View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Dudley

216 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

217 of 255

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Page 1 of 6

(1) 2007 Fed Fund Futures Curves
Percent

10/25/2006

12/12/2006

Percent

1/26/2007

5.30

5.30

5.20

5.20

5.10

5.10

5.00

5.00

4.90

4.90
Jan-07

Feb-07

Mar-07

Apr-07

May-07

Jun-07

Jul-07

Fed Fund Futures Contracts

Percent

(2) Eurodollar Futures March 2008 - March 2007 Calendar Spread
October 1, 2006 – January 26, 2007

Percent

-0.20

-0.20

-0.30

-0.30

-0.40

-0.40

-0.50

-0.50

-0.60

-0.60
10/25/06:
FOMC

-0.70
10/1

10/15

10/29

12/12/06:
FOMC

11/12

11/26

12/10

-0.70
12/24

1/7

1/21

(3) Treasury Yield Curves
Percent

10/25/2006

12/12/2006

Percent

1/26/2007

5.00

5.00

4.90

4.90

4.80

4.80

4.70

4.70

4.60

4.60

4.50

4.50

4.40

4.40
2-Year

5-Year

Years to Maturity

10-Year

30-Year

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

218 of 255

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Page 2 of 6

(4) U.S. Breakeven Inflation Rates
January 2, 2006 – January 26, 2007

Percent

2.80

Percent
10/25/06:
FOMC

2.70

2.80

12/12/06:
FOMC

2.70

5Y-5Y Forward Breakeven Rate

2.60

2.60

2.50

2.50

2.40

2.40

10Y Breakeven Rate

2.30

2.30

2.20

2.20
5Y Breakeven Rate

2.10
2.00

Source: Barclays

Jan-06

2.00
Apr-06

Jul-06

Oct-06

Jan-07

(5) Corporate Cash Index Spreads, Investment Grade and High Yield
January 3, 2005 – January 26, 2007

Basis Points

500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

Basis Points

500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

Merrill Lynch High Yield

Merrill Lynch Investment Grade

Jan-05

Percent

2.10

May-05

Sep-05

Jan-06

May-06

Sep-06

Jan-07

(6) Implied Volatility on the S&P 100 and Treasury Yield Implied Volatility
January 2, 1995 – January 26, 2007

Basis Points

60

200

50

175
VIX Index (LHS)

40

150

30

125

20

100

10

75
Merrill Lynch Move Index (RHS)

0
1995

50
1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

219 of 255

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Page 3 of 6

(7) Foreign Exchange Implied Volatility
January 2, 1995 – January 26, 2007

Percent

Percent

30

30
One-month option implied volatility USD/Yen

25

25

20

20

15

15

10

10
One-month option implied volatility USD/Euro

5
0

5

Source: Goldman Sachs (1995-1996), Bloomberg (1997-present).*Euro: 1990-1999 = USD/DM, 2000-present = USD/Euro

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

0

2007

(8) Composition of First-Lien Mortgage Originations 2001-2006*
2001 – Q3 2006
Conforming Mortgages*

Jumbo

Subprime

Alt-A

Subprime as % of Total (RHS)

$ Billions

4,000

25%

85

3,500

335

3,000

655

24%

20%
68
231

2,500
60

2,000

200

576

540

190

380
400

15%

625
620

430

10%

515

1,500

570
512

1,000
5%
500

1,433

1,898

2,690

-

1,345

1,180

1,084

0%
2001

2002

Source: Inside Mortgage Finance

2003

2004
2005
2006
*Conforming mortgages include FHA/VA.
Yearly volume for 2006 estimated as of Q3 2006.

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

220 of 255

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Page 4 of 6

(9) Delinquency and Charge-off Rates for Subprime MBS
January 1996 – September 2006

Percent

Percent

14

3.5

12

3.0
60+ Days Delinquencies (LHS)

10

2.5

8

2.0

6

1.5
Charge-off Rate (RHS)

4

1.0

2

0.5

0

0.0

Jan-96
Jan-97
Jan-98
Source: Moody’s

Jan-99

Jan-00

Jan-01

Jan-02

Jan-03

Jan-04

Jan-05

Jan-06

(10) 60+ Days Delinquencies by Vintage (Subprime ARMs)

Percent

Percent

16

16

14
12

14
12

2002
2005

10

10

2003

8
6

8
6

2006
2004

4
2

4
2

0

0
1

3

5

7

9

Source: JPMorgan

11
13
15
Deal Age in Months

17

19

21

(11) Subprime MBS Tranche Spreads, Weekly
January 5, 1998 – January 22, 2007

Basis Points

23

Basis Points

350

350

300

300

BBB

250

250

200

200

150

150

A

100

100

AA

50

50

0
Jan-98

0
Jan-99

Jan-00

Jan-01

Jan-02

Jan-03

Jan-04

Jan-05

Jan-06

Jan-07

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

221 of 255

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Metric Tonne (000s)

250

Page 5 of 6

(12) Copper 3-Month Forward Price and LME Warehouse Stock
June 2004 – January 2007

USD/Metric Tonne

10000

200

8000
3-Month Forward Contract Price (RHS)

150

6000

LME Warehouse Stock (LHS)

100

4000

50

2000

0

Source: London Metal Exchange

Jun-04

Dec-04

0
Jun-05

Dec-05

Jun-06

Dec-06

(13) Annual Global Corn Inventory vs. Weekly Front-Month Futures Price
$U.S. Cents/Bushel
Millions of Tonnes
2000 – 2006
400
400

350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0

Front-Month Corn Futures Price (RHS)

350
300
250
200
150
100

World Stock (LHS)
U.S. Stock (LHS)

50
0

Source: USDA, Bloomberg

2000

2001

Millions of Barrels

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

(14) Crude Oil Inventory vs. Front-Month Futures Price
June 2006 – January 2007

USD/Barrel

400

80
Front-Month WTI Price (RHS)
June 2006 - Jan 2007 U.S. Inventory (LHS)

350

70

5-Year Historical Average U.S. Inventory (LHS)

300

250

60

Source: Department of Energy, Bloomberg

Jun 06

Jul 06

Aug 06

Sep 06

50
Oct 06

Nov 06

Dec 06

Jan 07

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

222 of 255

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Page 6 of 6

(15) WTI Crude Oil Futures Curves
USD/Barrel

6/30/2006

12/12/2006

USD/Barrel

1/26/2007

80

80

75

75

70

70

65

65

60

60

55

55

50

Source: NYMEX, Bloomberg
SPOT

3

50

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

Rolling Contract Month

(16) OPEC Spare Production Capacity
2000 – 2007 (Forecast)

Millions of
Barrels/Day

Millions of
Barrels/Day

7

7

6

Excludes potential
production capacity
increases

5

6
5

4

4

3

3

2

2

1

1

0

Source: International Energy Agency

2000

2001

2002

0
2003

2004

2005

2006

2007 Forecast

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 2: Materials used by Mr. Slifman, Mr. Wascher, and Mr. Gagnon

223 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL (FR) CLASS I-FOMC*

Material for

Staff Presentation on the
Economic Outlook

January 30, 2007

*Downgraded to Class II upon release of the February 2007 Monetary Policy Report.

224 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

225 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

226 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

227 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

228 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

229 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

230 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

231 of 255

Exhibit 7

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

Labor Market and Measures of Slack
Payroll Employment

Unemployment Rate
Thousands

400

400

Percent

7

7

Average monthly change
300

300

200

200

6

6

Trend
100

100

0

5

4

4

0

-100

-100

-200

-200

-300

NAIRU
5

2001

2003

-300

2007

2005

3

Job Openings Rate*

2001

2003

2005

3

2007

Beveridge Curve
Percent

4.0

4.0

Job openings rate

3.5

3.5

2006:Q4
3.5

3.5
3.0

3.0

2.5

2.5

Nov.
3.0

3.0

2.5

2.5

2.0

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2.0

2006

2.0
4.0

3.5

2.0
6.5

6.0

Manufacturing Capacity Utilization
4.0

Percent

85

3.5

Average, 1996:H2

Average
1972 to 2006

80

3.0

5.5

Note: The data cover 2001:Q1 to 2006:Q4. The openings rate
for 2006:Q4 is the average of October and November.

Persons Working Part-Time for Economic
Reasons
4.0

5.0

Unemployment rate

* Number of job openings as a percent of the sum of private
employment and job openings.

Percent of household employment

4.5

Dec.

85

80

3.0

Q4
75
2.5

2.0

75

2.5

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2.0

70

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

70

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

232 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

233 of 255

Exhibit 9

Class II FOMC -- Restricted (FR)

Recent Market Developments
Primary Commodity Prices
Dollars per barrel

Real Trade-Weighted Dollar

Index, January 2005 = 100

Monthly
75

Index, Q1 2005 = 100

160

110

Quarterly
Major currencies

Oil*

150

140

130
Broad dollar
120

60

110

2005

Other important
trading partners

100

IMF nonfuel index

45

100

2006

2007

2008

90

2005

2006

2007

2008

90

*West Texas Intermediate spot price.

Equity Prices: Industrial Countries
Index, March 2000 = 100

Equity Prices: Emerging Markets
Index, March 2000 = 100

120

Daily

340

Daily
Japan
(TOPIX)

United Kingdom
(FTSE 350)

110
290

Mexico
100
Brazil

United States
(Wilshire 5000)

240

90
Thailand
80

190

70
Euro area
(DJ Euro Stoxx)

140
Korea
60

2005

2006

50

2005
Source: MSCI Barra.

2006

90

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

234 of 255

Exhibit 10

Class II FOMC -- Restricted (FR)

Emerging-Market Debt and Capital Flows
Gross External Debt

Yield Spreads over U.S. Treasuries
Percent of GDP

Basis points

55

Yearly

1800

Monthly
1600

50
Latin America

1400

Latin America

45

1200

40

1000

35
800

30

Asia

600

25

400

20
1990

1995

2000

2005

200

Asia

15

1990

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook database.

1995

2000

2005

0

Source: Merrill Lynch.

Official Capital Outflows and Current Account Balances
Billions of dollars

2005

Net official outflows*
Current account

2006e

400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50

Emerging Africa and Eastern
Asia
Middle East Europe

Latin
America

Emerging Africa and Eastern
Asia
Middle East Europe

0

Latin
America

* Changes in foreign exchange reserves, external public debt, and assets of government-run investment funds.
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook database.

Emerging-Market Official Flows and Industrial Country Interest Rates
Percent
Yearly

EM net official flows*
Real interest rate**

6
5
4

GDP growth rate**

3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

-4

* Net official capital flows of emerging markets as share of aggregate industrial-country GDP.
** Real GDP growth rate and 3-month interest rate minus CPI inflation rate for G-10 countries (including U.S.) plus Australia and Spain, weighted by GDP.
Source: IMF World Economic Outlook database and IFS database. 2006 data are estimates.

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

235 of 255

Exhibit 11

Class II FOMC -- Restricted (FR)

Bond Markets, Inflation Compensation, and Monetary Policy
(Monthly data, percent)

Indexed Bond Yields, 10-Year

3
United States

Canada**

3

3

3

2

2

2

1

1

United Kingdom
2

Japan*
France

2003

1

2005

0
2007

1

2003

0
2007

2005

2003

2005

0
2007

*Japan first issued an inflationlinked bond in March 2004.

2003

2005

0
2007

**Bond maturing in 2021.

Inflation Compensation, 10-Year

United States

United Kingdom

Canada**

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

Euro Area
Japan*

2003

2005

0
2007

2003

2005

0
2007

2003

2005

0
2007

*Japan first issued an inflationlinked bond in March 2004.

2003

2005

0
2007

**Bond maturing in 2021.

Policy Interest Rates
6

6

6

6

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

2

2

1

1

Fed funds rate

4

Euro area
refinancing
rate

2005

2007

0
2009

UK bank
rate

2005

2007

0
2009

Japanese
call rate
target

2005

2007

2
1
0
2009

Canadian
overnight
rate target

2005

2007

2
1
0
2009

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

236 of 255

Exhibit 12

Class II FOMC -- Restricted (FR)

Housing Sectors
Real House Prices*
Four-quarter percent change

20

Quarterly

Netherlands

France

15
10
5
0

Japan

Canada
1992

1996

2000

-5
-10

2004

* House price index deflated by CPI. House price index for France begins in 1996. Japan series is semi-annual.

Australia
250

United Kingdom

Index, 1992Q1 = 100

Percent of GDP

10

250

Index, 1992Q1 = 100

Quarterly

10

Quarterly

200
150

Percent of GDP

200

8
Residential investment

8

150
6

100

6

Real house prices*
100

4

4

Real house prices*
2
50

1992

1996

2000

2004

Residential investment

0

50

* House price index deflated by CPI.

1992

1996

2

2000

2004

* House price index deflated by CPI.

Real GDP*

(Percent change, annual rate**)
2006
H1

H2e

2007p

2008p

1.

Total Foreign

4.4

3.4

3.4

3.5

2.

Industrial Countries
of which:
Europe
Japan
Canada

3.0

2.3

2.4

2.5

3.4
1.9
2.9

2.8
2.2
2.0

2.3
1.9
2.6

2.1
1.7
2.9

Emerging Markets
of which:
Emerging Asia
Latin America

6.4

5.0

4.8

4.9

6.7
6.0

6.5
3.7

6.0
3.5

6.2
3.5

United States

4.1

2.3

2.3

2.5

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
memo:

*GDP aggregates weighted by shares of U.S. exports.
**Years are Q4/Q4; half years are Q2/Q4 or Q4/Q2.

0

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

237 of 255

Exhibit 13

Class II FOMC -- Restricted (FR)

U.S. External Sector
Import Prices

U.S. Real Goods Exports*
Percent change, annual rate

(Percent change)

15

Quarterly

2006**

10
5

1.

-5
Goods and Services

-10

2005

2006

2007

2008

10.5

selected contributions:

0
Core Goods

Total

2.

Aircraft

1.1

3.

Machinery

2.3

4.

Semiconductors

1.3

-15
* Census data.
** January-November at annual rate.

Contributions to U.S. GDP Growth
Percentage points, annual rate*
Net exports
Exports
Imports

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

-0.5

-1.0

2005
*Half years are Q2/Q4 or Q4/Q2.

2006

2007

2008

-1.5

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

238 of 255

ECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR 2007

FOMC
Range

Central
Tendency

Staff

-------------Percentage change, Q4 to Q4-----------Nominal GDP

4¾ to 5½

5 to 5½

5.0

July 2006

(4¾ to 6)

(5 to 5½)

(5.0)

2¼ to 3¼

2½ to 3

2.3

(2½ to 3¼)

(3 to 3¼)

(2.7)

2 to 2¼

2 to 2¼

2.2

(2 to 2¼)

(2 to 2¼)

(2.2)

Real GDP
July 2006

Core PCE Prices
July 2006

--------------Average level, Q4, percent--------------Unemployment rate
July 2006

4½ to 4¾

4½ to 4¾

4.8

(4¼ to 5¼)

(4¾ to 5)

(5.2)

Central tendencies calculated by dropping high and low three from ranges.
ECONOMIC PROJECTIONS FOR 2008

FOMC
Range

Central
Tendency

Staff

-------------Percentage change, Q4 to Q4-----------Nominal GDP

4¾ to 5½

4¾ to 5¼

4.8

Real GDP

2½ to 3¼

2¾ to 3

2.5

Core PCE Prices

1½ to 2¼

1¾ to 2

2.0

--------------Average level, Q4, percent--------------Unemployment rate

4½ to 5

4½ to 4¾

4.9

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 3: Materials used by Mr. Reinhart

239 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

240 of 255

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled FR

Material for

FOMC Briefing on Monetary Policy Alternatives

Vincent Reinhart
January 31, 2007

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

241 of 255

Exhibit 1
Estimated Expected Federal Funds Rate

FRBNY Survey of Primary Dealers

Percent
7

Most Recent: January 30, 2007
Last FOMC: December 11, 2006

●

Dealers are unanimous in anticipating
no change in policy rate at this meeting

●

Nearly all dealers anticipate the
funds rate at 5-1/4 percent through
the May meeting

●

Some anticipate a more upbeat assessment
of the economic outlook

●

Nearly unanimous in expecting no
change in the assessment of risks

6

5

4

3
Jan.

May
Sept.
2007

Jan.

May
Sept.
2008

Jan.
2009

Note. Estimates from federal funds and eurodollar futures, with an
allowance for term premia and other adjustments.

Nominal and Inflation-Indexed Yields

Decomposition of Change in Ten-Year Yield

Percent

Basis Points

6

30

Most Recent: January 30, 2007
Last FOMC: December 11, 2006

25
20
15

Nominal Yields

10

5

5
0
News

Statement

Minutes

Speeches

Other

-5
-10

4

Primary Dealer Expectations, 2007

Most Recent: January 30, 2007
Last FOMC: December 11, 2006

Q4/Q4, Percent

3

FOMC Meeting
December

January

GDP Growth

2.5

2.6

Core PCE Inflation

2.3

2.1

Inflation-Indexed Yields

2

1

3

5

7

10

20

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

242 of 255

Exhibit 2
Optimal Policy Under Alternative Inflation Goals
1½ Percent Inflation Goal
Federal funds rate

2 Percent Inflation Goal
Percent
6.5

Percent
6.5

6.0

6.0

5.5

5.5

5.0

5.0

4.5

4.5

Current Bluebook
December Bluebook
October Bluebook

2007

2008

2009

2010

3.5

2011

Civilian unemployment rate

2007

2008

2009

2010

Current Bluebook
December Bluebook
October Bluebook

4.0

2011

2012

3.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

4.0
3.5

2011

2012

3.0

Percent
6.0

Percent
6.0

5.5

5.5

5.0

5.0

4.5

4.5

2012

4.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

4.0

Core PCE inflation
Percent
3.0

Four-quarter average

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Percent
3.0

Four-quarter average

2.5

2.5

2.0

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.0

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

1.0

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

243 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

244 of 255

Table 1: Alternative Language for the January FOMC Announcement
December FOMC
Policy
Decision

Rationale

Assessment of
Risk

Revised: January 29, 2007

Alternative A

Alternative B

Alternative C

1. The Federal Open Market
Committee decided today to keep its
target for the federal funds rate at
5¼ percent.
2. Economic growth has slowed
over the course of the year, partly
reflecting a substantial cooling of the
housing market. Although recent
indicators have been mixed, the
economy seems likely to expand at a
moderate pace on balance over
coming quarters.

The Federal Open Market Committee
decided today to keep its target for the
federal funds rate at 5¼ percent.

The Federal Open Market Committee
decided today to keep its target for
the federal funds rate at 5¼ percent.

The economy seems likely to continue
to expand at a moderate pace on
balance over coming quarters.
However, the substantial cooling of the
housing market remains a drag on
economic growth.

Recent indicators have suggested
somewhat firmer economic growth,
and some tentative signs of
stabilization have appeared in the
housing market. Overall, the
economy seems likely to expand at a
moderate pace over coming quarters.

The Federal Open Market Committee
decided today to raise its target for the
federal funds rate by 25 basis points to
5½ percent.
Economic growth seems to be
rebounding and some tentative signs of
stabilization have appeared in the
housing market. Going forward, the
economy seems likely to expand at a
moderate pace over coming quarters.

3. Readings on core inflation have
been elevated, and the high level of
resource utilization has the potential
to sustain inflation pressures.
However, inflation pressures seem
likely to moderate over time,
reflecting reduced impetus from
energy prices, contained inflation
expectations, and the cumulative
effects of monetary policy actions and
other factors restraining aggregate
demand.

Readings on core inflation have
improved modestly in recent months,
and inflation pressures seem likely to
moderate over time, partly reflecting
the recent decline in energy prices.

Readings on core inflation have
improved modestly in recent months,
and inflation pressures seem likely to
moderate over time. However, the
high level of resource utilization has
the potential to sustain inflation
pressures.

Readings on core inflation have
improved modestly in recent months
but remain elevated. Inflation
pressures seem likely to moderate over
time, but the extent and speed of that
moderation remain uncertain.

4. Nonetheless, the Committee
judges that some inflation risks
remain. The extent and timing of any
additional firming that may be needed
to address these risks will depend on
the evolution of the outlook for both
inflation and economic growth, as
implied by incoming information.

In these circumstances, future policy
adjustments will depend on the
evolution of the outlook for both
inflation and economic growth, as
implied by incoming information.

The Committee judges that some
inflation risks remain. The extent and
timing of any additional firming that
may be needed to address these risks
will depend on the evolution of the
outlook for both inflation and
economic growth, as implied by
incoming information.

The Committee judges that inflation
remains the predominant concern, and
consequently that in the near term
policy firming is more likely than policy
easing. Future policy adjustments will
depend on the evolution of the outlook
for both inflation and economic
growth, as implied by incoming
information

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

245 of 255

Appendix 4: Materials used by Mr. Reifschneider, Mr. Doyle, and Mr. Reinhart

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

CLASS I FOMC—RESTRICTED CONTROLLED (FR)

Material for the
Staff Presentation on Producing and
Publishing Economic Forecasts

January 31, 2007

246 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

Exhibit 1

247 of 255
01-31-07

Should the Committee Change Its Current Practices for the
Production and Publication of Forecast-Related Material?

Key Issue
•

The Federal Reserve regularly provides information on the outlook to the
public.

•

Effort undertaken with an eye towards advancing the goals of economic
performance, public discourse, internal discourse, and efficient operations.

•

But would changing your practices advance these goals further, or achieve a
better trade-off?

Three Questions
1. What production and publication options are open to the Committee?
2. What can we learn from the international experience?
3. What governance issues would alternative approaches raise?

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

248 of 255

Exhibit 2

01-31-07

Production Options and Their Implications

Three Basic Options
•

Independent (each participant responsible for his or her own forecast)

•

Centralized (FOMC or a subcommittee produces a single forecast)

•

Coordinated (each participant produces own forecast but conditions on a
common set of assumptions for factors such as oil prices and fiscal policy)

Implications for Communications and Operational Costs
Independent
Option

Coordinated
Option

Centralized
Option

difficult to
distill message
from multiple
forecasts

might be
simplified a bit

relatively easy

naturally
reveals diversity

obscures some
sources of
diversity

no diversity
without
additional
comments

Forecast production

relatively low
cost

more costly

very costly if
task not
delegated

Forecast publication

may be
burdensome

also may be
burdensome

could be less
costly,
especially under
delegation

Communications
Telling the central story

Conveying diversity

Operational costs

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

Exhibit 3

249 of 255
01-31-07

Publication Options
•

Release more information about individual forecasts?

•

Provide more forecast details?

•

Lengthen the forecast period?

•

Publish information about the outlook more frequently?

•

Publish fan charts and confidence intervals?

Two Options for Setting the Federal Funds Rate
1. Condition the outlook on “appropriate” monetary policy
•

Publishing details about the “appropriate” funds rate path could facilitate
telling a more informative story

•

Forecast might be mistaken as a promise

•

Release might generate public criticism and create political pressures

2. Condition the outlook on a flat funds rate or market expectations
•

Might mitigate some of the problems of the “appropriate” option

•

Would alter nature of the outlook and create communication challenges

•

Would require statement about desirability of the projection

•

Might require providing guidance about a more “appropriate” path

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

250 of 255

Exhibit 4

Class I FOMC -- Restricted Controlled (FR)

01-31-07

The Experience of Foreign Central Banks with Published Forecasts
Publication Choices

Factors
(F)
Head
Resp.

(G)
External
Members

Yes

Yes

0

3

Yes

No

0

Not
Stated

6

Yes

Yes

0

Specified

7

Yes**

No

6

7

Yes**

No

5

Appropriate

6

Yes

No

0

Yes

Specified

9

Yes

No

4

Yes

Specified

9

Yes

No

0

No

Specified

18

No

No

0

Dissent

(C)
Int. Rate
Forecast

1. Reserve Bank
of New Zealand

Centralized

No

Appropriate

1

2. Swiss National Bank

Centralized

No

Specified

3. Bank of Canada

Centralized

No

4. Reserve Bank
of Australia

Centralized

No

5. Norges Bank

Centralized

No* Appropriate

6. Sveriges Riksbank

Centralized

Yes

7. Bank of England

Centralized

8. Bank of Japan

Coordinated

Central Bank

9. European Central Bank

Staff

(B)

(E)
(D)
Size of Same
Comm. Location

(A)
Type of
Forecast

*Dissents at the Norges Bank are not released until 12 years after publication.
**External members at the RBA and the Norges Bank are not full-time employees of the central bank and do not necessarily live in the same city.

Consequences of Publishing a Forecast

Publication is regarded as useful by central banks and obervers:
-- Central banks have increased the amount of detail.
-- Observers agree that forecasts have improved communications and accountability.
We have found very little econometric work on whether publishing forecasts has
improved monetary policy communications or economic outcomes:
-- Publication has nearly always been part of a package.
-- Econometric evidence does not provide a basis for deciding to publish a forecast.

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

251 of 255

01-31-07

Class I FOMC -- Restricted Controlled (FR)
Exhibit 5 (Last page)

The Role of Economic Forecasts in the Policymaking Process
One
or
many?

1

single forecast

individual forecasts

Which
one?

Committee
(1)

Chairman
(2)

Conditioned
on
what?

Staff
(3)

2

Common
assumption

Aggregated
(4)

Disaggregated
(5)

Appropriate
policy

Aggregated
(4)

Disaggregated
(5)

1

Does the Committee want to produce a joint forecast or conduct a survey of individual forecasts?

2

If the forecasts are done individually, should they be based on common assumptions about some key conditioning factors?

3

Should the forecasts be accompanied by a minutes-style narrative description?

4

Should the Committee jointly agree on the minutes-style description or delegate the release of it to the Chairman or the staff?

5

How frequently should forecasts be made?

6

How many years should the forecast cover?

7

How many variables should be forecasted?

8

Should there be some attempt to convey formally the uncertainty surrounding the forecasts?

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

252 of 255

CLASS I FOMC — RESTRICTED CONTROLLED (FR)
Table 1: Details on Publicly Available Central Bank Forecasts
New Zealand

Canada

United Kingdom

Sweden

Australia

Norway

ECB

Switzerland

Japan

Forecast first
published

June 1988

May 1995

February 1993

October 1993

January 1995

December 1994

December 2000

December
1999

October 2000

Whose Forecast?

Governor

Governing Council

Monetary Policy
Committee

Executive
Board

Entire Bank

Executive Board

Staff

Entire Bank

Policy Board

# of members

1

6

9

6

7

7

18

3

9

Monetary Policy
Statement

Monetary Policy
Report and
Monetary Policy
Report Update

Inflation Report

ECB Staff
Macroeconomic
Projections and
Eurosystem Staff
Macroeconomic
Projections

Monetary
Policy Report
(in Quarterly
Bulletin)

Outlook for
Economic Activity
and Prices

Where forecasts are
published

How Dissent of
Forecast is Noted

Inflation Report

Inflation
Report

In Minutes

In Minutes

Statement on
Monetary Policy

Range, central
tendency, and
median of Board
members’
forecasts. In
minutes.

In Proceedings
(only released after
12 years)

Other commentary
at release

Press conference
and presentation
to Bank’s Board

Press conference,
testimony to
Parliament after
Full Report

Press conference,
testimony to
Parliament

Press
conference;
Semi-annual
testimony to
Rikstag

Semi-annual
testimony to
Parliament

Press conference

Press conference

Press
conference
(2/year)

Press conference

Timing of release
relative to policy
meeting

Day of policy
announcement

Within 1 week
after policy
announcement

6 days after policy
announcement

Day of policy
announcement

Monday
following
Tuesday of
policy
announcement

Day of policy
announcement

Day of policy
announcement

Day of policy
announcement

Day of policy
announcement

At policy meeting
(Friday before
announcement)

At policy meeting

About 1 week
before
publication

2 days before
publication

About 5 days prior
to publication

About 2 weeks
before publication

About 2 weeks
prior to policy
meeting

At policy meeting

Council writes
down after
receiving staff
forecast

Iterative process
between staff and
MPC

Staff forecast
presented to
Executive
Board for
approval

Governor
comments on
Staff forecast;
Governor
presents to
Policy Board

Staff presents initial
forecast to
Governor; Revises
after receiving
comments

Staff forecast; 2
members of Gov.
Council have joint
responsibility to
oversee

Staff forecast
with only
limited input
from Board

Board members
write down after
receiving staff
forecast

Quarterly

3 times a year

Quarterly

3 times a year

Quarterly (Both
Semi-annually)

Quarterly

Semi-annual

Quarterly

Annual in
tables, higher
frequency in
charts

No precise
numbers

Annual in tables,
higher frequency in
charts

Annual

Quarterly in
chart, no
precise data for
GDP

Annual
(fiscal years)

When is forecast
finalized

Forecasting process
(for policy makers)

In practice about
2 week prior to
publication
Staff presents
initial forecast to
Governor and
advisers;
Revises after
receiving
comments

Frequency of
forecast

Quarterly

Full report semiannually, updates
in remaining
quarters

Frequency of
variables forecast

Annual in tables,
higher frequency
in charts

Quarterly in nearterm, annual for
later years

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

253 of 255

CLASS I FOMC — RESTRICTED CONTROLLED (FR)
Table 1 (continued): Details on Publicly Available Central Bank Forecasts
New Zealand

Canada

United Kingdom

Sweden

Australia

Norway

ECB

Switzerland

Japan

Variables forecasted in tables or charts
Inflation measures

CPI, underlying
inflation, import
and export
prices, terms of
trade, foreign
inflation

CPI; CPI excl. 8
volatile
components and
indirect taxes; CPI
excl. ind. taxes

CPI (HICP)

CPI; CPI excl.
interest and
indirect taxes,
import and
domestic
prices, foreign

No
(A qualitative
forecast is
provided)

CPI excluding
energy and real
taxes, CPI, import
prices, domestic
prices, foreign CPI

Euro-area CPI
(HICP)

CPI

CPI excluding
fresh food,
Domestic
Corporate Goods
inflation

GDP growth

Yes and its
components

Yes, and its
components

Yes

Yes, and its
components

No

Yes and some
components

Yes, and
components

Yes

Yes

Output gap

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

No

No

Other

Many including:
exchange rate,
productivity,
foreign GDP,
current account
balance, fiscal
balance, labor
market variables.

Foreign GDP, oil
prices conditioned
on futures markets

None

Productivity,
labor market
variables, fiscal
balance,
Foreign GDP,
oil prices,
exchange rate.

None

Exchange rate,
employment
growth,
unemployment rate,
wage growth,
foreign GDP

None

Foreign GDP,
oil prices

None

Conditioning
assumption for
interest rate

Published
forecast

Not specified

Market
expectations and
constant path

Published
forecast
(as of Jan. 17)

Constant path

Published forecast

Market expectations

Constant path

Market
expectations

How forecasts are
presented

Tables; charts
for inflation and
GDP

GDP and inflation
in tables and
charts; rest only
described in text

“Fan” charts, data
provided 2 weeks
after publication

“Fan” charts
for inflation,
tables and
charts

Qualitative
description with
a few numbers
for reference

“Fan” charts for key
variables, table of
means

Range of values in
table

Chart for
inflation;
description of
GDP; rest
tables

Range and median
of individual
members’
forecasts

Forecast horizon

3 years

2 to 3 years

3 years; 2 years
conditioned on
unchanged policy

3 to 4 years

2 years

3 to 4 years

Current year and
next

3 years

Current and next
fiscal year

How risks to forecast are expressed
Distribution
measures

No

No

“Fan” charts, data
provided 2 weeks
after publication

“Fan” chart for
inflation

No

“Fan” charts

Range

No

No

Alternative
scenarios

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Discussion of risks

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 5: Materials used by Ms. Yellen

254 of 255

January 30-31, 2007

Authorized for Public Release

255 of 255
Prototype for FOMe fan charts - 1/29/07

FOMe Economic Projections for 2007 and 2008
Real GOP

4-quarter percent change

~----------------------------------~6

Unemployment rate
Percent
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , 6.0

5
Forecast

5.5
Forecast

4

5.0

3
2

4.5

4.0
2005

2006

2007

Core PCE price index

2008

2005

4-quarter percent change

,..--------------------------------------, 3.5

2006

2007

2008

Percent
7

Federal funds rate
Forecast

Forecast

3.0

6

2.5

5

2.0

4

1.5

2005

2006

2007

2008

3

2
2005

2006

2007

2008

Note: The central tendencies of the FOMe participants' mean forecasts are denoted by the vertical thick intervals. Approximate
70 percent confidence intervals, which are based on historical forecast accuracy, are denoted by the thin intervals.