View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE press release

February 8, 1991

For Use at 4:30 p.m.

The Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Open Market
Committee today released the attached record of policy actions
taken by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting on
December 18, 1990.
The record for each meeting of the Committee is made
available a few days after the next regularly scheduled meeting
and subsequently is published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin
and the Board's Annual Report.

The summary description of

economic and financial conditions contained in each record is
based solely on the information that was available to the
Committee at the time of the meeting.

Attachment

RECORD OF POLICY ACTIONS OF THE
FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE
Meeting Held on December 18, 1990
1. Domestic policy directive
The information reviewed at this meeting suggested that
economic activity had fallen appreciably in recent months.

A depressed

level of consumer confidence and a decline in real disposable income had
contributed to sluggish consumer spending.

In response to apparent

weakness in final demands, businesses had reduced production and
employment; these cutbacks were most evident in the motor vehicle and
construction sectors, but a broad range of other industries had been
affected to some degree.

Consumer inflation had moderated recently,

largely as a result of some softening in oil prices.

Despite the

substantial increases in living costs this year, wage gains appeared to
have slowed somewhat in recent months.
After a progressive weakening during the first three quarters
of the year, total nonfarm payroll employment fell sharply further in
October and November.

Job losses were widespread across industries in

November but were especially pronounced in manufacturing and
construction.

In the service-producing sector, which had generated most

of the employment gains earlier in the year, the health industry was one
of the few to post significant increases in jobs.

The civilian

unemployment rate rose to 5.9 percent in November.
Industrial output declined markedly for a second straight month
in November.

Production cutbacks were broadly distributed across

industries but were especially pronounced in motor vehicles and parts,
non-auto consumer goods, and construction supplies.

Reflecting the

sizable decline in manufacturing production, the rate of capacity
utilization in manufacturing dropped further below the mid-year high.
In October and November, retail sales in real terms were below
the downward revised September level.

Real disposable incomes had been

reduced by a decrease in total hours worked and by the effects of higher
energy prices, and major surveys of consumer attitudes in November
indicated that consumer confidence remained at depressed levels.

In

October, total private housing starts declined substantially further;
almost all of the drop reflected additional weakness in starts of
multifamily units.

Sales of both new and existing houses fell in

September and October.
Shipments of nondefense capital goods edged lower in October
after changing little, on balance, in previous months.

A sizable drop

in shipments of aircraft and parts more than offset further increases in
the office and computing equipment category.

New orders for nondefense

capital goods pointed to a considerable softening in business equipment
spending in coming months.

Nonresidential construction activity fell

for a third straight month, and permits and contracts for new
construction remained in a downtrend.

Manufacturing inventories posted

a small increase in October, and the ratio of stocks to sales continued
to edge down.

At the retail level, non-auto inventories rose moderately

after two months of little change; the inventory-to-sales ratio remained
within the range that had prevailed for an extended period.
Reflecting a sharper rise in the value of imports than in that
of exports, the nominal U.S. merchandise trade deficit widened in
October from its average rate in the third quarter.

After moderating

somewhat in September, non-oil imports surged in October; the value of
oil imports also rose as a sharp increase in prices offset a small
decline in volume.

Nonagricultural exports registered a sizable

increase that more than offset a further drop in exports of agricultural
products.

Economic growth in the major foreign industrial countries was

mixed in the third quarter.

Growth remained strong in Western Germany

and appeared to have rebounded in France.

Some slowing from the rapid

rise early in the year had occurred in Japan, while declines in economic
activity were recorded in the United Kingdom and Canada.

Some

moderation in consumer price inflation appeared to be in progress for
the major foreign economies, reflecting the nearly completed passthrough
to the retail level of the earlier rise in oil prices.
In November, increases in producer prices of finished goods
moderated from the rapid pace of previous months; the prices of finished
foods again advanced sharply, but declines in the prices of refined
petroleum products damped the overall rise in producer prices.

Over

October and November, producer prices of non-energy, nonfood finished
goods increased at about the third-quarter rate, which in turn was
somewhat below that in the first half of the year.

The pace of consumer

inflation also slowed in November, mostly as a result of a smaller rise
in energy prices.

Excluding food and energy items, consumer prices rose

in November at the more moderate pace seen in the previous two months.
Average hourly earnings of production or nonsupervisory workers were
unchanged on balance over October and November; this represented a

considerable slowing from the increases recorded in earlier months of
the year.
At its meeting on November 13, the Committee adopted a
directive that called for a slight immediate reduction in the degree of
pressure on reserve positions and that also called for giving weight to
potential developments that might require some slight further easing
during the intermeeting period.

The reserve conditions contemplated by

the Committee were expected to be consistent with growth of both M2 and
M3 at annual rates of about 1 to 2 percent over the period from
September through December.
Following the meeting, open market operations were directed
toward implementing the slight easing of reserve market conditions
sought by the Committee.

Subsequently, in early December, in light of

further indications of a softening economy and continuing weakness in
the monetary aggregates, another slight easing in reserve pressures was
carried out.

In addition, a number of technical adjustments were made

to assumed levels of adjustment plus seasonal borrowing to reflect the
declines in seasonal borrowing activity that typically occur late in the
year.

Adjustment plus seasonal borrowing fell from about $260 million

for the reserve maintenance period that ended the day after the November
meeting to a little over $100 million for the period completed prior to
this meeting.

In the early part of the intermeeting period, in the

context of continued cautious reserve management by banks and the
settlement of the mid-quarter Treasury refunding, the federal funds rate
averaged near 7-3/4 percent.

Late in the period, after the slight

additional easing of policy and as concerns about a year-end squeeze on

-5-

the availability of short-term funds abated somewhat, the federal funds
rate averaged around 7-1/4 percent.

Other market interest rates also

declined on balance over the intermeeting period, in some cases
substantially, as markets responded to mounting evidence that the
economy was slowing significantly and to the easing of monetary policy.
Lower interest rates and optimism over a possible peaceful resolution of
the Persian Gulf situation contributed to a rise in broad stock market
indexes.
The easing of concerns about year-end pressures appeared to
have been helped by the announcement by the Board of Governors on
December 4, 1990, of the elimination of reserve requirements on
nonpersonal time deposits and net Eurocurrency liabilities.

These

reserve requirements were phased down in two steps, with the second
occurring in the reserve maintenance period spanning year-end.

This

action was not expected to affect underlying pressures on reserves or
federal funds rates but was intended to help counter the tightening by
depository institutions of credit terms for many types of borrowers by
providing those institutions with added incentive to lend to
creditworthy borrowers.
In the foreign exchange markets, the dollar fluctuated in value
over the intermeeting period in response to changing perceptions
regarding the Persian Gulf situation, the release of U.S. employment
data for November, and the further easing of U.S. monetary policy.

On

balance over the period, the trade-weighted value of the dollar rose
slightly in terms of the other G-10 currencies.

The dollar appreciated

more against the yen and sterling; the recent decreases in oil prices

along with expectations of slowing or negative economic growth had
sparked large rallies in bond markets in Japan and the United Kingdom.
The dollar increased less against the mark, which was generally firm on
the basis of continuing strong economic growth in Western Germany and
heightened market expectations of further tightening of German monetary
policy.
M2 was about unchanged over October and November after growing
at a relatively limited pace on balance in earlier months of the year,
while M3 declined slightly in both months.

The weakness in M2, which

persisted despite an earlier decline in opportunity costs, perhaps
reflected very weak expansion of nominal income in recent months as well
as damped credit growth at depository institutions.

From the fourth

quarter of 1989 through November, expansion of M2 was estimated to be in
the lower half of the Committee's range for the year and M3 near the
lower end of its range.

Expansion of total domestic nonfinancial debt

appeared to have been near the midpoint of its monitoring range.
The staff projection prepared for this meeting pointed to a
mild further decline in economic activity over the near term and an
upturn before mid-1991.

The projection was prepared against the

background of persisting uncertainties regarding the prospects for a
peaceful resolution of the situation in the Persian Gulf region.

The

staff assumed that there would be no major further disruption to world
oil supplies and that oil prices would drop appreciably further in the
first half of next year.

The projection took into account the

constraints on the supply of credit and an expectation that such
constraints would persist to some degree through the year ahead.

Consumer outlays were expected to continue to be damped in the near term
by the erosion of real disposable income associated with a reduction in
hours worked and the effects of higher energy prices; in light of weak
consumer demands, business equipment spending was projected to be
sluggish and commercial construction to decline further, given the oversupply of currently available space.

Economic growth was expected to

resume during the first half of 1991 in association with the effects of
the assumed reduction in oil prices on consumer spending and the support
provided by further gains in exports.

Subsequently, as business sales

and orders improved, production and business investment outlays were
expected to pick up.

The outlook for inflation remained clouded by the

uncertainties regarding oil prices but, based on the assumption of a
substantial decline in oil prices and some added slack in resource
utilization, the staff projected a slower rise in prices and labor
costs.
In the Committee's discussion of the economic situation and
outlook, members commented that a relatively mild and short recession
remained a reasonable expectation, but they emphasized the risks of a
more severe and prolonged contraction in economic activity.

Generally

lean business inventories, favorable conditions for the further growth
of exports, and appreciable declines in oil prices from their recent
peaks all promised to buoy spending and activity over coming quarters.
However, the key to a near-term rebound in the economy was a pickup in
consumer spending.

Even under the assumption that the Persian Gulf

situation would be more settled and oil prices lower, restoration of the
degree of confidence needed to induce a substantial upturn in spending

was not assured.

The financial difficulties of many borrowers and

financial intermediaries, especially banks, could continue to damage
confidence as well as to constrain further the availability of credit to
many borrowers and contribute to additional declines of asset values in
commercial and real estate markets.

In general, the economy and

financial markets were undergoing a process of adjustment to earlier
excesses in leveraging by borrowers and speculative increases in asset
prices; while the course and effects of that adjustment were difficult
to predict, there clearly had been an increase in the downside risks to
the economy as a result.

With regard to the outlook for inflation,

members saw growing indications that a disinflationary process might be
getting underway, and some viewed recent price and wage developments as
consistent with an outlook for faster progress in reducing inflation
than they had anticipated some months ago.
Regional business developments continued to indicate uneven
conditions ranging from modest further growth in some parts of the
country, including areas that were benefiting from a relatively strong
agricultural sector, to declining activity in an increasing number of
regions.

Indications of softening economic conditions were widespread,

however, even in regions where overall business activity still appeared
to be expanding.

Business sentiment was negative in much of the nation,

and business contacts suggested that it was worsening in many areas.
Many state and local governments, notably in relatively depressed areas,
were facing severe budgetary problems and were curbing expenditures in
response to lagging tax receipts and impaired access to financial
markets.

Consumer caution was widespread and was evidenced by reports

of generally soft retail sales thus far in the holiday season.

Some

members commented, however, that while its timing remained uncertain, an
improvement in consumer sentiment associated possibly with more settled
conditions in the Middle East and an upturn in real disposable income
would be likely to generate considerable strengthening in deferred
consumer spending, particularly for motor vehicles, and to foster a
rebound in overall economic activity.

Other comments focused on the

possibility that consumer sentiment might well remain bearish and
consumer spending restrained for an extended period, perhaps even in the
context of favorable developments in the Middle East, as consumers
continued to adjust to the adverse wealth effects of weak housing
markets, heavy debt loads, concerns about the well publicized
difficulties of many financial institutions, and fears about their
employment prospects.

Weak housing prices affected household spending

especially by reducing perceived wealth, but also by eroding the margin
of unborrowed equity available to be liquified for spending on other
goods and services.
Many of the members stressed that business investment spending
was likely to remain relatively weak, particularly the construction of
office and other commercial facilities that were overbuilt in many
metropolitan areas.

To date, the manufacture of capital goods appeared

to have held up relatively well in key capital-producing sections of the
country, though the output of some types of capital equipment had turned
down.

Statistical and anecdotal reports suggested that inventories

generally remained under tight control, even in relatively depressed

-10-

industries and regions, and a pickup in overall demand was therefore
likely to lead fairly promptly to stronger production activity.
Members commented that, apart from the key role of consumer
spending, current forecasts of a rebound in overall economic activity
relied to an important extent on expectations of appreciable further
growth in net exports over the next several quarters.

The substantial

depreciation of the dollar in terms of other key currencies over the
past year, especially since mid-1990, would encourage exports and curb
imports.

Some members noted, however, that economic activity in a

number of major trading nations might be somewhat weaker than was
anticipated earlier, thereby tending to limit the growth in U.S.
exports.

That view was reinforced by comments from some domestic

exporters who now saw more limited export opportunities in the year
ahead, at least to some countries.
Turning to financial developments, members commented that
economic recovery would depend to an important degree on the
availability of credit.

While credit terms and conditions were not

projected to tighten appreciably further, the possibility of such a
development represented a risk to the economy that could not be ruled
out.

A major source of financial pressures was the decline in real

estate values in many areas and the inability of many heavily indebted
borrowers to service their real estate debts.

The difficulties in the

real estate sector and the related vulnerability of many lending
institutions obviously would be aggravated by a prolonged recession.
Many business borrowers with less than prime credit ratings continued to
report problems in securing financing, even from their usual lenders,

-11-

and those problems seemed to be increasing in at least some parts of the
country in conjunction with bank efforts to rebuild their capital
positions and limit their lending risks in a weak economy.

At the same

time, there were indications of greater efforts by banks in some areas
to increase their loans in order to improve their profits; moreover,
many large banks appeared to have made significant progress in adjusting
the pricing of their loans to take better account of lending risks;
those efforts also could lead to improved profits and to a better
availability of credit to many potential borrowers.
The softness in real estate prices was having a pronounced
effect on inflationary sentiment, and against the background of reduced
pressures on production resources and an extended period of limited
monetary growth most of the members believed that substantial progress
toward lower inflation was a likely prospect over the next several
quarters.

Rising unemployment in some areas of the country was clearly

reflected in downward adjustments to the wages of some categories of
workers.

More generally, the rise in broad wage measures appeared to

have peaked in an atmosphere of concern about reduced employment
opportunities; it was noted in this connection that current unemployment
rates probably underestimated actual unemployment, as discouraged
potential workers abandoned efforts to secure employment.

Members also

commented that competitive pressures, including competition from foreign
producers, remained strong in retail markets around the country and also
in markets for many producer goods.

-12-

In the Committee's discussion of policy for the intermeeting
period ahead, all of the members indicated that they favored or could
accept a directive calling for some slight easing in reserve conditions.
Members noted that monetary policy had been eased in several steps over
the course of recent weeks; while substantial additional easing might
not be needed under prevailing conditions, a limited further move would
provide some added insurance in cushioning the economy against the
possibility of a deepening recession and an inadequate rebound in the
economy without imposing an unwarranted risk of stimulating inflation
later.

The members favored a cautious approach to further policy moves

in light of the appreciable easing in reserve conditions that already
had been implemented and the considerable decline that had occurred in
market interest rates.

The stimulus provided by the recent easing

actions had not yet been felt in the economy, and given the lags that
were involved, there was some risk of overdoing the easing of policy at
some point, with potential inflationary consequences once the economic
recovery got underway.

Most of the members viewed such a risk as

relatively remote and one that could be dealt with, should the need
arise, by a future tightening of policy, although it was recognized that
moves toward restraint could be difficult.

Persisting weakness in the

monetary aggregates tended to reinforce the view that policy was not
moving in a way that would promote a resurgence in inflation.

In

evaluating the behavior of the monetary aggregates, members stressed the
need for policy to provide adequate liquidity in a period of declining
economic activity in order to encourage economic recovery.

-13-

Growth of M2 had displayed an uneven pattern but had tended to
weaken over the course of the year, especially in recent months.

The

behavior of M2 was not fully understood, but it appeared to be
associated, at least in the past year, with the constrained availability
of credit from depository institutions and with lagging income growth.
In addition, other factors, such as perceptions of increased risks in
holding deposit balances in current financial circumstances, seemed to
be affecting monetary expansion.

A staff projection prepared for this

meeting pointed to a pickup in M2 growth over the months immediately
ahead, reflecting in part a projected upturn in the expansion of nominal
GNP and the lagged effects of the recent declines in market rates on
demands for money balances.

Members noted that for the year 1990 as a

whole, M2 would increase at a rate within the Committee's range, albeit
in the lower half of that range and that M2 growth had now been within
the Committee's ranges consistently in recent years.

While monetary

policy might still be viewed as somewhat restrictive from the standpoint
of monetary growth, members cited other indicators such as the decline
in interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, and conditions in the
commodity and foreign exchange markets as indicative of an adequate
provision of liquidity and a basically satisfactory policy in current
circumstances.

Nonetheless, members stressed the need to maintain an

appropriate rate of monetary expansion, and they generally concluded

that the behavior of the monetary aggregates would need to be monitored
with special care in the period ahead for any indication that their
growth might be falling significantly short of current expectations.

-14-

During this discussion, members noted the potential
interactions between open market policy and a possible, near-term
reduction in the discount rate.

Most of the Federal Reserve Banks had

proposed a reduction of one-half percentage point in the discount rate,
and in light of their concerns about the narrowing spread between the
discount rate and short-term market rates, the members generally favored
Board approval of that reduction to implement an easing of conditions in
money markets.

Ordinarily, a reduction in the discount rate would show

through fully in lower short-term market rates.

However, because of

their desire to ease reserve conditions only slightly in the near term,
the members generally supported a proposal to gear open market
operations toward allowing only about one-half of the proposed cut in
the discount rate to be reflected immediately in the money market.

If

the discount rate were not reduced, the Manager for Domestic Operations
would execute the slight easing of policy through open market operations
alone.

With regard to any further adjustment in the degree of reserve

pressure later in the intermeeting period, nearly all the members
expressed a preference for retaining a bias in the directive toward
potential easing, especially given the recessionary tendencies in the
economy, current fragilities in the financial system, and the weakness
in the monetary aggregates.
At the conclusion of the Committee's discussion, all of the
members indicated that they could support a directive that called for
some slight further easing in the degree of pressure on reserve
positions and that also provided for giving emphasis to potential
developments that might require some additional easing during the

-15-

intermeeting period.

It was recognized that open market operations

initially might need to take account of a possible reduction in the
discount rate.

Subsequent to the initial easing, slightly greater

reserve restraint might be acceptable during the intermeeting period or
somewhat lesser reserve restraint would be acceptable depending on
progress toward price stability, the strength of the business expansion,
the behavior of the monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign
exchange and domestic financial markets.

The reserve conditions

contemplated by the Committee were expected to be consistent with some
pickup in monetary growth, including expansion of M2 and M3 at annual
rates of about 4 and 1 percent respectively over the four-month period
from November to March.
At the conclusion of the meeting, the following domestic policy
directive was issued to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York:
The information reviewed at this meeting suggests
appreciable weakening in economic activity. Total
nonfarm payroll employment fell sharply further in
November, reflecting widespread job losses that were
especially pronounced in manufacturing and construction; the civilian unemployment rate rose to 5.9
percent. Industrial output declined markedly in
October and November, in part because of sizable
cutbacks in the production of motor vehicles. Retail
sales were weak in real terms in October and November;
real disposable income has been reduced not only by a
decrease in total hours worked but also by the effects
of higher energy prices. Advance indicators of
business capital spending point to considerable
softening in investment in coming months. Residential
construction has declined substantially further in
recent months. The nominal U.S. merchandise trade
deficit widened in October from its average rate in
the third quarter as non-oil imports rose more sharply
than exports. Increases in consumer prices moderated
in November largely as a result of a softening in oil
prices. The latest data on labor costs suggest some
improvement from earlier trends.

-16-

Most interest rates have fallen appreciably since
the Committee meeting on November 13. In foreign
exchange markets, the trade-weighted value of the
dollar in terms of the other G-10 currencies rose
slightly on balance over the intermeeting period.
M2 was about unchanged on balance over October
and November after several months of relatively
limited expansion, while M3 declined slightly in both
months. From the fourth quarter of 1989 through
November, expansion of M2 was estimated to be in the
lower half of the Committee's range for the year and
growth of M3 near the lower end of its range.
Expansion of total domestic nonfinancial debt appears
to have been near the midpoint of its monitoring
range.
The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary
and financial conditions that will foster price
stability, promote growth in output on a sustainable
basis, and contribute to an improved pattern of
international transactions. In furtherance of these
objectives, the Committee at its meeting in July
reaffirmed the range it had established in February
for M2 growth of 3 to 7 percent, measured from the
fourth quarter of 1989 to the fourth quarter of 1990.
The Committee in July also retained the monitoring
range of 5 to 9 percent for the year that it had set
for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt. With
regard to M3, the Committee recognized that the ongoing restructuring of thrift depository institutions
had depressed its growth relative to spending and
total credit more than anticipated
Taking account of
the unexpectedly strong M3 velocity, the Committee
decided in July to reduce the 1990 range to 1 to 5
percent. For 1991, the Committee agreed on provisional ranges for monetary growth, measured from the
fourth quarter of 1990 to the fourth quarter of 1991,
of 2-1/2 to 6-1/2 percent for M2 and 1 to 5 percent
for M3.

The Committee tentatively set the associated

monitoring range for growth of total domestic nonfinancial debt at 4-1/2 to 8-1/2 percent for 1991.
The behavior of the monetary aggregates will continue
to be evaluated in the light of progress toward price
level stability, movements in their velocities, and
developments in the economy and financial markets.
In the implementation of policy for the immediate
future, the Committee seeks to decrease slightly the
existing degree of pressure on reserve positions,
taking account of a possible change in the discount
rate. Depending upon progress toward price stability,
trends in economic activity, the behavior of the

-17-

monetary aggregates, and developments in foreign
exchange and domestic financial markets, slightly
greater reserve restraint might or somewhat lesser
reserve restraint would be acceptable in the intermeeting period. The contemplated reserve conditions
are expected to be consistent with growth of M2 and M3
over the period from November through March at annual
rates of about 4 and 1 percent, respectively.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan
Corrigan, Angell, Boehne, Boykin, Hoskins,
Kelley, LaWare, Mullins, Ms. Seger, and
Mr. Stern. Votes against this action: None.
2. Authorization for Domestic Open Market Operations
The Committee approved a temporary increase of $6 billion, to a
level of $14 billion, in the limit on changes between Committee meetings
in System Account holdings of U.S. government and federal agency
securities.

The increase amended paragraph 1(a) of the Authorization

for Domestic Open Market Operations and was effective for the intermeeting period ending with the close of business on February 6, 1991.
Votes for this action: Messrs. Greenspan
Corrigan, Angell, Boehne, Boykin, Hoskins,
Kelley, LaWare, Mullins, Ms. Seger, and
Mr. Stern. Votes against this action: None.
The Manager for Domestic Operations advised the Committee that
the current leeway of $8 billion for changes in System Account holdings
was not likely to be sufficient to accommodate the potentially very
large need to drain reserves over the intermeeting period ahead.

That

need would reflect a bulge in available reserves stemming from the
elimination of reserve requirements on nonpersonal time deposits and net
Eurocurrency liabilities combined with the effects of seasonal
reductions in currency in circulation and in required reserves over the
intermeeting period.