View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MARCH 1964

IN THIS ISSUE

THE ALUMINUM
INDUSTRY:
ITS PROBLEMS
AND PROGRESS

FEDERAL



RESERVE

BANK

OF

CLEVELAND

Additional copies of the ECON OM IC REVIEW
may be obtained from the Research Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cleveland,
Ohio 44101. Permission is granted to reproduce
any material in this publication.




MARCH 196 4

THE ALUMINUM INDUSTRY:
ITS PROBLEMS AND PROGRESS

HE TOTAL production of primary alumi­
num in the United States ranks second
only to steel in the production of all primary
metals. From 1950 through 1963, domestic
production of primary aluminum increased
by more than three times as much as total
industrial production, while the combined
output of other primary metals (steel, copper,
lead, magnesium and zinc) was virtually
unchanged.1
The expansion of the aluminum industry

T

1 Primary aluminum refers to aluminum produced from
bauxite ore. Secondary aluminum is recovered from
scrap and is not freely substitutable for the primary
product because of impurities. Primary producers
account for more than 80 percent of total production
in the United States as well as for the bulk of the capital
invested in the aluminum industry.




has not taken place without problems. Re­
cently, for example, the industry has had to
cope with excess capacity, unstable prices,
and relatively low profits. These problems
are being overcome in part by the improve­
ment of existing markets and the development
of new ones. In fact, steadily increasing con­
sumption of aluminum may bring about re­
newed expansion of productive capacity.
This article surveys the aluminum industry.
It discusses various technical aspects of
aluminum, geographical factors, and the
structure of the industry. The article also
considers the relationship of capacity to
production, the behavior of aluminum prices
and profits, expanding markets, world trade
in aluminum, and international expansion of
the industry.
3

ECONOMIC REVIEW
From 1 9 5 0 to 1 9 6 3 the production of
prim ary aluminum increased more than
th ree tim es as much as total industrial
production w h e re a s the output of other
prim ary m etals showed little change.

1.
IN D E X 1950=100

Because of a shortage of high grade sources
in the U. S., four-fifths of the aluminum in­
dustry's supply of bauxite has to be imported
from Jamaica, Surinam, Dominican Republic,
Haiti, and British Guiana. The other one-fifth
is mined domestically, primarily in Arkansas.
Inasmuch as bauxite is found near the surface
of the earth, it is mined with large power
shovels. After being crushed and dried, it is
shipped to refining plants located in the Gulf
Coast region of the United States (Texas,
Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Ala­
bama) .
In the refining process, bauxite is mixed
with a solution of caustic soda. When the
mixture is heated under pressure, the hydra­
ted alumina contained in the bauxite dissolves.
After being precipitated from the solution
and washed, the hydrated alumina is dried
in large kilns. The resultant white powder
(pure alumina) is shipped to reduction
plants.

Sources o f d a ta : U. S. Departm ent o f the Interior;
Aluminum Association;
B oard o f G overnors o f the F ed e ra l
Reserve System

THE PRODUCTION PROCESS
Primary aluminum is obtained commerci­
ally from bauxite ore, which is essentially
aluminum in chemical combination with
oxygen and water plus other materials re­
garded as impurities.2 Bauxite is found in
large quantities in many parts of the world.
2 High grade bauxite contains from 50 to 6 0 percent
alumina (aluminum oxide), 15 to 32 percent water,
2 to 7 percent silica (silicon dioxide), 2 to 2 0 percent
iron oxide, and 2 to 4 percent titanium oxide. Traces
of a number of other minerals are usually present.

4



In the reduction process pure alumina is
smelted in large electrolytic furnaces called
cells or pots and separated into its component
parts—aluminum and oxygen. In each cell, a
direct electrical current is passed through a
solution of alumina and cryolite. The elec­
trical current passes out of the furnace
through the carbon lining of the pot. The
current causes metallic aluminum to be
deposited on the lining where it settles to the
bottom of the cell. At intervals the aluminum
is siphoned from the pots and the molten
metal then is cast into ingots of various forms
and sizes. From ingot form, the metal is
rolled, extruded, forged, or cast into semi­
fabricated shapes required by manufac­

MARCH 1 9 6 4

turers that fashion them into a myriad of
finished products.3

GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION
AND ELECTRIC POWER
Because the production of primary alu­
minum requires large quantities of electrical
power, the industry has located reduction
plants where inexpensive electric power is
available. As shown in the Map low-cost
hydroelectric power attracted the industry
to the St. Lawrence river valley early in the
century. A shortage of electric power in
northern New York, however, soon caused
an increase in its cost, and the industry began
to move to areas with lower costs.
During World War I the industry expanded
in the Tennessee and Yadkin River Valleys,
where it was able to obtain electric power
from falling water. The industry developed its
own facilities many years prior to the pur­
chase of electric power from the Tennessee
Valley Authority.
During World War II, vast quantities of
aluminum were needed for the aircraft in­
dustry located in the Pacific Coast region.
To encourage aluminum production in that
region, the Federal government subsidized
the development of hydroelectric power sites
in Washington and Oregon. The combination
of government subsidies and the wartime
demand for large quantities of aluminum was
a major influence in the aluminum indus­
try's decision to locate in the Pacific North­
west.
3 Semifabricated shapes include sheet and plate, rod
and bar, extruded and drawn products, tubing, castings
and forgings, wire and cable, foil, and powder and
paste.




The Korean War brought about another
surge in demand for aluminum. Because of a
shortage of hydroelectric sites in the nation,
the industry expanded to the Gulf Coast and
Arkansas where electrical energy could be
derived from natural gas. By 1955, however,
it became apparent that low-cost gas could
not be relied on in the long-range expansion
plans of the aluminum industry. The wide­
spread use of gas as a source of domestic
heating led to the rapid construction of gas
transmission lines; it also committed large
gas reserves to be used for the eastern and
midwestern states. The increasing cost and
potential shortage of natural gas caused by
this market expansion forced the aluminum
industry to search elsewhere for an alterna­
tive source of cheap and abundant electrical
power.
Because coal is another source of fuel that
may be used for producing electric power,
and a fuel of which this nation has a relative
abundance, the industry considered the
possibility of producing primary aluminum
in the Ohio River Valley, where vast deposits
of bituminous coal are located nearby.4 (A
portion of the Ohio River Valley lies within
the Fourth Federal Reserve District.)
The combination of substantial coal re­
serves, the mechanization of coal mining, and
innovations in steam generating plants re­
duced the cost of producing electric power
in the Ohio River Valley. Although electrical
power rates in this area are greater than rates
in the Pacific Northwest and in most other
areas of primary aluminum production, the
4 The Ohio River Valley consists of a portion of six
states (Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, West Virginia,
and Pennsylvania) that border on the Ohio River.

5

ECONOMIC REVIEW

GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS OF ALUMINUM PRODUCTION

<$> ST. L A W R E N C E R I V E R V A L L E Y
<2> T E N N E S S E E & Y A D K I N R I V E R V A L L E Y S
<§> P A C I F I C N O R T H W E S T
<$> G U L F C O A S T & A R K A N S A S
<S> O H I O R I V E R V A L L E Y

Source o f d a ta : U. S. Departm ent o f the Interior

The aluminum industry has located reduction plants in regions w h ere inexpensive
electrical pow er is availab le. Initially, the industry built facilities in the St. Law rence
River V alley. Later, it developed in the Tennessee and Yadkin River V alleys. During
World W ar II, the industry expan d ed in the Pacific N orthw est. Plants w e re constructed
on the Gulf Coast and in A rkansas during the Korean W ar. Since 1 9 5 7 , the Ohio River
V alley has exp erien ced a rapid growth in the production of prim ary aluminum.
6



MARCH 1 96 4

Ohio River Valley is located closer to alu­
minum consuming firms (aluminum fabrica­
tors). In fact, approximately 70 percent of
the total aluminum market is within 500 miles
of the Ohio River Valley. In addition, the basic
raw material (alumina) is transported inex­
pensively from the Gulf Coast to the Ohio
River Valley by rail or via the Mississippi and
Ohio Rivers. The net overall saving in the
transportation cost of alumina and primary
aluminum apparently more than offsets the
difference in the cost of electrical power.
Since 1957, the Ohio River Valley has
become the third largest area of primary
aluminum production in the United States.
This area accounts for approximately 20 per­
cent of the nation's primary aluminum output
as compared with 27 percent for the Pacific
Northwest and 3 0 percent for the Gulf Coast
and Arkansas.

INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
For more than 50 years after the start
of aluminum production, only one firm pro­
duced primary aluminum in the United
States. In 1941, however, a second firm,
with an established reputation in the output
of aluminum foil, began to produce primary
aluminum in anticipation of heavy defense
needs. During World War II, the Federal
government also constructed additional facili­
ties to meet the increasing demand for alu­
minum. At the end of the war, the Federal
government sought to encourage additional
competition in the industry by selling some
of its plants to firms who wished to enter the
industry. As a result, a third company en­
tered the industry in 1946. Three more firms




in the 1950's started to produce primary
aluminum to supply their own fabricating
operations and to obtain a share of total
capacity. In 1963 a foreign-owned corpora­
tion began to produce primary aluminum in
the United States. The industry now has seven
producers engaged in both the production of
primary aluminum and in a number of semi­
fabricated shapes. Nevertheless, the three
largest producers account for 80 percent of
primary aluminum production and 65 per­
cent of the production of semifabricated
shapes.
A high degree of vertical and horizontal
integration characterizes the operation of the
three largest producers. That is to say, each
firm has established facilities at all stages of
aluminum production, from the mining of
bauxite to the final sale of aluminum products
(vertical integration). Each firm also has
extensive control over an increasing number
of operations at any one stage of its produc­
tion and sales (horizontal integration).
In addition to the major producers, there
are several thousand foundries that produce
aluminum castings and more than 200 fabri­
cators making semifabricated shapes ex­
clusively.

CAPACITY AND PRODUCTION
From 1950 through 1963 primary alu­
minum capacity in the United States more
than tripled, with the increase occurring at
an uneven pace. In 1963 capacity was
estimated at approximately 2.5 million tons
of primary aluminum (see Chart 3). The in­
crease in capacity represents a considerable
capital outlay because the investment per
7

ECONOMIC REVIEW

stepped-up purchases for the
Federal government stockpile of
aluminum.

Another

incentive

was the privilege of selling large
quantities of aluminum to the
government at a fixed price, if
future markets were unable to
absorb all of the metal produced.5
Production kept pace with the
expansion in capacity from 1950
through 1956. In 1957, how­
ever, a decline in production

Source o f d a ta : U. S. Departm ent o f the Interior

ton of basic aluminum capacity is much larger
than for any other metal. Integrated facilities
for producing primary aluminum from bauxite
are estimated to cost from $ 1 ,000 to $1,400
per ton of capacity, depending upon the
size of the plant; this compares, for example,
with $ 1 0 0 to $ 1 50 per ton for producing
steel.
The early phase of the expansion in capa­
city was partly in response to encouragement
by the Federal government. To induce rapid
investment, the government offered to the
aluminum industry both accelerated depreci­
ation allowances for new facilities and
8



marked the beginning of a fiveyear period when the outputcapacity relationship was below
the desired ratio (see Chart 3).
Because of excess capacity, the
construction of new plant facili­
ties was curtailed as quickly as
possible, so that capacity showed
only a slight increase in 1959-63.
Resumption of capacity expan­
sion is scheduled by some of the
large producers in the face of
rising output, which is approaching full
capacity utilization.
The causes of excess capacity are easily
identified. During the early 1950's a large
portion of primary aluminum production,
instead of being consumed in military or
civilian products, was allocated to the Federal
government's strategic stockpile. Hence, from
1950 through 1956, the shortage of aluminum
was probably caused by the strong demand
for stockpile purposes. Because of govern­
5 This provision is known as "put rights” , under which
the industry sold approximately 9 0 0 thousand tons of
aluminum ingot to the government from 1956 to 1963.

MARCH 196 4

mental incentives and because of inaccurate
forecasting of demand, the industry expanded
facilities in excess of demand. In addition,
several major commercial markets for alu­
minum, notably residential construction, home
appliances, and automobiles, also experi­
enced slack demand in 1957-58 and in
1960-61. The combination of these circum­
stances burdened primary aluminum pro­
ducers with excess capacity, particularly in
1958 and 1961. A sharp rise in exports in
1960, however, allowed primary aluminum
production to rise slightly from the 1959 level.

THE BEHAVIOR OF PRICES
AND PROFITS
The rate of capacity at which the industry
operates has a strong influence on the price
of primary aluminum. Historically, the price
has increased less rapidly than wholesale
prices.6 From 1950 to 1957, however, the
price of primary aluminum increased faster
than wholesale prices as illustrated in Chart 4.
The rapid increase in the price of primary
aluminum reflected shortages when the in­
dustry was operating near full capacity.
During the period of excess capacity that

started in 1957 primary producers competed
vigorously for orders to activate their idle
capacity, and the price of primary aluminum
as well as prices of semifabricated shapes
declined sharply, while wholesale prices
remained steady.
Since October 1963 the industry has once
again been operating near full capacity, and
at the close of March 1964 the price of
primary aluminum had increased from 22 3^
cents per pound to 23}-^ cents.7 The prices of
a wide range of semifabricated shapes also
have increased during this period.8
Partially because of declining prices, profits
after taxes for the three largest producers fell
The price of prim ary aluminum increased
fa ster than w holesale prices from 1 9 5 0 to
1 9 5 7 . Commencing in 1 9 5 7 , ho w ever, the
price of prim ary metal declined rapidly
w hile w holesale prices rem ained stead y.

4.
IN D E X 1950=100

6 Aluminum prices have been more stable and have
risen less than the prices of other metals.
7 Although the price of primary aluminum increased in
October 1963, the average price of primary aluminum
for 1963 was lower than that for 1962. The decline was
caused by the sharp decrease in the price of primary
aluminum from 24 cents per pound to 2 2 x/2 cents in
December 1962.
8 The prices of some semifabricated shapes have been
adjusted upward to eliminate the practice of so-called
"commodity pricing”, i.e., selling a standard product
for a specific application at a price lower than the pub­
lished price.




*U n allo yed ingot
Sources o f d a ta : Bureau of La b o r Statistics;
Aluminum Association

9

ECONOMIC REVIEW

5.

ALUMINUM IN CONSTRUCTION

sharply from 1957 to 1960. Although the
average price of primary aluminum con­
tinued to decline from 1961 to 1963, profits
after taxes for the three largest producers did
improve slightly.

MARKETS FOR ALUMINUM

ALUMINUM IN TRANSP OR T ATIO N

The aluminum industry recognized that the
solution to its problems depended in part on
its success in increasing the demand for alu­
minum through expanding existing markets
and creating new uses for the metal. In devel­
oping new uses for aluminum, the industry
has utilized the advantages of aluminum, i.e.,
lightness, resistance to corrosion, machinability, appearance, electrical conductivity
and ease of fabrication.
Existing markets for aluminum are com­
prised of five major industries, namely, con­
struction, transportation, consumer durables,
electrical equipment, and packaging, as well
as other uses of aluminum. In 1963 these
users consumed approximately 6 ,250 million
pounds of aluminum.

ALUMINUM IN CONSUMER DURABLES

The construction industry is one of the
largest users of aluminum. It consumed about
1,440 million pounds or almost one-fourth of
total aluminum shipments in 1963. As shown
in Chart 5, the size of this market has in­
creased more than 50 percent during the
past five years. The increasing use of alu­
minum in construction reflects the wide
acceptance of curtain wall construction for
office buildings and the expanded use of
aluminum in residential housing.9 Bridges,

Sources o f d a ta : Estimates b y the Aluminum
Association and b y the
aluminum industry

10



9 The average new house consumed 2 3 0 pounds of
aluminum in 1962 compared with 8 0 pounds in 1955.

MARCH 1964

highway accessories, and the general con­
struction field are other important outlets.
The transportation industry is another im­
portant market for aluminum. Although its

ALUMINUM IN ELECTRI CAL INDUSTRY

use of the metal declined in 1955-58 because
of the reduction in military aircraft produc­
tion (see Chart 5), the transportation industry
has been the largest expanding market for
aluminum since 1958. In 1963 it consumed
about the same quantity of aluminum as the
construction industry. The use of aluminum
for transportation applications has more than
doubled since 1958, partly because of record
consumption by the automotive industry.10
Other important uses for aluminum in trans­

ALUMINUM IN PA CK AGIN G

portation are: commercial aircraft, railroad
cars, cargo containers, ships, and mobile
homes.
The amount of aluminum used in consumer
durables showed little change from 1955
through 1963 (see Chart 5). This market
consumed approximately 650 million pounds
of aluminum or more than 10 percent of total
shipments in 1963.
The electrical equipment industry's con­

ALL OTHER USES OF ALUMINUM

sumption of aluminum increased more than
40 percent in 1960-63 (see Chart 6). In 1963
the demand for aluminum by this industry
was equivalent to the amount used by manu­
facturers of consumer durables. Increased
aluminum consumption

by the

electrical

equipment industry is a result of many new
applications ranging from light bulb bases
10 The average amount of aluminum used in passenger
vehicles increased from 52 pounds per car in 1958 to
7 0 pounds in 1963.




Sources o f d a ta : Estimates b y the Aluminum
Association and b y the
aluminum industry

11

ECONOMIC REVIEW

to cross-country transmission cables. Pro­
ducers of electronic equipment (automatic
controls, computers, and communications
systems) have relied heavily on aluminum's
properties: electrical conductivity, corrosion
resistance, ease of fabrication, and nonmag­
netic quality. Large quantities of aluminum
are used in the production of wire and cable,
conduit, lighting fixtures, motors and genera­
tors, and transformers.
The use of aluminum by the packaging
industry more than doubled from 1958
through 1963 (see Chart 6). The sharp rise
in 1959 was caused by the increased use of
aluminum for flexible foil packaging and semi­
rigid foil containers. In the past three years,
the gain has been stimulated by the increasing
consumption of aluminum for cans, foil con­
tainers, and household foil. In 1963 pack­
aging consumed about 480 million pounds of
aluminum or approximately 7 percent of
total aluminum shipments.
The total of all other uses of aluminum
has doubled during the past five years, as
illustrated by Chart 6. The gain has resulted
from a wide variety of uses: e.g., industrial
equipment, irrigation pipe, rocket fuel, and
deoxidants, as well as for export purposes.

EXPORTS AND IMPORTS
Exports of primary aluminum increased
from 56 .0 million pounds in 1957 to 5 70.0
million pounds in 1960, an all-time high (see
Chart 7). This overall advance was in large
part an outgrowth of the acquisition of foreign
facilities by U. S. manufacturing firms that
consumed large quantities of aluminum from
the United States. In 1960 a sharp rise in
exports represented a buildup in inventories
12



at the newly acquired foreign facilities. After
declining sharply to 2 5 7 .7 million pounds in
1961, exports of aluminum have increased
steadily. Exports of primary aluminum
amounted to approximately 3 30.7 million
pounds in 1963. The United Kingdom, West
Germany, Italy, Argentina and France were
the principal destinations of these exports.
Despite the overall improvement in primary
aluminum exports, imports of aluminum have
exceeded exports by a substantial amount for
a number of years, with the exception of
1960. In 1963 imports of primary aluminum
amounted to about 8 31.2 million pounds.
More than 65 percent of these imports came
from Canada, with Norway and France
supplying about 21 percent and 8 percent,
respectively.
Imports of primary aluminum remain at a
high level because the price from Canada and
several other foreign countries is less than, or
competitive with, the price of similar domestic
products, even after payment of a 5 percent
tariff on imports of primary aluminum into
this country. In addition, because the large
aluminum fabricators also produce primary
aluminum there is a tendency on the part
of other fabricators in the United States to
purchase their aluminum abroad rather than
from their competitors.
In attempting to sell aluminum in other
markets, U. S. exporters of aluminum are
confronted by obstacles and hindrances
similar to those that face exporters of other
nations, e.g., the ad valorem tariff on alu­
minum imposed by other major countries
is more than in the United States. (It should
be remembered that the ad valorem tariff is
determined as a percent of price, and country-

MARCH 196 4
Exports of prim ary aluminum expan d ed rapidly from 1 9 5 7 to 1 9 6 0 . After a sharp
decline in 1 9 6 1 , these exports increased stead ily. Imports of prim ary aluminum, how ­
e v er, have exceed ed exports by a substantial amount for a number of y e a rs. Exports
and imports of sem ifabricated shapes remain at a low level.

7.

Sources o f d a ta : Aluminum Association; U. S. Departm ent of Commerce

to-country comparisons are especially diffi­
cult to make because of price variations.)
To expand foreign trade, the U. S. aluminum
industry is arguing for "equal opportunity"
in free world aluminum markets. That is to
say, U. S. firms advocate the reduction of
foreign tariffs on primary metal and semi­
fabricated shapes to the levels of those of
the United States. If this goal cannot be
achieved, U. S. producers advocate raising
the U. S. tariff to the same level as those
maintained by other countries.
Aluminum scrap is not subjected to a
similar tariff situation and has become an




important product in international trade.
Foreign producers demand large quantities
of aluminum scrap because many semi­
fabricated shapes may be produced at a lower
cost by the remelting of imported scrap rather
than by the importing of primary metal. The
countries in which these foreign producers
are located include West Germany, Italy, and
Japan, all of which have a deficiency of
primary aluminum capacity. Consequently,
aluminum scrap has been exported from the
United States in increasing amounts, expand­
ing from 36.3 million pounds in 1957 to 142.1
million pounds in 1963.
13

ECONOMIC REVIEW

WORLD-WIDE EXPANSION
The U. S. aluminum industry already had
extensive overseas interests prior to 1957
inasmuch as large quantities of bauxite were
mined in foreign countries. In the late 1950's,
additional aluminum firms were acquired in
England. Following the acquisition of these
facilities, the industry acquired many plants
in Western Europe. In the past few years,
U. S. aluminum producers also have estab­
lished additional facilities in South America,
Africa, Asia, and Australia.
The purpose of developing an overseas
network of plants is to serve the expanding
world aluminum market. At the present time,
aluminum consumption in the United States
is about 28.5 pounds per capita; this compares
with 10.8 pounds per capita in the European
Common Market countries, 10.0 pounds in

Australia, 4 .4 pounds in lapan, less than 1.0
pounds in Africa, India, and South America.
Such a comparison suggests that aluminum
consumption may increase in many nations.

CONCLUSION
The recent problems experienced by the
aluminum industry are being overcome for
the most part by aggressive marketing poli­
cies. Such policies are indispensable to the
expansion of the aluminum industry in the
face of competition both here and abroad.
Following several years of virtually no
change in capacity, the steadily increasing
consumption of aluminum suggests that the
industry again may be on the verge of a new
period of expansion. If such an expansion
occurs, the Ohio River Valley may be a
beneficiary because of its locational and
resource advantages.

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYST EM :
PURPOSES AND FUNCTIONS
The fifth edition of THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM : PU RPO SES AND
FUN CTIO N S commemorates the fiftieth anniversary of the signing of the
Federal Reserve Act by President W oodrow Wilson on December 2 3 , 1 9 1 3 .
The new edition has been expanded to include chapters on the o rg an iza­
tion of the Federal Reserve System for policy making, on the open market
policy process, and on the balance of payments. These and other changes
that have been made throughout the text are designed to c la rify the
System’s role and functioning in light of changes that have occurred in the
national and world economies and in light of further advances in monetary
knowledge.
Published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
Washington, D .C., December 19 6 3 .
Copies may be obtained by writing to:
Research Department
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland
C leveland, Ohio 44101

14



MARCH 196 4

RECENTLY PUBLISHED
FEDERAL RESERVE BAN K OF
A TLA N TA , G EO R G IA

THE INTERNATIONAL M ONETARY SYSTEM: AS IT IS
THE INTERNATIONAL M ONETARY SYSTEM:
AS IT MIGHT BE
Monthly Review, Jan u ary and February 1964

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN K OF
BOSTON, M ASSACHUSETTS

WHY FINANCE COMPETITORS?

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN K OF
M INNEAPOLIS, M INNESOTA

THE AN ATO M Y OF INNKEEPING

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN K OF
NEW Y O R K , NEW YO R K

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN K OF
SAN FR A N CISCO ,
C A LIFO R N IA




New England Business Review, February 1964

Monthly Review, February 1964

TREASURY AND FEDERAL RESERVE FOREIGN
EXCHANGE OPERATIONS, AND THE GOLD POOL
Monthly Review, March 1964

THE TAXES THAT WON’T BE CUT
Monthly Review, Janu ary 1964

15




Fourth Federal Reserve District