View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FARM and RANCH BULLETIN

U.S. COW HERD DECLINES AGAIN,
FURTHER REDUCTION LIKELY

The liquidation phase of the current cattle
cycle is continuing. Reacting to low prices and
financial distress resulting from not only an oversupply of beef relative to demand but also rising
production costs, producers are reducing the size
of the nation’s cattle herd. And the drawdown in
cattle numbers will likely continue for another
12 months.
The July 1 cattle count—130.6 million—indi­
cated total numbers in the United States declined
2 percent from a year earlier, a much slower rate
than the 6-percent decrease between July 1975
and July 1976. A larger than expected number
of feeder steers and heifers 500 pounds and
over partly offset smaller inventories of cows,
bulls, and replacement heifers.
Beef cows in the United States numbered 41.3
million on July 1, 1977, down 4 percent from a
year earlier. And pointing to further reductions
in cow herds next year, beef heifer replacements
declined 10 percent. While slaughter rates have
fallen from the record levels of late 1975 and
early 1976, the number of cows marketed in the
next 12 months will likely remain above the levels
before the liquidation cycle began. Federally
inspected cow slaughter in May totaled 654,000

head, well below levels for the same month in the
past two years but 46 percent above the number
slaughtered in May 1974.
Inventories of feeder steers and heifers were
not as low as had been expected. The number
of steers, heifers, and bulls under 500 pounds
declined slightly over 2 percent to 38.5 million.
One reason this category was not smaller is that
the number of calves born per 100 cows in the
first half of 1977 was larger than a year earlier.
Even with fewer cows, the calf crop this year was
indicated, as of July 1, to be only 3 percent
smaller than a year before. A 6-percent decline
was recorded in the previous 12-month period.
A large number of feeder steers and nonre­
placement heifers weighing over 500 pounds are
still on farms and ranches in the United States.
Inventories of these heavyweight feeder cattle
on July 1 were just under 27.3 million, compared
with 27.1 million a year earlier and 24.9 million
two years before. The increase in heavyweight
feeder cattle has resulted from a slowdown in
grass-fed heifer and steer slaughter in the past
two years. The number slaughtered in 1975 was
large, accounting for about 17 percent of total
cattle slaughter. However, the rate fell to around

STEER PRICES AND COW SLAUGHTER
PRICES
DOLLARS PER HUNDREDWEIGHT

13 percent in 1976, and it is currently less than
12 percent. The number of heavyweight feeder
cattle increased even though there was a slight
rise in yearlings placed on feed between the first
half of 1976 and the same period in 1977.
While cattle inventories during the past 12
months declined nationwide, three of the four
states in the Eleventh District had small increases
in cattle numbers. The herd numbers rose 3 per­
cent in New Mexico and Texas and 7 percent
in Oklahoma. Conversely, the cattle count in
Louisiana fell a fifth.
Because of an increase in feeder and stocker
calves, the inventory of cattle in New Mexico,
Oklahoma, and Texas rose 4 percent to total 25.6
million on July 1. While beef cow numbers and
the number of cattle on feed in the three states
were lower, the number of steers, bulls, and non­
replacement heifers over 500 pounds was up 12
percent over a year earlier. Heifers for herd

SLAUGHTER
MILLION HEAD

replacement increased somewhat in Texas but
declined in the other two states. With 16.8 mil­
lion head of cattle, Texas is the largest beefproducing state in the nation.
Moreover, the supply of lightweight calves—
500 pounds and less—in the three southwestern
states has also increased in the past 12 months.
In the latest inventory report, 8.2 million light­
weight cattle and calves were counted, 5 percent
more than a year earlier. The 1977 southwestern
calf crop is expected to be near last year’s level,
reflecting a somewhat larger calf crop in Okla­
homa. A steady supply of lightweight feeder and
stocker calves will be available in the next 12
months.
The smaller cow herd and the reduced inven­
tory of heifers for herd replacement point to a
continuing decline in total cattle numbers in the
United States, at least through next year. And
the large number of steers and nonreplacement

heifers indicates the supply of feeder cattle avail­
able for feedlot placements this fall and in early
1978 will not drop sharply. In fact, a moderate
increase in cattle feeding could develop because
of the abundance of grain supplies and low costs
of weight gained in feedlots.
The exact time when the cattle cycle will bot­
tom out is uncertain. Changes in cattle numbers
will be heavily influenced in the near term by
forage conditions and in the longer term by the
level of prices for feeder and stocker calves. But
prolonged price improvement may be slow in
developing. Drouth conditions affecting forage
and hay supplies in the West and South may
cause producers to step up livestock marketings
this fall, increasing cattle slaughter and beef
supplies somewhat. Alternatively, more cattle
could be placed on feed, increasing beef supplies
and pressuring cattle prices even more later this
year and in early 1978.
Although beef supplies in 1977 are currently
expected to be 3 to 5 percent below last year,
increased production of pork and broilers may
partly check any significant gains in cattle prices
in the next few months. Altogether, profitability
in cow-calf operations and the turnaround in the
cattle cycle will take place only when cattle
numbers have been adjusted sufficiently so that
market prices increase, allowing the bottom line
of income and expense statements to be inked
in black.
INVENTORIES OF ALL CATTLE AND CALVES

Area

L o u is ia n a .............
New M exico ___
Oklahoma ...........
Texas ..................

Thousand head, July 1
1977 as
— ------------------------------------------------------------ -- percent
1975
1976
1977
of 1976

2,100
1,900
6,550
17,000

2,000
1,800
6,450
16,300

1,600
1,860
6,900
16,800

80
103
107
103

Four states .. . 27,550
United
States ......... 140,056

26,550

27,160

102

133,559

130,565

98

SOURCE: U.S. Department of A griculture.

FARMLAND TRANSFERS UP,
VOLUNTARY SALES DOWN

After declining three years, the number of farm
real estate transfers rose moderately in the year
ended February 1, 1977. The rise resulted as
small increases in estate settlements, inheri­
tances, gift transfers, and tax sales more than
offset declines in voluntary sales and foreclosures
of 1.5 percent and 5 percent, respectively. In fact,
voluntary sales have decreased a third in the past
four years.
Approximately 109,000 land transactions were
made during the latest reporting period, 900
more than in the previous 12 months. A similar
increase in transfers occurred between March
1970 and February 1971. The number of farm
tracts changing ownership rose less than 1 per­
cent during that period, following many years of
decline. Subsequently, in the 1971-74 period,
transfers jumped 35 percent.
The change in the number of transfers in the
next few years, however, will likely not duplicate
this sharp increase. As with the number of farms
in the United States, the long-term trend in total
transfers has been a general downturn, particu­
larly in voluntary sales. Furthermore, the events
that spurred the sharp increase in transfers dur­
ing 1971-74 will likely not occur again in the
near term.
A substantial rise in farm prices and incomes,
mainly because of a large increase in export
demand for U.S. grains and other crops, triggered
the growth in land transfers during those three
years. Real estate market activity increased sig­
nificantly, with the number of inquiries for land
purchases doubling. Many of the inquiries were
from farmers wanting more land to expand their
operations. Enlargement was encouraged not only
by higher commodity prices and farm incomes
but also by the need to make more efficient use
of new and bigger farm equipment.
At the same time, the number of farms offered
for sale changed little. With inquiries far out­
pacing available tracts, land values were bid up
markedly by prospective buyers. Although land

values have continued to rise since 1974, trans­
fers have declined as grain prices have fallen and
production costs have increased.
Another major factor also contributed to the
1971-74 surge in real estate market activity. As
land prices have climbed, both farmers and non­
farmers seeking investment opportunities have
purchased land as a hedge against inflation.
Returns from alternative investments—savings
accounts, certificates of deposit, stocks, and
bonds—have not kept pace with the high rates
of inflation in the past few years. And although
returns to land—cash leases and crop share rents
—generally have fallen short of returns from
alternative investments, the appreciation in land
values has outpaced inflation.
Land values in the United States, on average,
increased 132 percent from March 1971 to Feb­
ruary 1977. Over the same span, the consumer
price index for all items—a measure of inflation—
rose 48 percent. Deflating the change in land
values by the consumer price index shows the
purchasing power of a dollar invested in land
rose 57 percent—that is, the annual rate of
appreciation in land values exceeded the rate of
inflation by 7.8 percent.
Farm real estate has been a good investment,
particularly in the large grain-producing areas of
the Corn Belt, Lake States, and Northern Plains.
Since 1971, land values have more than tripled in
Iowa, Illinois, and Minnesota and nearly tripled
in Indiana, North Dakota, and Nebraska. The
lowest gains between early 1971 and early 1977
were in California, Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona.
The smallest was in California, which had a gain
of 26 percent. Sluggish growth in land values has
largely been the result of drouth, depressed cattle
markets, preferential assessment according to
California’s Williamson Act, and lower prices for
some specialty crops.
Another sharp increase in land transfers, such
as in the 1971-74 period, is not expected. How­
ever, land prices will likely continue to be pres­
sured as potential buyers outnumber sellers by
a wide margin. Individuals seeking an investment
opportunity in land in hopes that land prices

U.S. FARM REAL ESTATE TRANSFERS

1962

1965

1968

1971

1974

1977

1962-75 based on March 1 estimates; 1976-77 based
on February 1 estimates.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

will continue to rise are expected to remain an
important factor in the farm real estate market.
Cattle and grain prices that are at or below total
costs of production could temper farmers’ pur­
chases to enlarge farm units, but land transfers
for farm enlargement in cotton and soybean areas
may rise somewhat.
Alan M. Young