View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 1: Materials used by Messrs. Fallick and Faberman, and Ms. Şahin

231 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR)

Material for

FOMC Briefing on Structural Unemployment

Bruce Fallick, Jason Faberman, and Aysegul Sahin
January 25, 2011

232 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

233 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

234 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

235 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

236 of 282

Exhibit 4

Theoretical Motivation

The Matching Function
•
•
•
•

Ht = total hires (or matches)
Vt = total vacancies
Ut = total unemployment
µt = “matching efficiency”
parameter

H t = µtVt

1−α

U tα

Matching Efficiency
• Lower efficiency implies fewer hires for a given Ut, Vt
• Decline in efficiency shifts Beveridge curve out
• Efficiency parameter can change because of structural or
cyclical factors (i.e., any changes not captured by Ut or Vt)

Shifts and Movements in the Beveridge Curve
Things that shift the Beveridge curve
• Changes in matching efficiency
• Changes in layoff, separation rates
• “Looping” to new equilibrium
Things that affect measured
matching efficiency
• Mismatch
• Behavior of quitting workers
• Search efforts of workers, firms

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

237 of 282

Exhibit 5

Extended Unemployment Insurance Benefits

Unemployment Duration by Reason for Unemployment
Weeks Unemployed
40

Extended UI Benefits
30

Quits/entrants
(UI ineligible)

20

Job losers
(UI eligible)

10

0
2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

• Job loser’s behavior:
+ 0.8% pts to Ut
• Transitions out of
unemployment:
+ 0.9 to 1.7% pts to Ut
• Preferred estimate
across studies:
about +0.8% pts to Ut

2010

Note: Through October, 2010, three-month moving average. From Daly et al. (2011), using CPS
data. Dashed vertical lines indicate effective dates for extensions of maximum UI duration.

Unemployment Transition Rates by Unemployment Duration
Transitions from Unemployment to
Employment

Note: From Fujita (2010), using CPS data.

Transitions from Unemployment to
Out of the Labor Force

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

238 of 282

Exhibit 6

Employer Recruiting Intensity

Recruiting Intensity per Vacancy over Time
1.3

Index Value

1.2

Recruiting Intensity
1.1

Low recruiting
intensity accounts
for 1.4% of Ut
Rise could be
structural or cyclical

1.0
0.9
0.8

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

0.7

Note: From Davis, Faberman, and Haltiwanger (2010), using JOLTS data. JOLTS data begin in
December 2000. Scaled so that average value is equal to one over the sample period.

Actual vs. Counterfactual Unemployment Rate, Holding Recruiting
Intensity Constant
12.0
11.0

Percent of
Labor Force

10.0

Actual Unemployment Rate

9.0

Rate Predicted from Time-Invariant
Recruiting Intensity

8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

3.0

Note: From Davis, Faberman, and Haltiwanger (2010), using JOLTS and CPS data.

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

239 of 282

Exhibit 7 

General Measures of Mismatch 
Unemployment Outflow Rates by Industry
Rate
0.8

0.7
0.6

Rate
0.8
Construction

0.7

Education and
Health

0.6

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4

0.3
0.2

Financial
Total

0.3

Information

0.2

Durable Goods

0.1

0.1
0

0
2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Note: Elsby, Hobijn, Şahin (2010), CPS. Series 12-Month Moving Average.

Unemployment Rate of Recent College Graduates
Percent
12

Percent
12

10

10
All

8

8

6

6

4

4
<25 College
Graduates

2

2

0
1976

0
1983

1990

Note: Aaronson, Barlevy, Mazumder (2011), CPS.

1997

2004

2011

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

240 of 282

Exhibit 8

Skill Mismatch 

Mismatch Indices by Industry

Actual and Counterfactual Unemployment (Industry)

Index
0.35

Index
0.15

0.12

0.30

Rate
12.0

Rate
3.0

10.0

2.5

8.0
0.09
0.25

2.0

6.0
Mu

(Left Axis)

4.0
0.03

2.0

Mh (Right Axis)

2003

2005

2007

1.5

0.06

0.20

0.15
2001

Unemployment Rate
(Left Axis)

2009

0
2011

Note: Şahin, Song, Topa, Violante (2010), JOLTS, CPS. Series 3-Month Moving Average.

0.0
2001

Counterfactual Unemployment
(Left Axis)

1.0
0.5

Difference
(Right Axis)

2003

2005

2007

2009

0.0
2011

Note: Şahin, Song, Topa, Violante (2010), JOLTS, CPS.

Mismatch Indices by Occupation

Actual and Counterfactual Unemployment (Occupation)

Index
0.40

Index
0.18

5.0

8.0

0.38

Rate
6.0

10.0

Mu (Left Axis)

Rate
12.0

4.0

0.16

0.36

0.14

0.34

6.0

Unemployment Rate
(Left Axis)

3.0

0.12

4.0

0.32
2005

Mh (Right Axis)

2006

2007

2.0

2008

2009

2010

0.10
2011

Note: Şahin, Song, Topa, Violante (2010), The Conference Board Help Wanted OnLine Data
Series, CPS. Series 3-Month Moving Average.

0.0
2005

Difference
(Right Axis)

1.0

Counterfactual Unemployment
(Left Axis)

2006

2007

2008

2009

2.0

2010

0.0
2011

Note: Şahin, Song, Topa, Violante (2010), The Conference Board Help Wanted OnLine Data
Series, CPS.

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

241 of 282

Exhibit 9 

House Lock and Geographic Mismatch 
Rates of Migration between States
Interstate Migration Rate (%)
3.5

Interstate Migration Rate (%)
3.5
Published Data

3.0

3.0

2.5

2.5

2.0

2.0

1.5

1.5

Non-Imputed
Data

1.0

1.0

0.5

0.5

0.0

0.0
1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Note: Kaplan and Schulhofer-Wohl (2010), CPS.

Average Unemployment Duration by 12-Month Change in StateLevel House Price
Average Duration (in weeks)
30

Average Duration (in weeks)
30

25

25

Renter

20

20

15

15

Owner
10

10

5

5

0

0
-40

-32

-24

-16
-8
0
8
16
Percent Change in House Prices

Note: Foote and Ryan (2011), CPS, FHFA.

24

32

40

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

242 of 282

Exhibit 10 

Long‐term Unemployment and Hysteresis 
Unemployment-to-Employment Outflow Rates by Unemployment Duration
Rate

Rate

0.5

0.5

0.4

0.4
<5 Weeks

0.3

0.3
5-14 Weeks

0.2

> 27 Weeks

0.1

0
1977

0.2

15-26 Weeks

0.1

0
1982

1987

1992

1997

2002

2007

Note: CPS. Series 12-Month Moving Average.

Unemployment Inflow and Outflow Rates by OECD Countries
Inflow Rate

4.0%
3.5%
3.0%

United States

United States (2010)

2.5%
2.0%

Australia

Canada
New Zealand
Norway

1.5%

Spain United Kingdom Sweden
Ireland France
Japan
Germany
0.5%
Italy Portugal
1.0%

0.0%
0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%
Outflow Rate

Note: Elsby, Hobijn, Șahin (2009), OECD.

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

243 of 282

Exhibit 11 

Summary 

•

The following factors have had a measurable effect on the unemployment rate 
during 2007‐2010: 
                  Estimated effect on U 
o Extended unemployment insurance benefits:    + 0.4 to 1.7 percentage points  
                       (preferred estimate around    
                        + 0.8 percentage point) 
o Decline in the recruiting intensity of firms:        + 1.4 percentage points 
o Skill mismatch across industries:  
 
     + 0.8 percentage point 
o Skill mismatch across occupations:     
     + 1.4 percentage points  

 
Note: These effects are not additive. 
 
 

•

The following factors have had no measurable effect on the unemployment rate 
during 2007‐2010: 
o House lock  
o Geographic mismatch 

 

•
 

Problems facing the U.S. labor market are unlikely to be as severe as the 
European‐style hysteresis problem of the 1980s. 

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

244 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 2: Materials used by Mr. Sack

245 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Class II FOMC - Restricted FR

Material for

FOMC Presentation:
Financial Market Developments and Desk Operations
Brian Sack
January 25, 2011

246 of 282

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

247 of 282

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Exhibit 1

(1) Treasury Yields

Percent

Percent

Nov.
FOMC

4.0

Dec.
FOMC

(2) Implied Federal Funds Rate Path*

1.00
01/21/11
11/02/10

3.0

0.75

2.0

0.50

0.25

1.0

2-Year

0.0
01/01/10

5-Year

05/01/10

0.00

10-Year
09/01/10

01/01/11

01/24/11

06/24/11

11/24/11

04/24/12

*Based on federal funds and eurodollar futures rates.
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Source: Bloomberg

(3) Cumulative Size of Asset Purchase Program
Percent

Percent

90

November Survey

80

(4) 10-Year Term Premium*
(Kim-Wright Model)

3.0
FOMC

January Survey

70

2.0

60
50
1.0

40
30

0.0

20
10

0

-1.0
300-599

600-899

900-1199 1200-1499

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey

Percent

≥ 1500

($ billions)

(5) Breakeven Inflation Rates

01/03/00

01/03/06

01/03/09

*Based on zero coupon Treasury yield.
Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors

$ Trillions

4.0

01/03/03

(6) Treasury Debt Outstanding

14.6
FOMC

14.4

3.0

14.2
14.0
13.8

2.0

13.6
1.0

13.4

5-Year, 5-Year Forward
0.0
01/04/10

Projected with SFP Rolloff

13.2

5-Year Spot

Projected without SFP Rolloff

Current Debt Limit

13.0
05/04/10

Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors

09/04/10

01/04/11

10/01/10

12/01/10

02/01/11

Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors

04/01/11

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

248 of 282

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Exhibit 2

(7) S&P 500 Index

Indexed to
08/03/09

(8) 5-Month Change in the S&P 500
Percent

50

140

40

FOMC

30

130

20
10

120

0
-10

110

-20
100

-30
-40

90

-50

08/03/09

01/03/10

06/03/10

11/03/10

01/01/95

Source: Bloomberg

01/01/99

01/01/07

01/01/11

Source: Bloomberg

(9) Corporate Bond Spreads

(10) CMBS and ABS Spreads

BPS

950

01/01/03

BPS

390

High Yield (LHS)
Investment Grade (RHS)

850

FOMC

340

BPS

800

Super Senior AAA CMBS
AAA Credit Card ABS

600
FOMC

750

290
400

650

240

550

190

450

140

200

08/03/09

01/03/10

06/03/10

11/03/10

Source: Bank of America

Indexed to
08/03/09

0
08/03/09

01/03/10

06/03/10

11/03/10

Source: JPMorgan Chase

(11) U.S. Trade Weighted Dollar

BPS

(12) 3-Month Funding Spreads to OIS

120

105
FOMC

Euribor Panel (Swapped to Dollars)
Libor Panel

100
FOMC
80

100

60
40

95

20
90
08/03/09

0
01/03/10

06/03/10

Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Bloomberg

11/03/10

08/03/09
Source: Bloomberg

01/03/10

06/03/10

11/03/10

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

249 of 282

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Exhibit 3

(13) Treasury Purchases by Maturity

Percent

(14) Average Bid Size for 10-Year
Treasury Note

$ Millions

120

30
25

FOMC

90

20
60

15
10

30

5

TIPS

17-30

10-17

7-10

5.5-7

4-5.5

2.5-4

1.5-2.5

0

01/01/10

05/01/10

09/01/10

01/01/11

Source: BrokerTec

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(15) Projected SOMA Reinvestments

$ Billions

0

November FOMC

50

$ Trillions

3.5

(16) Projected Size of Federal Reserve
Securities Holdings*

December FOMC
40

January FOMC

Median

3.0

Interquartile Range
2.5

30
2.0
20

1.5

Jun-11

May-11

Apr-11

0.5
Mar-11

0
Feb-11

1.0

Jan-11

10

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(17) Probability of Halting Reinvestments
(Over 2 and 5 Year Horizons)

0.0
2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

*Values of end of year estimates.
Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Federal Reserve Bank of New
York Policy Survey

Percent

Percent

100

100

75

75

50

50

25

25

0

(18) Probability of Asset Sales
(Over 2 and 5 Year Horizons)

0
2 Year 5 Year 2 Year 5 Year 2 Year 5 Year
Treasury
Agency
MBS

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey

2 Year 5 Year 2 Year 5 Year 2 Year 5 Year
Treasury
Agency
MBS
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Policy Survey

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

250 of 282

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR

Exhibit 4

(19) Balance Sheet Path under
Baseline Scenario

$ Billions

Percent

3,000

6.0

2,500

5.0

2,000

4.0

1,500

3.0

1,000

2.0

500

1.0

0

(20) Interest Rate Path under
Baseline Scenario

0.0

2010

2013

2016

2019

Source: Staff memo to FOMC

Q1 2010

Q3 2012

Q1 2015

Q3 2017

Q1 2020

Source: Staff memo to FOMC

(21) Net Portfolio Income under
Baseline Scenario

$ Billions

10-Year Treasury Yield
Federal Funds Rate

120

$ Billions

Funding Cost
Net Coupon Income
Capital G/L*
Total

90

(22) Treasury Remittances under
Baseline Scenario

100

75

60
50
30
25

Net Portfolio Income
Remittances to Treasury under Baseline

0
0

-30
2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

*Represents the average between the FRBNY and the Board.
Source: Staff memo to FOMC

$ Billions

2010

2016

2019

Source: Staff memo to FOMC

(23) Effects of Higher Interest Rates on
Treasury Remittances

100

$ Billions

100
Baseline Scenario
High Rate Scenario

75

2013

75

50

25

0

Baseline Scenario
Faster MBS Sales with Baseline Rates
Faster MBS Sales with High Rates

50

25

(24) Effects of Faster MBS Sales on
Treasury Remittances

0

2010

2013

Source: Staff memo to FOMC

2016

2019

2010

2013

Source: Staff memo to FOMC

2016

2019

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

251 of 282

Appendix 3: Materials used by Messrs. Reifschneider and Kamin, and Ms. Liang

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

CLASS II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

Material for

Staff Presentation on the
Economic Outlook

January 25-26, 2011

252 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

253 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

254 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

255 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

256 of 282

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

257 of 282

Exhibit 5

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

European Developments
Sovereign Bond Spreads*

German Indicators
Basis points
Irish
Package

Greece

1200

62

Diffusion index*
Total
PMI

1000
800

Jan. 5, 2010 = 100

120
115
110

58

IFO
survey

105

600

Ireland
Portugal

Spain

100
400

54

95
DAX equity index

200

90

Italy
0
Jan

Mar

May

Jul
2010

Sep

Nov

Jan

50

85
Jan

* Long-term yield spreads over German bunds.
Source: Bloomberg.

Mar

May

* 50+ = expansion.

Portugal sovereign
Portugal banks
Spain sovereign
Spain banks

Sep

Nov

Jan

Sovereign Debt-to-GDP Ratios*

Gross Sovereign and Bank Financing Needs*
Billions of euros

Jul
2010

Percent

300
250

200

Greece
160

200
150

120

Ireland

100

Portugal

50

Spain

80

0
2010

2011

2012

2013

* Sovereign is sum of projected fiscal deficit and sovereign bond
redemptions. Bank is marketable debt only. Does not include potential
costs of bank bailouts.

Unit Labor Costs

Greece

Ireland
130
Spain Portugal
120
110

Germany
100
90
Source: Haver Analytics.

* Staff estimates.

2014

2016

2018

2020

150
140

2004

2012

Containing Contagion
2001:Q1 = 100

2002

40
2010

2006

2008

2010

Backing Portugal and Spain will require

)¨ §¥¦¦¥¤ ¢¢(' ¡& %  $§ # §# ¦¤¦¥ "
!¦ ¨    ¥   § ©¨ §¥¦¦¥¤ £ ¢¢¡ 

2009

Critical that back-stop capacity be
expanded.
Horizontal review of banks must:
o be more credible than one last summer.
o require more banks to raise capital.
o be able to help recapitalize weak banks.

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

258 of 282

Exhibit 6

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

Foreign Outlook
Real GDP*

Percent change, annual rate

2010

2012p

3.0
3.3

3.4
3.3

3.6
n.a.

2.5
9.6
-1.1
2.8

5.0
9.9
4.9
3.1

5.0
8.6
4.8
4.2

5.1
8.5
5.0
4.2

1.7
1.4
2.9
1.0
4.5

1.3
1.5
-2.0
2.7
-1.6

2.1
1.2
2.0
2.8
1.7

2.4
2.2
2.5
2.7
2.0

Q4e

5.6
4.6

2.1
3.3

8.1
9.7
12.3
5.2
3.6
2.7
2.9
3.9
4.9

1. Total Foreign
2. June Tealbook
3.
4.
5.
6.

2011p

Q3

H1

Emerging Market Economies
China
Emerging Asia ex. China
Latin America

7. Advanced Foreign Economies
8.
Euro Area
9.
United Kingdom
10.
Canada
11.
Japan

* GDP aggregates weighted by shares of U.S. merchandise exports. Table reflects January Tealbook updated for data.

Industrial Production*

Jan. 2006 = 100
Oct.

Nominal Exports of Goods*
Jan. 2006 = 100

125

Oct.

120

AFE

Oct.

140
130

0

120

-2

100
95
AFE

100

85
80

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

90

2

Advanced foreign
economies

110

U.S.

90

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

4
Emerging market
economies

Nov.

105
Dec.

6

Nov.

110
U.S.

Percent*

160
150

EME

115

EME

Output Gaps

-4
-6

United States

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

* Weighted by share of U.S. merchandise
exports.

* Dollar value; weighted by share of
U.S. merchandise exports.

* Deviation from potential GDP.

Policy Rates

CPI Ex. Food and Energy*

-8

BBB Corporate Spreads

Percent

United Kingdom

6

Four-quarter percent change

5
4

Euro
area

4

Basis points

Weekly

3

United
Kingdom

600
500

2

Euro area

400

3
1

Canada

300

2
Euro area
Japan

1
Japan

-1

0
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

-1

United
Kingdom

0

2006

2008

* Staff estimates.

2010

2012

-2

200
100

Japan

2007

2008

2009

2010

0

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

259 of 282

Exhibit 7

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

Asset Bubbles and Commodity Prices
Flows to EME Dedicated Funds*

Real Exchange Rates Against the Dollar (USD/FC)

Billions of U.S. dollars

Jan. 2007 = 100

18

Monthly

Monthly

150
140

12
130
China

6

120

Brazil
Emerging Markets

0

110
100

Mexico

-6

90
80

-12

Bond funds
Equity funds

Foreign
Appreciation

70

Korea

-18
2007

2008

2009

60

2010

2007

* January 2011 flows are based on data through January 19th.

Property Prices

2008

Percent

180

160
Hong
Kong

Emerging Asia

2010

Policy Rates

Corporate Debt Spreads*

Jan. 2007 = 100

2009

Percent

30
25

15

Brazil

10

20
140

Mexico

15
120

China*

Latin
America

5

10

China

Korea

100

5

Singapore*

80
2007

2008

2009

* Data are quarterly.

2010

0
* Source: Merrill Lynch. U.S. dollar-denominated
debt over five-year Treasury rate, composite BBrating for Asia, B for Latin America.

Emerging Market CPI

0
2007

2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

2009

2011

* Rate for China is the one-year lending rate.

Commodity Prices
12-month percent change

9

120

Jan. 2008 = 100

Dollars per barrel

150

Headline CPI
110
6

120

Nonfuel
index

100
90

90

Ex. food
3

80
60
Oil import
price

70
0
2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

60

30
2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

260 of 282

Exhibit 8

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

U.S. Trade Outlook
Real Exports and Imports

Contribution of Net Exports to Real GDP Growth
Percent change, a.r.

Percentage points, a.r.

40

Q4

30
20

4
3

H1

2

Real exports
10

1

0

0
H2

Real imports

-10

Q1

-1
Q3

-20

-2

-30

-3
Q2

-40
2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2009

Imports and Industrial Production*

-4

2010

2011

2012

Real Core Exports and Imports*

Change in import penetration (percentage points)**

Billions of chained (2005) dollars, a.r.

2.5
2.0

1600

Actual/forecast
Model solution
1400

1.5
1.0

Imports
1200

0.5
0.0

1000

Exports
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Industrial production (percent change, a.r.)**

30

-0.5
35
800
2008

* 21 disaggregated manufacturing sectors.
** From 2009:Q2 to 2010:Q3.

2009

2010

2011

2012

* Core exports exclude computers, semiconductors, and services.
Core imports also exclude petroleum and natural gas.

Current Account Balance

Broad Real Dollar
2008:Q1 = 100

Percent of GDP

135

-2

130
-3

125
120

-4

115
110

-5

105
100

-6

95
90
2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

-7
2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

261 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

262 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

263 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

264 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 4: Materials used by Ms. Zickler

265 of 282

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

Material for Briefing on

FOMC Participants’ Economic Projections

Joyce Zickler
January 25, 2011

Page 1 of 4

266 of 282

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release
Class I FOMC - Restricted Controlled (FR)

267 of 282

Exhibit 1. Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections, 2011–13 and over the longer run
Percent

Change in real GDP

5

Central tendency of projections
Range of projections
Tealbook forecast

4
3
2
1
+
0
_
1

Actual

2

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Longer
run
Percent

Unemployment rate

10
9
8
7
6
5

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Longer
run
Percent

PCE inflation
3

2

1

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Longer
run
Percent

Core PCE inflation
3

2

1

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Page 2 of 4

2011

2012

2013

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release
Class I FOMC - Restricted Controlled (FR)

268 of 282

Exhibit 2. Economic projections for 2011-2013 and over the longer run (percent)
Change in real GDP
2011
2012
Central Tendency
November projections
Range
November projections
Memo: Tealbook
November Tealbook

November projections
Range
November projections
Memo: Tealbook
November Tealbook

3.5 to 4.4
3.6 to 4.5

3.7 to 4.6
3.5 to 4.6

2.5 to 2.8
2.5 to 2.8

3.2 to 4.2
2.5 to 4.0

3.4 to 4.5
2.6 to 4.7

3.0 to 5.0
3.0 to 5.0

2.4 to 3.0
2.4 to 3.0

3.8

4.4

4.6

3.0

3.6

4.7

4.7

2.8

2013

Longer run

November projections
Range
November projections
Memo: Tealbook
November Tealbook

7.6 to 8.1
7.7 to 8.2

6.8 to 7.2
6.9 to 7.4

5.0 to 6.0
5.0 to 6.0

8.4 to 9.0
8.2 to 9.3

7.2 to 8.4
7.0 to 8.7

6.0 to 7.9
5.9 to 7.9

5.0 to 6.2
5.0 to 6.3

8.9

7.8

7.0

5.2

9.0

7.9

7.1

5.2

2013

Longer run

November projections
Range
November projections
Memo: Tealbook
November Tealbook

PCE inflation
2012

1.3 to 1.7
1.1 to 1.7

1.0 to 1.9
1.1 to 1.8

1.2 to 2.0
1.2 to 2.0

1.6 to 2.0
1.6 to 2.0

1.0 to 2.0
0.9 to 2.2

0.7 to 2.2
0.6 to 2.2

0.6 to 2.0
0.4 to 2.0

1.5 to 2.0
1.5 to 2.0

1.3

1.0

1.2

2.0

1.1

1.1

1.2

2.0

2011
Central Tendency

Unemployment rate
2012

8.8 to 9.0
8.9 to 9.1

2011
Central Tendency

Longer run

3.4 to 3.9
3.0 to 3.6

2011
Central Tendency

2013

Core PCE inflation
2012

2013

1.0 to 1.3
0.9 to 1.6

1.0 to 1.5
1.0 to 1.6

1.2 to 2.0
1.1 to 2.0

0.7 to 1.8
0.7 to 2.0

0.6 to 2.0
0.6 to 2.0

0.6 to 2.0
0.5 to 2.0

1.0

1.0

1.2

1.0

1.0

1.2

NOTE: The changes in real GDP and inflation are measured Q4/Q4

Page 3 of 4

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release
Class I FOMC - Restricted Controlled (FR)

269 of 282

Exhibit 3. Risks and uncertainty in economic projections
Number of participants

Number of participants

Risks to GDP growth

Uncertainty about GDP growth
January projections
November projections

January projections
November projections

18

18

16

14

12

10

10

8

8

6

6

4

4

2

Similar

14

12

Lower

16

2

Downside

Higher

Balanced

Number of participants

Upside
Number of participants

Uncertainty about PCE inflation

Risks to PCE inflation
18

16

14

12

12

10

10

8

8

6

6

4

4

2

Similar

16

14

Lower

18

2

Higher

Downside

Page 4 of 4

Balanced

Upside

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 5: Materials used by Mr. Stockton

270 of 282

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

271 of 282

The Market for New Single-Family Homes
2010
2010
Sales1
Total
Previous
Percent Change

Q2

321

335

-14.4

By region
Northeast
Midwest
South
West
Inventories
New homes for sale2
Months’ supply3

2010

Q3

Q4

Oct.

31
44
173
73

Dec.

1.7

280
275
-11.7

280
290
.0

17.5

31
42
159
59

23
34
165
74

30
40
161
49

20
31
165
64

19
32
168
110

211
7.9

202
8.5

190
8.0

200
8.6

195
8.4

190
6.9

271.6
.3

264.2
-1.9

253.8
-7.6

n.a.
n.a.

253.4
-5.2

278.6
3.4

293.7
4.3

.3

-20.9

-14.9

n.a.

-5.8

9.9

5.4

-.4

-1.1

-.1

-1.2

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

-.4

Constant-quality price index6
Year-to-year percent change5
One-period percent change
(annual rate for quarters)

33
47
180
76

190
8.0

Prices
Mean (thousands of dollars)4
Year-to-year percent change5
One-period percent change
(annual rate for quarters,
monthly rate for months)

296

-6.9

291
288
-13.1

Nov.

329

-9.7

.7

3.8

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

1. Thousands of units, s.a.a.r., except where noted. Percent change is from previous comparable period, not at an annual rate.
2. Thousands of units, seasonally adjusted, end of period stock.
3. At current sales rate; expressed as the ratio of s.a. inventories to s.a. sales. Quarterly and annual values are averages of
monthly values.
4. Quarterly and annual values of mean prices are equal to a weighted average of monthly data; the weights are based on the
response rate to the survey in each month. Seasonally adjusted by FRB staff.
5. Year-to-year percent changes are from the year-earlier comparable period.
6. Based on characteristics of new homes sold in 2005. Seasonally adjusted by FRB staff.
s.a.a.r. Seasonally adjusted annual rate. s.a. Seasonally adjusted. n.a. Not available.
Source: Census Bureau.

Inventories of New Homes
and Months’ Supply
1.6

Millions of units

New Home Sales

1.6

Number of months
Thousands of units
13
650
Inventories of new homes (left scale)
12
600
Months’ supply (right scale)
11
550
10
500
9
450
8

1.4

1.4

1.2

1.2

1.0

1.0

.8

.8

400

7

.6

.6

350

6

.4

.4

5

300
.2

.2

.0

.0

1998

2000

2002

2004

Source: Census Bureau.

2006

2008

2010

4
250

Dec.

200
150

3
Dec.

2

1
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Note: Months’ supply is calculated using the 3-month moving
average of sales.
Source: Census Bureau.

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

Appendix 6: Materials used by Mr. English

272 of 282

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

273 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)

Material for

FOMC Briefing on Monetary Policy Alternatives

Bill English
January 26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

274 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

DECEMBER FOMC STATEMENT
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November confirms
that the economic recovery is continuing, though at a rate that has been insufficient to bring
down unemployment. Household spending is increasing at a moderate pace, but remains
constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight
credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising, though less rapidly than
earlier in the year, while investment in nonresidential structures continues to be weak.
Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. The housing sector continues to be depressed.
Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable, but measures of underlying
inflation have continued to trend downward.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment
and price stability. Currently, the unemployment rate is elevated, and measures of
underlying inflation are somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be
consistent, over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Although the Committee anticipates a
gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, progress
toward its objectives has been disappointingly slow.
3. To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time,
is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to continue expanding
its holdings of securities as announced in November. The Committee will maintain its
existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings. In addition,
the Committee intends to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end
of the second quarter of 2011, a pace of about $75 billion per month. The Committee will
regularly review the pace of its securities purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase
program in light of incoming information and will adjust the program as needed to best foster
maximum employment and price stability.
4. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and
continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization,
subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally
low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period.
5. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments
and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help
ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate.
 

 

Page 1 of 9
 

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

275 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

JANUARY FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE A
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November
December confirms that the economic recovery is continuing, though at a rate that has been
insufficient to bring down unemployment about a significant improvement in labor
market conditions. Household spending is increasing at a moderate pace, but remains
constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight
credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising, though less rapidly than
earlier in the year in recent quarters, while investment in nonresidential structures continues
to be weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. The housing sector continues to
be depressed. Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable, but measures of
underlying inflation have continued to been trending downward.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment
and price stability. Currently, the unemployment rate is elevated, and measures of
underlying inflation are somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be
consistent, over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Although the Committee anticipates a
gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, progress
toward its objectives has been remains disappointingly slow and there are still significant
downside risks to the economic outlook.
3. To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time,
is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to continue expanding
its holdings of securities. as announced in November. Moreover, in light of incoming
information, the Committee now intends to increase its holdings of securities by a total
of $800 billion—$200 billion more than announced in November—by purchasing
longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of about $75 billion per month through the
third quarter of 2011. In addition, the Committee will maintain its existing policy of
reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings. In addition, the Committee
intends to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of the second
quarter of 2011, a pace of about $75 billion per month. The Committee will regularly review
the pace of its securities purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase program in light
of incoming information and will adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum
employment and price stability.
4. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and
continues to currently anticipates that economic conditions, including low rates of resource
utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant
exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period at least through
mid-2012.
5. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments
and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help
ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate.
 

 

Page 2 of 9
 

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

276 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

JANUARY FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE B
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November
December confirms that the economic recovery is continuing, though at a rate that has been
insufficient to bring down unemployment about a significant improvement in labor
market conditions. Growth in household spending is increasing at a moderate pace picked
up late last year, but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth,
lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software is
rising, though less rapidly than earlier in the year, while investment in nonresidential
structures continues to be is still weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. The
housing sector continues to be depressed. Although commodity prices have risen, longerterm inflation expectations have remained stable, but and measures of underlying inflation
have been trending downward.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment
and price stability. Currently, the unemployment rate is elevated, and measures of
underlying inflation are somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be
consistent, over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Although the Committee anticipates a
gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in the context of price stability, progress
toward its objectives has been disappointingly slow.
3. To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time,
is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to continue expanding
its holdings of securities as announced in November. In particular, the Committee will is
maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings.
In addition, the Committee and intends to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury
securities by the end of the second quarter of 2011, a pace of about $75 billion per month [,
which, given the quantity of purchases thus far, implies a pace of about $80 billion per
month]. [The Committee will regularly review the pace of its securities purchases and the
overall size of the asset-purchase program in light of incoming information and will adjust
the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability. | The
Committee will continued its practice of regularly reviewing the pace of its securities
purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase program in light of incoming
information, and will it remains prepared to adjust the program as needed to best foster
maximum employment and price stability.]
4. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and
continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization,
subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally
low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period.
5. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments
and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help
ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate.

Page 3 of 9
 

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

277 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

JANUARY FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE C
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November
December confirms that the economic recovery is continuing, though at a rate that has been
insufficient to bring down unemployment about a significant improvement in labor
market conditions. Growth in household spending is increasing at a moderate pace has
picked up but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower
housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising,
though less rapidly than earlier in the year, while investment in nonresidential structures
continues to be weak. and business investment is rising. However, employers remain
reluctant to add to payrolls and the housing sector continues to be depressed. Although
commodity prices have risen, longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable, but
and measures of underlying inflation have been trending downward.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment
and price stability. Currently, the unemployment rate is elevated, and measures of underlying
inflation are somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be consistent,
over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Although the Committee anticipates a gradual
return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, Progress toward
the Committee’s objectives has been disappointingly slow, but there are some indications
that the economic recovery is strengthening.
3. To promote a stronger pace of economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time,
is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee decided today to continue expanding
its holdings of securities. as announced in November. However, in light of incoming
information, the Committee now intends to increase its holdings of securities by a total
of $400 billion—$200 billion less than announced in November—by purchasing longerterm Treasury securities at a pace of about $40 billion per month through the second
quarter of 2011. The Committee will maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal
payments from its securities holdings. In addition, the Committee intends to purchase $600
billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of the second quarter of 2011, a pace of
about $75 billion per month. The Committee will regularly review the pace of its securities
purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase program in light of incoming information
and will adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price
stability.
4. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and
continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization,
subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally
low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period.
5. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments
and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help
ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels [of 2 percent or a bit less, which the Committee
judges to be] consistent with its mandate.

Page 4 of 9
 

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

278 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

JANUARY FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE D
1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in November
December confirms that the economic recovery is continuing. though at a rate that has been
insufficient to bring down unemployment. Growth in household spending is increasing at a
moderate pace has picked up but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest
income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and
software is rising, though less rapidly than earlier in the year, while investment in
nonresidential structures continues to be weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to
payrolls. The housing sector continues to be depressed. and business investment is rising.
Measures of underlying inflation have trended lower in recent quarters and longer-term
inflation expectations have remained stable, but measures of underlying inflation have
continued to trend downward. commodity prices have risen noticeably.
2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment
and price stability. Currently, the unemployment rate is elevated, and measures of
underlying inflation are somewhat low, relative to levels that the Committee judges to be
consistent, over the longer run, with its dual mandate. Although the Committee anticipates a
gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, progress
toward its objectives has been disappointingly slow.
2. To promote a stronger pace of support the economic recovery and to help ensure that
inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate, the Committee will maintain
the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and anticipates that
economic conditions are likely to warrant low levels for the federal funds rate for some
time. However, the Committee judges that a further expansion of its securities holdings
is not necessary to support a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a
context of price stability. Accordingly, the Committee decided today to continue
expanding discontinue the asset purchase program it its holdings of securities as
announced in November. For the time being, the Committee will maintain its existing
policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings. In addition, the
Committee intends to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities by the end of
the second quarter of 2011, a pace of about $75 billion per month. The Committee will
regularly review the pace of its securities purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase
program in light of incoming information and will adjust the program as needed to best foster
maximum employment and price stability.
3. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and
continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization,
subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally
low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period.
3. The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments
and will employ its policy tools as necessary to support the economic recovery and to help
ensure that inflation, over time, is at levels consistent with its mandate promote maximum
employment and price stability.
Page 5 of 9
 

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

279 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

January 2011 FOMC Directive — Alternative A
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will
foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run
objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds
trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute purchases of
longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities
held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 $2.8 trillion by the end of June
September 2011. The Committee also directs the Desk to reinvest principal payments from
agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities. The
System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of
ongoing developments regarding the System’s balance sheet that could affect the attainment over
time of the Committee’s objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
 

 

Page 6 of 9
 

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

280 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

January 2011 FOMC Directive — Alternative B
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will
foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run
objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds
trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute purchases of
longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities
held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 trillion by the end of June 2011.
The Committee also directs the Desk to reinvest principal payments from agency debt and
agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities. The System Open Market
Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments
regarding the System’s balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the
Committee’s objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
 

 

Page 7 of 9
 

Authorized for Public Release

January 25–26, 2011

281 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

January 2011 FOMC Directive — Alternative C
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will
foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run
objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds
trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute purchases of
longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase the total face value of domestic securities
held in the System Open Market Account to approximately $2.6 $2.4 trillion by the end of June
2011. The Committee also directs the Desk to reinvest principal payments from agency debt and
agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities. The System Open Market
Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments
regarding the System’s balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the
Committee’s objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
 
 
 

 

Page 8 of 9
 

January 25–26, 2011

Authorized for Public Release

282 of 282

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR)
 

January 2011 FOMC Directive — Alternative D
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will
foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run
objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds
trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to execute purchases of
longer-term Treasury securities in order to increase maintain the total face value of domestic
securities held in the System Open Market Account to at approximately $2.6 $2.2 trillion by the
end of June 2011. The Committee also directs the Desk to by reinvesting principal payments
from agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in longer-term Treasury securities.
The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed
of ongoing developments regarding the System’s balance sheet that could affect the attainment
over time of the Committee’s objectives of maximum employment and price stability.
 

 

Page 9 of 9