View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY REVIEW
O f Agricultural, Industrial, Trade and Financial
Conditions in the Sixth Federal Reserve District

F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E

B A N K

O F

A T L A N T A

(Compiled May 17, 1929)

VOL. 14, No. 5.

ATLA N TA , GA., M ay 3 1, 1929.

B U SIN E SS CONDITIONS IN T H E U N IT ED STA TES
In d u strial activ ity continued a t a high level in A pril,
and th e volume of fac to ry em ploym ent and payrolls in ­
creased fu rth e r. Loans and investm ents of m em ber banks
in leading cities continued to decline betw een th e middle
of A p ril and the middle of May, and w ere a t th a t tim e a t
ap proxim ately th e sam e level as a y e a r ago.
Production
In d u strial activ ity increased in A pril to
th e h ig h est level on record. The iron and
steel and autom obile industries continued exceptionally
active during A pril. A ctivity in copper refining, lum ber,
cem ent, silk and wool textiles, and th e m eat packing in ­
d u stry increased, and production of cotton tex tiles showed
a less th a n seasonal reduction. F acto ry em ploym ent and
p ayrolls increased, co n trary to th e seasonal tren d . O ut­
p u t of m ines w as also la rg e r in A pril. Copper and a n th ­
rac ite coal production increased and th e seasonal decline
in o u tp u t of bitum inous coal w as sm aller th a n usual. P e­
troleum production declined slightly. P relim inary rep o rts
fo r th e first h alf of M ay indicate a continued high r a te of
operation in th e iron and steel industry. O utput of lum ­
b er and bitum inous coal w as som ew hat la rg e r during th e
first p a r t of M ay th a n a t th e end of A pril. Building con­
tra c ts aw arded during th e m onth of A pril increased sh a rp ­
ly and fo r th e first tim e in five m onths approxim ated th e
to ta l fo r th e corresponding m onth in the preceding year.
The increase w as not continued, however, in th e first p a r t
of M ay w hen aw ards averaged 20 per cent below th e sam e
period in M ay 1928. D uring A pril m ost classes of build­
ing showed seasonal increases over M arch, th e la rg e st be­
ing in contracts fo r residential building and public w orks
and utilities.
D istrib u tion Shipm ents of commodities by ra il increased
during A pril and w ere th e la rg e st fo r th is
m onth in any recent year. The increase from M arch r e ­

Digitized
FRASER
Aprilfor121.


This review released fo r publication in
the afternoon papers of May 30.

flects la rg e r loading of m iscellaneous fre ig h t, lum ber, live
stock and ore. D uring th e first h alf of M ay shipm ents of
fre ig h t continued to increase. Sales a t w holesale declined
seasonally in A pril, except in th e case of g ro cry and
h ard w are firm s. In com parison w ith A pril, 1928, all lines
of trad e rep o rtin g to th e F ed eral Reserve System showed
increases. D ep artm n t sto res sales w ere also sm aller in
A pril th a n in M arch, b u t continued above th e level of a
y ear ago.
P rices
W holesale com modity prices averaged
slig h tly low er in A pril th a n in M arch, ac­
cording to th e index of th e U nited S tates B ureau of Labor
S tatistics, reflecting prim arily declines in prices of fa rm
products and th e ir m an u factu res. P rices of m ineral and
fo re st products and th e ir m anufactures, on th e av erage,
showed little change. T here w ere increases in th e prices
of iron and steel, and sh arp declines in copper, lead, and
tin . Seasonal declines occurred in prices of coal and coke,
w hile gasoline prices advanced. P rices of fa rm products
and th e ir m an u factu res averaged low er in A pril th a n in
M arch, P rices of g rain , especially w heat, moved down­
w ard m ore sh arp ly and wool and cotton continued to de­
cline. Livestock and m e at prices continued th e upw ard
m ovem ent of th e previous m onth; hides averaged slig h tly
higher in price, and le ath e r som ew hat lower. A m ong im ­
ported raw m aterials, rubber, su g ar, and coffee showed
m arked price recessions. E a rly in M ay cattle, hides and
w h eat prices declined sh arp ly and th e price of ru b b er in ­
creased.
B ank C redit D uring th e fo u r weeks ending M ay 15 loans
and investm ents of m em ber banks in lead­
ing cities showed a decrease of n early $ 2 0 0 ,00 0,0 00 , la rg e ­
ly in loans on securities, to g eth er w ith some fu rth e r de­
cline in investm ents. A ll o th er loans, chiefly fo r com m er­
cial and ag ric u ltu ral purposes, rem ained unchanged a t a
(Continued on page 7 )

M ONTHLY R E V IE W

Monthly averages of daily figures fo r 12 Federal Reserve Banks.
L atest figures are averages of first 22 days in May.

SIX TH D ISTRICT SUMMARY
W eather conditions in some p a rts of th e six th d istric t
d u rin g M arch and A pril w ere unfavorable, excessive rain s
have delayed fa rm w ork and low tem p eratu re s have h in­
dered grow th. A ccording to rep o rts of th e U nited S tate s
D ep artm ent of A gricu lture, prospects fo r peaches in th e
d istric t generally, and fo r citru s fru its in Florida, are
low er th a n a t th is tim e la s t year.
R etail tra d e in A pril w as in som ew hat la rg e r volume
th a n in th e sam e m onth la s t year, although slig h tly less
th a n in M arch. W holesale tra d e increased over M arch
and w as g re a te r th a n in A pril 1928. Stocks of both re ­
ta il and wholesale firm s w ere sm aller th a n a y ea r ago, and
collections during A pril rep o rted by departm ent sto res
and by w holesale dealers w ere g re a te r th a n in M arch or in
A p ril la s t year. The volume of debits to individual ac­
counts a t tw enty-six cities in th e d istric t declined slig h tly
in A pril com pared w ith M arch, b u t w as g re a te r th a n in
A pril 1928. S avings deposits averaged fo u r p er cent less
th a n a y ea r ago. B uilding perm its issued a t tw en ty cities
of th e d istric t in A pril w ere g re a te r th a n in M arch, and
averaged less th a n one p er cent sm aller th a n fo r A pril
1928. The consum ption of cotton in A pril w as about th e
sam e as in M arch, and w as tw en ty p er cent g re a te r th a n
in A pril la s t y ea r, and production of cotton ojoth and
y a rn by rep o rtin g m ills in th e six th d istric t w as in g re a te r
volume th a n fo r eith er of those periods. P roduction of
coal in A labam a averaged g re a te r, b u t in Tennessee
sm aller, th a n a y ea r ago. A labam a production of pig
iron w as less th a n in M arch b u t g re a te r th a n in A pril
1 928. T here w as an increase of less th a n th ree millions
of dollars in to ta l loans by th irty w eekly rep o rtin g m em ­
b er banks in the la rg e r cities of th e d istric t in th e fo u r
w eeks period betw een A pril 10 and M ay 8, and on th is
date loans w ere m ore th a n nine m illions g re a te r th a n a
y ea r ago. Investm ents of these banks in U nited S tates
governm ent and o ther securities on M ay 8 w ere also a
little m ore th a n nine m illions g re a te r th a n on th e corre­

Monthly rates m the open m arket in New Y ork: commercial paper
rate on 4- to 6 -month paper and acceptance ra te on 90-day bankers*
acceptances. L atest figures are averages fo r first 24 days in May.

sponding re p o rt d ate la s t y ea r, and to ta l loans and in v est­
m ents show an increase over th a t d ate of 18^2 m illions.
D iscounts by th e F ed eral R eserve B ank of A tla n ta fo r
m em ber banks increased n ea rly 17 m illions betw een A pril
10 an d M ay 8, and w ere over 2 5 ^ m illions g re a te r th a n
on the sam e re p o rt date la s t y ear. H oldings of bills
bought in th e open m a rk e t and of U nited S tate s securities
declined com pared w ith both of th ese re p o rt dates.
R E T A IL TRA D E
M erchandise d istrib u tio n a t re ta il in th e six th F ed eral
R eserve D istric t d u rin g A pril, reflected in figures rep o rted
confidentially by dep atm en t sto res located th ro u g h o u t th e
district, w as in som ew hat sm aller volume th a n in M arch,
b u t averaged som ew hat g re a te r th a n in A p ril la s t y ear.
Stocks of m erchandise increased slig h tly over those fo r
M arch, b u t w ere sm aller th a n a y e a r ago, and th e r a te of
tu rn o v er fo r A pril w as slig h tly g re a te r th a n fo r A pril
1928.
A p ril sales by 4 5 rep o rtin g d ep a rtm en t sto res av e r­
aged 1.3 p er cent g re a te r th a n in A p ril la s t y ear, in ­
creases a t A tla n ta and N ashville slig h tly m ore th a n off­
se ttin g decreases fro m o th er points. Sales fo r th e first
fo u r m onths of th e y ea r averag ed ab o u t th e sam e as d u r­
ing th e sam e period la s t year. Stocks averag ed 1.6 p er
cent la rg e r th a n fo r M arch, b u t w ere 4 .8 p er cent sm aller
th a n a y ea r ago. A ccounts receivable decreased 2.4 p er
cent com pared w ith M arch, b u t w ere 3.2 p er cen t g re a te r
th a n fo r A pril 1928, and collections increased 6.3 p er cent
over those in M arch, and w ere 8.1 p er cent g re a te r th a n in
A pril la s t y ear. The ra tio of collections d u rin g A p ril to
accounts receivable and due a t th e beginning of th e m onth,
fo r 33 firm s, w as 33.3 p er cent; fo r M arch th is ra tio w as
3 2.3 p er cent, and fo r A p ril la s t y e a r 3 3.4 p er cent. F o r
A pril th e ra tio .of collections a g a in st re g u la r accounts, fo r
33 firm s, w as 35.7 p er cent, and th e ra tio of collections
a g a in st in stallm en t accounts, fo r 8 firm s w as 15.9 p er
cent.

CONDITION OF RETA IL TRADE DURING A PR IL 1929
AT 45 DEPARTM ENT STORES IN THE SIXTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT

A tlan ta (5)
Birm ingham (5)
Chattanooga (6)
N ashville ( 4 ) '
New Orleans (5)
O ther Cities (20)
D istrict (46) ____

Comparison of N et Sales
Apr. 1929 w ith Ja n . 1 to A pr. 30,1929
A pril 1928 w ith same period 1928
----- +10.9
+ 6 .6
------— 3.3
+ 0.7
------ — 2.4
— 1.0
----- + 6.1
— 1.3
— 0.4
— 2.7
— 4.8
— 2.4
+ 1.3
+ 0.1

Comparison of Stocks
A pr. 30, 1929
A pr. 30, 1929
w ith
w ith
A pr. 30, 1928
Mch. 31,1929
+ 3.3
+ 0 .6
—13.1
+ 0.5
— 2 .0
+ 1.5
— 5.6
+ 4.3
— 7.6
— 0 .1
-f 2 .8
+ 2.5
— 4.8
+ 1 .6

Note: The rate of stock turnover is the ratio of sales during given period to average stocks on hand.



R ate of Stock T urnover
Ja n . 1 to
A pril
Apr. 30,
1928
1929
1928
1929
.26
.29
1.03
1.13
.19
.19
.79
.79
.18
.18
.72
.73
.23
.24
.94
.93
.17
.18
.73
.70
.2 0
.18
.78
.73
.2 0
.2 1
.82
.81

M ONTHLY R EV IEW
W H O LESA LE TRADE
The volume of w holesale trad e in the sixth d istric t d u r­
ing A pril, as reflected in sales figures reported confiden­
tia lly to th e F ed eral Reserve Bank by 121 w holesale firms
in eig h t different lines, increased slightly over the p re­
ceding m onth and w as g re a te r th a n in th e sam e m onth
la st y ear. Stocks of m erchandise on hand a t the end of
A pril, rep orted by some of these firm s, w ere sm aller th a n
a m onth or a y ear earlier. A ccounts receivable a t the end
of A pril increased slightly over M arch, but w ere sm aller
th a n a y ear ago, and collections averaged b etter th a n in
M arch or in A pril 1928. P ercentage com parisons of
figures fo r all lines combined are shown in the able, and
com parisons by lines are shown in the p ara g ra p h s which
follow.
Sales _____________
Stocks on hand ___
Accounts receivable
Collections _______

A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
___________________ + 1.1
+ 8.7
______________ ____ — 1.8
— 7.1

_______________

+ 0.6

__________________

+ 5.7

— 0.6
+ 6.4

Groceries

A pril sales of groceries a t w holesale av e r­
aged 2.2 per cent less th a n in M arch, due to
decreases reported from Jacksonville and New Orleans,
b u t w ere 6.4 per cent la rg e r th a n in A pril 1928. Stocks
on hand and accounts receivable decreased, and collections
increased, com pared w ith both of those periods.
A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
A tlan ta (3 firms) _____________________ + 9.9
+ 3.0
Jacksonville (4 firms) -------------------------- —18.4
-j-16.4
New Orleans ( 6 firms) _______________ — 2.9
—10.8
Vicksburg (3 firms) ___________________ + 5.6
+12.1
O ther Cities (13 firms) ________________ + 5.7
+11.7
DISTRICT (29 firms) _________________ — 2.2________ + 6.4
— 5.8
Stocks on hand ___
— 4.3
— 7.5
— 3.2
Accounts receivable
+ 7.2
+ 3.1
Collections -------------

D ry Goods

Sales of dry goods a t w holesale in A pril de­
clined 7.3 per cent from th e higher level in
M arch, b u t w ere 8.1 per cent g re a te r th a n in A pril of la st
year. Stocks on hand increased over those a t th e end of
M arch b u t w ere 18.3 per cent sm aller th a n a year ago. Ac­
counts receivable w ere sm aller, and collections g rea ter,
th an fo r eith er th e preceding m onth or th e sam e m onth
la s t year.
A pril 1929 compared w ith :
S ales:
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
A tlan ta (3 firms) --------------------------------- — 0.1
+14.8
Nashville (3 firms) ______________ ____ —10.3
+ 2.1
New Orleans (4 firms) ________________ — 7.3
— 4.3
O ther Cities (15 firms) ________________ — 7.2
+13.6
DISTRICT (25 firms) ________________ — 7.3________+ 8.1
Stocks on hand _______________________
+ 2.2
—18.3
Accounts receivable ___________________
— 2.8
— 4.4
Collections ------------------------------------------+10.0
+ 4.8

H ardw are

Sales of hardw are a t w holesale during
A pril increased 4.2 per cent over M arch and
w ere 11.1 p er cent g re a te r th a n in A pril 1928. Stocks of
m erchandise a t the end of A pril w ere sm aller th a n fo r a
m onth or a y ear earlier. A ccounts receivable a t the end
of A pril, and collections during the m onth, both show in ­
creases over the preceding and th e sam e m onth la st year.
Nashville (4 firms) ....... ................. ...............
New Orleans (5 firms) ________________
O ther Cities (19 firms) ________________
DISTRICT (28 firms) _________________
Stocks on hand ___
Accounts receivable
Collections ............. ....

A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
+ 8.5
+11.1
+ 3 .1
+22.8
+ 3.6
+ 3.7
+ 4.2________ +11.1
— 3.1
— 3.0
+ 3.4
+ 4.8
+ 6.9
+13.3

F u rn itu re

A pril sales of fu rn itu re a t wholesale de­
clined com pared w ith M arch bu t averaged
slig h tly la rg e r th a n in A pril a y ear ago. A ccounts receiv­
able w ere sm aller th a n fo r M arch, but averaged 6.4 per
cent la rg e r th a n fo r A pril la st year, and collections show
decreases com pared w ith both of those periods.

S ales:
A tlan ta (5 firms)
Other Cities (7 firms) __
DISTRICT (12 firms) __
Accounts receivable
Collections ...............




April 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
— 1.1
+18.0
— 4.7
— 2.1
— 4.1
____ + 1.2

------------------------------------____________

■2.4
2.0

+ 6.4
—10.7

$

E lectrical
Supplies

Sales of electrical supplies a t wholesale
during A pril averaged 17.4 p er cent g re a t­
er th a n in M arch, and 14.5 p er cent g re a te r
th a n in A pril la st year. Stocks on hand, accounts receiv­
able and collections all show increases over M arch, and
collections w ere g re a te r th a n in A pril la s t year, b u t de­
creases com pared w ith th a t m onth a re shown in stocks and
accounts receivable.

S ales:
New Orleans (4 firms)
O ther Cities ( 8 firms) ..
DISTRICT (12 firms) .
Stocks on hand ___
Accounts receivable
Collections ________

A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
____________ +21.5
+34.5
____________ +15.1
+ 5.0
____________ +17.4________+14.5
+ 1.4
— 1.9
— 0.8
+12.7
+ 2.3
+16.8

Com parisons in the other th ree lines are shown only fo r
th e d istrict as th ree or m ore rep o rts w ere n o t received
from an y single city in an y of these lines. Sales in all
th ree lines increased over both th e preceding m onth and
the corresponding m onth a y ear ago.
Shoes: Sales ___
S tationery: Sales
D ru g s: Sales
Accounts receivable
Collections ________

A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
__ + 2.5
+ 5.4
„ + 8.9
+ 8.9
- + 5.4
+11.5

... + 1.0

_

— 4.6

— 0.0

— 4.1

A G RICU LTU RE
W hile fa rm w ork generally in th e south has m ade f a ir
progress, w eath er conditions in some p a rts of th e six th
d istrict during A pril and early M ay have n ot been fav o r­
able. In F lorida th e n o rth ern and w estern p a rts of the
sta te have had too much ra in and cool w eath er, while cen­
tr a l and south F lorida w ere suffering from drought. As a
re su lt of storm dam age, th e re w as some rep lan tin g in th e
staple crop sections. The p resen t outlook fo r citrus fru its
is much below th a t of a y ear ago, th e condition of oranges
on May 1 being 61 p er cent com pared w ith 82 p er cent la st
year, and g ra p e fru it being 56 p er cent com pared w ith 80
p er cent a y ear ago. The early bloom w as unusually lig h t
and the extrem e dry w eath er has caused some dropping of
the young f ru it and lowered the condition of th e trees.
Peaches and p ears w ere also dam aged by storm s during
A pril, and th e condition is below th a t of a y ea r ago. T ruck
crops are much earlier th a n la st year. U nseasonably cool
tem p eratu res during A pril accom panied by excessive ra in
over th e en tire s ta te of Georgia have delayed farm in g
operations and hindered p lan t grow th. The tornado and
storm stricken sections suffered severe dam age to crops
and pro p erty . On May 2 heavy w indstorm s sw ept south­
ern G eorgia and a p a r t of th e Piedm ont sections, re su lt­
ing in some in ju ry to crops and to peaches. On M ay 8
hail storm s accounted fo r additional dam age in localized
areas of middle G eorgia. P rospects fo r peaches w ere
much lower on M ay 1 th a n a m onth earlier, th e condition
being 60 p er cent norm al com pared w ith 84 p er cent on
A pril 1. Curculio in festatio n w as th e w o rst in y ears and
th e continuous and excessive rain s during the blooming
period resu lted in an unusually heavy drop. F o r th e ten
southern sta te s th e condition of peaches on May 1 w as
67.4 p er cent, com pared w ith 73.8 la st year. In A rkansas,
Oklahom a and Texas prospects are b e tte r th a n in any of
th e p ast th ree years, b u t in other sta te s th e condition is
low er th a n a t th e sam e tim e of la s t year.
COTTON M O V EM EN T -U N IT ED STATES
Since August 1
1928
1927
1929
7,957,377 12,213,276
Receipts a t all U. S. P orts ----------- 9,088,699
Overland across Miss., Ohio & Potomao
1,082,042
1,463,772
Rivers to Nor. Mills and C anada__ 1,252,539
In terio r stocks in excess of those
217,543
417,503
held a t close of Com’l year----------266,334
4,070,787
3,922,143
Southern mills takings, net ----------- 4,182,000
17,965,378
Total for 276 days _________________ 14,789,572 13,379,065
6,510,379
Foreign exports ___________________ 7,325,191
6,102,859
♦American Mills N. & S. & C anada— 6,594,339
Am erican Cotton thus fa r -------------- 13,328,000 12,655,000 14,725,000
♦of which 1,728,744 by N orthern Spinners against 1,678,609 last year
and 4,865,595 by Southern Spinners against 4,424,250 last year.

4
S u g ar Cane
an d S u g ar

W eather conditions in th e Louisiana cane
belt have not been entirely favorable during
th e la tte r p a rt of A pril and ea rly M ay. The
cool w eath er h as som ew hat checked th e grow th of th e
cane b u t stands a re excellent and th e crop shows a health y
color, according to press rep o rts.
SUGAR MOVEMENT (Pounds)
Raw S ugar
A pril 1929
Mch. 1929
R eceipts:
140,103,566
New Orleans ___________.-193,251,535
87,989,890
S avannah __ ______________ 59,138,160
M eltings:
-154,040,093
168,606,357
New O rleans
_ 37,375,892
39,070,377
Savannah
Stocks:
148,312,836
-187,417,944
New O rleans
55,563,256
- 77,325,524
Savannah —

A pril 1928
183,381,992
49,667,557
131,323,534
32,249,541
97,930,035
54,714,793

Refined S ugar (Pounds)
Shipm ents:
New Orleans
Savannah __
Stocks:
New Orleans
Savannah —

-176,573,549
- 19,350,188

136,984,464
27,053,159

116,710,526
18,968,799

_ 65,898,750
_ 37,905,141

89,664,711
21,105,929

58,350,183
35,936,952

RICE MOVEMENT—NEW ORLEANS
Rough Rice (Sacks)
A pril 1929
19,512
16,525
22,832

Receipts _
Shipm ents
S t o c k s ___

Mch. 1929
34,071
36,710
19,845

A pril 1928
12,583
11,289
8,243

119,770
116,548
163,847

160,846
205,148
205,501

CLEAN RICE— (Packets)
122,132
131,246
154,733

Receipts
Shipm ents
S t o c k s ----

RICE M ILLERS ASSOCIATION STATISTICS
(B arrels)
Receipts of Rough Rice:
Season 1928-29 _____
Season 1927-28 -------D istribution of Milled R ice:
Season 1928-29 ________
Season 1927-28 -----------Stocks of Rough an d Milled R ice:
May 1, 1929 _______________
May 1, 1928 _______________

A pril
429,389
620,032

Aug. 1 to
A pril 30
8,614,837
8,997,201

745,097
835,992

8,001,677
8,463,902

1,763,837
1,957,878

FIN A N C IA L
T otal savings deposits a t th e end of A pril,
reported by 80 banks located throu g h o u t
th e six th district, averaged tw o-tenths of
one p er cent less th a n a m onth earlier, and w ere fo u r
p er cent less th a n a t th e end of A pril la s t year. Sm all
increases over M arch rep o rted from A tla n ta and B irm ing­
ham w ere m ore th a n offset in th e d istric t average by de­
ceases rep o rted from o ther points, and decreases com pared
w ith A pril 1 92 8 w ere shown fo r all points except “ O ther
Cities/*
Com parisons in th e table a re shown fo r A tla n ta, and
fo r F ed eral R eserve branch cities, and rep o rts fro m
banks located elsew here a re gouped under “O ther C ities.”

Savings
D eposits

(000 Omitted)

A tlan ta (7 banks) -------Birm ingham (4 banks) .
Jacksonville (5 banks) „
Nashville < 8 b a n k s ) ---New O rleans (7 banks)
O ther Cities (49 banks)
Total (80 b a n k s ) ---------

D ebits to
Individual
Accounts

__
__
__
__
—

Comparison
Comparison
A pril
Mch, Apr.-Mch. Apr.
A pril
1929
1929
1929
1928
*29-'28
42,974 $ 42,707 + 0.6 ? 44,564 — 3.6
25,354 — 1.5
24,978
24,784 + 0.8
26,025
26,631 — 2.3
29,101 —10.6
27.898 — 8.8
25,442
25,446 — 0.02
50,194 — 8.1
46,121
46,433 — 0.7
110.455
110,207
110,399
— 0.1
+ 0.2
275,939
276.456 — 0.2 287,318 — 4.0

The to ta l volume of debits to individual accounts a t tw enty-six rep o rtin g cities in th e
six th d istric t in A pril averaged 1.4 p er cent
less th a n in M arch, b u t w as g re a te r by 11.8
p er cent th a n in A pril la st year. T w enty of these re p o rt­
in g cities showed increases over A pril a y ea r ago, w hile
six showed decreases com pared w ith th a t m onth. The
m onthly figures shown in ta b le a re derived from w eekly
figures by p ro -ratin g figures fo r those w eeks w hich do
n o t fall en tirely w ithin a single calendar m onth.




(0 0 0

A labam a
Birm ingham
D o t h a n ____
M o b ile _____
Montgomery
Florida
Jacksonville
Miami
P e n s a c o l a __
T a m p a _____
Georgia
A l b a n y _____
A t l a n t a ____
A u g u s t a ____
B r u n s w ic k _
C o lu m b u s___
E lb e r t o n ___ _
M a c o n ______
New nan ____
S avannah ___
V a l d o s t a ___
L ouisiana
New O rleans
Mississippi
H attiesburg
Jackson ____
M e r i d i a n ___
V icksburg __
Tennessee
C hattanooga .
Knoxville __
Nashville ___
Total 26 cities

om itted)
A pril 1929
$ 150,797
3,418
38,270
31,207

Mch. 1929
$ 149,077
8,181
38,703
28,635

A pril 1928
$ 141,848
8,230
38,189
29,442

87,750
45,800
7,935
40,270

84,014
48,532
7,053
38,368

76,307
38,945
7,213
39,639

3,958
231,954
28,430
4,039
16,173
1,131
19,958
1,962
40,890
4,335

4,195
240,771
28,000
3,861
16,085
1,322
19,981
2,043
42,939
4,842

3,685
155,159
27,670
3.042
13,574
1,054
21,927
2,128
46,698
5.043

341,170

356,882

324,311

7,460
31,584
15,507
6,731

7,189
29,084
16,352
7,465

7,122
24,544
17,988
6,774

52,281
38,691
110,724

48,169
35,846
119,710

47,932
38,510
96,988

~$1,362,425

$1,382,299

$1,218,962

.

Conditions of M em ber B anks
in Selected C ities

W eekly re p o rts received
fro m
th ir ty
rep o rtin g
m em ber banks located in
A tla n ta , N ew O rleans, B irm ingham , Jacksonville, N ash ­
ville, C hattanooga, Knoxville and S avannah indicate th a t
betw een A p ril 10, figures fo r w hich d ate w ere shown in
th e previous issue of th e Review, and M ay 8 th e re w ere
increases in loans on securities and in A ll O ther loans, and
to ta l loans on M ay 8 w ere $ 2 ,9 2 5 ,0 0 0 g re a te r th a n fo u r
w eeks earlier. F ig u re s fo r A p ril 10, shown in th e tab le
below, have been slig h tly corrected since publication o:
th e previous issue of th e Review. Com pared w ith figures
fo r th e corresponding re p o rt d ate a y ea r ago, loans on
securities on M ay 8 th is y ea r show an increase of over 17
m illions, while A ll O ther loans show a decrease of $7,740,000. T otal loans on M ay 8 w ere $ 9 ,4 1 4 ,0 0 0 g re a te r th a n
on the sam e re p o rt d ate a y ea r ago. H oldings of U nited
S tate s securities declined slig h tly betw een A p ril 10 and
M ay 8, and w ere over 3J4 m illions g re a te r th a n a y ea r
ago, and holdings of o th er stocks and bonds w ere $ 27 5 ,0 0 0
less th a n on A p ril 10, and $ 5 ,52 8,0 00 g re a te r th a n a y ea r
ago. T otal loans and investm ents of th ese w eekly re p o rt­
ing m em ber banks on May 8 am ounted to $ 6 4 8 ,67 5,0 00 ,
com pared w ith $ 64 6 ,5 6 6 ,0 0 0 on A p ril 10, and w ith $630,1 54,000 on M ay 9, 1 928. Tim e deposits of th ese banks de­
clined slig h tly d u ring th e fo u r w eek period betw een A pril
10 and M ay 8, and w ere 14.4 m illions less th a n a y ear
ago, and dem and deposits show decreases com pared w ith
both of th ese dates u nder com parison. Borrow ings by
th ese banks w ere g re a te r th a n fo r eith er of th ese com par­
ative re p o rt dates.
May 8 .
1929
L o an s:
$150,248
On Securities
363,239
All Other
513,487
Total Loans
64,939
U. S. Securities
70,249
Other Stocks and B o n d s ----------------Total Loans and Investments. 648,675
228,595
Time Deposits
327,888
Demand Deposits -----------------49,522
Borrowings from F . R. B a n k -

O perations of th e
F ed eral R eserve B ank

A pril 10,
1929
$149,187
361,375
510,562
65,480
70,524
646,566
228,663
341,705
38,360

May 9,
1928
$133,094
370,979
504,073
61,360
64,721
630,154
243,025
336,406
30,896

F ig u re s contained in th e weekly sta te m en ts of th e F ed era1
R eserve B ank of A tla n ta ind:
cate th a t discounts fo r m em ber banks declined from 60.'<
m illions on Ja n u a ry 23 to th e low point so f a r th is y ear,
a t 48.6 m illions, on M arch 20, and since th en have in creas­
ed to 76.5 m illions on M ay 1, declining th e follow ing w eek
to 74.5 m illions. Bills discounted fo r m em ber banks based
on governm ent securities have averaged low er in volume
during m ost of M arch and A pril th a n d u rin g Ja n u a ry and
F eb ru ary , and th e p rin cip al increase h as been in O ther
Bills D iscounted, fo r com m ercial, ag ric u ltu ral and indus-

M O N THLY R E V IE W
tr ia l purposes. H oldings of bills bought in the open
m a rk e t have decreased nearly th ree-fo u rth s since the
first of th e year, and holdings of U nited S tate s securities
have also declined. T otal bills and securities held by th e
F ed eral Reserve B ank w ere g re a te r on M ay 1 th a n on any
o th er re p o rt date since th e la s t of Ja n u a ry , and declined
less th a n tw o m illions during th e w eek ending May 8.
Com pared w ith figures fo r th e corresponding re p o rt date
of la s t y ear, discounts secured by governm ent obligations
show a sm all decrease, b u t O ther bills discounted are a l­
m ost tw ice as la rg e a s a t th a t tim e. T otal discounts on
M ay 8 am ounted to $ 74 ,5 31 ,00 0, com pared w ith $57,536,0 0 0 fo u r w eeks earlier, and w ith $ 48 ,7 85 ,00 0 on th e sam e
re p o rt d ate la s t year. H oldings of bills bought in th e
open m arket, and of U nited S tate s securities, a re also
m a teria lly sm aller th a n a y ea r ago. Cash reserves de­
clined $ 1 7 ,6 7 1 ,0 0 0 d uring th e fo u r weeks period betw een
A p ril 10 and M ay 8, and w ere $ 2 1 ,8 52 ,00 0 sm aller th a n a
y ea r ago. D ecreases com pared w ith both of these com­
p ara tiv e dates a re shown in to ta l deposits, and in F ederal
R eserve N otes in ac tu a l circulation. P rincipal item s in
th e w eekly sta te m en t of th e F ed eral Reserve B ank fo r th e
th re e re p o rt d ates under com parison, are shown in th e
table.
(000 Omitted)
May 8 ,
Bills Discounted:
1929
Securities by Govt. Obligations----- $ 17,486
57,045
All Others
74,531
T otal Discounts
7,995
Bills Bought in open m a rk e t3,148
U. S. Securities
248
Foreign loans on Gold
85,922
T otal Bills and Securities^
118,908
Cash Reserves
67,061
T otal Deposits
132,693
F. R. Notes in actual circulation..
59.5
Reserve R a t i o ----------------------------

A pril 10,
1929
$ 14,166
43,370
57,536
10,600
4,000

May 9,
1928
$ 18,884
29,900
48,785
22,185
6,463

72,136
136,579
67,158
134,610
67.7

77,432
140,760
71,221
142,535
65.9

Gold
M ovement

Im ports of gold into th e U nited S tates continued in A pril m uch la rg e r th a n exports,
and fo r th e first fo u r m onths of th is y ear
im ports have exceeded exports by m ore th a n 120 millions
of dollars. D uring th e sam e period la st y ea r exports of
gold w ere n ea rly 211 m illions g re a te r th a n im ports. A pril
ex p o rts am ounted to $1,594,000, com pared w ith $1,635,000
in M arch, and w ith $96,469,000 in A pril 1928, and im ­
p o rts of gold in A pril am ounted to $24,687,000 com pared
w ith $25,470,000 in M arch, and w ith $5,319,000 in A pril
la st y ear.
Com m ercial
F ailu re s

A ccording to sta tistics compiled by R. G.
D un & Com pany, com m ercial failu res d u r­
ing A pril in th e U nited S tate s increased
in num ber, com pared w ith th e preceding m onth and w ith
th e corresponding m onth la s t y ear, b u t w ere som ew hat
less th a n fo r eith er of these m onths in to ta l liabilities of
failin g firm s. F ig u re s fo r th e six th d istric t indicate few er
failu re s in A pril th a n in M arch, or in A pril 1928, and
liabilities of firm s w hich failed in A pril w ere 30 per cent
less th a n fo r M arch, and 39 p er cent less th a n fo r A pril
la s t y ear. F ig u re s in th e tab le show failu res in th e
U nited S tate s divided by F ed eral Reserve D istricts.
N um ber
Liabilities
D istrict
A pril 1929 A pril 1929
Boston __________ ___ 223
$ 3,904,184
New Y o r k _______ ___ 328
8,846,562
P h ila d e lp h ia _____
90
2,015,410
C le v e la n d ________ ___ 158
2,539,185
R i c h m o n d _________ _132
2,573,495
A t l a n t a _________
94
2,075,964
4,983,924
C h i c a g o _________ ___ 295
St. L o u i s ________ ___ 126
1,992,932
M in n e a p o lis _____
81
717,778
Kansas C i t y _____ ___ 128
1,271,800
Dallas __________ ___ 51
515,003
San Francisco ___ ___ 315
3,833,465
2,021
$35,269,702
T o t a l __- I

Liabilities
Mch. 1929
$ 3,017,038
7,226,081
1,583,521
4,141,234
2,167,780
2,983,415
6,329,441
1,987,665
540,973
1,706,639
559,130
4,112,774
$36,355,691

Liabilities
A pril 1928
$ 2,384,602
6,436,423
2,005,049
7,055,083
2,316,842
3,407,316
5,531,131
1,208,376
1,283,614
4,427,764
$37,985,145

IM PORTS AND EXPORTS
P relim in ary figures fo r A pril, compiled
by th e U nited S tate s D epartm ent of
Commerce indicate th a t exports during A pril declined,
b u t im ports increased, com pared w ith M arch, and both
im ports and exports w ere g re a te r th a n fo r A pril la st
year. A pril exports w ere 12.8 p er cent less th a n fo r M arch,
and 17.3 p e r cent g re a te r th a n in A pril 1 928, and im ports
increased 6 .6 p er cent over M arch and w ere 18.4 p er cent
U nited S tate s




5

g re a te r th a n in A pril la st year. P relim inary figures fo r
A pril, w ith com parisons, are shown in th e table.
E xports
1929
A pril -------------------------------------------------$ 427,000,000
March ----------------------------------------------- 489,891,000
1 0 months ending w ith A p r i l _________ 4,597,026 000
Im ports
A pril
____________________
~$ 409,000,000
M arch _____ ___________________
383,804,000
10 months ending w ith A p r i l ___
~ 3,536,667,000

1928
$ 363,928,000
420,617,000
4,065,853,000
$ 345,314,000
880,437,000
3,476,270,000

New O rleans
M erchandise w as im ported into th e
_ .
.
U nited S tate s th ro u g h th e p o rt of New
O rleans du rin g F eb ru ary , th e la te s t m onth fo r w hich de­
tailed figures a re available, to th e value o f $ 21 ,7 3 0 ,2 4 6
com pared w ith $18 ,7 37 ,24 3 in ja n u ary , and w ith $20,576,2 59 m F e b ru a ry la s t y ear.
M erchandise ex p o rts th ro u g h the p o rt o f N ew O rleans
F eb ru ary to taled $ 32 ,3 83 ,32 5, com pared w ith $43,374 ,1 43 m Ja n u a ry , and w ith $28,0 63 ,29 0 in F e b ru a ry of
1 928.
G rain E x p o rts—New O rleans
G rain w as exported th ro u g h th e p o rt of N ew O rleans
d u rin g A p ril to th e am ount of 959 ,9 83 bushels an increase of 2 6 9 ,7 1 5 bushels over th e sam e period a y ea r
ago, due to th e increases in w heat, corn, oats an d b arley
exports. F ig u re s fo r th e m onth and fo r th e season to
d ate a re given in th e table.
W heat, bu. _
Corn, bu. _
Oats, b u . _
Barley, bu.
Rye, bu.
Total, bu.

~

A pril 1929
304,124
567,393
70,806
17,660
959 983

A pril 1928
132,801
253,074
68,679
235,714
690,268

Season Ju ly
1929
5,335,696
11,345,529
554,912
3,842,139
256,031
21,334,307

1

to A pril 80,
1928
7,992,534
3,419,246
784,889
931,602
13,128,271

BU ILDIN G
The volume of prospective building a t tw en ty rep o rtin g
cities of th e six th d istric t as reflected in p erm its issued
fo r the^ construction of buildings w ith in th e ir corporate
lim its, increased 3.9 p er cent in A p ril as com pared w ith
M arch, and w as only eig h t-ten th s o f one p er cen t less th a n
fo r A pril of la st y ear. Seven of th ese tw en ty rep o rtin g
cities showed increases over A p ril 1928, and th irte e n re ­
ported decreases. The index num ber fo r A p ril, based
upon th e m onthly av erag e fo r th e th ree-y ear period 19232 5, w as 73.4, com pared w ith 7 0.7 fo r M arch, and w ith 7 4.0
fo r A pril 1 928. Index num bers fo r F ed eral R eserve B ank
and B ranch cities a re shown on th e la st page o f th is Re­
view.
The to ta l value of co n tracts aw arded fo r building an d
construction w ork in th e 3 7 sta te s e a st of th e Rocky
M ountains, according to sta tistic s compiled by th e F . W .
Dodge C orporation, am ounted in A pril to $64 2,06 0,5 00 , an
increase of 32.4 p er cent over th e preceding m onth, an d
ab o u t equal to th e to ta l fo r A p ril la s t y ea r $ 6 4 2,23 7,1 00
The A pril to ta l th is y ea r is la rg e r th a n fo r th a t m onth
of any other* y ea r except 1928, and is th e la rg e s t m onthly
to ta l recorded since Ju n e 1928. In A p ril 4 0 p e r cent of all
construction, or $ 25 6,77 9,7 00 , w as fo r resid en tial build­
ings; 2 4 p er cent, or $ 1 5 2 ,12 6,9 00 , fo r public w orks and
utilities; 12 p er cent, or $77 ,9 88 ,40 0, fo r com m ercial build­
ings, and 11 p er cent, or $ 68 ,2 29 ,50 0, fo r in d u stria l p ro ­
jects. The to ta l fo r th e firs t fo u r m onths of 1929, is $1,897 ,8 89 ,80 0, a decrease of 11 p er cent com pared w ith th e
corresponding period of la s t y ear.
C ontract aw ards in th e six th d istric t d u rin g A p ril
am ounted to $ 37 ,3 87 ,26 3, an increase of 47.2 p e r cent over
the to ta l fo r M arch, and g re a te r by 5 3.4 p er cent th a n fo r
A pril 1928. The to ta l fo r A p ril th is y ea r is la rg e r th a n
fo r any m onth since N ovem ber 1927.
In th e table a re shown sta tistics of building p erm its is­
sued a t rep o rtin g cities of th e six th d istrict, and com par­
ative figures fo r th e sam e m onth la s t y ear.
Alabama
A nniston __
Birm ingham
Mobile ____
Montgomery
Florida
Jacksonville

A pril 1929
Num ber
Value
29 $ 43,350
394
3,306,416
130,932
121
292,447
226
375

461,355

A pril 1928
Num ber V alue
16 $ 20,350
574
1,919,265
89
160,006
149
141,796
409

924,990

Percentage
change in
Value
+ H 3 .0
+ 72.3
— 18.2
+106.2
— 50.1

M O N THLY R E V IE W

6

M ia m i--------284
303,906
279
O r l a n d o -----72
25,820
119
134
P e n s a c o l a __
74,489
65
Tam pa ____
286
204,188
332
♦Lakeland ___
13
3,575
7
♦Miami Beach
53
475,280
46
Georgia
A tlan ta
317
1,097,148
A ugusta ___
167
90,183
184
Columbus __
37
95,800
54
M a c o n _____
137
67,403
107
24
Savannah __
76,625
30
Louisiana
New O rleans
191
495,309
215
A lexandria —
69,715
66
Tennessee
Chattanooga .. - 329
304,954
249
Johnson City 23
48,550
25
Knoxville __ . 189
522,246
253
„ 318
Nashville
552,275
258
Total 2 0 Cities
. 3,746
8,263,111 3,869
Index N o . -----73.4
♦Not included in totals or index numbers.

346,332
85,005
141,262
292,496
1,175
399,125
1,022,797
66,950
152,665
43,760
144,200
689,189
50,855
453,931
69,325
569,074
1,035,882
8,329,130
74.0

—• 12.3
— 69.6
— 47.3
— 30.2
+204.3
+ 19.1
+
+
—
+
—

7.3
34.7
37.2
54.0
46.9

— 28.1
+ 37.1
— 32.8
— 30.0

— 8.2
— 46.7

— 0.6

LUM BER
M anufacturing conditions in th e lum ber in d u stry w ere
m ore favorable in A pril th a n in M arch, and p relim in ary
figures fo r A pril received up to th e middle of M ay from
100 rep o rtin g m ills indicate th a t th e volume of orders
booked during A pril averaged seven-tenths of one p er
cent less th a n th e ir production. In M arch, w hen opera
tions w ere seriously in te rru p te d by excessive rain s, orders
exceeded o u tp u t by 13.3 p e r cent, and in A pril la s t y ear
orders w ere 10.6 p er cent g re a te r th a n production. Ship­
m ents in A pril by rep o rtin g m ills averaged 5.8 p er cent
g re a te r th a n orders booked during the m onth, and 5 p er
cen t g re a te r th a n th e ir production. O utput in A pril av er­
aged 3.4 p er cent below th e th ree -y e ar average production
fo r th ese mills; in M arch production w as 9.3 p er cent, and
in A p ril la s t y ea r 4.8 per cent, below th e th ree -y e ar a v e r­
age. Stocks on hand a t th e end of A pril averaged 8.9 p er
cent sm aller th a n th e th ree-y ear relativ e stocks of these
rep o rtin g m ills. Unfilled orders on hand a t th e end of
A p ril am ounted to 88.9 p er cent of a m onth’s production a t
th e r a te w hich prevailed in A pril. P relim in ary figures fo r
A p ril, w ith com parisons, are shown in the able.
(feet)
Orders ________
Shipm ents -----------------------Production -----------------------3-Year Average Production
Stocks, end of m onth ------3-Year Relative Stocks
Unfilled orders, end of m onth

A pril 1929
1 0 0 mills
239,409,819
253,178,033
241,187,077
249,565,833
582,168,511
639,038,272
214,470,380

Mch. 1929
104 mills
270,424,831
247,809,492
238,637,908
263,203,059
620,248,106
673,957,753
236,932,470

A pril 1928
113 mills
310,628,650
299,445,790
280,953,818
295,025,989
757,815,226
742,668,922
277,086,420

T E X T IL E S
C otton
S tatistic s compiled and published by th e
Consum ption U nited S tates Census B ureau indicate th a t
th e consum ption of cotton in th e U nited
S tate s during A pril am ounted to 631 ,7 10 bales, a decrease
of tw o-tenths of one per cent com pared w ith th e preced­
in g m onth, and 2 0.4 p er cent g re a te r th a n consum ption
d u rin g A pril of la st year. Stocks of cotton in consum ing
establishm ents declined som ew hat com pared w ith those a t
th e end of M arch, b u t w ere la rg e r th a n a y ea r ago, w hile
stocks in public sto rag e and a t com presses w ere sm aller
th a n fo r eith er of those com parative periods. E x p o rts of
cotton during A pril w ere 18.6 p er cent less th a n in M arch,
and 2.9 p er cent sm aller th a n in A pril a y ea r ago. The
num ber of spindles active during A pril decreased by 179,8 1 2 as com pared w ith M arch, and w as sm aller by 2 6,15 6
th a n th e num ber active in A pril 1928.
U nited States (Bales)
Cotton Consumed:
A pril 1929
Mch. 1929
L i n t ______________________ 631,710
632,808
79,008
76,746
L in ters ___________________
Stocks in Consm. E sta b .:
L in t ______________________ 1,606,832
1,730,944
L in ters ___________________
233,189
228,544
Stocks in Public Storage and
a t Compresses:
L in t _____________________
2,523,574
3,177,147
L i n t e r s _________________ _
81,333
81,308
Exports
____________________
453,591
556,986
Im ports
"
__________________
84,621
37,124
Active Spindles ______________ 30,924,184
31,103,996




A pril 1928
524,765
59,930
1,507,599
223,252
2,919,278
61,897
467,318
18,149
30,950,340

Cotton Growing S tates (Bales)
A pril 1929
March 1929
Cotton
----- -------------------------477,866
- - - - - Consumed
480,517
Stocks m Con. E stab...................... 1,146 004
1,257,828
Stocks in Public Storage and
a t Compresses --------------------- 2,239,899
2,914,759
Active Spindles ______________ 17,941,948
18,097,420

A pril 1928
396,566
1,018,738
2,668,657
17,822,160

Cotton Cloth
R eports fo r A p ril w ere rendered to th e
.
F ed eral Reserve B ank of A tla n ta by cot­
ton m ills m th e six th d istric t which, d u ring th a t m onth,
m an u factu red 2 8,7 3 9 ,0 0 0 y ard s of cotton cloth, an o u tp u t
1.2 p er cent la rg e r th a n fo r M arch, and 20.9 p er cent
g re a te r th a n in A p ril la st y ear. O rders declined sh arp ly ,
however, com pared w ith M arch, and w ere in sm aller vol^
um e th a n in A pril 1928. Shipm ents w ere sm aller th a n
in M arch, and unfilled orders on hand a t th e end of A p ril
w ere also sm aller th a n a m onth ea rlier, b u t both ship­
m ents and unfilled orders w ere g re a te r th a n a t th e sam e
tim e a y ea r ago. Stocks on hand increased over those fo r
M arch, b u t w ere n early one-third sm aller th a n a y ea r ago,
and th e num ber of w orkers on pay ro lls w as 8 p e r cent
g e a te r th a n fo r A pil 1 928. P ercen tag e com parisons of r e ­
ported figures are shown in th e table.
Production ________
Shipm ents ________
Orders booked _____
Unfilled orders ___
Stocks on hand ___
Num ber on payroll

---------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
+ 1.2
+ 20.9
— 1.8
+ 13.3
—46.4
—23.5
—13.7
+20.6
+ 4.6
—33.0
+ 1.4
+ 8.0

Cotton Y arn

R eports w ere also received fo r A pril
from m ills w hich produced 7,3 09 ,0 0 0
pounds of y arn , an o u tp u t 5.3 p er cen t g re a te r th a n in
M arch, and 19.5 p er cent g re a te r th a n in A p ril la s t y ear.
Shipm ents, and num ber of w orkers, also increased over
both of th ese com parative periods. O rders booked du rin g
A pril declined, and unfilled orders on hand a t th e end of
A pril decreased, com pared w ith M arch, b u t both item s
w ere g re a te r th a n fo r A pril 1928. Stocks on hand a t th e
end of A pril w ere sm aller th a n a m onth or a y ea r ago.
Production ________
S h i p m e n t s ________
Orders b o o k e d ____
Unfilled orders __
Stocks on hand ___
Num ber on payroll

A pril 1929 compared w ith :
Mch. 1929
A pril 1928
+ 5.3
+19.5
+ 4.4
+27.8
—10.1
+40.5
— 8.9
+39.2
— 2.5
—12.8
+ 2.9
+15.2

H osiery

P roduction of hosiery by 36 establishm ents
rep o rtin g to th e U nited S tate s Census Bu­
rea u showed an increase of 3.2 p er cent in A p ril over
M arch. O rders booked d u rin g th e m onth increased 6.3 p er
cent over M arch, and shipm ents declined slig h tly , and u n ­
filled orders on hand a t th e end of A p ril w ere 7.8 per cent
g re a te r th a n a m onth earlier. Stocks on hand decreased
2.5 p er cent.
Production ____
Shipm ents _____
Stocks on hand
Orders booked
Cancellations __
Unfilled orders .

(Dozen pairs)
A pril 1929
Mch. 1929
784,033
759,931
805,946
812,517
1,738,469
1,783,156
899,276
845,672
36,550
47,274
903,500

COTTON SEED AND COTTON SEED PRODUCTS
(1) Sixth D istrict
U nited States
Aug. 1 to A pr. 30
Aug. 1 to A pr. 30
1929
1928
1929
1928
Cotton Seed, Tons
Received a t m i l l s ____ 1,485,275
1,424,157
4,535,151
5,004,626
Crushed ------------------- 1,403,922
1,402,398
4,831,611
4,516,591
On H a n d .................
86,056
48,223
191,048
107,844
P roduction:
Crude Oil, lbs.
.. 465,368,952 458,913,841 1,523,553,552 1,427 788 664
610,989
2,176,222
Cake and Meal, tons_
608,370
2,028,916
Hulls, tons
404,976
385,398
1,307,549
1,279,663
L inters, bales
__
304,169
253,059
1,030,890
846,844
S tocks:
(2 )
(2 )
17,579,216
57,209,133
65,492,218
Crude Oil, lbs............... 12,374,633
75,840
23,811
225,362
84,515
Cake and Meal, to n s_
16,790
26,148
123,543
85,793
Hulls, tons
............
27,345
46,344
167,263
111,253
L inters, bales ---------(1) Georgia, Alabam a, Louisiana and Mississippi.
(2) N ot including stocks held by refining and m anufacturing estab­
lishm ents, and in tra n s it to refiners and consumers.

M ONTHLY R EV IEW
COAL
P relim in ary figures compiled by the U nited S tates Bu­
reau of Mines indicate the production in A pril of 36,888,000 tons of bitum inous coal. This rep resen ts a decrease
of 6.2 p er cent in production com pared w ith M arch, but
w as 14.6 p er cent g re a te r th a n the output in A pril of la st
year. In A pril th e re w ere 25.6 w orking days, com pared
w ith 2 6 in M arch, and w ith 24.7 in A pril 1928. The av e r­
age daily output p er w orking day in A pril w as 1,441,000
tons, sm aller by 4.8 p er cent th a n th e daily average of
1.513 .0 0 0 fo r M arch, bu t 10.6 per cent g re a te r th a n the
average of 1 ,303,000 tons fo r A pril la s t year. W eekly
production figures since the beginning of th e new coal
y ea r A pril 1 also show increases over figures fo r corre­
sponding weeks of la st year, as shown in the table below.
W eekly figures fo r A labam a average som ew hat g re a te r
th a n a y ear ago, bu t production w as sm aller in Tennessee.
The to ta l production of bitum inous coal during the presen t
calendar y ear up to May 4 (approxim ately 106 w orking
day s) am ounted to 1 80,511,000 net tons, com pared w ith
1 66.570.000 tons produced in th e sam e period of 1928.

Week E nded:
A pril 6
A pril 13
April 20
A pril 27
May
4

(000 Omitted)
United States
1929
1928
... ....... .... .
_____ ...........
_____ _____
_____ ............
........... ...........

7,641
8,247
8,651
9,118
8,781

7,158
7,415
7,917
8,191
8.174

Alabama
1929
1928
325
321
335
335
335

325
329
333
320
338

Tennessee
1929
1928
100
96
98
95
90

107
109
108
110
106

IRON
S tatistics compiled and published by the Iron A ge indi­
cate th a t the production of pig iron during A pril th is
y ear w as g re a te r th a n fo r th a t m onth of any other year,
and th a t the daily average r a te of production in A pril
w as th e th ird highest fo r any m onth, having been exceed­
ed only by May and Ju n e of 1923. F urnace activ ity in ­
creased in the U nited S tates as a whole, bu t th e re w as
no change in the num ber of furnaces active in A labam a,
w here production declined, both in to ta l am ount and in
daily average output, com pared w ith M arch, b u t w as m a­
te rially g re a te r th a n a y ea r ago.
T otal production of pig iron in th e U nited S tates d u r­
ing A pril am ounted to 3,662,625 tons, sm aller by 1.4 p er
cent th a n fo r th e longer m onth of M arch, but 15 per cent
g re a te r th a n fo r A pril 1928. The daily average increased
1.9 p er cent com pared w ith th e average fo r M arch. On
M ay 1 st th e re w ere 2 15 furnaces active, an increase of
th ree fo r th e m onth, and an increase of ten over th e num ­
ber active on May 1 st a y ea r ago. F o r th e first four
m onths of th is y ear the to ta l outp u t of 1 4,025,653 tons
establishes a new record fo r th a t period.
S tatistics fo r A labam a indicate th e production of 235,
787 tons during A pril, a decrease of 5.3 per cent com pared
w ith M arch, b u t 18.2 per cent g re a te r th a n the output in
A pril 1928. The daily average ra te fo r A pril declined 2.2
p er cent com pared w ith M arch. The num ber of furnaces
active did not change, 17 Leing active a t th e beginning
and a t the end of th e m onth, com pared w ith 16 active
a t the sam e tim e a y ea r ago. P ress rep o rts indicate th a t
consum ers are covering only th e ir nearby requirem ents
and shipm ents are steady, bu t show no increase. Some
furnaces are not shipping all th e iron made. A sm all
am ount of iron has been sold a t $15.00 fo r shipm ent out­
side th e B irm ingham d istrict, b u t m erchant producers are
still quoting $15.50 base on much of th e business o rig in at­
ing in the d istrict.
Production figures are shown in ta b u ­
la r form fo r convenience of com parison.




7

U nited S tates:
A pril 1929
Production __________________ 3,662,625
Index N um ber _____________
123*1
Average per day ___________
122,087
♦Active furnaces _____________
215
A labam a:
Production ------------------------------ 235,787
Index N um ber ______________
101.5
Average per day ___________
7,860
♦Active furnaces _____________
17

Mch. 1929 A pril 1928
3,714,473
3,185,504
124.3
106.6
119,822
106,183
212
195
249,079
107.3
8,036
17

199,487
85.9
6,650
16

♦First of following month.

NAVAL STORES
Receipts of both tu rp en tin e and rosin a t th e th ree p rin ­
cipal naval sto res m ark ets of the d istrict increased season­
ally in A pril as com pared w ith preceding m onths, and
w ere g re a te r th a n in th e sam e m onth la st y ear. Stocks
of both commodities w ere som ew hat g re a te r th a n fo r
M arch, and stocks of tu rp en tin e w ere g re a te r th a n a t th e
sam e tim e la st year, b u t supplies of rosin w ere sm aller
th a n a y ea r ago. F ig u re s over a period of y ears indicate
th a t A pril receipts of both tu rp en tin e and rosin w ere
g re a te r th a n fo r A pril of any of th e p a st tw elve years.
Stocks of tu rp en tin e a t th e end of A pril w ere la rg e r th a n
a t the sam e tim e of any y ear since 1919, and stocks of
rosin, while la rg e r th a n fo r A pril of 1920, 1926 and 1927,
w ere sm aller th a n fo r A p ril of other recen t years. P ress
rep o rts indicate th a t th e dem and fo r both commodities has
been fa irly good, from both domestic and foreign sources.
The price of tu rp en tin e has ranged betw een 48 and 4 9 ^
cents, betw een th e middle of A pril and th e early p a r t of
May, and prices fo r th e different grades of rosin have not
fluctuated g rea tly . Receipts and stocks, w ith com pari­
sons, are shown in th e table.
Mch. 1929 Apr. 1928
9,125
3,477
8,463
4,423
3,177
570

Receipts—T u rp en tin e:
Savannah ____ ________ ................
Jacksonville ------------- ________
Pensacola ---------------- ...............

Apr. 1929
15,415
12,028
4,169

Total ............... ........________
Receipts—R osin:
Savannah ------------------ .................
Jacksonville .................
Pensacola ---------------- ________

31,610

8,470

20,765

49,932
38,691
11,831

14,031
20,115
3,587

29,260
32,442
6,060

Total ____________________
Stocks—T u rp en tin e:
Savannah ___________ ________
Jacksonville ------------- ________
Pensacola ---------------- ________

100,454

37,733

67,762

12,685
18,745
21,257

8,280
18,145
21,971

10,303
19,656
15,499

Total .......... .............
Stocks—R osin:
Savannah __________ ________
Jacksonville ________ ________
Pensacola __________ ________

52,687

48,396

45,45f

64,559
33,666
1 0 ,1 1 0

54,752
36,946
9,024

65,433
68,455
6,917

108,335

100,722

140,805

Total ____ ______

(C ontinued from P age 1 )
relativ ely high level. There w as a fu rth e r reduction^ in
th e average volume of reserve bank credit outstanding
betw een th e weeks ending A pril 2 4, and M ay 22, owing
larg ely to additions in the co untry’s m o netary stock of
gold. The decline w as in discounts fo r m em ber banks;
holdings of acceptances and of U nited S tates securities
showed p ractically no change.
O pen-m arket ra te s fo r com mercial paper rem ained u n ­
changed as did ra te s on prim e b ankers’ acceptances, ex ­
cept fo r a tem p o rary decline a t th e end of A pril and th e
first week in May. In the first th ree weeks of M ay ra te s
on collateral loans averaged considerably higher th a n in
A pril.

M ONTHLY R E V IE W
MONTHLY IN D E X N U M BERS
The follow ing index num bers, except as indicated otherw ise, are com puted by th e F ed eral Reserve B ank
of A tla n ta m onthly. The index num bers of re ta il and w holesale trad e are based upon sales figures rep o rted con­
fidentially by represen tativ e firm s in the lines of trad e indicated, and th e other series of index num bers are based
upon figures reported to the bank or curren tly available th ro u g h the daily or tra d e p ress. These index num bers,
except as indicated in th e foot-notes, are based upon th e m onthly averages fo r the th ree y ea r period 1 923-25 as
rep resented by 100.
F eb ru ary
1929

M arch
1929

A pril
1929

F eb ru ary
1928

M arch
1928

A pril
1928

112.8
9 7.4
60.6
82.0
79.7
87.5
87.0

153.8
119.5
90.9
1 16.6
97.4
113.4
113.0

146.1
99.1
82.8
103.9
9 4.8
99.6
105.0

109.0
1 00.4
67.5
88.8
88/.
93.4
91.0

152.4
115.7
82.5
106.0
100.9
109.7
110.0

131.8
102.5
84.8
94.2
95.2
104.6
1 02.0

84.7

1 09.5

104.0

86.0

103.0

101.9

229.2
122.0
169.8
88.3
146.9
111.6

234.6
156.3
196.3
158.5
2 40.7
152.3

2 32.0
142.0
186.0
123.0
220.0
121.0

193.0
115.0
148.0
86.0
137.0
106.0

2 27.0
133.0
163.0
117.0
2 00.0
119.0

202.2
134.6
154.5
130.0
194.6
130.0

84.0
68.9
77.5
87.4
81.3
75.5
74.8
89.6
80.0

89.9
89.4
86.5
98.9
81.7
102.7
68.3
100.3
89.1

87.8
83.6
90.9
98.0
9 5.4
101.4
74.3
108.1
89.9

85.8
80.0
81.8
95.1 '
73.2
85.8
90.7
100.1
84.2

91.8
96.5
88.7
102.5
75.1
112.1
76.3
113.3
9 2.2

80.6
76.9
81.1
93.9
78.2
92.3
71.5
95.9
81.7

W H O LESA LE P R IC E S U . S. ( 2 )
F arm products________________
Foods _________________________
Hides and le ath e r products..
T extile products __________
Fuel and lighting..
M etals and M etal products..
B uilding m a te r ia ls .
Chemicals and d ru g s__
H ousefurnishing goods.,
M iscellaneous ________
A LL COMMODITIES..

105.4
98.1
109.0
96.1
81.3
104.4
97.5
96.1
96.6
80.4
96.7

107.1
98.1
108.3
96.1
80.6
106.4
98.8
95.6
96.5
80.C
97.5

104.9
97.7
107.9
95.5
8 0.6
106.4
97.9
94.9
9 6.7
79.2
96.8

104.5
98.7
124.1
96.6
81.2
98.3
91.0
95.8
98.4
87.3
96.4

1 03.5
98.0
124.0
96.5
80.8
98.4
91.0
95.6
98.3
86.8
96.0

107.6
99.5
126.7
96.5
80.8
9 8.4
9 2.5
95.8
97.9
84.9
97.4

BU ILDIN G PER M ITS 6 th D ISTRICT
A t l a n t a ____________________________
B irm in g h a m _______________________
Jacksonville _______________________
N a sh v ille ___________________________
N ew O r l e a n s ____________________ __
O ther C ities________________________
D ISTRICT (2 0 C itie s).

56.9
44.5
50.7
121.5
181.9
33.0
61.1

114.6
50.4
51.0
80.3
154.6
46.0
70.7

70.9
223.0
56.1
87.1
38.5
42.9
73.4

72.3
149.4
106.8
45.7
86.6
41.0
70.3

116 .6
121.7
92.2
111.8
47.3
74.8
87.2

66.1
129 .4
112 .4
163 .3
53.5
50.0
74.0

63.7

72.4

1 06.7

63.5

85.0

69.4

117.7
130.2
90.1
99.8

124.5
137.5
95.8
90.4

124.3
136.8
96.8
73.8

112.9
123.0
90.7
103.3

1 14 .4
123 .5
94.3
100.0

103.3
1 13.5
80.9
78.9

107.3
90.9

124.3
107.3

123.1
101.5

97.1
89.2

107.1
96.2

1 06.6
85.9

86.8

92.4

92.7

92.1

90.8

81.1

R E T A IL TRA D E 6 th D ISTRICT
(D ep a rtm en t S to re s.)
A tlanta..
Birm ingham _
Chattanooga „
N ashville ___
New O rleans..
O ther Cities.—
DISTRICT
R E T A IL TRA D E U . S. ( 1 )
D ep artm en t S to res__
Chain S tores:
G rocery _________
5 & 10 Cent______
D r u g ____________
S h o e _____________
W earing A pparelCandy _
W H O LESA LE TRA D E 6 th D ISTRICT
G roceries __________________________
D ry Goods__________________________
H a r d w a r e __________________________
F u rn itu re __________________________
E lectrical Supplies..
Shoes
S tatio n ery
D rugs ___
TOTAL __

CONTRACTS AW ARDED 6 th D ISTRICT
COTTON CONSUM ED:
U nited S ta te s_________________________
Cotton-G row ing S tates
A ll O ther S ta te s______
E x p o r ts _________________
PIG IRON PRO DU CTIO N :
U nited S ta te s___________
A la b a m a _______________
U N FIL L E D ORDERS— U. S. S TEE L
CORPO RA TIO N ___________________

(1 ) Compiled by F ederal Reserve Board.
( 2 ) Compiled by th e B ureau of L abor S ta tistic s.




Base 1926— 100.