View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M O N TH LY

R E V IE W

O f Agricultural, Industrial, Trade and Financial
Conditions in the Sixth Federal Reserve District

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
O sc a r N e w to n ,
W ard

Chairman of the Board and Federal Reserve Agent
Assistant Federal Reserve Agent

A lb e r ts o n ,

(Compiled July 18, 1928)
VOL. 13, No. 7

BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Industrial production and the distribution of commodi­
ties in June were in smaller volume than in May, and the
general level of wholesale prices, following a sharp ad­
vance in April and May, also declined. Member bank
credit was in record volume early in July and indebted­
ness at the reserve banks was larger than at any time
in the past six years.
Production

Activity of manufacturing industries
declined slightly in June and there
was a decrease of about six percent in the output of min­
erals owing to declines in the production of coal. The
manufacture of iron and steel decreased in June by some­
what more than the usual seasonal amount, but there are
indications that there were no further declines in July
and the industry was somewhat more active than a year
ago. Production of flour, and activity of cotton and wool
mills, also declined in June. Automobile production show­
ed considerably less than the usual seasonal decline in
June, and weekly employment figures for Detroit indi?ate that operations of automobile plants were well main­
tained during the first three weeks of July. The manu­
facture of agricultural implements and machine tools
continued in June at the high level reached last spring.
Production of lumber, copper, and shoes, and activity of
silk mills increased in June. Contracts awarded for new
building continued large in June and total awards for the
first half of the year exceeded those for any previous cor­
responding period. There were increases over last year
in contracts for residential, industrial, public and educa­
tional building. Awards during the first three weeks in
July were in somewhat smaller volume than for the cor­
responding period of last year.
The July estimates of the Department of Agriculture
indicate a yield of wheat of 800,000,000 bushels, a decrease
of 8 percent from the harvested yield of 1927, and a yield
PERCENT

PERCENT

150

150

of corn of 2,736,000,000 bushels, a reduction of 2 percent.
The production of oats, barley, white potatoes, and to­
bacco is expected to be larger than last year. The acreage
of cotton in cultivation on July 1 was estimated at 46,695,000 acres, an increase of 11 per cent as compared
with that of a year ago.
Trade
Merchandise distribution at retail
and wholesale was seasonally smaller
in June than in May. Sales of department stores de­
clined by about the usual seasonal amount, while the de­
clines in sales of chain stores were smaller. Sales of
wholesale firms in most lines of trade showed a more
than usual seasonal decline. Compared with a year ago
sales of department stores and chain stores were larger
and those of wholesale firms were smaller. Stocks of
wholesale firms were in about the same volume at the
end of June as a year ago, and those of department
stores were smaller. Freight car loadings for practically
all classes of commodities declined in June and continued
in smaller volume than a year ago. During the first two
weeks of July, however, owing to increases in loadings
of grains and miscellaneous commodities, total loadings
were larger than in the corresponding period of 1927, but
continued below the high level of 1926.
Prices

The general level of wholesale com­
modity prices declined in June and
the Bureau pf Labor Statistics’ index, which had advanced
from 96 percent of the 1926 average in March, the low
point for the year, to 98.6 per cent in May, declined to
97.6 per cent. The decline in the all-commodities index
reflected decreases in those groups which had advanced
most rapidly in previous months, farm products, foods,
and hides and leather products. Prices of livestock and
meats, which are included in these groups, however,
showed further advances in June, and there was also an
increase in the prices of building materials, while prices
(Continued on Page Seven)
PER CENT

P ER C EN T

i25r

^ ______ A
Tjf

.
V

i/

1

125

WHOL ESALE PFtlCES

M a n u iF a c t u r e s

100

This review released for publication in
the afternoon papers of Tuesday, July 31,

ATLANTA, GA., JULY 31, 1928

FarmPr<3(JUCtS

100

M in e r a ls

100

50

'K

\

100

'\W /
v ^ / Nonagricuitural
Commodities

50
P R lO D U C T I O N O F
M ANUFACT U R E S A N O

I
1924

M IN E R A L S

1
1925

1924
1926

1927

1925

75
1926

1927

1926

1928

Index numbers of productions of manufactures and minerals, adjusted
for seasonal variations (1923-25 average—100.). Latest figures, June
manufacturers 109 ,* minerals 100.




1
1

75

^ ? United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1926—100, base
adopted by bureau). Latest figures, June: Non-Agricultural Commodities 95.2; Farm Products 106.7.

2

MONTHLY REVIEW

Monthly averages of daily figures for 12 Federal Reserve Banks.
Latest figures are averages of first 23 days in July.
SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY
Seasonal declines in the volume of trade at both retail
and wholesale, and generally unfavorable conditions in
agriculture, are reflected in statistics and reports for
June and early July gathered for the Monthly Review.
Retail trade in the sixth district in June was seasonally
lower than in the three months preceding, and was only
slightly greater than for June 1927. Department store
sales during the first half of 1928 have averaged 2.9
per cent greater than in the same period of 1927. Whole­
sale trade in June was at a seasonally low level, and was
in smaller volume than for any month in recent years.
Savings deposits on hand at the end of June were 2.1
per cent greater than a month earlier, and 4.9 per cent
greater than a year ago. Debits to individual accounts in
June were somewhat less than in May, but slightly greater
than in June last year. Commercial failures in the dis­
trict, in point of liabilities, increased over May, but were
less than for June 1927. Total discounts of weekly re­
porting member banks declined slightly between June 13
and July 11, but loans secured by stocks and bonds in­
creased, and these banks’ investments in stocks and bonds
also increased. Discounts for member banks by the Fed­
eral Reserve Bank of Atlanta increased slightly during
this period, but holdings of bills bought in the open mar­
ket declined. Demand deposits of all member banks in
the district declined in June compared with preceding
months, but time deposits increased to a new high level.
Building permits in the district decreased in June com­
pared with the May total, and were 5.5 per cent less than
in June last year. Contracts awarded also decreased
compared with both of those periods. Cotton consumption
in the cotton states was less than in May, or in June a
year ago, and production of cloth and yarn in this district
also decreased, but orders of both cloth and yarn in­
creased over May, and orders of yarn were greater than

Weekly rates in New York money market: Commercial paper rate
on 4-to-6 months paper and acceptance rate on 90-day paper.
in June last year. Production of coal in Alabama during
June was lower than at the same time last year, but in
Tennessee it was greater. Pig iron production in Ala­
bama showed decreases compared with both of those
periods. The cotton acreage in cultivation on July 1 this
year in the six states of this district is 12.3 per cent
greater than on the same date last year. The crop made
fair growth in June, but is still backward.
RETAIL TRADE
The volume of retail trade in the sixth district, as re­
flected in sales figures reported confidentially to the
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, declined seasonally in
June to a point lower than in the three months preceding,
but was slightly larger than in the corresponding month
of last year. Sales at New Orleans in June declined 7.3
per cent compared with June last year, and there were
decreases of less than one per cent shown for Birmingham
and Chattanooga, increases being reported from Atlanta,
Nashville and Other Cities. For the first half of 1928
sales by these reporting stores have averaged 2.9 per
cent greater than in the same period of 1927. Stocks of
merchandise on hand at the end of June declined 6.7 per
cent compared with May, but were 3.7 per cent greater
than a year ago. Accounts receivable at the end of June
were 3.5 per cent smaller than a month earlier, but 13.5
per cent greater than at the end of June last year. Col­
lections during June were 5.4 per cent less than in May,
but 4.4 per cent greater than during June 1927. The
ratio of collections during June to accounts outstanding
and due at the beginning of the month, for 33 firms, was
31.9 per cent; for May this ratio was 33.7 per cent, and
for June last year 34.9 per cent. For June the ratio of
collections against regular accounts outstanding for 33
firms was 34.0 per cent, and the ratio of collections against
installment accounts reported by 9 firms was 15.8 per
cent.

CONDITION OF RETAIL TRADE DURING JUNE 1928 AT 46 DEPARTMENT STORES
SIXTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
Comparison of Net Sales
Comparison of Stocks
Rate of Stock Turnover
June 1928 with Ian. 1 to June 30, June 30, 1928 with June 30, 1928 with
June
Jan. 1 to June 30
June 1927
1928 with same
June 30, 1927
May 31, 1928
1927
1928
1927
1928
__
period in 1927
__ _____________
___
Atlanta (5) _____
+ 13.2
— 1.4
— 2.3
1.87
1.63
+ 15.7
.27
.26
Birmingham (5)
— 0.8
— 0.7
— 8.6
— 7.2
.26
1.29
.20
1.22
Chattanooga (6)
— 0.6
— 6.9
— 6.4
.23
.24
— 3.3
1.19
1.17
Nashville (5) __ __-.-..+ 2.6
+ 6.4
— 3.3
+ 6.0
.26
.23
1.64
1.48
New Orleans (5)
— 7.3
— 3.4
+ 11.6
— 8.8
.21
.16
1.18
1.08
Other Cities (20)
— 0.2
— 7.5
..+ 0.6
— 3.1
.22
1.38
.20
1.20
District (46) ____ ._....+ 0.6
+ 2.9
+ 3.7
— 6.7
.24
1.37
.20
1.25
NOTE—The rate of stock turnover is the ratio of sales during given p eriod to average stocks on hand.



MONTHLY REVIEW
WHOLESALE TRADE
The volume of wholesale trade in the sixth district,
reflected in sales figures reported confidentially to the
Federal Reserve Bank by 127 wholsale firms in eight difcerent lines of trade, declined seasonally in June compared
with preceding months. The index number for June is
77.5, and is lower than for any month since July 1922.
This index number for June compares with 84.5 for May,
and with 83.4 for June last year. Sales of electrical sup­
plies in June averaged somewhat greater than in May,
and were slightly greater than in June a year ago, but
the other seven lines show decreases compared with both
of those periods. Some of the reports state that the back­
ward condition of the crops has caused merchants in the
smaller towns to delay buying, and heavy rains in south­
ern Alabama have interferred greatly with business in
that part of the district. Comparisons of reported figures
are shown in the tables which follow.
Groceries

June sales of groceries at wholesale
averaged less than in May at all re­
porting points, and were also less than in June a year ago
except at New Orleans. Decreases compared with both
periods are also shown in stocks, accounts receivable and
collections, as indicated in the following percentages.
June 1928 compared with:
Sales:
May 1928 June 1927
Atlanta (4 firms) -------------------—13.7
—13.7
Jacksonville (4 firms)__________ — 8.4
—22.9
New Orleans (6 firms) _________
— 9.5
+ 5.8
— 8.1
—13.5
Vicksburg (3 firms) ___________
Other Cities (15 firms) _________
— 7.1
—10.2
DISTRICT (32 firms) ______ __ _
— 8.7_____ —10.2___
Stocks on hand ------------------------— 7.3
— 8.6
Accounts Receivable ____________
— 6.6
— 2.8
— 6.3
— 1.0
Collections ____________________
Dry Goods
Sales of dry goods at wholesale dur­
ing June declined 19.3 per cent com­
pared with May, and were at a lower level than for any
other month for which statistics are available. Sales
decreased at all reporting points, compared both with the
preceding month and with the corresponding month last
year. Stocks were somewhat larger than for either of
those months, but accounts receivable and collections show
declines in both instances.
June 1928 compared with:
Sales:
May 1928 June 1927
—25.5
Atlanta (3 firms) _____________ — 4.1
Nsishville (3 firms) ___________
—37.7
—34.4
New Orleans (3 firms) __________
— 5.7
— 6.5
Other Cities (15 firms) _________
—18.1
—19.4
DISTRICT (24 firms) __________
—19.3_____ —21.4
Stocks on hand ________________
+ 1.1
-j- 9.5
Accounts receivable _____________
— 5.7
— 8.2
Collections ____________________
—16.9
—13.5
Hardware

June sales of hardware at wholesale
increased over May, and over June
last year, at both Nashville and New Orleans, but reports
from “Other Cities” were more than sufficient to offset
these increases. Sales for the district averaged 5 per
cent less than in May, and seven-tenths of one per cent
less than in June last year. Decreases compapred with
both months are shown in stocks on hand, accounts re­
ceivable, and collections.
June 1928 compared with:
Sales:
May 1928 June 1927
+ 1.3
_j_ 4.5
Nashville (3 firms) ____________
New Orleans (5 firms)__________
+ 1.3
+ 6.4
—11.1
— 6.8
Other Cities (19 firms)__________
DISTRICT (27 firms) __________
— 5.0
— 0.7
— 1.9
Stocks on hand _____ ______I_______ — 4.1
Accounts receivable _____________
— 7.7
— 1.5
Collections _________ ,__________ — 3.9
— 6.6
Furniture

Sales of furniture at wholesale by 13
reporting firms were 7.6 per cent less
in June than in May, and one-half of one per cent less
than in June last year. Stocks on hand, accounts receiv­
able and collections also showed varying degrees of deMnes compared with both of those periods, as indicated
a the following percentages.
June 1928 compared with:
SaT?,:
. (5 firms)
„ v _____________ M
ay7.1
1928 June
1927
Atlanta
—
_13.9
Other Cities (8 firms)_______
— 78
4- 2 7
DISTRICT (13 firms) .
— 7.6
— 0.5
Stocks on hand ________________
— 4.8
_271
Accounts receivable _____________
— 0.8
_lo!3
Collections ____________________
—18.3
_2.4




I

Electrical
Supplies

June sales of electrical supplies at
wholesale by 14 reporting firms aver­
aged 7.3 per cent greater than in
May, and were 1.9 per cent greater than in June a year
ago. Stocks on hand show decreased compared with both
of those periods. Accounts receivable, increased 4.3 per
cent over May, but were less than a year ago, and col­
lections decreased 2.3 per cent compared with May but
were slightly greater than in June 1927.
June 1928 compared with:
Sales:
May 1928 June 1927
Atlanta (3 firms) ___
6.0
+11.6
+19.8
+10.8
New Orleans (4 firms)
+ 13.8
—13.9
Other Cities (7 firms)
+ 7.3
DISTRICT (14 firms) ..
+ 1.9
—19.1
Stocks on hand --------— 3.1
— 5.3
+ 4.3
Accounts receivable ___
— 2.3
+ 1.0
Collections _________
Comparisons for the other three lines are shown only
for the district as three or more reports were not re­
ceived from a single city in any of these lines. Each
of these lines showed decreases in sales compared with
May, and with June last year, and figures reported by
wholesale drug firms also showed decreases in accounts
receivable and collections compared with both of those
periods.
June 1928 compared with:
May 1928 June 1927
Shoes: Sales ___ ______ ________
—29.5
—16.2
Stationery: Sales _____ ____ _____ — 8.6
— 3.9
— 7.8
— 7.7
Drugs: Sales ___ ______________
— 1.0
— 1.4
Accounts receivable _______
— 8.7
— 3.8
Collections ____ __ _______
AGRICULTURE
Recent reports issued by the United States Department
of Agriculture indicate that crops made considerable
progress during June, but there was so much cool weather
and rain that they appear to be still short of normal
growth. Violent storms in the south caused no little
damage to cotton and to ripe grain in certain sections.
Cotton made fair growth during June, but still presents
a backward and spotted aspect, with widespread reports
of irregular stands, grassy fields, and damage from bad
weather. Corn made good growth on the whole, and is
so far a promising crop, although the rains hindered cul­
tivation and many fields are full of weeds. The reports
indicate that present indications point to an increase of
about 2 per cent in the acreage of principal crops in the
United States over the acreage harvested last season. The
most important increases are: corn, 4 per cent; barley,
30 per cent; cotton, 11 per cent; potatoes, 9 per cent;
tobacco, 18 per cent; beans, 7 per cent; and peanuts, 5
per cent, while decreases are indicated in the acreage of
hay, 4 per cent; wheat, 1.5 per cent; rye, 4 per cent;
sweet potatoes, 8 per cent; rice, 5 per cent, and flax,
3 per cent.
The estimated tobacco acreage this year in Georgia is
30 per cent greater than last year, and amounts to
106,000 acres. Indicated production is placed at 14 per
cent over last year’s crop of 59 million pounds. Tobacco
acreage in Tennessee increased 22 per cent over that of
last year, and totals 107,100 acres, and indicated pro­
duction is placed at 72 million pounds. Peach prospects
declined slightly in Georgia during June, but are still
very much better than last year in all states of the dis­
trict. Peanuts show an increase in Florida, but decreases
in other states.
Cotton
Acreage

The acreage of cotton in cultivation
in the United States on July 1 is esti­
mated by the United States Depart­
ment of Agriculture at 46,695,000 acres, an increase of
11.4 per cent over 1927. This estimate does not refer to
the total acreage planted, but only to that portion re­
maining in actual cultivation on July 1. The increases in
acreage this season are most marked in the less impor­
tant cotton states, in the extensive area flooded last year,
and in some other areas where the acreage was sharply
reduced last season. Owing to late planting, the need
for repeated replantings in many sections, and to the im­
possibility or working the crop out at the proper time,
the reported stand of cotton is 6 per cent below the stand
reported on July 1 last year. In the table are shown the

MONTHLY REVIEW

4

cotton acreage fo r the sta te s of this d istrict, com pared
w ith th a t of la st year.

Percentage
Comparison
1927
1928
3,214,000
3,471,000
+ 8
Alabama ________
+ 49
67,000
100,000
Florida ______ ____
3,956,000 3,501,000
+ 13
Georgia __________
+ 19
1,886,000 1,585,000
Louisiana ________
+ 11
3,783,000 3,408,000
Mississippi _______
+ 15
985,000
1,133,000
Tennessee ________
+
12.3
Total 6 states______ 14,329,000 12,760,000
+ 11.4
46,695,000 41,905,000
Total United StatesCotton Movement—United States Since August 1
Receipts at all U. S. Ports____ 8,379,912 12,737,926 9,772,910
Overland across the Miss., Ohio and
Potomac Rivers to Nor. Mills
and Canada ___________
988,822 1,575,669 1,474,928
Interior stocks in excess of those
held at close of Commercial
639,238
64,093
year
Southern Mills takings, net------ 4,423,000 4,622,571 4,032,977
15,920,053
18,936,480
Total 334 days ____________ 13,855,827
Foreign exports ___________
7,464,207 10.774,216
American Mills, N. & S. & Canada 6,586,919 7,782,124
American cotton thus far-------- 14,322,000 17,097,000 14,458,000
S ugar Cane
and S ugar

The to ta l acreage in su g ar cane in
the 22 P arishes com prising the Louis­
iana Cane B elt in 1928 is estim ated
by th e D epartm ent of A griculture a t 1 72,000 acres,
ag a in st 9 8,40 2 acres in 1927, an increase of 75 per cent.
The relatively larg e increase is reported to be due to
heavy plantings of the new PO J varieties. It is esti­
m ated th a t of th e to ta l acreage in su g ar cane this year,
1 44,500 acres will be used for sugar, 15,500 fo r syrup,
and 12,000 acres fo r “seed.” The condition of su g ar cane
on Ju ly 1 w as estim ated to be 80 p er cent of norm al,
com pared w ith 89 per cent a t the same tim e la st year.
The crop is la te r th a n usual, but is rapidly catching up
now due to the influence of favorable w eather.

SUGAR MOVEMENT
(Pounds)
Raw Sugar
Receipts:
June 1928
May 1928 June 1927
New Orleans _____ 99,998,019
87,003,959 193,799,644
Savannah ..... ...... .
16,577,449
6,719,503 36,734,273
Meltings:
New Orleans _____ 105,988,846 119,543,548 173,393,420
Savannah _______
17,594,017
24,812,035 31,043,164
Stocks:
New Orleans _____ 58,948,324
58,500,514 70,896,927
Savannah ________ 35,605,693
36,622,261 43,095,180
Refined Sugar
Shipments:
New Orleans _____ 116,386,813 106,751,375 155,048,153
Savannah _____ 27,474,805 23,999,077 34,294,697
Stocks:
New Orleans _____
52,299,657 62,948,318 83,960,221
Savannah ______
24,232,203 33,837,629 23,528,150
Rice

The are a sown to rice in Louisiana in
1928 is estim ated a t 4 5 7 ,0 00 acres,
com pared w ith 481 ,0 00 acres in 1927, a decrease of 5 per
cent. The condition of the rice crop on Ju ly 1 w as 86
per cent of norm al, com pared w ith 89 per cent a year
ago, and the indicated production of rice is estim ated a t
1 4,935,000 bushels, com pared w ith 1 7,316,000 bushels la st
year.

RICE MOVEMENT—NEW ORLEANS
Rough Rice (Sacks)
June 1928 May 1928 June 1927
Receipts ___ _____
1,102
13,393
48,438
Shipments _______
7,331
12,491
47,118
Stocks __________
2,916
9,145
17,701
Clean
Rice (Pockets)
8,211
189,552
105,579
Receipts ________
Shipments __ ___
37,360
203,261
119,932
Stocks __________
159,643
188,792
210,525
Rice Millers Association Statistics
(Barrels)
Season
Receipts of Rough Rice
June
to date
Season 1927-28 ________________
129,752 9,478,560
Season 1926-27 _______ _______
429,614 8,651,590
Distribution of Milled Rice
Season 1927-28 __ _____________
531,073 9,904,693
Season 1926-27 __________ ____
643,295 8,679,941
Rtocks of Rough and Milled Rice
July 1, 1928___________ *........ ... 1,067,092
July 1, 1927__________________ 1,181,230



FIN A N C IA L

Savings
Deposits

Savings deposits held a t the end of
Ju n e by 86 rep o rtin g banks in the
six th d istric t increased 2.1 per cen
over the to ta l ’ a m onth earlier, and w ere 4.9 per cent
g re a te r th an a t the end of Ju n e 1927. T otals for A tlan ta
and B ranch F ed eral Reserve Bank cities are shown in the
table, and rep o rts from banks located elsew here in the
d istrict are grouped under “O ther C ities.” Increases over
May are shown fo r each group except N ashville, and over
Ju n e la st y ear by all groups except Jacksonville.

(000 Omitted)

CompariComparison
son
June
May June-May June June
1928
1928 1928
1927 *28-’27
Atlanta (7 banks)_____ 5 47,755 $ 45,530 + 4.9 $ 40,469 + 18.0
Birmingham (4 banks)_ 26,468 25,524 + 3.7 25,868 + 2.3
Jacksonville (5 banks)__ 30,898 28,848 + 7.1 30,998 — 0.3
Nashville (8 banks)___ 27,256 27,883 — 2.2 24,575 + 10.9
New Orleans (8 banks).... 50,929 50,259 + 1.3 49,659 + 2.6
Other Cities (54 banks) ... 117,010 116,136 + 0.8 114,756 + 2.0
Total (86 banks) _____ 300,316 294,180 + 2.1 286,325 + 4.9
Debits to
Individual
Accounts

The to ta l volume of debits to individual accounts a t 26 rep o rtin g cities
during the m onth of June declined 3.3
per cent com pared w ith May, but was
1.3 per cent g re a te r th an in the corresponding m onth
la st year. Sixteen of these cities show increases over
June 1927, and decreases occurred a t the other ten cities.
M onthly to tals are derived from weekly figures by pro­
ra tin g figures fo r those weeks which do not fall entirely
w ithin a single calendar m onth.

Alabama
Birmingham ___
Dothan _______
Mobile ________
Montgomery ___
Florida
Jacksonville __
Miami ________
Pensacola _____
Tampa _______
Georgia
Albany _______
Atlanta _____ ..
Augusta ______
Brunswick _____
Columbus _____
Elberton ______
Macon ________
Newnan ______
Savannah _____
Valdosta ______
Louisiana
New Orleans ___
Mississippi
Hattiesburg ____
Jackson ___ __
Meridian _____
Vicksburg _____
Tennessee
Chattanooga ___
Knoxville _____
Nashville _____
Total 26 cities_____
Condition of
Member Banks in
Selected Cities

(000 Omitted)
June 1928 May 1928
$ 148,338 $ 159,946
2,637
3,066
40,394
42,219
24,019
27,010

June 1927
$ 138,910
2,574
38,133
21,690

76,459
32,682
7,810
40,943

76,775
36,904
7,810
42,276

85,470
47,072
8,451
47,545

3,507
155,804
24,056
4,103
13,318
913
22,245
1,962
42,679
4,623

3,901
163,237
26,645
3,390
14,558
911
22,483
2,163
44,406
4,778

4,363
146,016
23,642
3,766
13,303
678
20,135
1,577
46,297
5,834

320,190

323,317

7,269
25,434
17,089
7,052

7,777
27,159
18,039
6,646

49,472
37,623
102,909
$1,213,530

53,249
34,356
101,964
$1,254,985

314,486
7,323
19,823
17,511
7,387
49,268
35,243
91,977
$1,198,474

W eekly rep o rts received from 31
m em ber banks located in A tlan ta,
New O rleans, B irm ingham , Jackson­
ville, N ashville, C hattanooga, Knox­
ville and Savannah indicate th a t betw een June 13 and
J u ly 11 th ere w ere increases in these banks' holdings of
stocks and bonds, other th a n governm ent securities, and
in loans to custom ers secured by stocks and bonds, but
decreases in holdings of U nited S tates securities, and in
loans to custom ers secured by U nited S tates securities,
and in “All O ther L oans” larg ely fo r com m ercial, a g ri­
cu ltu ral and in d u strial purposes. Time deposits increased
during th is period, b ut dem and deposits declined. Loans
on Ju ly 11 secured by stocks and bonds w ere also g reate
th a n fo r the corresponding re p o rt date la st year, bui
other classes of loans w ere sm aller. Holdings of U nited
S tates securities and of o th er stocks and bonds were
g re a te r th a n a y ear ago, and the to ta l of loans and in­
v estm ents shows an increase over th a t tim e of $35 ,3 00 ,00 0.
Time deposits show an increase of a little more th an five
million dollars, and dem and deposits a decrease of $5,6 28 ,0 00 com pared w ith a y ear ago. B orrow ings by these

5

MONTHLY REVIEW
banks from the F ederal Reserve Bank of A tla n ta on Ju ly
11 w ere sm aller by $2,40 4,0 00 th a n four weeks earlier, but
w ere n early 32 millions g re a te r th a n a year ago. P rin ­
cipal item s in the weekly rep o rt, fo r the three dates under
com parison, are shown in the table:

(000 Omitted)
July 11,
Bills Discounted:
1928
Secured by Govt. Obligations.......$ 4,344
Secured by Stocks and Bonds..... 140,112
All Other ..... ... ....... . .1........... 362,131
Total Oiscounts ........ ............. 506,587
U. S. Securities... ....... ..... ............ 60,599
Other Stocks and Bonds........ ........ 71,336
Total Loans and Investments__ 638,522
Time Deposits ................... .......... 245,704
Demand Deposits....... ................... 324,865
Borrowings from F. R. Bank........ 46,094

June 13,
1928
$ 5,060
133,289
370,932
509,281
62,187
67,165
638,633
242,453
337,387
48,498

July 13,
1927
$ 5,053
109,879
373,424
488,356
55,428
59,438
603,222
240,692
330,493
14,119

Bank D eposits of
All Member Banks

R eports of net dem and and tim e deposits held by all m em ber banks in
the sixth d istric t are compiled as of
W ednesday preceding the 14th of each m onth. Demand
deposits have declined each m onth since Ja n u a ry to a
point in June low er th a n fo r any m onth since A ugust
la st y ear. Time deposits have continued to increase and
in Ju n e w ere g re a te r th a n fo r any other m onth on record.
Total figures are shown fo r com parison:

June 1928
May 1928 .
June 1927
Operations of the
Federal Reserve
Bank

Demand
.$596,668,000
.. 607,138,000
.. 587.188,000

Time
$471,953,000
471.907.000
460.112.000

The weekly statement of the Federal
Reserve Bank of Atlanta for July 11
indicates an increase of $1,699,000 in
total discounts over the figures for
June 13, but a decrease of $5,753,000 in investments in
bills bought in the open market and government securi­
ties, and the total of bills and securities on July 11 was
as a result more than four millions smaller than four
weeks earlier. Discounts secured by government obliga­
tions increased $2,626,000 during this four weeks period,
and were more than three times as great as at the same
time a year ago. Other discounts decreased slightly be­
tween June 13 and July 11, but were more than 18 millions
greater than a year ago. Holdings of bills bought in the
open market and of government securities on July 11
were nearly two million dollars less than on the same
report date last year. Cash reserves, and deposits, in­
creased slightly on July 11, compared with June 13, but
were less than a year ago, and the volume of Federal
Reserve notes in actual circulation was smaller than for
either of those report dates. Principal items in the
weekly statement, for the three report dates under com­
parison, are shown in the table:
(000 Omitted)
July 11, June 13, July 13,
Bills Discounted:
1928
1928
1927
.$ 19,944 $ 17,318 $ 6,327
All Others ___ ________
46,576 47,503 28,505
Total Discounts ____ __
. 66,520 64,821 34,832
Bills Bought in open market_
13,340 19,074 10,895
U. S. Securities__ ___ ____
... 5,205
5,224
9,595
Total Bills and Securities
85,065 89,119 55,622
Cash Reserves .......... ...... ......
118,456 117,478 173,927
Total Deposits __________
.. 67,413 67,220 71,900
132,100 134,880 156,964
Reserve
59.4
58.1
76.0
Commercial
According to statistics compiled by
Failures
R. G. Dun & Co., commercial failures
in the United States during June 1928
numbered 1,947, compared with 2,008 in May, and with
1,833 in June last year, and liabilities in June totaled
$29,827,073, compared with $36,116,990 in May, and with
$34,465,165 in June 1927. Figures for the sixth district
show a small decline in number but an increase in lia­
bilities in June compared with May, but decreases in both
instances compared with June last year. In the table are
shown failures in the United SStates divided by Federal
Reserve Districts.
Number Liabilities Liabilities Liabilities
District
June 1928 June 1928 May 1928 June 1927
Boston ......
278 $ 3,242,468 $ 3,558,326 $ 2,476,055
New York ..
364 6,475,521 5,993,860 4,733,218
Philadelphia
79 1,806,562 2,693,285 5,610,200
Cleveland _
136 2,847,201 2,377,568 3,572,903
Richmond _
98 1,397,502 2,947,871 2,255,430
Atlanta __
108 1,984,306 1,566,985 2,347,238
Chicago __
265 4,901,261 7,456,484 4,000,364
St. Louis ....
105
962,860 1,663,143 1,897,022



912,178 1,397,112
498,560
55
Minneapolis ----1,060,074 1,768,039 1,767,937
88
Kansas City __
539,916 2,214,149 1,555,260
46
Dallas _______
San Francisco --- 325 4,110,842 2,965,102 2,852,426
Total____ 1,947 $29,827,073 $36,116,990 $34,465,165
Gold
Movement

Exports of gold from the United
States during June reached a level
higher than for any month in recent
years, and imports were greater than for any month
since January. Exports of gold in June amounted to
$99,932,000, compared with $83,689,000 in May, and with
$1,840,000 in June last year. Imports of gold in June
totaled $20,001,000 compared with $1,968,000 in May, and
with $14,611,000 in June 1927. For the six months of
1928 gold exports have exceeded imports of gold by $372,542,000, while in the corresponding period of 1927 im­
ports exceeded exports by $131,501,000.
IMPORTS AND EXPORTS
United States

Preliminary figures compiled and pub­
lished by the United States Depart­
ment of Commerce indicate declines in both exports and
imports of merchandise during June compared with pre­
ceding months. June exports were greater than in June
last year, however, while imports were smaller. June
exports were 7.5 per cent smaller than in May, but were
9.3 per cent greater than in June 1927. Imports in June
declined 10.6 per cent compared with May, and were
10.7 per cent less than in June last year. Preliminary
figures, with comparisons, are shown in the table:
Exports:
1928
1927
$ 390,000,000 $ 356,966,000
June -______ _______
May _____ ____ _____
421,676,000
393,140,000
12 months ending with June
4,877,815,000
4,968,100,000
Imports:
354,892,000
June _________ ____317,000,000
May ......... .......... ...........
354,715,000
346,501,000
12 months ending with June
4,147,883,000
4,252,024,000
New Orleans

The value of merchandise imported
into the United States through the
port of New Orleans during the month of April 1928 was
$19,131,917, compared with $18,990,785 in March, and
with $22,101,920 in April last year. Increases ov^r April
last year are shown in the value of imports of coffee, gaso­
line, and burlaps, but most of the other large items show­
ed decreases.
Merchandise was exported through the port of New
Orleans during April to the value of $30,056,103, com­
pared with $31,192,991 in March, and with $38,155,122 in
April 1927. Among the large items which showed in­
creases over April last year are long staple cotton, oak
boards, illuminating oil, and gas and fuel oil, but other
large items showed decreases compared with that month.
Grain Exports—New Orleans
The export movement of grain through the port of
New Orleans continues smaller than last year, decreases
being shown in wheat, corn and oats, both for June, and
for the season to date, as indicated in the table.
Season (July-June)
June 1928 June 1927 June 1928 June 1927
Wheat, bu. __
168,299 207,397 8,213,263 9,011,712
Corn, bu.........
206,975 338,942 3,776,756 4,392,716
Oats, bu..........
65,640 106,369
918,507 1,219,451
Rye, bu..........
19,285
1,047,316
651,628
Total bu... 460,199 652,708 13,955,842 15,275,507
BUILDING
The volume of prospective building indicated by permits
issued at twenty reporting cities in the sixth district dur­
ing June was over eight million dollars, and only slightly
smaller than for the corresponding month last year.
Eight of these regularly reporting cities showed in­
creases over June last year, and comparatively large in­
creases were reported from Chattanooga, Knoxville, Sa­
vannah and Orlando. The total value of permits issued
at the twenty cities whose figures are included in the
totals shown in the statement below, and in the index
numbers, was 5.5 per cent smaller than for June 1927.
The index number for June was 71.5, compared with 123.9
for May, and with 75.6 for June last year.
Contracts awarded in the 37 states east of the Rocky
Mountains during June broke all previous June records,
and was only about two and one-half percent under the total

MONTHLY REVIEW

6

for May this year, which was the highest total for any
month on record. June contract awards totaled $650,466,200, compared with $667,097,200 for May, and with
$632,478,000 for June last year. In June, 40 per cent of
all of the contract awards were for residential buildings,
20 per cent for public works and utilities, and 14 per cent
for commercial buildings. Contracts awarded during June
in the sixth district totaled $28,600,017, compared with
$32,497,484 in May, and with $31,187,703 in June last year.
Percentage
June 1928June 1927
Change
Alabama
No. Value
No.Value in value
Anniston ______
13 $ 8,995
32$ 160,375 - 91.7
Birmingham___ 584 1,693,194 575 1,682,085 + 0.7
Mobile ________ 110 250,259
75 376,918 — 33.6
Montgomery ____ 201 137,334
72 113,352 -j- 21.2
Florida
Jacksonville ____ 303 663,582
4431,082,835 — 38.7
Miami ________ 198 232,363
268 288,752 — 19.5
Orlando _______
86 155,580
118 108,824 + 43.0
Pensacola _____
69 55,558
57 118,550 — 53.1
Tampa ________ 334 293,836
436 345,781 — 15.0
♦Lakeland ______
11 9,625
26 30,800 — 68.7
♦Miami Beach ___
37 401,600
25 116,600 + 44.4
Georgia
Atlanta _______ 318 1,124,342 357 946,362 + 18.8
Augusta ______ 163 291,010
158 274,719 + 5.9
Columbus _____
55 105,017
83 224,564 — 53.3
Macon ________ 311 179,849
186 211,795 — 15.1
53 393,774
50 207,390 + 89.9
Savannah _____
Louisiana
201 988,614 — 17.4
New Orleans ___ 254 816,505
Alexandria _____
59 32,856
73 163,875 — 80.0
Tennessee
Chattanooga ___ 239 616,053
246 277,095 +122.3
Johnson City ___
14 78,650
.22 80,450 — 2.2
Knoxville _____
153 623,674
252 432,864 + 44.1
Nashville _____
249 292,623
283 414,735 — 29.4
Total 20 Cities ___ 3,766 $8,045,056 3,987 $8,509,935 — 5.5
Index No. --------71.5
75.6
♦Not included in totals or index numbers.
LUMBER
Preliminary figures for the month of June, compiled by
the Southern Pine Association based upon reports from
99 mills, indicate that production during June was some­
what below the three-year average production of the re*
porting mills, that the volume of orders booked was
slightly smaller than the month's production, but that
shipments were greater than output. June production by
these 99 reporting mills amounted to 254,376,337 feet,
and was 8.9 per cent below the three-year average pro­
duction of these mills. Orders received during the month
totaled 254,105,584 feet, and were one-tenth of one per
cent less than production. Shipments during June exceed­
ed production by 2.1 per cent, and exceeded orders by 2.2
per cent. Stocks on hand at the end of June amounted
to more than 710 million feet, and were 1.1 per cent
greater than the three-year relative stocks of these re­
porting mills. The weekly statement issued by the Asso­
ciation indicates that figures of identical mills show in­
creases in orders and shipments over corresponding
weeks last year, but smaller volume of unfilled orders
and output. According to the weekly statement of oper­
ating time, mills have averaged somewhat below normal
running time during recent weeks. Preliminary figures
for June, with comparisons, are shown below:
June 1928 May 1928 June 1927
(feet)
99 mills
95 mills 118 mills
Orders _________________ 254,105,584 242,179,608 261,982,713
Shipments _______________ 259,804,985 281,363,536 268,365,613
Production ______________ 254,376,337 256,161,840 281,675,918
Three-Year Average Production- 279,211,730 259,763,710 309,177,071
Stocks, end of month_______ 710,327,466 648,800,809 814,456,252
Three-Year Relative Stocks____ 702,859,688 653,903,187 828,128,424
Unfilled Orders, end of month— 206,545,451 189,985,232 190,231,010
TEXTILES
The consumption of cotton in the
United States during June showed a
decline compared with preceding
months, and was less than last year, and there were also
declines in stocks of cotton, in exports, and in spindle
activity compared with both of those periods, according
to figures contained in the United States Census Bureau’s
statement. The total consumption of cotton in June was
11.6 per cent less than in May, and 22.6 per cent smaller
than in June last year. Exports during June were 22.6
per cent less than in May, and were 5 per cent less than
in June 1927. The number of spindles active in June was
Cotton
Consumption




smaller by 435,872 than in May, and was 4,132,374 smaller
than in June last year.
Figures for the cotton-growing states indicate a decline
in consumption in June of 11.4 per cent compared with
May, and a decrease of 17.6 per cent compared with con­
sumption in June last year. Consumption in other states
was 12.4 per cent less than in May and 37.0 per cent
smaller than in June 1927. The number of spindles ac­
tive in June in the cotton-growing states declined 64,346
in June, compared with May, and in other states active
spindles decreased 371,526. Compared with June 1927,
spindles active in the cotton-growing states in June this
year show an increase of 86,630, while in other states
there was a decrease of 4,218,164. The Census Bureau’s
statement indicates that 76.8 per cent of the total con­
sumption of cotton in June was in the cotton-growing
sates, compared with 76.6 per cent in May, and with 71.6
per cent in June last year.
UNITED STATES (Bales)
Cotton Consumed:
June 1928 May 1928 June 1927
510,565
577,710
Lint ______ -------659,841
Linters ____ _____
63,587
62,020
70,055
Stocks in Consuming Establishments:
Lint _____________
1,158,531
1,331,135
1,594,475
Linters __________
182,632
211,580
218,015
Stocks in Public Storage and at Compresses:
Lint
1,645,971
2,305,366
2,181,509
Linters
59,504
_______
53,580
58,783
Exports _
_______
457,781
481,943
591,345
Imports
---------14,587
19,842
37,078
Active Spindles _______
28,624,488 29,060,360 32,756,862
Cotton Growing States (Bales)
Cotton Consumed
442,441
475,958
392,089
Stocks in Consuming
Establishments ____
734,452
877,742
1,037,107
Stocks in Public Storage
1,460,919
and at Compresses__
1,846,117
2,091,653
Active Spindles _______
17,756,262 17,820,608 17,669,632
Cotton
Cloth

Confidential reports for June were
rendered to the Federal Reserve Bank
by cotton mills in the sixth district
which during that month manufactured 28% million yards
of cotton cloth, an output smaller by 2.9 per cent than in
May, and 5.7 per cent smaller than in June last year.
Figures reported by these mills indicate an increase in
orders over May, but a decline in shipments and unfilled
orders, but decreases in each of these items compared
with June last year. Stocks on hand and number of
workers increased slightly over May, and were larger
than a year ago.
June 1928 compared with:
May 1928 June 1927
Production __ ______________
— 2.9
— 5.7
—10.8
—14.4
Shipments __________________
Orders booked ______________
+10.4
—21.7
Unfilled orders ______________
— 3.0
—30.6
Stocks on hand --------------------+ 0.9
+68.0
Number on payroll ----------------+ 0.7
+ 1.0
Cotton
Yarn

Confidential reports were also rendered for June by mills which produced
over six million pounds of yarn, an
output smaller than in either the preceding month or the
same month last year. Shipments were also smaller than
for either of those periods. Orders booked by the mills,
stocks on hand and number of workers increased in June
over May, and over June last year, and unfilled orders
were larger than for May but smaller than a year ago.
June 1928 compared with:
May 1928 June 1927
—10.2
— 9.7
Production _________________
Shipments _________________
— 2.5
—13.0
Orders booked ______________
+45.8
+45.2
Unfilled orders ---------------------+ 4.4
—16.9
Stocks on hand --------------------+ 3.7
+52.2
Number on payroll ___________
+ 3.0
+ 0.7
Hosiery
Figures for May and June, reported to
the Census Bureau by 38 identical es­
tablishments manufacturing hosiery in the sixth district,
indicate declines in production, stocks and orders in June,
compared with May, but increased shipments, cancella­
tions and unfilled orders. Totals of reported figures are
shown for comparison.
(Dozen Pairs)
June 1928 May 1928
Production ___
588,912
601,039
Shipments ___
644,372
633,364
Stocks on hand
1,708,314 1,754,097

J

MONTHLY REVIEW
Orders booked _______________
Cancellations ___________ ___
Unfilled orders _____ _________

728,676
32,279
1,032,214

817,621
20,081
1,001,643

COTTON SEED AND COTTON SEED PRODUCTS
♦Sixth District
United States
Aug. 1 to June 30
Aug. 1 to June 30
Cotton Seed, tons:
1928
1927
1928
1927
Received at mills _ 1,434,805 1,981,075
4,562,237
6,325,409
Crushed ______ 1,445,345 1,950,786
4,621,327
6,238,114
On Hand, June 30
15,924
37,374
30,194
103,407
Crude Oil, lbs___474,762,572 617,761,339 1,465,250,911 1,865,342,894
Production:
Cake and Meal, tons 630,070
840,152
2,079,358
2,801,062
593,628
1,311,852
1,832,429
Hulls, tons __ __ 418,096
Linters, bales __
262,937
315,117
869,808
1,026,812
Stocks, June 30:
**
**
28,814,104
12,381,968
Crude Oil, lbs___ 7,713,470 5,093,956
Cake and Meal, tons
9,919
26,562
45,387
101,748
9,256
41,313
45,641
190,960
Hulls, tons ____
12,180
27,493
59,957
81,105
Linters, bales ___
♦Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi.
**Not including stocks held by refining and manufacturing establish­
ments, and in transit to refiners and consumers.
COAL
According to statistics compiled and published by the
United States Bureau of Mines, the production of bitumi­
nous coal in the United States during June was slightly
lower than in May, or in June last year. June production
this year amounted to 35,963,000 tons, compared with 36,624.000 tons produced in May, and with 36,627,000 tons
mined in June 1927. Average output per working day in
June this year was 1,383,000 tons, compared with 1,387.000 tons in May, and with 1,409,000 tons per day in
June last year. Weekly production figures for June and
early July are shown in the table compared with figures
for corresponding weeks last year. The sharp decline in
output for the week ended July 7, compared with preced­
ing weeks, is of course due to the observance of the July
4th holiday. Weekly figures for Alabama show a lower
level of production than at this time last year, while the
output in Tennessee is higher than it was a year ago.
Total production of bituminous coal during the present
calendar year through July 7, approximately 159 working
days, has amounted to 241,126,000 net tons, compared
with 282,987,000 tons produced in the same period last
year.
(000 Omitted)
United States Alabama
Tennessee
Week Ended:
1928
1927
1928 1927
1928 1927
8,524
304
315
99
86
June 9 _____ _8,412
8,284
294
303
97
92
June 16 _____ _8,342
8,479
302
310
96
84
June 23 _____ _8,391
June 30 -------- --8,444
7,981
284
323
90
79
July 7 _____ _6,830
6,577
245
263
73
78
IRON
Statistics compiled and published by the Iron Age indi­
cate that the production of pig iron during June declined
in comparison with May, and was smaller than in June
last year, and there was g, net loss of nine in the number
of furnaces active. June production of pig iron totaled
3,082,000 tons, a decrease of 6.1 per cent compared with
the output in May, but only two-tenths of one per cent
less than production in June 1927. Furnaces active on
July 1 numbered 189, compared with 198 at the begin­
ning of June, and compared with 198 active at the begin­
ning of July last year. The daily average rate of iron
production in June was 102,733 tons, compared with 105,931 in May, and with 102,988 tons for June last year.
The index number of June production was 103.2, com­
pared with 109.9 for May, and with 103.4 for June 1927.
Statistics for Alabama indicate a decline in production
and a loss of one in the number of furnaces active. June
output in Alabama amounted to 200,643 tons, smaller by
3.1 per cent than in May, and 8.9 per cent smaller than
production in June last year. On July 1 there were 16
furnaces active in Alabama, compared with 17 a month
earlier, and 18 active on July 1 last year. Press reports
indicate that pig iron producers reduced the price 50 cents
per ton on June 20 and are now quoting No. 2 foundry iron
at $15.50, Birmingham. The reduction stimulated inter­
est in the market and a fair tonnage was booked, some



consumers covering their third quarter
while others are buying through August.

requirements

Unfilled Orders—U. S. Steel Corpn.
Unfilled orders of the United States Steel Corporation
reported through the press, amounted at the end of June
to 3,637,009 tons, an increase of 220,187 tons over the
total for May. This is the first increase reported since
February, and the total is 583,763 tons greater than at
the end of June last year.
NAVAL STORES
Receipts of both turpentine and rosin at the three prin­
cipal naval stores markets of the district increased season­
ally in June as compared with earlier months of the sea­
son, but were in smaller volume than at the same time last
year. Stocks of both commodities at the end of June also in­
creased over those on hand a month earlier, and stocks
of turpentine were greater than a year ago, but supplies
of rosin were slightly smaller. Except for June of last
year, receipts of both turpentine and rosin in June this
year were larger than for the same month of any of the
past ten years, and the same is true for the first quarter
of the naval stores season, (April-June). Press reports
indicate that during the latter part of June and early
July there has been improvement in the demand for both
commodities. Prices of turpentine during this period
have ranged between 50 and 52^ cents, and there has
been some improvement in prices on the various grades
of rosins. Receipts and stocks at the three principal
markets of the district are shown in the table with com­
parisons.
June 1928 May 1928 June 1927
Receiptps—Turpentine
31,966
24,234
19,729
Savannah ________
14,118
18,909
17,363
Jacksonville ______
6,825
6,514
5,917
Pensacola ________
39,764
57,730
48,111
Total _______
Receipts—Rosin
75,862
59,730
101,086
Savannah _________
55,260
44,052
65,185
Jacksonville ______ __
14,678
18,700
Pensacola _________
16,919
148,041
118,460
184,971
Total _________
Stocks—Turpentine
25,809
Savannah __ _____
9,931
19,330
24,965
20,832
23,195
Jacksonville ______
Pensacola ________
3,336
17,041
15,978
Total ___ __ __
46,741
52,340
61,336
Stocks—Rosin
Savannah ________
80,325
93,633
65,710
Jacksonville ______
66,259
56,674
51,226
Pensacola ________
11,953
19,407
15,297
Total _________
165,991
165,604
128,889
BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
(Continued from Page One)
of silk and rayon, fertilizer materials, house furnishings,
and automobile tires declined. During the first three
weeks in July there were declines in the prices of wheat
and cotton, and advancs in those of cattle and hogs.
Bank Credit
Member bank credit, after rising to
a record volume early in July, de­
clined somewhat during the two following weeks and on
July 18 total loans and investments of reporting banks
in leading cities were about $160,000,000 smaller than
four weeks earlier. The decrease was largely the result
of reduction by about $125,000,000 in the banks’ invest­
ment holdings, but reflected also a decline in the volume
of loans on securities following a temporary increase
over the mid-year. Contrary to the usual seasonal trend,
loans largely for commercial purposes were in record
volume during the period. Member bank borrowing at
the reserve banks showed a decline following the mid­
year settlement period, but the volume on July 25 at
slightly more than $1,000,000,000, was somewhat larger
than five weeks earlier. Holdings of acceptances and
United States securities declined during the period.
In July there were further advancs in opn market
rates for commercial paper and bills, and discount rates
at seven of the Federal Reserve Banks were raisd from
4 V2 to 5 percent.

MONTHLY REVIEW

8

MONTHLY INDEX NUMBERS
The following index numbers, except as indicated otherwise, are computed by the Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta monthly. The index numbers of retail and wholesale trade are based upon sales figures reported con­
fidentially by representative firms in the lines of trade indicated, and the other series of index numbers are based
upon figures reported to the bank or currently available through the daily or trade press. These index numbers,
except as indicated in the foot-notes, are based upon the monthly averages for the three year period 1923-25 as
represented by 100.
April
1928
131.8
102.5
84.8
94.2
95.2
104.6
102.0

May
1928
157.8
120.8
89.9
119.5
97.7
109.8
114.0

June
1928
122.9
106.1
100.0
91.0
86.2
100.5
99.6

April
1927
124.8
102.7
92.2
96.2
109.5
114.2
109.0

May
1927
138.0
99.8
94.9
114.1
93.3
111.6
108.0

June
1927
108.6
107.0
100.6
88.7
93.0
96.6
99.0

101.9
115.3

107.2
115.6

103.4
127.0

111.
120.

102.
99.

101.
107.

202.2
134.6
154.3
99.8
130.0
194.6
129.7

213.0
139.0
163.8
110.0
129.9
220.8
126.8

207.1
139.3
161.9
107.8
146.7
216.1
121.5

172.
135.
144.
113.
150.
199.
136.

171.
123.
134.
113.
109.
171.
115.

178.
123.
136.
109.
118.
172.
114.

80.6
76.9
81.1
93.9
78.2
97.0
71.5
95.9
81.7

86.4
74.0
85.3
83.9
78.5
93.9
68.2
108.0
84.5

79.0
59.8
81.5
77.3
84.2
66.2
62.3
99.6
77.5

84.9
94.6
90.4
90.6
89.3
101.7
71.4
106.8
89.6

92.5
83.6
85.5
70.8
79.8
93.0
73.3
99.9
87.1

87.9
76.1
82.1
77.4
78.5
79.0
64.7
105.3
83.4

WHOLESALE PRICES U. S. (2)
Farm products
____
________
Foods _______________ _____________
Hides and leather products__________ _
Textile products
Fuel and lighting____________________
Metals and Metal products
Building materials___________________
Chemicals and drugs
Hoiisefiirmshing goods
Miscellaneous ______________________
ALL COMMODITIES________________

107.6
99.5
126.7
96.5
80.8
98.4
92.5
95.8
97.9
84.9
97.4

109.8
101.2
126.3
96.6
81.8
98.6
93.5
95.3
97.8
85.1
98.6

106.7
100.3
123.7
96.3
82.1
98.7
93.9
94.9
97.0
82.2
97.6

94.3
94.6
101.7
94.2
84.9
97.8
95.0
97.8
97.8
91.3
93.7

96.3
94.4
103.7
93.9
83.9
98.6
95.1
95.4
97.8
91.3
93.7

96.5
94.4
107.3
94.3
84.2
98.2
94.6
95.8
98.0
90.2
93.8

BUILDING PERMITS 6th DISTRICT
Atlanta
Birmingham________________________
Jacksonville
Nashville
__
New Orleans
Other Cities..________________________
DISTRICT ( 9.0 flities)

66.1
129.4
112.4
163.3
53.5
50.0
74.0

382.0
129.0
88.8
90.6
62.3
73.3
123.9

72.7
114.2
80.7
46.1
63.4
63.1
71.5

71.8
164.2
202.2
94.1
107.2
111.5
118.2

73.6
139.9
140.4
113.2
56.1
67.2
84.3

61.2
113.5
131.6
65.4
76.8
62.0
75.6

69.4

92.6

81.5

88.3

88.6

88.9

103.3
113.5
80.9
78.9

113.7
126.6
85.1
96.2

100.4
112.2
74.5
74.5

121.8
128.0
108.2
139.2

124.5
130.6
111.2
102.2

130.4
135.8
118.3
78.4

106.6
85.9

109.9
89.2

103.2
86.4

114.6
108.3

113.5
107.8

103.4
94.8

81.1

71.6

76.2

72.4

63.9

63.9

RETAIL TRADE 6th DISTRICT
(Department Stores.)
Birmingham------------------------------ --------Chattanooga_________ _______ -.................
Nashville______________________ ______
New Orleans__________________________
Other Cities____________________ ______
DISTRICT___________________________
RETAIL TRADE U. S. (1)
Department Stores___________________
Mail Order Houses___________ _____ —
Chain Stores:
Grocery .................. .............................. ...
5 & 10 Cent........................................
Drug _______ _____________ ______
Cigar —..................................- ................
W^a^ing Apparel
WHOLESALE TRADE 6th DISTRICT
Groceries
Dry Gon^s
_
____ ..
Ha^dwa^^
Furniture
____ ___
Electrical Supplies
Shoes
Stationery
TOTAT.

CONTRACTS AWARDED 6th DISTRICT
COTTON CONSUMED:
United States_______________________
Cotton-Growing States ______________
All Other States..........................................
Exports................ ............................................
PIG IRON PRODUCTION:
United States
_
_
Alabama
_____
UNFILLED ORDERS—U. S. STEEL
CORPORATION
__________

(1) Compiled by Federal Reserve Board.
(2) Compiled by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Base 1926—100.