View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

F E D E RA L R E S E R V E BANK OF SAN F R A N C I S C O

M

O

N




T

H

L

Y

R

E

V

I

E

W

I N THI S I SSUE
Not With A Bang
In the Markets
The West at Midyear
At Western Banks

AUGUS T
7 965




Not With A Bang . . .
. . . Despite escalation in Vietnam , some observers still foresee a
possibility of the boom running out of steam.

In the Markets
. . . The spring quarter is featured by a turn of the screw of
monetary policy and an ebullient business demand for credit.

The West at Midyear
. . . The re gio n’s key export industry, aerospace m anufacturing,
shows improvement, but unemployment still nags.

At Western Banks
. . . District banks disp lay less credit growth than other banks
—but remain in a tighter liquidity position.

Editor: W illiam Burke

MONTHLY REVIEW

August 1965

Not W ith a Bang . . .
Professor Jam es T obin surveyed
ond quarter, but the quarterly gain in GN'P
was adm irable by all standards except those
the business scene at m idyear and, wax­
ing som ew hat poetic, concluded that the ex­ of the unsustainably fast-paced first quarter
pansion might very well end “ not with a bang
of 1965. T he nation’s total output increased
but a w him per.” In line with the thinking of
$9 billion, to a $65 8 -billion annual rate, in
his form er colleagues on the Council of Eco­
the A pril-June period. This gain, although
nom ic A dvisers, Professor T obin was here
falling below the $ 14-billion gain of the first
raising the possibility that the prolonged
quarter, approxim ated the average quarterly
gain of prosperous 1964. M oreover, the sec­
boom , instead of building up too m uch steam
under pressures of excess dem and, might
ond-quarter expansion was broadly based;
consum ption spending, business investm ent,
rather be endangered by running out of steam.
net export spending, and expenditures at
This thesis received some support during the
every level of governm ent, all contributed to
second quarter, as the nation’s growth rate
the increase.
slowed som ew hat, and it was given greater
weight for m any tape-w atchers by the lateThe gain in personal consum ption spend­
spring decline in the stock m arket. (A fter
ing would have been greater except for a de­
m idyear, on the other hand, the escalating
cline in auto purchases below the phenom enal
situation in V ietnam raised possibilities of
first-quarter pace. D uring the spring quarter,
another kind.)
unit sales of new dom estic cars approxim at­
ed 8V3 million, at a seasonally adjusted an­
Strong growth, b u t . . .
nual rate. This rate fell about 10 percent be­
T he growth rate of the national economy
low the first-quarter pace, bu t it exceeded the
adm ittedly did lag som ew hat during the sec-

Y

a l e

E x p a n s io n stim u la te d by fixed-investment boom,
plus continuing strength in autos and inventories
B illio n s

of

D o lla r s

S o u r c e ; D e p a r tm e n t o f C o m m e rc e




s tr o n g 1 9 6 4 sa le s
r a te b y a b o u t th e
same margin.
A g a in , b u s in e s s
spending for inven­
tories, substantial as
i t w a s d u r i n g th e
s p rin g q u a r te r ,
w o u ld p r o b a b l y
h a v e b e e n g re a te r
h a d th e s tr ik e hedge stockpiling of
steel consum ers and
th e p o s t-s trik e r e ­
b u i l d i n g o f a u to
dealers’ inventories
not been co n cen ­
trated so heavily in
earlier m onths.
W ith d e v e l o p -

143

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K OF S A N F R A N C I S C O

m ents of this type, the lagging growth rate
showed up not only in the G N P statistics but
in the production indexes as well. Industrial
production by m idyear was running about 3
percent above the la te -1964 level, mainly on
the basis of the first-half strength in electrical
and non-electrical m achinery. Production of
consum er goods, how ever, declined slightly
after reaching a peak in M arch. By way of
contrast, the index rose about 5 percent in
the second half of 1964, as production for all
m arkets increased in tandem at a relatively
rapid rate.
T he question at m idyear, then, was w heth­
er the econom y’s slower second-quarter pace
foreshadow ed a dying away of the boom or
w hether it simply represented a tem porary
readjustm ent of forces which would later p ro ­
vide the foundation for a further substantial
advance. T o answ er the question, m ost ana­
lysts are now closely exam ining each of the
several sectors which at one time o r another
have provided the m ain stimulus to the AV2 year-old expansion. These include defense
spending and residential construction, which
dom inated the scene in the early stages of the
boom , and auto spending and business fixed
investment and inventory spending, which
kept the expansion moving during the last
several years.

Defense, business spending up?

144

D efense spending, which strongly support­
ed the early stages of this business expansion
but later tapered off, may again be a rising
sector. (Spending in this area increased
roughly 20 percent between late 1960 and
m id -1962, at the time of the Berlin buildup.)
A lthough no one knows how m uch might
eventually be required because of the V iet­
nam ese crisis, the $ 1.7-billion supplem ental
appropriation request recently sent to C on­
gress effectively removes the $55-billion ceil­
ing m aintained on defense spending the last
several years. B ut the projected buildup
comes at a time when total Federal spend­




ing (a t 10 percent of G N P ) is at its low ­
est relative level of the past fifteen years.
Business fixed-investm ent spending, one of
the m ainstays of the m ore recent stages of the
current expansion, is expected to exceed
even the $62-billion annual rate recorded in
the second q uarter of this year. This spring’s
survey of business spending intentions indi­
cated a 5-percent second-half increase in new
plant-equipm ent spending, on top of the 4percent gain registered in the first half of
1965. The optim ism revealed in the M ay
spending survey was based partly on strong
business-sales expectations for the next sev­
eral years and partly on the growing belief
that present capacity is inadequate to m eet
forthcom ing dem ands. T he continuing fixedinvestm ent boom is also receiving support
from a rising carryover of spending plans; ex­
penditures intended for projects already u n ­
derway rose to alm ost $ 15 billion in the spring
quarter, or to about double the level of two
years ago.

Inventories, autos dow n?
A nother strong support of the recent ex­
pansion, inventory spending, appears m ore
of a questionm ark for the second half of the
year. Stockpiling, which began rising rapidly
in late 1964 on the basis of steel and auto de­
m and, may actually have reached its peak
during the January-M arch quarter. (T h e in­
crease in business inventories shifted from
$ 6 . 8 billion in that period to $5.7 billion in
the A pril-June q u arter.) Inventories of steel
consum ers increased roughly 50 percent in
the w inter and spring m onths, o r about as
much as they did in the strike-anticipation
periods of 1962 and 1963. T hus, with stock­
piling needs essentially fulfilled, steel produc­
tion dropped from about 87 percent of capac­
ity in late A pril to about 81 percent of ca­
pacity in late July. A t the sam e time, inven­
tories of auto retailers rose to an estim ated
1 Vi million cars by A ugust 1 .

August 1965

MONTHLY REVIEW

The residential-construction sector con­
tinued as a questionm ark at m idyear, although
spending for new housing (a t a $ 26-billion
annual rate) was som ew hat higher in the first
half of the year than in late 1964. New starts
and building perm its stayed near dead center
throughout early 1965; perm its for new single-family housing held at about 700,000 an­
nually, and m ulti-family perm its tended to
fall off from the 550,000 average of 1964. The
housing m arket thus showed few signs of an
early response to the dem ographic factors
which are expected to support the m arket
in the late 1960’s. M oreover, it showed little
indication of any further response to the rela­
tively stable cost and ready availability of
m ortgage financing— a m ajor bulw ark of the
housing m arket throughout this decade.
T he auto industry meanwhile, is now test­
ing its m arket to see how m uch m om entum
will carry over from its spectacular 1965 per­
form ance. A uto spending in the second qu ar­
ter dropped about $ 2 billion below the unsus­
tainable $28 Vi-billion first-quarter rate, but
the m ajor test still lies ahead. E ven D etroit’s
sales m anagers are uncertain that the 1966
models will be greeted with as m uch enthu­
siasm as the 19 6 5 ’s; nonetheless, the m ost pes­
simistic sales forecast now being quoted from
the auto capital would have been considered
wildly optim istic a year ago. Producers will
soon be com pleting their 1965 runs, leaving
retailers with stocks of perhaps IV 2 million
new cars in early A ugust. This figure undoubt­
edly is high, but it represents only a 44-day
supply at recent sales levels as com pared with
a 49-day supply at m odel-cleanup time last
year. M eanwhile, autom akers are looking for
future strength not only to the basic factors—
high consum er income, large num bers of new
drivers, high scrappage rates, easy credit
term s, and new -car price stability— but also
to the extra sales which m ay be stim ulated by
the recent excise-tax reduction.



Steel and other prices
F or some observers, the above adds up to
a definite w eakening of consum er a n d /o r
business dem and. B ut to those who argue that
the boom will soon run out of steam, others
reply that offsetting factors— such as escala­
tion in V ietnam — can easily spell overheat­
ing. The latter claim , in other words, that in­
flationary pressures of either the excess-dem and variety o r the wage-cost variety may be­
gin to develop in coming months.
C onsider the w age-cost side. T rue enough,
unit labor costs in m anufacturing were about
3 percent below the 1957-59 average through­
out the first half of the year, reflecting a
strong growth of productivity and a com para­
tive m oderation in labor-contract settlements.
But m anufacturers’ prices have been edging
up in some areas; wholesale prices of indus­
trial com m odities recently averaged about
IV 2 percent above m id -1964 levels, on the
basis of substantial gains in prices of gas fuels,
leather, and metals. (N onferrous-m etal prices
have gained 12 percent over the year.) M ean­
while, the overall wholesale price index has
been pushed up by a 7 V i-percent year-toyear gain in farm -product prices, highlighted
by a 25-percent gain in livestock prices.
T o reinforce the A dm inistration’s concern
over prices, the C ouncil of Econom ic Advisers
released in M ay some implicit guidelines for
current labor-contract negotiations in the steel
industry. In its study, the Council pointed out
that labor productivity in the industry in­
creased 3 percent a year in the 1957-1964 pe­
riod, and thereby im plied that the steelm akers
could absorb a 3-percent gain in labor costs
w ithout raising prices. T he study em phasized
that steel is a basic input for the economy,
since changes in steel prices generally force
businessm en to reconsider hundreds of other
prices. Accordingly, the Council concluded,
“A steel price increase is one of the two cost
changes m ost likely to upset the general sta-

145

FEDERAL RES E RVE B A N K OF S A N F R A N C I S C O

bility of industrial prices”— the other being
a rise in general basic wage rates greater than
gains in productivity.

M eaning of diffusion
W ith A dm inistration spokesm en showing
some w ariness of inflationary pressures bu t
even m ore wariness of pressures on the down
side, they are paying increased attention to
the statistical series th a t usually lead turns
in business activity. These series anticipate
future production and em ploym ent; some
foreshadow ing is involved, for exam ple, when
new orders are placed for m achinery and
equipm ent, w hen contracts are let for con­
structing new plant, and when investm ents are
m ade in m aterials inventories.
In recent m onths the 30-odd leading series
developed by the N ational B ureau of E co­
nomic R esearch have shown no definite m ove­
m ent, since roughly half of the series have
been m oving up and half have been trending
down. F u rth er inform ation may be gained,
however, by looking within some of these
leading series and exam ining the “ diffusion”
of changes am ong their com ponents. Diffu­
sion indexes, which m easure the breadth
o r scope of statistical change, express for

D iffu sio n in d e x e s support picture
of broad-based business expansion

, j ,
•4 o

N o t e : D iff u s io n in d e x e s sh o w f o r e a c h a g g re g a te s e rie s t h e p e r c e n ta g e o f a ll in d u s trie s w i th in t h a t s e rie s re c o rd in g in c re a s e s
S o u r c e : B u r e a u o f th e C e n s u s




a given aggregate series the percentage of all
industries within that series which have re­
corded increases over a given tim espan.
Every postw ar recession has been preceded
by an irregular decline of six m onths or so in
some of the key diffusion indexes, related to
new orders for durable goods, average weekly
hours in m anufacturing, stock m arket prices,
industrial m aterials prices, and other such
leading series. Since a prolonged decline of
this type has not occurred in recent m onths,
the m ore optim istic m em bers of the forecast­
ing fraternity thus see little evidence of the
boom running out of steam. (T hey w ould ad­
mit, of course, th at diffusion indexes should
be regarded only as shorthand m easures of
the fundam ental forces which determ ine eco­
nom ic activity.)

The means and the w ill
A ccording to the recent statem ents of the
Council of Econom ic Advisers, the A dm ini­
stration is well prepared to take appropriate
action should the early w arning signals fore­
shadow an im m inent decline. In C hairm an
A ckley’s words, “W e have the m eans and, I
believe the will to adjust either o r both sides
of the budget if th a t should be necessary in a
way which will contribute to the steady and
adequate expansion of private purchasing
pow er.” B ut in describing the likely direction
of policy, M r. Ackley recognized that changes
in defense spending in future m onths could
limit intended tax reductions or intended
spending on dom estic program s.
A dm inistration fiscal activity at m idyear
took the form of a $ 0 . 8 -billion retroactive
increase in social security benefits and a $ 1 . 8 billion excise-tax reduction, th e latter to be
followed by a reduction of like size next J a n ­
uary. T he im pact of these m easures of course
cannot be com pared to the im pact of last
y ear’s incom e-tax reduction, which exerted
not only a direct stimulus of about $ 7 Vi bil­
lion in 1964 and $9 billion in 1965 bu t also

August 1965

MONTHLY REVIEW

E x c is e -t a x cuts, social-security gains
presage late-1965 fiscal stimulus
B i l l i o n s of D o l l a r s

an indirect stimulus of several times that m ag­
nitude. Even apart from the relative size of

the recent as against the earlier fiscal stimulus,
doubts have arisen concerning the effective­
ness of these recent fiscal m easures as opposed
to an across-the-board tax reduction— doubts,
for exam ple, concerning w hether excise-tax
cuts would be passed along to consum ers in
the form of low er prices.
T he prelim inary report of an inter-agency
A dm inistration com m ittee, released in late
July, showed th at tax savings on autos and airconditioners generally were being passed on
to consum ers. But early returns were mixed
regarding the effectiveness of tax-cum -price
reductions in spurring the perhaps-jaded ap­
petites of those consum ers. N ot everyone
agreed with the com m ent of one culture-con­
scious retailer who delightedly reported that
“ pianos are going like crazy.”
William Burke

In the Markets
in the financial m arkets continued at a vigorous pace during the
second quarter, as businesses, consum ers, and
governm ents (particularly at the state and
local level) again increased their gross b o r­
rowings. O verall, the volum e of credit de­
m ands increased during the quarter, although
some shifts again occurred in the pattern of
credit and financial flows. M any observers
especially noted the stepped-up financing by
businesses in the bond and equity m arkets,
and the still substantial, albeit somewhat
slower, increase in business borrowing from
the com m ercial banks.
A c t iv it y

W all Streeters in particular noted the shift
in the investing public’s attitude tow ard the
stock m arket, where frenetic activity accom ­
panied a 10-percent decline in the Standard
and Poor index between m id-M ay and late
June. Though m uch less spectacular than



1962’s sharp break, the m arket decline, like
th at of three years ago, ran counter to the gen­
erally rising trend of econom ic activity and, not
surprisingly, generated a considerable am ount
of com m ent as to its causes. O ne suggested fac­
to r was the June 1 speech of F ederal Reserve
C hairm an M artin dealing with certain “dis­
quieting sim ilarities” between the present eco­
nom ic situation and that of the 1920’s. A l­
m ost unnoticed by the press were those pas­
sages in the speech dealing with the many, and
im portant, dissim ilarities with the 1920’s. T he
fact too, that the advent of the m arket decline
preceded C hairm an M artin ’s com ments by
tw o weeks also appeared to have escaped
general notice.

Turn of the screw
M eanwhile, m onetary policy assum ed a
som ew hat firmer tone during the spring
m onths. T he level of m em ber bank free re-

14 7

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF S A N F R A N C I S C O

serves— a very frequently consulted baro m ­
eter of the clim ate of policy— moved from an
average of $60 million of net free reserves to
an average level of $155 million of net b o r­
rowed reserves betw een the first and second
quarters. T he change in policy cam e against
the backdrop of a strong dem and for bank
accom m odation and a som ew hat paradoxical
decline of about 25 basis points betw een lateFebruary and late-June in the m arket yield on
9 1-day T reasury bills. T he policy shift, of
course, actually began in February, w hen a
package program was developed to correct
the nation’s balance-of-paym ents difficulties.

The fall in Treasury bill yields did not ex­
tend to the rem ainder of the T reasury list,
since the m arket return on coupon issues re­
m ained essentially unchanged from the begin­
ning of the year. Long-term rates on co rp o ­
rate and m unicipal bonds cam e under pres­
sure in June as the volum e of new issues, to ­
gether with com peting Federal agency issues,
com ing onto the m arket approached record
proportions. T he corporate and agency issues
m oved into investor hands after som e initial
congestion, and by early July this sector of
the long-term m arket showed increasing
strength. However, the municipal m arket con­
tinued w eaker into July, as prices were de­
pressed by large inventories of unsold issues.

To meet the burgeoning dem and for credit,
m em ber banks substantially reduced their
holdings of U. S. G overnm ent securities,
largely bills. Borrow ings from the Reserve
Banks rose by $130 million in the second
quarter, to an average level of about $500
million; in contrast, excess reserves fell only
$40 million in the quarter, to a level of $350
million. T hus, the m em ber banks supported
the increase in bank credit through a sell-off
of G overnm ents and through a greater re­
course to the discount window.

The m odest dim ensions of T reasury activi­
ty in the capital m arkets during the second
quarter contributed substantially to the over­
all stability of interest rates. A lthough the
T reasury ended fiscal 1965 with a deficit, it
had reason to be pleased with its financial p o ­
sition. O n a cash-budget basis the deficit was
roughly about $2.7 billion — a little m ore
than half the cash deficit for fiscal year 1964,
and $1.3 billion less
than had been p ro ­
B a n k s sh ift to n e t b o r r o w e d -r e s e r v e position
jected as recently as
as excess reserves fall and borrowings soar
last January. A $2M i l l i o n s o f D o lla r s
1000
billion reduction in
N»1 B o rro w e d R t n r v t l
d e fe n se o u tla y s ,
I I N e t Free R «»*rv»i
which offset m ost of
800
th e in c r e a s e d e x ­
penditures in other
areas, and a larger
600
than expected vol­
um e of re v e n u es
4 00
from individual in­
c o m e t a x e s , w e re
the principal factors
200
contributing to the
im provem ent — an
0 u I 1
1.1, 1.1 1 I I I I
I I I
L.U I. M . |>
I I
I| <
1
I
,1 I 1. 1 . 1 l i l J . I
I M
I
I,
I
I l,,J 11
im
provem ent which
I9 6 0
1961
I96Z
I96J
1964
1965
enabled the TreasS o u r c e : F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B o a r d
I I

148

Money in the til!




I I

I.

I

I II

III

I |) I

,1

I

I

I I

I I

I I|

I

II

August 1965

MONTHLY REVIEW

ury to start fiscal 1966 with a cash balance
of nearly $11.5 billion. This was the highest
level attained by the general fund since 1946,
and represented a gain of about $1.3 billion
over the T reasury’s cash position at the end
of June a year ago. F urtherm ore, the im prove­
m ent was accom panied, during the first half
of 1965, by a reduction of $0.8 billion in the
public debt, in contrast to a $ 2 .4-billion debt
increase during the corresponding period a
year ago. D uring both periods, the volume of
special securities issued to G overnm ent trust
accounts increased. On the other hand, publicheld m arketable debt declined far m ore rap ­
idly this year than last, and thereby contrib­
uted to the general steadiness in yields on
T reasury coupon issues and to the decline in
the bill rate.
In the state and local governm ent sector,
a further rise in spending during the second
quarter was again accom panied by an in­
crease in debt offerings. Prices softened under
the im pact of the new issues and rising inven­
tories in the hands of dealers. However, by
cutting prices on older issues in their inven­
tories, dealers during June m ade considerable
headw ay in reducing their holdings of unsold
securities (from about $900 to $750 m illion),
thereby minimizing upw ard pressures on
yields on the new issues coming onto the m ar­
ket. Consequently, yields on top-quality gencral-obligation bonds only rose a few basis
points above the level prevailing throughout
m ost of the quarter,

Private sector growth
F or their part, consum ers increased their
borrowings to help finance a rising level of
purchases, but they also increased, albeit
modestly, their personal saving. P art of the
saving increase took the form of increased
holdings of liquid assets, although these rose
at a m uch slower pace than during the first
quarter. Part of the saving gain also took the
form of stepped-up debt repaym ents. B ut in



M o n e y su p p ly in c re a se s s lo w ly
while time deposits grow rapidly
B i l l i o n * of D o l l o r i

S o u rc e : F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B o a rd

this connection, a strong rise in credit exten­
sions, bolstered by an exceptionally large in­
crease in personal loans during A pril (a p p a r­
ently for tax purposes) and by a continued
vigorous expansion in autom obile credit,
raised instalm ent debt outstanding by a solid
$2.3 billion (seasonally adjusted) during the
quarter.
But it was the business sector which again
accounted for the lion’s share of activity in the
nation’s credit m arkets. Business dem ands
were reflected in a continued vigorous pace
of borrow ing from banks, as loans rose by
$ 2 . 8 billion (seasonally ad ju sted ), or at an
18-percent annual rate. Business demands
were also reflected in a sharp rise in financing
in the bond and equity m arkets; at $4.5 bil­
lion, offerings for new capital, which included
issues totalling som ew hat over $500 million
by two New Y ork banks, far exceeded their
first-quarter volume. This developm ent con­
tributed to a slight increase in yields on topquality corporate bonds, from 4.42 percent in
M arch to 4.47 percent in June. On the other
hand, the rise in business borrowings from
banks was accom m odated at a slightly lower
average-interest cost, at least on short-term

149

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF S A N F R A N C I S C O

loans, although non-price term s of borrow ing
apparently firmed during the quarter.
T he continued strength of business credit
dem ands was understandable, in view of the
continuation of inventory accum ulation, the
financing of current and prospective increases
in fixed-investm ent outlays, and a growing
need for w orking capital to support expanded
operations. Some squeeze on liquidity may
also have been involved, although conclusive
evidence on th a t point is still lacking. T he
very sharp rise in business borrowings over
the June tax date reflected the speed-up in
corporate tax paym ents required under the
terms of the R evenue A ct of 1964. T he secondq u arter rise in borrow ings was accom panied
by another increase in negotiable certificates
of deposit; in fact, the $ 1 .3-billion increase
in these high-yielding certificates (m ost of
which are held by businesses) almost equalled
the first q u a rte r’s very strong gain.

Busy bankers

1 50

T he n atio n ’s com m ercial banks again occu­
pied a pivotal position in accom m odating the
n ation’s credit dem ands, as a $ 6 .7-billion gain
in bank credit (seasonally adjusted) fell only
slightly short of the first q u arter’s record $8.3billion increase. Business loans, as noted p re­
viously, again experienced a vigorous ad ­
vance, despite the reduced im portance of
several special factors which contributed to
the particularly strong first-quarter gain— fac­
tors such as the financing of goods held up
in transit d uring the dock strike, and the fi­
nancing of inventory accum ulation in antici­
pation of a steel strike. Similarly, net dis­
bursem ents under long-term bank loans to
foreigners, which exceeded $450 million d ur­
ing the first quarter, shifted to net repaym ents
of over $130 million in A pril and M ay, as
the credit-restraint program adopted to cope
with the balance-of-paym ents problem began
to take hold. N evertheless, 16 of 18 m ajor
industry groups increased their bank borrow -




B a n k s su p p o rt b o o m by expanding
loan and municipal security portfolios
Billions

of

Dollars

S o u r c e : F e d e r a l R e s e rv e B o a r d

ings during the second quarter, amply testi­
fying to the breadth as well as to the depth of
business loan dem and.
D em ands for bank credit from o ther sectors
of the econom y also continued strong. R eal
estate loans, with an increase of $ 1 billion,
m aintained their strong pace of the past year,
and thereby indicated a continued willingness
on the p art of the banks to com pete aggres­
sively with other lending institutions for a
larger share of a m ore slowly growing supply
of mortgages. C onsum er loans, with a gain
of over $ 1 billion, slightly exceeded their firstq u arter increase and considerably surpassed
their average quarterly gain of the 1962-64
period.
Portfolios of “other securities” (including
tax-exem pt issues) recorded a particularly
sharp $ 2 -billion rise, and gave fu rth er evi­
dence of the banks’ desire to place a substan­
tial portion of their loanable funds in stateand local-governm ent debt issues. B ut in the
second as in the first quarter, the banks helped
finance the growth in their loans and other
securities by a fairly substantial $ 2 -billion
liquidation of U. S. G overnm ent securities.
This action reduced one traditional m easure

August 1965

MONTHLY REVIEW

of liquidity, the ratio of portfolios of U. S.
G overnm ent securities m aturing within one
year to deposits, to a cyclical low. Similarly,
another (inverse) m easure of bank liquidity,
the ratio of bank loans to deposits, reached
its highest level of the post-w ar era.
T o tal bank deposits, with a $ 7 .3-billion
increase, grew m ore slowly than in the first
quarter, and the deposit mix also shifted
somewhat. U. S. G overnm ent deposits rose

by $ 2 . 6 billion as a reflection of the rising
levels of tax revenues. B ut a $ 3 .1-billion
growth in time and saving deposits was only
about half the size of the first-quarter gain.
(O n the other hand, com m ercial banks— un­
like their principal com petitors— recorded a
larger gain than in the year-ago p erio d .) P ri­
vate dem and deposits at the com m ercial
banks meanwhile increased $ 1 . 6 billion, al­
though the increase was centered in June.
Verle Johnston and Herbert Runyon

Foreign Investment
Copies are again available of the article, “ C an W e Afford to Invest A b ro ad ?” ,
which appeared in the Septem ber 1964 M onthly Review.
T he article provides a background analysis of the role of private capital flows in
the U. S. paym ents picture. The discussion includes definitions of different types of
private capital investm ents, the location of o ur investm ents abroad, the short- and
long-run im pact of private capital outflows on the balance of paym ents deficit, and
the implications of private capital exports.
Copies of the article are available on request from the A dm inistrative Service De­
partm ent, F ederal R eserve B ank of San Francisco, 400 Sansome Street, San F ran ­
cisco, C alifornia 94120.




151

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF S A N

FRANCISCO

The W est at M idyear
like the rest of the nation, re­
corded a slower growth rate in the second
q uarter of 1965 than it did earlier in the year.
H ere as elsewhere, nonfarm em ploym ent in­
creased roughly Vi percent in the A pril-June
period, as com pared with a 1 -percent gain in
the preceding quarter. A t the sam e time, the
unem ploym ent rate rose slightly in Twelfth
District states, while continuing to decline
elsewhere in the nation.

T

he

W est,

U nem ploym ent thus has rem ained a nag­
ging problem in the W est— at least in Cali­
fornia— even in the face of a sustained cyclical
expansion. In the first two quarters of the year,
the unem ploym ent rate in C alifornia averaged
5.9 percent— close to the average of the
1963-64 period. By way of contrast, the jo b ­
less rate in other D istrict states declined from
5.4 to 5.0 percent between 1964 and the
first half of 1965, and the jobless rate else­
w here in the nation dropped from 5.1 to 4.7
percent in the sam e period.

Aerospace off the ground?
By m idyear, nonetheless, some im prove­
m ent was visible in the region’s key export
industry, aerospace m anufacturing— the in­
dustry which had been largely responsible for
the unsatisfactory growth rate of the past two
years. D istrict aerospace firms during the sec­
ond q u arter increased their em ploym ent to
about 550,000. This increase, although only
a slight advance over the first-quarter level,
represented the first quarter-to-quarter gain
since em ploym ent peaked at 640,000 in late
1962. M uch of the im provem ent was due to
increased orders for com m ercial jet produc­
tion at C alifornia and W ashington firms.

152

Hopes for a continued rise in aerospace em ­
ploym ent increased, meanwhile, because of
recent significant gains in defense and space
agency contract awards. In the A pril-June




period, for exam ple, D istrict firms received
$ 1 . 6 billion in defense procurem ent aw ards,
as com pared with a $ 1.3-billion total in the
year-ago period. A nd the supplem ental ap­
propriation request sent to Congress in early
A ugust suggested even further gains, although
increased spending for helicopters, fighter air­
craft, and other conventional w eapons m ay
be offset by cutbacks in spending for ex tra­
terrestrial vehicles.

Construction mixed
T he D istrict’s construction industry p re­
sented a mixed picture during the second
quarter. C ontract aw ards, at $2.2 billion, were
8 percent below the first-quarter level, bu t
m ost of the decline could be traced to a d ro p ­
off from early 1965’s unsustainably high level
of heavy construction. R esidential construc­
tion aw ards were relatively stable during the
A pril-June period, and nonresidential build­
ing continued strongly upw ards.
H ousing starts, during the second as d u r­
ing the first quarter, held stable at about a
310,000 annual average. B ut the num ber of
residential building perm its trended down-

U n e m p lo y m e n t rate remains high
in California, but improves elsewhere
Percent Unemployed

0

10

20

30
CALIFORNIA

S o u r c e : S ta te r e p o r tin g a g e n c ie s

40

50

60

August 1965

MONTHLY REVIEW

wards during the quarter; although this did
not necessarily portend a further decline in
construction volume, it threw a dash of cold
w ater on hopes for a bounceback to early1964 housing levels.
N onresidential building, meanwhile, in ­
creased by 1 0 percent over the first-quarter
figure. Store awards were up sharply, just as
in the rest of the nation. B ut industrial awards,
which have supplied m uch of the steam be­
hind the national construction boom , rose
only m odestly in the W est, and educational
building also lagged the national pace.
A round m idyear, construction work at C al­
ifornia sites was disrupted by a num ber of
labor contract disputes. T he longest and most
extensive strikes were called by painters in
N orthern C alifornia and by operating engi­
neers in Southern California. Settlements to
date have resulted in fairly substantial in­
creases in wages and fringe benefits.

Rising farm prices
The D istrict farm sector reported signifi­
cant gains in receipts throughout the first half
of the year. C rop and livestock m arketings
both rose, and thereby contributed to a 3percent year-to-year gain in receipts— a gain
in line with the national increase.
Farm ers found their price situation quite
favorable at m idyear. A lm ost w ithout excep­
tion, commercial vegetable producers report­
ed considerably higher prices in June than in
last year’s m arketing season, and m eat and
poultry producers also reported higher prices.
W heat prices trended dow nw ards, however,
because of a change in the technique for sup­
porting wheat prices.
T he biggest price news cam e from the live­
stock sector. Prices received by D istrict farm ­
ers, particularly for m eat animals, strength­
ened considerably during the second quarter.
The prices received for fed beef advanced
som ew hat m ore than the cost of animals en­
tering feedlots, and this increase in price



W e s t e r n construction activity sags
because of year-long housing decline
M illions

of

D ollars

spread contributed to a rapid increase in the
num ber of cattle on feed. A t m idyear, a rec­
ord num ber of cattle were being fattened in
W estern feedlots for this time of the year.
On the other hand, crop production pros­
pects were som ew hat w eaker at m idyear.
Crop production in 1965, according to the
m idyear report of the U. S. D epartm ent of
A griculture, should fall below 1964 levels.
The wheat crop may increase, but cotton out­
put should decline. D eciduous fruit produc­
tion should drop as a result of last w inter’s
freeze in im portant producing areas, and to ­
m ato production may fall off substantially.
The labor supply in C alifornia was reported
generally adequate at m idyear, after six
m onths of experience with rigid restrictions
on the use of alien farm labor. In the latter
part of June, only about 1,500 foreign w ork­
ers were w orking on C alifornia farms, p ri­
marily in the straw berry and asparagus fields.
By way of contrast, about 36,000 of these
braceros were em ployed at the same stage of
the growing season last year. N onetheless, the
m ajor test of the adequacy of supply of do­
mestic labor is yet to come. The seasonal
peak in farm -labor requirem ents should oc­
cur in early Septem ber, and a potential short­
age at th at time could be accentuated by the
return to school of the young seasonal w ork­
ers who have been em ployed this sum m er.

]5 3

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF S A N

M aterials producers gain
W estern lum ber producers reported disap­
pointing results in the spring quarter. D espite
good construction w eather in m ost m ajor
m arkets, a hoped-for upsurge in orders failed
to m aterialize and prices rem ained relatively
low. Soft spots in the lum ber m arket centered
along the E ast C oast, where heavy inventories
continued to retard new business, and in the
Los Angeles area, w here a severe decline in
apartm ent building depressed dem and. In
addition, a shortage of railroad cars seriously
interrupted shipping schedules to all destina­
tions. A fter m idyear, however, lum ber and
plywood m arkets strengthened considerably,
on the basis of G overnm ent and construction
dem and.
W estern steel mills turned out a record
am ount of steel during the second quarter.
O utput continued strong, even after the M ay
1 postponem ent of a nationw ide steel-strike
deadline took some of the frantic pressure off
the m arket. T he D istrict industry’s perform ­
ance was based prim arily on the W est’s
strong pace of heavy construction and to a
m uch sm aller degree on the type of inven­
tory accum ulation th a t has stim ulated p ro­
duction elsewhere. W estern mills thus do not
anticipate severe declines in stockpile de­
m and, such as m ay face other mills in the
event of a prom pt settlem ent of steel labor
negotiations.

154

T he D istrict’s alum inum industry also re­
ported a high level of dem and in the A prilJune period. M ajor alum inum com panies in
m id-M ay posted increases of from 2 to 3 cents
a pound on prices of soft alloy extrusions,
and producers then raised prices 1 cent a
pound on m ost fabricated products im m edi­
ately after a new labor contract was signed
at the end of that m onth. T he industry appears
confident of its ability to m ake these price in­
creases stick— unlike last year, when announced increases were rendered ineffective




FRANCISCO

by com petitive pressures arising from excess
capacity conditions.
O ther m etal m arkets also rem ained very
strong during the spring quarter. Pressures
on copper prices, which were reflected in
early M ay’s 2-cent increase (to 36 cents a
p o u n d ) in refined copper prices, w ere sub­
sequently relieved by the release of 1 0 0 , 0 0 0
tons from G overnm ent copper stockpiles. The
sale brought about a sharp reduction in p re­
mium prices on the dealer and exchange m ar­
kets, but the producer price rem ained firm.
T he 75,000 tons of zinc released from G ov­
ernm ent stockpiles also found ready purchas­
ers, bu t consum ers purchased only one-third
of the 60,000 tons of lead offered at the same
tim e. W estern silver producers, m eanwhile,
lam ented the fact th at a run-up in silver prices
was practically precluded by the G overn­
m ent’s action in reducing the use of silver in
the n ation’s coinage.
A reversal of the dow nw ard trend in W est­
ern crude-oil output appears assured this year
because of a com bination of m ore intensive
secondary recovery efforts and of increased
supplies from new fields. Since heavier do­
mestic supplies are now anticipated, licensed
im port quotas for the second half of 1965
have been reduced by 67,000 barrels p er day
from the first-half quota. M eanw hile, W est­
ern refiners are spending substantial sums for
new facilities and for the m odification of exist­
ing facilities, in response to the continued
grow th in overall dem and for petroleum
products and to the rapidly changing struc­
ture of dem and for such products. Industry
sources estim ate the value of construction
projects now underw ay at C alifornia refin­
eries at $365 million, considerably above the
year-ago figure.

Underpinning for retailers
In general, W estern farm ers, m iners, and
other prim ary producers benefited strongly
from the cyclically expanding dem and for

August 1965

MONTHLY REVIEW

materials during the first half of the year. At
the same time, the crucial aerospace and hous­
ing industries saw some signs of an end to the
recent softness in their markets.
The resultant increase in employment and
income provided the underpinning for con­
tinued gains in retail sales throughout the
District. Overall, sales during the spring quar­

ter rose about 7 percent above the levels pre­
vailing during the tax-cut period of last spring.
Some retailers reported declines, however. In
particular, apparel stores and furniture-appliance stores both suffered sales decreases of at
least 5 percent below year-ago levels. But auto
dealers, here as elsewhere, recorded a substan­
tial (16 percent) year-to-year gain in sales.
—- Regional Staff

At Western Banks
ceeding three-m onth period. In the time-anddem and for credit which
characterized the national banking scene
savings category, the $496-million secondduring the second quarter was much less evi­ quarter increase was about 25 percent smaller
than the inflow recorded in the first quarter,
dent at the regional level. In fact, a $506-milwhen the higher interest rates paid on such
lion loan increase at Twelfth District member
deposits had their greatest initial impact.
banks was little m ore than half as great as
the contra-seasonal rise recorded in the first
For each of these deposit categories, the
quarter of 1965, while nationally, the secondtotal first-half increase was somewhat greater
quarter increase almost m atched the record
than the gain recorded in January-June 1964.
first-quarter gain. On the other hand, District
Nonetheless, the composition of interest-bear­
banks invested in municipal and Federal
ing deposits shifted somewhat between these
Agency securities at more than double the
two periods. Savings deposits increased twice
national rate, as they had during the first three
as fast in the first half of 1965 than in the
months of the year. Consequently, an $852com parable period of 1964, but negotiable
million net investment in “other” securities
time certificates of deposit grew only half as
in the first six months of 1965 more than
fast as in the earlier period. Since February,
offset a $482-million reduction in holdings of
U. S. Governm ent securities (all series sea­
Liq u id ity p o sitio n s remain tight,
sonally adjusted).

T

h e

s tr o n g

especially for District banks

Although District banks displayed less
credit growth than other banks, they remained
in a tighter liquidity position than banks na­
tionally, as measured by either the ratio of
loans to deposits or the ratio of short-term
Governments to deposits. Thus, District
banks may simply have had less flexibility
than other banks in expanding their loan port­
folios.
A fter posting a $264-miIlion increase in
demand deposits adjusted in the first quar­
ter of the year, District banks gained only
$95 million more in such deposits in the suc­



S o u rc e : F e d e ra l R e se rv e B o a r d ;
F ra n c is c o

F e d e ra l R ese rv e B a n k of San

155

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF S A N F R A N C I S C O

District banks have not competed aggressively
with New Y ork banks for large-denomination
C D ’s. But the large New Y ork banks which
have recently increased their capital stock
may now become less interested in issuing
C D ’s and may thus remove some of the up­
ward pressure on rates. In that case, District
banks might assume a more prom inent role in
the market.

Business dominates demand
In line with the early-1965 pattern, the
business sector accounted for almost half the
second-quarter loan expansion. But the $ 300million gain 1 in business borrowing at District
weekly reporting member banks fell some­
what short of the increase recorded in the
com parable period of 1964, despite heavy
m id-June tax borrowing by corporations with
increased liabilities under the stepped-up cor­
porate tax schedule. The District business
loan gain also fell short of the increase record­
ed at weekly reporting banks elsewhere, pri­
marily because of the very strong business
dem and for credit at the New York money
m arket banks.
District business borrowing was widely
based during the A pril-June quarter, just as
in the rest of the nation. Public utilities ac­
counted for the largest proportion of total
borrowing, reversing their first-quarter p at­
tern of net repayments. Meanwhile, petroleum
industry borrowing continued heavier than
last year, reflecting the very large 1965 con­
struction program of California refineries.
Food, liquor, and tobacco processors made
large net repaym ents in the second quarter,
partly because repayments normally made
earlier in the year were limited by the firstquarter dock strike. Bankers acceptances, also
influenced by the dock strike, showed a de­
cline in the A pril-June period. But other m a­
jor borrowing categories were on the plus
side.
. _ ,
I -->0

‘D a t a fo r w e e k ly re p o rtin g m e m b e r b a n k s a r e n o t se a s o n a lly
a d ju s te d .




While loans continued to expand, the cost
of short-term business borrowing dropped 6
basis points below the first-quarter average to
5.05 percent in the early-June survey period.
The decline in average interest cost was due to
an increase in the dollar volume of loans made
at the 4 ]/ 2 -percent rate available to borrowers
with prime credit ratings. But rates on smaller
loan-size categories (under $500,000) were
higher in June than in other recent survey
periods. In addition, the spread continued to
widen between the average rate paid by b o r­
rowers with formal or informal lines of credit
and borrowers without established credit lines.
Thus, the survey results partially supported
other evidence regarding the firming of price
and non-price terms of lending in recent
months.

Other shifts in assets
In the first half of 1965, mortgage portfo­
lios of District weekly reporting banks fell

Business, co n su m e r loans increase
along with municipal security holdings

S o u rc e : F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B a n k of S an F r a n c is c o

MONTHLY REVIEW

August 1965

S E L E C T E D B A L A N C E S H E E T IT E M S O F W E E K L Y R E P O R T IN G
M E M B E R B A N K S IN L E A D IN G C IT IE S
( d o lla r a m o u n t s in m il li o n s )

T w e lf th D i s t r i c t

U. S . M i n u s T w e lfth D i s t r i c t

Net chan ge
O u t s t a n d in g
6 /3 0 /6 5

ASSETS
Loans adjusted and investments1
Loans adjusted1
Commercial and industrial loans
Real estate loans
Agricultural loans
Loans to nonbank financial institutions
Loans for purchasing & carrying securities
Loans to foreign banks
Other loans (mainly consumer)
Total Securities
U. S. Government securities
Other securities
LIABILITIES
Demand deposits adjusted
Total time and savings deposits
Savings
Other time

S e c o n d Q u a r te r 1 9 6 5
D o ll a r s
P e rce n t

2 n d Q tr.
1964
P ercen t

O u t s t a n d in g
6 /3 0 /6 5

$33,431
24,087
8,154
7,7 )2
1,048
1,634
435
32 0
5,190
9,344
4,880
4,464

+
+
+
+
+
+
_
—
+
+
—
+

781
674
300
143
48
83
76
10
202
107
29 6
403

+ 2.39
+ 2.88
+ 3.82
+ 1.89
+ 4.80
+ 5.35
— 14.87
— 3.03
+ 4.05
+ 1.16
— 5.72
+ 9.92

+
+
+
+
+
+
—
+
+
—
—
+

2.71
4.13
5.16
1.63
8.76
4.62
4.66
4.56
6.25
0.57
3.27
3.71

$1 25,0 07
86,839
38 ,690
13,437
558
8,197
6,983
1,257
19,617
38,168
19,374
18,794

12,215
19,968
14,458
5,510

—
+
+
+

128
572
137
43 5

—
+
+
+

—
+
—
+

0.97
1.92
0.08
8.58

51,592
53,848
28,669
25,179

1.04
2.95
0.96
8.57

Net ch an ge
2 n d Qtr.
2 n d Qtr.
1 9 65
1964
P ercen t
P e rce n t

+ 4.77
+ 6.68
+ 5.23
+ 5.33
+ 2.95
+ 11.58
+ 17.60
+ 1.05
+ 4.81
+ 0.67
— 2.10
+ 3.70

+ 3.26
+ 4.44
+ 0.40
+ 4.08
— 1.75
+ 9.48
+ 15.73
+ 11.26
+ 5.88
+ 1.02
— 0.31
+ 2.79

+
+
+
+

+
+
+
+

1.04
4.07
2.38
6.05

0.50
3.02
1.42
5.19

1 E x c lu s iv e o f lo a n s t o d o m e stic c o m m e rc ia l b a n k s a n d a f te r d e d u c tio n of v a lu a tio n re s e rv e s ; in d iv id u a l lo a n ite m s a re sh o w n gross.
N o te : Q u a rte rly c h a n g e s a re c o m p u te d fr o m M a r c h 3 1 , 1965 - J u n e 3 0 , 1965 a n d fro m A p ril 1, 1964 - J u l y 1, 1964.
S o u rc e : B o a rd o f G o v e rn o rs o f th e F e d e ra l R e se rv e S y s te m ; F e d e ra l R ese rv e B a n k o f S an F ra n c is c o .

below their outstanding business loans for the
first time since mid-1962. Nonetheless, the
second quarter witnessed a reversal of the
recent deceleration in the rate of expansion of
mortgage loans. Real estate loans rose $143
million during the quarter, after increasing
only nominally in the first three months of the
year. Thus, the heavy tim e-deposit inflow of
early 1965 apparently has triggered renewed
interest in mortgage financing on the part of
District banks. A nd since the ratio of real
estate loans to savings deposits at midyear—
53 percent— was lower than the year-ago
figure, District banks may have room for fur­
ther expansion of their mortgage holdings,
despite the continued aggressive competition
for mortgages from nonbank institutions.
District consumers continued to rely heavi­
ly on bank credit to finance the endless stream
of cars moving from the assembly lines to the
highways, and thus they helped to accelerate
the already fast pace of consumer lending dur­



ing the spring quarter. (T hroughout the year
to date, auto financing has accounted for just
about 50 percent of extensions of consumer
credit.) The total first-half increase in con­
sumer loans was nearly double the gain for
January-June 1964.
N on-bank financial institutions increased
their debt at District banks by $83 million
during the second quarter. Sales finance com­
panies borrowed heavily during the two weeks
preceding the June tax date, and then, follow­
ing the usual pattern, made large repayments
in the following weeks.
Average borrowings by brokers and dealers
were higher during the second quarter than in
any other quarter of the current business ex­
pansion. In recent months District banks fi­
nanced a significant proportion of their loans
to G overnm ent securities dealers by purchas­
ing Federal funds (m em ber-bank excess re­
serves on deposit with the Federal Reserve)
from other banks and reselling those funds to

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K OF S A N F R A N C I S C O

dealers, so as to take advantage of the higher
dealer buy rates. Increased time-deposit in­
terest costs have made banks particularly alert
to situations of this type, with their possibili­
ties for arbitrage.

Discounting increases
Twelfth D istrict banks operated under
greater reserve pressure during the second
quarter, as did their counterparts in the rest
of the nation. Borrowings at the Federal R e­
serve discount window were $63 million on a
daily average basis, com pared with $14 mil­
lion during the first quarter of the year. And
along with the increase in the dollar volume
of borrowing went an increase in the num ber
of banks resorting to the discount window.
Discounts exceeded excess reserves on a daily
average basis throughout the quarter; the re­
sult was net average borrowed reserves of $37
million for the A pril-June period, in contrast
to net free reserves of $17 million during the
preceding quarter.
In addition, D istrict banks were net pur­

chasers of Federal funds on interbank trans­
actions, except for the first three weeks in
April. However, some of the m ore active netpurchase banks in the interbank Federal funds
m arket were not using these funds to bolster
their reserve position but, rather, were resell­
ing the funds to G overnm ent securities deal­
ers at higher rates. As indicated above, such
arbitraging activity intensified during recent
months.
A t midyear, D istrict banks generally were
lagging behind the gains in earnings reported
by banks elsewhere in the country. M oreover,
net earnings per share at many m ajor District
banks were generally lower than in the first
half of 1964, despite wide variation among
individual banks. But, on a m ore optimistic
note, earnings improved between the first and
second quarters, as the initial effects of high­
er interest costs on time and savings deposits
were offset by earnings from expanding loan
volume and increased investment in taxexempt securities.
— Ruth Wilson

Publication Staff: Ray Mansfield, Chartist; Phyllis Culbertson, Editorial Assistant.
Single and group subscriptions to the M o n th ly R eview are available on request from the A dm in­
istrative Service Departm ent, Federal Reserve Bank o f San Francisco, 400 Sansome Street,
San Francisco, California 94120.

158



MONTHLY REVIEW

August 1965

Condition items of all Member Banks — Twelfth District and Other U. S.

S o u rc e : F e d e ra l R e s e rv e B a n k o f S a n F r a n c is c o . ( E n d - o f - q u a r te r d a ta sh o w n th r o u g h 1 9 6 2 , a n d e n d -o f- m o n th d a ta th e r e a f te r : d a ta n o t
a d ju s te d o r se a so n a l v a r ia tio n .)

B A N K IN G A N D CREDIT STATISTICS A N D BUSINESS INDEXES—TWELFTH DISTRICT1*
(In d e x e s : 1957-1959 = 100. D o lla r a m o u n ts in m illio n s of d o lla rs)

C o n d ition ite m s o f a ll m e m b e r b a n k s 1
S e a so n a lly A d ju ste d
Y ear
and
M o n th

Leans
and
d isc o u n ts5

U .S .
G o v ’t.
se cu ritie s

Dem and
d e p o sits
a d ju ste d 1

T o ta l
tim e
d e p o sits

B a n k rates
Bank
on
short-term
d e b its
In d e x
b u s in e s s
31 citie s5, 6 1 o a n s?, 8

1952
1953
1954
1955
1958
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964

8,712
9,090
9,264
10,816
12,307
12,845
13,441
15,908
16,612
17,839
20,344
22,915
25,581

6,477
6,584
7,827
7,181
6,269
6,475
7,872
6,514
6,755
7,997
7,299
6,622
6,492

10,052
10,110
10,174
11,386
11.580
11,384
12,472
12,799
12,498
13,527
13,783
14,125
14,450

7,513
7,994
8,689
9,093
9,356
10.530
12.087
12,502
13,113
15,207
17,248
19,057
21,300

59
69
71
80
88
94
96
109
117
125
141
157
169

1964
M ay
Ju n e
Ju ly
A ugust
S ep tem b er
O ctober
N ovem ber
D ecem ber

24,126
24.443
24,912
24,965
25,282
25.165
25,339
25.561

6,493
6,380
6.161
6,212
6,480
6,519
6,685
6,492

14,199
14,376
14,369
14,377
14,689
14,587
14,503
14,450

19,813
19,896
20,152
20.235
20,473
20,602
20,792
21,300

168r
169r
168r
172r
167r
170r
172r
168r

25,853
26,120
26,539
26.525
26,755
27,059

6,337
6,659
6,538
6,212
6.183
6,010

14,430
14,453
14,714
14,405
14,365
14.832

21,689
21.878
21,996
22,184
22,211
22.492

179
176
181
180
182
168

1965
Ja n u a ry
Feb ru ary
M arch
April
M ay
Jun e

3.95
4.14
4.09
4.10
4.50
4.97
4.88
5.36
5.62
5.46
5.50
5.48
5.48

5.46
5.51
5,48

5.44
5.46

In d u s tr ia l production
(p h y sic a l v o lu m e )6

T o ta l
n o n a g r icu ltu ra 1
e m p lo y ­
m ent

D e p 't.
sto re
s a le s
(v a lu e )8

84
86
85
90
95
98
98
104
106
108
113
117
120

73
74
74
82
91
93
98
109
110
115
123
129
139

101
102
101
107
104
93
98
109
98
95
98
103
109

90
95
92
96
100
103
96
101
104
108
111
112
115

92
105
85
102
109
114
94
92
102
111
100
117
132p

119
119
119
120
120
121
121
122

139
137
141
143
137
139
150
142

106
105
113
107
108
111
106
106

112
114
115
118
121
117
113
115

139
131
121p
121p
129p
132p
149p
140p

122
123
123
123
124
124

151
146
140
134
146

110
109
119
101
103

116
117
119
120
122

137 p
142p
150p
149 p
147 p
147p

Lum ber

R e fin e d *
P etroleu m

S te e l*

1 A djusted for seasonal v ariatio n , except where in d icated . Except for banking a n d credit and d e p a rtm e n t store statistic s, all indexes are based upon d a ta
fro m outside sources, as follows: lum ber, N a tio n a l L um ber M an u fac tu re rs' A ssociation, W est C o ast L um berm an's A ssociation, an d W estern Pine Asso­
c iatio n ; petroleum , U.S. B ureau o f M ines; steel, U.S. D e p artm e n t of Com m erce a n d A m erican Iron and Steel In s titu te ; nonagricultural em ploym ent,
U .S. B ureau of L ab o r S ta tistic s a n d cooperating s ta te agencies.
2 Figures as of la s t W ednesday in year or m o n th .
! T o ta l loans, less
valu atio n reserves, an d a d ju sted to exclude in te rb a n k loans.
4 T o ta l d em an d deposits less U.S. G overnm ent deposits a n d in te rb a n k deposits, a n d
[ess cash item si n process of collections.
5 D ebits to dem and deposits of individuals, p a rtn e rsh ip s, a n d corporations a n d states and political
subdivisions. D ebits to to ta l deposits except in te rb a n k prior 1942.
6 D aily average,
7 Average ra te s on loans m ade in five m ajor
c itie s, w eighted b y loan size categ o ry .
8 N o t ad ju sted for seasonal v a ria tio n .
'B a n k in g d a ta have been revised using up d ated seasonal factors.
M o n th ly d a ta from 1948 available on re q u e st from th e R esearch D e p artm e n t of this B an k .
p — Prelim inary.
r —R evised.




159