View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

ii— |

M O N T H L Y

3 uomeMKet/cew
IN

THIS

ISSUE

- F E D E R A L RESERVE BANK of C LEV EL AN D —
Shifting Shapes of the National Product . 2

s4cc$cut 1954

Local Trends in Volume of Bank Debits .

9

Better M anagem ent of W a te r Resources 12

Between the 2nd quarter of 1953 and the 2nd quarter of 1954, Gross National
Product declined $14.4 billion, expressed in seasonally adjusted annual rates.

+$3.0
.
-----F ED E R A L
GOVT.
PU R CH A SES

CONSUMER OUTLAYS
FOR NONDURABLES
AND S E R V IC E S

STATE AND LOCAL
GOVT. PURCHASES

s 'v vJ
.£

Rises in four component parts
largely offset a decline of
nearly $10 billion in Federal
Government purchases

N ET FOREIGN INVESTMENT
NEW CONSTRUCTION

PR O D U C ER S' D U R A B L ES
+ C O N SU M E R S ’ D U RA BLES

... but that still left a decline
of about $14 billion, of which
inventory change accounted
for the largest part.
CH A N G E IN
B U S IN E S S IN V E N T O R IE S




(Based on preliminary estimates for 2nd quarter ’54.)

Shifting Shapes of the National Product
of business trends have come
The GNP Concept. The Gross National Product or
to be almost as much interested in the
Expenditure is a statistical estimate of the market
composition of the Gross National Product—value of the total output of goods and services cur­
rently produced in the national economy, without de­
the relative sizes of the various parts—as
duction for depreciation and other allowances for
they are in the question of whether the ag­
consumption of durable capital goods.
gregate is rising or falling. About two years
The main streams of the Gross National Product
are the purchase of goods and services by consumers
ago, for example, the following question was
and by government (including federal, state and
widely propounded(1) and variously ans­
local), gross private domestic investment (including
new construction, investment in producers’ durable
wered: “ As soon as the volume of defense
equipment, inventory changes), and net foreign in­
spending begins to be cut back, will there
vestment.
be an offsetting rise in other parts of the
All dollar figures for GNP or its parts used in
this article, unless otherwise specified, are the official
Gross National Product?”
estimates of the U. S. Department of Commerce,
Now that there has been some actual ex­
National Income Division. For source of second-quar­
perience with reduction in defense spending,
ter 1954 estimates see Note at end o f article.
as well as in total federal expenditures, it is
time to take another look at the question,
quently, the characteristics and configuration
with a view to answering it so far as the
of
the ’53-’54 recession become more suscep­
available data permit. The question is too
tible
of analysis than when the downswing
important to be relegated to that large
was in full force.
limbo of questions whose disposition takes the
The period selected for special emphasis in
form of merely being superseded with the
the
remarks which follow is that which oc­
passage of time.(2)
curred
between the second quarter of 1953
Added point to a reappraisal of the ques­
and the second quarter of 1954, during which
tion is given by the most recent business re­
the Gross National Product slipped from an
ports of the past month or two, which in­
annual rate of $369.9 billion to an annual
dicate a steadying of general business, or
rate
of about $355.5 billions. Most of the
even a recovery, as contrasted with the pre­
drop had occurred by the first quarter of the
vious moderate recession. To the extent that
year; between the first and second quarters,
business news continues to confirm this tone
the GNP total remained practically station­
of improvement, a punctuation mark is be­
ary.
ing set to the recession of 1953-’54. Conse-

O

b servers

Offsetting Rises and Fails

(1) For one instance among many, see “The National
Product Before and After Korea” in the September 1952
issue of this Review.
(2) Reference here is to the following too familiar se­
quence: (a) An important question is raised, and the fac­
tors in the answer are sorted out, but a positive answer
cannot be given at the moment, (b) A decision is made
to wait for more experience. “Time will tell; it will be
interesting to see how it turns out.” (c) Time passes,
experience is accumulated, but meantime attention has
been shifted to different questions.
The fact is that time, itself, never tells anything; a con­
scious effort needs to be made to recapture the unanswered
questions, provided they are still worth answering, as is
the case with the topic under consideration.

2



From the second quarter of 1953 through
the second quarter of 1954 the rate of fed­
eral government purchases for national secur­
ity purposes dropped from an annual rate
of $54.3 billion to one of about $45.7 billion,
or a decline of $8.6 billion expressed in an­
nual rates. At the same time, total purchases
of goods and services by the federal govern­

ment declined by a slightly larger annual
rate, or $9.8 billion.
Were there any other parts of the Gross
National Product which were rising at the
same time by a comparable magnitude ? There
were, as a glance at the cover chart will
show. Thus, increased consumer outlays for
nondurable goods and services, together with
larger purchases by state and local govern­
ments, an increase in net foreign investment,
and a rise in outlays for new construction,
amounted in combination to $8.9 billion in
annual rates. The latter sum is slightly
larger than the decline in national security
expenditures by the federal government, and
almost as large as the decline in total pur­
chases by the federal government. In this
sense and up to this point, there was an
equivalent arithmetic offset to the effect on
GNP of the cutback in defense expenditures.
It may be noted that the economic sectors
in which such offsets occurred were in gen­
eral the same as those to which observers two
years ago were looking, with varying degrees
of hope, for the basic answer to the problem
of over-all demand following the period of
defense expansion.
Defense expenditures and the offsets just
mentioned, however, do not encompass the
entire range of GNP. If they did, or if it
were a case of “ all others being equal”, the
adjustment to the defense cutbacks could be
pronounced as having been fully and clearly
made, at least during the four quarters un­
der consideration. What actually happened
was that certain other significant components
of Gross National Product went into a de­
cline. As a consequence, the aggregate of
GNP showed a drop, which, although rela­
tively moderate, was sufficient to confirm the
generally accepted conclusion that business
was undergoing a moderate cyclical recession.
Thus, the inventory account, which had
shown an accumulation of business inven­
tories during the second quarter of 1953
amounting to an annual rate of $5.4 billion
shifted to a reduction of inventory. During
the second quarter of 1954 the reduction
amounted to about $4.2 billion, which was
about the same as in the first quarter, but




which represented a net difference of $9.6 bil­
lion from the annual rate during the second
quarter of last year. Simultaneously, pro­
ducers ’ purchases of durable equipment
dropped over the interval of the year by an
annual rate of about $2.4 billion, and con­
sumer expenditures for durable goods slipped
by about $1.5 billion in annual rate.
In combination, the decline scored by the
groups of items just mentioned (inventory
change and the parts of the GNP accounts
measured respectively in terms of producers’
purchases of durable equipment and consumer
takings of durable goods) add up to about
$13.5 billion, or a sum very close to the
total drop in Gross National Product, or $14.4
billion, expressed in annual rates. (See cover
chart.)
In striking a balance of the changes in
component parts of the GNP during the past
year, the selection of plus and minus items
for pairing off against each other is, in the
last analysis, the result of a somewhat arbi­
trary decision (in part, at least, on grounds
of convenience in presentation) rather than
an arrangement which is necessarily given by
the nature of the items. Thus, as an alterna­
tive to the previous formulation, it could be
stated that the rise in consumer outlays for
nondurable goods and services, together with
the other 11plus ’’ items mentioned above, had
the effect of cancelling out almost the entire
decline in the inventory account; this would
leave the decline in federal expenditures as
well as the recession in durable goods as the
equivalent of the total GNP decline. It re­
mains to be seen whether the underlying
cause-and-effect relationship among t h e
changes in the various items would point to
one type of pairing rather than another as
the more realistic way of striking the balance.
With the benefit of hindsight, all observers
can now see that the question about *‘defense
offsets”, as it was raised about two years ago,
was in some cases incorrectly formulated—
especially insofar as the stated alternatives
were too limited. Thus, it would frequently
be asked, for example, whether certain
named types of offset would be likely to oc3

cur or whether there would
be a business recession. As
it turned out, the named
offsets did occur and the
economy also experienced
a moderate business reces­
sion. Many analysts prob­
ably missed the boat be­
cause of an understandable
difficulty in forecasting the
timing of inventory cycles.
Occasionally, h o w e v e r ,
some observers would pose
the question of what might
happen if the downswing
of a short-term inventory
cycle should coincide in
time with the early stage
of defense cutbacks; on the
whole, however, this possi­
ble conjecture of affairs
went unnoticed in the early
discussions of the problem.

The three im portant segm ents of G N P nearest the base line of this
chart have been rising during the past year, helping to offset declines
in the tw o segm ents shown nearer the top.

Billions o f Dollars
Seasonally Adjusted
Annual Rates

The developments of the
past year which were re­
flected in the shape of the
G r o s s National Product
can be understood better if
they are viewed against a
backdrop including at least
the period of the Korean war, and prefer­
ably a somewhat longer span of time. Two
accompanying charts are designed to assist
in arriving at such a perspective. In differ­
ent ways, the two charts are both concerned
with quarterly movements in the Gross Na­
tional Product and its parts from the first
quarter of 1948 through the second quarter
of this year, including the latest available
data.
The Area Chart. The first chart depicts
by means of shaded areas the relative sizes
of five major components of GNP, moving
through time. The sum of the five parts falls
short of accounting for the total GNP, to
the extent of the plus and minus adjustments
4



AL PRODUCT

lUCERS’
ES and
DURABLES

m
FEDERAL
:
-60VT. PURCHASE^

kTE8 LOCAL

mw/MftwteWA
CONSTRUCTION-

NONDURABLE GOODS
Oftd S E R V IC E S

i* -— KOREAN

WAR

o fK lO D

for inventory change and for net foreign in­
vestment. The colored line at the top of the
chart, which represents the GNP total, there­
fore, runs above or below the black line rep­
resenting the sum of the five components, de­
pending on whether the combined adjust­
ment items are positive or negative. During
the past year the combined adjustment items
were negative, due to the substantial inven­
tory liquidation which took place; conse­
quently the line for total GNP during the
1953-54 recession cuts below the sum of the
five parts shown on the chart. As between
the two adjustment items, the one for inven­
tory change has tended during the entire
postwar period to be larger than the one for
net foreign investment, and has frequently

moved in a direction opposite to that of the
latter.
It is apparent from the area chart that the
part of GNP represented by federal govern­
ment purchases (topmost shaded area) was
on the rise during the Korean period, and fell
off. subsequently. The area representing the
combination of producers’ durable equipment
and consumers ’ expenditures f o r durable
goods (second from top) also showed some
diminution in the most recent period. Each
of the other three major components, shown
nearer the base of the chart, lent strength to
GNP during the 1953-54 period.
The rises in dollar totals during the Ko­
rean war period which are indicated on the
area chart both for the GNP and for its com­
ponent parts are, of course, associated in con­
siderable measure with price increases. No
attempt is made here to reduce GNP or its
parts to estimated physical quantities.
Although the area chart serves the general
purpose of providing a perspective on the
relative sizes of the main parts of GNP, and
their recent changes, it is difficult to use it
for a close comparison of the various items.
For the latter purpose, a charting of each
major component of GNP, expressed as a per­
centage of the total, is more useful. In this
type of chart, the effects of price increases
tend in part to cancel out. Such a device is
provided by the accompanying ‘*share ’’ chart.
Shares of the Total

Reading downward on the share chart
means progressing from those parts of GNP
which have recently been diminishing in rel­
ative importance to those which have been
gaining ground within the past year.
(3)
The consolidation of the two items on the chart is
solely for the purpose of convenience in presentation. If
the effect of inventory change had been separately plotted,
it would appear more pronounced than can be seen from
the areas of the chart representing the two combined ad­
justments.
The magnitude of the inventory-change item for each of
the five calendar quarters from the second quarter of
1953 through the second quarter of 1954 was as follows:
+ 5.4, + 2 .0 , —4.2, — 4.2, —4.2 (est). For the same
periods the item of net foreign investment was as follows:
— 3.3, — 1.8, — 0.6, — 1.1, — 1.1 (est). These figures are
seasonally adjusted annual rates, in billions of dollars. The
item for inventory change includes the “inventory valuation
adjustments” made by the Department of Commerce.




Federal Government Purchases. The share
of Gross National Product represented by
federal government purchases of goods and
services rose as high as 16.8 percent for the
second quarter of 1953. This includes the na­
tional security expenditures stemming from
the Korean war and from the alterations in
the general defense program. (The figure
may be contrasted with the 42 percent rep­
resenting the share of GNP made up by total
purchases of goods and services by the fed­
eral government at the height of World War
II.) The decline following the second quarter
of last year brought the share of GNP rep­
resented by federal government purchases
down to about 14.7 percent during the sec­
ond quarter of this year.
Accompanying the decline in federal gov­
ernment expenditures, taxes were lowered
and civilian purchasing power was freed for
other uses. Some of the effects of the latter
will appear in the items which follow. At the
same time, however, the decline in federal
government purchases, or the defense cut­
backs which were associated with it, undoubt­
edly had some influence toward reducing
some of the other components of GNP which
are indicated on the share chart and which
are discussed below.
Producers’ Durables and Consumers’ Du­
rables. A moderate decline in activity in the
durable goods groups occurred between the
second quarter of 1953 and the second quar­
ter of 1954. (See second tier of the “ share’’
chart.) The decline in producers’ purchases
of durable equipment, however, was slightly
more pronounced than the decline in the
consumer sector. The former amounted to a
dip from 6.7 percent of total GNP to 6.2
percent, whereas the decline in the share
represented by consumer expenditures for
durable goods was a mere shading,—from
8.2 percent of GNP to 8.1 percent. (The last
mentioned figure reflects in part a pickup in
consumer takings of durable goods from the
first to the second quarter of this year.)
In interpreting the line showing the sum
of producers’ durables and consumers’ du­
rables (taken as a share of total GNP) it
5

Percent o f GNP
20 %

FEDERAL GOVT
Federal governm ent pur­
chases, as a share of the
G ro ss N ational Product,
declined after the se c­
ond quarter of 1953.

25%

PRODUCERS

ABLES
A t the same time, the
share of G N P rep re­
sented by the durablegoods groups also de­
clined slightly, although
this share leveled off in
the second quarter.

10%
State and local g o vern ­
ment purchases rep re­
sent a rising share of
GNP.

N e w construction as a
share of G N P has also
been rising slightly in
recent quarters.

65%

The s h a r e represented
by nondurable g o o d s
and services has picked
up appreciably since a
year ago.

1948

6



1949

1950

1951

1952

1953

1954

should be understood that neither segment
includes adjustment for inventory; allow­
ance for inventory change is included else­
where as part of the inventory account.(4)
Orders received by the machinery-producing industries, which make up such an im­
portant part of the producers’ durable seg­
ment, are known to have been adversely af­
fected during 1953-54 by the cutbacks in the
defense program. This provides an illustra­
tion of the fact that the reduction in federal
government expenditures had repercussions
on some other parts of the GNP, on the down
side. The downward push on the machinery
industries from this quarter, however, may
already be coming to a close, if the defense
program totals are now tending to level off
as many believe to be the case.
At the same time the tax cuts which were
made possible by the reduction in federal ex­
penditures were expected to, and apparently
did, have some stimulating effects on numer­
ous civilian types of investment or consump­
tion, both on the part of producers and con­
sumers. On the producers’ side, this took the
form of maintenance of investment in the
modernization of equipment at a higher level
than would otherwise have been the case. On
the consumers’ side it represented a force
sustaining the market for autos, appliances
and furniture at relatively high levels in the
face of indications that market ‘‘saturation ”
was approaching in some lines.
On balance, the combined ‘‘durable goods ’’
sector of GNP did lose some ground during
the 1953-54 period, as previously indicated.
The extent of lost ground would show up as
appreciably larger, if the part of the inven­
tory account applicable to durable goods
were taken into consideration at this point.
In general it appears that the prospect for
maintenance or expansion of the Gross Na­
tional Product in the immediate future will
probably depend in considerable part on the
(4)
What is here called “producers’ durables” appears in
the Department of Commerce estimates as “producers’ du­
rable equipment,” a subdivision of “Gross Private Domestic
Investment”. What we are here calling “consumers’ dura­
bles” is the durable-goods subdivision of the Commerce
estimates for “personal consumption expenditures”.
The rearrangement of Commerce data is entirely for con­
venience in presentation.




durable goods segment at least holding its
own, both in dollars and as a percentage
share of the total. Much of the current dis­
cussion of business prospects turns around
the “ pros” and “ cons” of this very point.
The prospects for the automobile and ap­
pliance industries, as well as for heavy ma­
chinery, are at stake in this matter.
State and Local Government Purchases.
This part of the GNP, which is depicted in
the third tier of the share chart has been
representing one of the ‘‘plus ’’ offsets to the
decline in federal government expenditures,
as already noted. It is widely expected that
this item will continue to constitute a rising
share of GNP, particularly because of the
unfulfilled needs for highways, hospitals,
schools, and local facilities of all sorts. Such
an expectation, of course, is based on favor­
able assumptions concerning the ability of
the local governments concerned to handle
the financial problems involved in the phy­
sical expansion of their various undertakings.
In many ways, both direct and indirect,
the strong pace of state and local government
expenditures has been influenced favorably
by the reduction in national security ex­
penditures by the federal government.
The stimulus to be expected from expendi­
tures by state and local governments,
although significant, cannot in the nature of
the case be expected to be relatively large
in terms of a share of total GNP.
New Construction. The share chart shows
that “ new construction” has been gaining
during the past year or so as a fraction of
total GNP. This reflects the well-known fact
that the strength in construction has been
one of the most important bulwarks of the
economy during a period when the forecasts
had been quite evenly divided in respect to
the immediate outlook; thus, in some quar­
ters the strength in construction has turned
out to be a pleasant surprise. Like the du­
rable-goods sector previously discussed, the
construction sector as a share of GNP could
readily be expected to go either way in the
near future. It does not have so clearly dis­
cernible an upward trend, either in the sta­
7

tistical record or in the qualitative factors
involved in the outlook, as state and local ex­
penditures or as the nondurable goods and
services sector yet to be discussed.
Nondurable Goods and Services. This is
the largest single component of GNP plotted
in the share chart. As a share of GNP, non­
durable goods and services rose from 54.2
percent to 57.2 percent of the total from the
second quarter of 1953 to the second quarter
of 1954, at the time that total GNP was going
down. The share rise was due to a sub­
stantial dollar gain in the services com­
ponent, coupled with stability in the dollar
totals of expenditures for nondurable goods.
It is true that the services component in­
cludes a significant item for “ rents”, a
part of which in turn represents the imputed
rent on owner-occupied houses. Nevertheless,
the maintenance of activity in nondurable
goods, even exclusive of services, is a signifi­
cant indication of underlying strength in the
economy. The tax reductions associated with
the federal expenditure cuts have been a
favorable factor at this point, too.
Most observers believe that the combina­
tion of nondurable goods and services (as
a share of GNP) is more likely to continue
rising in the period ahead than it is to re­
verse its direction.
General Considerations. It has been indi­
cated that the recent reductions in federal
expenditures have had repercussions of both
“ plus” and “ minus” types on various other
parts of GNP. What bearing does this have
on a proper interpretation of the chart shown
on the cover?
The method of “ pairing” or offsetting
which underlies the cover chart, is, as pre­
viously stated, largely arbitrary. It would
be incorrect to assume that the ‘‘plus ’’ items
on the right side of the chart were casually

8



linked exclusively with the “ minus” items
on the top left, and that the inventory ac­
count stands independently as the active
force in the recent recession. The reasons why
this would be incorrect stem from the fact
that the cutting back of the defense program
had certain direct repercussions on inventory
change as well as other effects along lines
already noted.
It does not follow, however, that an altern­
ative arrangement of the items would be
preferred. To show the rise in state and local
government expenditures, for example, as a
partial offset to the reduction of the general
inventory account (rather than as a partial
offset to federal government expenditures)
would be arithmetically correct, but it would
probably not indicate the lines of actual re­
lationship even as well as the present chart.
However the parts of GNP are thought of,
in relation to each other, there are solid
grounds for satisfaction in the way the na­
tion’s economy has responded to the defense
cutbacks following the Korean war. The
record is not perfect; the adjustment has
not been painless; important problems still
lie ahead. All this is well known. But the
statistical record fortifies a general impres­
sion that the economy’s shock absorbers have
been in good working order.
Note on Sources. The dollar values for all data shown
above, both in the text and the charts, are drawn from the
U. S. Department of Commerce estimates of Gross national
Product and its parts, except for the second quarter of
1954, for which the official data were not available at press
time. Second-quarter data are our estimates, based in part
on the preliminary estimates made by the Council of Eco­
nomic Advisers and in part on later information drawn
from various sources.
The Commerce series utilized here reflect the revisions of
quarterly data announced on July 14, 1954. Figures for
quarterly periods beginning with the first quarter of 1952
have thus been incorporated on the revised basis. Revisions
of quarterly data for periods prior to 1952 were in process,
but had not been announced by the Department of Commerce
at press time. However, an examination of some of the re­
vised data for earlier periods, which became available after
the charts had been completed, confirms a judgment that the
“area chart” and the “share chart” accompanying this ar­
ticle would not be visibly affected by incorporation of
revised data for all back periods affected. The chart on the
cover is based entirely on the revised series.

Local Trends in Volume of Bank Debits
s t a t i s t i c a l series showing monthly
data somewhat less representative of general
volume of bank debits is one of many in­
business trends.)
dicators of business activity used by analysts During February and March of this year,
to measure the pace of business in particular
seasonally adjusted debits to demand de­
localities as well as in the nation. In many
posits showed a strong increase, rising to a
instances bank debits are the only kind of
peak in March from the January low both
comprehensive business indicator available
for this district and for the nation. After
at the local level.
the March peak, which was not as prominent
The debits being measured are charges to
here as in the case of the national total,
debits declined through April and May. The
demand deposit accounts except those of the
debits total for June in this district, how­
Federal government and of banks. They rep­
ever, was second only to the all-time high of
resent all check payments made for goods and
July 1953. Nationally, neither the decline in
services by individuals, by business, and by
state and local governments; they include
payments for property transfers and finan­
The adjusted volume of bank debits so far this
cial transactions, as well as tax payments by
year has recovered som ew hat from last fall's re­
individuals and businesses. The debit series
duced positions.
thus covers a very wide range of business
and financial activity, serving as an indica­
tor of the dollar volume of transactions
through banks in a city, region, or the United
States. As a measure of business trends ex­
clusive of finance, however, the data on
debits must be interpreted with caution.
Changes in the volume of bank debits so
far this year have shown some tendency
toward a recovery from the moderately re­
duced positions which characterized the sec­
ond half of last year. An accompanying
chart portrays the trends for the past three
years, after allowance for seasonal variation,
both for the Fourth Federal Reserve District
and for the United States, exclusive of New
York City. (The latter city is omitted be­
cause movements of bank debits there are
affected by financial transactions to a sig­
nificantly greater extent than in other parts
of the country, thus making the New York
h e

T




9

May nor the June recovery were so strong
as those reported here.

C ities of the Fourth D istrict show ed w ide varia­
tions In change of bank debit volum e from the
first half of last year to the first half of this year.

Bank Debits in Cities of the
Fourth District
In this district, at least, the high June fig­
ure for bank debits indicates considerable
business strength. Department store sales
showed a marked improvement in June, and
construction activity continued to be strong.
Nevertheless, as indicated by the accompany­
ing chart, a majority of reporting cities in
the Fourth District have posted bank debit
totals for the first half of the year which are
below the volume of the year-ago period.
Demand deposit activity for the first six
months of this year was substantially below
a year ago in such steel-making centers as
Sharon and Youngstown, and also (less con­
spicuously) in Pittsburgh. Other centers in
the district in which various types of metal
fabrication are important, such as Toledo,
Cleveland, Erie, Warren, and Lima also show
a year-to-year decline for the first half year,
although the percentage decreases are more
moderate in these cities.
Debits to demand deposit accounts at
some centers in this district, however, were
above the year-ago level during the first half
of this year. The steel and manufacturing
center of Lorain completed the six-month
period 3.3 percent above the year-ago mark.
This showing, however, represents a slacken­
ing in the very sharp rate of gain in debit
activity reported for that city during the
first half of 1953.
At Columbus, demand deposits activity
during the first half of this year was 9.5 per­
cent above the year-ago level. Part of the
gain is probably attributable to increased
activity in state accounts and to the fact that
industrial activity in the city has not de­
clined as sharply as elsewhere. Portsmouth
has also posted a high debits total compared
to a year ago, largely as the result of con­
struction at the atomic energy plant in the
area. Deposit activity at Cincinnati is up
fractionally from year-ago totals. Debit
strength in that city may be based partly
10



1st h olf '5 4 com pared with year a go
10%

-5 %

f ' ■' >' r ’

0
y-rj-n

+5%

T

+ 10%

1— T— j

I

Columbus
Portsmouth
Covington - Newport
Dayton
Lexington
Lorain
Cincinnati
Canton
Hamilton
Lima
Warren
Erie

BANK
DEBITS

Cleveland
Toledo
Pittsburgh

m
*

Springfield
Akron
Mansfield
Wheeling
Steubenville
Youngstown

1 ^

Sharon
Fourth District Total
United S ta le s TotGl

□

upon the relatively strong showing of the
soft goods industries during the first part
of the year.
Factors Affecting Bank Debits
It was stated earlier that use of the bank
debit series as an indicator of general busi­
ness trends is subject to the qualification
that the data include numerous types of spe­
cial financial transactions. Further explana­
tions of this point may be in order—espe­
cially as related to recent trends in the vol­
ume of bank debits.
Tax payments at the quarterly dates cause
increases in debit totals not related to the
actual level of business activity. A strong
“ bull” market in securities will also have

a heavy effect on the series, especially in New
York City, but to some extent also in other
financial centers. For some cities and areas,
irregular increases in bank debits may be re­
lated to a large individual transaction such
as the flotation of a large bond issue or the
renewal of a large loan. Such circumstances
may have a strong effect upon debit totals
at the local level.
The movement of bank debits during the
first half of this year was certainly related
in part to financial transactions and tax pay­
ments. Total check payments in the United
States, excluding six financial centers in ad­
dition to New York, show a relatively lower
volume than the series depicted at the top of
the first of the accompanying charts. Some
financial factors also enter into debit volume
outside the main financial centers, thus mak­
ing it necessary to discount somewhat the
business significance of increased debits vol­
ume when there is a high level of activity
in the financial markets.




More specifically, the strength of debit
volume in March and June must also be dis­
counted when the effect of quarterly tax
collections is taken into account. Under the
Mills plan, corporations had to pay 45 per­
cent of their taxes on their 1953 income in
each of the first two quarters of this year.
This factor increased bank debits for March
and June of this year, but will result in low­
er debits for September and December than
would otherwise be the case.
Recent indications, however, lead to the
belief that the large volume of debits report­
ed for June cannot be entirely discounted.
More favorable showings by other business
indicators tend to bear out the assumption
of underlying debit strength. The gain in
department-store and retail sales in June, the
apparent stabilization of employment during
the month and the apparent leveling of the
index of industrial production, are factors
which tend to corroborate a favorable evalua­
tion of the recent trend in debits.

11

Better Management of Water Resources
By CLYDE WILLIAMS, President and Director, Battelle Memorial Institute
INCE 1900, the country’s consumption of water
has increased sixfold, and continued sharp in­
creases may be expected in the future. This
seems certain, because of population growth, pro­
jected expansions in industrial operations and irri­
gation, and the greater use o f water-consuming
appliances in the home.
Increased demands for water must be met to keep
our economy moving forward. They will be met, at
first, through better management o f existing water
resources. Later, technological developments, such
as rainfall control through cloud seeding and the
recovery of fresh water from the ocean, will enable
us to expand fresh water supplies. Better manage­
ment is the problem at the moment.
Water is one of our most plentiful natural re­
sources. Each day an average of 4,300 billion gallons
o f water falls on the United States as precipitation.
Some 3,000 billion gallons a day return to the
atmosphere through evaporation and transpiration
(use by vegetation). L eft is an average daily run­
off of 1,300 billion gallons. The country captures
and uses only about one-seventh of this runoff. B et­
ter management should enable us to increase the
proportion.
Better management of water resources involves a
wide variety of long-range, interrelated projects.
These include flood control, irrigation, the develop­
ment o f storage reservoirs, surface and ground
water conservation, soil conservation, re-use of water,
and reduction of stream pollution.
Serious attention has been given to well-conceived
programs of water management for many years. Be­
fore such programs come to maximum fruition, how­
ever, there are pressing needs for (1) more coordi­
nation between Federal agencies concerned, and (2)
a greater community consciousness of the value of
water. There are encouraging signs that progress
is being made toward fulfilling both o f these needs.
I t is encouraging to note President Eisenhower’s
recent announcement of the creation of a committee
of three Cabinet members to seek a more effective
and better coordinated national water policy. Ac­
cording to reports, this committee will put greater
emphasis not only on more coordination among gov­
ernment agencies concerned, but also among govern­
ment and private interests.
A rapidly growing, nationwide movement is under
way for more community action in regional water­
shed problems. Municipal and state officials, indus­
trial leaders, and farmers are banding together in
local water resource and development projects.
Many of the nation’s farmers and some industries
are voluntarily adopting practices that could gather
momentum and eventually have widespread effect.
What the farmer does is especially important be­
cause farm acreage, constituting about 60 per cent
of the country’s total land area, is the collector of
much of our usable rainfall. What industry does

S

Editor’s Note— While the views expressed on this page are
not necessarily those of this bank, the Monthly Business Re­
view is pleased to make this space available for the discus­
sion of significant developments in industrial research.

12



about conserving water is also o f major importance.
Industrial usage of water—already about 40 per
cent of the nation’s total consumption— will prob­
ably increase at a much more rapid rate in the years
ahead than water usage for irrigation and domestic
purposes.
Farmers have found that practices that reduce the
rapidity of water run-off are good business. Such
practices reduce soil erosion and retain water for
crops, thus helping to increase or stabilize crop
yields. Contour plowing, and contour plotting with
grass or waste vegetation between plots, have be­
come quite well established in some rolling and hilly
sections of the country. These practices not only
protect the farm er’s soil, but help to prevent floods,
build up underground water tables, and, by slowing
run-off, make more water available to urban areas.
Other practices, such as mulching, where feasible,
and the use of grass and legumes between crop rows,
where economical, also are used to reduce rapid
run-off.
For reasons o f economy or better community re­
lations, an increasing number o f industries are mak­
ing considerable progress in the re-use o f water.
For example, one chemical concern reports that by
recirculating its process water it has reduced its
water requirements from 130 million gallons to 4
million gallons per day. One o f the largest airplane
manufacturers states that its water-conservation pro­
grams are saving 120 million gallons per month.
Many similar examples could be found in other
industries, notably in those making paper, petroleum,
textile, and steel products.
Methods are being devised for the treatment of
wastes that formerly went into streams untreated.
The elimination or recovery of such wastes can great­
ly increase the supply o f water suitable for down­
stream or municipal use. This is now an important
factor in the industrial development o f some areas
where inadequate water supply but sufficient raw
materials and labor exist. It is equally important
to those concerns that put a high premium on friend­
ly relations with their communities.
Many industrial plants and all domestic consum­
ers are not only concerned with the quantity of
water available, but also with its quality. Increas­
ing attention is being given, therefore, to better
management and more extensive development o f un­
derground water, which is usually cleaner than sur­
face water. Underground water reservoirs provide
huge natural fresh water storage facilities. Such
storage facilities in the United States are reported
to be greater than those of the Great Lakes.
Because water is an abundant, replenishable re­
source, there has been a lag in applying science and
technology to its management and utilization. In re­
cent years, however, the recurrence of water short­
ages in many sections of the country where adequate
supplies were taken for granted has roused the na­
tion from its complacency about the water situation.
The future, therefore, should bring more aggressive,
scientific management and development o f water
resources.