View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version available
based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was created
through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned
versions text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was
employed, some imperfections may remain.
Please note that some material may have been redacted from this document if that
material was received on a confidential basis. Redacted material is indicated by
occasional gaps in the text or by gray boxes around non-text content. All redacted
passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                            
1
  In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic
format. All scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced
tilting) and lightly cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other
blemishes caused after initial printing).
 
2
 A two-step process was used. An advanced optical character recognition computer program (OCR)
first created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive,
staff checked and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and
tables were not reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff. 

Content last modified 6/05/2009.

 

CONFIDENTIAL

(FR)

SUPPLEMENT
CURRENT ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

Prepared for the
Federal Open Market Committee

By the Staff
Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System

December 11,

1970

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES

The Domestic Economy
Retail sales.

According to the advance report, sales of all

stores at retail declined half a per cent in November--primarily as a
result of continued weakness in strike-affected automotive sales.
Excluding automotive sales, which were off 5.0 per cent, the level of
sales was up 0.3 per cent from October.

Furniture and appliance sales

and general merchandise were unchanged from October, and sales of the
apparel group were strong for the second month in a row.

Compared

with a year earlier, total sales were up 7.3 per cent, excluding automotive stores; including autos, sales were up 2.9 per cent.

SALES OF RETAIL STORES

Billions of dollars

Per cent change
from previous month

1970

1970
Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

-1.3

-

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

All stores

30.9

30.5

30.3

Total,

25.2

25.6

25.7

9.6
5.7
1.3

8.9
4.9
1.4

8.7
4.7
1.4

.6
2.4
-3.9

-7.0
-13.1
3.9

21.3
6.9
5.2

21.6
6.9
5.3

21.7
6.9
5.3

.2
.8
1.2

1.3
.2
1.8

excluding auto

Durable goods
Auto
Furniture & appliance
Nondurable
Food
General merchandise

Inventory anticipations.

.3
-

.1

1.4

.5
.3

-2.6
-5.0
0
-

.3
.1
.1

When surveyed in November, manu-

facturers anticipated increasing their rate of inventory growth (book
value) in the fourth quarter of 1970 to an annual rate of $4.8 billion

from $4 billion in the third quarter.

In the first quarter of 1971, a

further increase to an annual rate of $6.4 billion is expected.

The

survey's record of accuracy is spotty, even with respect to the direction of change in inventory accumulation.
Durable goods manufacturers expected some slowdown in the
fourth quarter and then acceleration in the first quarter of 1971 to a
rate higher than any achieved in 1970; "both steel and auto producers
project substantial inventory additions early next year," according to
the report.

Nondurable goods manufacturers anticipated a return from

no change in the third quarter of 1970 to relatively high rates in each
of the next two quarters.
Manufacturers expected sales to dip 1 per cent in the fourth
quarter and to rise 4-1/2 per cent in the first quarter of 1971.

Exclud-

ing motor vehicles, increases of 2 per cent are anticipated for both the
fourth and first quarters.

The Domestic Financial Situation
Money supply growth in November has been revised upward to a
seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.5 per cent from the estimated 2.8
per cent shown in the Greenbook.

The revision was attributable to a

rise in privately-held demand deposits in late November that exceeded
earlier estimates.

As a result of this increase in demand deposits,

the adjusted credit proxy expanded at a slightly faster rate than previously estimated and is now estimated at a 7.8 per cent annual rate
of growth.

-3-

Mortgage market.

A new departure for Federal agency support

of the residential mortgage market was launched December 10, when the
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation began to operate the first
formal market for participations in conventional first mortgage loans.
FHLMC has asked members of the Federal Home Loan Bank System to submit,
by December 23, offers to sell to FHLMC participating interests of
between 25 and 75 per cent in certain outstanding conventional home
and multifamily mortgages originated during 1970.

The participating

interests are to be evidenced by transferable participation certificates
issued in multiples of $100,000 each against a designated group of
mortgages, to yield FHLMC a fixed 8-1/2 per cent after servicing.
While individual sellers may offer certificates totaling not less than
$500,000 nor more than $5 million, FHLMC has placed no ceiling on the
aggregate amount of certificates it may buy.

At some later date,

FHLMC may resell the certificates, possibly by pooling them and then
issuing pass-through type securities against the pool.

Earlier this

year, FHLMC purchased $315 million in whole FRA and VA mortgages sold
by members of the FHLB System, and in another action entered into
commitments to buy an additional $200 million from them.
Sales of new homes by merchant builders declined in October.
However, the decline, which may have reflected seasonal adjustment
problems, was from an exceptionally high September rate and left the
October level more than three-tenths above a year earlier.

Homes

available for sale rose somewhat, but this reflected mainly an increase
in homes not yet completed.

Median prices of new homes sold, although unchanged in October,
at $22,700, were 7 per cent below a year earlier, owing mainly to the
shift in the mix of sales toward smaller, lower-priced units which has
been a particularly conspicuous feature of developments this year.
Median intended prices of homes available for sale edged off in October,
but remained near earlier highs and some $4,000 above comparable prices
of homes actually sold in that month.

Median prices of existing homes

sold, at $22,740 in October, were 4 per cent above a year earlier and
13 per cent above two years earlier.

While the year-to-year rise

suggested some downshift in the mix of such prices, the two-year rise
was about the same as has prevailed in most other months this year.

-5INTEREST RATES

1970
Highs

Lows

Nov. 16

Dec. 10

Short-Term Rates
Federal funds (weekly averages)

9.39 (2/18)

3-months
7.93 (1/6)
Treasury bills (bid)
8.75 (1/13)
Bankers' acceptances
10.50 (1/9)
Euro-dollars
8.30 (1/9)
Federal agencies
8.25 (2/1)
Finance paper
CD's (prime NYC)
Most often quoted new issue 6.75 (10/30)
9.25 (1/23)
Secondary market
6-month
Treasury bills (bid)
Bankers' acceptances
Commercial paper (4-6 months)
Federal agencies

7.99
8.88
9.13
8.50

(1/5)
(1/13)
(1/8)
(1/28)

4.91 (12/9)

5.80 (11/12)

4.91 (12/

4.80
5.38
6.62
4.97
5.38

5.30
6.00
7.31
5.78 (11/12)
6.25

4.90
5.50
7.29
4.97
5.38

(11/23)
(12/4)
(11/24)
(12/10)
(12/10)

5.00 (11/25) 5.75 (11/12)
5.50 (11/25) 6.35

5.50
5.70

4.92
5.50
5.63
5.13

5.46
6.12e
6.50
6.01 (11/12)

4.94
5.62e
5.75

6.38 (11/12)
6.50

5.62
5.80

(12/4)
(12/4)
(12/4)
(12/10)

5.13

CD's (prime NYC)
9.38 (1/23)

5.50 (12/2)
5.50 (12/2)

Treasury bills (bid)

7.62 (1/30)

4.78 (11/23) 5.38

4.91

CD's (prime NYC)
Most often quoted new issue
Prime municipals

7.50 (9/16)

5.50 (11/25) 6.38 (11/12)
2.95 (11/27) 3.10

5.62

5.60 (1/9)

Treasury coupon issues
5-years
20-years

8.30 (1/7)
7.73 (5/26)

5.85 (12/4)
6.16 (12/4)

6.63
6.68

5.95
6.25

Corporate
Seasoned Aaa
Baa

8.60 (6/24)
9.47 (8/28)

7.77 (12/10) 8.05
8.57 (3/10) 9.39

7.77
9.23

New Issue Aaa

9.30 (6/19)

7.74 (12/10) 8.40 (11/12)

7.74

Municipal
Bond Buyer Index
Moody's Aaa

7.12 (5/28)
6.95 (6/18)

5.33 (12/10) 6.12 (11/12)
5.15 (12/10) 5.95 (11/12)

5.33
5.15

Mortgage--implicit yield
in FNMA biweekly auction 1/

9.36 (1/2)

8.54 (12/7)

8.54 (12/

Most often quoted new issue
Secondary market

7.00 (10/7)

1-year

3.00

Intermediate and Long-term

1/

8.93 (11/2)

Yield on 6-month forward commitment after allowance for commitment fee and
required purchase and holding of FNMA stock
stock. Assumes discount on 30-year
loan amortized over 15 years.
e--estimated.

,

International developments
The following notes on changes in liabilities of U.S. banks
to their foreign branches amplify and supplement the account given on
page IV-5 of the Greenbook.

On Wednesday, November 25, liabilities to

branches totaled $8.8 billion (on the basis the staff generally uses in
reporting the Wednesday figures).

This was about $850 million below

the amount on October 28, four weeks earlier, $1.7 billion below the
average of 5 Wednesdays in September, and $3.5 billion below the average
of 4 Wednesdays in June.

From Wednesday,November 25 to Monday,November

30, there was a further reduction of over $600 million (partly estimated,
using daily data).

Much of this month-end drop should be viewed as a

fairly normal reflection of end-of-November conditions in European money
markets.
The Board's action on Regulation M was announced late in the
day on November 30.

In the next two days there was a substantial rise

in liabilities to branches.

While Eurodollar deposits of more than

overnight maturity are normally not settled until two days after the
contract, the increase in liabilities to branches from November 30 to
December 2 could have been affected by branch takings of overnight money
arranged in the first two days after the Board's announcement.

However,

it is reasonable to suppose that a considerable part of the rise of
about $500 million in liabilities from November 30 to Wednesday,December 2
was a normal reversal of a normal month-end drop.
In the following week, to Wednesday,December 9, there was
little net change.

This is contrary to the information that was available

in time for the Greenbook, which showed a substantial net increase in
liabilities to branches through Monday.

The daily data during the week

exhibited very large fluctuations, with liabilities rising or falling
by $200-400 million most days.

At the close of business on Wednesday,

December 9, liabilities to branches were virtually unchanged from a week
earlier, according to the preliminary indications given by the daily
data (which do not have complete coverage).
Three points are of interest.

(I) In the first week after

the month-end dip and recovery, which is also approximately the first
week in which the Board's action might have had an effect, there was a
cessation of the decline in U.S. banks' liabilities to their foreign
branches which had been going on pretty continuously since midyear.
This is not the first time that the decline has stopped for a week or
two, but this time the interest rate relationships have been highly
unfavorable for borrowing Eurodollars.
(2) The average level of borrowings through the first half of
the current reserve computation period now appears to be some half
billion dollars or more below the daily average in the preceding computation period (which ended November 25).

This is the result of the decline

through all the latter half of November, which was only partly offset by
the post-month-end recovery and bulge.

Between now and December 23 (the

end of the current period) the banks are likely to find rate relationships very unfavorable for an attempt to avoid new losses of historical
reserve-free bases.

(3) Different banks have been acting differently.
increased their borrowings since December 2.

Some have

On the other hand, one or

two banks that had previously given up substantial parts of their May
1969 bases have continued to reduce their borrowings.
The National Bank of Belgium reduced its discount rate
effective December 10 from 7 to 6-1/2 per cent.

Other discount rate

reductions since the November 13 Greenbook Supplement include two
changes in Germany, which are referred to on page IV-1 of this week's
Greenbook.

The first of these, from 7 to 6-1/2 per cent, took effect

November 18; the second was to 6 per cent, effective December 3.

The

Bundesbank's rate on advances ("Lombard rate") went from 9 to 8 to 7-1/2
per cent.

Corrections
Section III, page 6, beginning paragraph 2, all of page III-7
and III-8 should be shifted to follow III-16.
Section II, page 2 table, the figure in the first line, GNP,
second column, current projection, should be $5.4 billion instead of
$1.4.
Section II, page 8 GNP table.
tion were left out.

1970
proj.
3.0

19711970
pr.
pro.
pro.
0.8

Changes in Industrial produc-

Theyshould be:

I
-3.1

971
Projection
II
III

IV
-13.1

11.1

2.4

2.9

IV
5.7

Section II,

page 27, Table Wholesale Prices.

Please substitute

the following correctedtable.

WHOLESALE PRICES
(Seasonally adjusted percentage changes at annual rates)

Dec 1969
to
Mar 1970
All commodities
Farm and food products
Farm products
Processed foods & feeds
Industrial commodities
Selected groups
Fuels and related
products and power
Metals and metal products
Nonferrous metals 1/
Machinery and equipment
Finished goods
Producer finished goods
Consumer nonfoods
Nondurables
Durables
1/ Not seasonally adjusted.

Mar 1970
to
June 1970

June 1970
to
Sept 1970

Sept 1970
to
Oct 1970

Oct 1970
to
Nov 1970

4.0
6.8
5.0
8.7

1.1
-9.9
-14.9
6.2

3.9
8.9
12.2
5.6

2.5
-14.7
-28.5
-1.9

-1.1
-4.1
-17.1
3.9

3.1

4.5

2.9

7.8

0.0

.8
9.0
9.1
4.0

6.5
8.9
4.2
4.1

11.3
-1.0
-16.0
5.2

20.1
4.0
-7.0
5.9

12.4
-10.0
-23.1
2.4

4.3
2.2
2.1
3.0

2.9
2.9
3.0
2.4

4,8
3.3
3.5
3.1

12.1
11.5
4.4
22.7

2.4
2.1
3.1
3.4

SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX A:

SURVEY OF BANK LENDING PRACTICES*

Participants in the November 15, 1970, Survey of Bank Lending
Practices indicated a substantial shift in policy from the time of the
previous survey. With loans demands weakening and funds more readily
available, banks generally eased the terms and conditions on loans
and were particularly willing to lend to customers which had been
screened heavily during the past two years. Banks also indicated increased willingness to make selected major types of loans, including
term loans to businesses and mortgage loans.
Loan Demand
Banks reported that the demand for business loans generally
weakened during the three months ending November 15, 1970. A full
three-fifths of the respondents indicated slackened loan demand while
little more than one-third reported essentially unchanged demand.
Moreover, a sizable number of banks expected business loan demands to
weaken further during the next three months. These results represent
a clear break from the previous survey when participants reported
strengthening loan demands and an expectation of continuing strength;
however, the earlier survey was taken as of August 15 when financial
markets were still reacting to the Penn Central insolvency, and this
could have masked the underlying weakness in loan demands.
Terms and Conditions on Lending to Nonfinancial Businesses
A large majority of banks (nearly three-fourths of the
respondents) reported an easing of interest rates over the three-month
period, which was a reflection of the declines in the prime rate in
September and early November. Moreover, a third to a half of the
respondents reported easier policies in reviewing lines of credit for
both new and established customers and for local customers generally.
On the other hand, few banks reduced their compensating balance
requirements, and standards of credit worthiness applied to loan applicants were stiffened somewhat at a significant minority of banks. This
change presumably reflected increased quality consciousness in light of
the well-known difficulties of some larger business firms during the
summer and probably a concern over a possible rise in classified loans.
The easing reported in the November survey represents a
marked reversal in the trend of lending policy developments that had
prevailed over the preceding seven survey periods. During that time,
the lending posture of banks, in most respects, had remained restrictive,
as shown in Table 2A. In November, however, the net responses of
participants indicate a substantial shift toward ease, particularly in
interest rates and in reviewing credit lines. Moreover, the intended
use of the loan was receiving less scrutiny than had been the case earlier.
* -

Prepared by James Kichline, Economist, Banking Section, Division
of Research and Statistics.

SA - 2

Lending to Noncaptive Finance Companies
The easier lending posture of banks in regard to nonfinancial
business loans was carried over only in part to finance company loans.
While banks generally reduced the interest rates charged on finance
company loans, only 17 per cent of respondents indicated an easier
policy in establishing new or larger credit lines. Furthermore, compensating or supporting balance requirements and the endorsement of
such balances were stiffened on balance in the case of finance companies.
Willingness to Make Other Loans
The extent of the shift to an easier policy is indicated by
a considerable increase in bank willingness to make selected major types
of loans. Term loans to business were being considered more favorably
by thirty per cent of the banks in the survey, with an insignificant
number of banks less willing to make such loans. Banks also reported
a distinct trend toward increased willingness to extend mortgage
loans--single-family, multi-family, and other types of mortgage loans.
Variation by Size of Bank
There were relatively few differences in survey responses
among banks with $1 billion in deposits or more compared with smaller
banks. However, those banks that reported an increase in loan demand
over the past three months, or an expectation of stronger loan demand
in the forthcoming three months, were generally the smaller banks. The
smaller banks when reviewing credit lines also appeared to place a
greater priority on factors relating to the applicant--value as a depositor, for example--than did larger banks.
Those respondents who offered supplementary comments reported
their policy changes were directly related to reduced loan demands and
an increased availability of funds, as would be expected. Several banks
indicated specifically their concern about credit quality. A few banks
noted that the shift to an easier policy would now permit the extension
of credit for certain types of loans they had not made for some time,
such as loans for acquisition purposes.

TABLE 2A
NET RESPONSES OF BANKS IN LENDING PRACTICES SURVEYS
(In per cent)

Nov.

Feb.
1969

May
1969

J1969

Aug.

Nov.
1969

Feb.
1970

May
1970

Aug.
1970

25.6

54.4

60.0

30.6

28.0

-1.6

12.1

16.0

20.8

49.2

41.8

5.7

8.9

-8.0

11.2

13.6 -32.0

86.2
64.3
32.8
30.3

91.0
75.6
41.4
42.3

78.3
68.3
40.6
42.2

49.6
57.6
36.0
35.2

34.4
38.4

-12.8

22.4
17.6

-1.6
6.4
-4.1
15.4

32.5
61.7
30.9

47.2
80.2
46.7
'71.3

36.8
160.8
32.0
56.5

18.4

49.5

51.6
81.4
48.8
68.8

16.0
6.4

58.6

67.2
71.6

165.0
168.5

46.0
39.2

-26.4
2.4
3.2
4.8

53.3
22.9
29.5
54.9

50.8 i48.0
27.9 135.0
42.6 42.3
62.4 i 62.0

19.3
26.7
34.7
48.4

-0.8

48.8
4.2
30.8
40.1
42.5

64.3
17.2
45.5
57.5
62.0

65.9
26.9
49.7
58.3
62.5

48.0
24.2
30.4
36.3
42.3

21.6
17.7
19.7
22.2

12.8
-4.1
-8.2
3.4
9.9

18.7
34.2

38.4
40.0

48.4
59.3

31.5
36.1

10.6
20.5

5.6
20.3

______1968
!
Strength of loan demand(compared to 3 months ago)
Anticipated demand in next 3 months

Nov.
1970
-56.8

LENDING TO NONFINANCIAL BUSINESSES2/
Terms and Conditions
Interest rates charged
Compensating or supporting balances
Standards of credit worthiness
Maturity of term loans

r27.2

10.4
4.8
1.6

20.8
10.4

15.2
24.8
22.4
14.4

-73.6
-0.8
4.8
-7.2

5.6
17.6
5.6
22.6

1.6
6.4
-3.2
16.1

-32.0
-40.8
-33.6
-16.8

29.9
21.6

18.5

18.51

12.0

9.6

14.5

-16.0
6.4
16.0
21.6

18.4

Reviewing Credit Lines
Established customers
New customers
Local service area customers
Nonlocal service area customers

34.4
14.4
31.4

Factors Relating to Applicant
(Net percentage indicating
more important)
Value of depositor as source of
Business
-ended

use of loan

54.5

-9.6

2/
2

LENDING TO NONCAPTIVE FINANCE COMPANIESTerms and Conditions
Interest rates charged
Compensating or supporting balances
Enforcement of balance requirements
Establishing new or larger credit lines

21.7
30.7
32.2

9.7

-41.6
1.6
23.41 6.4
22.6 -10.4

12.1:

WILLINGNESS TO MAKE OTHER LOANS-3
Term loans to businesses
Consumer instalment loans
Single-family mortgage loans
Multi-family mortgage loans
All other mortgage loans
Participation loans with correspondent banks
Loans to brokers

15.3

-3.3
4.1
1.7

21.8

8.8

-28.8

-11.6

-25.6
-12.4
-15.4

-- I -24.2
5.0
-2.4
10.6

-9.6
-0.9

1/ Per cent of banks reporting stronger loan demand minus per cent of banks reporting
weaker loan demand. Positive number indicates net stronger loan demand, negative number
indicates net weaker loan demand.
2/ Per cent of banks reporting firmer lending policies minus per cent of banks reporting
weaker lending policies. Positive number indicates net firmer lending policies, negative
indicates net easier lending policies.
3/ Per cent of banks reporting less willingness to make loans minus per cent of banks more
ling to make loans.
Positive number indicates less willingness, negative number indicates
more willingness.

NOT FOR QUOTATION

OR PUBLICATION

TABLE

PAGE 11

1

QUARTERLY SURVEY OF CHANGES IN BANK LENDING PRACTICES
T
HE U.S.
1/
AT SELECTED LARGE BANKS IN
COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS
NOVEMBER 15, 1970
OF POLICY ON
(NUMBER OF BANKS & PERCENT OF TOTAL BANKS REPORTING)

(STATUS

MUCH
STRONGER

TOTAL
BANKS

pCT

BANKS

PCT

ESSENTIALLY
SNCHANG O)

MODERATeLY
WEAKEP

PCT

BANKS

BANKS

MODERATFLY
STRONGER
BANKS

EARLIER)

PCT

PCT

MUCH

WEIKER
B NKS

PCT

STRENGTH OF DEMAND FOR COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL LOANS (AFTER
ALLOWANCE FOR
BANK'S USUAL SEASONAL VARIATION)
COMPARED

125

ANTICIPATED DEMAND IN NEXT 3

MONTHS

100.0

4

3.2

46

36.8

12

57.6

3

2.4

125

TO THREE MONTHS AGO

100.0

15

12.0

55

44.0

54

43.2

1

3.8

MUCH
FIPMER
POLICY

ANSWERING
QUESTION

BANKS
LENDING TO NONFINANCIAL

PCT

BANKS

PCT

MODFRATELY
FIRMER
PCLI Y
BANKS

PCT

ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANGED
P3LICV

MODEATELY
EASTER
(OLI:Y

BANKS

BANKS

PCT

PCT

BUSINESSES

TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
INTEREST RATES
COMPENSATING

CHARGEC

OR SUPPORTING

24.8

1 0O 0
100.0

BALANCES

92.9

67.?

ST NCARCS OF CREDIT WORTHINESS
MATURITY
REVIEWING

OF

TERM LOANS

CREDIT LINES OR LOAN

84 .8

100.0
APPLICATIONS

ESTABLISHED CUSTOMERS

2

100.0

1.6

NEW CUSTOMERS

100.0

B

6.4

LOCAL

100 .0

1

0.8

1 00.0

6

4.E

SERVICE AREA CUSTOMERS

NONLOCAL

1/

SURVEY
AS OF

SERVICE

AR EA CUSTOMERS

CF LENDING PRACTICES
NOVEMBER 15, 1970.

AT 125

LARGE BANKS

REPORTING

IN

THE

FEDERAL

RESERVE

QUARTERLY

I trFRFST

ATF

S (H VEY

MUCH
FA<IFR
POL I CY
BANKS

PCT

NCT FOR QUOTATION

OR

PUBLICATION

TABLE I

ANSWERING
QUESTION
BANKS
FACTORS

RELATING

TO

APPLICANT

PCT

MUCH
FIRMER
POLICY
BANKS

PAGF 3?

IKTINJED)

(CO

MODERATELY
FIRMER
POLICY

ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANGED
POLICY

PCT

ANKS

PCT

ANKS

PTT

MnOFRA TFrY
FASIER
POLICY
PCT

RANKS

124

100.0

2

1.6

5

4.0

110

R8.8

7

INTENDED USE

125

100.0

1

0.8

3

2.4

105

84.0

125

100.0

0

0.0

4

3.2

65

125

100.0

1

0.8

3

2.4

125

100.0

1

0.8

7

125

100.0

3

2.4

5

LENDING TO

THE LOAN

"NONCAPTIVE"

BANKS

PCT

2/

VALUE AS DEPOSITOR OR
SOURCE OF COLLATERAL BUSINESS
OF

MUC
EASIER
POLICY

FINANCE

5.6

0

0.0

16.

12.8

0

".0

52.0

51

40.8

5

4.0

119

95.2

2

1,6

0

0.3

5.6

117

93.6

0

0.0

0

0.0

4.0

96

76.8

21

16.8

0

0.0

COMPANIES

TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
INTEREST

RATES CHARGED

COMPENSATING OR
ENFCRCEMENT

OF

ESTABLISHING

SUPPORTING

BALANCES

BALANCE REQUIREMENTS

NEW OR LARGER CREDIT LINES

ANSWERING
QUESTION
BANKS
WILLINGNESS
TERM

TO MAKE

LOANS

CONSUMER
SINGLE

PCT

CONSIDERABLY
LESS
WILLING
BANKS

PCT

MODERATELY
LESS
KILL ING

ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANl GE

MODERATFLY
MORE
WILLI N

BANKS

RANKS

BANKS

PCT

PCT

P.T

CONS IOERS LY
MORE
WILLING
BANKS

PCT

OTHER TYPES OF LOANS

TO BUSINESSES

INSTALMENT

LOANS

FAMILY MORTGAGE

LOANS

125

100.0

0

0.0

2

1.6

85

68.0

38

30.4

0

0.

124

100.0

0

0.0

2

1.6

90

72.6

20

22.6

4

3.7

0.0

88

72.8

31

25.6

1

1.9

121

100.0

1

3.8

0

MULTI-FAMILY MORTGAGE LOANS

121

100.0

1

0.8

0

0.0

104

86.0

16

13.2

0

0.0

ALL OTHER

123

100.0

1

0.8

0

D .0

102

83.0

19

15.

1

0.

125

100.0

2

1.6

2

1.6

105

I4.0

16

12.3

"

.O

124

100.0

1

0.8

6

4.

109

97.

6.5

r

.0

MORTGAGE

PARTICIPATION
CORRESPONDENT
LOANS

2/

LOANS
BANKS

TC BROKERS

LOANS
WITH

FOR THESE FACTORS,
FIRMER MEANS THE FACTORS WERE CONSIDERED MORE
CREDIT REQUESTS, AND EASIER MEANS THEY WERE LESS IMPORTANT.

IMPORTANT

S3

IN MAKING DECISIONS FOR APPROVING

NOT FOR QUOTATION

PAGE

2

TABLE

OR PUBLICATION

OF QUARTERLY CHANGES IN BANK LENDING PRACTICES AT BANKS GROUPED BY SIZF 3F T-TAL
NOVEMBER 15, 1970, COMPARED TC THREE MONTHS EARLIER)
(STATUS OF POLICY ON
[NUMBER OF BANKS IN EACH COLUMN AS PER CENT OF TOTAL BANKS ANSWERING QUESTION)

COMPARISON

SIZE

TOTAL
$1 &
OVER

UNDER
$s

OF

BANK

$1 E
OVER

--

TOTAL

DEPOSITS

UNDER
$1

ESSENTIALLY
UNCHAN GEF

$1 r
OVER

OVER

UNDER
t5

I/

IN BILLIONS

MODERATELY
STRONGER

MUCH
STRONGER

DEPDSITS

3

LNDER

MnOERATELY
WEAKER

$i
OVER

UNDER
OVER

MUCH
WEAKFR

$1 E

UNDER
l$1

STRENGTH OF DEMAND FOR COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL LOANS (AFTER ALLOWANCE FOR
BANK'S USUAL SEASONAL VARIATIONI
COMPARED

TO THREE MONTHS

ANTICIPATED DEMAND

AGO

100

100

0

0

0

5

24

45

72

49

4

1

100

NEXT 3 MONTHS

IN

100

0

0

6

15

47

43

47

41

0

1

TOTAL

$I E
OVE R
LENDING TO

NONFINANCIAL

UNDER
t

MODERATELY
FIRMER

MUCH
FIRMER

$1 &
OVER

UNDER
s$

ESSENTIALLY
UNCHANG ED

MODERATELY
WEAKER

tI F
OER

$t1
OVER

$1 &
OVER

UNDER
1

UNDER
$1

UNDER
t1

MUCH
WFAKER

$1 6
OVER

UNDER
s1

BUSINESSES

TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
INTEREST RATES CHARGED

100

100

0

0

2

0

28

64

73

COMPENSATING

100

100

3

0

2

4

92

93

6

100

100

0

0

6

10

90

96

4

100

100

2

0

0

5

94

90

OR

SUPPORTING BALANCES

STANDARDS OF CREDIT
MATURITY
REVIEWING

OF TERM

WORTHINESS

LOANS

CREDIT LINES

ESTABLISHED

OR

23

6

4

3

0

0

4

0

0

4

15

0

0

32

4

0

LOAN APPLICATIONS
100

100

0

0

0

3

64

65

32

NEW CUSTOMERS

100

100

0

0

2

9

4?

48

43

40

13

3

LOCAL

100

100

0

0

0

1

58

70

6

21

6

1

100

100

0

0

2

6

64

BO

30

14

4

0

SERVICE AREA CUSTOMERS

NONLOCIL

I/

CUSTOMERS

SERVICE

AREA CUSTOMERS

SURVEY OF LENDING PRACTICES AT
47 LARGE BANKS (DEPOSITS OF $1 BILL 19 OP MOPE) AND
78 SMALL
IANKS (DnFPSITS
SI BILLION) REPORTING IN THE FEDERAL RESERVE QUARTERLY INTEREST RATE SURVEY AS OF
NOVEMRER 15,
197".

OF

LFSS THAN

NOT

TABLE

OR PUBLICATION

FOR QUOTATION

SIZE

OF BANK
MUCH
FIRMER
POLICY

NUMBER
ANSHE RI NG
QUESTI ON
$1 &
OVER
FACTORS

UNDER
51

PAGE 04

2 (CONTINUED

$1 E
OVER

UNDER
$1

TOTAL DEPOSITS IN BILLION S
MODERATELY
MODERATELY
FSSENTIALLY
FIRMER
UNCHAN GED
EASIER
POL ICY
POLICY
POLICY
$1 &
OVER

UNDER
$1

$1 A
OVER

$1 £
OVEP

UNOER
$l

UNDER
$1

E
$t
OVER

UNDER
t$

RELATING TO APPLICANT 2/

VALUE AS DEPOSITOR OR
SOURCE OF COLLATERAL BUSINESS

100

100

100

10C

100

0

0

41

SUPPORTING BALANCES

100

100

1

0

0

BALANCE REQUIREMENTS

100

100

1

2

0

100

100

3

2

10

USE OF THE LOAN

INTENDED

TERMS AND

6

100

LENDING TO "NONCAPTIVE"

13

FINANCE COMPANIES

CONDITIONS:

INTEREST RATES CHARGED
COMPENSATING OR
ENFORCEMENT OF
ESTABLISHING

NEW OR LARGER CREDIT LINES

NUMBER
ANSWERING
QUESTI ON
$1 &
OVER
WILLINGNESS TO MAKE OTHER

UNDER
$l

CONSIDOERABLY
LESS
WILLING
$1 C
OVER

UNDER
$1

MODERATELY
LESS

wILLING
$1 t
OVER

ESSNFT
r

MODERATEL Y
AfORF
WILLING

LL Y

UNCHANGED

UNDER
I1

1 E
OVER

UNDER
$1

$1 &
OVER

UN DOE
51

C3OSTDERABLY
MORE
WILLING
$IE
OVER

UNDER
t$

TYPES OF LOANS

TERM LOANS TO BUSINESSES

2

1

66

T7

32

29

CONSUMER

0

3

79

6B

17

26

0

0

68

76

30

23

0

0

84

87

16

12

O

0O

81

17

.4

SINGLE

INSTALMENT LOANS

FAMILY MORTGAGE LOANS

MULTI-FAMILY
ALL OTHER

MORTGAGE

MORTGAGE

LOANS

LOANS

PARTICIPATION LOANS WITH
CORRESPONDENT BANKS
LOANS

2/

MUC-I
EASIER

TC BROKERS

P

100

100

4

0

0

13

13

100

100

2

0

9

6

6

FOR THESE FACTORS,
FIRMER MEANS THE FACTORS
CREDIT REQUESTS, AND EASIER MEANS THEY WERE

WERE CONSIDERED
LESS IMPORTANT.

MORE

IMPORTANT

IN MAKING

DECISIONS

0

FOR A PROVING

0

0