View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M

O

N

T H

L Y

R E V I E W

O f Financial, A gricultural, T ra d e and Industrial
C onditions in the S ixth Federal Reserve D istrict

FED ER A L RESERVE B A N K O F A T L A N T A
Vol. 22 No. 3

ATLANTA, GA., MARCH 81, 1937

N ATIO N AL SUMMARY OF BUSINESS
CONDITIONS
Prepared by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
V o lu m e o f p roduction , em p loym en t, and trade in creased
m ore than se a so n a lly in F eb ru ary and w h o le sa le p rices o f
in d u strial com m od ities con tin u ed to advance.

Production
and
Employment

T he B oard ’s in d ex o f in d u stria l production , w h ich m akes a llo w a n c e fo r ch an ges
in th e num ber o f w ork in g d ays and fo r
u su al sea so n a l varia tio n s, w as 1 1 6 per
cent o f the 1 9 2 3 -1 9 2 5 average in F eb ru ary as com pared
w ith 114 in Janu ary and an average o f 115 in the last
quarter o f 1936. A t steel m ills a ctiv ity co n tin u ed to in ­
crease in F ebruary and the first three w eeks o f M arch and,
alth ou gh the grow th w as som ew hat less than sea so n a l, ou t­
put cu rren tly is at about th e p eak le v e l reached in the
sum m er o f 19 2 9 . A u to m o b ile p rod u ction , w h ile fluctuating
co n sid era b ly w ith strikes at im p ortan t p la n ts, h a s been
larger fo r the year to date than in the co rresp o n d in g period
last year. O utput o f p la te g la ss in F ebruary show ed a
sharp rise from the lo w lev e l o f the tw o p reced in g m onths
w hen strikes cu rtailed prod u ction . A t te x tile m ills and sh oe
factories a ctivity con tin u ed at a h ig h le v e l, w h ile output
at m eat-packing establish m en ts d eclin ed som ew h at further.
M in eral p rod uction increased , reflecting ch iefly greater ou t­
put o f coal and a further rise in crude p etroleu m p rod u c­
tion.
V alu e o f constru ction contracts aw arded th is year, accord ­
in g to the F. W . D o d g e C orporation, has been co n sid era b ly
larger than a year ago, reflecting an in creased v o lu m e o f
p rivate resid en tial b u ild in g and other typ es o f private co n ­

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION

In d e x o f p h y s ic a l v o lu m e o f p ro d u c tio n , a d ju ste d f o r se a s o n a l v a r ia t io n .
m o n th s, J a n u a r y , 1929, to F e b r u a r y , 1937.

1923-1925
a v e ra g e = 100. B y



™

struction, w h ile the vo lu m e o f p u b licly -fin a n ced w ork h as
been sm a ller.
F actory em p loy m en t and p a y r o lls in creased from the
m id d le o f January to th e m id d le o f F eb ru ary b y m ore than
the u su al season al am ount. T h e num ber em p lo y ed in the
m achinery in d u stries in creased co n sid era b ly and there w ere
sm a ller in creases at a u to m o b ile and p la te g la ss factories.
In the n on d u rab le g ood s ind u stries as a group there w as
a season al rise in em p loym en t.

Distribution

D ep artm en t store sa les in creased from
January to F ebruary and the B oard’s sea ­
so n a lly adjusted in d ex advanced from 9 3 to 9 5 p er cent o f
the 1 9 2 3 -1 9 2 5 average. S a les at variety stores also in ­
creased m ore than sea so n a lly , w h ile m a il order sa les, la r g e ­
ly in rural areas, sh ow ed less ex p a n sio n than is u su al at
this tim e o f year. T o ta l freigh t-car lo a d in g s in creased in
February and th e first h a lf o f M arch, o w in g in part to sea ­
son al influences.

Commodity
Prices

T h e g en eral le v e l o f w h o le sa le com m od ity
p rices advanced fro m the m id d le o f F ebru­
ary to the third w eek o f M arch, reflecting
p r in cip a lly fu rther su b stan tial increases in the p rices o f
in d u strial materials.^ P rices o f iron and steel, non-ferrou s
m etals, lu m b er, cotton, rubber, and h id es advanced co n sid ­
e ra b ly and there w ere a lso in creases in the p rices o f cotton
g o o d s, p aper, and fu rn itu re. W heat p rices advanced in re­
cent w eeks fo llo w in g a d eclin e in the latter part o f F eb ­
ruary.

Bank
Credit

On M arch 1, w hen the first h a lf o f th e recent
in crease in reserve requirem ents w ent in to effect,
ex cess reserves o f m em ber banks d eclin ed from
$ 2 ,1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 to about $ 1 ,3 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 . In th e n ext three

WHOLESALE PRICES

In d e x co m p ile d b y the U n it e d S ta te s B u r e a u o f L a b o r S t a t ist ic s,
1926
100. B y m o n th s, 1929 to 1931; b y w e e ks to date. L a t e s t fig u re

i s f o r w ee k e n d in g M a r c h 13.

2

M O N T H L Y

R E V IE W

MONEY RATES IN NEW YORK

M inimum rate on rediscounts fo r and advances to member banks by
Federal Reserve Bank, and weekly prevailing rates on prim e commercial
paper, 4 to 6 m onths, and prim e bankers* acceptances. 90 days. For
weeks ending Ja n u ary 3, 1931, to M arch 27, 1937.

w eeks, w h ich in clu d ed th e M arch ta x c o lle c tio n p erio d , e x ­
cess reserves sh ow ed m od erate flu ctu ation s around th e new
le v el. In con n ection w ith th e in creases in reserve req u ire­
m ents th ere w ere som e w ith d raw als o f bankers’ b a la n ces
from city banks bu t p ra c tic a lly n o b o rro w in g b y m em ber
banks from the R eserve B anks. H o ld in g s o f U n ited States
G overnm ent o b lig a tio n s at rep o rtin g m em ber banks in le a d ­
in g cities d eclin ed b y $ 2 8 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 in the fo u r w eeks en d ­
in g M arch 17, a part o f the d e c lin e reflecting la rg e m atu ri­
ties o f T reasury B ills. C om m ercial lo a n s in creased further
at rep ortin g banks and on M arch 17 w ere a b o v e la st y ea r’s
h ig h le v e l reached on D ecem b er 3 0 . L oans to brokers and
d ealers in secu rities increased sh a rp ly .

Money
Rates

S in ce the b eg in n in g o f M arch the rate o n 90-d ay
bankers’ accep tan ces advanced fro m 5 /1 6 o f 1
per cent to 9 / 1 6 o f 1 per cen t and com m ercial
paper rose from a flat % per cent to a range o f betw een
% per cent and 1 per cent. B ond y ie ld s, w h ich u n til re­
cen tly had been n ear the extrem e lo w p o in t reached la st
D ecem ber, advanced b y betw een ^ an d V2 Per cen t an ^ on
M arch 2 4 w ere at about th e le v e ls p rev a ilin g ea rly in 1 9 3 6 .

SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY
T rade at both retail and w h o le sa le in the S ix th D istrict
con tin u ed in F ebru ary at r e la tiv e ly h ig h le v e ls, and te x tile
activity, b ased on the d a ily average rate o f cotton co n su m p ­
tion , reached in F ebruary th e h ig h est le v e l on record. L ife
in su ran ce sa les in creased over th o se in January, and the
d a ily rate o f prod u ction o f p ig iro n and co a l a lso in creased ,
and a ll o f these series o f figu res w ere h ig h er than in F eb ­
ruary, 19 3 6 . W h ile th e v a lu e o f b u ild in g perm its in creased
over January, contracts aw arded d eclin ed 4 9 .5 per cent,
and both p erm its and contracts w ere sm a lle r than a year
ago. T h e p rice o f cotton reached ab ou t th e m id d le o f
M arch th e h igh est le v e l in n e a r ly seven years.
D epartm ent store sa les in creased 8 .6 per cent in d o lla r
v o lu m e from January to F eb ru ary. T h e d a ily average,
how ever, rose 13.1 per cent, b ecau se o f the shorter m onth,
and the F ebruary u n ad ju sted in d ex o f d a ily average sa les
is the h igh est fo r that m onth in the series. Stocks a lso in ­
creased, and the c o llectio n ratio w as h ig h er than a m onth, or
a year, earlier. W h o lesa le trade d eclin ed o n ly 1.5 p er cent
in F ebruary, about th e sam e as the d ecrease at that tim e
st FRASER
year, and w as 2 7 .2 p er cen t greater than in F ebruary,
Digitizedlafor


MEMBER BANK RESERVE BALANCES

1932

1933

1934

1935

1936

1937

Wednesday figures of total m ember bank reserve balances a t Federal
Reserve Banks, w ith estim ates of required reserves, Ja n u a ry 6, 1932, to
March 24, 1937.

1 9 3 6 , and at the h ig h est le v e l fo r F eb ru ary sin ce 1930.
L ife in su ran ce sa le s in crea sed fro m Jan u ary to F ebruary
fo r the secon d tim e in seven years, and w ere 1 5 .9 per cent
greater than a y ea r a g o . B ank d eb its to in d iv id u a l ac­
counts d eclin ed from Jan u ary, b ut w ere 1 8 .8 per cent
greater than in F eb ru ary, 1 9 3 6 .
A t w eek ly rep o rtin g m em ber b anks in le a d in g cities o f
the D istrict in vestm en t h o ld in g s o f secu rities d eclin ed 5.3
m illio n s in the fo u r w eeks e n d in g M arch 1 0 , and lo a n s in ­
creased slig h tly , b u t lo a n s w ere 4 8 .2 m illio n s, and in v est­
m ents 30.1 m illio n s, greater than a y ea r a g o . D em an d deposits-ad ju sted in crea sed fu rth er in th is fo u r w eeks p erio d ,
but d ep o sits o f th e U n ited S tates and in terb ank d ep o sits
d eclin ed som ew h at. A t th e F ed era l R eserve B ank there
w as an in crea se in th e sm a ll v o lu m e o f d isco u n ts, and m em ­
ber bank reserve accou n ts in crea sed fo llo w in g the in crease
in reserve req u irem en ts o n M arch 1.
T h e v a lu e o f b u ild in g p erm its issu ed in F eb ru ary in ­
creased 1 5 .2 p er cent over January, b ut th e to tal v a lu e o f
contracts aw arded d eclin ed b y 4 9 .5 p er cent. F eb ruary p er­
m its w ere 6 .2 p er cent, an d to ta l con tract aw ards w ere 9 .4
p er cent, sm a ller than in F eb ru ary la st year. R esid en tial
con tracts, h ow ever, in creased 1 5 .8 p er cen t over January
and w ere 1 7 .9 p er cen t la r g er than a y ea r a g o . E m p lo y ­
m ent d eclin ed som ew h at fro m D ecem b er to January, as it
u su a lly d oes fo llo w in g th e C hristm as h o lid a y s, but num ber
o f w orkers w as 1 0 p er cen t, an d p a y r o lls 1 9 .6 p er cent,
greater than a y ea r a g o . On a d a ily a verage b asis, co n ­
su m p tion o f cotton in th is D istr ic t in crea sed 1 p er cent from
Jan u ary to F eb ru ary to th e h ig h est rate fo r an y m onth on
record. O rders an d p ro d u ctio n at lu m b er m ills averaged
h ig h er in F eb ru ary th is y ea r than la st, b ut there w as som e
fa llin g off in the latter part o f th e m on th . C oal prod u ction
averaged h ig h er in F eb ru ary in b oth A la b a m a and T en ­
n essee than in Jan u ary, and w as greater than in F eb ru ary
last year in A la b a m a , but som ew h at sm a ller in T en n essee.
T o ta l p rod u ction o f p ig ir o n in A la b a m a d eclin ed in F e b ­
ruary, but th e d a ily a verage rate in crea sed 3 p er cen t over
Jan u ary an d w as 3 3 .7 p er cen t la rg er than a yea r ago.
O p eration s at cotton seed o il m ills d eclin e d se a s o n a lly in
F eb ru ary, but w ere su b sta n tia lly greater than in F eb ruary
la st year. A fter rea ch in g in D ecem b er th e la rg est m o n th ly
total on record, elec tric p ow er p ro d u ctio n d eclin ed 4 .1 per
cent in Jan u ary but w as 9 .4 p er cent greater than a year
earlier.

M O N T H L Y

FEDERA L RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
(In Thousands of Dollars)
March 10
Feb. 10
1937
1937
Bills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. Obligations
All O thers.................................
Total Discounts..............
Bills Bought on Open M a rk e t..
Industrial Advances....................
U. S. Securities............................
Total Bills and Securities
Total Reserves............................
Member Bank Reserve Account
U. S. Treasurer—Gen. Account
Total D eposits............................
F. R. Notes in actual circulation
Commitments to make indus­
trial advances..........................

$

•

75

201
276
108
350
109,941
110,675
268,688
175,426
5,831
189,724
184,204
275

$

60 $
104
164
108
361
109,941
110,574
248,435
157,678
4,235
171,360
182,852
283

March 11
1936
55
12
67
164
870
100,209
101,310
199,240
122,917
2,633
132,761
160,756
387

FINANCE
Reserve
Bank
Credit

T o ta l earn in g assets o f the F ed eral R eserve Bank
o f A tlan ta in creased slig h tly b etw een F ebruary
10 and M arch 10, but con tin u ed at about the
lev el o f p reviou s W ed n esd ays sin ce the turn o f
the year. D iscou n ts fo r m em ber banks in creased som ew hat
the first w eek in M arch, and on M arch 10 w ere $ 1 1 2 ,0 0 0
larger than fou r w eeks ea rlier, and w ere a lso la rg er than a
year ago. H o ld in g s o f purchased p ap er h ave rem ained at
$108*000 sin ce M ay o f la st year. H o ld in g s o f U n ited States
secu rities have am ounted to $ 1 0 9 ,9 4 1 ,0 0 0 sin ce th e first o f
the year w hen this ban k ’s p a rticip a tio n in the S ystem ’s se ­
cu rity h o ld in g s w as increased , and w ere 9 .7 m illio n s larger
than on th e corresp on d in g W ed n esd ay a year a go. O ut­
stan d in g in d u strial advances fo r w ork in g ca p ita l d eclin ed
$ 1 1 ,0 0 0 sin ce F ebruary 10, and at $ 3 5 0 ,0 0 0 w ere on M arch
10 co n sid era b ly less than h a lf the to ta l o f $ 8 7 0 ,0 0 0 a year
earlier, and com m itm ents to m ake such ad van ces registered
a further sm a ll decrease.
O n e-h alf o f the 3 3 ^ * p er cen t in crease in reserve re­
quirem ents im p osed b y the B oard o f G overnors o f the F ed ­
eral R eserve S ystem on m em ber banks becam e effective
M arch 1, and m em ber bank reserves, w h ich had risen from
153.1 m illio n s on the first W ed n esd ay o f th e year to 1 5 8 .9
m illio n s on the last W ed n esd ay in F eb ru ary, rose to 1 7 5 .4
m illio n s in th e tw o fo llo w in g w eeks, and w ere 5 2 .5 m illio n s
greater than a year ago. T here w ere d eclin es in th e last
h a lf o f January and the first h a lf o f F eb ru ary in n et dem and
d ep osits, and in the am ount o f required reserve, but in ­
creases in actual reserves and in the estim ated ex cess, based
o n d a ily average figures. In th e la st h a lf o f F ebruary,
h ow ever, net dem and d ep osits in creased , and tim e d ep osits
con tin u ed to in crease, resu ltin g in a sm a ll in crea se in re­
q u ired reserve.
A ctu a l reserves d eclin ed slig h tly , h o w ­
ever, and the estim ated excess in the la st h a lf o f February
w as 4 3 .3 m illio n s, o r 3 7 .6 p er cent.
F o llo w in g a d eclin e from 1 9 5 .5 m illio n s on D ecem b er 2 3
to 1 8 0 .7 m illio n s on January 2 7 , F ed eral R eserve n otes o f
this ban k’s issu e in creased to 1 8 4 .2 m illio n s on M arch 10,
h igh er b y 2 3 .4 m illio n s than a year ago. T o ta l d ep o sits
w ere about 5 7 m illio n s, and total reserves 6 9 .4 m illio n s,
greater than on the corresp o n d in g W ed n esd ay la st year.
P rin cip a l item s in th e w eek ly statem ent are com p ared in
an accom p an yin g tab le.

Member
Bank
Credit

B ecause o f a d eclin e in h o ld in g s o f in vestm en t
secu rities, to ta l lo a n s and in vestm en ts at 22
w eek ly rep ortin g m em ber banks in th e S ix th D is­
trict d eclin ed 5 .2 m illio n s betw een F eb ru ary 10
and M arch 10, and w ere lo w er than on other W ed nesd ays
O ctober 7, but 7 8 .3 m illio n s greater than on th e corDigitizedsin
force
FRASER


%

R E V IE W

CONDITION OF 22 M EM BER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
(In Thousands of Dollars)
March 10
Feb. 10
March 11
1937
1937
1936
Loans and Investm ents..............
Loans—T o ta l..............................
On Securities............................
To Brokers and D ealers........
To O thers................................
Real E state Loans......................
Acceptances and Com’l Paper

$

Loans to B anks...........................
All Other Loans..........................
Investments—T otal....................
U. S. Govt. Direct Obligations
Obligations Guaranteed by U.S.
Other Securities......................
Reserve with F. R. B an k ..........
Cash in V ault..............................
Balances with Domestic Banks.
Demand Deposits—A djusted...
Time Deposits.............................
U. S. Govt. Deposits..................
Inter-bank deposits: Domestic.
Foreign. .
Borrowings—at F. R. Ba nk. . . .
O ther....................

582,366 $
262,832
60,183
8,979
51,204
25,785

498,790
214,687
56,484
6,579
49,905
21,111

4,809
804
170,294
314,189
196,063
36,750
81,376
102,977
11,422
132,959
341,062
178,030
15,083
234,504
1,209

6,207
838
169,819
319,534
201,373
35,873
82,288
90,195
11,256
148,687
334,302
177,075
23,829
241,216
1,108

4,994
614
131,484
284,103
172,538
36,551
75,014
68,219
10,271
174,754
292,969
170,099
26,687
210,940
1,315

40

60

577,125
262,936
60,653
8,641
52,012
26,376

$

resp o n d in g rep ort date a year ago. S in ce January 6, total
loan s, and “A ll O ther” lo a n s, in clu d in g lo a n s fo r co m ­
m ercial, in d u strial and agricu ltu ral p u rp oses, h ave averaged
som ew hat lo w er than th ey did in D ecem ber, fo llo w in g a
rather stead y rise sin ce m id-year. On M arch 10, h ow ever,
total lo a n s w ere 4 8 .2 m illio n s, and “A ll O ther” lo a n s w ere
3 8 .8 m illio n s, greater than at that tim e last year. L oans on
secu rities h ave not ch an ged m a teria lly sin ce the first
W ed n esd ay in January, and on M arch 10 w ere 4 .2 m illio n s
greater than a year a go. R eal estate lo a n s have exh ib ited a
slo w but stead y rise sin ce th e m id d le o f 1 9 3 5 . H o ld in g s o f
accep tan ces and purchased com m ercial pap er in creased in
F ebruary, but d eclin ed e a rly in M arch to the lo w est total
sin ce A u gu st, and lo a n s to banks a lso rose som ew hat in
F ebruary and th e first w eek in M arch.
T o ta l h o ld in g s o f in vestm en t secu rities on M arch 10, at
3 1 4 m illio n s, w ere at the lo w est le v el sin ce June 10 last
year, but w ere, n ev erth eless, 30.1 m illio n s greater than on
the corresp on d in g report date in M arch la st year. T otal
DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS*
(In Thousands of Dollars)
Feb. 1937
Jan. 1937
Alabama—4 Cities......................
Birmingham............................
D othan.....................................
M obile......................................
M ontgomery............................

$

126,594 $
73,866
2,892
30,905
18,931

Feb. 1936

164,389 $
99,129
3 ,339
38,148
23,773

108,505
61,426
2,267
26,322
18,490

Florida—4 C ities........................
Jacksonville.............................
M iam i.......................................
Pensacola.................................
T am pa......................................

158,126
73,580
47,897
8,068
28,581

175,353
84,217
49,373
9,026
32,737

134,568
60,047
41,496
7,282
25,743

Georgia— 10 Cities......................
Albany......................................
A tlanta.....................................
Augusta....................................
Brunswick................................
Columbus.................................
Elberton...................................
M acon......................................
Newnan....................................
Savannah.................................
Valdosta...................................

256,503
4,614
172,383
15,739
2,410
13,208
1,011
13,688
2,001
28,158
3,291

297,712
5,818
193,671
21,275
2,514
15,067
1,086
16,444
2,525
34,830
4,482

216,172
2,864
143,182
15,943
2,080
10,303
704
10,841
1,511
25,990
2,754

Louisiana—New Orleans...........

210,389

237,417

173,229

Mississippi—4 Cities..................
H attiesburg..............................
Jackson....................................
M eridian..................................
Vicksburg.................................

45,598
4,826
24,354
9,398
7,020

51,686
4,715
29,285
9,910
7,776

35,702
3,889
18,764
7,398
5,651

Tennessee—3 Cities....................
Chattanooga............................
Knoxville..................................
Nashville..................................

137,311
36,933
24,266
76,112

161,368
47,172
31,860
82,336

118,453
31,377
21,815
65,261

Total—26 Cities......................

$

934,521

$

1,087,925

$

786,629

♦ M o n t h ly tota ls are derived from w eekly reports b y p ro ra tin g figures for those
weeks w hich do n ot fall entirely w ith in a sin gle calendar m onth.

4

M O N T H L Y

investm en t h o ld in g s had risen to 3 3 7 .8 m illio n s, on O ctober
2 1 , b ut h a v e averaged lo w er each m on th sin ce th en . M ost
o f th e recent d eclin e h as b een in h o ld in g s o f d irect o b lig a ­
tio n s o f th e U n ited States w h ich am ounted on M arch 1 0 to
1 96.1 m illio n s, th e sm a lle st to ta l fo r a n y W ed n esd ay sin ce
M arch 18 la st year. H o ld in g s o f secu rities gu aranteed by
th e U n ited S tates w ere slig h tly h ig h er than on earlier
W ednesdays th is year, but sm a lle r than th e a v erage fo r a n y
m onth la st year ex cep tin g June. H o ld in g s o f O ther S ecu r­
itie s w ere lo w er on M arch 1 0 than on other W ed n esd ays
sin ce A u gu st, but ab out 6 .4 m illio n s la rg er than a year a go.
D em and dep osits-ad ju sted in creased furth er in th e fo u r
w eeks en d in g M arch 10, w hen th ey w ere at a n ew h ig h le v e l
and 4 8 .1 m illio n s greater than a y ea r ea rlier. T im e d e­
p osits a lso in creased s lig h tly over oth er recent rep ort dates
and w ere 7 .9 m illio n s greater than a year a g o . D ep o sits o f
other d om estic banks ro se fro m 1 7 7 m illio n s on th e la st
tw o W ed nesdays in June to 2 4 1 m illio n s o n th e secon d and
third W ed n esd ays in F eb ru ary, but h a v e sin ce d eclin ed
som ew hat. T h ey w ere, h ow ever, o n M arch 10, 2 3 .6 m il­
lio n s greater than a yea r a g o . B a la n ces m ain tain ed b y
these banks w ith corresp on d en t banks d eclin ed fro m the
h ig h p o in t at about 17 5 m illio n s, on M arch 11 la st year, to
1 22 m illio n s on N ovem b er 1 0 ; sin ce that tim e th ey h ave
risen to about 14 8 m illio n s on F eb ru ary 17, and d eclin ed to
1 33 m illio n s on M arch 1 0 , w hen th e ^ w ere 4 1 .8 m illio n s
less than a year ago. P r in c ip a l item s in the w eek ly report
are com pared in an a cco m p a n y in g ta b le.
D eb its to in d iv id u a l accou n ts at 2 6 rep o rtin g cities,
sh ow n in another ta b le, d eclin ed 14.1 p er cen t fro m Jan ­
u ary to F ebru ary, but w ere 1 8 .8 p er cen t greater than in
F ebruary 1 9 3 6 , and the la rg est fo r F eb ru ary sin ce 1 9 3 1 .

AGRICULTURE
T h e u n u su a lly w arm w eather o f Jan u ary and e a r ly F eb ­
ruary w as fo llo w e d in the latter part o f F eb ru ary and ea rly
M arch w ith lo w er tem peratures, and m ore r a in fa ll. C old
w eather k ille d th e a b n o rm a lly ea r ly b lo o m and sm a ll fru it
in the straw berry section s o f G eorgia and A la b a m a . F lo r ­
id a, alth ou gh co o ler, escap ed fro st dam age. In the sou th ­
ern and cen tral section s o f th e state sp rin g crop s are m o stly
p lan ted , but w aterm elon s and cucum bers w ere s till b ein g
p lan ted in the n orthern and w estern areas at th e m id d le o f
the m onth.
SUGAR MOVEM ENT—NEW ORLEANS—Pounds
Raw Sugar
Feb. 1937Jan. 1937

Shipments
Stocks

Feb. 1936

73,876,097
83,736,128
26,920,124

75,318,137
83,980,901
38,705,759

Refined Sugar
47,323,468
42,086,227

61,496,661
32,149,918

85,578,677
23,068,135

R IC E MOVEM ENT
(Rice Millers' Association Statistics)
February
Aug. to Feb. Incl.
Receipts of Rough Rice*
Season 1936-37........................
Season 1935-36.......................

972,917
483,100

9,238,133
7,404,363

Distribution of Milled Rice**
Season 1936-37.......................
Season 1935-36.......................

1,109,334
1,069,756

6,824,932
5,656,404

Stocks:
Feb. 28, 1937...........................
Feb. 29, 1936...........................

Rough
1,410,999
1,146,356

Clean
1,727,551
1,407,452

ls of 162 lbs. **P o c k e ts
Digitized ♦B
fora rre
FRASER


of 100 lbs.

R ECEIPTS FROM SALE OF PRIN CIPA L FARM PRODUCTS
Including Livestock and Livestock Products
(In Thousands of Dollars)
Jan. 1937
Jan. 1936
Jan. 1935
Jan. 1934
Alabama...........................
F lorida..............................
Georgia.............................
Louisiana..........................
Mississippi........................
Tennessee.........................

$

T o ta l.............................

$

5,407
12,767
7,187
7,245
12,003
13,928
58,537

$

$

8,267
10,343
6,664
3,550
.5 ,9 6 8
9,913
44,705

$

4,732
9,835
6,319
8,889
6,371
8,352

$

4,594
11,435
5,693
8,573
6,648
7,924

$

44,498

$

44,867

P ro sp ectiv e p ro d u ctio n o f a ll o ra n g es, in c lu d in g ta n g er­
in es, fro m th e 1 9 3 6 b lo o m , in F lo r id a , rem ains at 2 1 .2
m illio n b o x es, th e la rg est on record . L ast sea son p ro d u c­
tio n w as 18 m illio n b o x es. In d ica ted p ro d u ctio n o f F lo rid a
g ra p efru it is th e sam e as e a r lie r estim ates, 1 7 .5 m illio n
b o x es, a lso a record cro p , com p ared w ith 1 1 .5 m illio n b o x es
la st sea so n . R a in fa ll w as g en era l over th e citru s b e lt dur­
in g F eb ru ary an d trees a re in g e n e r a lly g o o d co n d itio n .
C ool w eather w as a p p a r e n tly b en eficia l to citru s fru it.
C ash receip ts fro m th e sa le o f p r in c ip a l fa rm products,
in c lu d in g liv esto ck and liv esto c k p rod u cts, d eclin ed from
D ecem b er to January, b ut th e Jan u ary to ta l o f $ 5 8 ,5 3 7 ,0 0 0
fo r th e six states o f th is D istric t w as 3 0 .9 p er cent greater
than in January, 1 9 3 6 and la rg er than fo r that m onth o f
other recent years.
I f G overn m en t p aym en ts, w h ich
am ounted in Jan u ary to 6 .7 m illio n s , are ad d ed th e Jan ­
u ary total w o u ld b e 4 5 .3 p er cen t la rg er than a year a g o ,
w hen G overnm ent p aym en ts w ere o n ly $ 2 2 3 ,0 0 0 .
T h e a verage p rice o f m id d lin g co tto n o n th e ten d esig ­
nated m arkets has stren gth en ed co n sid e r a b ly in recent
w eeks. T h e a verage fo r Jan u ary at 1 2 .8 4 cen ts com p ared
w ith 1 2 .6 0 cen ts fo r D ecem b er an d 1 2 .0 6 cen ts fo r N o v em ­
ber, an d fro m an a v era g e o f 1 2 .7 5 cen ts on F eb ru ary 1 8 it
rose in th e fo llo w in g th ree w eek s to 1 4 .1 5 cen ts on M arch
12, th e h ig h est, a cco rd in g to th e D ep artm en t o f A gricu ltu re,
sin ce June 2 , 1 9 3 0 . H ea v y b u y in g fo r b o th d o m estic and
fo reig n accou n t w as in d ica ted in th e D ep artm en t’s statem ent.
R ep orts to th e D ep artm en t o f A g ricu ltu re in d ica te that
farm ers in th is D istrict in ten d ed on M arch 1 th is yea r to
p la n t som ew h at la rg er acrea g es than la st year in tob acco,
p otatoes, oats and p ean u ts, b ut sm a lle r areas in other p rin ­
c ip a l crop s. T h e to ta l fo r th e m o re im p o rta n t crop s, not
in c lu d in g cotton a b ou t w h ich n o in fo r m a tio n is co llected
b ecau se o f le g isla tiv e p ro h ib itio n , in d ica tes an average d e­
crease o f 2 .4 p er cen t th is y ea r fro m th e a crea g e harvested
in 1 9 3 6 . T o ta ls fo r th e s ix states, b y cro p s, a re com p ared
b elo w .
(000 Omitted)
Intended
Acreage
1937

84,552,697
74,950,059
36,501,562

Receipts.
Meltings
Stocks. .

R E V IE W

Corn...............................................
O ats...............................................
Tame H a y ....................................
Potatoes—W hite.........................
Potatoes—Sweet.........................
Tobacco........................................
Soybeans.......................................
Cowpeas........................................
P eanuts.........................................
Rice (Louisiana)..........................

14,752
733
4,407
196
441
229
757
912
1,272
436

Acreage
Harvested
1936
15,345
678
4,463
170
440
193
773
995
1,232
445

Percent
Change
H
— 3.9
+ 8.1
— 1.3
+ 1 5 .3
+ 0.2
+ 1 8 .7
— 2.1
— 8 .3
+ 3.2
— 2 .0

T o ta l..................................................24,135________24,734________— 2 .4

TRADE
Retail
Trade

T h ere w ere in crea ses in F eb ru ary in sa le s and
stocks at rep o rtin g reta il firm s in th e S ix th D is­
trict, com p ared w ith Jan u ary an d w ith F ebru ary
a year a g o , and th e c o lle c tio n ratio w as a lso h ig h er than
fo r eith er o f th o se p erio d s.
F eb ru ary sa le s w ere 8 .6 p er cen t la rg er than in January,

M O N T H L Y

5

R E V IE W

RETA IL TRADE i n T H E SIX TH D ISTRICT DURING FEBRUARY 1937
Based on confidential reports from 54 department stores
C omparison o f N et Sales
C omparison op Stocks
February 1937
February 28, 1937
with:
Year to date
with:
Same month
Previous
with same period
Same month
Previous
a year ago
M onth
last year
a year ago
M onth
+ 1 0 .2
+ 1 2 .6
+ 4 2 .6
+6.9
..........
+3.4
+ 1 0 .0
— 11.3
+ 7.1
+ 6.1

Atlanta (6 )....................................
Birmingham (4)............................
Chattanooga (3)............................
Jacksonville (3 ).............................
Miami (—) ....................................
Montgomery (3)............................
Nashville (4)..................................
New Orleans (4)............................
Other Cities (24)..........................
DISTRICT (54)............................
NOTE:

+ 1 2 .3
+ 1 6 .0
+ 3 2 .8
+ 18.5
..........
+4.4
+ 2 1 .0
— 7.6
+ 5.1
+ 8.6

+ 1 3 .9
+ 16.5
+ 2 5 .6
+5.0
..........
+7.4
+ 1 1.4
— 2.7
+ 1 0.9
+ 9.6

+ 2 1 .2
+12.1
+ 9 .4
+4.5
..........
+ 28.5
+ 1 3 .3
+ 1 3.3
+ 1 6.3
+ 1 3 .6

C ollection R atio
February
January
February
1937
1937 1936

+ 8.8
+ 7.7
+ 1 6 .2
+8.1
..........
+ 13.7
+ 1 5 .4
+ 2 1 .6
+ 1 1 .2
+ 1 0.9

36.4
40.5
27.9

30.7
35.5
32.6

33.5
36.5
29.5

....

....

....

28.6
40.0
35.0
36.0

29.3
37.6
34.5
33.7

30.0
40.8
35.0
35.1

The collection ratio is the percentage of accounts outstanding and due at the beginning of the month which were collected during the month reported on.

and 6.1 per cen t larger than in F eb ru ary la st y ear. T h e
m onth w as shorter b y o n e b u sin ess d a y than January, or
F ebruary, 19 3 6 , and th e u n ad ju sted in d ex of d a ily average
sa les increased from 6 3 .5 p er cent o f th e 1 9 2 3 -2 5 average
fo r January to 7 1 .5 p er cent fo r F eb ru ary. T h is is the
h ig h est in d ex fo r F eb ru ary in the series.
F or the tw o
m onths o f 1 9 3 7 , com b in ed sa le s h ave b een 9 .6 p er cent
larger than in that p eriod la st year. S tock s o f merchan*
d ise on hand at th e c lo se o f F eb ru ary averaged 1 0 .9 per
cent larger than a m onth ea rlier, an d 1 3 .6 p er cent larger
than a year ago. T h e in crease in stocks is p ro b a b ly due in
som e m easure to th e ea rlier date o f E aster th is y ear. T he
co lle c tio n ratio o f 3 6 per cent fo r F eb ru ary com p ares w ith
3 3 .7 per cent fo r January, and w ith 35.1 p er cen t fo r F e b ­
ruary, 1936. In February the ratio for regular accounts
w as 4 3 .2 p er cen t, and that fo r in sta llm en t accou n ts 1 3 .2
p er cent.
A statem ent b y th e U n ited S tates D ep artm en t o f C om ­
m erce in d icates that d a ily a v erage sa le s o f gen era l m er­
ch an d ise in sm a ll tow n s and rural areas o f th e S ou th w ere
7 .7 p er cen t larger in January th is year than la st. O ther re­
g io n s reported larger ga in s, and the a v erage fo r the co u n ­
try w as 1 0 .9 per cent.
P ercen tage com p arison s in the ta b le are based u p on fig ­
ures reported in actual d o lla r am ounts and m ake n o a llo w ­
ance fo r changes in p rice le v e ls. T h e in d ex es o f d a ily
average sa les, and o f stock s, on p a g e 8, are b ased u p on re­
ports from a sm a ller num ber o f firm s w h o se figu res have
been reported over a lo n g p erio d o f tim e.

Life
Insurance

F ebruary sa les o f new , p aid -fo r, o rd in ary life
in su ran ce in th is D istrict in creased 6 .8 per
cent over January and w ere 1 5 .9 per cent
greater than a year ago, and fo r the tw o m onths o f 1 9 3 7
have been 11.2 per cent greater than in th ose m onths last
year. A v a ila b le figures p rior to 1931 sh ow in creases each
year from January to F eb ru ary, back to 1 9 2 3 . B eg in n in g
in 1 9 31, h ow ever, th ese sa les h a v e decreases in F eb ru ary,
excep t in 1933 and 1 9 3 7 . F ig u res in the ta b le are from
th ose co m p iled b y th e L ife In su ran ce S a le s R esearch
Bureau.
SALES OF N EW PA ID -FO R ORDINARY L IF E INSURANCE
(In Thousands of Dollars)
February
January
February
1937

Alabam a.......................................
Florida..........................................
Georgia.........................................
Louisiana......................................
Mississippi....................................
Tennessee.....................................
Total Six S tates......................
United S tates..........................




$

$

3 ,3 3 1
5 ,2 3 7
6 ,1 7 9
3 ,8 6 8
2 ,3 6 0
5 ,2 6 3
2 6 ,2 3 8
4 8 7 ,8 1 9

1937
$

$

3 ,0 5
4 ,3 8
5 ,3 1
4 ,4 3
2 ,3 5
5 ,0 3

1936
8
9
2
1
4
4

2 4 ,5 7 8
4 6 2 ,3 6 7

$

$

2 ,7 3 7
3 ,9 5 0
5 ,2 5 0
3 ,9 1 5
1 ,9 3 6
4 ,8 5 8
2 2 ,6 4 6
4 6 0 ,4 6 3

WHOLESALE TRADE IN SIX TH D ISTR IC T DURING FEBRUARY 1937
Based on confidential reports from 70 firms.
Percentage Comparisons
Jan.-Feb. Incl.
Number
Feb. 1937 with:
Feb.
with same
Jan.
of Firms
1936 period last year
1937
All Lines Combined:
+ 27.5
+ 27.2
— 1.5
70
+ 2 3 .0
+ 8.3
24
Groceries:
+13.1
— 0.8
+ 15.8
14
— 1.3
+ 4.6
3
— 3.1
Jacksonville.......
+
17.8
+
19.2
Other Cities
11
— 0.2
Dry Goods:
+
2
2 .9
+
12.3
14
— 6.1
+ 10.7
+ 5.8
+ 3.3
Nashville............
3
+
14.7
+
2
6
.0
— 8.5
Other Cities
11
+ 27.4
+ 35.9
7
Hardware:
+ 3 6.6
+ 3 5 .8
— 12.8
24
+ 2 8 .0
+ 35.8
+ 4.4
3
Nashville............
+ 40.1
— 9 .0
+ 38.5
4
New Orleans. . . ,
+ 35.1
+ 3 5.8
17
— 16.9
Other Cities
+ 4.9
9
Stocks.........................
+ 5.9
Furniture:
+47.7
+ 39.5
+ 5.3
5
+30.1
+ 8.4
3
Electrical Supplies:
+ 7 7 .0
+ 79.8
+ 65.5
3
Drugs:
+ 8.6
+ 9.3
7
— 0.5
COLLECTION RATIO*
February
1937
79.6
33.0
45.8
42.7

January
1937
80.1
35.5
48.5
38.1

February
1936
62.6
38.0
38.0
38.3

46.0
51.0
51.0
T o ta l..................
*The collection ratio is the percentage of accounts and notes receivable out­
standing at the beginning of the month which were collected during the month

Wholesale
Trade

February sales by 70 reporting wholesale
firms in the District declined 1.5 per cent
over the month, and were 27.2 per cent
greater than a year ago, and the index number for February, at 76.5 per cent of the 1923-25 average was the high­
est for the month since 1930, when it was 76.8 per cent.
Stocks increased from January to February and were 23
per cent larger than a year ago. The collection ratio, at
5 1.0 per cent, was the same as for January, but 10.9 per
cent higher than for February, 1936. Reported figures are
compared in the table, and index numbers appear on
page 8.

Commercial
Failures

The number of business failures in the
Sixth District, according to Dun’s Review,
was 2 1 in February, 3 1 in January, and 2 1
in February, 1936, and liabilities for February amounted to
$251,000 against $249,000 in January and $108,000 a year
ago. In 1936 there were 294 failures in the District, and
liabilities totaled $4,216,000, the smallest in many years.

EMPLOYMENT
There were small declines in employment and payrolls,
at firms in the Sixth District reporting to the United States

M O N T H LY

6

B U IL D IN G

P E R M IT S — F E B R U A R Y
1936

P ercentage
C h a n ge
in V a lu e

19,121
81,317
40,428
65,757

— 11.7
+ 5 4 8 .5
+ 1 8 6 .5
+ 170.2

359,071
865,843
534,052
98,431
332,545

250,595
938,606
386,840
54,331
54,3 90

+ 4 3 .3
—
7 .8
+ 38.1
+ 8 1 .2
+ 5 1 1 .4

155
27
102
189
27

300,340
34,472
40,435
52,464
3 9 ,8 30

174,455
113,035
58,843
28,963
112,988

+
—
—
+
—

7 2 .2
6 1 .5
31 .3
81.1
64.7

94
66

87
53

282,240
34,803

144,950
22,724

+
+

94 .7
53 .2

Tennessee
C h a tta n o o g a ................
Johnson C i t y ...............
K n o x v ille ...................
N a s h v ille .....................

279
13
97
143

250
2
42
109

254,938
24,110
314,598
131,018

239,961
2,000
97,763
1,949,648

T o ta l 20 C i t i e s -----

3,217

2,798

4 ,53 6,97 6

4 ,83 6,71 5

Num ber
1937
1936
A la b a m a
A n n is t o n .....................
B i r m in g h a m ................
M o b i l e .........................
M o n t g o m e r y ................

26
424
24
115

18
259
30
105

F lo rid a
Ja c k so n v ille .................
M i a m i .........................
M i a m i B e a c h ..............
O r la n d o .......................
T a m p a ........................

487
650
80
68
171

523
550
70
45
155

209
31
79
129
32

L o u isia n a
N e w O rle a n s................
A le x a n d r ia ...................

G e o rg ia
A t l a n t a .......................
A u g u s t a .......................
C o lu m b u s ....................
M a c o n .........................

V a lu e
1937

$

16,878
527,369
115,835
177,704

$

+
6 .2
+ 1105.5
121.8
— 93 .3
—

6 .2

Bureau of Labor Statistics, from December to January, as
there usually are, the decrease in number of workers being
1.2 per, cent and in payrolls 2.6 per cent. January employ­
ment and payrolls were, however, at higher levels than
January of other recent years, as indicated in these per­
centages :
J a n u a ry 1937
C o m p a re d w ith :
J an u a ry
J an u a ry
J an u a ry
J a n u a ry
J an u a ry

Num ber
E m p lo y e d

W e e k 's
P a y ro ll

1936........................... ..................... + 1 0 . 0
19 35................................................ + 1 3 . 9
1934........................... ..................... + 1 9 . 7
1933................................................ + 4 0 . 8
1932........................... ..................... + 2 8 . 6

+ 1 9 .6
+ 3 3 .1
+ 4 4 .4
+ 9 2 .5
+ 4 9 .8

INDU STRY
After declining each month since last July, the value of
building permits issued at twenty reporting cities in the
District increased 15.2 per cent from January to February.
The February total was 6.2 per cent smaller than in Feb­
ruary, 1936, but larger than in that month of other years
since 1929. The combined total of $8,475,869 for the first
two months of 1937 was also smaller than for that period
last year, by 8.2 per cent, but larger than those months of
other years since 1929. Of the twenty cities, there were
only seven decreases from January to February, and six
decreases compared with February last year, one of which,
that at Nashville, was due to a large total last year includ­
ing a large public building. Comparisons for the month
are shown in an accompanying table.
B U IL D IN G

A N D C O N S T R U C T IO N C O N T R A C T S A W A R D E D
F . W . D o d g e C o rp o ra tio n F igu re s
Feb. 1937
Jan. 1937
Feb. 1936

11 ,4 11 ,200

2 2 , 585 ,600

12 , 588 ,490

4 ,9 5 6 ,9 0 0
6 ,4 5 4 ,3 0 0

4 ,2 8 0 ,3 0 0
18,305,300

4 ,20 3,06 7
8,3 8 5 ,4 2 3

S ta te T o ta ls :
A la b a m a ..............................
F lo r id a .................................
G e o r g ia ................................
L o u is ia n a ..............................
M is s is s ip p i...........................
T e n n e sse e .............................

1,14 4,40 0
3,6 5 7 ,8 0 0
2 ,2 7 0 ,5 0 0
1,58 9,00 0
1,69 8,00 0
3,2 4 8 ,0 0 0

1,78 0,20 0
14,560 ,0 00
2 ,2 5 8 ,3 0 0
1,76 9,10 0
1,78 0,70 0
2 ,5 2 2 ,3 0 0

1,54 2,40 0
4 ,7 4 5 ,3 0 0
1,86 0,90 0
2 ,9 9 4 ,3 0 0
1,422,500
1,85 7,40 0

37 E a ste rn S tate s— T o t a l .........
R e s id e n t ia l...........................
N o n -R e s id e n tia l...................
P u b lic W o r k s a n d U t ilit ie s ...

188,590,800
63 ,0 11 ,7 00
6 5 ,9 5 1 ,3 0 0
5 9 ,6 2 7 ,8 0 0

2 4 2 ,84 4,000
78 ,423,700
9 5 ,9 68 ,9 00
6 8 ,4 5 1 ,4 0 0

142,050,200
31,175,500
62 ,6 1 0 ,9 0 0
48 ,2 6 3 ,8 0 0

S ix th D is tr ic t T o t a l .................
R e s id e n tia l...........................
A ll O t h e r s ............................




R E V IE W

The value of building and construction contracts awarded
in the Sixth District, according to statistics compiled by the
F. W. Dodge Corporation and subdivided into district totals
by the Division of Research and Statistics of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, declined by onehalf from January to February, and was 9.4 per cent less
than in February, 1936. Residential contracts, however, in­
creased 15.8 per cent over January, and were 17.9 per cent
greater than a year ago, while “Other” contracts declined
64.7 per cent from January, and were 23 per cent less than
in February last year. “Other” contracts in February were
the smallest since April, 1935, and the total for the month
was the smallest total since August, 1935. Figures for the
first two months of 1937 show gains of 5.7 per cent in total,
and 32.7 per cent in residential, awards, but a decrease of
1.8 per cent in “Other” contracts, compared with that
period a year ago. Increases over January in Tennessee and
Georgia were outweighed by decreases in the other four
states, and decreases compared with February last year in
Alabama, Florida and Louisiana, more than offset increases
in Georgia, Mississippi and Tennessee. In the 37 Eastern
States all classes of contracts declined from January to
February but were larger than a year ago, residential con­
tracts in both February and January being more than dou­
ble those in February and January, 1936.
Press reports indicate that “the Southern Pine market
continues generally strong, although there are some reports
of a slight slowing up in the demand for retail yard stock.
Box factories continue active buyers of low-grade stock,
and the railroads and industrials are having difficulty in
placing their schedules.” In the last two weeks of Febru­
ary, orders at mills reporting to the Southern Pine Asso­
ciation were somewhat less than production, and in the
week ending February 27, orders, shipments and produc­
tion were somewhat below the corresponding week last
year. For the four weeks, however, orders averaged 5.3
per cent, shipments 20.7 per cent, production 4.8 per cent,
and unfilled orders 25.7 per cent, greater than in the same
weeks a year ago.
Consumption of cotton by American mills amounted in
February to 664,439 bales, a slight decline from January,
but 28.8 per cent greater than in February last year, and
the highest total, according to the Census Bureau, on record
for the month. The previous high for February was
594,720 bales, in 1929. February was shorter than Jan­
uary, however, and daily average consumption increased
2.1 per cent. Of the total consumption, 553,553 bales, or
83.3 per cent, were consumed by mills in the cotton grow­
ing states, and 110,886 bales in the remainder of the
country. In the seven months of the current cotton season,
C O T T O N C O N S U M P T IO N , E X P O R T S , S T O C K S , A N D A C T IV E S P IN D L E S
U N I T E D S T A T E S — B a le s
Feb. 1937
Jan. 1937
Feb. 1936
C o tto n C o n s u m e d ....................
S t o c k s ......................................
I n C o n s u m in g E sta b lis h m e n ts
I n P u b lic Sto ra ge an d at
C o m p re s se s.......................
E x p o r t s ....................................
A c tiv e Sp in d le s— N u m b e r ........

664,439
8,02 1,93 3
2 ,05 6,14 4

67 8,06 4
8,84 5,65 3
2,06 6,30 2

5,965,789
462,517
24,5 36 ,2 54

6,779,351
538,280
24 ,3 64 ,8 02

515,977
8,65 2,83 7
1,405,329
7 ,2 4 7 ,5 0 8
406,022
23 ,3 4 7 ,8 5 0

C O T T O N G R O W I N G S T A T E S — B a le s
C o tto n C o n s u m e d ....................
S t o c k s ......................................
I n C o n s u m in g E sta b lis h m e n ts
I n P u b lic Sto ra ge a n d at
C o m p re s se s .............................
A c tiv e S p in d le s— N u m b e r ........

553,553
7,57 5,92 9
1,719,741

564,874
8,43 8 ,4 8 2
1,748,008

431,387
8,3 0 5 ,4 6 4
1,181,055

5,856,188

6,690,474

7,124,409

17,760,252

17,662,922

17,215,076

M O N T H LY

August through February, total consumption has been
4,512,634 bales, a gain of 27.8 per cent over that part of
the previous season. Mills in the cotton states have con­
sumed in this seven months period 3,772,715 bales, or 83.6
per cent of the total. The increase over that part of the
previous season in the cotton states was 27.5 per cent, and
in other states 29.4 per cent.
February exports of cotton amounted to 462,517 bales,
a decrease of 14.1 per cent from January, but 13.9 per cent
larger than in February last year, and for the seven months
of the season total exports have been 3,897,599 bales, a de­
crease of 11.6 per cent compared with that part of the
1935-36 season. According to the Census Bureau, Febru­
ary exports were valued at $31,719,000, compared with
$36,581,000 for January and with $25,920,000 in February
last year, and for the seven months period exports were
valued at $261,303,000, against $283,744,000 for that
period a year ago.
Stocks of cotton held by mills at the close of February
were 46.3 per cent larger than at that time last year, while
stocks in storage and at compresses were 17.7 per cent
smaller.
Active spindles have increased in number each month
since May, and in February the total was 5.1 per cent
larger than a year ago.
Cotton mills in Georgia consumed 130,709 bales in Feb­
ruary, those in Alabama 71,112 bales, and those in Ten­
nessee 15,577 bales. The total of 217,398 bales for the
three states was somewhat smaller than for January or
December, and was slightly less than the total for June,
1933. For each of the 24 business days in February, how­
ever, there were consumed 9,058 bales, a daily rate higher
than has been recorded for any previous month. The
cumulated total for the seven months of the season is
1,489,465 bales, larger by 29.3 per cent than in the cor­
responding part of last season.
After reaching in December the highest level on record,
total production of electric power for public use in the six
states of this District declined 4.1 per cent in January, but
was 9.4 per cent greater than in January, 1936. An increase
of 21 per cent in January production in Georgia was more
than offset by decreases in the other five states. January
production was smaller than a year ago in Florida and
Louisiana. The rate of January production, reflected in
daily average figures, was somewhat lower than in the last
four months of 1936, September, with only thirty days,
having recorded the highest daily average rate on record.
Production by use of water power accounted in January
for 68.4 per cent of the total, the highest percentage since
COTTON SEED

C o tto n Seed— T o n s
R eceived a t M i l l s .......
C r u s h e d .....................
O n H a n d Feb. 2 8 .......
Prod u ctio n
C ru d e Oil, lb s ............
C a k e a n d M e a l, t o n s . .
H u lls, t o n s .................
Lin ters, b a le s .............
S to c k s a t M i ll s Feb. 28
C ru d e Oil, lb s ............
C a k e a n d M e a l, to n s..
H u lls, t o n s .................
Lin ters, b a le s .............

May, 1935. In December it was 64 per cent, and in Jan­
uary last year 65.3 per cent.
Weekly reports of the Bureau of Mines indicate that coal
production in Alabama in the four weeks ending February
27 averaged 278,000 tons per week, a gain of nearly 6 per
cent over January and 9.4 per cent larger than a year ago,
and in Tennessee the February average of 119,000 tons per
week is only slightly larger than in January and 4 per cent
less than in the corresponding period of 1936. For the
eight weeks of 1937, Alabama production has averaged 11.4
per cent, and that in Tennessee 0.1 per cent, larger than in
that part of last year. Preliminary figures for the United
States indicate a total production in February of 41,740,000
tons, a gain of 2 per cent over January, and 1.4 per cent
larger than a year ago. Daily average production, how­
ever, increased 7.1 per cent over January and was 5.6
per cent larger than in February, 1936, which had one more
business day.
Total production of pig iron in Alabama, according to
Iron Age statistics, declined 7 per cent from January to the
shorter month of February, but the daily average rate in­
creased 3 per cent from 6,774 tons per day in January to
6,975 tons per day in February, the highest recorded since
June, 1930. In the two months of 1937, Alabama produc­
tion has amounted to 405,308 tons, the largest for those
months since 1930. At the close of February there were 15
furnaces active, the same as for the three previous months,
and compared with 12 active a year ago. Early in March
one additional furnace was blown in, making a total of 16.
Press reports indicate a fair run of new business in both
pig iron and steel; that shipments are moving steadily and
mills are having difficulty filling specifications against or­
ders already on file. Wage increases ranging between 10
and 15 per cent and affecting 22,000 workers were reported
to become effective March 16. Price quotations in the Iron
Age indicate the current price in Birmingham District has
been increased to $20.38 per ton, compared with $17.38 in
early February, and with $15.50 a year ago.
February receipts of both turpentine and rosin declined
further to the lowest for the season. Stocks of turpentine
were the smallest since September, 1934, and stocks of
rosin were the lowest since June, 1929. Quotations for tur­
pentine on the Savannah Market have declined from 45%
cents per gallon on January 8, the highest in nearly a year,
to 3914 cents on March 13, the same as at that time last
year. The average of quotations for the thirteen grades of
rosin also declined from $11.08 per 280 pounds on Jan­
uary 8, the highest in about ten years, to $9.31 on March 6
and rose slightly the following week to $9.49, which com­
pares with $4.50 on the same Saturday a year ago. Feb­
ruary receipts and stocks are compared in the table.

A N D COTTON SEED PRODUCTS
S ix th D is tr ic t*
U n ite d States
A u g . 1 to Feb. 28
A u g . 1 to Feb. 28
1936-37
1935-36
1936-37
1935-36
1,806,992
1,520,608
292,688

1,325,093
1,221,279
149,347

4,3 2 8 ,7 0 3
3,78 0,41 9
570,210

3,565,444
3 ,2 8 3,21 4
371,805

7

R E V IE W

N A V A L STO RES M O V E M E N T
T u rp e n tin e (1)
R o s in (2)
Feb. 1937
Feb. 1936
Feb. 1937
Feb. 1936
Receipts:
S a v a n n a h .................................. 931
J ac k so n v ille ............... ............... 796
P e n sa c o la .................. ............... 277

625
632
185

11,308
12,539
1,449

11,457
10,387
1,504

468,256,795 379,555,162 1,132,769,388 989,491,414
6 6 1 ,9 6 6

5 4 2 ,2 4 5

1 ,6 9 2 ,5 6 6

1 ,4 8 5 ,5 9 1

399,307
368,686

321,389
271,251

963,519
927,523

848,353
743,379

15,899,617
72,433
61,638
58,012

20,483,461
114,485
24,374
42,848

38,917 ,7 24
198,768
149,604
210,641

89,497 ,9 26
321,843
154,085
176,016

A lab am a, Lo u isian a,
Digitized for♦Georgia,
FRASER


and M ississip p i.

T o t a l ..................

2,004

1,442

25,296

23,348

Sto ck s:
S a v a n n a h ..................
J a c k so n v ille ...............
P e n sa c o la ...................

25,006
38,967
21,097

41,416
50,249
33 ,620

58,916
48,689
20,636

70,860
99,219
52,559

128,241

222,638

T o t a l ..................
(1) B a rre ls of 50 gallons.

85,0 70

125,285

(2) B a rre ls of 500 pounds.

8

M O N T H LY

R E V IE W

MONTHLY INDEX NUMBERS COMPUTED BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
M O N T H L Y A V E R A G E 1923-1925 =

100

D ec.
1936

Jan .
1937

Feb.
1937

D e c.
1935

Ja n .
1936

Feb.
1936

328.3
187.3
137.1
164.6
161.0
187.1

145.7
77.5
63.4
62.9
72.8
84.7

173.4
95.0
87.7
79.3
73.1
95.1

283.8
138.6
123.1
141.8
138.1
157.5

115.9
61.2
56.9
53.5
65.4
71.2

147.8
80.0
59.0
69.2
75.8

197.8

204.0
105.6
93.3
83.1
108.1

172.0
81.5
78.9
84.9
80.3
92.6

154.5
85.0
72.0
71.3
77.9
90.1

173.9
88.9
74.7
81.4

110.1

194.3
107.6
80.3
83.9
86.7
107.2

100.9
67.3
35.2
50.1
54.0
61.2

107.4
61.9
52.9
51.6
50.1
63.5

114.9
64.5
61.5
59.6
60.9
71.5

92.2
50.7
45.7
58.9
50.4
58.6

91 .7
54.9
50.5
47.1
46.8
57.0

92.3
56.6
56.2
52.6
53.8
61.6

Atlanta (3 firms) ......................................................................................
Birmingham (3 firm s).............................................................................
Chattanooga (3 firm s)............................................................................
N ashville (3 firm s)......................................... .........................................
New Orleans (4 firm s)............................................................................
D I S T R I C T (25 firm s)...........................................................................

116.0
63.0
40.0
55.7
60.7

116.7

119.7
67.2
63.4
62.7
60.9
73.0

106.0
55.7
51.9
65.4
56.6
65.8

99.7
61.0
56.7
54.1
51.4
62.6

96.1
59.0
57.9
55.4
53.8
62.9

W H O L E S A L E T R A D E — S IX T H D IS T R IC T — T O T A L .. . .
Groceries (18 firm s).................................................................................
D ry Goods (14 firm s).............................................................................
Hardware (25 firm s)...............................................................................
Furniture (7 firm s)..................................................................................
Drugs (7 firm s).........................................................................................

77.5
58.6
60.6
87.8

7 7 .7R
56. 2r
62.4
93.5
79.5
98.5

76.5
55.8
58.6
81.5
83.6
98.2

63.1
52.1
53.8
69.0
61.4
90.6

59.8
51.9
46.3
69.1
51.2
91.3

59.0
48.9
52.2
59.9
61.3
89.8

58.5
45.1
74.2
57.9
69.9
53.8
53.5

62.5
49.1
88.5
67.4
61.0
54.0
55.9

72.1
60.4
83.7
80.3
80.0
62.9
64.3

54.9
40.8
69.6
57.7
62.5
47.5
51.8

53.9
40.4
66.7
57.2
61.8
44.3
51.6

37.0

35.0

11.0

21.1

15.2
41.0
19.6
19.7
55.7

15.8
59.1
17.5
14.1
47.4

40.3
19.4
35.6
43.6
20.7
21.9
53.6

29.2
5.2
9 .8
36.9
159.0
27.0

39.0
18.9
9 .4
34.0
62.1
27.8
53.5

43.0
11.3
5.5
30.5
307.3
11.3
40.8

A ll O thers...................................................................................................

53.4
38.1
63.6

64.4
30.5
86.9

32.5
35.3
30.6

58.1
36.6
7 2.4

55.8
19.6
79.5

35.9
30.0
39.8

W H O L E S A L E P R I C E S — U N IT E D S T A T E S f
A L L C O M M O D I T I E S .........................................................................
Farm Products..........................................................................................
Foods...........................................................................................................
Other Commodities.................................................................................
Hides and leather products.........................................................
Textile products...............................................................................
Fuel and lighting.............................................................................
Metals and metal products..........................................................
Building materials................................................ ..........................
Chemicals and drugs*......................................................................
Housefurnishing goods..................................................................
M iscellaneous...................................................................................

84.2
88.5
85.5
82.2
99.7
76.3
76.5
89.6
89.5
85.3
83.2
74.5

85.9
91.3
87.1
83.4
101.7
77.5
76.6
90.9
91.3
87.7
86.5
76.2

86.3
91.4
87.0
84.1
102.7
77.5
76.8
91.7
93.3
87.8
87.9
77.3

80.9
78.3
8 5.7
78.7
95.4
73.2
74.6

80.8
78.2
83.5
78.8
97.1
71.7
75.1
86.7
85.7
80.5
81.4
67.4

80.6
79.5
83.3
79.0
96.1
71.0
76.1
86.7
85.5
80.1
81.5

134.5
168.4
67.3
178.7
219.6
167.1

131.7
165.0
65.6
172.1
213.4
167.7

129.0
161.7
64.2
167.7
206.8
156.5

97.0

C O T T O N E X P O R T S — U N IT E D S T A T E S ................................

115.7

104.8

P I G IR O N P R O D U C T IO N — U N IT E D S T A T E S ...................

104.3
86.5

107.5
90.4

D E P A R T M E N T S T O R E T R A D E —S IX T H D IS T R IC T
D a ily Average S a le s — U n a d ju s te d
Atlanta (3 firm s)......................................................................................
Birmingham (3 firm s)..........................................\ . ..............................
Chattanooga (4 firm s)......................................................................
Nashville (4 firm s)...................................................................................
New Orleans (4 firm s)............................................................................
D I S T R I C T (30 firm s)...........................................................................

88.1

D a ily Average S a le s— A d ju s te d *
Atlanta (3 firm s)......................................................................................
Birmingham (3 firm s).............................................................................
Chattanooga (4 firm s)............................................................................
N ashville (4 firm s)...................................................................................
New Orleans (4 firm s)............................................................................
D I S T R I C T (30 firm s)...........................................................................

110.2
87.9
98.6
93.6

111.0

86.1
•97.8

M o n th ly S to c k s — U n a d ju s te d
Atlanta (3 firm s)......................................................................................
Birmingham (3 firm s).............................................................................
Chattanooga (3 firm s)............................................................................
N ashville (3 firm s)...................................................................................
New Orleans (4 firm s)............................................................................
D I S T R I C T (25 firm s)...........................................................................
M o n t h ly S to c k s — A d ju s te d *

L I F E IN S U R A N C E S A L E S — S I X S T A T E S — T O T A L
A labam a.....................................................................................................
Flo rid a.........................................................................................................
Georgia.......................................................................................................
Louisiana....................................................................................................
M ississippi.................................................................................................
Tennessee...................................................................................................
B U IL D IN G P E R M IT S —T W E N T Y C IT IE S — T O T A L
A tlanta........................................................................................................
Birm ingham ...............................................................................................
Jacksonville...............................................................................................
N ashville.....................................................................................................
New Orleans..............................................................................................
Fifteen Other C itie s ................................................................................
C O N T R A C T A W ARD S— S IX T H D IS T R IC T — T O T A L . . .

C O T T O N C O N S U M P T IO N — U N IT E D S T A T E S ..................
Cotton-Growing States...........................................................................

* Adjusted for Seasonal Variation.




68.8

100.2
103.6
77.9
64.9

100.8
79.1
78.7
80.1
70.0

68.8
59.4
59.3
55.1
69.8

fCompiled by Bureau of Labor Statistic*. 1926-100.

21.1

88.8
85.5
80.6
81.0
67.5

68.1
100.2

48.0
124.8
167.9
115.0

114.7
145.2
54.1
148.8
194.5
138.2

126.0
49.0
127.9
159.4
124.5

90.1

172.8

105.7

79.1

100.4
84.1

70.5
70.1

67.8
68.4

61.0
65.1

121.8