View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FEBRUARY 1964

IN T H IS IS S U E

Inventories in
Perspective................. 3

External Financing by
Fourth District
Industries, 1953-1963.. 8

FEDERAL RESERVE



B A N K OF C L E V E L A N D

Additional copies of the E C O N O M IC

REVIEW

m ay be obtained from the Research Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cleveland,
O hio 4 4 1 0 1 . Permission is granted to reproduce
any material in this publication.




FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4

INVENTORIES IN PERSPECTIVE

HE BEHAVIOR of inventories held by

This article examines specifically the in­

T

business firms corresponds closely with

ventories held by manufacturers of durable

movements in econom ic activity. For ex­

goods and the behavior patterns that might

ample, during the recessions of both 1953-

be expected. The durable goods segment of

1954 and 1957-1958, a major portion of the

total business inventories has been selected

decline that occurred in the Gross National

because it is the volatile portion of the total,

Product was explained by a reduction in the

accounting for virtually all of the cyclical

level of business inventories. In the 1960-

movement in the total business inventory

1961 recession, the small decline in GNP

series. Briefly stated, the evidence presented

was accom panied by an even larger net

here suggests that inventory accumulation

decline in business inventories. On the other

will continue in the near term, and that this

hand, during the early stages of econom ic

will occur at a reasonably moderate pace.

recovery, increases in the level of business
inventories usually have provided impetus to

S U R V E Y O F E X P E C T A T IO N S

the thrust of the economy.
A review of the business inventory situation

year, inventory expectations of durable goods

is appropriate at this time, not only because

manufacturers suggest a moderate rate of

inventories will be a principal factor in near-

accumulation during early 1964.1 The table

term performance of business activity, but

shows both anticipated and actual changes in

According to a survey conducted late last

also because the econom y has now completed

changes could be emerging in the area of

1 The survey is conducted quarterly by the U. S.
Department of Commerce, and is based on a sample
of nearly 1,400 manufacturing corporations whose
inventories account for 55 percent of manufacturers'

business inventories.

inventories of durable goods.

three years of expansion, and after so long a
period of continued expansion, important




3

EC ON O M IC REVIEW

inventories of durable goods for the rela­

of durable goods manufacturers grouped by

tively short time period that this type of in­

stage of fabrication (see Chart I). The stages

formation has been published. Unfortunately,

are: (1) materials and supplies; (2) goods-in-

data are not available to cover the duration of

process; and (3) finished goods.

a complete business cycle. Moreover, it is not
possible to analyze anticipated and actual
changes in inventories of durable goods
during a complete period of econom ic ex­
pansion. Nevertheless, the information avail­
able indicates that the survey results have a
reasonably accurate record of pointing to
the direction of period-to-period inventory
changes, as well as providing a reasonably
accurate

estimate

of

the

magnitude

of

inventory accumulation.

Inventories

of

m a teria ls and su pp lies

declined moderately through December, after
reaching their 1963 high in August. O n the
other hand, inventories of g o o d s -in -p r o c e s s
moved to new high ground in December.
The nature of the recent performance of these
two groupings of inventories, taken together,
implies a reasonably moderate inventory
policy of manufacturers of durable goods
during early 1964.
Contrary to a widely held view, the liquida­

S T A G E O F F A B R IC A T IO N

tion of steel inventories during the late

G IV E S C L U E S

summer and fall of 1963 was not solely re­

Another indication of inventory perfor­

sponsible for the reduction in inventories of

mance is found in the changes in inventories

materials and supplies held by durable good

A N T IC IP A T E D A N D A C T U A L NET C H A N G E S IN
IN V E N T O R IE S O F D U R A B L E G O O D S M A N U F A C T U R E R S ,
SE A S O N A L L Y ADJU STED
(B illio n s o f D o lla r s )

Six-Month Periods
June 30, 1961
September 30, 1961
December 31, 1961
March 3 1 ,1 9 6 2
June 30, 1962
September 30, 1962
December 31,1 962
March 31,1 963
June 30, 1963
September 30, 1963

December 31, 1 9 6 1 ...................... ...................
March 31,1 962 ...................... ...................
June 30, 1962 .......................... ...................
September 30, 1962 ................ ...................
December 31,1 962 ................... ...................
March 31,1 963 ...................... ...................
June 30, 1963 .......................... ...................
September 30, 1963 ................ ...................
December 31,1 963 ................... ...................
March 3 1 ,1 9 6 4 ...................... ...................

3 Based on change from reported level o f inventories at time of anticipation survey,
b Based on revised data, as reported by Bureau of Census,
Source: U. S. Department of Commerce

4



Anticipated
Change"1

Actual
Changeb

+ $ 1 .7
+ 1 .2
+ 1 .5
+ 0 .4
+ 0 .5
+ 0 .5
+ 1 .4
+ 1 .2
+ 0 .9
+0.6

+ $1.2
+ 1.6
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

1.2
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.9
0.9
0.8

FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4
i

The recent inventory performance of durable go od s manufacturers grouped by
stage of fabrication indicates a moderate rate of accumulation during the fourth
quarter of 1963.

GOODS-IN-PROCESS

10

M A T E R I A L S A N D S UP PL I E S
F I N I S HE D G O O D S

SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

Source of data: U.S. Department of Commerce

producers after August. There were also

July to December 1963 than during any com ­

reductions in other types of inventories held

parable period of the current business ex­

by durable goods producers.2 Because the

pansion. The strong advance of this grouping

decline in inventories of raw materials has

of inventories was primarily responsible for

been broadly based, the current build-up in

the net rise in total inventories held by pro­

steel inventories may not be sufficient to

ducers of durable goods.

offset the general decline in inventories of
materials and supplies.
Inventories of fin ish ed g ood s held by
durable goods producers rose faster from

The near-term significance of the rise in
finished stocks for inventory policy is not
clear. It should be pointed out, however,
that in the past producers of durable goods

2 Raw materials inventories held by primary metals
producers, which includes raw materials inventories
held by the steel industry, advanced from $2,200
million in August 1963 to $2,230 million in December,
seasonally adjusted. All other industry groupings of
raw materials inventories held by durable goods pro­
ducers showed declines during the interval.




have not reduced stocks of finished goods
until the demand for such goods has declined
for an extended period. For example, stocks
of finished goods continued to rise for twothirds of the duration of the 1960-1961 reces­
sion, and for about one-half of the duration of
5

EC ON O M IC REVIEW

the recessions of 1953-1954 and 1957-1958.

1.00, it is a signal to manufacturers that in­

Thus far in this recovery, no such decline has

coming business is less than outgoing deliv­

begun.

eries. Manufacturers may then prepare to
pare inventories. Conversely, a rise in orders

O THER S O U N D IN G S

relative to shipments serves as an incentive

There are three other soundings of the
behavior of inventories of durable goods that

to increase output and ultimately to increase
inventories.

are used widely. These include: (1) the ratio

In the latter half of 1963, the ratio of new

of inventories to shipments of producers to

orders to shipments bobbed around the parity

durable goods; (2) the ratio of new orders to

mark. Although orders were lower than ship­

shipments; and (3) industrial prices.

ments in four of the six months from July

The in v e n to r y -s h ip m e n ts ratio (the top
panel of Chart 2) reached a four-year low

through December, the ratio was only slightly
below parity.

in July 1963. The recent small rise in the

The recent tendency of the ratio to remain

ratio is not significant, and it would seem that

near parity may conceal certain factors that

current levels of stocks are not burdensome

actually suggest strength in the series. For

and that inventories have sufficient room to

example, the swell of durable goods orders

rise before manufacturers becom e concerned.

in the early part of 1963, which was associ­

Although this particular ratio is followed

ated with the threat of a steel strike, probably

closely by many observers, it is unstable, and

included orders that would have been placed
later in the year.

a drop in sales can quickly reverse a re­
assuring ratio. During the postwar period

P rices represent another factor that has a

there has been a downtrend in the ratio,

bearing on the performance of inventories

reflecting

of

held by durable goods manufacturers. In­

methods of inventory control by business

the

increased

effectiveness

dustrial prices have usually moved upward

firms.

during the later phases of business expan­

The n ew o r d e r -sh ip m e n ts ratio also points

sions. In marked contrast, the current ex­

toward a period of continued mild expansion

pansion in business activity has been charac­

in inventories of durable goods producers

terized by stability in the industrial price

(bottom panel of Chart 2). Manufacturers

level. This steadiness, particularly during the

need to anticipate demand in order to main­

past year, has probably acted as a restraint to

tain an adequate level of inventories. The

acquisitions of additional inventories by pro­

ratio of new orders to shipments of durable

ducers of durable goods.

goods manufacturers is helpful in this respect.

If current price stability were to give way

W hen monthly orders continually run less

to an upsurge in prices, this could provide a

than shipments, i.e., the ratio drops below

strong stimulus to inventory accumulation.

6



FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4

2

Although the current

RA T IO
2.50
2.40

v a lu e of the inventory-shipments

ratio

indicates that durable

2.30

2.20
2.10
2.00

goods p r o d u c e r s’

1.90

stocks are com para­

1.80

tively

1.70

month

low,

should

care

be taken

'57

in

’58

B i l l i o n s of d o l l a r s

i nterpreti ng

thi s

+ 20

NET C H A N G E IN IN VE N T OR IE S ^H EL D B Y D U R A B L E G O O D S P R O D U C E R S

series.
S EA SO N A l LY ADJU STED A N N U A L HATES

The new order-shipments ratio points to­
w a rd

a

period

co n tin u e d m ild

of

quarterly a v e ra g e

____ :_____ i__i__ _

R A TIO
1.30
1.20

ex­

pansion in inventor­
ies of durable go od s

0.90
0.80
0.70

producers.

Source of data: U.S. Department of Commerce




7

EC ON O M IC REVIEW

EXTERNAL FINANCING BY FOURTH
DISTRICT INDUSTRIES, 1953-1963

I

NDUSTRIAL activity in the Fourth Federal

determine the volume of securities issued.

Reserve District ranges from the produc­

(See Chart 1.) In addition, the study was in­

tion of chemicals and paint to that of machine

tended to provide information on the type of

tools and fabricated steel products. In an

securities issued, method of issue, quality,

effort to learn more about an important aspect

and yield.

of this activity, the Research Department of

Data were obtained from the Securities and

the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland re­

Exchange Commission (SEC), through the

cently conducted a study of large offerings of

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve

new securities by companies that maintain

System, in the form of individual listings for

their principal offices in the Fourth District.1

all large public offerings registered with the

The study was designed to provide informa­

SEC and for private placements that are

tion on the industries that issued new securi­

not subject to registration but were reported.

ties from 1953 through mid-1963 and to

S U M M A R Y O F F IN D IN G S
1 Based on the volume of net sales in 1962, sixty-three
of the nation's 500 largest industrial firms maintain
their principal offices in the Fourth District.
Large security offerings include public offerings with
gross proceeds of $15 million or more and private
placements with net proceeds of $14.5 million or more.

8



The principal findings of the study indicate
that nearly 6 percent of total net proceeds
from all large offerings reported by the SEC
from 1953 through the first half of 1963 was
received by firms with principal offices in the

FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4

1

Fourth District firms have also used the

NET PROCEEDS FR O M LARGE ISSUES OF
SECURITIES BY FOURTH DISTRICT
C O R P O R A T IO N S

private placement method of issuing securi­
ties. The data reveal that approximately onequarter of all securities issued were privately
placed and that public utilities were the
principal users of this method of issue.
The quality of the securities issued by
Fourth District firms

compared

favorably

with total U. S. issues. Nearly two-thirds of
the publicly offered notes and bonds carried
a Moody's rating of Aa (the second highest
rating), and no reported issue by a District
company was rated lower than Baa.
The high quality of offerings by District
firms also is suggested by the fact that the
average yield on notes and bonds at the time
of issue was usually lower than the average
reported for the nation. The reoffering yield
on Fourth District debt offerings exceeded
* 1 963 total estimated
Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission

T a b le I
L a r g e Is s u e s o f S e c u ritie s b y
F o u rth D istric t C o r p o r a t io n s
(m illio n s o f d o lla r s )

Fourth District (see Table I).2 The proportion
was no doubt higher in specific industries
such as primary metals, rubber, and glass.
Public utilities and producers of primary
metals accounted for more than 60 percent
of total issues by District firms during the
1953-63 period.
The study also indicates that over 90 per­
cent of the dollar volume of securities issued
by District companies during the 1953-1963
period were debt securities, with debentures
(unsecured bonds) accounting for the largest
share.

Volume
of Issues

Percent of
U. S. Total

1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963*

$

107.2
381.2
356.9
347.0
422.5
397.8
292.7
354.2
227.9
433.2
198.7

2.2%
9.4
6.7
5.6
5.3
5.7
5.6
6.9
3.4
8.0
7.6

Total

$3,519.3

5.8%

2 One company located outside the Fourth District is
included because it is a joint venture by two Ohio

* First six

companies which guarantee its obligations.

Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission




months

9

EC ON O M IC REVIEW

T a b le II
N e t P r o c e e d s From L a r g e Is s u e s o f S e c u r itie s
B y Fo u rth D istric t C o r p o r a t io n s a
C la s s ifie d b y In d u s t r y
(m illio n s o f d o lla r s )
Industry
Classification

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

$226.7

$204.7

$ 99.5

$137.1

$125.4

$ 80.5

$ 74.9

$ 30.1

$ 91.4

1 14.6

19.1

70.0

182.7

143.0

152.2

180.6

86.1

39.4

$51.0

Public Utilities

$ 72.2

Primary Metals
Machinery &
Trans. Equip.

—

Rubber

35.0

_

20.0

27.7

38.3

—

—

95.6

17.0

—

Petroleum

—

—

14.9

Chemicals

—

—

Mining

—

—

G lass

—

39.9

—

Paper.

—

—

—

Finance &
Insurance

_

_

Real Estate

—

TOTAL

$107.2

$381.2

17.5

1963b
—

$1,142.5
1,038.7

37.7

—

39.4

48.8

79.7

—

—

25.4

59.3

—

26.0

73.6

296.9

24.6

—

—

—

—

113.8

59.1

212.4

84.4

—

29.2

14.9

—

—

—

—

128.5

—

—

21.3

—

—

38.6

23.1

—

100.5

24.2

—

—

—

—

—

24.3

—

—

15.5

94.6
80.7

59.8

—

73.6

—

—

17.0

_

13.8

_

_

_

_

—

—

—

24.3

—

—

—

—

$397.8

$292.7

$354.2

$227.9

$433.2

$198.7

$422.5

326.6

—

—

$347.0

19.7

15.0

19.7

$356.9

Total

24.3
$3,519.3

a Proceeds from sale less issuing costs
b First six months
Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission

the average yield on all large offerings re­

Ten electric utility companies and one

ported by the SEC in only two of the 103^

telephone company each reported at least

years included in the study.

two separate offerings of securities during the
period under review.3 The largest volume of

IN D U S T R Y C L A S S IF IC A T IO N

public utility issues occurred in 1954 in re­

As shown in Table II, eleven industry

sponse to declining interest rates. High grade

groups in the Fourth District issued new

debt instruments were issued in that year

securities during the 1953-63 period. Five

with an approximate reoffering yield of 3.0

of the industry classifications (public utilities,

percent. The proceeds were used, in large

primary metals, machinery and transporta­

part, to repay bank loans.

tion, rubber, and petroleum) accounted for
more than 85 percent of the total volume of
new issues.
Public utilities, which are heavy users of
borrowed capital, accounted for the largest
volume of new issues. Utility issues declined,
however, from about two-thirds of the total in
1953 to no new issues in the first half of 1963.
10



The primary metals industry accounted for
the second largest volume of new issues
during the 10^ -year period; however, only
eight metal producers reported offerings.
3 One electric company is owned by ten other electric
companies. Five Fourth District companies own 38.7
percent of the common stock of this company.

FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4

T a b le III
N e t P r o c e e d s fr o m L a r g e Is s u e s o f S e c u ritie s
B y Fourth D istric t C o r p o r a t io n s
B y T y p e o f S e c u r ity
(m illio n s o f d o lla r s )
Type of
Security
TOTAL DEBT

1953

1954

1955

1956

1957

1958

1959

1960

1961

1962

1963*

Total

$ 74.9

$362.3

$295.6

$318.0

$302.3

$376.5

$292.7

$354.2

$227.9

$402.2

$198.7

$3,205.3

39.9

207.8

206.5

153.6

134.7

120.2

158.7

113.3

68.7

133.9

236.4

240.9

1 12.6

182.5

M o rtga g e
Bonds
Debentures
Convertible
Debentures
Notes

35.0

100.0

_

_

132.5

167.6

19.1

43.6

19.4

_

1 19.1
19.7

19.9

_

34.5

136.3

—

46.6

85.8

66.0

369.6

31.9

$ 18.9

$ 61.3

$ 29.0

$120.2

$ 21.3

—

—

—

$ 31.0

—

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

_

—

—

—

31.0

—

Preferred
Stock

15.4

Common
Stock

16.9

18.9

61.3

29.0

120.2

21.3

TOTAL ISSUES $107.2

$381.2

$356.9

$347.0

$422.5

$397.8

14.9

$292.7

1,498.4

_

50.0

—

1,337.3

_

54.5

—

TOTAL EQUITY $ 32.3

39.1

_
132.7

$354.2

$227.9

$433.2

$198.7

$

314.0
15.4
298.6

$3,519.3

* First six months
Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission

Primary metal firms accounted for more than

From 1953 through 1956, first mortgage

half of all District issues in 1959 and 1960,

bonds accounted for the largest part of debt

but less than 10 percent in 1955 and 1962.
The largest volume of securities issued by

financing. Since that time, with the exception
of 1959, debentures have been the most im­

the primary metals industry occurred in 1957,

portant type of debt security issued. The rela­

and may have been associated with a sub­

tive decline in the issuance of mortgage

stantial volume of plant and equipment spend­

bonds in recent years is explained by an

ing in that year.

accompanying decline in issues of securities
by public utilities. As the principal users of

TYPE O F IS S U E
Over 90 percent of the volume of large
issues by Fourth District firms during 1953-63

mortgage bonds, public utilities accounted
for nearly three-fourths of the volume issued
in the District during the 1953-1963 period.

was in the form of notes or bonds as compared

The reliance on mortgage bonds by public

with 83 percent for the entire nation (see

utilities reflects the characteristics of utility

Table III). Nearly half of the debt securities

operation.

issued by District firms were debentures (un­

public utilities provide a nearly stable income

secured bonds) while 40 percent were mort­

and rate of return on investments; therefore,

gage bonds (secured bonds).

the assets provide excellent collateral for




The nature and regulation of

11

EC ON O M IC REVIEW

mortgage bonds. In addition, public utilities

Only one issue of preferred stock was

are often able to reduce interest costs on a

reported during the entire period. This single

bond

issue was by a public utility in 1953.

issue

by

pledging

their

assets

as

collateral.

In addition to the issuance of equity securi­

In contrast, other industries have relied

ties, nearly 10 percent of the debentures

heavily on the use of debentures as a means of

issued by manufacturing firms in the Fourth

borrowing. For example, the primary metals

District were classified as convertible deben­

industries accounted for more than 40 per­

tures. A convertible debenture holder is

cent of the volume of debentures offered by

given the privilege of exchanging a debenture

firms located in the Fourth District in the

for shares of common stock of the issuing

period under review. The reliance on deben­

corporation at a predetermined price per

tures by concerns other than public utilities

share. The conversion price is set well above

is explained, in part, by the unwillingness of

the existing market price at the time the

many organizations to accept the limitations

debentures are issued. The holder usually

placed on the use and disposition of assets

has the right to exercise the option at any

when pledged as collateral. More important,

time between the date of issue and the

the highly specialized nature of their assets

redemption date. Many firms have adopted

and fluctuations in income usually subject

the use of convertible debentures as a means

their assets to a sharp decline in value in case

of improving

the attractiveness of fixed-

of default. Therefore, such assets often do not
provide the type of protection
require for collateral purposes.

creditors

Nearly all of the equity financing by District
firms occurred from 1953 through 1958, and

T a b le IV
N e t P r o c e e d s From
P r iv a te P la c e m e n t s o f S e c u r itie s
b y F o u rth D istric t C o r p o r a t io n s
(m illio n s o f d o lla r s )

nearly 80 percent of the issues were a c­
counted for by public utilities, primary metals
producers,

machinery

and

Volume
of Issues

transportation

Percent of
Total District
Issues

firms, and the rubber industry. The largest

that interest costs moved up sharply between

1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
196
1
1962
1 9 6 3 * ................

$ 17.9
161.3
209.5
83.4
—
72.6
40.3
—
85.2
148.3
66.0

16.7%
42.3
58.7
24.0
—
18.3
13.8
—
37.4
34.2
33.2

mid-1956 and the fourth quarter of 1957, and

T o t a l ................

$884.5

25 .1 %

amount of common stock issued by Fourth
District firms was in 1957. In that year the
volume of new equity issues amounted to
nearly $120 million, or approximately 40 per­
cent of the common stock issued during the
entire period. O ne explanation for the con ­
centration of offerings in 1957 is the fact

thereby encouraged the issuance of common
stock as opposed to debt securities.

12



* First six months
Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission.

FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4

income

securities.

From

a

annual volume of private issues during the

corporation's

standpoint, use of a convertible debenture

entire 10^ -year period.

may widen the market for its securities, per­

All private placements reported in this

mit a lower cost of capital, and, in the event

study were debt securities, with nearly 28

of conversion, the corporation normally re­

percent of all issues of notes and bonds

ceives a higher price for its common stock

classified as private placements. Moreover,

than would have been received at the time

nearly all of these issues were either mortgage

the debentures were issued. Furthermore,

bonds or notes, as only 5 percent of total

conversion relieves the management of the

debenture

problem of refunding at the time the deben­

Approximately

tures mature.

placement of securities; however, two public

placement

of

were

privately

placed.

18 firms reported

private

utilities accounted for 40 percent of the

P R IV A T E P L A C E M E N T S
Private

issues

securities

total volume.

occurs

when one large investor, usually a financial

Q U A L IT Y R A T IN G S

institution, acquires an entire issue of new
securities through direct negotiation with

Approximately two-thirds of the $2.3 billion

the issuing firm. Hence, the securities are

of publicly offered debt securities during the

not offered for sale on the securities markets,

1953-1963 period were rated Aa (see Table

nor is the public given the opportunity to

V). At the same time, less than 10 percent

acquire any part of the issue. Approximately

were rated Baa, the lowest rating achieved

one-fourth

of all issues of

by any issue from a Fourth District corpora­

securities by

District firms in the period under review

tion.

were classified as private placements (see
Table IV). In 1955, nearly three-fifths of all

Securities with the highest rating of Aaa,
accounting for approximately 10 percent of

new issues were privately placed, and the

total volume, were all issued by 4 of the 11

dollar total of $210 million was the largest

public utilities reported in the study. More

T a b le V
N e t P r o c e e d s From L a r g e Iss u e s o f D e b t S e c u r itie s
B y Fourth D istric t C o r p o r a t io n s
B y Q u a lit y R a tin g
(m illio n s o f d o lla r s )
Quality
Rating
Aaa

1953

. . .

.

—

A a .............. $ 22.0
A
Baa

..............
. . .

.

1954
$ 36.0
165.0

35.0

—

—

—

1955

1956

1957

—

$ 20.1

$ 24.6 $ 70.3

$ 47.0

151.2

—
39.1

1958

1959
$ 25.1

218.0 187.4 207.6

19.7 16.0

46.2

43.6 43.7

—

1960
$ 30.2

284.6

1961
—

1962
$ 45.4

$ 79.1

—

39.4

19.7

—

119.2

1963*
—
$ 73.6

Total
$

251.7
1,554.7

39.0 89.3

24.6

309.2

24.6 —

34.5

205.2

* F irst six m onths

Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission




13

EC ON O M IC REVIEW

than half of the Aa rated securities were

tered with the SEC and offered for sale

offered by firms in the primary metals in­

throughout the U. S.

dustry, with public utilities accounting for an

Interest rates on both national and Fourth

additional one-fourth of the total. The machin­

District offerings were responsive to changes

ery and transportation equipment industry

in econom ic activity. Business recessions

accounted for 40 percent of the securities

occurred in 1953-54, 1957-58, and 1960-61

rated A and more than 40 percent of those

and are represented by the shaded areas in

rated Baa.

Chart 2. The decline in rates in 1954 and

Y IE L D

of funds in the capital market during those

again in 1958 indicates a ready availability
Chart 2 shows the average reoffering yield

periods. The most recent recession, in 1960-

of all large public offerings of debt securities

61, was also characterized by a ready availa­

by Fourth District corporations from 1953

bility of funds, although rates at first leveled

through the first half of 1963. It represents an

off in 1961 and declined in 1962, with

average yield in that it includes all securities

further declines in the first half of 1963.

issued in the District regardless of quality

The average yield on securities issued by

rating. Also shown on the chart is the average

Fourth

reoffering yield for all large securities regis-

weighted by securities that carried the Aa

District

corporations

was

heavily

quality rating. Table VI compares yield rates
2

of District and total U. S. offerings by quality

A V E R A G E REOFFERING YIELD OF LARGE
ISSUES OF DEBT SECURITIES

ratings. Comparisons of interest rate b e­
havior should be concentrated on the Aa and
A ratings because they represent a major
portion of all issues by Fourth District firms.
A comparison of Aa offerings by Fourth
District firms with total Aa offerings in the U .S.
indicates generally lower yields on District
securities.
There have been too few offerings of
securities by separate industries in the Dis­
trict to permit meaningful comparisons of the
costs of borrowing among various industries;
comparisons of yields on securities of similar
quality ratings among industries present even
greater obstacles. A very general comparison
can be made, however, between Aa rated
debt securities issued by public utilities and
primary metals producers because of the

Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission

14



volume of securities issued by these firms

FEBRUARY 1 9 6 4

T a b le V I
R e o ff e r in g Y ie ld s o n L a r g e Is s u e s o f D e b t S e c u ritie s
b y C o r p o r a t io n s in th e Fo u rth D istric t
a n d th e U n ite d S t a t e s

A aa

1953 .
1954
1955 .
1956 ,
1957 .
1958
1959
1960
1961 .
1962 .
19 6 3 *.

. .
.
. .
.
. .
.
.
.
.
. .
.

.
.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Aa

A

Baa

Fourth
District

Total
U. S.

Fourth
District

Total
U. S.

Fourth
District

Total
U. S.

Fourth
District

Total
U. S.

—
2.98%
—
3.40
4.17
3.97
4.29
4.88
—
—
—

3.56%
2.99
3.20
3.69
4.53
4.07
4.86
4.81
4.31
4.36
4.25

3.24%
3.04
3.27
3.99
4.61
3.92
4.49
4.74
4.60
4.40
4.30

3.54%
2.94
3.29
3.81
4.65
4.07
4.82
4.75
4.58
4.34
4.31

3.90%
—
—
3.75
4.41
4.44
—
4.75
4.68
4.41
4.35

3.88%
3.24
3.37
3.87
4.78
4.26
4.95
4.87
4.77
4.43
4.42

—
—
3.63%
4.25
4.96
—
4.50
—
5.25
—
3.88

4 .0 8 %
3.95
3.64
4.26
5.15
4.86
5.03
5.31
4.94
4.69
4.58

* First six months
Source of data: Securities and Exchange Commission.

and the regularity of issue. Despite the fact

primary metals producers. In addition, in

that the cost of borrowing for both industries

most years the Aa securities issued by public

tended to reflect prevailing business con ­

utilities in this District carried a higher yield

ditions, yields on Aa issues of public utilities
show a wider fluctuation than those by

than those issued by primary metals pro­
ducers.




15




50 Y E A R S '^
FEDERAL RESERVE
SYSTEM

Fourth Federal Reserve District