View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ARM AND
171ANCH
F I ULLETIN
January 1970

Vol. 25, No. 1

C U R R E N T A G R IC U L T U R A L S ITU A TIO N
Agricultural income from livestock was stronger
than from crops in 1969. Although there were sub­
stantial gains in consumers’ take-home pay, market
supplies of livestock and products were expanded
only slightly. As a result, livestock prices received
by farmers were up sharply from the previous year.
An abundant crop harvest, with large carryovers
of grains and soybeans, weakened average crop
prices. But with the volume of crop marketings up,
cash receipts were about steady. Realized net farm
income was close to $16 billion, up from the $14.8
billion achieved in 1968, according to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.

will not exceed the 8.25 million bales of the pre­
vious season, the smallest in over a decade. The
weakness is attributed to reduced military pur­
chases, higher levels of textile imports, and con­
tinuing market losses to man-made fibers. Although
annual exports averaged 3.75 million bales in
1964-68, exports in 1969-70 are expected to total
near last season’s level of 2.75 million bales.

Agricultural production and income in the Elev­
enth Federal Reserve District states — Arizona,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas —
were sharply divided, with livestock and livestock
products holding a moderately favorable income
position, while crop income was weakened by poor
yields and generally low prices.

Cotton
The nation’s cotton stocks are expected to de­
cline moderately in the 1969-70 season. Because
disappearance may be more than in 1968-69, the
carryover in August may slip to near the 6 millionbale level, compared with 6.5 million last August.
Cotton production in 1969 for the District states
totaled approximately 4.5 million bales — 14 per­
cent less than a year earlier. The U.S. crop totaled
almost 10.1 million bales, down 8 percent from
1968 production.
Prospects for cotton disappearance in 1969-70
have weakened in recent months. Mill use probably

F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E
DALLAS,

Millions of running bales.
Ending carryover.
1969-70 based on October 1, 1969, indications.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Man-made fibers have continued to displace cot­
ton in many uses. Total consumption of fibers in­
creased in 1969, but use of cotton declined. The
USDA estimates that cotton’s share of the fiber
market may ease to a new low of about 40 percent,
while man-made fiber use may increase to 57 per­
cent. Cotton is used with many man-made blends
but usually as the minor fiber.

B A N K
TEXAS

OF

D A L L A S

Because of the small 1969 cotton crop, the
USDA increased the 1970 acreage allotment for
upland cotton 6 percent. Direct price-support pay­
ments will be 16.80 cents a pound on domestic
acreage allotments, compared with 14.73 cents
under the 1969 program. The national average
rate of price-support loans will still be 20.25 cents
a pound for Middling 1-inch cotton at average
locations.

Sorghum Groin
Production of sorghum grain in District states
was estimated at close to 386 million bushels in
1969, or 4 percent less than in 1968. Nationally,
the supply was up about 2 percent because of a
large total crop of 757 million bushels.

1969-70 based on November 1969 indications.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The sharp rise in cattle feeding in the Southwest
has also increased requirements for sorghum grain,
which, in turn, give some support to prices. Prices
received by Texas farmers in the last half of 1969
averaged approximately 20 percent above the level
of the corresponding period a year earlier. In midOctober 1969, prices received by U.S. farmers
averaged $1.91 per hundredweight, 30 cents above
the loan and the highest for that month since 1956.
With more cattle on feed, domestic demand for
sorghum grain is apt to continue strong in the
1969-70 season. Domestic use in 1968-69 was 620
million bushels, a record high. The USDA esti­
mates that feed consumption in 1969-70 probably
will exceed the previous high by 5 to 10 percent.

Although exports were down 36 percent from the
previous season, shipments of sorghum grain in
1968- 69 totaled 106 million bushels. If the ex­
pected domestic expansion in use is realized in the
1969- 70 season, the crop would fall below total
requirements, reducing the October 1, 1970,
carryover.

Wheat
Farmers in the District states produced about
200 million bushels of wheat last year — 9 percent
less than in 1968. Total U.S. output, at 1,456 mil­
lion bushels, was 7 percent less than in 1969.
Marking the third consecutive year of increase,
the total U.S. supply of wheat in the 1969-70
marketing year is estimated by the USDA at 2,275
million bushels, or 164 million more than in 196869. A sharp decline in exports in 1968-69, resulting
from an extended dock strike, as well as large and
increasing world supplies, was only partially offset
by increased feeding of wheat in the United States.
Exports are expected to rise a little from the
1968-69 level of 544 million bushels. But con­
tinued large production in several key importing
countries has dampened any significant increase in
world trade. Wheat stocks in the major exporting
countries were up sharply last summer. Two-thirds
of these stocks were held outside the United States,
compared with less than half in 1961. Major ex­
porters’ supplies of wheat in 1969-70 may exceed
domestic needs by 4.2 billion bushels. This is a
record exportable surplus and enough to meet usual
world import requirements for two years.
The 1970 wheat program is essentially the same
as in 1969. But the supply-demand situation for
wheat led the USDA to reduce allotments for 1970.
In the five southwestern states, the 1970 wheat
acreage allotment has been set at 4.6 million acres.
The national acreage allotment was reduced to
45.5 million acres, 12 percent less than in 1969.
The acreage diversion program for payment con­
tinues, and the national average loan rate remains
at $1.25 a bushel.

Rice
Adverse weather, along with a 9-percent re­
duction in planted acreage, lowered the 1969 rice
harvest in Louisiana and Texas to about 4 1 million
hundredweight — 24 percent less than in 1968.

U.S. production was down 14 percent for a total
that was about 90.2 million hundredweight.
Total disappearance of milled rice in 1968-69
was up only slightly from a year earlier, in con­
trast to the sharp annual increases of recent years.
Because an increased carryover partly offset the
reduced 1969 crop, the rice supply for 1969-70
is nearly as large as in 1968-69. With prospects for
a further decline in exports and little change in
domestic use, the carryover may rise again this
summer, but the increase will be more moderate.
This implies that prices will stay close to the pricesupport loan of $4.72 per hundredweight.

cow numbers in 1965-67 slightly more than offset
the increases in beef cow numbers. For the last
couple of years, the gains in beef cow numbers
have about equaled the reduction in dairy cow
numbers.
Consumer demand for beef has continued to
increase over the past decade. The average Amer­
ican consumed 81 pounds of beef in 1959, but
he ate close to 110 pounds in 1969. This strong
demand for beef is expected to continue next year,
but with projected gains in red meat output, most
meat and livestock prices are not likely to increase
much.

Cattle

Dairy

Livestock production in the District states rose
about 6 percent in 1969 over the previous year. As
in 1968, cattle and calves accounted for most of
the increase. Even though total U.S. fed beef out­
put increased in 1969, commercial beef produc­
tion was only slightly larger because slaughter of
nonfed steers and heifers dropped. Consequently,
with increases in consumer demand for meat and a
decline in supplies, the result was a strengthening
in livestock and meat prices.

Continuing the trend of recent years, the number
of milk cows in the five southwestern states as of
January 1, 1969, dropped about 4 percent from a
year earlier, but total milk production in 1969
was about steady. The rate of decline in numbers
of milk cows in the nation slowed to about 2.5 per­
cent, and total milk output decreased about 1 per­
cent below 1968.
The market supply of domestic milk and im­
ported dairy ingredients available for processing
and manufacture in 1969 is expected to be down
about a billion pounds from the equivalent of 113
billion pounds in 1968. If milk production contin­
ues to show gains, market supplies may be up
slightly in early 1970. The 1969 decline in supply
resulted from reduced marketings of milk and
cream by farmers.
Total domestic consumption of dairy products
(milk equivalent) was about 1 percent less than
the 117 billion pounds of 1968. Most of the decline
was in civilian consumption. The USDA expects
per-capita civilian consumption to decline again
in 1970.

Pounds — carcass-weight basis.
1969 based on November indications.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Although cattlemen have been expanding the
beef herd since 1958, increases in recent years
have been small. The beef cow herd has risen an
average of about 2 percent a year for the last five
years, compared with a 5-percent average annual
increase during the early 1960’s. Declines in dairy

Prices dealers paid for milk used in bottling
early in 1969 averaged between 5 percent and 6
percent higher than a year earlier. But the gains
narrowed to less than 3 percent in the third quar­
ter and probably from 2 percent to 3 percent in
the last quarter. If milk production continues to
rise in early 1970 and premiums above Class I
prices do not change, dealers are likely to pay
slightly higher than year-earlier prices, according
to the USDA.

Sheep and Lambs
The number of sheep and lambs in District states
declined last year for the fourth consecutive year,
dropping 5 percent lower at the start of the year
than a year earlier. The number of sheep shorn fell
4 percent, and the average fleece weight slipped
3 percent. As a result, wool production was down
about 6 percent from 1968.

SHEEP AND LAMBS ON FARMS, JANUARY 1
MI L . H E A D

only more beef but also more chicken. Despite this
advance, however, total output of poultry and eggs
declined slightly for the second consecutive year.
Although the laying flock at the start of 1969 was
9 percent smaller than a year before, the output of
eggs during the year was only about 5 percent less
than in 1968. For the nation, egg production in
1969 is expected to total slightly below the 193
million cases produced the year before. This de­
cline was primarily the result of a smaller laying
flock and a decrease in the rate of lay in early 1969.
The USDA expects a moderate increase in egg
production and larger broiler output in the first
half of 1970 than the corresponding year-ago
levels. Turkey meat supplies probably will be
down. Although supplies are expected to be larger
in the first half of 1970, strong demand for eggs
used in liquid egg production will tend to hold
average egg prices near year-earlier levels.

, y T o t a l sheep and lambs

Farm Income
1925

1935

1945

1955

1965

1975

1969 preliminary.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Total sheep and lamb numbers in the United
States declined in 1969 for the tenth consecutive
year. These numbers have dropped at an average
annual rate of 4 percent since 1960, when the in­
ventory was at its most recent peak. In the early
1960’s, lamb slaughter was large in relation to
inventories, and lamb prices were relatively low.
Since 1965, however, slaughter supplies have
dropped while consumer demand has been strong.
Thus, prices in recent years have averaged above
any period since the early 1950’s. In the first ten
months of last year Choice grade slaughter lambs
averaged $28.80 per hundredweight at San Angelo,
Texas, about $3.15 higher than for the same period
a year earlier.

Poultry and Eggs
Broiler production in Eleventh District states in­
creased in the first 11 months of 1969 at a rate
indicating a 7-percent gain for the year. Even so,
prices continued to rise, showing that with in­
creased personal incomes, people were eating not

The expected increase in gross farm income in
the five southwestern states in 1969 was due pri­
marily to gains in cattle prices and beef production.
Crop receipts in the first ten months were 2 per­
cent lower than in January-October 1968, but fivestock receipts were 13 percent higher. This brought
cash receipts from farm marketings up 7 percent
from the level of a year earlier. Nationally, cash
receipts from livestock and livestock products were
about 11 percent above 1968, while crop receipts
declined 2 percent and overall cash receipts rose
6 percent.
A small rise over 1969 levels in the volume of
livestock marketings in the United States is likely
for the first half of 1970, but demand is expected
to expand a little. Consequently, the USDA ex­
pects livestock prices to not drift much below No­
vember 1969 levels. Feed grain supplies are cur­
rently about in balance with use. With continued
strong domestic and export demand, prices of feed
grains are expected by the USDA to average slightly
higher in the 1969-70 season than in the year be­
fore. Nevertheless, with production expenses con­
tinuing to advance, the cost-price squeeze will con­
tinue for both crop and livestock producers in
1970. For this reason, realized net income for the
nation’s farmers in the first half of 1970 may fall
below the $15.6 billion rate of January-June 1969.
Prepared by
C a r l G. A n d e r s o n , J r .