View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

A meeting of the executive committee of the Federal Open Mar
ket Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System in Washington on Wednesday, May 26, 1954,
at
2:30 p.m.
PRESENT:

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Martin, Chairman
Robertson
Szymczak
Williams
C. S. Young, Alternate for Mr. Sproul

Mr. Mills, Member of the Federal Open Market
Committee
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Thurston, Assistant Secretary
Solomon, Assistant General Counsel
Thomas, Economist
R. A. Young, Associate Economist
Rouse, Manager, System Open Market Account
Carpenter, Secretary, Board of Governors
Sherman, Assistant Secretary, Board of
Governors
Mr. Youngdahl, Assistant Director, Division of
Research and Statistics, Board of Governors
Mr. Gaines, Securities Department, Federal Re
serve Bank of New York
Upon motion duly made and seconded, and
by unanimous vote, the minutes of the meeting
of the executive committee of the Federal Open
Market Committee held on May 11, 1954 were
approved.
Before this meeting there had been sent to the members of the
committee a report prepared at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
covering open market operations during the period May 11 through May
21, 1954,

inclusive,

and at this meeting there was distributed a sup

plemental report covering May 24 and 25, 1954 inclusive.

Copies of both

reports have been placed in the files of the Federal Open Market Committee.

-2.
Mr. Rouse stated that, although not a part of the report re
ferred to, the System account purchased $40 million of Treasury bills
this morning in view of the possibility of contraction in reserves
over the coming holiday weekend and that it planned to purchase another
$35 million this afternoon.

He added the comment that, while the need

for these purchases was not clearly established, in view of the market
situation generally and the difficulty of anticipating precisely the
reserve position of banks, it was felt that it was preferable to err
on the side of ease, in accordance with the suggestion at the last
meeting of the executive committee.
Mr. Robertson referred to the purchase on Tuesday, May 18, of
$55 million of Treasury bills for delivery on May 19, and to the state
ment in the written report submitted by Mr. Rouse that such purchases
"were undertaken in view of the temporary firmness in the New York
money Market which, in the absence of System purchases in recent weeks,
might have given rise to speculation that the System's easy money policy
was becoming less active."

He expressed doubt that purchases should be

made for the reason indicated in the latter part of the sentence.
Mr. Rouse agreed, stating that the reason for making the pur
chases was the temporary firmness in the money market.
Mr. Robertson stated that he also had some doubt as to the
advisability of purchasing additional bills today on the basis of the
amount of reserves currently available to banks, and it was understood
that the question of prospective open market operations would be

5/26/54

-3

discussed more fully later during this meeting.
Upon motion duly made and seconded,
and by unanimous vote, transactions in
the System account during the period May
11 to May 25, 1954, inclusive, were ap
proved, ratified, and confirmed.
Mr. R. A,

Young made a statement with respect to recent economic

developments concerning which a staff memorandum had been distributed
under date of May 24, 1954.

Mr. Young said that statistical data now

becoming available as well as impressions gained from comments from
business and financial sources were providing increasing support to the
view that the down turn in activity, which had slackened after the first
of the year, had leveled off.

He cited particularly recent strength of

meat prices as having possible significance in
tone to commodity markets.

Mr.

indicating a firmer under

Young stated that it

appeared that the

Board's industrial production index for May would be little

changed from

the March and April figures of 123 per cent of the 1927-1949 average.
Mr.

C. S.

Young stated that the situation in the Chicago district

compared generally with the comments made on the national situation.
pointed out, however,

that at the Chicago Bank it

building industry would not maintain its
ticularly in

was felt

He

that the

current level of activity, par

the residential field, throughout the remainder of the year.

On the whole, Mr. Young's view was that the current decline in economic
activity had about leveled off and that in some cases business concerns
were stepping up their orders.
Mr. Williams commented upon remarks of speakers at the annual

5/26/54

-4

convention of the Pennsylvania Bankers Association which he attended
earlier this week, citing statements by some to the effect that most of
the decline in business this spring had now passed although it was not
felt that there would be a rapid pickup from current levels,
Chairman Martin then called upon Mr.
market developments,

Thomas who reviewed capital

the Treasury cash position, and the banking and

credit situation.
Mr. Thomas stated that during the first
bank credit increased, in
weeks of last year.

three weeks of May total

contrast to a decline in the corresponding

Although commercial loans declined this year as

last, bank holdings of Government securities increased sharply this year,
whereas last year they had declined.

Private demand deposits declined

$400 million at reporting member banks in the three week period this
year compared with a decline of more than a billion dollars a year ago.
Time deposits and Government deposits showed larger increases than last
year.

Mr. Thomas felt that the bank credit picture indicated that banks

were making use of their funds in one way or another, even though busi
ness and consumer loans were going down.

The reserve situation has been

relatively easy, Mr. Thomas said, but the outlook was for some decline
in

connection with the weekend holiday, and end of month transactions

which might call for some additional funds to be put into the market.
Furthermore, toward the end of next week there would be drains on re
serves,

and free reserves could be expected to decline fairly sharply

in the absence of System open market operations.

5/26/54

-5
Chairman Martin said that, while the picture before the committee

appeared fairly clear, he felt it

would be desirable to have a full dis

cussion of open market operations in terms of the current and prospec
tive economic situation, and he called upon Mr. Mills for an expression
of his views.
Mr. Mills stated that his views seemed to be diametrically op
posed to those expressed by Messrs. Robertson and Rouse in discussing
the report of transactions for the System account earlier in this meet
ing.

The objective of the committee, he said, was that the banking

community would have assurance that there would be adequate reserves
available to meet acceptable credit needs.

Mr. Mills felt

that if

the

System looked only to the needs of the commercial banking system, it
might be overlooking an important area of credit which might be suf
fering at the present time.
of municipal,

toll

He referred specifically to the large issues

road, and corporate securities coming on the market

at this time and compared the present situation with that existing in
the spring of 1953.

He felt that monetary policy had a secondary re

sponsibility to this segment of credit to the extent that it

could give

confidence and assurance to the over-all money market and to the banking
fraternity; this secondary responsibility was to assure that reserves
were not only carried at a minimum point of convenience, but at a point
well above that level.

His concept of desirable free reserves would be

a level around $700 to $800 million which might give confidence to the
investment market that new securities would be conveniently carried in

-6

5/26/54

bank loans until they could be distributed.

Mr.

Mills stated that

while he would have no more liking for a softening in the bill rate than
had been indicated by others, he would have still
softening in

the market for long-term Government and corporate securities.

A steadily falling bill
money, since it

rate was not necessarily a reflection of easy

might equally well be argued that the softening was a

result of restricted supplies of bills.
if

less liking for a

Mr. Mills went on to say that

the committee waited to supply reserves until it

providing them, rather than supplying them in
needs, it

sensed a need for

advance of anticipated

might unwittingly provoke concern as to the System's credit

policy among the investment fraternity by indicating that reserves were
being supplied grudgingly and not with any willingness to meet the de
mand for credit which was evidenced by the volume of long-term securities
backing up in syndicate hands.

It

was his view that the committee

should act forcefully to provide additional reserves in advance of the
demand and in

a way that would produce confidence.

Mr. Mills emphasized

that his thinking was for the short-run period of the next two to three
weeks,

since estimates of reserve needs were subject to change in

even

less than two weeks.
Mr. Rouse interjected two comments on Mr. Mills' statement.
First, open market operations attempt to anticipate the need for funds
and do not wait until the need has actually arisen.

Second, the pro

jections upon which decisions are based are not unreasonably uncertain.
Over the past ten weeks,

the error in the projections has averaged only

5/26/54

-7

$80 million.

Even in the week of May 5, when reserves dropped unex

pectedly on the last day of the week, they at no time fell below
$219 million.
Chairman Martin said that Mr. Mills made a good point in con
nection with projections for any extended period ahead.

It

was per

fectly obvious, he said, that the committee could not be too precise in

preparing such estimates.

However, it was difficult for him to see

what the addition of a few more reserves would do under present con
ditions one way or the other.
Mr. Thomas stated, in response to a request of the Chairman,
that he felt a level of $500 to $600 million of free reserves was too
close to the minimum level to create real ease.

He noted that country

banks generally maintain around $500 to $600 million of excess reserves
and that development of any situation at city banks calling for addi
tional reserves would result in undue money market tightening.

In the

present situation of uncertainty this might be an influence on banks.
Mr. Thomas also noted that with the discount rate and the repurchase rate
as far above the market rate for bills as they now are, changes in the
market result in wide gyrations in rates.

If the System was going to main

tain a situation which resulted in a bill rate below 1 per cent, this
called for a discount rate or a repurchase rate closer to that level or
for a larger amount of free reserves than was currently being maintained
in the market.

Mr. Thomas recognized that it might be difficult actually

to maintain a higher level of free reserves since banks might put such

-8

5/26/54
reserves to use.
the System in

This,

however, would be attaining the objectives of

trying to create an easy money situation.

Chairman Martin inquired of Mr. Rouse whether he knew of any
segment of the community, other than persons who had gotten caught be
cause of their positions in securities, which was seriously worried
about a shift in Federal Reserve policy from ease to tightness.
Mr. Rouse responded that he did not think any segment of the
financial community was actually worried about such a shift,

It

was true

that some of the underwriters were looking for signs of such a shift,
but Mr. Rouse did not feel that there was a real belief that it
place under the present economic situation.

would take

He felt that comments along

this line represented an attempt to promote another "shot in the arm".
Chairman Martin then read a letter from Mr. Sproul, Vice Chair
man, dated May 25, 1954, as follows:
"I am sorry to have to miss the meeting of the Executive
Committee of the Federal Open Market Committee tomorrow. In
thinking over our recent discussions I have jotted down, in
some sort of sequence, various views which I have expressed,
and I am sending them along for what they may be worth
"1.
Trying to maintain such a large volume of excess
reserves and free reserves as would create standing pools of
reserves in every bank or in every community is a self-defeat
ing proposition, given a banking system in which there is a
relatively free flow of funds between banks and between com
possible to force a large volume of excess
It isn't
munities.
reserves on the banks unless they have reached a position at
which they consider their total loans and investments to be
at the maximum consistent with their capital funds and their
management capabilities.
To try to force more reserves on the banking system
"2.
(in the absence of immediate need) would be something like
forcing more credit into a system in which productive forces
You drive up prices but don't
are already fully employed.
increase output - in this case you drive down yields on

5/26/5

-9-

liquidity instruments but don't increase the kind of bank
lending and capital investment which facilitates recovery
Our experience with very large excess reserves and free
reserves during the thirties, when the banking system was
super-saturated with reserves, is suggestive.
It seems to
me that we have created the required ease and the evidence
is to be found in the loan and investment markets, not in
statistics of bank reserves.
"3.
It is not necessary nor desirable to have a large
cushion of reserves to protect us against day-to-day errors

in our projections of reserve needs.

The way to meet such

situations is not to try to lay down a thick cushion of re
serves day in and day out, but to take care of doubtful
cases as they occur by choosing the most appropriate course

of action, which leans toward ease, in a given situation.
"4. Similarly in the case of shifts which may occur
in the distribution of reserves between money market cen
ters and the rest of the country. It is doubtful if a
money market can perform its functions without occasionally
swinging away from the reserve situation in the rest of the
country. To maintain a volume of reserves at all times,
which would prevent periodic tightening as between money
market banks and other banks, would seem to be possible
only if bank reserves were available without limit in New
York and in the rest of the country. This problem of distri
bution of reserves can also be dealt with best as it occurs.
I continue to believe that, for the present, our
"5.
ob is to maintain a climate of credit ease, with assurance
that it will continue so long as the present economic situa
tion persists. This we have done. The range of excess re
serves and free reserves which has existed for some time has
demonstrated, in the loan and investment markets, that it
does not err on the side of 'too little'."
In response to Chairman Martin's request for comments, Mr. C. S.
Young stated that he would go along largely with Mr. Mills' views.

This

was one reason, he said, why the Chicago Bank had been recommending a
reduction in reserve requirements for member banks,

Mr. Young did not

feel that banks would be aggressive in loaning unless they could be
certain that they would have plenty of reserves.

While many people think

-10

5/26/54

the recession has stopped, there was still uncertainty on such mat
ters as Government borrowing and the international situation, and Mr.
Young felt it
serves in

would be necessary that the System supply additional re

order to get loan expansion.

In response to a further ques

tion from Chairman Martin, Mr. Young thought that there was little

or

no belief that the System was changing from a policy of active ease to
one of less ease, and any comments along that line could be disregarded.
The System had let it be known that it would supply the funds for leg
itimate credit needs, he said, and this applied not only to banks but
to issues of securities by municipalities, by toll road authorities,
and by corporations.

If

the System failed to do this it

create the impression that the policy had changed.

would then

Mr. Young added the

comment that a feeling of optimism was very much in the air.
Mr. Szymczak felt

that for the immediate future,

open market

operations should be continued about as they have been recently, with
the System account making a few additional purchases rather than being
on the conservative side.

Mr. Szymczak would concentrate on seeing

that there were plenty of reserves to take care of Treasury needs and
seasonal needs on the basis of the best projections that could be made,
and he would watch carefully for developments in the situation during
the month of June.
Mr. Robertson said that he would agree almost completely with
the views expressed in Mr. Sproul's letter.

He felt there was a tendency

to pay too much attention to keeping the bill rate low (one per cent)

5/26/54

-l

and too little

attention to the availability of credit.

He could find

no unavailability of credit anywhere in the country at this time; as
a result of the policy the System had followed for some months, funds
were available for extending credit.

Mr. Robertson would be inclined

to stop erring on the side of ease in

carrying on open market opera

tions and would hope that the System would maintain about the "right"
degree of ease.

He felt

the economy had been doing very well under the

degree of ease thus far maintained and he would not try to drive interest
rates further down by augmenting the level of reserves through open mar
ket actions.
Mr. Williams noted that Mr. Mills'

comments were directed to the

short-term outlook and that abrupt changes could be very disconcerting.
He felt,

on the basis of the short-term outlook, that the System had

done very well in

carrying out a policy of monetary ease and that it

would not be desirable to ease the situation much more than has already
been done.

Mr. Williams would not, however, wish to project operations

for more than about a two-week period.
Chairman Martin stated that it was necessary to look on both sides
of the present picture.

He thought that there was not a complete under

standing of the impact of reserves on the money market.

Chairman Martin's

philosophy, quite apart from what was happening, was that he would like
to see, normally speaking, interest rates as low as could exist without
introducing inflationary pressures,
formation.

He did not believe,

so long as they added to capital

however, that there would be an addition

-12

5/26/54

to capital formation by forcing interest rates down,
a short period of time.
in

advance of a movement.

certainly not in

He had considerable difficulty about acting
It

was one thing to operate aggressively

as a matter of technique when you had decided that an action should be
taken, but it

was another thing to act in

anticipation.

More and more

investors were saying that there was no point in investing because
current policy was in

the direction of starting inflation all over.

Chairman Martin questioned very much whether in

that atmosphere (and

he recognized that he was making a judgment on the atmosphere) there
would be any addition to capital formation by increasing the impact of
free reserves over what now existed.
Mr.

Solomon inquired whether sufficient allowance was being made

for growth in

the money supply in terms of long-term economic growth,

and Chairman Martin noted that the money supply recently had been higher
than a year ago despite a considerable decline in

business and that,

on a seasonally adjusted basis, at the end of April it
as it
in

ever had been.

was about as high

He also commented that velocity must be considered

judging the adequacy of the money supply.
In response to Chairman Martin's request, Mr. Ralph Young com

mented to the effect that the problem of the money supply and growth
of the economy was linked closely

with the level of business activity

and the rate at which business was generating bankable assets.

In a

recession, there was a slowing down in

the generation of assets of the

quality that banks should hold, and in

some recessions there had been

5/26/54

-13

liquidation that had been a part of the contraction process.

In the

current recession, Mr. Young said, the money supply had not been a
factor contributing to the contraction.

Mr. Young also was inclined

to think that the System had done about as much as it could in meeting
requirements concerned with the money supply.

If there should be an

upturn in business over the remainder of this year, there would be a

substantial expansion in bank loans and investments with an accompanying
rise in the liabilities of banks which would require substantial additions
to reserves.

The System was in a position, Mr. Young said, to supply

the needed reserves without any tightening in the market, at least in
the initial stages.
After further discussion, Chairman Martin stated that it was
clear that open market operations were really a matter of degree,

He

noted that Mr. Mills, with some support, would prefer to have a little
higher volume of free reserves, perhaps $100 or $200 million more than
had existed recently, whereas the majority view seemed to be that free
reserves were at about the right level.

Chairman Martin said that he

could not think that the degree of difference under discussion was
decisive, but he recognized that was a matter of judgment.
circumstances,

Under the

he suggested that it be understood that operations

would be carried on in accordance with the majority views expressed,
and there was agreement with this suggestion.
Mr. Rouse stated that he had no suggestion for change in the
directive to be issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

-14Thereupon, upon motion duly
made and seconded, the executive
committee voted unanimously to
direct the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York until otherwise di
rected by the executive committee:
(1) To make such purchases, sales, or exchanges (in
cluding replacement of maturing securities and allowing ma
turities to run off without replacement) for the System
account in the open market or, in the case of maturing se
curities, by direct exchange with the Treasury, as may be
necessary in the light of current and prospective economic
conditions and the general credit situation of the country,
with a view (a) to relating the supply of funds in the market
to the needs of commerce and business, (b) to promoting
growth and stability in the economy by actively maintaining
a condition of ease in the money market, and (c) to the
practical administration of the account; provided that the
total amount of securities in the System account (including
commitments for the purchase or sale of securities for the
account) at the close of this date shall not be increased
or decreased by more than $500 million;
(2) To purchase direct from the Treasury for the
account of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (with dis
cretion, in cases where it seems desirable, to issue parti
cipations to one or more Federal Reserve Banks) such amounts
of special short-term certificates of indebtedness as may be
necessary from time to time for the temporary accommodation
of the Treasury; provided that the total amount of such
certificates held at any one time by the Federal Reserve
Banks shall not exceed in the aggregate $500 million;
(3) To sell direct to the Treasury from the System
account for gold certificates such amounts of Treasury
securities maturing within one year as may be necessary
from time to time for the accommodation of the Treasury;
provided that the total amount of such securities so sold
shall not exceed in the aggregate $500 million face amount,
and such sales shall be made as nearly as may be practicable
at the prices currently quoted in the open market.
It

was agreed that the next meeting of the committee would be

held on Tuesday, June 8, 1954, at 10:45 a.m.

5/26/54
Thereupon the meeting adjourned.

Assistant Secretary