View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

T H E

M O N T H L Y

BUSINESS REVIEW
C o verin g B u s in e s s a n d A g r ic u ltu r a l C o n d itio n s in th e S ix th F e d e r a l R eserve D is tr ic t.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
JOS. A. McCORD, Chairman of the Board and Federal Reserve Agent
W ARD ALBERTSON, Assistant Federal Reserve Agent

VOL. 9

ATLANTA, GA., JULY 28, 1924

No. 7

BUSINESS CONDITIONS IN THE UNITED STATES.
Prepared by the Federal Reserve Board.

Production; of basic commodities and factory employment showed further large declines during Ji&ie.
Trade, both at wholesale and retail, also decreased during the month and was in smaller volume than a year
ago.
PRODUCTION.
The Federal Reserve Board’s index of production in basic industries, adjusted to allow for seasonal varia­
tions, declined about 9 per cent in June to a point 22 per cent below the level of the first two months of the year.
Iron and steel and cotton manufacturing industries continued to show the most marked curtailment of activity,
and decreases were general in other industries. Factory employment decreased 3 per cent in June, the metal,
automobile, textile and leather industries reporting the largest reductions in forces. Value of building con­
tracts awarded in June was 8 per cent smaller than in May, though 4 per cent larger than in June of last year.
Condition of the corn crop on July 1, as reported by the Department of Agriculture, was the lowest on record
for th at date and Indicated a probable yield about 500,000.000 bushels less than last year. Condition of the
cotton crop the middle of July was reported less satisfactory than on June 25, while forecasts for wheat; and
oats were larger than in June.
TRADE.
Railroad shipments decreased in June and were about 15 per cent less than a year ago, owing to smialler
loadings of fell classes of freight except grain and livestock. Wholesale trade showed a further slight declixie
in June and was 11 per cent smaller than a year ago. Sales of Hardware, drugs, shoes, and dry goods decreased,
while sales of groceries and meat increased slightly. Sales of department stores and chain stores showed more
than the usual seasonal decrease during June and were smaller than last year. Mail order sales in June showeki
less than the usual seasonal decline and were larger than a year ago. Department stores further reduce®
stocks of merchandise and slightly increased their outstanding orders.
PRICES.
Wholesale prices, as measured by the index of Bureau of Labor Statistics, declined more than one per
cent in July to a level 5 per cent below the high point for this year. Prices of all groups of commodities, except
clothing, showed declines and decreases were particularly large for building materials. During the first three
weeks of July quotations on wheat, com and hogs advanced sharply, while prices of sugar, cotton goods, and
iron and steel products were lower.
BANK CREDIT.
Commercial loans at member banks in leading cities during June and the first two weeks of July remained
at a relatively constant level, considerably below the peak reached in April, while investment holdings $n<j
loans secured by stocks and bonds increase rapidly and carried total loans and investments to the high, point
for the year. Demand deposits, owing partly to the growth of bankers balances at financial centers, advanced
to a record level. At the Reserve Banks there was a continued decline in discounts and an increase in pur­
chases of government securities in the open market. As a consequence, total earnings assets in the middle pf
July were only slightly less than at the beginning of June. Member banks reserve balances increased rapidly,
reflecting a return flow of currency from circulation and further imports of gold; total deposits at the Re­
serve Banks on July 16, were larger than at any time since the organization of the system.
Money rates in July were comparatively steady but continued to show a somewhat easier tendency *1
Discount rates, at the Federal Reserve Banks of Kansas City and Dallas were reduced during July from 4} to 4
per cent.



THE MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW

2

PRODUCTION IN BASIC INDUSTRIES

Index of 22 basic commodities corrected for
seasonal variation.
(1919^=100). Latest figure June 94.

Index
for 33 manufacturing industries.
(1919==100). Latest figure June 90.

SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY
■ June and early July have brought material improvement in
the condition of agricultural crops, especially cotton, and the
prospects for the season’s production may reasonably be said
to be considerably brighter than they were two or three months
ago, although, of course, weather conditions during the remain*
der of July and August will have an important bearing on the
outcome.
The;Department of Agriculture, in reporting upon the condi­
tion of the cotton crop on June 25, estimated that it had imjjtoved from 65.6 per cent of normal on May 25 to 71.2 per cent
on June 25, and all of the states in this district have reported
improvement except Alabama, where the condition was 70 per



WHOLESALE PRICES

Index of U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
(1913=100 base adopted by Bureau.) Latest
figure June 145.

Weekly ligures for 12 Federal Reserve Banks.
Latest figure Ju ly 23.

cent on both of these report dates. The scarcity of farm lalor
has made necessary for the farmer long hours and hard work,
and the limited credit which some have been able, to obtain
has resalted in the practice of xipd economy. Increased use of
insect poison, following the cold weather of last winter, has re­
sulted in a considerably smaller number of Weevils this year.
The prospective output of su?ar and rice in Louisiana are also
some yhat better than last year.
Busiress in most lines is experiencing a seasonal lull which
Is. usaal at this time. Retail and wholesale trade, and manu­
facturing in various lines, show recessions probably some vhat
greater than might be expected because of seasonal factors,
and business generally is hesitating until more Accurate and de­
finite information is available regarding the outcome of the

3

THE MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW
season’s crops. A lagging market has resulted in a continued
low level of coal production, and iron mining in the Birming­
ham District, as well as in the country as a whole, declined sub­
stantially during June. Unemployment has continued in June
to show some increase in this district, due to part time opera­
tions in a number of industries, although building construc­
tion and road work continued to employ large numbers.
Savings deposit statistics continue to show small increases
from month to month, and the total of savings held by 94 banks
at the end of June was 7.1 per cent greater than at the same
time a year ago. Bank loans are at a low point, while res­
erves are high, and the same is true of the Federal Reserve
Bank, the reserve ratio being higher in the weekly statement
on July 16 than in any preceding report date in nearly a year
and a half.

R E T A IL T R A D E

Sales and stocks both registered declines in June, according
to confidential figures reported by 43 department stores in the
sixth district. The index number of sales by these 43 reporting
stores in June is 96.6, compared with 106.4 in May, and stocks
of merchandise on hand at the end of June were 6.7 per cent
lower than a month earlier. This decline in sales was some­
what greater than that which occurred last year at the same
time, when the index number declined from 108.1 in May to
to 104.7 in June. Sales for June this year were 8.4 per cent
lower than in June last year, but for the first half of 1924 the
volume of sales was only one-half of one per cent lower than for
the first half of 1923. Stocks at the end of June were 2.4 per
cent larger than at the same time last year. Index numbers
for individual reporting cities are shown on page 12 of this
Review.

CONDITION OF RETAIL TRADE—JUNE 1924
Sixth Federal Reserve District
Percentage of Increase or Decrease
(1)
(2)
C om parison of n e t sales w ith 1
th o se of corresponding
S tocks a t e n d of m o n th
com pared w ith
p eriod la s t year
j1
B
Ja n . 1
B
A A
June
Ju n e
May
to
J u n e 30
1924
1923
-1 1 .2
— 8.5
— 5.8
—12.4
-1 0 .4
- 6.3
— 7.3
-1 0 .5
--- 8.4

A tla n ta (4)............
B irm in g h am (5)_
C h a tta n o o g a (6)..
Ja c k so n (3)...........
N ashville (5).........
New O rlean s (5)..
S av an n ah (3)........
O th e r P ities (12).DISTRIOT (43) - - -

— 7.1
0.1
+ 16.3
- 1.5
- 1.6
- - 0.7
— 2.5
- 3.5
- 0.5

- 4 .6
+ 1 0 .9
+ 8.5
+ 8.1
— 0.6
+ 1.8
— 7.4
+ 2.7
+ 2.4

— 3.9
- 5 .1
— 9.3
- 4 .8
— 6.7
— 8.3
-4 .9
— 4.9
- 6.7

W HOLESA LE TRAD E

Confidential reports made to the Federal Reserve Bank for
June by more than 150 representative wholesale firms in the
sixth district, in nine different lines of trade, show a smaller
volume of business than in either the preceding month or the
corresponding month last year. Electrical supplies is the
only line to show a larger volume of sales in June than in May or
in June 1923. The declines in the other eight lines compared
with May may be attributed largely to seasonal influences, but
the unfavorable comparisons with June last year are due partly
to the lower price level now prevailing, the fact that buying
power generally is somewhat lower now than then because of in­
creased idleness resulting from ths curtailed operations in some
industries, and to the fact that business generally is running at
a somewhat slower pace than at this time a year ago. Percent­
age comparisons of sales, by lines of trade, are shown in the
following table:
May 1924
G roceries (40 firm s)—
D ry G oods (31 firm s).
H ard w are (31 firm s)..

- 7.6
-1 0 .4
— 8.2
24.4
+14.5
-2 1 .8
—17.0
— 5.2
-19.8

Shoes (10 firm s)......................
S tatio n ery (4 firm s)...............
D rugs (5 firm s).......................
F arm Im plem ents (7 firm s)..

(3)

1

(4)

P ercentage of average stocks P ercentage o f o u tsta n d in g
orders a t e n d of J u n e
a t e n d of each m o n th
1924 to to ta l purchases
from J a n . 1924 to d a te
d u rin g c alen d ar
(6 m onths) to aver­
age m o n th ly sales
y ear 1923
over sam e
period
500.1
449.7
543.1
483.5
469.9
489.2
572.5
542.8
493.8

1.4
2.8
X
X
4.9
8.7
4.0
2.4
5.6

were reported excellent by one firm, good by eight firms, fair
by twelve, and poor by one. On the whole the reports indicate
a satisfactory outlook for the trade during the coming months.
Some of the firms state that while their volume of business dur­
ing the first half of 1924 has been smaller than during the same
period last year, they have realized more profit than they did
during that period. Our index number for wholesale grocery
sales in June is 75.8, compared with 81.5 for May, and 81.6 for
for June last year. Percentage comparison by cities are shown
below:
J u n e 1924 sales com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
A tla n ta (5 firm s).............................................— 4.0
Jacksonville (4 firm s).................................. ..—10.8
M eridian (3 firm s)........................................ ..—10.8
New O rleans (9 firm s)................................. ..— 3.2
V icksburg (4 firm s)...................................... ..— 8.9
O th e r C ities (15 firm s)...................................—10.1
D ISTR IC T (40 firm s)................................... ..- 7 . 6

+ 2.3

T-1.0

+ 4.2
— 5.9
—13.2
- 5 .5
- 4 .3

J u n e 1923
- 4.3
-1 7 .3
-1 5 .2
7-37.3
+ 12.8
-3 5 .8
-1 8 .3
- 7 .3
-1 2 .9

G ro c e rie s

Forty wholesale grocery firms reported sales in June which
were, in the aggregate 7.6 per cent lower than in May, but only
4.3 per cent lower than in June 1923. Atlanta and Meridian
showed increases over June last year. Collections during June



1

D ry G o o d s

Dry Goods sales during June at Atlanta and New Orleans
were larger than in May, but declines at other points resulted
in an average decrease for the district of 10.4 per cent, while
compared with June 1923, sales showed a decline of 17.3 per
cent. Collections were reported good by six firms, fair by
thirteen, and poor by one. The tone of the reports indicate
that considering the midsummer season a satisfactory volume
of business is being obtained, and many of them state that the
outlook for the last half of the year is good. Percentage com­
parisons of sales by cities is indicated in the following table:

THE MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW

4

J u n e 1924 sales com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923

J u n e 1924 sales com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
A tla n ta (4 firm s)..........................................
Jacksonville (4 firm s)..................................
Knoxville (3 firm s).......................................
Nashville (3 firm s)....... ................................
New O rleans (5 firm s).................................
O th er Cities (12 firm s)................................
DISTRICT (31 firm s)...................................

+ 3 .3
—16.2
—15.4
-1 2 .6
+ 0 .5
-1 5 .1
-1 0 .4

— 7.9
—11.0
—23.5
-1 6 .8
—14.4
-1 9 .9
-1 7 .3

A tla n ta (3 firm s)....................................— —31.9
O th e r C ities (7 firm s)............... -................. —16.9
D ISTR IC T (10 firm s)................................... -2 1 .8

—41.8
—33.1
-3 5 .8

Comparisons of sales in the other three lines are indicated
in the first table under Wholesale Trade, as many as three re­
ports not having been received from any individual city.

H a rd w a re
C o n d itio n s in th e w holesale h a rd w a re bu sin e ss d u rin g J u n e
w ere m u ch th e sa m e a s in o th e r lines. W holesale firm s s t a te
t h a t som e m e rc h a n ts a re p lacin g som e fall o rd ers fo r goods w hich
m u s t b e o rd e re d a h e a d , b u t as a g en eral th in g a re b u y in g s u p ­
p lies of m o st a rtic le s only a s th e y a re re q u ire d . J u n e sales
w ere la rg e r a t C h a tta n o o g a a n d N ew O rlean s th a n in M a y , b a t
fo r th e d is tr ic t as a w hole w ere sm a ller b y 8.2 p e r c e n t th a n in
M a y , w h ile c o m p a re d w ith J u n e 1923 a decline of 15.2 p e r c e n t
w as sh o w n , C h a tta n o o g a b ein g th e only c ity to r e p o rt in crease d
b u sin e ss o v er t h a t m o n th . S om e of th e re p o rts s ta te t h a t
tra v e lin g m en a re usu ally b r o u g h t in d u rin g J u n e a n d p a r t of
J u ly in p r e p a r a tio n fo r th e b eg in n in g of th e fall season. A m a ­
jo rity of th e re p o rtin g firm s in d ic a te t h a t w ith good crop p ro ­
sp e c ts th e o u tlo o k fo r b u sin e ss d u rin g th e fall is good. P e r ­
cen ta g e co m p ariso n s b y re p o rtin g cities follow :
J u n e 1924 sales com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
A tla n ta (3 firm s).............................................—13.6
C h a tta n o o g a (3 firm s).................... . ............+ 4 . 2
Jacksonville (3 firm s).................................. ..—37.4
N ashville (4 firm s)..........................................— 8.3
New O rleans (5 firm s)................................. ..+ 1 . 4
O th er C ities (13 firm s)................................ ..—14.5
D ISTRICT (31 firm s).....................................- 8.2

—12.0
+ 15.3
—23.1
-2 3 .5
—22.0
— 8.8
-1 5 .2

F u rn itu re
J u n e sa le s b y six teen w holesale fu rn itu re firm s in th e d is­
t r ic t w ere low er b y 24.4 p e r c e n t th a n in M a y , a n d b y 37.3 p e r
c e n t th a n in J u n e la s t y ear. T h e re p o rts in d ic a te t h a t th e
m o n th is u su ally a q u ie t one, a n d in te r e s t is usu ally c e n te re d
in th e o p en in g o f th e larg e fu rn itu re m a rk e ts early in Ju ly . T h e
follow ing fig u res show co m p ariso n s of sales in cities w h ere th re e
o r m o re firm s a re re p o rte d fo r th e m o n th :
J u n e 1924 sales com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
A tla n ta (4 firm s)..............................................—31.5
C h a tta n o o g a (3 firm s)................................ .. —19.5
N ashville (3 firm s)........................................ .. —26.3
O th er C ities (6 firm s).................................. .. —25.4
D ISTR IC T (16 firm s)................................... —24.4

—22.5
—48.3
—44.7
—26.4
-3 7 .3

E le ctrical S u p p lies
Sales d u rin g Ju n e b y 12 w holesale electrical su p p ly firm s in
th is d is tric t exceeded M a y b u sin e ss b y 14.5 p e r c e n t, a n d w ere
12.8 p e r c e n t larg er th a n in Ju n e la s t y ear. C o m m e n ts c o n ta in ­
ed in th e re p o rts in d ic a te t h a t m u ch of th e in crease in b u sin ess
is d u e to in crease d sales of electric fan s. P e rc e n ta g e co m ­
p ariso n s follow :

A G R IC U L T U R E
C otton

The hot, dry weather which came during a part of June caused
considerable improvement in the condition of growing cotton
between May 25 and June 25, the dates upon which the Departpartment of Agriculture estimates the condition of the crop.
Throughout the cotton belt the condition of the crop improved
from an average of 65.6 per cent of normal on May 25 to 71.2
per cent a month later. The condition of the crop improved
during that period in all of the states in the sixth district except­
ing Alabama, where the condition was reported as 70 per cent of
normal on both report dates, while in Tennessee a gain of thirteen
points was reported.
The area in cultivation throughout the belt is estimated by
the Department of Agriculture to be about 40,403,000 acres,
an increase of 1,702,000, or 4.4 per cent, as compared with the
revised estimate of acreage in cultivation a year ago, and the
estimated production is placed at 12,144,000 bales, based upon
this acreage and the condition on June 25. Georgia’s crop is
in better condition and the prospects for making a crop are
brighter than in several years. Fields on June 25 were report­
ed to be in a good state of cultivation in most of the state;
plants are fruiting rapidly in southern Georgia and squares
forming in the northern part of the state. Very few weevils
are found in northern Georgia, and the number in the southern
part of the state is very much smaller than last year. Reports
from Alabama indicate a stand on June 25 about 77 per cent
perfect, and a poisoning of about 13.5 per cent of the acreage in
an attempt to control the weevil. The number of weevils repported on June 25 was 20 per cent lower than last year. Not­
withstanding a decrease of 35 per cent in the acreage planted in
Florida, prospects are reported good for a crop in that state.
Weevils are reported fewer this year than last, and farmers are
using increased measures of control. The same is true in Louis­
iana, where the acreage this year is five per cent greater than
last, and where the condition improved eight points during
June. Many stands in Mississippi are poor, but the crop gener­
ally is clean of grass, and weevils are not so numerous as last
year. The Tennessee crop showed an improvement of thirteen
points during June, and while there are still a number of grassy
fields and quite a few poor stands, most of the crop is in good
shape, in healthy condition, and growing rapidly.
The following table shows the condition on June 25, and May
25, this year, and June 25 a year ago, together with the esti­
mated acreage in cultivation on June 25 this year, compared
with the revised estimate for the same date a year ago:

J u n e 1924 sales com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
A tla n ta (3 firm s)........................................... + 2.6
New O rleans (5 firm s)................................. + 19.4
O th e r Cities (4 firm s)................................. + 3 1 .3
D ISTR IC T (12 firm s)................... .............. +14.5

+ 8.2
+ 1 3 .0
+ 21.4
+ 12.8

A labam a.

S h o es
T ennessee.
D ecreases of 21.8 p e r c e n t co m p ared w ith M a y , a n d 35.8 p e r
c e n t c o m p ared w ith J u n e la s t y ear, w ere show n b y re p o rts fro m
t e n w holesale shoe firm s in th is d is tric t fo r J u n e . L ittle com ­
m e n t is c o n ta in e d in th e re p o rts , ex cep t t h a t re ta ile rs c o n tin u e
b u y in g only c u rre n t re q u ire m e n ts.




C o n d itio n
J u n e 25 May 25 J u n e 25
1924
1924
1923
. 75
68
56
79
77
65
70
70
68
78
70
69
.. 74
69
67
. .. 67
54
67

Acreage J u n e 25
1923
1924
3,767,000
111,000
3,190,000
1,537,000
3,256,000
1,184,000

3,844,000
171,000
3,190,000
1,464,000
3,392,000
1,221,000

O th e r C rops

Reports and statistics from Alabama indicate increased pro­
duction this year over last of most of the principal crops, except­
ing sweet potatoes and oats. The corm crop is estimate*! at

THE MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW
nearly six million bushels larger than last year, while a consider­
able increase is also indicated in cotton, peanuts, white potatoes
and sorghum syrup. An increase of more than three million
bushels of corn is indicated on a slightly increased acreage in
Florida, and other staple crops indicate favorable prospects.
Pecan prospects are not as good as they were earlier in the
season, but good crops of peaches, pears and pineapples are in
prospect. The acreage planted to com in Georgia is reported
to be 4,115,000, an increase of two per cent over last year, and
the production is estimated at nearly 63,000,000 bushels, com­
pared with 49,215,000 bushels last year. Although the crop
is late, satisfactory progress was made during June. The
peanut acreage is estimated at 25 per cent larger than last year,
the condition better than at this time a year ago, and probable
production estimated at 125,590,000 pounds, compared with 77,
824,000 pounds produced last year. Georgia’s tobacco acreage
has reached a new high mark this year, the official acreage of
aU types of tobacco in the state being 34,000 acres, twice as
large as last year, and the condition of the crop is better than at
this time a year ago. In Tennessee there was an increase in
the corn acreage, and in white potatoes, but a slight decline in
the acreage of sweet potatoes. While crops are still late, June
weather brought considerable improvement. After severe losses
from “wild-fire” last season, the acreage of tobacco in Tennes­
see shows a decided decline, especially in the middle and west­
ern parts of the state where the dark types are grown. The
acreage of Burley in the eastern part of the state shows a decided
increase over last year.

Cotton Movement (bales) United States Since August 1.

COTTON MOVEMENT

I n te rio r T ow ns:
A tla n ta ..........
A u g u sta.........
M acon.............
M ontgom ery.

May 1924

J u n e 1923

S u g a r an d S u g a r C ane

The weather in the Louisiana cane belt during recent weeks
has been favorable for cultivation and fields are generally' quite
clean and the crop is growing well. The condition of the cane,
however, on July 1 was 69 per cent of normal, compared with 80
per cent at the same time last year. The report of the Agri­
cultural Statistician in Louisiana states that the acreage and
condition of the crop indicate a production of approximately
2,979,972 short tons of cane on the area to be used for sugar
this year, and a yield for the state of 210,282 short tons of sugar,
compared with 162,023 tons last year.

.
In te rio r T ow ns:
A tla n ta ..........
A u g u sta .........
M acon............

.

.
Stocks—P o rts:
New Orleam
M obile.........

.
.

In te rio r T ow n s:
M ontgom ery.
V icksburg , -




Receipts:
New O rle a n s.... ......
S av a n n a h .......... ........

J u n e 1923

90,811,909
28,691,839

166,100,725
49,547,839

115,240,063
25,729,183

M eltings:
New O rle a n s.... .... . 148,085,423
S av a n n a h ......... .......... 41,848,988

130,354,191
29,379,437

112,669,877
32,430,453

Stocks:
New O rle a n s.... .........
S av a n n a h .......... .........

111,783,979
22,680,312

46,700,733
13,175,849

54,510,465
9,523,163

Refined Sugar—1Pounds

New O rleans— .......
S a v a n n a h ........... .......

J u n e 1924
178,679,118
48,393,463

May 1924
111,586,425
26,725,794

J u n e 1923
82,572,888
30,534,059

S tocks:
New O rlean s— ... ..
S a v a n n a h ....................

47,289,863
3,433,539

90,253,870
14,111,644

137,106,344
11,738,122

59,734
11,509
41,373

111,335
12,269
28,841

35,112
2,515
16,945

8,202
6,699
1,576
2,024
16,680

8,144
7,823
2,827
1,718
16,653

2,776
8,227
1,234
418
22,848

113,724
11,787
36,093

95,079
13,471
35,821

62,674
2,090
21,276

12,052
7,969
3,075
3,331
18,060

13,504
6,825
3,464
4,177
17,582

15,303
5,266
4,044
1,169
22,328

81.818
1,437
32,859

135,808
2,017
26,839

70,040
1,030
20,185

S ta te

8,684
13,952
2,926
6,510
1,149

12,534
19,441
4,375
7,817
1,600

18,943
18,960
7,971
6,995
3,476

L o u isian a...................
T exas............................
A rkansas.....................
C alifornia...................
O th e r...........................
U nited S ta te s............

S h ip m en ts—P o rts :

1921

♦Decrease.

Shipm ents:

Sixth Federal Reserve District

.
,
-

1922

MOVEMENT OF SUGAR
Raw
J u n e 1924
May 1924

The condition of oranges in Florida continued in June to de­
cline at a time when improvement should be evident. The
aphis infestation has caused a condition on July 1 of 83 per cent
of normal, compared with 85 per cent a month earlier, and 93
per cent on July 1, 1923. Condition of grapefruit showed a
slight improvement. Trees are not up to last year’s condition,
and the trend of reports is not optimistic.

J u n e 1924

1923

1924

R eceipts a t U. S. P o rts 6,740,018 4,821,872 6,172,744 6,553,023
O verland to Nor. Mills
a n d C a n a d a ..............
921,797 1,235,527 1,569,624 1,384,730
S o u th ern Mills T ak ­
in g s............................. 3,273,000 3,857,001 3,347,738 2,570,051
In te rio r Stocks i n ex­
cess of th o se h e ld a t
close of Com’l. y ear.
*10,895
34,544
531,208
437,462
T o ta l m ovem ent of
crop fo r 332 d a y s .... 10,945,710 10,879,856 10,558,898 10,945,266
Am erican Mills N . &
S. C a n a d a ................. 5,404,687 6,664,381 .....................................
Am erican C o tto n th u s
f a r ............................... 10,574,000 11,744,000 12,099,000 ................

C itru s F ru its

R eceipts—P o rts:

5

R ice

The area sown to rice in Louisiana in 1924 is estimated by
the Agricultural Statistician of that state to be 485,000 acres,
an increase of one per cent over last year, but 15,000 acres less
than the ten-year average. The condition of the crop on July
1 was 90 per cent of normal, the estimated yield about 35.1
bushels per acre, and a total probable production of about 17,
024.000 bushels, compared with 15,840,000 bushels last year.
The rice acreage in the United States this year is estimated
at 899,000 acres, compared with 892,000 acres last year; the
condition at 91.1 per cent, and the probable total production at
35.829.000 bushels, against 33,256,000 bushels produced in
1923. Following are figures for the rice-growing states:
E stim ated Acreage C o n d itio n
1924
J u ly 1
485,000
156,000
154,000
90,000
14,000
899,000

90
91
95
90
..
91.1

E stim ated
P ro d u c tio n
(bushels)
17,024,000
5,536,000
7,754,000
5,184,000
331,000
35,829,000

THE MONTHLY BUSINESS REVIEW

6
RICE MOVEMENT

Rough Rice (sacks) Port of New Orleans
R eceipts........................................
S h ip m en ts...................................
S to ck .............................................

J u n e 1924
740
1,701
34,188

May 1924
6,413
7,505
35,149

J u n e 1923
39,402
35,597
37,879

and the total of all loans, discounts and investments was lower
than on any preceding reporting date this year, and slightly
lower than on July 11, 1923. Reserves were higher than in a
number of weeks. Time deposits reached a new high point for
this year on July 2, but declined slightly the following week.
Member Banks in Selected Cities

Clean Rice (Pockets)
R eceipts........................................
S h ip m en ts...................................
S tock.............................................

14,133
34,646
97,703

44,252
71,433
118,216

159,959
131,517
191,994

Receipts of Rough Rice (Barrels)
J u n e 1924
.

A ssociation M ills...
New O rleans Mills..
O utside Mills...........

.

2,026
740
6,700

T o ta l..................

Season to L a st season to
J u n e 30, 1924 J u n e 30. 1923
4,835,482
729,017
1,784,946

5,560,470
1,190,459
2,164,317

7,349,445

8,915,246

Distribution of Milled Rice (pockets)
A ssociation Mills.......................
New O rleans Mills— ..............
O utsid e Mills..............................

68,347
21,972
44,775

5,116,871
812,377
1,885,527

5,538,863
1,361,556
1,910,082

T o ta l....................... ..............

135,094

7,814,775

8,810,501

Stock on Hand
J u ly 1,1924 J u n e 1,1924 J u ly 1, 1923
Association Mills........ ...............
New O rleans Mills— ..............
O utside Mills............... ..............

105,159
129,181
68,300

172,218
151,285
106,300

476,694
226,985
262,200

T o ta l....................... ..............

302,640

429,803

965,879

FIN A N C IA L

Declines in loans and discounts and continued increases in
time and savings deposits are indicated in reports received from
member banks in selected cities for June and early July. The
total of loans and discounts by 36 member banks which report
weekly reached on July 9 a new low point for this year, although
still a little higher than on the corresponding reporting date
last year. Investments in United States securities, and also
in other stocks and bonds, likewise reached a new low point,

(000 Omitted)
J u ly 9,1924 J u n e 11,1924 Ju ly 11,

Bills D iscounted:

Secured b y Govt. O bligations
Secured b y stocks a n d bondsAll o th e rs.....................................
T o ta l Bills D iscounted.........
U. S. Securities.................................
O th er Stocks a n d B onds................
T o ta l loans, d isco u n ts a n d invest­
m ents................................................
T im e d eposits.....................................
D em and deposits..............................
Accom m odation a t F . R . B a n k -

$ 7,771
67,330
335,363
410,464
28,751
40,999

$ 7,915
66,371
346,916
421,202
33,262
41,380

$ 7,713
61,990
331,921
401,624
43,194
38,735

480,304
189,041
268,448
8,182

495,844
185,979
269,594
18,720

483,553
176,813
271,779
14,705

The weekly statement of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
showed the total of bills discounted on July 16 at the lowest
point of the year, and also lower than at the corresponding time
a year ago. Acceptances purchased in the open market, and the
total of bills held by the bank were both at new low levels for
the year, as well as being lower than on July 18 last year. Earn­
ing assets reached the lowest point this year on July 16, but re­
serves were not far from the highest point for the year- which
was reached on June 25. Federal Reserve Notes in actual cir­
culation were lower than in a number of weeks, and the ratio
of reserves to deposit and notes liabilities was 83.4, higher than
on any reporting date in nearly a year and a half.
Federal Reserve Bank
(000 Omitted)
Ju ly 16, 1924 J u n e 18, 1924 J u ly 18,1923
Bills D iscounted:
Secured b y Govt. O bligations $ 2,778
$ 4,809
$ 5,893
All O th er...................................... 26,854
28,880
31,710
T o ta l bills d isc o u n te d .............. 29,632
33,690
37,603
Bills b o u g h t in open m a rk e t........
1,293
2,992
4,462
U. S. Securities.................................
428
195
287
T o ta l earn in g assets........................ 31,353
36,876
42,352
C ash reserves..................................... 161,152
162,004
143,992
T o ta l deposits.................................... 56,999
60,151
54,745
F. R . N otes in a c tu a l circu latio n 136,211
138,740
134,057
Reserve R a tio ....................................
83.4%
81.5%
76.3%

SAVINGS DEPOSITS—JUNE 1924
Sixth Federal Reserve District
J u n e 1924
A tla n ta (7 b a n k s )................................................................$ 32,528,003
B irm ingham (5 b a n k s)....................................................... 23,050,528
Jacksonville (5 b a n k s )........................................................ 20,381,635
N ashville (10 b a n k s )............................................................ 19,769,542
New O rleans (8 b a n k s )...................................................... 48,954,474
O th er C ities (59 b a n k s )...................................................... 88,855,301
T o ta l (94 b a n k s)............................................................ $233,539,483

DEBITS TO INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS
Sixth Federal Reserve District
J u ly 16,1924
A lb an y ............. ................... $ 746,000
A tla n ta ............ .................... 32,680,000
5,850,000
A u g u sta........... ...................
B irm ingham — -............. 26,333,000
B ru n sw ick — ....................
638,000
8,638,000
C h a tta n o o g a .....................
2,605,000
C olum bus....... ...................
424,000
D o th a n ............ ...................
182,000
E lb e rto n .......... ...................
3,500,000
Ja c k so n ........... ...................
Ja ck so n v ille....................... 14,231,000
Knoxville........
M acon.............. ................... 5,318,000
M eridian.......... ...................
2,975,000
Mobile.............. ...................
6,161,000

M ontgom
ery.. ...................
5,007,000



J u n e U, 1924 J u ly 18.1923
$ 896,000
$ 861,000
28,620,000
29,631,000
5,740,000
5,802,000
24,788,000
24,270,000
712,000
689,000
8,054,000
9,380,000
2,656,000
2,571,000
____ ___
430,000
267,000
123,000
3,500,000
2,808,000
13,937,000
13,202,000
7,102,000
7,462,000
4,442,000
5,282,000
2,614,000
3,822,000
6,527,000
6,421,000
5,365,000
4,218,000

C om parison of
May 1924J u n e 1924-May 1924 J u n e 1923
$ 31,853,958
22,205,706
19,760,962
19,664,833
47,838,961
87,478,718
$228,803,138

+
-f+
+
+
+
+

2.1
3.8
3.1
0.5
2.3
1.6
2.1

N ashville..............................
N ew n an ...............................
New O rleans.......................
P ensacola............................
S av a n n a h ............................
T am p a..................................
V aldosta..............................
Vicksbxirg............................

C om parison of
J u n e 1924-1923

$ 31,650,496
21,949,833
18,460,867
17,466,878
45,588,405
83,007,208
$218,123,687

17,205,000
331,000
67,272,000
1,763,000
9,012,000
8,650,000
986,000
1,958,000

T o ta l................................. $222,446,000

17,790,000
374,000
62,848,000
1,618,000
8,333,000
9,781,000
1,031,000
1,833,000
$219,298,000

+ 2.8
-f-15.0
+10.4
+ 3.2
+ 7.4
+ 7.0
+ 7.1

17.585.000
390.000
58.996.000
1,682,000
7.531.000
7.246.000
971.000
1.630.000
$205,071,000

COMMERCIAL FAILURES

The number of commercial failures in the United States during
June, according to statistics compiled by R. G. Dun & Co.,
was smaller, and the total liabilities of defaulting concerns were
slightly lower, than in any preceding month this year. June
totals were, however, somewhat higher than figures for the same
month last year.

T H E

M O N T H L Y

B U S IN E S S

June liabilities in the New York district were higher, with the
exception of March, than in any other month this year, while
in the Atlanta, Chicago, Minneapolis and Dallas districts the
number was the smallest thi3 year, and in the Richmond and
Kansas City districts the total of liabilities was smaller, while
in the San Francisco district both number and total liabilities
were the lowest of the year.
N um ber:
J u n e 1924
S ixth D istrict..............
103
U n ited S ta te s..............
1,607
L iabilities:
S ixth D is tr ic t.............. $ 1,805,051
U n ited S ta te s .............. 34,099,031

May 1924
113
1,816

J u n e 1923
91
1,358

$ 1,717,606
36,590,905

$ 1,294,943
28,678,276

IMPORTS AND EXPORTS

Preliminary statistics compiled and published by the Depart­
ment of Commerce show declines in June in both imports and
exports, compared both with the revised figures for the pre­
ceding month this year, and the corresponding month a year
ago. Exports exceeded imports for the month by $30,000,000,
For the twelve months ending with June, the value of imports
was a little lower, and the value of exports somewhat higher,
than during the twelve months ending with June 1923. The
following figures show the detailed comparisons:
1924

Im ports:

J u n e ............................................... $ 277,000,000
May....................................-...........
302,999,517
Twelve m o n th s en d in g w ith
J u n e ............................................ 3,557,147,532
E xports:
J u n e ................................................$ 307,000,000
334,949,901
May.......................................... — .
Twelve m o n th s en d in g w ith
J u n e ............................................ 4,311,625,797

Excess of im ports..

Volume
171,687,335
32,055,280
11,295,058
13,158,000
38,768,274
2,025,525
11,630
9,220,507
2,514,423
3,634
5,608,184
1,187,000

M ineral Oil. g als_____
B an an as, b u n c h e s___
N itrate of Soda, to n s .
Molasses, gals...............
Creosote, gals...............
Sisal, to n s ____ ______
N ew sprint paper, lbs._
M ahogany, M -ft...........

The following figures, indicating the value of imports at New
Orleans during May of the past ten years, are shown for comp ariso n :
1924.. _______$19,737,844
1923.. ...............19,092,150
192? ................11,373,907
1921. ........... -11,582,890
1920 ...............28,469,608

May
May
May
May
May

May
May
May
May
May

1919.................$18,891,683
1918.................. 9,768,838
1917.................. 8,653,218
1916.................. 8,316,966
1915 .................. 7,740,371

With the exception of com, grain exports through the port
of New Orleans continued in June to show declines compared
with the same period a year ago. Corn exports in June, how­
ever, were greater by 112,596 bushels than during June last
year.

3,780,958,965
$ 319,956,953
316,359,470
3,956,733,373

J u n e 1923
$19,433,539
548,484
18,885,055

$4,870,389
8,648,499

$6,065,947
3,581,081
2,484,866
................

During the year ending with June 1924 imports of gold
amounted to $417,025,638, while exports totaled $10,206,941,
and imports of silver were $79,939,985, while exports were
$96,785,586.
New Orleans

The value of imports through the port of New Orleans during
the month of May amounted to $19,737,844, slightly lower than
in April, but nearly seven hundred thousand dollars greater

The totals for the month, however, show substantial declines
and the total for the eleven months of the season is only a little
more than one-fourth of the total for the preceding season.
Season through
J u n e 1924
me 1923 June 1924
June 1923
W heat.........
C orn...................
O ats..............
R ye................
B arley...........

258,000
292,664
22,575
51,423

T o ta l.........- 624,667

1,412,682
180,068
29,335
312,857
1,934,992

6,614,095
5,264,745
317,580
333,056

26,163,193
18,671,192
630,844
1,502,031
10,428

12,529,476

46,977,688

BUILDING

Building permits issued during June at twenty cities in the
sixth district aggregated $8,323,117, nearly two million dollars
less than in May, but practically the same as the total for June
1923. The index number for the district for June is 230.8, com­
pared with 284.0 in May, and with 230.6 in June a year ago.
The high total for Macon includes a city auditorium and large
apartment, while included in the Nashville figure is a permit
for a large hotel to cost more than eight hundred thousand
dollars. Index numbers are shown on page 12.

BUILDING PERMITS—JUNE 1924
Sixth Federal Reserve District
A lteratio n s & R e p airs New B uildings
No.
V alue
No.
V alue
A labam a:
A n n isto n ........
B irm ingham ..
• Mobile.............
M ontgom ery..

16
138
48
55

$ 4,495
82,000
19,110
14,467

15
294
28
12

$

F lo rid a:
Jack so n v ille..
*L akeland........
Miami..............
*Miami B each .
O rlan d o ..........
P en saco la___
T a m p a ......... ...

203
18
_
7
39
40
176

74,991
19,485
____
22,200
34,205
10,000
40,907

61
47
__

312,850
130,150
_
" 893,350
391,622
15,000
227,215




V alue
$7,456,280
5,290,947
1,109,154
1,033,279
721,998
694,566
530,796
469,636
452,703
424,405
159,403
154,804

$ 320,233,799
372,544,578

J u n e 1924
$25,181,117
268,015
24,913,102

3,778,110

than in May 1923. This is due to the increase in the value of
coffee, nitrate of soda, molasses and creosote imported during
the month. Imports of sugar, both in volume and value, were
considerably smaller than in May last year. Some of the
principal commodities imported during May are shown below:

Grain Exports

Gold and Stiver

Silver

7

1923

The following figures show imports and exports of gold and
silver during June:
Gold
Im p o rts.......................................
Exports.......................................

R E V IE W

80
7
144

16,100
832,275
63,075
9,950

T o ta l
J u n e 1924

T o ta l
J u n e 1923

$

$

20,595
914,275
82,185
24,417

417,841
149,635
1,078,460
920,550
425,827
25,000
268,122

Percentage of
Increase or
Decrea

16,585
903,855
61,776
188,472

-h 24.2
4 “ 1-2
+ 33.0
— 87.0

419,126
100,050
649,200
377,510
140,766
74,655
216,939

- 0.3
f 49.6
+ 66.1
+143.8
+202.5
- 51.4
+ 23.6

T H E

8

M O N T H L Y

G eorgia:
A tla n ta ..........................................................
120
A u g u sta ..........................................................
97
C o lu m b u s............. ......................................................
M acon.................... ........................................
66
5
S a v a n n a h ............- ....................-..................
L o u isian a:
New O rlean s........ ................... ....................
A lexandria....... ............. ................... ...........

48
33

T ennessee:
C h a tta n o o g a ....................... .........................
150
Jo h n s o n C ity ...................... .............. .......................
K noxville.................................................................... .
N ashville.........................................................
109
T o ta l 20 C ities........................................ ............. 1,343

B U S IN E S S

R E V IE W

780^116
49,440

841,224
98,973
17,000
802,134
56,940

2,540,178
201,034
60,550
60,306
135,675

— 66.9
— 50.8
71.9
+1225.8
— 58.0

210
14

887,200
136,780

1,014,850
165,414

1,397,125
49,704

— 27.4
-h 232.8

46,862

40
26

115,450
98,100

78,985
$792,675

185
1,428

$5,835,612

162,312
98,100
599,370
1,210,078
$8,323,117

133,273
35,400
335,484
694,899
$8,315,002

- f 21.8
“h 177.1
+ 78.7
-b 74.1

189,181
11,670

241

37

652,043
87,303

22^018
7,500

19
25

127,650
28.634

I~i3i'09§

+ 0.1

*Not in clu d ed in to ta ls or index num bers.
Cotton Growing States

LUM BER

No material change has taken place in the lumber industry
in the district during the month of June. Weather has been
more favorable to manufacturing operations, but reports in­
dicate that lumber manufacturers are making an effort to keep
their production very close to their orders and shipments and
not accumulate heavy stocks. During the four weeks ending
July 4, orders, shipments and production of the mills report­
ing weekly to the Southern Pine Association ranged near 85 per
cent of normal output, excepting for the last week of this period
which included the holiday. During the week ended July 11,
however, with production at eighty per cent of normal, and ship­
ments slightly lower, orders received by the 130 mills which re­
ported for that week increased substantially and exceeded their
normal production by two per cent. Of the 85 mills which re­
ported operating time for that week, 37 operated full time, 35
operated five days, and ten operated four days. Of those which
operated full time, five operated double shifts.
Figures for the month of June received by the Southern Pine
Association from its reporting mills, through July 15, are shown
below:
J u n e 1924
143 Mills

May 1924
145 Mills

O rders.................................... ..286,779,846
S h ip m en ts...............................286,502,439
P ro d u c tio n ........................... ..301,302,116
N orm al p ro d u c tio n th ese
m ills......................................344,158,842
Stocks en d of m o n th ......... ..838,771,980
N orm al stocks th ese mills. 908,937,169
U nfilled orders en d of
m o n th ...................................184,091,553

329,255,495
367,381,242
367,272,312

J u n e 1923
142 Mills

268,073,520

J u n e 1924

May 1924
413,649
42,481

542,026
48,944

On H a n d in C onsum ing E stab lish m en ts:
L in t.............................. .
950,625
L in ters..........................
110,778

1,157,778
122,043

1,347,468
144,726

I n P u b lic S torage a n d a t Com presses:
L in t........ ........................
882,204
L in te rs.........................
69,742

1,126,711
74,437

1,227,184
42,224

307,102
19,255
16,107
30,493,165

212,949
1,902
13,367
34,855,520

Exports:
L in t...... ........................
L in te rs .........................
Im p o rts..............................
Active S p in d les________




350,277
39,583

J u n e 1923

217,598
13,381
13,641
29,216,486

J u n e 1923

289,987

351,181

490,867

636,619

707,850

749,269
15,582,725

962,786
15,784,301

935,636
16,021,970

M A N U F A C T U R IN G
C otton C loth

Reports for June were made to the Federal Reserve Bank by
31 cotton mills which manufactured 24,716,073 yards of cloth
during the month. This output was smaller by 14.5 per cent
than the production of these same mills during May, and showed
a decline of 15.4 per cent compared with June last year. Ship­
ments also showed declines compared with both of these months,
as did also unfilled orders on hand at the end of the month, al­
though orders received during June were slightly larger than in
May. Comments contained in the reports indicate a lagging
market, due to the fact that many buyers are awaiting more
definite information regarding the season’s crop than is now avail­
able before making their commitments. Percentage comparisons of
June figures are shown below:
J u n e 1924 com pared w ith :
J u n e 1923
May 1924
—14.5
—-1 8 .4
. . + 4.8
— 0.1
+ 9.2
. . . - 3.0

361,578,801 360,083,209
888,008,277 813,947,843
982,596,162 967,783,350
189,719,748

May 1924

247,478

262,996,279
312,905,359
343,015,786

COTTON CONSUMPTION

C o tto n C onsum ed:
L in t..............................
L in te rs .........................

J u n e 1924
C o tto n C onsum ed....... —
O n H a n d in C onsum ing
E stab lish m en ts................
I n P ublic S torage a n d a t
Compresses........................

-1 5 .4
— 6.6
-4 7 .6
— 7.6
+ 83.2
—10.7

C otton Y arn

Reports received from 26 yarn manufacturers reflect much
the same conditions as obtain among cloth manufacturers.
The demand is reported to be very poor, and market prices are
said to be below cost of production. June output, shipments,
orders received and unfilled orders all showed declines com­
pared both with the preceding month and with the correspond­
ing month a year ago, while stocks were somewhat larger than
at either of these periods.
J u n e 1924 com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
Y a m p ro d u c e d ................................................. —21.8
Y arn sh ip p e d .................................................... —16.1
Orders b o o k e d ..................... ............................ —20.3
U nfilled o rd ers..................................................— 8.7
Y a m o n h a n d ..................................................+ 8.8
N um ber o n p ay ro ll-........................................ — 6.0

-2 6 .4
-3 3 .1
-6 3 .7
—38.0
+ 43.8

- 6.1

T H E

M O N T H L Y

B U S IN E S S

Overalls

Reports received from overall manufacturers for June show
decreased production, but a small increase in orders booked
during the month. Stocks on hand were a little larger than a
month ago, but unfilled orders declined eleven per cent. Cur­
rent demand is reported very light, and the outlook uncer­
tain. Percentage comparisons of June figures are shown
below:
J u n e 1924 com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
Overalls p ro d u ced ....... ...... ............................ — 7.1
Stocks o n h a n d .......—. ........ ................... - . . . + 4.0
O rders b o o k ed -.............................................. _+ 2.3
U nfilled o rd ers......................................... - . . —11.1
N um ber o n p ay ro ll................. ..................... + 3.2

—13.2
— 4.9
+10.0
—46.7
— 2.8

Brick

June production of brick was somewhat larger than the output
either in May this year or June a year ago. Orders were smaller
than those received in May, but nearly forty per cent larger than
the volume received in June 1923, but unfilled orders declined
in comparisons with both of those periods. Reports indicate
a slight weakening in prices during the month.
J u n e 1924 com pared w ith :
May 1924
J u n e 1923
Brick m a n u fa c tu re d ..................................... + 9.2
Stocks o n h a n d ................................ ...... ........ — 0.6
Orders b o o k ed .................................... ............. — 8.0
U nfilled o rd ers.............................. .................. —10.2
N um ber o n p ay ro ll............ .................. ..........— 7.6

+10.8
— 5.9
+39.5
—53.6
+ 9 .9

Hosiery

The following table contains figures reported to the Census
Bureau by 25 identical establishments for May and June.
Production declined slightly during June, as compared with
May, and shipments also showed a decrease, resulting in an
increase in stocks of hosiery on hand at the end of the month.
Orders booked and unfilled orders on hand at the end of June
also declined, and there was a decrease in cancellations.
J u n e 1924

May 1924

438,975
438,589
1,426,743
385,355
47,257
974,554

438,878
447,518
1,416,344
437,301
50,732
1,078,492

R E V IE W

A surplus of common labor is apparent in some sections of
Georgia. Fair-sized building programs in the larger cities af­
ford employment to the resident tradesman. Most industrial
plants are operating and skilled labor is very well employed.
The supply of and demand for farm labor are about evenly
balanced. A surplus of labor in Atlanta is particularly notice­
able among textile and cotton-oil workers. Most plants are
operating, though some are on part time schedules. Cotton
mills at other points in the state are on part time, but with
this exception most industrial plants are running full time.
Labor conditions throughout Florida are considered satis­
factory for this time of the year. The supply of unskilled labor
about meets the demand for naval stores operations, farm
work, and road construction. Part time operations prevail
in the cigar-manufacturing industry, and there is a surplus of
these workers in Tampa. Large building and construction
programs are keeping most workers employed throughout the
state, and there is little unemployment.
Some unemployment is reported in certain sections of Ala­
bama. Railroad shops are reducing forces in appreciable num­
bers and running below normal, and part time operations and
further decreases in employment occured during June in coal
mining, and a large surplus of this class of labor exists. Lum­
ber mills and textile plants show no improvement and continue
on part time schedules. Highway construction and building
continue to afford employment to a large number of skilled and
unskilled workers.
In Louisiana there has been some slackening in almost all in­
dustries and a surplus of labor exists in some sections. Slight
reductions were made in the forces of oil refineries and railroad
repair shops. Sugar planters report a shortage of labor, as men
have been drawn from this industry to saw mills and highway
construction. Decreases in employment and some part time
operations were noted in lumber mills, while metal and metal
products other than iron and steel have reduced forces, but are
running full time. Large building programs are under way in
most cities.

EMPLOYMENT

Although there is a surplus of labor in Mississippi, there is
no serious amount of unemployment. A large number of
lumber mills have made cuts in forces, but a majority are on
full time schedules, and a very slight surplus of labor obtains,
as those workers released have been employed in agricultural
pursuits. Textile mills report additional shutdowns, de­
creases in forces, part time operations, and some surplus of labor
but highway construction shows a large increase over the month
before, and building continues steady.

The month of June brought some increase in unemployment
in the sixth district, according to reports made to the United
States Employment Service, from all parts of the district.
Idleness is probably most pronounced among textile mills, where
quite a number have closed down and others are on part time or
are operating with reduced forces. Building and construction
in cities, however, and highway and road work, have continued
to employ large numbers of workers.

In Tennessee reductions are reported in employment in prac­
tically all industries. Railroad repair shops have made no
further cuts in forces, but are operating below normal capacity
and some part time is reported. Further decreases have taken
place in coal mining and a number of mines have closed, and
part time operations prevail. A majority of lumber mills are on
full time, but have reduced forces, and a considerable surplus
of labor exists. There is a surplus of textile workers due to part

Hosiery m a n u fa c tu re d ----------------------S h ip m en ts___________________________
O n h a n d a t en d of m o n th ____________
O rders b o o k ed _______________________
C a n cellatio n s_______ _________________
U nfilled o rd ers_______________________




9

T H E

10

M O N T H L Y

time operations, but building continues to afford employment
to large numbers.

Coal

Weekly statistics compiled and published by the Geological
Survey indicate a slightly higher level of production of bitumi­
nous coal during June than that which prevailed during the two
months preceding. The figures, however, reflect a lagging de­
mand for coal which has resulted in part time operations on the
part of a large number of mines, and complete shut downs in
other instances. Current weekly production has been consider­
ably below the rate maintained at this time last year. Produc­
tion of soft coal during the first 153 working days of the calendar
year 1924 was 226,172,000 net tons, compared with the follow ­
ing figures for the preceding six years:
Y ears of activity:
191 8
.281,390,000 n e t to n s
192 0
262,084,000 n e t to n s
1923.................................................................. 270,811,000 n e t to n s
Y ears of depression:
191 9
192 1
192 2

................... 217,145,000 n e t to n s
199,061,000 n e t to n s
-.192,899,000 n e t to n s

Weekly production figures for June, and early July, are shown
below:
Week E n d ed :
1924
J u n e 7................................7,373,000 to n s
J u n e 14................................7,152,000 to n s
J u n e 21................................7,202,000 to n s
J u n e 28................................7,371,000 to n s
J u ly 5.................................5,738,000 to n s
J u l y 12................................ 7,455,000 to n s

1923
10,676,000 to n s
10,575,000 to n s
10,422,000 to n s
10,458,000 to n s
8,742,000 to n s
10,925,000 to n s

IR O N

The production of pig iron in the United States during June,
according to statistics published by the Iron Age, amounted to
2,026,221 tons, a loss during the month of nearly six hundred
thousand tons, and lower, than the output in any other month
since August 1922, when only 1,816,170 tons were produced.
The daily rate of production in June, 67,541 tons, was also
lower than the daily rate for any month since August 1922, when
the daily average was 58.586 tons. The relation of June pro­
duction to that of the preceding month and the corresponding
month a year ago is indicated by an index number of 79.5 for June
102.6 for May, and 143.9 for June 1923, based upon 100 as re­
presenting the average monthly production in 1919.
The number of furnaces in active operation declined during
June by 20, which added to those blown out during May and
April makes a total of 106 blown out during the past three
months, and leaving only 164 furnaces active on July 1.




B U S IN E S S

R E V IE W

Production of iron in Alabama, contrary to the tendency
in May, showed a sharp decline in June, to 119, 507 tons, com­
pared with 249,268 tons in May, and 239,589 tons in June last
year. Quotations in the Birmingham district have also declined
to $18.50 during the month, compared with $21.00 at the begining of June, and $25.00 at this time last year. Reports indicate
that a little buying is being done, and that the delivery of iron
on old and new contracts continues rather steady, but consumers
of iron in the territory have not come into the market with
business beyond their immediate needs.
Comparisons of June statistics with those for the preceding
month, and the corresponding month a year ago, follow:
U n ited S tates:

J u n e 1924

May 1924

J u n e 1923

2,026,221
67,541
164

2,615,110
84,358
184

3,676,445
122,548

119,507
3,984
22

249,268
8,041
24

P ro d u c tio n .................
D aily r a te ....................
♦F urnaces active.........
A labam a:
P ro d u c tio n .................
D aily r a te ....................
♦Furnaces active.........

29

♦First of follow ing m o n th .

Unfilled orders of the United States Steel Corporation at the
end of June showed a further decline of 365,584 tons, and at
that time totaled 3,262,505 tons. While the decrease in un­
filled tonnage was less pronounced than in May, it brought the
total to the lowest mark in ten years. The declines during
the past three months have amounted to a little more than a
million and a half tons, the June tonnage being slightly more
than half as large as at the end of June 1923.

NAVAL S T O R E S

Receipts of spirits of turpentine at the three principal ports
of the district during June were slightly larger than in either the
preceding month or the corresponding month a year ago, while
rosins were not received in quite the volume of either of those
months. Stocks of both commodities were somewhat larger
at the end of June than at the end of May or of June 1923.
The average price prevailing during June for spirits of turpentine
was 77 5/8, compared with 83 1/8 in May 89| in April, and 95*
in June last year, while the average price of the various grades
of rosin declined from $5.00 in May to 4.82J in June, compared
with $4.87J in June a year ago. Following are figures show­
ing the movement during June:

T H E

M O N T H L Y

B U S IN E S S

NAVAL STORES-May 1924

R osin:
J u n e 1923

S a v a n n a h ................ ..
Jacksonville.................
P ensacola..............— . .

J u n e 1924

May 1924

18,063
16,114
5,443

15,801
14,617
4,531

17,227
16,179
5,608

39,620

84,949

39,014

48,321
48,245
13,522

45.534
52.801
14.236

48,732
52,854
15,266

110,088

112,571

116,852

S hipm ents - T u r p e n tin e :
S a v a n n a h ................. .
Jack so n v ille-. ........ .
P e n s a c o la ...—

16,148
11.117
3,451

14,006
15,950
3,854

22.747
16.538
5.758

S a v a n n a h .._— . . —
Jacksonville— _____
P ensacola____ ______

T o ta l.-.* -.

30,716

33,810

45,043

T o ta l- - ..- - .—

R eceipts—T u rp e n tin e :
S a v a n n a h ............... .
Jacksonville...............
P en saco la........

.
-

T o ta l.........
B osin :
S a v a n n a h ...........
Jack so n v ille.. . . — . . .
P e n s a c o la ........... .
.
T o ta l- .- .




11

R E V IE W

T o ta l.........

40,105
45,817
17,692

31,790
29.937
9,309

48.088
51.932
13,710

103,614

71,086

113,730

9,525
17,828
5,146

7,610
12,831
3,154

2,670
9.149
1,357

32,499

23,595

13,176

80.447
112,136
48,525

72.231
109.718
52.695

71,829
109.891
33,3*0

241,108

234,644

215,090

Stocks—T u rp e n tin e :
S a v a n n a h .......
Jacksonville.......... .
P e n sa c o la ..
T o ta l......— .... R osin:

..

T H E

12

M O N T H L Y

B U S IN E S S

R E V IE W

MONTHLY IN D EX NUMBERS
The following index numbers, except where indicated otherwise, are computed by the Federal Reserve Bank
of Atlanta, and are based upon average figures for 1919. That is, average monthly figures for the year 1919 are
represented by 100, and the current monthly index numbers show the relation of activity in these lines to that
prevailing in 1919.
R E T A IL TRADE 6TH D IS TR IC T

April

May

June

April

May

June

(Department Stores)

1924

1924

1924

1923

1923

1923

100.0
129.3
111.3
111.7
98.0
115.0
77.0
100.2
108.7

97.8
131.5
107.9
109.2
117.7
106.0
78.6
91.3
106.4

87.6
122.4
115.9
101.9
88.3
94.9
73.3
88.4
96.6

96.9
117.4
85.6
97.7
94.8
107.6
73.5
94.1
100.7

105.9
139.5
99.8
112.6
107.4
109.1
73.9
96.1
108.1

99.4
133.8
118.5
116.3
98.6
101.3
80.3
95.6
104.7

132
114

126
90

120
89

119
103

128
98

127
86

209
145
178
178
88
208
130

212
150
150
174
82
189
143

196
143
146
162
75
176
131

180
135
125
142
99
159
125

189
142
143
154
100
170
136

183
149
144
154
97
176
136

Atlanta..............................................
Birmingham............ ........................ ...........
Chattanooga................... ............................
Jackson........ ............... _______________
Nashville................................... ..................
New Orleans......... ........ ....... .................. ...
Savannah............................... .....................
Other Cities.................................................
District (43 firms)........................ ..............
R E T A IL TRADE U. S. (1)
Department Stores........ ................... .
Mail Order Houses...............................
Chain Stores:
Grocery.......................... ................
Drug................................................
Shoe........................... ....................
5 & 10 cent..................... .................
Music..........................................
Candy..............................................
Cigar_________ _________ ______
WHOLESALE TRADE 6TH D ISTR IC T
Groceries_______________________
Dry Goods___ _ ________________
Hardware............................... ...........
Shoes.................... .................................
Total....................................................
WHOLESALE PR IC ES U. S. (2)
Farm Products_____ _____________
Foods__________________________
Cloths and Clothing____ _________
Fuel and lightning. ______________ _
Metals and metal products________
Building materials____ ______ ____
Chemicals and drugs____________ „
House furnishings_____ ___ ____ _
Miscellaneous.___ ___ _______ ____
All commodities_____ ____________
BUILD IN G PERM ITS 6TH D ISTR IC T
Atlanta______ ____________ _____
Birmingham..........................................
J acksonville._ ________ ___________
Nashville_______________________
New Orleans________ ___________
Other Cities............. ............................
District (20 cities)_______ ________
PIG IRON PRODUCTION:
United States.......................-...............
Alabama........ ........................................
U N FILLED ORDERS—U. S. S TEEL
CORPN____________ _____________ _____
(1) Compiled by Federal Reserve Board.
(2) Compiled by Bureau of Labor Sta­
tistics. (1913=100)




84.1
64.3
78.7
60.5
76.8

81.5
54.1 .
74.6
49.3
72.1

75.8
49.8
71.3
38.5
65.8

80.9
67.2
78.1
59.4
75.5

83.2
62.2
79.1
66.4
76.1

81.6
56.8
80.2
59.3
73.9

139
137
189
179
139
182
128
175
113
148

136
137
187
177
134
180
127
173
112
147

134
136
187
175
132
173
127
172
111
145

141
144
205
200
154
204
136
187
126
159

139
144
201
190
152
202
134
187
125
156

138
142
198
186
148
194
131
187
123
153

176.8
316.4
172.9
435.0
408.8
397.8
321.7

195.0
501.6
180.3
272.5
488.5
250.2
284.0

96.6
279.5
139.7
639.5
231.1
264.8
230.8

565.2
461.8
123.5
263.3
237.1
298.4
353.9

276.3
307.6
184.2
160.6
232.2
251.3
249.8

291.7
276.3
143.5
367.0
319.4
159.2
230.6

126.9
131.1

102.6
141.8

79.5
68.0

139.2
137.5

151.8
142.1

143.9
136.3

70.2

60.5

54.4

121.6

116.5

106.5