View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO

M ON TH LY REVIEW




Upsurge In Credit C arls
How Much for Services?

SEPTEMBER

1968

U psurge In C re d it Ccirds
. . . The total volume of activity is rising, and credit-card operators
are adding features and moving toward nation-wide coverage.

H o w yu e h fo r Ser¥ie@s?
. . . Families now budget over $200 billion annually for services
(including housing)— more than two-fifths of total spending.




Editor: W illiam lurk©

September 1968

MONTHLY

REVIEW

Upsurge in Credit Cards
The Federal Reserve System recently re­
leased a report entitled, “Bank Credit-Cards
and Check-Credit Plans.” The present article
presents some of the highlights of the report
— the first comprehensive survey of bank
credit plans — along with a brief survey of
recent developments in this rapidly moving
field.

redit cards are now a regular fixture of
the banking scene— especially in the
West, where credit-card plans are operating
in every District state and usually on a state­
wide basis. Not only is the total volume of
activity rising, but the character of plans is
changing also, since credit-card operators
are adding more banking services to the basic
charge feature and are moving toward nation­
wide coverage through interchange agree­
ments. Moreover, the growth of credit cards
has gone along with the spread of other kinds
of revolving-credit plans of the check-credit
or overdraft variety.
Credit-card and check-credit outstandings
nation-wide at the end of June 1968 totaled
$1,514 million, or almost double the yearago figure. Moreover, the West continued to
dominate this field as before. Twelfth District
banks this June accounted for almost onehalf ($434 million) of credit-card outstand­
ings, and for almost one-fourth ($143 mil­
lion) of check-credit outstandings.

C




Two types of plans
Credit-card and check-credit plans, al­
though often regarded as substitutes for one
another, actually differ in significant respects.
The common element in both is a pre­
arranged automatic line of revolving credit
available to a customer. But from this base,
the operational features of the two plans then
diverge.
Typically with check credit, the line of
credit is activated by the customer writing
a check on his check-credit account. This is
a special account set up for check-credit
transactions, whether or not the customer
also has a regular checking account. A com­
mon variation, used especially by Twelfth
District banks, is the so-called overdraft plan,
whereby the customer activates the credit
when he overdraws his checking account and
the bank covers the resulting overdraft by
automatically transferring funds to cover the
check. This link to the customer’s regular
checking account thus differentiates over­
draft-type plans from check-credit plans
proper.
With both types of check credit, the cus­
tomer is usually able to tap his credit line
directly for loans in cash. Charges on these
plans show many variations, but typically
the customer is charged interest on the aver­
age amount of funds borrowed. In addition,
there are often charges for each check used
in check credit, while the regular fee schedule
applies to overdraft plans.

FEDERAL

178

RESERVE

BANK

OF

SAN

F R A N C ISC O

T he c re d it card
W e ste rn b onks account for one-half of bank
sh a re s w ith checkcredit cards and one-fourth of check-credit activity
credit plans the idea of
using a line of revolv­
ing credit, but, in ad­
dition, it involves a
form al arrangem ent
with the retail estab­
lishments where pur­
chases are made by
the cardholder. The
privilege of making
charge purchases at
many stores is the
heart of a credit-card
plan. The fa m ilia r
plastic card identifies
the custom er to the
merchant as someone
customers’ interest payments. Merchant dis­
with an approved line of credit at the bank,
counts,
incidentally, now run around 3 per­
and permits the customer to use the card to
cent
for
most plans at Twelfth District banks.
charge purchases at stores belonging to the
A
bank,
desiring to offer some form of
credit-card plan. The merchant is reimbursed
credit-card
service to its customers, may
for the original charge transaction by the
choose to affiliate with one of the major non­
bank—less a discount on the transaction— so
bank travel and entertainment credit-card
that the bank, not the merchant, provides the
plans, thus combining elements of both
credit extended to the customer.
credit-card
and check-credit plans. Under
The customer, when billed by the bank,
these
arrangements,
the bank does not set
has the option of repaying the full balance
up
a
credit-card
operation-—this
is done by
within a grace period (typically 25 days)
the credit-card company—but instead offers
without any service charge, or repaying on
its customer an optional line of revolving
revolving credit with interest charged on the
credit in addition to the basic card privi­
unpaid balance. There are no other charges
leges. The customer then can repay his T&Efor the credit card— the cards are issued free
card bills on revolving credit, rather than in
— nor is there any requirement to open an
full when billed, and can also borrow at the
account with the bank. Thus if a customer
bank by drawing directly upon his line of
always pays within the grace period, the card
credit. Generally, higher credit standards are
is the equivalent of a charge account. In prac­
required for such plans than for bank credittice though, large numbers choose the re­
card plans.
volving-credit option, and thereby provide
the principal source of banks’ credit-card rev­
Although a rather sizable number of banks
enues. Merchant discounts, formerly an im­
offer this service, the total volume generated
portant source of revenue for credit-card
is not very large. In October 1967, with 136
plans, are now a less important source than
banks participating, credit extended through




September 1968

MONTHLY

these nonbank card plans amounted to only
about 1 percent ($16 million) of total ex­
tensions through bank credit-card and checkcredit plans. These prime credit-risk custom­
ers apparently have a low likelihood of bor­
rowing, which is probably one reason they
are such good credit risks.
Operating aspects
Credit-card managers attempt to activate
the largest number of accounts within the
shortest amount of time when starting a new
plan. A high volume is required both as a
way of recovering heavy start-up costs and
also as an attraction in signing merchants.
Therefore, banks frequently resort to the
mass issue of unsolicited cards and accept
the higher risks entailed. Check-credit man­
agers, on the other hand, typically limit their
dealings to relatively small numbers of lowrisk customers, each of whom has to apply
for an account— and the result normally is a
low-volume operation. These general char­
acteristics of course are clearly reflected in
the results of the Federal Reserve study.
As of September 1967, credit-card plans
covered 14.4 million accounts and $633 mil­
lion in outstandings, as against 1.1 million
accounts and $413 million in outstanding
check credit. Credit-card plans were offered
directly by 197 banks in addition to about a
thousand banks acting as agents, and these
plans covered 371,000 participating mer­
chants. Check-credit plans, on the other
hand, were operated by 599 banks.
Not surprisingly, check-credit accounts
were more highly active— 69 percent active
as against 35 percent for credit cards. Since
customers must apply individually for a
check-credit account, there is no equivalent
to mass mailing; presumably someone who
goes to the trouble of opening such an ac­
count is also more likely to use it. The aver­
age line of credit was also higher for check



REVIEW

credit, $1,100 compared to $350 for credit
cards. Actual usage was similarly skewed:
active check-credit accounts had an average
balance of $610, and active credit-card ac­
counts, $124. Finally, the interest rate
charged on outstanding balances was lower
for check credit, commonly 1 percent per
month compared to the IV2 per cent per
month for credit cards, reflecting the under­
lying risks and operational costs of each type
of plan.
The fact remains that credit-card accounts
are more important in terms of total numbers,
and in terms of total dollar volume, than the
competing form, check credit. The lower rate
of usage of credit cards may be due to noth­
ing more than the relatively large number of
new card plans. According to the 1967 sur­
vey, only 23 percent of the credit-card ac­
counts started in the 1966-67 period were
then active, as against a 61-percent rate of
usage for plans started in 1958-59. Similarly,
utilization of credit lines was much larger
for the older plans. Thus, as the credit-card
habit becomes established, we may well see
a higher percentage of active accounts and
larger average balances.
Of the 599 banks which operated checkcredit plans at the time of the 1967 survey,
274 offered overdraft plans and 410 offered
regular check credit. (As the figures indicate,
many banks offered both types of plans.) But
among the newer plans, the overdraft variant
is the more popular choice: 191 of the 312
new entrants nationally during the 1966-67
period were of the overdraft type, and over­
drafts accounted for roughly three-fourths of
all check-credit balances at Twelth District
banks on the survey date. Thus, banks which
are not prepared to start a credit-card opera­
tion apparently feel that an overdraft system
has certain advantages in being easier to in­
stitute and more appealing to customers than
the traditional form of check credit.

179

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

Loss experience
The Federal Reserve study attempted to
find whatever substance there is in the credit
card’s reputation for excessive credit losses
by analyzing data on write-offs during the
first half of 1967 and delinquencies as of
September 1967. The study revealed that
credit cards involved heavier credit losses
than check-credit plans, but it also showed
that these losses were not excessive. In the
period examined, credit-card charge-offs
amounted to 1.97 percent of outstandings, as
against 0.23 percent for check credit—but
the higher figure was partly due to the pre­
dominance of new plans among the creditcard plans studied. Charge-offs tend to fall
quite sharply over time, as is seen from the
fact that the ratio dropped to only 1.18 per­
cent when the newest plans were excluded
from the computations.
The experience of credit-card plans should
perhaps be compared, not to the relatively
low-risk check-credit lending, but rather to
lending where there is a similar acceptance
of higher credit risks and an emphasis on a
mass market— that is, to other classes of con­
sumer loans. Delinquencies as of September
1967 amounted to 0.97 percent of outstand­
ings for check-credit and to 1.99 percent for

Credif-ecord dellnqyeneies in line
with those on other consumer loans
Delinquency Rates (Percent)
0_____________-5____________ L0____________L5___________ 2.0
Credit
Cards
Check
Credit
REGULAR IN ST A LM E N T LOANS (U.S.)

180



OF

SAN

FR A N C ISC O

credit cards— but on regular consumer in­
stallment loans, the rate was 1.45 percent,
and on home-appliance loans (perhaps the
closest category to credit-card plans), the
rate was 2.19 percent.
Excessive losses certainly are not an inhe­
rent feature of credit-card plans; losses indeed
can be reduced to the levels acceptable in
other types of consumer lending. The tech­
niques of starting and operating a card plan
are now better controlled than heretofore—
witness recent mass mailings which avoided
heavy fraud losses— and the more obvious
sources of loss can be eliminated or reduced.
Although credit cards do involve extra risks,
these are not extreme when compared with
the risks encountered in other types of bank
consumer lending.
Mass mailing
The Federal Reserve study concluded that
some risks are involved in the mass mailing
of cards— but are generally acceptable risks.
As for public inconvenience, cases of multi­
ple card issue do occur at times, but these
cases usually arise only when several banks
are involved in issuing cards at the same time.
The cards are not sent indiscriminately; al­
though unsolicited, they are sent only to peo­
ple meeting specified standards. Current
practice in fact is to rely upon internal lists,
because of the undependability of outside
lists, even those from credit bureaus.
After analyzing the report, the Federal
Reserve Board of Governors declared that
the use of unscreened, purchased lists for
mass mailings was “objectionable,” and on
grounds of minimizing inconvenience, the
Board suggested that banks try to minimize
the possibility of duplicate mailings. But nei­
ther the Board nor the original committee
report advocated the prohibition of mass
mailing. The initial unsolicited mailing helps
generate quickly the necessary high volume
of activity at the start-up of each new plan.

September 1968

MONTHLY

The alternative of issuing on application only
seems much less effective. In one case cited,
a certain bank obtained a 20-percent rate of
usage from an unsolicited mailing of credit
cards but less than a 1-percent return from a
simultaneous mailing of credit-card applica­
tions. But the principal result of a prohibi­
tion of mass mailing would be to make the
entry of subsequent plans more difficult and
thereby to reduce somewhat the competitive
pressures on existing plans.
Consumers and prices
The System committee looked into the
charge that credit cards encourage excessive
growth of consumer credit, but found no
convincing proof of that charge, since creditcard outstandings now represent only a small
proportion of outstanding consumer credit
and bank loans. As of December 1967, credit
cards and check credit together accounted
for 1.2 percent of all consumer credit, 2.9
percent of bank-held consumer credit— and
only 0.3 percent of total bank loans and in­
vestments. Meanwhile, these two types of
bank credit together accounted for 5.5 per­
cent of total personal loans and 9.9 percent
of total “plastic” (credit-card) credit.
The impact of bank credit cards on indi­
vidual borrowers is of course more difficult
to evaluate. The rapid spread of such plans
indicates that large numbers of people find
credit cards to be convenient, and the rela­
tively low loss record indicates that the bulk
of bank customers do not have much diffi­
culty in handling this type of credit. Further­
more, the banks in their own interest try to
protect their customers from excessive bor­
rowing—witness the relatively low credits
(averaging only about $350), and the adop­
tion of stricter lending standards than many
other lenders use. Yet some individuals are
still incapable of handling credit cards, and
despite the safeguards taken by the banks,



REVIEW

Cre d it cards

pi us check credit
still represent small share of total
Percent of Outstandings

will get into trouble. But the report judged
that the benefits somehow must be weighed
against the disadvantages with this as with
any other credit system, and that consumers
on balance obtain a net gain from this new
service.
Similarly it would be difficult to prove that
credit cards have had a substantial inflation­
ary impact. It is sometimes argued that mer­
chants are forced to raise prices in order to
cover the merchant discount on credit-card
transactions. If only the increased cost of the
merchant discount is considered there would
be some tendency to push up prices. But ac­
tually credit cards generate other changes, so
that their net impact on prices is not at all
clear.
First, some merchants not previously able
to offer credit should experience increases
in sales, which tend more or less to offset the
cost increases associated with the merchant
discount. Second, to the extent that bank
credit-card plans replace existing merchantcredit plans, there can be a net reduction in
credit costs to the merchant. This factor is
especially important as merchant discounts
decline, toward 3 percent or lower, as they
have in many areas. But in general, it must

181

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

be remembered that widespread price rises
are primarily due to excess demand forces
working upon the whole economy, and that
inflationary pressures working from the cost
side can hardly be traced to credit cards
alone.
Small-bank participation
The System committee also considered the
possible impact of credit-card plans on the
structure of banking, specifically regarding
the effect of heavy start-up costs on smallbank participation. If credit-card plans
should develop into the principal source of
consumer credit, and if they should continue
to require massive big-bank financial re­
sources, then presumably the long-run com­
petitive position of smaller banks would be
weakened. The Federal Reserve study indi­
cated, however, that there is a definite place
for small-bank credit cards despite the domi­
nance of large banks in this field, and that, in
addition, these banks still have the alterna­
tive of check credit available to them.
In September 1967, roughly one-third of
the banks with credit-card operations had
deposits of less than $25 million, and another
quarter had deposits of between $25 and
$100 million. Many of these small banks
have operated successful plans for years, at
a time when larger banks were actually drop­
ping credit cards. Even so, the success of
small banks still tends to depend upon the
state of local competition. Generally the small
independents have not been forced to meet
competing bank plans and have thereby been
able to maintain their schedule of merchant
discounts at levels nearer 6 percent than the
3-percent competitive rate.

182

Although small banks may now find it
increasingly difficult to start independent
plans because of the development of large
regional and statewide systems, they can of
course participate themselves in these larger




OF

SAN

FR A N C ISC O

SmcslS b o nks as well as large
operate credit-card programs

Number of Banks Offering

systems. The most common form of partici­
pation is the agency system, where the agent
bank signs up merchants and accepts their
sales drafts for forwarding to some principal
bank. (In some plans, agents participate
themselves in the credit granted their cus­
tomers.) The agent bank has only a limited
role, but this limited participation permits
the minimization of costs and the mainte­
nance of long-standing relationships with
local merchants. There were well over 1,000
agent banks in September 1967, and the
number has since continued to grow.
Small-bank alternatives
Two other approaches permit smaller
banks to join with large banks so as to offer
a more-or-less complete credit-card program.
Both of these approaches were developed by
Twelfth District banks— the BankAmericard
and Master Charge systems.
The BankAmericard franchise system li­
censes certain banks, and these licensees in
turn can offer so-called associate status to
other local banks. The associate signs up
local merchants and issues cards bearing its

September 1968

MONTHLY

own name to its own customers. It is respon­
sible for the credit granted its cardholders
and, in the eyes of its customers, it is offering
its own credit card. The principal licensee
provides its associate with a central compu­
terized accounting system and other services,
in return for fees based on the volume of
business. Although it must pay those fees, the
associate avoids the costs of setting up its
own computer system and moreover obtains
a packaged credit-card plan.
The other approach, the Master Charge
System, has been developed by the Western
States Bankcard Association in California,
Nevada, Utah and Washington. The associa­
tion, a group of large and small banks orig­
inally organized at the initiative of four large
California banks — Wells-Fargo, CrockerCitizens, United California Bank, and Bank
of California— operates the necessary central
computer system for all members. The asso­
ciation administers the cardholder account­
ing, as well as the settlement of sales drafts
between members, while the members sign
up merchants and cardholders, carry card­
holder credit, and absorb any resulting credit
losses. A small bank thus can issue Master
Charge cards on the same terms as a large
bank does.
Elsewhere— for example, Chicago— lesscentralized organizations have been set up.
Under these systems, the central organization
does little more than arrange the interchange
of sales slips and design the basic credit card.
(This is sometimes described as a “compat­
ible” system.) The individual members them­
selves set up all the other elements of a
credit-card organization and can share costs
only to a limited extent. This type of system
thus is a half-way house between independent
operation and membership in a credit-card
association.
A small bank of course can become a li­
censee of a large system or strike out on its



REVIEW

own, but these are more costly alternatives
than association with a local system domi­
nated by one of the large-bank organizations.
The ease of credit-card operations by smaller
banks depends largely upon the arrangements
chosen by the dominant banks in their area
of operations. If the latter decide upon a
Master Charge organization or a sub-licens­
ing arrangement with BankAmericard, oper­
ations are simplified for the smaller banks.
But at the very least, the small banks in
almost all cases have agent status available
to them.
Recent trends: growth
Since the publication of the statistics con­
tained in the Federal Reserve study, bank
credit-card and check-credit plans have con­
tinued to show a sustained rate of growth.
Between September 1967 and June 1968,
consumer installment credit rose by 6 percent
overall and by 7 percent at commercial banks
—but credit card outstandings jumped by 44
percent and check credit by 24 percent.
The Twelfth District paralleled the na­
tional trend, and the District thus maintained
its dominant position in this field, accounting
in June 1968 for 38 percent of all credit
outstanding in such plans. Moreover, creditcard outstandings were three times as large
as check-credit outstandings at Twelfth Dis­
trict banks, whereas the totals for these two
categories were roughly equal for the rest of
the nation.
The important role of District bank credit
plans also shows up in comparisons with
broad bank lending categories. Credit-card
and check-credit outstandings account for
about 10 percent of installment loans at Dis­
trict banks, as against less than 4 percent
elsewhere. (The proportion jumps from onetenth to one-fourth of the total when the
more relevant comparison is made, with per­
sonal loans and non-auto consumer goods in

183

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

the denominator.) Thus, credit-card and
check-credit plans have definitely become a
major channel for short-term consumer lend­
ing in the West— and presumably the same
end-result will occur elsewhere as these plans
continue to proliferate.
Recent trends: interchange
Within the past two years alone the bank­
ing industry has clearly moved toward the
organization of national and regional inter­
change systems, thus shifting away from the
locally based plans previously in vogue. Two
nationwide interchange systems are now
functioning, along with several important
regional systems.
One national system, BankAmericard,
consists of BankAmericard licensees. The
second, Interbank Card Inc., is a nonprofit
corporation whose membership consists of
many banks operating their own plans, and
includes the Western States Bankcard Asso­
ciation. The best known of the regional
groups is the Midwest Card System, which
covers Illinois, Indiana, and Michigan. New
England also has two interchange networks,
and smaller systems are operational in some
other parts of the country.
The object of interchange is to broaden
the geographic coverage of a bank credit
card and hence increase its attractiveness to
the cardholder. Banks agree to accept one
another’s cards on a reciprocal basis; that is,
Bank A ’s merchants accept Bank B’s cards,
Bank A clears the sales slips to Bank B (the
cardholder’s bank), and Bank B then bills
the cardholder in the usual fashion. The
interchange system specifies the mechanics of
clearing the sales drafts and settling outstand­
ing balances between banks.

184

Each system tries to insure that the cards
of the various participating banks are readily
identifiable (and hence acceptable) by mer­




OF

SAN

F R A N C ISC O

chants for charge purchases. Both Bank­
Americard and the Midwest System issue
cards with a common design and some space
for the individual bank’s name. Interbank
resolves the recognition problem by printing
a common symbol — a lower-case letter “i”
within a small circle — on cards whose gen­
eral design otherwise varies from bank to
bank.
Although most credit-card transactions are
still local in origin, the competitive pressures
to offer a card with potential for wider use
are quite strong. Most banks starting new
plans within the past year have joined one
of the interchange systems, as have many
banks with older independent plans. Once
one bank announces its intention to join an
interchange plan, the other banks in the area
typically make matching moves. The conse­
quence is thus a cumulative growth of the
interchange networks.
In the West, the interchange concept reigns
supreme. One or another of the two national
systems has a member in every District state
except Alaska, and in five states both are in
operation. (One bank in Hawaii belongs to
both systems.) Only three District banks
remain with independent plans— one each in
Alaska, Utah and California.
Interchange and growth
The nation-wide spread of interchange ar­
rangements undoubtedly has reinforced the
upward trend in credit-card (and checkcredit) activity. Credit cards originated as
locally oriented charge services, to which
revolving-credit privileges were soon added.
As more banks entered the field, still more
features (such as cash advances) were of­
fered to increase the attractiveness of this
type of credit. Still, the pace of overall devel­
opment was uneven until well into 1966,
when the rapid spread of the interchange idea
helped generate a sharp expansion in activity.

MONTHLY

September 1968

REVIEW

improve their competitive position by open­
ing to them charge services capable of match­
ing those of the giant chains. For the general
public, these plans fulfill a need in providing
a convenient source of revolving credit. For
the banks, credit cards (and check credit, to
a lesser extent) can pose complex manage­
ment problems, but as these problems are
surmounted, very successful operations can
be expected. On balance, since current exam­
ination procedures appear sufficient to pre­
vent the spread of unsound practices by indi­
vidual banks, and since credit-card and
check-credit plans appear to pose no pressing
economic problems, the Federal Reserve
committee concluded that neither new con­
trols nor new legislation was required.
Robert Johnston

Some areas may remain where credit-card
programs are neither planned nor operating,
but in general, the average bank customer
can now carry a credit card with the privilege
of using it practically throughout the nation.
Interchange systems must still improve their
clearing processes and overcome their creditcontrol problems, but already they have cre­
ated the general framework for a major new
banking service.
As the Federal Reserve study concluded,
credit-card and check-credit plans should
show continued growth, since they perform
a useful service appropriate to the banking
system — although they still play a relatively
minor role in the overall picture of bank
lending, consumer credit, and banking struc­
ture. For small retailers, credit cards might

TWELFTH DISTRICT BUSINESS
C o n d itio n Ite m s of a ll m em bers b an k s
( m illio n s of d o lla rs, se a so n a b ly ad ju ste d )

Year
and
M o n th

1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967: .Tune
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct
• Nov.
Dec.
1968: Jan.
Feb.
M ar.
Apr.
M ay

•Tune
July

Loans
and
d isco u n ts

15,908
16,612
17,839
20,344
22,915
25,561
28,115
29,858
30,071
30,313
30,473
31,034
30,951
30,964
31,337
32,181
32,181
32,009
32,611
32,497
33,052
33,764

U. S.
G o v 't
se c u ritie s

Dem and
d e p o sits
a d ju ste d

T o ta l
tim e
d e p o sits

6,514
6,755
7,997
7,299
6,622
6,492
5,842
5,444
5,265
5,832
5,742
5,885
5,867
5,609
5,772
5,743
6,149
5,944
5,619
5,801
5,412
5,873

12,799
12,498
13,527
13,783
14,125
14,450
14,663
14,341
15,181
15,189
15,617
15,632
15,633
15,588
15,192
15,500
15,512
16,015
15,844
16,041
16,306
16,327

12,502
13,113
15,207
17,248
19,057
21,300
21,102
25,900
27,460
27,687
27,859
28,008
27,993
28,433
28,691
28,849
29,136
29,118
29,200
29,060
28.981
29,493

In d u s t r ia l production
Bank
Bank
ra te s:
d e b its
sh o rt-te rm
22 S M S A ’s
b u sin e ss
( b illio n s $)
loans

T o ta l
nonfarm
e m plo ym e nt
(1 957-59

IT 100)

E le c tr ic
power
co nsum p tio n

(1957-59 =

(1963 — 100
Lum ber

501
535
618
681
712
719
709
728
738
711
718
73S
734

5.36
5.62
5.46
5.50
5.48
5.48
5.52
6.32
5.95
5.92
6.32

104
106
108
113
117
120
125
133
137
13S
138
138
139
140
140
141
142
141
141
142
142
143

100)

100
112
122
134
143
145
144
149
152
147
150
153
148
154
152
157
151
152

109
98
95
98
98
107
107
103
93
94
94
91
98
98
101
111
101
107
111
102
109

Refined
Ste e l
P e tro le um

101
104
108
111
112
115
120
123
131
130
134
126
133
133
129
133
122
132
134
140
143

Publication Staff: R. Mansfield, Artist; Karen Rusk, Editorial Assistant.
Single and group subscriptions to the M onthly Review are available on request from the Admin­
istrative Service Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 400 Sansome Street,
San Francisco, California 94120



92
102
111
100
115
130
138
140
133
129
129
136
144
14S
147
138
139
149
150
156
152
150

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

OF

SAN

FR A N C ISC O

Redwood MationaS Park
A House-Senate compromise bill has been signed into law providing for the
establishment of a 58,000-acre national park in northern California’s scenic redwood
country. Passage of the measure culminated a 50-year-long battle involving lumber­
men, conservationists and legislators.
The new Redwood National Park is composed of a northern unit in the Mill
Creek area of Del Norte County and a southern unit in the Redwood Creek area
of Humboldt County. The corridor connecting the two includes a 33-mile stretch of
beach. The 58,000-acre total was 6,000 acres less than proposed in the Senate bill
but more than twice the 28,500 acres submitted in the House version.
The cost for land acquisition will be approximately $92 million. Roughly half
of the total property is now in private land and the remainder is in State lands, in­
cluding three existing State parks. The Park will include 32,476 acres of old-growth
redwoods long guarded by conservationists. Additional development costs for the
Park are estimated at $10 million.
In addition to preserving the redwoods themselves, the Park will serve as a
site for recreation and scientific research. The measure also activates a land-swap
arrangement whereby some of the Forest Service’s Northern Redwood Purchase
Unit is to be turned over to private loggers who give up timberlands for the Park.
Background information on the area affected by the Park and an analysis of
the present and future structure of its economy are presented in a booklet, “Trees,
Parks, and People,” published by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
For individual and bulk copies, free of charge, write to




Administrative Services Department
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
400 Sansome Street
San Francisco, California 94120

September 1968

MONTHLY

REVIEW

Hl©w Much for Services?
he nation’s factories over the years have
Breakdown of the budget
created a wealth of goods for an in­
Payments (either real or imputed) for the
creasingly prosperous citizenry, but a mam­
use of shelter facilities accounted for over
moth services industry has been relatively
one-third of total spending for services last
even more successful in selling a varied col­
year— $70.9 billion in all. About two-thirds
lection of services to American households.
of this amount represented the space-rental
In 1967, families spent $204 billion for ser­
value of owner-occupied nonfarm dwellings;
vices, or 41 percent of total consumer spend­
about one-fourth represented actual tenant
ing—whereas two decades ago, when aggre­
rents, and the remainder went mostly for
gate spending was only one-third of the 1967
hotel and motel bills.
total, they allocated only 31 percent of their
Other substantial payments were required
expenditures for that purpose.
for the maintenance of the nation’s 62 million
Some of these services may be considered
households, including $19.8 billion for gas
luxuries, but others are necessities—just as
and electricity, $7.5 billion for telephone and
some goods fall into each of the categories.
telegraph, and $4.3 billion for domestic serFor instance, the Com­
m erce D e p a rtm e n t
F c m ily spending'for services rises from 3! to 41
places in the services
percent
of total consumer spending over two decades
category such basic
needs as shelter and
transportation, along
with a wide range of
m o re d is p e n s a b le
Billions of Dollars
items. But perhaps the
most notable aspect of
the services sector is
simply its heterogene­
ity, since its products
range from the imper­
sonal outputs of the
capital-intensive tele­
phone and electricpower industries to the
tender ministrations of
doctors, barbers, and
landlords.

T




FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

vants. The latter category has grown rela­
tively slowly in recent years. Family mem­
bers, armed with the latest mechanical appli­
ances, increasingly do their own domestic
chores, especially since the supply of servants
has tended to dry up under the impact of
improved job opportunities and broader in­
come distribution. The number of domestics
was no higher in 1950 than in 1900 (1.5
million), and the number has declined even
further since 1950—which means a precipi­
tous drop in the number of servants per fam­
ily over the course of this century.
Consumer spending for transportation ser­
vices was relatively small last year, as this
category (like household maintenance) con­
tinued to reflect a shift in favor of do-ityourself service. Ground transportation fares,
at $2.7 billion in 1967, were no higher then
than two decades ago, as purchased local
transportation increased only slowly and
intercity transportation actually declined.
Auto servicing—parking, washing, repairing,
and the like — cost $6.8 billion last year,
rising in line with the strong overall uptrend
in auto and parts spending. (Airline fares
meanwhile were $1.6 billion — which may
seem somewhat low until it is realized that
this represents a 12-fold increase in only two
decades.)
The spending totals also included the costs
of a multitude of services which surround the
individual almost literally from the cradle to
the grave— such items as marriage licenses,
divorce fees, brokerage fees, life-insurance
premiums, and pari-mutuel tickets. Last year
alone, consumers paid $12.5 billion to doc­
tors and dentists, $7.9 billion to private edu­
cators, $3.7 billion to barbers and beauti­
cians, $6.2 billion to lawyers and brokers,
and so on down the list.

188

Large price increases
Spending for services thus has increased




OF

SAN

F R A N C ISC O

sharply over the past two decades—but much
of this expanded spending results from rising
prices, because of such factors as a sharp
upsurge in co n su m e r d em an d as well as
supply limitations enforced by a lack of pro­
duction-line processes. According to Com­
merce Department data, rising prices have
accounted for almost one-half of the 1947-67
increases in spending for housing services
and household operation — which in total
amounted to 354 and 276 percent, respec­
tively. Over the same time-span, price ero­
sion accounted for roughly two-thirds of the
310-percent increase in spending for medical
and personal services, and for fully four-fifths
of the 177-percent increase in transportation
services. (Price erosion accounted for only
one-fourth of the increase in durable goods
spending and for less than half of the non­
durables increase.)
Western families allocate their budget for
services a little differently from families else­
where, according to a recent Labor Depart­
ment study which differs slightly from the
Commerce Department concept. According
to this study, the average Los Angeles family
spent less than the typical U.S. family for
housing in 1966, but allocated substantially
more for medical and other services. San
Francisco, Seattle, and other Western cities
were more in line with the national housingexpense figure, but (like Los Angeles) re­
ported substantially above-average spending
for medical care.
Large payrolls for services
Yet in the West as elsewhere, services pro­
vide a substantial source of income as well as
a charge against consumer budgets. (Personal
income from services, in Commerce Depart­
ment terminology, encompasses fewer items
than the services category in consumption
expenditures.) Nationwide, service payrolls
totaled $50.2 billion in 1967, on the heels
of a 6.0-percent average annual gain in em-

MONTHLY

September 1968

Thanks to f@ M risfs0W est accounts
for bulk of hotel, amusement payrolls
West Payroll Income (Billions of Dollars)
0 ___________j_____
2

3

4

Personal
Services
Business
Services
Professional
Services

Payroll

Hotels and
Motels

Amusement and
Recreation

0
10
West Share of U.S.(Percent)

20

ployment over the 1960-67 period (after a
4.5-percent average gain in the earlier post­
war era). District states accounted for 17Vi
percent of 1967’s service income, as against
only a 15 Vi percent share of payrolls in
other industries.
Western payroll workers in 1967 received
$3.9 billion for professional services, $2.0
billion for business services, and $1.2 billion
for personal services. In each of these cate­
gories, income figures were roughly in line

REVIEW

with the national pattern. At the same time,
Westerners received 35 percent ($1.1 bil­
lion) of the total income from amusement
services and 22 percent ($0.5 billion) of the
total income from hotel-motel services—not
surprisingly, in view of the region’s welljustified attractiveness to tourists. California
and Nevada, which provide on-screen and
off-screen entertainment for all the nation’s
millions, received almost one-third of the
entertainment industry’s total payroll. (In
addition to this $9 billion in service payrolls,
roughly %3lA billion went to individual pro­
prietors, for whom detailed data are not
available.)
Over two decades, then, consumers have
sharply expanded their spending for services,
but workers in the services industry have just
as sharply increased their earnings from the
provision of services. While income from
this source has increased over three-fold in
the rest of the nation, it has increased four­
fold in the West alone. And as more and
more individuals require more and more ser­
vices to accompany them from cradle to
grave, the continued expansion of the diverse
services industry is practically assured.
Joan Walsh

Federal Reserve Publications
“Reappraisal of the Federal Reserve Discount Mechanism”— A System com­
mittee report, which proposes ways of making the “discount window” play a more
active part in enabling commercial banks to meet their communities’ credit needs.
(Price: 25 cents a copy, or 20 cents each in quantities of 10 or more.)
“Bank Credit-Card and Check-Credit Plans”— A System task-force study,
which evaluates the impact of bank credit-cards on consumer spending and assesses
the implications of such plans for bank competition and bank supervision. (Price:
$1.00 a copy.)
Copies of these System publications are available from Publications Services,
Division of Administrative Services, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, Washington, D.C. 20551.




189

FEDERAL

RESERVE

BANK

OF

SAN

FRANCISCO

Western Digest
Discount Rate Reduction
The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco lowered its discount rate by 14
point (to 5% percent) on August 29, thus climaxing the shift to a lower rate pattern
which was initiated by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis two weeks earlier.
The rate was last reduced during the sluggish economic situation of early 1967, then
it was raised three times, in equal 14-point steps, during the financial crises of No­
vember 1967 and March-April 1968. . . . The lower discount rate reflects the easing
of money markets that became evident after Congress passed the fiscal-restraint
package just before midyear. For example, the 90-day Treasury-bill rate stood at
5.08 percent in mid-August, down from a late-May peak of 5.85 percent.
Sharp Credit Expansion
Total bank credit at large commercial banks in the Twelfth District expanded
by $1.3 billion during the first half of the third quarter— roughly twice as fast as
during the year-ago period. Security holdings increased $927 million as banks added
both U.S. Government and municipal issues to their portfolios. Loans rose by $344
million (exclusive of loans to domestic banks). . . . The expansion in the loan cate­
gory reflected a substantial increase in loans to U.S. Government securities dealers,
who held unusually high inventories during this period. Business loans recorded a
seasonal decline, while mortgage and consumer instalment loans continued to expand.
Heavy Deposit Inflow
During the first half of the quarter, large Western banks posted an increase of
slightly over $1 billion in total deposits (less cash items in process of collection).
Private demand deposits rose by nearly $450 million, and time deposits increased
about $650 million. . . . Individuals made net withdrawals from their passbook
savings during this period, but an increase in consumer-type time certificates more
than offset this decline. Holders of large-denomination CD’s meanwhile added
nearly $500 million to their outstandings.
Alaskan Oil Strike
According to conservative estimates, the Alaskan oil strike reported at midyear
may cover 75,000 acres and contain 5 to 10 billion barrels of recoverable oil— in
other words, this Arctic field may rival all but the largest Middle Eastern oil reser­
voirs. But heavy capital outlays will be required to bring the oil from this and other
Alaskan fields to market. (Oil firms spent $227 million in the state in 1967 for the
exploration and development of oil resources.) . . . The level of costs in Alaskan
production is relatively high. Alaskan drilling costs of $159 per foot are roughly
2Vi times average California costs, and pipelines in offshore producing areas cost
$618,000 per mile in Alaska as against $185,000 per mile in California.