View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

Economic SYNOPSES
short essays and reports on the economic issues of the day
2007 ■ Number 20

U.S. Exporters: A Rare Breed
Rubén Hernández-Murillo
.S. firms rarely engage in international trade. In 2000, for
exporting firms in both employment and output (in both foreign
example, there were 5.5 million firms in the United States;
and domestic shipments).1
of these only about 4 percent were exporters. And the top
Andrew Bernard and J. Bradford Jensen, along with co-authors,
10 percent of these exporters accounted for 96 percent of total
argue that the higher initial productivity of exporters, combined
U.S. exports.
with higher output and employment growth after entry, suggests
Not surprisingly, goods-producing firms account for the
an important role for trade liberalization (a reduction of trade
majority of exports (as measured by value). The table shows the
barriers) in improving the aggregate productivity of the economy.2
distribution of exporting firms among 10 manufacturing indusThe reason is that a reduction in trade barriers would improve the
tries ranked by their share of total manufacturing employment
profits of existing exporting firms and would reduce the initial
in 2002. Most manufacturing industries have some firms that
productivity level necessary for additional firms to enter the export
export, but the share of those firms in each industry is relatively
market. This additional entry would, in turn, generate an increased
small, varying between 12 and 38 percent for the larger industries
demand for labor and therefore higher wages. Low-productivity
and between 12 and 25 percent for the smaller industries. Furthernon-exporting firms would be forced to exit the industry, and both
more, across all industries, on average, a firm’s foreign shipments
capital and labor factors would be reallocated from the less efficient
represent only a small proportion (never exceeding 21 percent)
non-exporting firms to the more efficient exporting firms. This
of total shipments. In manufacturing as a whole in 2002, only 18
would increase average productivity in the industry. Because the
percent of firms were exporters and only about 14 percent of
reallocation of factors occurs both within and across industries, this
total firm shipments were exports.
would translate into productivity gains for the entire economy. ■
Not only are exporting firms rare, they also stand out in several
1 Bernard, Andrew B. and Jensen, J. Bradford. “Exporting and Productivity in the
ways: Studies show that exporting firms are more productive in
USA.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2004, 20(3), pp. 343-57.
terms of value-added per worker and total factor productivity
2 Bernard, Andrew B.; Jensen, J. Bradford; Redding, Stephen J. and Schott, Peter K.
and that they ship a higher volume of products. They use more
“Firms in International Trade.” Journal of Economic Perspectives (forthcoming).
skilled workers, capital, and sophisticated technology than nonexporting firms. They also pay higher
wages and are more innovative. (These
Industry
Mean exports
differences persist even after accountemployment
%
of
%
of
firms
as % of total
ing for firm size and industry type.)
share rank
NAICS
Industry
firms
that export
shipments
On the surface, exporting seems
beneficial. So why don’t more firms
1
336
Transportation equipment
3.4
28
13
2
332
Fabricated metal product
19.9
14
12
export? One important distinction may
3
311
Food manufacturing
6.8
12
15
offer a clue: Although the productivity
4
334
Computer/electric product
4.5
38
21
level of exporting firms is higher than
5
333
Machinery manufacturing
9.0
33
16
that of non-exporting firms, their pro17
313
Textile mills
1.0
25
13
ductivity growth is not—which suggests
18
314
Textile
product
mills
1.9
12
12
that high productivity is a requirement
19
312
Beverage/tobacco product
0.7
23
7
for and not a consequence of engaging
20
324
Petroleum/coal
product
0.4
18
12
in international trade. High entry costs
21
316
Leather/allied product
0.4
24
13
for exporting may be a barrier to all
Aggregate manufacturing
100.0
18
14
but the most efficient firms. At the
NOTE: NAICS, North American Industry Classification System. Data are from Bernard et al. (forthcoming)
same time, economists have also found
and the 2002 Census of Manufacturers.
that once firms begin exporting they
experience faster growth than non-

U

Views expressed do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Federal Reserve System.

research.stlouisfed.org