The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.
September 25, 2015 Survey and Market Measures of Inflation Expectations Sara Millington and Mehmet Pasaogullari Inflation has been rising this year, but the overall increase appears to be small. The year-over-year change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is 0.2 percent (as of August 2015), while the core CPI (which removes volatile food and energy prices) has risen between 1.6 and 1.8 percent throughout the year. In this article, we review several measures of inflation expectations, which reflect economic agents’ perceptions about the future course of inflation. We look at two kinds of measures, expectations reported in surveys and expectations derived from financial markets. For survey expectations we consider the University of Michigan Survey of Consumers (UM Survey) and the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF). The former is conducted monthly, and the latter quarterly. The market measures of inflation expectations that we look at include the TIPS breakeven inflation rate and the inflation swaps rate, both of which are available at a daily frequency. One-Year Change in CPI and Core CPI Percent 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 Core CPI 1.5 1.0 0.5 CPI 0.0 -0.5 2012 2013 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2014 2015 Survey Measures Overall, surveys show that short-term inflation expectations have increased recently, but the increase has been limited. The UM Survey’s 1-year median inflation expectation has risen over the last six months, going from 2.6 percent to 2.9 percent (April to September). Similarly, the SPF 1-year median expectation has risen in the last two surveys, increasing about 0.1 percentage points for the CPI and 0.2 percentage points for the core CPI. As of 2015:Q3, SPF survey participants expect CPI and core CPI inflation to be 2 percent in one year. The upside risks to the core CPI inflation outlook for the end of 2015 and for 2016 seem more pronounced than before, judging from the SPF. The most likely outcome for the 12-month change in the core CPI at the end of 2015:Q4 is still in the 1.5 to 2.0 percent range, but the probability of it falling in the 2.0 to 2.5 percent range is a close second at 34 percent, which has almost doubled in the last two surveys. In contrast, the odds for the 1.0 to 1.5 percent range declined more than 13 percent, and now this range is the third-most likely outcome. The same trend is also seen for the 2016:Q4 outcomes, for which the 2.0 to 2.5 percent range is currently viewed as the most likely. Meanwhile, long-term inflation expectations have been quite stable in 2015 according to the surveys. The UM Survey’s 5-to-10-year inflation expectation has bounced back and forth in a narrow band of 2.6 to 2.8 percent this year and is currently at 2.8 percent (as of September 2015, preliminary result). The SPF 5-year CPI inflation expectation has remained at 2.0 percent since falling there in the first survey of 2015. The 10-year SPF increased only by 0.05 percentage points in the last two surveys; it is 2.15 percent in the recent survey. Inflation Expectations, One-Year Ahead Percent 5.0 4.5 4.0 UM Survey 1-year 3.5 3.0 SPF 1-year CPI SPF 1-year Core CPI 2.5 2.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources: University of Michigan and Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. SPF Core CPI Probabilities, 2015:Q4 45 40 2014:Q1 2014:Q2 2014:Q3 2014:Q4 2015:Q1 2015:Q2 2015:Q3 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Less than 1.0 1.0–1.5 1.5–2.0 2.0–2.5 2.5–3.0 Higher than 3.0 Expected 12-month change in Core CPI, percent Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. SPF Core CPI Probabilities, 2016:Q4 40 2015:Q1 2015:Q2 2015:Q3 35 30 25 20 Market Measures 15 Market measures of long-term inflation expectations have been volatile in the last six months, especially in the most recent period. Between mid-March and early July, the 10-year inflation swap rate increased by about 30 basis points to 2.16 percent, whereas the 10-year TIPS breakeven rate rose by 27 basis points to 1.91 10 5 0 Less than 1.0 1.0–1.5 1.5–2.0 2.0–2.5 2.5–3.0 Expected 12-month change in Core CPI, percent Source: Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Higher than 3.0 percent. However, from then until August 24, both measures declined steadily. On August 24, 2015, the TIPS breakeven rate was 1.49 percent, its lowest level since May 2009, and the 10-year inflation swap rate was 1.73 percent, its lowest level since January 2009. Long-Term Inflation Expectations from Surveys Percent 3.5 3.0 2.5 One thing to keep in mind when looking at market expectations is that they are not reflections of pure inflation expectations. They also reflect inflation and liquidity premiums, and the fact that financial markets have been quite volatile recently may have affected these premiums. On the same day these swap and breakeven rates were reported, August 24, US stock market indexes declined by about 4 percent, suggesting that the market measures’ low levels of inflation expectations reflect more than just a deterioration of market perceptions for the long-term inflation outlook. Since then, these measures have continued their volatile pattern. As of September 10, the 10-year TIPS breakeven rate was 1.59 percent, and the inflation swap rate was 1.84 percent. UM Survey 5-to-10 year 2.0 SPF 10-year CPI SPF 5-year CPI 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources: University of Michigan and Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Long-Term Inflation Expectations from Market Measures Percent 3.0 2.5 2.0 10-year inflation swap Bottom Line 1.5 10-year TIPS breakeven There has been a limited rise in short-term inflation expectations. Long-term inflation expectations are either rising slightly or falling quite a bit, depending on the measure consulted. Survey measures suggest that long-term inflation expectations have been largely stable or increasing only slightly over the last six months. In contrast, market measures of long-term expectations showed large declines recently, possibly due to liquidity and inflation premiums among other things. 1.0 0.5 0.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 Sources: University of Michigan and Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. Sara Millington is a research analyst in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Her primary interests include macroeconomics, monetary policy, and public finance. Mehmet Pasaogullari is a research economist in the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. His research areas include macroeconomics, financial economics, and applied econometrics. In particular, he works on the macroeconomics explanations of the nominal term structure slope and the interaction between monetary policy and the yield curve. Economic Trends is published by the Research Department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Views stated in Economic Trends are those of individuals in the Research Department and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Materials may be reprinted provided that the source is credited. If you’d like to subscribe to a free e-mail service that tells you when Economic Trends is updated, please send an empty email message to economictrends-on@mail-list.com. No commands in either the subject header or message body are required. ISSN 0748-2922
@FedFRASER