View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Potter and Ms. Logan

154 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

Material for the Briefing on

Financial Developments and
Open Market Operations

Simon Potter and Lorie Logan
March 15, 2016

155 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

156 of 192
Exhibit 1

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

(2) Importance of Factors Explaining
Financial Market Volatility*

(1) Asset Price Changes
Jan. FOMC Since
Since
to 02/11/16 02/11/16 Dec. FOMC
Changes in Percent

Rating
4

S&P 500 Index

-4

+11

-1

EuroStoxx 50 Index

-12

+15

-5

3

Brent Crude

-5

+34

+5

2

Bloomberg Dollar Index

-2

-1

-2

1
0

Changes in Basis Points
U.S. HY Corp. Credit OAS

+95

-197

-25

U.S. IG Corp. Credit OAS

+22

-39

+9

U.S. 10-Year Nominal TSY

-34

+32

-28

U.S.

Price (RHS)

Percent

USD/ Bbl.

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
01/04/16 01/18/16 02/01/16 02/15/16 02/29/16

45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Source: Bloomberg

(5) Five-Year, Five-Year Real Rates*
Japan

U.S.

Euro Area

2.0
1.5

Jan. FOMC

1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
07/01/13

02/01/14

09/01/14

04/01/15

U.S.
Chinese
FX

Oil
Vol

Foreign

Central Bank Policy

*Based on all responses from the March Surveys of Primary Dealers and
Market Participants.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(3) Brent Crude Realized Volatility and Price Level
Intraday Trading Range (LHS)

Foreign

Growth and
Inflation

Source: Barclays, Bloomberg

Percent

Average

5

11/01/15

*Calculated by subtracting the inflation swap rate from the nominal swap rate
and can be influenced by swap spreads and inflation bases across jurisdictions.
Source: Barclays

(4) RMB Level and Cumulative Change in China
Foreign Exchange Reserves
Cumulative Change (LHS)
Onshore RMB (RHS)*

$ Billions

0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
-600
-700
-800
-900

RMB/ USD

6.70
6.60
6.50
6.40
6.30
6.20
6.10
6.00

09/14

12/14

03/15

06/15

09/15

12/15

*Average level over the month.
Source: Bloomberg

(6) Equity and Bank Index Performance
S&P 500 Index
KBW Bank Index

EuroStoxx 50 Index
EuroStoxx Bank Index

Indexed to
12/31/15

105
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
01/01/16
Source: Bloomberg

Jan.
FOMC

01/22/16

02/12/16

03/04/16

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

157 of 192
Exhibit 2

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

(7) Japanese Yen and Equity Performance
USD-JPY (LHS)

(8) ECB Policy Action

TOPIX Index (RHS)

Indexed to
12/31/15

Indexed to
12/31/15

103

Interest Rate Changes:
•

5 bps cuts to refinancing operation rate and marginal
lending facility rate to 0.00% and 0.25%, respectively

105

Stronger Dollar,
Weaker Yen

100

•

97

95

Asset Purchase Changes:

94

90

•

€20 billion monthly expansion to €80 billion per month

91

85

•

Investment grade euro-denominated bonds issued by non-

100

BOJ Negative
Rate Decision

88
85
01/03/16

01/20/16

10 bps cut to deposit facility rate to -0.40%

banks will be eligible for purchases

80
02/05/16

02/23/16

75
03/10/16

TLTRO II will commence in June 2016
•

Borrowing in these operations can be as low as the interest

Source: Bloomberg

rate on the deposit facility

(9) Five-Year, Five-Year Inflation Swaps*

Crisis Low
Percentile
Abe Takes Office (Dec. '12)
Percentile
Draghi at Jackson Hole (Aug. '14)
Percentile
Current Level
Percentile

(10) Share of Sovereign Bonds with Negative Yields

U.S.

Euro Area
(Percent)

Japan

Maturity

Japan

Euro Area

1.93

2.26

-2.98

< 2 Years

100%

94%

0.01

0.48

0.00

2-5 Years

100%

67%

3.09

2.24

0.25

0.85

0.41

0.46

5-10 Years

100%

33%

2.77

1.95

1.14

10-15 Years

30%

6%

0.27

0.15

0.93

15-20 Years

0%

3%

1.99

1.50

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.29

20-30 Years

0%

1%

Total

74%

51%

*Percentiles of the distributions of rates over the last 10-years are shown for
U.S. and euro area, and over the last 9-years for Japan (earliest data available).
Source: Barclays

Source: Bloomberg, Staff Calculations

(12) Two-Year Rate Differential and Dollar Index

(11) Expected and Implied Fed Funds Rate Paths

Percent

3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
03/01/16

SEP Medians
Survey Modal Path (Mean)*
Survey Unconditional Path (Mean)*
Market Implied Path: Dec. FOMC
Market-Implied Path: Current

BPS

Two-Year Rate Differential* (LHS)
Bloomberg Dollar Index (RHS)

50

110

40

108

30

106

20

104
Dudley
Interview

10
0
10/01/16 05/01/17

12/01/17 07/01/18

*Based on all responses from the March Surveys of Primary Dealers and
Market Participants.
Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Federal Reserve
Board of Governors

Indexed to
06/30/15

-10
07/01/15

102
100

09/01/15

11/01/15

01/01/16

98
03/01/16

*Computed as U.S. two-year yield less weighted average of two-year yields of
countries with weights comparable to Bloomberg dollar index.
Source: Bloomberg, Staff calculations

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

158 of 192
Exhibit 3

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

(14) Overnight Treasury Repo Volumes*

(13) Money Market Rates*
FR 2420 EFFR
GCF
Tri-Party Ex. GCF and RRP**
3-Month Treasury Bill Rate

BPS

75

$ Billions
BPS

75

50

50

25

25
0

0
11/01/15

12/01/15

01/01/16

02/01/16

03/01/16

200 .00

180 .00

160 .00

140 .00

75

02/01/16

03/01/16

$ Billions

MEP

125

01/01/16

(16) Cumulative Change in Bill Supply*

(15) Primary Dealer Net Treasury Position
$ Billions

12/01/15

Private Repo***

*Series exclude month-end dates.
**Overnight RRP.
***Includes total triparty repo activity ex. Fed RRP.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

*Light dashed vertical lines indicate month-ends, dark dashed line indicates
quarter-end.
**Excludes intra-bank transactions.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

175

450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
11/01/15

Fed RRP**

150
100
50
0

120 .00

-50
100 .00

25

80.0 0

60.0 0

-25

40.0 0

20.0 0

-75
01/01/11

0.00

01/01/13

01/01/15

-100
-150
-200

-250
01/01/15

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Haver

(17) Expected RRP Demand*

07/01/15

10/01/15

01/01/16

(18) Foreign RP Pool Volume

Median

$ Billions

04/01/15

*Shown as cumulative change since the start of 2015.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Treasury Department

$ Billions

300

> 600
500
400
300
200
100
0

Current Top 5 Customers

250

All Others

Terms of Service
Change

200
150
6 months
forward

1 year
forward

January

6 months
forward

1 year
forward

March

*Dots scaled by percent of respondents from the March Surveys of Primary
Dealers and Market Participants.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

100
50
0
01/01/14

07/01/14

01/01/15

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

07/01/15

01/01/16

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

159 of 192
Exhibit 4

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

(20) Quarterly Realized and Projected
Foreign Portfolio Income*

(19) Recent Trends in SOMA Foreign Portfolio Income
SOMA holds around $20 billion euro- and yen-denominated

€ Millions

¥ Millions

Euro (LHS)
Yen (RHS)
50
45
40
Due to negative rates in euro area and Japan:
35
• Euro interest income expected to turn negative this month
30
25
• Yen income expected to decline to zero but not negative
20
• Total SOMA foreign income expected to be negative in April
15
10
Negative income could be noted in the following reports:
5
• Monthly ESF financial statements
0
-5
• FRBNY Quarterly Report
-10
• FRS and other RB annual reports and statements
03/01/10 09/01/11 03/01/13 09/01/14 03/01/16

1,500
1,350
1,200
1,050
900
750
600
450
300
150
0
-150
-300

investments

*Filled dots are realized, unfilled dots are projections.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(21) Projected and Realized SOMA Net Income:
Annual Report*
Historical

2014 Baseline

(22) Receipts of Principal on SOMA Securities*
Treasury

2015 Baseline

$ Billions

$ Billions

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
12/31/10

12/31/14

12/31/18

12/31/22

*Figures for 2010-15 (shaded area) are realized returns. Projected figures are
rounded. Rate path and reinvestment assumptions use the Dec.’15 Surveys of
Primary Dealers and Market Participants.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(23) March Term RRP Announcement

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
01/31/15

Agency MBS

Survey estimate of last month of
full reinvestments**

01/31/16

01/31/17

01/31/18

*Filled bars are realized, unfilled bars are projections.
**Based on all responses from the March Surveys of Primary Dealers and
Market Participants.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(24) March Quarter-End Term RRP Considerations

Should the Committee decide to conduct term RRPs and an
aggregate cap on ON RRP is not re-introduced:

In support of conducting term RRPs:

• The Desk plans to offer $250 billion in term RRPs

• Supports FOMC guidance to reduce elevated ON RRP

• Provides continuity to market
capacity
• Supports operational readiness

Operation
Date

Maturity
Date

Term

Amount
Offered
($ Billions)

Mar 28

Apr 04

7 Days

125

ON RRP + 1

Mar 30

Apr 01

2 Days

125

ON RRP + 1

Max. Rate
(BPS)

In support of not conducting term RRPs:
• Current ON RRP facility should provide ample capacity
o Term RRPs will not add to interest rate control
• Incremental interest cost of providing term RRP
Instruction to Desk to conduct term RRPs would be added to
implementation note, released concurrent with March statement

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

160 of 192
Appendix (Last)

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

Appendix: Summary of Operational Testing
Summary of Operational Tests in prior period:
• Domestic Authorization
o February 23: Completed Treasury outright purchase for $226 million
• Foreign Authorization

o February 9: Completed euro-denominated overnight repo for €1 million
o February 9: Completed liquidity swap with Bank of Canada for $51 thousand
• TDF test operation
o February 18: Conducted 7-day test with total take-up of $64 billion

Upcoming Operational Tests
• No tests under the Domestic Authorization
• Three tests scheduled under the Foreign Authorization
o April 12: Euro-dominated overnight repo for approximately €1 million
o April 19: Liquidity swap with the European Central Bank for approximately €51
thousand
o April 21: Liquidity swap with the Swiss National Bank for approximately CHF 51
thousand

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 2: Materials used by Mr. Wilcox

161 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

Material for the Briefing on

The U.S. Outlook

David W. Wilcox
March 15, 2016

162 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

163 of 192

Class II FOMC- Restricte

Forecast Summary

1. Evolution of 2016:Q1 GDP Growth Nowcasts
Percent, annual rate

6

Judgmental (Tealbook-consistent)
Board staff factor model
System staff models

5
4

6
5
4

3

3

2

2

1

1

0

0

-1

-1

-2

Dec.

Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

-2

Note: The shaded region is a 70 percent confidence interval around the Board staff factor model estimate.

2. Recession Probabilities at Various
Horizons
Percent

100
90

3 months ahead
6 months ahead
12 months ahead
Unconditional prob.

80
70

3. Estimates of the Short-Run Real
Natural Rate of Interest
100
90
80
70

60

60

50

50

40

40

30

30

20

20

10

10

0

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

0

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12

Percent, annual rate
Median estimate
Range of model estimates

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

2017

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12

Note: Shaded bar indicates a period of business recession as defined
by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

4. Real GDP

5. Unemployment Rate
Percent change, annual rate

10

Percent

10

9

8

8

6

6

7

7

4

4

6

6

2

2

5

5

0

0

4

-2

-2

3

-4

2

Mar. TB
Jan. TB
70% confidence interval

8

-4

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Note: Confidence intervals for panels 4 through 7 based on FRB/US
stochastic simulations.

Page 1 of 2

Mar. TB
Jan. TB
70% confidence interval

9
8

4

Natural rate

3
2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

6. PCE Prices

7. PCE Prices Excluding Food and Energy
Percent change, annual rate

6

Mar. TB
Jan. TB
70% confidence interval

5
4

6

4

2

2

1

1

0

0

-1

-1

-2

-2
2015

2016

Mar. TB
Jan. TB
70% confidence interval

4
3

2014

Percent change, annual rate

5

5

3

-3

2017

2018

-3

8. Inflation Revisions Since December:
Total PCE
Percentage points
Source of Revision:
Food
Energy
Core

2

2

1

1

0

0

-1

2014

2018

Percent
Michigan, next five to ten years
Twelve-month moving average
SPF for PCE, next ten years

3.5

Source of Revision:
Resource utilization
Energy price passthrough
Import prices
Underlying inflation
Other

Feb.

2.0

2010

2012

2014

2016

0.7

Revisions to Projection

0.5
0.3

-0.1

-0.1

-0.3

-0.3

-0.5

-0.5

-0.7

2015

4.0

2.5
2.0

2008

-1

0.1

Q1
1.5

2018

0.1

3.0

2.5

2017

Percentage points

3.5

3.0

2016

0.7

10. Longer-Term Inflation Expectations
4.0

2015

9. Inflation Revisions Since December:
Core PCE

0.5

2017

4
3

Revisions to Projection

2016

5

3

0.3

2015

164 of 192

Class II FOMC- Restricte

1.5

Note: Median responses. Shaded area denotes 70 percent of the
historical range since 1998.

Page 2 of 2

2016

2017

2018

-0.7

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 3: Materials used by Ms. Wilson

165 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

Material for the Briefing on

The International Outlook

Beth Anne Wilson
March 15, 2016

166 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

167 of 192

Exhibit 1

Page 1 of 2

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

The International Outlook
1. Foreign GDP

2. Chinese Exchange Rate
Percent change, annual rate

Dec. TB
Jan. TB

Emerging market
economies (EME)

5

114

December 31, 2014 = 100 RMB/USD (inverted scale)

110

5.50

4

RMB
appreciation

106
3
Total
2

2015

2016

2017

6.00

98

6.25
RMB/USD

6.50

1
90
0

2014

5.75

Multilateral
Index*

102

94
Advanced foreign
economies (AFE)

5.25

2018

6.75

86
2014

7.00
2015

2016

2017

2018

* China Foreign Exchange Trade System (nominal exchange rate basket).
Source: CFETS, FRB, and staff calculations.

4. Brent Oil Prices

3. Real Dollar Indexes
2013:Q1 = 100

USD per barrel

135

AFE

Dec. TB
Jan. TB

Monthly

Dec. TB
Jan. TB

130
Far Futures*

125
Broad

110
100
90
80

120

70
115
60
Dollar
appreciation

110

EME

50

105

Spot

40

100

30

95
2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

5. Foreign Inflation

* December 2018 contract.

6. AFE Policy Rates

Percent change, annual rate

2017

% of GDP

2.5

4

45

Dec. TB
Post-ECB meeting

Dec. TB

Monthly

2016

7. ECB Assets
Percent

5

Dec. TB
Jan. TB

Quarterly

20
2015

2018

40

2.0

EME

3

35
1.5

2

30

Canada

1.0
1

25

AFE*

0

0.5

-1
2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

* Excludes effects of the April 2014 and April
2017 Japanese tax hikes.

20

United Kingdom

0.0
2014

2015

2016

2017

15
2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

168 of 192

Exhibit 2

Page 2 of 2

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

The International Outlook (2)
8. Recession Probability Model

9. Estimated Probability of Global Recession
Over the Next 12 Months

1.0

Monthly probit model, including:
- Index of macro indicators: IP, retail sales,
new export orders, and GDP*
- Index of financial stress: excess bond
premium**

0.8

Unconditional
Probability (.16)

0.6
Feb. 2016

World recession defined as countries
comprising 2/3 of world GDP in recession

0.4

Model attributes current probability:
- 2/3 to macro factors
- 1/3 to financial factors

0.2

0.0
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

* Aruoba, Diebold, Scotti Index (JBES, 2009).
** Gilchrist and Zakrajsek Index (AER, 2012).

Note: Gray shading indicates that countries in our sample amounting to twothirds of the world economy are classified in recession.

10. Foreign Recession Scenarios

11. Foreign GDP
4-quarter percent change
Baseline
Effective FMP
Less Effective FMP

Tightening financial conditions, falling confidence reduce foreign GDP
Effective Foreign Monetary Policy (FMP)
- Foreign central bank actions depress bond yields, support
domestic demand. Foreign GDP growth falls below 1%.
- U.S. GDP growth down to 1.5%, real dollar up 4%.

6
5
4
3
2

Less Effective Foreign Monetary Policy
- Low pass-through of monetary policy to private yields and
household demand, GDP boost comes from exchange rate.
- Foreign GDP growth falls below -1%.
- U.S. GDP growth below 1% and real dollar up 9%.

1
0
-1
-2
2015

12. Real Broad Dollar
2015:Q1 = 100

13. U.S. GDP

2019

14. Federal Funds Rate

4-quarter percent change

120

2017

Percent

3.0

4.5
4.0

115

2.5

110

2.0

105

1.5

3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5

100

1.0

1.0

0.5
95
2015

2017

2019

0.5
2015

2017

2019

0.0
2015

2017

2019

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 4: Materials used by Mr. Tetlow

169 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

Material for Briefing on the

Summary of Economic Projections

Robert J. Tetlow
March 15, 2016

170 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

171 of 192

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 1. Medians, central tendencies, and ranges of economic projections, 2016–18 and over the longer run
Percent

Change in real GDP
Median of projections
Central tendency of projections
Range of projections

4
3
2
1

Actual

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Longer
run
Percent

Unemployment rate

9
8
7
6
5
4

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Longer
run
Percent

PCE inflation
3

2

1

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Longer
run
Percent

Core PCE inflation
3

2

1

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Longer
run

Note: The data for the actual values of the variables are annual. The percent changes in real GDP and inflation
are measured Q4/Q4. Projections for the unemployment rate are for the average civilian unemployment rate in the
fourth quarter of the year indicated.

Page 1 of 6

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

172 of 192

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 2. Economic projections for 2016–18 and over the longer run (percent)

Change in real GDP
2016
Median . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2
December projection . . . . . .
2.4
Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.9 – 2.5
December projection . . . . . . 2.0 – 2.7
Memo: Tealbook . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2
December projection . . . . . .
2.5

2017

2018

2.1
2.2
1.7 – 2.3
1.8 – 2.5
2.2
2.0

2.0
2.0
1.8 – 2.3
1.7 – 2.4
2.0
1.9

Longer
run
2.0
2.0
1.8 – 2.4
1.8 – 2.3
1.9
1.9

Unemployment rate
2016
Median . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.7
December projection . . . . . .
4.7
Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.5 – 4.9
December projection . . . . . . 4.3 – 4.9
Memo: Tealbook . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.8
December projection . . . . . .
4.7

2017

2018

4.6
4.7
4.3 – 4.9
4.5 – 5.0
4.5
4.6

4.5
4.7
4.3 – 5.0
4.5 – 5.3
4.3
4.5

Longer
run
4.8
4.9
4.7 – 5.8
4.7 – 5.8
5.0
5.1

PCE inflation
2016
Median . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2
December projection . . . . . .
1.6
Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 – 1.6
December projection . . . . . . 1.2 – 2.1
Memo: Tealbook . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.0
December projection . . . . . .
1.2

2017

2018

1.9
1.9
1.6 – 2.0
1.7 – 2.0
1.6
1.8

2.0
2.0
1.8 – 2.0
1.7 – 2.1
1.8
2.0

Longer
run
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0

Core PCE inflation
2016
Median . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.6
December projection . . . . . .
1.6
Range . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4 – 2.1
December projection . . . . . . 1.4 – 2.1
Memo: Tealbook . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4
December projection . . . . . .
1.4

2017

2018

1.8
1.9
1.6 – 2.0
1.6 – 2.0
1.6
1.7

2.0
2.0
1.8 – 2.0
1.7 – 2.1
1.8
1.9

* The percent changes in real GDP and inflation are measured Q4/Q4. Projections for the unemployment rate are
for the average civilian unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated.

Page 2 of 6

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

173 of 192

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 3. Overview of FOMC participants’ assessments of appropriate monetary policy

Percent

March projections of the appropriate pace of monetary policy
Target federal funds rate or midpoint of target range at year-end

5.0

March projections
Median prescription based on Taylor (1999) rule
Median of projections

4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

2016

2017

2018

Longer run

Percent

December projections of the appropriate pace of monetary policy
Target federal funds rate or midpoint of target range at year-end
December projections

5.0

Median prescription based on Taylor (1999) rule
Median of projections

4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0

2016

2017

2018

Longer run

Note: In the two panels above, each circle indicates the value (rounded to the nearest 1/8 percentage point) of
an individual participant’s judgment of the midpoint of the appropriate target range for the federal funds rate or the
appropriate target level for the federal funds rate at the end of the specified calendar year or over the longer run. The
red diamonds for each year represent the median of the federal funds rate prescriptions that were derived by taking
each participant’s projections for the unemployment gap, core PCE inflation and longer-run nominal federal funds rate
for that year and inserting them into the non-inertial Taylor (1999) rule. The whiskers represent the central tendency
of the prescriptions of the non-intertial Taylor (1999) rule using participants’ projections.

Page 3 of 6

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

174 of 192

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 4. Uncertainty and risks in economic projections

Number of participants

Uncertainty about GDP growth

Risks to GDP growth

March projections
December projections

Lower

Broadly
similar

Number of participants

March projections
December projections

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Higher

Weighted to
downside

Broadly
balanced

Number of participants

Uncertainty about the unemployment rate

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Weighted to
upside
Number of participants

Risks to the unemployment rate
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Lower

Broadly
similar

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Higher

Weighted to
downside

Broadly
balanced

Number of participants

Uncertainty about PCE inflation

Weighted to
upside
Number of participants

Risks to PCE inflation
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Lower

Broadly
similar

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Higher

Weighted to
downside

Broadly
balanced

Number of participants

Uncertainty about core PCE inflation

Weighted to
upside
Number of participants

Risks to core PCE inflation
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Lower

Broadly
similar

Higher

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2

Weighted to
downside

Page 4 of 6

Broadly
balanced

Weighted to
upside

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

175 of 192

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 5. History of assessments of uncertainty in economic projections
Diffusion index

Change in real GDP

1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Diffusion index

Unemployment rate

1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Diffusion index

PCE inflation

1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Diffusion index

Core PCE inflation

1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Note: The diffusion index for uncertainty about a variable equals the fraction of participants who reported that
uncertainty about that variable is higher than normal minus the fraction who reported that uncertainty is lower than
normal.

Page 5 of 6

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

176 of 192

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 6. History of assessments of risk in economic projections
Diffusion index

Change in real GDP

0.2
+
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Diffusion index

Unemployment rate
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
+
0
-

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Diffusion index

PCE inflation

0.2
+
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Diffusion index

Core PCE inflation

0.2
+
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8

2012

2013

2014
SEP meeting date

2015

2016

Note: The diffusion index for assessment of risks about a variable equals the fraction of participants who reported
that risks are weighted to the upside minus the fraction who reported that risks are weighted to the downside.

Page 6 of 6

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 5: Materials used by Mr. Laubach

177 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

Material for the Briefing on

Monetary Policy Alternatives

Thomas Laubach
March 15–16, 2016

178 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

179 of 192

Exhibit 1: Monetary Policy Alternatives
Medium Term Outlook:
2017 Q4/Q4 Survey Responses
Dec./Jan.

Federal Funds Rate Projections

Percent

Percent

3.5

Dec. 15, 2015
Feb. 11, 2016
Mar. 14, 2016

March

Real GDP

3.0

PD Survey

2.3

2.25

2.5

Blue Chip

2.4

2.3

2.0

PD Survey (PCE)

2

2.05

Blue Chip (CPI)

2.3

2.3

1.5

Inflation

1.0
0.5
2016

Note: The inflation measures are headline PCE and headline CPI
inflation, respectively. The Primary Dealer Survey was taken before
Dec 8, 2015; the Blue Chip survey was taken January 4−5, 2016.
Source: FRBNY Primary Dealer Survey and Blue Chip Economic
Indicators Survey.

4:00 PM on January 26, 2016 = 100

Percent

Conditional: no ZLB
50
Conditional: ZLB
Unconditional*
40

30

20

10

.26−.50

.51−1

1.01−1.5

1.5−2

2.01−2.5

2.51−3

3.01−3.5

0.0

2019

Dollars per barrel

140 5−minute intervals

75
WTI Crude (left scale)
S&P 500 Futures (right scale)

135

65

125

60

120

55

115

50

110

45

105

40

100

35

95

30

>=3.51

90

25

Jan. 2

Mar. 18

May 29 Aug. 11 Oct. 26
2015

Jan. 28
2016

* Based on the median dealer estimate of 25% probability of the funds
rate returning to the ZLB.
Source: FRBNY Primary Dealer Survey.

Note: Two−month West Texas Intermediate futures.
Source: Bloomberg.

Inflation Compensation: Composition of Decline
Basis Points
since mid−2014

Risk−Neutral Probability of Average Inflation
Over Next Ten Years Falling Below 1%
Percent

0

60
Jan.
FOMC

−20

Inflation
Expectations

70

130

0
0−.25

2018

Intraday Crude Oil and S&P 500 Futures

Distribution of Federal Funds Rate: End−of−2017

<=0

2017

Note: The implied federal funds rate path is estimated using overnight
index swaps (OIS) quotes with a spline approach and a term premium
of zero basis points.
Source: Bloomberg and staff calculations.

55
50
45

−40

40

Inflation
Risk Premium

−60

35
30

−80

Other
Premiums

25
20

−100
PD
Survey

Fed
Models*

*Fed models reflect the average composition from term structure
models of the Board, FRBNY, and FRB Chicago.

Feb.

May.

Aug.
2015

Note: Implied by inflation caps and floors.
Source: BGC Partners and Staff calculations.

Page 1 of 11

Nov.

Feb.
2016

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

180 of 192

JANUARY 2016 FOMC STATEMENT
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December
suggests that labor market conditions improved further even as economic growth
slowed late last year. Household spending and business fixed investment have been
increasing at moderate rates in recent months, and the housing sector has improved
further; however, net exports have been soft and inventory investment slowed. A
range of recent labor market indicators, including strong job gains, points to some
additional decline in underutilization of labor resources. Inflation has continued to
run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines
in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of
inflation compensation declined further; survey-based measures of longer-term
inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum
employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual
adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a
moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen. Inflation is
expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of the further declines in
energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects
of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens
further. The Committee is closely monitoring global economic and financial
developments and is assessing their implications for the labor market and inflation,
and for the balance of risks to the outlook.
3. Given the economic outlook, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for
the federal funds rate at ¼ to ½ percent. The stance of monetary policy remains
accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions
and a return to 2 percent inflation.
4. In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the
federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic
conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation.
This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including
measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation
expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of
the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor
actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that
economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases
in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time,
below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path
of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by
incoming data.
5. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments
from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency

Page 2 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

181 of 192

mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at
auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal
funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee’s holdings of
longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative
financial conditions.

Page 3 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

182 of 192

MARCH 2016 ALTERNATIVE A
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December
January suggests that labor market conditions improved further even as economic
growth slowed late last year economic activity has been expanding at a moderate
pace. Household spending and business fixed investment have has been increasing at
moderate rates a solid moderate rate in recent months, and the housing sector has
improved further; however, business fixed investment and net exports have been
soft and inventory investment slowed. A range of recent labor market indicators,
including strong job gains, points to some additional decline in underutilization of
labor resources strengthening of the labor market. Inflation has picked up in
recent months; however, it continued to run below the Committee’s 2 percent
longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices and in prices of nonenergy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation declined further
remain near historically low levels; some survey-based measures of longer-term
inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months declined
further.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum
employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual
adjustments in the stance of appropriately accommodative monetary policy,
economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators will
continue to strengthen. However, global economic and financial developments in
recent months pose downside risks to the outlook for economic activity and the
labor market. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of
the further earlier declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium
term as the transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the
labor market strengthens further. The Committee is closely monitoring global
economic and financial developments and is assessing their implications for the labor
market and inflation, and for the balance of risks to the outlook. In light of
continued low readings from measures of longer-term inflation compensation
and expectations, the Committee judges that the risks that inflation will fail to
rise to 2 percent over the medium term have increased.
3. Given the economic outlook and associated risks, the Committee decided to
maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at ¼ to ½ percent. The stance of
monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in
labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation. The Committee
anticipates that it will not increase this target range until inflation moves closer
to 2 percent on a sustained basis and the risks to the economic outlook are more
closely balanced.
4. In determining the When adjustments to the target range become appropriate,
their timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds
rate, the Committee will assess will depend on the Committee’s assessment of
realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum

Page 4 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

183 of 192

employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide
range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of
inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and
international developments. In light of the current shortfall of inflation from 2
percent, the Committee will carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward its
inflation goal. The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a
manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal
funds rate is likely to will remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to
prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will
depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.
5. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments
from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency
mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at
auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal
funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee’s holdings of
longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative
financial conditions.

Page 5 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

184 of 192

MARCH 2016 ALTERNATIVE B
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December
January suggests that labor market conditions improved further even as economic
growth slowed late last year economic activity has been expanding at a moderate
pace despite the global economic and financial developments of recent months.
Household spending and business fixed investment have has been increasing at
moderate rates in recent months a solid moderate rate, and the housing sector has
improved further; however, business fixed investment and net exports have been
soft and inventory investment slowed. A range of recent labor market indicators,
including strong job gains, points to some additional decline in underutilization of
labor resources strengthening of the labor market. Inflation has picked up in
recent months; however, it continued to run below the Committee’s 2 percent
longer-run objective, partly reflecting declines in energy prices and in prices of nonenergy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation declined further
remain low; survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little
changed, on balance, in recent months.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum
employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual
adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a
moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen. However,
global economic and financial developments continue to pose risks. Inflation is
expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of the further earlier
declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the
transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor
market strengthens further. The Committee is closely monitoring global economic
and financial developments and is assessing their implications for the labor market
and inflation, and for the balance of risks to the outlook. The Committee continues
to monitor inflation developments closely.
3. Given the economic outlook Against this backdrop, the Committee decided to
maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at ¼ to ½ percent. The stance of
monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in
labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.
4. In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the
federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic
conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation.
This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including
measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation
expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of
the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor
actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that
economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases
in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time,

Page 6 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

185 of 192

below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path
of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by
incoming data.
5. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments
from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency
mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at
auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal
funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee’s holdings of
longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative
financial conditions.

Page 7 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

186 of 192

MARCH 2016 ALTERNATIVE C
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in December
January suggests that labor market conditions improved further even as economic
growth slowed late last year economic activity has been expanding at a moderate
pace despite the global economic and financial developments of recent months.
Household spending and business fixed investment have has been increasing at
moderate rates in recent months a solid moderate rate, and the housing sector has
improved further; however, business fixed investment and net exports have been
soft and inventory investment slowed. A range of recent labor market indicators,
including strong job gains, points to some additional decline in underutilization of
labor resources strengthening of the labor market. Inflation has continued to run
below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting earlier
declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports, but it has risen in
recent months. Market-based measures of inflation compensation declined further;
and survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed,
on balance, in recent months.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum
employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual
adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a
moderate pace and labor market indicators will continue to strengthen. Overall,
taking into account domestic and international developments, the Committee
sees the risks to the outlook for both economic activity and the labor market as
balanced. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of the
further declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the
transitory effects of declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor
market strengthens further. The Committee is closely monitoring global economic
and financial developments and is assessing their implications for the labor market
and inflation, and for the balance of risks to the outlook continues to monitor
inflation developments closely.
3. Given the economic outlook Against this backdrop, the Committee decided to
maintain increase the target range for the federal funds rate at ¼ to ½ to ¾ percent.
The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further
improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.
4. In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the
federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic
conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation.
This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including
measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation
expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of
the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor
actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that
economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases

Page 8 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

187 of 192

in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time,
below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path
of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by
incoming data.
5. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments
from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency
mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at
auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal
funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee’s holdings of
longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative
financial conditions.

Page 9 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

188 of 192

Implementation Note for March 2016 Alternative A and Alternative B
Release Date: January 27 March 16, 2016
Decisions Regarding Monetary Policy Implementation
The Federal Reserve has made the following decisions to implement the monetary policy
stance announced by the Federal Open Market Committee in its statement on January 27
March 16, 2016:


The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System left unchanged the
interest rate paid on required and excess reserve balances at 0.50 percent.



As part of its policy decision, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to
authorize and direct the Open Market Desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, until instructed otherwise, to execute transactions in the System Open
Market Account in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:
“Effective January 28 March 17, 2016, the Federal Open Market Committee
directs the Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain
the federal funds rate in a target range of 1/4 to 1/2 percent, including
overnight reverse repurchase operations (and reverse repurchase operations
with maturities of more than one day when necessary to accommodate
weekend, holiday, or similar trading conventions) at an offering rate of 0.25
percent, in amounts limited only by the value of Treasury securities held
outright in the System Open Market Account that are available for such
operations and by a per-counterparty limit of $30 billion per day.
The Committee directs the Desk to continue rolling over maturing Treasury
securities at auction and to continue reinvesting principal payments on all
agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgagebacked securities. The Committee also directs the Desk to engage in dollar
roll and coupon swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the
Federal Reserve’s agency mortgage-backed securities transactions.”
More information regarding open market operations may be found on the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York’s website.



The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System took no action to change
the discount rate (the primary credit rate), which remains at 1.00 percent.

This information will be updated as appropriate to reflect decisions of the Federal Open
Market Committee or the Board of Governors regarding details of the Federal Reserve’s
operational tools and approach used to implement monetary policy.

Page 10 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

189 of 192

Implementation Note for March 2016 Alternative C
Release Date: January 27 March 16, 2016
Decisions Regarding Monetary Policy Implementation
The Federal Reserve has made the following decisions to implement the monetary policy
stance announced by the Federal Open Market Committee in its statement on January 27
March 16, 2016:


The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System left unchanged the
interest rate paid on required and excess reserve balances at 0.50 percent voted
[ unanimously ] to raise the interest rate paid on required and excess reserve
balances to 0.75 percent, effective March 17, 2016.



As part of its policy decision, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to
authorize and direct the Open Market Desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, until instructed otherwise, to execute transactions in the System Open
Market Account in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:
“Effective January 28 March 17, 2016, the Federal Open Market Committee
directs the Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain
the federal funds rate in a target range of 1/4 to 1/2 to 3/4 percent, including
overnight reverse repurchase operations (and reverse repurchase operations
with maturities of more than one day when necessary to accommodate
weekend, holiday, or similar trading conventions) at an offering rate of 0.25
0.50 percent, in amounts limited only by the value of Treasury securities held
outright in the System Open Market Account that are available for such
operations and by a per-counterparty limit of $30 billion per day.
The Committee directs the Desk to continue rolling over maturing Treasury
securities at auction and to continue reinvesting principal payments on all
agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgagebacked securities. The Committee also directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll
and coupon swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the
Federal Reserve's agency mortgage-backed securities transactions.”
More information regarding open market operations may be found on the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York’s website.



In a related action, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System took
no action to change the discount rate (the primary credit rate), which remains at
1.00 voted [ unanimously ] to approve a 1/4 percentage point increase in the
discount rate (the primary credit rate) to 1.25 percent, effective March 17,
2016. In taking this action, the Board approved requests submitted by the
Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of … .

This information will be updated as appropriate to reflect decisions of the Federal Open
Market Committee or the Board of Governors regarding details of the Federal Reserve’s
operational tools and approach used to implement monetary policy.

Page 11 of 11

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 6: Materials used by Mr. Wilcox

190 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

Material for

Consumer Price Index Update

David W. Wilcox
March 16, 2016

191 of 192

March 15–16, 2016

Authorized for Public Release

192 of 192

Class II FOMC-Restricted (FR)

Recent Changes in Consumer Price Indexes
(Percent changes)

Monthly change
Dec.
Jan.
Feb.

-0.1

0.0

-0.2
-0.2

Food
March TB

-0.2

0.0

0.2
0.1

Energy
March TB

-2.8

-2.8

-6.0
-5.4

Core CPI
March TB

0.2

0.3

0.3
0.2

Total CPI
March TB

Feb./Feb. change
2015
2016

0.0

1.0
0.9

1.7

2.3

Note: February 2016 CPI data released at 8:30 a.m. on March 16, 2016.

Page 1 of 1

2.2