View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M

O

N

T

H

L

Y

R

E

V

I

E

W

O f Financial, A gricultural, T rade and Industrial
C onditions in the S ix th Federal Reserve D istrict

F E D E R A L
Vol. 20 No. 5

R E S E R V E

B A N K

O F

A T L A N T A
This review released for publication
in m orning papers of May 31

ATLANTA, GA., MAY 31, 1935

NATIONAL SUMMARY OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS
Prepared by Federal Reserve Board
Factory production and employment showed little change
in April, while output at mines declined. Residential construc­
tion showed a further increase.
Production
Combined output of factories and mines, as
and
measured by the Federal Reserve Board’s seaEmployment sonally adjusted index of industrial production,
declined from 88 per cent of the 1923-25 aver­
age in March to 86 per cent in April. This downward move­
ment reflected chiefly decreases in the output of steel, cotton
and silk textiles, and bituminous coal, offset in part by in­
creased mill consumption of wool, and larger output of an­
thracite. At steel mills output declined from 49 per cent of
capacity in March to 45 per cent in April, and, according to
trade reports, showed a further slight decline in the first three
weeks of May. In the automobile industry there was a fur­
ther increase in production during April, followed by a decline
in the early part of May, partly as a consequence of labor
disputes. In the tobacco industry activity was maintained at
recent high levels. Output of bituminous coal declined sharply
at the beginning of April, following a period of relatively
high production earlier in the year.
The total number of workers employed in factories was
about the same in the middle of April as a month earlier and
factory payrolls also showed little change. Declines in em­
ployment were reported for railroad repair shops and textile
mills, while in the machinery industries employment continued
to increase and in the men’s clothing industry it showed none
of the usual seasonal decline. In agriculture and in the build­
ing industry employment increased seasonally.
Total value of construction contracts of all kinds, as re­
ported by the F. W. Dodge Corporation, showed little change

from March to April. A further increase in residential
projects was offset in the total by a decline in contracts for
other types of construction.
Distribution Total freight car loadings declined in April,
contrary to seasonal tendency, chiefly as a con­
sequence of a large decrease in shipments of bituminous coal.
Department store sales, which had shown a sharp increase in
March, increased by considerably less than the estimated sea­
sonal amount in April.
Commodity The general level of wholesale commodity prices,
Prices
as measured by the index of the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, has shown little change since the mid­
dle of April, following an increase in the early part of the
month, and in the week ending May 18 was at 80.0 per cent
of the 1926 average as compared with 79.9 per cent in the
week ending April 13. For this period the prices of cotton,
hogs, hides, and non ferrous metals increased somewhat, while
grains and butter declined. In the following week there were
further increases in the prices of hogs and of lead, while
prices of wheat decreased further.
Bank During the five weeks ended May 22 member bank
Credit balances with the Federal Reserve Banks increased to
$4,820,000,000, the highest figure on record, and ex­
cess reserves rose to a new high level of over $2,350,000,000.
The principal factors in the increase of member bank reserve
balances were the disbursement by the Treasury of $240,000,000 of funds previously held in the form of cash or on deposit
with the Federal Reserve Banks and further gold imports of
$90,000,000.
Deposits of reporting banks in leading cities increased fur­
ther during the four week period ended May 15, reflecting
chiefly disbursements by the United States Treasury.
per cent

120
■ACTOR'f EMPLC)YMENTAND PADROLLS
110 / V
100 p \
90

Emp•ioyment

80

A R

70

\

1 \ w
Payrolls^

60
50
40

/ V
** iA'*i1 T
/
\ -/ ,,, ,
\A

r

30
1929
In d e x n u m b e r o f in d u s t r ia l p ro d u ctio n , a d ju ste d f o r se a so n a l v a r ia t io n ,
(1923-1925 a v e r a g e = 1 0 0 .)
L a t e s t fig u re A p r i l P r e lim in a r y 86.




1930

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

In d e x n u m b e rs o f fa c to r y e m p lo y m e n t a n d p a y r o lls, w ith o u t a d ju stm e n t
f o r se a so n a l v a r ia t io n s (1923-1925 a v e r a g e = 1 0 0 ).
L a t e s t fig u re A p r i l
E m p lo y m e n t 82.4 ; p a y r o lls 70.7.

M O N T H L Y

2

MILLIONS OP DOLLARS

MILLIONS OP DOLLARS

6 0 0 ---------------

600

500

R E V IE W

PER CENT

120
110*

PEA CENTF

1120
110

IP R I C E S

W H O L E IS A L E

'A /*\

100

100

400

90

01(her

--------- ^

80
300

90

V

80
J d

70
I

200

60

70

Foods

\/*Y j

\

A

60'

?

50

50

too

Farm Products

40

]J

40
30

30
t929

1930

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

1929

1930

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

Three m onth moving averages of F . W . Dodge data for 87 Eastern.
States adjusted for seasonal v ariation. A pril P relim inary. Total 107.8:
Residential 32.6; All Other 75.2.

Indexes of the U nited States B ureau of L abor Statistics. By m onths
1929 to 1981; by weeks 1932 to date.
(1926=100.)
L atest figures
May 18; F arm Products 80.9; Foods 83.8; O ther Commodities 77.6.

Yields on short term Government Securities declined
slightly further during this period, while other short term
open market money rates remained at low levels. The dis­
count rate was reduced from 2 per cent to IV2 per cent at
the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and from 2% per cent
to 2 per cent at the Richmond, Minneapolis, Kansas City, and
Dallas Banks. Rates are now IV2 per cent at New York and
Cleveland, and 2 per cent at all the other reserve banks.
SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY
Retail and wholesale trade in the Sixth District were at
about the same level in April as in March, life insurance sales
increased somewhat, building permits issued at twenty report­
ing cities increased further and were greater than a year ago
and residential construction contracts in the District as a
whole although less than for March were substantially greater
than a year ago, but total contracts awarded declined over
the month and were less than for April, 1934. Deposits at
member banks increased, and orders booked by textile mills
also increased substantially over March and were greater than
a year ago.
Department store sales increased from March to April by
only 1 per cent, but were 11.8 per cent greater than a year
ago, and for the four months of 1935 have been 4.3 per cent
greater than in that part of 1934. The increase from March
to April was less than usually occurs at that time, and after
adjustment for the seasonal trend and the late date of Easter
the index declined. Wholesale trade was nearly 1 per cent
less in April than in March, but 7.3 per cent greater than a
year agro. Life Insurance sales increased 3.7 per cent over
March, but were 10.1 per cent less than in April last year.
Between April 10 and May 15 there were small increases in
discounts, industrial advances and in holdings of United States
securities at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, offset in
part by a small decrease in holdings of purchased paper.
Total reserve bank credit outstanding increased between these
dates by $164,000, and was 8.7 millions greater than a year
ago because of larger holdings of United States securities.
At weekly reporting member banks loans declined 3.3 millions
from April 10 to May 15, but were 22.5 millions greater than
a year ago; holdings of United States securities also declined
3.S millions, and were 7.3 millions less than a year ago, but
holdings of Other securities increased 3.7 millions and were
18.7 millions greater than on the same Wednesday last year.
Daily average demand deposits of all member banks increased
further in April to the highest level since March, 1929.
Building permits issued at twenty reporting cities in the
District increased over the preceding: month for the fourth
consecutive time in April, when the total was 19.2 per cent
greater than for March and 78.7 per cent greater than for
April last year. For the four months of 1935 combined, per­
mits have been 20.8 per cent greater than in that part of last
year, and more than three times the total for the same period
two years ago. Construction contracts awarded in the Dis­
trict as a whole, however, declined 27 per cent from March
to April and were 29.6 per cent less than for April last year.
Residential contracts, although less than for March, were 72.7

per cent greater than for April, 1934, and while total con­
tracts for the four months of 1935 show a decrease of 44.5
per cent compared with that part of 1934, residential con­
tracts show a gain over that period of 93.6 per cent. Con­
sumption of cotton in the three states of this District for
which figures are available increased slightly from March to
April, but was somewhat less than a year ago. Orders booked
during April, however, by reporting cloth and yarn mills in­
creased substantially over the month, and were much larger
than for April last year. Production of coal declined in both
Alabama and Tennessee in April, the first month of the new
coal year, but was greater than a year ago in both states, but
production of pig iron in Alabama declined 4.2 per cent from
March to April and was 6.3 per cent less than in April, 1934.
FINANCE
Reserve There has been no material change in total holdings
Bank
of bills and securities by the Federal Reserve Bank
Credit
of Atlanta since the middle of July last year. Since
that time total bills and securities held by the bank
have been between 94 and 96 millions of dollars. During the
five weeks between April 10 and May 15 total bills and securi­
ties increased by $164,000; there were increases of $125,000
in discounts, $38,000 in Industrial Advances, and $23,000 in
holdings of United States securities, offset in part by a de­
cline of $22,000 in holdings of purchased bills. Compared with
the corresponding: Wednesday a year ago, total bills and secur­
ities show an increase of $8,696,000, more than 8 millions of
which are accounted for by an increase in holdings of United
States securities. Discounts on May 15 were smaller by
$424,000 than a year ago, and holdings of purchased paper
slightly less. Member Bank reserve accounts increased some­
what between April 10 and May 15, and were more than 13
millions greater than on the same Wednesday of last year,
and total reserves also increased slightly since April 10 but
were 3.3 millions less than a year ago. Federal Reserve note
circulation of this bank's issue was 1.2 millions less on May 15
than five weeks earlier, and 6.7 millions less than at the same
time last year.
Principal items in the weekly statement are compared in
the table, which is followed by another table setting out sim­
ilar comparisons for the twelve Federal Reserve Banks com­
bined.




FED ERA L RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
(000 Omitted)
M ay 15
April 10
M ay 16
__________________________________ 1935__________ 1935__________ 1934
Bills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. Obligations
All O thers................................
Total Discounts..............
Bills Bought in Open M arket. .
Industrial Advances...................
U. S. Securities...........................
Total Bills and Securities
Total Reserves............................
Member Bank Reserve Account
Total Deposits............................
F. R. Notes in actual circulation
Reserve R atio .............................

$

160
$ 6 5
$
194
166
136
556
326
201
750
169
191
177
1,110 1,072
..........................
94,247
94,224
86,228
95,852
95,688
87,156
130,749
130,377
134,093
85,049
84,259
71,914
92,963
91,407
83,222
125,644
126,819
132,337
59.8%
59.7%
62.2%

M O N T H L Y

FEDERA L RESERVE SYSTEM
(000 Omitted)
May 15
April 10
1935
1935
Bills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. Obligations
All Others................................
Total Discounts..............
Bills Bought in Open M ark et. .
Industrial Advances...................
U. S. Securities...........................
Other Securities..........................
Total Bills and Securities
Total Reserves............................
Member Bank Reserve Account
Total Deposits............................
F. R. Notes in actual circulation
F. R. Bank Notes in actual cir­
culation....................................
Reserve R atio.............................

3,531
3,124
6,655
4,705
26,546
2,430,355

2,818
3,201
6,019
5,307
21,256
2,430,431

2,468*,26i
6,047,883
4,822,322
5,124,166
3,154,374

2 ,463,6i3
5,847,134
4,286,830
4,904,137
3,169,329

$

$

May 16
1934
$

6,298
28,104
34,402
5,501

2,430*, i56
546
2,470,605
4,850,497
3,694,493
3,991,197
3,061,279
63,752

73.1%

72.4%

68.8%

Member Total loans and investments of 17 weekly reporting
Bank
member banks located in Atlanta, Birmingham,
Credit
Jacksonville, Nashville, Chattanooga, Mobile and
Savannah declined 3.4 millions of dollars between
April 10 and May 15, but were 22.5 millions greater than on
the corresponding Wednesday of last year. Since April 10
loans by these banks on securities declined 3.6 millions, but
All Other Loans increased slightly, so that total loans were
3.3 millions less than on April 10. In this five week period
holdings of United States securities declined 3.8 millions, but
this decline was nearly offset by an increase of 3.7 millions in
holdings of Other Securities. Compared with figures for the
corresponding report date a year ago, total loans on May 15
show an increase of 11 millions, a decrease of 15 millions in
loans on securities being more than offset by an increase of
25 millions in All Other Loans; holdings of United States
securities show a decline of 7.3 millions, but Other Securities
an increase of 18.7 millions.
Demand deposits reported by these banks declined slightly
between April 10 and May 15, but were 40 millions greater
than on the same report date last year, and time deposits
increased 5.2 millions since April 10 and on May 15 were at
the highest level in more than a year. Bankers’ balances de­
clined between April 10 and May 15, but balances held by
these reporting banks for correspondents were 6.4 millions
greater than a year ago, while those maintained with their
correspondent banks were 4.6 millions smaller.
In the tables which follow are shown comparisons of prin­
cipal items in the weekly report, monthly averages of weekly
figures over the past year for some of the more important
items, and comparisons of savings deposits reported by a
list of banks located throughout the District.
CONDITIO N OF M EM BER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
(000 Omitted)
M ay 15
April 10
M ay 16
1935
1935
1934
On Securities...........................
All O thers................................
Total Loans.....................
U. S. Securities...........................
Other Securities..........................
Total Investm ents..........
Total Loans and Invest­
m ents............................
Time Deposits............................

$ 47,359
141,551
188,910
91,294
70,891
162,185

$ 50,917
141,305
192,222
95,141
67,159
162,300

$ 61,416
116,369
177,785
98,559
52,236
150,795

351,095
133,654
208,229
85,577
78,592

354,522
128,418
209,055
87,312
81,071

328,580
132,843
168,039
79,182
83,203

Due to Banks..............................
Due from Banks.........................
Borrowings from F. R. B an k ...

MONTHLY AVERAGES OF WEEKLY FIGURES OF
17 REPORTING M EM BER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
(000 Omitted)
Total
Borrowings
From
Invest­ Loans and Demand
Time
Loans
ments Investments Deposits Deposits F. R. Bank
1934
M arch.........
April...........
M ay............
June............
Ju ly ............
August........
Septem ber..
October. . . .
Novem ber..
December. .
1935
Ja n u a ry .. . .
F eb ru ary ...
M arch.........
April...........

$ 184,851 $ 155,608 $ 340,460 $ 161,794 $ 130,406
130,649
333,349
168,070
180,670
152,679
167,404
132,911
178,019
151,172
329,191
177,687
156,522
334,209
169,196
130,786
336,513
172,707
131,560
167,294
169,780
129,194
166,546
167,502
334,048
172,917
331,002
127,402
179,195
163,759
167,243
180,374
128,944
159,810 336,266
176,456
130,313
187,788
156,775
344,563
189,297
128,492
196,394
193,141
162,168
355,309
187,215
188,683
190,559
191,105

162,038
163,058
161,445
162,887




349,253
351,741
352,004
353,992

190,945
193,894
204,498
208,436

127,012
130,053
128,723
129,257

5161
..«

*

R E V IE W

Number
of
Banks
Birmingham.
Jacksonville..
Knoxville....
Nashville.. . .
New Orleans.
Other Cities..
T o tal........

SAVINGS DEPOSITS
(000 Omitted)
April
1935

3
3
3
4
4
5
35

$ 31,280
16,529
15,652
5,309
23,653
32,868
68,568

57

193,859

Percentage Change
Apr. 1935 compared
April
with
1934
Mar. 1935 Apr. 1934

March
1935

$ 30,961 $ 30,011
17,726
16,272
15,034
12,989
3,184
5,099
21,922
23,485
27,024
32,344
62,059
67,102

+ 1 .0
+ 1.6
+ 4 .1
+ 4 .1
+ 0 .7
+ 1 .6
+ 2 .2

+ 4.2
— 6.8
+20.5
+ 66.7
+ 7.9
+ 2 1 .6
+ 10.5

174,915

+ 1 .9

+ 1 0 .8

190,297

Debits to The volume of debits to individual accounts at
Individual banks in twenty-six clearing house centers of the
Accounts Sixth District declined 4.5 per cent from March
to April, but was 6.2 per cent greater than in
April last year. The decline of 4.5 per cent over the month
compares with a decrease of 5.2 per cent at the same time a
year ago. Monthly totals compared in the table are derived
from weekly reports by pro-rating figures for those weeks
which do not fall entirely within a single calendar month.
(000 Omitted)
April 1935
Alabama—4 Cities.....................
Birmingham............................
D othan.....................................
Mobile......................................
Montgomery............................

$

109,964
60,857
2,112
23,284
23,711

March 1935
$

106,740
59,789
2,250
23,998
20,703

April 1934
$

112,401
69,697
1,789
21,679
19,236

Florida—4 Cities........................
Jacksonville.............................
M iami......................................
Pensacola.................................
Tam pa......................................

121,570
61,389
30,433
6,408
23,340

127,121
61,873
34,998
6,020
24,230

107,189
53,980
24,470
5,894
22,845

Georgia— 10 Cities.....................
Albany.....................................
A tlanta.....................................
Augusta....................................
Brunswick................................
Columbus................................
Elberton...................................
M acon......................................
Newnan....................................
Savannah.................................
Valdosta...................................

215,465
2,813
142,223
17,939
2,022
9,919
758
10,919
1,567
24,596
2,709

226,480
3,026
149,389
18,984
1,918
10,029
795
10,855
1,525
26,391
2,773

194,508
2,114
125,982
16,661
1,933
9,325
651
10,016
1,392
23,855
2,579

Louisiana—New Orleans...........

174,484

193,902

176,328

Mississippi—4 Cities..................
Hattiesburg.............................
Jackson....................................
M eridian..................................
Vicksburg................................

37,183
3,889
20,406
7,146
5,742

38,792
3,994
21,268
7,656
5,874

35,311
3,443
20,428
7,068
4,372

Tennessee—3 Cities...................
Chattanooga............................
Knoxville.................................
Nashville..................................

122,238
32,929
21,277
68,032

125,074
30,294
20,947
73,833

109,782
26,923
19,922
62,937

Total—26 Cities.............

$

780,904

$

818,109

$

735,519

AGRICULTURE
The May 1 Crop Report issued by the United States Depart­
ment of Agriculture indicates that crop prospects in the coun­
try as a whole are much better than at this time last year,
but are still substantially below average due chiefly to carry­
over effects of last year’s widespread drought. Desperately
dry conditions still prevail in the Southern Great Plains
area; in the northern half of the Great Plains area most sec­
tions have had enough rain for current needs but the supply
of subsoil moisture is still deficient in some areas; most of the
irrigation States have had fair rains and conditions average
much better than at this time last year. About 13.8 million
acres of the wheat sown last fall have been abandoned, mostly
in the Southwestern area. Production is expected to total
431,637,000 bushels, about 7 per cent greater than that of last
year. The rye crop is expected to exceed 40 million bushels,
compared with the abnormally low production of 16 million
bushels harvested last year. About average fruit prospects
are indicated for most fruits except citrus. The apple outlook
is favorable in most States, and peach crop prospects in the
Southern States are more favorable than usual but appear to
be offset by the poor prospects indicated for most northern
and eastern States.
An open March was followed by cold weather in parts of
the Sixth District during April which caused some damage to
tender vegetables. In Georgia the frequent rains and cool
weather delayed farming operations in the northern part of
the State, while in some parts of South Georgia rainfall was

4

M O N T H L Y

insufficient. There have been general rains, however, in May.
In Florida April temperatures averaged above normal, while
rainfall was deficient. Pastures and hay crops were affected
and citrus bloom retarded. Planting and other farm work in
Tennessee were delayed by excessive rain. The condition of
citrus in Florida on May 1 was below that of a year ago as
a result of the December freeze and dry weather which has
prevailed during much of the growing season. General rains
since May 1 have benefitted the trees and should help in
bringing out late blooms. The May estimate of Florida
oranges from the 1934 bloom was 15.5 million boxes, the
same as a month earlier, compared with 18.1 million boxes a
year ago, and the estimate of grapefruit was 12.5 million
boxes, the same as for March and April, compared with 10.7
million boxes last year. The estimated production of water­
melons in Florida this year is 5.6 millions, compared with 4.4
millions last year. Production estimates have not been made
for other states in this District, but the acreage in Georgia
is 64,000 this year against 50,000 in 1934, in Alabama 6,200
against 5,800 last year, and in Mississippi 5,000 against 2,700
last year. In Georgia the acreage in cantaloupes is estimated
at 3,000, compared with 2,400 acres harvested last year.
The May 1 condition, and estimated production, of peaches
this year is higher than in 1934 in Georgia and Alabama, but
lower in Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi, as indicated in
these figures.
Production—000 bushels
Estimate
1935
1934
1,221
50

Mississippi.................

770

1,089
68
,610
198
781

Total Five States .

8,853

7,746

Alabama....................
Florida........................
Georgia......................

Condition M ay 1
% of normal
1935
1934
73
60
74
55
67

SUGAR M O V EM EN T--(Pounds)
Raw Sugar
April 1935
M arch 1935
Receipts:
New Orleans..........
Savannah........... ................
Meltings:
New Orleans.......... ................
Savannah...............
Stocks:
New Orleans..........
Savannah...............

April 1934

24,696,644

95,130,079
43,130,025

83,938,294
22,965,805

80,703,605

97,241,243
13,541,731

56,075,083
18,528,614

47,892,419
101,586,333

66,413,402
106,154,966

79,419,779
33,734,442

48,197,443
17,922,077

30,865,184
5,033,024

32,420,534
9,445,862

Stocks:
................

5,005,011

R IC E MOVEM ENT—New Orleans
Rough Rice—Barrels:
Receipts................... .
Shipments................ .
Stocks........................
Clean Rice—Pockets:
Receipts.....................
Shipments................ .
Stocks.......................

April 1935

March 1935

R IC E M ILLERS ASSOCIATION STATISTICS
(Barrels)
April
August to April
Receipts of Rough Rice:
Season 1934-35.......................
175,091
7,543,245
Season 1933-34.......................
191,376
7,198,681
Distribution of Milled Rice:
Season 1934-35 .......................
Season 1933-34.......................

953,389
436,129

Stocks:
April 30, 1935..........................
April 30, 1934..........................

Rough

Clean

586,214
664,001

1,256,060
1,549,331

April 1934

3,102
21,877
82,488

86,097
17,360
101,263

35,258
38,592
41,932

74,137
59,371
160,651

40,920
32,620
145,885

55,486
51,634
177,855

April
1935
Alabama.......................
Florida..........................
Georgia.........................
Louisiana.....................
Mississippi...................
Tennessee.....................

(Short Tons)
M arch
1935

90,600
24,968
106,229
12,209
91,250
27,775
353,031

215,000
43,064
290,490
27,855
62,829
15,792
655,030

Nashville (4)........................
New Orleans (5)..................
Other Cities (29).................
D ISTRICT (60)..................
NOTE:

1-18.0
-11.9
-17.3
b 9 .0
h 8.7
- 2.7
- 5.3
-17.6
-11.8

+ 1.9
— 6.2
— 0.4
— 2.8
—21.5
— 1.4
+17.1
+ 5.9
+ 1.0

+ 6.8
— 0.3
+ 5.9
+ 6.1
+ 1 1 .4
+ 3.3
+ 0.3
+ 3.2
+ 4.3

+ 4.9
+ 1 9 .6
+ 1.4
— 3.0
+ 1 8 .0
— 4.1
+ 0 .0
+ 5.3
+ 4 .6

+ 5 .8
+ 2 .9
+ 4 .2
— 1.1
—5.1
+ 1 .3
—0.1
+ 2 .4
+ 1 .6

.37
.28
.27
.19
.38
.25
.26
.28
.29

T h e rate of stock turn over is the ra tio of sales d u rin g giv en period to average stocks on hand.




April
1934

Aug. 1 to April 30
1934-35
1933-34

122,050
33,610
95,073
13,303
40,180
30,373

397,150
366,617
586,622
91,265
189,001
78,624

356,100
328,902
559,167
78,131
166,780
74,557

334,589 1,709,279 1,563,637

TRADE
Retail Department store sales in the Sixth District increased
Trade only slightly from March to April, but were greater
than a year ago, while stocks increased over both the
previous month and the same month last year. The rate of
stock turnover, and the collection ratio, declined from March
to April but were slightly higher than for April, 1934.
Total sales during April by 60 reporting firms in the Dis­
trict averaged 1 per cent greater than in March, and were
11.8 per cent greater than in April, 1934. For the four
months of 1935 total sales by these firms have been 4.3 per
cent greater than in that part of 1934. On a daily average
basis, however, the increase in April over that month last
year was 7.5 per cent, and after adjustment for the usual sea­
sonal change and the late date of Easter, the adjusted index
declined from 90.9 per cent of the 1923-25 average in March
to 83.8 per cent in April.
Stocks of merchandise at the end of April were 1.6 per cent
larger than a month earlier and 4.6 per cent larger than a
year ago, and the rate of stock turnover was slightly higher
in April, and for the four months of 1935, than for those
periods in 1934. The collection ratio was also slightly higher
in April than at the same time last year, although somewhat
lower than for March. For April the ratio for regular ac­
counts was 35 per cent, and for installment accounts 16.5
per cent.
Percentage comparisons shown in the table are based upon
figures reported in actual dollar amounts and make no allow­
ance for changes in the level of prices. Index numbers on
page 8 are based upon reports from a smaller number of firms
whose figures have been reported over a long period of years.

RETA IL TRADE IN TH E SIX TH D ISTRICT DURING APRIL 1935
Based on confidential reports from 60 department stores
C o m p a r is o n o p N e t S a le s
C o m p a r is o n o p S t o c k s
April 1935
Year to date
April 30, 1935
S t o c k T u rn o v e r
with:
with:
with:
Same month Previous Same period Same month Previous
April
Jan. — to Apr.
a year ago
M onth
Last Year
a year ago
M onth
1935
1934
1935
1934
Birmingham (6)...................
Chattanooga (4)..................

7,565,677
6,267,166

Fertilizer After increasing in March to the highest level in
Tag Sales about four years, sales of fertilizer tax tags in
the six states located wholly or partly in the
Sixth District declined 46.1 per cent in Apri, but were 5.5
per cent greater than a year earlier. Combined totals for the
nine months, August through April, show increases over that
part of the season before ranging from 4.9 per cent for
Georgia to 16.8 per cent for Louisiana, and for the six states
averaged 9.3 per cent. Figures compared in the table are
from those compiled by the National Fertilizer Association.

T o tal.................

71
71
71
76
75

Refined Sugar
Shipments:
New Orleans..........

R E V IE W

.34
.30
.24
.17
.43
.26
.25
.25
.28

1.45
1.06
1.05
.74
1.76
.96
.95
.99
1.12

1.40
1.13
1.03
.69
1.89
.94
.91
1.04
1.11

C o lle c tio n
April
1935

R a t io

Mar.
1935

April
1934

27.9
34.1
34.1

31.0
34.6
35.8
. . . .

. . . .
. . . .

30!9
38.1
32.3
32.1

32 ! i
39.1
34.3
34.1

29.7
40.2
29.8
31.7

27.1
38.8
33.4

M O N T H L Y

Wholesale Total sales during April by 95 reporting wholeTrade
sale firms in the District declined less than one
per cent from March, and were 7.3 per cent
greater than in April, 1934. For the first four months of 1935
total sales by these firms have been only slightly larger than
in that period a year ago. Gains over the month were re­
ported in sales of hardware, furniture and electrical supplies,
and over April a year ago in groceries, hardware, furniture,
electrical supplies and drugs. Detailed comparisons of reported
figures are shown in the table.
WHOLESALE TRADE IN APRIL 1935
Sixth Federal Reserve District*
Percentage Comparisons
Number April 1935 with: Jan.-April 1935
of Firms
March April
with same
19351934 period last year
All Lines Combined:
Sales.............................
Stocks...........................
Groceries:
Sales.............................
Jacksonville.........
New Orleans........
Vicksburg............
O therC ities.........
Stocks...........................
Dry Goods:
Sales.............................
Nashville..............
O therC ities.........
Stocks...........................
Hardware:
Sales..............................
Nashville..............
New Orleans........
O th erC ities.........
Stocks...........................
Furniture:
Sales..............................
A tlan ta.................
O therC ities.........
Stocks...........................
Electrical Supplies:
Sales..............................
New Orleans........
O th erC ities.........
Stocks...........................
Drugs:
Sales..............................
Stationery:
Sales..............................

95
29

— 0.9
+3.8

+ 7.3
+5.3

+ 0.6

21
3
4
3
11
3

— 4. 0
— 4.2
— 4.1
— 15.4
+1.0
— 3.6

+8.6
— 6.3
+ 8.9
+ 2.7
+ 19.1
+0.8

+1.0
— 8.6
— 1.1
— 3.3
+10.7

15
3
12
7

— 6 .0
— 18.7
— 1.8
— 1.1

— 10.2
— 6.3
— 11.2
— 8. 0

— 19.5
— 6.4
—22.7

25
3
5
17
9

+1.3
+1.5
+5.6
— 0. 7
+2.7

+ 6.6
+4.5
+1.8
+9.6
— 0.6

+ 2.8
+9.5
— 5. 3
+5.8

9
4
5
6

+2.0
— 2.4
+3.4
— 0 .9

+7.1
+ 2 8 .6
+1.8
+8.7

+4.9
+7.0
+4.2

12
4
8
3

+ 1 2 .0
+ 7.5
+ 13.5
+ 2 6 .6

+ 3 1 .9
+ 2 6 .3
+ 3 3 .9
+ 5 9 .7

+ 28.5
+ 24.7
+ 2 9.9
..

8

— 2. 4

+ 12.1

+6.6

3

— 6. 3

COLLECTION RATIO**
April
March
1935
1935

— 6. 1

+2.8

April
1934

47.8

49.6

46.8

* Based on confidential reports from 95 firms.
** The collection ratio is the percentage of accounts and notes receivable out­
standing a t the beginning of the month which were collected during the month.

Life
Total sales of new, paid-for, ordinary life insurInsurance ance in the six states located wholly or partly in
the Sixth District increased 3.7 per cent from
March to April, but were 10.1 per cent less than in April last
year. For the month, declines in Florida and Mississippi
were more than offset by increases in the other four states
but decreases were reported for all states compared with
April, 1934. For the first four months, the average increase
over that part of 1934 is 8.4 per cent. For the United States
as a whole it was 8.1 per cent. Figures compared in the table
are from those compiled by the Life Insurance Sales Research
Bureau.
(000 Omitted)
April
March
1935
1934

April
1935
$

3,994
4,730
6,425
4,570
2,466
5,390

+ 1 5 .4
+ 6.2
+ 6.4
+ 2 4 .6
— 0.9
— 0.2

T o ta l........ $ 28,595 $ 27,575 $ 31,812 $117,710 $108,608
United States $540,280 $545,450 $581,433 $2,264,848 $2,095,558

+ 8 .4
+ 8.1

$ 4,378
4,656
7,225
4,582
2,228
5,526




$ 16,965
19,195
27 ,665
21,138
9,121
23,626

Percent
Change

$ 14,702
18,068
25,995
16,966
9,203
23,674

Alabama
Florida..........
Georgia........
Louisiana....
Mississippi...
Tennessee. . .

$ 4,672
5,597
7,497
5,292
2,624
6.130

January-April Inc.
1935
1934

COMMERCIAL FAILURES
(From statistics compiled by Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.)
Sixth District
United States ^ ^
Number
Liabilities
Number
Liabilities
38
28
76
132
184

April 1935........................
March 1935.....................
April 1934........................
J anuary-April 1935........
January-April 1934........

$

296,809
245,594
1,016,110
993,997
2,751,390

1,115 $ 18,063,923
976
18,522,840
1,052
25,786,975
4,280
74,148,117
4,567
105,364,632

INDUSTRY
Building
The total value of buildings for which permits
and
were issued at twenty reporting cities of the
Construction Sixth District has increased each month this
year, and in April was 19.2 per cent greater
than in March, 78.7 per cent greater than in April last year,
and larger than for any other month since November, 1931.
Twelve cities reported increases from March to April, and
fourteen reported gains over April, 1934. The combined total
for the first four months of 1935 was $9,062,902, greater by
20.8 per cent than for that part of 1934, 213.1 per cent greater
than for the same months of 1933, and 47.1 per cent greater
than for the corresponding period in 1932. Comparisons for
the month are shown in the table.
1935
Alabama
Birmingham..........
Montgomery..........
Florida
Jacksonville...........
Miami Beach........
Georgia
Columbus..............
Savannah...............
Louisiana
New Orleans..........
Alexandria.............
Tennessee
Chattanooga..........
Johnson City.........
Knoxville...............
Nashville................
Total 20 C ities.. . . .

Groceries..........................
67.8
69.5
74.7
Dry Goods.......................
40.0
38.8
41.7
H ardware.........................
38.5
40.1
35.0
F urniture..........................
35.5
35.0
32.2
Electrical Supplies..........
69.7
80.1
73.3
D rugs............................... ................ 3U7____________3 ^ 7 ____________29.0
T o ta l.....................

5

R E V IE W

Num ber
April
1934

Value
Percentage
April
Change in
1935
1934
Value

29
382
45
137

10
141
41
126

7,342
147,841
25,556
58,377

1,752
89,537
22,661
29,008

+319.1
+ 65.1
+ 12.8
+101.2

602

497
391
54
68
230

193,503
319,724
954,700
50,877
38,369

290,630
155,306
171,386
16,852
61,566

— 33.4
+ 105.9
+ 457.0
+ 201.9
— 37.7

287
31
65
41
12

254,526
23,736
57,690
29,440
12,605

99,041
102,602
22,902
17,794
14,056

+157.0
— 76.9
+ 151.9
+ 65.4
— 10.3

95

77
52

202,361
16,191

441,966
18,916

— 54.2
— 14.4

321
7
70
157

269
2
55
121

73,556
1,875
479,135
72,402

3,468

1,974

85
199
315
104
20

+ 33.4
55,157
2,500 — 25.0
35,291 + 1 257.7
+ 75.0
41,371

3,019,806 1,690,294

+ 78.7

The value of building and construction contracts awarded
in the Sixth District, however, indicated in statistics compiled
by the F. W. Dodge Corporation and subdivided into District
totals by the Federal Reserve Board’s Division of Research
and Statistics, declined 27 per cent from March to April, and
was 29.6 per cent less than in April, 1934. Residential con­
tracts declined 17.1 per cent over the month, but were 72.7
per cent greater than in April last year, but other contracts
declined 32.3 per cent from March and were about half as
large as a year ago.
For the first four months of 1935, residential contracts have
amounted to $13,910,577, a gain of 93.6 per cent over the
amount for that part of 1934, but other contracts, totalling
$28,440,481, were smaller by 58.9 per cent.
State totals for Alabama, Florida and Mississippi increased
over the month, and Tennessee had the only increase in this
District over April last year.
Total awards in the 37 states east of the Rocky Mountains
increased 1.1 per cent from March to April, but were 5.2 per
cent less than in April, 1934. Residential contracts increased
31.3 per cent over March and were 86.8 per cent greater than
a year ago. Comparisons for the month are shown in the
table.
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS AWARDED
April 1935
March 1935
April 1934
Sixth District—T o ta l................ $ 9,335,016 $ 12,780,069 $ 13,252,084
Residential..............................
3,719,919
4,486,748
2,153,390
All Others................................
5,615,097
8,293,321
11,098,694
State Totals:
Alabama.................................. ......1,335,800
Florida........................................... 2,965,900
Georgia.................................... ..... 1,701,000

712,100
1,932,400
4,651,400

1,836,000
4,100,200
3,387,400

6

M O N T H L Y

Louisiana.................................
Mississippi...............................
Tennessee.................................

1,590,000
1,532,300
1,684,200

4,215,100
852,700
2,408,700

2,788,400
2,532,900
668,900

United States:
T o ta l......................................... 124,284,600
Residential............................... 42,280,800
Non-Residential...................... 41,514,700
Public Works and U tilities.. . 40,489,100

122,940,500
32,209,400
44,476,600
46,254,500

131,157,000
32,635,700
38,614,200
69,907,100

Lumber Marked improvement in the lumber industry during
the latter part of April and early May is indicated
in weekly statements of the Southern Pine Association and
reports in the press. During the six weeks ending May
11 orders booked by mills reporting to the Southern Pine
Association have averaged 41.8 per cent greater than a year
ago, and for the week ending May 11 were nearly double those
booked during that week in 1934. Production by these mills
has averaged 6.9 per cent greater than in the same weeks
last year. During this period orders have averaged 26.7 per
cent greater than production, while at the same time a year
ago they were about 4 per cent less than output. A recent
issue of the Southern Lumberman states that “the spurt in
buying of Southern Pine is attributed principally to the retail
yards’ need for stock to meet the increase in building and
modernization work”. Weekly figures compared in the table
are from those compiled by the Southern Pine Association.
Week
Ended

Number
of Mills

April 6 ........ ... 146
April 13____145
April 20_____141
April 27 . . . . 151
Ma y 4 .............136
Ma y 11___ __149

(In Thousands of Feet)
Orders
Production
Unfilled Orders
1935
1934
1935
1934
1935
1934
26,074
24,766
21,572
31,192
29,404
40,815

15,147
21,244
21,803
24,366
20,293
19,900

23,485
22,176
22,416
26,365

20,210

22,698

23,122
21,969
20,271
22,062
19,305
21,701

57,513
57,349
50,871
61,714
54,791
77,611

75.998
75,469
71.999
77,905
66,579
74,274

Cotton
The total consumption of cotton by American
Consumption mills declined 3.8 per cent from March to
April, to the lowest level since September last
year and 9.7 per cent less than in April, 1934. In the cottongrowing states the decline from March was 3.6 per cent, and
in other states 4.5 per cent, and in the cotton-growing states
April consumption was 8 per cent less than a year ago and in
other states 16.4 per cent less. For the nine months, August
through April, total consumption has been 8.1 per cent, that
in the cotton states 7.5 per cent, and in other states 10.3 per
cent, less than in that part of the season before.
Spindles active in April declined 2.9 per cent from March,
and were 9.9 per cent fewer than a year ago. At the end of
April combined stocks held at consuming establishments and
in public storage and at compresses were 1.8 per cent less
than a year ago in the cotton states, and 39.6 per cent less
in other states.
Exports during April declined 26.9 per cent from March,
were 39.9 per cent less than in April a year ago, and were
smaller than for any other month since August, 1931. For
the nine months period total exports have been 41.3 per cent
less than in that part of the season before.
Census Bureau figures are compared in the table.
COTTON CONSUMPTION, EXPORTS, STOCKS AND ACTIVE SPINDLES
U N ITED STATES—Bales
April 1935
March 1935
April 1934
Cotton Consumed......................
Stocks...........................................
In Consuming Establishments
In Public Storage and at
Compresses..........................
E xports........................................
Active Spindles—N um ber.........

462,844
8,262,641
1,060,946

481,135
8,901,975
1,117,069

512,594
8,678,922
1,584,620

7,201,695
232,155
23,853,816

7,784,906
317,798
24,571,314

7,094,302
386,594
26,485,114

COTTON GROWING STATES—Bales
Cotton Consumed......................
Stocks...........................................
In Consuming Establishments
In Public Storage and a t
Compresses..........................
Active Spindles—N um ber.........

374,013
7,841,467
823,307

388,134
8,460,466
875,237

406,318
7,981,235
1,233,018

7,018,160
17,022,690

7,585,229
17,274,884

6,748,217
17,995,616

OTHER STATES—Bales
Cotton Consumed......................
Stocks...........................................
In Consuming Establishments
In Public Storage and a t
Compresses..........................
Active Spindles—N um ber.........




88,831
421,174
237,639

93,001
441,509
241,832

106,276
697,687
351,602

183,535
6,831,126

199,677
7,296,430

346,085
8,489,498

R E V IE W

Cotton consumption in the three states of this District for
which separate figures are available increased by an average
of 1.5 per cent from March to April, but was 5.5 per cent
less in total, and 9.1 per cent smaller in daily average, than
in April, last year. For the nine months of the current sea­
son consumption in these states has been 10.6 per cent less
than in that part of the season before. Census Bureau figures
for these states are compared in the table.
COTTON CONSUMPTION—Bales
April
March
April
Aug. 1 to April 30
_________________________1935
1935
1934
1934-35
1933-34
Alabama.......................
Georgia.........................
Tennessee.....................

52,621
86,387
11,064

51,940
85,620
10,243

T otal.........................

150,072

147,803

54,011
92,928
11,813

416,524
717,327
93,191

454,859
825,286
92,392

158,752 1,227,042 1,372,537

Cotton
Although employment at reporting cotton
Manufacturing mills in this District declined about 3 per
cent from March to April, and was about 9
per cent less than a year ago, orders booked during April
recorded a substantial increase over both the month of
March and April last year. Cloth production by these mills
was slightly larger than a month or a year ago, and yarn pro­
duction, although 3.5 per cent less than in March, was $.6
per cent greater than in April, 1934. Reported figures are
compared in the table.
Cloth
April 1935 compared
with:
Mar. 1935
Apr. 1934
Production...............
Shipments................
Orders Booked........
Unfilled Orders........
Stocks on H a n d .. . .
Number on Payroll.

+ 1.7
+ 3.8
+123.8
+ 3.5
+ 1.2
— 2.9

+ 1.7
+ 7.3
+ 4 5 .0
— 11.6
+ 3 4 .0
— 8.7

Yarn
April 1935 compared
with:
March 1935 April 1934
— 3.5
— 4 .8
+ 7 9.5
— 11.6
— 2.1
— 3 .6

+ 9 .6
+ 1 7 .7
+ 5 7 .5
— 16.8
+ 30.1
— 9.6

Cotton Seed
Operations at cotton seed oil mills declined
and Cotton Seed seasonally in April and, except for a small
Products
increase in production of linters, were at a
lower level than a year ago. For the nine
months of the season, however (August through April), re­
ceipts and crushings of seed and production of the principal
cotton seed products, have been greater than in that part of
the previous season, and stocks at the end of April, except of
crude oil, were also larger than a year earlier. For the coun­
try as a whole, however, receipts, crushings, and production,
except of linters, have been less than during the correspond­
ing part of last season. In the first two columns of the table
are compared combined totals for Georgia, Alabama, Louis­
iana, and Mississippi, and in the last two columns are com­
pared totals for the country.
COTTON SEED AND COTTON SEED PRODUCTS
Sixth District*
United States
Aug. 1 to Apr. 30
Aug. 1 to Apr. 30
________________________ 1934-35
1933-34
1934-35
1933-34
Cotton Seed, Tons:
Received a t M ills...
Crushed....................
On Hand Apr. 3 0 ...

1,307,897
1,230,015
145,814

1,163,398
1,035,838
156,330

3,339,740
3,313,843
248,558

4,008,375
3,854,587
374,209

Production:
Crude Oil, lbs.......... 398,109,281 337,672,773 1,031,826,345 1,202,900,480
Cake & Meal, tons..
537,698
450,576
1,507,950
1,750,389
Hulls, tons...............
324,568
282,434
852,075
1,026,162
Linters, Bales..........
270,001
203,141
746,849
734,571
Stocks a t Mills Apr. 30:
Crude Oil, lbs..........
Cake & Meal, tons..
Hulls, to n s...............
Linters, bales...........

9,619,352
111,336
47,418
47,672

20,922,260
85,944
16,934
46,420

28,315,862
264,999
129,289
147,952

82,317,454
252,625
69,885
141,505

♦Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Electric Total production of electric power for public use in
Power
the six states located wholly or partly in the Sixth
Federal Reserve District increased 3.6 per cent from
February to March, but because of the longer month daily
average production declined 6.4 per cent. March production
was 6.3 per cent greater than in March, 1934. Production by
use of water power, which accounted for 67.5 per cent of the
total in March, 66.3 per cent in February and 63.8 per cent in
March last year, increased 5.4 per cent from February to

M O N T H L Y

March and was 12.4 per cent greater than a year ago, while
that by use of fuels was about the same in March as in
February and 4.6 per cent less than a year ago. For the
first quarter of 1935 total production of electric power in these
six states was 12 per cent, greater than in that part of 1934.
For this three months period production by use of water
power was 25.8 per cent greater, while that by use of fuels
was 8.3 per cent less, than a year ago. Figures compared in
the table are from those compiled by the United States Geo­
logical Survey.
PRODUCTION OF E LECTR IC POWER ( k. w. Hours)
M arch 1935
Feb. 1935
March 1934
Alabam a.......................................
Florida..........................................
Georgia.........................................
Louisiana.....................................
Mississippi...................................
Tennessee....................................

173,792
64,724
108,268
83,243
4,283
112,538

174,425
60,602
96,766
88,800
3,833
103,421

140,792
63,612
106,826
93,375
3,909
106,144

T o ta l................................

546,848

527,847

514,658

369,252
177,596

350,177
177,670

328,473
186,185

13,925
215,137
1,708,761

11,645
206,445
1,769,762

12,400
217,795
1,864,705

By use of:

W ater Power___
Fuels.....................
Fuels consumed in Production
of Electric Power:
Fuel Oil—tons.........................
Natural Gas—000 cu. ft........

Bituminous According to preliminary figures compiled by
Coal Mining the United States Bureau of Mines the produc­
tion of bituminous coal in the United States
declined 43.6 per cent from March to April, the first month
of the new coal year, and was 10.9 per cent less than in April
last year. Because of the different number of working days,
the daily average output declined 42 per cent over the month,
and was 14.8 per cent less than a year ago. At the same time
last year, daily average production declined 27.6 per cent
from March to April. Combined totals for the first four
months of 1935 show an increase of 2.5 per cent over that
part of 1934. Preliminary figures are compared in the table.
Production—Tons
Total
Daily Average
April 1935....................................
21,920,000
March 1935.................................
38,848,000
April 1934....................................
24,599,000
January-April 1935.................... 132,230,000
January-April 1934.................... 129,046,000

Number of
Working Days

866,000
25.3
1,494,000
26
1,016,000
24.2
............... ................. . . .
...............

Weekly production figures indicate that output declined
sharply in both Alabama and Tennessee at the beginning of
the new coal year April 1, but for the four weeks ending in
April Alabama production averaged 51.5 per cent greater than
a year ago, when production was affected by strikes, and in
Tennessee April production was 4.8 per cent greater than in
April, 1934. During the first four months of 1935 Alabama
production has been about 5 per cent, and Tennessee output
14 per cent, greater than in that part of 1934. Weekly fig­
ures are compared in the table.

year. There was a reduction from nine furnaces active at the
close of March to eight active a month later, compared with
ten active at the same time a year ago. Press reports indi­
cate that an additional furnace was blown in about the middle
of May. Shipments during April by merchant producers are
reported to have increased further for the fourth consecutive
month. Orders for cast iron pressure pipe are still limited to
small lots, but reports indicate a slight but scattered increase
in structural steel business.
Total production of pig iron in the United States during
the first four months of 1935 has been 11.9 per cent greater
than during that part of 1934, nearly three times that in the
same period of 1933, and 73.5 per cent greater than in those
months of 1932, and Alabama production during the first four
months of this year has been 17.7 per cent less than in those
months of last year, but three and one-half times as large as
in the first four months of 1933, and 22.8 per cent greater
than three years ago. Production figures are compared in the
table.
Production—Tons
Total
Daily Average
United States:
April 1935................................
1,663,475
55,449
March 1935.............................
1,770,028
57,098
898,043
29,935
September 1934 ......................
April 1934................................
1,726,851
57,561
January-April 1935................ 6,519,391
...................
January-April 1934................5,825,284
...................
Alabama:
April 1935................................
114,824
3,827
March 1935.............................
119,918
3,868
September 1934......................
57,842
1,928
April 1934................................
122,591
4,086
January-April 1935................ 392,819
.......................
.......................
January-April 1934............... 477,460

April
April
April
April

6 ..............................
13............................
20................................
27................................

Alabama
1935
85,000
156,000
188,000
172,000

1934
178,000
76,000
37,000
104,000

Tennessee
1935
1934
23,000
31,000
83,000
80,000

31,000
57,000
60,000
59,000

Pig Iron
According to Iron Age statistics, the production
Production of pig iron in the United States declined 6 per
cent from March to April, and was 3.7 per cent
less than in April last year. On a daily average basis, how­
ever, the decrease from March to April was only 2.9 per cent.
At the end of April there were 97 furnaces in active opera­
tion, a decrease of one over the month, and compared with
110 active a year earlier.
April production of pig iron in Alabama amounted to
114,824 tons, smaller by 4.2 per cent than total production in
March, although the daily average declined only 1.1 per cent,
and smaller by 6.3 per cent than in April a year ago. Except
for March, production in April was the largest since June last



Furnaces
Active*
97
98
62
110

8
9
5
10

Naval Receipts of both turpentine and rosin at the three
Stores principal markets of the District increased substan­
tially from March to April, as they usually do, and
turpentine receipts were somewhat larger than a year ago but
receipts of rosin slightly smaller. Stocks of both commodi­
ties declined slightly from the end of March to the close of
April, but were greater than at the same time last year.
Press reports indicate that there has recently been some im­
provement in the demand for both commodities, from both
domestic and foreign buyers. Quotations on the Savannah
market for turpentine declined from 48^ cents on April 13
to 471/4 cents on May 4 and rose to 47% cents on May 11, and
the average of quotations on the thirteen grades of rosin de­
clined from $4.71 per 280 pounds on April 13 to $4.65 on May
11, which compares with $4.87 at the same time last year.
Receipts and stocks for the month are compared in the table.

(Tons)
Week Ended:

7

R E V IE W

April 1935

March 1935

April 1934

Receipts—Turpentine (1)
Savannah.................................
Jacksonville.............................
Pensacola.................................

9,460
6,747
2,203

T o ta l................................

18,410

4,761

17,315

Receipts—Rosin (2)
Savannah.................................
Jacksonville.............................
Pensacola.................................

31,772
31,181
6,337

9,642
16,555
2,200

34,411
29,477
5,608

T otal................................

69,290

28,397

69,496

Savannah.................................
Jacksonville.............................
Pensacola.................................

26,569
37,251
24,151

23,791
36,833
27,457

5,059
23,813
17,593

1,462
2,419
880

8,089
7,228
1,998

T otal................................

87,971

88,081

46,465

Stocks—Rosin (2)
Savannah.................................
Jacksonville.............................
Pensacola................................

119,891
94,376
35,946

116,272
104,354
32,477

83,903
62,890
9,654

253,103

156,447

T o ta l................................
(1) Barrels of 50 gallons.
(2) Barrels of 500 pounds.

250,213

8

M O N T H L Y

R E V IE W

MONTHLY INDEX NUMBERS COMPUTED BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
M ONTHLY AVERAGE 1923-1925=100
Feb.
1935

M arch
1935

A pril
1935

F eb.
1934

129.9
55.1
55.4
60.5
62.0
70.4

162.9

183.3
65.3
72.7
80.0
76.2

121.2

152.8
61.2
70.1
71.2
70.5
80.0

DEPARTM ENT STORE TRADE—SIX TH D ISTR IC T
Daily Average Sales—U n a d ju ste d
Atlanta (3 firms)................................................................................
Birmingham (4 firms)........................................................................

DISTRICT (34 firms).......................................................................

M arch
1934

A pril
1934

88.0

58.8
54.7
57.0
61.3
68.4

166.0
69.2
69.3
80.9
64.9
84.4

145.8
62.1
64.5
81.0
75.3
83.0

175.2
72.2
82.0
90.1
72.3
90.9

151.2
64.7
71.3
77.7
71.2
83.8

142.6
65.3
69.2
67.1
69.7
77.7

167.7
68.5
72.9
84.3
67.6

86.1

142.9
65.4
67.2
83.5
74.6
83.8

88.4
46.2
48.8
62.1
54.8
59.5

97.4
47.2
50.3
65.3
59.7
63.5

103.7
49.2
52.4
59.6
64.9

84.2
39.5
43.8
57.4
55.9
55.9

90.2
37.4
45.0
65.5
58.9
58.7

97.8
35.2
51.7
68.9
69.6
60.8

92.1
48.1
50.3
65.4
54.8
60.7

95.5
46.3
47.5
64.0
57.4
61.7

98.8
46.9
49.9
63.6
57.3
61.8

87.7
41.1
45.2
80.4
55.9
57.0

88.4
36.7
42.5
64.2
56.6
57.0

93.0
33.5
49.2
66.3
57.3
57.9

55.2
50.4
52.1
54.2
52.6
71.4
40.7
79.2

61.1
52.9
59.8
61.0
56.8
91.6
39.4
82.0

60.5
50.8
56.2
61.8
58.0

54.9
50.4
64.5
51.5
54.1
55.3
40.0
73.9

60.0
53.6
70.8
57.6
56.6
63.1
38.9
80.9

56.0
45.9
62.6
57.9
54.1
77.8
39.3
71.5

65.6
64.5
83.4

65.7
58.9
79.9
70.1
72.1
56.4
57.3

57.7
47.6
73.1
67.5
49.6
45.8
56.5

67.6
52.8
78.4
71.4
73.4
58.6
67.8

75.8
68.9
94.6
81.7
83.5
60.0
65.1

14.6
20.9
4.8
31.8

13.7

8.1

15.0
6.4

4.0
16.0

4.9
19.4
21.5
5.0
18.0

35.3
6.5
34.3
13.3

68.6
73.0
81.1
65.1
83.6

Daily Average Sales—A djusted*
Birmingham (4 firms)........................................................................
Nashville (4 firms).............................................................................
New Orleans (5 firms).......................................................................
DISTRICT (34 firms).......................................................................
M o n th ly S tocks—U n ad ju sted
Atlanta (3 firms)................................................................................
Birmingham (3 firms)........................................................................
Chattanooga (3 firms).......................................................................
New Orleans (4 firms).......................................................................
DISTRICT (27 firms).......................................................................

66.1

M o n th ly S tocks—A djusted*
Atlanta (3 firms)................................................................................
Chattanooga (3 firms).......................................................................
Nashville (4 firms).............................................................................
DISTRICT (27 firms).......................................................................
WHOLESALE TRADE—SIX TH DISTRICT—TOTAL........
. Dry Goods (15 firms)........................................................................
Hardware (25 firms)..........................................................................
Electrical Supplies (12 firms)............................................................

LIFE INSURANCE SALES—S IX STATES—TO TA L..........

66.2
75.2
43.8
58.1
BUILDING PER M ITS—TWENTY C IT IE S ............................

16.3
19.4
7.3

102.6
36.9
80.1

68.1
64.5
78.7
78.8
72.3
51.0
58.7

22.5

26.8
16.5

23.5
11.4
15.7
39.2

12.1

10.0

8.0

New Orleans........................................................................................

9.5
19.8

47.3
31.1
21.9
11.5
21.5

CONTRACT AWARDS—SIX TH DISTRICT—TO TA L . . . .

24.8
12.7
32.8

36.4
32.0
39.4

26.6
26.5
26.7

33.4
7.6
50.6

57.8
13.8
87.2

37.8
15.8
52.7

79.5
79.1
82.7
77.4

79.4
78.3
81.9
77.3
85.4
69.4
73.0
85.7
84.9
81.5
80.7
69.2

80.1
80.4
84.5
77.2
86.3
69.2
72.8
85.9
84.6
81.0
80.7
68.7

73.6
61.3
66.7
78.7
89.6
76.9
72.4
87.0

73.7
61.3
67.3
78.5
88.7
76.5
71.4
87.1
86.4
75.7
81.4
69.3

73.3
59.6

Tennessee....................................................................................

56.6
106.9
141.4
106.6

93.4
113.4
53.9
109.9
151.1
102.9

89.9
109.2
51.5
110.9
153.1

92.6
109.6
59.1
113.6
142.9

111.2

COTTON EX PO RTS—UNITED STA TES...............................

76.0

61.9

45.2

PIG IRON PRODUCTION—United States..............................
Alabama......................................

53.8
38.1

59.2
51.6

55.7
49.4

20.2
8.0

WHOLESALE PRICES—UNITED STATES f
ALL COM M O DITIES....................................................................

86.0
Metals and metal products......................................................
Chemicals and drugs..................................................................

COTTON CONSUMPTION—UNITED STA TES...................
All Other States..................................................................................
Georgia........................................................................................

♦A d ju ste d for Seaso n al V a riatio n ,




70.1
72.5
85.8
85.0
80.4
80.7
70.1
92.9

111.2

f C o m p ile d b y B u re a u of L a b o r Statistics.

1926-100.

10.0

86.6
75.5
81.0
68.5

105.8
125.7

66.2
78.6
88.9
75.3
71.7
87.9
86.7
75.5
81.6
69.5

100.0

130.8
160.7
117.7

99.5
118.7
61.6
119.3
157.1
118.7

122.4

107.1

75.3

42.3
48.7

54.2
53.8

57.8
52.8

66.2