View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY REVIEW
B U S IN E S S

C O N D IT IO N S

IN

T H E

T W E L F T H

F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E

D IS T R IC T

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
R e v ie w o f th e M o n t h
Settlement of the maritime strike early in February
was followed by a rapid expansion in water-borne
commerce. By mid-March practically every available
ship was in service and maritime shipments were at
a higher level than in the period immediately pre­
ceding the strike. Notwithstanding the resumption
of maritime shipments, rail traffic, which had been
enlarged during November, December, and January
by the diversion of shipments normally m oving by
water, increased by almost the full seasonal amount
in February. W ith the restoration of shipments by
water and the release of cargoes held in Pacific
Coast ports during the strike, there was a marked
advance in industrial output, particularly at lumber
and flour mills and at cane sugar refineries. These
gains were only partly offset by decreases in pro­
duction resulting from labor disputes in several
industries, including automobile assembly and air­
plane fabrication. Residential building activity de­
creased less than is customary in February, but the
value of permits for private nonresidential building
was sharply curtailed. Department store sales in­
creased less than is customary during February.
Increased industrial output during February re­
sulted largely from a greater than seasonal expan­
sion in lumber production. This advance, which
raised the seasonally adjusted index of lumber out­
put approximately 7 percent, resulted entirely from
expansion in the Douglas fir region where produc­
tion was seriously curtailed during the period of
the maritime workers’ strike. Follow ing the re­
sumption of maritime commerce in early February,
production increased rapidly and in the second
week of March was 47 percent larger than the
January weekly average, and only about 8 percent
smaller than the weekly average last October. L og
shortages and limited shipping space checked fur­
ther expansion. Outside the Douglas fir region lum­
ber production, which, on a seasonally adjusted
basis, had averaged about as high in November,
December, and January as in 1929, advanced less
than is customary in February.
Resumption of maritime commerce also contrib­
uted directly to substantial gains in flour and sugar
production in February. Reflecting expansion at
seaboard mills, the seasonally adjusted index of
wheat flour production increased 28 percent. The
release of raw sugar from strike-bound vessels in
San Francisco enabled local refineries to resume
operations and by the middle of the month daily
output had increased to pre-strike levels.
Expansion in production during February was
accompanied by an increase of 3 percent in indus­




April i, 19 37
trial employment, a development only partly at­
tributable to seasonal influences. Estimates indicate
that about 424,000 workers were on the pay rolls of
manufacturers in the three Pacific Coast states in
February, a slightly larger figure than in the corre­
sponding month of 1929. Factory pay rolls advanced
sharply last month but still were estimated to be
15 percent lower than in February 1929. During the
past year, pay rolls have increased somewhat more
rapidly than employment, a development reflecting
increases in both working time and wage rates.
New private construction activity continued to
decline in February. The value of permits for stores,
office buildings, service stations, and other private
nonresidential buildings in twenty large cities was
40 percent smaller than in January and 48 percent
smaller than the high figure for the recovery period
recorded in October 1936. A small decline in resi­
dential building reflected entirely the smaller num­
ber of working days in February.
The snow pack this winter has been heavy and
irrigation water is expected to be adequate during
the forthcoming crop season, a factor of major sig­
nificance in the outlook for agricultural production
in the Twelfth District. W et, cold weather has de­
layed soil preparation and planting in some sections,
and growth of forage on livestock ranges has been
retarded. As a result of late rains, however, spring
and summer range feed is expected to be plentiful.
A

creage—

S

p r in g

S

o w n

C

rops—

T

w e lfth

(000 omitted)
,--------Acreage Harvested-------■>
Average
1928-1932
1935
1936
Corn, A l l ..........................
269
234
246
1,368
2,225
Spring W h ea t.................. 1,894
Oats ..................................
682
856
814
Barley .............................. 1,430
1,566
1,389
Tame H a y ........................ 5,521
5,421
5,231
117
190
159
Grain Sorghum s..............
Beans ................................
459
458
461
Rice ..................................
114
99
140
Potatoes............................
256
260
260

D

is t r ic t

Indicated for
Harvest-1937
247
2,430
757
1,353
5,322
184
516
147
288

According to the United States Department of
Agriculture, somewhat larger acreage of most
Twelfth District crops will be harvested this year
than last. This forecast is based upon farmers’ in­
tentions to plant as of March 1, with allowance for
ordinary abandonment.
B a n k C r ed it

Twelfth District banks met that part of the in­
crease in reserve requirements ordered by the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to
become effective March 1 without borrowing and
without material liquidation of earning assets.
Some adjustments were made by banks to meet
this increase, which amounted to almost $60,000,000

14

April 1, 1937

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SAN FRANCISCO

and which established a new level of about
$410,000,000 for required reserves. These adjust­
ments were effected over a period of several weeks,
however, and there were no sharp changes at the
end of February. Country banks withdrew some of
the idle balances they had carried with Twelfth
District city correspondents, transferring them to
the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Simi­
larly, city banks withdrew comparatively small
amounts of balances from New York correspondents
and deposited them in the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco.
Although the amount of reserves that member
banks are required to carry with the Federal R e­
serve Bank of San Francisco was increased 16%
percent on March 1 by the Board’s order, the
amount actually carried showed but a minor rise.
Banks in the aggregate had been carrying reserves
sufficiently in excess of the legal amounts to enable
them to meet the new requirements with a large
margin, and thus did not find it necessary to bring
about an increase in their reserves through borrow ­
ing or liquidating earning assets. Other influences
which might have added to or reduced the supply
of district bank reserves caused relatively little net
change during February. Unusually small amounts
of funds were furnished by the United States Treas­
ury, which, through disbursing more than it has
collected in the Tw elfth District, has been the prin­
cipal source of additional reserves in recent years.
Such amounts as did enter district banks during
February because of Treasury disbursements in ex­
cess of local collections, as well as small amounts
of currency redeposited in banks, were used in mak­
ing net payments of funds to other districts in con­
nection with commercial and financial transactions.
In contrast with these minor fluctuations in dis­
trict member bank reserve balances during Febru­
ary, considerable expansion in reserves took place
in the first seventeen days of March. Disbursements
P rod u ction and E m ploym ent—
Index numbers, 1923-1925
average=100

Industrial Production
Manufactures (physical volume)
L u m b e r ........................................
Refined Oils* ............................
Cement* ......................................
Meat* ..........................................
Wheat Flour* ............................
Minerals (physical volume)
Petroleum* ................................
Lead (U . S .)* * ..........................
Silver (U. S .)* * ........................
Construction (value)
Total Construction*}*..................
Urban Building Permits
Residential ..............................
Nonresidential ........................
Total (incl. alterations, e tc.).
Public W orksf ..........................
Miscellaneous
Electric Power Production. . . .
Factory Employment and Pay Rolls
Pacific Coast
Employment ..............................
Pay Rolls ..................................
California
Employment ..............................
Pay Rolls ..................................

With
Seasonal
/—Adjustment ->
,— 1937— v 1936
Feb. Jan. Feb.

—

73

—

102
114

134
111
95

79
—
87
105
114

_

_

76

62
93

_

68

Without
Seasonal
r~ Adjustment ->
,—1937—v 1936
Feb.. Jan. Feb.
53
154
91

48
154
94

58
156
77

95

114

88

88
87

89
64
100

_

_

_

73

69

88

66

63

79

—

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—
—
—
—

32
81
49
157

34
45
37
158

19
41
30
290

199

197

179

182

182

164

113
96

112
94

101
78

103
88

100
83

92
72

126
110

125
109

108
86

115
104

111
99

99
81

*Daily average. ^Prepared by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, flndexes are for three months ending with the month in­
dicated.




by the United States Treasury between March 1 and
March 17 supplied banks with additional amounts
of funds, despite the fact that $21,000,000 was trans­
ferred from local banks to the Treasury because of
income tax payments by individuals and businesses.
Part of the net gain in reserves also resulted from
return to this district of proceeds from sales of
securities which were disposed of in eastern mar­
kets by banks and others. The increase in reserve
balances between March 3 and March 17 was
$47,000,000, and on the later date they totaled
$520,000,000. This amount was by far the largest
ever carried by member banks at the Federal R e­
serve Bank of San Francisco and included a con­
siderable amount in excess of legal requirements.
W eekly reporting member banks continued to
dispose of some of their investments during Febru­
ary, including Government direct and guaranteed
obligations, state and municipal bonds, and cor­
porate securities. Some of the sales were no doubt
in anticipation of the increase in reserve require­
ments, but it would appear that the selling also
represented efforts to take advantage of a possible
change in status of the bond market. Compre­
hensive statistics of country bank investments are
not available currently, but other data indicate that
some securities were sold by those banks immedi­
ately prior to and during the period of sharp de­
clines in bond prices in late February and the first
half of March.
Contrasting with the reduction in investments of
city banks during February and early March, further
increases in loans were recorded. The rise in loans
since the first of this year has resulted from pur­
chases of commercial paper and acceptances and
from advances in the “ all other” classification, gen­
erally considered to represent largely loans for busi­
ness and agricultural purposes. The expansion in
“ all other” loans has included a considerable in­
crease in the volume of monthly instalment loans
made to finance consumer purchases of automobiles
and various forms of equipment.
Distribution and Trade —
Index numbers, 1923-1925
average=100

Retail Trade
Department Store Sales (value)*
Twelfth District ........................
California ....................................
Los Angeles ..........................
Bay Region ............................
San Francisco ......................
Oakland ..................................
Pacific Northwest ....................
S eattle......................................
Spokane ..................................
Salt Lake City ..........................
Department Store Stocks (value) f
Furniture Store Sales (value) *$.
Automobile Sales (number)*
P assenger................................
Commercial ............................
Carloadings (number)*
Merchandise and Misc..............

With
Seasonal
,—Adjustment—s
,— 1937— N 1936
Feb. Jan. Feb.
96
103
99
106
103
118
72
80
58
77
68
84

98
105
101
108
105
118
73
80
59
69
67
88

86
93
85
101
99
109
63
69
53
72
65
79

—

—

—
—

—
—

92
109
90

94
106
79

81
92
66

23
9
63

7

75
69
96

—

Intercoastal Traffic (volume)
Eastbound
Westbound

—

Without
Seasonal
,—Adjustment —N
,— 1937— N 1936
Feb. Jan. Feb.
81
88
87
89
89
94
57
63
46
61
66
75

80
88
86
89
88
92
54
61
41
52
61
73

73
79
75
85
85
88
50
55
42
57
63
71

112
108
149

100
96
143

76
91
58

74
88
57

67
76
55

21

7
10
0

67
61
87

—

*Daily average. fA t end of month. $1929 average^ :100.

70

April 1, 1937

Developm ents in the Twelfth District
Banking Structure— 1936
There was a further decline in the number of
banks in operation in the Tw elfth District during
1936, but the total number of banking offices in­
creased. Both of these changes reflected consider­
able further growth of branch banking, almost en­
tirely among member banks. A t the end of the year,
323 Twelfth District banks were members of the
Federal Reserve System while 329 district banks
were not members. Both member and nonmember
banks were fewer in number on that date than at
any previous time since the Federal Reserve System
was established in 1914.
Although the number of banks in the district de­
clined further during 1936, assets continued to in­
crease and at the end of the year were larger than
at any previous time. Member banks held almost 87
percent of total district bank assets on December
31, 1936, a proportion slightly higher than on any
earlier date.

declined from 694 to 652 during 1936, banking offices
increased from 1,640 to 1,657 because of additional
branches. Most of the 45 banks absorbed during the
year continued to be operated as branches and, in
addition, 25 new branch offices were established by
member banks and two by nonmembers. The dis­
continuance of seven branches by banks operating
extensive branch systems in California partially off­
set this increase. Discontinuance of certain branches
during 1936 was not a new development in that year
but continued a practice evident for some time. Prior
to 1929, rapid growth in the number of branches in
California resulted in establishment of some offices
which later were found not to be profitable. A good
many of those branches were closed or consolidated
with others between 1929 and 1933 and, even in the
period of expansion since 1933, some further con­
solidation of branches has taken place. Ordinarily,
a branch is closed only when it has become evident
that it cannot be operated profitably and when its
closing will not weaken the competitive position of
the parent bank.
B r a n c h B a n k s i n O pe r a t io n — T w e l f t h D ist r ic t

B r a n c h B a n k A ssets — T w e l f t h D is t r ic t
(in thousands of dollars)

State

15

M O N T H L Y REVIEW OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS

-----Branches------------------ \
-Banks Operating— <
-Operated by— NLocated
Branches
State Non- Outside
State NonNat. Mem. Mem. Home
Nat. Mem. Mem.
Total B’ks B’ks B’ks
Total B’ks B’ks B’ks City
December 31, 1935

Ratio Branch
Nonmember
Bank Assets to
Member
t---- Branch Banks---- \ /^—Branch Banks—\A11 Bank Assets
1935 1936
1936
1935
1936
1935

Arizona ..............
35,773
California .......... 3,032,664
Idaho .................
43,411
Nevada ..............
17,944
Oregon .............., 185,398
Utah ..................
49,278
Washington . . . ., 259,540

44,608
3,356,598
64,080
26,034
217,928
52,608
296,121

3,620
355,322
2,941
0
1,197
1,214
3,691

3,887
366,157
3,467
0
2,547
1,519
3,912

77.2
8 3.6
51.0
64.1
69.1
32.8
52.9

77.7
84.0
63.2
75.4
70.5
33.1
52.9

Twelfth District. 3,624,008

4,057,977

367,985

381,489

77.6

78.1

.

3
39
5
9
., 3
Utah ...........
4
Washington . . . 8

2
11
3
2
2
3
5

0
8
1
0
0
0
1

1
20
1
0
1
1
2

19
798
26
7
42
10
44

15
615
10
7
41
9
37

0
136
14
0
0
0
5

4
47
2
0
1
1
2

19
553
26
6
31
9
30

. 64

28

10

26

946

734

155

57

674

California

Reduction in the number of both member and
nonmember banks during 1936 resulted principally
from the absorption of institutions in smaller cen­
ters by banks having their head offices in district
reserve cities. In only one instance did a merger of
reserve city banks take place. In all, 28 member and
17 nonmember banks in the Twelfth Federal Re­
serve District were taken over by city banks during
the year. The number of banks was also decreased
by the voluntary liquidation of two nonmembers,
but there were no failures of banks in the Twelfth
District during 1936. Changes were not all in the
direction of reducing the number of banks since
four new state charters were issued during the year,
two in W ashington, one in Oregon, and one in Cali­
fornia. None of these four banks became members
of the Federal Reserve System. During the year,
one state bank withdrew from membership and two
others became members, but these changes did not
affect the number of banks in operation.
Although the number of Twelfth District banks

..

December 31, 1936

. 3
. .. . .38
.. 6
2
Oregon
4
Utah ........... . . . 4
Washington . . . 8

2
10
4
2
2
3
5

0
9
1
0
0
0
1

1
19
1
0
2
1
2

22
839
32
8
49
10
45

18
657
16
8
47
9
38

0
137
14
0
0
0
5

4
45
2
0
2
1
2

22
598
32
7
38
9
31

. 65

28

11

26

1,005

793

156

56

737

California

During 1936 the number of branches increased in
all states in the district except Utah. The largest
expansion was in California with a net increase of
41 branch offices. All of this net increase represented
branches acquired outside the home office city. Con­
siderable expansion in branch banking also took
place in Oregon and Idaho, entirely through the
absorption of banks in smaller centers by banks hav­
ing their head offices in Portland or in Boise or
Lewiston. Growth in the number of branches re­
sulted entirely from mergers with existing banks in
all states of the district except in California, where
27 new offices were authorized, and in Arizona,
where three new branch offices were established.

L ic e n s e d B a n k s i n O p e r a t io n — T w e l f t h D is t r ic t
/—...
Number

1935
State
6
Arizona ........................
139
California ....................
Idaho .......................... ........ 33
6
Nevada ........................
50
Oregon ........................
32
Utah ............................
84
Washington ................

1936
6
123
30
5
44
32
83

. . . . 350

323

Twelfth District ........




(Figures as of December 31. Assets in thousands)
.------- Nonmember Banks----------- \
Member Banks%
Assets
Number
Assets

$

1935
42,799
3,550,334
69,962
23,155
234,633
125,812
389,316

$4,436,011

1936
53,158
3,911,014
86,403
28,936
270,455
133,212
449,705

1935
3
132
27
4
47
27
104

1936
3
121
23
3
48
27
104

$4,932,883

344

329

$

$

1935
8,219
502,588
20,841
4,850
35,590
28,154
108,119

$708,361

$

1936
9,242
522,564
20,517
5,586
42,343
30,380
117,079

$747,711

------Number

1935
9
271
60
10
97
59
188

1936
9
244
53
8
92
59
187

694

652

— All Banks —---------------Assets

$

1935
51,018
4,052,922
90,803
28,005
270,223
153,966
497,435

$5,144,372

$

1936
62,400
4,433,578
106,920
34,522
312,798
163,592
566,784

$5,680,594

16

April 1, 1937

FEDERAL RESERVE B A N K OF SAN FRANCISCO

N a tio n a l S u m m a ry o f B u sin e ss C o n d it io n s
Prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

of production, employment, and trade increased more than season­
ally in February and wholesale prices of industrial commodities continued
to advance.

V

o lu m e

P

IN DU STRIAL PRODUCTION
Index of physical volume of production, adjusted for
seasonal variation, 1923-1925 average=100. By
months, January 1929 to February 1937.

W HOLESALE PRICES
Index compiled by the United States Bureau of Labor
Statistics, 1926=100. By months, 1929 to 1931; by
weeks, 1932 to date. Latest figure is
for week ending March 20.

r o d u c t io n

E

a n d

m plo y m e n t

The Board’s index of industrial production, which makes allowance for
changes in the number of working days and for usual seasonal variations, was
116 percent of the 1923-1925 average in February as compared with 114 in
January and an average of 115 in the last quarter of 1936. At steel mills
activity continued to increase in February and the first three weeks of March
and, although the growth was somewhat less than seasonal, output currently
is about the peak level reached in the summer of 1929. Automobile production,
while fluctuating considerably with strikes at important plants, has been larger
for the year to date than in the corresponding period last year. Output of
plate glass in February showed a sharp rise from the low level of the two
preceding months when strikes curtailed production. At textile mills and shoe
factories activity continued at a high level, while output at meat packing
establishments declined somewhat further. Mineral production increased, re­
flecting chiefly greater output of coal and a further rise in crude petroleum
production.
Value of construction contracts awarded this year, according to the F. W.
Dodge Corporation, has been considerably larger than a year ago, reflecting an
increased volume of private residential building and other types of private
construction, while the volume of publicly-financed work has been smaller.
Factory employment and pay rolls increased from the middle of January
to the middle of February by more than the usual seasonal amount. The num­
ber employed in the machinery industries increased considerably and there were
smaller increases at automobile and plate glass factories. In the nondurable
goods industries as a group there was a seasonal rise in employment.
D

is t r ib u t io n

Department store sales increased from January to February and the Board’s
seasonally adjusted index advanced from 93 to 95 percent of the 1923-1925
average. Sales at variety stores also increased more than seasonally, while mail
order sales, largely in rural areas, showed less expansion than is usual at this
time of year. Total freight carloadings increased in February and the first half
of March, owing in part to seasonal influences.
C

M ON EY RATES IN NEW YORK
Minimum rate on rediscounts for and advances to member
banks by Federal Reserve Bank, and weekly prevail­
ing rates on prime commercial paper, 4 to 6 months,
and prime bankers’ acceptances, 90 days. For
weeks ending January 3,1931, to March 27,1937.

1933

1934

1935

1936

1937

M EMBER BANK RESERVE BALANCES
Wednesday figures of total member bank reserve balances
at Federal Reserve banks, with estimates of re­
quired reserves, January 6, 1932, to March 24,1937.




r ic e s

B

a n k

C

r e d it

On March 1, when the first half of the recent increase in reserve require­
ments went into effect, excess reserves of member banks declined from
$2,100,000,000 to about $1,300,000,000. In the next three weeks, which included
the March tax collection period, excess reserves showed moderate fluctuations
around the new level. In connection with the increase in reserve requirements
there were some withdrawals of bankers’ balances from city banks but prac­
tically no borrowing by member banks from the reserve banks.
Holdings of United States Government obligations at reporting member
banks in leading cities declined by $280,000,000 in the four weeks ending March
17, a part of the decline reflecting large maturities of Treasury bills. Com­
mercial loans increased further at reporting banks and on March 17 were above
last year’s high level reached on December 30. Loans to brokers and dealers
in securities increased sharply.
M

1932

P

o m m o d it y

The general level of wholesale commodity prices advanced from the middle
of February to the third week of March, reflecting principally further sub­
stantial increases in the prices of industrial materials. Prices of iron and steel,
nonferrous metals, lumber, cotton, rubber, and hides advanced considerably and
there were also increases in the prices of cotton goods, paper, and furniture.
Wheat prices have advanced in recent weeks following a decline in the latter
part of February.

o n ey

R

ates

Since the beginning of March the rate on 90-day bankers’ acceptances ad­
vanced from i5e of 1 percent to
of 1 percent and commercial paper rose from
a flat
percent to a range of between ¿4 and 1 percent.
Bond yields, which until recently had been near the extreme low point
reached last December, advanced by between *4 and ^ percent and on March
24 were at about the levels prevailing early in 1936.