View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

REVIEW

MONTHLY

Agricultural and Business Conditions
TENTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
VoL. 36, No. 9

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY

SEPTEMBER

30, 1951

THE GROWTH OF METROPOLITAN AREAS IN THE TENTH DISTRICT
During the last twenty years economic growth
in the Tenth District, as in the nation as a whole, has
been largely concentrated in urban areas. Agriculture
has provided employment not only for a declining
proportion of the population, but also for a progressively smaller number of people. Employment in
manufacturing, trade, service, and governmental
activities-all urban pursuits-has quite generally
expanded. Consequently, jn order to observe the lines
that economic development is following, it is necessary to inquire into the nature of the expansion occurring in urban communities. For this purpose, comparatjve information on various aspects of economic
growth in the larger cities within the Tenth District
is presented in the following paragraphs.
A growth in the proportion of the
total population living in urban places
of more than 2,500, although somewhat retarded
during the 1930's, has persisted in the United States
ever since the first census in 1790. During the last
thirty years, this tendency has been even more pronounced in the Tenth Distrjct than in the entire
country. While total population in the seven District
states increased at less than half of the rate at which
total population in the United States grew from 1920
to 1950, as shown in Table 1, the rate of growth of

urban populat,ion was approximately the same for
the District states as for the nation-75 per cent and
77 per cent, respectively. The population of the District states is still more rural than for the country
as a whole, but the difference has been narrowed since
1920, as shown in Table 2. The proportjon of the
population of the seven District states living in urban
communities increased from 37 per cent in 1920 to
56 per cent in 1950. In the United States, the increase
was from 51 per cent to 64 per cent during the same
interval. Since 1920, rural population-farm and
small town-has declined approximately 8 per cent
in the seven District states, while in the entire country it has increased 6 per cent. Most of this decrease
in rural population within the Tenth District has
occurred during the last decade.

Urba nixation

There are 168 urban areas in the
United States which, for the purpose
of collecting information, are designated by the Federal Government as standard metropolitan areas. They are generally defined in terms
of county boundaries ( except in New England) in
order to include fringe population and industrial activities located outside the central cities but associated
economically wjth activities carried on inside. Eleven
of these metropolitan areas are located in the Tenth
Metropolitan
Area Growth

Tobie 1. URBAN AND TOTAL POPULATION

1920

1940

Wyo .............. ....

Total
939,629
1,769,257
3,404,055
1,296,372
360,350
2,028,283
194,402

Urban
453,259
616,485
1,586,903
405,293
64,960
538,017
57,095

Total
1,123,296
1,801 ,028
3,784,664
1,315,834
531,818
2,336,434
250,742

Urban
590,756
753,941
1,960,696
514,148
176,401
879,663
93,577

7 States ............
U.S ..................

9,992,348
105,710,620

3,722,012
54,157,973

11,143,816
131,669,275

4,969,182
74,423,702

Colo ..................
Kans .................
Mo ... ... ...... .........

Nebr .................
N. J\Iex ..............
Okla ..................

1950*
Urban**
Total
831.318
1,325,089
993,220
1,905,299
2,432,000
3,954,653
621,905
1,325.51 0
341,889
681,187
1,139,481
2,233 ,351
144,618
290,529
11,715,618
150,697,361

6,504,431
96,028,000

Per Cent Change
1920-1950
1940-1950
Total Urban Total Urban
+41.0 +83.4 +17.3 +40.7
+7.7 +61.1
+5.8 +31.7
+16.2 +53.3
+4.5 +24.0
+2.2 +53.4
+0.7 +21.0
+89.0 +426.3 +27,3 +93.8
+10.1 +111.8
-4.8 +29.5
+49.4 +1 53.3 +15.9 +54.5
+17.2
+42.6

+74.8
+s.1 . +30.9
+77.3 · +14.5 +29.0

•1950 urban data are preliminary for Kan sas, Missouri, Wyoming, and the United States.
UThe 1950 "urban" definition was more inclusive than the one used in earlier Census tabulations; hence, the data are not strictly comparable in· all cases.
SOURCE: Census of Population, 1940 and 1950.
·
·

REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS

2

Tobie 2. URBAN POPULATION AS A PERCENTAGE
OF TOTAL POPULATION

Colorado ...................
Kansas .....................
Missouri ...................
Nebraska .................
New Mexico ............
Okla homa .................
Wyoming .................

1920
48.2
34.8
46.6
31.3
18.0
26.5
29.4

1930
50.2
38.8
51.2
35.3
25.2
34.3
31.1

1940
52.6
41.9
61.8
39.1
33.2
37.6
37.3

1950
62.7
52.1
61.5
46.9
50.2
51.0
49.8

Seven states ............
United States ..........

37.2
51.2

41.9
56.2

44.6
56.5

55.5
63.7

SOURCE: Census of Population, 194.0 and 1950.

District. All are defined in terms of single counties
with the exception of Kansas City and Denver, both
of which jnclude four counties, and Omaha, which includes three counties.
The metropolitan areas in the Tenth District display wide diversity in population growth, as shown
in Table 3. Albuquerque had a more rapjd growth
from 1940 to 1950 than any of the other 167 metropolitan areas in the United States. On the other
hand, St. Joseph was one of seven metropolitan areas
in the country which lost population. Taken together,
the eleven metropolitan areas in the Tenth District
increased jn population at a more rapid rate during
the decade than did all 168 met ropolitan areas in the
United States-27 per cent in comparison with 21
per cent for the nation. In both the Tenth District
and the United States as a whole, however, urban
growth occurred somewhat more rapidly jn the
smaller cities than in the metropolitan areas, since
the rate of all urban growth exceeded the rate of
growth for metropolitan areas. Nevertheless, 80 per
cent of the growth of population in the United States
from 1940 to 1950 occurred in metropolitan areas,
while the amount of the jncrease in population which
took place in the eleven metropolitan areas in the
Tenth District exceeded the population gain in the
seven District states. Ninety of the metropolitan

areas jn the country gained more than 20 per cent in
population during the decade. Six of the metropolitan
areas in the Tenth District-Albuquerque, Denver,
Oklahoma City, Pueblo, Tulsa, and Wichita-had a
gain in excess of that rate.
Since World War I, the most rap.id growth of
Albuquerque, Denver, Lincoln, Pueblo, and Wichit a
occurred during the decade of the 1940's. Although
urban growth was generally retarded during t he
1930's, substantial population increases took place ,in
Albuquerque and Denver. Tulsa and Oklahoma Cit y
experienced a major part of their growth as cities
during the 1920's, and Kansas City, Omaha, and
Topeka also grew more rapidly during that decade
than they have ,in subsequent decades. The population of St. Joseph has declined by 5 per cent since
1930.
The growth of population in
urban communities is obviously dependent on the economic f unctions which they perform. The percentage
d.istribution of nonagricultural civilian employment
by m ajor industrial categories, shown for a recent
month in Table 4, may serve as a guide to the predominant activities of the various communities. None of
t he eleven metropol.itan areas in the Tenth District
ar e extremely specialized in any single type of a ctivity, although within any industry group, such as
manufact uring, employment may be found to be concentr ated in one particular industry. Descriptions
are appropriately stated, therefore, in terms of different combinations of activities rather than a single
major industrjal group.
Indust rial employment (manufacturing and mining
combined) constitutes a larger proportion of tot al
employment than any other activity in Wich,ita, St.
J oseph, Tulsa, Pueblo, and Kansas City. Only Wichita
Economic Character of
Metropolitan Areas

Table 3. POPULATION OF METROPOLITAN AREAS

Metropolitan Area
Albuquerque .................
Denver 1 . . . . . . ... ... . . .. ..... . ...
Kansas City2 ................
Lincoln ..........................
Oklahoma City .............
Omaha3 .............. ... ........
Pueblo ............................
St. Joseph .....................
Topeka ...........................
Tulsa ..............................
Wichita ..........................

1920
29,855
299,087
528,833
85,902
116,307
275,444
57,638
93,684
69 ,159
109,023
92,234

1930
45,430
352,563
665,655
100,324
221,738
313,272
66,038
98,633
85,200
187,574
136,330

1940
69,391
407 ,768
686,643
100,585
244,159
325,153
68,870
94 ,067
91,247
193,363
143,311

1950*
146,014
560,36 1
808,231
118,260
322 ,520
362,203
89,592
93,629
104.430
248 ,6 58
220,213

1920-50
+389.1
+87.4
+52.8
+37.7
+177.3
+31.5
+55.4
-0.1
+51.0
+128.1
+138.8

District, 11 areas........
U. S., 168 areas..........

1,757,166
n.a.

2,272,757
n.a.

2,424,557
69,276,481

3 ,074 ,111
83,929,863

+74.9
n .a

Per Cent Change
1920-30
1930-40 1940-50
+52.7
+52.2
+110.4
+17.9
+15.7
+37.4
+25.9
+3.2
+17.7
+16.8
+o.3
+17.6
+90.6
+10.1
+32.1
+13.7
+3.8
+11.4
+14.6
+30.1
+4.3
-4.6
-0.5
+5.3
+23 .2
+14.4
+7.1
+72.0
+28.6
+3.1
+47.8
+5.1
+53.7
+29.3
n.a.

+6.7
n.a.

+26.8
+21.2

1930-50
+221 .4
+5 8.9
+21.4
+17.9
+45 .5
+15.6
+35.7
-5.1
+ 22.6
+32 .6
+61. 5
+35.3
n .a.

•1960 data are preliminary. Revised figures have been released for some areas, and in m ost cases show larger populations, but for the sake of comparability the preliminary data have been used; the error is within approximately 1 per cent.
Adams, Arapahoe, Denver, and Jefferson counties, Colorado.
Johnson and Wyandotte counties, Kansas, and Clay and Jackson counties, Missouri.
•Includes Douglas and Sarpy counties, Nebraska, and Pottawattamie county, Iowa.
n.a. Not available.
SOURCE: Census of Population, 1940 and 1950.
1 Ineludes
1 Ineludes

FEDERAL RESER VE BANK OF KANSAS CITY

8

Table 4. EMPLOYMENT IN MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUPS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL NONAGRICULTURAL CIVILIAN EMPLOYMENT
Transportation,
Finance,
Metropolitan
ManuInsurance,
ConCommunication,
GovArea
facturing
struction Public Utilities
Trade
Real Estate Service ernment Mining
Albuquerquel ...............
14.1
12.4
19.8
10.5
25.1
4.6
13.5*
Denver 1 .........................
20.2
9.5
14.6
0.5
12.4
27.7
5.1
10.0*
Kansas City2 ................
28.5
6.2
6.4
0.3
12.9
27.9
5.8
12.0*
Lincoln a.........................
22.8
6.2
17.7
11.3
25.2
5.0
11.7
Oklahoma Cityl ...........
11.2
4.6
6.7
25.1
9.0
27.3
5.4
10.7
Omaha3 .........................
23.0
4.9
16.3
26.4
11.8
9.8
7.5
Pueblos ..........................
30.5
5.5
22.0
1.3**
13.0
10.9
15.2
1.6
St. Josepha ...................
40.9
2.8
9.5
11.4*
5.6
29.8
Topeka2 .........................
16.6
5.3
24.0
0.2
10.3
17.3
21.2
5.0
Tulsa 1 ... . ....... . . . ..............
22.4
6.2
6.2
10.6
12.0
10.6
26.9
5.0
Wichital ........................
43.2
4.8
6.9
9.1
7.2
1.3
23.8
3.7
United Statesl .............
34.2
13.7
2.0
5.8
10.4
9.0
20.9
4.1
3 July, 1951.
••Mining and other.
tJune, 1951. 2 May, 1951.
•Service and other.
SOURCE: Compiled from estimates prepared by the state and local employment security offices and the U. S. Department of Labor.

and St. Joseph, however, have a higher percentage of
their total nonagricultural employment engaged in
manufacturing than does the entire country, which
has approximately 34 per cent. Kansas City is an·
important wholesale and retail trade center; employment in trade and manufacturing are of about equal
relative importance. St. Joseph does a large volume
of wholesaling, in addition to manufacturing, as reflected in the high portion of employment engaged in
trade. Heavy industry in Pueblo is paired with a
relatively high volume of governmental employment
in conjunction with the operation of the Federal
ordnance depot. Although the relative importance of
manufacturing is not h igh in Tulsa, manufacturing in
combination with mining activities (oil and gas) accounts for about a third of total employment.
Trade absorbs the largest portion of employment
in Denver, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Lincoln, and
Albuquerque. Wholesaling is particularly prominent
in Omaha, Denver, and Oklahoma City. Denver also
has a fifth of its workers engaged in manufacturing
and an important segment in governmental occupations, chiefly state and Federal. Governmental employment constitutes a larger share of the total in
Oklahoma City than in any of the other ten metropolitan areas in the District. This arises because it
possesses important military installations, chiefly
Tinker field, in addition to the various state offices.
Governmental employment is only slightly less important than trade in Albuquerque, which has an
assortment of state and Federal establishments. Despite the fact that Lincoln serves as the seat of state
government and of the state university, governmental
employment is exceeded by employment in trade and
manufacturing. For a city of its size, it is uniquely
balanced in economic activities. Omaha, although it
is important as a marketing center, likewise exhibits
a fairly high degree of diversification. Manufacturing ranks second and is of considerable significance.
Employment in transportation is relatively high because Omaha serves as the location of the offices and

shops of a major railroad, and employment in finance,
insurance, and real estate is high relative to the other
areas because of the presence of insurance company
home offices.
Governmental employment makes up the largest
share of the total in Topeka, as Table 4 indicates.
Again this represents the combination of heavy employment by both state and Federal governments.
Trade is second in importance, and employment in
transportation is relatively high for the same reason
as in Omaha-the presence of repair shops and administrative offices of an important railway system.
The significance of the particular functions performed by various urban communities lies in the different rates of growth in these various activities
within the regional and national economies, in addition to the geographic changes which may be taking
place within any industry group. For example,
in the United States as a whole from 1940 to 1950,
employment in mining increased by 6 per cent, in
comparison with an increase of 34 per cent in
manufacturing, 38 per cent in trade, and 19 per cent
in service industries. During the decade, agricultural
employment declined by 15 per cent. Some assistance
can be gained in understanding the past and potential
growth of metropolitan areas in this District by investigating more specifically the changes which have
occurred in several of these major lines of activity.
The growth of a number of the
metropolitan areas in the Tenth
District, like urban growth in the country as a whole,
can be attributed to the process of industrial expansion which has been under way in the United States
since early in the nineteenth century. From 1939 to
1947 the expansion in manufacturing employment,
shown in Table 5, was considerably faster in the
eleven metropolitan areas, which contain approximately two thirds of the Tenth District total, than in
the entire United States. The rate of growth in
each of the eleven areas during that period exIndustrialization

4

REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS
Table 5. MANUFACTURING EMPLOYMENT
Number of
Number of
Establishments
Production Workers
1947
1939
1929
1947
1939
1929
110
52
1,695
1,610
917
47
844
637
17,817
26,932
828
12,588
1,345
1,023
48,417
61,698
1,183
38,085
120
120
3,093
164
6,001
1,662
346
306
6,552
261
5,979
9,903
427
524
522
18,439
11,622
21,543
65
80
81
5,831
4,967
7,658
110
114
144
7,499
5,697
9,190
105
119
119
3,847
2,481
4,448
342
252
220
6,137
6,313
11,527
185
326
239
5,925
5,019
13,584

Metropolitan Area
Albuquerque ........ ......................
Denver ................................. .......
Kansas City ..............................
Lincoln ........................................
Oklahoma City ..........................
Omaha ........................................
Pueblo .........................................
St. Joseph ..................................
Topeka ........................................
Tulsa ...........................................
Wichita ..................... ..................
District, 11 areas ....................
United States ............................

3,808
206,663

3,282
173,802

4,270
240,881

125,252
8,369,705

95,330
7,808,205

174,094
11,916,188

Per Cent Change in
Production Worker s
1929-47 1929-39 1939-47
-5.0 -45.9
+ 75.6
+51.2 -29.4 + 113.9
+27.4 -21.3
+62.0
+94.0 -46.3 +261.1
-8.8
+65.6
+51.1
+16.8 -37.0
+85.4
+31.3 -14.8
+54.2
+22.5 -24.0
+61.3
+15.6 -35.5
+ 79.3
+87.8
+2.9
+82.6
+129.3 -15.3 +1 70.7
+39.0
+42.4

-23.9
-6.7

+82.6
+52.6

SOURCE: Census of Manufactures, 1929, 1939, and 1947.

The expansion of manufacturing in the Wichita
ceeded the rate of increase of 53 per cent for the
United States. The conclusion that there is a long- area, occurring especially in the aircraft industry,
term trend for industrial expansion with,in the Tenth • has been phenomenal within the last decade. EmDistrict to catch up with the level of industrialization ployment in aircraft production greatly expanded
in other parts of the country is forestalled, however, during the war period, contracted quickly in the early
by the experience of the decade prior to 1939. In the postwar years, and is once again growing rapidly
period from 1929 to 1939, manufacturing employ- under the impact of defense orders. More diversified
ment fell off much more severely in the eleven metro- manufacturing activities in the Lincoln area have
politan areas, taken collectively, than in the United provided for a surge in industrial employment at more
States-it declined 24 per cent in the Tenth District t han twice the national rate. On the other hand, at
metropolitan areas, as compared with 7 per cent in the St. J oseph, the various food products industriesentire United States. Consequently, a significant especially meat packing-which employ the bulk of
part of the growth of manufacturing employment dur- manufacturing wage earners, constituted the basis
ing the last ten years in all but one of the eleven for a more moderate expansion in job opportunities.
metropolitan areas in the Tenth District was absorbed Pueblo's iron and steel industry also provided for only
in the recovery of manufacturing activity from the a moderate expansion in manufacturing employment
adverse effects of the depression years. The eighteen- from 1939 to 1947, although there has been a conyear growth of 39 cent in manufacturing employment tinued growth at a fairly rapid rate since that time.
in the eleven metropolitan areas was slightly less than The 51 per cent increase in manufacturing employthe increase of 42 per cent in the nation. Notwith- ment in Denver during the last twenty years was
standing the failure of manufacturing in the Tenth greater than the average rate ofincreaseforalleleven
District to display growth greater than that for the metropolitan areas and for the country as a whole.
entire country, industrial activity did provide a very The food products industrjes account for about a
marked expansion in job opportunities in several of quarter of Denver's manufacturing employment ;
the metropolitan areas.
other important industries are machinery, rubber
Tobie 6. WHOLESALE TRADE

Metropolitan Area
Albuquerque ...................
Denver.............................
Kansas City...................
Lincoln .............................
Oklahoma City...............
Omaha ..............................
Pueblo ................ ..............
St. Joseph .......................
Topeka .............................
Tulsa ................................
Wichita ............................
District, 11 areas ... ........
United States .................

Number of
Establishments
1929
1939
1948
~
90
205
977
1,050
1,366
1,876
1,764
2,152
166
200
183
506
572
766
730
800
920
71
107
134
216
238
227
122
141
173
306
418
528
328
419
575
5,345
169,702

5,782
200,573

7,246
244,705

9 Averaire for the year.
1 19,8 employment divided by 1950 population.
SOURCE: Censue of Business, 1929, 1939, and 1948.

1929 2

Number of
Employees
1939 2

506

848

10,649
27 ,577
2,284
6,785
10,159
730
4,248
1,856
2,666
3,347

10,045
20,089
1,754
5,966
8,739
717
2,150
1,163
3,116
3,237

19483
2,144
19,646
32,327
2,062
9,610
12,609
1,070
2,800
1,870
6,572
6,248

70,807
1,605,042

57,824
1,561,948

96,958
2,463,433

3

Per Cent Change
in Employees
1929-48 1939-48
+323.7
+152.8
+84.5
+95.6
+17.2
+60.9
-9.7
+17.6
+41.6
+61.1
+24.1
+44.3
+46.6
+49.2
-34.1
+30.2
+o.8
+60.8
+146.5
+110.9
+86.7
+93.0
+36.9
+53.5

+67.7
+57.7

Number employed full workweek ended nearest November 16.

Per Capita
Wholesaling
Employment
19481
.015
.035
.040
.017
.030
.035
.012
.030
.018
.026
.028
.032
.029

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY
products, printing and publishing, fabricated metal
products, apparel, and primary metals. Tulsa has had
a still more rap.id growth in manufacturing, based
chiefly on the making of oil field equipment and
storage tanks. The number of new manufacturing
jobs created in Kansas City between 1929 and 1947
exceeded the increase in any of the other ten metropolitan areas and constituted over a quarter of the
total ,increase in the eleven areas in the Tenth District. As in Denver, meat packing and other food
products industries provide employment for approximately one fourth of those engaged in manufacturing. However, other manufacturing activ,ities, which
are widely diversified, furnished most of the basis
for expansion. They include the apparel, paper and
allied products, printing and publishing, chemical,
petroleum refining, steel, automobile, machinery, and
metal products industries, among others. N evertheless, the rate of growth of manufacturing in Kansas
City since 1929 has been less rapid than for the nat,ion
as a whole. Similarly, Omaha's industrial growth has
lagged behind the expansion in other parts of the
United States. Meat packing, which has exh,ibited
little disposition to grow in the older packing centers
in recent years, and other food products industries
account for the major part of manufacturing employment ,in Omaha.
Changes in employment in wholesaling,
shown in Table 6, indicate that since
1929 the metropolitan areas in the Tenth
District have experienced a lesser rate of growth in
thjs activity than the United States as a whole, just
as in the case of manufacturing. Data on the number
of employees in 1948 are not strictly comparable with
the two earlier census years (since they refer to the
number employed during the full workweek ended
nearest November 15, while the 1929 and 1939 data
refer to the average number employed during the
year), but the relative changes among the different
Wholesale
Trade

5

areas are indicative of developments in wholesaling
within each community. Two of the chief wholesaling
centers in the Tenth District--Kansas City and
Omaha-lost ground in wholesaling relat,ive to six
of the other metropolitan areas and to the rest of
the United States. Employment in wholesale trade
in St. Joseph and Lincoln actually declined. The loss
to St. Joseph was especially severe, as wholesaling
was of considerable relative ,importance. The Census
data suggest a drift of wholesale activities to the
outlying centers in the Tenth District-to Denver,
Tulsa, Wichita, and Oklahoma C,ity. The rapid growth
of wholesaling in Albuquerque appears to be primarily
associated with internal population growth.
Both the relative and absolute changes ,in
the number of persons employed in retailing
between 1929 and 1948 in the metropolitan
areas in the Tenth District are closely connected with
changes in income and populat,ion, as a comparison between data in Table 7 and Table 3 suggests. As in
the cases of both manufacturing and wholesale trade,
retailing increased more rapidly from 1939 to 1948
in the Tenth District c,ities than in the rest of the
United States, but the eleven areas showed less relative growth over the entire period from 1929 to 1948.
The number of retail jobs created during the last
twenty years was almost as large as the increase in
job opportunit.ies in manufacturing but, unlike a large
part of manufacturing and wholesale trade, most
increases in retailing are incident to the growth in
other primary income-generating ,industries and are
not the initial source of new urban expansion.
Retail
Trade

Detailed information on government,
transportation, communication, pub1,ic utility, finance, mining, and construction employment is not available from Census
sources for a recent year. It is clearly evident from
the foregoing information, however, that an imporOther Sources
of Growth

Table 7. RETAIL TRADE

Metropolitan Area
Albuquerque ..............
Denver ........................
Kansas City ............. .
Lincoln ........................
Oklahoma City.........
Omaha ........................
Pueblo .........................
St. Joseph ..................
Topeka .......... ..............
Tulsa ...........................
Wichita .......................

1929
541
5,112
9,390
1,196
2,814
3,618
773
1,360
1,060
1,988
1,862

District. 11 areas ....
United States ............

29,714
1,543,158

Number of
Establishments
1939
942
5,725
9,690
1,235
3,284
4,297
952
1,387
1,300
2,691
2,197
33,700
1,770,355

1948
1,428
5,433
8,988
1,091
3,550
3,536
935
1,186
1,196
2,682
2,418

32,443
1,769,540

1948 sales diviiied by 1950 population.
'Average for the year.
SOURCE: Census of Business, 1929, 1939, and 1948.
1

Sales
Per Capita
19481
$ 836.74
1,061.28
1,225.67
1,054.74
985.72
1,057.44
845.56
959.08
954.01
1,023.11
1,022.07
$1,066.27
866.11

3 Number

1929 2
1,723
20,424
40,142
4,949
11,266
13,467
2,604
4,524
4,190
9,540
7,421
120,250
3,833,581

Number of
Employees
19392
1948 3
2,935
5,666
23,229
29,284
38,351
53,432
5,659
6,305
16,536
12,613
16,383
18,417
2,774
3,644
4,242
4,639
4,435
4,945
9,581
12,641
7,956
12,083
128,158
4,600,217

167,592
5,608,398

employed full workweek ended nearest November 15.

Per Cent Change
in Employees
1929-48 1939-48
+228.8
+93.0
+26.1
+43.4
+33.1
+39.3
+27.4
+11.4
+46.8
+31.1
+36.8
+12.4
+39.9
+31.4
+2.5
+9.4
+18.0
+11.5
+32.5
+31.9
+62.8
+51.9
+39.4
+46.3

+30.8
+21.9

6

REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS

tant part of the growth of Oklahoma City, Topeka,
Albuquerque, Pueblo, Lincoln, and Denver was due
to the expansjon of Federal and state governmental
activities in those areas. The fortunes of Oklahoma
City, Topeka, and Albuquerque, in particular, have
been closely related to the growth of various functions
of government. In the case of the construction industry, changes jn the level of activity have been
dependent on the amount of industrial, commercial,
and institutional expansion taking place in the areas
and have been closely tied to changes in population.
The relative importance of construction employment
is greatest in Albuquerque, where the rate of increase
in population was largest in the last decade, and least
jn St. Joseph, where a loss of population occurred.
Mining has been of direct consequence in providing
employment only in the case of Tulsa and Oklahoma
City, although the proximity of certain minerals for
processing has been important to the economic development of several of the areas, particularly Pueblo
and Denver.

Industr,ial growth at about the national
rate during the last twenty years has
formed the chief basis for the growth of metropolitan
areas in the Tenth District. Manufacturing alone
contributed most of the expansion at Wichita and
Lincoln. Economic growth in Kansas City and Omaha
was governed by their diversified industrial expansion and continued rise as retail trading centers.
Wholesale trade, along with ,industry, formed the
basis for growth in Tulsa and Denver, and the latter
also extended its governmental functions. In the
case of Pueblo, military activities, in addition to the
steel jndustry, have provided expanding job opportunities. Although industrial growth has occurred in
St. Joseph, it has been largely offset by a contraction
of employment in wholesaling. Growth in Oklahoma
City, Topeka, and Albuquerque, on the other hand,
can be attributed primarily to the expansion of governmental activities, including civilian employment
at military bases which has been a particularly important factor in the case of Oklahoma City.
Summary

BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL CONDITIONS
MEMBER BANK CREDIT
Loan volume of District member banks began a
belated seasonal increase during the five-week period
ended August 29, reflecting demand by grain dealers
and millers following the retarded wheat harvest and
reversing the downward trend which had persisted
for the previous three months. Total loans of all member banks in the District increased by 42 million dollars, reserve city and country banks increasing by
24 million and 18 million dollars, respectively.
District member banks increased their holdings
of Government securities by 80 million dollars in the
period under review, as the result of net purchases
by city banks of 56 million and by country banks of

24 million dollars. Other investments by member
banks increased 11 million dollars during August.
Total deposits at District member banks increased by 35 million dollars, with the largest part
of the change representing an expansion of 25
million in demand deposits of country banks. Demand
deposits at city banks declined by 4 million dollars,
and time deposits of all District banks showed an increase of 14 million dollars.
The increase in loans and jnvestments of banks in
the District appears to have been financed to an important extent through a reduction of 65 million in
balances with banks in the United States and by
credit from the Reserve Bank totaling 21 million.
Reserve city banks were responsible for the entire

SELECTED ITEMS OF CONDITION OF TENTH DISTRICT MEMBER BANKS
(In millions of dollars)
ALL MEMBER BANKS

Loans and investments ..................................... .
Loans and discounts ................................... ... .
U. S. Government obligations .....................Other securities .............................................. .
Reserve with F. R. Bank ................................. .
Balances with banks in U. S .......................... .
Cash items in process of collection ................. .
Gross demand deposits ...................................... .
Deposits of banks ........................................... .
Other demand deposits .................................. .
Time deposits ...................................................... .
Total deposits ..................................................... .
Borrowings .......................................................... .

Aug. 29
1951
4,820
1,969
2,375
476
884
622
285
5,521
918
4,603
752
6,273
29

July 25 Aug. 30
1951
1950
4,687
4,640
1,927
1,672
2,295
2,508
465
460
869
744
687
604
306
264
5,500
5,277
915
843
4,585
4,434
738
684
6,238
5,961
8
10

RESERVE CITY BANKS

Aug. 29
1951
2,720
1,164
1,299
257
556
255
265
3,192
855
2,337
401
3,593
25

July 25 Aug. 30
1951
1950
2,631
2,570
1,140
956
1,243
l,3n9
248
255
541
462
314
253
285
246
3,196
2,994
854
782
2,342
2,212
395
366
3,591
3,360
3
9

COUNTRY BANKS

Aug. 29
1951
2,100
805
1,076
219
328
367
20
2,329
63
2,266
351
2,680

4

July 25 Aug. 30
1951
1950
2,056
2.070
787
716
1,052
1,149
217
205
328
282
373
351
21
18
2,304
2,283
61
61
2,243
2,222
343
:us
2,647
2,601

5

1

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY
increase in member bank borrowing dur,ing the
period and also accounted for 59 million, or 90 per
cent, of the reduction in District member bank
balances with other banks.
DEPARTMENT STORE TRADE

Dollar volume of sales at reporting department
stores ,in this District in August was 6 per cent below
that of a year ago, but in the first three weeks of
September sales were only 2 per cent below last year
despite an upsurge in sales that had taken place in
mid-September a year earlier, just prior to the imposition of consumer credit controls on durable goods.
Sales ,increased more than is usual from July to
August, and the seasonally adjusted index of daily
BANK DEBITS

COLORADO
Colo. Springs .......
Denver* ................
Grand Junction ...
Greeley .................
Pueblo* .................

Aug.
8 Mos.
1951
1951
( Thousand dollars)
445,320
60,727
5,866,894
758,079
16,198
136,787
26,462
214,350
49,021
422,809

Change from '50
Aug. 8 Mos.
~ e r cent)
+31
+16
+24
+11
-2
+17
+22
+s
-8
+23

KANSAS

11,238
Atchison ...............
12,679
Emporia ...............
45,146
Hutchinson ..........
8,026
Independence ......
84,138
Kansas City ... ......
Lawrence .............
11,993
12,531
Manhattan** .......
Parsons ................
10,396
Pittsburg .............
13,046
Salina ...................
50,616
Topeka ................. 101,818
Wichita ................ 320,467
MISSOURI
Independence** ..
13,060
Joplin ...................
30,955
Kansas City ......... 1,257,891
St. Joseph ............ 129,709

8G,D85
97,657
32 ,244
64,230
694,356
97,374
86,201
70,321
103,196
310,713
822,573
2,369,607

+23
+4
+23
+s
+38

+15
+12
+12
+11
+27

101,634
242,170
9,868,881
913,132

+6
+3
+9

+15
+16
+18

21,110
33,035
17,180
92,696
655,288

164,763
234,170
127,240
744,337
5,122,947

0
+25
+12
+3
+12

+13
+25
+22
+14
+29

121,085
36,793

986,781
274,160

-17

+8

186,905
37,995
4,436
19,879
26,768
7,288
388,900
6,817
24,547
640,168

1,375,817
296,560
38,284
145,773
218,876
66,078
3,140,049
56,913
168,506
4,878,083

+31
+s
+1

+31
+4
+11

+1

+9

+s
-2
+22
+19

+11
+5
+12
+24

37,014
37,038

293,857
294,028

+11
+4

+27
+21

District. 40 cities* .. 5,419,138
41,970,656
U.S., 342 cities .....125,291,000 1,040,398,000

+10
-2

+20
+17

-10
+17
+20
+13
+s
+12

+10
+16
+11
+14
+23
+17

:N°EW MEXICO

Albuquerque* ......
Santa Fe** ..........
OKLAHOMA

Bartlesville ..........
Enid ......................
Guthrie .................
La"\vton** .............
Muskogee .............
Norman** ............
Oklahoma City* ..
Okmulgee .............
Ponca City ...........
Tul.:;a ....................
WYOMING

Casper ..................
Cheyenne .............

average sales rose to 333 per cent of the 1935-39 average in August from a rather steady level of around
315 per cent the previous four months.
Department store inventories, which usually show
little change during August, increased somewhat this
year and the seasonally adjusted index of stocks rose
from 356 per cent of the 1935-39 average at the end
of July to 361 per cent at the end of August, reversjng
the trend of the three preceding months. Stocks of
merchandise on hand at the end of August were about
one fourth larger in value than a year earlier, but the
volume of outstanding orders was only half as large
as a year ago, when stores had been placing heavy
orders to replenish inventories.
DEPARTMENT STORE SALES AND STOCKS
SALES
STOCKS
Aug. 1951 8 Mos.1951
Aug. 31, 1951
comp. to
comp. to
comp. to
Aug. 1950 8 Mos.1950
Aug. 31, 1950
(Per cent increase or decrease)
Denver.............................. -7
+3
+30
Hutchinson ....................... -10
-1
+29
Topeka .............................. +u
+9
+16
Wichita............................. +5
+15
+30
Joplin............................
-7
+5
+10
Kansas City..................... -5
+2
+23
St. Joseph......................... -8
+2
•
Omaha.............................. -4
+6
+46
Oklahoma City................ -16
-4
+15
Tulsa ................................. -10
0
*
Other cities...................... -5
+2
+22
District.............................

-6

+3

+25

•Not shown separately but included in District total.

NEBRASKA

Fremont ...............
Grand Island .......
Hastings ..............
Lincoln* ...............
Omaha ..................

7

-

•Dollar figures inclu de one or more additional reporting banks, beginning
January, 1961; however, percentage changes shown are computed from
comparable data for both 1951 and 1950.
.. New reporting center. beginning January, 1951.

EMPLOYMENT

The employment situation and outlook is recejving
increasjngly widespread attention as forecasts of expanding defense activities are made for the months
ahead. After allowance is made for students seeking
summer jobs and still in the labor force, unemployment dropped to the lowest level of the postwar period
during- August, while nonagricultural employment
reached a new all-time high. The largest part of the
July-August gain occurred in manufacturing industries, as various seasonal and defense-related activities expanded their work forces. The change, however, was substantially smaller than a year ago,
largely because of a smaller than usual seasonal rise
in employment in the soft goods industries.
Over the past year, employment has increased
rapidly in the mountain states of the Tenth District.
From the standpojnt of type of activity, the largest
increase has been in governmental work. Construction, primarily "heavy," has contributed the next
largest number of new jobs in Colorado, while Wyoming and New Mexico report a drop in construction
employment. Increases in manufacturing employment have been shared by all three states and have
been particularly marked in the Colorado metal in-

8

REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS

dustries. It is interestjng to note that, although there
has been a greater expansion of employment in Colorado than in the other two states, the reactivation
and expansion of military facjlities, together with
stepped up minerals production, has allowed all three
states to expand their labor forces in competition with
more industrjalized areas.
Recognizing that the full impact of defense manpower mobilization has not yet hit the Rocky Mountain region, the Secretary of Labor has appojnted a
regional labor-management committee to assist in
over-all planning and to assist local areas in solving
problems involving manpower requirements, defense
training needs, recruiting, transportation, community
facilities, day-care centers for children of defense
workers, and other matters. The commjttee plans to
work with officials of the employment security agencies in the eight mountain states in setting up jts own
operational machinery.
In other parts of the Tenth District a sjmilar
tightening of the labor supply is reported. In Kansas
and western l\1issouri most communities affected by
the July flood report that employment is approachjng
the preflood level, and in Missouri unemployment
compensation claims were lower during July of this
year than they were a year ago in spite of the flood
s,ituation. On September 1, there were fewer workers
without jobs in the Omaha labor market than at any
time on record and, for the state as a whole, 25 per
cent fewer job seekers were registered than a year
ago. Unemployment has shown similar declines in Oklahoma, particularly in Tulsa where manufacturing
has recorded better than a 20 per cent gain over the
past year. The only severe labor shortage reported
for District cities is at Wichita, where several major
plants are heh.ind on their hiring schedules and there
is a critical need for construction workers for the
housing program and air base project.
BEEF PRODUCTION

Unless unforeseen events cause rapid slaughtering
during the remaining months of 1951, beef cattle
numbers on farms on January 1, 1952, will exceed by
a substantial figure the record number on farms on
January 1, 1945. On January 1 of this year, the United
States Department of Agriculture reported 84.2 million head of cattle and calves on United States farms
and ranches. This number was 4.1 million larger than
the number on farms the previous January and only
1.4 million lower than the all-time record number jn
January, 1945. During the first six months of this
year, 9 per cent fewer cattle and 18 per cent fewer
calves were slaughtered commercially than in the
same six months of 1950. Furthermore, the number
of calves produced this year should be signifjcantly

greater than last year because there are 1.6 million
more cows in the breeding herd. On the basis of this
evidence, it is apparent that farmers are retainjng
beef cattle on farms.
Cattle numbers on farms usually follow a rather
definite cycle. The cycle normally averages about 14
years in length. Currently, cattle numbers are passing
through the increasing phase of the cycle. For the
country as a whole, several factors have contributed
toward encouraging an increase jn the number of
beef cattle. First, a large feed production during the
past few years has resulted in relatively cheap feed
prices. Second, the large demand for beef has been
reflected in relatively high prices for beef, and feeding ratfos have been favorable. Third, an intensive
effort has been made to encourage farmers to adopt
good land use practices. Better pasture and land
managemen~ has resulted in higher production
of pasture and legume crops. These crops can
be marketed most successfully through livestock. The
large increase in numbers of beef cattle in the South
Atlantic and South Central states can be attributed
to better land use practices jn these areas and the
use of better pasture management. Fourth, pastures
and ranges in most areas of the United States, exclusive of the Southwest, have been good. Rainfall,
combined with cool weather, has increased the carrying capacity of pastures in large areas of the United
States. Fifth, developments and uncertajnties in
legislation have retarded marketings during recent
months. As a result, cattle numbers on farms are
large and cattle slaughter should increase in the near
future as farmers market a larger proportion of their
cattle. With numbers of cattle on farms on January
1, 1952, likely to exceed the record numbers on farms
on January 1, 1945, average annual beef production
during the per,iod from 1952 to 1954 could exceed the
current year's production by from 5 to 15 per cent, if
pasture and feed grain production can be maintained
at recent levels.
In the Tenth District, conditions encouraging the
retention of large numbers of beef cattle on farms
have been somewhat mjxed during the past year.
Pasture and hay conditions throughout most of the
District, with the exception of the southwestern part,
have been good. Prospects now appear favorable for
an abundant supply of winter wheat pasture during
the fall and winter. On the other hand, the production
of feed grains will be reduced from last year's level because of excessive ra,i nfall and flood damage throughout much of the District. Abundant rainfall and cool
weather, except for the southern and southwestern
parts of the District, have resulted in the holding of
many cattle on pastures for a longer period of time
than normal.