View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

1

In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.

Confidential (FR)

Class II FOMC

March 17, 2000

CURRENT ECONOMIC
AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Supplemental Notes

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
by the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Contents
1

Domestic Nonfinancial Developments ..........................
Housing Markets .................................
............ .
Prices .................
Consumer Sentiment ...................................
Labor Settlement at Boeing ....................

.. 1
.... . ....... . 1
7
.9
......

Tables
Private Housing Activity ................................
CPI and PPI Inflation Rates ............................
University of Michigan Survey Research Center:
Survey of Consumer Attitudes ..........................
Prices of U.S. Imports and Exports .......................
..........
U.S. Current Account .....................
Summary of U.S. International Transactions ................

2
5
8
. 11
. 13
15

Charts
Indicators of Housing Supply, Home Prices, and Housing
................
........
...
Demand ...........
Measures of Core Consumer Price Inflation .................

U.S. International Transactions .............................
Prices of Internationally Traded Goods ....................
... ..... ......
U.S. Current Account ................
..................
Transactions
Financial
U.S. International

3
6

10
10
. 12
13

16

The Financial Economy ....................................
Tables
Selected Financial Market Quotations ...................

. 16

Supplemental Notes
The Domestic Nonfinancial Economy
Housing Markets
Total private housing starts rose 1-1/4 percent last month to an annual rate of
1.78 million units. The continuing overall strength of residential construction
activity was the result of a sharp--but likely temporary--surge in multifamily
starts that offset a decline in single-family starts.
At the regional level in February, total starts jumped 21 percent in both the
Northeast and Midwest; the surprisingly strong reading in the Midwest was the
highest since late 1978. Starts rose 1-1/4 percent in the West and declined
11-1/4 percent in the South. The extent to which favorable weather may have
given some support to construction in February is not clear. The sizable
increases in starts in the Northeast and Midwest coincided with above-normal
temperatures. However, unusually good weather should boost single-family as
well as multifamily starts, and the strength was confined to the latter category.
In addition, weather conditions in the South, the only region where starts
declined, were even better in comparison to historical norms than in the other
regions.1
In the single-family sector at the national level, starts declined nearly 4 percent
to an annual rate of 1.31 million units in February from a January estimate that
was revised down almost 2-1/2 percent to 1.36 million units. Permits for new
single-family houses turned down noticeably in February, more than retracing
January's increase. The ratio of starts to permits was close to its long-term
average, implying that the starts estimate likely does not understate the
underlying level of construction activity.
Multifamily housing starts jumped 19 percent to an annual rate of 471,000 units
in February--the highest level since January 1989. However, permits dropped
sharply, and the ratio of starts to permits in the multifamily sector was 2-1/2
standard deviations above its mean, which strongly suggests that starts will
retreat to a more moderate level.
Prices
The consumer price index jumped 0.5 percent in February reflecting a
4-1/2 percent surge in energy prices. Over the past twelve months, the CPI rose
3.2 percent, compared with a 1.6 percent increase over the preceding twelve-

1. Some evidence suggests that unusual weather has a more noticeable effect on housing
starts in the South, where winter weather conditions are marginal for construction, than in areas
such as the Northeast and upper Midwest where conditions typically are unfavorable even if the
weather is somewhat better than normal.

-2-

Private Housing Activity
(Millions of units; seasonally adjusted annual rate)

1999

Q2

1999
Q3

Q4 r

Dec.r

2000
Jan.r

Feb.P

All units
Starts
Permits

1.67
1.64

1.59
1.60

1.66
1.59

1.69
1.61

1.77
1.62

1.76
1.77

1.78
1.63

Single-family units
Starts
Permits
Adjusted permits 1

1.33
1.23
1.32

1.30
1.23
1.32

1.31
1.21
1.30

1.38
1.20
1.30

1.44
1.23
1.35

1.36
1.32
1.38

1.31
1.22
1.29

New home sales
Existing home sales

.91
5.20

.93
5.29

.90
5.25

.90
5.06

.92
5.14

.88
4.59

n.a.
n.a.

Multifamily units
Starts
Permits

.33
.41

.30
.37

.36
.38

.31
.41

.33
.39

.40
.45

.47
.41

Mobile homes
Shipments

.35

.36

.33

.31

.30

.31

n.a.

Note. p Preliminary. r Revised. n.a. Not available.
1. Adjusted permits equals permit issuance plus total starts outside of permit-issuing areas, minus a correction for
those starts in permit-issuing places that lack a permit.

Total Private Building
(Seasonally adjusted annual rate)

Millions of units

P

.

r

•

Ti

ui
11
ii

\

X' It

\
'.
I

/|

.

-,w

I

-

***

1976

1978

1980

t

Feb.

"t

.
.Ir//':"
'.
j: *
*1
.. ",'"**'.', ,. . . .*,
1 j.-

;

IA

'

"
Feb.

','' " Multifamily

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

Indicators of Housing Supply, Home Prices, and Housing Demand
Supply of Existing Homes

Existing Home Prices

Months

Percent
8

4-quarter change

7

6
5
4
3
2
1
0

Note. Ratio of inventory, seasonally adjusted by Board
staff, to sales, seasonally adjusted by the National
Association of Realtors.

New Home Prices

Note. Not seasonally adjusted.

Builders' Rating of New Home Sales

Percent

Diffusion index

8

4-quarter change

80

6

60
Mar.

Q4

40
20

2
I

1995

I

1996

,

.

.

,

.

.

1998

1997

I

0

1999

1995

Note. Not seasonally adjusted.

1996

I-

1997

--

1998

I

1999

2000

'-20

Note. Calculated from National Association of
Homebuilders' data as the proportion of respondents
rating current sales as good minus the proportion
rating them as poor. Seasonally adjusted by Board staff.

Perceived Homebuying Conditions

MBA Index of Purchase Applications
Index
-week moving average

Diffusion index
90

350

80
300
Mar. 10

70
250

60
50

200

Mar.
40

150
30
I

Note. Seasonally adjusted by Board staff.

100

S20
Source. Michigan Survey, not seasonally adjusted.

month period; faster energy price inflation more than accounts for this
acceleration in the total CPI. Excluding food and energy, the CPI rose
0.2 percent in February and was up 2.1 percent over the past twelve months, the
same as the increase over the preceding period. On a current-methods basis, the
twelve-month change in the core CPI has increased 0.2 percentage point over the
past year; excluding tobacco as well as food and energy items, the acceleration
over the past year is 0.4 percentage point.
Among energy items, consumer motor fuel prices jumped 6 percent in February,
and heating fuel prices surged 28 percent--by far the largest monthly increase on
record. In fact, that increase seems to be an aberration; it is out of line with
movements in wholesale prices, and we expect some fallback in consumer
heating fuel prices in March. However, for motor fuel, survey data for the first
half of March point to further large price increases this month. Consumer prices
of natural gas also rose notably in February, in part reflecting substitution away
from petroleum-based fuels, and electricity prices were up last month as well. In
all, the CPI for energy increased nearly 20 percent over the past twelve months.
Food prices rose 0.4 percent in February, reflecting larger than usual increases in
the meats, poultry, fish, and eggs category, as well as higher prices for fruits and
vegetables. Overall food prices have increased 1-3/4 percent over the past
twelve months, not much different from the rise in the core index.
Prices of commodities excluding food and energy were unchanged in February.
New car and truck prices edged down further last month; with the expiration of
the General Motors coupon incentives at the end of February, some uptick in
these prices may be expected in March. Over the past year, new vehicle prices
have fallen 1/2 percentage point. In addition, computer prices declined at a
more-typical 2.8 percent rate in February after two months of unusually firm
prices. (A similar result was evident in the PPI for computers in February.)
However, consumer tobacco prices rose 2 percent last month, reflecting the
remainder of the mid-January wholesale cigarette price increase. And, prices of
apparel items moved up 0.2 percent last month after a sizable decline in January
that may have been exaggerated by seasonal adjustment difficulties. Overall,
prices of core commodities have increased 0.3 percent over the past twelve
months--a 1/2 percentage point deceleration from its year-earlier increase that is
more than explained by a sharp deceleration in tobacco prices over this period.
Prices of non-energy services rose 0.3 percent in February, the same as the
average increase over the preceding three months. Owners' equivalent rent rose
another 0.3 percent last month, continuing its string of larger monthly gains
following unusually small increases through much of last year. Elsewhere,
prices in the erratic airfares category jumped 3.8 percent in February; airlines'

-5-

CPI AND PPI INFLATION RATES
(Percent)
From 12
months earlier
Feb.
1999

Feb.
2000

1999
Q3

2000
Q4

-Annual rate-

Jan.

Feb.

-Monthly rate-

CPI
All items (100.0) 1
Food (15.3)
Energy (7.0)
CPI less food and energy (77.7)
Commodities (23.4)
New vehicles (4.8)
Used cars and trucks
Apparel (4.7)
Tobacco (1.3)
Other Commodities

(1.9)

(10.7)

Services (54.3)
shelter (29.9)
Medical care (4.5)
Other services (20.0)

1.6

3.2

2.4

2.9

.2

.5

2.4
-5.7
2.1

1.8
19.9
2.1

1.8
12.7
2.1

2.7
10.7
2.3

-. 1
1.0
.2

.4
4.6
.2

.7

.3

.6

1.5

-. 2

.0

-.4
-. 1
-1.7
33.5

-.6
3.2
-.4
9.8

-. 1
12.1
-3.5
16.9

.5
5.0
3.5
12.5

-.3
-.7
-1.1
1.6

-.1
-.6
.2
2.1

-. 3

-. 4

-. 7

-. 7

.1

2.8

2.8

2.3

2.7

.3

.3

3.0
3.4
2.3

2.8
3.7
2.7

2.5
3.5
1.9

2.3
3.4
3.3

.3
.3
.3

.3
.5
.2

.5

4.0

4.0

3.7

.0

1.0

.4
-7.6

1.3
24.7

2.3
24.9

1.1
14.1

.1
.7

.4
5.2

2.2

1.0

.8

2.5

-.2

.3

3.6
.1

1.5
.3

1.7
-.5

3.4
1.4

-.4
.1

.5
.0

-2.7

5.3

6.0

4.3

.4

.8

-1.8

2.7

3.8

2.3

.3

.2

-11.9

26.1

32.7

16.2

2.7

4.2

-6.6
-18.0
-13.1

-.6
73.8
15.4

-2.2
96.2
18.3

8.8
19.7
25.1

.7
4.4
3.2

.7
10.0
-.2

-. 2

PPI
Finished goods (100.0) 2
Finished consumer foods (22.9)
Finished energy (13.8)
Finished goods less food
and energy (63.3)
Consumer goods (38.9)
Capital equipment (24.4)
Intermediate materials (100.0) 3
Intermediate materials
less food and energy (81.6)
Crude materials (100.0) 4
Crude food materials (38.8)
Crude energy (39.4)
Crude materials less
food and energy (21.8)
1.
2.
3.
4.

Relative
Relative
Relative
Relative

importance
importance
importance
importance

weight
weight
weight
weight

for
for
for
for

CPI, December 1999.
PPI, December 1999.
intermediate materials, December 1999.
crude materials, December 1999.

Measures of Core Consumer Price Inflation
(12-month change except as noted)
CPI Excluding Food and Energy
Percent

%V%i1* 1
A

6

i 6

1

3-month change

ILr

4

.

t

I

I

I

1993

1992

1995

1994

1996

1997

1998

jn

2000
2000

1999

CPI Services and Commodities
Percent

services ex. energy

SCPI

-

-

-

-

r--.

,-

%

Feb.
' -

-

3

-I

1992

CPI and PCE Excluding Food and Energy
Percent

CPI

C

IFeb.
n.t-ethods CPI

_
'-

PCE price index

.

1992

I

.,I

1993

1994

1995

-

' -

- N' -/

I

1996

1997

1998

1999

'- Jan.

J0
2000

-7attempts to add fuel surcharges to ticket prices, which has met with only partial
success, may explain part of last month's increase. Overall, the CPI for nonenergy services increased 2.8 percent over the past year, the same as its yearearlier increase.
At earlier stages of processing, the PPI for intermediate materials excluding food
and energy rose another 0.2 percent in February. The increase in recent months
has been most pronounced in a variety of petroleum-related materials, including
chemicals and plastics, as well as in metals. Over the past twelve months, this
index has risen 2-3/4 percent, more than reversing the decline registered in the
preceding year. However, the PPI for core crude prices edged down last month
after having jumped more than 3 percent in January; the rise over the past year
still is more than 15 percent reflecting sizable price increases for several metals.
The energy price increases appear to be showing through more noticeably to
expectations of inflation. According to the preliminary Michigan survey,
median one-year-ahead inflation expectations moved up to 3.2 percent in early
March, from an average of 2.9 to 3 percent over the preceding few months.
Median five- to ten-year ahead expectations ticked up early this month as well,
to 3.1 percent.
Consumer Sentiment
According to the preliminary report, the Michigan Survey Research Center
index of consumer sentiment fell about 3-1/2 points in early March. While the
overall index has retreated from the historical high level posted in January, it
remains above the highly favorable level recorded, on average, over last year.
Compared with February, respondents reported improved views of their current
financial situations early this month, but were a bit less optimistic about their
finances looking ahead twelve months. Expectations of business conditions for
this year and over the next five years moved down significantly relative to last
month. Also, consumers lowered their appraisals of buying conditions for large
household appliances in early March.
Among those questions not in the overall index, assessments of current buying
conditions for homes and cars were not as favorable as last month. According to
the early-March results, current buying conditions for cars were at their lowest
level in more than two years, as consumers' views of price discounting fell
sharply. After having recorded very low values since December, the index of
unemployment change moved up in early March, but was still in the middle of
the favorable range posted over 1999.

March 17, 2000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER: SURVEY OF CONSUMER ATTITUDES

(Not seasonally adjusted)
1999
July

1999
Aug.

1999
Sept.

1999
Oct.

1999
Nov.

1999
Dec.

2000
Jan.

2000
Feb.

2000
Mar
(p)

106.0
116.5
99.2

104.5
114.1
98.4

107.2
115.9
101.5

103.2
112.7
97.1

107.2
116.8
101.0

105.4
112.2
101.1

112.0
117.3
108.6

111.3
116.8
107.8

107.7
115.7
102.6

Personal financial situation
Now compared with 12 months ago*
Expected in 12 months*

132
135

132
139

132
135

127
133

138
138

133
132

135
141

132
138

135
135

Expected business conditions
Next 12 months*
Next 5 years*

147
118

140
118

150
124

140
118

146
123

150
125

165
133

161
136

151
127

Appraisal of buying conditions
Cars
Large household appliances*
Houses

153
171
167

148
165
153

145
169
149

146
166
149

148
166
156

141
158
154

144
169
152

153
172
153

135
166
146

49
73

50
65

47
62

48
59

50
68

50
70

51
85

48
75

54
71

109

113

110

112

111

105

104

106

111

24

21

20

20

21

19

19

21

21

Expected inflation - next 12 months
Mean
Median

3.0
2.7

3.2
2.8

3.2
2.7

3.5
2.9

3.3
2.9

3.6
3.0

3.5
3.0

3.5
2.9

3.9
3.2

Expected inflation - next 5 to 10 years
Mean
Median

3.3
2.9

3.3
2.8

3.5
2.9

3.2
2.8

3.5
2.9

3.2
2.9

3.5
3.0

3.3
2.9

3.8
3.1

Indexes of consumer sentiment

(Feb. 1966=100)

Composite of current and expected conditions
Current conditions
Expected conditions

Willingness to use credit
Willingness to use savings
Expected unemployment change - next 12 months
Prob. household will lose a job - next 5 years

* -- Indicates the question is one of the five equally-weighted components of the index of sentiment.
(p) -- Preliminary
(f) -- Final

Note: Figures on financial, business, and buying conditions are the percent reporting 'good times' (or
'better') minus the percent reporting 'bad times' (or 'worse'), plus 100. Expected change in
unemployment is the fraction expecting unemployment to rise minus the fraction expecting
unemployment to fall, plus 100.

Labor Settlement at Boeing
Boeing announced earlier today that the company had reached a tentative
contract agreement with its striking engineers, which would end the strike which
began February 9. The union workers are expected to vote on Sunday and,
according to the company, could be back to work as early as Monday. The
proposed contract looks favorable to the union on the three key issues in the
strike: guaranteed annual wage increases, bonuses, and health insurance
provisions regarding copayments/deductibles and employee contributions to
premiums.
According to the terms of the agreement (as provided by the union), professional
workers will receive wage increases totaling 8 percent in the first year and 4-1/2
percent in the second and third years, of which 3 percent per year is guaranteed
and the rest is allocated for merit increases, skills improvement, and promotions.
Technical workers are slotted to receive wage increases of 5-1/2 percent in the
first year and 4-1/2 percent in years two and three, with guaranteed wage
increases of 4 percent in the first year and three percent in the other years.
Although the total wage increases are only about 1/2 percentage point per year
higher than Boeing's initial offer, Boeing had not initially offered any
guaranteed wage increases to the professional workers and much more modest
increases for the technical workers. In addition, both professional and technical
workers will receive $2,500 bonuses, with the first $1000 guaranteed and the
remainder tied to aircraft delivery goals that seem quite attainable.
The agreement also leaves the basic health and disability benefit packages
essentially unchanged from the previous contract. Specifically, the workers will
not face monthly premiums for health insurance, their deductibles or
copayments for medical costs as well as the nature of the disability and pension
plans will not be changed--although pension benefits will increase.

U.S. International Transactions
Prices of Internationally Traded Goods
Non-oil imports and exports. Prices of imported non-oil goods rose in
February following a small decline in January Most of the increase was in
industrial supplies, particularly metals. For January-February combined, prices
of non-oil imports rose at an annual rate of 3/4 percent, a smaller increase than
in the fourth quarter of last year. Prices of imported computers and
semiconductors declined in January-February at rates similar to those recorded
in the fourth quarter. Prices of core goods (which exclude oil, computers, and
semiconductors) rose less in January-February than in the fourth quarter as
prices of imported machinery swung back to a decline (as did prices of consumer
goods) and prices of industrial supplies and foods rose a bit less rapidly than
previously.
Oil. The price of imported oil (BLS) jumped sharply in February following a
much smaller increase in January. For January-February combined, the price of
oil imports rose at an annual rate of 83 percent, about the same rate as in the
fourth quarter Oil prices have continued to rise since February, with spot West
Texas intermediate breaking through $34 per barrel on March 7 to set a new
post-Gulf War high. Spot WTI is currently trading around $31 per barrel.
Prices of total goods exports rose strongly in February, following a small
increase (revised) in January, with most of the rise in agricultural products and
industrial supplies. For January-February combined, prices of exports rose at an
annual rate of 2 percent, a little less than the increase recorded by BLS for the
fourth quarter of last year. The price index for agricultural exports in JanuaryFebruary averaged about the same as in the fourth quarter. Prices of exported
core goods rose at an annual rate of 3 percent, nearly as fast as in the fourth
quarter. While much of the rise was in industrial supplies, prices of exported
machinery and consumer goods also posted moderate increases.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GREENBOOK FORECAST
For imports, data for February matched what we had estimated for prices of
imported core goods and suggest that no revisions are necessary to the staff
projection of import prices in 2000:Q1 (prices of imported core goods are
projected to rise 1-3/4 percent AR).
For exports, the smaller rise in prices in January-February than in the fourth
quarter of last year reported in the BLS data is consistent with the direction we
anticipated for Q1 export prices in the Greenbook. The magnitude of export
price increases reported in NIPA figures is smaller than shown in BLS data for
both 1999:Q4 and (we project) for 2000:Q1.

Prices of U.S. Imports and Exports
(Percentage change from previous period)
Annual rates
1999
2000
Q3
Q4
Q1e
Merchandise imports
Oil
Non-oil
Core goods*
Foods, feeds, beverages
Industrial supplies ex oil
Computers
Semiconductors
Cap. goods ex comp & semi
Automotive products
Consumer goods
Merchandise exports
Agricultural
Nonagricultural
Core goods*
Industrial supples ex ag
Computers
Semiconductors
Cap. goods ex comp & semi
Automotive products
Consumer goods
Chain price index
Imports of goods & services
Non-oil merchandise
Core goods*

Monthly rates
1999
2000
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.

---------- BLS prices (1995 weights)---------9.0
8.2
8.0
0.6
0.3
1.9
178.2
83.8
83.3
6.5
3.0
13.9
-0.1
1.9
0.8
0.0
-0.1
0.3
1.0
2.5
1.0
0.0
-0.1
0.4
-6.8
7.9
-13.7
-7.4
-2.1
0.8
-0.4

2.6
9.9
-1.0
1.6
0.3
0.5
0.1

0.7
5.1
-0.6
-2.9
-1.5
0.6
-0.I

1.9
-0.1
0.5
-0.3
-0.3
0.0
-0.1

-1.3
0.1 .
-0.2
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.0

-0.6
1.4
-0.5
-0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0

0.7
-4.2
1.1
1.6

2.6
-1.7
3.1
4.1

1.8
-0.3
2.2
3.1

0.0
-0.7
0.1
0.0

0.1
0.2
0.1
0.3

0.5
1.0
0.5
0.6

10.1
-8.6
-9.6
-0.5
0.8
0.3

10.6
-2.0
-3.8
0.5
2.6
1.3

8.6
-1.8
-4.6
0.9
-0.2
0.9

0.7
-0.4
-0.9
-0.2
-0.1
0.2

0.5
0.0
-0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0

1.6
-0.3
-0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2

---Prices
6.2
-0.7
1.1

in the NIPA accounts (1996 weights)--4.6
n.a.
0.8
n.a.
1.2
n.a.

1.3
Exports of goods & services
Nonag merchandise
1.0
2.5
Core goods*
*/ Excludes computers and semiconductors.
e/ Average of two months.
n.a. Not available. ... Not applicable.

2.6
2.8
2.9

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

Oil Prices
Dollars per barrel

Spot West Texas Intermediate

U.S. Current Account
In the fourth quarter of 1999, the U.S. current account deficit rose to $399 billion
at a seasonally adjusted annual rate, an increase of $43 billion over the third
quarter (revised).
Nearly half of the widening of the deficit in the fourth quarter was from a jump
in net payments of income on investments. While income receipts from U.S.
direct investments abroad rose a bit, there was an extraordinary surge in income
payments to foreigners on their direct investments in the United States
(reflecting in part the robust U.S. profits picture). In addition, the sharp rise in
income payments on foreign portfolio investments in the United States exceeded
the increase in income receipts on U.S. portfolio investments abroad (both
reflected increased capital flows and a rising rate of return).
About one-fourth of the rise in the current account deficit in Q4 was from trade
in goods and services. Although the global expansion has fueled increasing
demand for U.S. exports, the U.S. appetite for imports has remained stronger.
The jump in "other net income and unilateral transfers" by $11 billion at an
annual rate largely reflected year-end government grants to Israel.
For the year 1999, the current account deficit was $339 billion compared with
$221 billion in 1998. Most of the $118 billion widening in the deficit was from
trade in goods and services, particularly from the strong steady growth of
merchandise imports. Most of the pick-up in exports occurred in the second half
of the year.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GREENBOOK FORECAST.
The current account deficit was $10 billion SAAR larger in 1999:Q4 than
anticipated in the March Greenbook. Net trade in goods and services was $11
billion SAAR stronger (smaller deficit, all services), and payments of net
investment income were $21 billion SAAR larger than projected. These data
suggest that NIPA real net exports will be $7-1/2 (SAAR) stronger (smaller
deficit than in the preliminary NIPA press release. Exports will be $2-3/4 billion
(SAAR) higher, and imports will be $4-3/4 billion lower.
A preliminary assessment suggests that not all of the fourth-quarter jump in
income payments on foreign direct investments in the United States will be
sustained in the current quarter, but that other elements of the current account
will grow at rates projected in the March Greenbook from the new fourth quarter
levels. Thus, for the current quarter and over the forecast period, a higher level
of net receipts from service transactions is just about offset by a higher level of

U.S. Current Account
(Billions of dollars, seasonally adjusted annual rate)
Period

Goods and
services,
net

Investment
income,
net

Other
income and
transfers, net

Current
account
balance

Annual
1998
1999

-164.3
-267.5

-7.0
-19.2

49.3
-52.2

-220.6
-338.9

Quarterly
1999:Q 1
Q2
Q3
Q4

-216.7
-261.2
-290.4
-302.0

-12.1
-13.2
-15.5
-35.9

46.8
-50.2
-50.4
-61.3

-275.6
-324.6
-356.3
-399.1

-43.7
-44.5
-29.2
-11.6

2.2
-1.1
-2.3
-20.3

12.6
-3.4
-0.2
-10.9

-28.9
-49.0
-31.7
-42.8

Change
Q1-Q4
Q2-Q1
Q3-Q2
Q4-Q3

Source: U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis.

net investment income payments, which leaves the projected current account
deficit for 2000 and 2001 very close to what it was in the March Greenbook.
U.S. International Financial Transactions
Quarterly balance of payments data (released Wednesday) indicate continued
large direct investment capital flows both into and out of the United States. In
the third quarter of last year foreign direct investment into the United States (line
7 on the Summary of U.S. International Transactions table) totaled $61 billion$16 billion higher than previously reported. Preliminary data for the fourth
quarter record an inflow of $44 billion. As has been the case for the past few
years, direct investment into the United States was buoyed by foreign takeovers
of U.S. firms. And, as has been the case for the past two years, a significant part
of the direct investment inflow was effected by swapping shares in the acquired
firm for shares in the acquiring firm. BEA estimates that U.S. residents acquired
$26 billion in foreign equity through stock swaps in the third quarter (revised
from $19 billion) and acquired $10 billion though this mechanism in the fourth
quarter. (Stock swaps are included in line 9 of the Summary table.) As shown
in line 6, U.S. direct investment abroad remained robust in the fourth quarter
($31 billion). As with the direct investment inflows, merger activity contributed
significantly.

-14The statistical discrepancy in the international accounts (the last line in the table)
was a positive $10 billion in the fourth quarter. This represents the sum of all
errors and omissions in the international accounts and a positive number
indicates some combination of under reporting of net capital inflows or over
reporting of the current account deficit. The discrepancy in the third quarter was
negative $5 billion (revised from negative $16 billion).

Summary of U.S. International Transactions
(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted except as noted)
1998

1999

Ql

Q2

1999
1999
Q3

Q4

Dec

2000
2000
Jan

-48.1

47.3

Official capital
I. Change in foreign official assets
in U.S. (increase,+)
a. G-10countries
b. OPEC countries
c. All other countries
2. Change in U.S. official reserve
assets (decrease, +)

-16.6

46.0

*

13.0

6.9

49.7

7.6

19.2

-9.0

1.7

2.5

-1.3

-14.4

-5.4

-10.2

-5.0

-6.8

8.6

1.2

1.9

57.3

5.9

6.0

19.0

-21.5

2.4

275.2

320.8

55.8

83.5

105.7

75.7

49.3

-19.8

-7.3

-5.2

9.8

-17.1

Private capital
Banks
3. Change in net foreign positions
of banking offices in the U.S.'
Securities

2

4. Foreign net purchases of U.S.
securities (+)
a. Treasury securities 3
b. Agency bonds
c. Corporate and municipal bonds
d. Corporate stocks
5. U.S. net purchases (-) of foreign
securities

73.8

18.1

17.1

21.2

17.5

121.7

50.5

158.6

34.8

33.8

49.5

40.4

53.7

108.2

10.2

37.9

25.2

35.0

10.0

7.3

17.4

-10.8

-3.9

-11.1

a. Bonds

17.4

-5.7

-.8

3.2

-10.1

2.0

b. Stocks 4

6.2

15.6

8.1

14.2

-.8

-5.9

6. U.S. direct investrrent (-) abroad

-132.8

-152.2

-41.6

-31.8

-47.4

-31.3

7. Foreign direct investment in U.S.

193.4

282.5

23.1

154.5

60.8

Other flows (quarterly data, s.a.)

8. Foreign holdings of U.S. currency
9. Other(inflow, + )fU.S. current account balance (s.a.)
Statistical discrepancy (s.a)

44. 1

16.6

22.4

-164.7

-166.0

11.0

-127.3

11.9

-37.9

-220.6

-338.9

-68.9

-81.2

-89.1

-99.8

10.1

-39.1

-4.8

-38.4

5.4

9.6

2.4

3. 1

4.7

12.2

NOTE. The sum of official capital, private capital. the current account balance, and the statistical discrepancy is zero. Details may not sum
to totals because of rounding.
1. Changes in dollar-denominated positions of all depository institutions and bank holding companies plus certain transactions between
broker-dealers and unaffiliated foreigners (particularly borrowing and lending under repurchase agreements. Includes changes in custody
liabilities other than U.S. Treasury bills.
2. Includes commissions on securities transactions and excludes securities acquired through exchange of equities: therefore does not match
exactly the data on U.S. international transactions published by the Department of Commerce.
3. Includes Treasury bills.
4. Quarterly balance of payments data include large U.S. acquisitions of foreign equities associated with foreign takeovers of U.S. firms.
These are not included in line 5.bbutare included in line 9.
5. Transactions by nonbanking concerns and other banking and official transactions not shown elsewhere plus amounts resulting from
adjustments made by the Department of Commerce and revisions in lines 1 through 5 since publication of the quarterly data in the Survey of
Current Business.
n.a. Not available. - Not applicable. * Less than 550 million.

-16-

Selected Financial Market Quotations
(One-day quotes in percent except as noted)
1999

Change to Mar. 16 from
selected dates (percentage points)

2000

Instrument

FOMC*

1999

1999

FOMC*

June 29

Dec. 31

Feb. 2

Mar. 16

June 29

Dec. 31

Feb. 2

Short-term
FOMC intended federal funds rate

4.75

5.50

5.50

5.75

1.00

.25

.25

Treasury bills 1
3-month
6-month
1-year

4.70
4.92
4.89

5.17
5.49
5.63

5.54
5.69
5.92

5.70
5.85
5.84

1.00
.93
.95

.53
.36
.21

.16
.16
-.08

Commercial paper
1-month
3-month

5.18
5.12

5.13
5.75

5.79
5.84

5.95
6.03

.77
.91

.82
.28

.16
.19

Large negotiable CDs I
1-month
3-month
6-month

5.21
5.32
5.43

5.72
5.90
6.08

5.86
6.01
6.24

6.03
6.14
6.35

.82
.82
.92

.31
.24
.27

.17
.13
.11

Eurodollar deposits 2
1-month
3-month

5.13
5.25

5.69
5.88

5.84
6.03

6.00
6.13

.87
.88

.31
.25

.16
.10

Bank prime rate

7.75

8.50

8.50

8.75

1.00

.25

.25

Intermediate- and long-term
U.S. Treasury (constant maturity)
2-year
10-year
30-year

5.68
5.93
6.07

6.24
6.45
6.48

6.60
6.62
6.43

6.50
6.26
6.05

.82
.33
-.02

.26
-.19
-.43

-.10
-.36
-.38

U.S. Treasury 10-year indexed note

4.01

4.33

4.30

4.17

.16

-. 16

-.13

Municipal revenue (Bond Buyer) 3

5.62

6.23

6.34

6.16

.54

-.07

-.18

Corporate bonds, Moody's seasoned Baa

8.05

8.18

8.27

8.42

37

.24

.15

10.74

11.12

11.50

11.77

1.03

.65

.27

7.63
5.93

8.06
6.56

8.25
6.65

8.23
6.68

.60
.75

.17
.12

-.02
.03

High-yield corporate

4

Home mortgages (FHLMC survey rate) 5
30-year fixed
1-year adjustable

Record high

1999

Level

Date

Dec. 31

FOMC*
Feb. 2

Mar. 16

11,723
1,469
5,049
606
14,202

1-14-00
12-31-99
3-10-00
3-9-00
3-16-00

11,497
1,469
4,069
505
13,813

11,041
1,409
4,052
504
13,393

10,631
1,458
4,717
574
14,202

Stock exchange index
Dow-Jones Industrial
S&P 500 Composite
Nasdaq (OTC)
Russell 2000
Wilshire 5000
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
*

Change to Mar. 16
from selected dates (percent)

2000

Record
high
-9.32
-.73
-6.56
-5.26
.00

Dec. 31

FOMC*
Feb. 2

-7.54
-.73
15.93
13.77
2.82

-3.72
3.49
1642
13.99
6.04

Secondary market.
Bid rates for Eurodollar deposits collected around 9:30 a.m. Eastern time.
Most recent Thursday quote.
Merrill Lynch Master II high-yield bond index composite.
For week ending Friday previous to date shown.
Data are as of the close on February 1, 2000.

BA:DAM