View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

1

In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.

Strictly Confidential (FR)

Class II FOMC

Part 1

August 18, 1999

CURRENT ECONOMIC
AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

Summary and Outlook

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
by the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Strictly Confidential (FR)

Class II FOMC

August 18, 1999

SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
by the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Domestic Developments
The developments of the past couple of months have contained hints that the
economy might be encountering, as the Wall Street Journalrecently put it, some
"growing pains" after a remarkable run. The BEA's advance estimate of secondquarter GDP came in lower than generally anticipated, while tight labor markets
seem to be generating increases in pay rates beyond what businesses perhaps can
be expected to offset in greater productivity. With Chairman Greenspan having
emphasized in his Humphrey-Hawkins testimony that the Fed should attempt to
deal preemptively with inflationary pressures, the fixed-income markets have
reversed the rally that followed the June 30 announcement that although the
funds rate was being raised, the FOMC had no predilection toward further hikes.
But fundamental economic concerns and monetary policy fears are not the only
factors that have weighed on these markets in the past few weeks. Participants
evidently have been suffering from a bout of Y2K jitters, with many borrowers
rushing to issue bonds on the assumption that dealers and institutions will retreat
to more conservative positions as the year draws to a close. However, with
memories of the 1998 liquidity crisis still fresh, the depth of the markets has
been limited, and a variety of rate spreads have widened markedly in response to
the current and expected supply. Even rates on high-grade corporates and home
mortgages have suffered, moving up sharply to levels not seen in two years. In
these circumstances, only a considerable upside surprise in second-quarter
earnings reports has held share prices within hailing distance of the record highs
registered in mid-July. And with many foreign economies beginning to look
healthier, the dollar has turned weaker--exacerbating concerns about domestic
inflation and interest rate pressures.
While recent developments on the external side point to some greater
improvement in net exports in coming quarters, the backup in intermediate- and
long-term interest rates--unless reversed soon--suggests a less buoyant outlook
for domestic demand than contemplated in the last Greenbook. We do anticipate
that the recent liquidity tensions will largely dissipate once the century date
change is behind us, but the declines in interest rates are expected to be limited
by a further moderate firming of monetary policy. On that assumption, the
output path in our current projection is little changed from that last time, with
real GDP increasing at an annual rate of 3-3/4 percent over the second half of
1999 and 2-3/4 percent in 2000. As before, the unemployment rate is expected
to remain in the vicinity of 4-1/4 percent.
Although the projected levels of resource utilization are essentially the same as
last time, we have elevated our inflation forecast a little. This change reflects
not only the upside surprises on the wage front of late but also indications that
somewhat greater pressures may be in train from materials costs and lessened
restraint on import prices. All told, we still expect the core CPI to rise a touch

I-2

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

more than 2 percent in 1999, while the surge in energy prices helps to lift total
CPI inflation to 2-1/2 percent. Assuming that energy prices ease next year, we
expect overall CPI inflation to drop to 2-1/4 percent even as core inflation
moves above 2-1/2 percent. Once again, we would note that an extension of our
forecast beyond 2000 would show a further escalation of inflation.
Key Background Factors
In light of this more inflationary tilt, we have assumed a notch more firming of
money market conditions than in our last forecast. Nonetheless, the increase in
the federal funds rate is less than forward rates would suggest that markets
currently are anticipating--although the reading of market expectations is more
problematic right now because of the extra liquidity premiums that seem to be
built into yields. In any event, we are not projecting any sustained or substantial
departures of longer-term Treasury rates from the range of recent weeks. And,
foreseeing a significant reversal of the spread widening that has occurred of late,
we expect that private long-term rates next year will generally be somewhat
lower than they are now.
Equity prices have exhibited considerable volatility since late June but, on
balance, they are now close to the level in our last projection. As before, we
think that Y2K anxieties may lead to some further shakiness in the latter part of
this year, but we have anticipated only modest fluctuations around an essentially
flat trend line through 2000. Given our forecast for profits, the sustained high
price-earnings multiples that are implied by our path for share prices suggest an
ongoing vulnerability to a major downturn if investors were to lose some of their
remarkable exuberance.
On the fiscal front, the appropriations legislation now making its way through
the Congress implies higher federal spending than we assumed in the June
Greenbook. We have increased discretionary outlays $20 billion in fiscal 2000,
including $7 billion for agricultural subsidies, $5 billion for national defense,
and $9 billion for a variety of other programs. If the entire $20 billion is given
the "emergency" designation, emergency spending in fiscal 2000 would total
$32 billion (including the supplemental appropriations that were passed in late
1998 and early 1999). We have not incorporated any tax changes at this time:
President Clinton has promised to veto the tax cut bill passed by the Congress,
and our assumed spending package would more than use up the $14 billion
surplus in the on-budget accounts that CBO is now projecting under current
policies for fiscal 2000.
In sum, we expect the unified budget to register surpluses of $124 billion in
fiscal 1999 and $167 billion in fiscal 2000; the on-budget accounts are expected
to show a small deficit in fiscal 1999 and a $17 billion surplus in fiscal 2000.

Domestic Developments

I-3

Our projection for the surplus in 1999 is about the same as the one CBO released
on July 1, but our number for 2000 is about $25 billion higher, after taking
account of the differences in policy assumptions.
As regards the external sector, we have raised our forecast for growth abroad,
with foreign GDP now expected to rise 3 percent over the forecast period. The
revision of about 1/2 percentage point per year on average is concentrated in the
developing Asian nations (except China) where recent growth has been
considerably stronger than anticipated and the downside risks seem to be
diminishing; prospects for growth in Europe and Mexico also look a little better
than they did in June. As noted, the dollar has depreciated slightly, on net, since
the last Greenbook; a considerable slippage against the euro and the yen having
been largely offset by an appreciation against the currencies of several emerging
market economies. Looking ahead, we expect the inflation-adjusted value of the
dollar against a broad range of currencies to edge down over the forecast period,
consistent with the decline in U.S. growth relative to that of our trading partners
and the large and growing U.S. current account deficit.
Crude oil prices are running about $3 per barrel above the June Greenbook path,
mainly because OPEC has been more successful in restraining production than
we had anticipated. The spot price of WTI is currently about $21.50 per barrel
and is expected to change little through year-end as OPEC maintains production
around current levels and the oil companies build a little extra inventory in
anticipation of possible Y2K demands. The WTI price is still projected to drift
down next year as supply pressures ease, but our current projection for the fourth
quarter of 2000--$18.50 per barrel--is $1 higher than we had anticipated in June,
the result of both lower production and stronger global demand.
The Current Quarter
According to the advance release, real GDP growth slowed to an annual rate of
2.3 percent in the second quarter, held down in part by a sharp drop in the rate of
inventory investment. Based on the information that has come in since that
report, we estimate that real GDP growth will be revised down a few tenths,
mainly because inventory investment appears to have been even less than the
BEA had assumed; the BEA may also make a small downward adjustment to
consumer spending. (The monthly source data for the domestic spending
categories are now complete, apart from future revisions, but the June figures for
merchandise trade will not be released until August 19.)

I-4

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

Summary of the Near-Term Outlook
(Percent change at annual rate except as noted)
1999:Q2
Measure

1999:Q3

June
GB

BEA'

Aug.
GB

June
GB

Real GDP
Private domestic final purchases
Personal consumption expenditures
Residential investment
Business fixed investment

2.9
5.6
4.4
2.1
15.2

2.3
4.9
4.0
5.1
10.8

1.9
4.8
3.8
8.0
10.4

3.5
3.7
3.9
-1.5
4.9

3.5
3.2
3.6
-4.8
4.5

Government outlays for consumption
and investment

-1.4

-1.2

-1.7

3.1

2.8

Aug.
GB

Change, billions of
chained (1992) dollars
Inventory investment
Net exports

-8.6
-27.8

-19.4
-19.4

-23.8
-20.9

24.3
-32.2

23.8
-22.0

1. Advance release, published on July 29.

We have only a few data for the current quarter. We are projecting that real
GDP will increase at around a 3-1/2 percent annual rate, the same as in the June
Greenbook. That outcome would be broadly consistent with the labor market
results for July, after taking account of both the sizable increase in aggregate
hours and the flat unemployment rate. Industrial production rose 3/4 percent in
July after a weak June and is projected to rise at an annual rate of nearly
5 percent for the quarter as a whole.
Growth in private domestic final sales slowed somewhat in the second quarter,
and our forecast is for a further slowing in the current quarter--to an annual rate
of 3-1/4 percent. One reason is that consumer spending seems to have
decelerated after having soared earlier in the year. Unit sales of new light
vehicles (adjusting for shifts in reporting periods) were a sizzling 16-3/4 million
units (annual rate) in July, but that only matched the pace of the second quarter.
Moreover, the advance report on retail sales indicated that real outlays for nonautomotive consumer goods were about unchanged last month at a level less
than 1/2 percent above the second-quarter average. We expect stronger retail
sales figures in the next couple of monthly reports, given the buoyant consumer
sentiment and positive fundamentals; in addition, heavy air conditioning use
should give an extra boost to the services component of spending. Even so, real
PCE seems likely to grow a touch less this quarter than last.

Domestic Developments

I-5

Residential investment should weaken substantially this quarter. We expect that
sales transactions will fall off in the coming months, as the higher cost of
mortgage finance bites. Starts on an unadjusted basis should hold up better than
seasonally as builders work on a backlog of projects that have been delayed by
short supplies of labor and materials. The 4-1/2 percent rebound in seasonally
adjusted single-family starts last month, to 1.33 million units (annual rate),
actually involved an appreciable decline in unadjusted starts. Nonetheless, the
drop-off in seasonally adjusted starts during the spring will translate into a
decline in real construction outlays, as estimated by the BEA, in the third
quarter.
Outlays for business investment probably will rise only moderately after having
surged in the second quarter. Recent softness in nominal computer orders and
shipments suggests that growth in spending for such equipment may be slowing
somewhat--perhaps the result of the Y2K considerations we have been citing.
Weak trends in orders for industrial, agricultural, and construction equipment
would seem to presage subdued shipments in those categories, and outlays for
motor vehicles are unlikely to match their spectacular second-quarter level.
Meanwhile, outlays for nonresidential construction may slip further, dragged
down especially by the ongoing contraction of industrial building.
In the government sector, real federal purchases should rise slightly this quarter,
mainly because of a spurt in defense outlays related to operations in the Balkans.
An appreciable gain in state and local spending also seems likely: Employment
continued to rise through July, and construction outlays appear poised to resume
an uptrend after the weather-induced gyrations of the first half.
Prospects for the external sector seem a little more favorable than we anticipated
in June, mainly because the stronger growth abroad bodes well for U.S. exports.
Nonetheless, with no reason to think that the steep rise in imports will abate in
the near term, we still expect the ongoing drop in real net exports to shave, all
else equal, nearly a percentage point from real GDP growth this quarter.
In contrast to the slowing in final sales, we expect inventory investment to pick
up considerably this quarter--indeed, enough to add more than a percentage point
to real GDP growth. Admittedly, although inventory-sales ratios have
plummeted over the past few quarters, there is little anecdotal evidence that
businesses are dissatisfied with their stock levels--and the orders information for
recent months does not indicate that a major inventory building effort is under
way. Under the circumstances, we have trimmed the level of stock accumulation
considerably relative to our last forecast, but--starting from the much lower
second-quarter pace--the swing is essentially the same.

I-6

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

We now expect the total CPI to increase at an annual rate of 2-1/2 percent in the
current quarter, 3/4 percentage point above our previous projection. The
revision is accounted for by energy prices, which rose 2 percent in July, and,
judging from surveys of gasoline prices, are increasing about as fast in August.
Our forecast of core CPI inflation is 1-3/4 percent, a little less than in the June
Greenbook. As for hourly compensation, we expect the ECI to rise at an annual
rate of 3-1/2 percent this quarter, slightly above the trend of the past year; we
have only a little information on wages this quarter, but the recent increases in
average hourly earnings have been on the high side.
The Outlook for Economic Activity beyond the Current Quarter
Our forecast shows real GDP growth running a little more than 3 percent per
year, on average, between now and the end of 2000.1 As in our previous
forecasts, domestic final demand is expected to decelerate appreciably, mainly
reflecting our assumption that the surge in stock prices is behind us; some
additional restraint is expected to come from the rise in longer-term interest rates
this year. At the same time, we continue to anticipate some offset to the slowing
in domestic final demand from a lessening of the drag from net exports and a
pickup in the rate of inventory investment. The basic story of the inflation
forecast also is the same as in the June Greenbook, although, as noted, we have
raised the projection a little, mainly to take account of recent developments in
commodities markets and some indications that the pressures on wages may be
somewhat greater than we had thought.
Consumer spending. We have made only small changes to the projection for
consumer spending beyond the current quarter. We still expect real PCE to rise
at an annual rate of about 4-1/2 percent in the fourth quarter (about 4 percent
excluding Y2K-related purchases) and 3-1/4 percent in 2000. As has been true
for some time, our projection hinges on the waning of the wealth effect, which
should evaporate by early next year, given the behavior of the stock market over

1. The quarterly pattern of real GDP growth exhibits considerable bumpiness, mainly

because of our assumed Y2K effects. These effects, which are the same as in the June
Greenbook, include a little precautionary stocking by consumers and businesses in the third and
especially the fourth quarters and a slowing in computer purchases toward the end of the year.
We also have assumed some minor disruptions of activity in early 2000 as computer glitches
surface. Excluding Y2K considerations, we expect real GDP to rise 3.3 percent in the third
quarter of 1999, 3.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 1999, 2.9 percent in the first quarter of
2000, 2.9 percent in the second quarter of 2000, and 2.9 percent in the third quarter of 2000.
The Y2K-adjusted four-quarter changes in real GDP would be 3.3 percent in 1999 and 3.0
percent in 2000. (We also think that concerns about Y2K provided enough of a boost to
spending on computers in 1998 to have added about 0.1 percentage point to that year's growth
in real GDP.)

I-7

Domestic Developments

Projections of Real GDP
(Percent change, compound annual rate)
Measure

1999:H1

1999:H2

2000

3.1
3.7

3.8
3.6

2.8
2.6

3.8
4.1

2.8
2.7

2.9
2.8

5.2
5.6

4.1
4.1

3.3
3.3

Residential investment
Previous

11.6
8.8

-4.3
.4

-3.4
-3.9

BFI

9.4
11.7

4.1
3.6

7.4
7.5

1.2
1.5

2.6
2.1

2.7
2.2

Exports
Previous

-.8
-1.3

6.0
3.8

5.3
4.7

Imports
Previous

11.5
11.8

10.0
9.8

7.7
7.6

Real GDP
Previous
Final sales
Previous
PCE
Previous

Previous
Government purchases
Previous

Change, billions of chained
(1992) dollars
Inventory change
Previous

-14.6
-7.2

20.3
18.4

-12.5
-12.5

Net exports
Previous

-37.3
-39.6

-17.7
-22.6

-52.6
-58.2

the past few quarters and our projection of essentially flat stock prices from here
on. Moreover, the wave of mortgage refinancings--which, we suspect, provided
extra impetus to consumption earlier this year--has ended as mortgage rates have
climbed. The personal saving rate is expected to bounce around over the next
year and a half, in part because of Y2K effects, but to remain around the level of
the second quarter of 1999 (that is, about -1 percent on the current NIPA

definition).2

2. This fall, in the benchmark revision of the NIPA, government retirement plans will be
included in the personal saving figures, as private plans have long been treated; this should add

about 1-3/4 percentage points to the level of the saving rate in 1998, although other changes to
the income and expenditure data could obscure the effect.

I-8

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

One remarkable aspect of consumption lately has been the sustained strength in
light vehicle sales, which has prompted us to revise up our forecast again.
Although the growth of the stock of vehicles may have been tempered by a
pickup in the rate at which old vehicles are being scrapped, demand seems
unlikely to hold at the recent pace without a considerable further escalation of
household wealth. Moreover, we expect the automakers to shift their focus a bit
from market share to profits, so that promotional efforts may diminish and
effective prices may firm. All told, we expect the pace of sales to drop over the
remainder of the year and run a bit above 15-1/2 million units in 2000. In
general, a deceleration in outlays on consumer durables would appear to be in
store, after the steep run-up to high levels in recent years.
Residential investment. We have trimmed the housing forecast to reflect the
higher mortgage rates in the current Greenbook. The decline in starts should be
gradual, however, in part because this year's shortages of skilled labor and
materials have resulted in backlogs that should help buoy construction in the
near term. Moreover, employment and income conditions should generally
remain supportive of demand. And given our assumption that at least some of
the recent spike in mortgage rates will be reversed by early next year, homes are
likely to remain fairly affordable--barring a greater surge in home prices than we
have seen to date. We now expect single-family starts to average 1.31 million
units (annual rate) in the second half of 1999 before slipping to 1.27 million
units next year.
Constraints on the availability of labor and materials evidently have produced
some backlog of projects in the multifamily sector as well. But we still expect
multifamily starts to edge lower through the end of next year. With many people
moving into single-family residences, the need for additional multifamily units
likely is diminishing in many locales--and lenders probably will be increasingly
sensitive to signs of excess supply, adding to the financial restraint associated
with the higher interest rates.
Business fixed investment. Real business fixed investment appears to be
decelerating appreciably in the current quarter, and we expect it to remain on a
slower growth track into early next year, in part because of a Y2K-related lull in
computer purchases. Investment is expected to regain some momentum
thereafter as computer purchases re-accelerate. On average, real BFI is expected
to rise about 6-1/2 percent per year between mid-1999 and the end of 2000, only
a little more than half the pace of the preceding year and a half. The reasons for
this slowing are familiar: the deceleration in business output, the less favorable
financial conditions, and weakening profitability--all at a time when the capital
stock (particularly of equipment) is already expanding rapidly.

Domestic Developments

I-9

We shall not belabor our story of how we expect preparations for the century
date change to affect computer expenditures. Suffice it to say that, while this
remains a decidedly uncertain element in our forecast, nothing has happened
during the intermeeting period to alter our thinking--aside from the
aforementioned recent downturn in computer orders and shipments, which has
led us to accentuate the near-term deceleration in real outlays a bit. Advances in
technology and declines in prices continue to be dramatic, and they underpin our
expectation that real computer investment will be very strong, on average, over
the projection period. The same can be said for communications equipment, as
the rapidly evolving market for voice and data transmission services drives huge
increments in outlays through 2000.
We anticipate a considerable slackening in outlays for transportation equipment
over the projection period. The backlog of orders for medium and heavy trucks
appears to be sufficient to a sustain a hefty pace of production in the near term,
but we expect to see a substantial decline in vehicle shipments as the economic
expansion remains more moderate. And, given Boeing's schedules, deliveries of
planes to domestic carriers almost certainly will drop significantly next year.
Outside the IT and transportation categories, demand for equipment has been
notably soft over the past year, in part because manufacturers have sought to
avoid a greater buildup of excess capacity as world economic growth has fallen
well short of trends prevailing before the Asian shock. Looking ahead, the
strengthening of world demand now under way and the need to stay current
technologically should produce a moderate pickup in investment in industrial
machinery. A bottoming out of the recent slump in spending for farm and
construction equipment also seems a reasonable prospect.
Our forecast for investment in nonresidential structures remains essentially flat
through the end of next year. Consolidation in heavy manufacturing no doubt
will continue to depress industrial construction during this period. In the
commercial sector, property values and space-rents continued to move up
through the first quarter, but contracts for new construction have fallen sharply.
Credit generally remains available for commercial projects, although at higher
interest rates than we had foreseen in the June Greenbook.
Business inventories. Nonfarm inventory investment has fallen well short of
our expectations in recent quarters, and the aggregate inventory-sales ratio has
plunged. The strength of sales over this period must have caught at least some
firms by surprise and left them with unexpectedly lean stocks. But there is a
noticeable absence of reports of concern about potential stock-outs, and it may
be that the adoption of better inventory management techniques has enabled
firms to lower their target inventory-sales ratios more rapidly then we had

1-10

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

anticipated. On this interpretation of the recent behavior, we are projecting a
relatively flat overall inventory-sales ratio through the end of next year, in
contrast to the upward drift in the ratio that characterized our past forecasts.
Nonetheless, even a return to levels of investment that would stabilize the ratio
implies a swing at some point to a positive GDP contribution from this
component of expenditure. In our projection, that swing occurs in the second
half of this year, exaggerated for a time by Y2K hedging. But, as always, this is
a highly uncertain element of the forecast.
Movements in farm inventories have negligible effects on forecast GDP growth
in 1999 and 2000. Taken at face value, the USDA's August crop report would
have led us to raise our forecast of farm inventory accumulation to some degree.
However, crop conditions in the Midwest have been reflecting increased drought
damage in the first half of August, and we therefore expect the USDA
production estimates to be revised down somewhat in September. We have
nudged down our forecast of farm inventory investment as well. Even so, farm
stocks seem likely to remain at levels that are ample to excessive in the coming
year.
Government spending. Reflecting the change to our fiscal assumption, we
have raised our forecast of real federal expenditures on consumption and gross
investment. Nondefense purchases are now expected to rise 2-1/2 percent in real
terms in 1999 and 1 percent in 2000; the June Greenbook had shown no net
change in these programs over the two years. Real defense spending is now
expected to be about flat over the four quarters of 2000, after having fallen
nearly 2-1/2 percent in 1999.
Real purchases by state and local governments are expected to rise at a annual
rate of 3-1/2 percent in the second half of 1999 and nearly 4 percent in 2000.
The increases would be more than a percentage point larger, on average, than
those of the past three years. However, some pickup seems likely in light of the
continuing hefty revenue inflows to these governments and the exceptionally
strong financial condition of the sector as a whole.
External sector. In response to the firming of economic activity abroad, we
have raised the projection for growth of real exports between mid-1999 and the
end of 2000 to an annual rate of 5-1/2 percent. With little change to the outlook
for imports, the negative contribution of net exports to real GDP growth now
amounts to about 3/4 percentage point, on average, in the second half of this year
and 1/2 percentage point in 2000, well below the figures for the past year and a
half. (A more detailed discussion of the outlook for net exports is contained in
the international developments section.)

I-11

Domestic Developments

Labor markets. We have made only modest changes to our projection of labor
productivity growth despite the sharp slowing registered in the second quarter.
That drop-off followed a string of sizable increases and coincided with a marked
deceleration in output. We expect productivity to post another relatively small
increase in the current quarter, but to resume a faster pace of growth in the fourth
quarter. On average, we expect productivity to rise about 2 percent per year
between mid-1999 and the end of 2000; this would be about 1/2 percentage
point below the average gain over the preceding six quarters. Firms surely will
continue to seek efficiency gains through capital deepening and innovative uses
of technology; however, productivity will no longer be getting a lift from output
growth that not only is above trend but also is above many prevailing
expectations (as we believe has been the case in the past couple of years).

The Outlook for the Labor Market
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4, except as noted)
Measure

1998

1999

2000

Output per hour, nonfarm business
Previous

2.6
2.7

1.9
2.4

2.2
1.9

Nonfarm payroll employment
Previous

2.4
2.4

2.1
2.0

1.2
1.3

Household employment survey
Previous

1.3
1.3

1.5
1.6

.9
1.0

Labor force participation rate1
Previous

67.1
67.1

67.2
67.2

67.1
67.2

Civilian unemployment rate1
Previous

4.4
4.4

4.2
4.1

4.3
4.2

1. Percent, average for the fourth quarter.

Indeed, we expect that employers may not wish to cut back payroll growth
commensurately with the deceleration of output in the near term. We continue
to hear that firms have intensified their efforts to fill the many jobs that have
gone vacant for a while--in some cases offering higher pay especially, but not
exclusively, to individuals with special skills. We anticipate that, as a result,
payrolls will grow somewhere around 200,000 per month, on average, over the
remainder of the year. In 2000, with firms having caught up to some degree in
their hiring, payroll growth is projected to slow to about 130,000 per month, on
average.

I-12

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

Despite the strong demand for workers over the past few years, the labor force
participation rate has essentially moved sideways; we assume that it will stay
within this narrow range through the end of next year. Thus, given the outlook
for labor demand, we expect the unemployment rate to remain around
4-1/4 percent.
Prices and wages. The leitmotif of the inflation forecast is the same as that in
the June Greenbook--namely, with labor markets expected to remain extremely
tight and import prices turning up, wages and prices are likely to show some
tendency to accelerate. And in light of the less favorable tone of the recent
readings on wages and the adverse developments in the markets for energy and
industrial materials, we have nudged up the projected inflation rates.
The employment cost index for private industry rose at an annual rate of
4-1/2 percent in the second quarter; this rebound from the first quarter's
implausibly low number was larger than we had anticipated and brought the
four-quarter change to 3-1/4 percent. Arguably, much of the error in our secondquarter ECI forecast may reflect merely an inaccurate guess on timing; after all,
our assumption in the last Greenbook, that the make-up for the first-quarter
"shortfall" would be spread over the remainder of the year, was rather arbitrary.
But other pay indicators, including the measure of compensation per hour in the
productivity and cost (P&C) release for the second quarter and the readings on
average hourly earnings through July, have also been on the high side of our
expectations. And, in light of the upward revisions to our price forecast, the
pressures for cost-of-living catch-ups will be a tad greater over the projection
period. Finally, we have delayed the first stage of our assumed increase in the
minimum wage from October to January--a change that shifts a tenth from this
year's ECI forecast to next year's. 3 On balance, we still expect ECI
compensation to rise 3-1/4 percent in 1999. But by next year, with labor markets
remaining very tight, the minimum wage rising, and price inflation having
turned up in 1999, the ECI is expected to be increase 3-3/4 percent-1/4 percentage point more than we anticipated in the June Greenbook.

3. In the June Greenbook, we assumed that the minimum wage would go up by $1 in three
equal steps, the first in October of this year, the second next October, and the third in October of
2001. We have retained our assumption of a $1 hike, but given the lack of movement in the
Congress on this issue, we now expect the minimum wage to rise 50 cents per hour in January

of 2000 and another 50 cents in January of 2001. Under our new assumptions, the rise in the
minimum wage has no effect in 1999 but is expected to boost the ECI by 0.2 percentage point in

2000.

Domestic Developments

I-13

Inflation Projections
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4, except as noted)
1998

1999

2000

1.5
1.5

2.6
2.3

2.3
2.3

Food
Previous

2.2
2.2

2.0
1.9

2.3
2.1

Energy
Previous

-9.2
-9.2

9.9
6.3

-1.7
.8

Excluding food and energy
Previous

2.4
2.4

2.1
2.1

2.6
2.5

.8
.8

1.9
1.6

1.9
1.8

1.2
1.2

1.4
1.4

2.0
1.8

GDP chain-weighted price index
Previous

.9
.9

1.5
1.5

1.9
1.7

ECI for compensation of private
industry workers'
Previous

3.5
3.5

3.3
3.3

3.8
3.6

Prices of core non-oil
merchandise imports
Previous

-2.1
-2.1

.4
-.3

1.8
1.6

Measure
Consumer price index
Previous

PCE chain-weighted price index
Previous
Excluding food and energy
Previous

Percentage points
MEMO: Adjustments for technical
changes to the CPI2
Core CPI

-.2

.0

.0

1. December to December.
2. Adjustments are calculated relative to the current methodological
structure of the CPI.

The P&C measure of hourly compensation in the nonfarm business sector
increased 4-1/4 percent over the past four quarters, according to the published

I-14

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

data.4 This measure and the ECI may diverge for several reasons, including mix
shifts and coverage differences, and frequently have done so. The recent
divergence may be occurring in part because the P&C measure includes--albeit,
imperfectly--compensation in the form of stock options whereas the ECI by
design does not. The P&C measure, which follows the NIPA accounting
conventions, includes the value of stock options when they are exercised, and
this has been a sizable quantity in recent years. While it is unclear how deferred
compensation in general--and this kind in particular--should be treated
analytically, we strongly suspect that the P&C measure is overstating the extent
of labor cost pressures on pricing while the ECI, which excludes options and
most other equity considerations entirely, is probably understating them. 5
On the price side of the ledger, we are now projecting that retail energy prices
will rise at an annual rate of about 9 percent, on average, in the second half of
1999 before easing a bit in 2000. In the June Greenbook, we had anticipated
that retail energy prices would rise only moderately, on net, in the second half of
1999 and edge up further in 2000.
We are predicting increases in consumer food prices of 2 percent in 1999 and
2-1/4 percent in 2000; these forecasts are slightly higher than last time. Recent
indications that the drought will bring a slightly less favorable supply-demand
balance in crude food markets are one factor in this adjustment. In addition,
given the heavy weight of processing and distribution expenses, the changes in
the labor and energy cost picture are a consideration. The fact is that only in
circumstances of extreme fluctuations in commodity prices do CPI food prices
deviate markedly from the rate of core inflation--even the sizable farm price
declines over the past couple of years have not been great enough to produce a
marked deviation.
Although the incoming data for the core CPI have remained tame, we have
edged up the forecast. The change mainly reflects the higher labor costs now
projected and the indirect effects of the higher energy prices. In addition, we
have raised the projection for prices of imports, and prices of intermediate
4. As is discussed in Part II of the Greenbook, we expect a substantial upward revision to
the increase in hourly compensation for 1998. Once this revision is made, we expect P&C
compensation to show a pattern of gradual deceleration over the past year or so similar to the
one indicated by the ECI, presumably reflecting the petering out of the effects of the previous
hike in the minimum wage and the restraining effect of good inflation news on wage demands.
5. Our crude estimates, which are based on information from financial statements of a small
sample of firms, suggest that, had the value of stock option grants been included in the ECI, that
measure of compensation would have increased about 1/4 percentage point per year faster, on
average, over the past four years. Including the value of stock options at exercise would have
added an average of about 3/4 percentage point per year.

Domestic Developments

I-15

materials are running higher than we had anticipated. Past patterns suggest that
the increases in materials prices will be passed through to the consumer level
quickly, but that their effect is likely to be limited by the ample margins of
unused capacity in the manufacturing sector.
The CPI is not alone in signaling a pickup in overall inflation this year: Broad
NIPA-based measures of inflation also have turned upward. For core consumer
prices, however, the picture remains somewhat ambiguous: The rate of increase
in the core CPI over the first half of this year was somewhat smaller than that
over 1998 as a whole while core PCE prices accelerated a bit--narrowing the
extraordinarily wide gap that emerged between the two last year.
Money and Credit Flows
Growth of domestic nonfinancial sector debt has decelerated in line with our
expectations. The slowdown reflects some moderation in borrowing by
businesses and households while the federal government has continued to pay
down its debt with the proceeds from budget surpluses. Overall debt growth is
projected to decline further, on balance, over the forecast period, as private
credit demands ebb along with the downshift in the pace of economic expansion
and as paydowns of federal debt strengthen, on net. Over the next several
months, however, credit flows and interest rate relationships could be noticeably
distorted by shifts in behavior in anticipation of the century date change.
In the business sector, total borrowing has been sizable so far in the third
quarter. Business credit needs are projected to remain substantial over the
second half of the year, as capital expenditures continue to expand rapidly while
growth of internal funds languishes and equity retirements are buoyed by brisk
merger activity. Next year, we expect some abatement in share repurchases and
merger-related equity retirements, but business borrowing will remain
substantial, to fund a growing financing gap.
Corporate credit demands recently have been focused particularly on the bond
market, as firms have attempted to lock in fixed-rate financing in view of
expectations of a rise in interest rates and potential market disruptions associated
with the century date change. Partly reflecting recent heavy issuance, corporate
yield spreads over Treasuries have widened, as have spreads in the interest-rate
swap market, which in recent years has been used increasingly heavily by debt
issuers and dealers as a hedge vehicle. The widening reportedly has not been
driven primarily by credit concerns. Still, in our view, some worsening of credit
quality over the forecast period is likely, given the prospective pressures on
profits and cash flows.

I-16

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

Household debt growth is forecast to edge lower this year and next, as
residential investment falls off and the expansion of spending on durables slows.
Nonetheless, debt growth is expected to outpace gains in personal income.
Given the implied increase in debt-income ratios, and with interest rates on the
stock of household debt projected to rise in response to climbing market rates,
debt-service burdens are projected to increase. The resulting deterioration in
credit quality could trigger a modest tightening in terms and standards on loans
to households.
The expansion of state and local government debt is expected to remain
moderate. Infrastructure spending will require a considerable amount of bond
issuance, but the anticipated level of interest rates suggests that advance
refundings will remain relatively light. Given the positive fiscal outlook for
most states and localities, credit quality should not become an issue in this
sector during the forecast period.
In the federal sector, the runoff of Treasury debt is projected to steepen as the
budget surplus widens. Over the next six quarters, federal debt in the hands of
the public is forecast by the staff to decline more than $200 billion. To address
the market liquidity problems arising as a consequence of this shrinking supply,
the Treasury recently announced that it would issue long-term bonds less
frequently and said that it was considering reducing the frequency of certain
other issues as well. It also released for public comment plans to buy back some
of its debt. By purchasing older, "off-the-run" issues, which require a yield
premium, and financing those purchases with new issues, which are more
actively traded and therefore trade at lower yields, the Treasury hopes to reduce
its overall interest cost. To avoid the need to implement new systems in the next
few months, however, the Treasury would not begin its buy-backs until some
time next year. With supplies of on-the-run issues still limited over the rest of
the year and demands for the liquidity of on-the-run issues probably rising,
liquidity spreads within the Treasury market could well widen further in coming
months.
Growth of the monetary aggregates has remained close to the more moderate
rates of this spring, following the rapid advance of last fall and winter that
resulted from unusual demands for liquidity and monetary policy easings. Both
M2 and M3 are projected to grow a little above the FOMC ranges this year and
to post another year of declining velocities. The two aggregates could be
boosted somewhat in the period around year-end, as both liquid balances and
credit demands shift, on balance, into the banking system. To date, however,
little sign of heightened retail demand for liquid balances has been evident.
Currency growth was unusually strong early in the year, and appeared to reflect
a pickup in domestic rather than foreign demands, but it has cooled off

Domestic Developments

I-17

somewhat recently. In 2000, the broad monetary aggregates should decelerate
with the slowing in nominal spending, and, with M2 also restrained by a further
tightening of policy, the declines in its velocity observed since mid-1997 could
about cease.
Alternative Simulations
We have developed four alternative, model-based simulations for this forecast.
The first two simulations present the implications of alternative paths for the
federal funds rate; the other two consider the effects of alternative paths for
stock prices, where the deviations from the baseline are generated
autonomously, without policy changes.
Alternative Federal Funds Rate
and Stock Market Assumptions
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4, except as noted)
Measure

1999

2000

Real GDP
Baseline
Flat funds rate
Tighter monetary policy
15,000 Wilshire
20 percent stock price decline

3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.2

2.8
3.2
1.9
3.7
1.6

Civilian unemployment rate1
Baseline
Flat funds rate
Tighter monetary policy
15,000 Wilshire
20 percent stock price decline

4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2

4.3
4.1
4.6
4.1
4.7

CPI excludingfood and energy
Baseline
Flat funds rate
Tighter monetary policy
15,000 Wilshire
20 percent stock price decline

2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1

2.6
2.7
2.3
2.6
2.5

1. Average for the fourth quarter.

1-18

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

The first simulation assumes that the FOMC holds the federal funds rate flat
over the forecast interval. Relative to baseline, this alternative path for the funds
rate would have little effect on real GDP, unemployment, or inflation in 1999.
In 2000, however, the growth of real GDP would be noticeably stronger and the
unemployment rate nearly 1/4 percentage point lower by the end of the year.
Inflation would be only slightly higher than in the baseline forecast in 2000. But
if this simulation were extended out to 2001, inflation would rise noticeably
further, even if the funds rate were moved upward to avoid a still greater decline
in the real short-term rate.
The other alternative monetary policy simulation is designed to avert a further
deterioration in the inflation trend as we move beyond the year 2000: It assumes
that the FOMC raises the federal funds rate 100 basis points by next March-considerably more than in the baseline forecast and beyond prevailing market
expectations. In this scenario, the higher path for the funds rate does not visibly
affect the economy in 1999. In 2000, however, real GDP growth is much
weaker than in the baseline, and the unemployment rate is 1/3 percentage point
higher by the end of the year. The core inflation rate would move up
1/4 percentage point less than in the baseline forecast next year and would tend
to rise only a little further in 2001. This rough extension assumes a modest
depreciation of the dollar and stable real oil price.
The third simulation has the Wilshire 5000 rising to a level of 15,000 by the
fourth quarter of next year--a gain of almost 25 percent from the current level.
The increase is assumed to occur because of a reduction in the equity risk
premium required by investors. Under this alternative, real GDP growth is
considerably stronger than in the baseline next year, and the unemployment rate
is lower. Core inflation would be the same as in the baseline forecast. But, as
we have noted in previous Greenbooks, expectations of inflation in the FRB/US
model respond relatively slowly to movements in resource utilization that are not
accompanied by changes in the perceived stance of monetary policy. Over time,
consumers and firms would deduce that the Fed's inflation target had been
relaxed, and inflation expectations ultimately would begin to move upward.
Indeed, by 2001, the inflationary consequences of the stronger stock market
would start to become more visible.
The simulation with the bearish view of the stock market assumes that the
Wilshire index falls 20 percent by the end of this year and then flattens out at
that lower level. This correction is assumed to be set off by a sudden upward
shift in the equity premium. In this scenario, real GDP growth is considerably
lower than in the baseline forecast--dipping to about 1-1/2 percent in 2000--and
the unemployment rate approaches 4-3/4 percent by the end of next year. As in
the other stock market simulation, inflation in 2000 differs only slightly from the
baseline forecast, again because of lagging expectations adjustments.

Strictly
Class II

Confidential
FOMC

<FR>

August
STAFF PROJECTIONS

OF CHANGES IN GDP, PRICES,
(Percent, annual rate)

18,

1999

AND UNEMPLOYMENT

ANNUAL

1996
1997
1998
1999

2000
QUARTERLY
1997

Q1
Q2
03
Q4

7.2
5.6
5.4
4.2

7.2
5.6
5.4
4.2

4.2
4.0
4.2
3.0

4.2
4.0
4.2
3.0

2.8
1.7
1.2
1.1

2.8
1.7
1.2
1.1

2.5
1.3
1.8
2.0

2.5
1.3
1.8
2.0

5.2
5.0
4.9
4.7

5.2
5.0
4.9
4.7

1998

Q1

Q2
Q3
Q4

6.4
2.7
4.7
6.9

6.4
2.7
4.7
6.9

5.5
1.8
3.7
6.0

5.5
1.8
3.7
6.0

0.9
0.9
1.0
0.8

0.9
0.9
1.0
0.8

1.0
1.7
1.7
1.7

1.0
1.7
1.7
1.7

4.6
4.4
4.5
4.4

4.6
4.4
4.5
4.4

1999

Q1
Q2
Q3
04

6.0
4.7
4.8
5.4

6.0
3.5
5.0
5.8

4.5
2.9
3.5
3.7

4.3
1.9
3.5
4.1

1.5
1.7
1.3
1.6

1.6
1.6
1.4
1.6

1.5
3.6
1.8
2.4

1.5
3.4
2.5
2.8

4.3
4.2
4.1
4.1

4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2

2000

Q01

2.2
6.0
4.7
4.7

2.6
6.3
5.1
5.1

0.1
4.4
2.9
3.0

0.4
4.4
3.2
3.1

2.1
1.6
1.7
1.7

2.2
1.8
1.9
1.9

2.1
2.3
2.4
2.5

2.1
2.2
2.4
2.5

4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2

4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3

Q2

03
Q4

3

TWO-QUARTER

1997

Q2
Q4

6.4
4.8

6.4
4.8

4.1
3.6

4.1
3.6

2.2
1.2

2.2
1.2

1.9
1.9

1.9
1.9

-0.3
-0.3

-0.3
-0.3

1998

Q2

4.6
5.8

4.6
5.8

3.7
4.8

3.7
4.8

0.9
0.9

0.9
0.9

1.4
1.7

1.4
1.7

-0.3
0.0

-0.3
0.0

5.4
5.1

4.7
5.4

3.7
3.6

3.1
3.8

1.6
1.5

1.6
1.5

2.5
2.1

2.5
2.7

-0.2
-0.1

-0.1
-0.1

4.1
4.7

4.4
5.1

2.2
3.0

2.4
3.1

1.8
1.7

2.0
1.9

2.2
2.5

2.2
2.4

-0.0
0.1

-0.0
0.1

3.1
1.9
1.5
2.6
2.3

-0.3
-0.6
-0.3
-0.3
0.1

04
1999

Q2

Q4
2000

Q2

Q4
4

FOUR-QUARTER

1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
1.
2.
3.
4.

Q4
04
Q4
Q4
Q4
For all
urban consumers.
Level, except as noted.
Percent change from two quarters earlier;
Percent change from four quarters earlier;

for unemployment rate, change in percentage points.
change in percentage points.
for unemployment rate,

Strictly Confidential
Class II FOMC

<FR>

August 18, 1999

REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS, ANNUAL VALUES
(Seasonally adjusted annual rate)

- Projected 1992

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

6244.4
6244.4

6558.1
6389.6

6947.0
6610.7

7269.6
6761.7

7661.6
6994.8

8110.9
7269.8

8511.0
7551.9

8951.5
7839.8

9371.5
8061.0

3.6
4.0
3.9
4.9

2.4
3.0
2.1
3.7

3.3
3.6
2.7
3.7

2.1
1.6
2.7
2.9

3.9
4.2
3.7
4.3

3.8
4.4
3.4
4.6

4.3
5.3
4.6
6.5

3.4
4.5
3.3
4.9

2.8
3.1
2.9
3.4

4.2
9.4
3.4
3.6

2.7
7.4
1.6
2.3

3.1
6.3
3.0
2.5

2.6
4.5
1.7
2.6

3.3
5.8
2.8
3.0

3.7
7.4
2.0
3.8

5.3
13.2
4.7
4.0

4.7
7.2
5.1
3.9

3.3
4.3
2.5
3.4

5.5
9.6
-3.4
16.9

9.9
12.2
4.5
7.8

7.6
10.2
1.1
4.2

7.3
9.1
2.7
-1.4

11.7
11.8
11.6
5.4

9.8
12.7
2.5
4.2

11.9
16.8
-0.3
12.6

6.7
9.1
0.3
3.3

7.4
10.1
-0.3
-3.4

4.1
7.4

4.6
10.2

10.0
12.3

10.5
5.6

10.3
11.8

9.6
14.0

1.1
9.7

2.5
10.8

5.3
7.7

1.7
1.3
-1.3
2.0

Unitsl

Item

1993

-1.4

0.1

-6.1
-6.9
2.0

-3.9
-6.0
2.7

-0.9
-5.6
-5.0
2.1

2.1
1.1
-0.1
2.8

1.4
-0.6
-1.4
2.6

1.6
0.9
-1.3
2.1

1.9
-0.6
-2.3
3.4

2.7
0.5
0.3
3.9

22.1
29.5
-70.2

60.6
49.0
-104.6

27.7
37.7
-96.5

30.0
23.2
-111.2

63.2
58.8
-136.1

57.4
50.1
-238.2

37.0
34.2
-333.6

38.4
37.7
-396.5

4.2

5.8

5.6

5.2

5.1

4.7

EXPENDITURES

Nominal GDP
Real GDP

Bill. $
Bill. Ch. $

Real GDP
Gross domestic purchases
Final sales
Priv. dom. final purchases

4 change

Personal cons.

expenditures

Durables
Nondurables
Services
Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equipment
Nonres. structures
Residential structures
Exports
Imports
Gov't. cons. & investment
Federal
Defense
State & local

7.0
2.0
-29.5

Change in bus. inventories
Nonfarm
Net exports

Bill. Ch. $

Nominal GDP

% change

6.3

5.0

Nonfarm payroll employment
Unemployment rate

Millions

108.6
7.5

110.7
6.9

Industrial prod. index
Capacity util. rate - mfg.

' change
14

3.6
79.5

80.5

Housing starts
Light motor vehicle sales
North Amer. produced

Millions

1.20
12.85
10.51
2.34

Nominal GNP
Nominal GNP
Nominal personal income
Real disposable income
Personal saving rate

Bill. $
% change

5.7

4.4

Corp. profits,
IVA & CCAdj.
Profit share of GMP
Excluding FR Banks

\ change

11.3

19.0

6.8
6.6

7.5
7.2

Federal surpl./deficit
State & local surpl./def.
Ex. social ins. funds

Bill. $

-280.9
86.3
18.3

5.8

EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTION

117.2

5.6

119.6
5.4

122.7
4.9

125.8
4.5

128.6
4.2

130.7
4.2

6.5
82.5

3.5
82.7

5.3
81.4

6.6
82.0

1.9
80.8

3.7
79.8

2.4
79.6

1.29
13.86
11.71
2.15

1.46
15.01
12.88
2.13

1.35
14.72
12.82
1.90

1.48
15.05
13.35
1.70

1.47
15.02
13.09
1.92

1.62
15.50
13.47
2.04

1.66
16.37
14.04
2.34

1.58
15.69
13.54
2.15

6255.5

6576.8

6955.2

7287.1

7674.0

8102.9

8490.5

8928.1

9341.5

6.2
7.2
4.0

5.1
4.0
1.2

5.7
5.2
2.5

4.4
4.6
2.1

5.6
5.9
2.7

5.2
5.4
2.9

5.2
5.1
3.5

5.0
5.7
3.4

4.7
5.1
3.1

3.5

3.4

2.9

2.1

0.5

-0.9

14.1

14.6

7.7

7.7

0.1

5.0

2.9

8.2
7.9

9.2
8.9

9.8
9.5

10.1
9.8

9.7
9.4

9.7
9.4

9.2
8.9

-250.7
87.4
19.7

-186.7
96.8
27.9

-174.4
111.7
37.0

-110.3
122.6
52.2

-21.1
134.1
66.0

72.8
150.2
82.5

148.6
171.0
103.2

174.9
178.9
111.1

14.5
3.7

14.4
3.7

15.5
4.7

16.3
5.8

16.6
6.3

17.4
7.3

17.3
7.3

17.1
7.3

16.9
7.2

2.6

2.6

2.5

2.1

1.8

1.7

0.9

1.5

1.9

2.7
3.1
3.5

Other

114.1
6.1

2.3
2.7
3.1

2.5
2.6
2.8

2.0
2.7
3.1

1.8
3.1
2.6

1.3
1.9
2.2

0.4
1.5
2.4

1.6
2.6
2.1

1.7
2.3
2.6

3.5

3.6

3.1

2.6

3.1

3.4

3.5

3.3

3.8

3.5
4.5
1.0

-0.4
1.6
2.0

0.1
2.1
2.0

1.2
2.9
1.6

2.0
3.6
1.6

1.6
3.7
2.1

2.6
4.1
1.5

1.9
4.5
2.6

2.2
4.5
2.2

3.3

INCOME AND SAVING

Gross natl. saving rate
Net natl. saving rate

-0.9

Schange
PRICES AND COSTS

'4 change

GDP chn.-wt. price index
Gross Domestic Purchases
chn.-wt. price index
CPI
Ex. food and energy
ECI, hourly compensation
Nonfarm business sector
Output per hour
Compensation per Hour
Unit labor cost

1.
2.

2

quarter to fourth quarter.
Changes are from fourth
Private-industry workers.

Strictly Confidential
Class II FOMC

<FR>

August 18,

REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS, QUARTERLY VALUES
(Seasonally adjusted, annual rate except as noted)

1999

1996
Ql

1996
Q2

1996
Q3

1996
Q4

1997
Ql

1997
Q2

1997
Q3

1997
Q4

1998
Ql

1998
Q2

7495.3
6882.0

7629.2
6983.9

7703.4
7020.0

7818.4
7093.1

7955.0
7166.7

8063.4
7236.5

8170.8
7311.2

8254.5
7364.6

8384.2
7464.7

8440.6
7498.6

Priv. dam. final purchases

3.3
4.5
3.6
5.1

6.1
7.0
5.4
6.2

2.1
3.4
0.9
2.8

4.2
1.8
5.1
3.3

4.2
5.5
2.9
4.6

4.0
4.4
2.7
3.3

4.2
4.6
5.8
7.5

3.0
3.2
2.1
2.9

5.5
7.8
4.3
8.5

1.8
3.9
4.6
7.4

Personal cons. expenditures
Durables
Nondurables
Services

3.7
5.8
2.2
4.0

4.7
12.7
4.8
3.0

1.8
-1.9
1.2
3.0

2.9
7.2
2.9
2.0

4.3
12.3
3.6
3.1

1.6
-1.5
-0.2
3.2

6.2
16.8
5.1
4.7

2.8
3.1
-0.4
4.3

6.1
15.8
7.4
3.5

6.1
11.2
5.3
5.4

Producers' dur. equipment
Nonres. structures
Residential structures

13.1
15.7
6.4
9.3

11.0
12.3
7.4
19.5

14.2
16.2
8.9
-1.7

8.8
3.2
24.5
-3.9

7.0
8.3
3.9
3.1

14.0
22.8
-6.2
6.1

17.0
18.8
12.4
-0.4

1.8
2.2
0.9
8.2

22.3
34.3
-4.9
15.6

12.8
18.8
-2.3
15.0

Exports
Imports

3.7
13.1

5.8
13.5

2.1
13.6

32.0
7.0

8.3
18.6

15.5
17.9

10.6
13.5

4.4
6.3

-2.8
15.7

-7.7
9.3

3.2
8.0
7.2
0.5

7.1
8.1
8.1
6.5

-1.6
-4.7
-6.3
0.3

0.0
-6.3
-8.3
3.8

2.1
-2.7
-9.9
4.9

2.1
3.6
9.1
1.3

1.4
-1.2
-1.8
2.9

0.1
-2.1
-2.0
1.3

-1.9
-8.8
-18.5
2.1

3.7
7.3
9.9
1.8

14.4
10.4
-95.5

26.1
15.2
-113.5

47.5
38.6
-140.1

32.1
28.7
-95.9

56.3
56.2
-121.5

79.0
72.1
-131.6

51.0
44.0
-142.4

66.5
62.7
-149.0

91.4
85.9
-198.5

38.2
29.9
-245.2

change

5.7

7.3

3.9

6.1

7.2

5.6

5.4

4.2

6.4

Nonfarm payroll employment
Unemployment rate

Millions

118.5
5.5

119.3
5.5

120.0
5.3

120.7
5.3

121.4
5.2

122.3
5.0

123.0
4.9

123.9
4.7

124.8
4.6

125.5
4.4

Industrial prod. index
Capacity util. rate - mfg.

% change

2.8
80.9

9.6
81.6

5.5
81.8

3.5
81.3

6.6
81.6

6.0
81.7

7.2
82.1

6.6
82.5

1.6
81.8

2.8
81.2

Housing starts
Light motor vehicle sales

Millions

Units

Item

EXPENDITURES

Nominal GDP
Real GDP

Bill.
Bill.

Real GDP
Gross domestic purchases
Final sales

% change

$
Ch. $

Business fixed investment

Gov't.

cons. & investment

Federal
Defense

State & local
Change in bus. inventories

Bill.

Ch. $

Nonfarm
Net exports
Nominal GDP

9

2.7

EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTION

North Amer. produced

Other

1.46

1.50

1.50

1.42

1.46

1.47

1.46

1.52

1.59

1.57

15.10
13.44
1.66

15.18
13.46
1.72

15.00
13.33
1.68

14.91
13.16
1.76

15.32
13.41
1.92

14.54
12.68
1.86

15.19
13.20
1.99

15.02
13.08
1.94

15.08
13.13
1.95

16.07
14.07
1.99

INCOME AND SAVING

7515.0

7643.3

7708.6

7829.0

7952.4

8062.3

8162.0

8234.9

8369.4

8421.8

% change

5.6
6.6
2.9

7.0
6.9
2.1

3.5
5.5
4.4

6.4
4.6
1.3

6.5
7.3
3.3

5.6
4.7
2.9

5.0
4.7
2.4

3.6
5.0
2.9

6.7
5.9
4.0

2.5
4.5
2.6

'4

3.2

2.6

3.1

2.6

2.4

2.6

1.7

1.7

1.2

0.4

16.9
9.8
9.5

6.9
9.8
9.5

3.8
9.8
9.5

3.5
9.7
9.5

18.1
10.0
9.7

11.1
10.1
9.8

13.1
10.3
10.0

-9.2
10.0
9.7

4.2
9.9
9.6

-4.1
9.7
9.5

-150.1
117.3
45.3

-112.6
129.1
58.2

-100.1
122.3
52.5

-78.3
121.7
52.9

-51.2
128.4
59.8

-34.8
130.1
61.6

-0.3
136.6
68.7

2.2
141.4
73.8

58.8
140.2
72.7

74.4
141.3
73.6

16.4
6.0

16.4
6.2

16.8
6.6

16.7
6.5

17.0
7.0

17.6
7.6

17.5
7.5

17.3
7.3

17.7
7.8

17.2
7.2

Nominal GNP
Nominal GNP
Nominal personal income
Real disposable income
Personal saving rate

Bill. $

Corp. profits, IVA & CCAdj.
Profit share of GNP
Excluding FR Banks

% change

Federal surpl./deficit
State & local surpl./def.
Ex. social ins. funds

Bill. $

Gross natl. saving rate
Net natl. saving rate
PRICES AND COSTS

GDP chn.-wt. price index
Gross Domestic Purchases
chn.-vt. price index

CPI
Ex. food and energy
1

ECI, hourly compensation

% change

2.2

1.1

0.9

2.1
3.2
2.5

1.0
2.0
2.4

-0.2
1.0
2.4

2.5

4.3

3.0

Nonfarm business sector
Output per hour
Compensation per hour
Unit labor cost

1. Private-industry workers.

4.2

3.0

-0.2

1.0

2.8
-1.4

5.1
2.1

3.4
3.6

3.2
2.1

3.2
4.6
1.4

0.4
3.9
3.5

Strictly
Class II

Confidential
FOMC

<FR>

August 18, 1999

REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS, QUARTERLY VALUES
except as noted)
(Seasonally adjusted, annual rate

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

- Projected

-

----------

1998
03

1998
04

1999
Q1

1999
Q2

1999
03

1999
04

2000
Q1

2000
Q2

2000
03

2000
04

8537.9
7566.5

8681.2
7677.7

8808.7
7759.6

8884.2
7795.6

8992.8
7862.3

9120.2
7941.8

9178.3
7949.3

9319.0
8035.8

9435.7
8098.7

9552.9
8160.2

3.7
4.2
2.8

6.0
5.4
6.6

4.3
6.6
4.6

1.9
2.6
3.0

3.5
4.2
2.4

4.1
4.5
3.3

0.4
0.7
1.8

4.4
5.3
3.7

3.2
3.6
3.0

3.1
3.0
3.2

3.7

6.5

7.4

4.8

3.2

4.0

1.8

4.9

3.6

3.5

4.1
2.4
2.1

5.0
24.5
4.2

6.7
12.9
9.5

3.8
4.8
2.5

3.6
6.8
2.3

4.6
4.3
6.1

2.0
4.4
-1.1

4.8
3.7
6.1

3.2
4.4
3.0

3.0
4.6
2.2

5.4

1.7

4.1

4.2

3.6

3.9

3.1

4.4

3.1

3.1

Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equipment
Nonres. structures
Residential structures

-0.7
-1.0
0.2
9.9

14.6
17.8
6.0
10.0

8.5
9.5
5.7
15.4

10.4
14.8
-1.1
8.0

4.5
6.7
-1.9
-4.8

3.7
5.5
-1.1
-3.9

2.8
4.1
-1.0
-4.3

9.7
13.4
-0.6
-3.8

8.5
11.4
0.1
-3.2

8.8
11.7
0.4
-2.4

Exports
Imports

-2.8
2.3

19.7
12.0

-5.1
13.5

3.7
9.6

4.8
10.6

7.2
9.5

0.1
2.6

6.0
12.5

6.0
8.4

Gov't. cons. a investment
Federal
Defense
State & local

1.5
-1.4
4.3

3.3
7.3
1.3

4.2
-1.9
-6.6

-1.7
-3.2
-3.3

2.8
2.3
4.0

2.4
0.3
-2.9

3.6
3.2
0.5

3.2
2.0
-1.1

2.5
-0.1
1.2

1.5
-2.9
0.4

3.1

1.3

7.7

-0.9

3.4

3.5

3.9

3.8

3.9

3.9

Units

Item

EXPENDITURES

Nominal GDP
Real GDP

Bill.
Bill.

Real GDP
Gross domestic purchases
Final sales
Priv. dom. final
purchases

% change

Personal cons.
Durables
Nondurables
Services

$
Ch.

$

expenditures

9.4
7.6

38.7
36.3

55.5
54.2

25.2
24.5

40.5
39.7

45.0
44.2

43.0
42.3

-259.0

-250.0

-303.6

-324.5

-346.5

-360.0

-368.7

-395.4

-409.4

-412.5

% change

4.7

6.9

6.0

3.5

5.0

5.8

2.6

6.3

5.1

5.1

Nonfarm payroll employment
Unemployment rate

Millions

126.1
4.5

126.9
4.4

127.6
4.3

128.2
4.3

129.0
4.2

129.6
4.2

130.0
4.2

130.7
4.2

130.8
4.3

131.1
4.3

Industrial
prod. index
Capacity util.
rate
- mfg.

% change

0.9
80.2

2.2
80.1

1.3
79.5

3.8
79.5

4.8
79.8

5.1
80.2

-2.5
79.1

4.5
79.5

3.7
79.8

4.1
80.1

Housing starts
Light motor vehicle sales
North Amer. produced
Other

Millions

1.64
14.55
12.54
2.01

1.70
16.31
14.11
2.20

1.77
16.22
13.95
2.27

1.61
16.73
14.31
2.42

1.64
16.48
14.12
2.36

1.62
16.07
13.77
2.30

1.60
15.90
13.67
2.23

1.59
15.71
13.55
2.16

1.58
15.62
13.50
2.12

1.57
15.53
13.44
2.09

Bill. $
t change

8510.9
4.3
4.5
3.2
0.2

8660.0
7.2
5.5
4.3
0.0

8788.4
6.1
5.1
3.5
-0.7

8863.2
3.4
5.6
2.9
-0.9

8967.6
4.8
5.7
3.6
-0.9

9093.3
5.7
6.2
3.7
-1.1

9149.4
2.5
4.8
3.9
-0.6

9289.0
6.2
5.9
3.7
-0.8

9405.7
5.1
4.8
2.5
-1.0

9521.8
5.0
4.7
2.5
-1.1

change

3.2
9.7
9.4

-2.5
9.5
9.2

25.0
9.9
9.6

2.6
9.9
9.6

-8.4
9.5
9.3

3.4
9.5
9.2

-15.0
9.1
8.8

10.3
9.1
8.9

9.4
9.2
9.0

9.5
9.3
9.1

92.0
148.7
81.3

65.8
170.5
102.6

122.7
169.7
101.9

142.1
170.8
102.8

165.5
166.4
98.6

164.2
177.1
109.3

142.7
176.0
108.2

166.0
179.2
111.4

189.0
180.0
112.2

202.0
180.4
112.6

17.3
7-3

16.9
7.0

17.2
7.4

17.2
7.3

17.1
7.3

17.0
7.3

16.8
7.0

16.9
7.2

17.0
7.3

17.0
7.4

1.0

0.8

1.6

1.4

1.6

0.7
1.7
2.3

0.9
1.7
2.1

1.2
1.5
1.6

1.5
2.5
1.8

1.7
2.8
2.5

4.1

2.9

1.4

3.6

3.6

2.7
4.1
1.3

4.1
3.8
-0.4

3.6
4.4
0.8

-0.1
4.7
4.8

3.5
4.3
0.8

2.7
4.4
1.7

2.7
4.4
1.7

Change in bus.
Nonfarm
Net exports

inventories

Nominal GDP

Bill.

Ch. $

55.7
47.0

44.2
37.5

38.7
35.1

14.9
11.4

EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTION

INCOME AND SAVING

Nominal GNP
Nominal GNP
Nominal personal income
Real disposable income
Personal saving rate
Corp. profits, IVA & CCAdj.
Profit share of GNP
Excluding FR Banks
Federal surpl./deficit
State & local surpl./def.
Ex. social ins. funds

Bill. $

Gross natl. saving rate
Net natl.
saving rate

PRICES AND COSTS

GDP chn.-wt. price index
Gross Domestic Purchases
chn.-wt. price index
CPI
Ex. food and energy
ECI,

hourly compensation

1

Nonfarm business sector
Output per hour
Compensation per hour
Unit labor cost

1. Private-industry workers.

% change

2.1
4.2
2.1

Strictly Confidential <FR>

August 18, 1999

CONTRIBUTIONS TO GROWTH IN REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS

Class II FOMC

I
1996
03

Item

Real GDP
Gross dom. purchases
Final sales
Priv. dom. final purchases

1996
04

1997
01

1997
Q2

1997
Q3

1997
Q4

1998
01

1998
02

1998
03

96Q4/
95Q4

97Q4/
96Q4

9804/
9704

2.1
3.5

4.2
1.9

4.2
5.5

4.0
4.4

4.2
4.7

3.0
3.2

5.5
7.9

1.8
4.0

3.7
4.3

3.9
4.2

3.8
4.4

4.3
5.4

0.9

5.1

2.9

2.7

5.7

2.1

4.3

4.6

2.8

3.7

3.3

4.5

2.3

2.7

3.8

2.7

6.1

2.4

7.0

6.1

3.1

3.6

3.8

5.4

2.9

1.1

1.0
0.7
1.2

-0.1
-0.0
1.3

4.2
1.3
1.0
1.9

1.9
0.3
-0.1
1.7
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3

2.2
2.4
-0.2
0.6

1.4
1.4
-0.1
0.6

-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.4
-0.6
-0.3
-0.3

Personal cons. expenditures
Durables

Nondurables
Services
Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equip.
Nonres. structures

Residential structures
Net exports
Exports

Imports
Government cons. a invest.
Federal
Defense
Nondefense
State and local
Change in bus. inventories
Nonfarm
Farm

1.4
1.1
0.2
-0.1

0.9
0.2
0.6
-0.2

0.7
0.6
0.1
0.1

1.4
1.6
-0.2
0.2

1.7
1.3
0.4
-0.0

-1.3
0.2
-1.6

2.4
3.2
-0.9

-1.2
1.0
-2.2

-0.5
1.8
-2.2

-0.5
1.2
-1.7

-0.3
0.5
-0.8

-2.2
-0.3
-1.9

-2.1
-0.9
-1.2

-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
0.0
0.0

0.0
-0.4
-0.4
0.0
0.4

0.4
-0.2
-0.5
0.3
0.6

0.4
0.2
0.4
-0.2
0.2

0.3
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.3

0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.2

-0.3
-0.6
-0.8
0.3
0.2

0.6
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.2

1.2
1.3
-0.1

-0.8
-0.5
-0.3

1.3
1.5
-0.2

1.3
0.9
0.4

-1.4
-1.5
0.1

0.9
1.0
-0.1

1.2
1.2
0.0

-2.7
-2.8
0.1

Note. Components may not sum to totals because of rounding.

0.3
-0.1
0.2
-0.3
0.4

Strictly Confidential <FR>
Class II FOMC

2000
Q2

2000
Q3

2000
Q4

9804/
9704

9904/
98Q4

004/
99Q4

0.4
0.7

4.4
5.5

3.2
3.7

3.1
3.1

4.3
5.4

3.4
4.5

2.8
3.2

3.3
3.4

1.8
1.5

3.7
4.2

3.0
3.0

3.2
2.9

4.5
5.4

3.3
4.1

2.9
2.9

2.5

3.1

1.4

3.3

2.3

2.1

3.6

3.2

2.3

0.6

0.4

0.4

0.3

0.4

0.4

1.1

0.6

0.4

0.5
1.7

0.5
1.4

1.2
1.6

-0.2
1.2

1.2
1.8

0.6
1.3

0.4
1.3

0.9
1.6

1.0
1.6

0.5
1.4

0.9
0.8
0.2
0.7

1.1
1.1
-0.0
0.4

0.5
0.5
-0.1
-0.2

0.4
0.4
-0.0
-0.2

0.3
0.3
-0.0
-0.2

1.0
1.0
-0.0
-0.2

0.9
0.9
0.0
-0.1

0.9
0.9
0.0
-0.1

0.7
0.7
0.0
0.1

0.8
0.8
-0.0
-0.2

0.5
2.0
-1.5

-2.2
-0.6
-1.7

-0.8
0.4
-1.2

-0.9
0.5
-1.4

-0.5
0.8
-1.3

-0.3
0.0
-0.4

-1.0
0.6
-1.7

-0.5
0.6
-1.1

-0.0
1.0
-1.0

-1.1
0.3
-1.4

-0.5
0.6
-1.1

0.6
0.4
0.1
0.4
0.2

0.7
-0.1
-0.2
0.1
0.8

-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1

0.5
0.1
0.2
-0.0
0.4

0.4
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.4

0.6
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4

0.6
0.1
-0.0
0.2
0.4

0.4
-0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.4

0.3
-0.2
0.0
-0.2
0.4

-0.5
-0.5
-0.1

-0.3
-0.1
-0.1

-1.1
-1.1
0.0

1.1
1.2
-0.1

0.8
0.8
-0.1

-1.4
-1.3
-0.0

0.7
0.7
0.0

0.2
0.2
0.0

-0.1
-0.1
0.0

0.1
0.2
-0.1

-0.1
-0.1
-0.0

1999
Q1

1999
Q2

1999
Q3

1999
Q4

2000

6.0
5.5

4.3
6.7

1.9
2.7

3.5
4.4

4.1
4.6

6.6
5.4

4.6
6.2

2.9
4.1

2.4
2.7

Personal cons. expenditures
Durables
Nondurables
Services

3.5

4.6

2.6

1.9

1.1

0.4

0.8
0.7

1.8
1.7

Business fixed investment
Producers' dur. equip.
Nonres. structures
Residential structures

1.5
1.4
0.2
0.4

1998
Item

04

Real GDP
Gross dom. purchases
Final sales
Priv. dom. final purchases

Net exports
Exports
Imports

Government cons. & invest.
Federal
Defense
Nondefense
State and local
Change in bus. inventories
Nontarm
Farm

Note.

Components may not sum to

August 18, 1999

CONTRIBUTIONS TO GROWTH IN REAL GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT AND RELATED ITEMS

totals

because of rounding.

01

-0.3
-0.3
0.0

Strictly Confidential (FR)
Class II FOMC

August 18, 1999

Staff Projections of Federal Sector Accounts and Related Items
(Billions of dollars except as noted)
Fiscal year'

a

a

Q4

Qla

Q4

QI

Q2

Q3

446
416
29
15
15

435
443
-8
-49
41

428
448
-20
-46
27

598
436
162
97
64

464
431
33
15
18

452
454
-2
-47
45

142

28

-9

-21

161

32

-3

7
-4
-9

-108
-31
-4

-16
.2
-13

27
-27
8

-37
60
-3

-129
-25
-8

-39
5
I

-.9
10
-7

22

53

53

80

20

45

40

30

1973
1808
476
307
169
1332
165
61

2005
1841
477
305
173
1363
164
62

2007
1864
493
313
180
1371
143
64

2041
1875
498
313
185
1377
166
63

2072
1883
498
314
185
1384
189
64

2101
1899
495
315
181
1403
202
64

80

104

102

79

103

125

138

-71

-47

-26

-35

-43

-26

-4

9

.4

-.5

-.2

-.2

.0

.0

-. 1

-.2

-. 1

2.0

1.5

2.0

.6

.4

-.0

-.6

1997a

Item

2000

1999

1998
8

19980

1999

2000

Qla

Q2

Q3

Q2P

1579
1601
-22
-103
81

1722
1653
69
-30
99

1824
1700
124
-4
127

1925
1758
167
17
150

378
409
-30
-53
22

544
407
137
87
50

412
410
2
2
-. 1

413
467
-55
-58
3

401
396
6
-49
55

564
421
143
88
55

-36

65

118

163

-31

136

.8

-57

5

38
.6
-17

-51
5
-23

-84
-14
-25

-178
13
-2

26
4
.0

-82
-45
-10

-29
33
-7

32
21
.8

44

39

53

40

28

72

39

18

1687
1728
458
306
152
1270
-41
61

1818
1761
458
301
157
1303
57
60

1927
1802
472
304
168
1330
124
62

2031
1866
492
311
181
1374
165
63

1809
1750
451
293
158
1299
59
61

1838
1764
464
303
161
1300
74
57

1859
1767
459
303
156
1308
92
61

1870
1805
471
307
164
1334
66
60

1915
1792
472
304
168
1320
123
65

1948
1805
470
300
170
1335
143
64

-102

-3

62

102

-2

18

31

6

58

-163

-99

-64

-27

-81

-70

-112

-.9

-.8

-.4

-.4

-.5

-.2

-.1

-2.1

-1.5

3.5

2.4

-2.1

1.1

.4

Q3

I

Not seasonally adjusted

Unified budget
Receipts 2
Outlays 2
Surplus/deficit 2
On-budget
Off-budget
Surplus excluding
deposit insurance
Means of financing
Borrowing
Cash decrease
Other3
Cash operating balance,
end of period

Seasonally adjusted annual rates

NIPA federal sector
Receipts
Expenditures
Consumption expenditures
Defense
Nondefense
Other expenditures
Current account surplus
Gross investment
Current and capital
account surplus

Q4

4

Fiscal Indicators

High-employment (HEB)
surplus/deficit
Change in HEB, percent
of potential GDP
Fiscal impetus (FI)
percent, calendar year

-101

-1.1

.5

1. Fiscal year data for the unified budget come from OMB; quarterly data come from the Monthly Treasury Statement and may not sum to OMB fiscal year totals.
2. OMB's June 1999 surplus estimates (assuming the enactment of the President's proposals) are $99 billion in FY 1999 and $143 billion in FY2000. CBO's July 1999 baseline surplus estimates are
$120 billion in FY 1999 and $161 billion in FY2000. Budget receipts, outlays, and surplus/deficit include corresponding social security (OASDI) categories. The OASDI surplus is excluded from the
on-budget deficit and shown separately as off-budget, as classified under current law. The Postal Service deficit is included in off-budget outlays beginning in FY 1990.
3. Other means of financing are checks issued less checks paid, accrued items, and changes in other financial assets and liabilities.
4. HEB is the NIPA current and capital account surplus in current dollars, with cyclically sensitive receipts and outlays adjusted to the level of potential output associated with an unemployment rate of
6 percent. Real potential GDP growth is assumed to be 3.3 percent beginning 1998:Ql. Quarterly figures for change in HEB and FI are not at annual rates. Change in HEB, as a percent of nominal potential
GDP, is reversed. FI is the weighted difference of discretionary changes in federal spending and taxes in chained (1992) dollars, scaled by real federal consumption plus investment. For change in HEB and FI,
negative values indicate restraint.
a--Actual p--Preliminary

Strictly Confidential Class II FOMC
August 18, 1999

Change in Debt of the Domestic Nonfinancial Sectors
(Percent)

Year

1990
1991
1992
1993

6.4
4.3
4.6
5.0

11.0
11.1
10.9
8.3

5.2
2.3
2.6
3.8

7.3
4.6
4.4
5.4

9.3
6.2
5.3
4.5

1.5
-1.3
0.5
7.6

3.3
-1.6
0.8
1.4

5.0
8.6
2.2
6.0

1998
1999
2000
Quarter

1998:3
4
1999:1
2
3
4
2000:1
2
3
4
Note. Quarterly data are at seasonally adjusted annual rates.
I. Data after 1999:QI are staff projections. Changes are measured from end of the preceding period to
end of period indicated except for annual nominal GDP growth, which is calculated from Q4 to Q4.
2. On a monthly average basis, total debt is estimated to have grown 6.1 percent in 1998 and is projected to grow 5.5 percent in 1999 and 4.2 percent in 2000.
3. On a monthly average basis, federal debt is estimated to have grown -1.2 percent in 1998 and is projected to grow -2.1 percent in 1999 and -5.3 percent in 2000.
4. On a monthly average basis, nonfederal debt is estimated to have grown 8.6 percent in 1998 and is projected to grow 7.9 percent in 1999 and 6.8 percent in 2000.
2.6.3 FOF

4.4
3.8
6.3
5.0

Strictly Confidential Class II FOMC
August 18, 1999

Flow of Funds Projections: Highlights
(Billions of dollars except as noted)

Seasonally adjusted annual rates
Calendar year

1998

1999
Q2

Q3

Q4

484.2
-146.0
630.2

607.0
-78.0
685.0

634.1
-46.0
680.1

731.7
-38.0
769.7

125.4
-174.0
321.7

118.2
-146.0
396.4

137.0
-78.0
365.4

140.7
-46.0
369.4

139.9
-38.0
371.4

494.6
375.9
67.6
97.9

488.2
381.7
60.0
98.4

475.3
381.7
57.9
98.9

468.7
378.7
51.3
99.4

466.8
372.7
50.4
100.0

457.7
368.7
49.3
100.6

27.9
185.8

54.5
189.9

54.4
201.0

54.4
200.3

54.4
202.9

54.4
203.0

54.4
203.9

-119.2
7.5
-5.8

-119.7
-108.0
-143.1

-118.0
-16.2
-29.4

-0.4
27.3
8.1

-295.8
-36.7
19.7

-203.4
-128.9
-161.6

-210.4
-39.3
-33.0

-113.7
-1.0
1.9

674.4

193.4

195.9

299.7

269.4

262.9

267.9

272.9

273.9

183.5
12.5
0.3
12.2

183.8
11.4
-1.4
12.7

184.7
8.2
-1.3
9.5

184.6
8.8
-1.3
10.1

184.3
9.5
-0.0
9.5

185.1
6.9
-3.2
10.1

184.1
7.4
-2.2
9.5

183.6
7.2
-2.2
9.4

183.3
8.1
-1.2
9.2

Q2

Q3

Q4

936.3
-65.7
1002.0

372.7
-354.0
726.7

697.7
-90.0
787.7

689.8
-174.0
863.8

93.3
-491.3
425.5

63.0
-65.7
498.1

68.4
-354.0
281.7

112.2
-90.0
356.7

436.0
336.9
81.7
94.3

561.2
435.3
64.1
95.1

556.3
411.1
126.2
96.2

536.8
401.7
64.6
97.1

54.4
202.5

72.6
182.2

75.4
201.7

66.8
198.7

-89.3
-89.3
-170.2

-205.8
-205.8
-173.1

-136.5
-28.8
-3.0

26.9
32.1
54.5

361.9

239.6

269.4

296.0

183.3
11.0
-0.6
11.6

184.2
9.4
-1.0
10.4

184.2
7.4
-2.2
9.6

183.8
9.9
-1.6
11.5

Q4

1997

1998

1999

2000

Q3

Net funds raised by domestic
nonfinancialsectors
I Total
2 Net equity issuance
3 Net debt issuance

608.2
-114.4
722.6

670.1
-267.0
937.1

674.1
-170.9
845.1

614.3
-77.0
691.3

535.3
-308.4
843.6

597.7
-491.3
1089.0

Borrowingsectors
Nonfinancial business
4 Financing gap 1
5 Net equity issuance
6 Credit market borrowing

62.7
-114.4
316.8

85.6
-267.0
436.7

92.2
-170.9
364.6

134.0
-77.0
375.7

67.8
-308.4
471.4

Households
7 Net borrowing 2
8
Home mortgages
9
Consumer credit
10 Debt/DPI (percent) 3

326.6
229.5
52.5
90.8

472.7
359.6
67.6
94.0

518.9
392.6
79.6
97.3

467.1
375.5
52.2
99.7

State and local governments
II Net borrowing
12 Current surplus 4

56.1
135.1

80.3
182.8

50.9
193.8

23.1
23.1
2.4

-52.6
-52.6
-55.2

Depository institutions
16 Funds supplied

336.3

Memo (percentage of GDP)
17 Domestic nonfinancial debt 5
18 Domestic nonfnancial borrowing
Federal government 6
19
20
Nonfederal

182.1
8.9
0.3
8.6

Category

Federal government
13 Net borrowing
14 Net borrowing (quarterly, n.s.a.)
15 Unified deficit (quarterly, n.s.a.)

Note. Data after 1999:QI are staff projections.
I. For corporations: Excess of capital expenditures over U.S. internal funds.
2. Includes change in liabilities not shown in lines 8 and 9.
3.Average debt levels in the period (computed as the average of period-end debt positions)
divided by disposable personal income.

2.6.4 FOF

2000

Q1

Q1

4. NIPA surplus less changes in retirement fund assets plus consumption of fixed capital.
5. Average debt levels in the period (computed as the average of period-end debt positions) divided by nominal GDP
6. Excludes government-insured mortgage pool securities.

International Developments
The global economy's rebound from its recent slowdown continues, led by a
burgeoning recovery in the Asian emerging market economies. Recent
information also suggests a pickup in Mexico and Brazil. However, although
the improvement in activity is fairly widespread among countries, there are some
notable exceptions. In particular, Japanese prospects are still uncertain, and
several other Latin American economies remain weak.
Recent information suggests that the pace of the overall rebound exceeds our
previous expectations. Export-weighted foreign real GDP is estimated to have
increased at an annual rate of 31/2 percent in the first half of 1999, more than 1
percentage point higher than previously projected. We have also revised up our
projection for growth over the forecast period to an average rate of 3 percent,
percentage point higher than previously projected. Consequently, we
almost 1/2
have raised our forecast for U.S. net exports and lowered our path for the dollar
a small amount. We have also revised up our projected path for oil prices in
response to recent developments, primarily continued production discipline
among OPEC countries.
Recent Developments
International financial markets. Since the June FOMC meeting, the weighted
average foreign exchange value of the dollar, as measured by the staff's broad
nominal index, has dropped about 1 percent on balance. The two major
components of the index have moved in opposite directions, with the dollar
falling 21/2 percent relative to the major foreign currencies while rising almost 1
percent in terms of the currencies of our other important trading partners.
The decline in the major foreign currency index occurred in response to
information suggesting a pickup in activity in Europe and the possibility of light
at the end of the tunnel for Japan.
Japanese monetary policy has remained on hold, and government bond yields
have been stable over the period. The Nikkei index has declined slightly in
response to concerns about the effect of the stronger yen on the economy.
Japanese monetary authorities intervened to restrain the rise in the yen three
times in July,
Since the latest operation on July 21, the
yen has appreciated another 5 percent.
In the euro area, ten-year government bond yields have risen more than 30 basis
points since the June FOMC, narrowing the spread relative to comparable U.S.
Treasuries. Long-term interest rates have also moved up somewhat in the
United Kingdom and Canada. These movements apparently reflected some
increase in market perceptions of the likelihood of official interest rate hikes

I-30

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18,1999

over the next year. Share prices in the major foreign industrial countries
changed little over the period.
The appreciation of the dollar relative to the currencies of other major trading
partners reflects increased uncertainty in both Asian and Latin American
financial markets. Over the intermeeting period, the dollar appreciated about 4
percent in terms of the Thai baht, the Korean won, and the Philippine peso, and
10 percent against the Indonesian rupiah. Tensions between China and Taiwan,
as well as a heightened perception of a possible devaluation of the renminbi,
contributed to falling equity prices in much of the region.
Latin American financial markets appeared particularly sensitive to prospects for
rising interest rates in the United States. The Mexican peso moved up slightly
on balance over the period, supported in part by rising crude oil prices, but the
Brazilian real depreciated 6 percent. Concerns over the future of Argentina's
currency board persist, as the recession has appeared to deepen and political
uncertainty before this fall's presidential election has increased. Equity prices
fell 13 percent in Brazil, 8 percent in Argentina and 6 percent in Mexico. Brady
yield spreads over Treasuries widened appreciably on balance during the
intermeeting period, with the Emerging Market Bond Index spread increasing
100 basis points.

. The Desk did not intervene
during the period for the accounts of the System or the Treasury.
Economic activity abroad. Recent indicators for economic activity in the
foreign industrial economies suggest that the recovery in Europe is gaining
momentum in the current quarter, while the Japanese contraction shows tenuous
signs of bottoming out. Meanwhile, the Canadian economy continues to thrive.
Second-quarter data for Japan indicate a reversal of some of the surprising jump
in GDP in the first quarter. Both production and orders have fallen, and the
unemployment rate has continued to climb. One of the few bright spots is
housing construction, which has continued to rise, largely reflecting government
incentives. Forward-looking indicators are mixed. Machinery orders have
fallen sharply, more than reversing their first-quarter rise, but the June Tankan
survey showed some improvement in business confidence.
In contrast, recent indicators for the euro area point to a brightening outlook.
Although euro-zone industrial production in April and May was below the first-

InternationalDevelopments

I-31

quarter average, forward-looking indicators such as orders and business and
consumer sentiment have turned decidedly positive.
GDP growth in the United Kingdom accelerated in the second quarter after
stagnating over the previous two quarters, and both business and consumer
confidence are at high levels, signaling continued improvement. The Canadian
economy continued to expand briskly in the second quarter, and recent gains in
new orders as well as a sharp jump in employment in July suggest further robust
expansion in the current quarter.
Inflationary pressures remain quiescent in the major foreign industrial
economies. Japanese prices were unchanged in the twelve months ended in July,
as higher oil prices offset continued deflationary pressure. Higher oil prices have
also resulted in an uptick in prices in some euro-zone countries, but aggregate
year-over-year inflation for the area is still around 1 percent, well below the
percent in July, is also
ECB's 2 percent ceiling. U.K. inflation, at 2 1/4
comfortably below the target rate of 2 1/2 percent. Canadian inflation moved up
to 1 3/4
percent in July, just below the midpoint of the Bank of Canada's 1 to 3
percent target range.
The situation is mixed in the developing countries. The Asian countries except
China and Hong Kong posted robust growth in the first half of this year,
although the level of output remains below 1997 peaks in most of these
countries. In contrast, Chinese growth has slowed sharply. Hong Kong's
economy also remains weak, although a dip in the unemployment rate in the
second quarter suggests that some improvement may be occurring.
The recent performance of the Latin American countries has also been uneven.
Growth in Mexico appears to have accelerated this year to a nearly 8 percent
pace in the second quarter. The Brazilian economy has also perked up following
last year's recession, posting growth of about 4 percent at an annual rate in both
the first and second quarters of this year. However, the Argentine economy
appears to have continued to contract in the second quarter, which would be the
fourth consecutive quarterly decline in real GDP. Several other Latin American
economies also remain weak.
Inflation rates remain low in most developing countries. Consumer prices were
down from a year earlier in the most recent data for China, Taiwan, Hong Kong,
and Thailand and were little changed in Korea and Singapore. Inflation rates are
positive but declining in the other Asian developing countries. In Latin
America, weak activity in Argentina has contributed to a drop in prices over the
past year. Inflation rates are still in double digits in Mexico and Venezuela but
have declined somewhat this year. Year-over-year inflation has picked up to

Part 1. Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

about 41/2
percent in Brazil recently, largely reflecting hikes in administered fuel
prices.
U.S. net exports and prices. In May, the nominal U.S. trade deficit was
$21.3 billion, up $2.7 billion from April. The widening deficit reflected a small
drop in the value of exports along with a sharp rise in imports. For April-May
combined the deficit was $240 billion at an annual rate, up from $215 billion in
the first quarter. Data for June will be released on August 19 and will be
reviewed in the Greenbook Supplement.
The value of exports fell 3/4 percent in May with declines widespread among
major categories. However, for April-May combined the value of exports was
up a bit over the first quarter. Imports were up 2 percent in May and were 2
percent above the first-quarter level for April and May on average, with much of
the increase resulting from higher oil prices.
Oil prices have continued to rise as OPEC sticks to its production restraint
agreements. The monthly average spot price of WTI increased from $17.75 in
May to more than $20 per barrel in July, and the spot price is now trading
around $21.50. Supply disruptions in Nigeria and strengthening world
economic activity have also contributed to higher prices.
Prices of non-oil imports decreased 2 percent at an annual rate in the second
quarter and fell slightly further in July. Prices of core goods imports (which
exclude oil, computers, and semiconductors) declined a little more than
1 percent at an annual rate in the second quarter after two quarters of virtually no
price change. In July, the price index of core goods was very slightly higher
than the second-quarter average, largely as a result of rising prices of industrial
supplies. Prices of exports were down a little in the second quarter on average,
and also in July, primarily reflecting substantial declines in prices of agricultural
exports.
Outlook
Growth of foreign real GDP (weighted by U.S. nonagricultural export shares) is
projected to average about 3 percent (annual rate) over the forecast period. This
is somewhat stronger than our previous projection, with the bulk of the upward
revision in the outlook for the Asian developing countries. The forecasts for
Canada and Europe are also marginally stronger.
As in the June forecast, we assume that Y2K effects will raise foreign growth in
the second half of 1999 because of inventory accumulation and reduce it in the
first half of 2000 as stocks are run down. The dollar is expected to depreciate a
small amount in real terms relative to our broad index of trading-partner

I-33

InternationalDevelopments

currencies over the forecast period. The trajectory for the dollar is similar to the
previous projection, although the level is lower as a result of the recent
depreciation.
Summary of Staff Projections
(Percent change, seasonally adjusted annual rate)
Projection
Measure

1999

1998

H1

Q3

Q4

2000

Foreign output

0.5

3.5

2.5

3.4

3.0

June GB

0.6

2.3

2.1

3.0

2.7

1.1

-0.8

4.8

7.2

5.3

1.1

-1.3

1.3

6.3

4.7

Real exports
June GB

Real imports
June GB

9.7

11.5

10.6

9.5

7.7

9.7

11.8

11.1

8.5

7.6

NOTE. Changes for years are measured as Q4/Q4; for halfyears, Q2/Q4 or Q4/Q2; and for quarters, from previous quarter.

Declines in U.S. real net exports are expected to subtract 3/4 percentage point
from U.S. real GDP growth in the second half of 1999 and 1/2 percentage point in
2000, as the rebound in exports and continued slowing of import growth lessen
the negative contribution of the external sector.
The dollar. The nominal exchange value of the dollar against the index of
major foreign currencies is still expected to decline moderately from its current
level. We continue to assume that the dollar will move lower against the euro,
partly in response to widespread current account imbalances, and partly as a
result of the expected pickup in European growth. We also expect partial
reversal of the recent appreciation relative to the Canadian dollar, as the
continuing recovery of commodity prices provides some near-term support for
the Canadian currency. This forecast assumes that the Bank of Canada will
match any U.S. interest rate increases. Against the yen, we project that the
dollar strengthens a little from its current level in the near term. The continued
accommodative stance of Japanese monetary policy and market participants'
likely disappointment with the pace of recovery in Japan should lend support to
the dollar. However, the dollar remains vulnerable to a downward correction
against the yen owing to the persistence of the widening current account
imbalances of the two countries.

I-34

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

The real exchange value of the dollar against the currencies of a wider group of
U.S. trading partners, as measured by the staff's broad index, is projected to
edge down over the forecast period. U.S. consumer price inflation, which is
expected to outstrip inflation in most of the foreign industrial countries, offsets a
part of the nominal decline against the major foreign currencies. In addition, we
continue to expect the dollar to appreciate in real terms against all major Latin
American currencies except the Brazilian real. As before, we are projecting that
the Chinese renminbi will be devalued at some point during the forecast period,
a view held with somewhat more confidence owing to the recent slowing in
Chinese growth as well as recent regional political tensions. In contrast, we
assume that the Argentine and Hong Kong currency pegs will hold, although
they confront more downside risk than they may have previously.
Activity in foreign industrial countries. Real export-weighted GDP in the
foreign industrial countries is projected to grow at an annual rate of about 21/4
percent over the forecast period. Absent the assumed Y2K effect, which shifts
1/4
percentage point of growth from 2000 into 1999, the forecast would have a
modest upward trajectory.
The Japanese economy is expected to contract in the second half of 1999,
reflecting payback for unsustainably strong first-quarter growth, further declines
in business investment, and weakness in the consumer sector owing to declining
compensation and uncertainty about employment prospects. Moving into next
year, we expect that the economy will register modestly positive growth, as
exports to other Asian countries continue to recover and domestic demand
stabilizes. We assume that the Bank of Japan will maintain its current monetary
policy stance through the end of the forecast period and that the fiscal impulse
will remain modestly positive.
We are projecting euro-area GDP growth to average 2 percent at an annual rate
1/2
over the forecast period. The relatively competitive value of the euro, despite its
recent appreciation versus the dollar, and the low level of interest rates should
both be important in supporting activity going forward.
U.K. GDP is projected to grow at a rate of about 21/4 percent over the forecast
period as recent monetary easing is expected to help keep economic growth on
an upward path. Canadian growth is projected to average about 3 percent over
the forecast period, with some slowing next year as the U.S. economy
decelerates and export growth is restrained by the assumed rise in the Canadian
dollar.
Inflation. Consumer price inflation in the foreign industrial countries, weighted
by U.S. non-oil import shares, is projected to average about 1 percent on a year-

InternationalDevelopments

I-35

over-year basis over the forecast period. This is little changed from the June
Greenbook, as the higher path for oil prices is offset by a greater amount of
exchange rate appreciation.
Interest rates. Short-term interest rates in Japan are assumed to remain near
zero throughout the forecast period. Euro-area short-term rates are assumed to
remain unchanged this year and to increase 25 basis points in the second half of
next year as the expansion gains momentum. The Bank of England is expected
to tighten monetary policy in the middle of next year as U.K. inflation rises
toward the target rate. With diminishing economic slack in Canada, we project
that the Bank of Canada will raise interest rates by 25 basis points by the end of
this year and another 25 basis points next year.
Other countries. Real export-weighted GDP in the developing countries is
expected to expand at an average pace of about 4 percent, a rate nearly 3/4
percentage point above that in the June forecast. The upward revision is entirely
in the outlook for developing Asia; the aggregate projection for Latin America is
little changed.
We now project real GDP growth of about 5 percent on average for developing
1/2
Asia over the forecast period, about 1 percentage points higher than in the June
Greenbook. The upward revisions have been greatest among the ASEAN
countries, which appear to be rebounding much more quickly than previously
anticipated, partly reflecting a pickup in the global electronics market. This
suggests that economic activity in these countries may be returning to capacity
sooner than we had expected; the still-unresolved problems in the banking
sectors of some of these countries do not appear at this time to be as much of a
hindrance to growth as we had assumed. Export-weighted growth in these
countries is now expected to average about 51/2 percent over the forecast period,
up 3 percentage points from the June Greenbook forecast. In contrast, we have
revised down our projection for average growth in China about 3/4percentage
point, to 5 1/4
percent.
Real GDP in the Latin American developing countries is expected to expand at
an average pace of 31/4 percent over the forecast period, a forecast little changed
from that in the last Greenbook, as a small upward revision to projected growth
in Mexico in response to recent information has been offset by a more
pessimistic outlook for Argentina and Chile. The outlook for Brazilian growth
is little changed.
Century date change. We continue to assume that Y2K will affect the
quarterly pattern of GDP growth abroad in the second half of 1999 and the first
half of 2000. We know very little about the likely magnitude of these effects

I-36

Part1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

across countries, but although many countries are less prepared than the United
States to deal with these problems, they are also generally less dependent than
the U.S. economy on computers.
Real exports and imports of goods and services. Real net exports are
estimated to have weakened in the second quarter. However, the negative
percentage point at an annual rate, was only
contribution to real GDP growth, 3/4
about one-third the size of that in the first-quarter. Growth in net exports is
percentage point from GDP growth in the second half of
expected to subtract 3/4/
the year and 1/2
percentage point next year.
Real exports of goods and services are expected to grow at a 51/2 percent annual
rate over the remaining six quarters of the forecast period after changing little
during the first half of 1999. The improvement relative to the first half of this
year is primarily in core exports (goods other than agricultural products,
computers, and semiconductors) and reflects both the pickup in foreign
economic activity as well as the fading impact of past increases in the foreign
exchange value of the dollar. This projection calls for total export growth to be
higher than in the June Greenbook by about 2 percentage points (annual rate) for
the second half of this year and about 1/2 percentage point next year.
Growth of real imports of goods and services is projected to average 10 percent
at an annual rate in the second half of the year, a little below the first-half pace,
and to slow to a little less than 8 percent in 2000. The pattern largely reflects the
behavior of core imports. The projected slowing results from both moderating
growth in U.S. activity as well as increasing import prices.
The quantity of imported oil is expected to increase more rapidly than
consumption over the forecast period as domestic production continues to
decline in response to the past year's low level of oil prices. Because of the
recent run-up in prices, however, domestic production is not expected to fall as
rapidly as we previously anticipated. The assumed precautionary increase in
stocks because of Y2K increases oil imports about 3 percent during the fourth
quarter of this year and decreases imports by the same volume during the first
quarter of 2000.
Oil prices. The staff has raised its forecast for the price of imported oil $2.25
per barrel for the second half of 1999 and the first half of 2000 and about $1.50
per barrel for the second half of 2000. These revisions reflect lower projections
for OPEC production in accord with recent relatively high compliance with its
production targets, stronger predicted world economic activity, declining
inventories, and a weaker exchange value of the dollar. We now anticipate that
OPEC will hold production at current levels through the third quarter of this

1-37
I-37

InternationalDevelopments

InternationalDevelopments

year. The price of imported oil is expected to increase to around $18.50 per
barrel in the fourth quarter of this year and then to decline gradually to around
$16 per barrel by the end of 2000 as OPEC loosens its production constraints
and non-OPEC production increases in response to the higher prices.
Selected Trade Prices
(Percent change except as noted; seasonally adjusted annual rate)
Projection
Trade category

1998

1999
H1

Q3

2000
Q4

Exports

Nonagricultural (core)

-1.9

0.5

1.4

1.5

1.2

Agricultural

-9.9

-9.1

2.0

2.0

2.4

-2.0
11.40

-0.5
14.69

0.7
17.40

1.7
18.61

1.8
16.22

Imports

Non-oil (core)
Oil (level, dollars per barrel)

NOTE. Prices for exports and non-oil imports of goods, excluding computers
and semiconductors, are on a NIPA chain-weighted basis.
Changes for years are measured as Q4/Q4; for half-years, Q2/Q4 or Q4/Q2;
and for quarters, from previous quarter.
The price of imported oil for multi-quarter periods is the price for the final
quarter of the period.

Prices of non-oil imports and exports. Prices of core imports are projected to
increase in the second half of the year following three and a half years of decline
as commodity prices pick up with the rebound in foreign activity and the lagged
effects of earlier dollar gains dissipate. Core import prices are projected to rise
just under 2 percent in 2000. Core export prices are forecast to rise moderately
in line with comparable U.S. domestic prices.
Nominal trade and current account balances. The nominal trade deficit for
goods and services is projected to widen substantially from an estimated annual
rate of $246 billion in the second quarter of 1999 to $312 billion in the fourth
quarter of 2000. The deficit for net investment income is expected to widen
somewhat this year and next. Accordingly, the current account deficit, which
was $220 billion (2.6 percent of GDP) in 1998, is projected to rise to about
$375 billion in 2000, 4.0 percent of projected GDP. The previous peak level of
the current-account-deficit-to-GDP ratio was 3.5 percent in 1987.

Part 1: Summary and Outlook, August 18, 1999

I-38

Weaker U.S. dollar. Although there are always considerable risks to the
exchange rate forecast in both directions, we continue to believe that one of the
most significant is that the large and growing U.S. current account deficit will
become a more central focus of attention to market participants. Questions
about the longer-term sustainability of that deficit could result in a significant
depreciation of the dollar. In the scenario summarized in the following table, we
have considered the effects of a dollar path that is 10 percent weaker than our
current forecast throughout the projection period.' In this case, both U.S. real
GDP growth and CPI inflation are substantially higher in 2000, assuming no
change in U.S. monetary policy.
Impact of Weaker Dollar Alternative
(Percent change, Q4 to Q4)

Measure

1999

2000

U.S. real GDP
Baseline
Alternative

3.4
3.4

2.8
3.7

U.S. CPI excludingfood and energy
Baseline
Alternative

2.1
2.1

2.6
3.2

NOTE. Simulation assumes nominal federal funds rate unchanged from
baseline.

1. More precisely, the exogenous shock to each bilateral exchange rate is in the form of a
change in the risk premium that is calibrated so that the U.S. dollar would depreciate by 10
percent in the absence of any changes in bilateral long-term real interest rate differentials. In
response to the dollar depreciation, foreign monetary authorities reduce short-term interest rates,
leading to a fall in long-term real rates as well. However, with the federal funds rate held at the
baseline path over the simulation period, higher expected inflation causes U.S. long-term real
interest rates to fall slightly more than corresponding foreign rates, leading to a further 3/4
percent
dollar depreciation by the end of 2000.

Strictly Confidential (FR)
August 18, 1999
Class II FOMC
OUTLOOK FOR FOREIGN REAL GDP AND CONSUMER PRICES: SELECTED COUNTRIES
(Percent, Q4 to Q4)
-Projected-

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2.3

3.1

5.2

2.2

4.3

4.1

0.5

3.3

3.0

Industrial Countries
of which:
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom
Euro-11
Germany

0.6

1.9

4.0

1.8

2.9

3.3

1.7

2.5

2.2

0.9
0.1
0.7
0.1
0.8

2.9
0.5
3.2
0.0

5.5
0.9
4.6
3.0

1.4
2.5
1.9

2.8

0.9

2.4
5.1
2.9
1.6
1.5

4.4
-0.8
3.4
3.1
1.8

2.8
-3.0
1.6
1.9
1.3

Developing Countries
Asia
Korea
China
Latin America
Mexico

4.8
7.1
3.9
14.6
2.8
2.5
0.1

4.9
7.5
6.3
6.1
2.6
1.9

6.9
8.8
9.4
16.3
5.5
5.1

2.9
7.3
7.2
12.6
-4.0
-7.3

4.4

9.6

-1.5

6.3
6.9
6.8
9.2
6.3
7.5
4.9

5.2
4.9
3.7
8.2
6.3
7.2
2.0

-1.0
-2.7
-5.3
9.5
0.8
2.9
-1.9

2.0

2.1

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.6

1.0

0.8

1.1

1.8
1.2
2.7
NA
4.3

-0.0
0.8

2.0
0.1
3.2
2.0
1.4

1.0
2.1
2.8
1.4
2.1

1.1
0.7
2.6
0.9
0.4

1.8
-1.4
2.2
1.8
0.9

2.1
-1.1
2.5
1.5
1.3

11.2
4.8
5.1
7.0
26.0
28.1
10.8

6.9
2.8
5.1
1.0
15.8

8.9
4.6
6.0
-1.1
15.5

5.4
0.9
0.4
0.2
13.4

17.2
5.3

17.6

14.7

6.1
3.1
3.5
2.4
11.1
11.9
6.3

Measure and country
REAL GDP

(1)

Total foreign

Brazil

-0.2

1.5

4.0
4.7
4.9
5.4
3.4
4.0
2.5

CONSUMER PRICES (2)
Industrial Countries
of which:
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom (3)
Euro-11 (4)
Germany
Developing Countries
Asia
Korea
China
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil

NA

2.1
-0.8
2.9
2.7

2.6

1.5

21.6
24.7
23.0
7.7
10.7
5.5
4.7
5.5
5.8
8.2
17.1
26.9
71.7
54.3
74.2
13.2
6.9
8.6
1118.8 2287.6 1216.3

17.0

2.2

6.4
4.4

11.1
42.2
48.8
23.1

1.8

7.8

Foreign GDP aggregates calculated using shares of U.S. non-agricultural exports.
Foreign CPI aggregates calculated using shares of U.S. non-oil imports.
CPI excluding mortgage interest payments, which is the targeted inflation rate.
Harmonized CPI's, weighted by shares in final consumption of households converted to a common
currency using estimated PPP exchange rates.

August 18, 1999

Strictly Confidential (FR)
Class II FOMC
OUTLOOK FOR FOREIGN REAL GDP AND CONSUMER PRICES: SELECTED COUNTRIES
(Percent changes)
----------------1999

1998
Measure and country
REAL GDP

(1)

Total foreign

Q1

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

-------------------- Quarterly changes at an annual rate ------------------0.7

Industrial Countries
of which:
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom
Euro-11
Germany

2.8
-4.8
2.2
2.4
4.1

Developing Countries
Asia
Korea
China
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil

-3.8
-10.6
-23.0
7.0
4.0
5.1
-0.4

CONSUMER PRICES (2)
-------------------

Q2

Projected -----------------2000

1.7

0.4

1.0

1.4

3.7

3.4

2.5

3.4

1.1

3.8

3.5

3.5

1.1

1.8

2.1

3.7

1.9

1.8

2.7

0.2

3.5

2.8

2.5

2.6

4.8
-3.3
0.2
1.1

4.2
8.1
0.5
1.9
1.8

3.5
-3.0
2.0
2.0
1.5

3.0
-3.1
2.4
2.4
2.2

3.6
-0.3
2.8
2.7
2.7

0.4
-1.1
0.5
0.4
0.7

4.2
1.6
3.1
3.6
3.4

3.4
0.5
2.9
3.0
3.1

3.0
0.7
2.4
2.7
3.0

2.4
2.3
3.0
2.2
2.7
3.9
0.6

4.3
5.1
5.7
5.2
3.8
4.1
3.2

1.1

-2.9

-1.2

1.9

2.2

2.2
0.0

2.1
1.8

-0.6
-3.6
-5.3
6.5
2.5
2.6
5.7

0.0
-0.1
4.0
11.0
0.3
3.8
-6.0

-0.6
0.7
4.1
6.0
13.8
-3.6
0.1
-6.6

3.8
6.9
14.7
2.2
0.5
1.3

4.1

5.3
6.3
3.5
1.1
5.3
7.7
3.8

3.6
4.9
5.0
4.7
2.5
3.8
1.2

4.5
5.6
5.3
5.5
3.8
4.7
3.1

4.8
6.0
5.9
7.3
3.7
3.9
3.2

--------------------------- Four-quarter changes --------------------------

Industrial Countries
of which:
Canada
Japan
United Kingdom (3)
Euro-11 (4)
Germany

1.5

1.1

1.0
2.1
2.5
1.2

1.0
0.6
3.0
1.4

1.2

1.4

0.6

Developing Countries
Asia
Korea
China
Latin America
Mexico
Brazil

7.4
4.2
8.9
0.4

7.6

7.9

4.7

0.8
0.9
-0.1
2.6
1.2

8.2
-0.9

4.6
7.0
-1.4

14.1

14.1

15.3
4.6

14.2

15.1
3.7

15.6
2.6

1.0

0.6

0.9

1.0

1.1

0.8
1.8
-1.4
2.2
1.8
0.9

0.7
2.6
0.9
0.4
8.9
4.6
6.0
-1.1

0.7
-1.4

15.5
17.6
1.8

16.3
18.6
2.3

7.8

2.6

6.5
0.8

5.8

0.6
-2.2
15.4

-1.0

17.9

3.3

0.4
0.1
14.5
16.5
5.6

5.4
0.9
0.4

0.2
13.4
14.7
7.8

0.9
1.9
-1.1
2.3
1.6
1.0
5.6
1.5
1.2
1.0

12.2
13.3
7.5

1.0

1.1

1.1

2.0
-1.1
2.3
1.6
1.1

2.1
-1.1
2.4
1.5
1.2

2.1
-1.1
2.5
1.5
1.3

6.0
2.4
1.8
1.8
11.6

6.2
2.9
3.3
2.1
11.3
12.1
6.6

6.1
3.1
3.5

12.5

7.0

Foreign GDP aggregates calculated using shares of U.S. non-agricultural exports.
Foreign CPI aggregates calculated using shares of U.S. non-oil imports.
CPI excluding mortgage interest payments, which is the targeted inflation rate.
Harmonized CPI's, weighted by shares in final consumption of households converted to a common
currency using estimated PPP exchange rates.

2.4
11.1

11.9
6.3

Strictly Confidential
Class II FOMC

(FR)

August 18, 1999
OUTLOOK FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS

1992

1993

1994

1996

1995

1998

1997

Projected
1999
2000

NIPA REAL EXPORTS and IMPORTS
Percentage point contribution to GDP growth, Q4/Q4
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-0.4
0.4
-0.8

-0.6
0.5
-1.1

-0.4
1.0
-1.4

-0.3
1.2
-1.4

0.5
1.1
-0.7

-0.6
1.1
-1.7

-1.1
0.1
-1.2

-1.1
0.3
-1.4

-0.5
0.6
-1.1

Percentage change, Q4/Q4
Exports of G&S
Services
Agricultural Goods
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 1/

4.1
-0.9
10.4
25.2
64.8
2.3

4.6
4.1
-5.5
23.7
32.9
3.6

10.0
6.0
16.6
32.0
66.9
7.0

10.5
9.8
-4.3
55.5
79.6
5.8

10.3
7.5
4.8
35.9
46.2
8.0

9.6
1.5
2.8
40.7
21.0
11.6

1.1
-0.6
-1.2
6.4
7.8
1.3

2.5
2.8
-5.8
27.4
31.1
-0.6

5.3
3.0
2.2
29.5
24.6
3.3

Imports of G&S
Services
Oil
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 2/

7.4
1.4
12.1
45.1
42.0
5.4

10.2
3.2
10.1
39.3
34.2
9.5

12.3
1.4
-0.2
44.8
54.5
12.2

5.6
6.1
2.4
48.1
92.4
-1.1

11.8
5.5
7.9
24.4
57.6
10.4

14.0
12.4
4.0
30.3
32.7
13.0

9.7
2.4
5.9
28.3
-7.8
10.9

10.8
7.5
10.6
44.5
33.3
7.9

7.7
3.5
2.1
36.7
28.9
5.8

-111.2
860.0
971.2

-136.1
970.0
1106.1

-238.2
984.7
1222.9

-333.6
1013.7
1347.3

-396.5
1060.7
1457.2

Billions of chained 1992 dollars
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-29.5
639.4
669.0

-70.2
658.2
728.4

-104.6
712.4
817.0

-96.5
792.6
889.0

Billions of dollars
US CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE

-50.6

-50.6

-85.3

-121.7

-113.6

-129.3

-220.6

-318.4

-377.4

Net Goods & Services (BOP)

-37.0

-37.0

-69.9

-98.4

-97.5

-104.3

-164.3

-253.6

-306.0

Net Income
Direct, Net
Portfolio, Net
Employee Comp., Net

22.3
54.7
-29.1
-3.3

22.3
54.7
-29.1
-3.3

23.2
58.6
-31.7
-3.7

15.9
54.4
-34.1
-4.4

19.4
63.8
-39.9
-4.5

17.2
67.7
-46.0
-4.5

-12.2
59.4
-66.4
-5.2

-21.9
60.9
-77.3
-5.6

-28.6
71.3
-94.3
-5.6

Net Transfers

-35.9

-35.9

-38.5

-39.2

-35.4

-42.2

-44.1

-42.8

-42.8

1. Merchandise exports excluding agricultural products, computers, and semiconductors.
2. Merchandise imports excluding oil, computers, and semiconductors.

Strictly Confidential
Class II FOMC

August 18, 1999

(FR)
OUTLOOK FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS
1995
---------------------------Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1

1996
--------------------- '------Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1

1997
------------------- '-------Q4
Q3
Q2
Q1

NIPA REAL EXPORTS and IMPORTS
Percentage point contribution to GDP growth
-0.2
1.0
-1.2

Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-0.3
0.6
-0.9

1.6
1.9
-0.3

0.7
1.1
-0.4

-1.0
0.6
-1.6

-1.1
0.4
-1.5

-1.4
0.2
-1.6

2.4
3.2
-0.9

-1.3
0.9
-2.2

-0.4
1.7
-2.2

-0.5
1.2
-1.7

-0.3
0.5
-0.8

Percentage change from previous period, SAAR
Exports of G&S
Services
Agricultural Goods
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 1/

5.4
2.9
-13.4
33.8
100.8
1.4

17.8
21.7
5.0
86.6
96.2
9.4

10.2
6.4
-9.4
71.6
53.6
8.1

3.7
-4.0
22.6
57.6
23.8
0.1

5.8
10.3
-32.8
24.7
29.7
6.0

2.1
-9.9
-1.6
27.7
30.2
5.7

32.0
39.8
48.7
35.9
118.6
21.3

8.3
-6.7
-16.1
70.2
41.3
13.8

15.5
11.8
-7.8
78.7
17.3
15.6

10.6
5.9
8.7
41.9
32.3
9.2

4.4
-4.0
32.8
-9.2
-2.2
8.0

9.8
20.5
-11.4
15.4
37.1
7.2

Imports of G&S
Services
Oil
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 2/

9.2
9.1
1.8
36.4
72.0
4.3

7.2
-3.3
15.4
51.6
105.5
1.5

2.0
3.1
31.4
62.7
128.2
-8.8

3.5
5.5
-18.2
69.3
113.3
-3.8

13.1
9.2
-9.8
22.5
38.7
13.9

13.5
4.3
68.9
22.9
8.9
10.5

13.6
9.9
3.5
18.8
50.1
13.4

7.0
-1.1
-14.0
33.8
172.1
4.1

18.6
17.8
-8.2
54.5
89.0
16.2

17.9
10.6
37.0
39.0
16.0
16.1

13.5
15.8
6.0
30.6
20.3
11.8

6.3
5.8
-12.2
2.9
17.6
8.1

-140.1
849.9
990.0

-95.9
911.1
1007.0

-121.5
929.4
1050.9

-131.6
963.6
1095.2

-142.4
988.1
1130.5

-149.0
998.8
1147.8

Billions of chained 1992 dollars, SAAR
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-109.5
763.9
873.4

-114.7
774.0
888.7

-86.8
806.3
893.1

-74.8
826.1
900.9

-95.5
833.6
929.1

-113.5
845.5
958.9

Billions of dollars, SAAR
US CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE

-122.1

-132.9

-112.3

-87.1

-122.1

-132.9

-112.3

-87.1

-107.0

-125.8

-153.3

-131.1

Net Goods & Services

(BOP) -107.2

-123.6

-87.2

-72.1

-89.4

-105.9

-125.9

-96.1

-106.4

-96.8

-102.9

-112.8

Net Income
Direct, Net
Portfolio, Net
Employee Comp.,

20.6
61.7
-36.7
-4.4

24.3
68.4
-39.6
-4.5

10.3
57.0
-42.2
-4.5

22.4
68.1
-41.1
-4.6

20.6
61.7
-36.7
-4.4

24.3
68.4
-39.6
-4.5

10.3
57.0
-42.2
-4.5

22.4
68.1
-41.1
-4.6

26.1
68.5
-38.2
-4.3

16.8
64.3
-43.0
-4.5

10.6
63.6
-48.5
-4.5

15.3
74.5
-54.3
-4.9

-35.5

-33.6

-35.3

-37.3

-43.7

-36.7

-38.0

-50.3

-37.4

-38.0

-40.4

-52.1

Net Transfers

Net

1. Merchandise exports excluding agricultural products, computers, and semiconductors.

2. Merchandise imports excluding oil, computers, and semiconductors.

Strictly Confidential
Class II FOMC

August 18,

(FR)

1999

OUTLOOK FOR U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS

Q1

Q2

Projected --------------------2000

------------------1999

1998
Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

-0.5
0.8
-1.3

-0.3
0.0
-0.4

-1.0
0.6
-1.7

-0.5
0.6
-1.1

-0.0
1.0
-1.0

Q3

NIPA REAL EXPORTS and IMPORTS
Percentage point contribution to GDP growth
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-2.3
-0.3
-1.9

-2.1
-0.9
-1.2

-0.6
-0.3
-0.3

0.5
2.0
-1.5

-2.3
-0.6
-1.7

-0.8
0.4
-1.2

-0.9
0.5
-1.4

Percentage change from previous period, SAAR
Exports of G&S
Services
Agricultural Goods
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 1/

-7.7
1.6
-23.5
8.5
-14.3
-10.9

-2.8
-10.3
-14.3
20.7
23.9
-1.2

19.7
8.3
61.1
15.7
29.9
21.9

-5.1
4.3
-37.9
0.2
34.2
-8.8

3.7
3.6
21.4
46.8
41.1
-3.0

4.8
0.8
2.2
43.1
25.3
2.8

7.2
2.6
2.2
25.0
24.4
7.4

0.1
0.9
2.2
27.4
24.4
-4.4

6.0
4.1
2.2
29.8
24.4
3.9

6.0
3.5
2.2
29.8
24.8
4.2

9.4
3.6
2.2
31.0
24.8
10.2

15.7
9.3
8.8
38.7
9.9
16.1

Imports of G&S
Services
Oil
Computers
Semiconductors
Other Goods 2/

-2.7
-1.2
-9.6
-15.4
-2.0
-1.7

9.4
-0.7
41.6
22.6
-27.8
10.8

2.3
-0.5
-5.8
9.6
-3.0
3.5

12.0
1.9
-13.4
45.3
-6.4
13.9

13.5
11.9
7.0
43.8
17.5
11.6

9.6
2.0
28.2
66.9
55.7
4.3

10.6
10.1
9.6
43.8
36.0
7.0

9.5
6.2
-0.3
26.2
26.7
9.0

2.6
1.0
-21.9
31.1
28.2
2.1

12.5
5.1
42.2
38.6
28.6
9.0

8.4
4.2
3.5
38.6
29.1
6.4

7.6
3.9
-5.2
38.6
29.6
6.0

-346.5
1017.4
1363.9

-360.0
1035.2
1395.2

-368.7
1035.6
1404.3

-395.4
1050.7
1446.1

-409.4
1066.2
1475.6

-412.5
1090.4
1503.0

Billions of chained 1992 dollars, SAAR
Net Goods & Services
Exports of G&S
Imports of G&S

-198.5
991.9
1190.4

-245.2
972.1
1217.3

-259.0
965.3
1224.3

-250.0
1009.6
1259.6

-303.6
996.5
1300.1

-324.5
1005.6
1330.1

Billions of dollars, SAAR
US CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCE
Net Goods & Services

-172.1

-209.6

-253.9

-246.7

-274.3

-305.3

-333.4

-360.7

-356.2

-376.7

-383.6

-393.0

(BOP) -133.4

-167.8

-182.9

-173.1

-215.0

-245.7

-269.6

-284.2

-288.7

-308.1

-315.0

-312.3

Net Income
Direct Net
Portfolio, Net
Employee Comp, Net

1.0
67.3
-61.3
-5.1

-2.2
64.7
-61.8
-5.2

-27.9
47.3
-69.9
-5.3

-19.7
58.2
-72.5
-5.4

-18.9
58.1
-71.4
-5.6

-19.6
61.2
-75.2
-5.6

-23.7
60.8
-79.0
-5.6

-25.5
63.5
-83.5
-5.6

-27.5
65.3
-87.2
-5.6

-28.6
68.3
-91.3
-5.6

-28.6
73.6
-96.7
-5.6

-29.7
78.0
-102.1
-5.6

Net Transfers

-39.7

-39.5

-43.1

-53.9

-40.4

-40.0

-40.0

-51.0

-40.0

-40.0

-40.0

-51.0

1. Merchandise exports excluding agricultural products, computers, and semiconductors.
2. Merchandise imports excluding oil, computers, and semiconductors.