View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Prefatory Note

The attached document represents the most complete and accurate version
available based on original copies culled from the files of the FOMC Secretariat at the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. This electronic document was
created through a comprehensive digitization process which included identifying the bestpreserved paper copies, scanning those copies, 1 and then making the scanned versions
text-searchable. 2 Though a stringent quality assurance process was employed, some
imperfections may remain.
Please note that this document may contain occasional gaps in the text. These
gaps are the result of a redaction process that removed information obtained on a
confidential basis. All redacted passages are exempt from disclosure under applicable
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

1

In some cases, original copies needed to be photocopied before being scanned into electronic format. All
scanned images were deskewed (to remove the effects of printer- and scanner-introduced tilting) and lightly
cleaned (to remove dark spots caused by staple holes, hole punches, and other blemishes caused after initial
printing).
2
A two-step process was used. An advanced optimal character recognition computer program (OCR) first
created electronic text from the document image. Where the OCR results were inconclusive, staff checked
and corrected the text as necessary. Please note that the numbers and text in charts and tables were not
reliably recognized by the OCR process and were not checked or corrected by staff.

Strictly Confidential (FR)

Class I FOMC

MONETARY POLICY ALTERNATIVES

Prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee
By the staff

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Strictly Confidential (FR)
August 12,

Class I - FOMC

1994

MONETARY POLICY ALTERNATIVES
Recent Developments1
(1)

Consistent with the Committee's decision to maintain the

existing degree of pressure on reserve positions, the intended federal
funds rate was kept unchanged at 4-1/4 percent during the intermeeting
period.

The allowance for adjustment and seasonal borrowing was

raised in several steps over the period, by a total of $125 million,
to accommodate increasing demands for seasonal credit.

The federal

funds rate averaged 4.28 percent in the intermeeting period. 2
(2)

Other market interest rates showed mixed changes

over the intermeeting period.

Rates generally edged lower in the

first half of July, after the FOMC left policy unchanged at its meeting and as incoming data seemed to suggest continued moderation in
aggregate demand and a lower trajectory for System firming.
upper panels of chart.)

(See

However, after the Chairman's Humphrey-

Hawkins testimony and the strong employment report made substantial
near-term tightening appear considerably more likely, rates began to
back up.

Most of the net rate increases over the intermeeting period

were registered on short-term Treasuries, which may have been affected
as well by expectations of a large swing in bill issuance from the
second to the third quarter.

Expected bond market volatility con-

tinued to decline (chart), helping to hold down long-term yields, and
spreads on the standard mortgage instruments stayed relatively nar-

1.
noon,
2.
above
since

Financial market quotations in this section are taken as of
Friday, August 12.
Adjustment plus seasonal borrowing averaged about $22 million
its allowance in the two complete reserve maintenance periods
the last FOMC meeting.

Chart 1

Federal Funds Futures
Percent

Current
Month

t+1

t+2

t+3

t+4

t+5

7/12

7/1

Implied Bond Volatility
Weekly

7/22
1994

8/2

8/12

Treasury Yield Curves
Percent

Percent
FOMC

FOMC

FOMC

July FOMC

F

-.

Feb

Mar

Apr

May
1994

Jun

Jul

Aug

3mo 3

5

7

10

row.

With corporate profit reports for the second quarter gener-

ally better than expected, most stock prices rose 3 to 4 percent over
the intermeeting period.
(3)

The weighted-average foreign exchange value of the dol-

lar was little changed, on balance, over the intermeeting period.

The

currency continued to move lower in early July but seemed to gain some
support from statements about the desirability of a stronger dollar by
U.S. Treasury officials and by Chairman Greenspan at the HumphreyHawkins hearing.

In Japan most interest rates rose 20 to 25 basis

points in response to increasing indications of a turnaround in the
Japanese economy.

Three-month interest rates showed little net change

in Germany, but bond yields there rose 25 basis points.

Bond yields

in Europe generally increased sharply late in the period in the wake
of discount rate increases in Italy and Sweden intended to support the
lira and the krona.
; the Desk did
not intervene.
(4)

Growth of all of the monetary aggregates in July was

considerably stronger than projected at the time of the last FOMC
meeting; although data for early August suggest a return to subdued
expansion, on balance the broad aggregates remain above expected
levels.

M2 and M3 increased at 5 and 6 percent rates, respectively,

last month, leaving these aggregates slightly above the lower ends of
their annual ranges.

Despite the likely depressing effects of declin-

ing mortgage refinancings and compensating balances, demand deposits
expanded at a rapid pace last month, helping to boost M1 growth to a

3. The thirty-year Treasury bond yield fell 12 basis points over
the intermeeting period, but some of this decline reflected the effects of a shift to a newly auctioned bond at the end of the period.

7-1/2 percent rate.4

In addition, a jump in overnight Eurodollars

buoyed the nontransaction components of M2 and M3.

Even aside from

these volatile components, however, M2 accelerated in July, perhaps
owing partly to a resumption of runoffs in bond mutual funds.5
Flows into money market funds were particularly strong, likely benefitting from their close substitutability with bond funds within a
family of funds.

In addition, the contraction of savings and MMDAs

slowed a bit, and the expansion of other checkable and small time
deposits picked up in July, perhaps partly reflecting a greater
appreciation of the protection of principal in deposits.

Rates on

small CDs continued to increase, but their response to rising market
rates this year has been unusually sluggish, and an especially wide
gap to market rates remains.

The continuing attraction of direct

holdings of short- and intermediate-term market instruments is indicated by persistently high levels of noncompetitive tenders in Treasury auctions.

Rather than bid aggressively for retail deposits,

banks have relied on wholesale sources--especially funds raised by
their foreign offices and, recently, in the domestic large CD market-to finance increases in bank credit.
(5)

Bank credit surged in July.

Growth of security holdings

rose, but that pickup primarily reflected revaluation of banks' offbalance sheet positions; banks reduced their holdings of U.S. govern-

4. Total reserves and the monetary base increased in July at 1-3/4
and 8 percent rates, respectively, with currency growth remaining at a
robust 10-1/4 percent pace.
5. M2 plus bond and stock mutual funds is estimated to have
expanded at a 3-3/4 percent rate last month. This aggregate has
increased at a 1 percent pace since the fourth quarter of 1993.

ment securities slightly.6 Much of the jump in overall bank credit
growth was accounted for by a strong pickup in lending.
loans rose at an 17 percent annual rate.

Business

According to responses to

the August Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey, demand for business
loans has increased, reflecting needs to finance inventory and fixed
investment.

Reduced financing in the capital markets as well as bor-

rowing to finance mergers also appear to have prompted a portion of
the recent growth in business loans.7

In the household sector,

consumer loans expanded sharply at banks in July, suggesting that
overall consumer credit about maintained June's strong pace.

In the

aggregate, the expansion of the debt of nonfederal sectors is estimated to have continued in recent months at about the 5 percent pace
of earlier this year.

From the fourth quarter of 1993 through June,

total debt rose at a 5-1/2 percent rate, leaving this aggregate well
within its 4-to-8 percent monitoring range.

6. An interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FIN 39) requires banks to include on their balance sheets the net
value of off-balance-sheet contracts with each individual
counterparty. If the net value of contracts with a given counterparty
is positive, it is included in "other securities holdings" on the
balance sheet; if negative, it is reported as a liability. In
contrast to the first three months of this year, when banks were
phasing in such reporting, the bulk of the rise in "other securities
holdings" in July reflected a revaluation of existing positions. Such
a rise does not necessarily indicate an increase in bank net worth,
however, as offsetting changes may have been recorded on the liability
side.
7. The loan officer survey also suggests that banks continued to
ease terms and standards on business loans over the past three months.

MONEY, CREDIT, AND RESERVE AGGREGATES
(Seasonally adjusted annual rates of growth)
QIV.

May

June

July

to
July

Money and credit aggregates
M1

1.9

3.7

7.6

4.3

M2

.3

-3.2

4.9

1.6

-1.8

-1.1

6.0

0.6

4.8
4.2
5.1

5.2
6.7
4.7

----

5.4
6.2
5.1

1.7

3.2

12.6

7.2

-9.9

-6.7

-0.7

-1.7

-8.4

-4.0

1.8

-1.0

7.6

7.7

8.0

9.1

borrowing

200

333

458

Excess reserves

915

1105

1086

M3
Domestic nonfinancial
debt
Federal
Nonfederal

Bank credit
Reserve measures

Nonborrowed reserves

2

Total reserves
Monetary base
Memo:

(Millions of dollars)
Adjustment plus seasonal

QIV to June for debt aggregates.
Includes "other extended credit" from the Federal Reserve.
NOTE:

Monthly reserve measures, including excess reserves and borrowing, are calculated by prorating averages for two-week reserve
maintenance periods that overlap months. Reserve data incorporate adjustments for discontinuities associated with changes in
reserve requirements.

Monetary Policy Alternatives
(6)

Three monetary policy alternatives are presented for

consideration by the Committee.

Under alternative B, federal funds

would continue to trade around 4-1/4 percent in association with retaining the $450 million allowance for adjustment plus seasonal borrowing.8 Under alternative C, the federal funds rate would be
raised to 4-1/2 percent and the initial borrowing allowance to $475
million.

Under alternative D, the funds rate would be moved to 4-3/4

percent, either through an increase in the initial borrowing allowance
to $500 million or a hike in the discount rate to 4 percent and unchanged adjustment plus seasonal borrowing.
(7)

In the staff economic forecast, the federal funds rate

rises a full percentage point by early next year and remains at that
higher level over the balance of 1995.

The economy is already essen-

tially at potential, and aggregate demand will continue to be bolstered by, among other factors, the aggressive lending posture adopted
by banks and by foreign demands for the U.S. goods and services owing
to the lower dollar and stronger growth abroad.

In these circum-

stances, further policy tightening is seen as needed to hold total
output at potential to keep inflation from rising.

The Greenbook rate

assumption does not necessarily entail a tightening at the August FOMC
meeting itself, but it does imply that the upward trajectory of shortterm rates will be resumed fairly promptly.
(8)

Alternative B might be preferred if it were thought that

there would be less strength in the economy than in the staff forecast.

Such a view might follow from placing more weight on recent

8. Later in the intermeeting period it may prove necessary to
reduce the borrowing allowance a little to reflect the onset of the
typical unwinding of the summer bulge in seasonal borrowing.

soft spending indicators, on undesired inventory buildups, or on the
effects of previous policy tightenings.

Waiting for more clarifica-

tion of how much slowing in spending growth is already in train would
be seen as posing fewer risks than implied in the staff forecast if it
were thought that favorable readings on price indexes suggested that
some slack remained in the economy.
(9)

Market participants now seem to expect at least a 25

basis point increase in the federal funds rate at the August meeting,
with some possibility of a 50 basis point increase;
funds rate is anticipated by late September.

a 4-3/4 percent

In these circumstances,

the choice of no change in the stance of policy under alternative B
would result in some decline in short-term interest rates, and the
dollar might tend to weaken on foreign exchange markets.
rates could move lower, at least initially.

Long-term

Market participants might

view the absence of action as indicating a milder degree of tightening
into the future as well--perhaps because the Federal Reserve saw less
inflation in the outlook than previously thought.

However, rate de-

clines would be limited to the extent that market participants questioned the Fed's anti-inflation resolve; absent subsequent data pointing to further weakening in aggregate demand or surprisingly modest
price pressures, concerns about inflation would mount, pushing up
longer-term interest rates.
(10)

A tightening of reserve conditions might seem appropriate

if the Committee saw significant risks of greater inflation from the
pressure of demand on available resources under an unchanged policy.
immediate rise in short-term interest rates might also be seen as more
consistent with the Committee's longer-run intention to make progress

An

toward price stability.

The question in these circumstances would be

how large an increase in the federal funds rate should be sought.
(11)

Alternative C embodies a move of 25 basis points.

An

increase of this size, by itself, would be unlikely to have a substantial effect on spending or prices, but a small tightening could lend
assurance that policy had firmed enough to keep the economy around its
potential.

Although further tightening could prove to be necessary, the

Committee might judge that the case for a larger move is not yet established.

As noted above, alternative C is about what is built into the

structure of market interest rates, and neither interest nor exchange
rates are likely to react very strongly to such an action.

However,

this would be the first move since the announcement in May that excess
accommodation had been substantially removed and could be seen as marking a return to the usual practice of reacting to incoming data with
small changes in reserve conditions.

Markets could become somewhat more

unsettled and volatile, especially if the rise in short-term rates were
perceived as less than needed and therefore likely to be followed by
another increase but of uncertain timing.
(12)

The more forceful move of alternative D might be chosen

if the Committee viewed the economic situation as highly likely to
require substantial additional monetary tightening, for example, of the
scope embodied in the steep tilt to the yield curve over the next few
years.

Alternatively, the Committee also might take this action if it

believed that only moderate further tightening were required to hold
inflation in check.

In this regard, the 50 basis points of alternative

D would imply more assurance of this outcome than alternative C and,
therefore, would be more likely to be followed by a period of stability
of short-term rates.

Given these alternative rationales, the Committee

might want to explain its reasoning publicly--an opportunity for which
would naturally occur if the increase were accomplished through a hike
in the discount rate.

The market response might depend importantly on

how the action was perceived.

If the market saw it as one of a series

of further steps, interest rates could rise substantially along the
maturity spectrum.

On the other hand, if markets saw the increase as

the last at least for a time, short-term rates would rise, but intermediate- and possibly long-term rates might move very little.

Some

forward rates would be revised down and reductions in expected volatil-

ity might lower risk premiums on longer-term assets.
(13)

Under all of the alternatives, borrowing by nonfederal

sectors is expected to remain around the pace of recent months.

Bor-

rowing by nonfinancial businesses will be buoyed by further increases in
external financing needs and large cash-for-equity merger transactions.
The more aggressive posture of bank lenders and the higher levels of
bond rates since earlier this year suggest that banks will continue to
be a major source of credit in the months ahead, although businesses
are likely to take advantage of any intermittent rallies in the bond
market to lengthen debt maturities.

Still-large outlays for housing and

consumer durables will boost growth in mortgage and consumer credit to a
pace roughly in line with that of personal disposable income.

With

federal debt growth firming a bit in the months ahead, total debt of
domestic nonfinancial sectors is projected to grow at nearly a 5 percent
pace over the remainder of the year--placing annual growth in this
aggregate at 5-1/4 percent, in the lower half of its 4 to 8 percent
monitoring range.
(14)

Growth of the monetary aggregates over July to December

is presented below for alternatives B and D.

The path for alternative B

-10-

is based on the assumption of no change in the federal funds rate for
the rest of this year.

Alternative D assumes a 50 basis point increase

in the funds rate at this meeting and no change thereafter. 9

(Money

growth under the reserve conditions of alternative C would lie half way
between alternatives B and D.)

Alt. B

Alt. D

Growth from July to December
1

M2

1-1/2

M3
M1

3/4
3

1/2
2-1/4

1-1/2
1/2
4

1-1/4
1/2
3-1/2

Implied growth 93Q4 to 94Q4
M2
M3
M1

(15)

M2 would grow at a 1-1/2 percent rate over the July-to-

December period under alternative B, down from the July pace but
quicker than that over the first six months of the year.

Acting to

boost growth in this aggregate would be some narrowing of opportunity
costs as deposit rates, especially those on small time deposits, moved
up in lagged response to earlier increases in market rates.

Renewed

outflows from bond mutual funds over recent weeks, even as bond rates

9. The interest rate path of the Greenbook forecast, because it
assumes continuing increases over the balance of the year, corresponds
to none of the bluebook alternatives. With the interest rates and
nominal income of the Greenbook, the staff would expect M2 growth at a
1 percent rate for the July-to-December period and 1-1/2 percent for
the year, and M3 growth at a 1/2 percent pace for both intervals; M1
growth would be at a 2-1/4 percent rate from July to December and
3-3/4 percent for the year. Although these money growth rates are
roughly the same as those projected for alternative D, the higher
year-end level of rates assumed in the Greenbook implies slower growth
of money and income in the first half of 1995 than would
alternative D.

Alternative Levels and Growth Rates for Key Monetary Aggregates
M3

M2

Levels in Billions
May-94
Jun-94
Jul-94
Aug-94
Sep-94
Oct-94
Nov-94
Dec-94
Monthly Growth Rates
Jun-94
Jul-94
Aug-94
Sep-94
Oct-94
Nov-94
Dec-94

M1

Alt. B

Alt. D

Alt. B

Alt. D

Alt. B

Alt. D

3590.9
3581.3
3595.9
3599.2
3604.6
3609.7
3614.5
3618.7

3590.9
3581.3
3595.9
3598.6
3601.6

4216.3
4212.5
4233.4
4237.3
4239.4
4241.4
4243.5
4245.6

4216.3
4212.5
4233.4
4236.6
4237.3
4237.5
4238.6
4239.6

1142.9
1146.4
1153.7
1155.5
1158.8
1162.1
1165.0
1167.9

1142.9
1146.4
1153.7
1155.2
1157.5
1159.6
1161.8
1164.1

3604.0

3606.4
3608.8

-3.2
4.9
1.1
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.4

-3.2
4.9
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8

-1.1
6.0
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6

-1.1
6.0
0.9
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.3

3.7
7.6
1.9
3.4
3.4
3.0
3.0

3.7
7.6
1.6
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.4

Quarterly Averages
94 Q1
94 Q2
94 Q3
94 Q4

1.8
1.4
1.4
1.6

1.8
1.4
1.3
0.9

0.2
-0.1
1.8
0.6

0.2
-0.1
1.8
0.3

6.0
1.9
4.4
3.1

6.0
1.9
4.2
2.2

Growth Rate
To
From
Dec-93
Jul-94
Jul-94
Dec-94

1.4
1.5

1.4
0.9

0.1
0.7

0.1
0.4

3.8
3.0

3.8
2.2

93 Q4

Jul-94

1.6

1.6

0.6

0.6

4.3

4.3

91 Q4
92 Q4
93 Q4

92 Q4
93 Q4
94 Q4

1.9
1.4
1.6

1.9
1.4
1.3

0.5
0.6
0.6

0.5
0.6
0.5

14.3
10.5
3.9

14.3

1994 Target Ranges:

1

to

5

0

to

4

10.5

3.6

Chart 2

ACTUAL AND TARGETED M2
Billions of Dollars

3800
*

Actual Level
Short-Run Alternatives

3750

3700

-1 3650
~~~..
''~'
*

a
o

-1 3600

3550

-1

I
O

I

N
D
1993

I

I
J

I
F

I
M

I
A

I
M

I
J

J
1994

I

I
A

I
S

I
O

I
N

D

J

3500

3450

Chart 3

ACTUAL AND TARGETED M3
Billions of Dollars

4450
-

Actual Level

*

Short-Run Alternatives

--

4400

4350

*
*

S 1I
O

N
1993

1I 1
D

J

1
F

I
M

I
A

I
M

I
J

I

J
A
1994

I
S

I
O

I
N

8
D

-1

4300

-1

4250

-1

4200

-4

4150

-1

4100

I

D

J

4050

Chart 4

M1
Billions of Dollars

1320
15%

Actual Level

--

*

Short-Run Alternatives

1300

-1280

-1260

- 1240

- 1220

- 1200

**

.* *
-

.

*

*

1180

D

1160

o

1140
0%

..............................................................................

I

L

ON

I
D

1993

I
J

I
F

l

I
M

A

l
M

l
J

J
1994

l

l
A

l
S

1120

l

i
N

D

J

Chart 5

DEBT
Billions of Dollars

13400
S
*

Actual Level
Projected Level

13200

13000

12800

12600

12400

12200

O

N
1993

D

J

F

M

A

M

J

J
1994

ASO

N

D

J

12000

-12-

have fluctuated around levels attained in the spring, suggest that
households may continue to rebalance portfolios in a way that might
also impart some upward tilt to growth of the broader aggregates.
Restraining monetary growth is some projected slowing of nominal
income growth, even under the unchanged interest rate assumptions of
this alternative.10

M2 velocity would rise at around a 3 percent

rate in the third and fourth quarters, somewhat slower than over the
first half and about in line with predictions of traditional models of
money demand.11

M3 is projected to grow at a 3/4 percent pace in

the July-to-December period, a bit less slowly than in the first half
of the year.

Abstracting from the effects of FIN 39, we expect a

little more growth in bank credit over the second half of the year-though not a persistence of the unusually rapid increase in July.
Moreover, with short-term rates unchanged under alternative B, institution-only money funds should be stable after large runoffs through
the spring.
(16)

Under alternative D, M2 would grow at a 1 percent rate

over the July-to-December period.

Opportunity costs would widen under

this alternative, particularly damping M1 and savings deposits.

How-

ever, if bond yields backed up under this alternative, the additional
capital losses might accentuate a redirection of savings back into M2,
offsetting some of this restraining effect.

M3 would grow at only a

10. M1 would expand at about a 3 percent rate over the July-toDecember period under alternative B.
Continued rapid currency growth
would account for this expansion, as higher opportunity costs reached
earlier this year and slow mortgage refinancing activity hold
transaction deposits about flat. The monetary base would grow at a
7-1/2 percent rate and total reserves would contract at a 3 percent
rate over this period.
11. M2+ is predicted to grow a little more rapidly than M2 over the
second half of this year, but not as fast as nominal output, and its
velocity would still register an appreciable increase.

-13-

1/2 percent rate from July to December, as institution-only money
funds ran off appreciably owing to their lagging yields.

-14-

Directive Language
(17)
paragraph that

Presented below is draft wording for the operational
includes the usual options

for Committee consideration.

OPERATIONAL PARAGRAPH
In the implementation of policy for the immediate
future, the Committee seeks to DECREASE

SOMEWHAT/ main-

tain/INCREASE SOMEWHAT the existing degree of pressure
on reserve positions.

In the context of the Commit-

tee's long-run objectives for price stability and sustainable economic growth, and giving careful consideration to economic, financial, and monetary developments,
slightly (SOMEWHAT) greater reserve restraint would/
MIGHT or slightly

(SOMEWHAT) lesser reserve restraint

WOULD/might be acceptable in the intermeeting period.
The contemplated reserve conditions are expected to be
consistent with modest growth in M2 and M3 over coming
months.

August 1b, 1994
SELECTED INTEREST RATES
(percent)
Short-Term

Long-Term
money

CDs

corporate

conventional home mortgages

federal

Treasury bills

secondary

comm.

market

bank

U.S. government constant

A-utility

funds

secondary market
3-month I 6-month I 1-year
2
3
4

market
3-month
5

paper
1-month
6

mutual
fund
7

prime
loan
8

maturity yields
3-year I 10-year
30-year
9
10
11

recently
offered
12

Bond
Buyer
13

fixed-rate

1

municipal secondary
market
14

primary
market
lixed-rate
ARM
15
16

93 -- High
-- Low

3.24
2.87

3.12
2.82

3.27
2.94

3.48
3.07

3.36
3.06

3.44
3.07

2.92
2.59

6.00
6.00

5.06
4.07

6.73
5.24

7.46
5.83

8.28
6.79

6.44
5.41

8.17
6.72

8.14
6.74

5.36
4.14

94 -- High
-- Low
Monthly
Aug 93
Sep 93
Oct 93
Nov 93
Dec 93

4.38
2.97

4.42
2.94

4.87
3.12

5.24
3.35

4.79
3.11

4.55
3.11

3.85
2.68

7.25
6.00

6.57
4.44

7.41
5.70

7.68
6.25

8.57
7.16

6.60
5.49

8.98
7.02

8.77
6.97

5.58
4.12

3.03
3.09
2.99
3.02
2.96

3.02
2.95
3.02
3.10
3.06

3.14
3.06
3.12
3.26
3.23

3.30
3.22
3.25
3.42
3.45

3.14
3.12
3.24
3.35
3.26

3.14
3.14
3.14
3.15
3.35

2.64
2.65
2.65
2.66
2.70

6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00

4.36
4.17
4.18
4.50
4.54

5.68
5.36
5.33
5.72
5.77

6.32
6.00
5.94
6.21
6.25

7.16
6.94
6.91
7.25
7.28

5.67
5.50
5.48
5.71
5.59

7.05
6.89
6.85
7.32
7.27

7.11
6.92
6.83
7.16
7.17

4.48
4.36
4.25
4.24
4.23

Jan 94
Feb 94
Mar 94
Apr 94
ay 94
Jun 94
Jul
94
Weekly
Apr 27 94

3.05
3.25
3.34
3.56
4.01
4.25
4.26

2.98
3.25
3.50
3.68
4.14
4.14
4.33

3.15
3.43
3.78
4.09
4.60
4.55
4.75

3.39
3.69
4.11
4.57
5.03
4.98
5.17

3.15
3.43
3.77
4.01
4.51
4.52
4.73

3.14
3.39
3.63
3.81
4.28
4.36
4.49

2.71
2.73
2.86
3.03
3.29
3.61
3.75

6.00
6.00
6.06
6.45
6.99
7.25
7.25

4.48
4.83
5.40
5.99
6.34
6.27
6.48

5.75
5.97
6.48
6.97
7.18
7.10
7.30

6.29
6.49
6.91
7.27
7.41
7.40
7.58

7.24
7.45
7.82
8.20
8.37
8.30
8.45

5.54
5.65
6.16
6.48
6.46
6.38
6.48

7.12
7.35
7.96
8.55
8.78
8.62
8.82

7.06
7.15
7.68
8.32
8.60
8.40
8.61

4.21
4.20
4.55
4.96
5.46
5.45
5.52

3.59

3.78

4.21

4.64

4.10

3.88

3.13

6.75

6.01

6.89

7.17

8.27

6.42

8.69

8.32

5.15

May
May
May
May

4
11
18
25

94
94
94
94

3.76
3.70
4.02
4.22

3.95
4.18
4.16
4.17

4.37
4.68
4.64
4.57

4.86
5.14
5.07
4.93

4.22
4.61
4.61
4.48

3.95
4.29
4.36
4.32

3.15
3.24
3.31
3.47

6.75
6.75
6.89
7.25

6.21
6.50
6.35
6.22

7.09
7.34
7.19
7.10

7.33
7.52
7.41
7.35

8.51
8.46
8.23
8.30

6.43
6.60
6.41
6.41

8.89
8.98
8.50
8.76

8.53
8.77
8.56
8.53

5.25
5.54
5.58
5.48

Jun
Jun
Jun
Jun
Jun

1
8
15
22
29

94
94
94
94
94

4.27
4.13
4.21
4.19
4.19

4.17
4.11
4.12
4.15
4.16

4.63
4.52
4.51
4.53
4.58

5.06
4.92
4.90
4.94
5.11

4.51
4.47
4.44
4.49
4.62

4.35
4.35
4.32
4.35
4.41

3.51
3.57
3.59
3.63
3.64

7.25
7.25
7.25
7.25
7.25

6.32
6.16
6.19
6.28
6.38

7.13
6.97
7.04
7.14
7.20

7.40
7.27
7.34
7.44
7.48

8.19
8.21
8.32
8.41
8.49

6.38
6.20
6.34
6.43
6.56

8.71
8.49
8.61
8.68
8.89

8.55
8.25
8.33
8.46
8.57

5.52
5.45
5.43
5.41
5.48

Jul
Jul
Jul
Jul

6
13
20
27

94
94
94
94

4.38
4.30
4.30
4.28

4.21
4.38
4.27
4.39

4.67
4.83
4.67
4.79

5.19
5.23
5.06
5.23

4.78
4.79
4.66
4.69

4.52
4.55
4.47
4.46

3.70
3.75
3.78
3.80

7.25
7.25
7.25
7.25

6.50
6.57
6.37
6.49

7.33
7.41
7.22
7.29

7.62
7.68
7.52
7.56

8.57
8.42
8.45
8.27

6.52
6.47
6.46
6.47

8.91
8.79
8.82
8.71

8.68
8.72
8.52
8.57

5.56
5.58
5.46
5.54

Aug
Aug

3 94
10 94

4.28
4.26

4.33
4.42

4.74
4.87

5.12
5.24

4.68
4.75

4.45
4.50

3.83
3.85

7.25
7.25

6.36
6.52

7.15
7.26

7.43
7.52

8.37
8.35

6.37
6.49

8.82
8.84

8.38
8.57

5.50
5.56

Daily
Aug
Aug
Aug

5 94
11 94
12 94

4.28
4.22
4.20p

4.46
4.34
4.38

4.90
4.92
4.90

5.28
5.30
5.28

4.77
4.79
4.79

4.49
4.54
4.61

7.25
7.25
7.25

6.55
6.61
6.57

7.28
7.36
7.27

7.54
7.56
7.48

---

-

.5

NOTE: Weekly data for columns 1 through 11 are statement week averages. Data in column 7 are taken from Donoghue's Money Fund Report. Columns 12,13 and 14 are 1-day quotes for Friday, Thursday or Friday, respectively,
following the end of the statement week. Column 13 is the Bond Buyer revenue index. Column 14 is the FNMA purchase yield, plus loan servicing lee, on 30-day mandatory delivery commitments. Column 15 is the average
contract rate on new commitments for fixed-rate mortgages (FRMs) with 80 percent loan-to-value ratios at major institutional lenders. Column 16 is the average initial contract rate on new commitments for 1-year, adjustablerate mortgages (ARMs) at major institutional lenders offering both FRMs and ARMs with the same number of discount points.
p - preliminary data

Strictly Confidential (FR)-

Class II FOMC

Money and Credit Aggregate Measures

AUGUST 15, 1994

Seasonally adjusted

_____Moiney
stock

measures and liquid assets

Bank credit

nontransactions components

Period

Annual growth rates(%):
Annually (Q4 to Q4)
1991
1992
1993

M1

M2

1

2

In M2

In M3 only

3

4

Domestic noninancial debt'

total loans

M3

L

5

6

investments'

and

U. S.
government'

other'

total

7

8

9

1

2

7.9
14.3
10.5

2.9
1.9
1.4

1.2
-2.4
-2.3

-6.0
-6.3
-3.5

1.2
0.5
0.6

0.4
1.4
1.1

3.5
3.7
4.9

11.3
10.7
8.4

2.6
3.2
3.8

4.6
5.0
5.0

12.0
9.4
6.0
1.9

2.5
2.3
1.8
1.4

-1.7
-0.8
-0.1
1.2

-6.7
4.0
-8,9
-8.7

1.0
2.6
0.2
-0.1

1.0
1.9
2.3
0.5

6.8
3.1
6,8
6.9

9.2
5.5
7.1
5.2

4.8
4.9
5.3
4.9

6.0
5.0
5.8
5.0

11.4
9.4
10.7
9.0
9.7
6.4

1.7
0.8
2.8
1.2
4.2
2.5

-2.5
-3.0
-0.8
-2.3
1.6
0.7

-10.6
-4.6
1.5
7.4
2.6
10.2

-0.3
-0.0
2.6
2.2
3.9
3.7

-0.8
2.0
-1.6
2.5
3.2
4.8

9.0
1.7
3.1
0.9
6.3
5.2

7.4
9.1
7.0
-1.8
9.1
13.3

5.3
3.8
5.6
5.7
3.3
5.0

5.9
5.2
6.0
3.7
4.8
7.2

Quarterly Average

1993-3rd
1993-4th
1994-ist
1994-2nd

QIR.
QTR.
QTR.
QTR.

Monthly
1993-JULY
AUG.
SEP.
OCT.
NOV.
DEC.
1994-JAN.

5.4

1.7

0.0

-2.0

1.2

4.7

7.6

3.0

7.1

6.0

5.4

-1.3

-4.4

-42.3

-7.7

-2.8

5.3

5.2

4.4

4.6

4.0

4.7

5.0

-12.0

2.2

-0.1

10.5

9.0

4.0

5.4

-1.4
1.9
3.7
7.6

2.3
0.3
-3.2
4.9

4.0
-0.3
-6.4
3.6

2.1
-14.2
10.9
12.4

2.3
-1.8
-1.1
6.0

4.2
-1.1
-2.8

9.8
1.7
3.2
12.6

2.9
4.2
6.8

5.7
5.1
4.7

4.9
4.8
5.2

1142.4
1141.1
1142.9
1146.4
1153.7

3582.9
3589.9
3590.9
3581.3
3595.9

2440.5
2448.7
2448.0
2434.9
2442.2

631.8
632.9
625.4
631.1
637.6

4214.7
4222.8
4216.3
4212.5
4233.4

5139.8
5157.9
5153.2
5141.1

3165.6
3191.4
3195.9
3204.3
3237.9

3375.4
3383.6
3395.4
3414.5

9107.7
9150.6
9189.3
9225.1

12483.2
12534.2
12584.6
12639.6

4
11
18
25 p

1145.4
1149.9
1152.5
1158.2

3589.8
3590.5
3594.8
3600.7

2444.4
2440.6
2442.3
2442.5

631.6
635.0
637.5
643.3

4221.4
4225.5
4232.3
4244.1

1 p

1159.2

3601.3

2442.2

637.9

4239.2

EBB.
MAR.

APR.
MAY
JUNE
JULY p
Levels ($Billion)
Monthly
1994-MAR.
APR.
KAY

JUNE

JULY p
Weekly
1994-JULY

AUG.

:

1.
2.

Adjusted for breaks caused by recassifications.
Debt data are on a monthly average basis, derived by averaging end-of-month levels of adjacent months, and have been adjusted to remove discontinuities.

p
pe

preliminary
preliminary estimate

Strictly Confidential (FR)Class II FOMC

Components of Money Stock and Related Measures

AUGUST 15. 1994

Seasonally adjusted unless otherwise noted

P

o

Currency

e

Other
checkable

Overnight
RPs and
uro-

3

4

Sain

Small
denomination

Money market
mutual funds
general
purpose
Institutions

Large
denomintion

Term
AP'

Term
Euro-

Savings

Short-term
er
Commercal

ank
B e

dealerd
1

LevelsJ
( Bi.L.ons) :
Annually (4th Qtr.)
1991
1992
1993

2

5

8

7

8

10

12

13

19
14

265.6
289.7
319.5

286.3
337.1
382.1

328.8
380.1
411.9

77.5
81.2
90.6

1027.8
1177.9
1212.1

1082.8
883.0
790.4

369.7
354.0
346.7

174.4
206.5
195.4

433.1
365.3
340.0

74.7
80.9
94.5

137.0
154.4
170.9

321.1
327.7
325.9

334.0
366.3
385.2

24.5
20.5
15.4

Monthly
1993-JULY
AUG.
SEP.

309.7
312.4
315.4

366.4
370.9
375.4

402.8
404.2
406.6

81.1
82.1
85.4

1202.1
1205.9
1208.4

814.5
806.6
799.9

346.6
345.5
345.0

192.6
190.1
190.8

341.8
341.6
340.4

96.4
96.0
95.6

167.1
168.2
169.2

344.3
343.8
328.0

370.4
379.5
378.4

17.4
16.5
16.4

OCT.
NOV.
DEC.

317.6
319.5
321.4

378.4
383.2
384.8

409.5
411.8
414.3

89.4
90.4
92.1

1208.8
1211.9
1215.5

794.9
790.6
785.6

344.4
347.0
348.8

194.3
194.8
197.0

341.6
339.4
339.0

94.2
94.0
95.3

170.1
170.8
171.7

323.7
324.6
329.3

384.7
384.1
386.8

16.4
15.3
14.6

1994-JAN.
MAR.

325.2
329.2
332.4

388.3
390.3
390.0

412.0
411.2
411.9

94.8
93.0
97.9

1220.3
1220.9
1221.9

779.5
774.5
771.1

347.8
343.7
348.4

192.7
176.9
177.4

341.5
335.7
330.9

91.3
89.3
91.2

172.7
173.4
174.1

339.1
341.6
345.8

391.6
403.0
389.6

14.9
15.3
15.7

APR.
MAY
JUNE

334.8
337.6
340.3

388.9
385.8
386.6

409.3
411.2
411.4

94.6
94.6
96.3

1220.7
1215.9
1207.2

768.6
769.1
770.4

361.5
365.1
359.3

177.0
169.3
169.5

330.6
333.5
333.8

94.2
91.7
95.3

174.8
175.7
176.6

361.3
358.8
349.0

384.9
391.0
392.6

14.1
11.4
10.5

JULY p

343.2

389.5

412.7

1202.2

772.5

363.5

170.9

336.9

95.7

FEB.

101.5

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Net of money market mutual fund holdings of these items.
Includes money market deposit accounts.
Includes retail repurchase agreements. All IRA and Keogh accounts at commercial banks and thrift institutions are subtracted from small time deposits.
Excludes IRA and Keogh accounts.
Net of large denomination time deposits held by money market mutual funds, depository Institutions, U.S. government, and foreign banks and official institutions.

p

preliminary

NET CHANGES IN SYSTEM HOLDINGS OF SECURITES
Millions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted

August 12, 1994
Treasury bills
Period

Net
2
purchases
20,038
13,086
17,717

7,749
1,268
8,700

1994 ---Q1
---02

2,164
6,639

1993 August
September
October
November
December

902
366
1,396
5,911
1,394

1994 January
February
March
April
May
June

1,264
900
1,101
1,395
4,143

July

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL (FR)
CLASS II-FOMC

1

Treasurycoupons

Redemptionswi
I
(-)

tNet
change

hin

eNetp urchases 3
withi nRedemptions e
5-10
year
1-5

|

over 10

Federal
agencies
redemptions

Net
Change

(-)

Net change
outright
holdings
total 4

g
Net RPs

19,038
11,486
17,249

3,043
1,096
1,223

6,583
13,118
10,350

375
2,333
3,457

11,282
19,365
19,198

27,726
30,219
35,374

-1,614
-13,215
5,974

---

7,749
1,268
8,232

279
244
511
189

1,441
2,490
3,700
2,719

705
1,110
817
826

3,141
4,990
6,326
4,742

2,851
12,648
7,067
12,807

-461
10,624
-8,644
4,455

-----

2,164
6,639

147
364

1,413
2,817

2,665
4,754

4,418
11,086

-11,663
17,719

902
366
927
5,911
1,394

100
411

1,100
2,400

1,800
4,326

100
189

2,619

100
4,642

2,577
4,656
857
5,996
5,954

4,528
1,262
-6,723
7,232
3,947

-817
1,163
4,073
5,520
1,480
4,085
-322

-7,757
-3,946
40
8,208
5,441
4,070
-5,023

-51

3,059
3,490
-3,849
2,682
2,161
1,471
-5,396
2,127
435
94
2,042
1,009
-864
-3,057
2,321
144

1,000
1,600
468

468

----468
-

1,103
1,117

618
896

616
440

-616
147
209
155

3,281
4,599
155
--_~
---

---

Weekly
April 27
May 4
11
18
25
June 1
8
15
22
29
July 6
13
20
27
August 3
10
Memo: LEVEL (bil. $)6
August 10

---

350
1,045
3,750

-25
350
1,045
3,750

5

310
1,195
3,750
-26

150
203.9
~-~--

246
147

246
147

214
147

203.

-302
-20
184

184

184

176.9

1. Change from end-of-period to end-of-period.
2. Outright transactions in market and with foreign accounts.
3. Outright transactions in market and with foreign accounts, and short-term notes acquired
in exchange for maturing bills. Excludes maturity shifts and rollovers of maturing issues.

86.6

25.0

33.1

348.6

I

359.6

4. Reflects net change in redemptions (-) of Treasury and agency securities.
5. Includes change in RPs (+), matched sale-purchase transactions (-), and matched purchase sale transactions (+).
6. The levels of agency issues were as follows:
I
I
....1 year
1-5
5-10
over 10
total
3.9
0.0
0.6
1.8
1.5
August 10

6.4

I