View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY REVIEW
T W E L F T H F E D E R A L R E S E R V E DI ST RI CT

O c t o b e r 1954

Fe d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k

of

S a n Fr a n c i s c o

REVIEW OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS
h e level of economic activity in the nation and the
Twelfth District showed no substantial overall change
from August to September. Moderate improvement in
output and employment in some industrial lines, however,
added a firmer tone to the general business situation than
has been true in other recent months. Employment in
nonfarm activities rose somewhat more than seasonally
from August to September in both the nation and the
District. Seasonally adjusted nonagricultural employ­
ment had declined in each of the preceding eleven months
in the nation. With the exception of a small rise in Jan­
uary and a period of no change in April and May,
the District’s adjusted nonagricultural employment level
had fallen for thirteen months. Although a considerable
portion of the nonseasonal employment expansion repre­
sented gains attributable to the cessation of major labor
disputes, a pickup in activity in the machinery and several
nondurable goods industries was a significant influence.

T

Substantial advances in the level of operations have
taken place in the lumber industry in the Pacific North­
west and in northern California since striking workers
returned to their jobs in mid-September. This resumption
of activity in lumber production combined with a similar
return to normal levels of output in the rubber industry
has had a substantial effect upon the trend of employment
in both the District and the nation. Possibly of more
underlying significance, however, has been the recent
pickup in the level of output and employment in the
machinery industries. A substantial part of the weakness
in the general employment situation has been concentrated
in these industries along with the metals and transporta­
tion equipment industries. The strengthening in machin­
ery production, both in the District and nationally, reflects
the recent rise in the rate of contract awards under the
defense procurement program as well as a noticeable
gain in the volume of new orders from private industrial
sources. Production of electrical equipment, including the
electronics segment that is quite important in some areas
of the District, has continued the rise that started in July.
Reversals of previous downtrends also occurred in a
number of nondurable industries, although the prelim­
inary September data available indicate that the rise in
these industries in the District may have been not much
more than seasonal. Nationally the apparel, paper, chem­




icals, and printing industries registered small advances in
employment of production workers after allowance for
seasonal forces.
Consum er expenditures well
m aintained nationally

The maintenance of a high level of consumer expendi­
tures on goods and services has been a major factor in
keeping the current business recession within moderate
bounds, in both the District and the country as a whole.
Preliminary estimates indicate that on a national basis
personal consumption expenditures reached new high
ground in the third quarter of this year and were nearly
$3.0 billion ahead of their 1953 peak. While consumer
expenditures were still below 1953 peak levels for durable
goods (largely owing to reduced purchases of new pas­
senger automobiles), outlays for nondurables and services
were at new highs. The sustained high level of consumer
spending is accounted for by a number of factors. Of
major importance has been the growth in disposable in­
comes that has occurred despite a moderate downtrend
in incomes before taxes. Reduced tax rates on personal
incomes and sharply increased payments to individuals
under unemployment insurance programs have been in­
strumental in the maintenance of spendable incomes. An
increase in the proportion of current income devoted to
consumption purposes, which rose from 91.4 percent in
the fourth quarter of 1953 to 92.7 in the third quarter of
this year, has also been a factor of considerable signifi­
cance in holding consumer expenditures at a high level.

A lso in This Issue

Situation and Outlook for Livestock
and Livestock Products................ 131
The District Cash Farm Income
S i t u a t i o n ................................136
Income Payments in the District:
1953 ........................................

139

130

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SA N FRANCISCO

District sales experience reveals similar stability

While data on total consumer expenditures or total
retail sales for the District are not available by which
direct comparisons may be made with the nation, infor­
mation on District department store sales indicates that
they have held at relatively high levels and have fluctuated
within a fairly narrow range. Total District department
store sales in the first nine months of this year were only
about 4 percent under the same period last year. Perhaps
more significant is the fact that seasonally adjusted sales
have tended to strengthen in each of the first eight months
of the year. The District seasonally adjusted index of
department store sales was 109 percent of the 1947-49
average in January and 116 percent in August. A pre­
liminary estimate places the index at 111 percent in Sep­
tember, which is one point above the index for September
1953. Sales were declining, however, from May through
September last year which makes the comparison appear
somewhat less favorable.
Stability has also been evident in nonagricultural em­
ployment in the District. This suggests that District con­
sumer incomes have roughly followed the national pat­
tern. Nonagricultural employment, after seasonal adjust­
ment, declined by only 2 percent from the peak in July
of 1953 to September this year. As the same factors of
tax reductions and increased unemployment insurance
payments were operative in the District, it seems likely
that District consumer disposable incomes have remained
high and may have risen somewhat. The extended lumber
strike, which involved up to 80,000 workers at its incep­
tion, has undoubtedly had an effect upon incomes in those
areas most affected by the dispute. Sales in those areas
have shown no particular weakness, however. A seasonal
rise in activity in other manufacturing lines and in agri­
culture provided new jobs and offered temporary alterna­
tive employment to striking workers. In addition, at lum­
ber mills not directly involved in the dispute or where an
early settlement was reached activity rose to unusually
high levels. Thus, while the strike tended to depress in­
comes, its effects were offset to a considerable extent by
favorable developments in other sectors and at some lum­
ber mills.

October 1954

As has been true for consumer expenditures in the
country as a whole, most of the weakness in taxable retail
sales in California has been concentrated in consumer
durable goods. While total taxable retail sales declined by
6 percent in the first half of 1954 compared with the same
period a year ago, sales of household appliances were
down more than 13 percent, homefurnishings sales de­
clined by almost 8 percent, and sales of new and used
automobiles dropped by more than 17 percent. Substan­
tial declines also occurred in retail sales of farm imple­
ments, building materials and hardware, and in sales by
trailer, boat, motorcycle, and airplane dealers. Sales vol­
ume of nondurable goods was generally maintained at a
rate not substantially different from 1953 levels. Although
down somewhat, sales declines in such groups of stores
as apparel, general merchandise, grocery, and specialty
shops were materially smaller than in the durable cate­
gories.
Improvement (in the sense of a smaller decline from a
year ago) was also noticeable in taxable retail sales as
between the first and second quarters of the year. In the
first quarter total taxable retail sales in California were
off nearly 9 percent from the first quarter of 1953, while
in the second quarter the sales decline from last year was
less than 4 percent. The second quarter improvement was
apparent in almost every merchandise line, although those
commodity groups that showed the most substantial sales
weakness in the earlier quarter, particularly sales of new
and used automobiles, continued significantly below their
1953 sales volume. Sales of nondurables generally rose
above last year’s levels in the second quarter.
Sa le s experience varies considerably
by major area within District

Taxable retail sales decline in California

While the general month-to-month pattern of depart­
ment store sales this year has been similar in most areas
of the District for which data are available, the degree of
sales decline from a year ago has varied considerably.
Based upon the total value of sales for the first nine
months of the year, the largest declines were concentrated
in the Central Valley of California, eastern Washington,
Utah, Idaho, and in Arizona. Smaller declines were gen­
eral in northern and southern California, Oregon, and in
the western portion of Washington.

The trend exhibited by total taxable retail sales in Cali­
fornia is roughly the same as that for department stores.
According to the latest data available, total taxable retail
sales in the first half of this year declined about 6 percent
compared with a decline of 5 percent for department
stores in the state during the same period. The taxable
sales information is considerably more representative of
over-all retail sales in that it includes sales of items not
handled by department stores and covers sales in many
areas and communities that do not have full-fledged de­
partment stores. A look at taxable retail sales in Cali­
fornia will point up the major differences in sales com­
pared with last year by type of commodity.

In Arizona, department store sales in the first nine
months of the year were 11 percent under the same period
in 1953, compared with an over-all District decline for
this period of 4 percent. Seasonally adjusted sales in this
area of the District have declined generally throughout
most of the period since June of 1953. Some moderate
strengthening, however, has been noticed in the adjusted
monthly index of sales for Arizona since May of this
year. Most of the sales weakness apparently stems from
the substantial losses of employment in manufacturing
(largely in aircraft modification), difficulties associated
with nonferrous metal mining, and a fairly sharp decline
in the tourist trade reported for this year. In addition,




October 1954

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

Arizona had the largest percentage decline in cash farm
income in the first half of this year of any state in the
District.1
Sales of department stores in eastern Washington,
Idaho, and Utah have declined in the first nine months of
this year by more than 6 percent from the same period in
1953. The larger sales decline in these areas as compared
with the over-all District average reflects a combination
of unfavorable factors that have affected their economies
during the past year or so. Substantial declines in Federal
Government employment and weakness in nonferrous
metals markets which closed many of the lead and zinc
mines in these areas have been particularly important.
In Utah strikes in copper mining and refining were addi­
tional factors contributing to the sales decline, while Idaho
had a drop in cash farm income second only to that of
Arizona among District states. Improvement in the min­
ing areas may be expected as operations recover from
strike interruptions and strengthening lead and zinc prices
raise the level of mining activity.
In the Central Valley of California a substantial drop
in agricultural income has been the dominant influence in
the greater than average department store sales decline in
1For a more detailed discussion, see the article in this issue entitled, “ The District
Cash Farm Income Situation.”

131

the first nine months of the year. Within the District,
California ranks after Arizona and Idaho in the relative
size of the decline in cash farm income in the first half of
this year.
The areas where sales declines have been somewhat less
than the over-all District average are without exception
those areas with more diversified economic structures or
where development is occurring most rapidly. In the case
of southern California and western Washington the high
degree of stability in over-all employment and some
growth in aircraft employment has sustained business
activity at levels not signicantly different from last year.
In San Jose and northern California generally, develop­
ment of new industrial plants and a very high level of
residential and commercial construction have been par­
ticularly important in maintaining over-all economic
activity.
In general, it should be noted that, with the exception
of Arizona and some other areas of the Intermountain
region, significant improvement in the level of department
store sales has occurred since the first of the year. Most
of the major areas of the District have shown moderate
uptrends in seasonally adjusted department store sales
throughout most of the months of this year and in some
cases uptrends have prevailed for an even longer period.

SITUATION AN D OUTLOOK FOR LIVESTOCK AN D LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS
levels of production, low prices, and reduced
income characterize the 1954 situation for producers
of livestock and livestock products. Beef production con­
tinues high with prices low and about unchanged from
last year. Similarly, increases in slaughter of sheep and
lambs are being scored in 1954 but prices of these prod­
ucts have dropped sharply since mid-year. Furthermore,
supplies of pork are increasing and poultry meats are
plentiful. Hog prices are down somewhat from a year
earlier and turkey prices, as a result of a record large
national crop of birds, have fallen markedly. Production
of milk and dairy products also will be unusually large
in 1954 despite seasonal reductions this fall in milk out­
put and additional reductions in certain areas affected by
drought. Farm prices of milk have been lower since April
when price supports on dairy products were cut from 90
percent of parity to 75 percent. Despite price reductions,
the decline of cash income from livestock and livestock
products has been small this year. Small farm price reduc­
tions for beef have been more than offset by increases in
marketings and slaughter. Cash income increases for beef,
on the other hand, have nearly offset substantial reduc­
tions in cash incomes of dairy farmers and of poultry and
egg producers.
ecord

R

The outlook appears to indicate little improvement in
the price and income situation affecting livestock and
livestock products during the remainder of this year.
Some slight reduction in beef slaughter may occur next
year, but this will probably be more than offset by antici­




pated increases in output of pork. Continued high levels
of milk and egg production are in prospect unless pro­
ducers of these products cut back herds and flocks in
response to lower prices.
Some small dairy producers currently are reported as
having some credit and financial difficulties. Where pos­
sible credit agencies in working with farmers are attempt­
ing to resolve these difficulties through extensions of
loans. Few are attempting to refinance delinquent dairy
loans with real estate loans. But in some instances addi­
tional collateral of a nonreal character is being requested.
Inefficient turkey producers also may encounter finan­
cial difficulties toward the end of the current marketing
season.
R ed meat production at near record level

Combined production of red meat in 1954 will equal
or exceed the record level of production last year. For the
period January-August this year District and national
slaughter of livestock exceeded 1953 slaughter for the
same period by 4 percent and 3 percent respectively
(Table 1).
Lamb and mutton on a District basis and veal, both
nationally and within the District, contributed most im­
portantly to the increased level of slaughter in the first
8 months of this year. Beef slaughter in the period Janu­
ary-August, 1954 also exceeded production for the same
period a year earlier. The current level of beef production

132

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF S A N F R A N C ISC O

T able 1
P r o d u c t io n o f L iv e s t o c k a n d L iv e s t o c k P r o d u c t s w i t h
C o m p a r is o n s T w e l f t h

D is t r ic t a n d U n it e d S t a t e s ,

J a n u a r y to A u g u s t
- iaii
Twelfth District
Red meat production (millions of
lbs. live w t.)
B e e f .............................................................
V e a l ............................................................
Pork ..........................................................
Lam b and m utton..................................

Production
Percent change from
January. ,------January to August------N
August
1949-53
1943-52
1954
1953
average
average
2,155
+ 6.2 + 4 1 . 6
138 + 1 0 .8
+ 4 1 .6
449 — 9.6 — 21.0
197 + 1 1 .1
+ 2 3 .7

tw

Total

.....................................................

2,828

M ilk, total (millions of lb s .) .................
Butter (thousands of lb s .) ............ ..
Cheese (thousands of l b s .) ....................
E ggs (m illions)............................................
Chickens raised on farms1
(thousands) ............................................
Turkeys raised (thousands)
Light b r e e d s ............................................
H eavy b r e e d s.........................................

8,447
83,980
45,900
4,207

Total

1954

+

3.9

+ 2 5 .2

+ 8.4
+ 3 4 .7
+ 4.1
+ 7.4

...
...
...

+ 1 0 .9
+ 3 1 .2
+ 1 2 .3

49,378

+

...

—

2,159
12,736

+ 1 1 .2
— 0.9

3.3

6.0

........................
...

.....................................................

14,895

+

0.7

...

+ 3 2 .8

W o o l (thousands of l b s .) ......................

53,865

+

0.1

...

—

Red meat production (millions of
lbs. live w t.)
Beef .............................................................
V e a l .............................................................
Pork ..........................................................
Lamb and m utton............................. , .

15,124
1,783
9,382
994

+ 8.7
+ 1 3 .0
— 7.2
+ 3.7

+ 3 9 .0
+ 3 7 .0
— 11.4
+ 2 0 .0

.....................................................

26,556

+

2.7

+ 1 5 .6

M ilk, total (millions of l b s .) .................
Butter (thousands of l b s .) ....................
Cheese (thousands of l b s .) ....................
E g gs (m illio n s ).........................................
Chickens raised on farms
(thousands) ...........................................
Turkeys raised (thousands)
Light breeds............................................
H eavy b r e e d s.........................................

88,174
1,080,450
756,025
44,433

+
+
+
+

3.5
4.2
4.9
3.6

620,847 +

.....................................................

61,045

+

8.6

...

+ 4 4 .7

W o o l (thousands of l b s .) ......................

229,371

—

0.4

...

— 14.3

8.6

United States

Total

Total

1953

m ore

im p r e s s iv e w h e n

+ 6.1
+ 1 6 .8
+ 1 6 .1

2.0

...

— 16.0

18,096 + 1 6 . 0
42,949 + 6.0

...

...

t h a t in

m o r e b e e f w a s s la u g h t e r e d t h a n in a n y y e a r o f r e c ­

o r d . T h i s is tr u e f o r th e D is t r ic t a s w e ll a s n a tio n a lly . O n
th e o th e r h a n d , D is t r ic t a s w e ll a s n a tio n a l h o g s la u g h te r
in th e fir s t 8 m o n th s o f th is y e a r w a s r u n n in g 8 to 1 0 p e r ­
c e n t u n d e r th e le v e l o f o u tp u t in th e s a m e p e r io d la s t y e a r .
A

p r in c ip a l fe a t u r e o f t h e liv e s t o c k o u tlo o k th is fa ll, h o w ­

e v e r , is f o r a s u b s ta n tia l in c r e a s e in p o r k p r o d u c tio n .

Current levels of cattle a n d calf slaughter reflect
recent production patterns
T he

r e c o r d la r g e o u tp u t o f b e e f la s t y e a r a n d in

1954

to d a te w a s m a d e p o s s ib le b y t h e r a p id in c r e a s e in n u m ­
b e r s o f c a ttle a n d c a lv e s o n f a r m s b e t w e e n th e y e a r s 1 9 4 9
and

1953.

fa rm s

The

w ere

dem and
in c re a se d

a

p r in c ip a l

s u s ta in e d

backed

up

by

s tim u li

h ig h

to

beef

p r o d u c tio n

le v e l o f c iv ilia n

a d e q u a te

p u r c h a s in g

a id s h ip m e n ts o r fo r e ig n
o f th e K o r e a n

pow er,

r e lie f p u r c h a s e s . W i t h

w a r a n d a n in c r e a s e in w o r ld




on

con su m er

d e m a n d f o r m e a t b y th e m ilita r y , a n d

With a sharp increase in cattle slaughter in late 1952,
beef cattle prices began to drop precipitously. By early
1953 beef prices received by farmers had dropped about
30 percent from the high level of such prices in 1951. Fur­
thermore, it appeared that cattle numbers on farms would
continue to grow, as in past production cycles, for another
two or three years. Last year, however, the beef industry
with a minimum of Government aid nearly succeeded in
halting the growth in farm production of beef. Beef
slaughter increased in 1953 and 1954 beyond all reason­
able expectations. Cattle inventory data next January 1
may reveal a slight drop in total numbers of cattle on
farms despite an exceptionally large calf crop last spring.

increased rate of cattle m arketings

...
...
...

it is r e m e m b e r e d

red meat, cattlemen of the District and the United States
found themselves with greatly enlarged herds, over­
stocked ranges, and weakening prices. Production in­
creases in areas outside the traditional beef producing
regions of the United States, such as in the eastern Corn
Belt, were particularly great.

Lo ng continued drought has contributed to an

1 Estimate for total year 1954 with comparisons.
Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service, Crop Reporting Board.

is e v e n

October 1954

an

fo r e ig n
th e en d

s u p p lie s o f

The higher than expected rate of cattle slaughter over
the past two years has resulted partly from drought and
poor feed conditions in some areas of the United States.
These areas include the central and southern Great Plains
regions, the Southwest, Utah, and Nevada. In Idaho and
Utah range feed conditions on October 1, 1954 were
somewhat worse than last year and rated about 8 points
below the average of the last 10 years. In Nevada consid­
erable deterioration in range feed conditions on October
1 from a year earlier had taken place. Compared with the
preceding 10 years the October 1 average range feed con­
dition in Nevada was rated about 18 points below average
and the lowest for the date since 1934. Similarly, long
continued drought currently covers most of Wyoming,
eastern Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, much of Texas, and
parts of New Mexico. Arizona, on the other hand, bene­
fited greatly from early fall rains and in Pacific Coast
states range feed conditions are generally satisfactory.
They are exceptionally good in Washington.
A Federally sponsored drought aid program was re­
instituted last summer. Nearly 250 counties in 7 states
had been designated drought disaster areas by October 1.
Late in October several other counties, including 10 in
Nevada and 6 in Utah, were so designated. Eligible farm­
ers and ranchers in drought designated counties are able
to obtain feed grains below current market prices and may
receive Farmers’ Home Administration loans to meet
their credit needs. In addition, emergency loans have be­
come available to established producers and farm feeders
of cattle, sheep, and goats regardless of location. In order
to be eligible for such loans, however, a producer must
have exhausted his ability to obtain funds from private or

October 1954

M O N T H L Y REVIEW

cooperative credit sources and must show that he has a
reasonable chance to work out of his difficulty.
Additional factors which have contributed to the large
off-farm movement of cattle and calves are (1) financial
difficulties and the disappearance of wide profit margins,
(2) the continued relatively high level of consumer in­
come, (3) the beef purchase program of the Federal Gov­
ernment in 1953, and (4) the beef promotion efforts of
the beef industry and others.
Relative stability has m arked cattle prices

Most of the decline in cattle prices occurred in late
1952. Since that time farm prices of beef cattle, despite
the increased supply, have been remarkably stable. This
year farm prices of cattle have been at or near prices of
comparable periods a year earlier. Although prices of fed
steers and heifers this fall have been down slightly from
year earlier levels, stocker and feeder cattle prices have
been above last year. With beef prices remaining relatively
stable and with an increase in cattle marketings, total cash
income received by beef producers has been maintained
at a level slightly above the level of such income received
last year. Nevertheless, profit margins remain small and
in the case of some high-cost producers have disappeared
entirely.
Beef cattle outlook g o o d but not rosy

The growth in farm inventories of cattle apparently has
been stopped. There are signs that beef cow herds are
being reduced in areas outside the traditional “beef cattle
country/’ Relatively great increases in District as well as
in national slaughter of veal and heifers seem to point
toward potential reductions in other areas. These devel­
opments do not mean that total production of beef cattle
is being cut back to any great extent. However, a small
reduction in inventory numbers next January, according
to the United States Department of Agriculture, is in
prospect.
Reductions in the rate of cattle marketings can be ex­
pected in November and December. Consequently, sea­
sonal price increases by January may be expected. Other­
wise, no great change in cattle prices is in prospect for
the remainder of 1954.
T
I ndexes

of

able

P r ices R eceived

by

2
F arm ers— U

n it e d

S tates,

S e p t e m b e r 15, 1954
(1910-14= 100)

A ll farm p ro d u cts....................
All crops ....................................
A ll livestock and products. .
Meat a n im a ls........................
Dairy products1....................
W o o l .........................................
Poultry and eggs1...............

Index ^----------- Percent change from----------Sept. 15, June 15,, Jan. 15, Sept. 15, Sept. 15,
1952
1954
1953
1954
1954
— 0.8 — 5.0 — 4.3 — 14.6
+ 5.6 — 6.4
,,..
247
+ 1.2 + 2.9
245 — 2.4 — 11.6 — 11.2 — 20.7
, . 277 — 7.4 — 10.4 — 7.4 — 20.6
253
+ 10.5 — 7.7 — 7.7 — 17.6
+ 5.3
0
297 — 4.2
+ 1-4
.
162 — 3.6 — 23.9 — 29.9 — 28.6

1 Unadjusted for seasonal variation.
Source: United States Department of
Service, Agricultural Prices.




Agriculture,

Agricultural

M arketing

133

Cattle feeders appear more confident this fall than
last, following fairly satisfactory profits in feeding last
winter and spring. Feeders in some regions, including
most Twelfth District areas, are paying more for feeders
and stockers this fall even though prices of fed cattle
are a little lower. This exhibition of increased confidence
appears justified. Published statistics of cattle and feed
indicate that a reduced corn crop in midwestern areas
may tend to prevent large increases in cattle feeding and
hog production. On October 1 this year slightly fewer
cattle were on feed in Illinois, Iowa, and Nebraska, the
principal midwestern cattle feeding states, than on the
same date in 1953. In California, however, about 41 per­
cent more cattle were in feedlots on October 1 than a year
earlier. But since California is a meat deficit area, it is
anticipated by Department of Agriculture forecasters that
although profits in feeding during the season ahead prob­
ably will average somewhat less than in the past year
they will be considerably larger than the low returns in
1952-53.
It is possible that an upward trend in grass cattle prices
may be initiated early in 1955. If so, however, price in­
creases are likely to be small. Nevertheless, it appears
that even though additional adjustment in the cattle in­
dustry will be required for reestablishment of favorable
price-cost conditions the low point in the current cycle of
cattle prices probably has been reached.
Increased slaughter a n d lower prices characterize
the current sheep a n d lamb situation

District and national increases in slaughter of lamb and
sheep in the first 8 months of this year compared to the
same period last year were 11 and 4 percent, respectively.
The larger summer and fall volume of sheep and lamb
marketings reflects both the larger 1954 lamb crop and
a trend toward earlier marketings. The larger lamb crop,
in turn, was made possible by a slight increase from last
year in numbers of breeding ewes on farms and by a par­
ticularly good lamb crop percentage. For the District and
the nation the 1954 lamb crop was larger than the crop
of a year earlier by 4 and 3 percent respectively.
With increases in both production and slaughter of
lambs, the seasonal decrease in lamb prices was earlier
and greater than usual. In Pacific Coast states lamb prices
received by farmers began to drop in late May or early
June and by September 15 had fallen about 5 cents per
pound liveweight to about 11.5 percent under the price
of the same date in 1953. In most other District states
price reductions were somewhat smaller.
Sheep and lamb prices ordinarily change along with
changes in prices of beef cattle and in the same direction.
A high degree of correlation between prices of these two
products results partly from the predominant effect which
changes in the supply of beef have on the total supply of
red meat. The relatively close competitive relationship of

134

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SA N FRANCISCO

the two products in consumption also is a factor. It is
reasonable, in view of existing production and consump­
tion relationships between beef and lamb, to expect the
outlook for sheep and lamb to be affected markedly by
current and future developments in the cattle industry.
Little substantial ch a n g e in lam b prices
expected next year

With a slackening in the volume of lamb marketings in
late September and October lamb prices edged up season­
ally. Additional increases stemming from a fairly firm
demand for feeder lambs and further reductions in mar­
ketings are in prospect for the remaining months of 1954
and until early spring.
The lamb price outlook for the more distant future
hinges upon changes since last spring in the size of breed­
ing herds on farms, the size of the 1955 lamb crop, and
the supply of competitive meats. With a continued high
level of cattle slaughter in prospect, probable increases
next year in hog production, and relatively large pro­
spective supplies of white meat available, the supply of
competitive meats in 1955 probably will be large. Conse­
quently, barring the possibility of a greatly reduced lamb
crop next spring, there appears to be little prospect of
substantial increases in lamb prices during the spring and
summer of 1955.
Increases in pork production
anticipated

District slaughter of hogs for the period January
through August this year totaled about 10 percent less
than for the same period last year (Table 1). For the
year as a whole, however, the District pork production
probably will exceed the 1953 total. This is true also of
the nation. The spring slaughter of hogs was small both
nationally and within the District, reflecting breeding
herd liquidations in the period 1952-53 and a small pig
crop in the fall of 1953. But with District as well as
national increases of about 12 percent last spring in num­
ber of pigs saved, hog slaughter this fall has increased
markedly. Since June of this year, pork production has
exceeded year-earlier levels. District slaughter of hogs
in August was more than 11 percent greater than in the
same month last year, and throughout the remaining fall
months the slaughter rate is expected to stay above levels
of the comparable period last year. Pork supplies this fall,
however, will not be excessive compared with recent years
and prices received by producers of hogs probably will
remain relatively favorable. Cash returns to hog pro­
ducers in 1954, therefore, probably will compare favor­
ably with those received last year. However, they will be
much below average levels of earlier years.
The current fall pig crop is now indicated to be 14
percent above the 1953 crop in 6 Corn Belt states. The
District appears slated for an increase of about 16 per­
cent. Even with this increase, however, District hog pro­
duction will remain down at least 30 percent under the




October 1954

average production level of the years 1943-52. Never­
theless, general increases from last year in farm inven­
tories of pigs and a larger fall pig crop this year mean
increases at least through mid-1955 in available supplies
of pork. The spring slaughter of hogs in 1955 probably
will be much greater than last spring’s. As a result hog
prices are likely to show less than a normal seasonal re­
covery from the low point reached this fall.
The hog price outlook for the period June-December
1955 hinges largely on the number of pigs farrowed next
spring. Available supplies of competitive meat probably
will be large. Consequently, a substantial increase in num­
ber of farrowings next spring could bring prices of
slaughter pigs down to relatively low levels during the
fall 1955 marketing season. Some increase in the pig crop
next spring is anticipated by outlook specialists of the
Department of Agriculture. However, they indicate that
a smaller corn crop this year and a less favorable hogcorn price ratio has eliminated some of the incentive to
increased production.
W o o l production a n d prices about u n ch a n g e d
from last year

Wool prices received by farmers, although down sea­
sonally, remain about unchanged from year earlier levels.
Production of wool in 1954 also is expected to be about
the same as last year in the United States as well as in
the District. Compared with the average level of produc­
tion in the period 1943-52, however, national wrool pro­
duction in the last two years was down about 14 percent
and District production was off nearly 9 percent.
An increase in price supports for the 1955 wool crop
was announced by the Secretary of Agriculture on Octo­
ber 12, 1954. Next year wool producers will be guaran­
teed an average return of 62 cents a pound, grease or raw
basis, compared with 53.2 cents for this year’s crop. The
1955 support rate will reflect 106 percent of the wool
parity as of September 15, 1954.
The increase in wool support prices was authorized in
the Agricultural Act of 1954. This Act provides for the
support of wool prices by means of loans, purchases,
direct payments, and other methods. The support price
may be as high as 110 percent of parity, but only the direct
payment method of support may be used for supporting
above 90 percent. The direct payment method involves a
cash subsidy to wool producers equal to the difference
between the actual market price and the support rate.
Therefore, the full effect of the increased level of wool
supports will not be felt in market prices of wool. Wool
support provisions of the 1954 Act were enacted under
the assumption that wool is a strategic material and for
the purpose of increasing domestic wool production to
300 million pounds from this year’s 230 million pounds.
M ilk, butter, a n d cheese production continues high
despite drought in som e areas

District as well as national production of milk increased
greatly in 1953 and in the first half of 1954. The output

October 1954

135

M O N T H L Y REVIEW

of milk in the United States last year totaled 121 billion
pounds compared with 115 billion pounds in 1952. Dis­
trict production increased 17 percent in 1953 to about
13 billion pounds. In the first 6 months of 1954 District
and national milk production increased 10 and 5 percent,
respectively, from the high levels of the corresponding
period a year earlier. However, the seasonal decline this
year in United States milk output from the early June
peak was considerably larger than usual. Hot, dry sum­
mer weather in some parts of the United States was a con­
tributing factor. Also, the proportion of cows not milked
during July and August increased more than in the same
months of other recent years. This indicates the likeli­
hood of an increase in number of cows freshening in sub­
sequent months and an increase in milk output during the
late fall and winter. Total milk flow during the remainder
of 1954 is expected to approximate levels of a year earlier,
and output for the year as a whole probably will be around
125 billion pounds or 4 billion pounds more than last year.
District producers, largely unaffected by drought,
maintained milk output through the fall months this year
at a level about 5 percent above the fall months last year.
With feed and pasture conditions reported favorable in
the major milk producing regions of the District, late fall
and winter production probably will continue above year
earlier totals.
Despite current and prospective increases in milk pro­
duction, several factors seem to indicate that the upward
trend in milk output may soon begin to level off. Milkfeed price relationships in recent months, for instance,
have been less favorable for milk production than in the

T able
A v e r a g e P r ic e s R e c e iv e d b y
sto ck

and

4

F armers

D e sig n a t e d

for

L iv e ­

L iv e s t o c k P r o d u c t s — M o u n t a i n a n d P a c if ic

15, 1954

S t a t e s, S eptem ber

w it h

C o m p a r is o n s

Average prices
received
Percent change in prices received
Sept. 15,
,-------------- Sept. 15, 1954 from--------------x
,--------- 1954— ------ \
June 15,
Sept. 15,
M oun✓
---------- 1954-----------N/ ---------- 1953---------- \
Livestock or
tain
Pacific M ounM ounlivestock product
states
states tain
Pacific tain
Pacific
Butterfat in milk
(in dollars)
states
states states
states
(per l b . ) ................................. 54
.55
+ 0.7
...
— 13.4 — 17.2
A ll milk whole
(per c w t .) ....................
3.89
4.22
+ 7.5
+ 6.8 — 8.9 — 12.1
H ogs (per c w t .) ..........
20.60
22.00 — 15.6 — 17.4 — 15.2 — 12.4
Beef cattle (per cw t.)
16.10
17.40 — 5.3 — 3.9
+ 4.5
+ 9.4
Calves (per c w t .) ____
16.80
17.00 — 8.2 — 13.3
+ 9.8 + 6.3
Sheep (per c w t .) ..........
4.98
4.87 — 24.0 — 9.8 — 10.3 — 2.2
Lambs (per c w t .) ____
17.70
17.20 — 14.5 — 18.1
+ 4.7
+ 2.4
W o o l (per l b . ) ........................53
.49 — 2.6 — 16.6
+ 0.9 — 1.6
M ilk cows (per head) 170.00
184.00 — 1.2 — 0.5 — 6.6 — 7.1
Turkeys (per l b . ) ...................26
.26 — 6. 9 — 6. 9 — 17.9 — 16.3
Farm chickens
(per l b . ) ................................. 18
.15 — 15.3 — 22.8 — 17.6 — 33.9
Commercial broilers
(per l b . ) ................................. 28
E ggs (per d o z .) ........................40

.27
.34

— 2.8
+ 1 7 .6

— 4.7
— 6.5

— 6.8
— 28.4

— 16.1
— 40.1

Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service,
A g r ic u l t u r a l P r ic e s .

p a st several y ea rs. T h e

reason

f o r th is is th a t in

A p r il,

th is y e a r , p r ic e s u p p o r ts fo r d a ir y p r o d u c ts w e r e lo w e r e d
t o r e fle c t 7 5 p e r c e n t o f p a r it y r a th e r t h a n 9 0 p e r c e n t . I n
a d d itio n to le s s fa v o r a b le p r ic e -c o s t r e la t io n s h ip s , s la u g h ­
te r

fig u r e s

d a ir y

herds

m ore,
such

in

a

in d ic a te
m ore

num ber

as h o g s, are

cow s

is

th a t

d a ir y

h e a v ily
of

sta tes

r e a d ily

d e c lin in g .

In

fa rm e rs

th is

year
w h ere

o th e r

areas

be

la s t.

b etter

a v a ila b le , th e

m a y b e u n lik e ly s in c e fa r m

m ay

th a n

c u llin g

F u rth er­

a lte r n a tiv e s ,

n u m b e r o f m ilk

su b s ta n tia l

decreases

p r ic e s o f m o s t liv e s to c k a n d

liv e s to c k p r o d u c ts r e p r e s e n t p o o r a lte r n a tiv e s . R e p o r te d
c r e d it a n d fin a n c ia l d iffic u ltie s a m o n g s m a ll d a ir y f a r m e r s

T able

3

of

P r o d u c t io n o f M i l k , B u t t e r , a n d C h e e s e — V a r i o u s P e r io d s
i n 1954 C o m p a r e d w i t h P r o d u c t io n i n C o r r e s p o n d in g
P e r io d s i n E a r l i e r Y e a r s
T w e l f t h D is t r ic t a n d U n it e d S t a t e s

th e

T w e lfth

D is tr ic t

and

e ls e w h e r e ,

h ow ever,

m ay

r e s u lt in s c a t t e r e d c a s e s o f fo r c e d liq u id a t io n . N e v e r t h e ­
le s s , D e p a r t m e n t o f A g r ic u l t u r e o u t lo o k s p e c ia lis ts in d i­
c a te th a t m ilk p r o d u c t io n n e x t y e a r w ill c o n t in u e a t a b o u t
th e s a m e h ig h le v e l o f t h is y e a r a n d t h a t t h e r e w ill b e lit t le ,

,----------Twelfth District---------^ , ----------- United States----------- ^

Percent
Percent
change from
change from
corresponding
corresponding
Milk production
•-----period in— ^
, period in—
(millions of lbs.)
1943-52
1943-52
or
or
1953
Production 1953 1948-521 Production 1953 1948-521
January-August
7,791
...
4- 2.2
85,154
...
+ 2.5
July-August . . .
2,090
...
+ 3.5
22,002
...
— 0.5
August
1,015
...
-t- 4.9
10,624
...
+ 0.9

p r ic e s o f m ilk .

W i t h th e d e c lin e s in c e J u n e in th e n a tio n a l a n n u a l r a te
o f m ilk

o u tp u t a n d

a

s lig h t in c r e a s e

in

c o n s u m p tio n

of

flu id m ilk , n a tio n a l p r o d u c tio n o f b u tte r a n d c h e e s e sin c e
m id -J u ly h a s b e e n b e lo w a y e a r e a r lie r . G o v e r n m e n t p u r ­
c h a se s o f th e s e ite m s d u r in g th is p e r io d h a v e b e e n ju s t a
little o v e r h a lf t h o s e o f a y e a r e a r lie r . P u r c h a s e s o f n o n fa t

1954
January-August
July-August . . .
August ...............

if a n y , i m p r o v e m e n t in f a r m

8,447

2,205
1,070

+ 8.4
+ 5.5
+ 5.4

+ 1 0 .9
+ 9.7
+ 1 0 .5

88,174
22,119
10,494

+ 3 .5
+ 0 .5
— 1.2

+
—

6.1
0
0.3

d r y m ilk , h o w e v e r , w e r e n e a r ly a s la r g e a s la s t y e a r .
D is tr ic t p r o d u c tio n o f c h e e s e sin c e J u n e h a s c o m e fo r th
in s lig h t ly s m a lle r v o lu m e th is y e a r th a n la s t b u t b u tte r

Butter (thousands of lbs.)
January-August. 83,980
July-August . . . 20,420
August ............... 10,050

+ 3 4 .7
+ 1 5 .3
+ 1 7 .5

+ 3 1 .2
+ 2 5 .3
+ 3 2 .9

Cheese (thousands of lbs.)
January-August 45,900
July-August . . . 13,150
August ...............
6,375

+ 4.1
— 0.3
+ 1.9

+ 1 2 .3
+ 1 1 .0
+ 1 6 .4

1,080,450
238,905
109,290

+ 4 .2
— 7.4
— 8.7

+ 1 6 .8
— 4.4
— - 8.2

p r o d u c tio n

c o n tin u e s

fir st 8 m o n t h s o f 1 9 5 4

r e la tiv e ly

h ig h

m o r e b u tte r th a n in th e s a m e p e r io d
756,025 + 4 . 9
183,670 — 3.7
84,245 — 5.1

+ 1 6 .1
— 0.8
— 3.4

(T a b le

3 ).

th e D is tr ic t p r o d u c e d

35

In

th e

percent

of 1954. T h e

com ­

p a r a b le fig u r e f o r c h e e s e is 4 p e r c e n t b u t D is t r ic t c h e e s e
p r o d u c tio n

had

in c r e a s e d

g r e a tly — a b o u t

8

p e r c e n t — in

th e fir st 8 m o n t h s o f 1 9 5 3 .
1 Ten-year period, 1943-52, employed for milk; 5-year period, 1948-52, used for
butter and cheese.
Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service, Crop Reporting Board.




D a i r y m a r k e t s in r e c e n t m o n t h s h a v e im p r o v e d s lig h t ly
fo r

fa rm e rs

but

fa r m

p r ic e

in c r e a se s

so

fa r

have

been

136

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SAN FRAN CISCO

slight because production continues to exceed use and
Government stocks are large. Wholesale and retail prices
continue somewhat below a year earlier. The outlook
appears to call for some continued increase for the Dis­
trict as well as nationally in total numbers of dairy cows
on farms. This means that production of milk, butter, and
cheese will continue high in 1955 if weather, feed, and
pasture conditions are normal. Continued drought in
some areas may force liquidations but these probably will
be offset by increases in other areas.
Poultry and eg g production high
with prices low

An increased number of layers on farms, large produc­
tion of eggs for this time of year, and seasonally increased
supplies of poultry meat are holding down prices of these
commodities. Nationally, egg production on September 1
was record high for the date. District egg production in
the first 8 months of this year was up 7 percent from the
same period last year. In the same period numbers of
layers on District farms increased 9 percent. As a result
farm prices of eggs in Pacific Coast states averaged 39
cents per dozen on August 15 compared with 58 cents on
the same date a year ago. Prices of medium eggs have

O c to b e r 1954

declined in recent months because of the increasing pro­
portion of eggs laid by pullets in recent production. Prices
of large eggs have shown less net change. Continued low
prices and increased production appear in prospect for
District egg producers at least until well into 1955.
Changes in outlook after June next year depend largely
on how producers react to an unfavorable egg-feed price
ratio. Heavy culling and some flock liquidations next year
could result in an improved fall marketing situation for
eggs in 1955.
Turkey prices weakened about mid-summer this year
as it became evident that national fall supplies of turkey
meat would be exceptionally large. For the United States
the 1954 turkey crop is expected to be about 9 percent
larger than the 1953 crop and to exceed the record 60
million bird crop of 1952.
The District increase in turkey production from last
year is small— less than 1 percent. Nevertheless, prices
received by District turkey producers this fall have been
15 to 18 percent under those of a year earlier. Farm prices
of turkeys in District states apparently are strongly af­
fected by supply-demand conditions in eastern markets.
As a result inefficient District turkey producers probably
will encounter financial difficulties this year.

THE DISTRICT CASH FARM INCOME SITUATION
income of District farmers in 1954 may be mod­
C
erately smaller than in 1953. If so, this will mark the
third consecutive annual decline of District farmers’ re­
turns. During the first half of 1954, District farmers re­
ceived considerably less income than in the first half of
last year, and District cash receipts in the second half of
1954 are expected to continue below the 1953 level. The
production of two high income-producing District crops,
cotton and wheat, was reduced in 1954 by acreage allot­
ments and marketing quotas. Since a large part of the
diverted cotton and wheat acreage was devoted to feed
grain production in 1954, marketings of these alternative
crops may be the source of an unusually large proportion
ash

T W E L F T H D IS T R I C T R E C E IP T S F R O M F A R M M A R K E T IN G S A N D
U N I T E D S T A T E S P R IC E S R E C E I V E D B Y F A R M E R S , 1924-1953
(1 9 4 0 -1 0 0 )

1Indicates the District trend of the volume of farm marketings.
Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service, Agricultural Statistics and The Farm Income Situation.




of District farm income during the last half of the year.
Increased feed grain production also may stimulate an
expansion of District livestock feeding enterprises.
District cash receipts at relatively
high level

Examination of the current farm income situation in
terms of changes from recent years does not reveal some
of the long-term factors that are related to the present
level of District farm income. Despite recent reductions,
the volume of District cash returns from farm marketings
continues at a relatively high level. District cash receipts
have more than tripled during the last three decades. The
upward trend of cash income over this period has been
due largely to the higher prices received for farm prod­
ucts. The significance of price in determining the volume
of cash receipts is indicated by the similar movements of
cash receipts and prices (Chart 1). Farm prices in turn
are affected by the general level of business activity in
the nation. Since prices are such an important factor in
determining the volume of cash returns from farm mar­
ketings, the general health of the economy becomes of
primary concern to District agriculture.
Although prices received by farmers and cash receipts
from District marketings have been closely associated,
cash receipts have increased relatively more than prices
received ( Chart 1). This indicates that factors other than
prices have been operating to boost farm income, and that
these factors have influenced cash receipts by expanding
farm output and the volume of marketings. Among these

O c to b e r 1954

M O N T H L Y REVIEW

additional factors have been technological and farm man­
agement advances, increases in crop acreage, increases in
the number of animal units,1 and the growth of specializa­
tion in agricultural production.
District cash receipts have been declining
since 1951

If District cash income does decline during 1954 from
the level of the previous year, it will be the third consecu­
tive annual decline. The paramount factors associated
with this prospective reduction, however, differ from
those associated with the reductions in farm income from
1951 to 1952 and from 1952 to 1953.
In 1951 District cash income was at a record high level.
During that year practically all circumstances seemed to
favor a high level of District cash income. Inflation was
affecting the general price level and farm prices reached
their post-Korean peak nationally in February of 1951.
Bolstered by various forms of governmental assistance,
the value of agricultural exports during the year also was
at a record high level. As a result of the Korean war,
military demand for agricultural products remained high
throughout the year.
Despite an increase in personal disposable income and
a larger volume of District farm marketings, District farm
income declined in 1952 from the 1951 level. More than
offsetting the effect of higher personal income and larger
marketings was the reduced value of agricultural exports
and lower farm prices. The decline of District cash in­
come in 1952 stemmed largely from decreased returns
from the sale of livestock and livestock products, as op­
posed to receipts from crop marketings. The number of
cattle on farms reached its peak for the current cycle in
1952 and was accompanied by an increase in cattle mar­
ketings. The effect of these increased marketings on farm
income, however, was more than offset by lower cattle
prices. Some crop prices also declined, but their effects
were largely minimized by price increases for other crops.
The decline of District cash receipts continued in 1953
with much of the income decline again due to the lower
volume of cash income from marketings of livestock and
livestock products. Personal disposable income continued
to rise and a record volume of District farm products
apparently was marketed during 1953. The value of agri­
cultural exports, on the other hand, slipped to lower levels.
Farm prices again were an important income-depressing
factor. In addition to lower cattle prices, dairy prices also
were at a lower level than in 1952. Furthermore, crop
prices were beginning to weaken, but the existence of
price supports on many important field crops cushioned
the over-all decline.
For the entire period of 1951 through 1953, the decline
of District cash income was due to the drop in farm prices,
principally cattle prices. The volume of farm marketings
1This count does not include animals used for power on farms. The number of
“ animal units” is not equivalent to the number of “ animals." An “ animal unit”
is defined as the average sales value per herd for milk cows. Other animals are
assigned unit weights either larger or smaller than “ one” and are counted accord­
ingly.




137

appears to have increased. Although District cash income
declined from the 1951 level, the relative decline was less
in the District than in the country as a whole. The prin­
cipal reason for this difference is that a smaller propor­
tion of the District than of the national cash income is
derived from marketings of livestock and livestock prod­
ucts. Returns from farm marketings of livestock and live­
stock products generally are about 40 percent of the Dis­
trict's total cash receipts. Nationally, marketings of this
type of farm product account for about 60 percent of total
cash receipts.
Further decline of District cash receipts
indicated for 1954

In contrast to the situation in 1952 and 1953, the bulk
of the income decline this year will apparently stem from
reduced crop receipts. Since crop marketings are a com­
paratively more important source of farm returns in the
District than in the nation, a reduction in total District
cash receipts of somewhat more than the 4 percent pre­
dicted for the nation may be expected. Some of the factors
that have had or are expected to have a depressing effect
on District farm income during the year are reduced crop
output, lower prices at the farm level, and a reduced
volume of crop marketings. On the other hand, the level
of disposable income and the value of agricultural exports
generally have been somewhat above 1953 levels.
During the first six months of 1954, District farm in­
come was about 11 percent lower than during the com­
parable period a year earlier. Cash receipts from crop
marketings declined 17.4 percent compared with a decline
of only 2.8 percent in farmers' returns from farm market­
ings of livestock and livestock products. In addition to
lower crop prices, there is evidence that a reduced volume
of crop marketings also contributed to the decline in cash
income. With the farm price of wheat and cotton below
support levels during and after harvest, price support
loans were obtained on these important District crops at
a rapid rate in the latter part of 1953. These compara­
tively heavy farm marketings did not conform to the usual
seasonal pattern and probably left a relatively small pro­
portion of the crops to be marketed by farmers in the first
half of 1954. That this was the case seems especially likely
in view of the drastic decline in cash receipts from crop
marketings in the District’s cotton producing states dur­
ing the first half of the year. Declines in crop income in
District wheat producing states were not as pronounced as
in the cotton producing regions. This difference in the
behavior of cash income in the two areas cannot be fully
explained at present owing to the absence of data concern­
ing cash receipts by individual crops.
The relative decline in cash receipts from the first half
of 1953 to the first half of 1954 was considerably larger
in the District than in the nation. National cash receipts
declined only 3.6 percent, while District cash receipts de­
clined 10.9 percent. Since a comparatively large share of
District farm returns is obtained from crop marketings,
the reduced volume of such marketings, lower crop prices,

138

O c to b e r 1954

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SA N FRANCISCO

and the relative strength of cash receipts from livestock
marketings resulted in a relatively greater decline in Dis­
trict farm income.
The volume of District cash receipts obtained during
the last half of the calendar year depends to a large extent
on crop marketings. Cash income from the sale of crops
generally accounts for two-thirds of the total District cash
receipts received from July through December. District
farm income in the second half of this year will be affected,
however, by acreage allotments and marketing quotas on
wheat and cotton. Although carry-over stocks of sup­
ported commodities have accumulated under the price
support program, cash income was not greatly affected as
long as output of these commodities was not curtailed.
These increasing stocks of price supported commodities,
however, were largely responsible for the imposition of
acreage allotments and marketing quotas in 1954 on two
important District crops, cotton and wheat. These acreage
controls prompted a production shift to alternative crops
such as feed grains.
There are at least two possible ways by which this pro­
duction shift from wheat and cotton may reduce District
cash receipts during the last half of 1954. First, in District
areas specialized in their production, cotton and wheat
provide more income per acre than generally results from
the production of alternative crops. Secondly, a portion
of the increased 1954 feed grain production may be mar­
keted indirectly through livestock instead of being sold
outright as is common with wheat and cotton. Such a
practice would reduce crop receipts if livestock feeding
enterprises were expanded on the farms producing the
feed grain, so that no cash transaction was involved in
transferring the feed to the livestock. The shifting of cash
receipts from 1954 feed grain production to livestock and
livestock products not only would reduce cash income
from crops in 1954 but would also tend to shift cash re­
ceipts from 1954 to subsequent years. The receipts from
the utilization of feed grains produced in 1954 would not
be realized until the animals consuming the grain were
ultimately sold. In the case of feeder cattle, this sale takes
T able 1
R e l a t i o n s h i p B e t w e e n S o u r c e a n d C h a n g e o f C a s h R e c e ip t s
fro m F a r m M a r k e t in g s , T w e l f t h D is t r ic t ,

1951 a n d 1953

Proportion of total
cash receipts derived
from farm marketings
of livestock and
livestock products
1951
38.4
A r iz o n a ................................................... .................

Percent change
total cash
receipts
1953 from 1951
+ 10.8
— 5.7
+ 0.3

W ashington ......................................... .................
Oregon .................................................. ....................

41.0
49.0

— 10.7
— 6.8

Utah

76.0

— 20.4

....................................................... ....................

— 39.1

...................

59.8

—

5.3

—

5.6

Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Serv-

ice, Farm Income Situation.




T able 2
C a s h R e c e ip ts F ro m F a r m M a r k e t in g s , T w e l f t h D is t r i c t ,
J a n u a r y -J u n e

1954

Percent change from
January-June 1953— ^
Livestock
and
Crops
Total
prod(in thousands of dollars)
ucts
Crops
Total
445,341
500,634
945,975 — 2.8 — 19.4 — 12.4

Livestock
and
livestock
products
California

.......... .

W ashington

f—

..........

87,501

121,154

208,655

— 6.3 +

Arizona ....................

55,319

104,852

160,171

— 0.3 — 24.8

Oregon

....................

77,697

62,481

140,178

— 5.2 —

......................

65,600

40,015

105,615

+ 1 .2

........................

Idaho
Utah

5.7
9.2

— 32.5

+

0.4

— 17.9
—

7.1

— 14.9

50,961

9,376

60,337

— 3.1 — 16.5

—

5.4

....................

14,235

1,825

16,060

— 3.9 — 30.9

—

7.9

Twelfth D istrict..

796,654

840,337

1,636,991

— 2.8 — 17.4

— 10.9

— 1.5 —

—

Nevada

United

S t a t e s . . ..

8,345,795 4,252,606 12,598,401

8.6

3.6

Source: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Serv­
ice, Farm Income Situation.

place from 3 to 9 months after the animals are placed on
feed.
The effect of the reduced District output of crops on
District cash income may be partially offset by price
changes during the last half of the year. Farm prices of
several important District crops have been strengthening
in the last few months. A continued high level of cash
receipts from cattle marketings would also help to bolster
farm cash receipts. Dairy, poultry, and egg prices, how­
ever, have had a depressing effect on farm income and are
currently below their year-ago levels. Based on informa­
tion obtained at the Agricultural Outlook Conference in
Washington, D. C. during the last week in October, Dis­
trict and national farm income in 1955 is expected to be
somewhat lower than in 1954. Smaller wheat and cotton
allotments are scheduled for next year. The support level
for 1955 crop wheat also will be moderately lower than
this year. Hence, incomes of wheat producers will be af­
fected by both smaller production and lower prices.
Farm income changes during 7954 vary am ong
District states

There is considerable variation in the annual changes
in farm income among District states. These variations
depend in large part upon existing differences in the com­
parative importance of crops and livestock as sources of
farm income in each state. Between 1951 and 1953, farm
income declined in five Twelfth District states but in­
creased in Arizona and Washington. As indicated in
Table 1, for the period of 1951-53 changes in farm income
among District states were closely related to the relative
importance in each state of crops and livestock as sources
of farm income. Since cattle prices and receipts from
cattle marketings were declining during 1952 and 1953,
the most drastic income reductions occurred in those
states obtaining a large share of their receipts from live­
stock marketings.
During the first six months of 1954, cash income from
farm marketings in most District states was again lower
than in a like period of the previous year (Table 2 ). On
the whole, the largest income declines occurred in those

O c to b e r 1954

139

M O N T H L Y REVIEW

states depending largely on crop marketings as a source of
income. The state of Washington, however, was an excep­
tion. Although depending heavily on cash receipts from
crop marketings, the volume of farm cash receipts in
Washington increased slightly instead of declining. Re­
turns from apple marketings apparently maintained cash
receipts in this state. On the other hand, Idaho generally
receives a relatively small proportion of its farm income
from crop marketings, but cash receipts in this state de­
clined sharply during the first half of the year. Potato
prices during the first few months of 1954 were consid­
erably below the prices received by Idaho farmers in the
first part of 1953 and accentuated the farm income decline
in Idaho. The most drastic decline of cash receipts during
the first half of 1954 occurred in Arizona and probably
resulted from a smaller volume of cotton marketings. In
1953, cotton marketings accounted for about 60 percent

of Arizona’s cash receipts from farm marketings. Since
marketing quotas and acreage allotments were placed on
cotton in 1954, Arizona’s cash income probably will con­
tinue below the 1953 level of income during the last six
months of 1954.
Prospects for decreased farm returns in the last half
of the year are not confined to the state of Arizona. Prac­
tically every state in the District depends heavily on the
income from marketings of either wheat or cotton, or both.
Acreage allotments and marketing quotas on these two
crops may be expected to result in a decrease for the year
in cash receipts in most District states. Reductions may
be relatively small for Utah and Nevada where cash re­
ceipts are derived largely from marketings of livestock
and livestock products. Lower prices for these commodi­
ties are being offset for the most part by significant in­
creases in production and marketings.

INCOME PAYMENTS IN THE DISTRICT: 1953
payments to individuals in the Twelfth District
rose 6 percent from 1952 to 1953, reaching a record
$36 billion.1 This increase, paralleling a 6 percent rise na­
tionally, represents an average of a somewhat wide dis­
persion of income changes among the seven states of the
District. California— accounting for approximately 83
percent of the dollar amount of the District rise— regis­
tered a 7 percent gain, while at the extremes Idaho had a
3 percent decrease and Nevada a 9 percent increase in total
income payments. The marked dispersion in changes in
income payments among the District states (Table 1)
largely reflects geographical dissimilarities in economic
structure and varied developments among industries. An
examination of income payments by major source indi­
cates that a decline in agricultural income exerted the
strongest downward pull in total income payments in both
the District and the country as a whole. Manufacturing
payrolls, on the other hand, showed strong parallel in­
creases in both this region and the nation and represented

I

n c o m e

xThis article is based primarily upon the estimates which appear in the United
States Department of Commerce, S u r v e y o f C u r r e n t B u s i n e s s , August 1954,
pp. 9-17.

T able 1
T o t a l a n d P er C a p it a

Income P aym en ts

C h anges— T w elfth

D is t r ic t a n d

w it h

P ercentage

U n it e d S t a t e s ,

1952 a n d 1953
Total
Per capita
payments------- % <f-------income payments--------,
Percent
Percent
1952
1953
change
1953
change

f--------income

1952
(in m illion s of dollars)

Arizona
Idaho .
Nevada
Utah . .
Californi
Oregon

1 ,3 0 8
874
412
1 ,0 7 5
2 3 ,2 5 7
2 ,7 4 6
4 ,4 5 8

T w elfth D is tr ic t.. .

1 9 5 2 -5 3

(in dollars)

1 ,3 7 0
851
448
1 ,1 0 8
2 4 ,8 5 6
2 ,7 6 2
4 ,6 6 3

+ 5
— 3
+ 9
+ 3
+ 7
+ 1
+ 5

1 ,5 0 3
1 ,4 8 4
2 ,2 2 7
1 ,4 5 9
1 ,9 7 8
1 ,7 1 2
1 ,8 1 0

3 4 ,1 3 0

3 6 ,0 5 8

+ 6

2 5 6 ,0 9 1

2 7 0 ,5 7 7

+ 6

1 9 5 2 -5 3

1 ,4 7 3
1 ,4 1 1
2 ,1 7 5
1 ,5 1 0
2 ,0 3 9
1 ,7 2 4
1 ,8 8 2

— 2
— 5
— 2
+ 3
+ 3
+ 1
+ 4

1 ,8 9 7

1 ,9 2 9

+ 2

1 ,6 4 4

1 ,7 0 9

4 -4

Note: State income statistics for 1952 have been revised by the Department of
Commerce.
Source: United States Department of Commerce, S u r v e y o f C u r r e n t B u s i n e s s ,
August 1954.

the major sources of increase in total income payments
during the year.
Owing to a relatively larger increase in population in
the District than in the nation, per capita income pay­
ments in the District rose by a moderate 2 percent from

T a b le

2

P e rc e n ta g e D is tr ib u tio n a n d P e r c e n t C h a n g e o f T o t a l In co m e P a y m e n ts

1952 a n d 1953

b y S e le c te d C o m p o n e n ts ,
Agriculture
-income—
Per­
Percent
cent
distribution
change

Manufacturing
-payrolls—
Percent
Percent
distribution change

Government
------ income-----Per­
Percent
cent
distribution
change

1952

1953
2 5 .6
2 5 .1
3 3 .6
2 5 .3
2 8 .5
2 8 .0
2 6 .5

+

5

2 5 .4
2 2 .5
3 1 .8
2 4 .5
2 8 .4
2 6 .5
2 6 .3

6

2 7 .6

3 0 .0

2 5 .6

2 6 .0

1952

1953

1 9 5 2 -5 3

1952

1953

1 9 5 2 -5 3

1952

1953

1 8 .5
2 2 .5
8 .2
7 .4
6 .0
8 .7
6 .7

1 5 .6
1 7 .9
3 .7
5 .2
4 .6
6 .5
5 .6

— '14
— 21
— 52
— 29
— 14
— 12
+
4

7 .1
1 0 .9
4 .3
1 0 .5
1 8 .7
2 2 .0
1 8 .6

7 .6
1 1 .2
4 .3
1 1 .3
1 9 .5
2 2 .1
1 9 .1

+ 14
0
+ 12
+ 11
+ 12
0
+
7

1 9 .1
1 5 .9
1 7 .3
2 3 .1
1 8 .7
1 6 .2
2 1 .1

1 9 .4
1 7 .1
1 7 .8
2 3 .6
1 8 .6
1 5 .9
2 1 .5

+

6

+
—
+

6
2

Twelfth District

7 .3

5 .6

— 19

1 7 .9

1 8 .6

+ 10

1 8 .9

1 8 .9

+

United States

6 .7

5 .3

— 12

2 4 .5

2 5 .7

+ 11

1 5 .9

1 5 .9

+

5

Area
Arizona
Nevada .................
Utah . . .................
California ............
Oregon .................
Washington

..

1 9 5 2 -5 3

+
+

Trade and
-services income----Per­
Percent
cent
distribution
change

I

5

+ 13

1 9 5 2 -5 3

Construction
Mining
------ payrolls-----—pay roll s PerPer­
Percent
Percent
cent
cent
distribution change distribution change
1952

1953

1 9 5 2 -5 3

1952

1953

6
7
16
6
7
4
4

5 .6
5 .1
8 .6
4 .6
4 .8
4 .0
5 .2

6 .2
4 .7
9 .4
4 .2
5 .0
3 .9
5 .0

+ 18
— 10
+ 20
— 5
+ 12
— 3
0

4 .3
2 .5
3 .9
7 .0
0 .8
0 .2
0 .3

4 .5
2 .3
4 .5
7 .3
0 .8
0 .2
0 .3

+
9
— 11
+ 26
+
9
+ 10
+
6
+
4

+

7

4 .9

5 .0

+

8

1 .1

1 .1

+

8

+

6

4 .1

4 .0

+

4

1 .5

1 .4

+

2

+
+

+
+
+
+

Note: Figures may not add to 100 percent due to rounding. State income statistics for 1952 have been revised by the Department of Commerce.
Source: United States Department of Commerce, S u r v e y o f C u r r e n t B u s i n e s s , August 1954.




1 9 5 2 -5 3

140

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SA N FRAN CISCO

T able 3
P e r c e n ta g e D is tr ib u tio n o f T o t a l In c o m e P a y m e n ts by
Type

of

P a y m e n t , 1 9 5 2 -5 3
Pro­
prietors’
income
23.4
20.1

Property
income
9.0
9.5

Other
income

1953

Wages
and
salaries
61.8
64.2

1953

57.8
60.4

27.7
24.0

8.6
9.2

5.9
6.5

1953

63.8
67.2

19.4
15.6

12.4
12.5

4.4
4.7

17.3

8.0

1953

68.9
70.8

14.8

8.3

5.8
6.1

1953

68.1
69.1

15.0
13.9

11.1
11.2

5.8
5.8

O regon ........................... . .

1952
1953

66.4
67.2

17.0
16.3

9.3
9.7

7.3
6.7

W a s h in g t o n ................. . .

1952
1953

69.0
69.0

15.5
15.1

9.3
9.4

6.2

1953

67.6
68.6

16.0
14.7

10.5
10.7

6.0
6.0

1953

68.5
69.6

15.2
14.1

10.5
10.5

5.7
5.8

N e v a d a ...........................
Utah ...............................

Tw elfth

District

...

United S t a t e s ............

5.7
6.3

6.6

Note: State income statistics for 1952 have been revised by the Department of
Commerce.
Source: United States Department of Commerce, S u r v e y o f C u r r e n t B u s i n e s s ,
August 1954.

1952 to 1953 compared with a national increase of 4 per­
cent (Table 1). Idaho had a 5 percent drop in per capita
income payments which reflected a decline in total income
payments as well as a moderate rise in population. Ari­
zona and Nevada had moderate declines in per capita in­
come payments but only because of population increases.
Washington was the only District state in which the in­
crease in per capita income payments was as large as the
4 percent rise in the country as a whole.
The percentage distribution of total income payments
by type showred varied changes from 1952 to 1953 in both
the District and the nation (Table 3 ), largely reflecting
differences in developments between the agricultural and
nonagricultural sectors of the economy. Proprietors’ in­
come, which includes the net income from unincorporated
farms, showed substantial declines in Arizona, Idaho,
Nevada, and Utah, all states in which agricultural income
is both relatively important and also showed the largest
percent declines. These four District states combined had
a 12 percent decrease in proprietors’ income payments
during 1953. The decline in farm income coupled with
substantial rises in nonagricultural payrolls in 1953 made
wages and salaries a larger fraction of total income pay­
ments in these four Intermountain states than in 1952.
On the other hand, proprietors’ income experienced only
moderate declines in both California and Oregon. In con­
trast to the experience in the other District states and the
nation, proprietors’ income rose in Washington, largely
reflecting an increase in agricultural income in that state.
Agricultural income declines in District and nation

For the second successive year, farmers in both the Dis­
trict and nation suffered declines in their income pay­
ments. In contrast to a smaller percentage decline in farm
income in the District compared with the nation in 1952,




O c to b e r 1954

agricultural income in the District decreased by a larger
percentage in 1953 than in the country as a whole. All
states in the District, except Washington, shared in a
19 percent decline in District farm income, with Nevada
registering a very sizable drop of 52 percent. Both the
District and national decreases resulted from a fall in the
value of farm output (reflecting lower farm prices) which
was only slightly offset by a much smaller percentage de­
cline in farm production expenses.
Again as in 1952, varied fluctuations in agricultural
income between the District and the nation and among
the seven western states largely reflect differences in
regional specialization in crop and livestock farming.
Lower livestock and livestock product prices during 1953
coupled with unfavorable growing conditions during the
summer and fall contributed to sizable declines in the
income of Nevada and Utah, states receiving a large por­
tion of their income from livestock farming. The value of
farm crop production was also moderately lower in both
the District and nation. Owing to a drastic cut in prices,
the value of the 1953 national potato crop was less than
half that of 1952 and this contributed to a 21 percent de­
cline in Idaho’s agricultural income. Washington, fav­
ored with an exceptionally good fruit crop, had a 4 per­
cent rise in farm income— the only District state record­
ing a gain in farm income.1
Rise in District nonagricultural income
parallels national trend

District income payments from the nonagricultural
sectors of the economy increased 7 percent from 1952 to
1953, a rise equal to that in the country as a whole. In­
come arising from manufacturing activities showed the
largest percent gains for the year— both nationally and
regionally. These gains offset the declines in farm incomes
in all but one District state. Manufacturing payrolls in the
District were 10 percent higher during 1953 than in 1952,
compared with an 11 percent rise in the country as a
whole. Despite a 54-day strike in the aircraft industry
lasting from October into December 1953, California
manufacturing payrolls rose about 12 percent above the
1952 figure. Payrolls in the lumber industry were about
the same in 1953 as in the previous year, thereby dampen­
ing increases in total manufacturing incomes in the lum­
ber-important economies of Washington and Oregon.
Income payments arising from each of the remaining
major sectors of the economy during the year showed
larger percentage increases in the Twelfth District than
in the country as a whole. Income from governmental
activity in the District was 6 percent above the 1952 figure
compared with a 5 percent rise nationally. Oregon was
the only District state to have a decline in government
income while Nevada, at the opposite extreme, showed
a 13 percent gain above 1952.
The rise of 7 percent in trade and service incomes from
1952 to 1953 in the District was slightly higher than in
1 For a more complete review of Twelfth District agricultural developments during
1953 see this R e v i e w , February 1954, pp. 39-47.

O c to b e r 1954

M O N T H L Y REVIEW

the nation as a whole. Unlike changes in other major
sources of income, all states in the District shared in this
7 percent regional increase. Nevada again had the largest
gain (16 percent) among the seven District states, with
trade and service incomes accounting for slightly more
than one-third of its total income payments during the
year. California had a 7 percent increase, while both
Oregon and Washington, with 4 percent increases, had
the smallest gains among the District states.
Income payments from construction and mining activi­
ties increased substantially more in the District from
1952 to 1953 than in the country as a whole. Construction
payrolls in California and Nevada, despite a 41-day strike
during the year, showed sizable increases in 1953. Con­
struction payrolls in the District rose 8 percent compared
with a 4 percent national increase, reflecting sizable per­
centage increases in three states (Arizona, California,
and Nevada) and substantial percentage decreases in
three other District states (Idaho, Oregon, and Utah).




141

Somewhat in contrast, an 8 percent climb in mining pay­
rolls in the District from 1952 to 1953, compared with a
more moderate 2 percent rise nationally, represents in­
creases by all District states except Idaho.1
The differences in the patterns of change in income
payments from 1952 to 1953 among the nation, District,
and component District states, reflecting diverse move­
ments in major sources of income, suggest that regional
differences in income fluctuations may be significantly
associated with regional differences in economic struc­
ture. A review of annual fluctuations in per capita income
payments over the pre- and postwar years, to be pub­
lished in a future issue of the Monthly Review , indicates
that those states in the District deriving a large propor­
tion of their total income payments from agricultural
activity have been, in general, also subject to wide annual
swings in their per capita income payments.
1For a more complete review of Twelfth District nonagricultural developments
during 1953 see this R e v i e w , February 1954, pp. 19-30.

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SAN FRANCISCO

O c to b e r 1954

BUSINESS INDEXES— TW ELFTH DISTRICT1

(1947-49 average=100)

In d u s t r ia l p ro d u ctio n (p h y sic a l vo lu m e )*
Year
and
m o n th
1929
1931
1933
1935
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953

Lum ber

P etroleu m *
C r u d e R e fin e d C e m e n t

Lead*

C opper*

W heat
flour*

T o ta l
C ar­
R e ta il
n on agri­ T o t a l
D e p ’t
m f ’g
food
c u ltu ra l
lo a d in gs store
E le c t r ic e m p lo y ­ e m p lo y ­ ( n u m ­
sales
prices
1» s
pow er
b er)3 (v a lu e )2
m e n t4
m ent

80a
42a
34a
45a
61a
48a
60a
65a
77a
77a
74a
74a
61a
80a
94a
102a
104a
116a
115a
111a
119a

87
57
52
62
71
75
67
67
69
74
85
93
97
94
100
101
99
98
106
107
109

78
65
50
56
65
64
63
63
68
71
83
93
98
91
98
100
103
103
112
116
123

54
36
27
33
56
45
56
61
81
96
79
63
65
81
96
104
100
112
128
124
130

165
100
72
86
114
92
93
108
109
114
100
90
78
70
94
105
101
109
89
86
74

105
49
17
37
88
58
80
94
107
123
125
112
90
71
106
101
93
115
115
112
111

90
86
75
87
84
81
91
87
87
88
98
101
112
108
113
98
88
86
95
96
96

29
29
26
30
38
36
40
43
49
60
76
82
78
78
90
101
108
119
136
144
161

118a
113a
114a
115a
114a

109
109
109
110
109

124
126
125
121
125

134
133
137
128
120

69
73
69
69
67

110
111
112
112
104

92
101
99
98
96

122a
122a
119a
120a
124a
103a
79a
88a

109
109
108
107
107
107
106
104

121
120
118
119
123
119
118
115

114
117
116
134
143
140
143
137

60
79
76
71
67
69
63r
73

107
102
99
98
103
105

99
97
98
96
96
96
92
101

W a te rb o rn e
fo re ign
trade*» •
E x p o r t s Im p o r ts

30
25
18
24
30
28
31
33
40
49
59
65
72
91
99
104
98
105
109
114
116

64
50
42
48
50
48
47
47
52
63
69
68
70
80
96
103
100
100
113
115
113

190
138
110
135
170
164
163
132

124
80
72
109
119
87
95
101

'ÍÓÓ
101
96
95
99
102
99
103
111
118
122

**47
60
51
55
63
83
121
164
158
122
97
100
102
97
105
122
132
139

102
68
52
66
81
72
77
82
95
102
99
105
100
101
106
100
94
97
100
101
100

“ ¿9
129
86
85
91
186
171
140

” 57
81
98
121
137
157
200
308

168
166
163
157
158

122
122
122
121
121

139
140
141
137
138

99
98
95
97
102

114
110
111
112
109

113
114
114
113
113

127
129
133
139
141

337
368
316
287
256

163
160
171
168
174
183
179

121
121
120
120
120
120

138
137
136
136
136
137r
131r
130p

109r
107
111
111
114
114
115
115

114
114
113
113
114
114
113
113

108
156
156
157
158
141

210
271
233
232
271
237

1953
August
September
October
November
December

1954
January
February
March
April
M ay
June
July
August

91r

73p

119r

119p

93
90
94
99
97
96
88
90

BANKING AN D CREDIT STATISTICS— TW ELFTH DISTRICT

(amounts in millions of dollars)

C o n d itio n Ite m s o f a ll m e m b e r b a n k s 7
Y ear
and
m o n th
1929
1931
1933
1935
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953

U .S.
Loans
an d
G o v ’t
d is c o u n t s s e c u r it ie s

T o ta l
Dem and
d e p osits
tim e
a d ju ste d 8 dep osits

2,239
1,898
1,486
1,537
1,871
1,869
1,967
2,130
2,451
2,170
2,106
2,254
2,663
4,068
5,358
6,032
5,925
7,093
7,866
8,839
9,220

495
547
720
1,275
1,270
1,323
1,450
1,482
1,738
3,630
6,235
8,263
10,450
8,426
7,247
6,366
7,016
6,415
6,463
6,619
6,639

1,234
984
951
1,389
1,740
1,781
1,983
2,390
2,893
4,356
5,998
6,950
8,203
8,821
8,922
8,655
8,536
9,254
9,937
10,520
10,515

1,790
1,727
1,609
2,064
2,187
2,221
2,267
2,360
2,425
2,609
3,226
4,144
5,211
5,797
6,006
6,087
6,255
6,302
6,777
7,502
7,997

9,241
9,255
9,248
9,220

6,481
6,556
6,693
6,639

10,018
10,248
10,255
10,515

7,794
7,854
7,815
7,997

9,198
9,176
9,106
9,045
9,001
9,049
8,989
8,977
9,054

6,844
6,667
6,500
6,903
6,991
6,981
7,190
7,574
7,610

10,540
10,138
9,922
10,190
10,045
10,087
10,310
10,257
10,463

7,995
8,071
8,175
8,234
8,306
8,428
8,444
8,501
8,555

Bank
rates on
short-term
b u sin e ss
loan s*

M e m b e r b a n k reserves a n d related It e m s 19
Reserve
bank
cre d it11
__

+
+
—

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

3.20
3.35
3.66
3.95
4.14

+
+
+
+

C o in a n d
C o m m e rc ia l T r e a su ry
cu rre n cy In
o p e ra tio n s12 o p e ra tio n s12 c ir c u la t io n 11

34
21
2
2
1
3
2
2
4
107
214
98
76
9
302
17
13
39
21
7
14

0
- 154
110
163
90
- 240
192
148
- 596
-1,980
-3,751
-3,534
-3,743
-1,607
- 510
+ 472
- 930
-1,141
-1,582
-1,912
-3,073

+
23
+ 154
+ 150
+ 219
+ 157
-1- 276
+ 245
+ 420
+1,000
+2,826
+4,486
+4,483
+4,682
+1,329
+ 698
- 482
+ 378
+1,198
+1,983
+2,265
+3,158

113
19
137
50

-

308
391
149
432

+
+
+
+

217
394
330
438

1
98
125
5
9
21
29
18
16

+
-

308
245
213
324
148
254
307
28
170

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

125
80
315
381
136
277
170
12
196

__

+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
—
—
—
—

+
+
+

Reserves

B a n k d e b its
1ndex
31 cities*« ”
(1 9 4 7 -4 9 100)*

6
48
18
14
3
20
31
96
227
643
708
789
545
326
206
209
65
14
189
132
39

175
147
185
287
549
565
584
754
930
1,232
1,462
1,706
2,033
2,094
2,202
2,420
1,924
2,026
2,269
2,514
2,551

42
28
18
25
32
29
30
32
39
48
60
66
72
86
95
103
102
115
132
140
150

4
7
23
26

2,425
2,449
2,476
2,551

149
142
149
158

86
2
29
7
36
15
3
7
8

2,468
2,398
2,413
2,477
2,432
2,413
2,308
2,317
2,368

146
153
158
150
143
157
145
154
152

1953
September
October
November
December

4.17
4.19

+
+
+

—

+
+

1954
January
February
M arch
April
M ay
June
July
August
September

4.12
.............

4.14

+
+
+
+
+
+

—
—
—

+
+
+
+
+

1 Adjusted for seasonal variation, except where indicated. Except for department store statistics, all indexes are based upon data from outside sources, as
follows: lumber, various lumber trade associations; petroleum, cement, copper, and lead, U .S. Bureau of Mines; wheat flour, U .S. Bureau of the Census;
electric power, Federal Power Commission; nonagricultural and manufacturing employment, U .S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and cooperating state agencies;
retail food prices, U .S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; carloadings, various railroads and railroad associations; and foreign trade, U.S. Bureau of the Census.
* Daily average.
* N ot adjusted for seasonal variation.
4 Excludes fish, fruit, and vegetable canning.
* Los Angeles, San Francisco, and
Seattle indexes combined.
6 Commercial cargo only, in physical volume, for Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Oregon, and Washington customs
districts; starting with July 1950, “ special category” exports are excluded because of security reasons.
7 Annual figures are as of end of year, monthly
figures as of last Wednesday in month or, where applicable, as of call report date.
* Demand deposits, excluding interbank and U .S. G ov’t deposits, less
cash items in process of collection. M onthly data partly estimated.
• Average rates on loans made in five major cities during the first 15 days of the month.
10 End of year and end of month figures.
11 Changes from end of previous month or year.
12 Minus sign indicates flow of funds out of the District in the
case of commercial operations, and excess of receipts over disbursements in the case of Treasury operations.
11 Debits to total deposits except interbank prior
to 1942. Debits to demand deposits except Federal Government and interbank deposits from 1942.
a — New revised series.
p — Preliminary.
r— Revised.