View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ARM AND
171ANCH
F I ULLETIN
Vol. 22, No. 2

February 1967

THE U.S. M EA T IM PO RT L A W
In order to clarify some of the questions that
have been raised about the importation of
meat into the United States, the Foreign Agri­
cultural Service has released an interpretation
of the provisions of the Meat Import Law. This
legislation (Public Law 88-482) was enacted
in August 1964 and became effective at the
beginning of 1965. Its objective is to provide
a basis for limiting imports of beef and certain
other meats into the United States if these
imports threaten to exceed a specified quantity.

by this law are fresh, chilled, or frozen meat
of cattle, goats, and sheep (except lambs).
During 1963-65, 87 percent of the U.S. im­
ports of these meats were fresh, chilled, or
frozen; the remainder was mainly canned meat,
together with small amounts of sausage. In
1965, 92 percent of the chilled and frozen meat
imported was beef, and the remaining 8 per­
cent was mutton, veal, and goat meat (in de­
scending order of importance).

The Secretary of Agriculture is required,
under the Meat Import Law, to estimate at
the beginning of each calendar year what the
total volume of U.S. imports of certain meats
will be during that year. This estimate is re­
viewed (and revised, if necessary) and pub­
lished quarterly during the year. The law sets
forth a formula for establishing what the level
of import quotas should be, if they are neces­
sary, and provides a method of determining
when quotas should be imposed. Quotas are
to be imposed when the import level estimated
by the Secretary of Agriculture for any calen­
dar year equals or exceeds 110 percent of what
the quotas would be.

The act states that it is the policy of Con­
gress that the aggregate quantity of these meats
imported into the United States during any
calendar year, beginning with 1965, should not
exceed 725.4 million pounds — except as this
amount is increased or decreased in accordance
with the change in domestic commercial pro­
duction of these meats. This base quantity
(725.4 million pounds) represents the average
annual volume of imports of these meats during
the five calendar years 1959 through 1963.
The average U.S. commercial production of
beef, veal, mutton, and goat meat during these
years was 15.7 billion pounds annually; there­
fore, this base quantity was 4.6 percent of
commercial production.

The law states that the President may sus­
pend or increase the quota levels if he deter­
mines (1) that such action is required by
underlying economic or national interests of
the United States, or (2) that the supply of
these meats will be inadequate to meet domes­
tic demand at reasonable prices, or (3) that
trade agreements with supplying countries will
insure the adherence to quota limits. Covered

The act provides that if domestic commercial
production should increase or decrease, the
quotas established should also increase or de­
crease in proportion. It also specifies the
method of calculating the increase or decrease
in commercial production for the year in ques­
tion, i.e., the average of the estimated com­
mercial production for that year and the two
preceding years as compared with average

F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E
DALLAS,

B A N K
TEXAS

OF

D A L L A S

commercial production for the years 1959
through 1963.
The following procedure shows how the
quota is calculated: U.S. commercial produc­
tion of beef, veal, mutton and goat for 196466 averaged 19.3 billion pounds, or 22.7 per­
cent greater than the 1959-63 average. In
order to calculate the quota quantity for 1966,
the base quantity of 725.4 million pounds is
multiplied by 1.227; the resultant quota quan­
tity is 890.1 million pounds. To calculate the
volume necessary to bring quotas into effect
for 1966, the quota quantity of 890.1 million
pounds is multiplied by 110 to arrive at a
trigger amount of 979.1 million pounds. Im­
ports of meat subject to the act are estimated
at 800 million pounds in 1966. Although U.S.
imports of beef and other meats subject to
quotas under the U.S. Meat Import Law in
1966 were about 30 percent higher than in
1965, they were not large enough to trigger
the quotas. Meat import quotas will be imposed
in 1967 if imports reach 995.0 million pounds,
or 110 percent of the base period (1959-63).

tions, authorized by Section 709 of the N a­
tional Wool Act, would be used by the Council
to finance advertising and promotion programs
for mohair and mohair products. The proposed
agreement is similar to agreements under
which advertising and sales promotion pro­
grams for wool and lamb have been conducted
since 1955.
Record-Keeping Under the New
Farm Labor Law
The U.S. Department of Labor recently is­
sued proposed record-keeping requirements for
farm operators whose employees come under
the minimum wage law on February 1, 1967.
Employers must observe the terms of the pro­
posals as of February 1 in order to be in com­
pliance with the requirements, pending final
regulations. However, persons have until Feb­
ruary 6, 1967, to submit written views on the
proposals. Such statements should be sent to
the Administrator, Wage and Hour and Public
Contracts Divisions, U.S. Department of L a­
bor, Washington, D. C. 20210.

The FAS says that, in future years, the quota
The administrator of the Labor Depart­
and trigger quantities will continue to increase ment’s Wage and Hour and Public Contracts
or decrease in proportion to the change in aver­ Divisions states that the proposals were neces­
age domestic commercial production of these sary because of the 1966 Amendments to the
meats. Furthermore, imports can be expected Fair Labor Standards Act, which became effec­
to increase or decrease as the U.S. market be­ tive February 1. The legislation sets a minimum
comes relatively more or less attractive than wage of $1 per hour for certain farm workers
other foreign markets. Any increase, of course, effective on that date; $1.15 per hour effective
depends upon whether sufficient supplies are February 1, 1968; and $1.30 per hour effec­
available in the meat-exporting countries for tive on February 1, 1969.
shipment abroad.
The Labor Department emphasizes that the
Referendum on Mohair Production
wage law and record-keeping proposals apply
A mail referendum among mohair producers to only about 390,000 farm laborers of em­
will be held February 6-17 in order to deter­ ployers who used more than 500 man-days of
mine whether or not they approve a proposed hired farm labor in any calendar quarter of
agreement between the Secretary of Agricul­ the preceding calendar year. Family labor is
ture and the Mohair Council of America, Inc. exempt from the requirements; consequently,
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has an­ only about 1 percent of the Nation’s farm oper­
nounced that the referendum will be conducted ators are involved in the new legislation.
through the county offices of the Agricultural
Copies of “Hired Farm Workers Under The
Stabilization and Conservation Service.
Fair Labor Standards Act as Amended in
The agreement provides that the Secretary 1966” (Publication 1161) may be obtained
of Agriculture withhold up to 1.5 cents a pound from any office of the U.S. Department of
from producers’ payments on mohair m ar­ Labor’s Wage and Hour and Public Contracts
keted during 1966-69. The payment deduc­ Divisions.

Signups Announced for 1967 Crops
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has
announced a 4-week signup period, beginning
February 6 and ending March 3, 1967, for
farmers who want to participate in this year’s
programs for wheat, feed grains, and upland
cotton. Signups for the 1967 Cropland Adjust­
ment Program (CAP), which began between
November 14 and December 1, 1966, will also
conclude on March 3, 1967.
The USDA says that weekly national com­
pilations of returns are planned. Reports on
the first week of the signups are expected to
be available about mid-February.
"M orlam " Ewes
Agricultural Research Service
scientists at Beltsville, Mary­
land, are producing a crop of
lambs every 8 months with a
new strain of sheep called
“Morlam” (more lambs) and
a new system of sheep breeding. Top Morlam
ewes have produced 2 lambs per pregnancy,
or 6 lambs in 2 years — the goal of the breed­
ing project. By selective breeding of the ani­
mals, the scientists hope to develop in the
Morlam strain such economically important
characteristics as year-round multiple births,
long wool, hornlessness, and white, open faces.

Since 1961, individual ewes have been se­
lected which could breed in the spring as well
as in the fall. These Morlam ewes are bred in
April, August, and December, and lambs are
born in September, January, and May.
Two months after breeding, the ewes are
checked for pregnancy with an ultrasonic ana­
lyzer developed for pregnancy diagnosis. If a
ewe is not pregnant, it can be rebred with the
next group without breaking the rhythm of
8-month lambings. In conventional sheep
breeding, failure to conceive during the breed­
ing season delays lambing for a period of 12
months.
Even with just one lambing a year, the
Morlam strain would supply lambs at the sea­
son when prices are highest and when extra
labor for lambing is available. Since first-gen­
eration ewes of the Morlam strain are still pro­
ducing in the flock, they have not yet accumu­
lated lifetime records. Consequently, the ARS
scientists say that it is too early to evaluate the
overall progress of the program.
Rate on Certificates of
Interest Lowered

In farm flocks, sheep usually lamb once each
year. However, a ewe carries her lamb to term
in about 5 months and does not need to nurse
it for more than 2 months. In theory, she could
complete three terms every 2 years. A produc­
tion cycle of 8 months, instead of the usual
12 months, could result in a 50-percent in­
crease in the lamb crop.

The rate of interest payable on certificates
of interest issued by the Commodity Credit
Corporation to banks and other lending insti­
tutions for financing 1966-crop price-support
loans was lowered to 5.5 percent per annum,
effective January 22, 1967. The rate for certifi­
cates had been 5.7 percent per annum since
October 22, 1966, at which time it had been
increased from 5.2 percent per annum. The
U.S. Department of Agriculture says that the
decrease in the interest rate is in line with
recent changes in the money market.

The 8-month cycle presents problems, how­
ever. Sheep generally do not come into heat
between February and July, and they reach
peak fertility in September and October. Thus,
lambs generally are born in the early spring
when there is ample pasture to supplement
milk from their mothers. Breeds of sheep and
individuals within breeds vary in their ability
to propagate beyond the usual season. Rambouillets, Merinos, and Dorsets probably come
closer to year-round fertility than other breeds.

The decrease in the interest rate is not retro­
active. Consequently, lending institutions which
have invested funds in 1966-crop price-support
loans will earn interest on their investments
at the rate of 4.9 percent per annum from the
date of investment through July 31, 1966; at
5.2 percent per annum from August 1, 1966,
through October 21, 1966; at 5.7 percent
per annum from October 22, 1966, through
January 21, 1967; and at 5.5 percent per
annum thereafter.

Turkey Marketing Guide
The U.S. Department of Agriculture recom­
mends that turkey producers limit 1967 output
to no more than a 5-percent gain over last
year’s production and that the number of
breeder hens be increased by not more than
4 percent. The favorable price-supply relation­
ship in both 1965 and 1966 is stimulating
turkey production in 1967, which could be­
come excessive if turkey growers do not take
adequate precautions, according to the USDA’s
Consumer and Marketing Service.

or the fresh market because it can be harvested
in the green, vine-ripe, or ripe stages. It is not
quite as large as the La Pinta variety but is
redder in color. El Monte yields have ranged
from 16.6 tons per acre in spring plantings to
20.2 tons per acre in the fall.
Chico Grande is related to the Chico tomato
variety, which was also developed by Mr.
Leeper and released in 1961. The new tomato
is a blocky pear shape and is about twice as
large as Chico, a characteristic that has low­
ered costs of peeling. Since the Chico Grande
tomato matures in a relatively short time,
the fruit is well adapted to machine harvest­
ing.

Although the demand for turkeys is expected
to rise in 1967, the gain may be more moder­
ate than in the preceding 2 years. Factors
which contribute to the increased consumption
Rural Recreational
of turkey meat are (1) rapidly rising consumer
Enterprises Increase
incomes, (2) a high level of employment, (3)
Rural landowners in the United States con­
less competition from red meats, and (4) the
growth in popularity of further-processed foods tinued to establish new outdoor recreational
facilities at an accelerated pace in 1966, ac­
containing turkey.
cording to Secretary of Agriculture Freeman.
With technical assistance from the U.S. De­
New Tomato Varieties for Texas
partment of Agriculture, farmers and ranchers
Three new commercial-type tomatoes — La converted 310,169 acres of land to recreational
Pinta, El Monte, and Chico Grande — are and wildlife use in 1966, representing a 10scheduled for production in Texas this spring, percent increase over 1965. A total of 4,266
according to Texas A&M University. The new landowners established new income-producing
tomatoes are firm, pleasant tasting, attractive recreational enterprises, and 524 of them now
in color, and have good keeping qualities. They consider recreation to be a primary source of
are resistant to disease and cracking and, under income on 147,412 acres of land.
test conditions, have produced double the
Secretary Freeman says that income-produc­
yields of present varieties.
ing facilities have a two-fold purpose — a town
The new tomatoes were developed at the and a country purpose. These facilities offer
Lower Rio Grande Valley Research and Exten­ the rural resident a new alternative use for
sion Center by Paul Leeper, Horticulturist with his land, and they serve the city resident oppor­
the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. tunities for fun and relaxation that the urban
Seed of the new varieties are available to environment generally cannot provide.
growers for this spring’s crop.
The Food and Agriculture Act of 1962 ex­
La Pinta and El Monte tomatoes are adapted
panded
existing USDA programs that provide
mainly to the Lower Rio Grande Valley of
technical
assistance and loans to farmers and
Texas, but Chico Grande is expected to pro­
ranchers
in
establishing income-producing ru­
duce well throughout the State. La Pinta can­
ral
recreational
enterprises. Since then, more
not be harvested successfully until it is ripe, a
than
34,000
farmers
and ranchers have estab­
factor which should boost the Valley’s fresh
lished
one
or
more
recreational
enterprises on
tomato market. In field trials, the variety has
their
land.
Of
these,
more
than
3,200
— oper­
produced from 10 to 18 tons per acre.
ating 1.2 million acres of land — consider
Texas A&M University says that the El recreational facilities to be a primary source
Monte tomato lends itself to either processing of income.