View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ARM AND
Q anch
□ ULLETIN
August 1963

Vol. 18, No. 8

INCOME EXPECTATIONS OF FARM BOYS
Iowa State University researchers have con­
ducted a study to find the major factors which
Iowa farm boys take into consideration in
making their occupational choices and plans.
In a recent article, the specialists discuss the
income expectations and goals of the boys —
both those planning to farm and those plan­
ning nonfarm jobs. Although the study was
made in Iowa, the results may indicate how
some southwestern farm youths feel about
farming as a career.

best advantage in the future. (A) How much
net income per year do you think your labor
and this capital would earn for you in 1965 if
you were farming? (B) How much net income
per year do you think you could earn in 1965
if you worked at the highest-paid nonfarm job
you could get and put this $15,000 into the
best-paying nonfarm investment?”
The average of the responses of the 822
boys who answered these questions indicated
that farming would bring in only 85 percent
as much net income as would nonfarm work.
Youths planning to farm thought it would
bring in 94 percent as much as nonfarm work,
while those planning nonfarm careers expected
farming to be 79 percent as profitable as non­
farm work.

Although available information shows that
income expectations are an important factor
in the occupational plans and choices of Iowa
farm boys, results of the study show that in­
come expectations are not the only significant
factor. A substantial number of the boys indi­
cated a preference for farming even at a con­
Thus, the boys who planned to farm were
siderable sacrifice in income. In contrast, there
more
optimistic than the others about relative
were some boys who preferred nonfarm work
income
earning opportunities in farming.
even if the income from farming were greater.
About 38 percent of the boys planning to farm
However, all of the farm boys were highly expected returns in farming to be as high as,
responsive to changes in relative income oppor­ or higher than, those in nonfarm work. Only
tunities. Did the boys who planned to farm 21 percent of the youths not planning to farm
have more optimistic income expectations from had similar expectations. In contrast, 79 per­
farming than the youths who planned non­ cent of the boys planning nonfarm careers ex­
farm careers?
pected returns from farming to be lower than
from nonfarm occupations, while 62 percent
In order to answer this question, a group of of the boys planning to farm expected returns
860 high school senior boys who participated from farming to be lower than those from non­
in the Iowa study were asked the following farm occupations.
question: “Suppose you had $15,000 in the
bank and were considering how you should use
Of the boys who expected lower returns
this money and your own working time to the from farming, approximately one-third still

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

DALLAS, TEXAS

OF

DALLAS

intended to farm. Many of them placed heavy
weight on other values that they associated
with farming which they thought would more
than offset the lower expected income. In addi­
tion, the boys planning to farm expected con­
siderable assistance from their families.
Undoubtedly, these factors tended to offset the
effects of less favorable income expectations in
farming.
Income expectations also varied with the
certainty of the boys about their future plans.
For example, youths who said they were cer­
tain that they were going to farm had twothirds higher income expectations from farm­
ing than the boys who were sure that they
were not going to farm. Moreover, the boys
who were certain of their plans to farm had
higher income expectations than those who
were not sure of their farming plans.
Going beyond income expectations as such,
the specialists attempted to find out whether
farm boys who plan to farm have lower or
higher income goals or aspirations than those
who plan to enter nonfarm occupations. The
youths who expected to farm had lower money
income goals than those who planned nonfarm
careers. On the average, the boys who intended
to farm considered an annual income of
$4,688 to be satisfactory at 20 years of age
and $6,612 to be satisfactory at age 30.
Youths planning nonfarm jobs considered a
satisfactory income to be $5,070 at 20 years of
age and $7,491 at age 30.
About 37 percent of the boys who planned
to farm reported that they would be satisfied
with a net money income from farming of less
than $4,000 per year at age 20. However,
nearly one-fifth of them indicated that they
wanted an annual income of $8,000 or more
at age 20. Fifteen percent of them said that an
annual income of less than $4,000 would be
satisfactory at age 30, while nearly 30 percent
desired an income of $8,000 or more.
Findings of the Iowa study reveal only
money income goals. They do not consider the
weight or value of other preferences or advan­
tages that the boys associated with farming or
nonfarm employment — preferences that may
be included in their overall aspirations and
goals.

Electrical Controls Facilitate
Farm Work
Electrical control devices that make possible
the substitution of machinery for man power
are being utilized for many farm jobs, says
W. S. Allen, Agricultural Engineer with the
Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Con­
trols that react to changes in temperature,
humidity, pressure, time, and light are now
available. These can be used to operate heat­
ers, motor-driven equipment, lights, and other
devices in order to maintain desired conditions.
Thermostats and humidistats are used to
control electric hotbeds, brooders, ventilating
systems, and supplemental heaters. Switches
that respond to changes in the pressure of
liquid, air, or gas may automatically control
electric pumps and air compressors. A type
of pressure switch is also used to operate feed
grinding and conveying systems automatically,
according to the agricultural engineer.
Time clocks are used for the automatic con­
trol of lights in poultry houses, as well as for
automatic feeders for poultry, aeration systems,
and other equipment. A photoelectric relay
control, which is sensitive to changes in light,
is used on yard lights and in poultry houses to
control lighting. Photoelectric devices are also
adapted for counting operations.
Mr. Allen says that electric controls are
essential in the design of automatic systems
for the farm and home. Systems that are cur­
rently being used will automatically blend,
grind, and mix ingredients of a grain ration
for livestock and poultry and will deliver the
ration to the feeder. Prospects are favorable
for more varied uses to be developed as auto­
mation continues.

Test Irrigation Water for Salt
All irrigation waters contain salts, and even
low levels of certain of these minerals can be
harmful, says W. F. Bennett, Soil Chemist with
the Texas Agricultural Extension Service.
Salt is applied to the crop each time water is
used for irrigation. If the mineral is allowed to
accumulate, crop output will be affected. Not
only is the total salt content of the water im-

portant, but some types of salt will lower the
quality of irrigation water more than other
types. For example, sodium salts are more in­
jurious than are calcium and magnesium salts.
Even a small amount of sodium salts in water
can be very harmful.
Mr. Bennett recommends that irrigation
water be tested for total salts, as well as for
chemical composition. Such knowledge can aid
farmers in the utilization of irrigation water to
its best advantage by determining the water
management practices needed.
Tests for determining water quality are
available through Texas A. & M. College.
These tests may be submitted with Form D617, which may be obtained from offices of
local county agricultural agents.

New Parasiticide for Cattle
and Sheep Worms

certain species of pests when they reach adult­
hood but have little effect on the more de­
structive immature stages.
According to the USDA, thiabendazole was
developed by industry chemists. Laboratories
in many countries are testing the drug against
some of the world’s most destructive livestock
parasites.

Not Just

Any

Hog!

Not just any hog is satis­
factory in the breeding herd
in order to produce the
kind of pork required by
today’s consumers, accord­
ing to T. D. Tanksley,
Swine Specialist with the
Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Most
successful pork producers cannot afford to
leave their choice of breeding animals to
chance; they must have records on both breed­
ing and performance of the animals.

Thiabendazole, an experimental parsiticide,
has proven highly effective in controlling sev­
Mr. Tanksley believes that the most eco­
eral parasitic worms in cattle and sheep, reports
the U. S. Department of Agriculture. In limited nomical way for a producer to improve the
tests, the drug was found to be practically 100 carcass desirability of hogs is to obtain a boar
percent successful against five species of round whose littermates or several closely related
worms that attack cattle and five that infect individuals have yielded superior carcasses.
sheep. No toxic reactions occurred in any of After being self-fed from weaning time until
marketing, hogs of this type will produce ade­
the treated animals.
quate muscling with a minimum of fat.
The drug was given orally to the cattle at the
Research has proven that many important
rate of 55 milligrams per kilogram of body
carcass
traits are highly heritable. Conse­
weight (about 1/10 ounce per hundred­
weight). This dosage level had been determined quently, Mr. Tanksley suggests that swine
in previous tests in the United States, Australia, producers take advantage of opportunities to
add performance-tested hogs to their breeding
New Zealand, and Africa.
herds.
In tests with cattle at Auburn, Alabama,
thiabendazole proved very effective against
common stomach worms, stomach hairworms,
nodular worms, intestinal hairworms, and
Rice oil, a by-product of the rice industry,
thread-necked strongyles. The drug was mod­ has been found to increase milk yields when it
erately effective against medium stomach is added to the ration of dairy animals, reports
worms. In tests with sheep, thiabendazole con­ the Texas Agricultural Extension Service. Fat
trolled large stomach worms, intestinal hair­ in the ration supplies energy and aids in the
worms, threadworms, and two nodular worm metabolism of ingredients in the feed. A good
species.
dairy ration should contain adequate fat for
efficient utilization of all the feed.
The experimental drug controlled the imma­
ture stages of some worm species, as well as
In a test conducted at the Tyler Agricultural
the adult worms. Other parasiticides control Experiment Substation, 12 Jersey cows were

Rice Oil Increases Milk Production

paired according to milk yield, body weight,
and stage of lactation. The “oiled” ration was
made by adding 1 percent rice oil to the regular
ration. One cow from each pair was given this
feed, and the other cow received the regular
ration.
Although the two feeds used in the test were
dry, a slight reduction in dust was found in the
ration containing the rice oil, and the ration’s
palatability was thus improved. The cows
also had free choice of grass hay and perma­
nent pasture during the test.
Results of the Tyler experiment show that the
cows fed the rice oil-modified ration averaged
0.9 pound more milk per head daily than the
cows fed regular rations. For every $1.00 spent
on rice oil, about $3.50 was returned through
increased milk output. This gain in yield is
attributed to the rice oil, since no significant
difference was found in the grain ration con­
sumed, content of butterfat, solids-not-fat of
the milk, or body weight of the animals, accord­
ing to the report.

Hexadecanol Restricts Evaporation
From Soil
Hexadecanol, a commercial alcohol prod­
uct, reduced evaporation of moisture from the
soil by 43 percent in limited experiments con­
ducted by the U. S. Department of Agriculture
in cooperation with the Colorado Agricultural
Experiment Station. The USDA says that this
finding may indicate significant progress toward
the solution of one of agriculture’s most chal­
lenging problems — how to reduce loss of soil
moisture through evaporation.
An estimated 123 million acre-feet of water
evaporates annually from cropped and fallow
land in the 17 Western States, where water re­
sources often are inadequate for agricultural
and other uses. The loss represents about 43
percent of the water consumed annually in all
homes, industry, and agriculture of the conti­
nental United States.
In the Colorado studies, hexadecanol was
applied to the soil at rates of 660, 3,320, and
16,600 pounds per acre, by four methods: (1)
mixed with the surface quarter inch of soil, (2)
mixed uniformly with all of the soil, (3) lay­

ered 1 inch below the soil surface, and (4)
layered 3 inches below the soil surface.
The scientists added enough water to satu­
rate the treated soil and then measured the
water lost by evaporation at the end of a 10day period. The 10-day cycles — saturating
the soil and measuring evaporation — were
continued for 14 months.
The greatest evaporation reduction (43 per­
cent) resulted from the addition of hexadec­
anol at the 16,600-pound rate, placed in the
surface quarter inch of soil. The product
proved highly resistant to decomposition by
microbial action in the soil. Additional studies
will need to be made in order to determine
whether hexadecanol would be an economical
evaporation suppressant under farm condi­
tions, according to the USDA.

New Publication on Plant Diseases
Plant diseases are a source of much concern
to growers each year, according to C. Wendell
Horne, Assistant Plant Pathologist, and Harlan
E. Smith, former Plant Pathologist with the
Texas Agricultural Extension Service.
In a new publication entitled What You
Should Know About Plant Diseases, the spe­
cialists point out that plant disease epidemics
have been major causes of human disasters
throughout history, and they cite the “Irish
potato famine” as an example. More than a
million people died because of a potato crop
failure which was caused by late blight, a plant
disease. The crisis continued from 1845 until
1860, and even today outbreaks of the disease
occur.
As late as 1946 in the United States, Vic­
toria blight, an oat disease, destroyed the most
productive fields of the best oat varieties in the
Midwest. Fortunately, types which are resistant
to the disease were quickly developed to re­
place the diseased varieties.
The new Texas A. & M. publication contains
much usable information for farmers, ranchers,
and homeowners. Copies of What You Should
Know About Plant Diseases, B-995, may be
secured from county agricultural agents or
from the Agricultural Information Office, Col­
lege Station, Texas.