View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020
NOV 29 1963

CONFIDENTIAL--(F.R.)

To

Federal Open Market Committee
and Presidents of the
Federal Reserve Banks

From

Robert W. Stone and
John R. Farrell

November 27, 1963

Subject:

Procedures with respect
to allocations of the
System Open Market Account

The present procedures for reallocating the System Open Market Account
contain three principal elements:
1.

The Account is reallocated each statement date in order
to bring the reserve ratios of the respective Reserve
Banks into approximate equality and thus to minimize
the possibility that any Bank will incur a deficiency
on a statement date.

2.

If, despite such reallocation, a Bank shows a deficiency
on a statement date, a special "as of" adjustment to
eliminate the deficiency is undertaken the following
morning, before the books for the statement date have
been closed. (There has been one such occasion since
the present procedures were adopted last September.)

3.

A special adjustment is made in the Account on any day
other than a statement date if a Reserve Bank feels
that it may incur a reserve deficiency on such other day.

The combination of (1) and (2) above has prevented any Reserve Bank from
showing a deficiency on a statement date but, as indicated later, even statement
date deficiencies may be difficult to avoid in the future.
The third principal element outlined above, however, does not insure
avoidance of a deficiency by some Bank or Banks on other than a statement date
(an "intra-weekly" deficiency).

The reason for this is that special adjustments

undertaken on any day other than a statement date are based on the reserve ratios
of the preceding day.

For example, a Bank may find on a given day that it is

experiencing so heavy an outflow of funds that it feels its reserve ratio for
that day may move below 25 per cent.

On the basis of that feeling, which may or

may not turn out to have been correct, the Bank concerned would ordinarily call
the Manager and arrange for a special adjustment in which a part of its security

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020
2
holdings would be reallocated to the Bank or Banks which, on the basis of the
reserve position of the respective Banks on the preceding business day, seem to
be in the best position to

"take" additional securities.

The difficulty here,

however, is that the Bank whose reserve position was being reduced because it was
relatively most favorable yesterday might itself be experiencing a substantial
outflow of funds today.

It is thus entirely possible that, in undertaking a

special adjustment designed to prevent a deficiency in one Bank, we could put
another Bank in the position of incurring a deficiency.

Moreover, the procedure

gives no protection in those cases where a reserve outflow exceeds expectations
on a given day, so that a Bank might go below 25 per cent with or without having
asked for a special adjustment.
over the next few weeks.

This general problem may well become more acute

Not only will the reserve ratio for the Banks as a

group decline as the seasonal peak in note and deposit liabilities approaches,
but the size of inter-district money flows, and thus the size of daily swings
in individual Bank ratios, will very likely increase.
The essential point of the above discussion was indicated at the outset:
one or more Reserve Banks may incur intra-weekly deficiencies over the next few
weeks under present procedures.

It seems to us that the System, in considering

this problem, has before it three principal alternatives:
(a)

Leave the present procedures unchanged. This would
involve attempting to avoid an intra-weekly deficiency,
but "taking it" if one should nevertheless occur.

(b)

Employ, on days other than statement dates, the "as of"
adjustment procedures now employed for statement dates.
This would be administratively feasible, although
difficulties would be encountered (even on statement

dates) if several Banks should be deficient at once,
and particularly if a deficient Bank also found itself
with most or all of its participation in the System
Open Market Account pledged against its note issue;
indeed, in the latter case it might be impossible to
avoid a deficiency.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 3/17/2020
3
(c)

Choose to let intra-weekly deficiencies occur without
attempting remedial adjustments.

If the System should adopt alternative (b) above, the present statement
of procedures

(attached) could be made to conform with such a decision by

eliminating paragraph (3) of the procedures; by making certain changes in language
in the first and last lines of paragraph (2); and by making a minor change in
paragraph (4).

If the System should choose to let intra-weekly deficiencies occur

without attempting remedial adjustments, the present statement of procedures could
be made to conform to such a decision by striking paragraph (3) of the procedures
and by making a minor change in paragraph (4).

Attachment.