View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

N ECORDS SE

DEC 101964

BOARD OF GOVERNORS
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON

December 10, 1964

CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
TO:

Federal Open Market Committee

FROM:

Mr. Young
There is enclosed a copy of a memorandum from the

Steering Group of the Government Securities Market Study dated
December 7, 1964, entitled "Proposal for Obtaining Financial
Statements

from Nonbank Dealers in U.S. Government Securities."

Authorization to proceed with the collection of financial statements from nonbank government securities dealers, beginning with
data as of the end of the current year, will be requested at the
meeting of the Committee to be held on December 15, 1964.

As

you will recall, the Committee authorized exploration of this
general subject at its meeting on August 1, 1961 (see pages 50-55
of the minutes for that meeting).

Ralph

. Young, S

retary,

Federal Open Market Committee.

Enclosure

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

Si IN RECORDS

SECTION

DEC10 1964
To

Federal Open Market Committee
and Treasury Department

From

Steering Group of the Government
Securities Market Study

Dec mber 7, 1964

Subject:

Proposal for Obtaining
Financial Statements
from Nonbank Dealers
in U. S. Government
Securities

The Treasury-Federal Reserve Study of the Government Securities
Market in 1959-60, which grew out of the 1958 speculative boom and collapse
in U. S. Government bonds, recommended a number of measures to improve public
and official knowledge and understanding of the market.

The Study found that:

"The market for U. S. Government Securities should lead the way, both in developing trading procedures to serve the needs of all kinds of investors most
effectively, and providing the fullest practicable range of information to
serve as a basis for the judgments of those who participate in the market and
those who study its performance."
To meet this objective, a specific program for the collection and
publication of statistics on dealer positions, transactions, and financing was
developed.

The Market Statistics Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of New

York was set up to implement the program which has now been in effect since
1960.

The Steering Group, set up to implement the recommendations of the Study,

then turned its attention to the matter of dealer financial statements.

The

Study had suggested obtaining more uniform balance sheets and income statements
from the dealers in connection with "the possibility of eventual publication of
some kind of consolidated balance sheet and income statement for the dealer
community as a whole".
There is a strong case for more knowledge of dealers' activities and
financial condition by the Treasury, Federal Reserve, and the public.
Government securities dealers play a sensitive and key role in the Government

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
2
securities market, a market whose smooth and sound functioning is vital to
both the financing operations of the Treasury and the open market operations
of the Federal Reserve.

These dealers conduct massive operations in Treasury

securities, generally on small margins and in some cases on small capital,
and yet are largely free of Governmental supervision and regulation.

More-

over, the Government securities market is regarded as a key market from which
other sectors of the capital market take their cue.

Accordingly, any untoward

developments in the Government securities market could have a severe adverse
impact on the entire financial structure and indirectly on the economy as a
whole.
Moreover, dealers in recent years have increasingly criticized Federal
Reserve open market operations and Treasury debt management technique for
impairing the functioning of the market and reducing dealers' ability to earn
profits adequate to the long run health of the industry.

Nonbank dealers have

also expressed concern about the growing number of banks engaging in a dealer
or quasi-dealer function on the grounds that the banks have special advantages
in the form of lower financing costs and the tax and loan account privilege
which also hurts the profitability of the nonbank dealers.

Reasoned evaluation

of these questions necessarily requires more uniform information on dealer
income and expenses than is currently available.
It is essentially for these reasons that the Steering Group recommends a new standardized system of financial reporting for Government security
dealers.

The Group feels that improved and more uniform dealer financial

statements would contribute in no small way to sounder financial reporting and
practices within the industry as well as to a firmer basis for appraisal of
the financial health of the dealer market.
The new reports would supplement the data on dealer positions,
transactions and financing that are currently being received, and would also

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
2a
be collected by the Market Statistics Department of the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York.

They would also supplement the annual dealer financial state-

ments which the Federal Reserve Bank of New York has been receiving for many
years and which, together with supplemental information, have met the operating
needs of the Trading Department of that Bank in forming their judgments as to
the credit worthiness of the dealers with whom they do business.
Summary and Recommendation
In June 1961 the Federal Open Market Committee, acting for the
Federal Reserve System and the Department of the Treasury, authorized the
Steering Group to confer with nonbank dealers concerning the possibilities of
setting up a more standardized system of financial reporting.

This approach

had been suggested by the Steering Group in a memorandum dated June 15, 1961.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
3
Since that time extensive conferences have been held by the Steering Group
with the primary nonbank dealers in an effort to develop detailed information
on dealer accounting practices and problems in order to lay the groundwork
for a specific proposal which the Group could discuss with the dealers and
ultimately present to the Committee.

As a result, the Group has developed a

basis for dealer reporting which it believes is practicable and should produce
worthwhile results through greater knowledge of dealer financial positions,
activities and income, obtained from data that have a reasonable degree of
uniformity as between dealers.
The discussions with dealers brought to light or confirmed the following principal points of difficulty which have to be considered in developing a workable proposal:
1.

There are wide differences in types of activities conducted

by the various dealers, making comparisons of their financial statements difficult.
2.

The financial facts relating to the various dealers activities

receive quite diverse accounting treatment among dealers even for the
same types of activity, thus adding to the difficulties of comparisons.

3. Present dealer financial statements are prepared for a variety
of different statement dates.
4.
degrees.

Most dealers trade securities other than Governments in varying
Most would be able to allocate gross income as between

Government securities and other activities, but allocation of expenses
would be more difficult.

Allocation of net worth would be even more dif-

ficult for conceptual as well as for practical reasons.

All of these

items would probably involve, in varying degrees, estimates; but some
dealers already make such estimates for internal purposes.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
4

5.

The basic financial differences between corporations and

partnerships make comparisons of their net worth and net earnings data
tenuous.

Gross income comparisons would be more valid.

The Steering Group's proposal attempts to resolve most of the above
problems as well as other problems of lesser degree, in such a manner that
reasonably satisfactory, more uniform and more complete financial statements
on nonbank dealer firms

1
should be obtainable without excessive cost to dealer

organizations.
Initially, the proposal is designed to provide better dealer financial statements for use of the Federal Reserve System, the Treasury and other
interested public bodies on a confidential basis.

Eventual publication of some

of the data in consolidated summary form is possible if it proves desirable
after some trial period.
1.

The main features of the proposal are as follows:

All nonbank dealers which transact business in U. S. Government

Securities with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York would submit financial
statements to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of December 31 each
year beginning this year, such statements to be audited where feasible, and
where not audited, to be supplemented by information permitting reconcilement
with the most recent audit available.
2.

The content of the statements, as far as assets and liabilities are

concerned, would conform as nearly as possible to the daily position and
borrowing reports submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, but
all securities holdings would be valued at market rather than at par value.
3.

Long-term (over one year) subordinated debt would be reported

separately from net worth.

1. It is expected that some means of developing reasonably comparable
data for dealer banks could be worked out when and if the nonbank dealer
portion of the project is completed.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
5
4.

A reconcilement of net worth between statement dates would show

adjustments in the various net worth accounts and an analysis of earnings
and expenses for the period.

Both net worth and earnings and expenses

would be broken down to show the portions allocable to operations in

Government securities.
5.

Corporate dealers would show reserves for accrued tax liabilities,

including taxes on realized profits but not on unrealized profits.

Partner-

ships do not set up tax reserves and therefore would report none.
The proposal is set forth in more detail in the following pages as
well as in the attachments consisting of specific financial statement forms

(Forms A-i and A-2), form for reconcilement of net worth and analysis of earnings (Form B), a list of required supplemental information (Form C), and explanatory instructions (Form D).

Also attached is a proposed covering letter

to be sent to each dealer.

The Steering Group recommends this plan and, if it is approved by the
Federal Open Market Committee and the Treasury, would proceed to put it into
effect.

While preliminary discussions have indicated that most nonbank dealers

can comply without undue difficulty, a closer look at the specific proposal by
the dealers and further consideration by the Steering Group may, however,

suggest certain additional minor changes.
A more detailed discussion of the various aspects of the plan follows.

STATEMENT DATES AND AUDITS
Uniformity of statement date is desirable if the statements are to
be comparable and especially if a composite statement is to be prepared.

The

choice of a uniform December 31 statement date would minimize the number of
dealers that would have to make special interim reports and would thus have to
supply supplementary information to reconcile differences between the two

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

6
reports.

Three dealers now submit audited statements for December 31, including

the firm which states that it would have the greatest difficulty in adjusting
to a new statement date.

The audit dates for the other firms are quite diverse

(the three members of the New York Stock Exchange are audited on a surprise
basis on random dates) but two of these firms prepare unaudited December 31
statements for their customers.

All firms prepare month-end trial balances

for their own use which, they agree, could be used as a basis for the preparation of a December 31 statement.
The dealers believe it is feasible to prepare a special unaudited report for a specified month-end date, with supplemental information, if
necessary, to reconcile the special report to the most recent audit.

They are

willing to have the results made public in consolidated form.
An alternative would be to require all dealers to submit audited
statements as of the same date, December 31.

The Steering Group, however,

feels that at this point this requirement would impose an undue burden of expense on those firms which are not audited on that date, unless they were able
to shift their audit dates, which could also cause complications due to the
fact that several dealers use the same accounting firms who might have difficulty in making the audits simultaneously.
It may be argued that a December 31 statement would show a distorted
picture of a firm's assets and liabilities because of special year-end influences.

However, this does not appear to be the case with the three firms

now furnishing audited calendar year-end statements.

Some distortions in

assets and liabilities are likely to occur at the end of a firm's fiscal year,
regardless of its date, for special transactions are often carried out at that
time for tax reasons.

On the other hand, the net worth and earnings position

of a firm, especially of partnerships, would best be reflected at the end of
the firm's fiscal year.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

REPURCHASE AND RESALE AGREEMENTS
The proposal calls for the collection of repurchase and resale
agreement data broken down between those with maturities under 15 days and
those with longer maturities.

The supplemental information accompanying the

statements would show the relationship between the maturities of the securities underlying the longer-term agreements and the maturities of the agreements themselves.

This would provide a measure of the market risk involved

in the longer-term contracts, which could be a source of trouble if the
maturities of the securities were too long.

This detailed information would

be for the use of the Federal Reserve and Treasury only, except that if composite figures are eventually released for publication or other public purpose
with a sufficient time lag, the breakdown of short and long repurchase agreements would be shown.
VALUATION OF SECURITIES
Practices in valuing securities for financial statement
differ among dealers.

Five value at market, two at cost, and six at cost or

market whichever is lower.
a LIFO basis.

purposes

In computing cost, some use a FIFO basis, others

Under the proposal, all would be asked to value at market prices,

which they can readily do.

This would give a more current picture of the value

of the firm's holdings though not necessarily the most conservative picture;
also, it would avoid the problem of determining the basis for computing costs.
BREAKDOWN OF SECURITIES HOLDINGS
Although not all dealers now break down their securities holdings in
their statements by type and maturity, they would be willing to follow the
breakdown in the proposed statement form and can all do so readily, with the
exception of one large firm which expects to have problems in doing so because
of its particular machine accounting system.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

COMMITMENT VS. DELIVERY BASIS
Dealers follow widely divergent practices in the basis for reporting
their trading positions in securities, that is, their long and short positions.
Some report on a cash or delivered basis, others on a strictly commitment
basis, and still others on a mixed basis.

The result is that the securities

positions shown in financial statements are not consistent among dealers.
Moreover, in a majority of cases such positions could not be reconciled with
the daily position reports submitted by the dealers to the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York, all of which are on a commitment basis.
The proposal would require all dealers to show, for December 31 financial statement purposes, their holdings of United States Government securities, Federal agency issues and certificates of deposits on a commitment
basis. This would be done either by preparing the statement itself on a commitment basis, or by supplying supplemental data which would enable us to put the
statement on a commitment basis.
Use of a commitment basis would have the advantages of (1) reflecting
all potential risks in the Government securities position, (2) making the statements comparable to the daily position reports, and (3) providing a cross check
on the accuracy of the daily reports.
To require reports on other securities on a commitment basis would
create many reporting problems.

Therefore, it is proposed, initially at least,

to permit dealers to report such securities as they normally do in their financial statements, making proper identification as to whether such reporting
is on a commitment or delivery basis.
RESERVES FOR INCOME TAXES
Practically all incorporated dealer firms now set up reserves for
income taxes, including taxes on realized profits; none set up taxes against

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
9
unrealized profits.

Partnerships do not accrue tax liabilities or set up

reserves against them because the partners are individually liable for the
taxes.

Thus, the tax amounts due from any partner in any one tax period de-

pend on his over-all taxable status.
It seems reasonable to require all the corporations to show accrued
reserves for taxes on earned income and realized profits, as this is standard
accounting practice.

Most of the corporate dealers have indicated that they

could also estimate taxes on unrealized profits on a given date.

If their

securities holdings are to be valued at market, this would tend to show a truer
picture of the current status of the firm's net worth.

However, such an esti-

mate would have little significance because of frequent, sizable changes in
market values.
It is proposed, therefore, to require all corporate dealers to show
a reserve for taxes on realized profits but not on unrealized profits; partnerships would not be required to show any tax reserves.

While this results in an

inconsistency as between corporations and partnerships there seems to be no
good way of resolving it.
LONG-TERM DEBT
"Long-term debt" is
one year or longer.

defined to include any debt with a maturity of

Such debt is not part of net worth, but since it is sub-

ordinated to other liabilities, it represents a cushion against market risks
in trading operations which are essentially short-run.

Ordinarily such debt

would be in the form of debentures, capital or long-term notes, subordinated
to other liabilities, such as loans to carry securities in portfolio and repurchase agreements.

The cut-off at one year is arbitrary, and the terms of the

various indentures or loan agreements differ between dealers.

Detailed infor-

mation on specific long-term debt arrangements would be requested as supplementary information.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES
Those few firms which carry reserves for contingencies would show
them as a separate item on the liability side of the balance sheet.

Whether

or not this item would be considered as part of net worth would depend on the
character of the reserve in the particular case.
NET WORTH
The status and composition of each individual dealer's net worth as
shown by his balance sheet would be made clear by the use of supplemental information to accompany the statement.

A composite net worth figure for all

dealers will necessarily be a mixture reflecting the different types of firms
in the business--corporations and partnerships--having various types of
capitalization, i.e.,

various classes of stock and partners' capital having

different withdrawal features.
The significance of the individual net worth figures will depend to
a considerable extent on whether the December 31 statement is for a normal
fiscal year or for an interim period.

Under the proposal, the net worth of

a firm using December 31 as its fiscal year-end would reflect, as nearly as
possible, its true net worth position because substantial adjustments in

certain expense items, such as income taxes on profits, bonuses to employees
and other special payments, are normally made at the end of the fiscal year.
By comparison, the net worth of the firm with a September 30 fiscal year-end,
could be substantially inflated in its interim report as of December 31 because
these special expense items might not have been taken care of.

Another but

different and possibly offsetting inconsistency might be created between firms
having different fiscal years by a bunching up of profits or losses such as
are often realized by various firms at the end of their fiscal year for tax
reasons.

Proposed dealer financial reports may provide more information on

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
11
the dimensions of these types of discrepancies among dealers as well as the
extent to which they may offset one another in the aggregate figures.
Similar problems arise in connection with the proposed reconcilement
of net worth from one year to another.

Some dealers provide a reconcilement

with their regular annual statements but most do not, even though

practically

all dealers prepare a reconcilement for their own use covering their fiscal
year.

The dealers are all willing to try to prepare a reconcilement for in-

terim dates, although for some it would be a real burden, as they do not now
keep the accounting records needed to do so.
A question with respect to net worth of partnerships is whether any
of the partners' individual net worth should be considered as part of the firm's
net worth since it unquestionably underlies the risk of the business.
also be a very difficult matter to deal with.

This would

Therefore, no attempt is made to

cover it in the current proposal.
Partnership net worth and earnings data present additional difficulties of interpretation.

For example, their computation is clouded by the ques-

tion of the extent to which partners' drawings are in effect expenses (payments
for services) or withdrawal of capital.

Since there is no way of differentiating

among types of partnerships withdrawals, it is proposed that normally all withdrawals would be reported as one total.

Payments clearly made in the form of

salary or for specific services rendered would, however, be treated as expense.
ALLOCATION OF NET WORTH
Each nonbank dealer would be asked to distribute the firm's net worth
between the portion used in the Government securities business and that used
in other operations.

This allocation is designed to furnish a yardstick against

which earnings from Government securities operations can be measured and to
indicate the amount of capital which would normally be available at the risk

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

of the Government securities business.

Only one dealer has specifically

allocated a fixed portion of net worth in this manner.

Those dealers whose

activities are confined largely to Government securities would probably be
able to make reasonably accurate estimates but those who do a widespread
business in various types of securities expect to have difficulty because
their accounting methods are not designed to fit the concept of allocating
net worth.

These firms consider their net worth available to the extent

needed by any part of their business at any given time.
In view of the wide divergency of dealer

views as to a reasonable

basis for making such an allocation, each dealer would be asked to prepare
the allocation according to his own
of the method used.

judgment and to furnish an explanation

It is hoped that the resulting information would be

useful in itself or would point toward a way of obtaining more uniform data
in this area.

Unless or until the allocations clearly are meaningful, they

would not be used for summary statistical purposes.
In the interest of consistency with the earnings figures to be
obtained from the dealers, the Government securities business would be construed to include activities in securities of the U. S. Government and Federal
Agencies and in bank certificates of deposit.
NET INCOME ANALYSIS
Gross income would be broken down into three major categories,
trading profits, interest and dividend
income.

income

and discount earned, and other

All income on Treasury bills would be included as discount earned.

Most dealers do not break down discount on bills between trading profit and
interest earned since it would be an expensive, time-consuming process.
Gross expenses would reflect two categories, interest on borrowed funds, and
all other expenses except income taxes.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
13
Income and expenses, both gross and net, would be allocated between
those arising from Government securities, Agency securities and bank certificates of deposit and those arising from other securities operations.

This

allocation should present little difficulty, except in the category of other
expenses, such as salaries, telephone charges and rents.

As most dealers do

not keep accounting records from which they can allocate these overhead costs,
they would have to make estimates, at least to some extent.

The dealers would

be asked to explain any such estimates with the hope that the explanations
would suggest a way of obtaining more meaningful and uniform figures.

Attachments

Steering Group
Daniel S. Ahearn
Albert R. Koch
Spencer S. Marsh, Jr.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

REC'D INRECORDS SECTION

December
1964 10

DRAFT

(CORPORATIONS

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

ASSETS

Cash.............................................
.....................
$
Cash pledged against securities borrowed............
Due from brokers and dealers ........................ . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . .
Receivable on Resale Agreements .................... .....................

8.

9.

Securities owned (at market prices)
United States Government Securities (total)..
o..
Treasury Bills ................... .......
Certificates of Indebtedness....... .........
Notes and Bonds. ..........................
Due in 1 year or less...................$

.....

15.

Due after 1 year but within 5 years.......
Due after 5 years but within 10 years....
Due after 10 years......................
Securities of Federal Agencies (total)............
Due in 1 year or less ..................... $
Due after 1 year. ..........................

16.

Municipal and State Securities....................

10.

11.
12.

13.
14.

17.
18.

.....................

.

.

.

.

.

19.
20.
21.

Corporate Bonds. ..................................
Corporate Stocks. .................................
Other Securities.........................................
Bankers' Acceptances.........................................
Time Certificates of Deposit and Short-term Bank Notes.......

22.
23.
24.

Securities carried for participants in joint accounts .................
Securities sold, but not delivered (at selling prices)................
Accrued interest on securities owned..................................

25.
26.

Cash surrender value of life insurance on partners or officers...........
Furniture and fixtures (net) and other assets.............................

.....

:I:I

TOTAL ..................................................... $

No assets or liabilities are to be stated net of other liabilities
or assets, unless specified.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

DRAFT

FORM A-2
(CORPORATIONS)

LIABILITIES
1.

Loans Payable............................................................. $

Other Sec.

Govts.
2.
3.
4.

Banks (Unsecured $
Other (Unsecured $

);
);

(Secured $
(Secured $

$
$

)
)
...
Other Sec.

.......
Liability on Repurchase Agreements (at purchase price).
Govts.
Municipais

5.

Contracts maturing in 15 days or less..$

$

$

6.

Contracts

maturing in more than 15 days$

$

$

8.

Liability for securities held under Resale Agreements (at selling
price)............................................ .....................
Deposits on securities loaned......................... .....................

9.

Due to customers......................................

7.

.....................

---

Securities sold but not yet purchased (at market prices)

United States Government Securities (total)..............................
Treasury Bills............................................. $
Certificates of Indebtedness................................
Notes and Bonds.............................................
Due in 1 year or less..........................$
Due after 1 year but within 5 years............
Due after 5 years but within 10 years..........
Due after 10 years.............................
Securities of Federal Agencies (total)..................................
Due in 1 year or less...................................... $
Due after 1 year.........................................
Municipal and State Securities........................................
Corporate Bonds................
Corporate Stocks...............
Other Securities...............

11111.11
1111111.1

Securities purchased but not received (at purchase price)..
Accrued interest on securities sold but not yet purchased..
Reserve for Income Taxes. ..................................
Reserve for other expense items............................
Other Liabilities........................................
30.

Long-term Debt .............................................................

31.

Reserves for contingencies.................................................

Net Worth
Capital Stock (
shares outstanding, net of Treasury stock)...
Capital Surplus................................................
Earned Surplus................................................
Other Accounts (Explain in Supplementary Information, Form C).....
TOTAL...................................................... $

--

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

DRAFT

COMPARISON OF NET WORTH
Dec. 31, 1963

Dec. 31, 1964

$

Capital stock................................................. $
Capital surplus.....................................
Earned surplus..............................................
Total net worth.............................................
Amount of net worth allocable to activities in Government
and Agency issues and certificates of deposit (see

instructions).............................................$

RECONCILEMENT OF CHANGE IN EARNED SURPLUS
(Item 3 above)
6.
7.

Balance at beginning of calendar year......................................
$
Net income for the year.....................................................

8.

Income taxes.......................................

9.

Adjustments.................................................................
(Explain in supplemental information)
Dividends paid..............................................................
Earned surplus at end of calendar year (same as Item 3 above)............... $

10.
11.

NET INCOME ANALYSIS

(Item 7 above)
Allocable to
Government &
Agency securities
All other
& certificates
securities
of deposit
& activities

Income
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.

Trading and underwriting profit
on coupon issues .......................... $
(Includes unrealized appreciation or
depreciation on securities owned).........(
Interest and dividend income and discount
earned....................................
(Includes al.l income on Treasury bills)...(
Other income................................
Total income.................................$

Total

$
) (

)

)

(

)

(

$

$

$

$

Expense
18.
19.

Interest on borrowed funds ..................
All other expenses, including taxes other

20.
21.

Total expenses .............................. $
Net income (same as Item 7 above) ........... $

$

than income taxes..........................

$

)

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

REoRDS SFCTIO
FiC'D

DRAFT

(CORPORA

Ys

LIST OF SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHE

B4
..

WITH FORMS A-1, A-2 and B
(See also instructions Form D)

1.

Reconcilement to audit -- if audited statement is for a different date.

2.

Matched repurchase and resale agreements -- list.

3.

With respect to holdings of securities other than Governments, Agencies and
certificates of deposit specify the basis of valuation and whether shown on
a commitment basis or otherwise

(Form A-i, Items #16-19).

4.

Explanation of other assets (Form A-1, Item #26).

5.

Explanation of "other" loans payable

6.

Market value of securities sold under repurchase agreements maturing in more

(Form A-2, Item #3).

than 15 days and relationship of maturities of securities to maturities of
contracts.

(Form A-2, Item #6)

7.

Explanation of long-term debt, if any (Form A-2, Item #30).

8.

Explanation of nature of Reserves for Contingencies, if any (Form A-2, Item #31).

9.

Breakdown of classes of capital stock where there is more than one class, with
explanation of special provisions.

10.

(Form A-2, Item #32).

Explanation of significant changes in capital stock and capital surplus

(Form B,

Items #1 and 2).
11.

Explanation of allocation of net worth

12.

If available, furnish breakdown of income on Treasury bills (included in
Item #14,

(Form B, Item #5).

Form B) between portion considered trading profits and portion con-

sidered interest income.
13.

Contingent liability as endorser on bankers' acceptances.

14.

Nature and amount of other contingent liabilities.

15.

Nature and amount of commitments not reflected on balance sheet.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
DRAFT

i EC'D INRECORDS S
FORM D
£S4
g
(CORP

NONBANK DEALERS - CORPORATIONS

Instructions for Preparing Financial Statement Data
Forms A-i, A-2, B and C

Statement Dates and Audits
Statements

(Forms A-i and A-2), reconcilements

(Form B) and

supplementary information (Form C) are to be submitted to the Federal Reserve
Bank of New York in the proposed form as of December 31 each year, such statements to be unaudited unless December 31 is an audit date for the firm.

Firms

having audits on other dates are to furnish supplementary information to permit
reconcilement of the audited statements to the December 31 statements (Item #10
of Supplementary Information - Form C).
ASSETS - FORM A-i

(Instructions given only on items for which they are needed)

Line #4

Receivable on Resale Agreements

--

Do not include matched resale agreements.
Lines #5
- 15 -and line 21

Government and Federal Agencies Securities and Certificates
of Deposit and Short-term Bank Notes
Report holdings on a commitment basis in same manner as
daily position reports to Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
but at market prices.

Lines #16 - 20 --

Municipal and State Securities, Corporate Bonds, Corporate
Stocks, Other Securities, Bankers' Acceptances
Reporting basis at discretion of the dealer but basis
must be specified in Supplementary Information - Form C,

Item #13.
Line #2 3

--

Securities Sold But Not Delivered (at selling prices)
Include

(a)

Forward commitments for sale of securities owned,
including regular delivery.
are deducted from Assets

Offset -- The securities

#5 - 19.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
2
(b)

Failure to deliver securities owned and sold.
Securities are deducted from Assets #5

(c)

Offset --

- 19.

Forward commitments and failures to deliver securities
sold short.

Offset -- Securities are included in

Liabilities #10 - 24.
--

Line #26

Other Assets
Include all special items such as investments in and loans

to subsidiaries or loans to officers and explain in Supplementary
Information Item #4.

LIABILITIE S - FORM A-2

(Instructions given only on items for which they are

needed)
Lines #2

-

3 --

Loans Payable - Unsecured
Include
(a)

Any unsecured loans in the form of loans.

(b)

Any repurchase agreements wherein the securities sold
were not owned and were not delivered to the buyer -otherwise known as "due bills" sold.

Lines #4

-

6 --

Liability on Repurchase Agreements

Securities underlying contracts are included in Assets,
Lines #5 - 21.

Line #7

--

Do not include matched repurchase agreements.

Liability for Securities Held Under Resale Agreements
Do not include matched resale agreements.

Lines #10 - 24 --

Securities Sold Not Yet Purchased (at market prices)
Report Government and Agency securities

on commitment basis.

(Lines #10 - 20)

Reporting basis on all other securities

(Lines #21 - 24) at discretion of the dealer but basis must
be specified in Supplemental Information Form C, Item #13.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

Include
(a)

Securities sold short and borrowed to make delivery.
Offset -- Cash received.

(b)

Securities sold short but not yet delivered -- forward
commitments or failures to deliver.

Offset -- Included

in securities sold not delivered Assets #23.
Line #25

--

Securities Purchased But Not Received (at purchase prices)
Include
(a)

Forward commitments to buy, including regular delivery.
Offset -- Securities are included in Assets #5 - 19.

(b)

Failures to receive securities purchased.
Offset -- Securities are included in Assets #5 - 19.

Line #27

--

Reserve for Income Taxes
Show reserves for accrued taxes on earned income and
realized profits, but not on unrealized profits.

Such

reserves are to be estimated if necessary.
Line #30

--

Long-term Debt
Include any subordinated debt with maturity of one year
longer.

(Show details in Supplementary Information Form C,

Item #9.
COMPARISON OF NET WORTH - FORM B
Line #5

--

Amount of net worth allocable to activities in Government and
Agency securities and certificates of deposit
If net worth is normally not apportioned, make best estimate
and explain basis of estimate in supplementary information.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

NET INCOME ANALYSIS - FORM B

Line #8

--

Income Taxes
Include all accruals and transfers to Reserves for Income
Taxes to cover income taxes on income for the current calendar
year.

Do not include actual payment of taxes on income for

prior calendar years.
Lines #12

and 13 - Trading and underwriting profit on coupon issues (Includes unrealized appreciation or depreciation on securities owned)
Since all Government and Agency securities and certificates
of deposit are to be valued at market, trading profits and

losses in Line #11 will include some unrealized profits or
losses on securities which are still owned and are included in
the assets.

Such profits should be shown as a memorandum item

on Line #12.

Line #18

--

Interest on Borrowed Funds
Include interest from repurchase agreements.

Line #19

--

All other expenses including taxes other than income taxes
if certain types of expenses are not normally apportioned
between activities in

different types of securities,

make best

estimate and explain basis of estimate in supplementary

information.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020

OF LETTER TO BE ADDRESSED TO ALL NONBANK

Dear Mr.
When the project for improving the available information on the
Government securities market was initiated in January 1960, Chairman Martin
and Secretary of the Treasury Anderson wrote you under date of January 22,
1960 requesting your cooperation and mentioning, among other things, that the
program would include dealer balance sheet and income statement information.
Since that time extensive conferences have been held with dealers to lay the
groundwork for a specific plan for improving dealer financial statements.

As

a result of these discussions a basis for nonbank dealer financial statements

has been developed which should produce worthwhile results through greater
knowledge of dealer financial status, activities and income, obtained from
data that has a reasonable degree of uniformity as between dealers.

The need

for such knowledge is, if anything, greater than it was in 1960.
The plan is designed initially to provide better financial statements
for the use of the Federal Reserve System, the Treasury and other interested
public bodies on a confidential basis.

Eventual publication of some of the

data in consolidated summary form is contemplated if it proves desirable after
a trial period.
The details of the plan are set forth in the attached statement forms
and instructions.
1.

The salient features are:

All nonbank dealers are to submit financial statements to the

Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of December 31 each year, such
statements to be audited, where feasible, and where not audited to be
supplemented by information permitting reconcilement with the most recent
audit.

Authorized for public release by the FOMC Secretariat on 4/17/2020
2

2.

The content of the statement so far as assets and liabilities

are concerned will conform as nearly as possible to the daily position
and borrowing reports submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
with all securities holdings to be valued at market rather than at par
value.

3.

A reconcilement of net worth between statement dates will show

adjustments in the various net worth accounts and an analysis of net
earnings for the period.

Both net worth and net income will be broken

down to show the portions allocable to operations in Government securities.
It is expected that dealers will be able to comply with the requirements of the plan without assuming undue burdens.

Some minor adjustments in

the details of the plan may have to be made after each dealer has had an

opportunity to apply the requirements to his own situation.

It is hoped that

statements as of December 31, 1964 can be obtained from all dealers.
We shall be pleased to answer

any questions you may have regarding

this project.
Very truly yours,

Alfred Hayes,
President.

Enclosures