View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

i

M ONTHLY

—I

K

e

v

c

e

u

t

I N THI S I S S U E
Exports and Imports of Steel................. . . . 2

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of CLEVELAND —

Vtcuf. 1959

Notes on Federal Reserve Publications. . . . 5
Around the Fourth District...................... . . . 6
Changing Seasonal Patterns of
Department Store Sales...................... . . . 7
Three Measures of Employment
in Cleveland......................................... . . 1 0

U.S. EXPORTS AND IMPORTS OF STEEL




Exports and Imports of Steel
T n 1958 t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s exported nearly
J. twice as large a quantity of iron and steel
products as it imported.(1) The export surplus
was achieved despite the fact that the tonnage
of steel exported in 1958 was not much more
than half the quantity exported in 1957, while
the quantity of imports in 1958 was 40 per­
cent larger than in 1957. As a result of these
changes the U . S. export surplus in steel was,
however, the smallest since 1953.
Measured by dollar value, the export sur­
plus in 1958 was even larger than when meas­
ured by physical volume. Exports of iron and
steel products in 1958 were valued at $737
million, more than three times the $227-million valuation for steel imports.(2)
The drop in U. S. exports of steel from 1957
to 1958 was larger in percentage terms than
the decrease in total U. S. exports in the same
period. Total merchandise imports fell off
somewhat from 1957 to 1958, at the same time
that imports of steel increased sharply.

Foreign Trade in Two Recessions
As the cover chart shows, the 1957-1958
pattern of change in U. S. foreign trade in
steel was quite different from the experience
of the 1953-1954 recession. In the earlier
cycle, the volume of imported steel dropped
by half while the quantity of steel exported
declined only slightly. Imports had supplied
the marginal quantities needed in the boom
conditions of 1953; by 1958 imports of a num­
ber of steel products were apparently no
longer marginal. (Total U. S. imports also
declined from 1953 to 1954, but by a much
smaller proportion than steel imports.)
(1) Excluding pig iron and ferro-alloys.
( 2) All data on iron and steel products in tliis article are
taken from publications of the American Iron and Steel
Institute.

2



While changes in exports and imports of
steel did not conform closely to changes in
total foreign trade either in the 1953-1954 or
1957-1958 recessions, the net effect of foreign
trade in steel on the U. S. steel industry in
the two periods was similar to the effect of
foreign trade in general on the whole econ­
omy. That is, in the 1953-1954 period, changes
in foreign trade stimulated the domestic
economy and the U. S. steel industry, while
developments in 1957-1958 depressed both.
The U. S. export surplus in steel, as well as
in total foreign trade, was larger in 1954 than
in 1953, and thus provided some offset to the
1954 recession. In contrast, in 1958 the export
surplus, both in steel and all commodities,
was smaller than in 1957, and this decline in
the export surplus accentuated the 1958 re­
cession in general business and contributed
to the very sharp drop in activity in the steel
industry in 1958.
There were several reasons for the differ­
ing behavior of exports and imports in the
1953-1954 and 1957-1958 periods. One was
the slackening of industrial expansion in
Europe in 1957 and its virtual cessation in
1958, together with the development of excess
capacity and stocks in several basic industries
in Europe, including the coal and steel indus­
tries.(3) Not only did the European market
for U. S. exports decline, but Europe’s ex­
panded and improved industrial facilities
were able to offer effective competition to
U. S. producers, for the first time in the postWorld War II period, in other markets as
well as in the United States itself.
Other factors which worked toward the
curtailment of U. S. exports were the reces­
(*) Also, U. S. exports to Europe had been exceptionally
large in the latter part of 1956 and early in 1957 because of
the developments following the Suez crisis.

sions in Canada and Japan, and the drop in
export incomes of countries which produce
raw materials. The latter development, in
turn, was due in part to the large expansion
of productive capacity for certain raw mate­
rials; the expanded capacity was coming into
operation at about the time that European
and U. S. demand was falling.

T IN PLATE A N D TERNE PLATE
T h o u s a n d s of net ton s

7.0 0

0

6.000

DOMESTIC
SHIPMENTS
5.000

a

4.0 0 0

j

-------------------------------

-------------------- ---------------------------------

Table 1
PRINCIPAL STEEL E X P O R T S -n e t tons
1958

1957
Sheets and strip ............ ..... 1,076,306
Pipe and tubing ......... ..... 1,185,697
Shapes and plates ....... ..... 1,075,112
T in mill products ....... .....
620,392
Total steel exports

703,430
623,044
554,236
351,972

6,007,756

3,293,867

In summary form, Table 1 shows the
changes that occurred between 1957 and 1958
in major exports of steel products. The de­
cline in exports of the products listed in this
table accounts for two-thirds of the decrease
in total steel exports. Line pipe, as well as tin
and teme plate, which are important in terms

LINE PIPE
T h o u s a n d s of ne t to n s

5(000 -----------------------------

4 .0 0 0

DOMESTIC
SHIPMENTS A ,

^
S

V

*

3 .0 0 0

------------------------------------------ V ~

v

X

V

2,000

1,000

EXPORTS

°

1954

1955




1956

1957

1958

3.000

2 .0 0 0

EXPORTS

Y

1,000

-------------------------

_____ I
_______I
---------- !_______I
_____
1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

of total tonnage, also constitute a significant
proportion of U. S. production.
As the chart shows, both domestic ship­
ments and exports of line pipe have shown
considerable year-to-year fluctuation since
1953, in response to similar oscillations in the
investment programs of the natural gas and
petroleum industries which are the principal
consuming industries for this product. Line
pipe is a capital goods item, used in gas and
oil transmission and distribution lines. Siza­
ble year-to-year fluctuations are, therefore,
not surprising.
The sharp drop in domestic shipments of
line pipe from 1957 to 1958 was due to the
completion of several natural gas expansion
programs and the cessation of pipeline in­
stallations for the oil industry in 1958. Ex­
port shipments, which had increased sub­
stantially in 1956 and 1957 to supply pipe­
line projects in Canada and Venezuela,
dropped off as those projects were completed.
Exports of tinplate have been declining
since 1955 at the same time that domestic
shipments have been increasing. The relative
importance of exports has, therefore, also
lessened. Domestic shipments show some yearto-year fluctuation due to variations in fruit
3

and vegetable crops and in the size of the food
“ pack” . The drop in exports is attributed to
the increase in tinplate production in Western
Europe and the substantially lower prices of
European tinplate compared with the U. S.
product.

N A ILS A N D STAPLES
T h o u s a n d s of n et
7 0 0 ' - ...... ..

tons

6 00

X

Table 2
PRINCIPAL STEEL I M P O R T S -n e t tons
1957
Concrete reinforcing bars..
Structural shapes ..............
Pipe and tubing ................
Wire rods .............................

1958

160,371
311,517
190,727
54,369

472,741
241,393
200,038
181,283

Total steel imports ......... 1,321,003

1,844,242

The increase in imports of the products
listed in Table 2 accounted for nearly threequarters of the rise in total steel imports. If
imports of structural shapes, which declined
from 1957 to 1958, are excluded, the propor­
tion is even higher.
Not all of these large-volume steel imports
are as important in relation to domestic out­

put as some other products which represent a
smaller volume of steel imports, such as
barbed wire, nails (including staples), and
wire rods.
Imports Compete in Price
The lower price of the imported product
has been the principal factor in the increase
in imports of barbed wire, nails, and wire
rods. Barbed wire is the most spectacular ex­
ample of the displacement of domestic pro­
duction by imports, most of which come from
Belgium, Luxemburg, and West Germany. As
the chart shows, imports were larger than
domestic shipments in both 1957 and 1958,
but the drop in shipments by domestic pro­
ducers since 1953 has been much larger than
the increase in imports. That is, the total
market for barbed wire in the U. S. has de­
clined, as a result of the increased use of elec­
trified fence and the trend toward fewer and
larger farms. About three-fifths of the drop
in domestic shipments of barbed wire since
1953 was due to the decline in consumption,
and the balance to increased imports.

4




Imports of nails increased along with
domestic shipments from 1953 to 1955, but
since then, imported nails have accounted
for an increasingly large share of the domestic
market. Japan is the principal source of im­
ported nails, with Belgium, Luxemburg, the
Netherlands, and West Germany as secondary
suppliers.
Imports of wire rods rose sharply from
1957 to 1958, as the chart shows. Over the
period since 1955, however, the decline in
total consumption of wire rods has accounted
for more of the reduction in domestic ship­
ments than has the increase in imports.
In connection with the opening of the St.
Lawrence Seaway this year, it may be of
interest to note that the share of Great Lakes
ports in imports of steel has been quite small,
at least until 1959. In 1958 over 90 percent of
imported steel came through coastal ports,
mostly Atlantic and Gulf Coast ports.

NOTES ON FEDERAL RESERVE PUBLICATIONS
Among the articles recently published in the monthly business reviews of
other Federal Reserve banks are:
“ The 13b Program—An Experiment in Small Business Finance” , Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis, March 1959.
“ United States Foreign Trade and the Domestic Economy: Patterns and
Problems” , Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, April 1959.
“ Some Economics of Industrial Water Use” , Federal Reserve Bank of
Kansas City, April 1959.
“ The Common Market and European Economic Integration” , Federal Re­
serve Bank of New York, April 1959.
“ Mortgage Financing in the Postwar Period” , Federal Reserve Bank of
New York, April 1959.
“ Man-made Fibers” , Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, April 1959.
(Copies may be obtained without charge by writing to the Federal Reserve
Bank named in each case.)
# * *
Among the special publications of recent issue is the 54-page booklet en­
titled, “ The New York Foreign Exchange Market” , by Alan R. Holmes. Priced
at 50 cents each, copies are available from the Publications Division, Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, New York 45, New York.




5

Abound the fyamtlt ^bufaict
SAVINGS DEPOSITS O F INDIVIDUALS
(Outstanding at commercial banks, end of March 1959)
% change
from year ago
Canton ..............................................
Lexington ..........................................
Dayton ..............................................
Erie ...................................................
Pittsburgh ........................................
Akron ................................................
Cincinnati ........................................
Toledo ................................................
Youngstown ......................................
Cleveland ..........................................
Wheeling ..........................................

+20%
+11
+ 8
+ 8
+ 8
+ 6
+ 3
+ 3
+ 3
+ 2
+ 1

FOURTH DISTRICT TOTAL ..... + 5%
•

•

•

During March, department store sales in all reporting metropolitan areas
in the Fourth District scored gains over a year ago, ranging from 28 percent in
Portsmouth, Ohio, down to 4 percent in Erie, Pennsylvania. However, after
allowance for the difference in trading days and for seasonal variation, including
Easter, the adjusted sales index dropped from 133 in February to 128 in March.
# # #
Bank debits at 32 Fourth District centers during March were up 14 percent
from a year ago. In the first quarter, all but two centers participated in the 8
percent year-to-year increase, but in March all reporting centers showed gains.
Thus the recent activity in demand deposit accounts suggests a widening of the
improvement in business activity.
•

•

#

The 1958 advance in realized net income per farm in Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Kentucky, and West Virginia was smaller than the corresponding national ad­
vance. However, the gain in total net income per farm in these states was strik­
ingly greater than for the nation as a whole. Total net income is a measure that
adjusts realized net incomes for changes in inventories, and the large gains in
total net income of farmers in these four states are due mainly to increased farm
inventories of com, wheat, soybeans, and livestock.
# # *
During March, instalment sales at Fourth District department stores were
9 percent above March 1958, scoring a larger year-to-year gain than did cash or
charge-account sales. However, the ratio of instalment sales to the month’s total
declined from 18.5 percent in February to 16.9 percent in March.
(The above items are based on various series of District or local data, which are assem­
bled by this bank and distributed upon request in the form of mimeographed releases.)

6




The Changing Seasonal Pattern
of Department Store Sales
of the seasonal behavior of de­
partment store sales in the Fourth
Federal Reserve District for the past twelve
years has shown that a material change has
taken place in the seasonal pattern. The years
under observation were divided into two sixyear periods, 1947 through 1952, and 1953
through 1958.
The entry for any one month on the accom­
panying charts represents that month’s per­
centage of annual sales, averaged over the six
years of the designated period.(1) The results
for the earlier period, 1947-1952, appear on
the chart in the form of colored bars, whereas
the more recent period, 1953-1958, is repre­
sented by the black curve.
As shown by the chart for total store sales,
the entire seasonal pattern of department
store sales in the Fourth District has shifted
to the right; that is, sales during the first half
of the year have declined in relation to the
year’s total, while sales during the second
half of the year have increased their share.(2)
The relative reduction has been especially
pronounced in March and April, whereas the
relative gain has appeared especially in No­
vember and December. Thus the Christmas
shopping season has been increasing in im­
portance at the expense of Easter trade.

A

stu d y

been as deep in the more recent period as it
was in the preceding period. Perhaps the
greater effort on the part of department stores
to run special promotions during July and
August has helped to raise the sales level of
these two months. Also, more leisure and
longer vacations for Americans have resulted
in greater sales of sporting goods and casual
summer wear.

Department store sales during the first half of the
year have declined in relatio n to the year's total,
while August, November and December have In­
creased the ir shares.
M o n t h ly sales as percent of y e a r ’ s to ta l

It is also interesting to note that the mid­
year dip in department store sales has not
(1) The percentage relations of specific monthly sales to an­
nual sales were computed from sales indexes, on a 1947-49
base, before seasonal adjustment, but after allowance for
trading-day differences. The results are broadly comparable
with, although not identical with, the figures provided in
this bank’ s annual release entitled “ Distribution of Annual
Sales by Months; Fourth District Department Stores.”
(C .7.3.1) The latter series is not adjusted for differences in
trading days.
(2) The upward secular trend which has characterized de­
partment store sales in the postwar period, along with many
other economic series, may have had some influence on the
relative showing as between the first and the second halves
of the years. It is believed that allowance for such a factor
would not materially alter the findings described here.




7

A series of accompanying charts shows the
changing seasonal pattern of four groups of
departments within the department store
offerings. These four groups account for
nearly two-thirds of total store sales.

For women's apparel, the relativ e im portance of
November and December has increased considerably, chiefty a t the expense o f the first three months
of the year and the month of October.
M o n th ly sales as percent of y e a r ’ s to ta l
Fourth District Dept. Stores

•

•

•

•

W O M E N ’S AND
MISSES’ APPAREL

Women’s and Misses’ Accessories. The sea­
sonal pattern of women’s and misses’ acces­
sories has changed very little in the past
decade. Sales in July, November, and Decem­
ber have gained slightly at the expense of the
spring months, particularly March and May.
Women’s Apparel. In contrast to the case
with women’s and misses’ accessories, the

1953-58

The seasonal p a tte rn of women's and misses' acces­
sories has changed very li t t le In the past decade.

M o n th ly sales as percent of y e a r ’ s to ta l
18%

16

For homefurnishings, June, July and November have
recently become re la tiv e ly more im p o r ta n t tra d in g
months, while the importance o f A p r il and M ay has
declined considerably.

14

M o n th ly sales as percent of y e a r ’ s to ta l
12

10

8

6

4

2

0
J

F

M




A

M

J

J

A

S

O

N

D

seasonal shifts in sales of women’s and misses ’
apparel have been quite marked. The most
striking change occurred in the month of
December. During the earlier period, 19471952, sales of women’s apparel in December
averaged about 11 percent of the year’s total,
but in more recent years they increased to
nearly 13 percent. Sales in July, August, and
November have also shifted upward, whereas
the first three months of the year and the
month of October were the relative losers.
Men’s and Boys’ Wear. Seasonal fluctua­
tions in sales of men’s and boys’ wear are
always very large. Only four months of the
year (June, October, November, and Decem­
ber) have been above the annual average. The
recent change in the seasonal pattern has
brought about even greater seasonal swings.
The relative importance of December, for
example, has increased from less than 20 per­
cent in the 1947-52 period to more than 21
percent in the 1953-58 period, mainly at the
expense of spring months.
Homefurnishing s. While there is a definite
seasonal pattern in sales of homefurnishings,
the degree of fluctuation is considerably
smaller than is the case with apparel. The
shift in seasonal variation over the past
decade has resulted in an even more regular
pattern throughout the year. Thus, for exam­
ple, the usual mid-year decline has tended to
level out in recent years, in part, perhaps,
because of the increased sales of home air
conditioners during the summer months.
However, as in the case of apparel, the impor­
tance of November and December has in­
creased, while the spring and the early
autumn months have become less important
trading months for homefurnishings.




In the case of men's and boys’ wear, a substantial
increase In November and December has occurred
mainly a t the expense of spring months.

Monthly sales as percent of year's total

9

Three Measures of Employment
in Cleveland
e ve ra l

different methods of gauging the

S level of employment in Cleveland have
been developed in response to different needs.

Each method makes its own special contribu­
tion to an understanding of the current situa­
tion. Although the published results of the
several employment measures are not readily
comparable with one another, careful analy­
sis shows that they supplement each other in
a very useful way. The following brief de­
scriptions of three major employment barometerS-will explain the differences between them
and at the same time point out the particular
merits of each one. Employment in 100 Industries. One of the
oldest series of statistics measuring employ­
ment in Cleveland is the one called ‘ ‘ Employ­
ment in 100 Cleveland Industries” . It is com­
piled and published each month by the Cleve­
land Chamber of Commerce and it reports
the number of employees at 100 of Cleveland’s
larger manufacturing companies. These co­
operating companies were selected to repre­
sent various types of local manufacturing
activity. The figures gathered each month are
thus a sample count; they are neither a full
enumeration nor an estimate of total Cleve­
land employment, and they serve only to in­
dicate what the over-all trend may be.
The 100-company report has two special
merits: (1) it is available very promptly, dur­
ing the first week following the month of
report, and (2) it is sensitive to small monthto-month changes and thus is quick to reflect
the formation of a significant trend. The total
figure is subdivided into certain major indus­
trial groups. One limitation of the report,
however, is that it measures only manufac­
turing employment. This leaves substantial
gaps in coverage since it omits important sec­
10




tors of business such as construction, retail
trade, financial services, etc.
A resume of recent performance of the
100-company report shows that in June of
1958, Cleveland manufacturing employees
were the fewest in many years. The actual
figure reported at that time was 91,900, or
substantially below any month of 1957, dur­
ing which year employment at the 100 com­
panies ranged from a February high of
111,000 down to 102,000 at the close of the
year.
Month-to-month improvement has been re­
ported persistently since the June 1958 low
point, but the first year-to-year gain since the
start of the recession appeared when the fig­
ure for February 1959 advanced to 97,900.
The increase from the previous year was
slight, amounting to less than 1%. But in
March, employment in the 100 companies rose
to 99,127 and the year-to-year gain widened
to 4%, but partly because the year-ago month
had indicated a decline.
Employment, Hours, and Earnings in Ohio.
The Ohio Bureau of Unemployment Compen­
sation, through its Division of Research and
Statistics, now reports total monthly employ­
ment statistics for Cleveland, as well as for
seven other metropolitan areas in Ohio. (Until
recently, only manufacturing employment
was reported.) The published figures, pre­
pared in cooperation with U. S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics, are estimates of total area
employment rather than sample counts. How­
ever, complete coverage is not claimed since
no attempt is made to include the selfemployed, those working as domestics, or
members of the armed services. It should also
be pointed out that the statistics for the
Cleveland metropolitan area include all of

Cuyahoga and Lake counties, not just Cleve­
land proper.
One of the major assets of the O.B.U.C.
employment reports is that all manufactur­
ing industries are included, as well as retail
trade, services, construction and government
employment. Furthermore, total employment
is subdivided into more than 40 standard in­
dustrial classifications, which thus provides a
great deal of detail which is valuable in it­
self, and which can also be related to other
series using the standard industrial classifica­
tions. Like the Chamber of Commerce report,
the O.B.U.C. report reflects small as well as
large changes, thus making it possible to de­
tect the course of a trend as it is developing.
However, the reports take some time to
prepare and are not available until about
four weeks after the end of the month. There
are also some problems encountered in using
O.B.U.C. figures when attempting to recon­
struct a historical picture and in making com­
parisons with past years, insofar as sub­
stantial revisions of back data are frequently
necessitated by changes in the benchmarks
used to estimate the current statistics.
According to the monthly report of the
Ohio Bureau of Unemployment Compensa­
tion, the low point in Cleveland employment
during the recent recession occurred late in
the spring of last year. Steady improvement
has been reported each month since then. In
January 1959, total nonagricultural employ­
ment in the Cleveland metropolitan area was
indicated at 668,300, or about 3% below the
year-ago figure. From that point, total em­
ployment increased to 669,300 in February,
off less than 1% from the year-ago month, and
to 675,400 in March, up 1.4% from the yearago month. Thus, through March of this year,
the O.B.U.C. data have consistently confirmed
the rising trend indicated earlier each month
by the somewhat narrower Chamber of Com­
merce series.
The unique value of the O.B.U.C. report in
providing detailed data for various industries
is illustrated by the following case. While
total employment in March 1959 was slightly
higher than a year earlier, employment of
approximately 24,000 workers at blast fur­




naces and steel mills in Cleveland showed a
54% rise while, on the other hand, employ­
ment of about 26,000 workers in contract con­
struction here was 21% below that of a year
ago.
Labor Market Area Classifications. A third
method of appraising the over-all employ­
ment situation in Cleveland, and one which
focuses on the degree of joblessness that
exists, is the bi-monthly series prepared by
the Bureau of Employment Security of the
U. S. Department of Labor in which Cleve­
land, defined as Cuyahoga and Lake counties,
and 148 other major industrial areas are each
classified into one of six labor-supply cate­
gories labeled A, B, C, D, E, and F. In brief,
“ A ” indicates a labor shortage, “ B ” and
“ C ” indicate a low or moderate labor sur­
plus, and “ D ” , “ E ” , and “ F ” indicate a
substantial labor surplus of progressively
greater proportions.
It is immediately apparent that these rat­
ings are simple in form and easy to under­
stand. They have the further unique advan­
tage of making it readily possible to compare
each of the 149 major labor market areas in
the nation with any of the others. However,
there is considerable latitude within each
rating and naturally they are not sensitive to
small changes that may be occurring.
In May 1958, Cleveland dropped into the
“ D ” classification, which is defined as indicat­
ing a substantial labor surplus area with un­
employment affecting 6% to 9% of the total
labor force. This was the least favorable rat­
ing given to Cleveland since the inception of
the system three years before, in May of 1955.
Thus, at the low point of the recession, the
B.E.S. area rating confirmed the similar re­
sults being shown at the same time by the
Chamber of Commerce and the O.B.U.C. re­
ports.
But the gradual uptrend in employment
that was visible all through the last half of 1958
in both the Chamber of Commerce data and
the O.B.U.C. reports was not revealed by the
very broad B.E.S. area classifications until
January of this year when Cleveland returned
to the “ C ” group for the first time since
March of last year. No further improvement
11

has yet been reported; Cleveland was still
listed in the “ C ” group as of March 1959,
the latest B.E.S. report date, although both
of the other two employment barometers have
flashed a signal that some further improve­
ment has occurred. Apparently the gains have
not been strong enough to warrant reclassi­
fication under the B.E.S. rating system.
Thus, in making use of the B.E.S. area
ratings, the main advantages—simplicity of
final results and ready comparability with
other areas—must be weighed against the fact
that the results have been intentionally sim­
plified so as not to reflect small changes until
they have accumulated into a large change.
As previously noted, the area ratings do not
represent an employment count. They refer
to the proportion of the current labor supply
that is unemployed. Consideration is given to
the fact that the number of people in the total,
labor force, whether employed or not, Varies
from time to time as a result of population

12



increases (or decreases) among the group
which is of working age and which is desirous
of employment. Thus, changes in employment
are not equal and opposite to changes in un­
employment.
It is furthermore true that an element of
judgment is injected into the area ratings,
judgment that considers, among other factors,
“ the outlook, as reflected by local employer
estimates of their manpower requirements” .
One other major difference may be men­
tioned. Both the Ohio Bureau of Unemploy­
ment Compensation and the Cleveland Cham­
ber of Commerce reports include statistics
relating to hours worked and wages paid
whereas the area ratings do not provide any
direct information of that sort.
It is clear that for the best possible picture
of the employment situation in Cleveland, it
is necessary to synthesize the information
provided by all three of the reports described.