View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL
HOME
LOAN
BANK
Vol. 12, No. 2




Washington, D. C.

NOVEMBER 1945

Probably the most pressing problem of
today for financial institutions is the challenge of
tomorrow.

Conservative, since they are trustees

for other people's money, and having much at
stake in the form of prewar investments, they
must be especially alert to the needs of rapidly
changing social conditions.

Safety will not be

achieved simply by holding fast to the anchors of
yesterday but by adjusting the financial processes
to the needs of the new day.

General Manager,
Federal Savings and Loan
Insurance Corporation

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

Contents
Page
SHOULD COMMISSIONS BE PAID TO SECURE S A V INGS?
By Ralph H. Richards, President, FHL Bank of Pittsburgh.

Vol.12

No. 2

NOVEMBER 1945
The Federal Home Loan Bank Review
is published monthly by the Federal
Home Loan Bank Administration under
the direction of a staff editorial committee. This committee is responsible
for interpretations, opinions, summaries,
and other text, except that which appears in the form of official statements
and signed articles.
Each issue is written for executives of
thrift and home financing institutions,
especially those whose organizations are
insured by the Federal Savings and
Loan Insurance Corporation and are
members of the Federal Home Loan
Bank System.
Communications

concerning

FULL EMPLOYMENT BRINGS RECORD G A I N IN S A V INGS OF INDIVIDUALS
An analysis of what war has done to selected types of
savings.
DISPOSITION O F TEMPORARY W A R H O U S I N G OFFERS
A D V A N C E MATERIALS SUPPLY
A preview of an exhibit showing possibilities for re-use of
these units.
CHARACTERISTICS O F NEW H O U S I N G BEFORE THE
WAR
Based on a study by the Bureau of the Census.

31

34

42

43

STATISTICAL D A T A
New fam ily dwelling units
Building costs
Savings and loan lending
Mortgage recordings
Sales of U. S. war savings bonds.
F H A activity
Federal Home Loan Banks
Insured savings and loan associations
Savings held by institutions

.

54-55
55-56
56-57
57-58
58
58
58
59
59

REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
Directory Changes of Member, Federal and Insured Institutions
Worth Repeating
News Notes
Bookshelf
Monthly Survey

38
39
40
46
49

material

which has been printed or which is desired for publication should be sent to
the Editor of the Review, Federal Home
Loan Bank Building, Washington 25,

Contents of this publication are not copyrighted

D. C.
• •

•

The Federal Home Loan Bank Administration assumes no responsibility for
material obtained from sources other
than itself or other instrumentalities of
the Federal Government.

30




SUBSCRIPTION PRICE OF REVIEW.—A copy of the REVIEW is sent to each member and insured institution without charge. To others the annual subscription price, which covers the cost
of paper and printing, is $1. Single copies will be sold at 10 cents. Outside of the United States,
Canada, Mexico and the insular possessions, subscription price is $1.60; single copies, 15 cents.
Subscriptions and orders for individual copies should be sent with remittances to the Superintendent
of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C.

APPROVED BY THE BUREAU OF THE BUDGET

Federal Home Loan Bank Revi

SHOULD COMMISSIONS BE PAID TO SECURE
MORTGAGE LOANS?
This article is the counterpart of one by the same author in the August
REVIEW on the payment of commissions to secure new savings. Following a critical evaluation of brokerage services in obtaining new
loans, some specific recommendations for curbing this practice are
outlined.
By RALPH H. R I C H A R D S , President
Federal Home Loan Bank oj Pittsburgh
•

T H I S discussion might be considered a sequel to
a former article published in the August issue of

the

FEDERAL H O M E LOAN B A N K

REVIEW

on

the

subject, "Should Commissions Be Paid To Secure
Savings Accounts?" T h a t discussion took a stand
in opposition to the payment of commissions for
obtaining savings, under any circumstances.
This article will deal with commissions paid to
obtain mortgage loans, which practice is quite
prevalent in many cities of the country. The extent
to which this practice is followed varies with the
degree of the intensity of competition for mortgage
loans both within the savings and loan industry
and other lending agencies. Payment of commissions to brokers for obtaining mortgage loans should
not be confused with the purchase of mortgages
which have already been originated and for which a
premium is paid. I t appears that the two situations,
obtaining share capital and mortgage loans on a
commission paying basis, are not exactly comparable
and for that reason this discussion will concede that
in exceptional cases there may be some justification
for the payment of commissions to obtain the highest
grade mortgage risks. To be more specific, the
payment of commissions for obtaining mortgage
loans is never justified as long as savings and loan
associations are competing strictly among themselves,
but there may be some justification if other mortgage
lenders insist upon paying commissions for mortgage
business.
Share capital is not always a local problem, since
savings money is apt to be somewhat mobile and
will be attracted from other parts of the country,
with or without commissions, where the rate of
return is higher than that obtainable in the investor's
immediate neighborhood.
With few exceptions,
funds loaned on the security of home mortgages are
likely to be largely disbursed in the immediate terriNovember 1945




tory where the association is operating, which means
that mortgage lending is a local problem. Therefore,
the supply of mortgages, the prevailing rates of
interest, and the incentive to pay commissions are
dictated by conditions peculiar to different localities
throughout the United States. It goes without saying that the commission incentive is present only in
times of an abundant supply of funds seeking investment against a rather limited supply of mortgages.
This condition has been and still is present to such a
degree that it has given rise to the widespread
employment of the commission-paying practice.
I t would be inconceivable to contemplate the payment of commissions for mortgages when the situation
is reversed.
Competitive Results
Our competitors outside the savings and loan business, like ourselves, have much money awaiting
investment in sound mortgages on homes. For the
most part, mortgage business today is created by the
sale of existing real estate. Since the war brought
about a virtual cessation of new home construction,
there has been only so much real estate to be sold,
hence only so much mortgage business to be originated. Thus, it is but natural that all active lenders
will vie for the lessened volume of desirable mortgages that are created by the sale of existing properties. If our competitors outside the savings and
loan business originate the practice of paying bonuses
or commissions to brokers for mortgage business,
are we not placed in the competitive position of
having to do likewise? Therefore, as against the
outside competitor, associations in many localities
are compelled to deal with the source of supply if
they wish to obtain any volume of the high grade
home loans that today command a premium in
brokerage circles. In other words, the situation is
different where associations are competing among
themselves exclusively, as compared to localities
where there is keen competition from other lending
31

agencies outside the savings and loan business.
Certainly, there exists a limited supply of very high
grade home mortgage loans sought by outside
lenders for which savings and loan management
might consider paying a commission. If this type of
outside competition is not met, it follows that our
associations will obtain only inferior loans, the
superior ones going to other institutions willing to
pay commissions. In a situation such as this, payment of a commission is probably justified where the
application is for a low percentage top-grade risk.
Just where this line of distinction is to be drawn
must, of course, be determined upon existing conditions which are peculiar to each locality.
Non-Creative
On the other hand, the payment of commissions for
mortgage loans does not by any stretch of the
imagination result in the creation of new business.
The same number of houses are available, hence the
same number of potential mortgages. Some may
reason, however, that sales are greater in times like
these and anything which stimulates sales does
result in the creation of new business. This may be
true, but it has already been pointed out that such
activities result in higher prices and other accompanying evils. Thus, it must be concluded that
commission paying itself is not a creator of new
business for our industry. I t merely serves to shift
mortgages from institutions not paying commissions
to those which are willing to make such payments for
mortgage loans.
" . . . Associations today may quite properly
compete for mortgage business on the selling points
of lower interest rates and added services to the borrower. However, I consider the payment of commissions in an entirely different category and believe
it will only lead to bitter competition, resulting in
strife within the industry. Commissions are all
right so long as but one or two associations are following the practice. However, when other associations find their mortgage volume drying up, what
is more natural than that they too will follow suit,
with the result that we end up finding almost every
association out competing for mortgage loans purely
on the basis of a commission rather than on the
particular advantages of the association's service to
the borrower? This is only the beginning, for as soon
as other associations catch up with the leaders, then
the most natural thing is for either the leaders or the
followers to steal a march on the other associations
and increase the commission paid to brokers. Thus
32




you create a vicious circle that results only in more
bitter, if not destructive, competition. The final
result is a lot of black eyes with the shifting of some
mortgage loans, but no over-all increase in the
portfolios of our institutions, to say nothing of the
expenditure involved. The only person to profit is
the mortgage broker." 1
Sales Prices
In many localities the control of mortgages is
pretty largely in the hands of real estate brokers
because loans today are for the most part created
through sales. The selling agent, therefore, is in a
good position to steer mortgage financing into
channels of his own choice. Oft-times the borrower
does not approach the lending institution directly, but
arrangements are carried on for him by the real
estate broker. This is a very unfortunate circumstance and one which, for the ultimate good of the
public and of the savings and loan industry, should
be corrected. However, that is a subject unto itself.
At any rate, it can be fairly said that extreme competition accompanied by the payment of commissions,
usually leads to an over-liberal lending policy. Again,
it certainly cannot be denied that a too-liberal lending
policy on the part of any substantial number of lending institutions in a community is eventually bound
to affect the selling price of existing properties. This
means, then, that the commission evil is apt to exert
a vital influence upon the price of homes. Recently
there have been instances where financial institutions
as a group have become more conservative in theii
practices. As a result, the upward swing of selling
prices in their areas has been considerably checked,
If commissions do result in higher prices, there is
bound to be an increase in competition which certainly, sooner or later, must result in not only highei
prices but in inferior loans and much ill-feeling between competitors.
A n Expensive Practice
On the score of expense, it is perhaps axiomatic tc
say that acquiring mortgage loans on a commission
to-broker basis is costly. If an association feeL
obliged to get mortgage loans in this manner, th<
commissions paid are just as much a part of its
operating expense as the salary which might be paic
to a public relations and business-getting executive o:
employee. There are known to be cases where ou
i From address by Ralph H. Richards, Tenth Annual Stockholders' Meetir
of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh at Philadelphia, Pennsylvani
March 11, 1944.

Federal Home Loan Bank Revie\

institutions have spent as much as 10 percent of their
total gross operating income for mortgage loan commissions in an active lending year. This throws quite
a different light on the generally accepted concepts of
normal savings and loan operation when the payment
of commissions for new mortgage business reaches
such proportions.
Also, a factor frequently overlooked is that the
income from a mortgage investment acquired at the
cost of a brokerage commission is considerably less
than the contractual interest rate should produce in
the first year. Take, for example, a $5,000 directreduction loan carrying a 5-percent interest rate with
monthly payments of $50 acquired by payment of a
2-percent, or $100, commission.' The income yield on
the average of this investment for the first year is but
2.94 percent if we apply the commission cost against
interest income.
While it may be argued that over the life of the
loan, the cost of commission against all interest
income derived from the investment is negligible, yet
it must be reasoned that any substantial payment of
commissions in a given year does have a marked
effect upon earning power for that particular period.
Moreover, a loan acquired by payment of a commission carries no assurance that it will stay in the
association's portfolio, and in these days of rapid
property turnover, it is quite likely that many investments acquired at the cost of a commission and repaid
prematurely may prove very expensive to the lender
from a net earning viewpoint.
Self-Control
As indicated before, the intensity of competition
and, therefore, the practice of paying commissions
varies in different sections. There are parts of the
country where the evil does not exist and other
sections where the problem has been met and corrected by agreement, in a cooperative way, among the
lending institutions of those localities. I n some
places, associations, for their own protection and
mutual welfare, have banded together in a move to
control the commission business within the industry.
Some worthwhile benefits have been derived from
such endeavors as, for example, all associations in a
city agreeing among themselves not to pay commissions for any loans. I n other cases, associations have
agreed among themselves not to pay commissions for
certain types of mortgages or to pay only a certain
rate for especially desirable mortgage business.
These actions, of course, are in themselves a recognition of evil in the commission practice, and an
November 1945




endeavor to control something which is an undesirable and harmful influence.
At the same time, any program to control or abolish
abuses cannot hope to succeed unless all associations
in a given community or area unselfishly work
together for the common good. A few holdouts in a
movement of this kind must necessarily destroy the
effectiveness of the control. If the savings and loan
associations in any given community are able to
agree among themselves that commissions should
not be paid for obtaining mortgage loans, it would
appear that a second step should be attempted; that
is, an organized effort should be made to come to an
understanding with our competitors looking toward
abolishing such payments by all lenders. If only
bad effects accrue from the practice, it certainly must
be concluded that the payment of commissions is no
more desirable to our competitors than it is to our
own business.
Future Prospects
I t may be that as new home construction resumes
and lenders generally find more outlets for mortgage
money, the commission evil will disappear. For the
good of the savings and loan industry and the home
financing business, let us hope this change soon takes
place. I n the meantime, however, savings and loan
management might do well to survey the harmful
effects on the morale and dignity of our business
which a period of widespread scrambling and bidding
for mortgage business within the industry has
caused. Many associations have placed a large
volume of mortgages on their books at the price of
commissions higher than a neighboring institution
would or could afford to pay. From a long-range
viewpoint, has the advantage momentarily gained
been worth the cost?
Whether an association be Federally or Statechartered, it can adopt flexible lending plans in a
manner which will permit it to compete for any type
of loan. I t seems but good financial common sense
for the management of every association to strive
for the highest grade loans, as well as some bearing
a higher degree of risk compensated for by a higher
rate of interest. I t would seem far better policy
from every point of view for our institutions to make
their lending plans so attractive that it will not be
necessary to pay commissions in order to obtain a
high grade mortgage portfolio.
In addition to offering an attractive rate of interest there are many other features which can be
(Continued on p. 59)
33

FULL EMPLOYMENT BRINGS RECORD GAIN IN
SAVINGS OF INDIVIDUALS
Estimates of selected forms of individual savings indicate a marked
gain in 1944 as war and civilian employment absorbed substantially
all of our expanded labor force. Preliminary estimates show that this
upward movement in savings continued in the first half of 1945.
However, the impact of reconversion is expected to have significant
effects on savings trends.
• WAR and civilian activities absorbed substantially all of the labor force in 1944, including
supplemental, duration workers. Increased basic
wage rates, overtime and shift premiums raised individual earnings. With more money being paid to
more workers and corporate dividends running high,
income payments to individuals reached an all-time
record last year. Limited spending opportunities,
price control and a concerted appeal for thrift as an
anti-inflationary measure channeled an unprecedented volume of this income into various forms of
savings. At the end of the year total savings in
selected forms, i. e. investments in savings and loan
associations, reserves on life insurance policies, time
deposits in insured commercial banks as evidenced
by passbooks, accounts in mutual savings banks,
postal savings and the redemption value of U. S.
savings bonds (series A through E and 2)i percent
postal savings bonds) amounted to $107,042,000,000
according to estimates by the Division of Operating
Statistics of the Federal Home Loan Bank Administration. This was the first time that these
savings exceeded the one hundred billion dollar
mark.
The high volume of savings reported as of last
December 31 resulted from a $20,000,000,000, or 23percent, gain over the previous year-end. Thus, 45
percent of the entire wartime (1942 through 1944)
rise of $45,000,000,000 developed in 1944 alone.
Percentage distribution of changes in long-term
savings of individuals, 1939-1944
1939

1940

1941

1942

1943

50.0
14.0
8.1
1.9
25.2
U . S. savings b o n d s
._ _-_
Postal savings.
_.
0.9
2 H p e r c e n t postal savings b o n d s . . - 0 . 1

47.7
12.8
4.0
6.2
28.6
0.8
-0.1

54.0
4.5
-2.9
7.9
35.4
1.1

24.5
7.2
1.5
2.8
63.7
0.3

10.5
18.7
6.9
3.7
57.5
2.7

0)

0)

0)

100.0

100. 0

100.0

100.0

Life i n s u r a n c e companies

M u t u a l savings b a n k s . . . .

Total
1

Less than 0.05 percent.

34




.

_ .

100.0

1944
14.1
24.0
8.0
4.0
47.4
2.5

(0

With the same general economic conditions carrying over into the opening months of the current year,
indications are that during the first six months of
1945 savings continued to expand at a rapid rate
even though it was lower than last year. Preliminary
estimates place the aggregate as of June 30 at about
$113,000,000,000. This being the nearest possible
approximation of the end of hostilities, total wartime
expansion was about $51,000,000,000, or 83 percent.
As yet, data on trends since June are not available.
However, recent estimates of wage and salary income
in the postwar period, prepared by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics, 1 contain information which may be
indicative of future developments:
". . . In 1944 these payments reached their highest annual level of 98 billion dollars. Several of the
forces that contributed to the wartime rise, however,
can be expected to reverse themselves, now that the
war is over, and will tend to reduce the volume of
wage-salary income. Thus, by 1947, unless counterbalanced by other changes, the reduction of the
workweek, the loss of shift premiums in the leading
war industries, and the transfer of workers from war
production to lower-paid civilian production may be
expected to reduce wage-salary income by 16.7
billion dollars. This reduction, however, may be
partially offset by increased employment following
demobilization of the armed forces . . ."
From this, it is apparent that until the process of
reconversion is completed, the principal factor which
controls the volume of new savings, that is, wage
and salary payments, may sink considerably below
the wartime rate. Furthermore, many lines of
civilian products in curtailed supply or completely
off the market during the war will again be competing
for the income dollar. Therefore, it would seem
that some abatement, if not a temporary reversal,
in savings trends is to be expected for 1945 and 1946.

100.0

i "Income From Wages and Salaries in the Postwar Period," by Robert J.
Myers and N. Arnold Tolles, Monthly Labor Review, September 1945.

Federal Home Loan Bank Review

Analysis of 1944 Gain
How did the various forms of savings contribute
to the $20,000,000,000 rise estimated for 1944? I n
general, there was a continued accentuation in the
flow of new savings into the more liquid forms. As
in the two preceding years, the bulk of the year's
increase was concentrated in U. S. Government
savings bonds, which were responsible for slightly
less than half of the increment. Insured commercial
banks, following the pattern set in 1943, had the
second largest dollar gain, the expansion in their
time deposits accounting for nearly one-fourth of
the combined increase for all selected types, and life
insurance companies had the third largest share of
the rise, 14 percent.
Mutual savings banks, operating in 17 states,
accounted for 8 percent of the 1944 increase. Savings and loan associations were responsible for 4
percent, and postal savings showed a gain equivalent
to 2.5 percent of the combined increase. Three of
the selected forms of savings—time deposits in insured commercial banks, investments in savings and
loan associations and accounts in mutual savings
banks—claimed larger proportions of the 1944 gain
in savings than they did during the preceding year.
A comparison of the relative contribution t h a t
each medium of savings has made to the aggregate
1944 growth with the proportion to total that each
type represented as of the beginning of that year,
will give some indication of the effect of our wartime
economy upon the general structure of individual
long-term savings. For instance, U. S. savings bonds
(series A through E) which on January 1, 1944,
represented slightly less than 23 percent of total
savings, accounted for almost one-half of the gain
which occurred during the succeeding 12 months.
Time deposits in insured commercial banks likewise
showed an abnormal volume of growth by this
standard. Representing one-fifth of the total figure
at the beginning of the year, these accounts claimed
almost one-fourth of the total 1944 increment.
Postal savings was the only other category in which
this condition occurred. Representing about 2.1
percent of total savings a t the first of last year, these
accounts were responsible for about 2.5 percent of
the year's growth. I n the remaining groups, the
proportionate contribution to the year's gain was
below their relative proportions to total savings at
the beginning of the year. Life insurance, which
represented almost 36 percent of individual savings
on January 1, 1944, contributed slightly more than
14 percent of the growth during that year, while savNovember 194S




PERCENT CHANGE OF PRIVATE INVESTMENT
IN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
BY CLASS OF ASSOCIATION-CALENDAR YEAR 1944

.5
ALL MEMBERS

!

0

^

+

5

P ERC ENT
+10
+15

~

FEDERALS

^
INSURED-STATE

NONINSURED-STATE

^

+-20

+25 1

•

ffS"
•• '

NONMEMBERS

ings and loan associations, which started the year
with 6.3 percent of total savings, were responsible
for 4.0 percent of the expansion, and mutual savings
banks showed ratios of 13.5 and 8.0 percent, respectively.
Analysis of Wartime Growth
An examination of savings during the war (1942
through 1944) discloses trends generally similar
to those noticed in the single year 1944. That this
is true is some indication of the magnitude of changes
in the structure of savings over the past three years.
The foregoing table furnishes the basis for a
comparison of the three war years with the three
years immediately preceding the war. In following
this, it should be borne in mind that the total
volume of new savings each year has exceeded the
volume of the preceding year. Since 1941, the rate
of annual gain has expanded sharply, the $20,000,000,000 gain in 1944 being about six and threequarters times as great as the gain in 1939.
In general, it can be seen that as the volume of new
savings has mounted, a greater proportion of each
year's increment has been diverted into the more
liquid channels. U. S. savings bonds, showing the
most spectacular rise, had moved into first place by
1942, their 64 percent of the total gain in that year
edging out life insurance which then had the second
largest rise. By the next year, there was a recession
in the proportion of savings flowing into U. S. bonds
and this continued into 1944. More significant,
though, has been the growing volume of funds
pouring into time deposits in commercial banks.
By 1943, this was sufficient to rank second largest
in the annual gain in savings, moving life insurance
35

back into third position, and during 1944, substantially the same relationships have been maintained.
I n the two years preceding our entry into the war,
the proportionate flow of new savings into savings
and loan associations showed a distinct rise, gaining
from 1.9 percent in 1939 to 7.9 percent in 1941.
During the first war year it fell off proportionately
to 2.8 percent but in the two succeeding years gained
steadily to reach 4.0 percent by 1944.
The pattern of change in deposits in the mutual
savings banks probably reflects in part the retarded
improvement of economic conditions in the Northeastern States, where the bulk of these institutions
are located. Over a 24-year period, deposits in
these institutions have shown an extraordinary
measure of stability, indicating only a comparatively
slight decline during the past depression. However, their upward movement was again interrupted
in 1941 when deposits showed a small drop. During
the three following years they have accounted for a
steadily increasing proportion of annual savings

growth, increasing from 1.5 percent in 1942 to 8.1
percent in 1944.
A n Interpretation of Causes
An interpretation of trends, particularly during
the war years, must take into account the principal
characteristics of each of the various selected forms
of savings. I t has been observed that during the
three war years there has been an accentuation in the
flow of new funds into such liquid forms as U. S.
savings bonds and time deposits in insured commercial banks. This is probably the effect of institutional characteristics as well as a somewhat fixed
pattern of savings habits. To some degree it is also
the expression of a preference for liquidity, understandable in view of the uncertain duration of war
employment.
Prior to the war the bulk of new savings tended to
flow into life insurance companies. The growtb of
insurance, uninterrupted even during the depression
of the thirties, has led to the conclusion that this is,

Estimated savings of individuals in selected media, 1920-1944
[Millions of dollars]

Savings
a n d loan
associations 1

D e c e m b e r 31

1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927..
1928
1929
1930

r

_.
„

-

-.

1931
1932
1933
1934
1935

.

1936
1937
1938 ._
1939
1940_
1941
1942
1943_
1944

.

-_.--

i

Life insurance
companies 2

Mutual
savings
banks s

Insured
commercial
banks 4

Postal
savings «

War
savings
securities
a n d U . S.
savings
bonds 7

2H%
postal
savings
bonds «

Total

Net
increase
during
year

$1,741
1,965
2,210
2,626
3,153
3,811

$5, 814
6,175
6,625
7,349
8,<|48
8,927

$4,806
5,541
5,985
6,484
6,912
7,349

$6, 532
7,457
8,156
9,271
10,282
12,205

$166
148
135
135
137
138

$5
4
3
3
2
2

$761
652
730
373
411
376

$19,825
21,942
23,844
26, 241
28,945
32,808

$2,117
1,902
2,397
2,704
3,863

4,378
5,027
5,762
6,237
6,296

9,939
11,049
12, 213
13, 238
14,096

7,799
8,352
8,731
8,797
9,384

14, 288
15, 253
15,304
15,032
14, 286

143
153
158
169
250

3
3
5
7
8

356
245
95

36,906
40,082
42, 268
43, 480
44, 320

4,098
3,176
2,186
1, 212
840

5,916
5,326
4,700
4,358
4,104

14, 679
14, 858
15,011
16,052
17, 542

9,939
9,890
9,506
9,670
,9,829

12,096
9,341
8,729
9,709
10, 575

613
915
1,229
1,232
1,229

14
30
54
73
104

153

43, 257
40, 360
39, 229
41,094
43, 536

-1,063
-2,897
— 1,131
1,865
2,442

3,926
4,011
4,035
4,092
4,304

19,133
20, 510
21,858
23, 381
25,025

10,013
10,126
10,235
10,481
10,618

11,491
12,100
12,196
12,622
13,062

1,291
1,303
1,286
1,315
1,342

99
95
92
90
87

475
964
1,442
2,209
3,195

46,428
49,109
51,144
54,190
57, 633

2,892
2,681
2,035
3,046
3,443

4,652
4,910
5,494
6,305

27, 393
29,610
31, 256
34,100

10,490
10, 621
11,707
13, 332

13, 261
13, 916
16, 864
21, 728

1,392
1,417
1,837
2,342

85
84
83
82

4,750
10, 526
19, 574
29,153

r 62,023
* 71,084
r 86, 815
107,042

4,390
9,061
15, 731
20, 227

i Estimated private investments, excluding pledged shares. Estimates for 1941 and 1943 revised.
2 Estimated reserves, unpaid dividends, dividends left to accumulate and surplus to policyholders, less premium notes, policy loans and net deferred and unpaid
premiums. Estimates for 1941 through 1943 revised. Source: The Spectator, Chilton Company, Inc., Philadelphia, Pa.
3 Deposits. Sources: 1920 through 1937, Comptroller of the Currency; 1938 through 1944, The Month's Work, National Association of Mutual Savings Banks.
* Deposits evidenced by passbooks. 1920 through 1933 data based on figures reported by the Comptroller of the Currency covering all active banks except mutual
savings banks; for 1934 and subsequent years, figures represent savings deposits in insured commercial banks. Figures for 1942 through 1944 are estimates based on total
time deposits. Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
* Outstanding principal and accrued interest on certificates of deposit, outstanding savings stamps and unclaimed deposits. Source: Post Office Department.
* Excludes such bonds held by the Postal Savings System. Source: Treasury Daily Statements and Post Office Department.
7 Current redemption value. From 1920 to 1928, War Savings Securities; 1935 to May 1,1941, U. S. Savings Bonds, Series A-D; and May 1,1941 through 1944 also
includes U. S. War Savings Bonds, Series E. Source: Treasury Daily Statements.
* Revised.

36




Federal Home Loan Bank Review

perhaps, the most stable form of savings in that
people resort to curtailing life insurance only as a
last measure. While life insurance is assumed to be
the least likely form to show a decline, there are also
reasons for believing that it might be one of those
less likely to show abrupt gains as the result of an
admittedly temporary rise in the annual rate of
savings. I n other words, a person would not reasonably be expected to increase the amount of life
insurance carried, to the limit supportable by temporarily increased earnings, since premium payments
must continue at a fixed rate after the war. This
would seem to be one plausible explanation of the
inability of insurance to maintain its prewar position
with respect to the investment of new savings.
I n the case of savings and loan associations, the
maximum rate of investment per account has frequently been fixed as a matter of operating policy.
Thus, to a large extent, there also has been a force
restraining the flow of savings into these institutions.
As in the case of savings and loan associations,
mutual savings banks have encouraged systematic
thrift. To a lesser extent, subject principally to the
savings habit, individual accounts might be expected
to increase at a comparatively even rate as has been
demonstrated by their record over a long period of
years. Another factor which might be taken into
consideration in the case of mutual savings banks is
that these institutions operate in only 17 states
rather than on a nationwide basis.
From these assumptions it would appear that the
longer-term types of savings were saturated by the
sudden and probably short-term rise in the annual
savings rate, and that the excess flowed into more
liquid forms, namely, U. S. savings bonds and time
deposits in commercial banks.
However, this concept does not completely state
the case, in that the flow of individual savings into
U. S. savings bonds was as much the product of
patriotic motives as it was the choice of a sound
investment. This consideration may account in
part for the fact that it was not until 1943 that the
volume of new savings going to commercial banks
exceeded the increase shown by life insurance
companies.
A n Interpretation of Effects
While the foregoing considerations relate to the
probable causes which produced the recent pattern
for the investment of new savings, other assumptions may be made as to the character and stability
of the total accumulation. The dominating conNovember 1945
670732—45—2




sideration in this respect is that the growth in savings during the past three years took place under a
wartime economy when not only were income payments high, but many lines of civilian commodities
were either off the market entirely or were available
only in limited supply. From this, it would seem
that a substantial proportion of liquid savings are
probably earmarked for postwar spending. Varying
with the needs of the individual, this may mean
anything from a luxury item to deferred maintenance on a home or a personal reserve against
reconversion unemployment.
Family Savings
On this point, the distribution of savings by family
income group is of significance. Unfortunately, virtually no available information on this subject is
adequate for the formulation of broad conclusions.
However, the recently published findings of several
pilot surveys x conducted in Birmingham, Alabama,
and Douglas County, Illinois, by the Bureau of
Agricultural Economics for the Federal Reserve
Board, show an interesting distribution, even though
they may not be interpreted as being representative
of the county as a whole. According to these studies,
respondents with weekly incomes of less than $55
constituted 73 percent of the replies received from
Douglas County nonfarm areas, yet they accounted
for but 37 percent of total liquid assets. I n Birmingham, respondents with weekly incomes of less than
$55 made up 59 percent of the replies but accounted
for only 15 percent of total liquid assets. Here, it
should be noted that the Board's survey includes in
its definition of liquid assets U. S. savings bonds,
time deposits and demand deposits, and is, therefore, not identical with the selected forms of savings
heretofore referred to.
Another significant finding of the Federal Reserve
Board survey was that the greatest number of nonfarm savers gave security purposes as their reason
for saving, while the second most popular reason
was the acquisition of specific permanent assets, including home purchase, remodeling and mortgage
debt retirement.
Security has probably been one of the dominating
motives for saving at almost all times. If this is
true, it may well be that, despite a curtailment of
income payments during the reconversion period,
the total of the selected forms of savings may continue to grow, although at a slower rate. Also, it
i "Surveys of Liquid Asset Holdings," Federal Reserve Bulletin, September
1945.

37

would seem reasonable to expect a deceleration or
shrinkage to appear first among the more liquid
forms. One factor which may tend to maintain a
continued expansion in the volume of savings, in the
face of expanding consumer goods purchases, is the
tendency of many persons to prefer to buy on credit
while preserving their accumulations of liquid savings. However, the extent to which this will be a
significant factor, particularly among the lower
income groups, will depend almost entirely upon the
level of employment and wages which our postwar
economy sustains.

'* DIRECTORY
CHANGES
S E P T E M B E R 1 6 - O C T O B E R 15,

1945

Key to Changes
*Admission to Membership in Bank System
••Termination of Membership in Bank System
#Federal Charter Granted
##Federal Charter Canceled
01nsurance Certificate Granted
001nsurance Certificate Canceled
DISTRICT N O . 3
PENNSYLVANIA:

Philadelphia:
**##00Protected Future Federal Savings and Loan Association, 3701 North
Broad Street.
DISTRICT N O . 4

NORTH CAROLINA:

Rocky Mount:
0Citizens Savings and Loan Association, 126 North Main Street.
DISTRICT N O . 5
KENTUCKY:

Hazard:
**Hazard Federal Savings and Loan Association, Main Street.
DISTRICT N O . 7

ILLINOIS:

Forest Park:
0First Savings and Loan Association of Forest Park and River Forest,
7500 Madison Street.
Jacksonville:
0Jacksonville Savings and Loan Association, #l Public Square.
DISTRICT N O . 10
OKLAHOMA:

Bartlesville:
•Peoples Savings and Loan Association, 321 Dewey Avenue.
DISTRICT N O . 12

CALIFORNIA:

El Centro:
•Imperial Savings and Loan Association, 146 South Sixth Street.
Glendale:
•0United Savings and Loan Association, 116 West Wilson Avenue.
Hayward:
•Hayward Savings and Loan Association, 646 Main Street.
Richmond:
01ndustrial Savings and Loan Association, 1301 Macdonald Avenue.

NATIONAL HOUSING AGENCY
John B. Blandford, Jr.,

Administrator

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ADMINISTRATION
John H. Fahey, Commissioner

38




Urban Trend Resumed
T H E population trend toward urban centers, interrupted in the decade of
the thirties, was resumed
during the last four years,
according to data published by the Bureau of
the Census. In spite of a
decline of 5,000,000, or 4 percent, in the civilian
population of the country between April 1940 and
July 1944, population of cities of 100,000 or more
increased almost 3 percent. The number of people
in places of 2,500 to 100,000 remained relatively
stationary. Together these two segments accounted
for 60 percent of the number of civilians on the latter
date compared with 57 percent before.
During this period rural population dropped 11
percent, chiefly in farm areas, which showed a decline
of 15 percent compared with a 5-percent decrease in
rural nonfarm areas. The figures also show that the
urban birth rate has risen more sharply than that in
rural areas.
Effects of War
The fact that the number of women has increased
5 percent while men have decreased by 13 percent
is an obvious effect of the war. However, the
Census release points out that the progressively
greater decrease of men in rural areas is not to be
taken as a measure of the respective contribution of
these regions to the armed forces inasmuch as these
figures also reflect internal migration.
Another obvious development in the civilian
population trend during wartime was the increase
shown in both the very young and the comparatively
old groups. During the four years studied, persons
under 14 years of age increased from 23 percent of
total population to 26 percent. At the same time,
those from 45 up represented an increasing proportion (from 26 to 30 percent) while the intermediate
brackets declined from 50 percent to 45 percent of
the total.
This study should not be considered as necessarily
indicative of future population trends. I t is simply
a measure of the effects of the war on civilians
in this country. Until the armed forces are demobilized and the losses of war assessed, it is impossible to make any definite statements about the
future composition and residence trends which may
be expected in the nation.
Federal Home Loan Bank Review

* * * WORTH REPEATING * * *
TRANSITION DANGERS: "So long as
we remain in this period of physical
transition, wTe shall continue to be
faced with inflationary pressures.
There is a n enormous p e n t - u p demand,
particularly for capital a n d consumers' durable goods. T h e budget a r y deficit will be large. Accumulated individual and corporate savings
are enormous. We are starved for
new houses, new cars, new radios a n d
the like.
" W e must, therefore, a t present
keep up our guards against inflation,
not only through price and other direct
controls, b u t through taxation. I t
would be pathetic if, after besting t h e
enemy of inflation all through t h e
war, we allowed it to overtake us on
t h e home-stretch.
" A t t h e same time, we cannot overlook t h e deflationary dangers. . . If
the physical changeover of
our
economy is delayed or hampered, b y
fiscal or other impediments, t h e
t e m p o r a r y p h e n o m e n a of deflation
m a y t a k e on a more p e r m a n e n t a n d
inflexible character. If business lacks
confidence in t h e future, enterprise
will be timid. If workers a n d consumers lack confidence, t h e y will contract their purchases a n d hoard their
savings. I n either of these events,
the p r o m p t expansion of our peacetime economy will be endangered."
Fred M. Vinson, Secretary of the
Treasury, before the Ways and
Means Committee of the House
of Representatives, Oct. 1, 1945.

HOUSING FOR DEMOCRACY: ' ' F r o m
t h e social aspect, a supply of good
housing, sufficient to meet t h e needs
of all families, is essential to a sound
a n d stable democracy. Every family ought to h a v e a , decent home
in which to live. T h e character of
t h a t home determines more t h a n a n y thing else t h e character of family life,
the conditions in which children grow
up, and t h e a t t i t u d e of people toward
t h e community a n d t h e Government.
"Housing is long-lived, a n d t h e improvement of housing conditions requires foresight and m a n y years of
planning a n d work. Housing is substantial and visible to all a n d determines a large p a r t of the aspect of our
cities a n d our countryside. Slums
are not only a deterrent to the develop-

November 1945




ment of a sound citizenry, b u t they
lower the people's desire for a t t r a c t i v e
surroundings and the hope of improving their conditions.
" F r o m t h e point of view of industry
and employment, residential construction may be expected to make a major
contribution to our postwar economy.
T h e building of a million and a quarter
homes a year would stimulate an
expenditure upward of five t o six
billion dollars annually, and, directly
and indirectly, provide for three to
four million j o b s . "
Senator Robert |A. Taft, in address in United States Senate,
August 1, 1945.

FACE-LIFTING: "Face-lifting of our
cities will, then, entail some public
expense, even if most of t h e job is
done by p r i v a t e enterprise. B u t it
will be money well spent to recapture
c o m m u n i t y values t h a t h a v e been
recklessly squandered in t h e past.
By reclaiming decayed areas, cities
will create new tax values; t h e y will
help to lift t h e pall of degradation a n d
contagion from large sections of their
i n h a b i t a n t s ; they will recapture a good
deal of land t h a t is now wasted in useless streets, poorly planned subdivisions and unsightly vacant lots. No
less important, t h e y will create a large
volume of employment. T h e y will
give new tone a n d spirit to their comm u n i t y life."
Merlo Pusey, The Washington
Post, Sept. 18, 1945.

ENCOURAGEMENT: " N e w
financing
a n d technical devices should be m a d e
available to t h e general r u n of cont r a c t o r s to stimulate private construction . . . a n d especially housing in
t h e middle and low-rental fields. E n couragement should be given to t h e
elimination of obsolete building codes;
modification of restrictive practices;
use of improved materials a n d construction m e t h o d s designed to reduce
costs, increase effciency a n d t h u s
widen t h e m a r k e t for new construction. A wider a n d more stable m a r k e t
should carry with it a greater assurance
to t h e construction workers of stable
a n n u a l incomes."
Postwar Economic Policy and
Planning, Seventh Report of
the House Special Committee on
Postwar Economic Policy and
Planning.

CONSTRUCTION ECONOMY: " T h e
principal hope of reducing residential
construction costs lies in t h e economies
possible through mass production as
applied in building large developments.
These can be very substantial and are
something t h a t every builder now
should be studying, because it seems
probable t h a t a large p a r t of t h e next
housing boom will be on newly opened
land outside the thickly settled centers. At first, however, we should
expect most of t h e new homes to be
individual dwellings built singly or in
small groups, as was t h e usual practice
before the w a r . "
Raymond P. Harold, President
Worcester Federal Savings and
Loan Association, Real Fstate
News Letter, September 1945.

SIMPLIFIED TAX STRUCTURE: "Clearly, methods of financing public expenditures will constitute a major
phase of t h e p o s t w a r problems confronting t h e people of t h e United
States. We m u s t compose our differences of opinion to achieve our
common objective—a sound, welladministered
tax
structure under
which we may meet t h e revenue needs
of t h e federal, s t a t e a n d local governments."
Dixwell L. Pierce, Secretary,
California State Board of [Tax]
Equalization, Taxes, September
1945.

VETERANS' LOANS: " T h e mere fact
t h a t every eligible veteran is entitled
to a g u a r a n t y under Title III does not
indicate t h a t he should borrow money
beyond his capacity to p a y . If he is
not financially or otherwise ready now
to b u y a home or farm or business, he
should be intelligently a n d patiently
advised to wait. If approached in t h e
proper manner, he can be encouraged
a n d not discouraged.
"Unsound loans never made b e t t e r
economic conditions in a n y commun i t y — a n d t h e economic potentialities
inherent in t h e operation of this Act
a r e tremendous. T h a t operation can
work good or evil in your community . . . depending upon t h e m a n n e r
in which it is carried o u t . "
William C. McClelland, Loan
Guaranty Officer, Veterans' Administration, before annual convention of Massachusetts Cooperative Bank League,
Swampscott, Mass.

39

Improvements in
heating equipment

While startling innovations and
revolutionary changes are not forecast
for the immediate future, heating
equipment will be streamlined and
simplified in new homes. The emphasis will be placed on extreme compactness, higher efficiency and lower
maintenance costs.
One direct result of wartime fuel
shortages is the recognition of reed for
an all-purpose boiler. Manufacturers
have found that boilers can be built to
work with equal efficiency on solid,
liquid or gas fuel. Such boilers can
be converted easily and inexpensively
from one fuel to another.
Radiant heating, according to the
Plumbing and Heating Industries
Bureau, will be widely used in commercial, industrial and institutional
buildings as well as in residential
structures. This system provides heat
by circulating hot water through coils
embedded within the walls, floors and
ceilings of a structure. The equipment can be constructed to burn any
type of fuel.
Heating experts envisage extensive
use of packaged heating units as larger
numbers of prefabricated houses are
erected. The heating contractor would
install a packaged unit which probably
would include boiler, radiators, pipe,
valves, fittings and necessary controls.
Britain builds its first
permanent postwar house

The first permanent-type house to
be built in Britain since 1939, for other
than government use, was started
September 17. Located in Leicester
County, this dwelling and another
like it are the first of 26 pairs to be
constructed from winning plans chosen
in a competition sponsored by the
Home-Building Industries Standing
Committee. Prior to public inspection,
one house will be furnished through
the cooperation of the Council of
Industrial Design.
Serving as "pilot" projects, these
demonstration houses are expected
40




to provide both technical construction
data and information on public
reaction to the new designs. They will
incorporate such improvements as
compact plumbing without unsightly
pipes, central hot-air heating systems,
built-in cupboards, weatherproofing
and sound insulation superior to prewar standards.
Experts from 30 organizations representing such industries associated
with housing construction as lumber,
copper, concrete and heating, will
assist the builders. All houses will
be constructed to meet specifications
of the National Housebuilders Registration Council which means five
inspections during the building and a
two-year written guarantee of performance.
Temporary houses
sold to France

Over 8,000 temporary dwelling units
have recently been sold to the French
government by the FPHA, acting as
disposal agency under Surplus Property Administration procedure. These
units, which brought a cash payment of
$6,954,000, will be used to house
French dockworkers and will thus facilitate the U. S. Army's redeployment
program by providing living accommodations for necessary personnel.
The houses, originally intended for
lend-lease shipment to Great Britain,
are packaged units ready for shipment
and not economically usable in this
country since they were made without
glazing, wiring or heating systems
which were to be provided by the purchaser. They are subject to deterioration while unassembled and their sale
to the French will permit their being
put into use before such damage has
occurred.
Experimental homes for
G l students

Homes for student veterans and experience for architectural and engineering students is the goal set for a
hundred-unit housing project to be
erected on the campus of Massachu-

setts Institute of Technology. On
the 10-acre site, the Institute will
build experimental prefabricated houses
of glass, plywood, steel and other materials. Solar and radiant heating systems, insulation, air conditioning, new
materials and techniques will be observed under family living conditions.
Actual-use tests will record the practicability of such things as cinderblock construction, chemically preserved wood, and electronic controls.
Tenant comments and complaints
will be requested and carefully checked
against research findings. Eventually
another housing development of permanent type dwellings will be built
for graduate students and instructors.
This second project will serve as a
laboratory similar to the prefabricated
units in MIT's efforts to stimulate
better homebuilding through educational research.
New building materials emphasize
utility and economy

Builders and building supply dealers
have gone to some pains in the past
year to dispel the pipe-dreams of
potential home buyers who envisioned
"revolutionary" innovations in the
postwar house. Lest prospective owners withhold their purchases in anticipation of "disappearing walls" and
elaborate gadgets, emphasis has been
placed upon the point that the new
homes of tomorrow will generally resemble those of prewar days. While
this campaign to bring the buying
public back to earth may have pricked
many imaginative bubbles, research in
the development of new or improved
materials and improvements in home
design have been taking place. The
emphasis, though, is on utility, durability and economy—features which
will appeal to a home-buying family
about to make the largest single
investment of a lifetime.
Interested in expanding their peacetime markets, a long list of industries
are looking to the housing field.
Among the non-ferrous metals group
is the aluminum industry which is
Federal Home Loan Bank Review

preparing to offer window and door
frames and sashes, radiators, interior
wall panels and moisture-insulating
foil. As a building material, aluminum offers extreme weight economy
and low upkeep, due to its noncorrosive feature. In heating equipment
its high heat transfer properties may
be of great importance.
As in the past, the gypsum industry
is making a strong bid for trade in
new products. Among the postwar
lines it expects to offer is sheathing
which may play a particularly important role in view of the shortage of
seasoned lumber. Another product
will be aluminum foil gypsum lath
providing insulation against moisture
accumulation. New uses are also
being found for asbestos cement,
familiar as a roofing and side-wall
material.
A familiar scene in building has
been the hand sizing of bricks to fit
masonry construction around windows
and doors. This practice may be
largely eliminated in the future by
the use of outsized blocks which will
allow flush finish at such points without on-the-spot trimming.
These and numerous other developments will typify the wartime strides
of the building industry, many of the
changes being more apparent in the
utility, economy and durability of the
products than in their physical appearance. While most will represent
"subsurface changes" in the finished
house, they should greatly enhance its
life as an economic asset and consequently help in sustaining its value as
mortgage security.
S P A plans disposal
of surplus land

During the war the Federal Government acquired large quantities of land
in tracts of all sizes to meet a variety
of wartime needs. To date, 215,000
acres have been declared surplus, but,
eventually, nearly 6,000,000 acres will
be earmarked for disposition. This
job will fall to six Government agencies: National Housing Agency, Federal Works Agency, Reconstruction
Finance Corporation, Department of
Agriculture, Department of the Interior and the Maritime Commission.
Future municipal uses of the land,
including designation of the more
appropriate commercial, industrial and
residential sites, will be completed by
November 194S




the Surplus Property Administration
on the recommendation of local groups.
Real estate boards, city planning commissions, chambers of commerce and
municipal officials will be invited to
assist SPA in classifying surplus real
estate to the best interest of local
communities.
In making this announcement, Surplus Property Administrator, W.
Stuart Symington, explained that
"Certain properties, for example,
should be returned promptly to
private ownership and the tax rolls.
Some must be put speedily into production to create employment and to
help fill demands of consumers and
industry.
Still others should be
retained in public ownership for parks,
utilities, rights of way and the like."
Connecticut legislature
acts on land assembly law

Last summer a new redevelopment
law was placed on the books in Connecticut authorizing cities in that state
to acquire land for redevelopment purposes through the exercise of the
powers of eminent domain. This legislation merits particular consideration
in view of the broad and highly flexible
formula it establishes for the supervision of rebuilding substandard areas.
Reconciling the varying views of
groups interested in redevelopment of
urban areas, the new law leaves to the
respective cities the determination of
the means of administration. According to local preference, a separate redevelopment corporation may be established or the local housing authority
may be asked to assume the responsibility. In those instances where the
redevelopment plan is predominantly
of a housing nature and the community prefers to establish a redevelopment corporation, the local housing
authority must approve the plan.
Building material research
center planned

Plans for a new research center
which will provide 10 experimental
factories under one roof in addition to
research laboratory facilities, have
recently been announced by the JohnsMan ville Corporation. "Projects initiated in the research laboratory may
thus be carried clear through their
development and pilot plant production stages," the company announced.
This is expected to speed up the de-

velopment of new and improved materials for building and for industrial
uses, since new products will be more
nearly ready for commercial manufacture when they emerge from the research center. Also, it is claimed that
the new center will provide the largest
research facilities in the world devoted
to building materials and industrial
products development.
Utilizing 337,000 square feet of floor
space, the center will provide for all
technical activities, except engineering.
It will include fundamental scientific
research, product development, process
improvements involving product quality, pilot plant and semi-works scale
experiments, design and initial construction of new product equipment,
testing of building materials and industrial products and a central source
of technical information.
One section will permit quick cycle
tests of the wear and tear that building materials will get in actual use.
An entire roof or side wall will be
given 20 years of climatic changes in
6 months.

The popularity of home loans compared with other guarantees provided
under the GI Bill of Rights is evident
from the accompanying chart. Comprising 92 percent of the total dollar
volume, these loans numbered 22,981
through October 6, 1945, according to
data of the Veterans' Administration.
Guarantees for 1,681 business loans
were issued during this period, representing 6.5 percent of the dollar volume. Farm loans trailed the other two
categories wTith only 529 guarantees
issued. The average size of these loans
ran in the same order—homes, $1,665;
business, $1,596; and farms, $1,173.
41

DISPOSITION OF TEMPORARY WAR HOUSING
OFFERS ADVANCE MATERIALS SUPPLY
The FPHA is now carrying forward its plans for the disposition of
temporary war housing under the terms of the Lanham Act. As these
accommodations are declared surplus, it is anticipated that the bulk
will be sold for salvage to offset public expenditures for its construction
and to augment short stocks of building materials.
•

A l the present time, the Federal Public Housing
Authority has on hand a total of about 320,000
temporary war housing units, of which approximately 275,000 are movable—200,000 dormitory
units and 75,000 family dwellings. Unsuited to
long-term use as housing, they must be disposed of
within two years after the emergency, according to
the requirements of the Lanham Act. These structures include family dwellings and dormitories
quickly erected at minimum cost for wartime use and
have been built only where market analysis did not
justify the programming of permanent, privately
financed war housing.
Now the F P H A is confronted with the disposal of
these temporary buildings, not all at once, but in the
order in which they are declared surplus to the needs
of demobilization. Although not suitable for prolonged use as urban residences, experimentation has
show^n that they can be dismantled and converted for
non-residential and rural uses. Buildings constructed principally from temporary war housing
sawed into panels can serve usefully as storage warehouses, farm buildings, vacation cottages, tourist
cabins, garages, small schools, churches, and a variety
of utility-type structures. If the shipping distance
is not excessive, the cost is estimated to be considerably less than that of constructing such buildings
from new materials. Moreover, the erection of
buildings can proceed immediately at a time when
new materials are difficult to obtain.
Demonstration Planned
In order to bring the re-use possibilities to the
attention of potential buyers and the general public,
F P H A will stage a month's demonstration in
Washington, opening early in December.
The
exhibit will provide a 20-acre "showcase" of all
major types of temporary wartime buildings and a
cross-section of many different structures into which
these buildings can be converted for practical peacetime iise. The site of the demonstration will be part
of an 80-acre tract owned by the Government.
42




In addition to Federal and local agencies and
foreign governments, it is expected that possible
outlets will include many private purchasers in the
supply, distribution and construction fields, such as
contractors, lumber supply dealers, farm cooperatives,
wholesale suppliers, and purchasing groups and
organizations. Most of the structures are rowhouse or multiple-unit types and range in size from
4 to 10 units per building, while the projects contain
from 16 to nearly 10,000 units each. Purchasers in
most cases must be in a position to buy and remove
the structures in marketable quantities and to
restore sites to their original condition.
Through the re-use of this material to meet auxiliary needs in the domestic market, or to fulfill any
foreign requirements, it will not enter into competition with the postwar reconversion program of
the material and supply industry, the F P H A states.
"On the contrary/' Commissioner Klutznick commented, "if these materials can be channeled into
other uses, new supplies will be made available for
commercial and industrial plants and for long-range,
permanent home building, which constitute essential
sources of postwar employment and production.
The more we can do to speed new home construction,
moreover, the sooner we can vacate and remove this
temporary housing.''
Although not originally designed to be moved,
wartime experimentation showed that these buildings
could be sawed into panels, moved and re-erected at
great savings in time and money. During the war,
F P H A re-used, often in types of structures different
from the original, some 10,000 units of war housing.
Movements were made by truck, rail, ship and barge
over distances ranging from a few miles to more than
1,000 miles.
Temporary war housing accommodations should
not be confused with the demountable dwellings
which generally meet normal housing standards.
The latter will be sold for use as housing even
though the units may be removed from their present
war sites.
Federal Home Loan Bank Review

CHARACTERISTICS OF NEW HOUSING BEFORE
THE WAR
Postwar plans for the housing industry are being drawn by various
groups, almost all of which place emphasis on low-priced construction. A recent analysis by the Bureau of the Census clarifying earlier
data relating to the rental value of new housing will be of interest to
all concerned with this subject.
T H E 1940 Census of Housing 1 cast new light
on the quantitative distribution of our housing
stock by rental value and by age of structure. However, the original tabulations did not relate the
physical characteristics of dwelling units to the age
and rental value breakdown. Thus, until recently,
when the Census released its special analysis of 11
selected areas, there was no statistical means by
which an answer could be found to account for the
unusual concentration of the newer dwellings in the
lower rental brackets.
From the special analysis and from the original
nationwide tabulation, taken together, come a series
of factors which seem to give a distinct explanation
of this rental value grouping. The special survey of
the 11 selected areas reveals that an unusual proportion of the dwelling units constructed in the years
1935 to 1940 were in substandard condition at the
time the enumeration was made (1940).
The
national tabulation shows that a large proportion of
the units in this age group were erected in areas
where climatic conditions ordinarily make central
heating equipment unnecessary. In addition, the
location of many of these homes in rural areas where
building codes, zoning and high land costs would not
usually be expected to exert as strong an influence
on home values as they do in urban districts may be
another factor of significance.

•

National Figures
A total of 2,471,577 nonfarm units were reported
as having been constructed during the years 19351940, representing about 9 percent of the reporting
urban and rural nonfarm housing supply. Of these
newer dwellings, more than two-fifths were reported
as having contract or estimated monthly rentals of
less than $20, while between one-fifth and one-fourth
had rentals below $10. Almost 55 percent were
reported as having rentals of less than $30.
i Sources: Sixteenth Census—1940—Housing, Vol. I J J, Part 1. Characteristics of
Housing Built in 1935 to 1940 for Selected Areas: 1940, Series H-45, No. 5.

November 1945




Owner-occupied units built in the years 1935 to
1940 numbered 1,356,441, accounting for 62 percent of the occupied dwellings in this age group,
while tenant-occupied accommodations were reported at 821,926, or about 38 percent of the total.
Before analyzing the rental value distribution of the
owner- and tenant-occupied classes, at least passing
notice should be given to a distinct tendency which
is apparent among the newer homes: namely, the
higher proportion of owner occupancy. In all
other age groups, the proportion of tenant-occupied
units was greater. Of the 27,747,973 occupied
nonfarm units in all age groups, 11,413,036, or
about 41 percent, were owner occupied, leaving 59
percent to tenant occupancy.
Among the owner-occupied units constructed in
the latter thirties, almost 38 percent were recorded
as having a rental equivalent to less than $20.
Tenant-occupied dwellings built between 1935 and
1940, although smaller in number, showed a heavier
low-rent distribution, with about 48 percent reported
at rentals below $20. Approximately 22 percent of
the owner-occupied homes and 27 percent of the
leased accommodations were recorded at rentals of
less than $10 a month.
Principal Metropolitan Districts
An interesting although not surprising relationship appeared in the distribution of new housing by
rental brackets among the principal metropolitan
districts (85 areas containing a central city of over
100,000 or with a gross population over 150,000). A
marked tendency toward the concentration of the
higher rental units is noticeable in these areas which
accounted for but a relatively small proportion of
homes in the extremely low ranges. For instance,
only 17.5 percent of the units reported at rentals below $20 were situated in these districts. However,
they accounted for a progressively greater proportion
of dwellings in the higher ranges, the ratio mounting
to 81 percent for those with rentals between $60 and
43

Special Analysis
CHARACTERISTICS OF DWELLINGS
BUILT

WITH

1935 -

1940

PRIVATE BATH

IN SELECTED

AREAS

WITH PRIVATE BATH
AND CENTRAL HEATING

$100 a month. To a certain extent the small proportion of new low-rent construction in the principal
metropolitan areas may have been caused by building code requirements, but high land and construe*
tion costs as well as taxes are perhaps the most influential factors. Problems of site selection and
zoning likewise exert a deterring force there. With
respect to this, it is interesting to note that 63 percent of the newer units renting for less than $20 were
rural nonfarm dwellings.
T h a t but 16.6 percent of all units constructed in the
principal metropolitan areas from 1935 to 1940 were
in brackets below $20 does give startling contrast to
the relatively small volume of low-cost housing built
there. The most important segment of the market in
these larger metropolitan districts appears to have
centered between $40 and $60, for it was within this
range that 29 percent of the dwelling units which were
constructed in the last half of the thirties were
reported.
Regional Distribution

An examination by regions of the rental value
distribution of dwellings constructed from 1935 to
1940 reveals an interesting parallel between rental
value distribution and regional volumes of construction. I n the South, where the greatest proportion of
units built during this period was reported, almost 54
percent were in the rental groups below $20, while in
the North Central States, which had the second
largest share of the total, slightly less than 37 percent
were within the low-rental ranges. The West, which
had the third largest number of dwellings constructed
during that period as reflected in the Census report,
was second in the ratio of units with monthly rentals
below $20, about 37.4 percent, and the Northeast
stood last in both respects, the proportion in the lowrent brackets being but 18.5 percent.
44




What could account for the unusually heavy distribution of this comparatively new housing in the
low-rental brackets? I t is evident that this came as a
surprise to many, for it is a natural inclination to
visualize new residential construction in terms of a
neat, single-family, five- or six-room house with all
modern facilities and equipment. Yet, this information indicates that either our mental picture of the
typical new home is incorrect, or that the building
industry has succeeded in producing such houses at
lower rentals than were believed to prevail.
In the original enumeration there was no tabulation
relating characteristics to age groups. To determine
the point of deviation, a special analysis of the
characteristics and equipment of these newly built
dwellings was conducted by the Bureau of the
Census in 11 representative areas l which contained
a total of 1,871,057 nonfarm accommodations and
180,561 units within the age group 1935-1940.
The enumeration revealed that in the 11 selected
areas there was a total of 66,266 dwellings constructed between 1935 and 1940 having a rental
value of less than $20. Of these, only 2,112, or 3.2
percent, contained both private b a t h and central
heating equipment and were not in need of major
repairs. Of the 94,125 accommodations renting for
less than $30, only 9,008, or 9.6 percent, were so
equipped and not in need of major repairs. Thus,
it would seem apparent that although there is an
extraordinary concentration of dwellings constructed
between 1935 and 1940 in the low-rental value
brackets, most of these do not measure up to the
visualization of a snug, well built home.
A further analysis shows that dwelling units of $30
monthly value are comparatively high in the rental
range for those 11 selected areas. I n nine of these
localities the median rental value is less than $30
as computed for all housing, while for newly built
homes, seven of the eleven areas showed medians
of less than $30. However, in seven of the eleven
regions, a $20 rental value is below the median for
all dwelling units.
I n the 11 selected areas, almost 37 percent of the
homes constructed during the period 1935 to 1940
were without private bath, compared with a ratio of
34.9 percent for all dwellings in the same localities.
i These 11 selected areas are: city of Detroit; balance of Detroit metropolitan
district; city of Houston; balance of Houston metropolitan district; city of Seattle;
balance of Seattle metropolitan district; urban and rural nonfarm areas inside the
Illinois portion of the Chicago metropolitan district but outside the city of Chicago;
urban areas of less than 500,000 in Illinois; rural nonfarm areas of Illinois;
urban areas of less than 600,000 in Virginia, and the rural nonfarm areas of Virginia.

Fee/era/ Home Loan Bank Review

By area, the ratio without private bath ranged from
2.5 percent in the city of Detroit to 65.2 percent in
the rural nonfarm regions of Illinois and 69.0 percent
in the rural nonfarm portions of Virginia. The relatively high distribution of units without these facilities in rural areas, as revealed in the special analysis,
would seem to be a major clue to the cause of the
high proportion of low-rental values among the newer
homes. The national figures show that more than
38 percent of the homes built in the years 1935-1940
were in the rural nonfarm category. This was the
highest ratio of this type shown for any age group.
Among dwellings of all ages, about 27.2 percent were
rural nonfarm units.
The special analysis of the 11 areas also revealed
that central heating equipment is not more common
among the newly built homes than among all dwellings. However, in the city of Houston and the balance of the Houston metropolitan district the virtual
absence of units with central heating is the result of
climatic factors and is not in itself an indication of
substandard construction. I n the other nine areas
the relative number of homes with private bath,
central heating and not in need of major repairs
ranged from 15.7 percent in the rural nonfarm areas
of Virginia to 84.8 percent in the city of Detroit.
Other Factors
There are several other factors involved in the
Census enumeration which also contributed to the
heavy weighting of low-rent units in proportion to
the total new construction. Yet, none of these
others is sufficient to explain the low rental of all
newly built homes. The elimination of these factors
as significant elements, though, does lead to the conclusion that the quality and condition of the more
conventional, newly constructed unit was, on the
average, below that of the houses which were built
in earlier years.
One of these miscellaneous factors was the inclusion in the enumeration of such unconventional types
of accommodations as tourist cabins, shacks, boats,
etc. These miscellaneous accommodations represent
2 percent, or 3,555, of the newly built homes of this
type in the 11 selected areas as compared with 0.6
percent of all dwelling units. The higher proportion
among homes built in 1935-1940 probably results
from the presence of relatively more trailers and
tourist cabins.
Another factor was converted units which may be
improperly reported as built in the year in which
conversion took place. However, these represent
November 194S




only 3.3 percent of the newly built homes in comparison with 9.5 percent of all homes.
I t is interesting to note that despite the fact that
the newer homes showed a heavy distribution among
the low-rental groups, in the total of the 11 areas
there was no substantial difference in the median
number of rooms. For accommodations built
between 1935 and 1940 the median in the selected
areas was 4.55 rooms, while for all dwelling units it
was 4.91. I n fact, in five of the eleven areas the
newly built homes had a higher median number of
rooms than the old homes.
Conclusion
The large distribution of low-rental value units
among homes reported by the Census as having
been built from 1935 to 1940 is apparently due to a
greater proportion of units in this age group without
private bath and/or central heating. Also, a surprisingly large number of homes in this age group
were indicated as being in need of major repairs.
Applying these findings of the analysis of the 11
selected areas to the original national tabulation,
it will be noted that a large part of the homes in this
age group were (1) constructed in regions where
climatic conditions made central heating unnecessary
and (2) an unusual distribution of the age group
total is to be found in rural nonfarm areas where
influences of zoning, building codes and high land
costs, frequently do not exert as strong an influence
on rental values as is to be found in urban districts.

45

TOMORROWS HOUSE: By George
Nelson and Henry Wright, 1945.
Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1230 Sixth
Ave., New York 20, N. Y.
Tomorrow's House is an unconventional guide for home builders or
remodelers. It contains no blueprints
or floor plans, no catalog of styles or
rules of "good taste." Frankly and
wholly devoted to modern architecture
as an expression and medium of
modern living, it advances the idea
that a house should be planned to best
serve the needs and desires of its occupants, not just to look like houses
always have.
As stated in the foreword, "This
book challenges not most, but all of the
sweet-scented nostalgia on the domestic scene. Despite its persuasive manner, it is going to disturb many readers
who keep their milk in the latest refrigerator, drive to business in the
newest car, but persist in thinking
that a Cape Cod cottage remains the
snappiest idea in a home."
In a friendly but firm way, the
authors challenge the popular imitations of traditional "period" houses.
They show some of the many ways in
which current industrial techniques
can be geared to our contemporary
living habits to achieve better, more
attractive and more livable, as well as
more individual, homes.
It is the theory of Messrs. Nelson
and Wright (Consultant Editor and
Managing Editor, respectively, of the
Architectural Forum) that a house need
not follow an established pattern but
may be anything that a family's needs
and desires dictate and that their
budget will permit. Flexibility is the
keynote. By discarding traditional
notions of wThat a house should look
like inside and out, appointments,
arrangements and room combinations
which offer wide possibilities in designing a house to fit a family may be
achieved.
Without attempting to dictate arrangements or organization, the authors present many interesting suggestions. For instance, they show new
46




ways in which a living-dining room,
a dining room-kitchen, or a combined
kitchen and general workroom arrangement can be made practical and attractive by proper planning and construction. If a family likes to spend
leisure hours together, the book suggests a large, scientifically lighted
room with quiet corners and facilities
for all to use at once.
By applying such technical principles as sound conditioning and solar
or radiant heating it is demonstrated
that bulky essentials can be reduced
to minimum space fillers. Generous
use of window surfaces, including
sliding panels, can be made in suitable
locations to add space by combining
indoor and outdoor living. Illustrations of built-in furniture, fixtures and
organized storage space show how the
livability can be increased and housekeeping efficiency raised to a maximum.
These are but a few of the ideas advanced to help in solving individual
problems. The authors admit that
compromise is necessary, that it is not
always cheap and practically never
easy to plan such a house, even with
the help of a competent architect. But
they make it sound like a worthwhile
undertaking. •
The book is entertainingly written
and generously illustrated. It makes
provocative and informative reading
not only for the prospective occupant
but for anyone interested in houses.
If, as the authors state, there are going
to be houses like this, builders, real
estate dealers and home financers will
want to know and understand their
long-range values and appeal.
FINANCING AMERICAN PROSPERITY: By Anderson, Clark, Ellis, Hansen, Slichter and Williams.
The
Twentieth Century Fund, 330 West
42nd St., New York 18, N. Y.
This cross-section of widely varying
approaches and viewpoints on current
economic thought advances the unanimous opinion that America has a good
chance for a run of prosperity. How-

ever, the six economists chosen by the
Twentieth Century Fund to participate in this symposium frequently
differ as to the best means of bringing
it about. The essays present their
views on practical ways by which public policy can aid in maintaining full
and stable employment and thereby
security of livelihood and a hiph level
of economic well-being.
In approaching this book it is essential to keep in mind that the term
"financing" as used in the title is not
intended in the narrow sense to imply
the raising and allocating of funds by
fiscal and monetary agents, whether or
not of the Government. It refers,
rather, to matters of broad economic
policy and is not incompatible with a
conclusion that, under circumstances
favorable to private economic activities, sustained prosperity could be
self-financing.
The essays cover a range including
fiscal, taxation, wage, credit, commercial and anti-monopoly policies; price
control and rationing; housing, social
security and life insurance; research
and patent systems and international
finance. Obviously, this review could
not do justice to even the highlights of
the six individuals' separate opinions.
It is, however, interesting to note the
areas of substantial agreement among
these authorities who represent various
schools of economic thought.
All contributors seem to feel that our
present tax system offers obstacles to
ready investment and new enterprise
necessary to maintain a high degree of
prosperity. They recommend the
eventual reduction in corporate income
tax.
With one exception the authors foresee Federal spending in the postwar
period on a much larger than prewar
scale and advocate varying kinds and
amounts of Government spending for
the general economic good. However,
preponderant opinion is that this
policy should not be pursued to the
point of creating chronic Government
deficits. Four contributors, nevertheless, favor "compensatory" deficit
Federal Home Loan Bank Review

spending during a depression period,
which they imply will be short and
inevitably will be succeeded by a period of private surplus spending when
Government surpluses can be used for
debt retirement.
The recognition that high wages
usually mean higher purchasing power
is unanimous, with the chief difficulty
lying in the conflict between wages as
income to labor and as cost to management. Five of the economists are
inclined to put the major emphasis on
the value of wages as purchasing power
and seem to agree that increasing technical productivity should be reflected
in higher wages.
The central problem—how to
achieve prosperity with ample employment opportunities—permits no
quick and easy answers. No two of
these authorities come to the same set
of conclusions. However, in the variety of opinions presented the reader
undoubtedly will find much stimulation
for his own thinking about our economic future.
THE

CITY

IS

THE

PEOPLE:

By

Henry S. Churchill. 1945. Reynal &
Hitchcock, Inc., 8 West 40th St., New
York 18, N. Y.
The goal of city planning, as Mr.
Churchill sees it, is "a livable city,
suited to modern technologies of living." Proceeding from ancient times
down through our own c o u n t r y ' s
progress toward a high degree of urbanization, the author defines and analyzes
the city form and its problems in a
clear-cut and readable manner. Lucid
enough to appeal to the layman,
the book is also addressed to all who
are professionally concerned with the
economic and the social future of our
urban areas.
In retailoring today's cities to the
needs of a changing world; the author
would have planners follow the basic
precept of modern architectural philosophy: Build to fit the occupant's needs
and desires. In common, to a large extent, with individual families, cities
are seeking solutions to problems
which fall into three main categories—
physical, economic and social. The
first centers about dwellings, working
facilities and traffic; the second about
land values, service costs and taxation;
while the third takes in child-rearing,
health and recreation and various
social satisfactions.
Novcmbzr 1945




None of these problems, Mr.
Churchill feels, is incapable of solution, even if the process must of necessity be gradual. Planning techniques are available and for the most
part adequate. Rather it is necessary
to recognize and attempt to remove
the causes of inertia which have resulted in only fairly meager and sporadic attempts to attack the problems
as a whole. City planners and their
supporters are urged to inject vigor
and imagination in presenting their
program to the public without whose
support and sympathetic understanding no plan can be realized.
The planners themselves must bring
more to their task than technical competence, necessary as that is, the
author e m p h a s i z e s . Imagination,
vision and courage are required to integrate all the elements of today's known
needs with estimates of probable
future trends as revealed by the tested
methods of planning. All the threads
of such cooperative endeavor must be
tied together into a master plan that
has flexibility, direction and a basic
philosophy. This is at once the responsibility of the planners and the
challenge they must meet. "Until the
planners know by what methods the
ends are to be achieved, what the
purpose of the city is, what those who
live in it (not just those who 'own' it)
want it to be, planning will continue
to be merely the means of livelihood
of planners. A city plan is the expression of the collective purpose of the
people who live in it, or it is nothing."
The master plan conceived by Mr.
Churchill is quite a different thing
from that adopted by municipalities in
the past. Formerly after a blueprint
of civic improvements drawn up by
the authorized planning body was
accepted, years were spent in construction. During the building period
little or no attention was paid to
changing conditions which might affect
the achievement of the original purposes of the plan. "A master plan . . .
is not something static, but alive and
ever-changing as circumstances change.
It must be continually brought up to
date, and continually kept before the
public, for a master plan in which the
public does not participate is not a
master plan but a set of blue prints for
an ivory tower." Mr. Churchill goes
ahead to define his idea specifically,
"A Master Plan, be it noted is not a

blue print. It is not an 'official map.'
It is not a map at all, although parts
of it may be in the form of maps. It is
an accumulation of interpreted data,
financial, social, physical; it consists of
fact, fiction, surmise, and wishful
thinking; of maps, notes, photographs,
suggestions. It is . . . 'Not one goal,
but a direction. Not one plan, once
and for all, but the conscious selection
by the people of successive plans'. "
Although inclusion of title does not necessarily mean recommendation by the
REVIEW, the following recent publications will be of interest.

YOU AND
YOUR
NEIGHBORHOOD, A PRIMER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING:
Available
from Revere Copper and Brass, Inc.,
230 Park Avenue, New York 17,
N. Y.
STABILIZING
THE
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY:
By Miles L.
Colean. (Planning Pamphlet No. 41)
1945. 38 pp. Available at 250 from
National Planning Association, Washington 6, D. C.
COMMUNITY
ACTION
FOR
POST-WAR
JOBS AND
PROFITS: Published by Department of
Commerce. Available at 200 from
Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C.
THE MUNICIPAL
YEAR BOOK
19^5: Clarence E. Ridley and Orin E.
Nolting, editors. 603 pp. Available
at $8.50 from The Municipal Year
Book, 1313 East 60th Street, Chicago
37, 111.
BANK
LIQUIDITY
AND
THE
WAR: By Charles R. Whittlesey.
1945. 86 pp. Available at 500 from
National Bureau of Economic Research, 1819 Broadway, New York 23,
N. Y.
COMMUNITY
PLANNING
AND
INTEGRATION
IN
ALLEGHENY
COUNTY: A
DEMONSTRATION
COURSE IN COMMUNITY
PLANNING: 1945. 35 pp. Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa.
THE USE OF PUBLIC WORKS TO
SUSTAIN
CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITY: 1945. 12 pp. Construction and Civic Development Department, Chamber of Commerce of the
United States, Washington, D. C.
47

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ACTIVITY AND SELECTED INFLUENCING FACTORS
BY

I INDEX

1935-1939 = 100

YEARS

BY MONTHS

INDEX

240

A

-

240 j

220
ADJUSTED FOR SEASONAL VARIATION

220
PRIVATE

CONSTRUCTION^

IBS
FAMILY DWELL.UNITS
j
(FED. HOME LOAN BANK ADM.) j f
U.S. L" EPT OF LA B. RECORD*o)/

200 j

\

160

/

/

f^SVGS.

*sv<5S.8

100

V

80

\

FED.

.^,

LN. LEA 0.

HOME LN. BK.A

/r

180

V

160

a LN. LEND.
140
120

f

*•-/

100

y PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION

\,

V
V

\ - ..^"

60

\ •' "

V

/

/

I-

120

j

/

/

\/

140

/

.Al

200

*..'**x /

/y

(

180

/k/"*T

r _ J 1 a 2 FAMILY DWELL. UNITS

80

60

^

40
40

FORECLOSURES
(FFH

M H M P 1 M RK

fNONFARM

flnMl

—•

20
1 1

1 t

| >-

i i

1 1

FORECLOSURES
__ ^
1.

I

i

i

— ^BUILDING

7T\-

i

i i i

I

1 L_

I 1

;
_.-•*

220

3)

\

200

DJUS" •ED

\ I

l I

I l

I I

I I

FOR SEASONAL VARIATION

1

1

1 1

''^•1

s*

/

*S=C ,

/ /

160

"""•%.

y
MP6. EN 1PL0\fMEN T ^

*

-*H^

160
*'N. #

140
120

*r INCOME PAYMENTS

80

DEPT OF COMMERCE)^*,

^

'">^
'•\;

•^
*-

-+

V

^\

100

-MFG. EMPLOYMENT
(U.S.

DEPT OF LABOR)

80

t&''
i

i

1930 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39 '40 '41 '42 '43 4 4

MILLIONS .F.H.L.B. ADVANCES OUTSTANDING
$200 *

I • I I r • I l l I •

48




200
180

*•••.

/
(US.

220

\

\
\
* *••..

60
280

240

v.

"V/A COMl ; PAYMENl S

180

I i

260

.»—N.

/ j

140

0
140

100

r

1 1

1 1

»••"*•*•' ^•"

INDLISTRIAL PRODUC
:TION-^

N
I00\
\.

i

120

f INDUSTRIAL 1DRODI-/CT/C)N

120

i

80
1 1 1 1 1 I

240

Q

1 1

I

260

60

1 1

MATERIAL PRICES
DEPT OF LABOR)

_j

60
280

1 1

4

RLNIb

(U.S.

"

MATERIAL PRICES~

.*£.
^BUILDING

20

-t^-^-^.

INDEX

i 1

i

i

1943

CONSUMERS' PRICE INDEX
1935-192 9 =

i i

1 1

i

i

i i

1944

i

I

1 1

1 | 1 1 1 1 60
1945

LIQUID ASSETS

100

l l l l l l l l l l l 1 i l l l l i l Ii 1 Ml. J u l . I u l i

i Ii Mil

Federal Home Loan Bank Review

« « «

MONTHLY

SURVEY

» » »

HIGHLIGHTS
/. New lending activity of savings and loan associations declined 6.5 percent in September to $162,400,000,
but remained substantially
above that of a year ago.
A. Both construction and home purchase loans shared in the decrease.
B. The $1,330,000,000
of new loans made during the first three quarters of this year was only 3.5 percent less than the entire
1941 lending total.
II. An increase during September of over 11 percent in permits issued for family dwelling units brought the total to 14,315—84
percent
more than a year ago.
A. No publicly financed construction was included in the September 1945 total.
B. Private construction activity in the first nine months of this year amounted to 91,000 units compared with 75,000 in the same
period of 1944.
III. An increase in both material and labor costs raised the September composite index of this series to 136.4 percent of the
average compared with 135.8 in August.
IV.

Following the usual seasonal trend, mortgage recordings declined during September.

They amounted to

1935-1939

$464,157,000—down

5 percent.
A. Eight Bank Districts showed August-to-September drops but all recorded a greater volume of mortgages than in September
B. Recordings in the first nine months of 1945 were 16 percent greater than during the same time last year.
V. FHL Bank advances outstanding dropped 12 percent during September to
VI. Resources of the 2,476 insured associations totaled $5,726,000,000
liquid assets.

^r
BUSINESS CONDITIONS—Peacetime
production down
With Government expenditures down from $6,398,000,000 in August to $5,365,000,000 in September, according to U. S. Treasury figures, output and
employment, at factories producing war goods
dropped again in September. The Federal Keserve
Board's seasonally adjusted index of industrial
production stood at 172 percent of the 1935-1939
average in that month compared with 187 in August
and 230 in September 1944.
The declines, chiefly in machinery and transportation equipment industries, were partially offset by
a rise in steel production. Nondurable goods manufacture showed little change as a whole, since increases in the output of civilian-type products took
up the slack caused by the tapering off of war production.
Data from the Bureau of the Census showed a
decline of 2,370,000 in total employment. The
51,250,000 persons employed in September represented a 3-percent drop in agricultural and a 5-percent
decrease in non-agricultural categories. However,
employment in most non-manufacturing lines, except
Government service, was maintained or slightly
increased, after allowing for seasonal variations.
Claims for unemployment compensation increased
November 1945




$99,769,000.

on September 30, of which $1,911,000,000

#

1944.

was in the form of

^r
from 1,127,900 on September 1 to 1,640,200 at the
end of the month.
The prices of wholesale commodities, as reported
by the Labor Department (1935-1939 = 100, converted
from 1926 base) dropped fractionally during September. For the week ending September 1, they stood
at 130.6 while at the close of the week ending
September 29, the index showed 130.3. This compared with 128.6 and 128.8 for the corresponding
dates of last year.
Currency in circulation which, as reported by the
Treasury, totaled $27,619,000,000 for the week ending September 1, had risen to $27,769,000,000 at the
close of the week of September 29. By the middle of
October it had increased again to $27,954,000,000 and
stood more than $3,800,000,000 above the figure
for mid-October 1944.
[1935-1939=100]
Sept.

r
1

1945

Aug.
1945

Percent
change

Sept.
1944

Percent
change

95.5
108.3
131.8
228.6
172.0
123.1
229.7

79.8
108.3
131.5
236.6
* 187. 0
' 144.6
' 236.0

+19.7
0.0
+0.2
-3.3
-8.0
-14.9
-2.7

39.8
108.2
129.5
189.2
230.0
165.5
232.5

+139.9
+0.1
+1.8
+20.8
-25.2
-25.6
-1.2

Revised.
Adjusted for normal seasonal variation.

49

B U I L D I N G A C T I V I T Y — P r i v a t e building
over twice last year's volume
Residential construction in urban areas continued
to increase during September, according to building
permit data compiled by the U. S. Department of
Labor. The 14,315 family dwelling units provided
for by permits issued during the month represented
increases of 11 percent over the 12,903 units provided
in August and 84 percent over the 7,773 of a year ago.
Inasmuch as the September total includes no publicly
financed construction, as against 144 public units
included in the August total and 1,530 in the September 1944 figure, percentage gains in privately financed construction were somewhat greater—12 percent over August and 129 percent over September of
last year.
On a seasonally adjusted index basis, residential
construction in urban areas stood in September at
95.5 percent of the 1935-1939 average, the highest
point reached since early 1942.
During the first nine months of this year, permits
were issued for the construction of more than 91,000
privately financed dwelling units, as compared with
75,000 during the same 1944 period, an increase of
21 percent. In the same comparison, the number of
publicly financed dwelling units dropped from 16,000
to 9,000, down 43 percent. [TABLES 1 and 2.]

1.1-percent advance in the latter accounted for most
of the increase in the total cost index. As shown in
the accompanying table, the index of the cost of
labor required in the construction of the standard
house rose from 140.9 to 142.4 during September,
while that of material costs rose only fractionally
from 133.1 to 133.3. Since September of last year,
this over-all index has advanced 2.0 percent, the
result of increases of 1.6 and 2.8 percent, respectively,
in the material and labor components.
The U. S. Department of Labor's composite index
of wholesale prices of building materials also continued its advance during September, rising from
131.5 in August to 131.8. This gain resulted from
increases in prices of plumbing and heating materials
(1.7 percent), brick and tile (0.7 percent), paint and
paint materials (0.3 percent), cement and miscellaneous supplies (0.2 percent each). The wholesale price
of lumber dropped fractionally during the month,
while that of structural steel remained unchanged.
[TABLES 3, 4 and

Construction costs for the standard house
[Average month of 1935-1939 = 100]
Element of
cost
Material
Labor

THOUS,

5.]

NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION

Sept.
1945

Aug.
1945

Percent
change

Sept.
1944

Percent
change

" 133. 3
» 142. 4

133. 1
140. 9

+ 0. 2
+ 1. 1

131. 2
138. 5

+ 1. 6
+ 2. 8

T o t a l . . ' 136. 4

135. 8

+ 0.4

133. 7

+ 2. 0

URBAN AREAS - NO. OF DWELL. UNITS
v

Preliminary.

MORTGAGE LENDING—Post-VJ Day
decline reported

UJ PRIV.
^MULTI-FAMILY *

/^f.

I I I I I I I 11 ii1111 L I
1942
1943

^4

1944

*ns,ft&L
1945

B U I L D I N G COSTS—Upward trend
still apparent
Residential construction costs continued upward
during September, the FHLBA's index of the cost of
building the standard house rising from 135.8 in
August to 136.4 (1935-1939=100). Although both
material and labor costs contributed to this rise, the
50




During September, the first full month after VJ
Day, new mortgage loans made by savings and loan
associations approximated $162,400,000, a drop of
$11,200,000, or 6.5 percent, from the record volume
of loans made during August. This decline in home
financing activity, which was somewhat greater than
seasonally expected, was general throughout the
country. Associations in all F H L Bank Districts
reported smaller lending volumes in September than
during August, the declines ranging from less than
1 percent in the Little Rock District to as much as
19 percent in the states included in the Los Angeles
region.
Among the several loan-purpose groups, loans
for the construction of homes showed the sharpest
relative decline in September, the $16,400,000
Federal Home Loan Bank Review

New mortgage loans distributed by purpose
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]
Percent
change

Aug.
1945

Sept.
1945

Purpose

Sept.
1944

Percent
change

$16, 375 $20, 730 - 2 1 . 0 $5, 923 + 176.
- 6 . 2 101, 884 + 11.
113, 103 120, 557
- 2 . 1 14, 495 . + 1 5 .
16, 786 17, 146
+ 0. 2 3, 160 + 25.
3,971
3,980
+ 8.3 8,993 + 35.
12, 189 11, 259

Construction
H o m e purchase
Refinancing
Reconditioning
Other purposes

162, 433 173, 663

Total

5
0
8
9
5

- 6 . 5 134,455 + 20. 8

loaned for this purpose representing a drop of 21
percent from August. Loans for the purchase of
existing homes showed the second largest relative
decline, 6.2 percent, followed by refinancing loans
with a drop of 2 percent. On the other hand, both
reconditioning and "other purpose" l o a n s were
greater in September than in August, the former
showing a fractional rise and the latter reflecting an
increase of 8 percent.
Lending activity was substantially greater in
volume during September than a year ago, the gains
TOTAL LOANS MADE BY ALL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
UNITED STATES - BY TYPE OF ASSOCIATION

!
i

!
!

I
!

!

! !

TOTAL
ULt

o ^ /

J\
/

1
FEDEh ILS^

jC^/l

^

i^tf^

J

^STATt" CHARTERED
4EMBE?S
NC

,,,,

titH^

,r Yr:,,

1 1 . 1,1

1944

_l_l_

^Z

_LX.

1945

UNITED STATES - BY PURPOSE OF LOAN
BY MONTHS

J HOME PURCHASE
j-CONSTRUCTION
(-REFINANCING
l-RECONDITIONING
[-OTHER

OF OPERATING STATISTICS
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK SYSTEM

November 1945




ranging from 11 percent for home purchase to 177
percent for construction loans. Advances were
registered in all Bank Districts, the largest increase,
41 percent, being reported in the Winston-Salem
region and the smallest, 10 percent, in the Cincinnati
and Des Moines areas.
During the first nine months of this year an estimated $1,330,000,000 of home mortgage loans were
made by all savings and loan associations, an amount
only 3.5 percent less than that made during the
entire year 1941. Federals accounted for 47 percent of total loans made during this period, state
chartered members, 44 percent, and nonmember
associations, 9 percent. [TABLES 6 and 7.]

MORTGAGEfRECORDINGS-

>easona

decrease noted
During September a total of 135,119 mortgages
of $20,000 or less were recorded in the amount of
$464,157,000. Following the general seasonal pattern, this represented a decline from August, down
slightly more than 5 percent from that record
month. However, the dollar volume of recordings
during this first full month after the end of hostilities was about 11.5 percent greater than that reported for September 1944.
Indications are that mortgage recordings during
the current year will exceed the post-depression
peak established in 1941. Recordings in the first
nine months of 1945 have been maple in the amount
of $3,979,693,000, about 13 percent greater than the
volume recorded in the corresponding months of
that earlier year and approximately 16 percent
greater than in the like 1944 period.
The $172,551,000 of mortgages recorded by savings
and loan associations in September represented a
decline of almost 5 percent from the August figure,
but was 18 percent greater than in September last
year. Miscellaneous lenders showed" the greatest
month-to-month recession, down almost 9 percent,
while individuals were off more than 7 percent from
August and life insurance companies were down 7
percent. Mutual savings banks indicated the least
change, being only 0.1 percent below their August
level.
Except in the New York, Pittsburgh, WinstonSalem and Des Moines regions, which reported larger
recordings in September than in August, all Districts
showed declines in this comparison. The sharpest
drop occurred in the Los Angeles area, down more than
16 percent from the preceding month. However,
51

Mortgage recordings by type of mortgagee
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]

T y p e of lender

PerPercent
Cumuchange cent of
lative
Sept. recordings
from
Au1945 (9 months)
gust a m o u n t
1945

Savings and loan associations
-4.8
Insurance companies
-7.0
Banks, t r u s t companies _ _ - 1 . 8
-0. 1
M u t u a l savings b a n k s
-7.2
Individuals.
-8.7
Others
Total

-5.2

Percent
of
total
recordings

35. 3
4.4
19.0
3. 6
25. 7
12. 0

100.0 3, 979, 693

100. 0

F H L B S Y S T E M - A d v a n c e s and
repayments dropped
Advances by the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks to
mortgage lending institutions during September
totaled $4,519,000, a decline of 54 percent from the
preceding month. With the exception of the New
York Bank, all Districts shared in this decrease, the
sharpest drop being shown in the Portland area
where no new advances were made during the month.
I t will be recalled that the member associations in
the Portland region showed the highest ratio of
liquid items to total resources at the end of 1944.
Repayments in September continued well in excess of new advances, receipts during the month
totaling $17,200,000. This, however, was more
than 9 percent less than the August volume. Six of
the twelve Banks shared in this decline—Pittsburgh,
Winston-Salem, Cincinnati, Chicago, Des Moines
and Los Angeles.
The excess of repayments over advances is reflected
in the month-end statement of condition of the banks,
advances outstanding on September 30 being about
12 percent lower than at the end of August. Only
Winston-Salem showed a gain in the balance of advances above the figure reported at the close of the
preceding month. Reflecting the shrinkage in the
unpaid balance of advances, cash, including interbank deposits, increased by more than 5 percent
from the end of August and Government security
holdings were up almost 11 percent.




[TABLE

12.]

F L O W OF PRIVATE REPURCHASABLE
3 7 . 2 $1,403,161
177, 030
4. 1
755, 368
19.7
144, 697
4.0
2 4 . 0 1, 022, 144
477, 293
11.0

all Bank Districts showed increases over September
1944, gains ranging from a high of over 21 percent
in the Winston-Salem area to a low of more than 3
percent in the Chicago region. [TABLES 8 and 9.]

52

A rise of nearly 10 percent in member deposits and
an increase of 0.5 percent in capital items resulted
in a 1.5 percent gain in the combined assets of all
Banks during September. Debentures outstanding
showed no change. During the 12 months ended
September 30, 1945, there was an increase of approximately 9 percent in combined Bank resources.

CAPITAL

The $195,000,000 of private savings estimated to
have been invested in savings and loan associations
in September was about 20 percent below the peak
in monthly volume reached last July and fractionally
less than the inflow reported during August. Nevertheless, new savings invested during September were
28 percent greater than in the corresponding month
of 1944. Withdrawals amounted to $100,500,000,
approximately 44 percent less than in July and
almost 4 percent less than in August. However,
September withdrawals were 35 percent greater than
during the like month of last year. The September
1945 ratio of withdrawals to new investments was
51.6 percent compared with 48.6 percent in t h a t
month of 1944. The high rate of savings investment, though, resulted in a net gain of $94,300,000
in savings held, more than 20 percent greater than
the increase estimated for the corresponding month
last year.
Share investments and repurchases,September 1945
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]
I t e m a n d period

All asso- All insured Uninsured N o n ciations associations m e m b e r s m e m b e r s

Share i n v e s t m e n t s :
l s t 9 m o s . 1945_ $1,726,850 $1,385,967 $206,081 $134,802
l s t 9 m o s . 1944_ $1,404,629 $1,097,183 $185,850 $121,596
+ 23
Percent change
+ 26
+ 11
+ 11
$194,823 $146,290 $23,811 $24,722
Sept. 1945
Sept. 1944
$152,636 $122,016 $18,308 $12,312
Percent change
+ 20
+ 28
+ 30
+ 101
Repurchases:
l s t 9 m o s . 1945_ $963,281 $749,624 $133,877 $79,780
l s t 9 m o s . 1944_ $805,312 $601,847 $122,657 $80,808
Percent ch an ge _ _ _
+ 20
-1
+ 25
+9
$8,232
Sept. 1945
$100,506
$77,855 $14,419
Sept. 1944
$74,193
$7,238
$56,102 $10,853
Percent change
+ 35
+ 14
+ 33
+ 39
Repurchase ratio
(percent):
l s t 9 m o s . 1945_
l s t 9 m o s . 1944_
Sept. 1945
Sept. 1944

55.8
57.3
51.6
48.6

54.1
54.9
53.2
46.0

65.0
66.0
60.6
59.3

59.2
66.5
33.3
58.8

Federal Home Loan Bank Review

Activity during the first nine months of the current year resulted in a net gain of $763,600,000 in
savings held, approximately 27 percent larger than
that reported in the similar 1944 period. The withdrawal ratio during the first three quarters of 1945
was 55.8 percent, somewhat lower than the 57.3
percent estimated for the January—September interval of last year.
INSURED A S S O C I A T I O N S
showed another increase

13.]

FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS

The 1,467 Federal savings and loan associations
showed resources of $3,632,000,000 on September 30;
their first mortgage holdings were $2,255,000,000.
Private investors numbering 2,571,700 had accounts
of $3,182,000,000, or an average account amounting
to $1,237 compared with $1,115 a year ago.
Progress in number and assets of Federals
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]
Number
Class of association

Approximate assets

Sept. 30, Aug. 31,
1945
1945

New
Converted __
Total
November 1945




631
836
1,467

Sept. 30,
1945

Aug. 31,
1945

633 $1, 252, 668 $1, 239, 875
836 2, 379, 529 2, 355, 212
1,469

Foreclosures

Mechanical difficulties have made it impossible to prepare the regular quarterly information on nonfarm real estate foreclosures.
This material will be presented as soon as it
becomes available.

Resources

At the end of September there were 2,476 insured
associations with total resources aggregating
$5,726,000,000, a rise of $176,000,000, or 3.2 percent,
since June 30. Last year the gain was $130,000,000,
or 2.8 percent, for the same period.
During the third quarter of 1945, mortgages held
by insured associations increased $139,000,000 compared with $85,000,000 for the same quarter in 1944.
For each $1,000 increase in the balance of outstanding mortgages there were $2,700 of new loans made,
while in the third quarter of 1944 it took $3,500 of
new lending to increase the mortgage loan balance
by $1,000.
The 4,305,700 private investors had $4,982,000,000
in repurchasable shares on September 30. The average private share account was $1,157, while a year
ago there were 3,931,400 investors with the average
account about $1,041.
Liquid assets totaled $1,911,000,000 with cash
amounting to $303,200,000, or 5 percent of assets.
Government bond holdings were approximately
$1,607,800,000, or 28 percent of total resources.
[TABLE

Liquid resources were approximately 34 percent
of total resources. Cash amounted to $178,400,000,
or 5 percent of the total, while Government bond
holdings were about $1,068,000,000, or over 29
percent of resources.

3, 632, 197

3, 595, 087

Consumers1 Price Index
•

The "Consumers' Price Index for Moderate
Income Families in Large Cities/' which appears
at the bottom of page 48, is the new name given to
the former "Cost-of-living Index" compiled by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics (1935-1939 = 100). In
announcing the change, which was recommended by
the BLS, the Secretary of Labor stated that the new
title, being more descriptive of the data which the
series presents, should "end the confusion and controversy caused by misunderstanding of what the index
is designed to measure and by [its] use for purposes
for which it is not adapted."
The index itself has not been changed. The series
remains a measure of the effects of average changes
in retail prices of selected goods, rents and services,
weighted by quantities bought by average families
living on a fixed, moderate income in large cities of
the country. The items priced constituted about
70 percent of the expenditures of city families whose
incomes averaged $1,524 in 1934-1936.
There are, of course, other factors that also influence family expenditures which are not reflected
by this index. Nor does it try to show the full effect
of such factors as changes in quality and availability
of goods, both of which have declined during the war.
An attempt has been made by the BLS to allow
for the disappearance of low-priced merchandise by
pricing the most nearly similar article which has
been on the market.
The BLS further stated that the President's Committee on the Cost of Living has estimated that such
factors, together with certain others not fully measured by the index, would add a maximum of 3 to 4
points to the average price rise shown for large cities
between January 1941 and September 1944.
53

Table 1 . — B U I L D I N G A C T I V I T Y — E s t i m a t e d number and valuation of new family dwelling units
provided in all urban areas in September 1945, by Federal Home Loan Bank District and by State
[Source: U. S. Department of Labor]
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]
All residential s t r u c t u r e s
N u m b e r of family
dwelling u n i t s

Federal H o m e Loan B a n k Distiict and State

1

September
1945

$22,474

13, 298

991

464

263

2,020

990

424
213
1,321
15
207

886
3
87
1
14

80
25
303
9
47

222

424
53
1,321
15
207

885
3
87
1
14

82

3,974

245

672

82 1

3,724

244

27
55

1,308

88

206
466

27

55 1

1,058
2,666

87
157

14,315

7,773

490

263

2,180 1

80
51
303
9
47

222
2
30
3
6

N o . 2—JNew York___

736

INewJersey
New York

270
466
577

.

1

_ _

Connecticut
Maine
Massachusett
rview H a m p s h i r e
Rhode Island.
Vermont _

___ _
- _
._

_

. __
...

..
__-

-

_

No. 3—Pittsburgh
Delaware
Pennsylvania
W e s t Virginia

..

-

-

.
__

N o . 4—Winston-Salem
Alabama
D i s t r i c t of C o l u m b i a
Florida
Georgia
Maryland
North Carolina. . . .
S o u t h Carolina
Virginia

_._
_

..

N o . 5—Cincinnati..-

__

Kentucky _ . . .
Ohio _
Tennessee

________

INO. 6—Indianapolis

_ ..

Indiana
Michigan

__
__

N o . 7—Chicago
Illinois
Wisconsin

__

. _

__
_

_

_

N o . 8—Des M o i n e s _

_

I o w a __
_ .
Minnesota
Missouri _ _
_
North Dakota
South Dakota _

_

_

_ _

_ _
...
_..
_ _ _
__________

N o . 9—Little R o c k _ _

__
.
_

.

__

_

Arkansas
Louisiana _ - . _ _ . _ _ _ _
Mississippi _
_
N e w Mexico—.
Texas

._

__
_.
_

Colorado
Kansas
N e b r a s k a __
Oklahoma
N o . 11—Portland .
Idaho _
Montana
Oregon _.
Utah
Washington
Wyoming

. .
__

__

54




_._

_

.

-

__
__

_

-_

-

_
_ _
__

N o . 12—Los Angeles
Arizona
California
Nevada

-_ _
__ __

_
...

_
__

.
. _
._

157 1

5,538 1

2

30
3
6

September
1944

$55,044

$17, 531

1,791

552

366 I

2,343

1,111

510
17

8
2,019
386

1,780
11

1
452
99

349
17

8
1,961
3? 4

1,101
10

2,006

1,288

6,543

3,249

1,845

681

6,211

1,975

441
36
661
230
69
222
66
281

136
597
261
53
36
18
9
178

911
204
2,201
657
396
862
126
1,186

333
1,164
629
72
82
16
16
937

429
36
598
214
• 69
218
66
215

136
51
253
53
36
18
125

904
204
2,091
643
396
835
126
1,012

333
176
608
72
82
16
16
672

1,161

423

5,780

1,705

1,126

419

5,645

1,690

59
794
308

f 22
332
69

161
4,831

55
1,510
140

55
771
300

22
328
69

153
4,734
758

55
1.495
140

983

390

4,947

1,719

918

390

4,766

1,719

317
666

177
213

1,360

3,587 1

687
1,032

314
604

177
213

1,351
3,415

687
1,032

594

6,003

2,379 |

959

380

5,277

1,650

471
123

4,271

1,732 1

1,811
568

650
309

265
115

3,692
1,585

1,110
540

840

316

3,629

1,337

822 ~

276

3,580

1,175

119
432
177
71
41

66
185
60
2
3

515
2,200
550
243
121

308
844
181
2
2

119
427
164
71
41

66
181
24
2
3

515
2,195
506
243
121

308
831
32
2
2

2,399

1,057

547

N o . 10—Topeka

2,666 1

September
1945

2,413

107
162
222
74
1,834

...
_

$58,318 1

September
1944

527

780
345

_

September
1945

1
473
103

1,125

_

Permit valuation

September
1944

September
1944

UNITED STATES

N u m b e r of family
dwelling u n i t s

Permit valuation

September
1945

N o . 1—Boston

All p r i v a t e 1- a n d 2-family s t r u c t u r e s

200
93
62
1921

'

788 1

5,739

1,874

2,355

1,049

5,596

1,850

47
219
114
17
660 *

148
292!
312
120
4,867 ,

24
627
146
7
1,070

107
162
222
74
1,790

47
219
114
17
652

148
292
312
120
4,724

24
627
146
7
1,046

161

1,817

35
32
31 |
63

321

492

157

1,657

311

743
254
304
516'

73
48
125
75

145
93
62
192

31
32
31
63

583
254
304
516

63
48
125
75

3, 226

1,259

719

367

3,074

1, 253

316

104
38
160
117
285
15

42
20
78
34
136
57

307 1
122
616
578
1,407
44

775

370

108
38
164
118
312
35

42 1
20
78
34
139
57

122
626
588
1,485
89

126
73
173
121
453
313

2,676

2,302 1

12,067

5,604

2,374

1,108

11,151

3,563

96
2,535
45

28
2,260
14 1

431
11,289
347

28
5,557
19

92
2,237
45 1

28
1,072

419 I
10,385
347 1

3, 521

8

126
73
172
121
448
313

28
14

Federal Home Loan Bank Review

Table 2— BUILDING ACTIVITY-Estimated

number and valuation of new family dwelling units
provided in all urban areas of the United States
[Source: U. S. Department of Labor]
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]
N u m b e r of family dwelling u n i t s

Private construction.
1-family d w e l l i n g s .
2-family dwellings l
_.
3- a n d more-family dwellings

. _.
2

Sept. 1945

A u g . 1945

14,315

12, 759

6,243

91,084

12, 459
839'
1,017

11,059
617
1,083

4,963
575
705

75, 755
6,055
9,274

144

1,530

9,013

14,315

12, 903

7,773

100,097

P u b l i c construction __
T o t a l u r b a n construction _
1
2

January-September
totals

M o n t h l y totals

T y p e of construction

Permit valuation

Sept. 1944

1945

1944

•

January-September
totals

M o n t h l y totals

Sept. 1945

A u g . 1945

Sept. 1944

74, 978

$58, 318

$53,310

$19, 779

$338, 530

$236,072

57,177
7,993
9,808

51,871
3,173
3,274

47, 279
2,106
3,925

15, 500
2,031
2, 248

290, 642
20,619
27, 269

180,108
27,150
28, 814

538

2,695

18,899

39,181

58, 318

53,848

22, 474

357, 429

275, 253

15,863
90,841

1945

1944

Includes 1- and 2-family dwellings combined with stores.
Includes multi-family dwellings combined with stores.

Table 3-BUILDING COSTS

-Index of building costs for the standard house in representative
cities in specific months 1
[Average month of 1935-1939 = 100]
1944

1945

1943

1942

1941

1940

1939

Oct.

Oct.

Oct.

Oct.

Oct.

Federal H o m e Loan B a n k District
and City
Oct.
N o . 2—New Y o r k :
Camden, N. J
Newark, N . J
Albany, N . Y
Buffalo, N . Y . _
N o . 6—Indianapolis:
Indianapolis, I n d
__
D e t r o i t , M i c h _ ___' _

__

_.

__. . .

N o . 8—Des M o i n e s :
Des Moines, Iowa
St. Louis, M o
Fargo, N . D
Sioux F a l l s , S. D
N o . 11—Portland:
Boise, I d a h o
_ ._ . _
P o r t l a n d , Ore
Salt L a k e C i t y , U t a h
Seattle, Wash

..

.

July

Apr.

Jan.

Oct.

144.6

135.6
149.7
140.6
134. 7

138.9
153.9
134.2
128.1

139. 2
135.8
122.5
121.6

114.2
107.0
102.9
' 105.0

106.5
105.6
101.9
104.7

138.1
152.3

137.3
152.1

126.0
142.1

122.6
125.6

113.0
119.2

101.4
105.1

* 101. 2
104.0

120.8
127.1
128.3
131.9

120, 7
126.7
126.7
130.8

120.9
124.6
125.7
130.8

116.0
119.2
122.4
126.5

116.7
121.0
118.8
124.7

111.3
119.6
108.8
114.7

104.8
103.1
100.8
105.0

102.0
98.2
102.3
101.4

138.1
143.4
129.1
138.9

138.1
143.4
129.7
138.9

139.1
143.6
129.7
138.9

127.2
132.0
122.3
132.5

126.0
127.0
120.1
122.1

118.3
111.0
116.6
119.7

108.3
101.4
103.8
103.4

157.4
149.2

145.2
161.9
151.6
147.1

145.2
161.9
151.4
149.4

143.2
159.7
148.0
144.6

141.6
153.4

140.5
153.6

139.5
152.9

121.4
149.8
128.1
133.1

120.8
133.2
127.8
133.0

138.9
142.4
130.4
135.3

138.9
141.5
129.5
139.5

103.8
97.0
102.5
102.8

r

i Indexes of October 1941 and thereafter have been revised in order to use retail material prices collected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
This index is designed to measure the changes in the costs of constructing a standard frame house and to provide a basis for the study of the trend of costs within an
individual community or in different cities. The various units of materials and labor are selected in accordance with their contribution to the total cost of the completed
dwelling.
Material costs are based on prices for a limited bill of the more important items. Current prices are furnished by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and are based on
information from a group of dealers in each city who report on prices for material delivered to job site, in average quantities, for residential construction. Because of
wartime conditions, some of the regular items are not available at times and, therefore, substitutions must be made of similar products which are being sold in the current
market.
Labor costs are based on prevailing rates for residential construction and reflect total earnings, including overtime and bonus pay. Either union or nonunion rates
are used according to which prevails in the majority of cases within the community.
Figures presented in this table include all revisions up to the present time. Revisions are unavoidable, however, as more complete information if obtained and
becomes available for inclusion in this table.
Cities in FHLB Districts 2, 6, 8, and 11 report in January, April, July, and October of each year; those in Districts 3, 5, 9 and 12 report in February, May, August
and r November; and those in Districts 1, 4, 7 and 10 report in March, June, September and December.
Revised.

November 1945




55

Table 4 . — B U I L D I N G COSTS—Index of building costs for the standard house
[Average month of 1935-1939=100]
Sept. 1945 A u g . 1945 J u l y 1945 J u n e 1945 M a y 1945 A p r . 1945 M a r . 1945 F e b . 1945 J a n . 1945 D e c . 1944 N o v . 1944 Oct. 1944 Sept.1944

E l e m e n t of Cost
Material
Labor

. __

Total

p 133. 3
p 142.4

133.1
140.9

133.0
140.6

132.7
140.5

132.5
140. 4

132.4
140.5

132.3
140.4

131.9
140.1

131.7
140.1

131.5
140.0

131.5
139.9

131.3
139.1

131.2
138.5

136. 4

135.8

135.6

135.3

135.1

135.1

135.0

134.7

134.5

134.4

134.4

133.9

133.7

P

p Preliminary.

Table 5 . — B U I L D I N G COSTS—Index of wholesale prices of building materials in the United States
[Source: U. S. Department of Labor]
[1935-1939=100; converted from 1926 base]
All b u i l d i n g
materials

Period

1943: S e p t e m b e r

.

.

1944: S e p t e m b e r
October
November
December .
1945: J a n u a r y
February
March
April
May.
June
July
August___
September .

.

Brick and
tile

Cement

Lumber

Paint and
paint materials

Plumbing
and heating

Structural
steel

Other

_

125.6

109.0

102.7

162.7

126.1

118.5

103.5

110.3

___

129.5
129.9
130.0
130.0

111.7
115.3
115.6
115.9

106.3
107.0
107.2
107.0

171.5
171.3
171.3
171.3

129.7
130.3
130.7
130.7

121.4
121.4
121.4
121.4

103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5

111.7
111.7
111.7
111.7

130.4
130.6
130.8
130.8
131.0
131.1
131.2
131.5
131.8

121.5
121.6
121.8
121.7
121.8
122.1
122.9
122.8
123.7

106.9
108.7
109.1
109.1
109.1
109.1
109.1
109.1
109.3

171.3
171.4
171.3
171.4
171.9
172.5
172.7
172.9
172.6

130.7
130.8
130.7
130.7
130.8
130.7
130.4
131.9
132.3

121.4
121.4
121.4
121.4
121.4
121.7
121.7
122.7
124.8

103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5
103.5

111.9
112.0
112.3
112.3
112.6
112.8
112.8
112.8
113.0

+0.2
+1.8

+0.7
+10.7

+0.2
+2.8

-0.2
+0.6

+0.3
+2.0

+1.7
+2.8

0.0
0.0

+0.2
+1.2

.
_._. _
...
-_
_ __

P e r c e n t change:
S e p t e m b e r 1945- A u g u s t 1945
S e p t e m b e r 1945-September 1944

Table 6 . — M O R T G A G E LENDING—Estimated volume of new home mortgage loans by all savings
and loan associations, by purpose and class of association
[Thousands of dollars]
P u r p o s e of loans

Class of association

Period

1943
January-September.
September

_

1944
January-September
September
October _
N o v e m b e r __
December

__ _

1945
January-September
January..
February _
March
April
May.
June..
July
A u g u s t . __
September

__

_ -.-

56




_-

___-___-__

Reconditioning

L o a n s for
all o t h e r
purposes

Total
loans

Construction

Home purchase

Refinancing

•$106,497

$802,371

$167, 254

$30,441

$77,398

$1,183,961

$511, 757

$539,299

$132,905

81, 213
13, 211

581,403
86, 016

127,912
13,799

22, 639
3,229

55,016
6,718

868,183
122,973

372,730
54,100

396,193
55,907

99, 260
12, 966

95, 243

1,064,017

163,813

30, 751

100, 228

1, 454, 052

669, 433

648, 670

135,949

79, 269

790,866

121, 740

23, 418

74, 019

1, 089, 312

500,904

485, 563

102,845

5,923
6,095
4,635
5,244

101,884
101, 461
90,182
81, 508

14,495
15, 253
13, 265
13, 555

3,160
2,699
2,507
2,127

8,993
9,720
7,785
8,704

455
228
374
138

63,489
61, 965
54,978
51,586

59,162
60,945
52, 241
49, 921

11,804
12,318
11,155
9,631

109,162

957,089

140, 001

27, 434

96, 744

1, 330, 430

628,227

584, 360

117,843

3,772
3,081
7,406
9, 541
13,032
17, 567
17,658
20,730
16, 375

76, 495
78,140
105, 307
113,684
120, 244
116, 798
112,761
120, 557
113,103

12,167
12,524
15,922
16,800
15,887
17,147
15, 622
17,146
16, 786

1,868
1,994
2,559
2,951
3,396
3,364
3, 351
3,971
3,980

7,999
10, 270
10, 287
10,778
10, 520
12,435
11,007
11, 259
12,189

102, 301
106,009
141,481
153,754
163,079
167,311
160,399
173,663
162,433

46,439
49, 900
69, 430
71, 375
75, 607
79,603
76, 355
82,197
77, 321

46,452
46, 575
60, 688
67, 955
71,921
74, 219
70, 264
75,644
70,642

9,410
9,534
11,363
14,424
15, 551
13,489
13,780
15,822
14, 470

Federals

134,
135,
118,
111,

State
members

Nonmembers

Federal Home Loan Bank Review

Table 7.—LENDING—Estimated volume of new
loans by savings and loan associations

Table 8.—RECORDINGS—Estimated nonfarm
mortgage recordings, $20,000 and under

[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]

S E P T E M B E R 1945
[Thousands of dollars]

C u m u l a t i v e n e w loans
(9 m o n t h s )

N e w loans
Federal
Home
Loan B a n k District a n d class
of association

August
1945

September
1944

1945

1944

$162,433 $173,663 $134,455 $1,330,430 $1,089,312

U N I T E D STATES

Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember-__

Federal
State m e m b e r Nonmember___
N e w York

September
1945

__ __

Federal
State m e m b e r ,
Nonmember-._
Pittsburgh
Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember-_.
Winston-Salem
Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember--_

Federal
State'-member.
Nonmember--.

77,321
70,642
14,470

82,197 1 63,489
59,162
75,644
15,822 1 11,804 1

11,149

11,461 1 9,753

5,514
4,375
1,260
16, 899
5,813
8,406
2,680

Percent
change
+22.1

628,227
584,360

500,904
485,563
102, 845

+25.4
+20.3
+14. 6

89,919

79,150

+13.6

4,217
4,493
1,043

37,951
40,973
10,995

29, 627
39, 592
9,931

+28.1
+3.5
+10. 7

17,143 1 13,953

130,968

95, 598

+37.0

29, 734
49, 682
16,182

+54. 7
+27.2
+34.7

4,760 1
5,081

1,620 1

6,181
8,266
2,696

4,793
7,295
1,865

117,843 1

46,001
63,172 1
21,795

13,621

13,881

11,551

110, 630

90,931

+21.7

6,550
4,521
2,550

6,734
4,430
2,717

5,363
4,078
2,110

52, 523
37,988
20,119

41, 410
30, 874
18, 647

+26. 8
+23. 0
+7.9

20,798

22, 668

14, 735

165, 311

128, 012

+29.1

11,139
7,992
1,667

11, 581
9,476
1,611

7,860
6,024
851

87, 782
67, 303
10, 226

67, 706
52, 536
7,770

+29. 7
+28.1
+31. 6

26, 322

28,442

23, 920

220, 536

188,112

+17.2

10, 826
13,712
1,784

12, 363
13, 601
2,478

10, 383
11,817
1,720

94, 215
110, 885
15, 436

78, 570
94,185
15, 357

+19.9
+17.7
+0.5

S a v i n g s Insur- B a n k s M u and
Other
and
t u a l Individ- m
ance
ortloan
com- t r u s t savings uals
gagees
associa- panies corn- b a n k s
banks
tions

Federal H o m e Loan
B a n k District
and State

$172, 551 $18,935 $91,661. $18, 472 $111,384 $51,154 $464,157

U N I T E D STATES

Boston

_ _

.

14, 061

447

4,799

9,508

5,796

2,575

37,186

1,847
676
9,620
483
1,176
259

352
17
78

2,071
308
1,659
183
483
95

1, 408
749
5,814
696
462
379

1,756
430
2,675
246
499
190

823
50
1,249
32
410
11

8,257
2,230
21,095
1,640
3,030
934

14,461

1,636

7,713

6,886

16, 863

6,002

53, 561

3,968
10, 493

674
962

3,292
4,421

745
6,141

4,010
12, 853

2,061
3,941

14, 750
38, 811

13,840

1,722

8,845

558

6,692

2, 741

34, 398

20812, 520
1,112

132
1,303
287

208
6,950
1,687

97
461

331
5,495
866

90
2,520
131

1,066
29, 249
4,083

19, 309

2,790

6,355

125

16,005

4,263

48, 847

607
4,475
2,459
1,807
4,425
2,441
410
2,685

235
406
688
265
128
509
207
352

335
801
1,052
1,163
953
457
434
1,160

125

738
1,774
5,622
1,440
1,825
1,393
759
2,454

322
447
1,021
578
219
611
319
746

2,237
7.903
10, 842
5,253
7,675
5,411
2,129
7,397

..

32, 326

1,618

13,026

_.

2.993
28, 261
1,072

_

Connecticut . . .
Maine
. . _ __
M a s s a c h u s e t t s __ _ .
New Hampshire
Rhode Island _ _ _
Vermont
New York

. . .

New Jersey.. _
New York.
Pittsburgh
Delaware _
Pennsylvania
W e s t Virginia
W i n s t o n - S a l e m . . _.
Alabama
___ _
D i s t r i c t of C o l u m b i a Florida
Georgia. _ _._ ._
Maryland
_
N o r t h Carolina
S o u t h Carolina
Virginia..
.. ..
Cincinnati
Kentucky
Ohio
Tennessee

..

...

73, 648

60, 674

+21.4

Indianapolis

9,719

2,024

8,919

12

3,816

1,910

26,400

39,718
30, 644
3,286

29, 688
28,092
2,894

+33.8
+9.1
+13.5

I n d i a n a _.
Michigan

6,009
3,710

797
1,227

3,332
5,587

12

1,193
2,623

701
1,209

12, 044
14, 356

19,174

1,139

6,192

41

7,658

8,666

42,870

18, 504

19, 545

15, 222

151,153

123,160

+22.7

8,093
9,116
1,295

8,227
10,018
1,300

6,924
7,183
1,115

64,316
75, 481
11, 356

51, 660
61, 427
10, 073

+24.5
+22.9
+12.7

14, 558
4.616

793
346

3.762
2,430

41

4,494
3,164

7,857
809

31,464
11,406

11,462

1,571

7,890

277

5,792

4,357

31,349

2,959
4,904
2,929
489
181

134
358
1. 007
45
27

2,081
2,112
3,306
154
237

1,024
1,693
2,692
149
234

304
1,462
2,522
47
22

6,502
10, 806
12,456
884
701

9,021

2, 911

24, 306

42
644
122

11, 303

9,350

80,163

68, 610

+16.8

Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember--_

5,346
3,560
1,390

5,980
3,983
1,340

5,234
2,916
1,200

41,197
28, 379
10, 587

35, 735
24,140
8,735

+15.3
+17.6
+21.2

__ _

Federal
State m e m b e r .
N o n m e m b e r . _.

_.

7,730

7, 746

6,566

63,033

58, 039

+8.. 6

3,741
3,880
109

3, 665
3, 985
96

3,212
3,268
86

31,117
31, 066
850

24, 557
32, 820
662

+26/7
-5.3
+28.. 4

7,948

8, 523

6,494

67, 088

52,849

+26. 9

4,572 I
2,176
1,200

4,657
2, 346
1, 520

3,423
1,862
1,209

36, 625
19, 271
11,192

27 558
14, 865
10,426

+32. 9
+29. 6
+7.3

5, 403

5, 485

4,610

45, 410

35, 300

+28. 6

3, 281
2, 057
65

3, 475
1, 948
62

2,790
1,692
128

27, 700
16,511
1,199

23,139
10,818
1,343

+19.7
+52.6
-10. 7

Illinois
Wisconsin

. _.
______

Des M o i n e s
Iowa_._
_ ._
Minnesota.
_ _ ..
Missouri.. _
North Dakota
South Dakota
Little Rock

__

Arkansas . . _ .
Louisiana.Mississippi
N e w Mexico.
.__ _
Texas
_
Topeka.

__

__ __

Federal
State m e m b e r .
N o n m e m b e r . __

Colorado
_
K a n s a s , . _. ._
Nebraska
Oklahoma
. __
Portland

Portland
Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember...
Los Angeles

14, 787

Federal
State m e m b e r .
N o n m e m b e r . __

November 1945




5,149
47, 218
5,930

3,687
3,285
373

10, 296

Topeka

485

7,345

. ---

Little Rock.

58, 297

179
1,810
2,456

5,038
3,757
338

Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember-..
Des Moines

4,445

397
5,421
579

9,133

Chicago
-

6,397

5,012
3,585
379

Federal
State m e m b e r .
Nonmember-__
.

485

403 1,177
702 10, 539
513 1,310

8,976

Indianapolis

Chicago

Total

7, 434 1
7, 262
91

18, 333

10, 956

9,536
8, 753
44

5,603
5,249
104

132, 571 1
69,082
62, 687
802

108,877

+21.8

61, 520
46, 532
825

+12. 3
+34.7
-2.8

Idaho
Montana
Oregon
Utah
Washington
Wyoming

_

__ __

Los Angeles
Arizona
California. _
Nevada

_

277

2,454

2,651

7,269

778
188
2,379 I
215
465
142
187
5,212 1, 909

540
185
294
134
1,498

581
1,550
443
250 i
4,445

2.093

2,129
4,973
1,466
581
15,157

8,731

851

2,839

5, 726

1, 581

19, 728

1,387 i
2,592
1,180
3,572

91
111
353
296

718
830
323
968

3,035
669
574
1,448

539
271
146
625

5,770
4, 473
2,576
6 909

5,515

484

4,302

580

4,044

1,800

16, 725

455
478
1,535
418
2,410
219

40
63
126
111
144

175
255
440
675
2,530
227

78

442
411
1,360
399
1,182
250

57
39
252
171
1, 254
27

1 169
1 246
3,791
1 774
8, 022
723

9,903

70 490

502

14, 932

2,199 18,130

25,326 |

380
14, 447
105

45
559
2,143 17,434
137
11

1, 271
23, 745
;
310

10

2,352
97
9, 782 67, 551
587
24 j

57

Table 9 . — M O R T G A G E RECORDINGS—Estimated volume of nonfarm mortgages recorded
[Dollar a m o u n t s are s h o w n in t h o u s a n d s ]
Savings a n d loan
associations

M u t u a l savings
banks

Banks and trust
• companies

Insurance
companies

Individuals

Other mortgagees

All mortgagees

Period
Total
1944....
January-September
September
October
November
December

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

$1,563,678

33.9

$256,173

$877,762

19.0

$165,054

$1,134,054

24.6

$613,908

13.3

$4, 610,629

100.0

1,160,620
146,151
148,131
134, 359
120, 568

33.8
35.1
35.0
34.1
33.5

195,463
22, 432
20,985
20, 543
19,182

5.7
5.4
5.0
5.2
5.3

665,022
77, 000
76,181
71, 752
64,807

19.4
18.5
18.0
18.2
18.0

119,664
15, 447
16, 552
15,176
13, 662

3.5
3.7
3.9
3.9

825,206
104,479
109, 767
103, 513
95, 568

24.0
25.1
26.0
26.3
26.5

467,949
50, 676
51, 223
48, 296
46, 440

13.6
12.2
12.1
12.3
12.9

3,433,924
416,185
422,839
393,639
360, 227

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

1,403,161
111, 480
111, 176
151, 361
157,181
172, 421
176, 051
169, 784
181,156
172,551

35.3
31.4
32.8
34.9
34.5
35.4
36.1
36.2
37.0
37.2

177,030
17, 882
16, 034
20, 669
19,718
21, 459
21, 801
20,173
20, 359
18,935

4.4
5.0
4.7
4.8
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.3
4.2
4.1

755,368
65,109
63,933
80,000
88, 749
91, 023
91, 336
90,199
93, 358
91,661

19.0
18.4
18.9
18.5
19.5
18.7
18.8
19.2
19.1
19.7

144,697
12, 500
10, 343
13, 599
15, 680
18,981
18,572
18,062
18, 488
18,472

3.6
3.5
3.1
3.1
3.4
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.8
4.0

1,022,144
99, 200
93, 248
114,971
118, 713
125,849
121, 800
116, 964
120, 015
111,384

25.7
28.0
27.5
26.5
26.1
25.8
25.0
24.9
24.5
24.0

477,293
48, 407
43,963
52, 737
55, 749
57, 702
57, 481
54, 087
56, 013
51.154

12.0
13.7
13.0
12.2
12.2
11.8
11.8
11.5
11.4
11.0

3,979,693
354, 578
338,697
433, 337
455, 790
487, 435
487,041
469, 269
489. 389
464,157

100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0

1945
January-September.
January
February
March
April
May
June
July....:
August
September

Table 1 0 — S A V I N G S — S a l e s of war bonds 1

Table 1 1 . — F H A — H o m e mortgages insured *

[ T h o u s a n d s of dollars]

[ P r e m i u m p a y i n g , t h o u s a n d s of dollars]

Series E

Period

Series F

Series G

Total

Redemptions

Title II
Title V I
(603)

Period
Existing

New
1944..
September
October
November
December
1945 •
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August -.
September

$12, 379, 891
590,827
598, 570
806,817
1, 855, 300

$772,767

803,819
653.222
712,133
684,424
1,194, 712
1, 467, 673
1,031,778
571, 286
420, 058

42,034
30, 695
26, 487
23,112
62,940
178,003
47,409
21,629
17, 760

_

.

15, 953
13, 653
42,680
124, 669

i U . S. T r e a s u r y W a r Savings Staff.
t h e U . S. T r e a s u r y .

$2, 891, 427 $16,044,085
692,066
85, 286
695,094
82, 871
1,023,355
173,858
2, 385,849
405,880

$3, 263,168
277,445
394,846
376,053
358, 572

1944: S e p t e m b e r
October
November
December

1,074,180
847,990
889,076
837, 636
1, 540,089
2,178,055
1, 294,475
699, 740
514, 114

333, 443
317,083
437,892
381,198
404, 209
382, 536
406,103
515,161
514, 382

1945: J a n u a r y
February
March
April
May.
June
July
_.
August. _
September...

228, 327
164,073
150,456
130,100
282,437
532, 379
215, 288
106,825
76,296

A c t u a l deposits m a d e to t h e credit of

...

__

$79
40
54
31

$19, 967
21,941
21,646
18, 269

67
27
37
63
80
374
347
666
968

19,006
14, 085
16, 480
14,813
22. 272
18, 841
18, 207
17, 286
15,165

$42,
43,
38,
36,

Total
insured
a t e n d of
period

592
354
053
573

$5, 844, 599
5,909,934
5, 969, 687
6,024, 560

38, 640
31,417
29, 886
26, 885
23, 707
20, 413
19,056
14, 992
12, 634

6,082, 273
6,127,802
6,174, 205
6, 215, 906
6, 262,025
6, 301, 653
6, 339, 263
6, 372. 207
6. 400, 974

i Figures represent gross insurance w r i t t e n d u r i n g t h e period a n d do not t a k e
a c c o u n t of principal r e p a y m e n t s on previously insured loans.

Table 1 2 . — F H L B A N K S — L e n d i n g operations and principal assets and liabilities
[ T h o u s a n d s of dollars]
L e n d i n g operations
S e p t e m b e r 1945

P r i n c i p a l assets S e p t e m b e r 30,
1945

C a p i t a l a n d principal liabilities
S e p t e m b e r 30, 1945

Federal H o m e Loan B a n k
Advances

New York .
Pittsburgh
Winston-Salem
Chicago.

. . . . .

.__-

_
_ . ..

.. _

. . -.

. -.

L i t t l e Rock
Topeka
. . . . .
Portland
_
Los Angeles

--

--

..

.. -

_

..
__._
- - -

S e p t e m b e r 1945 ( C o m b i n e d total)
A u g u s t 1945.
S e p t e m b e r 1944

-

_

..

____. .

.

_.
1

58




Includes i n t e r b a n k deposits.

Repayments

Advances
outstanding

Cash i

Governm e n t securities

Capital 2

$20,280
28,275
17, 321
18, 584
28,696
15, 521
24,024
14, 283
12, 731
10, 901
8,771
16, 932

$0
0
4. 000
0
2, 500
4,000
5,000
3,500
500
1,000
1,000
10, 500

Debentures

Member
deposits

Total
assets
Sept. 30,
1945 i

$161
590
636
1,427
110
122
700
263
105
15
0
390

$594
1,305
1.279
1,067
2,167
1,569
3,223
1,008
593
293
1,675
2,427

$8,762
5,476
8,494
13,026
6,898
5,978
19,158
6,365
3,551
2,835
715
18,511

$1,356
3,264
2,806
784
2,741
1,976
2,697
562
747
1,863
829
1,046

$11,028
31,346
11,914
7,133
34,908
18,574
12, 324
11,720
9,135
8,225
9,855
14,646

4,519

17, 200

99, 769

20, 671

180,808

216, 319

32,000

51,163

302,157

215,128

32, 000

46, 235

297,524

205,045

44, 000

26, 945

276, 654

9,794

18, 951

112,451

19, 661

163,527

6,993

25, 466

95, 201

23, 907

156, 976

$909
11,883
1,950
421
13, 482
7,030
5,302
906
253
1,045
1,165
6,817

$21,191
40,186
23, 283
21,011
44,715
26, 575
34, 351
18,697
13,486
12, 950
11,440
34, 272

2 C a p i t a l stock, s u r p l u s , a n d u n d i v i d e d profits.

Federal Home Loan Bank Review

Table 1 3 . — I N S U R E D A S S O C I A T I O N S — P r o c e s s of institutions insured by the FSLIC
[Dollar amounts are shown in thousands]
Operations
Number
of associations

Period a n d class of association

ALL

Total
assets

N e t first
mortgages
held

Cash

Government
bond
holdings

Private
repurchasable
capital

Government
share
capital

Federal
Home
Loan
Bank
advances

New
mortgage
loans

N e w private
investments

Private
repurchases

Repurchase
ratio

INSURED
2,398

$3, 651, 598

$2,871,641

$256,470

$193,452

$2,983,310

$169,167

$113,977

$46,705

$91,029

$30, 219

1943* M a r c h
June . - _S e p t e m b e r . __
December

_ __
_.__
__ __ _
__

2,415
2,428
2,440
2,447

3, 690,918
3, 880,999
4, 037, 926
4,182, 728

2, 868,410
2,918, 577
2,971,411
3, 009, 025

260, 749
276, 785
186, 954
302, 556

241, 818
376,177
580, 087
581, 651

3,105,080
3, 270, 834
3, 389, 891
3, 573, 896

120,138
119, 252
69, 920
69, 693

66,970
78,155
118,153
100, 340

61,139
76,899
87, 878
70, 973

83,403
103, 939
83,970
118, 496

48,955
33, 704
60,019
37, 885

58
32
71
32

7
4
5
0

1944- M a r c h

________
-

2,452
2,461
2,460
2,466

4, 327, 868
4, 583, 568
4, 713, 875
5, 012, 662

3,035, 201
3,117, 585
3, 202, 359
3, 259, 819

228, 303
788, 854
239, 936
954,934
256, 250
997, 983
269, 701 1, 227, 451

3, 710, 356
3, 922, 705
4,092, 609
4, 333, 739

50, 868
50, 832
37, 721
37, 701

90,103
118, 743
86, 840
123, 466

87,163
105, 245
101, 658
83,408

104, 494
127,945
122,016
142, 291

56, 693
46, 560
56,102
45, 985

54
36
46
32

3
4
0
3

__ _

2,465
2,471
2,476

5,136, 903
5, 549, 563
5, 725, 962

3, 300, 601
3, 433, 871
3, 572, 964

327,151 1, 262,429
282,911 1, 585, 708
303,195 1, 607, 844

4, 538, 426
4, 786, 912
4, 981, 869

28, 781
28, 751
23, 367

54, 365
124, 936
92, 618

110, 287
126, 824
122, 098

138, 709
163,156
146, 290

71, 488
56, 279
77, 855

51 5
34 5
53 2

1,467

2, 299, 895

1, 853, 868

164,430

117, 339

1, 882, 051

137, 208

84,135

27, 381

58, 937

16, 530

28 0

. _ _ __ _

1,467
1,468
1,471
1,466

2, 300,
2, 426,
2, 523,
2, 617,

638
079
737
431

1, 839, 302
1, 865, 991
1, 896, 312
1,915, 771

156, 792
170, 730
109,181
183,038

146,
235,
369,
373,

1, 953, 846
2, 060, 502
2,135,010
2, 257, 002

96,109
96,109
55,021
55, 021

46, 820
56, 553
87, 648
74, 780

37, 850
46, 730
54,100
43,647

54, 824
68, 235
53,138
76, 677

30,
19,
37,
21,

55
28
70
28

1944* M a r c h
__. _ . _ __
June - _ _ -September
_____ _ ___ __
D e c e m b e r _ __

1, 466
1,465
1,464
1,464

2, 709, 897
2, 881, 276
2, 961, 860
3,168, 731

1, 927,122
1, 972, 881
2, 024, 635
2, 058,045

135, 664
48,913
151, 862
166, 764

509,170
620,016
652, 085
810,013

2,
2,
2,
2,

346, 042
488, 785
599, 565
760, 927

39, 957
39, 948
29, 562
29, 647

63, 892
84, 602
60, 877
90, 257

53,883
64, 474
63, 489
51, 586

68, 276
83, 856
79,126
93, 400

36,182
25, 969
35, 570
26,049

53 0
31 0
45.0
27 9

1945- M a r c h

1,465
1,465
1,467

3, 237,942
3,528,027
3, 632,197

2, 081, 813
2,164, 653
2, 255, 283

192, 904
832, 311
178, 377 1, 052, 668
178, 411 1, 067, 837

2, 895,120
3, 058, 683
3,182, 465

22,616
22, 616
18, 058

37,109
97, 940
71, 252

69, 430
79, 603
77, 321

91, 627
106, 770
96,180

46, 574
33, 601
51,428

50 8
31 5
53 5

__ _ _

931

1, 351, 703

1, 017, 773

92, 040

76,113

1,101, 259

31, 959

29, 842

19, 324

32, 092

13, 689

42 7

______
_

948
960
969
981

1,
1,
1,
1,

390, 280
454, 920
514,189
565, 297

1, 029,108
1,052,586
1, 075, 099
1,093, 254

103, 957
106, 055
77, 773
119, 518

95, 281
140, 653
210,133
208, 326

1,151, 234
1, 210, 332
1, 254, 881
1, 316, 894

24, 029
23,143
14, 899
14, 672

20,150
21, 602
30, 505
25, 560

23, 289
30,169
33, 778
27, 326

28, 579
35, 704
30, 832
41, 819

18, 717
14,118
22, 745
16,316

65
39
73
39

5
5
8
0

986
996
996
1,002

1,
1,
1,
1,

617, 971
702, 292
752,015
843, 931

1,108, 079
1,144, 704
1,177, 724
1, 201, 774

92, 639
91,023
104,388
102,937

279, 684
334, 918
345, 898
417,438

1, 364, 314
1, 433, 920
1, 493,044
1, 572, 812

10,911
10, 884
8,159
8, 054

26, 211
34,141
25,963
33, 209

33, 280
40, 771
38,169
31,822

36, 218
44, 089
42,890
48, 891

20, 511
20, 591
20, 532
19,936

56
46
47
40

6
7
9
8

1,000
1,006
1,009

1, 898, 961
2, 021, 536
2, 093, 765

1, 218, 788
1, 269, 218
1, 317, 681

134, 247
104, 534
124, 784

430,118
533,040
540,007

1, 643, 306
1, 728, 229
1, 799, 404

6,165
6,135
5, 309

17, 256
26, 996
21, 366

40, 857
47, 221
44, 777

47, 082
56, 386
50,110

24,914
22, 678
26, 427

52 9
40 2
52 7

1942: D e c e m b e r _.

.

September
December
1945- M a r c h

...

September

_

33 2

FEDERAL
1942" D e c e m b e r
1943- M a r c h

__

September
December _

. _
.

-

. . . __

537
524
954
325

238
586
274
569

2
7
1
1

STATE
1942: D e c e m b e r
.943: M a r c h
June..
September
December

._

___

1944: M a r c h
June
_
September
_ __
D e c e m b e r . __
1945: M a r c h
J u n e __
September

_____

Table 1 4 — S A V I N G S — H e l d

by

institutions

[Thousands of dollars]
Insured
savings a n d
loans l

E n d of period

1943: J u n e . . _
September
D e c e m b e r - . . __
1944: M a r c h . __ _
June - - - - September
December

_

1945: M a r c h - . .
June.September. _

$3, 270, 834
3, 389,891
3,573,896

Mutual
savings
banks 2

Insured
commercial
banks 3

$11,104, 707

$16,897,124

i l , 707,025

18, 572, 406

3, 710, 356
3, 922, 705
4,092, 609
4, 333, 739

12, 428,026

20, 543, 888

13,331,811

23, 362, 909

4, 538,426
4, 786,912
4,981,869

14, 378, 413

26, 363,106

Postal
savings

4

$1, 577, 526
1, 683,497
1, 787,994
1, 905, 864
2, 034,136
2,197, 701
2, 342, 297
2, 513,197
2, 659, 575
2,833,067

1
Private repurchasable capital as reported to the FHLB Administration.
2 Month's Work. All deposits.
s FDIC. These figures have been revised to show total time deposits of individuals,
partnerships and corporations.
. 4 Balance on deposit to credit of depositors, including unclaimed accounts.
September total is unaudited.

November 1945




Commissions
(Continued from p. 33)
adopted by our institutions, including term of contract, libera] prepayment privileges, rapid and personalized service and the absorption of borrowers 7
loan costs. All of these are competitive tools and
should be much more effective and cause less irritation than the payment of commissions. The savings and loan industry is the largest single factor in
the home financing business of the nation. We
must strive to keep that position by selling our lending services and not by depending upon the payment
of commissions to mortgage brokers with all of its
possible evils which have been pointed out in this
discussion.
59




,ORY-

U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1 9 4 5