View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M

O N T H

L Y

R E V I E W

O f Financial, Agricultural, Trade and Industrial,
Conditions in the Sixth F e d e ra l R e se rv e D is tr ic t

F E D E R A L
VOL. 17, No. 10

R E S E R V E

B A N K

ATLANTA, GA., OCTOBER 31, 1932

NATIONAL SUMMARY OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS
Prepared by Federal Reserve Board
Industrial activity and shipments of commodities by rail
increased from August to September by considerably more
than the usual seasonal amount. There was also a more
than seasonal increase in the volume of factory employment
and payrolls. The general level of prices, after advancing
for three months, showed a decline beginning in the early
part of September.
Production and Volume of industrial production, as measEmployment
ured by the Board’s seasonally adjusted
index, based on the 1923-1925 average, in­
creased from a low point of 58 in July to 60 in August and
66 in September. The advance in September reflected
chiefly large increases in activity at textile mills, shoe fac­
tories, meat packing establishments, and coal mines. In
the steel industry, where activity had shown none of the
usual seasonal increases in August, operations expanded
considerably during September and the first three weeks
of October to about 20 per cent of capacity. Daily average
output of automobiles and lumber in September showed
little change from recent low levels.
Factory^ employment increased from 58.8 per cent of the
1923-1925 average in August to 60.3 per cent in September,
according to the Board’s seasonally adjusted index. Con­
siderable increases were reported in the cotton, woolen, silk,
hosiery, and clothing industries and smaller increases at
car building shops, foundries, cement mills, and furniture
factories. In the automobile, tire and electrical machinery
industries, employment declined.
During the three months ending with September, value
of building contracts awarded, as reported by the F. W.
Dodge Corporation, was about the same as in the preced­
ing three months, although awards are usually smaller in
the third quarter. In the first half of October the daily
average of contracts declined somewhat.
Distribution
Volume of freight-car loadings increased
by considerably more than the usual sea­
sonal amount in September, reflecting chiefly larger ship­
ments of coal and miscellaneous freight. Department store

F e d e r a l R e s e r v e B o a r d ’s in d e x o f f a c t o r y e m p lo y m e n t w it h a d ju s t m e n t
f o r s e a s o n a l v a r ia t io n s .
(1 9 23 -25 a v e r a g e ” 100.) L a t e s t f ig u r e Se p t. 60.3.

A T L A N T A
This review released fo r publication in
m orning papers of October 81.

sales increased from the low level of August by somewhat
more than the usual seasonal percentage.
Wholesale
Wholesale commodity prices, as measured
Prices
by the monthly index of the Bureau of La­
bor Statistics showed little change from
August to September. During August and early September
there was a general advance in prices followed by a decline
which continued through the first half of October, when
the average was 2 per cent below the high point in early
September and 1 per cent above the low point of early
summer. Substantial decreases occurred after the begin­
ning of September in the prices of many domestic agricul­
tural commodities, including cotton, grains, and livestock,
and also in prices of gasoline, non-ferrous metals, and im­
ported raw materials; while prices of wool, worsted yarns,
coal, and lumber increased somewhat during this period.
Bank Credit

During September and the first three
weeks of October there were further addi­
tions to the reserve funds of member banks, arising from
increases in the Country’s stock of monetary gold, from an
unseasonal return flow of currency, and from issues of addi­
tional national bank notes. Member bank indebtedness to
the reserve banks declined by more than $100,000,000 from
September 7 to October 19 and their reserve balances in­
creased by $180,000,000.
During September and the first two weeks of October
reporting member banks in leading cities showed a further
growth in investment holdings, largely of United States
Government Securities, but to some extent of other invest­
ments. Loans of reporting banks declined further in Sep­
tember; in the early part of October loans at banks in New
York City showed an increase. There was considerable
growth in government deposits and in bankers’ balances
during the period; time deposits also increased.
Money rates in the open market declined to lower levels
during the first half of October, the rate on prime commer­
cial paper being reduced from a range of 2-2 % to a, range
of l% -2 per cent, and the rate of 90-day bankers' accept­
ances from % of one per cent to V2 of one per cent. Rates
for call loans on stock exchange collateral declined from
2 per cent to 1 per cent.
PER CEEfT




O F

PER CENT

In d e x n u m b e r o f in d u s t r ia l p r o d u c t io n , a d ju st e d f o r s e a s o n a l v a r ia t io n .
(1 9 23 -25 a v e r a g e — 100.)
L a t e s t f ig u r e S e p te m b e r 66.

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

2

120
110

120
11S

RAILRC)AD FRE1GHT-CAR LOAD1NGS

100

\l-H

Sj

100

Merchandise

90
80

80

Total\

60

V V
\

50

V/

70

40

1927

1928

1929

1930

1931

1932

70
60

AO

Monthly averages of daily figures. L atest figures are averages of first
22 days in October.

Indexes of daily average num ber of cars loaded; adjujsted for seasonal
variation. (1923-25 averager=100.)

SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY

a year ago. Smaller fluctuations were recorded in All Other
discounts. Holdings of bills bought in the open market on
October 12 had increased during the four-week period but
continued to be substantially less than at the same time a
year ago, and United States securities held on October 12
were slightly larger than four weeks earlier and a little
more than twice as large as at the same time last year.
Total bills and securities held on October 12 were smaller
by $13,374,000 than on September 14 and $26,068,000 less
than on the corresponding report date a year ago.
Increases were recorded between September 14 and Octo­
ber 12 in member bank reserve deposits, in total deposits
and in total reserves, and all of these items were less than
a year ago. Federal Reserve notes of this bank in actual
circulation, which on September 14 were at the lowest point
in about fourteen years, declined further during the follow­
ing four weeks.
Principal items in the weekly statement are shown com­
paratively in the table.

Statistical evidence for September indicates gains over
the previous month in most lines of business and industrial
activity, but comparisons with the corresponding period a
year ago continue to be unfavorable. At least some of the
increases over August are larger than the usual seasonal
gains at that time of year.
Department store sales in the Sixth District increased 22.5
per cent in September over August, but were 10.8 per cent
less than in September, 1931. After adjustment for the
number of business days, the gain from August to Septem­
ber was larger than the usual seasonal increase. Wholesale
trade gained 16.6 per cent from August to September, and
was 13.3 per cent less than in September a year ago, and
for the nine months period averaged 26.5 per cent less than
in that part of 1931.
Discounts of member banks held by the Federal Reserve
Bank of Atlanta declined more than 14 millions of dollars
between September 14 and October 12, but holdings of
purchased bills and of Government securities increased some­
what, and loans and investments of weekly reporting mem­
ber banks increased during this four week period, but were
substantially less than a year earlier.
Building permits increased 30.9 per cent from August to
September, but were 19.8 per cent less than a year ago,
and for the nine months period there has been a decrease of
42 per cent compared with that part of 1931. Orders booked
by Southern Pine mills in recent weeks have been greater
than a year ago, but production has been smaller. Con­
sumption of cotton in the cotton-growing states increased
20.6 per cent from August to September, and was 70.6 per
cent greater than at the low point in July. In the three
states of this District for which figures are available, con­
sumption of cotton increased 13.7 per cent, and the daily
average increased 22.8 per cent, over August, and was 5.8
per cent greater than in September, 1931. Employment and
production at cotton mills increased over August, but orders
declined, but all of these items show gains over September
last year. Production of pig iron in Alabama increased 14.7
per cent, and the daily average output 18.6 per cent, over
August, but was substantially smaller than a year ago. Coal
production in Alabama and Tennessee increased further in
September.
FINANCE
Reserve Bank
The total volume of reserve bank credit
Credit
outstanding at the Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta declined during the last half of
September but increased slightly during the two weeks end­
ing October 12. The decrease was due entirely to a reduc­
tion in discounts, holdings of purchased bills and of United
States securities having increased.
Total discounts declined from 33.4 millions on September
14 to 16.9 millions two weeks later, and on October 12 were
19.1 millions compared with 39.4 millions on the same report
date last year. Discounts secured by United States Gov­
ernment obligations decreased from 5.6 millions on Sep­
tember 14 to 1.5 millions on September 28, but increased
to 2.2 millions on October 12, compared with 5.5 millions



(000 Omitted)
Oct. 12, 1932 Sept. 14, 1932 Oct. 14, 1931
Bills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. Obligations
$ 2,248
All O thers __________ ________
16,857
19,105
Total Discounts ____________....
Bills Bought in open m ark et_____
2,089
46,692
U. S. Securities ________________
O ther Securities -------- --------------67,886
Total Bills and Securities-----88,340
Total Reserves ________________
Member Bank Reserve Deposits
.. 41,583
50,332
Total Deposits _________________
F. R. Notes in actual circulation ..... 102,835
57.7
Reserve Ratio ___________________

$ 5,611
27,834
33,445
1,210
46,605
_____
81,260
75,244
40,777
44,114
106,498
50.0

$ 5,474
26,104
31,578
39,436
22,340
600
93,954
94,558
52,731
63,995
117,205
52.2

Condition of
Total loans and investments of 24 weekly
Member Banks in reporting member banks located in AtSelected Cities
lanta. New Orleans, Birmingham, Jack­
sonville, Nashville, Chattanooga, Mobile
and Savannah increased by $7,859,000 between September
14 and October 12, and were then $63,310,000 less than on
the same Wednesday in 1931. An increase of $6,501,000 in
holdings of Government securities between September 14
and October 12 accounted for most of the increase, but
there were also small gains in holdings of other securities,
and an increase in “All Other” loans more than offset a
decrease in loans on securities. Compared with the corre­
sponding report date a year ago, loans show a decline of
$56,283,000 and investments a decline of $7,027,000.
Between September 14 and October 12 time deposits de­
clined but demand deposits increased somewhat, and both
continued below the levels for the corresponding report date
a year ago. Bankers’ balances, however, increased during
this four-week period and were greater than a year ago.
Borrowings by these banks from the Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta declined from nearly 19 millions on September
14 to 6.1 millions on September 28, the lowest point re­
corded for any Wednesday in more than a year.
Principal items in the weekly report are shown compara­
tively in the table, and are followed by monthly averages
of weekly figures for some of the more important items
in the report, showing their trends over the past year.

M O N T H L Y

(000 Omitted)
Oct. 12, 1932 Sept. 14, 1932 Oct. 14,1931
L o an s:
$114,655
$106,281
On Securities __________________ $104,980
263.398
215,078
216,790
All Others .
378,053
321,359
Total Loans _________________ 321,770
92,379
87,121
93,622
U. S. Securities --------------------------92,404
84,134
83,187
Other Securities _________________
184,783
170,308
Total Investm ents ___________ 177,756
562,836
491,667
Total Loans and Investm ents___ 499,526
218,156
194,396
Time Deposits ___________________ 194,094
272,005
215,739
Demand Deposits _____________ ___ 216,601
81,184
78,879
83,762
Due To Banks __________________
74,452
64,048
80,502
Due From Banks ________________
18,174
18,975
8,182
Borrowings from F. R. B ank--------

1931

Aug. .
Sept .
Oct. .
Nov. .
Dec. .
1932
Ja n . •
Feb. .
M arch
A pril .
May . .
Ju n e .
Ju ly .
Aug. .
Sept. .

Monthly Averages of Weekly Figures of R eporting
Member Banks in Selected Cities.
(000 Omitted)
Loans on All O ther Invest- Demand
Time
Borrowings
Securities Loans m ents
Deposits Deposits from F. R. Bank
$113,341
114.082
115,508
114,264
113,708

$263,351
262,759
261,950
258,929
252,428

$173,381
181,450
185,199
181,274
182,510

$290,772
280.966
267,026
259,056
254,486

$234,860
228,099
217,781
213,795
207,522

$ 6,109
11,060
22,348
80,762
29,992

109,658
107,587
106,645
106,573
110,647
110,611
108,987
105,815
106,068

245,706
241,360
237,979
234,239
227,871
221,415
218,055
217,168
214,809

178,755
178,555
178,162
176,037
177,477
175.588
170,186
172,591
175,623

244,147
237,630
237,662
234,990
226,776

200,591
196,661
198,274
194.704
194,830
192,402
189,892
195,237
195,538

27,919
26,542
18,342
19,307
15,582
18,677
24,532
17,944
12,967

221,211
213,908
212,576
215,013

Deposits of All For the first time since March, there was a
Member Banks small increase in daily average demand de­
posits of all member banks in the Sixth
District in September, over August, but a decrease of 24.5
per cent compared with September a year ago. Time de­
posits averaged slightly less than for August and were 12.5
per cent less than for September, 1931. Demand deposits
averaged 2 per cent less than time deposits in September1,
while a year ago they were 13.7 per cent greater. Changes
over the past year are shown in the table.
Demand
Deposits
1931
A ugust
September
October __
November .
December .
1932
Ja n u ary ...
F ebruary .
M a r c h ___
April -----May ____
J u n e ____
J u l y ------A u g u s t __
September

Time
Deposits

$467,814,000
453,797,000
436,299,000
418,720,000
417,991,000

$407,324,000
399,268,000
386,669,000
376,443,000
371,425,000

412,279,000
398,252,000
398,756,000
395,649,000
379,044,000
366,332,000
350,364,000
341,792,000
342,608,000

370,341,000
361,376,000
360,419,000
357,522,000
354,710,000
350,648,000
349,040,000
351,530,000
349,445,000

Savings Deposits of 63 R eporting Banks
(000 Omitted)
N um ber
Sept.
Aug.
Sept.
Percentage chance
of
1932
1932
1931 Sept. 1932, compared
Banks
with
Aug. 1932 Sept. 1931
A tlan ta .................. .
Birm ingham
_ . ..
Jacksonville —.......... ..
Nashville .............. .
New O rleans --------Other Cities ...........
Total .......................

4
3
4
5
6
41
63

$33,652
17,035
13,243
22,712
48,732
71,619
206,993

$33,635
17,304
13,273
23,202
48,984
71,933
208,331

$40,834
20,901
15,070
30,021
52,150
83,345
242,321

+ 0 .1
—1.6
—0,2
—2.1
—0.5
—0.4
—0.6

—17.6
—18.5
—12.1
—24.3
— 6.6
—14.1
—14.6

Total charges against bank accounts
reported during September from 26
clearing house centers of the Sixth
District increased by 7 per cent over August, and averaged
21.6 per cent less than in September, 1931. All except five
of these cities reported gains over August, and increases
over September last year occurred at Macon, Newnan and
Vicksburg. Monthly totals shown in the table are derived
from weekly reports by pro-rating figures for those weeks
which do not fall entirely within a single calendar month.
Debits to
Individual Accounts




3

R E V IE W

Sept. 1932
Alabama— 4 Cities _ ____ ____
Birm ingham ................ ...............
Dothan ............... .........................
_
Mobile _____ ______________
Montgomery .....
__ _________
Florida—4 Cities _________________
Jacksonville ___________________
Miami ............................ .......................
Pensacola ..... ........................... .......
T am pa ............... ...........................
Georgia—10 Cities ......... .................
Albany ..................... .......................
A tlanta _______________________
A ugusta ........ ............... .... ............. .....
Brunswick .......................... - ........
Columbus ........................... ............
Elberton ______________ _______
Macon ___________ ____________
Newnan _______________________
Savannah _____________________
Valdosta ________________ _____
Louisiana—New Orleans _________
Mississippi—4 Cities ____________
H attiesburg ................................. —
Jackson _______________________
M eridian ______________________
Vicksburg _____________________
Tennessee—3 Cities ______________
Chattanooga ...... ....................... ......
Knoxville _____________ - _______
Nashville ______________________
Total 26 Cities ...... ......................... ......

(000 Omitted)
Aug. 1932

$ 87,765
54,464
2,221
20,150
10,930
64,694
35,537
10,171
4,067
14,919
161,055
2,532
97,776
11,973
1,460
7,486
580
11,391
1,250
24.277
2,330
199,834
25,603
2,622
13,656
5,463
3,862
91,232
25,032
18,188
48,012
$630,183

$ 80,127
48,785
1,312
18,968
11,062
68,067
36,949
11,509
4,011
15,598
150,567
2,105
92,433
11,095
1,509
6,769
441
11,213
981
21,713
2,308
182,237
20,325
2,316
10,365
4,645
2,999
87,539
22,777
17,157
47,605
$588,862

Sept. 1931
$126,358
83,304
2,532
25,998
14,524
83,527
43,470
14,030
5,470
20,557
207,107
3,937
129,537
14,795
2,031
10,592
589
11,294
1,157
29,666
3,509
229,226
29,183
3,846
15,187
6,498
3,652
128,821
35,421
28,826
64,574
$804,222

AGRICULTURE
Prospective crop yields, according to the October report
issued by the United States Department of Agriculture,
improved from September to October in Mississippi, Florida,
Louisiana and Georgia, but declined in Alabama and Ten­
nessee, as indicated by these percentages based upon 33
important crops:
Alabama
F lorida ...
Georgia .

------------- —0.9
________ -4-1.4

--------- +0.1

Louisiana ..
Mississippi
Tennessee

_

+ 1 .4

_ +1.8
__ —1.3

Prospective production of food and feed crops made little
change in Georgia during the month. Light rains occurred
over most of the northern and central part of the state and
heavy rains in the southern part, causing some damage to
corn and hay crops. Matured crops are being harvested
rapidly and sowing of fall grains is in full progress. Sep­
tember weather conditions were mostly favorable to Florida
citrus fruits, but in staple crop sections there was consid­
erable damage in local areas to peanuts, sugar cane, sweet
potatoes and other crops. Commercial production of citrus
for the season of 1932-33 is estimated at 18,500,000 boxes,
of which 6,700,000 are grapefruit and 11,800,000 are
oranges, including tangerines. Total production, which in­
cludes in addition to the above, fruit to be trucked, that for
canning and juice extraction and home consumption, is
estimated at 23,500,000 boxes, of which 9,200,000 boxes are
grapefruit and 14,300,000 boxes oranges. Last year the
total crop amounted to approximately 24,000,000 boxes,
10,200,000 of grapefruit and 13,800,000 oranges. Sizes are
expected to be larger than last year, but the proportion of
the crop to move before January 1 will be smaller than a
year ago. October 1 prospects were for more corn in Geor­
gia and Florida than last year, but less in the other four
states; smaller crops of oats than last year in all six states;
more hay than in 1931 in Georgia, Florida and Alabama, but
less in Tennessee, Mississippi and Louisiana; more sweet
potatoes in all six states than last year, but less tobacco in
the four producing states, smaller production of pecans in
the five producing states, and larger crops of peanuts, except
in Florida.
Cotton

A cotton crop of 11,425,000 bales is forecast for
the United States by the Department’s October
report based on conditions as of October 1. This represents
an increase of 115,000 bales, or 1 per cent, over the Sep­
tember 1 forecast. Most of the increase over the Septem­
ber total took place in Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas and
Oklahoma, but these increases were partly offset by declines
in Texas and Tennessee. The October estimates for Georgia,
Alabama and Florida were the same as those for September.

4

M O N T H LY R E V IE W

T h e O c t o b e r e s t i m a t e f o r t h e S i x t h D i s t r i c t , o m it t i n g t h o s e
p a r t s o f M is s is s ip p i, L o u is ia n a a n d T e n n e s s e e s i t u a t e d in
o t h e r D i s t r i c t s , is 2 , 1 0 6 ,0 0 0 b a le s , l a r g e r b y 0 .7 p e r c e n t
t h a n t h e e s t i m a t e a m o n t h a g o , b u t 7 .5 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n
t h e f i r s t e s t i m a t e o f t h e s e a s o n o n A u g u s t 1 , a n d 4 1 .5 p e r
c e n t s m a lle r t h a n 1 9 3 1 p r o d u c t io n , a s in d ic a t e d in t h e t a b le .
Cotton Production—Bales
E stim ate
E stim ate Percentage Production Percentage
Oct. 1, 1932 Sept. 1, 1932 Comparison
1931
Comparison
A labam a ________ 836,000
Florida __________
16,000
Georgia _________ 795,000
Louisiana _______ 540,000
Mississippi ............ 1,100,000
Tennessee _______ 381,000
Sixth D istrict ____ 2,106,000

836,000
16,000
795,000
513,000
1,064,000
392,000
2,091,000

same
same
same
+ 5.3
-j- 3.4
— 2.8
+ 0.7

1,420,000
43,000
1,393,000
900,000
1,761,000
594,000
3,597,000

—41.1
—62.8
—42.9
—40.0
—37.5
—35.9
—41.5

C o t to n g in n e d in t h e s e s t a t e s p r io r t o O c t o b e r 1 t h i s y e a r
w a s l e s s b y 5 .5 p e r c e n t t h a n w a s g i n n e d u p t o t h e s a m e
tim e la s t y e a r .
T h e a v e r a g e p r ic e o f s p o t c o t t o n a t t e n d e s i g n a t e d m a r ­
k e t s r o s e f r o m t h e lo w p o in t a t 4 .7 6 c e n t s o n J u n e 9 t o 8 .2 7
c e n t s p e r p o u n d o n A u g u s t 2 6 , b u t h a s s in c e d e c lin e d a n d
o n O c t o b e r 1 4 w a s 6 .3 6 c e n t s , a s a g a in s t 5 .6 2 c e n t s o n
O c to b e r 15 la s t y e a r .
Sugar C ane
and Sugar

T h e O c t o b e r e s t i m a t e o f s u g a r p r o d u c t io n in
t h e L o u is ia n a C a n e B e l t is 2 0 7 ,0 0 0 s h o r t t o n s ,
w h ic h c o m p a r e s w i t h t h e e s t i m a t e o f 2 1 3 ,0 1 0
s h o r t t o n s a m o n t h e a r lie r , a n d w it h 1 9 3 1 p r o d u c t io n o f
1 5 6 ,6 1 7 s h o r t t o n s . S ir u p p r o d u c t io n in t h e C a n e B e l t is
n o w e s t im a t e d a t 3 ,7 2 3 ,0 0 0 g a llo n s , a g a i n s t a n e s t im a t e a
m o n t h a g o o f 3 ,8 3 2 , 5 0 0 g a l l o n s a n d p r o d u c t io n in 1 9 3 1 o f
2 ,5 4 5 ,0 0 0 g a l l o n s , a n d o u t s id e t h e C a n e B e l t p r o d u c t io n is
f o r e c a s t a t 2 , 2 4 2 , 5 0 0 g a ll o n s , t h e s a m e a s a m o n t h a g o ,
a n d c o m p a r e d w i t h 2 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 g a ll o n s in 1 9 3 1 .
Sugar Movement (Pounds)
Raw Sugar
Sept. 1932
Aug. 1932

R eceipts:
New O rleans __________ __ ____ 69,031,089
Savannah ___________________ 19,239,554
M eltings:
New Orleans _________________ 92,690,997
Savannah _________________ ___ 33,570,950
Stocks:
________ 68,642,215
New Orleans ___
________ 70,218,944
Savannah
-----Refined Sugar (Pounds)
Sept. 1932
Shipm ents:
83,073,452
New Orleans
Savannah ... ......................... ............ 32,113,000
Stocks:
New Orleans _______ ___ _____ _70,911,281
Savannah ____________________ _17,181,134

Sept. 1931

130,677,712
26,724,802

133,339,418
26,463,551

128,717,280
37,056,958

112,167,130
33,046,863

92,424,113
84,550,340

78,182,117
42,049,842

Aug. 1932

Sept. 1931

134,353,190
35,864,289

100,758,528
34,766,705

69,256,138
15,888,990

71,333,700
20,889,084

R ic e

T h e O c t o b e r e s t i m a t e o f t h e L o u is ia n a r i c e c r o p
i s t h e s a m e a s t h a t f o r S e p t e m b e r , 1 5 ,4 4 4 ,0 0 0
b u s h e ls , a g a i n s t 1 7 ,1 9 2 ,0 0 0 b u s h e ls p r o d u c e d in 1 9 3 1 . T h e
p e r c e n t a g e o f r ic e a c r e a g e h a r v e s t e d b y O c t o b e r 1 w a s 5 2
p e r c e n t, a g a in st 5 4 p e r c e n t la s t y e a r , a n d th e p e r c e n t
t h r e s h e d w a s 2 5 p e r c e n t , t h e s a m e as* a y e a r a g o .
Rice Movement—New Orleans
Sept. 1932
Aug. 1932
Rough Rice—B arrels:
Receipts ---------------Shipm ents ------------Stocks _________ *__
Clean Rice—Pockets:
Receipts
Shipm ents —
Stocks --------

Sept. 1931

76,072
90,908
3,565

81,451
80,543
18,401

87,617
87,457
4,639

123,726
82,918
145,484

102,207
96,345
104,676

157,666
139,048
118,955

Rice Millers Association Statistics
(Barrels)
September
Receipts of Rough Rice:
862,094
Season 1932-33
1,455,075
Season 1931-32
Distribution of Milled Rice:
735,615
Season 1932-33
875,393
Season 1931-32
Stocks of Rough and Milled Rice:
1,224,839
October 1, 1932________________
1,305,470
October 1, 1931________________

1,282,880
1,837,364
1,385,323
1,302,321

F e r tiliz e r
T a g S a le s

S a le s o f f e r t iliz e r t a x t a g s b y S ta te a u th o r itie s
in t h e s i x s t a t e s o f t h i s D i s t r i c t i n c r e a s e d f u r ­
t h e r in S e p t e m b e r a n d w e r e 7 .3 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r
t h a n in S e p t e m b e r a y e a r a g o .
F o r th e tw o m o n th s o f
t h e n e w s e a s o n t a g s a l e s h a v e a v e r a g e d 1 6 .5 p e r c e n t
g r e a t e r t h a n in t h o s e m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 1 . F ig u r e s in t h e t a b l e
a r e t a k e n f r o m s t a t i s t i c s c o m p ile d b y t h e N a t i o n a l F e r t i l i z e r
A s s o c ia t i o n .
Sept.
1932
300
Alabam a
Florida
22,910
200
Georgia
Louisiana ____ 4,001
Mississippi
Tennessee .____ 4,925
T otal_______ 32,336

(Short Tons)
Sept.
Aug. 1 th ru Sept. 30 Percentage
1931
1932
1931 Comparison

Aug.
1932
400
23,005
490
450

100
20,059
233
5,706
250
3,775
30,123

690
25,035

700
45,915
690
4,451
5,615
57,371

700
36,709
233
5,806
250
5,552
49,250

same
+ 25.1
+196.1
— 23.3
—100.0
+ 1.1
+ 16.5

TRADE
R e t a il
T rade

D e p a r t m e n t s t o r e s a le s in t h e S ix t h D i s t r i c t i n c r e a se d fr o m A u g u s t to S e p te m b e r m o r e , b u t
s t o c k s le s s , t h a n t h e g a i n s u s u a l ly s h o w n a t t h i s
t i m e o f y e a r . S a le s b y 3 8 d e p a r t m e n t s t o r e s d u r in g S e p ­
t e m b e r , w h ic h h a d 2 5 b u s i n e s s d a y s , g a i n e d 2 2 .5 p e r c e n t
o v e r A u g u s t , w h ic h h a d 2 7 b u s i n e s s d a y s , a n d s o t h e t o t a l
d a ily a v e r a g e s a le s i n c r e a s e d 3 2 .3 p e r c e n t . S e p t e m b e r s a l e s
w e r e 1 0 .8 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in t h a t m o n t h o f l a s t y e a r , a n
in c r e a s e o f 5 .5 p e r c e n t a t A t l a n t a p a r t ly o f f s e t t i n g d e ­
c r e a s e s a t o t h e r p la c e s . T h e d e c r e a s e o f 1 0 .8 p e r c e n t is
s m a lle r t h a n h a s b e e n s h o w n f o r a n y o f t h e p a s t t w e l v e
m o n t h s in c o m p a r is o n w i t h t h e c o r r e s p o n d in g m o n t h a y e a r
e a r lie r . T o t a l s a le s d u r in g t h e f i r s t n in e m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 2
h a v e a v e r a g e d 2 4 .1 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in t h a t p a r t o f 1 9 3 1 .
T h e r a t io o f c r e d i t s a le s t o t o t a l s a l e s f o r S e p t e m b e r t h i s
y e a r w a s 5 8 .4 , a n d f o r S e p t e m b e r l a s t y e a r 5 8 .5 .
S t o c k s a t t h e e n d o f S e p t e m b e r w e r e 7 .2 p e r c e n t la r g e r
t h a n a m o n t h e a r l i e r , b u t 2 3 .5 p e r c e n t s m a lle r t h a n a y e a r
a g o . S t o c k t u r n o v e r f o r t h e m o n t h w a s h ig h e r t h a n f o r S e p ­
t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 , b u t f o r t h e n in e m o n t h s p e r io d w a s lo w e r .
A c c o u n t s r e c e iv a b l e i n c r e a s e d 9 .5 p e r c e n t o v e r t h e m o n t h ,
b u t w e r e 1 6 .2 p e r c e n t le s s t h a n a y e a r a g o , a n d c o l l e c t i o n s
d e c lin e d 0 .1 p e r c e n t f r o m A u g u s t a n d w e r e 2 3 .9 p e r c e n t
s m a lle r t h a n in S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 .
T h e r a t io o f c o l l e c t i o n s d u r in g S e p t e m b e r t o a c c o u n t s o u t ­
s t a n d in g a n d d u e a t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h e m o n t h w a s 2 4 .8
p e r c e n t , f o r A u g u s t 2 4 .7 p e r c e n t , a n d f o r S e p t e m b e r l a s t
y e a r 2 5 .8 p e r c e n t . F o r r e g u l a r a c c o u n t s t h e r a t io f o r
S e p t e m b e r w a s 2 6 .4 p e r c e n t , f o r A u g u s t 2 6 .1 p e r c e n t , a n d
f o r S e p t e m b e r l a s t y e a r 2 7 .7 p e r c e n t , a n d f o r i n s t a l l m e n t
a c c o u n t s t h e r a t i o f o r S e p t e m b e r w a s 1 4 .3 p e r c e n t , f o r
A u g u s t 1 4 .0 p e r c e n t , a n d f o r S e p t e m b e r a y e a r a g o 1 5 .2
p er c en t.
A ll o f th e s e s ta tis tic s
d o lla r a m o u n t s a n d t h e
a llo w a n c e f o r c h a n g e s in
m o n t h a r e s e t o u t in t h e

a r e b a s e d u p o n r e p o r t s in a c t u a l
p e r c e n t a g e c o m p a r is o n s m a k e n o
t h e p r ic e l e v e l. C o m p a r is o n s f o r t h e
t a b le .

RETA IL TRADE IN THE SIXTH DISTRICT DURING SEPTEM BER, 1932
Based on confidential reports from 38 departm ent stores
Comparison of N et Sales
Comparison of Stocks
Sept. 1932
Sept. 1932
Ja n . 1 to Sept. 30,
Sept. 30, 1932
Sept. 30, 1932
w ith
w ith
1932, with same
with
with
Sept. 1931
Aug. 1932
period in 1931
Sept. 30, 1931
Aug. 31, 1932
H32.3
—18.3
[-17.9
—16.6
A tlan ta ( 3 ) ................. .. + 5.5
—29.0
-27.3
Birm ingham (4) ---------- —11.7
—23.9
- 7.0
—20.9
-27.6
—33.4
Chattanooga (5) --------- —13.0
- 6.8
—29.4
-25.1
-14.4
—18.1
Nashville (4) ------------- —13.1
—23.9
- 4.5
- 2.4
—22.6
New O rleans (5)............. —21.8
-41.9
—26.7
Other Cities (17)---------- — 9.5
—31.3
- 3.7
—24.1
-22.5
- 7.2
—23.5
DISTRICT (38) - .......... —10.8
N O T E : The rate of stock turnover is the ratio of sales during given period to average stocks on hand.




Aug. 1 to Sept. 30

Rate of Stock Turnover
Sept.
1931
.32
.19
.15
.18
.20
.20
.21

Sept.
1932
.43
.25
.19
.20
.20
.20
.24

Ja n . 1 to Sept. 30
1931
1932
3.15
3.01
1.82
1.79
1.51
1.59
1.92
1.60
1.76
1.67
1.82
1.46
1.98
1.85

5

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W
W h o le s a le
T rade

F o ll o w i n g a p e r c e n t a g e g a in f r o m J u l y t o
A u g u s t w h ic h h a d b e e n e x c e e d e d a t t h e s a m e
t i m e o f t h e y e a r in o n ly t h r e e i n s t a n c e s d u r ­
i n g t h e t w e l v e - y e a r p e r io d c o v e r e d b y t h i s s e r i e s , t o t a l s a l e s
b y 1 0 7 r e p o r t i n g w h o le s a le f i r m s in e i g h t d i f f e r e n t li n e s
in c r e a s e d f r o m A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r b y 1 6 .6 p e r c e n t . T h is
i s a l a r g e r p e r c e n t a g e g a in t h a n h a s b e e n s h o w n f r o m
A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r o f a n y o t h e r y e a r in t h e s e r i e s . F r o m
t h e l o w p o i n t in J u l y t o S e p t e m b e r , w h o l e s a le t r a d e i n ­
c r e a s e d 4 2 .6 p e r c e n t , c o m p a r e d w i t h 5 .3 p e r c e n t a t t h e
s a m e t i m e in 1 9 3 1 , 1 5 .9 p e r c e n t in 1 9 3 0 , a n d 2 5 .4 p e r c e n t
in 1 9 2 9 . A l l r e p o r t i n g l i n e s e x c e p t e l e c t r ic a l s u p p li e s s h a r e d
t h e in c r e a s e o v e r A u g u s t , a n d d r y g o o d s s h o w a g a i n o v e r
S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 , b u t o t h e r l in e s s h o w d e c r e a s e s c o m p a r e d
w ith t h a t m o n th .
C o m p a r is o n s o f c u m u la t iv e t o t a l s f o r t h e f i r s t n in e
m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 2 w i t h t h a t p a r t o f 1 9 3 1 a r e s h o w n b elow !,
a n d a r e f o l l o w e d b y d e t a ile d c o m p a r is o n s f o r t h e m o n t h .
A l l o f t h e s e p e r c e n t a g e s a r e b a s e d u p o n r e p o r t s in a c t u a l
d o lla r f i g u r e s , a n d m a k e n o a l lo w a n c e f o r t h e c h a n g in g
l e v e l o f p r ic e s .
Percentage Comparison
Jan.-S ept., 1932, w ith
___________________________________________________same period in 1931
Sales by L ines:
Groceries .......... ........................ ............... ... ............ ......
—22.3
—18.2
Dry Goods - __ _____________ ___ _______________
H ardw are .............. ...................... - ....................... ..... ......
—30.7
F u rn itu re ..................................... .... ................. ........ ......
—40.4
Electrical Supplies ________ _______________ ___ —41.1
Stationery! _________ ____________________ ______
—20.8
—21.9
Drugs .................. ..................... .......... ............... ............
Total_______________________________________

—26.5

W HOLESALE TRADE IN SEPTEM BER, 1932
Sixth Federal Reserve D istrict*
P ercentage change Sept. 1932
Num ber of
compared w ith
__________________________________ Firm s________Aug. 1932______Sept. 1931
All Lines Combined:
Sales ...................... ....................... .
107
— 13.3
+ 16.6
— 20.4
Stocks on hand ...........................—
28
+ 1.0
— 12.5
Accounts receivable __........ .... ... .
50
+ 5.0
— 19.5
53
Collections ................... ...... ...... ~...~
+ 8.4
Groceries:
— 12.3
Sales ......... ...... ..... ......................... .
26
+ 3.4
18.1
— 20.3
A tlan ta .............. ........ ...................
3
— 1.3
4
Jacksonville —............. ..................
+ 1.5
6.0
— 14.3
New Orleans ................... .........5
+
— 4.5
0.7
Vicksburg ------------------ --- —.....
3
— 16.4
O ther Cities ------------------------11
- r 1.7
8.6
— 27.0
Stocks on hand -—....... ......... ....- 4
t
-J- 2.2
11
Accounts receivable ....... ............—
~r 2.5
— 8.6
Collections ................... .......... . ~....
12
+ 0.7
D ry Goods:
+ 18.0
Sales —.................. - .............. .......... 17
+ 45.5
+ 11.6
Nashville _______ __ —...............
3
+ 69.6
+ 19.7
14
O ther Cities .......... ............. -........
+ 40.5
4.9
—
22.1
Stocks on hand ------------ --- --- —
9
+
— 11.6
Accounts receivable .......................
10
4- 16.3
24.6
— 0.3
Collections ..................... ...................
11
H ard w are:
— 20.3
Sales ........ ........................................ 25
- r 15.2
— 26.6
Nashville ........... - .......... ....... ......
3
+ 12.9
— 24.7
New Orleans --------------- ------ 5
+ 17.9
14.0
—
15.9
O ther Cities --------------- --------17
+
— 15.2
0.8
Stocks on hand ...............................
7
2.4
—- 12.8
Accounts receivable .......................
15
— 28.8
Collections --------------- ....................
15
+ 8.3
F u rn itu re :
38.7
— 19.0
Sales ............. ................. - .................
11
+
— 24.3
A tlan ta --------------------- ------ ---4
+ 70.2
— 17.6
O ther Cities __________ _______
7
+ 32.6
6.2
— 17.5
Stocks on hand --------------- ---------5
— 36.4
Accounts receivable ..... .................
6
+ 7.7
30.3
—
47.1
Collections ........ ..................... - .........
6
4E lectrical Supplies:
__
—
46.1
2.9
Sales ...... ..................... ......................
14
— 58.2
New Orleans ________________
4
+ 17.1
10.9
— 36.5
O ther Cities ........... .............. -.......
10
— 1.1
— 29.1
3
Stocks on hand ------------ ------ ---— 1.3
— 28.4
Accounts receivable -----------------4
— 44.3
C o llectio n s-----------------------------5
+ 3.4
D ru g s:
— 19.8
Sales _________________________
8
+ 8.4
— 7.8
Accounts receivable -----------------4
+ 0.5
— 16.6
Collections ............. ......... ..... - .........
4
+ 13.7
S tatio n ery :
17.0
— 11.6
Sales --------------------------------------4
+
* Based upon confidential reports from 107 firm s
L ife
In su ran ce

S a l e s o f n e w , p a id - f o r , o r d in a r y l i f e in s u r a n c e
d e c lin e d i n S e p t e m b e r , in t h e s i x s t a t e s o f t h i s
D i s t r i c t , t o a n e w l o w l e v e l , a n d w e r e 1 9 .9 p e r
c e n t l e s s t h a n in S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 . F i g u r e s in t h e t a b le a r e
t a k e n f r o m t h o s e c o m p ile d b y t h e L i f e I n s u r a n c e S a l e s
R esearch B ureau.




Sept.
1932
Alabama ..__ $ 2,770
Florida ____ 2,770
5,262
Georgia
Louisiana __ 3,922
1,603
Mississippi
Tennessee __ 4,949
Total __ __ $21,276

Aug.
1932
$3,157
3,538
5,387
4,159
1,788
5,153
$23,182

(000 Omitted)
Ja n . th ru Sept. Percentage
Sept.
1931 Comparison
1931
1932
$ 39,035 — 25.0
$3,685
$ 29,271
44,399 — 21.3
34,927
3,992
72,447 — 20.0
57,937
6,458
47,666 — 21.4
37,451
4,293
21,589 — 24.4
16,313
1,752
66,991
— 21.2
6,391
52,793
$292,127 — 21.7
$228,692
$26,571

S t a t i s t i c s c o m p ile d b y R . G . D u n & C o m p a n y
i n d i c a t e t h e r e w e r e 2 ,1 8 2 b u s i n e s s f a i l u r e s in
t h e U n it e d S t a t e s d u r in g S e p t e m b e r , a d e c lin e
o f 2 2 p e r c e n t f r o m t h e n u m b e r in A u g u s t a n d 1 2 .7 p e r c e n t
m o r e t h a n in S e p t e m b e r l a s t y e a r , a n d l i a b i l i t i e s f o r S e p ­
t e m b e r a m o u n t e d t o $ 5 6 ,1 2 7 ,6 3 4 , s m a lle r b y 2 7 .1 p e r c e n t
t h a n f o r A u g u s t b u t 1 8 .8 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n f o r S e p ­
tem b er, 1 9 3 1 .
I n t h e S ix t h D is t r i c t t h e r e w e r e 1 2 5 b u s in e s s f a i l u r e s in
S e p t e m b e r , 1 4 1 in A u g u s t a n d 1 1 1 in S e p t e m b e r a y e a r a g o ,
a n d l i a b i l i t i e s f o r S e p t e m b e r t o t a l e d $ 2 ,0 6 8 ,7 5 0 , s m a lle r b y
2 1 .5 p e r c e n t t h a n f o r A u g u s t a n d l e s s t h a n f o r a n y o t h e r
m o n t h s in c e S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 , b u t 3 0 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n
f o r t h a t m o n t h . C u m u la t iv e t o t a l s f o r t h e f i r s t t h r e e q u a r ­
t e r s o f 1 9 3 2 a m o u n t t o 1 ,1 1 7 i n n u m b e r , a d e c r e a s e o f 1 3 .3
p e r c e n t f r o m t h a t p a r t o f l a s t y e a r , a n d $ 2 6 ,5 5 8 ,0 0 0 in l i a ­
b i li t ie s , a n in c r e a s e o f 1 3 .9 p e r c e n t o v e r t h o s e f o r t h e
s a m e p e r io d i n 1 9 3 1 .
1--- ------— ------- Grain E xports—-New Orleans (Bushels)
September
September
July 1 through Sept. 30
1932
1931
1932
1931
128,854
345,957
W heat ................
- 125,238
1,001,464
4,136
16,762
3,127
C o r n ...................._____
22,700
46,289
111,325
Oats _______ _______ 65,826
145,747
_____
63,285
Barley ................
179,279
508,466
1,198,774
Total --------- _____ 194,191
C o m m e r c ia l
F a ilu r e s

IN D U S T R Y
B u ild in g a n d
C o n s t r u c t io n

F u r t h e r g a in s w e r e r e c o r d e d i n t h e t o t a l
o f b u ild in g p e r m it s is s u e d a t t w e n t y r e p o r t ­
i n g c i t i e s in t h e S i x t h D is t r ic t , a n d in c o n ­
t r a c t s a w a r d e d in t h e D is t r i c t a s a w h o le , d u r in g S e p t e m b e r
o v e r t h e t w o p r e v io u s m o n t h s , b u t b o t h s e r i e s c o n t in u e d
l e s s t h a n f o r t h e c o r r e s p o n d in g m o n t h o f 1 9 3 1 .
T o t a l b u i ld i n g p e r m i t s i s s u e d a t t h e t w e n t y r e p o r t i n g
c i t i e s i n c r e a s e d 3 0 .9 p e r c e n t in S e p t e m b e r o v e r A u g u s t .
T h e in c r e a s e in t h e t o t a l w a s d u e t o a p e r m it f o r t h e c o n ­
s t r u c t io n o f a F e d e r a l b u ild in g a t K n o x v i lle t o c o s t a p p r o x ­
i m a t e ly $ 9 5 4 ,0 0 0 , a s w i t h o u t t h i s t h e t o t a l w o u ld h a v e b e e n
s m a lle r t h a n f o r A u g u s t . T w e lv e c i t i e s r e p o r t e d d e c r e a s e s
f r o m A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r , a n d o n ly t h r e e c i t i e s s h o w g a i n s
o v e r S e p te m b e r la st y e a r .
C o m b in e d t o t a l s f o r t h e f i r s t n i n e m o n t h s a m o u n t t o
$ 1 3 ,2 6 9 ,7 8 7 , a d e c r e a s e o f 4 2 p e r c e n t c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e
c o r r e s p o n d in g p a r t o f 1 9 3 1 , a n d 6 4 .1 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n f o r
t h e s a m e p e r io d in 1 9 3 0 . C o m p a r is o n s f o r t h e m o n t h a r e
s e t o u t in t h e t a b le .
Number
September
City
1932
1931
Alabama
Anniston
______
4
13
156
Birm ingham .______ 151
35
Mobile .......... .______
34
Montgomery ........... . 96
93
Florida
281
Jacksonville ~______ 315
349
Miami --------- ____ 320
38
Miami Beach . ............
24
59
36
Orlando ________ __
223
Tam pa ........... ............. 221
Georgia
312
A tlanta ..........______ 206
39
113
A ugusta ------- .......
23
24
Columbus _________
.............
199
203
Macon ....... .
14
Savannah ___...........13
Louisiana
121
New Orleans .______ 110
72
88
Alexandria .................
Tennessee
292
Chattanooga .______ 159
4
4
Johnson City .______
__
___
41
Knoxville ----142
Nashville ------______ 174
2,559
Total 20 Cities...______ 2,242
Index N um ber ...

Value
September
1932
1931

Percentage
change
in value

$ 5,300
56,720
46,900
22,825

$ 6,260
106,433
162,254
45,862

—
—
—
—

15.3
46.7
71.1
50.2

93,010
59,243
52,275
14,795
37,337

103,655
208,158
295,656
16,960
36,206

—
—
—
—
+

10.3
71.5
82.3
12.8
3.1

101,614
5,966
2,175
28,442
14,370

256,077
23,010
53,652
45,938
10,725

—
—
—
—
+

60.3
74.1
95.9
38.1
34.0

271,030
22,955

516,216
61,528

— 47.5
— 62.7

55,964
3,500
1,008,508
96,539
1,999,468
17.8

130,332
19,700
284,110
110,803
2,493,535
22.2

— 57.1
— 82.2
+255.0
— 12.9
— 19.8

6

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

C o n t r a c t a w a r d s in t h e S ix t h D is t r ic t , a c c o r d in g 1 t o s t a t i s ­
t i c s c o m p ile d b y t h e F . W . D o d g e C o r p o r a t io n a n d s u b ­
d iv id e d i n t o d i s t r i c t t o t a l s b y t h e F e d e r a l R e s e r v e B o a r d ’s
D iv is io n o f R e s e a r c h a n d S t a t i s t i c s , g a in e d f u r t h e r in S e p ­
t e m b e r b y 1 4 .4 p e r c e n t , a n d w e r e t h e l a r g e s t s in c e O c t o b e r
l a s t y e a r , a lt h o u g h 3 1 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n f o r S e p t e m b e r a
y e a r a g o . R e s i d e n t i a l c o n t r a c t s d e c lin e d o v e r t h e m o n t h ,
b u t o th e r c o n tr a c ts in c r e a s e d 17 p e r c e n t. T h e r e w e r e in ­
c r e a s e s o v e r A u g u s t in A la b a m a , L o u is ia n a a n d E a s t T e n ­
n e s s e e , a n d in c r e a s e s o v e r S e p te m b e r , 1 9 3 1 , w e r e r e p o r te d
f o r A la b a m a a n d E a s t T e n n e s s e e . P a r t s o f t h e f i g u r e s in
t h e t a b l e f o r L o u is ia n a a n d M is s is s ip p i a p p ly t o o t h e r F e d ­
e r a l R e s e r v e D is tr ic ts .
Sept.
1932
Sixth D istrict—T otal_$9,469,910
Residential _______ 1,004,540
All Others ________ 8,465,370
State T otals:
Alabam a _________ $2,023,500
Florida ___________
979,300
Georgia __________
798,800
Louisiana ________ 3,518,000
Mississippi _______ 1,226,600
Tennessee (6th Dist.) 2,464,600

Aug. Percentage
1932 Comparison

Sept.
1931

Percentage
Comparison

$8,277,027
1,039,116
7,237,911

+ 14.4 $13,722,137
3.3
2,413,115
+ 17.0 11,309,022

—31.0
—58.4
—25.1

$ 633,600
1,043,400
3.654.200
2,346,300
1.609.200
523,100

+219.4
— 6.1
— 77.6
+ 49.9
— 23.8
+371.2

+29.7
—72.4
—66.9
—28.1
—33.0
+ 45.4

$1,559,800
3,542,800
2.413.000
4.891.000
1.830.000
1,694,700

C u m u la t iv e t o t a l s f o r t h e n i n e m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 2 f o r t h e
D i s t r i c t a m o u n t t o $ 6 0 , 4 4 8 ,1 7 5 , a d e c r e a s e o f 5 9 .6 p e r c e n t
c o m p a r e d w it h t h e t o t a l o f $ 1 4 9 ,5 2 5 ,1 6 8 f o r t h a t p a r t o f
1 9 3 1 . R e s i d e n t i a l c o n t r a c t s w e r e 4 9 .3 p e r c e n t , a n d o t h e r
c o n t r a c t s 6 1 .6 p e r c e n t , l e s s t h a n in t h e f i r s t t h r e e q u a r t e r s
of 1931.
T o t a l c o n t r a c t a w a r d s in t h e 3 7 s t a t e s e a s t o f t h e R o c k y
M o u n t a in s w e r e in S e p t e m b e r $ 1 2 7 ,5 2 6 ,7 0 0 , s m a lle r b y 4 .8
p e r c e n t t h a n in A u g u s t a n d 4 9 .2 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in S e p ­
t e m b e r a y e a r a g o . R e s i d e n t ia l c o n t r a c t s in c r e a s e d 9 .8 p e r
c e n t , a n d p u b lic w o r k s a n d u t i l i t i e s 7 .1 p e r c e n t , o v e r
A u g u s t , a n d n o n - r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g d e c lin e d 2 6 .6 p e r c e n t .
F o r t e n c o n s e c u t i v e w e e k s , t h o s e e n d in g A u g u s t
20 th r o u g h O cto b er 8, th e sta te m e n t o f th e
S o u t h e r n P in e A s s o c i a t io n h a s s h o w n a la r g e r v o lu m e o f
o r d e r s b o o k e d b y r e p o r t in g m i ll s t h a n f o r c o r r e s p o n d in g
w e e k s a y e a r a g o . S in c e t h e f i r s t o f S e p t e m b e r o r d e r s r e ­
p o r t e d b y i d e n t i c a l m ills h a v e a v e r a g e d 2 1 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r ,
a n d p r o d u c t io n 1 6 .5 p e r c e n t le s s , t h a n f o r t h e s a m e m ills
in t h a t p a r t o f 1 9 3 1 . T h e S o u t h e r n L u m b e r m a n f o r O c t o b e r
1 5 r e p o r t s “ A f a i r l y s t e a d y d e m a n d f o r S o u t h e r n p in e c o n ­
t i n u e s , a lt h o u g h t h e v o lu m e o f b u s in e s s is n o t u p t o t h e
l e v e l o f t w o w e e k s a g o . T h e f a l l i n g o f f h a s b e e n p r in c ip a lly
in t h e t r a d e w i t h r e t a i l y a r d s . R a ilr o a d p u r c h a s in g a g e n t s
a r e s h o w in g c o n s id e r a b ly m o r e a c t i v i t y , a n d t h e in d u s t r ia l
t r a d e i s a ls o d is p la y in g m o r e l i f e t h a n i t h a s s h o w n f o r a
l o n g t im e .
M ill s t o c k s a r e g e t t i n g t o b e r a t h e r b a d ly
b r o k e n , a n d p r ic e s a r e d i s t i n c t l y f i r m e r .” U n f i l l e d o r d e r s
f o r i d e n t i c a l m i ll s d u r in g t h i s s ix w e e k s p e r io d h a v e a v e r ­
a g e d o n ly 1 .5 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n a y e a r a g o , a n d f o r t h e t w o
w e e k s e n d in g O c t o b e r 1 a n d 8 w e r e g r e a t e r t h a n f o r c o r ­
r e s p o n d in g w e e k s in 1 9 3 1 . C o m p a r is o n s o f w e e k l y f i g u r e s f o r
i d e n t i c a l m i ll s a r e s h o w n in t h e t a b le .

a n d f o r t h e c o u n t r y a v e r a g e d 8 .5 p e r c e n t m o r e t h a n in
A u g u s t , b u t w e r e 5 .3 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in S e p t e m b e r a y e a r
a g o . E x p o r t s in c r e a s e d b y 6 2 .3 p e r c e n t o v e r A u g u s t , a n d
w e r e 3 1 .4 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n in S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 . C e n s u s
B u r e a u f i g u r e s a r e s h o w n c o m p a r a t iv e ly in t h e t a b le .
U nited S tates—Bales
Sept. 1932
Cotton Consumed ________________
491,655
Stocks ___ ______ _________________
9,056,566
In Consuming Establishm ents.........
1,087,286
In Public Storage and a t Compresses 7,969,280
733,665
E xports ...................................................
Im ports _______________ ___ _______
6,955
Active Spindles—Number ______
23,883,948
Cotton Growing States—Bales
407,966
Cotton Consumed _________________
Stocks ______________ _____________
8,372,765
In Consuming Establishm ents___
832,288
In Public Storage and a t Compresses 7,540,477
Active Spindles—Number _________ 16,701,442
O ther States—Bales
83,689
Cotton Consumed ------------------------Stocks ------------ ----------------------------683,801
In Consuming Establishm ents
254,998
In Public Storage and a t Compresses
428,803
Active Spindles—N um ber _________
7,182,546

Aug. 1932
402,601
7,637,984
1,090,421
6,547,563
452,154
7,223
22,022,490

Sept. 1931
464,335
7,076,266
777,858
6,298,408
558,192
5,425
25,230,618

338,170
6,928,294
826,312
6,101,982
16,227,232

377,531
6,471,052
511,671
5,959,381
16,838,338

64,431
709,690
264,109
445,581
5,795,258

86,804
605,214
266,187
339,027
8,392,280

C e n s u s f i g u r e s f o r G e o r g ia , A la b a m a a n d T e n n e s s e e s h o w
a g a in in c o m b in e d c o n s u m p t io n in t h e s e t h r e e s t a t e s o f 1 3 .7
p e r c e n t f r o m A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r , a n d a n in c r e a s e o f 5 .8
p e r c e n t o v e r S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 . D a i ly a v e r a g e c o n s u m p t io n
in c r e a s e d 2 2 .8 p e r c e n t o v e r t h e m o n t h . D a i ly a v e r a g e c o n ­
s u m p t io n in A la b a m a w a s t h e l a r g e s t s in c e O c t o b e r , 1 9 2 9 ,
a n d in G e o r g ia s i n c e A p r il, 1 9 3 1 .
Sept. 1932
Alabama _______ 54,379
Georgia ________ 86,180
Tennessee ______ 12,504
Total_______ 153,063

Bales Consumed
Aug. 1932 % Change Sept. 1931
46,500
+ 16.9
48,806
76,196
+ 13.1
80,777
11,912
+ 5.0
15,051
134,608
+ 13.7
144,634

% Change
+11.4
+ 6.7
—16.9
+ 5.8

L u m b er

Week
N um ber
E nded: of Mills
Sept. 3— __107
Sept. 1 0 - __112
Sept. 17—__105
Sept. 24___113
Oct. 1___ __ 99
Oct. 8 ___ ....103

(In Thousands of Feet)
Production
Orders
1932
1931
1932
1931
19.054
23,260
28,879
39,655
21,145
24,808
28,648
31,840
26,101
29,745
20,870
34,930
19,704
25,383
27,005
31,427
20,182
24,295
23,876
33,249
20,404
21,840
24,486
26,205

C o n s u m p t io n
o f C o tto n

Unfilled
1932
73,759
78,065
77,371
76,528
73,313
72,696

Orders
1931
77,222
80,783
80,606
78,392
70,088
71,536

T h e r e w e r e f u r t h e r i n c r e a s e s in S e p t e m b e r
o v e r p r e v io u s m o n t h s in t h e c o n s u m p t io n
o f c o t t o n b y A m e r ic a n m ills , in t h e n u m b e r
o f s p in d le s a c t i v e , a n d in e x p o r t s . S t o c k s a ls o in c r e a s e d a s
t h e h a r v e s t i n g s e a s o n p r o g r e s s e d . S e p t e m b e r c o n s u m p t io n
o f c o t t o n b y A m e r ic a n m i ll s in c r e a s e d 2 2 .1 p e r c e n t o v e r
A u g u s t , w a s 7 6 .4 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n t h e lo w p o in t in
J u ly , a n d w a s 5 .9 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n in S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 .
C o n s u m p tio n in t h e c o t t o n s t a t e s in c r e a s e d 2 0 .6 p e r c e n t
f r o m A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r , w a s 8 .1 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n
in S e p te m b e r la s t y e a r , an d w a s la r g e r th a n f o r a n y m o n th
s in c e O c t o b e r , 1 9 3 0 . C o n s u m p tio n in o t h e r s t a t e s in c r e a s e d
2 9 .9 p e r c e n t o v e r A u g u s t , b u t w a s 3 .6 p e r c e n t s m a lle r
t h a n in S e p t e m b e r l a s t y e a r . A c t i v e s p in d le s in c r e a s e d 2 .9
p e r c e n t in t h e c o t t o n s t a t e s , 2 3 .9 p e r c e n t in o t h e r s t a t e s ,




C o tto n
M a n u f a c t u r in g

F u r t h e r g a i n s in p r o d u c t io n , s h i p m e n t s a n d
e m p l o y m e n t a r e in d ic a t e d in S e p t e m b e r r e ­
p o r t s r e c e iv e d f r o m c o t t o n m i ll s in t h i s
D is t r ic t . S t o c k s d e c lin e d f r o m A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r , a n d
a d e c r e a s e in o r d e r s b o o k e d w a s l a r g e l y d u e t o t h e l a r g e
b o o k in g s in A u g u s t b y s o m e o f t h e la r g e r m ills . A ll r e p o r t e d
ite m s sh o w g a in s o v e r S e p te m b e r , 1 9 3 1 . N u m b e r o f w o r k e r s
a t c o t t o n g o o d s m ills in c r e a s e d 6 .3 p e r c e n t f r o m J u l y t o
A u g u s t a n d 6 .2 p e r c e n t f u r t h e r f r o m A u g u s t t o S e p t e m b e r ,
a n d w a s 1 .8 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n a y e a r a g o , a n d t h e
n u m b e r o f w o r k e r s a t y a r n m i ll s i n c r e a s e d 8 .4 p e r c e n t o v e r
A u g u s t a n d w a s 1 4 .5 p e r c e n t g r e a t e r t h a n f o r S e p t e m b e r ,
1 9 3 1 . C o m p a r is o n s o f f i g u r e s r e p o r t e d f o r t h e m o n t h a r e
s h o w n in t h e t a b l e .
N um ber of
Mills
Cotton C loth:
Production __________________
Shipm ents ______ _____ ______
Orders booked _______________
Unfilled orders ______________
Stocks on hand ______________
Num ber on payroll ______ ___
Cotton Y arn :
Production ____________ _____
Shipm ents ....... ............... .............
Orders booked _______________ _____
U nfilled orders ______________
Stocks on hand ___ ____ ______
Number on payroll __________
C o tto n S e e d
a n d C o tto n S e e d
P r o d u c ts

Percentage change Sept.
1932, compared with
Aug. 1932
Sept. 1931

18
17
13
15
16
17

+ 16.7
+ 9.0
— 52.4
+ 0.2
— 3.5
+ 6.2

+
+
+
+
+
+

16.8
40.9
39.8
88.1
13.3
1.8

12
12
7
9
11
11

+ 26.3
+ 22.9
— 8.8
— 1.5
— 8.3
+ 8.4

+
+
+
+
+
+

6.0
4.8
97.8
38.3
37.9
14.5

O p e r a t io n s o f c o t t o n s e e d o il m ills , b o t h
in t h e c o u n t r y a s a w h o le a n d in t h e f o u r
s t a t e s o f t h i s D i s t r i c t f o r w h ic h f i g u r e s
a r e a v a ila b le , in c r e a s e d s e a s o n a ll y in S e p ­
te m b e r o v er A u g u st, th e fir s t m o n th o f th e n e w se a so n , and
w e r e a ls o a t a m u c h h ig h e r l e v e l t h a n in S e p t e m b e r l a s t
y e a r . S e e d c r u s h e d d u r in g S e p t e m b e r w a s 3 2 .1 p e r c e n t in
t h i s D is t r i c t , a n d 4 1 .8 p e r c e n t in t h e c o u n t r y , g r e a t e r t h a n
in S e p t e m b e r , 1 9 3 1 , a n d p r o d u c t io n o f t h e p r in c ip a l c o t t o n
s e e d p r o d u c t s s h o w s im ila r i n c r e a s e s . S t o c k s o f s e e d , a n d o f
m a n u f a c t u r e d p r o d u c t s a t t h e e n d o f S e p t e m b e r w e r e a ls o
g r e a t e r t h a n a t t h e s a m e t im e a y e a r a g o . C o m b in e d f i g u r e s
f o r G e o r g ia , A la b a m a , L o u is ia n a a n d M is s is s ip p i a r e s h o w n
c o m p a r a t iv e ly in t h e f i r s t t w o c o lu m n s o f t h e t a b l e , a n d
t o t a l s f o r t h e c o u n t r y a r e s h o w n in t h e l a s t t w o c o lu m n s .

7

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W
Cotton Seed and Cotton Seed Products
"Sixth D istrict
U nited States
Aug. 1 to Sept. 30
Aug. 1 to Sept. 30
1932
1931
1932
1931
Cotton Seed, T ons:
1,088,693
284,679
399,440
Received a t m i l l s -------721,840
171,202
226,238
Crushed —----------------666,877
117,258
221,138
On H and, Sept. 30------Production:
52,238,574 218,737,556
Crude Oil, lbs............ ............. 72,290,487
326,826
73,425
Cake and Meal, to n s -------98,066
204,792
47,361
Hulls, tons ______________
63,275
108,486
28,489
Linters, bales ------------------38,932
Stocks a t Mills, Sept.
64,158,654
12,916,563
..19,223,893
Crude oil, lbs.
201,421
37,994
52,245
Cake and Meal, tons..
201,622
19,239
65,946
Hulls, tons ________
228,636
77,194
69,010
L inters, bales -------* Georgia, Alabam a, L ouisiana and Mississippi.

966,753
508,896
482,641
153,241,233
229,069
142,032
77,593
44,591,452
118,885
101,582
200,297

E le c tr ic
P ow er

A f t e r d e c l i n i n g f r o m 4 6 0 m i lli o n k i l o w a t t h o u r s
in M a r c h t o a p p r o x im a t e ly 4 1 7 m illio n in J u ly ,
p r o d u c t io n o f e l e c t r i c p o w e r f o r p u b lic u s e in
t h e s i x s t a t e s o f t h i s D i s t r i c t in c r e a s e d 8 .8 p e r c e n t in
A u g u s t o v e r J u ly , a n d w a s o n ly 4 .2 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in
A u g u s t , 1 9 3 1 . P r o d u c t io n b y u s e o f w a t e r p o w e r in c r e a s e d
7 .3 p e r c e n t o v e r J u l y a n d w a s s l i g h t l y l a r g e r t h a n a y e a r
a g o , a n d o u t p u t b y u s e o f f u e l s g a i n e d 1 1 .5 p e r c e n t o v e r
J u l y b u t w a s 1 1 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in A u g u s t , 1 9 3 1 . C o n ­
s u m p t io n o f c o a l i n c r e a s e d 9 .1 p e r c e n t , a n d o f n a t u r a l g a s
1 7 .7 p e r c e n t , b u t u s e o f f u e l o il d e c lin e d s l ig h t l y , f r o m
J u l y t o A u g u s t , b u t a ll o f t h e s e s h o w d e c r e a s e s c o m p a r e d
w ith A u g u s t la s t y e a r .
C u m u la t iv e t o t a l s f o r t h e f i r s t e ig h t m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 2 s h o w
d e c r e a s e s o f 8 .2 p e r c e n t in t o t a l p r o d u c t io n o f e le c t r ic
p o w e r , 5 .9 p e r c e n t in t h a t p r o d u c e d b y w a t e r p o w e r a n d
1 2 .3 p e r c e n t in t h a t p r o d u c e d b y u s e o f f u e l s , c o m p a r e d
w i t h t h a t p a r t o f 1 9 3 1 . C o m p a r is o n s f o r t h e m o n t h , s h o w n
b e lo w , a r e c o m b in e d t o t a l s f o r A la b a m a , F lo r id a , G e o r g ia ,
L o u is ia n a , M is s is s ip p i a n d T e n n e s s e e , a n d a r e t a k e n f r o m
f i g u r e s c o m p ile d b y t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s G e o lo g ic a l S u r v e y .
Aug. 1932

July 1932

Production of Electric Power
453,612
in k.w. h o u rs: T o ta l................. -_____
287,035
By use o f : W ater Power ............... _____
166,577
Fuels ------------------------ ...........
Fuels Consumed in Production of
Electric P o w er:
10,605
Coal—tons .................... .............. ~
Fuel Oil—bbls------------------------ -........... 165,817
N atu ral Gas—000 cu. f t .-------- _____ 2,022,828

Aug. 1931

416,905
267,569
149,336

473,546
286,276
187,270

9,721
167,512
1,718,049

20,713
172,812
2,148,758

B itu m in o u s
C o a l M in in g

T h e i n c r e a s e in t h e w e e k l y f i g u r e s s h o w in g
t h e p r o d u c t io n o f b it u m in o u s c o a l in t h e
U n i t e d S t a t e s s in c e t h e l o w p o in t r e a c h e d f o r
t h e w e e k e n d i n g J u l y 9 a n d w h ic h in c lu d e d t h e F o u r t h o f
J u l y h o lid a y , h a s b e e n in t e r r u p t e d o n ly t w i c e — t h e f i r s t
t i m e b y a s m a ll d e c r e a s e s h o w n in t h e f i r s t w e e k in A u g u s t ,
a n d b y a d e c l i n e s h o w n f o r t h e w e e k e n d in g S e p t e m b e r 1 0
w h ic h i n c lu d e d t h e L a b o r D a y h o lid a y . A f t e r in c r e a s i n g
2 5 .8 p e r c e n t f r o m J u l y t o A u g u s t , p r e lim in a r y f i g u r e s f o r
S e p t e m b e r s h o w a f u r t h e r in c r e a s e o f 1 6 .8 p e r c e n t in t o t a l ,
a n d o f 2 4 .6 p e r c e n t in d a ily a v e r a g e , p r o d u c t io n in S e p t e m ­
b er o v er A u g u st.

September, 1932
August, 1932 —
September, 1931

____
____
____

Total
Production
(tons)

Num ber of
working
days

26,266,000
22,489,000
31,919,000

25.3
27
25.3

A verage per
working day
(tons)
1.038.000
833,000
1.262.000

W e e k l y p r o d u c t io n f i g u r e s f o r A la b a m a a n d T e n n e s s e e
s h o w f u r t h e r g a i n s in S e p t e m b e r o v e r A u g u s t , b u t c o n t i n u e
l e s s t h a n f o r c o r r e s p o n d in g w e e k s a y e a r a g o . W e e k ly c o m ­
p a r is o n s f o l l o w :

Week E nded:
September
September
September
September
October 1
October 8

....
8 ................
10 -----------_______
17 -----------_______
24 ............ ______
................. . .............
--------------- _______




U nited States
1932
1931
5,644
5,304
6,145
6,325
6,790
7,255

7,621
6,784
7,244
7,432
7,860
7,848

Alabam a
1932
1931
162
144
161
163
183
—

231
193
203
196
211

Tennessee
1932
1931
57
53
61
61
62
—

88
78
83
74
82

P ig I r o n

S t a t i s t i c s c o m p ile d a n d p u b lis h e d b y t h e I r o n

P r o d u c t io n

A g e i n d ic a t e a g a i n o f 1 1 .7 p e r c e n t in t o t a l
p r o d u c t io n o f p i g ir o n in t h e U n it e d S t a t e s

in S e p te m b e r o v e r A u g u s t, a n d b e c a u s e o f th e s h o r te r
m o n t h , a n in c r e a s e o f 1 5 .4 p e r c e n t in d a ily a v e r a g e o u tp u t .
S e p t e m b e r p r o d u c t io n w a s 4 9 .3 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n a y e a r
a g o . A c t i v e f u r n a c e s in c r e a s e d b y 5 , f r o m S e p t e m b e r 1 t o
O c t o b e r 1 , w h ile a t t h e s a m e t i m e l a s t y e a r t h e r e w a s a
d e c r e a s e o f 3 in t h e n u m b e r a c t i v e . C u m u la t iv e p r o d u c t io n
f o r t h e n in e m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 2 a m o u n t e d t o 6 ,8 6 4 ,2 7 5 t o n s , a
d e c r e a s e o f 5 4 .3 p e r c e n t c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e 1 5 ,0 1 8 ,0 3 4 t o n s
p r o d u c e d in t h a t p a r t o f 1 9 3 1 .
S e p t e m b e r p r o d u c t io n o f p ig ir o n in A la b a m a in c r e a s e d
1 4 .7 p e r c e n t , a n d t h e d a ily a v e r a g e in c r e a s e d 1 8 .6 p e r c e n t ,
f r o m A u g u s t , b u t w a s 7 2 p e r c e n t l e s s t h a n in S e p t e m b e r ,
1 9 3 1 . L a s t y e a r t h e r e w a s a s u b s t a n t ia l d e c lin e f r o m A u g u s t
t o S e p t e m b e r . A c t i v e f u r n a c e s in c r e a s e d f r o m 2 o n S e p ­
t e m b e r 1 t o 3 o n O c t o b e r 1 , c o m p a r e d w i t h 9 a c t iv e a y e a r
a g o . C u m u la t iv e p r o d u c t io n f o r t h e n in e m o n t h s o f 1 9 3 2
h a s a m o u n t e d t o 5 1 5 ,2 2 2 t o n s , a d e c r e a s e o f 6 3 .5 p e r c e n t
c o m p a r e d w it h t h e t o t a l o f 1 ,4 1 0 ,1 3 3 t o n s p r o d u c e d d u r in g
t h a t p e r io d a y e a r a g o . P r e s s r e p o r t s in d i c a t e t h a t s in c e
O c t o b e r 1 o n e a d d it io n a l f u r n a c e h a s b e e n b lo w n in , a n d
t h e r e h a s b e e n s o m e s l ig h t im p r o v e m e n t in s a l e s a n d s h ip ­
m e n t s o v e r p r e c e d in g w e e k s . S t e e l t o n n a g e i s m a i n t a i n i n g
a f a ir le v e l, a n d S e p te m b e r p r o v e d to b e s o m e w h a t b e tte r
t h a n A u g u s t . O p e n -h e a r th o p e r a t io n s c o n t in u e a t a b o u t t h e
sa m e le v e l w ith e ig h t u n its a c tiv e .
Sept. 1932
U nited S tates:
Production—tons ______ ___ ___ ____
Average per day—tons ___ ...............
•Active furnaces — ...............................
A labam a:
__
Production—tons _________
Average per day—to n s.........
*Active furnaces ______ ____ ________

Aug. 1932

Sept. 1931

592,589
19,753
47

530,576
17,115
42

1,168,915
38,964
73

26,724
891
3

23,292
751
2

95,518
3,184
9

N aval
S to r e s

R e c e ip t s o f b o t h t u r p e n t i n e a n d r o s in a t t h e
t h r e e p r in c ip a l m a r k e t s o f t h e D i s t r ic t d e c lin e d
f u r t h e r in S e p t e m b e r , a n d w e r e l e s s t h a n f o r
S e p t e m b e r o f a n y y e a r s in c e 1 9 1 9 . S t o c k s o f b o th c o m m o d i­
t i e s a ls o d e c lin e d f u r t h e r c o m p a r e d w i t h A u g u s t a n d J u ly ,
a n d s t o c k s o f t u r p e n t in e w e r e 2 8 .5 p e r c e n t , a n d o f r o s in
2 2 .3 p e r c e n t , s m a lle r t h a n f o r S e p t e m b e r l a s t y e a r . C u r ­
r e n t p r ic e s o f t u r p e n t i n e c o n t i n u e a t a h ig h e r l e v e l t h a n
p r e v a ile d a t t h e s a m e t i m e l a s t y e a r , w h ile p r ic e s o n s o m e
g r a d e s o f r o s in a r e lo w e r t h a n a t t h a t t im e . C o m p a r is o n s
o f r e c e ip t s a n d s t o c k s f o r t h e m o n t h a r e s h o w n in t h e t a b l e .
Sept. 1932

Aug. 1932

Sept. 1931

9,858
10,117
2,836

12,347
11,652
3,771

14,791
14,064
4,140

22,811

27,770

32,995

37,020
36,346
10,068

46,875
40,146
12,127

55,068
49,707
11,845

T otal83,434
Stocks—T urpentine (1)
Savannah ------------------------------------- --13,571
Jacksonville ---------------------------------- --43,928
Pensacola ------------------------------------- --24,865

99,148

116,620

16,331
45,422
24,714

38,569
51,779
24,830

86,467

115,178

189,400
180,353
16,911

225,148
201,646
32,784

386,664

459,578

Receipts—Turpentine (1)
Savannah
____________
Jacksonville
____________
P en sa co la__
.........................
Total ____________
Receipts—Rosin (2)
Savannah
____________
Jacksonville ______________________
Pensacola ________________________

Total___________________________ 82,364
Stocks—Rosin (2)
Savannah ________________________ 170,286
Jacksonville ---------------------------------- 170,653
Pensacola ________________________ 16,046
T otal(1) B arrels of 50 gallons.
(2) Barrels of 500 pounds.

356,985

8

M O N T H LY R E V IE W

M O N T H L Y IN D E X N U M B E R S
T h e f o l l o w i n g in d e x n u m b e r s , e x c e p t t h o s e o f w h o le s a l e p r ic e s , a r e c o m p u t e d b y t h e F e d e r a l R e s e r v e B a n k o f
A t l a n t a m o n t h ly . T h e in d e x n u m b e r s o f r e t a i l a n d w h o le s a l e t r a d e a r e b a s e d u p o n s a l e s f i g u r e s r e p o r t e d c o n f i d e n t i a l l y
b y r e p r e s e n t a t i v e f i r m s in t h e l i n e s o f t r a d e in d ic a t e d , a n d t h e o t h e r s e r i e s o f in d e x n u m b e r s a r e b a s e d u p o n f i g u r e s
r e p o r t e d t o t h e b a n k o r c u r r e n t ly a v a ila b le t h r o u g h t h e d a ily o r t r a d e p r e s s . T h e s e i n d e x n u m b e r s , e x c e p t a s in d i ­
c a t e d in t h e f o o t - n o t e s , a r e b a s e d u p o n t h e m o n t h ly a v e r a g e s f o r t h e t h r e e y e a r p e r io d 1 9 2 3 - 2 5 a s r e p r e s e n t e d b y 1 0 0 .
D EPA R T M EN T STO RE TR A D E
D IS T R IC T

6 th

J u ly
1932

A ug.
1932

S e p t.
1932

J u ly
1931

A ug.
1931

S e p t.
1931

A t l a n t a ....................................... ..................... .........
B ir m in g h a m ............................................................ C h a t t a n o o g a ...........................................................
N a s h v i l l e ...................................................................
N e w O r le a n s ...........................................................
O th e r C it ie s ................................. ............................
D I S T R I C T .................................................................

8 9 .9
4 0 .3
3 3 .4
3 4 .4
4 3 .2
3 6 .4
4 6 .2

1 1 0 .6
4 6 .6
3 8 .6
4 8 .9
5 4 .6
3 8 .3
5 6 .2

1 4 5 .6
5 9 .4
4 9 .3
6 1 .2
5 7 .0
5 4 .4
6 8 .8

1 1 5 .7
6 4 .2
4 6 .0
5 5 .2
6 3 .7
5 5 .1
6 6 .4

1 3 0 .3
6 5 .2
5 3 .4
7 1 .7
6 9 .2
5 5 .6
7 1 .9

1 2 9 .2
6 7 .2
5 6 .6
7 0 .4
7 2 .9
6 4 .4
7 5 .2

W H O L E S A L E T R A D E 6 th D IS T R IC T
G r o c e r ie s ....................................................................
D r y G o o d s .........................................- ................ .
H a r d w a r e ...................... a.................................... .
F u r n i t u r e ..................................................................
E l e c t r i c a l S u p p lie s .............................................
S t a t i o n e r y .................................................................
D r u g s ............................................................................
T O T A L .....................................................................

3 7 .2
2 9 .3
3 0 .7
2 0 .2
4 6 .2
3 1 .0
5 6 .0
3 4 .8

4 3 .4
4 7 .7
3 8 .8
3 5 .2
3 8 .2
4 1 .6
5 9 .9
4 2 .6

4 4 .9
6 9 .4
4 5 .0
4 8 .8
3 7 .1
4 8 .7
6 4 .9
4 9 .6

5 9 .3
3 7 .0
5 1 .3
5 7 .8
7 6 .5
4 6 .8
8 1 .9
5 5 .4

5 5 .6
4 3 .7
5 3 .1
5 0 .0
6 4 .0
4 1 .0
7 4 .7
5 4 .0

5 8 .1
5 5 .2
5 6 .8
5 5 .8
6 8 .9
5 5 .0
8 1 .0
5 9 .0

L IF E IN S U R A N C E S A L E S 6 th D IS T .
A l a b a m a ......................................................................
F lo r id a .........................................................................
G e o r g ia ...... -..............................................................
L o u is ia n a ...................................................................
M is s is s ip p i ................................................................
T e n n e s s e e ...............................................................
T O T A L ...................................................................... .

5 1 .6
6 1 .6
6 8 .6
5 7 .3
4 1 .7
5 6 .1
5 7 .8

5 4 .5
6 4 .4
6 2 .9
6 9 .8
4 8 .8
5 6 .4
6 0 .1

4 7 .8
5 0 .4
6 1 .4
6 5 .8
4 3 .7
5 4 .2
5 5 .1

7 5 .4
8 9 .1
1 0 1 .0
9 4 .4
7 4 .4
7 9 .5
8 6 .8

7 1 .0
8 9 .9
8 5 .3
7 6 .4
6 2 .1
8 8 .9
8 1 .1

6 3 .7
7 2 .7
7 5 .4
7 2 .1
4 7 .8
7 0 .0
6 8 .8

B U IL D IN G P E R M IT S 6 th D IS T R IC T
A t l a n t a ......................................................................
B ir m in g h a m ..............................................................
J a c k s o n v ille ..............................................................
N a s h v ille ....................................................................
N e w O r le a n s ..........................................................
( 1 5 ) O th e r C it ie s ...............................................
D I S T R I C T ( 2 0 C i t i e s ) ....................................

5 .3
1 .7
1 2 .0
8 .4
1 5 .8
8 .0
8 .0

4 .9
2 .8
1 3 .5
1 2 .8
2 8 .3
1 5 .6
1 3 .6

6 .6
3 .8
1 1 .3
1 5 .2
2 1 .1
2 5 .2
1 7 .8

2 8 .6
1 1 .6
2 6 .4
3 3 .2
1 9 .7
1 7 .8
2 2 .0

2 2 .8
6 .2
1 3 .6
3 7 .4
4 5 .5
1 4 .1
1 9 .2

1 6 .6
7 .2
1 2 .6
1 7 .5
4 0 .1
2 0 .7
2 2 .2

C O N T R A C T S A W A R D E D 6 th D IS T R IC T
R e s id e n t ia l ................................................................
A ll O th e r ...................................................................
T O T A L .........................................................................

7 .7
2 1 .6
1 6 .0

7 .4
3 4 .4
2 3 .6

7 .2
4 0 .2
2 7 .0

1 8 .8
8 6 .7
5 9 .5

1 3 .7
4 2 .6
3 1 .1

1 7 .2
5 3 .7
3 9 .1

W H O L E S A L E P R IC E S U . S. ( * )
A L L C O M M O D I T I E S ....................................
F a r m P r o d u c t s ....................................................
F o o d s ............................................................................
O t h e r C o m m o d it ie s ............................................
H id e s a n d l e a t h e r p r o d u c t s ......................
T e x t i l e p r o d u c t s ............................................
F u e l a n d l i g h t i n g ...........................................
M e t a ls a n d m e t a l p r o d u c t s ......................
B u ild in g m a t e r i a l s ..........................................
C h e m ic a ls a n d d r u g s ................................. „
H o u s e f u r n i s h i n g g o o d s ..........................
M i s c e l l a n e o u s ............. .......................................

6 4 .5
4 7 .9
6 0 .9
6 9 .7
6 8 .6
5 2 .7
7 2 .3
7 9 .2
6 9 .7
7 3 .0
7 4 .0
6 4 .3

6 5 .2
4 9 .1
6 1 .8
7 0 .1
6 9 .7
5 4 .0
7 2 .1
8 0 .1
6 9 .6
7 3 .3
7 3 .6
6 4 .6

6 5 .3
4 9 .1
6 1 .8
7 0 .4
7 2 .2
5 7 .0
7 0 .8
8 0 .1
7 0 .5
7 2 .9
7 3 .7
6 4 .7

7 2 .0
6 4 .9
7 4 .0
7 3 .9
8 9 .4
6 6 .5
6 2 .9
8 4 .3
7 8 .1
7 8 .9
8 5 .7
6 9 .7

7 2 .1
6 3 .5
7 4 .6
7 4 .2
8 8 .7
6 5 .5
6 6 .5
8 3 .9
7 7 .6
7 6 .9
8 4 .9
6 8 .3

7 1 .2
6 0 .5
7 3 .7
7 3 .9
8 5 .0
6 4 .5
6 7 .4
8 3 .9
7 7 .0
7 6 .3
8 2 .7
6 8 .2

COTTON CO NSUM ED
U n it e d S t a t e s ......................................................
C o t to n - G r o w in g S t a t e s ....................................
G e o r g ia ...............................................................
A la b a m a ................................................................
T e n n e s s e e ...........................................................
A l l O t h e r S t a t e s .....................................................
E x p o r t s .........................................................................

5 4 .8
6 8 .5
7 3 .2
9 5 .2
7 8 .5
2 4 .8
7 3 .1

7 9 .2
9 6 .8
9 7 .8
1 3 5 .3
1 1 9 .7
4 0 .5
7 3 .6

9 6 .7
1 1 6 .8
1 1 0 .6
1 5 8 .2
1 2 5 .6
5 2 .6
1 1 9 .4

8 8 .6
1 0 1 .2
1 0 3 .3
1 2 6 .2
1 2 4 .4
6 1 .0
4 2 .1

8 3 .8
9 7 .8
9 4 .1
1 2 5 .2
1 2 9 .1
5 3 .0
3 4 .3

9 1 .2
1 0 7 .6
1 0 3 .7
1 4 2 .0
1 5 1 .2
5 5 .2
9 0 .8

P I G IR O N P R O D U C T I O N :
U n i t e d S t a t e s ..................................................... A la b a m a ___ *...........................................................

1 9 .2
1 3 .7

1 7 .8
1 0 .0

1 9 .8
1 1 .5

4 9 .0
6 8 .8

4 2 .9
5 1 .2

3 9 .1
4 1 .1

U N F IL L E D O R D E R S — U . S . S T E E L
C O R P O R A T I O N .............................................. -

4 1 .2

4 1 .2

4 1 .6

7 1 .3

6.6.4

6 5 .9

(* )

C o m p ile d b y t h e B u r e a u o f L a b o r S t a t is t ic s .




B a s e 1 9 2 6 -— 1 0 0 .