View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 1/12/2024

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Date:

July 18, 2018

To:

Federal Open Market Committee

From:

Thomas Laubach and David Wilcox

Subject: Monetary Policy Options at the Effective Lower Bound: Assessing the
Current Policy Toolkit
In recent years, central banks have been confronted with the possibility that policy
rates will be constrained by the effective lower bound (ELB) far more frequently than
previously expected, owing to the apparent structural decline in equilibrium real interest
rates. In this environment, a key question is the extent to which the FOMC’s current
monetary policy strategy and toolkit can provide adequate policy accommodation in
future economic downturns. The upcoming FOMC meeting will offer participants an
opportunity to discuss this topic.
As background for that discussion, the attached memo, prepared by Hess Chung,
Taisuke Nakata, Matthias Paustian and Diego Vilán (Division of Research and Statistics),
and Etienne Gagnon, Bernd Schlusche, James Trevino, and Wei Zheng (Division of
Monetary Affairs), assesses the adequacy of the FOMC’s current policy strategy and the
toolkit used during the post-crisis period to address an economic downturn in a low
interest rate environment. The first part of the memo presents different estimates of the
probability of events in which the policy rate is constrained by the (ELB) and of the
associated macroeconomic outcomes, assuming that the federal funds rate is set by a
policy rule and policymakers do not use additional forward guidance or balance sheet
policies to add accommodation. The second part of the memo explores the extent to
which departures from the baseline policy rule in the form of threshold-based forward
guidance for the federal funds rate, in conjunction with balance sheet policies of the type
and scale previously deployed by the Committee, can mitigate the effects of significant
recessionary shocks that leave the federal funds rate constrained by the ELB.

Page 1 of 3

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 1/12/2024

This memo is intended as part of prudent planning: Understanding what the
current toolkit can do when the ELB events occur is necessary background for informed
consideration of whether alternative policy tools and strategies should be developed. A
discussion of alternative policy strategies is tentatively scheduled to occur at an FOMC
meeting early next year.
At the upcoming FOMC meeting, following brief staff presentations and Q&A,
there will be an opportunity for participants to comment on these topics (not a full goround). If you would like to comment, it would be helpful if you could address the
questions on the following page.

Page 2 of 3

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 1/12/2024

Discussion Questions for the July/August FOMC Meeting:
Monetary Policy Options at the Effective Lower Bound:
Assessing the Current Toolkit
1. How concerned are you that the effective lower bound (ELB) could limit
attainment of the Committee’s maximum employment and price stability
objectives in future economic downturns?
2. In your view, how effective would forward guidance – explicit communication
about the future path of the policy rate – and balance sheet policies of the type
previously used by the Committee be in providing additional policy
accommodation at the ELB? Are there other existing policy tools to be
considered as options for dealing with the ELB? Should the Committee
communicate in advance how it would intend to use its policy toolkit when and if
the ELB constrains policy?
3. Should the Committee evaluate alternative monetary policy strategies, i.e.,
strategies that would require changing the Committee’s Statement on Longer-Run
Goals and Monetary Policy Strategy, in order to address the risk that the ELB
may prevent the attainment of its maximum employment and price stability
objectives?

Page 3 of 3