View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ARM AND
Q anch
F I ULLETIN
Vol. 20, No. 1

January 1965

A G R IC U L T U R A L O U T L O O K FO R
The outlook for agriculture in 1965 is for
continued stability, according to the U. S.
Department of Agriculture. Further economic
expansion, rising consumer incomes, and popu­
lation growth probably will increase domestic
demand for farm products. Per capita food con­
sumption in 1965 is expected to continue at
about the high level of 1964. Exports likely
will be only slightly below the record of last
year.
U. S. farm production expenses are expected
to increase but at a lower percentage than
the average for the past decade. Expenditures
for such production items as feed, livestock,
and fertilizers likely will rise, as will over­
head costs, but labor costs are estimated to
be lower. A continual reduction in farm labor
needs is anticipated as a result of the general
substitution of machines for labor.
Gross income realized by farmers (including
cash receipts from farm marketings, Govern­
ment payments, and nonmoney income, such
as farm-produced food and fuel) is expected to
be at about the level of the past 2 years. Ac­
cordingly, realized net farm income in 1965
may not change much from the relatively stable
level of recent years. Cash receipts from sales
of livestock and products may show a small
gain in 1965, reflecting a further increase in
marketings but little change in average prices.
Cash receipts from dairy and poultry products
are expected to be about the same as last year.
The smaller prospective crop receipts likely
will be partly offset by larger Government
payments.

1965

The following are summaries of national out­
look statements by the Department of Agricul­
ture for some important commodities in the
Southwest.
C off on
The cotton outlook is highlighted by (1)
another large crop, (2) rising mill use, and (3)
a further buildup in stocks. The U. S. carry­
over of cotton on August 1, 1965, is expected
to total about 13.0 million bales, or 0.6 million
bales more than a year earlier. A carry-over of
this size would mark the fourth consecutive
year in which the carry-over has increased and
would be the largest volume since the record
14.5 million bales in 1956.
Despite the prospective increase in carry­
over this year, Commodity Credit Corporation
stocks of cotton may be reduced, because com­
mercial interests are likely to increase holdings
during 1964-65. CCC stocks on August 1,
1964, were the largest in recent years, while
commercial holdings were the smallest since
1959.
The 1964 U. S. cotton crop of 15.4 million
bales is fractionally above the preceding year’s
production and is the largest output since 1953.
The crop is expected to exceed the anticipated
disappearance during the 1964-65 season
(August 1, 1964-July 31, 1965).
U. S. mill consumption of cotton may total
9.7 million bales for 1964-65, or an increase
of about 1.1 million bales over the previous
season. This rise in use is resulting from lower

F E D E R A L FEBERAl RBSBfiVE BftNK QFKDALtAB D A L L A S
DALLAS,

TEXAS

net costs to users and some rebuilding of cot­
ton textile inventories. Although exports may
decline from the previous year’s high level,
they are expected to remain above the 5 mil­
lion-bale figure.
The national acreage allotment for the 1965
crop of upland cotton has been set at the stat­
utory minimum of 16 million acres. The na­
tional acreage allotment for 1965-crop extralong staple cotton has been set at 77,758 acres,
compared with 112,500 for the 1964 crop.

Total U. S. disappearance of wheat in 196465 is estimated at 1,310 million bushels, with
exports accounting for 675 million bushels.
Exports at this level are considerably below
the record 860 million bushels in the preceding
season but are in line with wheat shipments in
recent years. The expected record world wheat
crop likely will increase competition for com­
mercial markets.
Domestic disappearance of wheat may rise
to 635 million bushels, or somewhat above that
in the past few years. This gain is expected to
result from a moderate increase in the use of
wheat for feed. The decline in per capita con­
sumption of wheat in the United States is ex­
pected to continue in 1964-65, maintaining the
total quantity of wheat used for food at the
500 million-bushel level. With total disappear­
ance of wheat slightly larger than the 1964
production, carry-over stocks on July 1, 1965,
may be reduced slightly.

The level of price support for 1965-crop
cotton — between 65 and 90 percent of parity
— will be determined by the Secretary of Agri­
culture after taking into consideration specified
factors, including changes in production costs.
Farmers who plant only their domestic allot­
ment in 1965 will be eligible to receive a basic
price support through loans, plus an additional
payment not to exceed 15 percent of the basic
price support. As in the case of the 1964 crop,
most farmers with 1965 allotments of 15 acres
Based on the present supply and demand out­
or less will not be required to reduce their look, the price received for wheat by U. S.
plantings in order to be eligible for the addi­ farmers in the current marketing year is ex­
tional price support.
pected to be near the national average pricesupport loan rate of $1.30 per bushel. Cash
receipts from wheat in 1964-65 may amount
W h eat
to $2.1 billion, compared with $2.3 billion
The USDA says that several new aspects in in the preceding season.
the present wheat situation could cause the
outlook for wheat in the 1964-65 marketing
Announcements on the 1965 wheat program
year (which began July l, 1964) to be sub­ indicate two important changes, each of which
stantially different from that of any other re­ provides a greater range of alternatives to the
cent year. For the first time since the 1953 crop, Nation’s farmers. One of the changes would
wheat can be sold without marketing quotas. permit farmers to produce any amount of wheat
The price-support rate for wheat is at a level they desire without losing acreage history
that is competitive with feed grain prices; con­ credit, provided they comply with program
sequently, wheat feeding has a potential for provisions relating to wheat. The other allows
expansion that has not been feasible during the the substitution of acreages between wheat and
past 10 to 15 years.
feed grains for farmers enrolled in the programs
for each of these grains. The national average
The total U. S. wheat supply for 1964-65 is loan rate for wheat in 1965 will be $1.25 per
estimated at 2,180 million bushels. This vol­ bushel; domestic and export certificates will be
ume includes the 1964 crop of 1,275 million valued at 75 cents and 30 cents per bushel,
bushels, the beginning carry-over of 900 mil­
respectively.
lion bushels, and the usual small quantity of
imports. The 1964 crop is estimated to be
somewhat larger than the previous year’s pro­ Rice
duction, but the July 1, 1964, wheat carry-over
The 1964 national rice crop is estimated at
is nearly 300 million bushels less than a year a record 72.2 million hundredweight, points
earlier.
out the USDA. The beginning carry-over on

August l, 1964, of 7.5 million hundredweight,
together with the 1964 crop and an allowance
for a small quantity of imports, provides a
supply of 79.8 million hundredweight for the
1964-65 marketing year. A supply of this size
is 3 percent above the previous year’s large
supply and is about one-fifth greater than the
1957-61 average.
Total disappearance of rice in the current
marketing year probably will be about the same
as the 1963-64 record. Domestic disappearance
may be slightly above a year earlier, since use
of rice for food is expected to continue its
longtime upward trend. On the other hand, use
of rice for seed and industry probably will not
be substantially different from that in the pre­
ceding season.
Total U. S. exports of rice in 1964-65 may
equal the peak 41 million hundredweight of the
previous season, as a larger proportion of the
crop is expected to be shipped under Public
Law 480. India may again be our largest for­
eign customer for rice, all of which likely will
move under the Food-for-Peace Program. The
U. S. carry-over of rice on August 1, 1965,
probably will be up from the level of the pre­
ceding 3 years but likely will be considerably
below the 5-year average.
Feed
Feed grain output for 1964 is estimated to
be 136 million tons, or 13 percent below the
preceding year’s record. The reduction in pro­
duction may be attributed to lower yields per
acre, as a result of dry weather, and to the
planting of 5 percent fewer acres. Total feed
grain supplies for the 1964-65 marketing year
are placed at 206 million tons — only 6 per­
cent below last year, according to the USDA.
The supply of feed grains and other concen­
trates for 1964-65 is estimated at 240 million
tons, or 12 million tons below a year earlier.
Corn has accounted for much of the reduc­
tion in the feed grain supply. The total supply
of corn is expected to be 354 million bushels
below a year earlier, and the 1964 crop is
estimated to be 300 million bushels below total
use. Supplies of other feed grains — oats, bar­
ley, and sorghum grain — are also below a

year earlier. Lower wheat prices are influenc­
ing the feeding of wheat to livestock, and the
quantity fed may reach 100 million bushels.
Feed grain prices in 1964-65 may average a
little above a year ago. Under the 1964 feed
grain program, the Commodity Credit Cor­
poration cannot sell feed grains at less than
the loan rate plus carrying charges.
Supplies of high-protein feeds available for
feeding in the 1964-65 year will likely rise
slightly. Soybean meal output may be up about
4 percent over last year’s 10.6 million tons.
Prices of high-protein feeds may average a little
below the high level of the past 2 years.
The hay supply, estimated at 135 million
tons, is 5 million tons below a year earlier. The
supply per animal unit is 4 percent smaller than
last year and about 10 percent below the 5-year
average.
Feed grain exports in 1964-65 probably will
at least equal, and may exceed, the year-earlier
record of 18.7 million tons. Continued strong
demand in Europe and reduced Canadian pro­
duction will tend to strengthen U. S. exports.
Cattle
The total inventory of cattle and calves on
the Nation’s farms as of January 1, 1965, is
estimated by the USDA to be only slightly
above the 106.3 million of a year ago. The
slowdown in inventory growth results from in­
creased slaughter and further decreases in im­
ports of live animals. However, beef production
in 1965 likely will be 2 to 3 percent above that
of last year. Cattle slaughter prospects are
slightly higher than in 1964, but total output
probably will not gain proportionately because
of lighter weights.
A modest gain in per capita consumption of
beef is expected. The large increase of 1964
is not likely to be repeated, however, despite
lower supplies of competing meats. The USDA
estimates that a record 100 pounds of beef were
consumed per capita in 1964, reflecting a large
rise in domestic production which more than
offset a sharp drop in imports.
Marketings in the first half of 1965 will
depend largely on the number and the weight

of cattle placed on feed during the fourth
quarter of 1964 and the early months of 1965.
The USDA estimates that fed cattle prices will
remain near the October 1964 levels into the
winter months. Feeder cattle prices probably
will remain under pressure during the winter
months because of large supplies; however, a
favorable price relationship between feeder
and fed cattle likely has encouraged large re­
placements in the fourth quarter of 1964 and
early 1965.
Dairy
Milk production in 1965 is estimated to be
about the same as the 125.7 billion pounds of
1964. A further decrease in the number of
milk cows is anticipated, but gains in output per
cow are expected to offset this decline. Farm
marketings likely will increase again in 1965,
and a continued gain in demand is in prospect,
according to the USDA. Growing domestic
disappearance and continued strong foreign
demand are expected to hold prices at about
the 1964 level, despite increases in farm
marketings.
W ool

in early 1964, which caused a shift to the use
of man-made fibers.
Poultry and Eggs
The production of poultry and eggs tends to
increase each year. Broiler production has
climbed for 18 consecutive years. Farm egg
and turkey output has grown persistently, with
only occasional interruptions in response to
lower prices. Poultry meat production has in­
creased more than egg output. The two major
reasons given by the USDA for this difference
are the greater efficiency gains in poultry
meat production and an increase in per capita
consumption.
Broilers are the bright spot in the poultry
outlook for 1965. Output is expected to in­
crease only slightly, and competition from red
meat is likely to be less severe, since pork
production is estimated to be lower. Live
broiler prices at the farm may average a little
higher in 1965 than in 1964.
The 1965 turkey output is expected to ex­
ceed the 98.7 million estimated for 1964. Im­
provement in production efficiency encourages
the expansion in numbers, even though prices
are expected to show weakness. Owners of
breeder flocks report intentions to keep 4
percent more turkey breeder hens at the be­
ginning of 1965 as compared with 1964. Thus,
the breeder flock will be large enough to sup­
port a sizable increase in turkey production
in 1965.

Shorn wool production in the United States
is expected to continue downward in 1965
because of a further decrease in the sheep
inventory, points out the USDA. Wool prices
probably will be moderately lower than those
received in early 1964. Mill consumption of
apparel and carpet wool likely will show an
advance over 1964, which recorded the lowest
level since 1958. Imports of raw wool and
wool products also are expected to increase
in 1965.
The shorn wool incentive level for 1965 will
be 62 cents per pound, grease basis. This fig­
ure is the same that has been in effect since
1955, the beginning of the wool incentive
program. The mohair support price will be 72
cents per pound — unchanged from 1964.

Another increase in egg production is in
prospect for 1965. The number of layers and
replacement chickens currently on hand likely
assures increased production through the first
half of 1965. The volume of eggs during the
second half of the year will depend on the
number of replacement chickens started in
the first half. Further improvements in the
rate of lay are anticipated, with a resulting in­
crease in total production also being expected.

U. S. apparel wool mill use likely will total
245 million to 250 million pounds in 1965.
This figure represents a modest gain over 1964
and is the same as that in 1963. The decline in
wool use during 1964 probably resulted from
the relatively high level of world wool prices

The price of eggs in early 1965 probably
will remain high enough to encourage increas­
ing flock sizes, according to the USDA. If this
pattern of placement materializes, however,
egg prices in the second half of 1965 likely will
be considerably below those in 1964.