View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

1

In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.

Confidential (FR) Class III FOMC

August 13, 1986

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
By the staff of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section
DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Page

II

Industrial production.........................................
Employment and unemployment .....................................
Personal income and consumption...............................
Business fixed investment.......................................
Housing...............
.................. .......... ............ ..
Business inventories............................................
The federal government .
....................... ....
...........

1
2
2
6
8
9
12

State and local government sector..............................

14

Prices........................
............. ........ ...........
Wages and labor costs . .........................................

15
20

Tables
Changes in employment...............................
..........
Selected unemployment rates.....................................
Personal income and expenditures..............................
Retail sales.......... .........................................

3
3
4
5

Auto sales, production, and inventories.........................

5

Business capital spending indicators...........................
Private housing activity ....................... o .............

7
10

Changes in manufacturing and trade inventories..................

11

Inventories relative to sales...................................

11

Changes in selected federal receipt
and expenditure categories...................................
Recent changes in consumer prices..............................

13
16

Recent changes in producer prices...............................
Indicators of U.S. agricultural production......................
Index of prices received by farmers.............................
Selected measures of labor costs in the

16
18
19

nonfarm business sector.....................................

22

Charts
Nonresidential construction and new commitments.................

7

Private housing starts..........................................

10

Index of prices received by farmers.............................

19

Appendix
Administration and Congressional Budget Office
budget updates .............................................

A-1

III

DOMESTIC FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Monetary aggregates and bank credit.............................

3

... ....

5

Treasury and sponsored agency financing.........................
Tax-exempt securities markets...................................
Mortgage markets......................... 4 ..................

9
11
12

Consumer installment credit.....................................

15

Business finance......................................

Tables
Monetary aggregates..........................................

2

Commercial bank credit and short- and intermediate-term
......................

4

Gross offerings of securities by U.S. corporations..............

6

business credit......................

Treasury and agency financing....................................

8

Gross offerings of tax-exempt securities........................
Net change in mortgage debt outstanding........................
New issues of mortgage-backed pass-through securities

12
14

by federally sponsored agencies.............................
Consumer installment credit....................................

14
16

IV

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

Foreign exchange markets........................................

1

U.S. international financial transactions......................

5

........

10

U.S. merchandise trade.................................

Foreign economic developments.................................
Economic situation in major developing countries................

13
23

Tables
Summary of U.S. international transactions.....

6
..................

International banking data......................................
.
U.S. merchandise trade............................ .............
.. ..........
........ ...... .................
Oil imports ..........

9
10
11

Major industrial countries
Real GNP and industrial production..........................
...................
Consumer and wholesale prices..............

14
15

Trade and current account balances..........................

16

Charts
Weighted average exchange value of the U.S. dollar..............
Selected dollar exchange rates.................................

2
2

DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL
DEVELOPMENTS

August 13, 1986
II

- T - 1

SELECTED DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL DATA
(Seasonally adjusted)

Period

Latest data
Release
date
Data

Percent change from
Three
Preceding
periods
Year
period
earlier earlier
(At annual rates)

Civilian labor force
Unemployment rate (%)1
Insured unemployment rate (%)1
Nonfarm employment, payroll (mil.)
Manufacturing
Nonmanufacturing
Private nonfarm:
Average weekly hours (hr.)1
Hourly earnings ($)1
Manufacturing:
Average weekly hours (hr.) 1
Unit labor cost (1967-100)

July
July
Mar.
July
July
July

08-01-86
08-01-86
06-13-86
08-01-86
08-01-86
08-01-86

118.1
6.9
2.9
100.3
19.1
81.1

-. 4
7.1
2.8
4.7
-1.4
6.1

2.9
7.1
3.0
1.9
-2.6
2.9

2.4
7.3
2.9
2.6
-.8
3.5

July
July

08-01-86
08-01-86

34.6
8.73

34.7
8.75

34.8
8.72

34.8
8.55

July
June

08-01-86
07-31-86

40.6
81.4

40.6
-2.9

40.7
-7.7

40.4
-4.7

Industrial production (1977-100)
Consumer goods
Business equipment
Defense & space equipment
Materials

June
June
June
June
June

07-15-86
07-15-86
07-15-86
07-15-86
07-15-86

124.1
123.7
138.0
179.7
113.4

-5.8
-1.0
-13.8
1.3
-5.3

-1.0
4.2
-3.2
2.7
-2.1

-. 2
2.8
-1.9
3.6
-.8

Consumer prices all items (1967-100)
All items, excluding food & energy
Food

June
June
June

07-23-86
07-23-86
07-23-86

327.5
326.3
316.7

5.5
3.7
1.1

1.5
3.1
3.3

1.8
4.0
2.5

Producer prices: (1967=100)
Finished goods
Intermediate materials, nonfood
Crude foodstuffs & feedstuffs

June
June
June

07-11-86
07-11-86
07-11-86

288.5
312.2
223.2

-. 4
.4
-9.1

-.1
-4.8
.5

-1.7
-3.9
-3.2

2
Personal income ($ bil.)

June

07-23-86

3,479.2

1.2

4.0

(Not at annual rates)

Mfgrs. new orders dur. goods ($ bil.) June
June
Capital goods industries
June
Nondefense
June
Defense

07-31-86
07-31-86
07-31-86
07-31-86

102.7
33.8
26.5
7.3

.1
-2.3
1.3
-13.4

-1.9
-8.7
-.2
-30.1

-3.8
-13.9
-5.4
-35.0

Inventories to sales ratio:1
Manufacturing and trade, total
Manufacturing
Trade

May
June
May

07-16-86
07-31-86
07-16-86

1.39
1.44
1.35

1.37
1.42
1.33

1.37
1.42
1.33

1.36
1.46
1.27

Ratio: Mfgrs.' durable goods inventories to unfilled orders1

June

07-31-86

.528

.528

Retail sales, total (1 bil.)
GAF3

July
July

08-13-86
08-13-86

118.7
26.6

July
July
July

08-12-86
08-05-86
08-12-86

10.9
7.6
3.3

June
June

07-17-86
07-31-86

1,845
178.6

Auto sales, total (mil. units.)
Domestic models
Foreign models

2

Housing starts, private (thous.)
Leading indicators (1967-100)

2

1. Actual data used in lieu of percent changes for earlier periods.
2. At annual rates.
3. Excludes mail order houses.

.1
.4
-3.8
-9.3
11.3

.550
.8
1.8
-1.6
-5.2
7.7
-5.9
1.5

3.6
8.6
4.8
0.9
15.2

DOMESTIC NONFINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

Incoming indicators have continued to suggest a sluggish and uneven
pattern of economic activity.

The service and construction sectors

continue to benefit from strong demand on the part of households, but
manufacturing still is contracting under the pressure of declining business
investment and strong foreign competition.

Wage gains appear to be

moderating gradually, and-apart from the recent energy market developments-price inflation has remained in check.
Industrial Production
The index of industrial production fell 0.5 percent in June-about
half of the decline being strike related.

Since reaching its most recent

peak in January, the index has dropped 2 percent; one-half percentage
point of the decline is attributable to the plunge in drilling activity;
but cutbacks in production of business equipment and durable materials
also have contributed significantly.
Preliminary indicators suggest that the downtrend in production
continued in July.

Automobile assemblies were down 400,000 units (annual

rate) last month, and drilling activity was reduced further, albeit, as
in June, by a smaller amount than earlier in the year.

More generally,

the July labor market report indicates that production probably declined
in many durable goods industries.

By contrast, output of metals and

paper rose last month, and the settlement of the strike against AT&T
probably boosted production of communication equipment.
Capacity utilization declined 0.6 percentage point in June to 78.3
percent.

Since reaching its most recent peak in July 1984, utilization
II-1

II-2

has fallen 4 percentage points, with much of the decline occurring during
the first half of this year.

The drop in operating rates this year has

been concentrated in the durable manufacturing and mining industries.
Employment and Unemployment
Nonfarm employment, as measured by the establishment survey, rose
390,000 last month; about 150,000 of this increase reflected striking
workers returning to their jobs at AT&T and Alcoa.

Led by large gains in

retail trade and services, the number of jobs in the private service-producing
sector grew about 240,000 (strike adjusted).

In addition, construction

employment rebounded in July, more than retracing a June decline.
Manufacturing employment, however, continued to fall; cutbacks of more
than 50,000 jobs (strike adjusted) last month brought the cumulative
decline since January to 175,000.
The civilian unemployment rate declined 0.2 percentage point in
July to 6.9 percent, toward the lower end of the range that has prevailed
over the past year.

Much of the improved labor market situation reflected

higher employment levels for adult women.

The teenage unemployment rate

also showed an unusually large drop in July.

However, the unemployment

rate for adult men has been essentially unchanged for several months,
likely reflecting the weak performance of the goods-producing sector.
Personal Income and Consumption
Real income growth and consumer spending have shown considerable
strength this year.

Owing in part to sharp declines in energy prices

and a substantial boost to farm income from government subsidy payments,
disposable personal income, in real terms, rose at an annual rate of
nearly 7 percent in the first half.

II-3
CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT 1
(Thousands of employees; based on seasonally adjusted data)
1985
1985

Q3

1986
Q4

-Average

Nonfarm payroll employment 2
Strike adjusted

Q1

1986
Q2

May

June

July

monthly changes-

229
235

261
260

191
184

127
181

135
134

-54
114

389
241

-18
-17

Manufacturing
Strike adjusted

230
229

-31
-22

30
24

-11
-13

-37
-25

-44
-46

-56
-16

-23
-53

21
65
122
38

19
50
131
59

20
55
123
31

17
79
98
23

34
31
159
1

2
68
132
9

-35
-21
182
-19

53
87
160
19

Construction
Trade
Finance and services
Total government
Private nonfarm production
workers
Manufacturing production
workers

159

137

191

135

99

94

-48

331

-18

-25

24

-13

-24

-35

-36

-15

Total employment 3
Nonagricultural

163
183

306
347

229
184

194e
e
149

295
335

218
280

563
558

209
261

1. Average change from final month of preceding period to final month of period
indicated.
2. Survey of establishments. Strike-adjusted data noted.
3. Survey of households.
e--Adjusted by the FRB to eliminate distortions caused by the introduction of
revised population estimates.
SELECTED UNEMPLOYMENT RATES
(Percent; based on seasonally adjusted data)

1985

1986

1985
Civilian, 16 years and older

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

7.2

7.2

7.0

7.1

7.2

May
7.3

1986
June

July

7.1

Teenagers
20-24 years old
Men, 25 years and older
Women, 25 years and older

18.6

11.0
5.3
5.9

18.3
11.0
5.3
5.9

19.0
10.8
5.2
5.5

18.5
10.6
5.3
5.7

19.2
11.1
5.4
5.7

19.0
11.7
5.4
5.7

19.1
10.7
5.5
5.7

17.5
10.8
5.5
5.4

White
Black

6.2
15.1

6.2
14.8

6.0
15.1

6.1
14.6

6.2
14.9

6.2
14.8

6.1
15.1

6.0
14.0

6.9

6.9

6.7

6.7

6.8

7.0

6.7

6.6

7.1

7.0

6.9

7.0

7.1

7.2

7.0

6.8

Fulltime workers
Memo:
Total nationall

1. Includes resident Armed Forces as employed.

II-4

PERSONAL INCOME AND EXPENDITURES
(Percent changes at annual rates) 1
1985
1984

1985

8.4

1986

Q3

Q4

Ql

Q2

6.1

3.0

7.4

6.0

5.6

8.8
8.3

6.3
3.9

4.7
3.0

7.5
6.0

6.5
2.6

1.9
-2.1

31.5

29.2

21.6

29.4

24.4

8.0
4.2

5.6
1.9

-1.4
-4.0

7.3
2.6

7.6
6.5

6.2
7.2

3.6

3.5

5.3

1.7

3.6

5.9

8.8
6.7
9.6
12.5

6.2
3.7
9.2
6.1

23.8
48.9
6.5
4.1

-11.1
-32.8
15.1
7.5

-1.8
-8.4
4.0
2.0

14.8
21.3
10.2
8.7

Nondurables
Clothing and shoes
Gasoline and oil
Food

2.2
4.0
.6
2.0

2.0
3.2
1.5
2.0

1.2
1.1
.4
.5

1.6
2.8
3.4
-.2

6.5
14.0
2.1
5.6

7.1
8.4
40.0
1.9

Services

3.3

3.9

3.2

6.0

3.2

2.5

6.5

4.6

4.2

4.4

5.0

5.2

Current dollars
Total personal income
Private wages and salaries
Manufacturing
Farm income 2
Disposable personal income
Real

39.1

Constant dollars
Personal consumption
expenditures
Durables
Motor vehicles and parts
Furn. and household equip.
Other durables

Memo:
Personal saving rate (percent) 3
1.
of
2.
3.

Annual figures are from the fourth quarter of preceding year to fourth quarter
year indicated.
Level, billions of dollars.
Annual figures are based on averages of quarterly data.

II-5
RETAIL SALES
(Seasonally adjusted percentage change)
1985
Q4

Q1

Total sales
Previous estimate1

-. 8

1.2

(REAL)2
Previous estimate1

-1.5

1.5

Total less automotive group,
nonconsumer stores, and
gasoline stations
Previous estimate1

1986
May

1986
June

1.1
1.1

.8
.7

-. 1
.2

.1
-

2.3
2.3

.5
.4

-.2
.0

-

Q2

July

1.4

.4
.0

.7
-

1.4

2.7

.1

1.3

.4

2.0
1.1
1.0
.1

3.2
3.8
4.2
1.5

1.5
3.1
2.7
2.9

-.7
-1.3
1.9
-2.1

-. 1
-1.7
1.6
2.0

1.0
1.6
1.7
.4
.2

Nondurable
Apparel
Food
General merchandise 4
Gasoline stations

.7
.6

-3.6
-8.1
4.3
1.5

Durable
Automotive group
Furniture and appliances
Other durable goods

1.4
1.3

1.6

GAF 3

1.3

.7
1.6
1.4
1.4
-4.4

-.2
3.7
-.5
1.6
-11.5

.4
.1
.4
-.9
1.1

.3
2.2
.5
.5
-.6

.2
-.2
.8
.0
-2.6

1. Based on incomplete sample counts approximately one month ago.
2. BCD series 59. Data are available approximately 3 weeks following the retail
sales release.
3. General merchandise, apparel, furniture and appliance stores.
4. General merchandise excludes mail order nonstores; mail order sales are also
excluded in the GAF grouping.
-Data are unavailable because of a future release date.
AUTO SALES, PRODUCTION, AND INVENTORIES
(Millions of units at an annual rate, FRB seasonals)
1985

1986

Q3
Total auto sales 1
Domestic
Imported
Domestic production
Dealers' stocks
Days' supply 2

Q4

Q1

Q2

12.3
9.4
2.9
8.2
1.31
43

10.2
6.8
3.4
7.8
1.67
75

10.7
7.8
2.8
8.3
1.81
71

11.2
8.2
3.0
7.9
1.80
68

May

1986
June

July

11.3
8.2
3.1
7.6
1.81
68

11.3
8.3
3.0
8.0
1.80
66

10.9
7.6
3.3
7.6
1.76
71

1. Components may not add to totals due to rounding.
2. Days' supply for the quarter are based on end-of-quarter stocks and average
sales for the quarter.

II-6

Consumer spending rose at nearly a 5 percent annual rate over the
first half of the year, with substantial gains in spending for a broad
range of goods.

Outlays for furniture, other household durables, and

apparel were particularly robust, and auto sales spurted in late spring
in response to enhanced financing incentives.

In addition, gasoline

usage surged, as pump prices fell.
In July, retail sales excluding automotive outlets, gasoline stations
and hardware stores (the "retail control" grouping) rose 0.7 percent from
an upward revised June level.
furniture and appliance stores.

Sales remained particularly strong at
In the auto market, total car sales slipped

to a 10.9 million unit rate in July, as a drop in sales of domestic
models more than offset a strong increase in foreign auto sales.
Business Fixed Investment
After falling sharply in the first quarter, real business fixed
investment declined 2-1/2 percent at an annual rate in the second quarter.
The weakness was centered on the nonresidential structures component, which
fell at an estimated 35 percent annual rate.

A portion of this drop

stems from the sharp curtailment of activity related to petroleum drilling,
but declines also occurred in commercial and industrial construction.
The decline in commercial spending probably reflected both the record-high
vacancy rates in most of the country and the widespread anticipation that
Congress will restrict the tax preferences given to investment in these
structures.

Spending for industrial buildings has been weak, in part,

owing to excess capacity throughout the economy.

New commitments for

nonresidential construction have fallen sharply since late last year,

II-7
BUSINESS CAPITAL SPENDING INDICATORS
(Percentage change from preceding comparable periods;
based on seasonally adjusted data)

1985
Q4

Ql

1986
Q2

Apr.

May

1986
June

July

Nondefense capital goods
Shipments
Excluding office & store mach.
Office and store machinery

3.2
3.7
.5

-5.8
-3.6
-17.5

2.5
1.0
11.7

.2
.6
-2.2

-2.8
-3.0
-1.7

2.5
.2
16.1

-

Orders
Excluding office & store mach.
Office and store machinery

.0
3.2
-16.8

-4.8
-4.8
-4.7

-.8
-1.8
5.1

-1.4
.1
-10.8

-.1
-2.8
19.2

1.3
-1.8
19.4

--

303

262

273

Nonresidential construction
Commercial building
Office
Other commercial
Industrial building

2.2
4.3
1.1
8.0
3.4

1.0
1.9
-.8
4.9
-6.2

-6.0
-8.3
-6.7
-10.0
-8.8

Rotary drilling rigs in use

-10.2

-21.0

-40.3

Producers' durable equipment

Sales of heavy-weight trucks
(thousands of units, A.R.)

321

195

304

Nonresidential structures
.1
-1.3
-1.0
-1.7
9.5
-18.0

-2.8
-4.5
-4.6
-4.3
-6.4
-13.2

-1.0
-1.2
-.8
-1.6
-3.6
-9.9

NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AND NEW COMMITMENTS 1
Six-month Moving Average

Index, 1982Q4 = 100

180

150

120

90

60

30
1979

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1. Sum of contracts (from F.W. Dodge) and permits (from Census).
2. Includes only the building components of nonresidential construction,
i.e., industrial, commercial, institutional, and hotels and motels.

-

-

-3.2

II-8

suggesting that outlays likely will retreat further during the third
quarter.
In contrast to structures, outlays for equipment rose substantially
in the second quarter, led by a rebound in spending for office and computing
equipment.

However, this gain only partly reversed a sharp decline in

the first quarter and near-term indicators suggest little prospect of a
significant pickup in demand.

New orders for nondefense capital goods

fell for three consecutive months before posting a small gain in June.
Although bookings for office and computing equipment, which account for
almost 20 percent of total equipment spending, rose markedly in May and
June, these gains were from the lowest quarterly level in the past three
years, and anecdotal evidence suggests continued caution in spending for
computers.
Housing
Residential investment expenditures increased sharply in the second
quarter, propelled by the rise in both starts and sales through early
spring.

However, indicators have softened recently.

Multifamily

starts fell sharply in May and were little changed in June.

The lower

pace of multifamily construction partly reflects high vacancy rates;
additional factors include concerns among investors regarding the impact
of tax reform on the yield to rental housing and a lessening effect from
the tax-exempt funds raised last year by state and local governments.
In the single-family sector, starts in the second quarter remained
in the 1-1/4 million unit range, but sales of new and existing houses
fell back in May and June from the exceptionally high levels recorded

II-9

earlier in the year.

The falloff in house sales in recent months may be

partly attributable to a backup of mortgage rates of more than three-fourths
of a percentage point (on fixed-rate loans) between April and June.

Though

rates edged down slightly since mid-June, they are still about 1/2 percentage
point above their spring low.
In the second quarter, the average price of new single-family
houses sold was 12 percent higher than a year earlier.

Adjusting for quality

improvements and changes in the regional mix of sales, however, average
prices were up about 5 percent.

Regionally, the largest price increases

were registered in the strong housing markets of the Northeast, where
prices rose sharply for both new and existing houses.

Business Inventories
Business inventory investment apparently slowed markedly in the
second quarter, especially in the trade sector.

Auto inventories were

reduced slightly after a large run-up in the preceding half year.

In

addition, the available data for nonauto trade inventories point to a sharp
slowing in the rate of accumulation.

After rising $18 billion in the first

quarter, these constant-dollar stocks were nearly unchanged, on balance, in
April and May.
In the manufacturing sector, constant-dollar stocks apparently
changed little in the second quarter.

The liquidation of the past year

has held the stock-sales ratio at a relatively low level despite the
sluggish performance of factory shipments.

II-10

PRIVATE HOUSING ACTIVITY
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates, millions of units)
1985
Annual

1985
Q4

Q1

Q2

Apr.

All units
Permits
Starts

1.73
1.74

1.74
1.77

1.83
2.00

1.81
1.91

1.89
2.02

1.79
1.86

1.75
1.85

Single-family units
Permits
Starts

.96
1.07

.96
1.07

1.05
1.25

1.11
1.24

1.14
1.24

1.09
1.25

1.09
1.22

Sales
New homes
Existing homes

.69
3.22

.70
3.50

.80
3.26

.79
3.48

.88
3.57

.78
3.45

.70
3.41

Multifamily units
Permits
Starts

.78
.67

.78
.70

.79
.75

.70
.67

.75
.78

.70
.61

.66
.62

Mobile home shipments

.28

.29

.26

n.a.

.25

.24

n.a.

1986

1986
May

June1

1. Preliminary estimates.
n.a.--Not available.
PRIVATE HOUSING STARTS
(Seasonally adjusted annual rate)
Millions
of units
l2.4

--2
1

.,
11"I
S/

1

aI

a

Total

'I,.'
-

I

I

N.I
'4

-

-

f'l
I

Single-family

SMultifamily

1982
1982

1983

1983

1.6

1.2

A

n

Sl

LI

K
1981

-

\I

«

I

-,v

1984
1984

198S

1986

1985

1986

II-11
CHANGES IN MANUFACTURING AND TRADE INVENTORIES
(Billions of dollars at annual rates)

1985
Q4

Q1

1986
Q2

17.6
-8.6
6.1
20.1
19.9
.2

20.1
-9.3
4.5
24.9
15.1
9.8

-5.2
7.4
-

11.0
-10.5
3.6
17.8
15.9
1.9

29.8
-5.3
6.8
28.3
17.2
11.0

--

Apr.

1986
Mayr

JuneP

Book Value Basis:
Total
Manufacturing
Wholesale
Retail
Automotive
Ex. auto

5.1
-2.6
.3
7.3
-6.0
13.3

-23.1
-12.1
5.1
-16.1
-9.9
-6.1

--1.1
16.8
--

Constant Dollar Basis:
Total
Manufacturing
Wholesale
Retail
Automotive
Ex. auto

25.8
9.5
1.6
14.7
1.0
13.7

-42.6
-7.0
-1.8
-33.8
-20.0
-13.8

-

--

INVENTORIES RELATIVE TO SALES 1
1985
Q4

Book Value Basis:
Total
Manufacturing
Wholesale
Retail
Automotive
Ex. Auto

1986
Q1

Q2

Apr.

1986
Mayr

1.36
1.42
1.18
1.43
1.65
1.37

1.38
1.43
1.20
1.47
1.78
1.38

1.43
1.24
---

1.37
1.42
1.20
1.46
1.72
1.39

1.39
1.44
1.25
1.44
1.66
1.38

JuneP

Cyclical
Reference Points 2
82 high
81 low
1.39
1.60
1.06
1.37
1.57
1.31

1.53
1.77
1.28
1.46
1.90
1.37

-1.44
1.24
--

1. Ratio of end-of-period inventories to average monthly sales for the period.
Constant dollar ratios are not available as BEA has not yet completed revision
to constant dollar sales data.
2. Highs and lows are specific to each series and are not necessarily coincidental.
r-Revised estimates.
p--Preliminary estimates.

II-12
The Federal Government
Increased spending on defense and farm subsidies helped push total
federal expenditures up $38 billion in the second quarter.

Federal spending

has been particularly variable over the past year, largely because of
unevenness in spending for defense and farm programs.

The volatility in

defense spending is largely attributable to discrete jumps in the delivery
rates of major new procurement items.

For example, deliveries of B1 bombers

and M1 tanks increased during the second quarter, and the first MX missiles
were delivered.

Current production schedules suggest some further increases

in delivery rates in the near term and a leveling off thereafter.

In

addition, this year's farm program authorized advance income payments to
farmers, which produced a surge in subsidy payments in the second quarter.
On the revenue side, the slow growth of receipts during the first and
second quarters reflects the sluggishness of taxable incomes and the
disappearance of windfall profits tax revenues because of falling oil
prices.
Action on the budget, though considerably behind the schedule
specified in the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, has picked up in recent
weeks.

The House, where appropriations bills originate, has passed 6 of

the 13 regular appropriations bills; the Senate, however, has not yet
acted on any of these bills.

The Senate has passed a bill to increase

the debt ceiling; this bill includes an amendment that would restore the
automatic mechanism to cut outlays-ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme
Court.

There is, however, substantial opposition to this amendment in

the House, and a short-term extension of the debt ceiling may be required

II-13

CHANGES IN SELECTED FEDERAL RECEIPT AND EXPENDITURE CATEGORIES
(NIA basis, change from previous quarter in billions of dollars)

1986

1985
03

04

01

02

Purchases
Defense purchases
Commodity Credit Corporation
Other nondefense purchases

20.0
10.4
9.1
.6

20.0

2.6
17.3
.1

-25.2
-1.6
-23.1
-.5

9.1
11.0
-2.9
.9

Subsidies
Payments to farmers
Other

-7.3
-7.8
.5

6.0
5.7
.3

-3.1
-3.1
.0

17.9
17.8
.1

6.8

7.3

6.4

11.1

19.5

33.3

-21.9

38.1

11.7

25.6

-27.8

25.9

33.0

6.0

-5.3

Corporate profits tax accruals

6.9

.4

-6.0

Indirect business tax accruals

-5.3

2.0

-3.3

Social insurance contributions

2.2

4.8

36.8

13.2

-5.8

13.2

-5.8

Expenditures

Other expenditures (transfers,
grants, and net interest)
Total expenditures
Memo: Farm and defense
expenditures

Revenues
Personal tax payments

Total revenues

Total revenues

8.8

-2.2
1.2

II-14

while this issue is debated.

In addition, a conference committee is

working to reconcile the Senate and House versions of the tax reform

bill.

Consideration of reconciliation legislation in the House and

Senate that would cut the deficit about $9 billion in 1987 and $24 billion
over three years has been postponed until Congress reconvenes from its
Labor Day recess.
The administration and the CBO recently released new estimates of
their economic and budget projections for FY 1986 through 1991; these are
discussed in an appendix.
State and Local Government Sector
State and local government spending strengthened in the second
quarter, but employment gains have slowed and fiscal positions of states
generally have weakened somewhat.

Real outlays advanced 7-3/4 percent at

an annual rate in the second quarter versus a gain of 2-1/2 percent in
the first quarter.

Most of the second-quarter increase was attributable

to a surge in construction spending in May.

Monthly employment gains

have been averaging 8,500 during the past four months, less than half as
much as during the first quarter of this year and substantially below the
pace in 1985.
Indicators of state fiscal positions point to some further
deterioration for the sector as a whole.

For fiscal year 1986, 18 states

reduced planned general-funds outlays, and 9 already have sliced planned
fiscal 1987 expenditures; a few states are expecting to spend less in
1987 than they did in 1986.

One early estimate of state finances indicates

that the general funds cash balance for the states as a whole will be
close to zero in fiscal 1987.

II-15

Prices
Recent patterns of price change have reflected the gyrations in
energy prices, with the consumer price index for all urban consumers up
1/2 percent in June and the producer price index for finished goods
unchanged.

Over the first half of this year, the CPI declined slightly

and the PPI substantially, owing largely to the sharp decline in
petroleum product prices.
A June pickup in energy prices at the consumer level reflected
advances for gasoline, electricity, and natural gas, which more than offset
continued declines for fuel oil.

Retail prices of gasoline tend to

respond fairly quickly to changes in spot prices of petroleum and refinery
products; these prices weakened considerably in domestic and world
markets after mid-June, but have responded to the recent OPEC agreement
with sharp climbs.

Prices of service fuels, however, have adjusted more

slowly to the lower price level for petroleum products.
Food prices also had a restraining influence on the CPI in the
first half, rising at an average annual rate of only 1.0 percent.

In

June, food prices in the CPI edged up 0.1 percent, as fresh fruit and
vegetable prices turned down, largely offsetting advances for meats,
poultry, and other categories.
At the farm level, crop and livestock prices have followed widely
divergent patterns in recent months.

Declines in crop output this year,

partly stemming from policy-induced reductions in acres planted, probably

II-16
RECENT CHANGES IN CONSUMER PRICES
(Percentage change; based on seasonally adjusted data) 1
Relative
Importance
Dec. 1985

1985

1985
Q4

1986
Q2

Q1

-Annual rateAll items 2
Food
Energy
All items less food and
energy
Commodities
Services

1986
May

June

-Monthly rate-

3.8
2.7
1.8

5.3
5.9
3.3

-1.9
-1.4
-34.2

1.5
3.4
-12.5

.2
.4
.3

.5
.1
2.3

70.2
25.9
44.4

4.4
2.1
5.7

5.4
3.6
6.5

4.1
.3
6.5

3.1
-.5
5.2

.1
-.1
.2

.3
.1
.4

100.0

Memorandum:
CPI-W 3

100.0
18.5
11.3

3.6

5.2

1.0

.2

.5

-2.7

1. Changes are from final month of preceding period to final month of period
indicated.
2. Official index for all urban consumers.
3. Index for urban wage earners and clerical workers.

RECENT CHANGES IN PRODUCER PRICES
(Percentage change; based on seasonally adjusted data) 1
Relative
Importance
Dec. 1985

1985

1985
Q4

1986
Q1

1986
Q2

-Annual rate-

June

-Monthly rate-

-12.4
-7.5
-67.6
2.9
.7

-.1
5.3
-23.5
1.4
1.9

.6
1.1
2.7
.2
.1

.0
.0
-.6
.0
.1

2.9
.0

-11.9
-1.2

-4.7
-1.2

-.3
.0

.0
.0

47.0
-4.0
1.5

-25.2
-50.1
-3.7

.5
-35.5
10.5

4.1
.2
.2

-.8
-3.0
1.1

100.0
24.5
12.5
40.3
22.7

1.8
.5
-.3
2.7
2.7

9.2
16.0
20.7
4.4
5.6

Intermediate materials 2
Exc. energy

95.3
79.6

-.1
-.1

Crude food materials
Crude energy
Other crude materials

52.5
31.6
15.9

-6.4
-4.9
-4.3

Finished goods
Consumer foods
Consumer energy
Other consumer goods
Capital equipment

May

1. Changes are from final month of preceding period to final month of period
indicated.
2. Excludes materials for food manufacturing and animal feeds.

II-17

will not be large enough to make a serious dent in the huge stockpiles
that have hung over the market for the past two years.

Consequently, with

price support levels for the major crops being reduced substantially in
an effort to boost exports, crop prices have fallen sharply.

Livestock

prices, in contrast, have strengthened substantially in recent months
especially for hogs and poultry.

Poultry output has been affected,

probably temporarily, by the drought in the Southeast, and a cyclical
contraction in the hog sector has limited marketings.
Excluding food and energy items, the CPI rose 0.3 percent in June,
after rising only fractionally in May.

Prices of commodities less

food and energy edged up 0.1 percent, as further declines for used cars
and apparel nearly offset increases for new cars and other items.

Recent

price hikes for new cars, including both domestic and imported models,
have raised that index to a level about 4-1/2 percent above a year earlier.
By contrast, used car prices have declined at about a 7 percent rate so
far this year.
Prices of nonenergy services rose 0.4 percent in June.

Price

increases for auto insurance and medical care remained large, and a
scheduled rise in local access charges boosted the cost of telephone
service.

Compared with June 1985, nonenergy service prices were up 5-3/4

percent, similar to the previous twelve-month pace.
According to the BLS, prices of imported consumer goods other than
autos rose 4 percent (not annual rate) over the first six months of 1986
and 7 percent over the past 12 months.

Although import prices have

spurted for consumer goods such as tape recorders, photographic equipment,

II-18

INDICATORS OF U.S. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION 1

Commodity (unit)

Projected
Percent change

1985

1986

8.87
2.43
2.10
13.4

8.32
2.16
1.98
10.7

-6.2
-11.1
-5.7
-20.1

23.6
14.7
16.9
56.0

23.7
14.2
17.9
56.6

.4
-3.4
5.9
1.1

116.3
9.7
52.3

112.2
8.9
48.8

-3.5
-8.2
-6.7

Crop production:
Corn (billions of bushels)
Wheat (billions of bushels)
Soybeans (billions of bushels)
Cotton (millions of bales)
Meat production:
Beef (billions of pounds)
Pork (billions of pounds)
Poultry (billions of pounds)
Total meat and poultry 2
Livestock inventories:
Cattle (millions of animals, July 1)
Cattle on feed, July 1
Hogs and pigs (millions of animals,
June 1)
1. All data are from the U.S. Agriculture Department. Crop production
estimates are based on conditions as of August 1. Projections of meat production are from USDA's supply-demand estimates of August 12. The inventory
data are actual, rather than projected, and are based on midyear surveys.

2. Includes some items not shown separately.

II-19

INDEX OF PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS
INDEX, 1977I00, RATIO SCALE

170
150
130
110
90

70

50
1970

1974

1978

1982

1986

INDEX OF PRICES RECEIVED BY FARMERS 1
(Percent change)

1983

Total

Q4 to Q4
1984
1985

1985
Q4

1986
Q1

Q2

May

1986
June

July

6.8

.0

-7.6

2.7

-2.6

-.8

1.7

-1.6

2.5

Livestock

-1.2

2.7

-3.8

6.2

-2.4

-2.3

3.1

1.5

6.8

Crops

18.5

-3.2

-12.0

-.9

-2.6

.6

.0

-4.4

-3.7

1. Not seasonally adjusted. Changes over periods larger than one quarter
are measured from final quarter of preceding period to final quarter of
period indicated.

II-20
watches, and optical goods, much of the increase apparently is being
absorbed by domestic distributors.
In the capital equipment area, prices of domestically-produced
goods have shown little change over the past year, while according to the
BLS survey, import prices of a wide range of machinery and equipment rose
at double-digit rates in the year ending in June 1986.

Prices of

intermediate materials, less food and energy, have continued to show
little change, on balance, over the past year and a half.

By contrast,

prices of crude nonfood materials, less energy, were up in June as well
as over the first half of this year, after declining during most of 1984
and 1985.

This index shows prices rising for such items as domestic

logs, wastepaper, and scrap metal.
Wages and Labor Costs
Available measures of labor costs provide different indications of
the current rate of wage inflation, but all point to continued restraint
so far this year.

The hourly earnings index was little changed July,

after rising at a 2-1/4 percent rate in the first half of this year.
In contrast, the wage and salary component of the employment cost index,
a more comprehensive measure, continues to show wage increases close to 4
percent, primarily reflecting relatively large increases for nonproduction
and supervisory workers who are excluded from the hourly earnings index.
The ECI measure of overall hourly compensation, which includes employer
costs as well as wages and salaries, also has been rising at just under a
4 percent rate, as moderation in the growth of fringe benefits has accompanied
the deceleration in wages.

II-21

The unionized sector continues to be a source of wage restraint.
In the first half of 1986, effective wage change was less than 3 percent,
most of which reflected wage adjustments negotiated under prior contracts;
COLA payments were nearly nonexistent in the first half of this year.
In general, settlements this year have been far less generous than
the contracts they replaced.

New settlements for the 1 million private

industry workers bargaining so far this year averaged just 1.2 percent in
the first contract year and 1.9 percent annually over the life of the
contract, exclusive of lump-sum payments and COLAs.

Much of the deceleration

in average first-year adjustments can be explained by the large number of
workers not receiving a wage increase.

More than 40 percent of workers

covered by new settlements so far this year accepted initial wage cuts or
freezes, the highest percentage since 1982.

However, 30 percent of

workers negotiating new settlements in the first half of this year
will receive lump-sum payments in lieu of wage increases.

These payments,

which averaged about 3 percent of salary in 1985, currently are excluded
from straight-time measures such as the hourly earning index and the wage
and salary component of the ECI, but are included as part of total hourly
compensation.
Along with favorable compensation trends, there has been some
improvement in productivity growth.

Output per hour in the nonfarm

business sector has risen 1.1 percent over the past year, compared
with just 0.2 percent over the preceding four quarters.

II-22
SELECTED MEASURES OF LABOR COSTS IN THE NONFARM BUSINESS SECTOR
(Percentage change at annual rates)

1985
1984

1985

Q3

1986
Q4

Q1

Q2

First seven
months

Hourly earnings index, wages of production workers1
Total private nonfarm
Manufacturing
Nonmanufacturing

1986
Year to date

2.9

3.0

2.4

3.2

2.7

1.8

1.3

3.4
2.7

3.3
2.9

2.5
2.4

2.4
3.5

2.3
2.8

2.4
1.6

1.5
1.1
1985 Q2
to
1986 Q2

Employment cost index, compensation of all persons 2
5.2

2.2

4.5

3.1

3.8

5.5
4.0
6.5

3.1
1.3
2.2

4.7
4.2
4.4

3.7
1.9
.6

4.2
2.9
3.4

3.2
5.9

Total
By occupation:
White collar
Blue collar
Service workers
By bargaining status:
Union
Nonunion

1.9
2.2

4.2
4.8

.9
3.8

2.5
4.2

2.3

3.9

3.5

Employment cost index, wage and salaries of all persons 2
Y
5.3

Total

First six
months

Major collective bargaining agreements 3
First-year wage adjustments
Total effective wage change

1985 Q2
to
1986 Q2

Labor costs and productivity, all personsa
Compensation per hour
Output per hour
Unit labor costs

4.3
1.0
3.2

3.9
0.2
3.7

3.2
2.2
1.0

3.7
-3.5
7.4

3.1
4.3
-1.2

2.2
1.7
0.5

1. Changes are from final quarter of preceding period to final quarter of period
indicated. Quarterly and year-to-date changes at compound rates. Seasonally adjusted
data.
2. Changes are from final month of preceding period to final month of period indicated.
Quarterly changes at compound rates; not seasonally adjusted.
3. Agreements covering 1,000 or more workers; not seasonally adjusted.

APPENDIX *
ADMINISTRATION AND CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE
BUDGET UPDATES
Official projections of economic and budget prospects were updated
last week with the release of the administration's Mid-Session Review of the
1987 Budget and the Congressional Budget Office's The Economic and Budget
Outlook: An Update. These reports take into account the legislative,
economic, technical estimating and policy developments that have occurred
since the FY1987 budget was submitted last February. Based on these developments, both the administration and the CBO have revised their estimate of
the fiscal 1986 deficit upward; they have made revisions in opposite directions for 1987 but both agencies have lowered their deficit projections for
the years beyond 1987.
Most of the revisions to the economic assumptions of the administration
and CBO, shown in table 1, merely incorporate recent developments--the greaterthan-expected deceleration of inflation, lower interest rates, and slow real
growth--into the 1986 and 1987 forecast. The contours of the longer-run
forecast are about unchanged from February, with the exceptions of somewhat
slower real growth and slightly lower interest rates now being projected by
CBO. The negative effect of lower inflation and real growth on tax revenues is,
however, offset in the CBO assumption by an upward revision in the share of
GNP that is subject to personal and corporate taxes. Both the administration
and CBO continue to be optimistic about the continuation of the recovery;
but the overall outlook of the administration forecast is more optimistic,
including a substantially higher growth rate of potential output implicit
in its real growth and employment projections, and a steeper downtrend in
inflation and interest rates.
The revised administration and CBO current services or baseline
budget projections are summarized in table 2. Current services and baseline
projections are estimates of the revenues and spending that would occur if
no policy changes were made. Most taxes and spending for entitlements are
projected on the basis of current law tax rates and spending formulas.
Nondefense discretionary spending is projected at the level that would
maintain real program services. The administration usually includes defense
spending at the level specified in its most recent policy proposal. However,
for the Mid-Session Review the administration has reduced the budget authority
assumed for 1987 to the level specified in the FY1987 congressional budget
resolution, but it assumes that after 1987 budget authority grows at the
3 percent real growth specified in the February budget (and in the FY1986
congressional budget resolution that was adopted by Congress in August
1985). The CBO, on the other hand, usually includes defense at a level
that reflects congressional policy. In its February projections, the CBO
rejected the defense spending path specified in the FY1986 budget resolution
because of the subsequent enactment of the Gramm-Rudman Deficit Reduction Act.
* Prepared by Wolf Ramm, Senior Economist, Government Finance Section,
Division of Research and Statistics.
II-A-1

II-A-2
It interpreted congressional intent as specifying zero real growth of
defense appropriations. This assumption was retained in the August
update.
As the table shows, a sharp decline in the current services
deficit is now being projected by both the CBO and the administration-from $224 or $230 billion in 1986 to less than $70 billion in 1991.
The decline is steeper than that projected in the February budget
documents and is in marked contrast to the steady or rising deficits
that were being projected last August (see the memo lines of the
table). The downward revisions of the long-range deficit projections
since last August are partly the result of spending restraint--including
a scaling back of the proposed size of the defense build-up--and minor
revenue increases that have been adopted by Congress and the administration over the past year. In addition, favorable economic developments, primarily lower interest rates and inflation, have cut the
growth of outlays.
The sources of the revisions to the February deficit estimates
are summarized in table 3. The administration's estimate of the FY1986
deficit was revised up because of higher than expected defense spend-out
rates, major technical reestimates of farm price support and FDIC and
FSLIC deposit insurance payments, and the lower than expected growth
of taxable incomes. In the years beyond 1986 the deficit is smaller
primarily because lower inflation reduced proposed defense spending
and because of nondefense spending cuts and tax increases that were
enacted in the Comprehensive Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1985
(COBRA). The CBO also has revised its 1986 deficit estimate because
of weak income growth and high farm and deposit insurance payments.
In the out years, CBO adjustments to the defense baseline are much
smaller than the administration's, apparently taking the lower inflation assumption into account only for pay estimates. On the other
hand, the CBO made larger deficit adjustments based on revised economic
assumptions; the share of taxable income in national income is assumed
to be greater than in the February report and assumed interest rates
are a bit lower. CBO technical reestimates about offset the effect
of COBRA on the deficit projection in the years beyond FY1986.
Table 4 summarizes the additional deficit-reducing actions that
have been proposed by the administration in the Mid-Session Review
and by Congress in its FY1987 Budget Resolution. The admininistration
estimates that its proposed initiatives would be sufficient to hold
the deficit below the GrammRudman targets. However, many economic
forecasts current in the private sector would imply higher deficits
and there has been substantial resistance in Congress to many of the
administration's deficit cutting proposals. On the other hand,
congressional policy, when reestimated by the CBO, also exceeds the
Gramm-Rudman targets.
It should be noted that the Gramm-Rudman sequester report which
is due on August 20 will be based on a different baseline concept

II-A-3
than the administration and CBO estimates discussed above.

The

Gramm-Rudman tax and spending estimates will be based only on currently
enacted legislation. If new appropriations for a program or agency
are not yet enacted, appropriation levels from the previous year would
be assumed (none of the 1987 appropriation bills have yet cleared
Congress); that is, there would be no adjustment for maintaining
real program services as in the CBO baseline and administration
current services budget, nor would defense be estimated at proposed
policy levels. The CBO estimates that the 1987 deficit computed on a
Gramm-Rudman basis would be about $173 billion and OMB officials have
indicated that their estimates will probably be between $160 and $170
billion. A reconciliation bill that would cut about $9 billion
from these estimates will be considered by the House and Senate in
early September. This bill would go a long way toward bringing the
deficit estimate down toward the $154 billion 1987 trigger for a
sequester under Gramm-Rudman (the sequester process is triggered when
the estimated deficit exceeds the $144 billion deficit target by more
than $10 billion).

II-A-4
Table 1
Administration and Congressional Budget Office Economic Assumptions
(calendar years, percent)

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

Administration (August)
Administration (February)

2.9
3.4

4.0
4.0

4.1
4.0

3.9
3.9

3.6
3.6

3.5
3.5

CBO (August)
CBO (February)

2.8
3.2

3.4
3.1

3.2
3.3

3.2
3.5

3.1
3.5

3.0
3.2

2.6
3.5

3.3
4.2

3.7
3.7

3.3
3.3

2.8
2.8

2.1
2.1

2.7
3.6

3.3
4.1

4.1
4.1

4.1
4.1

4.1
4.1

4.1
4.1

7.0
6.8

6.6
6.6

6.4
6.4

6.2
6.2

5.9
5.9

5.7
5.7

7.0
6.7

6.7
6.7

6.4
6.5

6.3
6.3

6.1
6.1

6.0
6.0

6.2
7.3

6.2
6.5

5.6
5.6

5.1
4.8

4.5
4.3

4.0
4.0

6.2
6.8

6.4
6.7

6.3
6.4

6.0
6.1

5.7
5.7

5.3
5.4

1991

Real GNP (year to year)

GNP deflator (year to year)
Administration (August)
Administration (February
CBO (August)
CBO (February)
Civilian unemployment rate
(annual average)
Administration (August)
Administration (February)
CBO (August)
CBO (February)
Three-month Treasury bill rate
(annual average)
Administration (August)
Administration (February)
CBO (August)
CBO (February)

II-A-5
Table 2
Administration Current Services and Congressional Budget Office
Baseline Budget Projections
(Fiscal years, billions of dollars)

1987

1989

1990

1991

983
987

1986

1050
1067

1111
1148

1054
1065

1099
1113

1140
1162

1175
1217

1988

Receipts:
Administration
CBO
Outlays:
Administration
CBO

999
1012

Deficit:
Administration
CBO
Memo:
Recent deficit
projections:
Administration current services:
February 1986
August 1985

206
243

150
256

139
244

126
238

104
n.a.

CBO baseline:
February 1986
August 1985

208
212

165
243

144
264

120
285

n.a.

Note:

Detail may not add to totals because of rounding.

104

II-A-6

Table 3
Revisions to Baseline Deficit Projections
(Fiscal years, billions of dollars)
1991

1986

1987

1988

1989

1990

205.6

181.8

150.0

138.9

126.3

103.9

-4.6
-3.4
.3
-2.0

-10.3
-7.6
-8.4
3.4

-19.2
-10.9
-6.8
1.4

-26.2
-11.1
-4.1
1.6

Administration:
Current services deficit
in February
Effect on deficit of:
National defense
Enacted policy
Economic assumptions
Technical reestimates

Updated current services deficit
in Mid-session Review

5.6
-.1
10.5
8.6

-2.8
-8.3
6.3
-5.5

230.2

171.5

140.3

116.0

90.7

64.1

208

181

165

144

120

104

-12

-10
-12
7

-13
-17
12

-15
-25
15

-16

Congressional Budget Office:
Baseline deficit in February
Effect on deficit of:
Enacted policy
Economic assumptions
Technical reestimates

-5
7
14

3
12

Updated baseline deficit in
August Budget Outlook
Note:

96

because of rounding.

Detail may not add to totals because of rounding.
Detail may not add to totals

-35
16

69

II-A-7
Table 4
Proposed Administration and Congressional Policy
(Fiscal years, billions of dollars)

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

171.5

140.3

116.0

90.7

64.1

Administration:
Current services deficit
Revenue increases

Outlay cuts
Deficit on a policy basis

3.6

4.6

4.4

2.8

2.7

24.0

38.2

50.5

64.8

68.8

143.9

97.5

61.1

23.0

-7.4

Congressional Budget Resolution:
CBO baseline deficit

184

150

127

6

6

7

17

26

36

Deficit on a policy basis

161

118

84

Memo:
Gramm-Rudman deficit target

144

108

72

Revenue increases1

Outlay cuts1

Note:

Detail may not add to totals because of rounding.

1. As reestimated by the CBO in the August Budget Outlook.

36

0

DOMESTIC FINANCIAL
DEVELOPMENTS

III-T-1

SELECTED FINANCIAL MARKET QUOTATIONS 1
(Percent)
1984

1985
March

April

Highs

highs

Lows

July 9

Federal funds 2

11.63

8.58

6.95

6.69

6.35

-0.60

-0.34

Treasury bills 3
3-month
6-month
1-year

10.67
10.77
11.13

8.80
9.13
9.25

5.77
5.81
5.79

5.88
5.90
5.94

5.61
5.59
5.69

-0.16
-0.22
-0.10

-0.27
-0.31
-0.25

Commercial paper
1-month
3-month

11.42
11.35

8.94
9.12

6.42
6.30

6.65
6.51

6.19
6.09

-0.23
-0.21

-0.46
-0.42

Large negotiable CDs3
1-month
3-month
6-month

11.52
11.79
12.30

8.89
9.29
9.92

6.51
6.39
6.35

6.61
6.45
6.44

6.10
6.08
6.06

-0.41
-0.31
-0.29

-0.51
-0.37
-0.38

Eurodollar deposits 4
1-month
3-month

11.89
12.20

8.89
9.58

6.59
6.55

6.84
6.65

6.36
6.38

-0.23
-0.17

-0.48
-0.27

13.00

10.50

8.50

8.50

8.00

-0.50

-0.50

10.74

5.16
5.27

5.60
5.59

5.44
5.35

0.28
0.08

-0.16
-0.24

U.S. Treasury (constant maturity)
13.49
11.22
3-year
12.02
10-year
13.99
13.94
11.97
30-year

6.49
6.98
7.14

6.93
7.31
7.15

6.60

7.23
7.34

0.11
0.25
0.20

-0.33
-0.08
0.19

Municipal revenue5
(Bond Buyer index)

11.44

10.25

7.55

7.91

7.97

0.42

0.06

Corporate--A utility
Recently offered

15.30

13.23

9.15

9.

9 .5 5e

0.40

0.01

14.68
12.31

13.29
11.14

9.86
8.41

0.54
0.03

-0.19
-0.13

1986
FOMC

Change from:
April
FOMC

Aug. 12

Lows

July 9

Short-term rates

Bank prime rate
Treasury bill futures
Sept. 1986 contract
Dec. 1986 contract

Intermediate- and long-term rates

Home mortgage rates
S&L fixed-rate
S&L ARM. 1-yr.

5 4e

6

Lows

1985

Record

Lows

Highs

1986

1986

March

1984

Stock prices
Dow-Jones Industrial 1086.57 1247.35
102.46
85.13
NYSE Composite
222.28
187.16
AMEX Composite
276.18
225.30
NASDAQ (OTC)
1. One-day quotes except as noted.

10.i 40
8. 44

10.59
8.57
FOMC

July 9

Percent change from:
Record

Aug. 12

Highs

FOMC

July 9

0.52
-3.85
1835.49
1826.07
0.34
-3.53
140.02
139.55
-2.13
-6.07
267.89
273.71
-5.11
-9.21
373.29
393.39
4. Averages for statement week closest
to date shown.
2. Averages for two-week reserve maintenance period
5. One-day quotes for preceding Thursday.
closest to date shown. Last observation is the
6. One-day quotes for preceding Friday.
average to date for the maintenance period ending
e--estimate
August 13, 1986.
3. Secondary market.

1909.03
145.15
285.19
411.16

DOMESTIC FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENTS

The discount rate was cut from 6-1/2 to 6 percent shortly after the
July FOMC meeting, but other interest rates have not registered comparable
declines.

Yields on 3- to 6-month money market instruments generally have

eased around one-fourth to three-eighths percentage point, while bond
yields are mostly unchanged to a bit higher over the intermeeting period.
The discount rate change had been widely anticipated, but several other
factors also worked to hold up market rates.

Until recent days when

rumors have circulated about discussions of new coordinated actions, the
failure of other central banks to match the July discount rate move and
the weakness of the dollar--along with the stress placed by U.S. officials
on the role of foreign demand in bolstering growth here-seemed to dim
hopes of further Federal Reserve easing steps.

In addition, the OPEC oil

supply initiative, coming on the heels of a larger-than-expected June CPI
increase, emphasized the importance of energy prices in recent disinflation
and had a moderate, bearish effect on the fixed-income markets.
A pickup in the growth of M2 and M3 in July moved these aggregates
to the upper portions of their annual target ranges.

Growth of the broader

aggregates was given considerable impetus by a surge in overnight RPs
associated with record acquisitions of U.S. government securities by
commercial banks.

M1 continued to grow rapidly, with strong increases

in demand deposits and other checkable deposits.
Apart from a drop-off in Treasury borrowing on a seasonally adjusted
basis, aggregate credit growth appears to be well maintained in the current
quarter.

Net borrowing by nonfinancial firms slowed in July as the use of

short-term credit was weak and bond issuance receded from the torrid pace
III-1

III-2
MONETARY AGGREGATES
1
(Based on seasonally adjusted data unless otherwise noted)
1984:04
to
1985:Q4
---1.

11.9
8.6
7.6

Ml

2. H2
3. M3

Growth from
01

02

1986
May

June

JulyPe

Q4 1985 to
July 1 9 8 6pe

Percentage change at annual rates ----

7.7
4.3
7.4

23.4

12.4
5.6

14.6

13-1/2
8-1/2
8-1/2

9.5
6.5

Levels in billions
of dollars
June 1986
Selected components
4.

Currency

7.5

7.5

6.2

9.6

5.5

6

176.6

5.

Demand deposits

8.6

3.0

15.2

25.7

14.1

14

284.9

6.

Other checkable deposits

22.3

15.0

25.8

32.9

24.0

30

199.0

7.6

3.2

8.7

8.8

7.8

11

2002.2

3.6

-55.4

99

64.0

7. M2 minus M12
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.

Overnight RPs and Eurodollars, NSA
General purpose and broker/dealer money
market mutual fund shares, NSA
Commercial banks
Savings deposits, SA,
3
plus MMDAs, NSA
Small time deposits
Thrift institutions
Savings deposits, SA,
3
plus MMDAs, NSA
Small time deposits
M3 minus M24
Large time deposits
5
At commercial banks, net
At thrift institutions
Institution-only money market
mutual fund shares, NSA
Term RPs, NSA
Term Eurodollars, NSA

3.0
10.9
7.2

-7.1
27.8
5.8

12.5
4.3

26.7
7.5

15
6

197.7
867.9

15.8
-9.6
6.3

21.4
-9.7
7.4

16
-6
7

486.1

24.5
-5.2

18
-2

379.3
504.1

19.0
-0.6
5.1

8.7
5.3
4.3

13.7
-0.4

1.3
6.6

13.8
2.8

21.4
-4.5

3.7

20.3

-1.5

-20.8

-5.5

16

653.6

15.6
18.5
10.0

-1.8
-8.7
11.0

-15.4
-23.4
-0.7

-2.4
-2.6
-2.2

3
0
9

445.4
280.8
164.6

26.8
44.1
7.7

39.2
-13.2
-1.5

32.4
-17.5
-40.0

-17.3
-44.3
-10.7

40
-4
-11

75.0
65.2
77.6

11.1
-4.6
-4.9

381.8
883.4

-- Average monthly change in billions of dollars -MEMORANDA:
23. Managed liabilities at commercial
banks (24+25)
24.
Large time deposits, gross

25.
26.
27.
28.

Nondeposit funds
Net due to related foreign
institutions, NSA
6
Other

2.3
1.0
1.3

7.7
3.4
4.3

-5.8
-2.6
-3.2

-5.3
-6.5
1.2

-3.7
-0.6
-3.1

0
-1
1

469.2
339.8
129.4

0.3
1.0

2.4
2.0

-1.6
-1.7

4.1
-2.9

-2.0
-1.1

-6
8

153.7

-24.3

U.S. government deposits at commercial
7
banks
0.2
-0.6
0.9
3.9
-2.8
-4
18.5
1. Quarterly growth rates are computed on a quarterly average basis.
Dollar amounts shown under memoranda for quarterly changes are calculated on an end-month-of-quarter basis.
2. Nontransactions M2 is seasonally adjusted as a whole.
3. Growth rates are for savings deposits, seasonally adjusted, plus money market deposit accounts (MHDAs), not seasonally adjusted. Commercial bank savings deposits excluding MMDAs increased during June and July 1986 at rates
of 17.7 percent and 23 percent, respectively. At thrift institutions, savings deposits excluding MMDAs increased
during June and July 1986 at rates of 29.1 percent and 23 percent, respectively.
4. The non-M2 component of M3 is seasonally adjusted as a whole.
5. Net of large-denomination time deposits held by money market mutual funds and thrift
institutions.
6. Consists of borrowings from other than commercial banks in the form of federal funds purchased, securities sold
under agreements to repurchase, and other liabilities for borrowed money (including borrowings from the Federal
Reserve and unaffiliated foreign banks, loan RPs and other minor items).
Data are partially estimated.
7. Consists of Treasury demand deposits and note balances at commercial banks.
pe--preliminary estimate

III-3

in the spring.

Fragmentary data on the household sector suggest that the

growth of home mortgage debt is continuing at a rapid rate, but that
growth of installment loans may be slowing further.

Meanwhile, however,

state and local government borrowing has soared once again, with bonds
being rushed to market ahead of proposed new restrictions that could
become effective on September 1, depending on developments in the tax

reform arena.
Monetary Aggregates and Bank Credit
M2 accelerated in July to a 13 percent annual rate of growth, owing
largely to a surge in the issuance of overnight RPs, apparently to finance
massive acquisitions of Treasury securities by large commercial banks in
late June and early July.

Among other M2 components, relative interest rate

movements again favored the more liquid items.

Yields on money market

mutual fund shares have lagged the decline in market rates, leading to
strong inflows into these instruments.

The same is true of savings deposits

and MMDAs, which rose rapidly while runoffs of small time deposits extended
into July.

Since late 1984, the share of small time accounts in M2 has

drifted down almost 5 percentage points to 33 percent; in contrast, the
share of liquid interest-bearing instruments (including OCDs, savings
deposits, MMDAs, and MMMFs) has risen over the same period from 43 percent
to almost 48 percent of M2.
The continued rapid growth of M1 obviously has been a significant
part of the shift toward liquid monetary assets.

Growth of M1 in July, at

an annual rate of 17 percent, was only a little below the change between
March and June.

The expansion was paced by continued strong inflows to

OCDs as yield spreads between OCDs and less liquid alternatives were

III-4
COMMERCIAL BANK CREDIT AND SHORT- AND INTERMEDIATE-TERM BUSINESS CREDIT
(Percentage changes at annual rates, based on seasonally adjusted data)1

1985

Q4

Q1

Q2

1986
May

June

JulyP

Levels in
bil. of dollars
JulyP

Commercial Bank Credit-------------1.

2.

Total loans and securities
at banks

9.3

5.9

3.8

11.7

1982.9

2.0

Securities

3.9
4.9

10.4

6.3

28.8

469.4

3.

U.S. government securities

-5.3

7.9

18.2

3.1

40.2

284.0

4.

Other securities

12.8

0.7

-1.3

11.2

11.8

185.4

11.6

3.6

4.6

3.0

6.5

1513.5

2.1

-2.6

4.7

0.5

508.9

5.

Total loans

6.
7.

Security loans

8.
9.

5.3

Business loans

10.

101.7

-62.0

-40.1

-98.5

62.1

44.7

Real estate loans

13.0

13.4

15.5

11.6

13.3

455.7

Consumer loans

11.0

6.7

7.6

5.9

4.7

305.7

7.3

-1.6

4.8

-0.6

-2.4

198.4

Other loans

Short- and Intermediate-Term Business Credit -11.

Business loans net of bankers
acceptances

6.0

2

5.2

1.0

-3.8

3.6

1.2

-26.1

-26.7

-20.5

---

17.3

504.0

-16.5

0.0

5.2

5.1

0.2

-4.4

2.5

0.2

521.3

Commercial paper issued by
3
nonfinancial firms

55.5

-14.4

-10.3

-2.9

13.1

-23.0

81.7

15.

Sums of lines 13 & 14

11.8

2.1

-1.2

-4.2

-3.0

603.0

16.

Bankers acceptances:
4 5
related ,

-30.8

-6.2

16.3

18.8

9.5

1.7

-0.4

-3.0

19.2

16.4

3.8

11.3

4.5

0.5

12.

Loans at foreign branches

13.

Sum of lines 11 & 12

14.

17.

-21.5

4.0

U.S. trade

Line 15 plus bankers acceptances:
U.S. trade related

18.

Finance company loans to business

19.

Total short- and intermediateterm business credit (sum of
lines 17 & 18)

4

25.8

n.a.

5.1

n.a.

637.7 (Jun)

-2.3

-2.3

n.a.

158.5 (Jun)

-2.0

3.8

n.a.

796.3 (Jun)

33.2 (Jun)

n.a.--not available.
p-preliminary
1. Average of Wednesdays for domestically chartered banks and average of current and preceding ends of months for
foreign-related institutions.
2. Loans at foreign branches are loans made to U.S. firms by foreign branches of domestically chartered banks.
3. Average of Wednesdays.
4. Based on average of current and preceding ends of month.
5. Consists of acceptances that finance U.S. imports, U.S. exports and domestic shipment and storage of goods.

III-5
squeezed to their narrowest levels since the introduction of nationwide
NOW accounts; for example, at commercial banks rates on 6-month small
time accounts were less than 75 basis points above Super NOW rates late
in July, compared with around 150 basis points in the latter part of 1985.
Growth of demand deposits remained strong in July.
M3 rose at an annual rate of 13 percent in July, the highest monthly
figure this year.
the increase.

A sharp rebound in the non-M2 component contributed to

Inflows to institution-only money funds bulged in July,

reflecting the lagging adjustment of their yields to the decline in market
rates.

Substantial issuance of large time deposits by thrifts also was an

important factor, as institutions regulated by the FHLBB sought to bolster
their liability base in light of a proposal for higher capital requirements
that would restrain their future growth.

Commercial banks as a group did

not rely on CDs, but the flatness hides a continued runoff at banks under
pressure from problems in the energy industry and other troubled sectors.
Business loan demand has been quite weak in recent months, but
overall bank credit picked up in July owing to the buildup in holdings of
U.S. government securities.

Banks continued to acquire other securities,

perhaps to take advantage of attractive yields on tax-exempt issues.

Real

estate loans again increased briskly in July while consumer loans continued
to grow relatively slowly, owing in part to the competition from captive
auto finance companies.

The volatile securities loan category bounced up

in July, adding a bit to total asset accumulation.

Business Finance
Overall short-term credit use by nonfinancial firms has remained
weak.

Business loans at commercial banks, including loans from offshore

III-6

GROSS OFFERINGS OF SECURITIES BY U.S. CORPORATIONS
(Monthly rates, not seasonally adjusted, billions of dollars)

1985
Year

Q1

Corporate securities - total1

16.09

Public offerings in U.S.

Q2P

1986
May P

27.86

30.62

22.09

28.93

24.09

12.94

23.84

26.46

19.89

26.00

21.00

Stocks-total2
Nonfinancial
Utility
Industrial
Financial

2.96
1.61
.37
1.24
1.35

4.46
2.20
.65
1.55
2.26

5.74
2.97
.48
2.49
2.77

6.60
3.62
.79
2.83
2.98

5.00
2.60
.30
2.30
2.40

4.20
2.60
.60
2.00
1.60

Bonds-total1
Nonfinancial
Utility
Industrial
Financial

9.99
5.21
1.51
3.70
4.78

19.38
9.99
3.30
6.69
9.39

20.72
12.24
4.30
7.94
8.48

13.29
8.56
2.85
5.71
4.73

21.00
10.50
3.00
7.50
10.50

16.80
8.65
2.40
6.25
8.15

By quality 3
Aaa and Aa
A and Baa
Less than Baa
No rating (or unknown)

2.35
4.58
1.42
.34

5.45
7.72
2.75
.30

6.32
6.16
4.65
.36

2.68
3.98
3.69
.48

7.15
5.05
4.50
.35

3.35
4.55
4.35
.55

Memo items:
Equity-based bonds 4
Mortgage-backed bonds
Variable-rate notes

.70
1.30
.87

1.16
3.16
.33

1.26
3.23
.56

1.29
2.46
.16

.72
3.95
1.17

1.09
4.00
.97

3.15
1.26
1.89

4.02
2.04
1.98

4.16
2.07
2.09

2.20
1.39
.81

2.93
.77
2.16

3.09
1.03
2.06

Bonds sold abroad - total
Nonfinancial
Financial

JuneP

JulyP

p-preliminary.
1. Securities issued in the private placement market are not included. Total reflects
gross proceeds rather than par value of original discount bonds.
2. Includes equity issues associated with debt/equity swaps.
3. Bonds categorized according to Moody's bond ratings. Excludes mortgage-backed bonds.
4. Includes bonds convertible into equity and bonds with warrants that entitle the holder
to purchase equity in the future.

III-7

branches of U.S. banks, were flat in July and commercial paper of nonfinancial firms resumed its decline after an uptick in June.

Although firms

are still borrowing to finance mergers and restructurings, the slack demand
for short-term credit reflects the limited need for external capital to
finance inventories and fixed investment.

Short-term borrowing might have

been even weaker recently if bond yields had not backed up from their
April lows and encouraged some deferral of long-term financings.
Although still heavy by historical standards, bond offerings of
nonfinancial firms have tapered off from the tremendous pace earlier in
the year.

With the higher level of long-term interest rates, moreover, the

proportion of nonfinancial corporate bonds with maturities of 20 years or
longer has contracted-to 35 percent of domestic issuance in July versus
the peak of 50 percent in the first quarter.

(Interest rates on inter-

mediate-term bonds have increased less than those at the long end of
the market.)

The market has remained receptive to low-rated or unrated

bonds, and these issues represented about 35 percent of the total domestic
corporate bond volume in July, compared with about 20 percent in the
first quarter. 1
Most major stock price indexes have declined as much as 9 percent

since hitting record highs at the beginning of July.

The gross issuance

of new equity has tapered off with the decline in stock prices; the July
volume was the lowest since January.

Initial public offerings of new

1. Holders of some existing low-rated issues fared poorly last month when
LTV declared bankruptcy. A total of $2.2 billion of bonds, much reportedly
held by mutual funds specializing in high-yield bonds, went into default
simultaneously as a result of this bankruptcy. The bonds had not been
issued in connection with recent mergers, but rather were mostly debt of
operating companies that was outstanding when the firms were acquired by
LTV.

II-8
TREASURY AND AGENCY FINANCING 1
(Total for period; billions of dollars)

Q2

Q3e

1986
JulyP
June

Aug.e

Sep.e

Treasury financing 5
Combined surplus/deficit(-)

-30.5

-57.9

-1.0

-24.4

-28.0

-5.5

50.8

52.3

18.5

15.2

17.5

19.6

39.8
3.5
36.3
11.0

47.8

16.3
1.8
14.5
2.2

12.4
4.1
8.3
2.8

16.6
2.3
14.3
0.9

18.8
5.4
13.4
0.8

.4

-11.8

3.8

11.3

24.2

24.6

20.8

9.5

24.2

-. 8

0.6

-. 4

0.3

Means of financing deficit:
Net cash borrowing
from the public
Marketable borrowings/
repayments(-)

Bills
Coupons

Nonmarketable
Decrease in the cash
balance
Memo: Cash balance
at end of period
Other 2

-12.4

24.6

-7.9

11.8

36.0
4.5

5.2

-5.7

-14.7

Federally sponsored credit
agencies, net cash
.
3
borrowingS

5.1

2.3

6.0

FHLBs

1.5
2.8

2.3

-. 1

.1

.0

FNMA

Farm Credit Banks

-2.5

-2.2

FHLMC

-0.5

0.3

.0

0.2

1.0

.0

0.3

SLMA

0.9

-1.2

-0.6

-1.0

-0.6

p--preliminary
e--staff estimate
1. Data reported on a not seasonally adjusted, payment basis.
2. Includes checks issued less checks paid, accrued items and other
transactions.
3. Excludes mortgage pass-through securities issued by FNMA and FHLMC.
4. Second quarter numbers are based on both.preliminary data and staff
estimates.
5. Third quarter estimates are based on the assumption that the Congress will
pass a temporary increase in the debt ceiling before its Labor Day recess.
This increase should allow the Treasury to borrow in the market with only
minor disruptions in its normal schedule.

III-9

equity also have slowed sharply, with the July volume only about 20 percent
of the amount brought to market in the second quarter.

Enormous amounts

of outstanding stock still are being absorbed in mergers, buyouts, and
restructurings, and net equity issuance has remained deeply negativeaccounting for the bulk of business borrowing needs.
Treasury and Sponsored Agency Financing
The staff is projecting a combined federal budget deficit for the
current quarter of $58 billion, bringing the estimated deficit for fiscal
year 1986 to $225 billion.

This projection is about in line with the

recent budget outlook published by the Congressional Budget Office, but
it is about $5 billion below the estimate of the Administration.

The

lower estimate of the staff compared with the Administration reflects
both higher receipts and lower expenditures in several categories.

In

financing the deficit this quarter, the Treasury is expected to borrow
about $48 billion in the market and to draw down its cash balance slightly.
Nonmarketable borrowing will provide $4-1/2 billion of financing-considerably
less than in other recent quarters, partly because the amount of securities
sold to state and local governments has weakened.

As the yields on tax-

exempt securities have increased relative to Treasury rates (many taxexempt securities recently have carried higher yields than Treasury issues),
state and local authorities have been able to invest the proceeds in market
instruments until they are needed, without violating arbitrage restrictions.

1

1. When the proceeds of an advance refunding bond are invested in Treasury
securities, the new bonds are backed by the revenues of the particular project
being financed or by the state and local government, and the old bonds are
backed by the Treasury security. In technical terms, the old bonds are said to
be defeased. When the proceeds of an advance refunding are invested in a nonTreasury security, the old bond continues to be backed by the revenues from
the particular project or by the state and local government, while the new
bonds are backed by the escrowed market security purchased with its proceeds.
In these cases, the revenue or government backing for the securities crosses
over to the new issue when the old bond is retired.

III-10

The Treasury's financing activities have been disrupted this quarter
because of the statutory debt ceiling.

The current ceiling was reached

on August 1, and the Treasury began to rely on the $15 billion borrowing
authority of the Federal Financing Bank, issuing FFB debt to government
trust accounts and redeeming nonmarketable securites.

The resultant room

will be close to exhausted, however, when the Treasury raises $13-3/4
billion, net, with the settlement of the midquarter refunding on August 15.
Already the Treasury has paid down bills to ensure that the refunding
could be held.

At this point, it appears as though the Congress plans to

pass a temporary increase in the debt ceiling before its Labor Day recess
and to consider a permanent increase and other budget matters when it
reconvenes.

Absent a temporary increase, the Treasury is expected to

have sufficient cash to maintain operations through the month of August
but would be unable to cover its large expenditures (such as social security
benefits) in early September before the Congress reconvenes.
Borrowing by the federally sponsored credit agencies in the third
quarter is estimated to be only slightly higher than in the preceding
quarter, with the Federal Home Loan Banks again more than accounting for the
net issuance.

The FHLBs have sold large amounts of debt since March as

the demand for advances by thrift institutions generally has been strong.
Fannie Mae's outstanding debt has been flat recently as the firm has been
raising funds by selling older, fixed-rate mortgages from its portfolio.
The Farm Credit Banks continue to pay down debt as their loan portfolios
shrink.
In the past few months, gross issuance by the FHLBs and FNMA has
been heavy in the 7- to 10-year maturity range; under this pressure, the

III-11

spread between rates on 10-year sponsored agency securities and Treasury
securities has widened to about 75 basis points from roughly 30 basis

points earlier in the year.

In contrast, spreads on securities with

shorter maturities (5 years and under) have changed only slightly.

Rate

spreads over Treasuries on the securities of the Farm Credit Banks also
have been about unchanged in recent weeks, despite the publication of
negative financial results for the second quarter.
Tax-Exempt Securities Markets
Issuance of tax-exempt bonds increased sharply in July and is likely
to rise even further in August.

The July volume reached nearly $20

billion, the largest amount for any month except during the fourth quarter
of last year.

The surge this summer, like the one last fall, represents

an effort on the part of issuers to beat regulatory deadlines.

Also,

tax-exempt bond volume in both periods was boosted by a large volume of
refunding issues as the rates on tax-exempt bonds were quite low compared
with those issued earlier in the decade.

However, unlike the rush last

year-which involved primarily private-purpose debt-the current surge in
gross issuance is composed almost entirely of public-purpose offerings.
In mid-March, congressional and Treasury leaders postponed to
September 1 the effective date on public-purpose bond restrictions
contained in the House tax reform bill (H.R. 3838).

State and local

governments are coming to market now in an effort to avoid restrictions
that, if legislation along the lines of H.R. 3838 were enacted, would
tighten arbitrage restrictions, require that the proceeds of bond sales
be spent more quickly, and further limit the amount of funds that could
benefit private entities in a public financing.

III-12

GROSS OFFERINGS OF TAX-EXEMPT SECURITIES

(Monthly rates, not seasonally adjusted, billions of dollars)
1985

1985

Year

Q4

1986
Q1

Q2

May

June

JulyP

Total

19.82

37.69

4.79

14.88

13.47

15.44

24.30

Short-term1
Long-term
Refundings 2
New capital
Total housing

1.97
17.85
4.84
13.00
2.11

.91
36.78
9.40
27.38
2.64

.64
4.15
2.15
2.00
.05

2.58
12.30
5.05
7.25
.33

.21
13.26
6.11
7.15
.15

3.70
11.74
3.54
8.20
.55

4.70
19.60
7.30
12.30
.39

p--preliminary.
1. Does not include tax-exempt commercial paper.
2. Includes all refunding bonds, not just advance refundings.
The recent surge in bond volume has occurred in the face of continued
uncertainty among investors about the future tax status of municipal
securities issued this year, as well as the tax situation for the investors
themselves.

The ratio of tax-exempt to taxable yields has declined somewhat

in recent weeks, however, as investor interest reportedly has been piqued
by the possibility that such attractive rates may not be available after
September 1.
Hampered by tax reform, and because tax-exempt rates are not much
different from taxable rates, a number of governmental units have marketed
private-purpose issues with taxable yields.

The state of Illinois, the

Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, and two governmental agencies in
Louisiana sold private-purpose taxable debt, and agencies in at least
four other states are planning similar taxable bond sales.

Such issues

totaled about $300 million in July and will exceed that amount in August.
Mortgage Markets
Total mortgage debt outstanding is estimated to have expanded at a
seasonally adjusted annual rate of 10 percent during the second quarter,

III-13

about the same as the upward revised pace of the previous three-month
period.

A surge in lending for single-family dwellings contributed to a

rebound in residential debt growth, while a decline in mortgage debt
secured by farms and a slowing in construction of commercial properties
led to a falloff in nonresidential debt growth.

Growth of residential

mortgage debt in the first half of the year probably was restrained some
by the volume of mortgage refinancings.

These transactions apparently

have involved little net debt expansion, for it appears that most homeowners
have not used refinancing as a vehicle for tapping much existing equity in
their homes; at the same time, the delays in other transactions caused by
the surge in refinancings have cut into net credit growth for home purchases.
The pooling of mortgage loans into pass-through securities has continued at a remarkable pace in the past few months.

In the second quarter,

more than 60 percent of the net change in residential loans was in the
federally related mortgage pool category.

New issues of pass-through

securities carrying a payment guarantee by GNMA, FHLMC, or FNMA totaled
almost $50 billion in June and July--equal to nearly half of last year's
volume.

Issuance of these securities has been stimulated by the robust

pace of loan originations during the spring as well as by the renewed
dominance of the fixed-rate home mortgage.

Thrift institutions have

acquired a large amount of mortgage-backed securities because of their
liquidity and their acceptance as collateral for borrowing.
The rate of growth in residential mortgage debt may well reach a

peak in the current quarter.

At FSLIC-insured thrifts, new commitments

to originate mortgage loans in June appear to have leveled off.

Weekly

HUD surveys of large mortgage companies indicate a moderation in the number

III-14

NET CHANGE IN MORTGAGE DEBT OUTSTANDING
1986

1985
1984
---By Type of Debt
Total mortgage debt
Residential
Nonresidential

12.0
11.4
13.6

Q3

1985

Q4

Q1 r

Percent rate of growth,
11.6
12.0
10.5

11.8
12.9
8.6

12.3
12.8
10.8

Billions of dollars,

----------

Q2 p

SAAR -----10.1
9.5
11.7

10.2
11.8
5.6

SAAR ----------

By Type of Holder
Total mortgage debt
S&Ls and savings banks
Commercial banks
Federal and related
agencies
Mortgage pools1
All other

218
83
46

236
54
49

253
72
57

270
51
56

228
15
53

236
27
57

11
47
31

8
83
42

1
88
35

3
108
52

-5
115
51

-10
125
37

1. Pools backing pass-through securities guaranteed by the Government
National Mortgage Association, Federal National Mortgage Association,
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Farmers Home Administration.
r-revised. p-preliminary.

NEW ISSUES OF MORTGAGE-BACKED PASS-THROUGH SECURITIES
BY FEDERALLY SPONSORED AGENCIES
(Monthly averages, billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)

Period

Total

GNMAs

FHLMCs

FNMAs

Memo:
FNMA and FHLMC
swap issues

1985-Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4

6.4
7.5
10.4
11.8

2.7
3.3
4.1
5.2

2.4
2.8
3.8
3.9

1.3
1.5
2.5
2.7

3.0
3.3
4.7
4.9

1986-Q1
Q2 p

12.6
19.5

5.1
7.0

4.4
7.8

3.1
4.7

5.3
8.3

1986-Apr.
May
June p
July p

15.3
17.7
25.4
23.6

6.9
5.9
8.2
8.6

5.6
7.4
10.4
8.9

2.8
4.5
6.8
6.1

5.8
8.7
10.5
n.a.

p-preliminary.

III-15

(NSA) of home loan applications received during July.

While these data

evidently reflect in large part a slowdown in refinancing requests, they
also are consistent with the plateauing of single-family housing starts
since February and the recent slackening in the pace of home sales.
Costs of credit in the primary mortgage market have declined somewhat
during the intermeeting period.

For conventional home mortgages at S&Ls,

average interest rates on commitments for 30-year, fixed-rate loans have
come down by 20 basis points since early July-but at 10.4 percent are
still one-half percentage point above their spring lows.

Initial rates on

one-year ARMs have subsided by a smaller amount.
Reflecting the relatively narrow spreads between fixed- and variablerate credit, as well as the level of mortgage rates, ARMs continue to
account for a small share of new lending.

At major lenders in early

July, only 22 percent of conventional loans closed for the purchase of a
single-family home carried adjustable rates, compared with about half
during 1985.
Consumer Installment Credit
Growth of consumer installment credit in June slowed to an annual
rate of 11 percent, and growth in the first half of the year averaged
about 12 percent.

Compared with last year's experience, the expansion of

consumer credit this year clearly has moderated, reflecting some
slackening in the growth of nominal consumer expenditures, a reduced
proportion of outlays for durable goods, and probably expanding repayments
on debt incurred in prior years.

In addition, a reduction in the average

maturity of new-auto loans at finance companies from 52 months in December
to 49-1/2 months in June is boosting monthly repayments and thereby

III-16

CONSUMER INSTALLMENT CREDIT
1986
1984

1985

----Change in outstandings--total
By type:
Automobile credit
Revolving credit
All other1

By major holder:
Commercial banks
Finance companies
All other

At auto finance companies 3
New cars
Used cars

Apr.

1986
May r

June p

20.6

18.0

11.8

11.9

10.6

13.9

10.8

18.7
25.7
19.7

19.3
20.1
15.6

15.3
13.0
7.9

15.6
8.8
10.0

8.1
12.9
11.8

17.5

20.4

10.7

2.7
5.8

12.2

Billions of dollars, SAAR ----------

77.3

81.5

63.4

65.6

58.5

77.5

60.9

27.2

33.4
19.8
28.4

31.5
15.3
16.5

33.3
10.8
21.5

17.4

37.8

15.7

13.2

25.3

26.4

44.8
3.4
12.8

31.6
24.0
25.9

17.5
29.3
16.6

18.0
30.0
17.6

27.9

14.2

15.7

29.3

14.9

34.0

20.1

30.0

39.8
10.0

27.6

---------Interest rates
At commercial banks 2
New cars, 48 mos.
Personal, 24 mos.
Credit cards

Q2p

Percent rate of growth, SAAR --------

--------Change in outstandings--total
By type:
Automobile credit
Revolving credit
All other 1

Q1

11.9
45.1
3.8

Annual percentage rate------------

18.32

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

11.45
14.89
18.32

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

9.80
16.43

10.55
16.67

9.49
16.56

9.35
16.06

13.71
16.47
18.77

12.91
15.94
18.70

12.29

11.45

15.52

14.89

18.48

14.62
17.85

11.98
17.59

10.07
16.66

1. Includes primarily personal cash loans, home improvement loans, mobile
home loans, and sales finance contracts for non-automotive consumer durable
goods.
2. Average of "most common" rates charged, on loans of specified type and
maturity, during the first week in the middle month of each quarter.
3. Average rate for all loans of each type made during the period, regardless of maturity.
n.a.-not available.
r-revised.
p--preliminary.

III-17

damping the growth rate of total consumer installment credit.

For July,

a reduction in auto sales and a further slowdown in consumer loan growth
at large commercial banks suggests continued deceleration in consumer
installment credit.
Several offerings were made during June and July of pass-through
securities collateralized by automobile credit receivables, including a
$755 million issue by GMAC.

Other offerings by Chrysler Financial Corpo-

ration, Nissan Motors Acceptance Corporation, and Empire Savings of
America amounted to a total of $628 million.
include generous recourse provisions.

These offerings typically

Initial yields on the securities

ranged from 7.42 percent on the Chrysler issue (rated AAA) to 8.04 percent
on the most recent GMAC issue (rated AA+).

The outstanding amount of

such securities in late July was about $3.7 billion.1
The average delinquency rate on finance company auto loans declined
to 1.94 percent in the second quarter from 2.01 percent in the first
quarter of 1986, after moving up fairly rapidly from mid-1984 through
early 1986.

In recent quarters, the finance company auto loan delinquency

rate has been near the midpoint of the historical range for this series.

1. The installment debt series has yet to be restructured to reflect the
emergence of this channel of credit provision; the data on consumer loans
currently are tabulated in such a way that the credit is attributed to
the institution selling the receivables rather than to the buyer of the
security.

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

Foreign Exchange Markets
Since the last FOMC meeting, the weighted-average foreign
exchange value of the dollar has declined nearly 3 percent, as shown in
the upper panel of the chart.

Lackluster U.S. economic statistics

together with the Federal Reserve's unilateral reduction in its discount
rate on July 10 contributed to the view that U.S. monetary authorities
were willing to accept a lower dollar, partly to prod German and
Japanese policymakers to stimulate their economies.

This perception was

reinforced by remarks of U.S. officials indicating that further dollar
depreciation was needed to redress the trade imbalance.

Statements by

the Japanese and German finance ministers favoring a consolidation of
exchange rates near current levels provided only temporary support for
the dollar.
Short-term interest rates abroad were little changed during the
intermeeting period, while comparable U.S. interest rates declined by
about 40 basis points.

At the long end of the maturity spectrum,

the differentials between U.S. and German and Japanese interest rates on
balance were about unchanged.
On a bilateral basis, the dollar displayed diverse movements
against the major currencies, as illustrated in the lower panel of the
chart.

During the intermeeting period the dollar's value depreciated

4-3/4 percent in terms of the mark and 3-1/2 percent vis-a-vis the yen,
as incoming data for Germany suggested a rebound in second-quarter
growth, while the outlook for economic activity in Japan remained weak.

IV-1

IV-2
Chart 1

8/13/86
March 1973=100

WEIGHTED AVERAGE EXCHANGE VALUE OF THE
Daily series

1

120
116

112

108
104
1986
SELECTED DOLLAR EXCHANGE PATES
Dailv series

FOMO
U.K. Pound

rJ
hi

106

^*-

/

102
!rman Mark

98
94
90
1986

IV-3

. Sterling
fell 3 percent in terms of the dollar and nearly 6 percent on a multilateral trade-weighted basis.

Further declines in oil prices early in

the intermeeting period and waning political support for the
Conservative government prompted heavy selling pressure on the pound.
Sterling recovered somewhat along with oil prices following the
announcement of an interim agreement on production quotas by OPEC.
Within the EMS, the mark's divergence below parity with the
French franc narrowed abruptly to about 1/4 percent from the level
of near 2 percent that had prevailed from the realignment on April 6
until early July.
cross-rates:

Several factors may have motivated this movement in

the general tendency of the mark to appreciate against the

other currencies in the exchange rate system when the dollar
depreciates; the brightening of growth prospects in Germany; and
political frictions between French President Mitterand and the Chirac
government over privitization decrees.

In other EMS developments, Irish

authorities devalued the Irish pound by 8 percent within the exchange
rate system on August 2 in an attempt to restore Ireland's competitive
position vis-a-vis the United Kingdom, its major trading partner;
Ireland's loss of competitiveness had stemmed from the sharp
depreciation of sterling against the EMS currencies.

IV-4

Meanwhile, Australian authorities

raised the rediscount rate -- from a level of 14.7
percent to 18 percent -- and introduced a package liberalizing direct
foreign investment into Australia as well as withdrawing previously
announced withholding taxes on interest earned by non-residents.

IV-5
U.S. International Financial Transactions
Foreign official reserve assets in the United States increased
sharply in the second quarter.
Transactions table.)

(See line 4 of the U.S. International

These increases were concentrated at the G-10

countries and Switzerland and reflected large scale official purchases of
dollars to slow the appreciation of foreign currencies against the dollar
in recent months.

Preliminary information indicates that there were

substantial increases in July as well.

For the first half of 1986,

investment of official holdings in U.S. Treasury securities more than
matched the increase in official reserves.
In contrast, private foreign purchases of U.S. Treasury
securities (line 3) were relatively small in the second quarter.

In

particular, Treasury (TIC) data show that Japanese net private purchases
fell to virtually zero in the first half of 1986, from $17 billion in 1985.
These data, reported by securities dealers in the United States, appear
inconsistent with market commentary which has focused on the large role of
Japanese-based securities dealers at recent Treasury auctions.
While one cannot rule out the possibility of reporting errors in
the TIC system, this does not appear the most likely explanation.
Virtually all major securities dealers, both U.S. and Japanese-based,
reported the same pattern for the first six months of 1986: large
purchases and sales of Treasury securities by Japanese residents, with
little net change in holdings.

It appears that the major Japanese

securities firms, in their efforts to become primary U.S. government
securities dealers, have been very active bidders at recent auctions, but
have not sold Treasuries net to Japanese residents or other foreigners.
Despite the lack of Japanese private net purchases, total sales of

IV-6
SUMMARY OF U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS
(Billions of dollars)
1984
Year
Private Capital
Banks
1. Change in net foreign
positions of banking offices
in the U.S. (* = inflow)
Securities
2. Private securities
transactions, net
a) foreign net purchases
+
( ) of U.S. corporate bonds
b) foreign net purchases
(+) of U.S. corporate stocks
c) U.S. net purchases (-) of
foreign securities
3.

Foreign net purchases (+) of U.S.
Treasury obligations 1/

Official Capital
4. Changes in foreign official
reserve assets in U.S.
(+ = increase)
a)

b)

5.

Other
6.
7;
8;
9.
10.

By area
G-10 countries (incl. Switz.)
OPEC
All other countries
By type
U.S. Treasury securities
Other 2/

Changes in U.S. official reserve
assets (+ = decrease)
transactions (Quarterly data)
U.S. direct investment (-) abroad
Foreign direct investment (+) in U.S.
Other capital flows (+ = inflow) 3/ 4/
U.S. current account balance 4/
Statistical discrepancy 4/

MEMO:
U.S. merchandise trade balance -- part
of line 9 (Balance of payments basis,
seasonally adjusted)
1.
2.
3.

1985
Year

Q3

1986

20.6

33.6

11.4

7.7

9.3

7.7

12.9

10.0

21.1

13.7

46.0

10.2

-0.9

4.8

1.4

-5.0

-7.9

-1.6

23.1

20.1

7.8

2.4

-2.0

2.2

3.1
-5;6

4.9

-0.4
-7:0
5;3

4.7
-2.3
-3.1

Apr.

1986
May

-5.6

-6.6

.7

-2.7

12.6

21.11

5.9

9.8

5.7

18.4

12.6

16.1

5.0

7.2

3.8

4.0

6.1

6.9

3.6

2.7

0.5

-6.1

-1.5

-2.7

4.9

7.8

2.3

-1.5

2.2

2.4
-2.3
2:1

-3.3
-1.0
2:9

-0.9
-1:1

0.4
1.8

-3.9

1985
Q4

-1.4

Q1

Q2

June

-0.1

1.3

3.0

-1.0

0.3

13.2

8.0

.6

3.6

3.9
1.3
-3.0

10.9
*2.6
4.8

6.7
-0.2
1.5

1.5
-0.8
0.8

2.8
-1.6
2.5

-2.0
0.5

3.3
-1.1

=0.8

14.0

6.9

3.8

3.3

1.1

-2.2

0.4

-0.1

-3.1

-0.1

-0.0

0.1

-0.2

0.1

-18.8
-3.9
25.4
17.9
6.8
-6.6
-106.5
-117.7
*23.0
27.3

-6.2
6.1
-1.5
-28.5
-1.3

-10.1
-2.4
9.0
-33.7
5.1

-10.1

-112.5

-31.7

-37.1

-36.6

-124.4

n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.

-1.3
5.1

-33.7
2;9

n.a.

-12.9

-11.6

n.a.

Includes U.S. Treasury notes publicly issued to private foreign residents.
Includes deposits in banks, commercial paper, acceptances, & borrowing under repurchase agreements.
Includes U.S. government assets other than official reserves, transactions by nonbanking concerns, and other banking
and official transactions not shown elsewhere.
4. Includes seasonal adjustment for quarterly data.
*
Less than $50 million.
NOTE: Details may not add to total because of rounding.

IV-7

Treasury securities to foreigners, official and private, were $27

billion

in the first half of 1986, greater than the amount reported for all of
1985.
Net capital inflows reported through other securities
transactions (line 2) continued at very high levels in the second quarter.
Foreign purchases 'of U.S. corporate bonds totaled $16 billion on a
payments basis (line 2a).

However new issues of Eurobonds by U.S.

corporations dropped sharply after April and have remained relatively low
through July while domestic bond issuance by U.S. corporations dropped
less sharply.

Apparently Eurobond dealers were caught with large

inventories of unsold bonds when interest rates reversed their downward
trend in April.

Foreign net purchases of U.S. corporate stock (line

remained at record levels in the second quarter.
purchases of foreign securities

2b)

On the other hand, U.S.

(line 2c) declined from the very strong

first quarter rate.
Participation of U.S firms in the newly developing
Euro-commercial paper market appears to be expanding.

Several U.S.

corporations have arranged substantial borrowing programs, although until
recently amounts outstanding appear to have been modest.

This situation

may change however, in the wake of an apparently successful new program
for GMAC; GMAC placed about $.5

billion by early July and dealers

speculate that its outstanding may increase to as much as $2.5 billion
this year.

Overall data on commercial paper and other short-term

borrowing by U.S. corporations are not collected through the same channels
as other securities transactions; they will be available only with
substantial lags and aggregated with other capital flows (line 8).

IV-8

Net bank reported capital flows (line 1) continued to reverse
directions from month to month; in June there was an outflow of $2.7
billion.

In July, as indicated on the International Banking Data table,

line 3, net outflows to related foreign offices and IBFs amounted to over
$6 billion, reflecting continued strong core deposit growth relative to
loan demand at commercial banks.

INTERNATIONAL BANKING DATA
(Billions of dollars)

1981
Dec.
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Net Claims of U.S. Banking
Offices (excluding IBFs) on Own
Foreign Offices

1982
Dec.

32.9

1983
Dec.

1984
1985
Dec. DATA
Dec.
of

BANKING
dollars)
INTERNATIONAL
(Billions

1986
May
1986

June

July 3/

17.5

18.2

18.7

n.a.

11.4

6.5

8.1

n.a.

28.9

i

25.4

18.9

7.8

39.3

Apr.

Mar.

21.0

10.1

Net Claims of U.S. Banking
Offices on Own IBFs 1/

11.8

16.2

Sum of lines 1 and 2
of which:
(a) U.S.-chartered banks
(b) Foreign-chartered banks

19.6
22.3
-2.6

49.1
40.0
9.1

44.5

40.5
4.0

33.2
32.1
1.1

29.0
32.4
-3.4

22.0
27.1
-5.1

30.9
-2.0

24.7
30.0
-5.3

26.8
31.1
-4.3

33.1
34.8
-1.7

Credit Extended to U.S.
Nonbank Residents by Foreign
Branches of U.S. Banks

13.2

15.8

18.6

20.7

18.7

17.6

18.1

18.0

17.7

17.9

Eurodollar Holdings of
U.S. Nonbank Residents 2/

95.5

112.6

124.3

117.6

112.1

118.2

116.9

116.1

117.3

116.5

1. Corresponds to net claims of international banking facilities (IBFs) on all foreign residents, including all banks
whether related or not, and all nonbanks.
2. Include terms and overnight Eurodollars held by money market mutual funds.
3. Through July 28, 1983.
*/ Less than 50 millio n (+).
Note: These data diffe r in coverage and timing from the overall banking data incorporated in the international
transactions accounts. Line 1 is an estimate constructed as the residual of line 3 minus line 2. Line 2 is data for the
last Wednesday of the month for the sample of monthly IBF reporters. Line 3 is an average of daily:data reported to the
Federal Reserve by U.S. banking offices. Line 4 is an average of daily data. Line 5 is the month-end value for data
through September 1983;
For dates after September 1983, the overnight portion is an average of daily data and the term
portion is an average of Wednesday data.

o

IV-10

U.S. Merchandise Trade
Commerce Department figures on U.S. merchandise trade through
June showed (in column 8 of the table below) that the deficit in June
was as large as in May on an unrevised basis.

The staff estimates that

after all the revisions are made and the data are adjusted to a
balance-of-payments basis (column 7), the value of the trade deficit in
the second quarter will be about the same as was recorded in the first
quarter.
U.S. Merchandise Trade
Billions of dollars, annual rates
Balance-of-payments basis, seasonally adjusted
Exports
Total Agr. Nonagr.
(1)
(2)
(3)

Years
1984
1985

220
215

38
30

Imports
Total Oil Nonoil
(4)
(5)
(6)

I
Balance
(7)

Census Balance
Unrevised, NSA
CIF Value 1/

(8)

182
185

332
339

57
51

275
288

-112
-124

-123
-149

Quarters
1984 - 4

224

187

341

57

283

-117

-108

1985 - 1

221
216
210
211

188
186
183
182

322
337
337
360

42
55
50
57

280
282
287
304

-100
-121
-127
-149

-125
-152
-153
-164

2

214
215e

186
190e

361
360*e

321
40
30*e 330*e

-146
-145*e

-174
-162

Months
1986-Apr
May
Jun

216e
211e
215e

190e
188e
190e

371e
351e
355*e

28e 343e
33e
318e
30*e 325*e

-155e
-140e
-140*e

-145
-171
-170

2
3
4
1986 - 1

1/

Unrevised data.

26e
23e
25e

Range of revisions for monthly data:
+ 15 billion.
Exports:
Imports:
+ 50 billion.
Balance:
+ 65 billion.
FR staff estimate.
Import figures are based on data for April-May and projections for June.

IV-11

The value of total exports in the second quarter is estimated
to be about unchanged from first-quarter levels.

However, a substantial

increase in exports of gold masked declines in agricultural exports and
in most categories of nonagricultural trade.

Excluding gold exports,

the volume of nonagricultural exports is estimated to have declined by 1
Gold exports, nearly $10 billion AR in

percent in the second quarter.

the second quarter, were largely to Japan to be used in the minting of a
commemorative gold coin.

The gold was imported into the United States

over the past six months.
On the import side, the estimates of second-quarter
developments are more tentative because of the size of potential data
revisions.

A decline in the value of oil imports resulted from a more

than 35 percent drop in the price of oil that was partly offset by a 20
percent increase in the volume imported (from a low first-quarter
average) as inventories were rebuilt.

See the table below.

Uncertainties regarding world oil prices continue to result in wide
swings in imports from quarter to quarter.
OIL IMPORTS*

I
Year
1985
Value (Bil. $, SAAR)
Price ($/BBL)
Volume (mbd, SA)
*/
e/

50.53
26.40
5.24

I

I
Q
41.61
26.67
4.27

1985
Q2
Q3
54.53
26.92
5.55

49.49
25.74
5.27

As published in the balance-of-payments accounts.
FR staff estimate.

I
94
56.48
26.30
5.88

1986
Ql

Q2e

40.06 3 0.00e
21.56 13.50e
5.09 6.30e

IV-12

Nonoil imports are estimated to have risen in value in the
second quarter.
prices.

About half of the increase resulted from rising import

On a fixed-weight basis, the price of nonoil imports increased

at a 5-1/2 percent rate in the second quarter, the third quarter in a
row of such increases.

This rise in the index for all nonoil imports

occurred in spite of continuing declines being recorded for prices of
industrial supplies (which account for 20 percent of nonoil imports).
The strongest price rises were recorded for various manufactured goods,
particularly general industrial machinery (other than computers),
electric machinery and telecommunication equipment, photographic
equipment and passenger cars.

For the volume of nonoil imports, the

estimated 1-1/2 percent increase in the second quarter was spread among
various trade categories (machinery, aircraft, passenger cars, consumer
goods and gold) and came from various geographic areas (Japan, Western
Europe, Latin America, and the newly industrialized countries in the Far
East).

IV-13
Foreign Economic Developments.

Recent data provide continued evidence

of generally weak economic activity in most of the foreign industrial
countries.

Industrial production in Japan grew only 1.1 percent

(s.a.a.r.) in the second quarter.

In the most recent months for which

data are available, industrial production fell in France, the United
Kingdom, Canada, and Italy.

German industrial production picked up

somewhat in the second quarter, but it only retraced its first quarter
decline.

French GDP grew 2.2 percent (s.a.a.r.) in the first half.

Inflation abroad continues to moderate.

In recent months, consumer

prices have declined in Japan, Germany and the United Kingdom.

In

France, Canada, and Italy inflation has slowed to levels which are
extremely low by recent historical standards.
Japan and Germany continue to experience record trade surpluses,
and France and Italy have narrowed their trade deficits.

In contrast,

the United Kingdom and Canada experienced deteriorating trade balances
in recent months.
Individual Country Notes.

In Japan, the pace of economic activity

remained sluggish in the second quarter.

Industrial production (s.a.)

increased 0.5 percent in June, after having risen 0.3 percent in May and
having remained unchanged in April.

In the second quarter, industrial

production on average was slightly above its first quarter level but 0.6
percent below its year-earlier level.

In May, new private sector orders

of machinery (s.a.) declined 2.7 percent, while new housing starts
(s.a.) increased 4.7 percent after having declined in the three previous
months.

In

the first quarter,

the consumer sector provided the

principal stimulus to growth, but the preliminary indications of

AUGUST 13, 1986
REAL GNP AND INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION IN MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES
(Percentage change from previous period, seasonally adjusted) 1/
1985

Q4/Q4 Q4/Q4

1986

----------- ----------Q2
Q1
Q3
Q4

1984

1985

5.4
4.4

3.9
5.3

.8
2.3

1.4
1.8

2.2
1.5

1.0
1.5

3.0
3.5

2.4
3.4

1.7
2.1

2.7
2.1

2.3
1.0

.3
-1.1

5.7
10.6

4.0
.9

2.6
-. 4

4.6
7.2

1986

-- --------------Feb. Mar. Apr.

May

June

Latest 3 months
from year ago 2/

Canada
GDP
IP

1.8
1.4

.6
-. 3

n.a.
n.a.

*

-3.

-3.2

*

3.1

-2.0

n.a.

3.6
3.5

*
3.8

7

.7

*n.

*
-5.1

*
n.a.

2.7
.8

France

GNP
IP

.0
1. 1
.6
.0 -1.2 n.a.

Germany

GNP
IP

-. 1
.4

-1.7 n.a.
-1. 1
1.1

*

-1.3

*

-1.0

*

*

3.6

-3.3

*
-6.7

*

2.7

1.6
2.6

Italy

GNP
IP

.6
.2

1.5
2.8

n.a.
n.a.

2*
2.8

*
3.1

*
1.5

.7
-. 1

1.4
-. 9

-. 5
.2

n.a.
.3

.*
.2

*
-. 2

*
.0

2.7
4.7

-. 3
-. 1

.5
-. 1

2.9
1.8

1.0
.5

.5
.5

*
n.a.

3.8
3.4

Japan

GNP
IP

3.0
-.6

United Kingdom
GNP
IP

. 7 n. a.
.5
-.9

*

*

*

1.4

-.1

.4

.9
.1

-*

*

*

*

*-

-.
9

-1.0

.6

-. 4

-. 5

*

-1.8

*

-1.2

2.5
-. 6

United States

GNP
IP

.3
-. 7

1. Asterisk indicates that monthly data are not available.
2. For quarterly data, latest quarter from year ago.

2.7
.4

AUGUST 13, 1986
CONSUMER AND WHOLESALE PRICES IN MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES
(Percentage change from previous period)
1985

Q4/Q4
1984

Q4/Q4
1985

3.7
4.0

4.2
2.3

--------------------------Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4

1986
------------Q1
Q2

1986
--------------------------Apr.
May
June
July

Latest 3 months
from year ago

Canada
CPI
WPI

1.2
1.2

1.1
.5

1.4
1.6

1.8
.9

.2
.0

n.a.
n.a.

3.9
.6

France
CPI
WPI

6.8
10.5

4.8
-1.2

2.1
1.3

1.8
-1.1

.9
-1.4

.6
-2.2

.1
n.a.

.7
n.a.

-. 2
-2.1

.3
-.9

.0
-2.1

1.1
-. 1

2.3
.9

1.8
-. 5

n.a.

.4

.2
n.a.

.3
n.a.

.1
n.a.

2.2
-1.2

-. 3
-2.6

-. 1
-. 4

.0
-. 9

.2
-. 9

-. 5
-2.1

-. 3

-8.1

1.1
-1.8

.3
-.4

.4
-.7

.4
.0

.0
n.a.

6.2
-1.4

-. 8
-. 7

-. 3
n.a.

.6
-9.6

Germany
CPI
WPI

I-

Italy
CPI

WPI

8.8
8.9

8.5
5.9

2.6
2.7

2.2
2.2

Japan
CPI
WPI

2.4
.5

2.3
-3.7

.1
-1.0

1.0
-2.4

-. 1
-2.4

.0
-4.2

.5
-1.4

.3
-1.0

United Kingdom
CPI
WPI

4.8
6.1

5.5
5.2

1.3
1.6

3.4
2.0

4.1
1.7

3.5
1.6

.8
.1

1.0
.6

.7
1.4

1.3
1.6

1.0
.8

.2
.3

-. 1
.0

n. a.
.1

.4
-1.5

-.4
-1.4

-.3
-.6

.2
.6

.5
-. 0

n.a.
n.a.

United States
CPI (SA)

WPI (SA)

.6
-. 2

1.1
1.1

1.6
-2.0

.

AUGUST 13, 1986
TRADE AND CURRENT ACCOUNT BALANCES OF MAJOR INDUSTRIAL COUNTRIES 1/
(Billions of U.S. dollars, seasonally adjusted except where otherwise noted)
1984

1985

1986

1985
Q1

Q1

Q2
Q2

Q3
Q3

Q4
Q4

1986

Q1

Q2

Q1

Q2

Mar.
Mar.

Apr.
Apr.

May
May

June
June

Canada
Trade
Current account

16.0
1.9

12.8
-.
8

4.0
.8

-2.4
-.8

-2.6
.9

-1. 1
-. 6

18.7
5.9

25.4
13.9

4.2
1.7

3.3
.2

2.6
-1.1

2.9
-. 7

1.7
-2.1

n. a.
n. a.

-. 8
.0

-. 4
1.0

.1
1.1

6.1
2.1

9.1
7.0

9.5
6.8

.9

.8

*

*

*

.6

n.a.

-1.1
n.a.

-. 4

-. 7

-. 3

-. 2

12.5
8.2

3.7

4.4

3.6

4.4

2.7

1.9

*

France
Trade
Current account

*

*

*

*

Germany
Trade (NSA)
Current account (NSA)

6.0
3.1

3.6

2.1

o

Italy
Trade
Current account (NSA)

-11.0
-2.8

-11.9
-6.1

44.1
35.0
-5.5
1.3

-3.7
-2.8

-3.8
-2.4

-1.3
-. 4

-3.1
-. 4

-3.0
n.a.

.0
n. a.

-. 7

-. 3
*

*

*

56.1
49.3

11.5
9.4

13.1
12.2

14.1
12.1

17.3
15.6

17.4
15.5

22.4
21.8

6.2
5.6

7.2
7.4

8.4
7.8

6.9
6.7

-2.5
5.2

-1.4
.1

-. 2
2.0

-. 6
2.0

-. 3
1.1

-2.0
.7

-2.3
.8

-1.8
-1 .0

-. 4
.7

-1.0
.1

-25.0
-26.1

-30.4
-29.4

-31.7
-28.5

-37.4
-33.7

-36.6
-33.7

*R
*
t

*t
*k

*

.1

.2

Japan

Trade
Current account 2/

United Kingdom
Trade
Current account
United States
Trade 2/
Current account

-112.5 -124.4
-106.5 -117.7

n. a.
n. a.

*k
*

1. The current account includes goods, services, and private and official transfers. Asterisk indicates
that monthly data are not available.
2. Annual data are subject to revisions and therefore may not be consistent with quarterly and/or monthly data.

*

IV-17
consumer demand in the second quarter are mixed.

Retail sales (s.a.)

rose 0.4 percent in April but fell 0.3 percent in May.
rate was unchanged in June at 2.7 percent.

The unemployment

A Bank of Japan survey of

investment intentions released in May suggests a substantial slowing of
investment.

Real investment grew 9 percent in FY 1985, but it is

projected to grow only 4.3 percent in FY 1986.
Japanese consumer prices have been declining in recent months.
Tokyo consumer price index (n.s.a.)

The

fell 0.8 percent in June and 0.3

percent in July, bringing the index to a level 0.2 percent below that of
a year ago.

Wholesale prices have continued to decline, and the overall

wholesale price index fell a record 10.1 percent in June from its yearago level.

The sharp decline in wholesale prices in June was mainly the

result of reductions in the prices of electric power and gas, reflecting
the yen's appreciation and falling world crude oil prices.
External surpluses remain at record levels.

In the first half of

the year, the cumulative current account and trade surpluses were $74.7
billion (s.a.a.r.) and $79.6 billion (s.a.a.r.) respectively.

Trade

volumes continue to decline in response to the yen's sharp appreciation
since last year.

In June, the export volume index declined 2.3 percent

from its year-earlier level, the fourth consecutive monthly decline.
Import volume has increased in recent months, rising 31.9 percent
between June 1985 and June 1986.

Import volume growth is not expected

to continue at this pace, however, because the June figure reflects
sizable imports of gold for the minting of coins commemorating the
sixtieth year of Emperor Hirohito's reign.

IV-18
In the July 6 general parliamentary elections, Prime Minister
Nakasone's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) won a landslide victory,
gaining 304 out of 512 seats in the upper house.

The margin of victory
Nakasone

was viewed as a personal triumph for Prime Minister Nakasone.

appointed Kiichi Miyazawa, a long-time advocate of greater monetary and
fiscal stimulation, as Minister of Finance.

It is unclear whether

Miyazawa's appointment signals a major shift in the government's
willingness to provide fiscal stimulus.

On the one hand, it is

increasingly likely that the government will propose a record 3 billion
On the

yen supplementary budget this fall to stimulate domestic demand.

other hand, the government's initial requests for the FY 1987 budget
indicate a desire to continue its program of fiscal austerity.
Industrial production in Germany rose 2.7 percent (s.a.)

in June.

With the substantial downward revision of the May figure, the level of
production in the second quarter was only 1.1 percent above that of the
first quarter and 2.6 percent above its level of a year ago.
of unemployment (s.a.) remained at 9 percent in July.

The rate

In an unusually

early report, an official of the Finance Ministry put second quarter
real GNP growth at 3 percent above the same quarter of last year.

This

would imply a strong rebound from the first quarter slump.
Consumer prices fell another 0.5 percent (n.s.a) in July to a level
0.5 percent below July of last year.

The index has fallen at an annual

rate of 1.3 percent in the first seven months of this year.

Import

prices in June were 21 percent below their year-earlier level.

In July,

wholesale were 8.7 percent (n.s.a.) below their level in July 1985.

IV-19
This year's cumulative trade and current account surpluses
continue at record rates.

In the first half of the year, the cumulative

current account surplus has been $30 billion (a.r.), compared with $9.6
billion (a.r) in the same period of last year.

These large and growing

external surpluses are primarily due to Germany's improving terms of
trade.
The pace of real economic activity in France slowed in the first
quarter and picked up in the second quarter.

Revised data show that

real GDP (s.a.) did not grow at all in the first quarter, but it grew
4.5 percent (s.a.a.r.)

in the second quarter.

The unemployment rate has

remained at a record high of 10.7 percent from April through June.
Industrial production fell by 5.1 percent (s.a.)
percent below its year-earlier level.

in May and was 1.5

However, the government

statistical institute attributed the sharp decline in this index to the
unusually large number of national holidays in May.

Early indicators

point to a recovery in industrial production in June, especially in the
automobile industry and in the semi-finished goods sector.
The inflation rate continues to be low.

Consumer prices increased

only 0.2 percent (n.s.a.) in July following a 0.3 percent rise in June.
The year-over-year consumer price inflation rate in July was 2 percent,
already below the government's inflation target for the end of this
year.
The trade deficit narrowed in June.

For the first half of this

year, the trade deficit rate was about $2.1 billion (s.a.a.r.), down
from the $2.9 billion deficit rate in the first half of last year.

IV-20
On July 31, Parliament adopted the conservative government's
privatization bill, which sets conditions for the sale of 65 state-owned
banks, insurance companies, and industrial concerns during the next five
years.
In the United Kingdom, recent data give a somewhat mixed picture
about the strength of economic activity.

Industrial production declined

by 1.2 percent (s.a.) in June and was 1.3 percent below its year-earlier
level.

The unemployment rate increased by 0.1 percentage point in June

to 13.1 percent.
percent (s.a.)

However, retail sales volume rose by a strong 3.5

in June according to provisional figures, a 6.1 percent

increase on a year-over-year basis.
Retail price inflation has continued to moderate.

The retail price

index declined by 0.1 percent (n.s.a.) in June, bringing the
year-over-year inflation rate down to 2.5 percent.

Other measures of

inflationary pressure present a less favorable picture.

Producer prices

in July were 4.4 percent above their year-earlier level, and average
earnings in May were up by 7.2 percent on a year-over-year basis.
The trade deficit continued at a high level in June, while the
current account remained in slight surplus.

In the first half of this

year, the cumulative trade deficit was $8.8 billion (s.a.a.r.),
substantially greater than the $3.1 billion deficit in the same period
last year.

The current account was in surplus by $3.2 billion

(s.a.a.r.) in the first half of 1986, only slightly below the $4.1
billion current account surplus in the first half of 1985.
Growth in real gross domestic product slowed in Canada to 2.3
percent (s.a.a.r.), in the first quarter of 1986, after having grown 3.8

IV-21
percent on average in 1985.

Were it not for a large build-up in

inventories, real GDP would have declined.

More recently, industrial

production fell 2 percent (s.a.) in May, reversing part of April's sharp
increase.

Furthermore, the unemployment rate rose 0.4 percent (s.a.)

July, reaching 9.9 percent.

in

Inflation continues to be moderate.

Consumer prices increased 3.7 percent (n.s.a.) over the twelve-month
period ending in June.

The industrial product price index was unchanged

in June, bringing the 12-month increase to 0.3 percent (n.s.a.).
Latest data confirm a sharp deterioration in Canada's external
position.

Exports fell 6.3 percent (s.a.) in May, but imports fell only

4.4 percent.

This brings the cumulative merchandise trade surplus to

$7.5 billion (s.a.a.r.) in May, well below the rate of $15.9 billion
(s.a.a.r.)

for the comparable period last year.

In Italy, industrial production rose 1.5 percent (s.a.)

in April

and fell by 6.7 percent in May, to a level below what it had been in May
1985.

In June, the official government survey showed consumer

confidence in the general state of the economy at a record high.

The

unemployment rate in April was 11.3 percent, slightly lower than it was
in January.
The consumer price index was unchanged in July, lowering the
twelve-month inflation rate to 5.9 percent (s.a.), the lowest such
figure since 1973.

The wholesale price index dropped 0.7 percent

(n.s.a.) in May and was unchanged in June, leaving this index 1.8
percent below its year-earlier level.

IV-22
During the first
billion (s.a.a.r.),

six months of 1986,

the trade deficit was $5.9

compared with a deficit of $15 billion (s.a.a.r.)

in

the first six months of 1985.
On August 8, Bettino Craxi's new coalition government received a
vote of confidence from the Chamber of Deputies, ending the political
crisis that had lasted for 40 days.

Craxi agreed to relinquish control

of the coalition to the Christian Democrats in the spring of 1987.

The

Ministers of Treasury and Finance are unchanged, and the new government
is not expected to institute any substantially different economic
policies from those of the old.

IV-23
Economic Situation in Major Developing Countries.

On July 22,

Mexico signed a letter of intent for an 18-month IMF stand-by
arrangement.

Brazil announced measures designed to restrain domestic

demand and to encourage the holding of longer-term securities.
Venezuela's Congress approved legislation establishing a fund to
facilitate private sector reschedulings.

After foreign banks objected

strongly to the terms of the fund, Finance Minister Azpurua said that
the government will propose to Congress that the fund be abolished.

In

Argentina, talks on a new stand-by arrangement with the IMF are expected
to begin later in August.

IMF Board consideration of Ecuador's new

stand-by arrangement has been delayed until Ecuador takes prior actions.
A new IMF stand-by arrangement for the Philippines received tentative
approval.
Individual Country Notes.

On July 22, Mexican Finance Secretary

Petricioli signed a letter of intent in support of an 18-month IMF
stand-by arrangement for SDR 1.4 billion.

The program calls for a

reduction of the public sector deficit by 3 percent of GDP through
(a) improved tax collection and the elimination of some deductions,
(b) increases in public sector prices, and (c) a reduction in public
sector expenditures.

It calls for a recovery of GDP growth, which is

expected to be negative in 1986, and for new initiatives in
privatization, trade liberalization, and encouraging foreign direct
investment.

The program includes two contingency mechanisms for

additional financing, one in case the economic recovery fails to
materialize, the other in case oil export prices average less than $9
per barrel for a calendar quarter within the first nine months of the

IV-24

program.

(External financing would be reduced should oil export prices

average more than $14 per barrel for a calendar quarter within the first
nine months of the program.)

The program envisages 18-month external

financing of about $12 billion, of which the commercial banks would be
asked to provide about $6 billion in new money ($3.5 billion in 1986 and
$2.5 billion in 1987 as envisaged by the IMF staff).

Formal IMF

approval of the stand-by arrangement is planned for September.

A

bridging loan from the monetary authorities of a number of developed and
developing countries and commercial banks is under negotiation.
In July, the CPI rose by 5 percent, after a 6.4 percent rise in
June, to a level 86 percent above July 1985.

Beginning June 9, deposit

interest rates were increased five times by a total of 7.5-12.25
percentage points.

After mid-July, the sale of Treasury bills to the

highest bidder was resumed, reversing the practice, instituted last
October, of announcing in advance the rate at which the bills would be
sold and letting the market determine the volume.

In line with its

commitments to the IMF, the government, in early August, raised sharply
Mexico City public transport fares and fuel prices.

Since June, the

daily rate of crawl of the peso price of the dollar in the controlled
market has been accelerated.

This price rose by about 10 percent in

July, compared with less than 7 percent per month in the second quarter.
Negotiations on Mexico's accession to GATT were completed in July.
Mexico is expected to sign the protocol of accession in mid-August and
to become a full member by September.
The Brazilian government announced on July 23 measures designed to
restrain domestic demand and to encourage the holding of longer-term

IV-25

securities.

Surcharges (some of which were characterized as compulsory

loans) were imposed on gasoline, fuel alcohol, cars, airline tickets,
and the purchase of foreign exchange for travel.

Among other measures,

certain withholding taxes will be substantially increased on short-term
securities and decreased on long-term securities.
The surcharge measures were presented in the context of financing a
new development plan that will emphasize spending on social welfare,
transport, and energy.

However, it appears that the main purpose was to

raise revenues (an estimated 1.8 percent of GDP) and to adjust prices
upward for a select number of goods in short supply under the price
freeze.

Longer-term CD rates are reported to have dropped by about 6

percentage points (from 32-33 percent) in response to the change in the
taxation of financial assets.

The spread between the official and

market exchange rates increased by 15 percent to about 75 percent in the
week following the announcement of the measures.
Consumer prices rose 1.3 percent in June, and now have risen 3.4
percent since the introduction of the February 28 anti-inflation plan.
Brazil's trade surplus was $6.2 billion in the first half of 1986
compared with $5.4 billion in the same period a year earlier.
Creditor banks are in the process of signing the $31 billion
rescheduling/rollover package for 1985-86 that Brazil and its advisory
committee agreed to on March 1.

Participation by banks holding 90-95

percent of the debt, which is necessary for the package to become
effective, will hinge on Brazil compensating creditors for losses
surrounding the intervention of three Brazilian banks in late 1985.
of August 8, between 75 and 85 percent of the banks had signed.

The

As

IV-26

termination date of the March 1 commitment to Brazil from the advisory
committee has been extended from August 15 to September 5.
On July 29, Brazil and Argentina signed an agreement establishing a
program for economic integration and cooperation.

The purpose of the

agreement is to increase bilateral trade and investment.

The various

agreements are to be implemented gradually.
On July 2, Venezuela's Congress approved legislation establishing
the Exchange Compensation Fund (FOCOCAM) to coordinate rescheduling of
$3.6 billion of $6.9 billion in registered private sector external debt.
FOCOCAM would collect bolivars from private sector debtors that wished
to retain access to a preferential dollar rate for debt repayment.

In

exchange, the creditors would receive 15-year, dollar-denominated bonds
paying a maximum of 5 percent interest.

On July 17, the preferential

rate available for repayment under the plan was changed to 7.5
bolivars/$ from 4.3 bolivars/$.

Foreign banks have objected strongly to

the changes in private debt repayment, and a special session of the
Venezuelan Congress will meet this month to review the legislation.
Finance Minister Azpurua said on August 12 that the government
will propose liquidation of FOCOCAM to the Congress, but it is unclear
what, if anything, the government will put in its place.
In Argentina, talks with the IMF on a new stand-by arrangement are
likely to begin later in August.

Argentina waited to begin negotiations

until the outcome of Mexico's negotiations with the IMF was known.
Consumer prices rose 6.8 percent in July.

Inflation has escalated since

the beginning of the year, and through seven months of 1986 has been 33
percent.

The government in its 1986 budget assumed inflation of 28

IV-27
percent for the entire year.

Publicity surrounding publication of the

July CPI increase rekindled inflationary expectations.

The interbank

interest rate rose to 8.1 percent per month on August 11, up about 2.5
percentage points per month from two weeks earlier.

Since the end of

July, the monthly interest rates on regulated 30-day loans and deposits
also have been raised two percentage points to 7 and 5.5 percent,
respectively.

The mini-devaluations of the austral were stepped up.

However, the spread between the austral price of the dollar in the
parallel market and the official rate, which since July 1 had been
virtually eliminated, increased to 10.8 percent on August 12.
IMF Board consideration of a one-year, SDR 75 million stand-by
arrangement and SDR 40 million Compensatory Financing Facility (CFF)
for Ecuador, which had been scheduled for August 4, was postponed
because the government failed to take prior actions involving
devaluation of the exchange rate, lowering minimum denominations of
certificates of deposit, and liberalization of import licensing
agreements.

The CFF for Ecuador would be the first facility for an OPEC

member based on an export shortfall that is due to low oil prices.
Ecuador has received commitments for about $180 million for a commercial
bank oil export financing facility (originally planned for $150-200
million).
Peru has recently significantly expanded its restrictions on
servicing its external debt.

For the first time, the government banned

debt service payments on private sector external debt.

Foreign currency

remittances associated with foreign direct investment were also limited.
In addition, existing restrictions on debt servicing of public sector

IV-28
medium- and long-term debt were extended for an indefinite period.

The

only debts that Peru will continue to service are short-term trade
credits (about $100 million in such credits are currently outstanding)
and debts owed to those creditors that are still willing to provide net
new credit to Peru:

i.e., the World Bank, the Inter-American

Development Bank, and some Paris Club governments.
Peruvian officials announced that they plan to pay only about $35
million of the $186 million in arrears that they owe to the IMF by
August 15.

The IMF Executive Board decided in May that if Peru did not

eliminate its arrears to the Fund by August 15 Peru would lose its
eligibility to use IMF resources.

All of these actions by Peru were

taken in the context of a deteriorating trade balance.

At the end of

March, Peru had $2 billion in gross foreign exchange reserves with an
additional 2.5 million ounces in gold reserves.

Since that time Peru is

reported to have lost about $300 million in reserves.
Nigeria is preparing to inaugurate a second-tier foreign exchange
market on or before October 1.

The government has indicated that

transactions for most goods and services (official debt service will
continue to be converted at the official rate) will be channeled through
the second-tier market.

On August 5, in anticipation of the opening of

the second-tier market, the government announced that Nigerians could
hold and trade foreign exchange on the parallel market.

The official

and second-tier rates are expected to be unified within 12 months.

In

anticipation of a unified rate, the government has been adjusting the
official rate downward in small increments on an almost daily basis.

Since June, the naira has been devalued from $0.85 to $0.75.

IV-29
Although the government has consistently opposed a formal IMF
stand-by arrangement with drawings, it may be working toward an
alternative arrangement with quantitative targets and performance
criteria that it could "sell" domestically.

Adoption of an IMF program

could open the way for a $400 million World Bank loan (which would be
used to supply foreign exchange to the second-tier market), and
commercial banks and Paris Club reschedulings.

The banks have already

agreed to defer principal payments until October 1, but Nigeria has
asked for new money as part of a comprehensive rescheduling package.

Early this month, the Philippines and an IMF mission in Manila
reached tentative agreement on a new 18-month, SDR 189 million stand-by
arrangement and an SDR 224 million Compensatory Financing Facility
(CFF).

Prior to Board approval, the government will produce a program

for reforming insolvent government financial institutions and commit
itself to a timetable for continuing the process of liberalizing
imports.

If the reform plan for the government financial institutions

is approved by the World Bank and the entire program is given the green
light by the IMF Management in mid-September, the Fund Board is expected
to approve the program in October.