View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M

O

N

T

H

L

Y

R

E

V

I

E

W

O f F in a n c ia l, A g r ic u ltu r a l, T r a d e a n d I n d u s tr ia l
C o n d itio n s in th e S i x t h F e d e r a l R e s e r v e D is tr ic t
F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E

Vol. 21. No. 7

Prepared by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System
Volume of production, employment, and trade was sus­
tained in June at the May level, although there is usually a
decline at this season. Wholesale prices of commodities ad­
vanced between the middle of May and the third week of
July, reflecting in part the effects of the drought.

Production

The Board’s seasonally adjusted index of
industrial production increased from 101
tj
I
per cent of the 1923-25 average in May to
mp oymen j
cent
june Steel production
continued at about 70 per cent of capacity in June and the
first three weeks of July, although a considerable decline is
usual at this season. Output of automobiles declined sea­
sonally. The cut of lumber showed a seasonal rise in June
following a substantial increase in the preceding month.
Production increased at woolen mills and was sustained at
cotton mills, where a decline is usual in June. Output of
foods increased.
Factory employment and payrolls showed a slight in­
crease between the middle of May and the middle of June,
contrary to seasonal tendency. Steel mills and plants pro­
ducing machinery employed more workers, and at automo­
bile factories there was less than the seasonal decline. At
textile mills employment was unchanged, although a decline
is usual in June, while the clothing industries reported a

1930

O F

A T L A N T A

ATLANTA, GA., JULY 31, 1936

NATIONAL SUMMARY OF BUSINESS
CONDITIONS

1929

B A N K

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

1936

In d e x n u m b e r o f in d u s t r ia l p ro d u ctio n , a d ju ste d f o r se a so n a l v a r ia tio n .
(1923-1925 a v e ra g e = 100.) L a t e s t fig u r e J u n e P r e lim in a r y 103.




decrease in the number employed.
Total value of construction contracts awarded, as reported
by the F. W. Dodge Corporation, increased somewhat from
May to June and continued to be substantially larger than
a year ago. There was a further increase in residential
building.

Agriculture

Crop estimates by the Department of Agri­
culture on the basis of July 1 conditions in­
dicated little change from last year for wheat and corn and
considerable declines for oats, hay, potatoes, and tobacco.
Since July 1 prospects have been reduced by extreme
drought over wide areas. Cotton area in cultivation on July
1 was estimated by the Department of Agriculture at 30,600,000 acres, compared with 27,900,000 acres last year
and an average of 41,400,000 acres in the years 1928-1932.

Distribution

Freight-car loadings increased seasonally
in June, and the distribution of commodi­
ties to consumers was maintained at the May level. In recent
months retail trade as measured by sales of automobiles and
by the volume of business of department, variety, and mail
order stores was expanded considerably.

Commodity The general level of wholesale commodity
Prices
prices, as measured by the index of the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, advanced by
about 3 per cent between the middle of May and the third
week of July, following a decline of about the same amount
earlier in the year. Prices of wheat, flour, feed grains, and
dairy products advanced sharply, owing primarily to the

1929

1930

1931

1932

1933

1934

1935

1936

In d e x o f fa c to r y e m p lo ym e n t, a d ju ste d f o r se a so n a l v a r ia tio n .
a v e ra g e = 100.) L a t e s t fig u r e J u n e 86.3.

(1923-25

2

M O N T H L Y

R E V IE W

Indexes of the U nited States Bureau of La b o r Statistics.
B y months
1929 to 1931; by weeks 1932 to date. (1926 = 100.) L a te st figure Ju ly
18, 80.1.

W ednesday figures, Ja n u a ry 31, 1934, to Ju ly 22, 1936.

drought, and there were increases also in the prices of hogs
and pork, cotton and cotton textiles, silk, rubber, copper,
and finished steel.

June and were also 1.4 per cent larger than in June last
year, but for the first half year show a decrease of 10.6 per
cent compared with the corresponding period in 1935.

Bank
Credit

Gold imports, which had been in large volume in
a June, declined in July. Funds held by
the Treasury as cash and on deposit with Federal
Reserve banks declined, as the result of disbursements in
connection with the cashing of veterans’ service bonds. Con­
sequently reserve balances of member banks, which had
declined in June, rose once more to their previous level.

Total loans and investments of reporting member banks
in leading cities, after increasing sharply at the end of May
and the early part of June, declined somewhat in the four
weeks ending July 15, reflecting largely a reduction in loans
to security brokers and dealers in New York City. Balances
held for domestic banks increased by $800,000,000 during
the period, as a consequence of redeposit with reporting
banks of a considerable part of funds acquired by banks
through Treasury disbursements.

SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY
Available business statistics for the Sixth Federal Reserve
District indicate a further substantial increase in building
and construction activities in June, and there were also gains
over May in operations at textile mills, and in life insurance
sales. Retail and wholesale trade declined over the month
by somewhat less than the usual amount, and production of
pig iron in Alabama, and of coal in Alabama and Tennessee,
also decreased.
Volume of June sales by reporting retail firms declined
10.1 per cent from May, but was 23.3 per cent greater than
in June last year, and after adjustment for the usual sea­
sonal movement, the June index rose to the level of March,
which was higher than for any other month since December,
1929. For the first half of 1936 total sales have been 12 per
cent greater than in the same period last year. Wholesale
trade declined 4.3 per cent in June, but was 25.3 per cent
greater than a year ago, and for the first half year has been
13.6 per cent greater than in the first six months of 1935.

Sales
of life insurance increased 1.4 per cent from May to


At weekly reporting member banks in leading cities of
the District total loans and investments increased 13.3 mil­
lions of dollars between June 10 and July 15, an increase of
19.2 millions in investment holdings being partly offset by
a decline of 5.9 millions in loans. Total loans at the middle
of July were 5.6 millions less than a year ago, but invest­
ment holdings were 90.9 millions greater. Deposits also in­
creased since early June and were substantially larger than
a year ago. At the Federal Reserve Bank there were further
increases in reserves, and Federal Reserve note circulation
also increased, but holdings of Government securities were
slightly reduced.
Employment statistics compiled by the United States
Bureau of Labor Statistics indicate that in the six states
located wholly or partly in the Sixth District, the number
of workers at reporting firms declined 2.1 per cent from the
middle of April to the middle of May, but that the amount
of a week’s payroll declined only one-tenth of one per cent.
Number of workers declined in Florida by 11.3 per cent,
chiefly in wholesale and retail trade and at hotels, 5.4 per
cent in Mississippi largely at shirt factories, fertilizer plants
and cotton seed mills, and 1.4 per cent in Georgia prin­
cipally at cotton and fertilizer mills. The May figures are,
however, higher for both employment and payrolls than in
May of other recent years. Value of building permits issued
in June at reporting cities of the District increased 17.5 per
cent over May, was 32.4 per cent greater than a year ago
and was the largest total for any month in more than six
years. Construction contracts awarded in June were also
substantially larger than in the previous month or in June
last year. Activity at cotton mills increased somewhat from
May to June, evidenced by an increase in the consumption
of cotton, and was at a substantially higher level than in
June last year. Pig iron production in Alabama declined
10.5 per cent, on a daily average basis, from May to June,
but was 47.8 per cent greater than a year ago. Production
of coal in Alabama and Tennessee also declined from May,
but for the first half of 1936 has been 12 per cent in Ala­
bama, and 5 per cent in Tennessee, greater than in that part
of 1935.

M O N T H L Y

FE D E R A L R ES ER V E BAN K OF A TLA N TA
(In Thousands of D ollars)
Ju ly 15
1936
B ills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. O bligations_______
A ll Others _________________________ ____
To tal Discounts
____
B ills Bought in Open M arket
In d u strial Advances „ ________
U . S. Securities ______
_____ _
To tal B ills and Securities
Total Reserves Member B a n k Reserve Account
U . S. Tre a su rer— General Account..
______ _______
Total Deposits
F . R . Notes in A ctual C ircu la tio n ....
Com m itm ents to M ake In d u strial
Advances ....... ______
____________

21
21

108
723
98,356
99,208
230,523
117,498
22,464
145,554
176,915
287

Ju n e 10
1936
$

Ju ly 17
1935

50

21

71
108
783
100,209
101,171
215,153
109,361
31,901
147,601
160,910

27
27
169
1,070
94,239
95,505
143,088
99,535
1,633
103,766
127,039
665

FINANCE
Reserve
Bank
Credit

Total holdings of bills and securities by the Federa^R0serve Bank of Atlanta declined about two
millions of dollars between June 10 and July 15,
and were then the smallest since early March.
The recent decrease was principally due to a reduction of
nearly 1.9 millions in holdings of United States Government
securities, accompanied by small decreases in discounts and
industrial advances. Compared with the corresponding
Wednesday a year earlier, discounts on July 17 were slightly
less, holdings of bills bought in the open market were
$61,000 smaller, and industrial advances had declined
$347,000, but holdings of United States Government securi­
ties were greater by more than four millions of dollars.
Total reserves held by the bank increased from 215 mil­
lions on June 10 to 238 millions on July 8, but declined
about 7.5 millions the following week, when they were 87.4
millions greater than on the corresponding Wednesday last
year. When the Treasury began the distribution of checks
and adjusted service bonds to veterans at the middle of
June, member bank reserve accounts declined 15.9 millions,
but Government deposits increased 22.8 millions, by June
17, and Federal Reserve note circulation began to increase.
Government deposits declined during the following week,
however, by about the amount of the increase, and member
bank reserve accounts increased, and by the middle of July
member bank reserve accounts were 8.1 millions greater
than on June 10. Federal Reserve note circulation had in­
creased to 180.4 millions on July 1 and declined to 176.9
on July 15, and Government deposits were 9.4 millions less
than on June 10. All of these items continued to be sub­
stantially larger than on the corresponding report date a
year ago, as indicated in the accompanying table.

Member Total loans and investments at 22 weekly reportBanfe
memher banks in leading cities of the Sixth
p

«.

District increased further between June 10 and
July 15, because of an increase in holdings of
investment securities. Loans declined during this period,
but deposits increased. Total holdings of investment securi­
ties increased by more than 19 millions of dollars since
June 10, and on July 15 were 90.9 millions greater than on
the corresponding Wednesday last year. The larger part of
the increase over both comparative report dates was in
direct obligations of the United States Government, but
guaranteed securities and other securities also increased.
Between June 10 and July 15 loans on real estate in­
creased somewhat, and were 3.6 millions greater than a
year ago, and loans on securities declined slightly since
June 10, but were 4.6 millions greater than a year ago.




3

R E V IE W

C O N D IT IO N O F 22 M E M B E R B A N K S IN S E L E C T E D
(In Thousands of Dollars)
Ju ly 15
Ju n e 10
1936
1936

C IT IE S
Ju ly 17
1935

Loans and Investm ents___ ___ __________ $548,245
Lo an s— Total __________ ____________________ 219,991
59,989
On Securities __________________________
To Brokers and D e a le rs _____________
7,198
To Others _______________________________ 52,791
Real E sta te Lo an s ______________________ 23,369
4,929
Acceptances and Com’l P ap er Bought
Lo an s to B a n k s __________ _______________
967
Other Lo an s _________ _____ _____________ 130,737

$534,954
225,880
60,266
7,192
53,074
22,444
5,742
1,173
136,255

$462,961
225,617
55,340
4,494
50,846
19,787
5,670
1,028
144,694

Investm ents— Total ___
_______________ 328,254
U . S. Govt. D irect Obligations
208,931
Obligations Guaranteed by U . S ___ 39,661
Other Securities ____________________ __
79,662

309,074
196,524
35,354
77,196

237,344
143,231
26,423
67,690

Reserve w ith F . R . B a n k ___________ .
Cash in V a u lt ____________________ ______
Balances w ith Domestic B a n k s________
Demand Deposits— Adjusted ___________
Tim e Deposits ____________________________
U. S. Govt. Deposits ___________________
Inter-bank D eposits: Domestic________
Fo reign _________
Borrow ings

61,055
10,139
144,059
298,644
172,629
43,335
182,200
1,090

55,601
8,395
129,942
261,336
172,369
19,785
151,180
1,037

67,007
10,154
157,196
305,154
177,147
51,303
197,081
1,078

Other classes of loans, however, were smaller at the middle
of July than a month earlier or a year ago.
Demand deposits-adjusted increased 6.5 millions of dol­
lars between June 10 and July 15, to the highest level on
record, and were 43.8 millions greater than at the same
time last year. There were further increases in time deposits,
which were 4.8 millions greater than on the corresponding
Wednesday a year ago, and in Government deposits, which
were 31.5 millions greater than a year earlier. Balances
maintained by these banks with correspondents increased
13.1 millions since June 10, were at the highest level since
March 18 and 27.3 millions greater than a year ago, and
interbank deposits also increased 14.9 million dollars since
June 10 and were 45.9 millions greater than on the cor­
responding Wednesday last year. Reserves maintained by
these banks with the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta in­
creased to a new high level on July 8, but declined slightly
the following week.
D E B I T S TO I N D IV ID U A L A C C O U N T S *
(In Thousands of Dollars)
Ju n e
M ay
1936
1936

Ju n e
1935

A L A B A M A — 4 Cities ___________________ __ $120,723
Birm ingham _______________________________ 70,204
Dothan -------------------------------------2,360
Mobile ---------------------------------------- 29,581
Montgomery _______________________________ 18,578

$122,168
71,366
2,230
29,566
19,006

$108,529
63,052
1,880
24,950
18,647

F L O R I D A — 4 Cities _______________________ 124,416
Jackso nville
______________________________
61,957
M iam i
------------------------ -------- 31,218
Pensacola ___________________________________
8,001
Tam pa --------------------------------- -23,240

138,207
74,242
31,953
7,708
24,304

105,278
56,087
22,873
6,268
24,050

G E O R G IA — 10 Cities ______________________ 228,577
A lb an y ------------ -------- ----- -----3,159
A tlan ta --------------- -- -------------------- 149,865
Augusta ------------ ------- ----- - ----- 15,217
B run sw ick ________________________ _______
2,212
Columbus ------------------------------------ 11,353
Elberton ___________________________________.
963
Macon ------------------------------------ --12,899
N ew nan ____________________________________
2,049
Savannah ____________________ __ ____________ 27,977
Valdosta —. ______________ ________________
2,883

230,696
3,290
150,515
17,288
2,219
10,629
1,201
12,130
1,662
28,969
2,793

193,477
2,375
126,725
14,062
1,890
8,769
737
10,860
1,327
24,408
2,324

L O U I S I A N A — New

O rleans

____________ 187,104

183,646

169,072

52,824
3,743
33,291
9,652
6,138

41,133
4,148
21,999
9,020
5,966

37,295
3,393
21,912
6,877
5,113

T E N N E S S E E — 3 Cities ___________________ 137,205
Chattanooga ____________________ _________ 36,270
K noxville ___________________________________ 22,790
N ashville ___________________________________ 78,145

133,662
35,940
24,320
73,402

120,604
30,097
19,530
70,977

$849,512

$734,255

M IS S I S S IP P I — 4 Cities ___________________
H attiesburg ________________________________
Jackson
____________________________________
M eridian __________________ __ _______________
V icksbu rg ___________________ __ ____________

Total— 26 Cities _______________

0,849

♦ M o n t h ly to ta ls a re d erived f r o m w e e k ly re p o rts b y p r o r a t in g fig u re s fo r
those w eeks w h ic h do n o t f a l l e n tir e ly w it h in a s in g le c a le n d a r m on th .

4

M O N T H L Y

Savings deposits at 57 banks located throughout the Dis­
trict at the close of June averaged 2.3 per cent larger than
a month earlier, and 2.1 per cent larger than a year ago.
Debits to individual accounts at 26 clearing house cen­
ters of the District, shown in an accompanying table, aver­
aged slightly larger in June than in May, and 15.9 per cent
greater than in June last year. Debits usually decline from
May to June.

AGRICULTURE
The July 1 crop report issued by the United States De­
partment of Agriculture indicates that “drought conditions
have reached a point where crop prospects are rather defi­
nitely poorer than at this date in any previous year except
1934. Prospects have been declining daily as successive
millions of acres of crops were dried out beyond possible
recovery, but with much of the South already relieved by
rains, and with the bulk of the com crop in the North Cen­
tral States small enough to stand considerable dry weather,
a nearly average yield is still possible if rains are not too
long delayed. . . . The drought has already greatly reduced
the production of small grains, early hay crops, and early
vegetables, although in most states conditions during the
spring months were not as bad as in 1934. The July 1
reports, received before the blistering hot weather of early
July, indicated that in addition to the loss of about 10 mil­
lion acres of the winter wheat seeded last fall, more than
eleven million acres of spring wheat and many acres of
oats and barley would be abandoned. . . . The condition of
tobacco and the condition of sweet potatoes were each the
lowest on record for July 1, the condition of potatoes the
second lowest, and cotton, peanuts, beans and soybeans have
all had an unfavorable start.”
Most parts of the Sixth District received some rains dur­
ing June and early July, but serious drought continued in
many counties in middle Georgia and in some parts of north
Georgia. Heavy rains early in July appear to have broken
the drought in most parts of Tennessee. The July 1 estimate
by the United States Department of Agriculture indicates an
increase of 1.9 per cent in production of wheat in Tennessee
this year over that in 1935. The estimates of the corn crop
in the six states of the District average 20.1 per cent less
than production last year; an increase of 7.4 per cent in
Florida being more than offset by decreases in the other five
states ranging from 11.4 per cent in Mississippi to 31.3 per
cent in Louisiana. Production of oats is estimated to be
somewhat larger than last year in Florida, Louisiana, and
Mississippi, but decreases in Georgia, Alabama, and Ten­
nessee more than offset these gains, and the total for the six
S U G A R M O V E M E N T — N E W O R L E A N S — (Pounds)
R a w Sugar
____________________________________________ Ju n e 1936_________ M ay 1936__________ Ju n e 1935
99,241,046
118,988,458
Receipts ----------------------- --- 92,041,824
M eltings ------------------------------ 88,832,982
85,639,706
85,310,972
Stocks --------------------------------- 65,879,518
62,683,951
116,617,768
Refined Sugar
Shipm ents __________________________ 81,924,603
84,979,823
77,217,997
Stocks ----------- --------------------- 31,353,891
31,989,459__________27,382,008
R IC E M O V EM EN T
(R ice M illers’ A ssociation Statistics)
Receipts of Rough R ice*
Ju n e
August-June, In cl.
Season 1935-36 ______________________ _____
60,354
7,986,249
Season 1934-35 ____________________ ______
82,069
7,768,134
Distribution of M illed R ice **
Season 1935-36 ____________________________ 317,538
8,269,711
Season 1934-35 ____________________________ 529,429
9,055,777
Stocks:
Rough*
M illed**
76,779
532,306
June 30, 1936..................................... .........
Ju n e 30, 1935_______________________________ 136,989___________________ 494,806
*B a rre ls of 162 lbs. **Pockets of 100 lbs.




R E V IE W

states is 9.9 per cent less than 1935 production. Tame hay
estimates for the six states average 21.3 per cent less than
production last year, small increases in Alabama and Flor­
ida being outweighed by decreases in the other four states.
Estimated production of potatoes and of sweet potatoes is
smaller in all six states than in 1935, the averages showing
decreases of 20.1 per cent, and 26.6 per cent, respectively.
Tennessee farmers up until July 1 had experienced one of
the most unfavorable years ever known for growing and
transplanting of tobacco plants, and the July estimate indi­
cates a decrease of 21.6 per cent from last year’s crop. Con­
ditions were more favorable in the tobacco sections of south
Georgia, however, and the crop in that state is expected to
be 9.2 per cent larger than in 1935. July 1 estimates of
apples average 26.3 per cent less than last year, and esti­
mates of peaches in these six states average 9.9 per cent
smaller than 1935 production. Estimates for pears and
grapes, however, were 68.1 per cent, and 7.7 per cent,
respectively, larger than production last year. Produc­
tion of sugar cane in Louisiana is estimated at 4,957,000
short tons, an increase of 3.1 per cent over that last year;
but production of sugar is estimated at 322,000 short tons,
a decrease of 3.3 per cent compared with 1935 production
of 333,000 short tons. Louisiana’s rice crop is estimated at
15,998,000 bushels, a decrease of 1.3 per cent from last
year. The July estimates of citrus fruits in Florida con­
tinued the same as for May and June, 17.7 million boxes
of oranges and 11.5 million boxes of grapefruit.
The area in cultivation to cotton on July 1 in the six
states of this District was 6.9 per cent greater than at that
time a year earlier, according to the July 1 report of the
United States Department of Agriculture. For the United
States as a whole the cotton acreage on July 1 was 9.8 per
cent larger than a year ago. Figures for the states of this
District are compared in the table.
Cotton A creage J u ly 1
1936
1935
A labam a _____________________ 2,342,000
2,252,000
Flo rid a _____ _________ ________
89,000
91,000
Georgia ______________ _______ 2,324,000
2,172,000
Lo u isia n a ___________ ________ 1,342,000
1,231,000
M ississippi __________________ 2,905,000
2,665,000
Tennessee ____ _____________
780,000
743,000
T o tal—_______________ 9,782,000
9,154,000
U nited States _____ ______ 30,621,000
27,888,000

A creage Harvested
1935
2,243,000
89,000
2,155,000
1,221,000
2,644,000
736,000
9,088,000
27,335,000

Cash receipts from the sale of principal farm products,
including livestock and livestock products, were larger in
May, and in the first five months of the year than in cor­
responding periods of other recent years. Comparisons by
states with last year are shown in the table.
R E C E IP T S FR O M S A L E O F P R IN C IP A L FA R M P R O D U C T S
(In Thousands of D o llars)
M ay
M ay
Ja n . to M ay, In cl.
1936
1935
1936
1935
A labam a ________________ -----------------$ 7,235
Flo rid a ___________________ _________________ 10,410
Georgia ____ _____________ _________________ 5,297
Lo u isia n a _______________ ----------------- 5,957
M ississippi _____________ ----------------- 4,531
Tennessee _______________ - ............. —
6,117
T o ta l____ __________ _________________ $39,547

$ 5,531
8,612
4,571
5,092
4,016
6,365
$34,187

$30,383
68,971
28,960
23,744
29,025
35,289
$216,372

$28,738
57,001
27,460
23,258
26,607
37,079
$200,143

TRADE
Retail The total volume of sales during June by 57 report­
Trade ing retail firms was 10.1 per cent smaller than in
May, but 23.3 per cent greater than in June last
year. At the same time a year ago, there was a decrease of
18.4 per cent from May to June. The decline this year was
slightly less than usually occurs at that time of year, and
after adjustment for the usual seasonal movement the index

M O N T H L Y

6

R E V IE W

R E T A I L T R A D E IN S I X T H D I S T R IC T — J U N E , 1936
Based on confidential reports from 57 department stores
C O M P A R IS O N O F N E T S A L E S
C O M P A R IS O N O F S T O C K S
Ju n e 1936
Y e a r to
Ju n e 30, 1936
w it h :
date w ith
w it h :
Same month
Previous
same period
Same month
Previous
a year ago
month
last year
a year ago
month
Atlanta (6) ________
Birm ingham (5) .....
Chattanooga (4) .....
.
Jacksonville (3)
M iam i (3) __________
Montgomery (3) .....
.
N ashville (4)
New O rleans (4) .....
Other Cities (25) ...
D I S T R IC T (57)

+ 23.8
+ 41.8
+ 9.8
+ 33.7
+ 29.3
+ 24.4
+ 10.2
+ 25.3
+ 12.3
+ 23.3

+ 2.8
+ 17.0
+ 7.3
— 0.8
— 5.8
+ 0.6
— 7.3
— 6.4
+ 1.5
+ 0.9

+ 10.4
+ 24.8
+ 4.0
+ 12.8
+ 9.9
+ 12.1
+ 8.4
+ 15.9
+ 6.0
+ 12.0

— 12.3
— 7.1
— 7.6
— 8.3
— 16.4
— 13.1
— 24.4
+ 4.1
— 17.3
— 10.1

— 8.5
— 8.0
— 7.3
— 5.3
— 10.0
— 10.1
— 9.6
— 6.9
— 6.9
— 7.7

STO CK TU R N O V ER
Ju n e
1936
1935
.40
.26
.31
.22
.31
.27
.35
.34
.22
.31

Jan .-Ju n e, In cl.
1936
1935

.32
.23
.29
.17
.23
....
.23
.25
.22
.25

2.25
1.55
1.59
1.25
2.58
1.65
2.07
1.80
1.43
1.81

N O T E : The rate of stock turnover is the ratio of sales during given period to average stocks on hand.
outstanding and due a t the beginning of the month w hich w ere collected du ring the month.

number of daily average sales rose from 102.1 per cent of
the 1923-1925 average for May to 102.6 per cent in June.
This is the same as the index number for March, and is
higher than for any other month since December, 1929.
June sales declined from May at all reporting cities except­
ing New Orleans, and of the 57 reporting firms, only five
had smaller sales than in June last year. For the first half
of 1936, total sales by these firms have been 12 per cent
greater than in that period a year ago. Stocks of merchan­
dise on hand at the end of June declined further by 7.7 per
cent, but were 0.9 per cent larger than a year ago, and the
rate of stock turnover was the same as for May, but con­
tinued to be higher, for June and for the half year, than in
those periods last year. The collection ratio declined slightly
from May, but was higher than for June, 1935. For June
this year the ratio for regular accounts was 37.1 per cent,
and for installment accounts 16.5 per cent.
Percentage comparisons in the table are based upon fig­
ures reported in actual dollar amounts and make no allow­
ance for changes in price levels. Index numbers on page 8
are based upon reports from a smaller number of firms
whose figures have been reported over a long period of
years.
A statement by the United States Department of Com­
merce indicates that daily average sales of general merchan­
dise in small towns and rural areas of the South declined
1 per cent from April to May, as compared with an increase
of 1 per cent for the country as a whole, and sales in the
South were 21% per cent larger than a year ago. The aver­
age for the country was also 21 % per cent.

Life
Insurance

Sales of life insurance in the six states of this

District increased further in June by 1.4 per

cent over May, and were also 1.4 per cent
larger than in June last year. In the past thirteen years in­
creases have been reported in June over May in only three
instances. For the first half of 1936, sales in these states
have been 10.6 per cent less than in that part of 1935. Fig­
ures compared in the table are from those compiled by the
Life Insurance Sales Research Bureau.

Alabam a —....... ...
Flo rid a ___________ _
Georgia ______,_______
Lo uisiana _________
M ississippi ________
Tennessee ___ ______

$

..

3,680
5,467
5,919
4,918
2,578
5,198

T o ta l_______________$ 27,760
United States
_______ 532,994




$

3,478
5,773
6,153
4,690
2,196
5,087

$ 27,377
503,530

$

3,982
4,822
6,216
4,997
2,296
5,066

$ 27,379
490,268

$

19,614
29,461
35,078
26,924
13,419
30,693

$ 155,189
3,007,255

$

24,826
28,417
40,736
31,736
13,605
34,319

$ 173,639
3,255,496

2.15
1.57
1.67
1.12
2.32

29.9
38.3
31.3

1.45
1.48
1.49
1.66

29.1
40.1
31.6
33.1

.

May
1936

June
1935

27.3
37.4
30.3

26.9
32.5
27.4

30.3
41.7
35.5
33.5

30.4
38.5
29.5
30.6

.

The collection ratio is the percentage of accounts

Wholesale Total sales in June by 79 reporting wholesale
firms averaged 4.3 per cent less than in May,
Trade

but were 25.3 per cent greater than in June
last year, and for the first half of 1936 have been 13.6 per
cent greater than in that part of 1935. The decline from
May to June compares with a decrease of 14.7 per cent at
that time last year. The June index number is the highest
for that month since 1929. All reporting lines shared the
increase over 1935, both for the month and for the half
year, and sales of groceries and furniture increased over
May. Reported figures are compared in the table.
W H O L E S A L E T R A D E IN S IX T H D I S T R I C T D U R IN G J U N E , 1936
(Based on confidential reports from 79 firms)
Percentage Comparisons
June 1936
Jan .-Ju n e, incl.,
N um ber
w it h :
1936, w ith same
of firms
M ay 1936
Ju n e 1935 period last year
A ll L in e s Com bined:
Sales __________________
Stocks ______ __ _______

79
26

— 4.3
— 3.1

+ 25.3
+ 5.5

+ 13.6

G roceries:
Sales __________________
Jackso nville . ___
N ew O rleans ........
V icksbu rg ________
Other Cities ______

18
3
3
3
9

+ 2.2
— 10.2
+ 2.1
— 3.3
+ 10.3

+ 11.6
— 3.8
+ 12.5
+ 13.4
+ 1 6 .7

+ 1.4
— 5.5
— 4.0
+ 18.6
+ 2.2

14
3

+27.6
+ 14.9
+ 30.9
— 4.9

+ 6.4
— 0.0
+ 8.3

D ry Goods:
Sales __________________
N ashville _________
Other Cities
Stocks ________________

7

— 13.3
— 31.1
— 7.9
— 1.0

H a rd w a re :
Sales __________________
N ashville _________
N ew Orleans
Other Cities ______
Stocks ________________

25
3
5
17
9

— 3.7
— 23.6
+ 2.0
— 2.9
— 2.3

+ 27.1
+ 5.1
+ 41.1
+ 23.3
+ 2.8

+ 18.7
+ 4.0
+ 3 6 .5
+ 1 2 .9

F u r n it u r e :
Sales __________________
A tlan ta ____________
O ther C ities ______
Stocks ________________

7
3
4
5

+ 1.5
+ 25.2
— 3.1
+ 2.5

+70.1
+ 67.6
+ 70.7
+ 7.9

+ 28.3
+ 17.2
+ 31.2

E le ctric a l Supp lies:
Sales _________________

3

— 12.5

+ 54.9

+ 4 3 .8

D ru g s :
Sales

__________________

7

— 0.6

+ 14.9

+ 12.1

S ta tio n e ry :
Sales
_____ _________

3

— 1.4

+ 23.1

+ 11.6

(In Thousands of D o llars)
M ay
June
Ja n . to June, In cl.
1936
1935
1936
1935

Ju n e
1936

C O L L E C T I O N R A T IO
Ju n e
1936

11

C O L L E C T I O N R A T IO *
Ju n e
M ay
1936
1936
Groceries ________________
D ry Goods _______________
H ard w are ________________
Fu rn itu re ________________
T o ta l_______________

-

---

72.5
34.7
41.7
38.7
44.3

69.4
39.3
43.9
39.9
45.9

Ju n e
1935

66.2
34.1
38.0
37.9
47.9

♦The collection ratio is the percentage of accounts and notes receivable
outstanding at the beginning of the month w hich were collected during the
month.

6

M O N T H L Y

B U IL D IN G P E R M IT S — J U N E
Num ber
_____________________________________ 1936
1935
A la b a m a :
A n nisto n __________________ ___ 30
B irm ing ham ______________ 341
Mobile ______________________ ___ 59
M ontgomery ______________ 131

20
269
42
107

F lo r id a :
Jackso nville ______________ 575
M iam i ______________________ 719
M iam i Beach ____________ 122
O rlando ............ ......................99
Tam pa _________________ ___ 213

529
534
77
59
168

G eo rg ia:
A tla n ta ___________________ 279
A ugusta ___________________ ___ 76
Columbus
______ _______ ___ 74
Macon ______________________ 153
Savannah __________________ ___ 49
L o u is ia n a :
N ew O rleans ____________ 115
A lex an d ria _______________ ___ 68
Tennessee:
Chattanooga ______________ 418
Johnson C ity ____________ ___ 12
________________ ___ 95
K n o xv ille
274
N ashville ________________
To tal— 20 C it ie s ______ 3,341

V a lu e
1936

1935

Percentage
Change in
V a lu e

76,308
101,060
23,020
62,785

— 40.2
+ 54.3
+ 119.8
+891.9

331,169
1,093,648
1,317,537
135,734
54,089

204,735
460,629
1,009,262
65,716
26,961

+ 61.8
+137.4
+ 30.5
+ 106.5

287
32
32
145
38

355,707
75,668
60,284
76,683
61,670

257,714
25,360
64,204
31,405
34,274

— 6.1

89
53

315,688
29,315

1,618,062
15,993

— 80.5
+ 83.3

296
6
66
109
2,958

242,786
17,200
532,368
299,960
$5,874,421

51,706
2,476
84,736
220,336
$4,436,742

+ 369.6
+ 594.7
+528.3
+ 36.1
+ 32.4

$

45,605
155,983
50,592
622,735

$

+100.6
+ 38.0
+ 198.4

+ 144.2
+ 79.9

INDUSTRY
The value of building permits issued at twenty cities in
the Sixth District during June was 17.5 per cent larger than
the total for May, 32.4 per cent greater than that for June
last year, and the largest total recorded for any month since
March, 1930. Of these twenty cities, twelve reported in­
creases over May, and seventeen reported gains compared
with June, 1935. For the first half of 1936, the value of
permits issued at these twenty cities was $29,426,845, an in­
crease of 71.9 per cent over that period a year ago, 151.6
per cent larger than two years ago, and 400.3 per cent
greater than three years ago, and greater than for the first
half of any year since 1929. Figures for the month are com­
pared in an accompanying table.
The value of building and construction contracts awarded
in the Sixth District, according to statistics compiled by the
F. W. Dodge Corporation and subdivided into district totals
by the Division of Research and Statistics of the Federal
Reserve System, increased 30.1 per cent from May to June,
was 48.7 per cent greater than in June last year. Residential
awards increased 50.7 per cent, and other awards 16.6 per
cent, over May, and both groups continued substantially
larger than a year ago. For the first half of 1936 residential
awards have been 52.4 per cent, other contracts 50.7 per
cent, and the total 51.2 per cent, greater than in that part
of 1935. State figures show increases over May except in
Louisiana, and over June a year ago except in Florida, and
for the first half year contracts have been greater in each
state than in the same period a year earlier.
B U IL D IN G A N D C O N S T R U C T IO N C O N T R A C T S A W A R D E D
(F . W . Dodge Corporation figures)
June 1936
M ay 1936
Ju n e 1935
Residential ____
A ll Others ........
State T o ta ls:
A labam a __ ____
Flo rid a ________
Georgia ________
Lo u isia n a _____
M ississippi ____
Tennessee _____




. . $18,886,511
8,682,167
10,204,344
—
—
~~
---

2,474,000
6,011,100
4,702,800
2,167,100
4,237,900
12,768,500

$14,511,916
5,759,463
8,752,453

$12,704,842
3,336.181
9,368,661

957,400
4,960,700
3,202,600
2,772,000
2,631,200
2,629,400

915,400
7,591,200
1,367,000
1,537,300
527,600
2,001,300

R E V IE W

Total awards in the 37 states east of the Rocky Mountains
increased 7.9 per cent from May to June, were 57.5 per cent
greater than in June last year, and for the first half of 1936
have been 77.7 per cent greater than in that part of 1935.
According to weekly reports to the Southern Pine Asso­
ciation, production at reporting mills continued in June to
be greater than a year ago, and in contrast to the May com­
parisons, orders and shipments were also greater than at the
same time last year. For the five weeks ending July 4,
production averaged 12.7 per cent, orders 5.4 per cent, and
shipments 3.3 per cent, greater than in the corresponding
weeks last year, but unfilled orders averaged 21.7 per cent
smaller. The Southern Lumberman states that the demand
is still principally for housebuilding material, and railroad
and industrial buying is slack.
Consumption of cotton by American mills increased 4.8
per cent in, June compared with May, and was 44.9 per
cent greater than in June, 1935. At the same time last year
there was a decrease of 17.8 per cent from May to June.
The total for June this year has been exceeded in that month
only four times in the past nineteen years, in 1933, 1929,
1927, and 1917. The increase over May consumption was
about the same, on a percentage basis, in the cotton states
and in other states, but June consumption in the cotton
states was 50.7 per cent greater than a year ago, and in
other states 19.7 per cent larger. Total consumption in the
United States during the eleven months of the current sea­
son, August through June, has amounted to 5,736,643, larger
by 15.4 per cent than in the corresponding part of the pre­
vious season. In the cotton states total consumption in these
eleven months has amounted to 4,821,408 bales, and in
other states 915,235 bales, larger by 21 per cent in the
cotton states, but smaller by 7.1 per cent in other states,
than in the corresponding period a year earlier.
Exports of cotton declined 18.3 per cent from May to
June, which compares with an increase of 23.6 per cent at
that time a year ago, and were 16.7 per cent less than in
June, 1935. For the eleven months of the season exports
have amounted to 5,806,140 bales, an increase of 31.1 per
cent over the corresponding part of the previous season.
Exports and consumption combined during this period have
amounted to 11,542,783 bales, larger by 22.8 per cent than
in the same period a year earlier.
Stocks of cotton held by consuming establishments and in
public storage and at compresses combined were 12.9 per
cent smaller at the end of June than a month earlier, and
20.7 per cent less than a year ago. Active spindles increased
in number in June over May by 0.6 per cent, and over June
last year by 1.1 per cent. Census Bureau figures are com­
pared in the table.
Consumption of cotton during June in Georgia amounted
to 108,485 bales, in Alabama 58,158 bales, and in Tennes­
see 13,827 bales, the total of 180,470 bales being 3.7 per
C O T T O N C O N S U M P T IO N , E X P O R T S , S T O C K S , A N D A C T I V E
S P I N D L E S , U N I T E D S T A T E S — Bales
______________________________________________
Ju n e 1936 M ay 1936 Ju n e 1935
Cotton Consumed -------------------------------556,323
530,799
Stocks ------ ---------------------------------------- 5,512,823
6,327,159
987,112
1,090,977
In Consuming Establishm ents____________
In P ub lic Storage and a t Compresses ... 4,525,711
5,237,082
E xp o rts ..... -------------------------------------287,336
351,734
A ctive Spindles— Number --- ---------------- 22,957,322
22,828,888
C O T T O N G R O W IN G S T A T E S — Bales
Cotton Consumed ----------------------- ------ 469,617
447,936
Stocks --------------------- -----------------------5,267,868
6,045,549
t
£ 0Jf.um inS Estab lish m en ts------ --805,748
895,325
In Pub lic Storage and a t C o m p resses... 4,462,120
5,150,224
A ctive Spindles— N um ber -------------------- 16,983,252
16,587,592

383,982
6,953,452
884,600
6,068^852
344,955
22,703,836
311,569
6,595,614
681,942
5,913,672
16,479,572

M O N T H L Y

cent larger than in May, and 45.7 per eent greater than in
June last year. It was the largest total for June of any year
except 1933. For the eleven months of the season total con­
sumption in these three states has been 1,874,274 bales,
greater by 24.7 per cent than in that part of the previous
season.
Confidential reports from mills in this District indicate
increased production of yarn in June over May, but a de­
crease in production of cloth, but both were produced in
larger quantities than in June last year. Orders increased
from May to June and were substantially larger than in
June, 1935, and employment averaged 1.6 per cent larger
than in May and 7.9 per cent greater than a year ago.
Operations at cotton seed oil mills in this District showed
a further seasonal decline in June, and the amount of seed
crushed in June was smaller than in any other month in
recent years excepting July of 1935 and 1932. Production
was also smaller than in June last year. For the eleven
months of the current season, however, receipts of seed have
been 6.3 per cent and crushings 9.1 per cent, greater than
in that part of the previous season, and production of the
principal cotton seed products ranged from an increase of
5.4 per cent for crude oil to 11.7 per cent for linters. Stocks
of seed at the mills at the close of June were substantially
smaller than a year earlier, and supplies of the principal
products, except crude oil, were also less. Totals for the
country for the eleven months’ period also show increases
over the corresponding part of the previous season in re­
ceipts and crushings of seed, and in production, and de­
creases in stocks. Census Bureau figures for this District,
and for the country, are compared in an accompanying table.
Production of electric power for public use in the six
states located wholly or partly in the Sixth District in­
creased 2.7 per cent from April to May and was 16.9 per
cent greater than in May last year. The May total is the
largest on record. On a daily average basis, however, May
output was slightly less than in April, or in February, which
were shorter months. For the five months of 1936 total pro­
duction has been 17.4 per cent greater than in that part of
1935. In May production by use of water power accounted
for 66 per cent of the total, in April 66.9 per cent, and in
May last year 69.1 per cent, and for the five months’ period
this year 65.8 per cent, compared with 67.5 per cent a
year ago.
Preliminary statistics compiled by the United States
Bureau of Mines indicate that bituminous coal production
in the United States during June amounted to 29,415,000
tons, an increase of 3.1 per cent over that in May, but 2.3
per cent smaller than in June last year. For the first half
CO TTO N S E E D AN D CO TTO N S E E D
Six th D istrict*
Aug. 1 to Ju n e 30
1935-36
1934-35
Cotton Seed— T o n s:
Received at M ills____
1,417,513
1,448,330
Crushed _______________
On Hand Ju n e 30 ...
14,716
P ro duction:
Crude O il, lb s ._______ 455,303,372
Cake & M eal, tons
647,938
H u lls, tons ___________
383,318
Lin te rs, bales ________
327,690
Stocks at M ills, Ju n e 30:
Crude O il, lbs.
**
9,421,779
Cake & Meal, tons
59,908
H u lls, tons ___________
9,385
Lin te rs, bales ________
26,586

PRODUCTS
United States
Aug. 1 to Ju n e 30
1935-36
1934-35

of 1936 total production has been 200,212,000 tons, larger
by 5.8 per cent than in that period a year ago.
Weekly statements of the Bureau of Mines indicate that
during the four weeks ending June 27 coal production in
Alabama averaged 195,000 tons per week, about 7 per cent
less than in May but slightly larger than a year ago, and in
Tennessee production in the four weeks ending June 27
averaged 71,000 tons per week, about 3 per cent less than
in May and 9 per cent smaller than a year earlier. For the
year through June 27, Alabama production has totaled
5,689,000 tons and Tennessee output has been 2,417,000
tons, the increases being 12 per cent and 5 per cent, respec­
tively, over the corresponding period in 1935.
Production of pig iron in the United States during June
amounted to 2,586,240 tons, a decrease of 2.3 per cent com­
pared with May, but 66.6 per cent greater than in June last
year. On a daily average basis, however, production in­
creased nearly 1 per cent over May. Four furnaces were
blown in during June, and five were blown out or banked,
leaving 145 operating on July 1 compared with 91 active at
that time a year ago. For the first half of 1936 total pro­
duction amounted to 13,528,226 tons, larger by 38.1 per
cent than in that part of 1935, and the largest total for the
first half of any year since 1930. Alabama production of
pig iron declined 13.3 per cent from May to June, and 10.5
per cent in daily average, but was 47.8 per cent larger than
a year ago. June production in Alabama was the smallest
since November. There was a reduction of two in the num­
ber of active furnaces, leaving 10 active on July 1, compared
with 7 active at that time last year. Total production in
Alabama during the first half of 1936 amounted to 954,156
tons, a gain of 54.3 per cent over the corresponding part of
1935, and larger than for that part of any year since 1931.
Press reports indicate only a fair volume of third quarter
tonnage has been booked, new commitments being small
because of stocks on hand or a tendency to buy only for
current needs.
June receipts of both turpentine and rosin at the three
principal markets of the District increased seasonally over
the month, but were the smallest for June since 1932, and
except for that year, were less than in June of any of the
past fifteen years. Stocks at the end of June also increased
over those a month earlier, and supplies of turpentine were
larger than for June of any other year in available statistics,
but supplies of rosin were the smallest for June since 1929.
Prices of turpentine on the Savannah market have fluctuated
within a narrow range in recent weeks, but the average of
quotations on the thirteen grades of rosin, which had risen
from a low point at $4.18 per 280 pounds on May 19 to
$4.61 on June 13, increased further to $5.01 on July 11.
An important factor in this increase was the inclusion of
naval stores in the Government’s Conservation program.
Receipts and stocks for the month are compared in the table.

3,387,267
3,484,589
125,339

N A V A L ST O R ES M O V EM EN T
Tu rpentine (1)
Rosin (2)
Ju n e 1936
Ju n e 1935
Ju n e 1936 Ju n e 1935

431,915,293 1,152,711,790 1,087,809,891
580,698
1,719,399
1,585,213
349,548
980,310
895,453
293,416
864,775
789,110

R e ce ip ts:
Savannah ________ _______ 14,003
14,144
50,839
51,233
Jackso nville —----------9,120
13,119
35,159
46,472
Pensacola ----------------- 4,295__________4,865_________________ 11,783________ 13,293

1,333,490
1,327,649
73,773

3,727,028
3,781,682
34,921

T o ta l------------------- 27,418
5,858,009
103,551
38,115
33,329

17,776,062
118,886
46,762
67,938

18,474,064
223,893
91,395
97,118

♦Georgia, Alabam a, Lo uisiana, and M ississippi.
♦♦June stocks of crude oil not included for Alabam a or Lo uisiana, and
of lin ters for Lo uisiana.




7

R E V IE W

32,128

97,781

110,998

S to ck s:
Savannah ----------------- 30,831
33,100
67,975
116,412
Jackso nville — ............ .. 44,978
42,903
51,384
106,004
Pensacola ----------------- 29,332________ 27,828_________________37,233________ 49,896
________ Total ------------ -- 105,141
103,831___________________156,592
272,312
(1) B a r r e ls o f 50 g a llo n s .

(2) B a r r e ls o f 500 poun ds.

8

M O N T H L Y

R E V IE W

MONTHLY IN DEX NUMBERS COMPUTED B Y FED ER A L R ES ER V E BAN K OF A TLA N TA
MONTHLY AVERAGE 1923-1925 = 100

Apr.
1936

May
1936

June
1936

Apr.
1935

M ay
1935

June
1935

168.6
89.1
74.4
83.9
88.9
100.2

178.3
95.3
82.4
101.5
84.3
103.1

148.7
89.1
76.2
76.7
87.7
92.3

163.3
65.3
72.7
80.0
76.2
88.0

155.1
63.4
74.3
86.2
71.9
84.4

131.0
54.8
72.1
72.4
69.1
75.3

157.6
89.1
73.7
82.3
83.9
96.3

169.8
94.4
80.0
91.4
86.9
102.1

170.9
95.8
68.6
83.4
98.5
102.6

151.2
64.7
71.3
77.7
71.2
83.8

147.7
62.8
72.1
77.7
74.1
83.6

150.6
58.9
65.0
78.7
77.6
83.7

104.6
62.2
57.9
55.9
58.3
66.4

98.3
61.8
53.2
51.7
54.7
62.8

90.2
56.5
49.3
46.8
50.9
57.9

103.7
49.2
52.4
66.1
59.6
64.9

94.6
48.8
50.2
63.1
58.2
62.2

86.6
46.7
46.0
59.9
54.4
58.2

A tlanta (3 firms)..
Birmingham (3 firms)___
C hattanooga (3 firms)..
Nashville (3 firms)..
New O rleans (4 firms)..
DISTRICT (25 firms)___

99.6
59.2
55.1
53.8
56.1
63.2

97.3
60.6
52.2
51.2
54.2
61.6

94.0
57.1
51.4
48.2
54.1
60.9

98.8
46.9
49.9
63.6
57.3
61.8

93.7
47.8
49.2
62.5
57.6
61.0

90.2
47.2
51.1
61.8
57.9
61.3

WHOLESALE TRADE—SIXTH DISTRICT— TO TA L.

69.3

69.4

66.4

60.5

61.7

52.6

51.2
52.6
64.8
58.1
39.3
80.5

45.3
37.4
57.6
48.5
36.8
71.0

DEPARTMENT STORE TRADE—SIXTH DISTRICT
D a ily A v e ra g e S a le s — U n a d ju ste d

A tlanta (3 firms)...
Birmingham (3 firms)___
Chattanooga (4 firms)..
N ashville (4 firms)_i_.
New O rleans (4 firms)~
DISTRICT (30 firms)____
D a ily

A v e ra g e

S a le s —A d ju sted *

A tlanta (3 firms)_
Birmingham (3 firms)..
C hattanooga (4 firm s)N ashville (4 firms)____
New O rleans (4 firms)..
DISTRICT (30 firms)_______________
M o n th ly

Stocks— U n a d ju ste d

A tlanta (3 firms)...
Birmingham (3 firms)..
C hattanooga (3 firms)...
N ashville (3 firms)..
New O rleans (4 firms)..
DISTRICT (25 firms)_____
M on th ly

S tocks—A d ju sted *

Groceries (18 firms)......................... ..............................
Dry Goods (14 firms)__________________________
H ard w are (25 firms)______________ _____________
Furniture (7 firms)_____________________________
Stationery (3 firms)_________________ __________
Drugs (7 firms)________________________________

54.1
62.9
73.4
72.6
39.5
87.0

49.7
56.8
76.0
79.3
46.0
82.5

50.8
49.3
73.2
80.6
45.3
81.9

50.8
56.2
61.8
58.0
36.9
80.1

LIFE INSURANCE SALES— SIX STATES—TOTAL..

64.2

65.2

66.1

68.1

68.0

65.2

A labam a..
F lorida—
G eorgiaLouisiana._
M ississippiTennessee....

52.1
82.9
66.9
73.9
52.7
57.3

51.3
97.5
67.1
74.0
50.2
54.1

54.3
92.4
64.5
77.6
59.0
55.2

64.5
78.7
78.8
72.3
51.0
58.7

57.2
74.3
74.7
88.4
50.0
59.8

58.7
81.5
67.8
78.9
52.5
53.8

40.0
22.9
12.5
46.4
104.0
26.2
47.2

44.4
43.1
12.7
40.3
60.7
15.5
58.9

52.2
23.0
10.5
40.3
47.3
24.5
80.6

26.8
16.5
10.0
23.5
11.4
15.7
39.2

32.1
13.9
6.3
44.9
72.7
14.1
41.9

39.4
16.7
6.8
24.9
34.7
125.7
37.1

57.8
42.9
67.7

41.3
41.0
41.5

53.8
61.9
48.4

26.6

29.9

36.2

26.5
26.7

27.4
31.5

23.8
44.5

79.7
76.9
80.2
78.9
94.6
70.2
76.4
86.6
85.7
78.5
81.4
68.6

78.6
75.2
78.0
78.8
94.0
69.8
76.0
86.3
85.8
77.7
81.5
69.2

79.2
78.1
79.9
78.8
93.8
69.7
76.1
86.2
85.8
78.0
81.4
69.7

80.1
80.4
84.5
77.2
86.3
69.2
72.8
85.9
84.6
81.0
80.7
68.7

80.2
80.6
84.1
77.6
88.3
69.4
73.1
86.6
84.9
81.2
80.6
68.7

79.8
78.3
82.8
78.0
88.9
70.1
74.2
86.9
85.3
80.7
80.5
68.4

112.0
142.2
52.1
143.9
182.8
141.5

103.1
130.8
48.0
132.3
168.1
132.5

108.0
137.2
50.2
139.2
169.2
138.9

91.0
109.2
51.5
110.9
153.1
111.2

91.3
110.7
52.3
112.7
152.4
116.1

74.6
91.0
42.0
93.1
123.4
89.4

COTTON EXPORTS—UNITED STATES....

68.7

68.5

56.0

62.9

54.3

67.2

PIG IRON PRODUCTION—U n ited S tates.

80.5
70.5

88.7
73.4

86.6
63.6

55.7
49.4

57.8
54.1

52.0
43.1

BUILDING PERMITS— TWENTY CITIES—TOTAL .

A tlanta_______________________________________
Birmingham___________________________________
Jacksonville...... .............._.............. ................... ............
N ashvilleNew O rleans________
Fifteen O ther Cities__
CONTRACT AWARDS— SIXTH DISTRICT—TOTAL..

Residential__________________________ _______ ____
All O thers__________ _____ ___________________ __
WHOLESALE PRICES— UNITED STATES t

ALL COMMODITIES..
Farm Products_____
Foods...
O ther Commodities...
Hides an d leath er products...
Textile products___________
Fuel a n d lighting..
M etals a n d m etal products...
Building m aterials..
Chem icals an d dru g s__
Housefum ishing goods...
M iscellaneous_________
COTTON CONSUM PTION- -UNITED STATES..

Cotton-Growing States_____
All Other States....................
G eorgia..
Alabama...
Tennessee..

A labam a_____

‘ A d ju s t e d

for S e a s o n a l




V a r ia t io n .

t C o m p ile d b y B u r e a u of L a b o r S ta tistic s.

1926-100.