View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ARM AND
Q anch
Q u l l e t in
April 1966

Vol. 21, No. 4

R U SS IA 'S A G R IC U L T U R A L PRO BLEM
Most Americans are curious about what
goes on behind the Iron Curtain, and farm
people are no exception, especially since agri­
cultural conditions in Russia during the past
few years have created a market for U.S.
wheat. Harry E. Walters of the Economic
Research Service says that a glimpse behind
the curtain is provided by a recent study of
Russian agricultural production since 1953.
Such a study is significant at this time be­
cause 1966 is a potential turning point in
Russian agricultural trade. Production has
been stagnant for 7 years, much wheat is
being imported, Khrushchev is no longer in
power, agricultural policy has shifted, and a
new Russian farm program is under way.
Whether 1966 will mark a substantial change
depends largely upon the success of the new
program. This situation, in turn, will deter­
mine whether past production trends continue
or change. In any event, it is difficult to de­
termine how much confidence should be
placed in the information available on Rus­
sian agriculture. U.S. Department of Agricul­
ture estimates of Russian conditions are, of
necessity, based upon sketchy information.
It is evident that the Soviets have experi­
enced difficulty in providing proper food and
clothing for their people. The urban popula­
tion in Russia has increased rapidly since
1959. Although these people consume less
grain than do rural residents, they still use
large quantities. They have not had enough
potatoes, meat, and vegetables to replace part
of the grain in their diets.
F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E
DALLAS,

After 1957, the transfer of capital, labor,
land, machinery, and fertilizer into Russian
agriculture was reduced considerably. The de­
velopment of additional land in Russia was
the principal reason for increased production
of wheat from 1953 to 1958, as per acre yields
were little changed. Mr. Walters says that
the newly developed lands now have been
exploited beyond their production capacity.
Although it required land needed for wheat
and other food crops, a corn program was
boosted in Russia during 1953-58. The policy
of increasing livestock numbers was empha­
sized, even though feed supplies were limited.
Moreover, the use of scientific techniques in
agriculture was discouraged.
In 1962, the tide in Russian agriculture
began to turn to some degree. The use of
capital, machinery, and fertilizer increased;
meat prices were raised; and some other costs
were reduced. However, many undesirable fea­
tures of Russian farm policy were continued.
These features included the downgrading of
oats, grasses, and fallow; considerable party
interference in agriculture; and unrelentingly
high quotas on production.
In March 1965, a new agricultural program
was announced for Russia. The program was
designed to provide more fertilizer, increased
investment, faster delivery of machinery and
parts, and higher prices for milk. Also, there
were more liberal private agricultural policies,
such as provision for the financing of livestock
purchases by individuals and permission for
B A N K
TEXAS

OF

D A L L A S

them to obtain feed for their animals. In addi­
tion, most quotas for farm products were re­
duced to more realistic levels.

Family Credit Union

Mrs. Doris Myers, Ex­
tension Home Manage­
Soviet farm records since 1953 compare ment Specialist at Texas
favorably with agricultural progress in most A&M University, says
other countries, according to the ERS special­ that the family credit
ist. However, the Russians have fallen far union may be a new way
short, both in the goals they set for themselves for families to finance
and in their needs for farm commodities. The various projects without borrowing from out­
impact of the 1964 crop failure upon the bread side sources. In a family credit union, some­
supply, livestock production, and farm imports one (usually the father) puts money into a
indicated to the free world the precariousness central family treasury. The members of the
of Russia’s situation during 1961-64.
family can then borrow from this fund.
From 1953 through 1958, agricultural pro­
This type of credit union has proved to be
duction in Russia advanced very rapidly —
successful
for one family in which there were
perhaps 40 to 50 percent, according to the
a
number
of
children. The family credit union
Soviet index of gross agricultural output and
was
used
to
finance
the higher education of its
similar indexes. Since 1958, farm output has re­
members.
In
June,
each
member of the family
mained relatively stable. Although the Soviets
who
had
enrolled
in
college
signed an interesthad planned a 70-percent net increase, the cur­
bearing
note
covering
the
outlay
for the past
rent situation suggests that the 7-year plan
academic
year.
Upon
graduation,
the member
(1958-64) ended with a level of gross produc­
began
to
pay
back
money
into
the
treasury.
tion which was about even with that of 1958.
At the same time, the younger children were
After sparking gross production in 1953-58, drawing on the family credit union for their
grain output lagged the most during the fol­ educations. As a result, the entire family was
lowing 5-year period. This situation caused able to receive college educations.
Russia, which was previously a major grain
In subsequent years, the members have con­
exporter, to become a leading importer of
tinued
to use the family credit union to finance
grain. Russian grain imports — largely of
automobiles,
make down payments on homes,
wheat— totaled approximately 11 million tons
and
underwrite
graduate educational pro­
in 1963-64, 3 million tons in 1964-65, and
grams.
Throughout
the years, the interest has
over 9 million tons in 1965-66.
accrued to the family as a whole. It is the
Mr. Walters says that, all in all, Russia’s father’s judgment that the plan has served to
system of socialized agriculture is unlikely to strengthen the relationship between family
be altered substantially in the near future. members.
However, the Russian leaders apparently have
a clearer picture of the problems involved now,
Sound Pollution Poses New Threat
and they are likely to continue the existing
programs in an effort to increase agricultural
Sound pollution may soon take its place
output, at least until reasonable results are along with air and water pollution as a danger
obtained.
to the health and well-being of our citizens, says
Busy bees slow down in the winter when they Dr. Lee Farr, Professor of Nuclear and E n ­
hibernate through the flowerless period of the vironmental Medicine at The University of
year, reports Texas A&M University. The aver­ Texas. Dr. Farr is located at the Texas Medical
age life of a worker bee during the busy season Center, M. D. Anderson Hospital in Houston.
when bees are gathering honey is about 6 He defines sound pollution as “unwanted noise
weeks. On the other hand, the average life span which has increased in volume as our mecha­
of the insect during hibernation may be from 90 nized urbanized society uses more and more
to 120 days.
machines in closer and closer quarters.”

Light Affects Crop Yields

"Make-Believe" Meat

Farmers soon may be timing plants so that
the crops will be “heading out” on the longest
day of the year — June 21. J. W. Stansel,
Geneticist at Texas A&M University’s RicePasture Research and Extension Center at
Beaumont, is doing extensive research which
shows that the amount and the intensity of
light during the critical heading stage are a
determining factor in yields of rice. The find­
ings can well apply to yields of other grains.
Consequently, if the crop heads out on the
longest day of the year, it should receive the
maximum amount of light possible.

“Make-believe” meat— a substitute for red
meat and poultry — could have a substantial
impact upon the Texas economy, points out
Ed Uvacek, Extension Livestock Marketing
Specialist at Texas A&M University. Recent
research in the use of spun fibers of soybean
protein as a substitute for almost any food
with natural fiber texture may bring this new
development closer to farmers and ranchers in
the foreseeable future.

Mr. Stansel uses instruments to record the
amount of light each day during the growing
season and then relates the amount of light to
the rice yield for that year. He says that the
intensity of light influences the plant’s ability
to use nitrogen. Photosynthetic activity is also
related directly to light conditions. Together,
these factors can result in either an increase or
a decrease in yield, depending upon whether
light conditions are good or bad.
Light becomes critical to rice from about 3
weeks before to 3 weeks after it heads out.
Cloud cover is one of the most variable factors
in light conditions, according to the specialist.
The density of clouds governs the amount of
light passing through to reach the crop.
Mr. Stansel says that there are several things
a grower can do to adapt to light conditions.
With advances in weather predictions, a rice
producer will be able to use the cloudy weather
forecast during the growing season to adjust
nitrogen applications accordingly. In a fore­
casted cloudy period, he would apply less ni­
trogen; for a forecasted clear growing season,
he would apply extra nitrogen.
The grower can alter seeding dates so that
the rice plants will be heading out on the
longest day of the year. In addition, he can
plant varieties that have narrow, erect leaves
in order to reduce “mutual shading.” Since
1962, Mr. Stansel has kept records of the light
intensity, by day, for the entire rice-growing
season. Each year the rice yield has related
closely to the amount of light which was
available.

The soybean fiber can be treated to resemble
the taste of meat, dried fruits, potato chips,
nut kernels, and many vegetables. Since it has
no taste, the fiber may be given any flavor
desired. Research is being continued, and con­
sumer acceptance and many product develop­
ments still have to be tested.
Guar Meal for Feeder Cattle
Guar meal is proving to be a valuable pro­
tein supplement for feeder cattle. In tests at
Texas A&M University’s Coastal Bend Experi­
ment Station at Beeville, guar meal has given
results comparable with those achieved with
cottonseed meal as a supplement for cattle on
feed. Bill Conrad, an A&M researcher con­
ducting the tests, says that net returns, daily
gain, and amount of feed required to make 100
pounds of gain are similar to those for cattle
receiving cottonseed meal.
Guar meal is a high-protein (35 to 45 per­
cent content) by-product of guar seed process­
ing. In order to compare its performance with
that of cottonseed meal, guar has been fed to
fattening steers at the Beeville station for the
past 3 years.
Steers on guar meal ate slightly less per day,
had a somewhat lower daily gain, and required
a little more feed to make 100 pounds of gain.
Since guar meal costs less, the steers fed the
product had a lower cost per 100 pounds of
gain than did the cattle receiving cottonseed
meal. However, the net return for the steers fed
cottonseed meal was $13.51 per head, com­
pared with $13.18 per head for those fed guar
meal. There was no significant difference in
the performance figures of the steers, whether
they were fed guar or cottonseed meal. Present

indications are that guar meal may furnish
another source of protein supplement for
growing and fattening cattle, as well as pro­
vide an outlet for a new product, according to
the A&M researcher.

to reduce food consumption at the other two
meals.) Families who produce their own eggs
consume larger quantities than do families in
similar economic circumstances who must buy
their eggs.

Breakfast or Coffee Break?

Operating Efficiency Important
on Today's Farms

A cup of coffee “to get the
heart started” or an occa­
sional glass of orange juice
“for nutrition’s sake” is the
extent of breakfast for
many modern American
adults, points out the Economic Research Serv­
ice. Others skip breakfast entirely and rely
upon the office coffee break. One result of the
rush to work without breakfast has been a
steady decrease in egg consumption since the
early 1950’s. The average U.S. consumption of
eggs in 1951 was 393; the estimated per capita
total for 1965 was 307.
Most fresh eggs are eaten for breakfast;
however, homemakers also add them to cake
mixes and use them in recipes for other meals.
A few eggs (an average of 29 per person in
1962-64) are consumed in processed form.

W. S. Allen, Extension Agricultural Engi­
neer at Texas A&M University, says that “op­
erating efficiency” is a term that is growing in
importance on today’s farms and ranches. H e
offers several suggestions for improving effi­
ciency. Locate and arrange facilities for feed
storage and supplies as conveniently as possi­
ble to their place of use. If these facilities must
be moved, the distances should be short. Plan
the movement of materials from the point of
origin to the place of use in an orderly manner
to eliminate work and travel. Avoid back­
tracking and duplication of effort. Make every
trip count by handling large amounts of
material.

The specialist recommends the use of con­
veying equipment, since electric energy is fa r
less costly than labor. Augers and chain con­
veyers can move large amounts of material in
According to the ERS, price is not the pri­ short periods of time, and they are especially
mary factor in the decline in egg consumption. adapted to moving grain and ground feed.
There has been a 27-percent reduction in the Mercury switches that are properly placed in
retail price of grade A large eggs since the storage bins will stop the system automatically
early 1950’s. Per capita disposable income dur­ when the bins are full.
ing the same period rose 53 percent, and retail
Electric feed grinders and mixers can be
food prices in general advanced 12 percent.
installed to operate automatically. An atten­
The problem of the decrease in egg con­ dant is needed only to change adjustments fo r
sumption stems from the pace of American liv­ the different rations that may be required.
ing. About one-third of all wives are now When new facilities are being planned, careful
working outside the home. This situation has attention should be given to the selection and
discouraged home baking and large breakfasts use of the equipment, location of each build­
and has encouraged the use of prepared cereals. ing or facility relative to other elements in the
Moreover, fewer persons are now engaged in system, building materials, and construction
strenuous work and, therefore, do not feel the methods.
need for big breakfasts.
Mr. Allen says that the use of sketches an d
Other probable factors in the decline in egg plans makes possible the working out of th e
consumption include calorie miscounting and best arrangement for an individual farm.
the vanishing backyard flocks. Some people Errors made on paper can be corrected easily,
think that they can lose weight by skipping but those made during the construction and
breakfast or limiting it to a cup of black coffee. installation of equipment can be expensive an d
(The ERS says that it would be more desirable trouble sources for years to come.