88.4

169.6
-62.3

16.0

20.0

10.4

-19.5

-70.0

-41.4

17.5
17.0
19.1

13.4
12.9
15.6

4.3
-1.3
29.3

-22.6
-28.5
-1.8

-82.3
-86.2
-64.8

-49.4
-60.0
-7.6

-3.7
-7.1
11.0

10.4
16.9

109.3
-11.9

32.7
34.4

-55.3
27.4

-37.8
11.9

-23.4
8.8

34.5
14.8

17.0

-18.7

-4.9
6.9

1.2

--Average monthly change in billions of dollars-MEMORANDA:
23. Managed liabilities at commercial
banks (24+25)
6
24.
Large time deposits, gross
6
Nondeposit funds
25.
26.
Net due to related foreign
6
institutions, NSA
6 7
Other ,
27.
28.

U.S. government deposits at commercial
8
banks

6.3
5.8
0.5

1.6
5.7
-4.1

-4.1
-6.5
2.4

0.4
0.1

-4.4
0.3

-0.8
3.2

-3.0
2.6

-14.1
5.0

0.4
2.0

-1.6

0.2

0.3

1.3

3.8

-6.9

1. Quarterly growth rates are computed on a quarterly average basis.

-13.7
-13.3
-0.4

-37.2
-28.1
-9.1

-13.9
-16.3
2.4

-38.3
-24.4
-13.9
-31.6
17.6

-8.6

Dollar amounts shown under memoranda for

quarterly changes are calculated on an end-month-of-quarter basis.
2. Ml seasonally adjusted using experimental model-based procedure applied to weekly data.
3. Overnight and continuing contract RPs issued to the nonbank public by commercial banks plus overnight
Eurodollar deposits issued by branches of U.S. banks to U.S. nonbank customers, both net of amounts held by
money market mutual funds. Excludes retail RPs, which are in the small time deposit component.
4. Beginning December, 1982, growth rates are for savings deposits, seasonally adjusted, plus money market
deposit accounts (MMDAs), not seasonally adjusted. Savings deposits excluding MMDAs declined at commercial
banks at annual rates of 21.7 percent in December, 90 percent in January and 58.0 percent in February. At
thrift institutions, savings deposits excluding MMDAs declined during December, January and February at annual
rates of 27.6 percent, 87.2 percent, and 20.5 percent, respectively.
5. Net of large-denomination time deposits held by money market mutual funds and thrift institutions.
6. Adjusted for shifts of assets and liabilities to International Banking Facilities (IBFs) which affected
flows from December 1981 to September 1982.
7. Consists of borrowings from other than commercial banks in the form of federal funds purchased, securities
sold under agreements to repurchase and other liabilities for borrowed money (including borrowings from the
Federal Reserve and unaffiliated foreign banks), loans sold to affiliates, loan RPs and other minor items.
Data are partially estimated.
8. Consists of Treasury demand deposits at commercial banks and Treasury note balances.
p--Preliminary.
n.a.--not available.

III-5

Growth of M2 in February, at a 23-3/4 percent annual rate, was off
only moderately from the record pace of January.

Data for early March,

however, imply a somewhat greater deceleration this month.

Money market

deposit accounts continued to grow rapidly in February and early March,
but at a steadily slower rate.

The bulk of inflows to MMDAs continues to

represent transfers from savings and small-denomination time deposits and
shares in general purpose and broker/dealer money market mutual funds.

The

reduced growth of MMDAs during February and March likely reflects a natural
waning in the adjustment of the public to this new deposit instrument, as
well as the further narrowing in spreads between the offering rates on MMDAs
and the rates on other instruments; currently, offering rates on MMDAs in
most cases have dropped to near those on short-term market instruments. 1
M3 grew at a 13 percent annual rate in February, a bit above its January pace.

Large CDs and shares of institution-only money market mutual

funds continued to decline rapidly in February, although at a somewhat
slower rate than in the previous month.

The runoff of large CDs is largely

attributable to MMDAs, as some investors have shifted directly to the new
account and as commercial banks have cut issuance in response to stronger
core deposits.

To some extent, shares of institution-only money market

funds also may have shifted directly to MMDAs, but a portion likely was
placed in open market instruments which generally were paying higher returns
than those registered by money funds.

M3 growth appears to have slowed con-

siderably in March, reflecting the deceleration of M2.
1. During February, the average offering rate on MMDAs declined about a
percentage point at mutual savings banks and 3/4 of a percentage point at
commercial banks while short-term open market rates were little changed.
The MSB average offering rate was about 3/4 of a percentage point above
the commercial bank rate.

III-6
COMMERCIAL BANK CREDIT AND SHORT- AND INTERMEDIATE-TERM BUSINESS CREDIT
(Percentage changes at annual rates, based on seasonally adjusted data)1
1982
Q2

Q3

Q4

1983
Dec.

-Commercial
1. Total loans and investments
2 3
at banks ,
2.
3.
4.
5.

Investments

3

Treasury securities
Other securities

3

2 3

Total loans ,

2 3

Jan.

Feb.

Feb. '82
to
Feb. '83

Bank Credit--

8.0

5.8

6.3

10.5

12.8

7.5

7.6

4.7

4.8

15.9

26.1

41.7

13.8

11.5

4.9

8.3

43.0

42.7

81.6

40.3

25.3

4.8

3.0

2.5

17.3

20.0

9.1

6.2

3.0

5.1

15.0

9.0

-. 2

-26.8

63.6

37.2

66.7

-. 9

4.6

2.8

5.3

6.6

8.5

1.2

8.2

-26.4

6.7

6.

Business loans ,

7.

Security loans

8.

Real estate loans

6.6

2.8

4.9

6.4

7.1

6.3

5.3

9.

Consumer loans

2.8

3.0

4.6

9.5

6.3

1.9

3.7

.0

-97.2

-- Short- and Intermediate-Term Business Credit--

10.

11.

12.

Total short- and intermediateterm business credit (sum of
3
lines 14, 15 and 16)
Business loans net of bankers
3
acceptances
Commercial paper issued by non4
financial firms
3

11.7

9.2

15.9

9.0

2.8

-6.2

-2.9

-3.1

-2.5

-.3

7.8

3.0

-39.6

-38.1

-104.0

12.7

-40.5

.6

n.a.
8.6

13.

Sum of lines 11 & 12

14.1

7.0

-4.5

-4.7

-4.8

4.0

5.3

14.

Line 13 plus loans at foreign
3 5
branches ,

13.9

8.4

-4.8

-4.8

-2.6

4.6

6.0

1.5

15.8

-15.2

-16.1

1.5

n.a.

n.a.

10.2

6.6

22.9

20.4

-4.6

n.a.

n.a.

15.
16.

Finance company loans to business 6
6

Total bankers acceptances outstanding

1. Average of Wednesdays for domestically chartered banks and average of current and preceding ends of months for
foreign-related institutions.
2. Loans include outstanding amounts of loans reported as sold outright to a bank's own foreign branches, unconsolidated nonbank affiliates of the bank, the bank's holding company (if not a bank), and unconsolidated nonbank
subsidiaries of the holding company.
3. Adjusted for shifts of assets and liabilities to International Banking Facilities (IBFs) which affected flows
from December 1981 to September 1982.
4. Average of Wednesdays.
5. Loans at foreign branches are loans made to U.S. firms by foreign branches of domestically chartered banks.
6. Based on average of current and preceding ends of month.
n.a.-Not available.

III-7

After two months of brisk expansion, bank credit slowed to a 7 percent annual rate of growth in February.

Acquisitions of U.S. government

securities, although substantial, diminished relative to January and
holdings of other securities declined slightly.

Growth in total loans

picked up only a little from the slow January pace, with essentially no
expansion in business loans.

Based on the February survey of bank lending

practices, a large proportion of senior bank loan officers expect the
demand for business loans to weaken over the next three months.1

Consumer

loans at commercial banks also were about unchanged in February despite
survey evidence that indicated a greater willingness of large commercial
banks to make such loans.

In early March, business loan growth at large

banks flattened out and consumer and real estate lending was sluggish; in
contrast, Treasury security acquisitions, largely in trading accounts,
strengthened from February's pace.
Business Finance
Nonfinancial corporations are continuing to restructure their balance sheets by emphasizing longer-term financing.

In recent months, pro-

gress on this front has been slowed somewhat by reduced bond offerings
and a small increase in short-term credit.

Outstanding commercial paper

rose in February, the first increase for nonfinancial corporations in six
months, and business loans at commercial banks increased moderately in
January and February combined.
Considering the size of the decline in bond rates since last summer,
and the extraordinarily high ratio of short-term to total debt, the moderate bond volume might be viewed as surprising.

On the other hand, "real"

1. The responses to this recent survey are discussed in the appendix.

III-8
GROSS OFFERINGS OF SECURITIES BY U.S. CORPORATIONS
(Monthly totals or monthly averages, millions of dollars)

1982

1983
Q4

Year
---------------

Q1

f

Jan.

p

Feb.

p

Mar.

f

Seasonally adjusted----------------

Corporate securities--total

8,118

11,548

11,319

11,086

10,573

12,200

Securities sold in U.S.
Publicly offered bonds 1
Privately placed bonds
Stocks 2

6,982
3,619
816
2,547

10,789
6,720
720
3,349

10,378
5,700
700
3,978

9,535
5,500
700
3,335

10,300
5,900
700
3,700

11,200
5,600
700
4,900

Securities sold abroad 3

1,136

759

941

1,551

273

1,000

----Domestic offerings, not seasonally adjusted---Publicly offered bonds--total1
By industry
Utility
Industrial
Financial
By quality 4
Aaa and Aa
A and Baa
Less than Baa
No rating (or unknown)
Memo items:
Convertible bonds
Original discount bonds
Par value
Gross proceeds
Stocks--total 2
By industry
Utility
Industrial
Financial
p--preliminary,

3,619

5,205

976
1,252
1,391

4,500

3,900

1,304
1,998
1,903

225
1,480
2,795

1,065
820
2,015

1,357
1,505
283
473

1,943
2,311
552
399

2,205
1,595
420
280

930
1,340
850
780

273

664

307

727

946
276

1,094
183

2,547

3,484

871
1,119
557

1,283
1,474
727

4,800

--

6,000

300
255
3,943

3,128

4,100

893
1,595
640

700
1,600
1,800

4,600

f--forecast.

1. Total reflects gross proceeds rather than par value of original discount bonds.
Includes equity issues associated with debt/equity swaps.
Notes and bonds, not seasonally adjusted.
Bonds categorized according to Moody's bond ratings.

III-9

rates may appear unattractively high to some potential bond issuers, and
many firms have been able to achieve improvements in both debt structure
and debt-equity ratios by selling new equity shares.

Price-earnings ratios

generally are at their highest level since 1977, and most major stock price
indexes have recorded new highs during the intermeeting period. 1

Over the

past seven months, the broader stock price indexes have advanced 45 to 65
percent, one of the strongest gains on record.
Financial companies have been active issuers of both bonds and stocks
in early 1983.

A large portion of the equity issues of these firms has

been in the form of adjustable-rate preferred stock.

The yields on these

securities are established quarterly at some fixed spread from Treasury
yields, and for corporate purchasers, 85 percent of the dividend income is
exempt from income tax.

Thus, they represent an attractive alternative to

taxable short-term instruments for use by corporations as a money management tool--assuming their secondary market liquidity proves adequate.
Since the beginning of the year, adjustable-rate preferred stock issues
have accounted for about 20 percent of the total equity volume.
Government Finance
Federal Sector.

Marketable borrowing by the Treasury totaled about

$55 billion in the first quarter, with roughly half of the total issuance
occurring in March.

With the increase in the regular auctions of 3- and

6-month bills to $12.4 billion in mid-February, the Treasury is raising
about $1 billion net in the bill sector each week.

In addition, the issu-

ance of a cash management bill dated to mature in April swelled borrowing
1. If adjusted with the GNP price deflator, real stock prices are still
45 to 65 percent below the peaks that were reached throughout the period
from the mid-1960s through the early 1970s.

III-10
TREASURY AND AGENCY FINANCING 1
(Total for period; billions of dollars)

1982
Q4

Q1e

-69.4

-60.9

62.0

53.8

Bills
Coupons
Nonmarketable

58.6
33.9
24.7
3.4

(2) Decrease in the cash
balance

9.6

1983
Jan.

Feb.p

Mar.e

Treasury financing
Combined surplus/deficit(-)

-9.9

-24.5

-26.5

6.4

18.2

29.2

55.2
20.4
34.8
-1.4

7.1
-3.7
10.8
-.7

19.2

28.9

12.4
-1.0

11.6
.3

5.3

2.3

7.5

-4.5

10.0

14.5

Means of financing deficit:
(1) Net cash borrowing
from the public
Marketable borrowings/
repayments(-)

Memo: Cash balance
at end of period
(3) Other

2

FHLB

14.5

-2.2

1.8

-1.2

1.8

-3.1

-2.5

-.2

-1.6

-1.0

3.0

-.2

1.0

-1.4

-.6

-.5

-1.1

FNMA
Farm Credit Banks
Other

17.3

19.8

Federally sponsored credit
agencies net cash borrowing 3

-1.4

-4.1

17.5

6.8

-1.5

-. 6

p--preliminary.
e--estimate.
1. Numbers reported on a not seasonally adjusted, payment basis.
2. Includes checks issued less checks paid, accrued items and other
transactions.
3. Includes debt of Federal Home Loan Banks, the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation, Federal National Mortgage Association, the
Federal Farm Credit Bank System, and the Student Loan Marketing
Association. Excludes mortgage pass-through securities issued by
FNMA and FHLMC.

III-11

through Treasury bills.
sector:

Borrowing is also continuing heavy in the coupon

the Treasury raised $10-1/2 billion in new cash in late March

with the auctions of 4-year and 7-year notes and 20-year bonds--the socalled mini-refunding.

Nonmarketable debt outstanding is expected to

decline by $1-1/2 billion in the first quarter after a $3 billion increase
in the fourth quarter.

A renewed runoff of foreign nonmarketable debt

mainly accounted for the turnaround.
Borrowing by the federally sponsored credit agencies continued light
through February owing to declining lending activity by the Federal Home
Loan Banks and the Farm Credit Banks.

At least part of the weakness in

lending by the Farm Credit Banks represented a substitution of CCC loans
to farmers.

FNMA ran off a small amount of debt in February, after bor-

rowing more than $2 billion in January.

However, this monthly pattern

reflects the timing of its debt issuance rather than weakness in mortgage
acquisitions; FNMA's net mortgage purchases are estimated to have been
about $1 billion in February, close to the pace of recent months.
State and local sector.

Rates on municipal securities fell along

with other market rates during February, bringing tax-exempt yields to
their lowest levels in 2-1/2 years.

The reduced level of rates has encour-

aged continued substantial issuance of long-term bonds, though less than
occurred in the fourth quarter when special legal factors were at work.
Nearly 20 percent of the long-term bonds sold in February and early March
were advance refunding issues that eventually will replace older, higheryielding debt.

Until the call date on the older bonds, the proceeds from

the advance refunding issues are placed in escrow and invested in taxable
securities, usually nonmarketable Treasuries.

III-12

STATE & LOCAL GOVERNMENT SECURITY VOLUME
(Monthly totals or monthly averages, billions of dollars)
1982

1983
e

Year

QIV

QI

Jan.

Feb.

e
Mar.

----------------- Seasonally adjusted ------------Total
Long-term
Short-term1

9.85
6.45
3.40

12.20
8.60
3.60

9.25
6.40
2.85

9.30
5.30
4.00

10.00
7.90
2.10

8.50
6.00
2.50

-------------- Not seasonally adjusted -----------Total
Long-term
Refundings
Mortgage revenue
Short-term 1

9.85
6.45
.35
1.00
3.40

12.10
9.10
.70
1.20
3.00

7.60
5.35
.85
.65
2.25

7.00
4.00
.30
.35
3.00

7.30
5.50
1.00
.70
1.80

8.50
6.50
1.25
1.00
2.00

e--estimate.
1. These numbers do not include tax-exempt commercial paper.
Housing revenue bonds accounted for about 15 percent of total longterm offerings in February and in March.

The sizable volume of such secu-

rities reflected in part the downward movement in tax-exempt bond rates
relative to yields on conventional mortgages.

In addition, many issuers

may have been drawn into the market earlier than otherwise because of legislation introduced in Congress that would prohibit, after April 14, the
sale of mortgage revenue bonds backed by the deposit insurance of the FSLIC
or FDIC. 1

Federally insured housing bonds were introduced in October 1982

1. Under these arrangements, a local housing authority sells tax-exempt
mortgage revenue bonds to investors and uses the proceeds of this sale
to purchase a certificate of deposit from a savings and loan association
or commercial bank. The depository institution then uses the funds from
this CD issuance to grant lower-rate mortgages generally for multifamily
units. Because the CD is held by a trustee as security for the benefit
of bondholders, and because a listing of the individual purchasers of
the mortgage revenue bond is maintained, federal deposit insurance flows
through to the bondholders.

III-13
and there are about $800 million outstanding; reports indicate that the
outstanding volume could surge to $2 billion before April 15.
Individuals reportedly remain the principal purchasers of tax-exempt
securities, both directly and indirectly through bond funds and unit investment trusts.

Total assets of open-end municipal bond funds increased a

record $850 million in February, bringing the level to $9.3 billion, and
total assets of unit investment trusts grew another $1.4 billion to $42
billion.
Mortgage Market
Since the last FOMC meeting, average interest rates on new commitments for conventional, fixed-rate home mortgages at S&Ls have declined
about 25 basis points to 12.81 percent in late March; for the first time
since August 1980, the average commitment rate has been below 13 percent
in all major regions of the nation.

Yields in the secondary mortgage mar-

ket generally have tracked other market rates, declining in the latter
half of February but increasing somewhat in the early part of March.

The

recent rise in yields on GNMA-guaranteed securities eased pressure for a
reduction of the 12 percent ceiling rate on regular FHA/VA home loans--a
ceiling that has been in effect since mid-November.
The volume of new mortgage commitments made by savings and loan associations in January amounted to $9.2 billion (seasonally adjusted), about
equal to the December volume and nearly double the pace recorded during
the first half of last year.

The higher level of commitment activity at

S&Ls in the last few months is beginning to be reflected in mortgage investment.

Total mortgage assets of S&Ls (including loans and mortgage-backed

securities) grew by $1.8 billion in January after a slight decline in

III-14

December.

The January gain included the first increase in mortgage loans

since early 1982 as well as a sharp fall-off in acquisitions of mortgagebacked securities--a pattern that reflects a reduction in swap activity
in light of strong MMDA inflows. 1

At mutual savings banks, mortgage loans

increased $300 million in December (the latest available data), the first
increase in 17 months and the largest since August 1979.
As interest rates have fallen in primary mortgage markets, an increasing share of mortgage originations has been for fixed-rate rather than
adjustable-rate loans.

Unpublished data from the Federal Home Loan Bank

Board show that fixed-rate mortgages accounted for 72 percent of the total
number of conventional home loans closed in February by institutional lend-

ers, up from 54 percent last August.

In addition, nearly two-fifths of

respondents to the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey noted a shift in
demand at their commercial banks toward fixed-rate mortgages; roughly
three-fourths of the commitments issued by respondents in January were for
fixed-rate loans (see appendix).
The decline in mortgage rates also has stimulated the refinancing of
high-rate loans written during 1981 and 1982.

In the period from November

through January, mortgage loans made by S&Ls for purposes of refinancing
have been about double the volume evident in the first half of last year.
Also, the mid-February survey of senior loan officers indicated that the
refinancing of existing mortgages accounted for about one-fourth of total
1. At FNMA and FHLMC combined, issues of securities under swap programs
declined from $5.9 billion in December to $1.8 billion in January. With
strong growth in core deposits, thrift institutions can reduce their borrowing through repurchase agreements, and thus have a reduced need for
mortgage-backed securities which could serve as collateral in these
transactions.

III-15

home mortgage lending at their banks in January.

Most of this refinancing

activity related to high-rate first mortgages held by these lenders, rather
than to loans made and held by individuals who had sold their homes.
Consumer Credit
Consumer installment credit expanded at a 10-1/2 percent annual rate
in January, marking the third consecutive month of accelerating growth and
the largest increase since September 1981.

In contrast to other recent

months when auto credit was the strongest component, the January increase
stemmed primarily from a large gain in the category that includes personal
cash loans, home improvement credit, and sales finance contracts on nonautomotive consumer goods.
Interest rates on consumer loans in the initial weeks of 1983 continued a decline that began in the fourth quarter of last year.

At com-

mercial banks, rates on new-car loans dropped about 2-1/4 percentage points
between early August and early February to an average of 14.8 percent.

At

the "captive" finance companies, rates paid by consumers on new-car loans
have plunged more than 5 percentage points to the lowest levels since 1973.
This reduction was prompted by the rate subsidy programs of the car-manufacturing parent companies.
Rates on personal loans at banks have fallen less than those on auto
loans--about 1-1/2 percentage points between August and February-and are
viewed as high relative to other market rates by some observers.

The com-

paratively sluggish decline in personal loan rates reflects in part less
intense competition than is currently affecting auto loan markets, and
perhaps continuing concern among lenders about the increased risk of unsecured lending that has resulted from the more lenient federal bankruptcy

III-16
CONSUMER INSTALLMENT CREDIT

1981

1982

1982
Q4

Q3
Change in outstandings
By type:
Automobile credit
Revolving credit
All other1
Change in outstandings
By type:
Automobile credit
Revolving credit
All other1
By major holder:
Commercial banks
Finance companies
All other

At auto finance cos. 4
New cars
Used cars

- - - - Percent rate of growth, SAAR
5.8

4.0

2.8

5.1

7.2

8.6

10.4

7.3
7.7
3.8

3.9
7.0
2.6

0.0
7.0
3.5

9.3
4.0
2.0

14.4
0.8
3.6

13.9
9.7
3.5

2.1
1.3
21.6

-

-

-

-

-

- Billions of

dollars, SAAR - - - - -

18.2

13.1

9.4

17.2

24.2

29.0

35.1

8.5
4.5
5.2

4.9
4.4
3.8

0.0
4.3
5.1

11.8
2.5
2.9

18.4
0.5
5.3

17.9
5.1

2.8
0.8
31.5

4.4
4.5
4.2

3.8
0.3
5.3

6.6
6.8
3.8

5.5
12.6
6.1

13.3
12.3
3.4

4.9
22.6
7.6

0.6
13.1
4.5
-

Interest rates
At commercial banks 2
New cars, 36 mos. 3
Personal, 24 mos.
Credit cards

1983
Jan.

Dec.

Nov.

-

-

-

-

-

- -

-

Percent, NSA -

6.0

-

- -

-

-

-

-

-

16.54
18.09
17.78

16.33
18.65
18.51

17.08
18.93
18.73

15.97
17.99
18.75

15.97
17.99
18.75

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

14.81
17.59
18.89

16.17
20.00

16.15
20.75

17.68
20.93

14.02
20.69

12.82
20.68

12.57
20.63

12.25
20.20

Series on amounts of consumer credit have been revised to reflect latest
NOTE:
benchmark data for commercial banks, and to incorporate new seasonals.
1. Includes primarily personal cash loans, home improvement loans, and sales
finance contracts for non-automotive consumer durable goods.
2. Third quarter figure represents average of "most common" rates charged
during the first week of August; fourth quarter and November figures are for
first week of November; figure in January column is for first week of February.
3. 48-month loans as of February, 1983.
4. Average rate for all loans of each type made during the period, regardless
of maturity.
n.a.--not available.

III-17

law enacted in late 1979.

From a more general perspective, it should be

noted that consumer loan rates generally lag other market rates and fluctuate less during the course of the business cycle.

Thus, the behavior of

consumer loan rates in recent months is not sharply out of line with previous experience.

Appendix A*
SENIOR LOAN OFFICER OPINION SURVEY ON BANK LENDING PRACTICES

Of the sixty large commercial banks participating in the
February 15, 1983 Survey of Senior Loan Officer Opinion on Bank
Lending Practices, two-fifths anticipated that the demand for
business loans would ease over the next three months, roughly
double the proportion expecting loan demand to strengthen.
Larger respondents tended to be more pessimistic than smaller
institutions. Growth of business loans at large commercial
banks had been relatively sluggish since the previous survey in
mid-November, and the weak economy together with continued
strength in long-term financing may have contributed to this
view.
Lagging earlier declines in open market rates, the prime
rate has continued to move downward in recent months. At the time
of the February survey, the prime rate was roughly 275 basis points
above the one-month commercial paper rate, down from about 315 basis
points in mid-November. As in the previous survey, however, other
aspects of lending terms were largely unaltered. Four-fifths of the
panel indicated no change over the past three months in standards of
creditworthiness to qualify for their lowest lending rates, and
almost as many banks reported no change in standards to qualify for
given spreads above their lowest lending rate. Similarly, about
three-fourths of the respondents indicated that compensating balance
or fee requirements on business loans had not changed since midNovember, roughly the same proportion of banks that reported no change
in policy toward business lending to new and non-local customers.
For the second consecutive survey, more than two-fifths of the
sampled banks expressed greater willingness to make installment loans
to individuals compared to three months earlier. Factors cited by
banks for this increased willingness included favorable rate spreads
on consumer loans and strong inflows of core deposits in the face of
weak demands for business loans.
Answers to the first supplemental question, dealing with credit
quality, indicate still further erosion in the credit quality of
existing business loan customers at the surveyed banks. Sixty percent of the respondents perceived a deterioration over the past three
months in the average financial condition of customers with business
The
loans outstanding, while only one bank reported an improvement.
proportion of larger respondents (those with more than $5 billion of
total domestic assets) noting a deterioration in the financial condition of existing customers, 80 percent, was nearly twice the fraction
of smaller banks so reporting.
* Prepared by David S. Jones, Economist, Banking Section, Division of
Research and Statistics.

III-A-1

III-A-2

The energy and manufacturing industries were
quently cited business sectors where deterioration
followed by transportation, capital equipment, and
About one-tenth of the respondents noted financial
across the board.

the most frehas occurred,
agribusiness.
deterioration

Despite widespread problems with nonperforming loans at
commercial banks over the past year or so, less than one-quarter
of the respondents reported that the incidence of problem loans at
their banks had affected lending terms offered to new or old business customers. Of these institutions, most responded to the incidence of problem loans by increasing collateral requirements or by
making loans with shorter maturities. Several banks commented that,
although wider spreads between interest rates on loans and banks'
costs of funds probably were justified in the present environment,
intense competition among banks for loans was in fact driving spreads
lower.
A second set of supplemental questions examined the extent to
which the recently authorized money market deposit account (MMDA) has
affected bank lending practices. Eighty-five percent of the sampled
banks reported experiencing large net inflows of funds into MMDAs
since December, but only 35 percent of these institutions indicated
that MMDA inflows, or associated costs, had affected their lending
practices regarding business loans. Less than 15 percent of the
respondents that registered large net inflows into MMDAs were
induced to become more aggressive in seeking out new business loan
customers, and less than 25 percent altered their lending terms on
business loans as a result of MMDAs. Changes in lending terms on
business loans involved mainly reduced willingness to make fixedrate, long-term loans, and greater use of pricing formulae based on
banks' costs of funds--including increased willingness to offer lower
tier customers floating-rate loans priced off open-market rates.
Roughly the same proportion of respondents--approximately 15
percent--indicated that these inflows had increased their bank's
willingness to make consumer installment or mortgage loans. Several
respondents noted that, partly as a result of MMDAs, they had recently
introduced, or were developing plans for introducing, adjustable-rate
consumer installment loans. One large money center bank noted that,
due to sizable MMDA inflows, it may soon begin holding home mortgages
in its portfolio, rather than reselling the mortgages in the secondary
market.
In response to a final set of supplemental questions dealing
with recent home mortgage lending activity, more than two-fifths of
the respondents noted that the composition of demand for home mortgage
credit during the past three months had shifted toward fixed-rate

III-A-3

loans as home mortgage rates continued to drop. On average, respondents indicated that three-fourths of their total new commitments for
Over this same
home mortgages in January were for fixed-rate loans.
period, panel members reported on average that onefourth of total
mortgage lending was for the purpose of refinancing existing mortgages,
but that less than one-tenth of total home mortgage refinancings were
to refinance mortgages held by the previous sellers of the homes.

III-A-4

SENIOR LOAN OFFICER OPINION SURVEY ON BANK LENDING PRACTICES
AT SELECTED LARGE BANKS IN THE U.S.
(Status of policy on February 15, 1983 compared to three months earlier)
(Number of banks and percent of total banks answering question)
(By size of total domestic assets, in billions1)
CORE QUESTIONS
Much
Stronger
Banks Pct
1. Strength of demand for commercial
and industrial loans anticipated
in next 3 months (after allowance
for usual seasonal variation):
All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

H...,
Firmer
Banks Pet

Moderately
Stronger
Banks Pct

13
2
11

21.7
7.4
33.3

Moderately
Firmer
Banks Pet

Essentially
Unchanged
Banks Pct

25
11
14

41.7
40.7
42.4

Essentially
Unchanged
Banks Pet

Moderately
Weaker
Banks Pct

22
14
8

Much
Weaker
Banks Pct

36.7
51.9
24.2

Moderately
Easier
Banks Pct

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

Total Banks
Answering

60
27
33

Much
Easier
Banks Pct

2. Standards to qualify for lowest
lending rate:
All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

1
0
1

1.7
0.0
3.0

6
3
3

10.0
11.1
9.1

51
24
27

85.0
88.9
81.8

2
0
2

3.3
0.0
6.1

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

60
27
33

3. Standards to qualify for spreads
above lowest lending rate:
All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

9
4
5

15.0
14.8
15.2

46
22
24

76.7
81.5
72.7

5
1
4

8.3
3.7
12.1

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

60
27
33

Stance on C&I lending to new and
nonlocal customers:
All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

3
2
1

5.0
7.4
3.0

7
2
5

11.7
7.4
15.2

47
23
24

78.3
85.2
72.7

3
0
3

5.0
0.0
9.1

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

60
27
33

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

9
4
5

15.0
14.8
15.2

46
21
25

75.0
77.8
75.8

5
2
3

15.0
7.4
9.1

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

60
27
33

4.

5. Compensating balance or fee
requirements for C&I loans:
All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

Considerably
Greater
Banks Pct

Moderately
Greater
Banks Pct

Essentially
Unchanged
Banks Pct

Moderately
Less
Banks Pct

Much
Less
Banks Pct

6. Willingness to make installment
loans to individuals:
All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

5
2
3

8.7
8.0
9.4

20
9
11

35.1
36.0
34.4

32
14
18

56.1
56.0
56.3

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

0
0
0

0.0
0.0
0.0

57
25
32

1. As of September 30, 1982, there were 27 banks having domestic assets of $5 billion or more. Their combined assets
totalled $527 billion compared to $632 billion for the entire panel and $1.77 trillion for all insured commercial banks.

III-A-5

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS
S.I.*

With regard to commercial and industrial lending, has there been a change over the last three months
in the average financial condition of customers to whom your bank has loans outstanding?
Total Banks

All respondents
55 and over
under $5

S.l.b

No Change

Improvement

Deterioration

Banks

Banks

Banks

Pct

Pct

23

38.3

11

TT

5
18

18.5
54.5

0
1

0.0
3.0

Answering

Pct

,3-

6liO

22
14

81.5
42.4

If there has been deterioration, in which industries has the above-normal deterioration been concentrate '

Across
the Board
All respondents
$5 and over
under 55

Banks. Pet
9
9.3
4
6.3
15.2
5

Housing,
Real Estate
and
Construction
Banks Pet
6
6.2
4
6.3
2
6.0

Transportation
Banks Pet
8.2
All respondents 11
7.8
5
SS and over
under $5
3
9.1

All respondents
S5 and over
under $5

Autos
and
Related
Industries
Banks Pet
3.1
3
3.1
2
1
3.0

Energy and
Related
Banks Pet
21
21.6
23.4
15
6
18.2

Building
Materials
Banks Pct
1
1.0
1.6
1
0
0.0

Agricultural
Machinery
Banks
Pet
8.2
7.8
5
3
9.1

Retail
Banks
Pet
1.0
1
0.0
0
1
3.0

International
Credits
Banks
Pet

Capital

Mining
Banks Pet

4

4.1

3

T

4
0

6.3
0.0

2
1

3.1
3.0

Equipment
Banks Pet

11
7
4

-iT7
10.9
12.1

Total
Industry
Citations

Manufacturing
and Metals
Banks
Pet
17
17.5
12
18.8
5
15.2

97
64
33

S.l.c. Has the incidence of problem loans at your bank affected the lending terms offered to new or old
business customers?

All respondents
55 and over
under S5

Yes
Banks Pet
14
23.3
9
33.3
5
15.2

No
Banks
46
18
28

Pet
76.7
66.7
84.8

Total
Banks
60
27
33

2. The number of times an industry was cited is shown under the heading "Banks".
industrv citations is shown under the heading "Pct".

This number as a percent of totat

III-A-6

S.l.d.

If so, then specify?
Increased
Collateral
Banks
Pet
'7
3T5.0
5
-33.7
1
16.7

All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

S.2.1.

All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

S.2.3.b

30-.

4
2

28.6
33.3

Banks

Pet

17

Total
Banks

I

1.T

I60

7.4
18.2

1
0

3.7
0.0

27
33

N.A.

no

-5I

Pct

Banks

8s.O

'-U-

24
27

88.9
81.8

2
6

Pet

Yes
Banks
7
3
4

No
Pct
13.7
12.3
14.8

Banks
44
21
23

Pct
86.3
87.5
85.2

Total
Banks
51
24
27

If yes, in what ways?

All respondents
$5 and over
under $5
S.2.3.a

6

Total
Citations
20
14
6

Other
Banks
Pet
10.0
2
1
7.1
16.7
1

Have these inflows induced your bank to become more aggressive in seeking out new business loan customers?

All respondents
$5 and over
under $5
S.2.2.b

General
Tighetening
Banks
Pet

Has your bank experienced large inflows of funds into MMDAs?
Yes
Banks

S.2.2.a

Shrter
Maturity Loans
Banks
Pet
5
25.0
3
21.4
2
33.3

Increased
Contacts
Banks
Pct
28.6
2
1
33.3
1
25.0

Other
BanksPct
5
71.4
2
66.7
3
75.0

Total
Banks
7
3
4

Have these inflows

or their cost affected terms of lending for business loans at your bank?

All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

Yes
Banks
Pet
21.6
11
4
16.9
7
25.9

Banks
40
20
20

Pct
78.4
83.3
74.1

Total
Banks
51
24

If yes, then in what ways?

All respondents
$5 and over
under $5

Greater Use of Pricing
Based on Bank Cost of Funds
Banks
Pct
5
38.5
2
50.0
3
33.3

Reduced Willingness to Make
Fixed-rate, Longer-term Loans
Banks
Pet
7
53.8
2
50.0
55.6
5

Other
Banks
1
0
1

Pet
7.7
0.0
11.1

Total
Citations
13
4
9

III-A-7

S.2.3.c

Have these inflows or their costs affected your bank's willingness to make consumer installment
lotns or home mortgage loans?

Decreased
Willingness
Banks
Pet
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0

Increased
Willingness
Banks
Pct
All respondents
55 and over
under $5

5.3.1.

15.7

16.7
14.8

Considerably
Toward
Banks
Pct
8
17.0
4
22.2
4
13.8

All respondents
SS5and over
under 55

24
27

Moderately
Toward
Banks
Pct
23.4
11
2
11.1
31.0
9

Essentially
Unchanged
Banks
Pet
2C
55.3
61.1
11
15
51.7

Moderately
Away
Banks
Pet
4.3
2
5.6
1
1
3.4

Considerably
Away
Pct
Banks
0
0.0
0.0
0
0
0.0

Total
Banks

Banks
tO
2
8

Pet
22.7
11.8
29.6

26-50Z
Banks
Pet
3
6.8
2
11.8
1
3.7

51-75Z
Pet
Banks

T
2
1

6.8
11.8
3.7

76-1002
Banks
Pct
28
63_
11
64.7
17
63.0

Average
Response
7.4
69.5%
78.1%

Total
Banks
44
17
27

Percentage of total mortgage lending in January for the purpose of refinancing an existing mortgage?

All respondents
S5 and over
under 55

5.3.4.

83.3
85.2

Percentage of total new commitments for home mortgage loans in January comprising fixed-rate loans?
0-252

S..3.

20
23

Total
Banks

In the past three months, has there been a noticeable shift in the composition of demand for home mortgage
loans toward (or away from) fixed rate mortgages?*

All respondents
55 and over
under S5

5.3.2.

8

4
4

No Change
Banks
Pet

0-25%
Banks
Pct
27
67.5
9
52.9
18
78.3

26-50?
Banks

Pet

51-75%
Pet
Banks

10

25.0

I

2.5

6
4

33.3
17.4

1
0

5.9
0.0

76-100%
Banks
Pet
2
5.0
5.9
1
1
4.3

Average
Reponse
25.5Z
35.7Z
14.6%

Total
Banks
40
17
23

Percentage of total mortgage refinancings in January of mortgages held by the previous sellers of the homes?
0-25%
Banks

26-502

51-75%

76-1002

Average

Total

Pet

Banks

Pct

Banks

Pct

Banks

Pet

Repose

Banks

.3
28.6
4.

0
0

0.0
0.0

1
0

9
0.0

8.1T
16.9%

35
14

0

0.0

1

L8

32.eV

21

All respondents
55 and over

29
10

82.9
71.4

5
4

under SS

19

90-5

I

.

.

.

*If institutions responded N.A. then they were not counted as part of total in S.3.1.

47

18
29

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

Foreign Exchange Markets
As shown by the chart on the top of the next page, the dollar
has appreciated slightly from its level at the time of the February FOMC
meeting.

After reaching a peak in the beginning of February the dollar

fell almost three percent to a trough in mid-February.

The fall was

apparently due to renewed expectations of declines in dollar interest
rates.

From mid-February until the beginning of March the dollar rose

over two percent.

Market commentary suggested that the dollar's rise was

associated with increased concern about the international debt situation
related to the prospect of sharp downward movements in oil prices.

Since

the beginning of March the dollar has remained steady, supported by
higher actual and expected dollar interest rates and the lowering of some
foreign interest rates.
Since the last FOMC meeting the pound depreciated almost three
percent to a record low against the dollar.

On February 17 the British

National Oil Corporation announced a price reduction.

This was followed

closely by price cuts by Norway and Nigeria and a two percent depreciation of the pound.

The pound continued to be weak throughout the

latter half of February and early March as OPEC attempted to reach an
accord on prices and quotas.

After OPEC reached an agreement on

March 14, the pound continued to weaken due to expectations that the
British National Oil Corporation will again cut prices which will further
reduce U.K. oil revenues.
Expectations of declines in oil prices also played a role in the
gold market.

Beliefs that lower oil prices would lead to mid-East gold
IV-1

IV-2

WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXCHANGE VALUE OF THE U.S.
Daily series
I

1982

DOLLAR

March 1973=100
1123

1983

Realignments of the EMS Currency Band
Percentage revaluations (+) and devaluations (-) of central rates
German
mark

Netherlands
guilder

Belgian
franc

French
franc

Italian
lira

-5.75

-2.75

-2.5

-2.5

Danish
krone

Irish
pound

September 24, 1979
November 30, 1979
March 23, 1981
5.5

October 5, 1981

-8.5

February 22, 1982
June 14, 1982

4.25

March 21, 1983

5.5

4.25
1.5

2.5

-3.5

IV-3

sales were a major factor in causing gold prices to fall by over fifteen
percent to below $410 in New York since the last FOMC meeting.
The EMS continued to be under strong pressure since the last FOMC
meeting and on March 21 the EC ministers realigned the EMS central parity
rates, as shown in the lower panel of the chart.

The central rate of the

mark relative to the European Currency Unit was revalued 5.5 percent, the
guilder was revalued 3.5 percent, the krone was revalued 2.5 percent, the
Belgian franc was revalued 1.5 percent, the French franc and lira were
each devalued 2.5 percent, and the Irish pound was devalued 3.5 percent.

After the March 6 elections in West Germany and France the pressure in
the EMS became more acute.

.

Belgium raised official lending rates 2-1/2 percentage points

and imposed restrictions on domestic holding of foreign currency.
Germany lowered its official interest rates one percentage point and the
Netherlands lowered its rates 1/2 percentage point.

Switzerland and

Austria, outside the EMS, also followed Germany's lead, reducing their
official lending rates by 1/2 and 1 percentage point, respectively.
Since the EMS realignment the French franc has traded at near its
new upper intervention limit against the mark,
. Belgium has lowered its official
lending rates by three percentage points.

IV-4
U.S. banks' claims on foreign borrowers.

Foreign lending by

U.S.-chartered banks slowed further in the second half of 1982, when the
increase in outstanding claims declined to $3 billion from $18 billion in
the first half.

Net new lending --the change in outstanding claims --to

OPEC and non-OPEC developing countries and to the smaller developed
countries in the second half of last year was only one-fourth to one-half
as much as in the first half, while there was an actual decline in the
outstanding claims on the G-10 countries and offshore banking centers
(which are largely interbank) in the second half.

For 1982 as a whole,

total net new lending of $20 billion was less than one-third of the 1981
total.
Several factors appear to have contributed to the slowing of lending
last year.

First, banks became more concerned about return on assets, and

this induced them to slow the growth of their interbank lending.

Second,

some banks became more cautious about lending in the interbank market, in
view of such factors as the high exposure of German banks to Eastern Europe
and AEG-Telefunken, the exposure of Canadian banks to Dome Petroleum, and
the Banco Ambrosiano affair.

Third, some banks became more anxious to

improve their capital/assets ratios or prevent them from declining further.
Fourth, output declined and inflation weakened in the main industrial
countries abroad, and this may have slowed those countries' demands for
credit from U.S. banks.

Finally, banks became more cautious about lending

to the non-OPEC developing countries, especially after the eruption of the
Mexican crisis in the springand summer.

This affected U.S. banks' foreign

lending not only to the non-OPEC developing countries themselves but also
to foreign banks, principally in the G-10 countries and the offshore

IV-5
U.S.-CHARTERED BANKS' CLAIMS ON FOREIGNERS, 1979-82
(Billions of dollars)

Increase

Claims on:
I.
II.

III.

IV.
V.
VI.

VII.

1979 1980 1981 1982
Year Year Year Year

1
1982
Outstanding
1st H. 2nd H. Dec. 1982

All foreign countries 38

48

62

20

18

3

435

G-10 countries and
offshore banking
centers

23

30

30

5

7

-2

244

Smaller developed
countries

1

2

7

5

4

1

34

Eastern Europe

*

*

*

-2

-1

-1

6

OPEC countries

*

*

2

3

2

1

27

10

14

19

11

7

3

107

Non-OPEC developing
countries
A.

Latin America

5

10

13

8

7

1

72

B.

Asia and Africa

5

5

6

3

1

3

35

2

2

5

-1

-1

-1

18

Miscellaneous

1. Half-year changes may not add to full-year change because of rounding.
* Less than $0.5 billion.

banking centers, which themselves were becoming more cautious in lending to
non-OPEC developing countries.
Recent changes in lending to the non-OPEC developing countries show
a considerable distinction between flows to Latin America and those to Asia
and Africa.

In the four quarters up to the middle of last year claims on

Latin America, in particular the claims on Mexico, were increasing very
fast.

They slowed sharply in the third quarter and underwent a nominal

IV-6

In the second half of the year there were

decrease in the fourth quarter.

decreases in claims on Mexico ($0.7 billion) and Argentina ($0.8 billion), but
claims on some other countries were still rising somewhat, notably on Brazil

($1.5 billion) where officials made strenuous efforts to obtain new short-term
credits from the banks.

U.S.-CHARTERED BANKS' CLAIMS ON DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 1981-82
(Billions of dollars)
Increase
1981

1982

Outstanding

Q-3

Q-4

Q-1

Q-2

Q-3

Q-4

Dec. 1982

1.3

1.0

0.6

1.0

0.9

0.2

27.2

0
.1
0
0
.5
.4

-.1
.1
.2
-.1
0
.5

0
.1
0
.3
.1
.5

0
-.1
.2
.2
.3
.3

-.1
-.1
.3
.1
.5
-.5

1.0
2.2
3.2
1.5
10.6
8.7

1
I. OPEC countries

II.
A.

Algeria
Ecuador
Indonesia
Nigeria
Venezuela
Middle East + Gabon

-.1
.1
.4
.2
.4
.3

Non-OPEC countries

5.4

6.0

1.3

6.1

0.2

3.1

106.9

Latin America

4.0

3.6

2.2

4.7

0.8

-0.1

72.2

.8
.2
.7
0

.1
1.4
.3
.1

.5
.6
.2
-.3

-.2
1.6
.4
.3

-.5
1.1
-.2
.2

-.3
.4
.1
.2

8.9
22.8
6.3
3.0

Mexico
Peru
Other countries

1.8
.1
.4

1.6
.2
-.1

1.3
-.1
0

2.2
.5
-.1

-.3
.1
.3

-.4
0
-.1

24.4
2.6
4.2

Asia and Africa

1.4

2.4

-0.9

1.4

-0.6

3.2

34.7

Korea
Philippines
Taiwan
Other countries

-.2
.5
.5
.6

.8
.4
0
1.2

-.8
-.1
0
0

.3
.4
-.1
.8

.4
-.3
-.1
-.6

1.5
.2
.3
1.2

10.8
6.2
5.2
12.5

Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Colombia

B.

1. Includes also Bahrain and Oman.

IV-7
The situation has been different for the non-OPEC developing
countries in Asia and Africa.

Claims on these countries rose $2.6 billion

in the second half of 1982, all in the fourth quarter; this was more than
in the first half and two-thirds as much as in the second half of 1981.
Conditions in the syndicated credit market also show that the climate for
Asian borrowers has changed much less radically than for Latin America.
Since last August that market has virtually dried up for Latin America while
Asian borrowers can still raise a large volume of loans, albeit at somewhat
higher spreads than before or through loans priced over the prime rate rather
than the LIBOR rate.
U.S. banks' claims on Latin America are expected to rise again as a
result of the new medium-term loans forming part of the recent financial
"packages" for some major Latin American borrowers.

Since the end of 1982,

term loans have been negotiated with Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico totalling
$12 billion, of which the U.S. banks' share appears to be about 40 percent,
or $4-3/4 billion.

Whether the U.S. banks' claims on these countries will

rise by that much this year will depend in part on whether the disbursements
of these loans, which will be piecemeal and dependent on these countries'
eligibility for further drawings on the IMF, will take place as scheduled.
The level of claims on these countries will also be affected by such factors
as scheduled amortizations of private medium-term debts that may not be
rescheduled and by these countries' need for and ability to retain shortterm credit.

One large group of short-term credits that are expected to be

repaid this year are the bridge credits which Brazil obtained late last year.
However, these repayments could be partly offset as banks accede to the new
loan requests made recently by Chile and Peru, which total more than $1.7
billion.

IV-8
U.S. International Financial Transactions
U.S. official reserve assets continued to rise in early 1983
even in the absence of foreign exchange market intervention by the
United States.

(See the table below.)

These increases were the

result of bilateral bridging finance and transactions with the
Given the

IMF, stemming from various IMF stabilization programs.

large IMF programs recently negotiated with Brazil, Mexico, and other
countries, U.S. reserve assets are likely to grow substantially in
1983, adding to the financing needs of the U.S. Treasury(although not

U.S. Official Reserve Assets 1/
(billions of dollars; increase in assets (+))

Outstanding as of
Dec. 1981
Dec. 1982
Total 3/

Transactions 2/
1982 2/
1983
1st Half Q3
Q4
Jan.-Feb. e/
2.6

15.9

21.5

SDRs

4.1

5.2

.6

.4

.3

.1

Reserve Position
in the I.M.F.

5.1

7.3

1.4

.5

.7

1.4

Foreign Currency 3/

6.8

8.9

.6

.8

1.4

-.4

6.8

6.8

.4

.2

.1

.1

-

2.1

.2

.6

1.3

-.5

G10 + Switzerland 3/
Other

1.7

2.5

1.1

1/ Excludes holdings of gold.
2/ Net flows on a balance-of-payments basis excluding valuation changes.
3/ Net of use of reserve assets to repay outstanding Treasury debt in foreign
currencies (Carter bonds). Carter bond redemptions for the period indicated
totaled $354 million for the 1st half 1982, $902 million for 1982 Q3, $519
million for 1982 Q4, and $386 million for January 1983.
e/ February data estimated from the change in official reserve assets from January
to February.

IV-9
to the budget deficit).
Foreign official reserve assets in the United States increased
by $2.8 billion dollars in January.
of U.S. International Transactions".)

(See line 4 of the table "Summary
Preliminary data indicate that

these assets fell in February and the first half of March.

During the first two and a half months of 1983, available data
sources indicate only small reductions in OPEC official assets held in
the United States, because most financially-pressed OPEC countries
have typically held their funds in the Eurocurrency markets, rather
than directly in the United States.
U.S. banking offices (including IBFs)added somewhat to their net
advances to their foreign offices in February and early March; the
level of net advances by U.S.-chartered banks in the first months of
1983 was substantially higher than the average for 1982.
"International Banking Data".)

(See table

Data are available through the end of

January only on the balance sheets of the foreign branches of U.S.
banks; they indicate that these large net advances were not used to
finance additional claims.

Total claims in fact fell between the

IV-10

International Banking Data
(billions of dollars)
Dec.

Mar.

1982
June
Sept.

Dec.

9.2
-8.9
18.1

10.7
-2.8
13.5

16.6
2.8
13.8

5.9
-5.0
10.9

-6.5 -8.4
8.1 -5.4
-3.1 -13.7 -14.6
-19.0
8.3
8.1
11.2
10.6

(a) Total
(b) New York Banks Only

13.2
8.8

13.8
9.1

14.2
9.7

16.1
11.4

15.7
11.2

3. Eurodollar Holdings of U.S.
Nonbank Residents 3/

93.6

104.2

116.0

111.5

110.3

1981

1. U.S. Offices' Banking
Positions Vis-a-Vis Own
Foreign Offices 1/
(a) Total
(b) U.S.-Chartered Banks
(c) Foreign-Chartered Banks

1983

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.4/

2. Credit Extended to U.S. Nonbank Residents by Foreign
Branches of U.S. banks 2/

Average of Wednesdays, net due to own foreign office
offices.
Averages.
End of month.
Through March 9.
Estimate.

beginning of December and the end of January.
were used to replace other sources of funds.

=

16.3
11.9

16.5
12.0

107.2e/ n.a.

Instead, the advances
For example, foreign

These financing shifts probably reflected

both the increased availability of funds at domestic offices and the
reduced demand for the liabilities of foreign offices due to the introduction of MMDAs,

n.a

(+). IBFs are included in U.S.

branch liabilities to U.S. nonbanks fell by $8 billion between
November 30 and January 31.

16.6
12.2

as discussed in the last Greenbook.

An additional

IV-11
factor was probably the continued liquidation of some Eurodollar
investments by financially-pressed OPEC countries.

Deposits of the

oil exporting countries in the foreign branches of U.S. banks fell by more
than $2 billion in the fourth quarter of 1982.
The Eurodollar holdings of U.S. nonbank residents fell by about
$3 billion dollars in January, after declining $3 billion dollars in
December.

This decline is almost entirely accounted for by the reduced

overnight and term holdings of MMFs during the same period ($2.4
billion and $3.3 billion respectively), and probably reflects the
impact of MMDAs.
The integration of U.S. and offshore financial markets continued
to be evident in recent months.

In December and again in January there

were sizable net purchases of U.S. corporate stocks by foreigners.
(See line 2b of the Summary Table of U.S. International Transactions.)
In addition, during the first quarter of 1983, borrowing by U.S.
corporations through the issuance of Eurobonds was substantial.

(See

the table "Publicized Borrowing in the Eurodollar Bond Market by U.S.
Firms.")

Another example of the increased use by U.S. corporations of

offshore

financial markets is the recently-signed loan agreement

between Walt Disney Productions and a syndicate led by Japanese banks;
it is the first yen syndication led by Japanese banks for a U.S.
corporation.

It may reflect a more favorable official Japanese

attitude toward the wider use of the yen in international credit
arrangements.

IV -12
Publicized Borrowing in the International Bond Market
by U.S. Corporations
(billions of dollars)

U.S. Dollar Eurobonds

Total 1982

Net c/
11.85

Gross
18.32

Foreign Currency
Bonds b/
1.70

Total
Net c/
13.55

Gross

20.03

1.35
1.33
0.77
0.50

2.96
1.53
0.91
0.72

0.09
0.19
0.15
0.13

1.45
1.52
0.92
0.63

3.05
1.73
1.06
0.85

October
November
December

1.17
0.32
0

1.17
0.99
0

0.12
0.13
0.14

1.29
0.45
0.14

1.29
1.12
0.14

January 1983
February
March d/

0.83
0.69
0.50

1.46
0.95
0.50

0.21
0.09
0.05

1.03
0.78
0.55

1.67
1.04
0.55

a/
b/
c/

d/

Monthly average.
Primarily Deutsche Mark, Swiss Franc and Yen.
"Net" columns represent the amount of funds actually received by issuers,
"gross" columns represent face value of the bonds.
These amounts differ due
to the issuance of zero coupon bonds and bonds sold on a partial payment
basis.
Offerings of zero coupon bonds were most concentrated in January and
One or two issues were also sold in April, May and July
February of 1982.
1982 and January 1983. Partial payment issues have appeared since November
1982 only.
Through March 17.
Two aspects of the recently released U.S. balance of payments
data for 1982 are worth noting.

First, there was an unprecedented

net inflow of funds in the direct investment accounts from foreign
affiliates to their U.S. parents.

This was mainly the result of the

large Eurobond borrowings by U.S. corporations through their
Netherlands Antilles finance affiliates.

Second, the statistical

discrepancy in the accounts increased to about $42 billion, casting
doubt upon the accuracy of the recorded data for both the current and
capital accounts.

IV-13
Summary of U.S. International Transactions
(in billions of dollars)

Private Capital
Banks
1. Change in net foreign positions of banking
offices in the U.S. (+ = inflow)
a) with own foreign offices
b) all other
Securities
2. Private securities transactions, net
a) Foreign net purchases (+) of U.S.
corp. bonds
b) Foreign net purchases (+) of U.S.
corp. stocks
c) U.S. net purchases (-) of foreign
securities

1981
Year

-34.5
-3.2
.-31.3

Year

-38.2

-29.8

9

-

-

1982
-

-

-

-14.5 -13.1
-4.1 -9.2
-10.3
-3.9

Jan.

5.8
3.9
1.9

-1.6

-. 8

-. 3

.5

.1

-.1

*

1.1

.8

-. 7

-. 3

-2.0

2.0

2.1

2.4

1.7

-. 1

.2

4.8

3.6

.8

.3

1.8

-5.6

-7.9

Foreign net purchases (+) of U.S. Treasury
obligations 1/

2.6

6.7

Official Capital
4. Changes in foreign official reserve assets
in U.S. (+ = increase)

5.2

-3.1

Dec.

-9.1
-1.4
-7.7

1.3

3.

1 9 8 2

Nov.

-. 3

-16.9
-11.6
-5.3

-9.9
-9.5
-. 4

2.)

1.3

2.1

.4

-1.6

2.9

1.6

2.8

1.6

-3.3

4.7

2.8

-10.7
12.7
3.3

-12.8
6.7
9.0

-4.1
2.7
3.6

1.5
.1
1.1

-2.8
-1.0
5.4

-2.6
-1.1
.5

1.9
-. 4
3.2

2.3
-. 3
.7

5.0
.2

5.7
-2.8

-2.1
3.7

4.8
-2.1

4.3
-2.7

1.4
1.8

5.6
-.9

4.1
-1.2

-5.2

-5.0

-1.1

-.8

-2.0

.7

-.4

-8.7
21.3
-12.3
4.5
25.8

2.2
9.4
-9.8
-8.1
41.9

2.5
.4
2.8 2.4
-3.5 1.2
2.2 -5.2
6.0 14.1

MEMO:
U.S. merchandise trade balance -- part of line 9
(Balance of payments basis, seasonally adjusted) -27.9

-36.3

-5.8 -12.5

a) By area
G-10 countries and Switzerland
OPEC
All other countries
b) By type
U.S. Treasury securities
Other 2/
5.

Changes in U.S. official reserve assets
(+ = decrease) 3/

Other transactions (Quarterly data)
6. U.S. direct investment (-) abroad
7. Foreign direct investment (+) in U.S.
8. Other capital flows (+ = inflow) 4/ 5/
9. U.S. current account balance 5/
10. Statistical Discrepancy 5/

-. 6
3.0
-3.8
-6.1
16.5

-12.1

-1.7

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

-4.1

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

-3.0

1/ Includes U.S. Treasury notes publicly issued to private foreign residents.
Includes deposits in banks, commercial paper, acceptances, & borrowing under repurchase agreements.
3/ Includes newly allocated SDR's of $1.1 billion in January 1981.
/ Includes U.S. government assets other than official reserves, transactions by nonbanking concerns,
allocations of SDRs, and other banking and official transactions not shown elsewhere.
5/ Includes seasonal adjustment for quarterly data.
*/ Less.than $50 million.

1/

NOTE:

Details may not add to total because of rounding.

2.9

-2.5

IV-14

U.S. Merchandise Trade
In January, the U.S. merchandise trade deficit was $31 billion,
annual rate, down slightly from December, but almost $20 billion smaller
than the average rate for second-half of 1982.

However, monthly trade

data often move quite erratically, sharply reversing previous months'
developments, and the data for December-January should probably not be
viewed as establishing a new trend.
While exports in January increased somewhat from December levels
most of the rise was associated with special factors affecting exports
of wheat, civilian aircraft, and petroleum products.

Wheat deliveries

to the Soviet Union under contracts made in December were begun in
January and the monthly seasonal factor accentuated the January increase;

U.S. Merchandise Trade*

1982
Year

lHalf

3Q

236.3
44.3
192.0

211.0
37.4
173.6

221.2
41.9
179.3

209.3
33.6
175.8

192.3
32.3
160.0

193.1 209.9
31.6 37.7
161.5 172.2

Imports
Oil
Nonoil

264.1
77.6
186.6

247.3
61.2
186.1

244.6
58.1
186.5

259.3
65.8
193.5

240.8
62.8
178.0

228.7 240.5
59.4 48.6
169.3 192.0

Trade Balance

-27.9

-36.3

-23.4

-50.0

-48.5

-35.6 -30.6

18.1
70.5

17.2
60.8

18.7
62.5

15.8
62.0

15.6
56.1

15.1
56.5

n.a.
n.a.

5.9
72.1

5.0
71.8

5.0
71.1

5.5
75.4

5.2
69.9

4.9
66.8

n.a.
n.a.

Value (Bil. $, SAAR)
Exports
Agricultural
Nonagricultural

Volume (Bil. $, SAAR)
Exports - Agric.
- Nonagric.
Imports - Oil
Nonoil

*

1983

1982

Years
1981
Year

-

- -

-

- _1

_

_

_

_ -

i f

l

_* _

< - _*i l _

4Q

a

Dec.

__

Jan.

_
d.

Internat

onal

Trans

IV -15
first-quarter wheat exports may well increase from the level in the
fourth quarter but probably not as much as the January data suggest. The
strong increase in civilian aircraft exports in January is also associated
with seasonal factors and is not expected to persist (the seasonally
adjusted value was about twice the unadjusted value).
Petroleum product exports were up strongly in January, and, according to oil industry sources, the increase was probably price related.
In January the price of some petroleum products, mainly heating oil,
was about 7 cents per gallon higher in Rotterdam than in New York.

With

shipping costs estimated at about 4 cents per gallon and the present lack
of restrictions on petroleum product exports, domestic oil companies had
This price differential still exists

a strong incentive to export.

Most of the January export increase was to the

(through mid-March).

Netherlands, France, Italy, and Japan.
Other exports in January were little changed from low December and
fourth-quarter levels.
The level of imports in January was up somewhat from December
levels despite a drop in oil imports.

Oil imports fell to the lowest

level since last May, to 4.4 million barrels per day (from 5.2 mbd in
December and 5.5 mbd in the fourth quarter of 1982.

1981
Year

Volume (mbd, SA)
Price ($/BBL)
Value (Bil$ SAAR)

6.25
34.00
77.6

1983

1982

Years
Oil Imports

In January, oil

1982
Year
5.35
31.23
61.2

2Q

3Q

4.81 5.76
30.53 31.25
53.6 65.8

4Q
5.50
30.97
62.8

Dec.

Jan.

5.20
30.82
59.4

4.36
30.48
48.6

IV-16

prices declined about 35 cents per barrel from December levels to average
$30.48 per barrel

most of the imports recorded in January were shipped

before the end of 1982 and, therefore, do not reflect recent price
declines.

The sharp increase in nonoil imports in January was primarily

in manufactured goods, but month-to-month changes in nonoil imports are
very erratic.

The average level of nonoil imports in December-January

was still less than during much of 1982, and partly reflected the weakness of U.S. economic activity and also the sharp liquidation of U.S.
business inventories that took place in the fourth quarter.
U.S. Current Account: 4Q82 and Year 1982.
The U.S. current account deficit in the fourth quarter was slightly
larger than in the third quarter.

See the table on the next page.

For

the year 1982 as a whole, the current account was in deficit by $8
billion in contrast to a small surplus in 1981.
For the year, the swing into deficit resulted primarily from
larger trade deficits (exports declined more than imports declined,
particularly in the second half of the year).

However, there was also a

substantial drop in net direct investment income receipts reflecting
primarily lower profits on foreign business operations.
In the fourth quarter a small reduction in the trade deficit
(imports fell more than exports fell) and an increase in direct investment income receipts were more than offset by lower net portfolio income
receipts (partly reflecting lower interest rates) and larger unilateral
transfers abroad (primarily economic aid program disbursements at the
beginning of a new fiscal year).

IV-17

U.S. Current Account
billions of dollars, SAAR
Years
1981
1982

1982
Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

$ Change
Year
4Q-82
82/81
3Q-82

4.5

-8.1

4.1

8.8

-20.9

-24.4

-12.6

-3.5

-27.9
236.3
264.1

-36.3
211.0
247.3

-23.8
222.4
246.2

-23.0
220.0
243.1

-50.0
209.3
259.3

-48.5
192.3
240.8

-8.4
-25.2
-16.8

+1.5
-17.0
-18.5

Investment Income, net
Direct, net
Portfolio, net

33.0
24.1
9.0

28.7
18.1
10.7

27.5
17.3
10.2

30.8
17.8
13.0

28.3
17.0
11.3

28.3
20.1
8.2

-4.

-6.0
+1.7

+3.1
-3.1

Other Services, net
Unilateral Transfers

5.9
-6.6

7.4
-7.9

8.6
-8.2

8.0
-7.0

7.4
-6.6

5.5
-9.7

+1.5
-1.3

-1.9
-3.1

Memo Item:
Statistical Discrepancy
in the BOP account.*

25.8

41.9

20.6

24.2

56.5

66.2

+16.1

+9.7

Current Account Balance
Trade Balance
Exports
Imports

U

*/ The persistence of large positive statistical discrepancies which have occurred in
in the last four years and especially the $42 billion statistical discrepancy last year,
has made it increasingly difficult to asses the accuracy of the measured current account
based on balance-of-payments data. If the cumulated statistical discrepancies were
interpreted as being entirely net capital inflows, interest payments to foreigners and
the current account deficit would be understated. Alternatively, if the entire
discrepancy were interpreted as unreported service receipts, the current account may well
have been in surplus in 1982.

IV - 18

Foreign Economic Developments.

The weak pace of real economic

activity abroad earlier in 1982 continued into the fourth quarter.

Real

GNP fell further in Canada and Germany, while in Japan it rose only
slightly.

Industrial production fell in December and January in Italy.

The only countries to experience significant real growth in the fourth
quarter were the United Kingdom and France.
1983 suggest,

Preliminary indications for

however, that recovery in activity is now beginning in

several major industrial countries.

Industrial production jumped

sharply in January in Germany and rose above its year-earlier levels in
the United Kingdom in December and January.

The Canadian rate of

unemployment actually declined on average in January and February.
Improved inflation performance continued in most countries.
Although some benefits from government assistance to residential
construction and other fiscal programs appear to be emerging in Germany
and Canada, the general stance of current and projected fiscal policy
abroad remains one of restraint.

Overall budgets for Germany are

restrictive both for this year and the next.

In Italy measures to

contain the government deficit have been adopted, and in France such
measures are expected following the recent elections.

Japanese

authorities may accelerate spending although the total amount for the
fiscal year is being restricted.

In Canada only modest stimulus is

expected in the April budget while in the United Kingdom the recently
announced budget calls for some reductions in taxes but no increase in
the Public Sector Borrowing Requirement from this year's low level.
On March 9 the Belgian National Bank raised its official lending
rates by 2.5 percentage points while on March 14 cuts in official rates

IV - 19
of 1 percentage point were announced by Germany and Austria and of 0.5
percentage points, by the Netherlands and Switzerland.

A realignment

within the EMS followed on March 21 with the mark and the guilder
appreciating relative to the other member currencies by varying amounts.
Belgian National Bank lowered its official rates 3 percentage points
three days later.
German industrial production jumped by 4 percent (monthly rate) in
January, although the recorded increase may exaggerate the pickup in
activity.

The volume of orders also rose sharply in January, following
Business surveys indicate

strong increases in November and December.

a continuation of the improvement in business climate which began late
last year.

Part of the apparent recent strength in economic activity is

attributable to specific incentives provided by the government last
In addition, an investment

year, such as support for private housing.

credit program covering orders placed through December 31, 1982 probably
caused a concentration of orders late last year and thus explains not
only the strong order figures at that time, but also part of the jump in
production in January.

However, the order volume continued to grow

strongly past the deadline, as noted above, with foreign orders playing
a larger role than before.

These factors, together with the uniformly

positive comments of the business sector on the recent election victory
of the center-right government, appear to have improved the investment
climate.
The rate of consumer price inflation has slowed further, to a
monthly rate of 0.1 percent in February.

The annual rate for the eight

months to February was just over 2 percent.

The seasonally adjusted

IV - 20
CPI (not shown on the attached table) fell by 0.3 percent in January,
the first drop that large since World War II. Major contracts in the
annual wage round are expected to be announced during the next few
weeks.

Indications are that the average rate of wage increases may be

around 3 percent.
Monetary policy has continued to ease and short-term interest rates
have fallen by about another percentage point since the beginning of the
year.

The growth of Central Bank Money (CBM) accelerated sharply to 11

percent (a.r.) in February relative to the fourth-quarter 1982 base for
the 4 to 7 percent target range.

This level of CBM was so far above

target that subsequent growth would have to be greatly reduced (although
still positive) in order to reach the upper limit of the target by the
end of the year.

Nevertheless, the Bundesbank cut both the discount and

Lombard rates one percentage point to 4 and 5 percent, respectively, on
March 14.

At the same time rediscount quotas were reduced, thus

eliminating as yet unused portions of the quotas that had been created
when quotas were increased earlier this year.
The current account was in balance in January, after large
surpluses in November and December.

In January of last year the current

account was in deficit by more than $1 billion.
In Japan fourth quarter GNP grew 1.8 percent (s.a.a.r) despite the
fact that for that period industrial production and investment
indicators were down.

Continued sluggishness in economic activity was

evident in the higher unemployment rate, 2.7 percent (s.a.) in January
compared with 2.4 percent six months earlier, and the fact that

IV - 21
industrial production (s.a.) fell again in January.
inflation rate continued into 1983.

Declines in the

In February the Tokyo CPI 12-month

rate of change fell to 2.4 percent while the February WPI was 1 percent
below its year-earlier level.

Japan's January trade and current account

surpluses, $2.1 and $1.3 billion respectively, were the largest since
the autumn of 1981.
The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP)

government is currently

wrestling with the problem of timing its fiscal policies.

It is

likely

the government will again engage in "front loading" of its public works
expenditures into the first half of the fiscal year.
"front loading" undertaken in FY 1982 was of little

Although the
apparent help in

stimulating sustained expansion of the economy, the LDP will likely
follow this policy again this year to limit losses in upcoming byelections.
In the United Kingdom real GDP grew in the fourth quarter of 1982
at 3.4 percent (s.a.a.r.).

Increases in industrial production

in both December and January (s.a.) have raised that index to 2.2
percent above its year-earlier level in the latter month; total housing
starts (s.a.)

in Britain rose vigorously in the three months November to

January to an average level 34 percent higher than that for the
equivalent year-earlier period.

Although there are these increasing

indications of recovery, unemployment continued to rise slowly.

The

rate in February was 12.9 percent (s.a.), compared with 12.2 percent six
months earlier.
Progress continued in lowering the inflation rate.

The February

retail price index stood 5 percent above its year-earlier level while

IV - 22

the equivalent figure for six months earlier was 8 percent.
price inflation has also abated, but not as much.

Wholesale

In February the

wholesale price index was 7 percent above its February 1982 level.

The

January current account deficit of $400 million was the first monthly
deficit since mid-1981.
January,

The trade balance was also in deficit in

$770 million, after recording a surplus of $3.5 billion for

1982.
The government budget for fiscal year 1983/84 has just been
announced by Chancellor Howe.
growth in M1, £M3, and PSL2.

Targets were set for 7-11 percent annual
Through February all three aggregates

were within last year's 8-12 percent target growth range.

Fiscal policy

will remain restrained, with an expected Public Sector Borrowing
Requirement (PSBR) of about £8 billion, approximately 2-3/4 percent of
GDP.

Some expansionary measures were proposed, however.

Expenditure

increases will include additional benefits in employment programs,
increased child allowances, and higher capital expenditure on housing
construction.

There will be no change in the present VAT rate; however,

some excise taxes will be raised.

Taxes will be reduced on oil revenues

from newly developed fields, on employment (in the form of a change from
1.5 to 1 percent in August of the National Insurance Surcharge), and on
small and medium-sized companies (through changes in the corporation tax
applicable to them).

Finally, the personal income tax brackets will be

adjusted by more than enough to compensate for the effects of inflation
on income.

Altogether the tax changes introduced in the budget were

estimated to add £1.5 billion to the 1983-84 PSBR.

IV - 23
Real

GNP in Canada contracted by 4.5 percent (s.a.a.r.) in the

fourth quarter of 1982 as inventory runoffs accelerated and exports
weakened.

However,

in contrast to declines during the preceding five

quarters of recession, final domestic demand expanded modestly in the
fourth quarter.

This turnaround was mainly due to strength in

residential construction which was spurred by government assistance
programs as well as by lower interest rates, but non-residential
construction and consumption were also up.

The unemployment rate in

February was 12.5 percent, about unchanged from January and below the
12.75 percent level of the October-December period.
The trend of inflation has changed sharply.

In the eight months

ending with February of this year, the monthly increase in the CPI
averaged about a third of the 12 percent annual pace registered during
the first half of 1982.

About one-half of this improvement consisted of

favorable movements in food and energy prices.
moderated considerably last year.

Wage demands also

Annual increases called for over the

life of wage contracts negotiated in the fourth quarter (excluding those
with COLAs)

averaged 7.3 percent, down from 12.8 percent in the first

quarter and 13.3

percent in 1981.

The current account surplus strengthened slightly in the fourth
quarter.

For 1982 as a whole, the current account surplus reached a

record $2.1 billion as the trade balance more than doubled to $14.5
billion, also a record.
The new federal government budget is expected in April and is now
likely to contain stimulus, but on a modest scale.
French GDP (s.a.), led by strong export growth,

increased at an

IV - 24
annual rate near 2-3/4 percent in the fourth quarter of 1982;

between

the fourth quarters of 1981 and 1982 GNP increased 1-1/2 percent.
Although industrial production increased in January, it was unchanged
from the average for the fourth quarter of 1982 and below its yearearlier level.
low, are stable.

Stocks are falling to normal levels; and orders, while
Industrialists expect little increase in economic

activity over the next several months.
In 1982 consumer price inflation on a fourth-quarter to fourthquarter basis fell to about 9-1/2 percent from more than 14 percent in
1981, at least in part due to the 4-1/2 month price freeze.

In the

three months since the end of October, when the price freeze was
modified, consumer prices have risen at an annual rate over 11-1/2
percent.

The government hopes to keep the inflation rate below 9

percent in 1983.
Both the trade and current account deficits in the middle quarters
of 1982 were at record rates.

By the fourth quarter the current account

deficit had been nearly halved but remained above $2 billion.

The trade

deficit fell in the final quarter of 1982, but in January it rose to
about $1.4 billion, the average monthly rate of the record third
quarter.
M2 growth in France was held below 12 percent in 1982, below the
target range of 12-1/2 - 13-1/2 percent.
at a significant reduction to 10 percent.
tightened.

The target for this year aims
Credit controls have been

Housing loans and export finance continue to be favored, but

consumer loans have been frozen.
The 1983 budget seeks to limit the government budget deficit to 3

IV - 25

percent of GDP,

but real expenditure is still scheduled to increase by

more than 4 percent.

The recent municipal elections have not yet

elicited major arrangements of policy change announcements, but measures
to restrain consumption and increase investment are generally expected
now that the elections are over and a new cabinet has been formed.
In Italy, 1982 ended with another decline in industrial production.
The December IP figure was about 6 percent below that of the previous
December,

with most sectors sharing in this decline.

decline in industrial production occurred in January.
consumer price inflation has slowed somewhat.

A slight further
In recent months,

In the 3-month period

ending in February, consumer prices rose at an annual

rate of 15.3

percent over the previous 3 months; in the corresponding period a year
earlier, the CPI jumped by almost 19 percent.

The deceleration of

wholesale prices hasbeen more marked, and in January the WPI was 11.1
percent above its year-earlier level.
Despite the weakness of economic activity, the Fanfani government
has persisted in its attempts to reduce the public sector deficit.

On

February 26, the Parliament approved some of the government's fiscal
measures which were designed to limit the deficit to 71 trillion lire.
The measures approved were mainly increases in various taxes; the
Parliament has yet to pass any expenditure cuts and, in fact, on March
18 approved an additional 1 trillion lire spending package.

Revised

budget projections suggest that a further 9 trillion lire will have to
be trimmed from the budget in order to attain the government's
objective.

Treasury Minister Goria has suggested that these cuts may

come in the areas of social security, health care, and the investment

IV - 26

and employment fund.

The high rate of government borrowing has been

cited as an important factor in the slight decline to date in interest
rates relative to the decline in inflation.
Belgian authorities acted to relieve severe exchange market
pressure on the franc prior to the EMS realignment.

On March 9, the

Belgian National Bank raised its official lending rates by 2.5
percentage points, and the following week emergency exchange controls
were imposed which sharply.curtailed the ability of Belgian residents to
acquire and hold foreign currency.

As a result of the EMS realignment

on March 21, the Belgian franc was devalued relative to the mark and
quilder while being revalued relative to the other EMS currencies.
Following the realignment the Belgian National Bank reduced its official
lending rates by 3 percentage points.

REAL GNP AND INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION IN MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES
(PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD, SEASONALLY ADJUSTED)

1982
Q2
Q3

Q4

OCT.

3.0 -2.7 -4.4

-2.3 -1.3 -1.1
-2.8 -2.9 -2.9

-1.1
-3.8

-3.1

1981
1980
CANADA:

FRANCE:

GERMANY:

ITALY:

JAPAN:

1981

1982
-4.8
-10.8

Q3

Q4

1.6 -1.1

-. 9

Q2

1

*

1982
NOV.
*

1983
DEC.
*

GNP
IP

.5
-1.7

3.1
1.7

GDP
IP

1.1
-.9

.1
-2.6

1.6
-1.6

1.3
.0

.2
.3

1.0
.5

-.3
-1.5

1.1 -.5
.5 -2.3

GNP
IP

1.8
-.1

-.2
-2.1

-1.1
-2.6

-. 8
-.3

.7
.2
.0 -1.2

-.5
1.3

-.3 -1.1
-.9 -3.4

-.1
-1.9

-1.9

CDP
IP

4.0
4.5

-.2
-2.4

N.A.
-2.2

2.6
4.7

1.2 -1.5 -3.0
.8 -1.4 -7.6

N.A.
2.2

-3.9

GNP
IP

4.8
7.1

3.9
3.0

3.0
1.1

1.2
-.3

.9
1.6

-.3
2.6

.4 1.9
-.9 -1.7

.9
1.7

.4
-. 8

-3.1

-.3
.6

1.0
.5

.1
-.3

-.1
.4

.8
.5

.8
-. 3

-.5

-1.1

1.9

-1.3
.5
-3.1 -1.7

.2
-.9

-. 3
-2.1

*
-1.2

*
-.6

*
.2

-1.1 -1.7
1.5 -4.9

UNITED
KINGDOM:

GDP
IP

-2.4
-6.1

-2.4
-5.1

1. 1
.7

-.7
-. 3

UNITED
STATES:

GNP
IP

-. 4
-3.6

1.9
2.6

-1.7
-8.1

-.4
.5

.5 -1.3
.3 -4.4

*GNP DATA ARE NOT PUBLISHED ON MONTHLY BASIS.

.6

*

*

.8

.8

*

*

*

*

*

.0

-.9
*

-1.6

*

N.A.
*

.8

*

*

-1.0

4.0

*

*

3.1

-1.3

*

*

3.0

-.7

*

JAN.

*

4

m

*V

CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES IN MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES
(PERCENTAGE CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD)

MEMO:

1981

o3 -04

01

1982
Q2 Q3

1982

1983

.NOV. .DE

04

CANADA:

CPI
WPI

2.9
2.1

2.5
1.3

2.5
1.4

3.1
1.9

2.2
.8

1.6
.2

.7
-. 3

.0
.4

FRANCE:

CPI
WPI

3.9
4.1

3.2
2.3

2.8
2.7

3.1
2.6

1.4
1.9

1.9
.9

1.0
.7

.9
.1

GERMANY:

CPI
WPI

1.2
2.1

1.2
1.8

1.5
1.8

1.4
1.3

1.1
.0

.7
.0

ITALY:

CPI
WPI

3.0
3.5

4.6
4.0

4.0
3.3

3.0
2.0

4.1
3.2

4.5
3.3

JAPAN:

CPI
WPI

.0
1.4

1.4
-.1

UNITED
KINGDOM:

CPI
WPI

1.7
2.1

2.5
2.3

UNITED
STATES-

CPI (SA)
WPI (SA)

2.9
1.0

1.8
1.2

1.7
2.2

3.2
1.7

.5
1.6

1.3
.3

1.9
1.5

.7
2.0

JAN.

-. 3
.1

FERB.

.4
N.A.
.7
N.A.

.2
-. 6

.2
-1.0

.1
-.8

.7
.4

1.4
.5

1.3
N.A.

-1.2
.1
-. 3 -1.3

.3
-. 9

-. 4
.1

1.4
1.4

.5
.6

-. 2
.9

.0
.6

-. 3
.2

LATEST 3 MONTHS
FROM YEAR AGO

.2
-1.0

-. 2
.1

16.2
11.8

TRADE AND CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCES OF MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES#
(BILLIONS OF U.S. DOLLARS; SEASONALLY ADJUSTED)

1981

1981

1982

Q3

Q4

TRADE
CURRENT ACCOUNT

5.3
-4.4

14.5
2.1

1.0
-1.9

2.3
-. 2

TRADE+
CURRENT ACCOUNT+

-9.3
-4.7

-14.8
-12.9

GERMANY:

TRADE
CURRENT ACCOUNT (NSA)

11.9
-7.3

20.6
3.6

ITALY:

TRADE
-15.9
-9.1
CURRENT ACCOUNT (NSA)

-14.6
N.A.

CANADA:

FRANCE:

-1.7 -3.3
-1.4 -2.0
3.1
-4.6

5.5
4.4

-3.7 -2.5
.3 -. 9

1982
Q2 Q3

Q1

2.9
-.1

3.7
.5

-3.0 -4.0
-2.0 -4.4
5.0
-. 4

5.3
.9

-6.2 -2.8
-3.7 -1.2

Q4

1982
NOV.
DEC.

4.0
.9

1.3

1.4

*

*

-4.2
-3.5

-3.7
-3.0

-1.8

5.2
-1.6

5.1
4.7

5.3
.9

-3.2 -2.4
N.A. N.A.

-.9

1983
JAN.

-1.4

*

*

1.8
1.9

2.2
2.4

-. 6

-. 8

*

*

*

*

N.A.

JAPAN:

TRADE+
CURRENT ACCOUNT

20.1
4.6

18.8
7.3

6.3
2.5

5.0
1.1

4.4
.9

5.3
2.5

5.1
2.2

4.0
1.6

1.0
-. 1

1.4
.7

2.1
1.3

UNITED
KINGDOM:

TRADE
CURRENT ACCOUNT+

6.6
12.6

3.5
6.8

-. 6
.5

.9
2.5

.6
1.1

.2
1.4

.7
1.5

2.0
2.8

.8
1.1

.8
1.2

-.8
-.4

UNITED

TRADE

CURRENT ACCOUNT

-5.9 -5.8 -12.5 -12.1
1.0 2.2 -5.2 -6.1

-4.1

STATES:

-27.9
4.5

-36.3
-8.1

-7.8 -9.2
.8 -.9

# THE CURRENT ACCOUNT INCLUDES GOODS, SERVICES, AND PRIVATE AND OFFICIAL TRANSFERS.
+ QUARTERLY DATA ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION AND ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH ANNUAL DATA.
* COMPARABLE MONTHLY CURRENT ACCOUNT DATA ARE NOT PUBLISHED.

*

-3.0

-2.6

*

*

I

0r

March 23,

1983
GROWTH OF TARGETED MONETARY AGGREGATES
(PERCENTAGE CHANGE)

COUNTRY

TARGETED
AGGREGATE
*********

M2

FRANCE*

FROM TARGET
TARGET
BASE PERIOD
TARGET
PERIOD
***********
**********
DEC. 1982***************
11.9
12.5-13.5%
DEC. 1982
DEC.

OVER LAST
3 MONTHS

*********

**********

********** *******

11.9

6.9

2.6

DECEMBER

10.9

7.0

8.5

10.5

FEBRUARY

01 1983
Q1 1982

10.6

10.0

15.1

18.9

JANUARY

1983
1982

10.7

10.7

19.0

38.1

JANUARY

10.9

10.9

13.8

10.3

FEBRUARY

CBM

Q4 1983
04 1982

JAPAN

M2**

SWITZERLAND

ADJUSTED
CBM

4-7%

APR. 1983
FEB. 1982

8-12%

LM3

APR. 1983
FEB. 1982

8-12%

8.6

FEBRUARY

PSL2

APR. 1983
FEB. 1982

8-12%

9.0

FEBRUARY

Q4 1983
Q4 1982

4-8%

UNITED
KINGDOM*

Q4 1983
AVER FEB.-MAR. 1983

6-9%

*THE 1983 TARGET GROWTH RATE FOR FRENCH M2 IS 10%.
THE 1983 TARGET FOR U.K. M1, LM3 AND PSL2 IS 7-11% GROWTH.
**FORECAST GROWTH OF M2. TARGETS ARE NOT SET.
ALL D "
ALL C

OVER LAST
6 MONTHS

1981

GERMANY

UNITED
STATES

LAST
OBSERVATION

OVER LAST
12 MONTHS

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED EXCEPT FOR SWITZERLAND.
' RATES COMPOUNDED AND ANNUALIZED.

15.0

N.A.

9.5

14.6

14.6

FEBRUARY

12.8

15.7

22.9

FEBRUARY