View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

In this issue:
Southeastern Agriculture:
A N ew D ress and a N ew Girl, T oo
M ississippi in 1972
District Banking N otes: Loans and Investm ents
District Business C ond ition s




S o u th e a s te rn A g r ic u ltu r e :
A

N e w

D re s s

a n d a N e w

G ir l, T o o

by G en e D. Sullivan

"T h e

s a m e o ld

g ir l w it h

o b je c ts th a t h a v e
d e s c r ip tio n

o f

d u r in g

la s t

th e

a n e w

u n d e rgo n e

ch an ge s
te n

in

stru c tu re

th at

a g r ic u ltu r e

ye ars.

th a t h a r d ly a n y fe a tu r e
th e

d re ss o n "

C h a n ge

For

m o st

o f

1969

C e n su s

p e r io d s ,
th e

th e

tw o

th e

average
fiv e

le a v in g

r e m a in in g

m ad e
had

up

s h ift e d

s h r in k a g e
gro u p s

to

p e r io d s
a c t u a lly

fa rm

T h is

S ix t h

is

II,

5 5 -6 4

1950

to ta l

R e se rve
o f

th e

In

1950,

fir s t t im e

gro u p

o f
In

a d d it io n ,
each

p e r io d .

D u r in g

m u ch

o f

le s s

fa rm

M o re o ve r,

th e

o f

th e re
th e

th e

m o st

th a n

had

o p e rato rs

in

ave rage

age

s e r v ic e s

o n

d u r in g

age

re ce n t

35

t h is

been

th e

2 5 -3 4

fo r

in

44

d e c id e d
age
p e r io d ,

e a r lie r

year

fa rm e rs

to

gro u p

a

fiv e -y e a r

tru e

o ld e r

p ro ce ss o f

fro m

1969,

had

o f

s u ffic ie n t

c o r r e s p o n d in g

been

o f

ste ad y

a

T he

C e n su s

n a tu ra l a g in g

In

in

w e re

re ce n t

w it h

in

gro u p .

fa rm e rs

p r e d o m in a n c e

r a n g in g

fa rm e rs

o f

in

o p e rato rs.

fa rm

o f

a g r ic u ltu r e .

a lm o s t

th e

c o u p le d

fa rm e rs

age

e n te r in g

fro m

ye ars

case s,

r e c o g n iz a b le .

ave rage

r e m a in e d

r e s u lte d

D is t r ic t

a g r ic u ltu r e

C h a n ge d

w e re

th at fo r

re ce n t

age

p r o p o r t io n

in c r e a s e d .

to d e s c r ib e

a p p r o p r ia t e

Fe d eral

th e

lo n g e r

th e

m en

o p e rato rs

in

n o

H ave

W a r

has

n u m e ro u s

d e c lin e s

th e

th e

u se d

not a n

p e rv ad e d

ago

y o u n g

sh o w e d

o f

n u m b e r

th e

th e se

an d

W o r ld

o p e rato rs.

th e

th e

s in c e

h o w e ve r,

o fte n

It is

b e g in n in g fa rm e rs, th u s o ffs e t tin g th e

m o st

in

age
ye ars.

fa rm

th e

so

T h e m s e lv e s

fe w e r

a g r ic u ltu r e

n u m b e r o f y o u n g
th e

w it h in

has

d e cad e s

s in c e

th at

o f A g r ic u ltu r e

p r e c e d in g

fa rm e rs

ye ars

in d ic a t in g

ad a ge

r e m a i n s a s it w a s t e n y e a r s a g o , a n d , in s o m e

e x is te d

F a rm e rs

in c r e a s e d ,

is a n

s u p e r f ic ia l c h a n g e s .

age

C e n su s

gro u p

th re e

D is t r ic t

sta te s d e c lin e d .
V ast

ch an ge s

stru c tu ra l
o p e rato rs

on

in

s h ift

th e

la r g e r

an d

ch an ges.

R e c o g n iz in g

o f

th e

lo a n s

For

m arke t

T h is
at

th e se

e x a m p le ,

v a lu e

a
o f

s h ift

th e

w e re

la r g e ly

le v e l

have

fa rm

asse ts.

Monthly Review,
u p o n

re q u e s t

V o l.
to

A tla n ta , G e o r g ia

150



th e

on

LV II,

m ad e

c r e d it

T h is
m an

a

N o .

R e s e a rc h

has

o f

th at

a lr e a d y

have

fa rm

a llo w s

r e c e n t ly

to

th e y are

c o n s e r v a tiv e

e s tim a t e

F re e

p la c e

d r a s t ic

ge ared
h ig h e r

m o re

le n d in g .
o f

s u b s c r ip t io n

D e p a r t m e n t ,

at

F e d e ra l

th e

a n d

fa rm

in p u t s ,

c o n tin u e d

a d j u s t m e n t s in

o p e r a t io n s

le n d e r s

fo r

u n d e rgo n e
have

th e

e d u cate d

d e m a n d

th at

c o n s id e r a b le

a c c o m p a n ie d

b e tte r

th e

to w h o m

9.

have

yo u n ge r,

a g e n c ie s

a g e n c ie s

sco p e

fa rm s

o f

m ean t

th o se

b road e r

b ase d

has

fa rm

th e m a n a g e r ia l c a p a b ilit y o f th e
lo a n s

p r o p o r t io n

ch a n ge s,

a g r ic u ltu r e

c o v e r in g

fo r

g r o w in g

in fo r m a t io n

s u c c e s s f u lly s e r v ic e

m ake

a

fa rm s.

s e r v ic e s ,

p ro gra m s.

d e m a n d

to w ard

In

to

t h e ir
up

to

p e rc e n ta ge s

w e ig h t

on

th e p a st,

m arke t

v a lu e

a d d it io n a l

R e s e rv e

B a n k

c o p ie s

o f A tla n ta ,

3 0 3 0 3 .

SEPTEMBER 1972, M O N T H L Y REVIEW

o f

c o lla t e r a l.

th e

T h e

in d iv id u a l

p r o c e ss, p o s s ib ly
le s s

v a r ia tio n

p o t e n t ia l

w as

b e cau se

in

e a r n in g

m in im iz e d

t h is

in

in

th e

q u a lit y

c a p a c it y

th e

o f

e v a lu a t io n

a g r ic u lt u r e
r e s e r v o ir

p a st th e re w a s

a m o n g

fa rm

B ut

L a rge r

o p p o s ite

F a rm s

o f

in

(a

th e

d e c lin e

th e

m o st

s in c e

in

n o t a b le

1950.

h a lf

ho w e ve r,
1954
has

n u m b e rs

ch an ge s

A c c o r d in g

A g r ic u ltu r e ,
th a n

fa rm

th e

to

in

th e

1950

le v e l.

an d

1959.

S in c e

been

m o re
th at

re ce n t

a

fa rm e rs

D is t r ic t
lo w

d e c lin e

in

p o in t.

r e t ir e d

an d

a

la r g e

e x is te n c e
fa rm s

w e re

are

th e

t h e ir

s m a lle r

th e

p r o p o r t io n a te

a g g r e g a t io n

o f

O n c e

o f

o ld e r

o f

th e

fa rm e rs

rece n t

th e

e n o u gh

has

by

of

th e

to

82

o f

n o w

a lm o s t

is

have

T he

its

u p w ard

as

lit t le

th e

th at

la r g e

r a p id ly

acre age

has

in

as

Even
le s s

th e

fa rm s

gro w th

s iz e

e v id e n c e

d e c lin e d

e v id e n t

th at

fa rm s.

t w ic e

th e re

r e m a in in g

an d

in

to

By

c o n tra st,

s m a lle r

in

1969

as

t im e s

e x p a n s io n

d is ­
le ft

its

by

in

b e in g

been

la r g e

average

fa rm

th e

fa rm

o n ly

la r g e s t

in

gro w n

fa rm

s iz e
has

sh o w n

an d

an

average

o ve r

in

th e

th e

1950

p e r io d

w e ll

e x is tin g

w it h

s in c e
a

fro m

acre s—

s iz e ,

o n e

s iz e

w h e re ,

220

co u n te rp art.

th e
th e

in

have

T e n n esse e

1950

fa r

fa rm s

aro u n d

o n e -h a lf

o f

in

ch an ge

M is s is s ip p i,

d ecades,
acre s

tw o

1950.

lo w e s t

average

rate

fa rm

o n e - h a lf t im e s a s

T e n n esse e

n u m b e r

o f

s t ill

fa rm s

la r g e

r e t a in s

o f

an y

sta te

D is t r ic t . F lo r id a h o ld s t h e d is t in c t io n

average

th re e
.

is

r a p id

tw o

th e
.

it

m a in t a in

o f h a v in g th e

fa rm s

is

th e
red u ced .

ch an ge s

t h is ra te o f in c r e a s e .

m o st

w it h in

Few er

in

th e

c o n tin u e d

ago ;

to

o ccu rre d

o f

o ld e r

have

an d

g r e a tly

been

to

n u m b e r

n u m b e rs

ye ars,

have

has

d e cad es

fa rm

The

u n it s

fo rm e r

fa rm

r e t ir e m e n t ,
be

s iz e .

be

c u r r e n t ly

c o m m u n ity .

in

s iz e

th e

1950

or

w ill

im a g e )

in

o f a n y s lo w d o w n

ab so rb e d
of

th e ir h o ld in g s .

fa rm s

an

n u m b e r

as

tw o

so m e
m ay

p o r tio n

th e

w it h in

is

ab o u t

e x p a n d in g

o f

le s s

ye ars

n u m b e rs

m a jo r

to

d e c lin e

th e re

s in c e

w as

th o u gh

d e c lin e ,

cam e

s o ld

n u m b e r

t im e ,

A

sh ru n k

C e n su s

an d

o f

fa rm

D is t r ic t

it

o f

a g r ic u ltu r e

m a jo r

fa rm

n u m b e rs

o th e r fa rm e rs w h o
T h u s,

th at

o n e

C e n su s

had

th e

m o d e ra te ,

a p p r o a c h in g

1969

T h e

b e tw e e n

been

D is t r ic t

th e

n u m b e r o f fa rm s

o ccu rre d

in d ic a t io n

has

d e a th
fa rm s

m ir r o r

e v id e n c e d

th ru st
T h e

s m a ll

C h a n ge s

o p e rato rs.

w e re
Few er

th ro u g h

o f

f e w e s t n u m b e r o f f a r m s , b u t in
fa rm

t im e s

s iz e

th at

in

in

F lo r id a

w as

1969

m o re

th a n

T e n n e sse e .

.
Mi lion

N um ber of farm s

F a rm

U se

o f

C a p ita l

So ars

1.0
W it h

H
’5 0

but

im

’5 4

la r g e r

.

th e

e n la r g e m e n t

.

’5 9

’6 4

0.5

fa rm

has

so are d .

a t t r ib u t a b le

’6 9

0

T he

o f

v a lu e

b u ll
'5 4

’5 9

'6 4

'6 9

fa rm s

th e

per

in c lu d e d

re al

1969

b a s is
w as

th a n

it

s u b s t it u t io n

in

th e

t r a ile d .

0

T he

lo c a t e d

in

v a lu e

o f

th e

m o st

$ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0

a

per

o f th e

a ls o
as

in

1950

n in e fo ld

m o re

fa rm
in c r e a s e

b e cau se

t im e

h o w e ve r,

t im e s

w ay

in

s in c e

of

th e

1950,

v a lu a b le

sta te

ave rage

p asse d .

D is t r ic t
v a lu a b le

in

1950.

D is t r ic t

th e

but

acre s

is

an d

$ 6 ,0 0 0

in v e s t m e n t

a lo n e ,

in

le d

th e

fro m

per

in c r e a s e

la n d

b e cau se

acre s

fiv e

w as

M is s is s ip p i
v a lu e

in

m o re

e sta te

fa rm

1 00

b a s is ,

n o t o n ly

acre

o f

r e p r e s e n t in g

in d iv id u a l

have

a

fa rm

in c r e a s e

g r o w in g ,

v a lu e

in c r e a s e d

1969,

has been

O n

fa rm s,

F lo r id a ,

per

in c r e a s e
an d

fa rm

fa rm

h o w e ve r,

w h ere

w as

in

T e n n esse e

th e

n e a r ly

w e re

average

t w ic e

as

v a lu a b le
Thous. $ per f arm

gre at

as

60

expen ses
rate

30

o f

0

tw o




fa rm

on

an d

o th e r

o n e -h a lf

c a p ita l,

le d

th e

$ 1 .6

1970,

fo r a n n u a l o p e r a t in g

F lo r id a

an

b illio n

th e

in

im p r e s s iv e

expen ses

e x p a n d in g

in

w ay

D is t r ic t .

sh o w n

o p e r a t in g

t im e s

th e

w it h

a ls o

fro m
in

in

r e q u ir e d

has

F a rm

b illio n

has

state

c a p ita l

fa rm s

in c r e a s e d

$ 4 .2

G e o r g ia

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA

an y

gro w th .

D is t r ic t
ab o u t

F ig u r e s sh o w n for D istric t state s.

in

T h e w o r k in g

Value of farm s

N ote

an d

s u b s t a n t ia l

r is in g

per

in

200

m o re

fa rm s

m o st

fa rm s

in

e x p a n s io n .

.

a

on

$ 5 4 ,0 0 0

The

th e

O n

in v e s t m e n t
to

Size of farm s

and

to

b u ild in g s .

Acres

’5 0

o f

o f m a c h in e r y f o r la b o r , th e c a p it a l e m p lo y e d

th e

in

in

m o re

2 0 -y e a r

in

as

to

th a n

p e r io d .

in c r e a s e d

c o m in g

th e

1950

a

u se

o f

c lo s e

151

S h a r p ly

r is in g

p ro d u c tio n

expe nses

and.

. .

T h ou s. $ p er farm

c r e d it

to

in te r e st

fin a n c e

T he

N o

asp ect

w it h in

s o a r in g

a g r ic u lt u ra l

in v e s t m e n t .

u se

as

a

u se fu l

c a p ita l,

as

a ggre gate

v o lu m e

o f

s in c e

c r e d it

th an

$3

o f

b illio n

A lth o u g h
have

m a in t a in e d
gro w th
21

in

to ta l

in

1950.

p o s itio n

o f

ban ks

been
fo r

s iz e s

e r o d in g .

d iffic u lt

cu sto m e rs.

la r g e r ,

c r e d it

L e n d in g
as

in

L o u is ia n a ,

by

ab o u t
O n

a

$400
per

o f c a p ita l
The

th at

In

had

th a n

th e

fa rm —

T he

le s s

r a p id

r e fle c t s

su ch

as

fe e d s,
fro m

w h ic h

on

th at

has
a

as

to

a ll

are

o n ce

d is p la y e d

w as

th e

o n e

o f

r e s u lt

152




o f

is
th e
th e

d e a lin g

la r g e

an d

m o re

as

and

ban ks

o f

to

fa rm

s o m e t im e s

b o rro w e rs.
to

not

so

th e

in d iv id u a l
in

a p o t e n t ia l
tak e s

case

n u m b e rs

of

M o re o ve r,

gro w n

o p e rato r

w as

fa rm

a c c u m u la t e d

lo a n s

fa rm

ye ars,

o f

a c c o m m o d a t io n

have

th a n

w it h

F a rm s

By

m o re

of

in p u t s ,

p u r c h a s in g

The

fa rm

in te r e s t
e x p e n d it u r e

r a p id

in c r e a s e d

gro w th
u se

are a

M o re

cash

any

has

on

w h e n
of

P r o d u c t iv e

T h an

fa rm

of

era

m e asu re ,

D is t r ic t

o f

p r ic e
th e
th at

ever
an

ban ks

s m a lle r

Ever

th at

has been
o f

w as

w it h

a g r ic u ltu r a l

not

fa rm s

D u r in g

to

th e

at

n e a r ly

M o st

of

la r g e r

K ore an

a g a in

in

1970

c o m m o d it ie s

a g r ic u lt u r a l

reach ed

gro w th

to tal

1950.

are

s ix -s t a te

s t a n d in g

in

a t t r ib u t a b le

1 9 5 0 's ,

T h e

th e

b illio n

e x is te d

in c r e a s e s .

e a rly

b e fo re .

u n in te r r u p te d

1960,

o f $ 5 .9

le v e l

o u tp u t

to

h ig h

s in c e

in c o m e

th e

p h y s ic a l

o f

th an

e x p e r ie n c e d

r e c e ip t s

d o u b le

a

u n it

p r o d u c t iv e

cash

th a n

p r o d u c in g

case.

a lm o s t

t h is in c r e a s e

and

th a n

m o st

o n e

th e

o p e ra to rs.

fa rm ,

ave rage .

c h e m ic a ls ,

a

o ve r

as

33

1969,

a s t o u n d in g .

p r in c ip a lly

m o n e y

an y

w e re

per

p r o d u c t io n

q u a n tit ie s

ra th e r

w it h

p r o p o r t io n s

o ve r

in c r e a s e

are

o f

o n ly

1971,

so u rc e

e n c o u n t e r g r e a t e r r is k s , s i n c e

la r g e r

fo r

in

c o m m e r c ia l

s in g le

th a t

a

th e

th e

s iz e

le n d e r s

p r o p o r t io n

$ 4 ,8 0 0

per

ab o u t

D is t r ic t

in s e c tic id e s ,

By

g r o w in g

not

r e m a r k a b le

e x p e n d it u r e s

$ 2 4 ,0 0 0

th e

D is t r ic t

$ 1 0 ,0 0 0

w as

u se

im p r e s s iv e .

1950.

is s o m e w h a t

so u rc e s

c o m b in e d

o f

la r g e r

fa rm e rs

b o rro w e d

in

o u t-o f-p o c k e t

areas
o f

to

th e

ave rage

state ,

average

in

in

m o re

n e a r ly

le a d in g

h a lf

u se

f e r t iliz e r s ,

t h e m s e lv e s

rate s,

in

th e

o ff-fa rm

p a id

th a n

th e

$ 1 ,5 2 5

q u in t u p le d

gro w th

fig u r e ,

th e

b o rro w e rs,

d is a s t e r

gro w th

o f

gro w n
th e

lo w e s t

is e v e n

o n ly

T e n n e sse e

e x p e n d it u r e s
It

th e

expen ses
to

th e

th o se

a n n u a lly .

b a s is ,

D is t r ic t sta te s

F lo r id a ,

m o re

w it h

m illio n

am o u n te d

w h e re as
per

in

am o u n t

fa rm .

state

fa rm

p r o d u c t io n

fa rm e r

had

th e

exceeded

as

an nual
t im e .

fa rm e rs

an d

d e m a n d s

p r o h ib it
o f

to

have

T h u s,

lim it s

d e m a n d s

w it h
e x p e n d it u r e s

to

b illio n .

th at

b e co m e s

s m a lle r

th e

sta te s

it

th e

to

1964

to ta l
s lig h t ly

to tal

lo a n s

c r e d it

fo r

r e s t r ic t iv e
c r e d it

in

A s

a g r ic u lt u r a l

gro w

$ 6 .2
th e

a cc o u n te d

th e

o f

th e

s h a r e o f th is

lo a n s

fa rm s.

fro m

lo a n s

a g r ic u ltu r a l

in

o ver

1964,

ban ks

23

acc o m m o d ate

F ig u r e s sh o w n for D istric t s ta te s.

b an k

need

gro w th

so ared

p r io r

1964,

p e rce n t

been

r is in g

D is t r ic t

th a n

u se d

B an k

have

on

exceeds

to ta l

has

m o re

m o re

w it h

d e m a n d s
fa rm

s in c e

m a t e r ia lly
fa r m in g

in c r e a s e d

s in c e

o f

r e la t iv e

c r e d it

to

a

to ta l

fa rm s

c r e d it

c r e d it .

co m p are d

th e

Ju st

a p r o p o r t io n a te

p e rc e n t

p e rce n t

th e

D is t r ic t
w id e ly

ad d

o f

c r e d it

c o m m e r c ia l

d o u b le d

can

f a r m e r 's

has

in c r e a s e

fa rm

th at

by

D is t r ic t

$ 3 .4 - b illio n

q u a n tit y

o u t s id e
umion *

h ig h e r

r a p id ly

th e

b e co m e

a g e n c ie s

of

1950.

has

th e

c r e d it

on

le s s

e s p e c ia lly

le n d in g

a g r ic u lt u r a l

m o re
th a n

c a p a c it y

in d ic a t e d

T h is

b o th

to o l

e a r n in g

M o st

to

s e v e n fo ld

In

C r e d it

a cc o m m o d a te

u se

o f

C r e d it

gro w n

p e r io d

a n x io u s

th e

se co n d .

has

c r e d it .

in c o m e

T o ta l

an d

A g r ic u ltu r a l

te n -y e a r

o f

fo r

Note:

o f

o p e r a t io n .

. .

_____________________________________________________B illio n $

b o o s t t o t a l f a r m c r e d it ,
c o m m e r c ia l b a n k s

o p e r a t io n s

fa r m in g

la s t

r e c o g n iz e d
th e

U se

o f

th e

f a r m e r 's

to

fa rm

rate s.

p r ic e s
u n t il

rath e r
W a r
a t t a in e d

ve ry

r e c e n t ly .
M a jo r

so u rc e s

of

th e

gro w th

in

cash

r e c e ip t s ,

SEPTEMBER 1972, M O N T H L Y REVIEW

th e n ,

have

d r a m a t ic

been

in c r e a s in g

in c r e a s e s

liv e s to c k .

in

T h is

r e fle c t s

o f

p o u lt r y ,

p r o d u c t io n

crop

th e

y ie ld s ,

o u tp u t

g re a te r
eggs,

as

per

e ffic ie n c y

m ilk ,

w e ll

u n it
in

beef

as

C h a n g in g

of

d e c lin e

th e

an d

In

N e w

a d d it io n

t r a d it io n a l
so m e

th e

crop s

o f

F a rm

im p o r ta n c e

So u th e a st,

So yb e an

se c to r,

fro m

crop s.

h o w e ve r,

has

e it h e r

n e w

o ld e r

o n es

cash

been

p r o d u c t io n

r e c e ip t s

an d

o f

T he

have

o f

m ake u p

o f

im p o rta n c e
r e c e ip t s .

o f

a cc o u n te d

in c o m e

1969,

o ve r

h o w e ve r,

(1 )

p e rce n t

c a t t le ,
to

40

fa rm

20

m o ve d

p e rc e n t

up

fro m

to tal

p e rce n t

o f to tal

So yb e an
sh o w n
ye ars

s ig n ific a n t
an d

has

t r a d it io n a l
in

p r o v id e s

p r o d u c t io n
are a.

at

r e la t iv e ly

a

b r is k

h ig h

o n w ard

a g r ic u ltu r e ,
rate s,

has

o f

g r a in

pace

as

fo r

th ru st

o f

r e s u lte d

in

fa rm

w o rke rs.

T he

1971

sto o d

ab o u t

fo r

by

c o n tin u in g

6 5 1 ,0 0 0

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA




fiv e

in

w e re

A m o n g

not

g re a te st

in

th e

to

to

to

fa rm

a m o u n t in g

le v e l.

By

of

The

7 6 ,0 0 0

th e

S o u th e rn

fo rc e
o n ly

in

T he

fa rm

to

in

o f

in

th e

o f

The

sce n e

is e s s e n t i a l l y

re ve rse

th e

A lth o u g h

fiv e -y e a r

th a t

o ccu rre d

la b o r

fo rc e

m ass

its e lf

27

had

w it h

w o rk

fo rc e
o f

ran ked

L o u is ia n a

o f

in

th e

f ir s t in

1971,

w it h

th e

th e

p e rce n t

p e rc e n t

in

T o

as

ex od u s

in

M is s is s ip p i

1971
its

F lo r id a
le v e l

th e

to tal

1 5 1 ,0 0 0 .

p la c e d

th a t

state

lis t .

fa rm s

d e c lin e

1950.

to

th e

107

w o rke rs

w o rke rs

n u m b e rs
to

th o se

o n ly

1950. T e n n esse e

b o tto m

u n lik e ly

w age

la s t

la b o r e r s ,

to

c o n tra st,

in c r e a s e d
in

le v e l.

th e

as

state s,

in

fo rc e

at

r e d u c t io n s

w o rk

D is t r ic t

r e d u c tio n

n u m b e r

1950

s h r in k .

th e

e x is tin g

its

w it h in

p e r io d s ,

w o rk

a c t u a lly
th e

of

gre at

W h e re

r is in g

w o rke rs,

as

C e n su s

1950

acre s

resp o n d

o n e -th ir d
r e d u c tio n s

p r e v io u s

c o n tin u e s

crop s

w it h in

o ver

fo rc e

Sca rce r

r a p id ly

a g r ic u ltu r a l

F ig u re s s h o w n fo r D istrict states.

s lig h t ly

th e

c o n tin u in g

m e c h a n iz a t io n

a lo n g

Note:

p e r io d
has

c o m m o d it y .

W o rk e rs B e co m e

*1971 fig u re u se d b e c a u se of co rn leaf b lig h t in 1970.

w o rk

e n te r p r is e

fro m

crop s

fa rm e rs

th e

p ast

o th e r

u se

is

25

1950.

so yb e an

rem o ve d

an d

R ic e

10

b r o ile r s

in t o

th e

p r o d u c t io n

p r ic e s

sp e d

at

th e

so m e

T o b a cc o
cc

r e c e ip t s ,

sta rte r,

in r o a d s

a lt e r n a t iv e

c o tto n

F a rm

T h e

la t e

w it h in

been

so yb e an

s in c e

a

a g r ic u ltu r e . T h e

have

o f

T h u s,

e xp an d

o f

p r o f it a b le

th a t

r e c e ip t s

m ad e

P e a n uts
j ts

cash
In

a p p r o x im a t e ly

th o u gh

gro w th

p o s itio n s

a

la n d

fa rm

r a p id ly

S o u th e a ste rn

o f

cash

p r o d u c t io n ,

to

C otton L in t

25 0

cash

ab o u t

(2 ) p o u l t r y p r o d u c t i o n , i n c l u d i n g b o t h
p e rc e n t

O a ts

p e r io d

cash

eggs,

8

C orn

500

C o m m o d it ie s

an d

fro m

Soybeans

un de r 10

t h is

40

1950 B

W heat

th e

to tal

_

Lbs. per acre________________________________________ Cwt per acre

th e

to tal

an d

up

1970,

fa rm e rs.

d u r in g

o f

th e

o f

-

ii i I I
n Jf
r-j

fo r

in

w e ll

"

17
90
196o|

ch an ge d

th e

’7 0

Bu per acre

n

la y in g

In

O n e

in c o m e .

im p o r ta n c e

w h ic h

n e a r ly

o f

’65

d r a m a t ic a lly

on

p r o d u c t io n

D is t r ic t

’6 0

in c r e a s e

gro w th

in c o m e

o f

c o tto n

’55

y ie ld s

s t r id e s

d e c lin e

r e c e ip t s w e r e

D is t r ic t
in

has

p e rc e n t

and

p e r c e n t in 1 9 5 0 .

p e rc e n t

by

c o tto n

m o st

a

’5 0

w h ere

th e

fa rm

ye ars.

th e

ago,

r e c e iv e d

to tal

th a t g a in e d

as

ye ars

se c to r,

ch a n ge d

27

IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

gro w th ,

R a p id

r e c e ip t s

is

th e

e m p h a s is

cash

20

th e

r e c e ip t s

a cc o u n te d

w it h

past

c o tto n

fo r

fa rm

o f

th e

ch an ges

T w e n ty

p e rce n t

cash

d u r in g

- 2.0

No. of farm workers

in

in

a g r ic u ltu r e .

to ta l

a

decade.

cash

b r o ile r ,

liv e s t o c k

h a lf

la s t

ram p an t

v a s t ly

S o u th e a ste rn
fro m

n o t a b le

w e re

th e

D is t r ic t , a s c o m p a r e d

r e m a r k a b ly

to

1 9 6 0 's .

o f

cau se
. .

o f o n ly

in c o m e

g re a te r

th e

w o rk e rs.

are a,

n e w co m e r

liv e s to c k

or

c o w

th e

o f

c o n tr ib u t e d

beef

m ix

a p p r o x im a t e ly

m o st

th e

d u r in g

r e c e ip t s

in t h e

in

been

s w e llin g

so u rc e

e ffic ie n c y

th e

in c o m e
cash

m a jo r

have

in

hen,

in

o f

th e

p r o m in e n c e

w it h in

r e la t iv e

e n te r p r is e s

in

p r e v io u s ly

a id e d

T he

has

a

w it h in

g a in e d

p a r t ic u la r ly

p r o d u c t io n ,

crop

p r o d u c t iv it y

liv e s to c k

have

m e c h a n iz a t io n

E n t e r p r is e s

in c r e a s in g

an d

e n te r p r is e s t h a t h a d

m in o r
th e

to

M ix

and

n u m b e r o f fa rm

p o rk.
_

A

e n t e r p r is e s

in t h e

F ro m

H e re?

an d

fa rm

r a p id ly

as

th e y

have

p e o p le

fro m

th e

has

n o w

o f

ove r;

th e

so m e

areas

tre n d
as

w o rke rs

la r g e r

are
s in c e
ru ral
b e gu n

n u m b e rs

153

o f

p e o p le

to w n s
in

c it ie s .

e ffic ie n c y

o f th e
to

to

liv e

F a rm s

an d

to

fa rm

in

th e

p e o p le .

as

crop s,

g r a in

s u ita b le

in t e r n a l

T he

fu rth e r

fo r

ru ral

s iz e

but
be

s u r r o u n d in g
to

e n te r p r is e
n e w

ad a p te d

to

th e

e ffic ie n c ie s

fe e d in g ,

of

b u t p r im a r ily

w ill

fa rm s

b e co m e

fo r m o n e ta ry

o p e rato rs

to d o u b le

w ill

a g a in

M o re o ve r,

su ch

o r ie n te d

m o re

fo o d

m o re

o f

p r o m in e n t .

m o re

o n

th e

c o m m e r c ia l

fo r s u b s is t e n c e
th e

b u s in e s s

su c c e ssfu l
o r ie n t a t io n

u s e o f c r e d i t is w i d e l y

D is t r ic t

ever

be

g a in ), a n d

r e fle c t

w it h in

to w a rd

p ro d u cts

an

w ill

( i.e ., n o t c a r r i e d

o f a g r ic u ltu r e . T h e

p r o b a b ly

an d

a g r ic u ltu r e

e v e r b e fo re

fa rm

n u m b e rs

e n te r p r is e s
r e g io n

th a n

a t t r ib u t a b le

d e c lin in g
m ix

as

So u th e a ste rn

im p r o v e

th e

m o re

o p e r a t io n s
an d

ch an ge

liv e s to c k

are as

c o n tin u e

lik e ly t o

in c r e a s in g fa r m

u n d e rgo

in
w ill

p r o d u c t iv it y ,

n e xt d e c a d e are

ch an ge s

th a n
o f

ch o o se

an d

th at

w ill

be

p r o d u c t io n

are

a fflu e n t

e x p e c te d

n e x t t e n -y e a r p e r io d .

fa r m in g
th e

m o re

th e

p le a s in g
an d

in c r e a s in g ly
o f

to

h ig h -q u a lit y
th e

p a la t e

d is c r im in a t in g

c o n su m e r.®

APPENDIX
Selected Characteristics of Sixth District Agriculture
N u m b e r

o f

F a rm s

D istrict
Sta te s

A lab am a

Florida

G eorgia

Lo u isia n a

M is s is s ip p i

Te n n e sse e

1950
1954
1959
1964
1969

211,512
176,956
115,788
92,530
72,491

56,921
57,543
45,100
40,542
35,586

198,191
165,523
106,350
83,366
67,431

124,181
111,127
74,438
62,466
42,269

251,383
215,915
138,142
109,145
72,577

231,631
203,149
157,688
133,445
121,406

1,073,819
930,213
637,506
521,494
411,760

1950
1954
1959
1964
1969

99
118
143
165
188

290
316
338
380
394

82
96
135
163
221

80
87
102
114
124

106
121
151
176
205

1950
1954
1959
1964
1969

$ 4,809
6,816
12,780
20,552
37,596

$ 15,437
28,444
73,554
109,055
139,818

$ 4,566
7,053
14,292
24,322
51,611

$ 6,182
8,049
13,288
20,509
33,176

$ 6,008
9,231
19,671
31,752
54,209

1950
1954
1959
1964
1969

$ 49
58
89
125
200

$ 58
115
218
286
355

$ 55
74
106
150
234

$ 77
93
130
179
268

$ 57
76
130
180
265

$1,130
1,638
3,197
4,860
7,909

$ 4,652
6,400
10,701
14,210
23,698

$1,161
1,659
3,078
4,774
9,016

$1,170
1,521
2,463
3,377
4,817

$1,525
2,194
3,942
5,761
9,645

A v e ra ge

F a rm

V a lu e

of

L a n d

o f

La n d

1950
1955
1960
1965
1971

1950
1954
1959
1964
1970

$459
396
527
628
821

$

98.7
178.1
287.6
690.4
1,155.3
1,333.9
F a rm

763
562
831
1,009
1,286

B u ild in g s

E x p e n se s

$

F a rm

689
582
738
920
1,228

A c re

Per

F a rm

$ 1,706
2,224
3,817
5,387
10,831
C r e d it

($

M illio n )

$123.5
152.3
194.6
323.8
710.1
848.8

E m p lo y m e n t

C a sh

Per

F a rm

$ 82
112
171
233
321

$

180.1
265.0
348.6
484.2
961.2
1,163.0

$

151.6
241.9
272.4
516.8
897.5
1,049.0

$

874.1
1,296.6
1,625.0
2,913.0
5,217.9
6,279.8

(T h o u sa n d s)

320
234
183
139
98
T o ta l

$

an d

174.4
261.2
289.4
558.0
921.7
1,197.0

107
119
121
121
114

P er

$ 7,416
11,497
23,719
38,636
74,414

A g r ic u ltu r a l

$

277
200
154
120
87

B u ild in g s

$ 1,812
2,830
5,287
8,038
12,723
T o ta l

$145.8
197.6
232.5
339.5
572.1
688.1

an d

$ 43
61
97
135
234
P r o d u c t io n

1950
1954
1959
1964
1969
1971

(A c re s)

90
103
139
167
232

$ 5,323
7,905
17,944
29,155
54,883

V a lu e

1950
1954
1959
1964
1969*

S iz e

130
145
185
215
234

459
340
239
179
125

213
182
151
121
76
In c o m e

($

$336
389
396
506
704

363
283
253
197
151

1,739
1,358
1,101
877
651

$530
524
656
797
1,058

$425
479
537
614
778

$3,202
2,932
3,685
4,474
5,875

M illio n )

*ln 1969, e x p e n s e s for certain c h e m ic a ls w e re reported that had n ot been in clu d e d in p re v io u s C e n s u s q u e stio n n a ire s.

154




SEPTEMBER 1972, M O N T H L Y REVIEW

M is s is s ip p i in 1 9 7 2
by W illiam N. Cox, M
l

W e

la s t s u r v e y e d

e c o n o m y
fu lly

has

th e sta te o f M is s is s ip p i e a r ly

been

g r o w in g

at an

in 1 9 7 1 . 1 S i n c e

in c r e a s in g ly

r a p id

pace.

th e n , th e

n a t io n a l

M is s is s ip p i

has

sh a re d

in t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n .

T o ta l

p e rso n al

a c t iv it y

w e

in c o m e

gre w

se co n d
an d

in c o m e ,

h a v e , t e lls t h e
at

a

s lu g g is h ly

h a lf o f 1 9 7 1 ,

im p r o v e d

gro w th
re b o u n d

th e

fu rth e r

in d ic a t io n ,

b e st

sto ry

r e s p e c t a b le

h o w e ve r,

even

is a n y

p e rh a p s

M is s is s ip p i

rate

th at g ro w th

in

th e

fir s t

o v e r a ll

b e st.

In

5V 2

o f

rate

fir s t

of

to

1972.

is c a u g h t

o f

up

per

11

If

in

e c o n o m ic

h a lf o f 1 9 7 1 ,

p e rc e n t

d o u b le d

q u a rte r

th e n , M is s is s ip p i

m e a su re

th e

ye ar.

p e rc e n t

p e rso n al

th e

p e rso n al
In

th e

per year

in c o m e

n a t io n a l

e c o n o m ic

in f u ll m e a s u r e .

S t a t is tic s
e c o n o m ic

fo r

n o n fa rm

te m p o .

fir s t

h a lf o f 1 9 7 1 ,

th a t

pace

v ie w in g

but

th ro u g h

su ch

a

u n e m p lo y m e n t

e m p lo y m e n t

T he

an n ual
it t r i p l e d

th e

fir s t

p e r io d
fe ll

o f

g iv e

gro w th
to

fo u r

4 .3

5 .1

sam e

h e re

p e rc e n t

m o n th s

e x p a n s io n

fro m

th e

rate

o f

to

p e rc e n t

in

in

th e

1972.

fin d

im p r e s s io n

w as

1 .4

se co n d

It

th at

o n ly

is

1970

in

rate

to

o f

4 .3

th e

m a in t a in e d

s u r p r is in g

S t a t e 's

D e ce m b e r

q u ic k e n in g

h a lf a n d

h a r d ly

th e

o f

p e rce n t

w h en

la b o r

p e rce n t

in J u n e 1 9 7 2 .
W e

can

c o rro b o ra te

e x p a n s io n

w it h

m o st

o f

in

p a rt

lo o k in g

e v id e n c e
e le c tr ic

a

lim it e d

at

th e

th e

h o st

o v e r a ll

stre n gth

o f s u p p le m e n t a r y

sco p e ,

ge n eral

tak e n

p o w e r

m e n t a ls o

u sage ,

e c o n o m ic

s a le s

in s t a lla t io n s ,
g iv e s

tax

s it u a t io n .
an d

o f th e

N o t w it h s t a n d in g th e
p r o b le m s .
e c o n o m ic
H er

an d

is t h e o n l y

th e

per

o f
th e

sta te

c o n tin u e s
p o stw ar

rece n t su rge

c a p ita

stan d ard

average

$ 4 ,1 3 9

ran k

In

o f

$ 2 ,7 6 6
S ix t h

per

in t h e u n i o n
d e s p ite

p e r io d .

p e rso n

in

th e

fo r

are

u se fu l

e x c e p tio n ,

ban k

th e y

c h e c k in g

b an k
o f

an d

b e st

ran ks

w as

th e

g iv e

th e

a cc o u n ts,

le n d in g .
1 9 7 1 -7 2

$ 3 ,4 1 4 .2

in c o m e

s u s t a in e d

im p r e s s iv e

as

w ay

to

T h e ir

agre e ­

e x p a n s io n .

th e

illu s t r a t e

lo w e s t a m o n g

s u b s t a n t ia lly

D i s t r ic t 's

p e r c a p ita

s ig n ific a n t

T h e re fo re ,

to

an d

n atu re

s t ill

1971

R e se rve

w it h

are

th e y

P r o b le m s

p e rh a p s

M is s is s ip p i

F e d eral

gro u p

e c o n o m ic

d ata

o f a c t iv it y , M i s s i s s i p p i h a s s o b e r i n g e c o n o m i c

in c o m e ,

liv in g ,

a

re ce n t

T h e se

t h e lis t : p l a n t a n n o u n c e m e n t s ,

d e b its

w id e s p r e a d

as

W it h o u t

c o n tra c ts,

S u b s t a n t ia l

d ata.

but

d o w n

c o lle c t io n s ,

c o n s t r u c t io n

e v id e n c e

M is s is s ip p i's

in d iv id u a lly ,

o f q u ic k e n in g e x p a n s io n , u p

t e le p h o n e

o f

e c o n o m ic

year

o f

an

50

th e

a r e a 's

state s.
n a t i o n 's

M is s is s ip p i

$ 3 ,0 0 0 . T h is

e c o n o m ic
p a st

b e lo w

In d e e d ,

b e lo w

th e

gro w th

lo w

a ll

e c o n o m ic

th ro u g h
a c t iv it y

’"M ississip p i in 1970: Paddling Against the Current," this Review, M arch 1971.
-This average covers the six states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, M ississippi, and Tennessee.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA




155

h a s . b e e n , it w i l l t a k e m a n y
M is s i s s i p p i 's

per

c a p ita

n a t io n a l

a v e ra g e .3 T h e

g r o w in g

to o ,

c atch
in

up,

w h ic h

sh e

n a t io n a l

m u st

an d
in

s e v e r it y

th e

stru c tu ra l

r e c o g n iz e d .

That

th e

a g r ic u ltu r e ,
m o re
an d

had

its

to

1 9 3 0 's

r u r a l.

u n t r a in e d

th e

an d

S t a t e 's

th e

w orke rs

w e re

w a y

a

a

p la n

w as

w it h

m o re

and

le s s

f le x e d

o b je c t

in d u s try —

o f

an y

B A W I,

k in d

e it h e r

s u b s t a n t ia l

f e r t ile

c r o p la n d

p r o x im it y

to

it

p o o l

had—

a

th e re fo re ,

o f

in d u s tr y .

m in e r a l
in

th e

in d u s t r ia l

s u p p le m e n t e d
a d v an tage s

jo b s

fo r

The
been

o f

o ff

th e

as

w as

to

a ttra ct
w it h

re so u rce s

(e x c e p t

fo r

or

m ark e ts,

an

to

is

p ro gra m

s t ill

th e

State

u se d

w h at

la b o r —

in d u s t r ia l

in d u s t r ia l

to

w h at

r e m a in s

th ro u gh

p r o s p e r it y

fo u n d

a

la n d s c a p e

p la n ts

w o rke rs

have

tra d e ,

e v o lv e d
O n e

to

an d

w ill

le ft

o u ts id e

e m p lo y m e n t

m a n u fa c tu r in g

w a s s u c c e s s fu l.

b o n d

th e

an d

m o m e n tu m

h a n d le
fo r

th e

any

v is it o r
w it h

A n d

w h o

lig h t

m an y

in

a

lit t le

in d u s tr y

th e

u n e m p lo y e d

ru ral

m o re

fa r m in g

th a n

10

a

R e a liz in g

w it h

t h is ,
to

m in d s

fo c u s

w h at

has

lig h t

can

be

d o n e

to

h e lp

s k e le t o n

o f

w it h in

th e

fle s h

s e r v ic e s

of

an d

go v e rn m e n t,

su p p o rt

th e

m a n u fa c tu r in g

a t t r a c tio n

d r a w in g

th e

u n d e rsto o d .

e ffo rts

m a n u fa c tu r in g ,

r e c e n t ly ,

p u llin g

co u n try .

T he
in

o f,

a

an d

lig h t

w h ic h

have

ta k in g

w o rke rs

th e re fo re ,
p r o b le m s

te n d e d

jo b s
in t o

to

o f

th e

u rb an

M is s is s ip p i
u rb an

to

has

The
no

has

not

had

c o n g e s tio n

o th e r p a rts o f th e c o u n try .

In

n o w

its

rath e r

U n til
to

th e

n e w

r ig h t

th is

been

su cce ss­

th e

State

are

a s k in g ,

in

M is s is s ip p i

to

s h a r e o f t h e n a t i o n 's
up

w it h

cu rren t

S tate
to ,

fo c u s

co n ce rte d

her

th e

pace

n o w

is

o f

o f

c it iz e n s '

re st

o f

th e

e c o n o m ic

b o th

r e t h in k in g

th e

is

by

no

p ro gra m

e v id e n c e

e c o n o m ic

m ean s

has

yet

s e t t le d
been

p a st 35

is

in d u s try .

p la n t s
but

in d u s t r ie s

a g r ic u ltu r e

ye ars, sh e

h ig h e r -w a g e

are

n o w

to

w e lc o m e ,

s h o u ld

h e r s ig h ts

fa c t o r ie s

be

s k ills , a n d

u t iliz in g

race
th e

b e g in n in g

are

b e in g

fo r

to

ta k e n

in d u s try

P u b lic

in d u s t r ie s .
t e c h n ic a l

se e

a

In

s h ift

t h is

e d u c a t io n ,
is

n o w

a t t r a c tin g
A

aro u n d

in

r e la t iv e ly

s c h o o ls ,

se t

lo n g

w id e ly

th e

n e w

n e w
up

to

e m p h a s is

o f jo b s.
State

e m b r o ile d

te ach

in

as

w o rke rs

o f

to

to u gh e r

r e c o g n iz e d

sy ste m

n e w

h ig h e r

a p a r t ic u la r

in

an d

h ig h e r -p a y in g

are

w it h

d e m a n d in g

n u m b e r o f j o b s to t h e q u a lit y

q u e s tio n ,
keys

to

to

as­

le a d e r s

h ig h e r t e c h n o lo g y .

are

w e

pay,

her

an d

b a la n c e d

h ig h e r

le a g u e .

and

in d u s t r y d u r in g

s h ift in g

A p p are l

s t ill

th e y

n o w

o ffe r in g

th e

y e t,

a cc e p te d ,

o f t h e o u t lin e s a r e c le a r . J u s t a s M is s i s s i p p i

h e r s ig h t s f r o m

A c tio n s

in d u s ­

w o rke r

g h e tto s.

p a r it y

stro n g

sp u r

co m p e te

d is p e r s e

to

10

stra te gy .

fro m

b ase .

M is s is s ip p i's

liv in g

o f

th a n

sa y th at

a lr e a d y

la r g e

o f

th e re

a cc o u n t­

le s s

n e w .p r o b le m s ,

th e re b y

an d

in d u s t r y .

p o s t a d is p r o p o r t io n a t e ly
g a in s ,

are

p e rc e n t

th ro u gh o u t

o n

a

s u p p ly ,

n o w

lit t le

se n se ,

have

th e

la b o r

in s t it u t io n s

an d

a g r ic u ltu r e

b a la n c e d

A g r ic u l­

lig h t

W it h

m o re

B a la n c e

co u n te d

th e

p o p u la t io n

M is s is s ip p i's
f u lly

s a y in g ,

w it h in

f in a n c e ,

w id e ly

but

C h a lle n g e s

p e r c e n t o f h e r j o b s , 4 it s e e m s f a i r t o

s e m b ly

se arch

f a c e t o f t h i s s u c c e s s , m o r e o v e r , is o n l y

b e c o m in g

has

a lth o u g h

M is s is s ip p i

State ,

p e rh ap s,

be

th e

p r o b le m .

o n ly

but so m e

In d u s t r y

d o tte d

agre e.

ru ral

th e

as

M is s is s ip p i

in d u s t r ia l

fo r

o f

fro m

M is s is s ip p i's

an d

a t t r a c tio n

revenu e

M is s is s ip p i,

an d

m u st

ro o m

u n d e r e m p lo y e d

a c t iv it y

ad v an tage o u s

n o n u n io n

s p e c ific

c a m p a ig n

a ttra c te d

m an y

w it h

h a rn e ss

s h ift e d

m a n u fa c tu r in g

w it h

T h e re

sta n d a rd

b le s s e d

lo w - w a g e

it w i t h

su ch

B A W I

p asse s

th a n

to

e ffe c t,

fin a n c in g .

tr ia l

In d u s t r y

b e g in n in g

to

N o t

D e lt a )

sp a re d

b le s s in g s ,

e c o n o m ic

T he

an d

has

u rb an

a n n iv e r s a r y , th e n , th e

W it h

th e

fo u n d

w h ic h

m e c h a n iz e d

an d

fa rm .

o f

W e ll- d is g u is e d

its 3 5 t h

tu re

in g

th e

u s in g

p r o v id e

O n

but
a ll

c o tto n

M is s is s ip p i

to

b e in g

B a la n c e

on

by

n a t io n

m u s c le s ,

n o

o f

n e v e r t h e le s s .

succe ss.

V ir t u a lly

b e c o m in g

p r o d u c t iv e ,

of

im b a la n c e .

d o m in a t e d

A s

as 1937,

le g a c y

c le a r ly

t h is :

M o s t jo b s

in d u s t r ia l b a s e

th u s

a

p ro gra m ,

w as

a lth o u g h

in d u s t r ia l

an d

saw

p ro d u ce.

a lm o s t n o

p o llu t io n .
b le s s in g s

re so u rce s

h e ad ach es

n atu re

ago

w as

( B A W I)

tu rn , w a s

w h ic h ,

la b o r

p a r t ic ip a t e
her

th e

co n ce n trate d
le s s

ex p an d e d
sh e

in

lo n g

to c o rr e c t a s p e c ific

w as

F a r m in g ,

th e

D e p r e s s io n ,

fir s t

m in e r a l

th e

S u c c e s s B r in g s N e w

im b a la n c e

year

o f

p o p u la t io n

fa rm .

G re at

In d u s t r y

d e s ig n e d

p r o b le m

is

to

o f

o f

p r o p o r t io n a lly

r e c o g n iz e d

p r o b le m s . A s

th e

W it h

th a n

la c k

m an y

in c o m e

M is s is s ip p i

m o re

lo n g

e c o n o m ic

A g r ic u ltu r e

T he

o f

p e r c a p ita

fo r

her

th e

gro w th .

have

o f th e se

m id d le

o f a c t io n

sh a re

it b e f o r e

ap p roach e s

n a t i o n 's

m ean s

e c o n o m ic

M is s is s ip p ia n s

m a n y y e a r s lik e

in c o m e

th e

o n e

of

an d

v o c a tio n a l-

s p e c ific

s k ills

co p e

a s s o c ia te d

a s im ila r se n se ,

4The M arch 1970 Census found 261 thousand persons, 12 percent of
M ississip p i's 2.2 m illion population, living on farms. W ith regard
to jobs, 47 thousand or V percent of the State's 725 thousand
em ployed workers regarded farming as their principal econom ic
activity. This figure is low, however, because the Census occurred
during a slack farming season. The M ississippi farm em ployment
totals published by the Department of Agriculture were 133
thousand for 1970 and 102 thousand for mid-1972. This series covers
all persons w ho spend one hour or more w orking on a farm
during a survey week, rather than just those w ho regard farm
work as their primary occupation.

62

3H ow many years? The M ississippi Research and Developm ent
Center has its eyes fixed on the target year 2000. U. S. Department
of Com m erce experts are more pessimistic, prophesying that
M ississip p i's per capita income will reach 72 percent of the nation's
by 1990. (See Survey of Current Business, A pril 1972.) Crude
regressions run at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta suggest
equality near the year
.

2100

156



SEPTEMBER 1972, M O N T H L Y REVIEW

______

M
SSKSIW EC N M
S OO Y
A c c e le ra te d in to 1 9 7 2 . . .
P e r s o n a l In c o m e C r e w

r m

m

8%

between 1970 and 1971, then grew

I

122%

N o n fa r m

m

*

3m
T h e

E m p lo y m e n t B r e w

between 1970 and 1971, then grew
from 1971 into 1972.

U n e m p lo y m

L O

from 1971 into 1972.

4.9%

e n t R a le

F e ll

in 1970, down to

. in 1971, then to

42% in 1 7 92
nL

'

AT THE BAN KS;

D e b it s G r e w

between 1970 and 1971, then
from 1971 into 1972.

lo a n s G r e w

between 1970 and 1971, then

14% from

1971 into 1972.

Personal income growth, at seasonally adjusted annual rates, reflects Department of Commerce
statistics for Fourth Quarter 1970 and 1971 and First Quarter 1972. Other growth rates, based on
the "Sixth District Statistics" in previous issues of this Review, were calculated similarly except
that Second Quarter statistics were used for 1972.




for specific industrial developm ents, is n ow cop yin g
the success of several other Southern states.
G ro w th Centers
The focus is shifting, too, tow ard M ississip p i's
m ore densely populated areas. H ighe r-w age in­
dustries look both for larger p o ols o f skilled labor
and for the services, am enities, and cultural attrac­
tions that urbanized areas find it easier to offer.
The focus o f industrial attraction is shifting,
specifically tow ard tw o grow th centers: Jackson
and the G u lf Coast.
The capital area around Jackson, boasting a
central location and the best transportation c o n ­
nections in the State, has en ough population in her
environs (300,000) to warrant her em ergence
as an industrial focal point. Jackson is not basically
a regional distribution center, however; her
products flo w to national markets. This fact is
illustrated by tw o recent plant announcem ents, an
au tom obile w irin g assem bly plant (of the traditional
light industry type) and an agricultural im plem ent
center (of the higher-w age, higher-technology
variety). M o d e rn convention facilities are m u sh ­
room ing, and a new m erchandise mart facility
shou ld shortly provide a convenient m arketing
center for the apparel and furniture plants scattered
across the State. Jackson has gro w in g pains and is
b egin n in g to feel the press o f urban problem s.
But the city has room to grow , and a resurgence of
civic awareness evidenced by a path-breaking
capital im provem ents program strengthens the odds
that Jackson's steady grow th will continue into
the 1970's and 1980's.
It is the G u lf C oast area, c o m p risin g the cities of
Biloxi, G u lfpo rt and P a sca gou la-M o ss Point, w hich
has show n m ore spectacular grow th, however.
The C o ast is characteristically distinct from the
rest of the State: Its heritage is French a la southern
Louisiana; its population is predom inantly white;
and its transportation ties lie east to M o b ile and
w est to N e w Orleans. Long the State's major
tourist and convention area, the G u lf C o a st also
boasts the highest per capita incom e in
M ississip p i and her only pocket o f heavy industry—
the Pascagoula sh ip b u ild in g com plex.
Fortunes in the Coastal area have ebbed and
flow ed in recent years. Hurricane C am ille lashed
the C o ast in 1969, but resort facilities and fishing
activities have been reconstructed and rem odern­
ized. M o re recently, substantial sh ip b u ild in g activity
swelled by the N avy's 47-destroyer contract has
dom inated the Coastal econom y, sparking w hat can
o nly be characterized as an eco n o m ic boom . D o w n
through the list of eco n o m ic statistics, Pascagoula
specifically, and the C o ast area m ore generally,
lead the State.
The boom , like all boom s, has brought difficul­
ties. C ivic services and sch ools in the Pascagoula

158



area have been strained to acco m m o d a te the influx
of new workers. M a n y o f them, in fact, have decided
to com m u te across the state line from M o b ile ,
where facilities are not so overtaxed and where
urban am enities are m ore readily available. W h a t
this m eans is that M ississip p i is sharing the benefits
and the headaches of the b o o m w ith Alabam a,
where m uch o f the incom e earned in Pascagoula
gets spent.
M oreover, with the m em ory of N A S A 's upsurge
and later decline in sp e n d in g very m uch in mind,
the Navy destroyer contracts have been slow to
attract the kind o f support-industry or retail-andservice activity that typically accom p anies such a
bo om in prim ary industry.
For these reasons, the G u lf C o a st probably
requires the sam e search for new industry, inde­
pendent of ship build in g, to balance the co n ce n ­
tration already there. Tourism and com m ercial
fishing are tw o o b vio u s possibilities for diversifica­
tion, but rapid expansion in these tw o industries
faces the obstacle o f a turgid, pollu tion -p ron e
coastal reef. So, the C o ast is co m p e tin g with
Jackson, for different reasons, in the sam e higher
w age industrial attraction market. A n n o u n c e d
plans for a large natural gas refinery near Pascagoula
evidence a recent success.
O th e r Areas
It w ou ld be unfair not to m ention tw o other
M ississip p i grow th areas, even though they lie
outside the boundaries of the Sixth Federal Reserve
District. G ains have been significant both in the
northwest corner next to M e m p h is and also in the
n e igh b o rh o o d of Tupelo, w hich has broken away
from its dependence on Delta cotton to m o un t an
im pressive bootstrap program o f industrial attrac­
tion. Econ om ic planners are p oin tin g to T up elo as
a m odel for other sm aller cities in M ississippi.
W h a t of these sm aller cities? Can they match
the pace o f Jackson and the G u lf C o ast and the
n ear-M em ph is area? There are several possibilities
for a positive answer.
First of all, new light industry w ill still have an
im portant role to play in p ro vid in g m anufacturing
em ploym ent, in exactly the w ay that these industries
have raised M ississip p i's standard o f living in the
past. Then, too, there is n oth ing to prevent M iss is ­
sippi's other sm aller cities from em u latin g T up elo to
provide new bases for industrial growth.
The third and m ost im portant reason, interest­
ingly enough, brings us full circle. W e have seen
the success of M ississip p i's effort to balance her
traditional cotton-oriented agriculture w ith industry,
and we are n ow seeing m ore interest in attracting
higher-w age, higher-tech no logy industry. So, agri­
culture itself, especially in the fertile areas alo n g
the M ississip p i River, offers a valuable econ om ic

SEPTEM 1972, M
BER
ONTHLY REVIEW

resource for raising and dispersing M ississip pi
incom e.
C o tton cultivation provides an anchor, and will
continue to provide an anchor as lon g as Federal
price subsidies remain in place. How ever, soybeans
represent the State's m ost valuable and fastestgro w in g cash crop. M ississip p i's share of national
production is not so large as to preclude a su b ­
stantial im provem ent of the share she provides, and
in turn to capture a bigger slice, of the m any
industrial processes w hich M ississip p i soybeans now
pass through outside the State. Fruits and vegetables
offer another prospect for an expanded processing
industry. So does the newer techn ology now
perm eating the State's oak and pine w o o d products
in the eastern part of M ississippi, where particleboard plants, in particular, have been reaping the

Bank
A n n o u n c e m e n ts

benefits of a national h ousing boom . Fifty years
from now, w e may find that M ississip pi has com e
full circle back to agriculture— a new, m ore
sophisticated agriculture— as a prim ary eco no m ic
base.
A Q u ick R ecap
Thus our 1972 survey of the M ississip p i eco no m y
finds a strong recovery all across the State, with
incom es and em ploym ent sh o w in g substantial
gains. Looking m ore closely at the structure o f the
State's industrial base, we detected a shift in
em phasis tow ard attracting higher-w age, highertechnology industry. Jackson and the G u lf Coast,
as relatively urbanized areas, stand to be the in­
dustrial focal points o f the 1970's and 1980's.B

J Morthland, chairman; B. F. Wilson, president;
.
R. P. Morthland, vice president; and Schuster Siegel,
vice president and cashier. Capital, $200,000; sur­
plus and other capital funds, $300,000.

August 10, 1972
H EN RY C O U N TY BAN K

Abbeville, Alabama
August 1,1972
B A N K O F R IV E R V IE W

Riverview, Florida
Opened for business as a nonmember. Officers:
Charles R. Westfall, president; and Archie H. Jones,
vice president and cashier. Capital, $450,000; sur­
plus and other capital goods, $300,000.

August 1, 1972

Opened for business as a nonmember. Officers:
Donald F. Oakley, president; and Guy F. Medley,
vice president and cashier.

August 15, 1972
T H E A M E R IC A N B A N K

St. Petersburg, Florida
Opened for business as a nonmember.

C A R R O LLT O N STA TE BAN K

Carrollton, Georgia
August 18, 1972
Open for business as a nonmember. Officer: Paul
B. Christenbury, president.

August 1, 1972
T H E P EO PLES B A N K A T SELM A M A LL,
N A T IO N A L A S S O C IA T IO N

Selma, Alabama
Opened for business as a member. Officers: Rex

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN OF ATLAN
K
TA




BAN K O F TH E SO U TH EAST

Birmingham, Alabama
Opened for business as a nonmember. Officers:
W. Cassell Stewart, chairman; C. Pratt Rather, Jr.,
president and chief executive officer; J Gaston
.
Demonson, vice president and cashier; and Howard
W. Cater, Jr., assistant vice president. Capital,
$1,000,000; surplus and other capital funds, $1,000,000.

159

BANKING STATISTICS
Billion $
-3 2

C R E D IT *

-

— 34

D E P O S IT S **

30

28

— 26

-2 4

— 14

-1 8

-

10

-

-1 4

8

Os
- 8

Time

Other Securities

Savings

U.S. Govt. Securities

-4

- 4
I I i i i i I i it

l I I I i i i i i i i I i i i M i i I i i I I I i i

J

J
DJ
J
1971
1972
LATEST MONTH PLOTTED: JU
LY
* Figures are for the last Wednesday of each month.
** Daily average figures

S IX T H

D J

A
1973

J

J
1971

i I i I i I i M

DJ

i i I l I

J
1972

i I I

D J A
1973

D IS T R IC T

B A N K IN G N O T E S
CREDIT AT SIXTH DISTRICT MEMBER BANKS
% Change, Annual Rate, December 1971 to June 1972
DISTRICT
................................
A L A B A M A ................................
Anniston-Gadsden . . . .
Birmingham
......................
Dothan
................................
Mobile
................................
Montgomery
.....................
FLORIDA
................................
Jacksonville
......................
Miami
................................
Orlando
. ...........................
Pensacola
...........................
Tampa-St. Petersburg
. .
M ISSISSIPPI*...........................
Jackson
................................
Hattiesburg-Laurel-Meridian
Natchez . . . . . . .

Loans
22.0
17.6
20.4
15.6
19.0
12.6
15.4
21.8
21.0
20.8
30.7
30.0
19.6
17.5
18.6
21.8
6.6

Investments
17.0
6.8
1.0
1.8
7.3
20.7
15.7
20.2
20.0
18.3
31.5
14.3
18.9
28.4
39.0
7.5
15.3

Loans Investments
GEORGIA
......................................28.8
16.5
Atlanta
......................................29.2
18.2
A u g u s t a ......................................28.4
19.6
Columbus
................................
18.4
20.1
Macon
......................................24.6
19.8
Savannah
................................
21.8
42.7
South G e o r g ia ...........................
24.9
9.9
LOUISIANA*
................................
13.0
Alexandria-Lake Charles . .
19.2
Baton R ouge.................................10.0
Lafayette-lberia-Houma . . .
3.2
New O r l e a n s ........................... 19.6

7.1
7.8
1.5
13.0
8.5

TEN N ESSEE*.................................23.6
Chattanooga
........................... 21.0
K n o x v ille ......................................14.6
Nashville
................................ 26.4
T r i-C ities......................................17.6

10.6
—
9.8
6.0
16.1
5.3

Note: Figures shown (not seasonally adjusted) are for trade and banking areas, which include several counties surrounding
central cities. Boundaries of some areas do not coincide with state lines.
*Trade and banking areas in Sixth District portion of state.

160



SEPTEM
BER 1972, M
ONTHLY REVIEW

D IS T R IC T B A N K S : L O A N S A N D
D u rin g the first half of 1972, District m em ber banks
expanded their loans and investm ents (bank credit)
by $2.4 billio n — an all-tim e record volum e. This
expansion in bank credit represents a seasonally
adjusted annual increase of over 20 percent, alm ost
twice the national rate.
A n exceptionally strong loan grow th accounted
for the bulk o f this increase in bank credit, with
m em ber banks a d d in g over $1.7 billion in loans—
equal to a 22-percent1 increase. Dollarw ise and
percentagew ise, total loan grow th w as greater than
that achieved in the first half of any other year and
equaled 90 percent of total loan grow th du ring all
of 1971. M oreover, the dollar increases in total loans
were greater than in any year prior to 1971, still
another indication of the recent loan strength.
W h ile m em ber banks were trying to satisfy strong
loan dem ands, they also increased their investm ent
h o ldin gs by 18 percent. The entire $.7-billion invest­
m ent increase w as centered in state and m unicipal
securities as m em ber banks follow ed expected sea­
sonal patterns by slightly reducing their h o ldin gs of
U. S. G overn m e nt securities.
Strong loan grow th w as not lim ited to the largest
m em ber banks but took place at m ediu m - and
sm all-sized banks as well. Loan grow th at the 32
largest banks averaged 23 percent, and at the re­
m aining 536 banks, 21 percent. Sm all banks (those
with total deposits of $25 m illion or less) increased
their total loans by slightly over 20 percent.
Loan grow th w as broadly distributed throughout
the District, ranging between 13 percent for the
District portion of Louisiana (southern half) and 29
percent for Georgia. A m o n g individual trade and
ban king areas, O rla n d o led the w ay (see table on
previous page).
As one m ight expect, the greatest dollar grow th
occurred in the " b ig three" loan categories— real
estate loans, consum er loans, and business loans.
Each of these increased by roughly $.5 billion, and,
together, m ake up nine-tenths of the District's m e m ­
ber bank total loans. W h ile real estate loans and
consum er loans have show n continued strength
since last year, the strong advance in business loans
is in sharp contrast with last year's sluggish per­
form ance. Business loan dollar grow th achieved
du ring the first half of 1972 alm ost equaled that
du ring all of 1971.
Percentagewise, the category, loans to other fi­
nancial institutions, show ed the largest rise; and
loans to farmers, the smallest. The " b ig three" fell
in-between.

'For consistency, all percentages in this article have been expressed
as annual rates. Unless indicated, data have not been seasonally
adjusted.

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN OF ATLAN
K
TA



IN V E S T M E N T S E X P A N D S H A R P L Y

MEMBER BANK LOANS
chg.,

A n n . ra t e o f
D e c . ’71 to J u n e ’7 2

■ Business
■ Consumer
□ Real Estate

- 40

10

Ala. Fla.
Ga.
*Sixth District portion

La.*

Miss.* Tenn.* Dist.

MEMBER BANK LOANS INCREASE RAPIDLY
18%
Real estate
28%
Business
Consumer
17%
1-4 family
Instalment
19%
residences
25%
26%
Automobile
29%
Mobile home
Multifamily
14%
Single payment
residences
80%
Farm
10%
Nonfarm
Financial
34%
25%
nonresidential
institutions
Note: Figures shown represent percentage changes, at an
annual rate, between December 1971 and June 1972.
Several subcategories are omitted.

Tw o categories of real estate loans— those se­
cured by 1 to 4 fam ily residential properties and
those secured by nonfarm , nonresidential properties
(e.g., business, industrial, fraternal, or church)— each
were up one-fourth and were responsible for m ost
of the dollar increase in real estate loans. This
growth in real estate loans was vigorou s in all
District states.
Business loan gains (seasonally adjusted) at the
32 largest m em ber banks, w hich account for half of
the outstanding m em ber bank loans, were more
than twice the national grow th rate. Reports
on the first half of 1972 from 23 large banks (who
report by borrow er's business) indicate that the
categories experiencing the greatest increases were
construction (up 48 percent), service (up 28 per­
cent), and trade loans (up 24 percent). M in in g was
the only category that show ed a decline.
C on su m e r instalm ent loans, w hich account for
nearly three-fourths of m em ber bank consum er
loans, advanced 19 percent. A u to m o b ile loans m ade
up m ore than half of the dollar increase in total
consum er instalment lending; m obile hom e lend­
ing, an ever-grow ing portion of bank consum er in­
stalm ent debt, registered the greatest percentage
increase.
JO SEPH E. R O S S M A N J R .
Note: A more detailed tabulation of changes in loans, derived from
the Reports of Condition, is available on request.

161

Sixth D istric t S tatistics
S e a s o n a lly A d ju s t e d

(All data are indexes, unless indicated otherwise.]
One
Two
Latest Month Month Months
1972
Ago
Ago

One
Year
Ago

SIXTH DISTRICT
INCOME AND SPENDING
Manufacturing P a y r o lls ................
Farm Cash R eceip ts........................
C r o p s ...........................................
Livestock ...................................
Instalment Credit at Banks* (Mil. $)
New Loans ..................................
Repayments..................................

ALABAM
A
INCOME
Manufacturing Payrolls
Farm Cash Receipts .
EMPLOYMENT
Nonfarm Employment
Manufacturing . .
Farm Employment

162




One
Year
Ago

Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force) . .
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.)
. July
. June
. June

146
135
151
138

146
114
151
107

144
133
140
139

134
135
167
130

. July
. July

447
416

452
392

465
404

116
108
108
101
105
107
111
115
104
108
103
111
108
116
125
101
119
109
116
119
125
124
98
127
86

116
108
109
102
105
105
111
115
104
108
102
110
104
117
125
102
119
109
116
119
125
124
98
126
86

116
108
108
103
105
105
110
115
105
107
102
111
106
118
123
101
119
111
116
119
125
123
100
125
90

113
106
107
101
103
107
108
114
105
104
99
107
104
116
116
103
114
107
112
116
121
119
99
119
88

4.3

4.2

4.3

4.8

2.4
41.0
189
251
127
173
87
125
271
233
186
268
286
215
163
297
318
193
184
181
205
270
409
708
407

2.4
41.1
195
247
143
168
86
123
269
234
185
266
290
215
164
299
311
193
183
185
200
267
398
650
413

23
41.0
238
259
217
176
85
124
268
231
184
264
287
211
164
294
314
190
179
187
202
266
395
652
425

2.8
40.6
172
181
164
168
89
127
254
219
177
243
278
200
166
261
296
174
177
166
211
241
386
614
389

. July
July

184
170

181
168

177
1.65

154
141

. July
. July
. July

169
150
191

165
145
192

166
148
184

146
130
165

, July
July

5.6
40.8

5.1
41.5

5.4
41.0

5.3
40.5

FINANCE AND BANKING
Member Bank L oan s...............
Member Bank Deposits . . .
Bank D eb its**........................

. July
July
July

178
165
168

176
160
165

174
162
166

147
140
144

Manufacturing Payrolls . . .
Farm Cash R eceipts...............

July
June

146
159

144
140

141
131

140
147

. July
. July
. July
. July
July

128
111
131
131
104

126
111
129
132
85

126
110
129
132
96

122
109
125
129
110

July
July

3.7
41.7

3.5
41.3

3.7
41.2

4.0
40.8

July
July
July

201

196
185
219

194
186

210

167
165
191

144
132

144
128

131
130

381
364

EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTION
Nonfarm Employment . . . .
. July
Manufacturing ....................
. July
Nondurable Goods . . . .
. July
F o o d ..............................
. July
T e x t ile s .......................
. July
Apparel..........................
. July
Paper ...........................
. July
Printing and Publishing
. July
C h e m ica ls....................
. July
. July
Durable G o o d s ................
Lbr., Wood Prods., Furn. & Fix.. . July
Stone, Clay, and Glass . . . . July
Primary M e ta ls.................... . July
Fabricated M etals................ . July
M achinery........................... . July
Transportation Equipment
. July
Nonmanufacturing....................... . July
Construction....................... . July
Transportation .................... . July
T r a d e ................................... . July
Fin., ins., and real est. . . . . July
S e r v ic e s ............................... . July
Federal Government . . . . . July
State and Local Government . July
Farm Employment........................... . July
Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force) . . . . . July
Insured Unemployment
(Percent of Cov. E m p .)................ . July
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.) . . . July
Construction C ontracts*................ . July
R esid en tial.................................. . July
All O th er...................................... . July
Electric Power Production** . . . . April
Cotton Consumption**................... . June
**
Petrol. Prod, in Coastal La. and Miss.- Aug.
*
. May
.M
ay
Nondurable G ood s...............
. May
F o o d ..............................
. May
T e x t i le s .......................
. May
Apparel .......................
Paper ...........................
. May
Printing and Publishing
. May
C h e m ica ls....................
.M
ay
Durable G o o d s ...................
.M
ay
. May
Furniture and Fixtures . .
. May
Stone, Clay, and Glass . .
. May
Primary M e ta ls................
Fabricated Metals . . . .
. May
Nonelectrical Machinery
. May
Electrical Machinery . . .
. May
Transportation Equipment
FINANCE AND BANKING
Loans*
All Member Banks .
Large Banks . . .
Deposits*
All Member Banks
Large Banks . . . .
Bank Debits*/** . .

One
Two
Latest Month Month Months
1972
Ago
Ago

EMPLOYMENT
Nonfarm Employment . . . .
Manufacturing ....................
Nonmanufacturing...............
C onstruction....................
Farm Employment...................
Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force)
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.)
FINANCE AND BANKING
Member Bank L oans...............
Member Bank Deposits . . .
Bank D eb its* * ........................

191
223

GEORGIA
INCOM
E
Manufacturing P a y r o lls....................July
Farm Cash R e c e ip ts ........................June
EMPLOYMENT
Nonfarm Employment . . . .
M anufacturing....................
Nonmanufacturing...............
Construction....................
Farm Employment...................
Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force) . .
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.)

.
.
.
.
.

July
July
July
July
July

115
104
120
110
78

115
105
120
108
80

115
105
120
108
87

113
103
116
107
82

. July
. July

4.0
40.2

3.7
40.9

3.8
40.8

4.2
40.4

Member Bank Loans . . . .
Member Bank Deposits . . .
Bank D eb its* * ........................

. July
. July
. July

181
152
201

179
148
203

174
152
197

150
133
173

Manufacturing Payrolls . . . .
Farm Cash R eceip ts................

. July
. June

139
122

137
106

132
120

124
122

.
.
.
.
.

July
July
July
July
July

107
102
108
85
83

107
102
108
86
75

107
102
109
90
85

104
100
105
82
77

. July
July

6.3
42.8

5.9
42.5

5.7
41.9

6.7
42.2

. July
. July
. July

161
156
159

159
153
161

154
154
151

136
136
138

. July
June

169
156

167
140

164
169

142
156

.
.
.
.
.

114
120
112
93
87

114
120
112
92
88

114
119
112
95
91

111
114
110
99
96

FINANCE AND BANKING

EMPLOYMENT
Nonfarm Employment . . . .
Manufacturing ....................
Nonmanufacturing...............
Construction....................
Farm Employment...................
Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force) . .
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.)
FINANCE AND BANKING
Member Bank Loans* . . . .
Member Bank Deposits* . . .
Bank D eb its* /* * ....................
MISSISSIPPI

. July
. June

144
145

146
62

143
162

129
157

.
.
.
.
.

108
107
109
97
75

108
107
109
95
76

108
107
109
97
83

107
107
107
101
79

July
July
July
July
July

Manufacturing Payrolls
Farm Cash Receipts . .
EMPLOYMENT
Nonfarm Employment
Manufacturing . . .

July
July
July
July
July

SEPTEM 1972, M
BER
ONTHLY REVIEW

One
Two
Latest Month Month Months
1972______ Ago
Ago

One
Year
Ago

Latest Month
1972

One
Two
Month Months
Ago
Ago

One
Year
Ago

EMPLOYMENT

Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force) . .
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.)

July
July

FINANCE AND BANKING
Member Bank Loans*
Member Bank Deposits*
Bank Debits*/** . . .

July
July
July

180
167
181

183
168
193

180
163
184

159
145
154

July
July
July
July
July

116
109
119
116
88

115
109
119
116
92

115
108
119
119
91

111
105
114
108
89

. July
. July

4.0
40.7

3.9
40.5

3.7
40.8

4.5
40.2

. July
. July
. July

Nonfarm Employment . . . .
Manufacturing ...................
Nonmanufacturing...............
C onstruction...................
Farm Employment...................
Unemployment Rate
(Percent of Work Force) . .
Avg. Weekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.)

180
163
161

179
158
173

172
159
154

152
137
147

.
.
.
.
.

TENNESSEE
Manufacturing Payrolls...................... July
Farm Cash R eceip ts........................... June

147
106

147
134

*For Sixth District area only; other totals for entire six states

137
138
“ Daily average basis

FINANCE AND BANKING
Member Bank Loans* .
Member Bank Deposits*

1

tPreliminary data

N.A. Not available

Note: Indexes for bank debits, construction contracts, cotton consumption, employment, farm cash receipts, loans, petroleum
production, and payrolls: 19S7 = 100.
Sources: Manufacturing production estimated by this Bank; nonfarm, mfg. and nonmfg. emp., mfg. payrolls and hours, and unemp., U.S. Dept, of Labor and cooperating
state agencies; cotton consumption, U.S. Bureau of Census; construction contracts, F. W Dodge Div., McGraw-Hill Information Systems Co.; petrol, prod., U.S. Bureau of
.
Mines; industrial use of elec. power, Fed. Power Comm.; farm cash receipts and farm emp., U.S.D.A. Other indexes based on data collected by this Bank. All indexes
calculated by this Bank.

D ebits to D em and D eposit A ccounts
I n s u r e d C o m m e r c i a l B a n k s in t h e S i x t h

D is t r ic t

(In Thousands of Dollars)

July
1972

June
1972

July
1971

Percent Change

Percent Change
Year
to
July
date
1972
From
1972
June July from
1972 1971 1971

July
1972

116,913
53,027

129,056
57,611
141,522
29,226
735,602
1,414,660

141,513
58,223
153,930
32,090
703,277
l,508,443r

119,798
48,913
120,741
29,956
618,682r
l,280,024r

148,519
90,595
148,890
22,815
105,615
51,566
31,350
47,869
123,286
84,468
14,149
8,490
60,550
49,341
15,218
31,902

158,144
80,801
164,367r
25,568
106,878
64,442
33,332r
52,104
124,304
84,361r
15,947r
8,643
56,421
50,600
16,658
30,346

171,011
80,248
130,516
16,380
97,148
49,792
28,173
36,893
119,486
75,343
13,489
8,773
57,448
48,983
15,472
26,594

.
.

114,921
64.920
102,733
47,764

108,457
59,442
104,376
59,506

93,680
49,541
83,001
45,104

+ 6 +23 + 15
+ 9 +31 + 15
— 2 +24 + 20
20 + 6 + 8

131,110
59,088
37.556

153,635
59,516r
36,515

99,138
58,343
38,622

_ 15 + 32 + 31

.
.

Bristol . . . .
Johnson City
Kingsport . . .

116,145
146,029
216,010

128,246
154,704
226,784

113.772
136,919
195,815

2,309,264
85,051
237,308
720,533
467,933
153,345

-1 1
-10
- 2
+ 0
- 1
+ 3

+ 20
- 5
+ 8
+ 20
+ 8
+ 5

+ 24
1
+ 2
+ 17
+ 9
+ 8

-

Bradenton
. .
Monroe County
Ocala
. . . .
St. Augustine
St. Petersburg .
Tampa . . . .

601,134
306,412

508,558
252,839

2
+ 8

+ 16
+ 30

+ 18
+ 27

1,621,908
220,637
214,393
3,325,793

1,235,326
208,053
173,135
2,659,702

- 7
- 3
- 11
- 6

+ 22
+ 3
+ 10
+ 17

+ 16
+ 6
+ 18
+ 23

371,080
5,191,506
1,283,001
412,144
332,795
541,333
3,009,760
884,897

287,674
4,876,063
946,022
332,883
273,079
352,667
2,525,857
751,195

8
- 4
- 7
-10
+ 0
+ 12
3
- 3

+ 19 + 15
+ 3 + 11
+ 26 + 20
+ 12 + 9
+22 + 24
+ 71 + 100
5
+ 15
+ 14 + 7

Athens . . . .
Brunswick .
Dalton . . . .
Elberton . .
Gainesville .
Griffin . . . .
LaGrange . .
Newnan
. .
Rome . . . .
Valdosta . .
Abbeville . .
Bunkie . . . .
Hammond . .
New Iberia .
Plaquemine .
Thibodaux
.

162,706
10,683,049
409,416
363,273
453,096
422,184

168,257
11,393,197
448,375
365,907
453,632
459,451

139.321
9,477,851
396,150
340,076
394,973
400,560

3
6
9
- 1
- 0
- 8

+ 17 + 16
+ 13 + 17
+ 3 + 12
+ 7 + 10
+ 15 + 14
+ 5 + 11

208,285
.
. . 1,304,546
226,914
.
.
195,154
. . 3,330,676

203,518
1,103,748
222,816
203,892
3,625,015

Albany ...............
A tla n ta ...............
Augusta
. . . .
Columbus . . . .
M a c o n ................
Savannah . . . .
Alexandria .
Baton Rouge
Lafayette . .
Lake Charles
New Orleans

.
.
.
.
.

_ 4 + 3 + 14
_ 1 + 10 + 12

125,106
58,800

2,749,881
90,002
263,750
864,642
508,634
157,648

“ Bartow-LakelandWinter Haven
591,631
**Daytona Beach
329,470
Ft. LauderdaleHollywood
. 1,509,452
**Ft. Myers . . . .
213,535
“ Gainesville . . .
191,272
Jacksonville . . . . 3,118,999
“ MelbourneTitusvilleCocoa . . .
341,191
Miami ................
4,998,964
Orlando
. . . .
1,192,727
Pensacola . . . .
371,511
“ Sarasota . . . .
332,951
604,157
Tallahassee . . .
Tampa-St. Pete
. 2,909,793
W Palm Beach
.
854,781

July
1971

date
7 mos.
1972
From
1971

119,906
58,121

STANDARD METROPOLITAN
STATISTICAL AREAS
Birmingham
. . . 2,769,381
Gadsden . . . .
81,190
Huntsville
. . .
257,365
M o b ile ................
866,423
Montgomery . . .
503,880
Tuscaloosa . . .
161,626

June
1972

July
1972
from
June July
1972 1971

184,761 + 2
955,593 + 18
195,397 + 2
4
183,966
3,192,523r
8

Biloxi-Gulfport . .
Jackson
. . . .

215,913
1,098,534

227,293
1,181,157

190,397
967,887

Chattanooga .
Knoxville .
. .
Nashville . . . .

945,746
759,538
2,667,549

1,003,684
753,506
2,899,624

999,497
754,300
2,264,033

OTHER CENTERS
Anniston . . . .

95,339

102,373

89,215

5
- 7

—

+ 13
+ 37
+ 16
4 6
4- 4

+
+
+
+
+

+ 13
+ 13

+ 14
+ 12

12
14
15
10
6

6 - 5 + 1
f 1 f 1 + 6
8 + 18 + 19
7

+ 7

+ 10

Hattiesburg .
Laurel . . . .
Meridian . .
Natchez . .
PascagoulaMoss Point
Vicksburg . .
Yazoo City .

District Total

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

. .

Alabama . .
Florida . . . .
Georgia
. .
Louisiana1 .
Mississippi' .
Tennessee' .

.
.
.
.
.

. 57,385,460

+ 8
+ 18
+ 17
- 2
+ 19
+ 11

+
+
+
+
+
+

21
17
51
78
20
16

_ 6 -13
+ 12 + 13
9 + 14
- 11 +39
+ 9
- 20 + 4
6 + 11
8 +30
—
+ 3
+ 0 + 12
11 + 5
—2 - 3
+ 7 + 5
—2 + 1
- 9 - 2
+ 5 +20

_
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+

17
18
19
27
5
9
1
30
14
15
8
4
10
7
8
6

9
1
8
9
5
6

—
-

+ 3

+ 1 +
- 3 +

9
- 6
“ 5

+ 2 + 7
+ 7 + 19
+ 10 + 12

59,663,900r 50,756,682r - 4

+ 13 + 16

6,587,714r 5,746,886
. 6,625,552
19,600,956 20,381,692r 17,089,817
15,663,604 16,506,218r 13,845,859
6,303,560
6,421,404r 5,640,818r
2,667,168r 2,173,094
2,504,236
6,687,552
7,099,704r 6,260,208

.
.
.
.

_
+
-

+
- 4
5
- 2
6
- 6

-

+ 15
+ 15
+ 13
+ 12
+ 15
+ 7

+
+
+
+
+
+

3
4

19
19
16
9
15
11

‘District portion only
‘Annual Rate. Also reflects statistical adjustment for trading days.
Figures for some areas differ slightly from preliminary f.gures published in “Bank Debits and Deposit Turnover” by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
r
*New Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Data from 1964 forward available upon request.

FEDERAL RESERVE BAN OF ATLAN
K
TA




163

D istric t B u sin e ss C o n d itio n s

The region's e c o n o m y is still expanding. In July, nonfarm em ploym ent, farm incom es, and farm prices
rose; construction activity declined slightly. Bank le n d in g increased m oderately. A lth o u gh consum er
bo rro w in g and au to m o bile purchases grew less than they had in earlier m onths of this year, they ran
w ell ahead of levels recorded a year ago.
July's gains in nonfarm jobs were concentrated
outside the m anufacturing sector. The em ploym ent
increases were spread evenly a m o n g all n o n m a n u ­
facturing industries. M an u factu rin g em ploym ent re­
m ained near its June level; however, average factory
hours declined fractionally. A s a result of a sharp
pickup in labor force growth, the u nem ploym en t
rate rose slightly.
D esp ite declines in prices of cotton, rice, and
oranges, prices paid for farm products in July m oved
up from the previous m onth and rem ained above
year-ago levels. Soaring prices in the livestock sector
accounted for m ost of the gain. In August, cattle
prices appeared to w eaken, w hile broiler and
e gg prices advanced and tobacco prices set record
highs. Farm cash receipts continued substantially
above last year's level; Florida's rate of gain c o n ­
tinued to lead the District. It is estimated that
cotton production in 1972 w ill be one-fourth higher
than in 1971, with M ississip p i accou nting for m ost
of the region's increase.
The value of construction contract aw ards in July
drifted dow nw ard. Nonresidential awards declined,
since b u ild in g by manufacturers continued to lag.

W ith residential m ortgage rates sh o w in g little
change and inflow s at thrift institutions contin u in g
at a high rate, residential aw ards were stable.
W h ile co n tin u in g to grow , bank le n d in g appears
to have m oderated from the rapid pace of the
springtim e. B o rrow in g from the Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta steadily increased d u ring the su m ­
mer as the Federal funds market tightened up. M a n y
of the banks outside of the largest District cities
continued to attract substantial am ounts of c o n ­
sum er time deposits, w hile the largest banks gained
interest-bearing deposits by issuing large-denom ination C D 's to state and local governm ents. M a n y
banks advanced their prim e lending rate from
5 V4
percent to 5 V 2 percent in late August.
C o n su m e r instalm ent credit o u tstan din g at c o m ­
mercial banks grew less vigo ro u sly in July than in
recent m onths. Net extensions of both auto loans
and personal loans were w eak relative to the
average for the first half of the year but were above
year-ago levels. Net extensions of loans for repair
and m odernization and for purchases of consum er
go o d s other than autos continued at high levels.
Sales of dom estically produ ced autos were un­
usually strong for July.

Note: Data on which statements are based have been adjusted whenever possible to eliminate seasonal influences.

164




SEPTEM
BER 1972, M
ONTHLY REVIEW