View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

IN THIS ISSUE:

MONTHLY
REVIEW
F E D E R A L



R E S E R V E

B A N K

• B ook k eep in g for F a n n ers
A N ew Bank S e rv ice
• C oonty Job Growth and
U nem ploym ent P a tte r n s
• D istrict B u sin e s s
C onditions

O F
JU LY

A T L A N T A

1968

B
A

o o k k e e p i n g
N

e w

B

a n k

f o r

F a r m

S e r v i c e

H is to r ic a lly , farm ers h a v e b e e n g o o d te c h n ic ia n s
in o p e r a tin g m o st p h a se s o f th e ir b u sin e sse s, b u t
th e y h a v e b e e n v e r y poor b o o k k eep ers. In fa ct,
k e e p in g reco rd s w a s o fte n a ss ig n e d su ch lo w
p r io rity th a t b efo re th e p a ssa g e o f th e In te rn a l
R e v e n u e A c t a farm er w ith a n y ty p e o f a c c o u n t­
in g s y s te m w a s a ra rity . E v e n s in c e 1913 fa rm ­
e r s’ a c c o u n tin g p ro ced u res o fte n h a v e sa tisfie d
o n ly th e m in im u m req u ire m en ts for in c o m e ta x es.
T h e y u s u a lly in c lu d e d a c ig a rb o x fu ll o f re c e ip ts
or sc a tte r e d sh e e ts o f p ap er a n d /o r e n v e lo p e s o n
w h ich a few p e r tin e n t n o te s w ere scrib b led . C er­
ta in ly , th e s e p ro ced u res w ere n e v e r a sig n o f
so u n d fin a n cia l m a n a g em e n t; b u t th e y c o u ld be
to le r a te d m ore in b y g o n e d a y s w h e n farm u n its
w ere sm a ll, th e o p era to r a n d fa m ily la b o r rep re­
se n te d th e m ajor p r o d u ctio n in p u t, a n d c a p ita l
in v e s tm e n t in m a c h in e r y a n d la n d w a s sm a ll.
T o d a y , h o w ev er, w h e n c o m m er c ia l fa rm s rep re­
s e n t m ajor b u sin e sse s , a c c u r a te a n d d e ta ile d r e c ­
o rd s h a v e b e c o m e a p r e r e q u isite to su c c e ssfu l
farm m a n a g em en t.
In r e c e n t y e a r s n u m ero u s s o lu tio n s for im p ro v ­
in g record s y s te m s h a v e b e e n p ro p o sed . T h e
c o o p e r a tiv e e x te n s io n se r v ic e in m a n y s ta te s h a s
d e v e lo p e d a n d im p le m e n te d v a r io u s p rogram s.
A lso , farm su p p lie r s, farm o r g a n iz a tio n s, so m e
b a n k s, farm er co-op s, a n d o th e r o rg a n iz a tio n s
h a v e d e sig n e d reco rd -k eep in g p ro g ra m s for fa rm ­
ers. H o w ev er, c o n tin u e d a d v a n c e s in e le c tr o n ic
d a ta p ro cessin g h a v e c a u se d m o re a n d m o re
b a n k ers to b eco m e aw are o f th e o p p o r tu n ity to
e x te n d a v a lu a b le a n d p ro fita b le re c o rd -k eep in g
se r v ic e to b o th th eir farm a n d n o n fa rm c u sto m ers.
I n c r e a s e d In te r e s t
T o d a y ’s cu rren t h ig h in te r e st in c o m p u te r iz e d
record s y s te m s w a s sp a rk ed b y tw o d e v e lo p m e n ts.

Monthly Review, Vol. LIII, No. 7. Free subscription
and additional copies available upon request to the
Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of At­
lanta, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
90 for FRASER
Digitized


e r s :

F ir st, m o re a n d m o re b a n k ers a re b e c o m in g fa ­
m ilia r w ith d a ta p r o c e ss in g e q u ip m e n t a n d it s
a p p lic a tio n to b a n k in g o p e r a tio n s a n d se rv ice s.
E v e n th o u g h m a n y b a n k ers d o n o t o w n or le a s e
E D P e q u ip m e n t, th e y n o w h a v e a c c e ss to c o m ­
p u te rs th ro u g h lo c a l se r v ic e b u r e a u s or co rre­
sp o n d e n t b a n k s. In a d d itio n , m o re b a n k ers a re
g e ttin g e q u ip m e n t to c o d e c h e c k s a n d d e p o sit
s lip s w ith m a g n e tic in k c h a ra cter r e c o g n itio n
(M I C R ) s y m b o ls to a id in a c c o u n tin g p ro c e d ­
u res. T h is e x p e r ie n c e w ith E D P m e th o d s h a s
m a d e b a n k ers m o r e a w a re o f th e p o te n tia l for
n ew a n d d iffe re n t c o m p u te r a p p lic a tio n s.
S e c o n d , n u m e r o u s ty p e s o f c o m p u te r iz e d rec­
o r d -k ee p in g s y s te m s h a v e b e e n d e v e lo p e d a fter
a s u c c e s sfu l la u n c h in g in 1 9 6 5 o f a p rogram d e ­
sig n e d b y a s m a ll ru ral b a n k in Io w a . T h is b a n k
r ec o g n iz e d th a t b a n k e r s a re n o w in a b e tter p o ­
sitio n to offer a r e c o r d -k ee p in g s y s te m th a n m o s t
o th e r o r g a n iz a tio n s. T h is a d v a n ta g e lie s in th e
b a n k ’s p a r tic ip a tio n in v ir tu a lly a ll o f a fa rm er’s
fin a n c ia l tra n sa c tio n s. B y r e d e sig n in g th e ch e c k
is su e d to farm ers, th e p o r tio n o f e a c h c h e c k a l­
lo c a te d to e a c h p u r p o se is reco rd ed a fter it h a s
c le a r e d a t th e b an k . A $ 1 0 0 c h e c k w r itte n to
a lo c a l farm s u p p ly sto r e m ig h t sh o w th a t $ 2 5
w a s u se d to p u rc h a se p o u ltr y fe ed , $ 2 0 for m a ­
c h in e r y rep a irs, a n d $ 5 5 for so m e b a b y ch ick s.
B y r e co rd in g th e s e d a ta for e a c h c h e c k w ritten ,
th e b a n k c o u ld p e r io d ic a lly g iv e it s farm c u s­
to m ers a v a lu a b le rep o rt o f th e ir e x p e n d itu r e s.
In lik e m a n n er, d e p o s it s lip s w ere r e d e sig n e d
to sh o w th e r e v e n u e g e n e r a te d fro m e a c h farm
e n te r p r ise . B y c o m b in in g e x p e n d itu r e a n d r e v e ­
n u e d a ta in o n e rep o rt, th e b a n k er c a n g en e r a te
a m o n th ly c a sh flo w r ep o rt th a t is a v a lu a b le
farm m a n a g e m e n t to o l.
E x te n t o f U s e
P rio r to 196 5 o n ly tw o b a n k s o ffered a farm
r e co rd -k eep in g sy s te m . H o w e v e r , b y 1967 over
2 0 b a n k -o r ie n te d a g r ic u ltu r a l E D P farm reco rd ­
k e e p in g p rog ra m s w ere in o p e r a tio n , a cc o r d in g
M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

D e p o s it s l ip s , c h e c k s , a n d p e tty c a s h v o u c h e r s a r e th e p r im a r y in p u t r e c o r d s .

to a n A m erica n B a n k ers A sso c ia tio n su r v e y . P r e s­
e n tly , 15 o f th e 2 0 p ro g ra m s a re n o w b e in g
le a s e d or fra n ch ised . A b o u t 4 5 0 b a n k s a re e x ­
te n d in g so m e ty p e o f reco rd -k eep in g s y s te m ser v ­
in g o v er 4 ,5 0 0 farm ers. M o s t o f th e m u lti-b a n k
p la n s are le a s e d or fr a n ch ise d o n a lo c a l or re­
g io n a l b a sis, b u t so m e a re o ffered n a tio n a lly .
M id w e ste r n b an k s a re th e m o st a c tiv e in d e ­
v e lo p in g c o m p u terized reco r d -k eep in g p rogram s.
T h e 2 0 b a sic p rogram s rev ie w e d in th e A B A su r­
v e y are lo c a te d in 11 d iffe r e n t sta te s. E ig h t
p ro gram s o r ig in a te d in Io w a a n d I llin o is , w ith
th e b a la n c e sta r tin g in o th e r C o m B e lt or P la in
s ta te s. N o n e o f th e progra m s o r ig in a te d in th e
S o u th e a s t, an d th e lic e n sin g or fr a n c h isin g o f
e x is tin g p rogram s b y so u th ern b a n k s is a lso v e ry
lim ite d .
S e r v ic in g fe e s ch a rg ed to farm ers v a ry from
a fla t m o n th ly rate to a c h a r g e for e a ch ite m
p r o c e sse d to a c o m b in a tio n o f b oth . A lso , so m e
b a n k s h a v e a n in itia l se t-u p fee, w h ich in m a n y
p ro gram s is a d ju ste d a cc o rd in g to th e n u m b er
a n d ty p e rep o rts th e farm er req u ests. R a te s u s u ­
a lly fa ll w ith in a ran ge from $ 7 .5 0 to $ 1 5 m o n th ly .
If a w id e v a r ie ty o f rep o rts is g iv en , th e c h a rg e
m a y e x c e e d th e s e le v e ls. A b a n k ’s c o st to fra n ­
JU LY

1 9 68




c h is e a r e co rd -k eep in g p rogram v a rie s a n d is
b a sed o n b an k d e p o sits, se r v ic e s p ro v id ed , an d
th e ty p e a n d n u m b er o f rep o rts a v a ila b le .

P rogram
M o s t o f th e o v er 2 0 b a sic farm reco rd -k eep in g
p rogram s n o w o ffered b y b a n k s u se th e c h eck
a n d d e p o sit s lip a s m ajor in p u t item s. T h e y
u s u a lly h a v e a th r e e -d ig it c o d e to a llo w d e ta ile d
id e n tific a tio n o f c o sts an d rev e n u e s a ss o c ia te d
w ith ea ch en ter p rise , a s w e ll a s fa m ily liv in g e x ­
p e n se s a n d n o n fa rm in co m e. M o s t s y s te m s a llo w
th e farm er to c o m p le te a s p e c ia l in p u t form so
th a t cu rren cy tr a n sa ctio n s w ill a p p ea r o n h is
sta te m e n ts.
T h e in p u t d a ta , o f co u rse, d e te r m in e th e fle x i­
b ility o f rep orts or o u tp u t r e c e iv e d b y farm ers.
B y u sin g ch eck s, d e p o sit slip s, a n d c a sh tr a n s­
a c tio n s, th e rep o rts a re u s u a lly lim ite d to v a rio u s
c a sh e x p e n se a n d r e v e n u e sta te m e n ts. M o s t p ro ­
g ram s p ro v id e th e cu sto m er w ith m o n th ly su m ­
m a ry ta b le s sh o w in g e x p e n se s a n d r e c e ip ts b y
c a te g o r y for th e cu rren t m o n th , p lu s y e a r -to -d a te
to ta ls. In a d d itio n , th e farm er u s u a lly r e c eiv es
a m o n th ly tr a n sa c tio n s jo u rn a l lis tin g e v e r y c h e c k
91

a n d d e p o s it b y c a te g o r y th a t c le a r e d h is a cc o u n t.
T h is rep o rt p ro v id es a n o p p o r tu n ity to c h e c k
for c o d in g errors.

g ram s p rep a re d e p r e c ia tio n s c h e d u le s for in c o m e
ta x p u rp o ses. S o m e reco rd s y s te m s c o m p u te a n ­
n u a l b a la n c e sh e e ts, re p o rts o n fu n d s b orrow ed
a n d rep a id , c a p ita l e x p e n d itu r e s, in v e n to r y a d ­
ju stm e n ts, su m m a r y e n te r p r ise re p o r ts for p a r­
tic u la r fie ld s a n d /o r p e n s o f liv e sto c k , in v e s tm e n t
c r e d it rep orts, a n d fa rm b u sin e ss a n a ly s e s w ith
in d iv id u a l grou p c o m p a r iso n b y en te r p r ise . S o m e
o f th e s e p ro g ra m s w ere d e v e lo p e d b y n o n b a n k in g
firm s b u t a re n o w b e in g le a s e d or fr a n c h ise d b y
co m m e r cia l b a n k s.

M a n y o f th e record s y s te m s offered b y b a n k s
h a v e o th er rep orts a v a ila b le to farm c u sto m ers.
T h e y m a y in c lu d e a p relim in a r y y e a r -e n d rep ort
is su e d in N o v e m b e r or D e c e m b e r for ta x p la n ­
n in g p u rp o ses. O th er p rog ra m s h a v e c o d in g s y s ­
te m s to c o in c id e w ith S c h e d u le F o f th e F e d e r a l
in c o m e ta x form s. C o st a n d r e c e ip t d a ta for e a ch
in d iv id u a l en te r p r ise o n a farm ca n a ls o b e d e ­
v elo p ed . A n d if c o d in g s y s te m s a re d e ta ile d su f­
fic ie n tly , c o st for a p a rticu la r fie ld w ith in a g iv en
farm or sep a ra te record s for d iffe re n t farm s o p ­
e r a te d b y th e sa m e farm er ca n b e g en era ted .
A lth o u g h n o n e o f th e a p p r o x im a te ly 2 0 d if­
fe r en t farm record p rog ra m s n o w offered b y
b a n k s h a s a ll th e o p tio n s lis te d a b o v e, m o s t h a v e
tw o or m ore. M a n y progra m s offer o th er o p tio n s
a t extra c o sts to th e farm cu sto m er. W ith th e
in c lu s io n o f su p p le m e n ta l in fo r m a tio n , so m e p ro ­

I m p lic a t io n s
O p p o r tu n itie s for th e b a n k c o n sid e r in g su c h a
r ec o rd -k eep in g p rogram for it s fa rm c u sto m er s
se e m n u m ero u s. F o r th e b a n k it r e p r e se n ts a n ­
o th e r se r v ic e th a t c a n b e e x te n d e d to it s c u s ­
to m ers w ith th e a d d e d b e n e fit o f profit. M o s t
b a n k s e n te r in g o n e o f th e s e p ro g ra m s h a v e re­
p o rted so m e o p e r a tin g lo s s e s in th e first o n e or
tw o y ea rs. H o w e v e r , a fte r th e p ro g ra m h a s b e e n

This cash flow report shows monthly and year-to-date income and expenditures.
...A D S
MR.

NBC

ROUTE

CUSTOMER

122,

SOUTHEAST,
CODE

BOX

BY

PERI0D

NBC
5

ACCOUNT

66

123

456

7

1

U.

S.

A.

r A
a t
fl r
1C
v .Un D
K ii lc oc

im UIN

INCOME

\/ c a n

1r l L I
EXPENSE

INCOME

xn

r vATt r
EXPENSE

INCOME
105

COTTON

LINT

SALES

110

COTTON

SEED

SALES

115

SOYBEAN

SALES

120

RICE

125

LIVESTOCK

130

M ISC .

135

INTEREST

140

RENT

145

1,1 3 2.00

SALES
SALES

SALES

1,124.68

23 .68

23.68

RECEIVED

RECEIVED

CUSTOM

WORK

150

GOVERNMENT

155

OTHER

202

EXPENSES
LABOR

100 .00

350.00

PAYMENTS

3 ,041.66
75.00

TOTAL

204

1,124.68

1 ,248 .36

5 ,747.02
696.64

206

SOCIAL
SECURITY
TAX
FED.
TAX W IT H H E LD

208

SEED

210

F E R T ILIZ E R

212

FUEL

214

EQUIPMENT

AND

OIL
REPAIRS

27.84

3 ,636.41
134.40

36.23

181.15

2 ,643.11

2 , 6 4 3 . 11

876.41

1,328.82

742.80

3 ,260.01

119.30

1, 102.50

216

AERIAL

118.50

419 .0 0

218

CHEMICALS
P0ISON

485.00

1,0 8 2 .9 0

126.50

326.00

220

APPLICATIONS

222

IRRIG A TIO N

224

DEFOLIANTS

226

HARVEST

228

TRUCK

230

LAND

EXPENSE

AND

HAULING

RENTS

MACHINE

HIRE

234

TENANTS

FURNISH IN G

236

M ISC .

232

EXPENSE

100.00

100.00

68.32

176.40

238

VETERINERY

240

TELEPHONE

12.62

68.40

242
2 44

U T IL IT IE S

3 1 .40

106.30

OFFICE

246

DUES

EXPENSE

AND

DONATIONS

248

INTEREST

250

ACCOUNTING

252
254

P.

256

PROPERTY

P.

R-E

TAXES

INSURANCE

258

INS
SHOP

262

B U ILD IN G

264

DEPRECIATIO N

266

PERSONAL
OTHER

92 for FRASER
Digitized


66.00
100.00

TAX

260

268

25.00
100.00

32.40

AND

INCOME

EXPENSE

WORKERS

COMP

EXPENSE

232.00
52.00

161.00

REPAIR
EXPENSE
TOTAL

300.00

1,5 0 0 .0 0

6 ,561.67

16 , 6 5 6 . 8 0

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

A m o re e x t e n s iv e

c o d in g s y s t e m

48-650013
100

and

s u p p le m e n t a l

in fo r m a t io n

w e re

re q u ire d

fo r

t h is

e n t e r p r is e

rep o rt.

DECEMBER 31,1967

JOHN Q. PU BLIC
ROUTE 1 BOX 13
SOUTHEAST, U. S. A.
DAIRY HERD 1
E N T ERPR ISE REPORT
FOR
70 U N ITS

ITEM D E SC R IP T IO N

TOTAL

* * * * * CASH EXPENSES * * * * *
FEED BOUGHT
CUSTOM WORK H IRED
SUPPLY EXPENSE
BREEDING FEE EXPENSE
VET £ M E O IC IN E EXP.
HAULING EXPENSE
GEN. LIVESTO CK EXP.
TOTAL OPERATING EXP.

4 ,9 9 3 .9 8
2 25.00
9 03 .4 2
294.01
2 64 .60
1 ,8 2 9 .3 6
9 93 .0 6
%

LIV EST O C K PURCHASES
TOTAL CASH EXPENSE

9 ,5 0 3 .4 3

i

1 0 ,4 0 3 .4 3
2 6 ,7 5 5 .7 4

TOTAL ORDINARY INCOME

$ 2 6 ,7 5 5 .7 4

C A PIT A L G A IN -L IV S T C K

t

$

2 ,8 6 9 .7 2
$ 2 9 ,6 2 5 .4 6

* * * NON-CASH EXPENSES * * *
NON-CASH FEED

%

1 3 ,3 3 5 .0 0

TOTAL NON-CASH EXPENSE $ 1 3 ,3 3 5 .0 0
* * * * NON-CASH INCOME * * * *
NON-CASH LIVESTO CK
TOTAL NON-CASH INCOME

$

9 00 .0 0

* * * * * CASH INCOME * * * * *
M ILK SOLD

TOTAL CASH INCOME

PER UNIT

$

2 ,2 1 3 .7 5
$

2 ,2 1 3 .7 5

e sta b lis h e d a n d o p era tin g p r o ced u res a re refin ed ,
a p rofit p o te n tia l e x is ts.
N o t o n ly co u ld th e p rogram it s e lf b e p ro fit­
a b le, b u t n u m ero u s o th e r a d v a n ta g e s c o u ld a c ­
c r u e to th e b ank. E x p e r ie n c e r e v ea ls th a t o p e r a ­
to rs o f la rg e farm s are m o s t lik e ly a ttr a c te d to
a fa rm reco rd -k eep in g p rogram a n d c o n se q u e n tly
b o th d e p o sits a n d g ood lo a n d e m a n d for th e bank.
In a d d itio n , m a n y o f th e p ro g ra m s c a n b e m o d i­
fie d to serv e sm a ll b u sin e sse s, p r o fe ssio n a l p e o p le ,
p e r so n a l a c c o u n ts, a n d sp e c ia l a c c o u n ts (lo c a l
g o v ern m en t a n d c iv ic o r g a n iz a t io n s ). W ith th e s e
ch a n g es, th e b an k er is in a p o s itio n to e x te n d th is
n e w s e r v ic e to th e b u lk o f h is d e p o sito r s. A n d
im p ro v ed reco rd s w ill p r o v id e th e b a n k er w ith
m o re in fo r m a tio n for fin a n c ia l c o u n se lin g a n d
e v a lu a tin g lo a n req u ests.
U r b a n b a n k s m a y a ls o c o n sid e r e m p lo y in g
E D P reco rd -k eep in g sy s te m s. E v e n th o u g h m a n y
u rb an b a n k s h a v e few farm borrow ers, th e y m ig h t

$

OPERATOR

LANDLORD

71.34
3.21
12.90
4 .2 0
3 .78
26 .1 3
14.18

2 ,4 9 6 .9 9
112.50
4 51.71
14 7.00
132.30
9 14.68
4 9 6 .5 3

2 ,4 9 6 .9 9
112.50
45 1.71
147.01
132.30
91 4.68
49 6.53

135.76

4 ,7 5 1 .7 1

4 ,7 5 1 .7 2 *

12.85

45 0 .0 0

4 50 .00

148.62

5 ,2 0 1 .7 1

5 ,2 0 1 .7 2

382.22

1 3 ,3 7 7 .8 7

1 3 ,3 7 7 .8 7

382.22

1 3 ,3 7 7 .8 7

1 3 ,3 7 7 .8 7 * *

4 0 .9 9

1 ,4 3 4 .8 6

1 ,4 3 4 .8 6

423.21

1 4 ,8 1 2 .7 3

1 4 ,8 1 2 .7 3

190.50

6 ,6 6 7 .5 0

6 ,6 6 7 .5 0

190.50

6 ,6 6 7 .5 0

6 ,6 6 7 .5 0 *

31.63

1 ,1 0 6 .8 7

1 ,1 0 6 .8 8

31.63

1 ,1 0 6 .8 7

1 ,1 0 6 .8 8 * *

u se th e s y s te m for in d iv id u a ls a n d o th e r d e ­
p o sito rs. A lso , m a n y c it y b a n k s a re n o w d e v e lo p ­
in g record s y s te m s for th eir c o u n tr y co r resp o n d ­
e n ts. In m o s t ca se s, th e c o u n tr y b a n k h a s n o
co m p u te r e q u ip m e n t. T h e y s im p ly p rep a re th e
d a ta a n d se n d th e m to th e c ity c o r re sp o n d e n t for
p r o cessin g . T h e r e p o rts a re p rep a red b y th e c ity
co r re sp o n d e n t a n d d is tr ib u te d to th e farm c u s­
to m ers b y th e c o u n tr y b ank.
W h ile th e a d v a n ta g e s to su c h a p rogram for
b a n k s are o b v io u s, h a za r d s a n d p r o b le m s h a v e
to b e s o lv e d b e fo r e a n efficien t a n d p ro fita b le
o p e r a tio n c a n e x ist. F r a n c h isin g a n e x is tin g p ro­
gram m a y e lim in a te so m e p ro b lem s o f d e v e lo p in g
a n e w re c o rd -k eep in g s y s te m b y th e lo c a l b ank.
H o w e v e r , e v e n th is ty p e p rogram req u ires c o n sid ­
era b le tim e a n d effo rt to b e o p er a tio n a l. A n y
b a n k c o n sid e r in g su ch a p rogram sh o u ld s tu d y
th e c o st a n d p o te n tia l b e n efits c a r e fu lly .
R o b e r t E. Sw eeney

Illustrations reprinted from Bank EDP Farm Recordkeeping Programs (Copyright 1968) with permission from The American Bankers
Association.
JU LY

1968




93

C

o u n t y

A

n d

U

J o
n e m

b

G

r o w

p l o y m

t h
e n t

The development of more jobs in urban slums and im­
poverished rural areas is an immediate, urgent need, de­
manded by the present critical problems of joblessness, under­
employment, and substandard earnings in these areas. . . .
More readily available manpower services are needed in both
urban slums and rural areas to help disadvantaged workers
find out about, qualify for, and obtain jobs.
— 1967 M anpow er R eport of the President

W ith a n u n e m p lo y m e n t r a te b e lo w 4 p e r ce n t
for tw o a n d a h a lf y e a r s, th e D is t r ic t s ta te s a n d
th e n a tio n h a v e e x p e r ie n c e d “h ig h e m p lo y m e n t.”
Y e t u n e m p lo y m e n t rem a in s a c r u c ia l p rob lem .
I n m a n y rural areas th e p a c e o f te c h n o lo g y in
a g r ic u ltu r e h a s r e d u ced farm e m p lo y m e n t fa ste r
th a n n o n fa rm jo b s h a v e b ee n c rea ted . P o c k e ts o f
p o v e r ty a n d u n e m p lo y m e n t e x is t in th e m id s t o f
p ro sp ero u s e c o n o m ie s w h er e m a n y jo b s, b o th
s k ille d a n d u n sk ille d , go u n fille d . W h e re a re
th e s e a rea s o f e x c e s s iv e u n e m p lo y m e n t in th e
D is t r ic t sta te s? W h ere are th e jo b o p p o r tu n itie s
a s r e v e a le d b y th e ra tes o f e m p lo y m e n t grow th
a m o n g co u n tie s?
D is tr ic t A r e a s o f H igh U n e m p lo y m e n t
T h e lis t o f a rea s g iv e n p r efer e n c e in F e d e r a l p ro­
c u r e m e n t p o lic y in d ic a te s th e a r ea s w ith th e
m o s t sev e r e u n e m p lo y m e n t. T h is p o lic y g iv e s
Digitized
94 for FRASER


P a t t e r n s

first p re fe r e n c e to “firm s o p e r a tin g in s e c tio n s o f
c it ie s or s ta te s w ith h ig h c o n c e n tr a tio n s o f h a r d ­
c o re u n e m p lo y e d , p r o v id e d th e y a g r e e to e m p lo y
d is a d v a n ta g e d u n e m p lo y e d or u n d e r e m p lo y e d
p e r so n s” ; a n d se c o n d p r efer e n c e to “firm s o p e r ­
a tin g in p e r s is te n t or su b s ta n tia l la b o r su r p lu s
a r e a s.” B o th ty p e s o f a r e a s h a v e u n e m p lo y m e n t
r a tes e x c e e d in g 6 p e r c e n t a fte r a llo w a n c e is m a d e
for se a s o n a l a n d te m p o r a r y fa cto rs.
F ifty -fiv e s e c tio n s o f 2 2 la b o r m a r k e ts a rea s
in th e n a tio n m e e t th e first c la s sific a tio n . In th e
D is t r ic t sta te s, 16 o f th e s e s e c tio n s a re in 4 areas:
A tla n ta , B ir m in g h a m , N e w O rlea n s, a n d th e M is ­
s is s ip p i D e lta . T h e lim ita tio n s o f th e su r v e y to
th e v e r y la r g e s t c it ie s u n d o u b te d ly r e su lte d in
th e o m issio n o f u rb a n a r e a s o f c o n c e n tr a te d u n ­
e m p lo y m e n t in m a n y o f th e 1 5 0 m a jo r lab or
m a rk ets. T h e h ig h u n e m p lo y m e n t r a tes in s e c ­
tio n s o f A tla n ta , B ir m in g h a m , a n d N e w O rlea n s
p e r sist, d e s p ite o v e r a ll lo w r a te s in e a c h m etro ­
p o lita n area. A ll o f th e s e s e c tio n s o f h ig h u n e m ­
p lo y m e n t a re n ea r th e c e n tr a l b u sin e ss d istr ic t.
O f th e 5 2 0 sm a lle r a r e a s o f su b s ta n tia l la b o r
su r p lu s (t h e se c o n d c la s s if ic a t io n ) , 7 6 a re in D i s ­
tr ic t sta te s. In th e r e g io n A la b a m a h a s th e s m a ll­
e s t n u m b er o f su c h a r e a s ( 4 ) , a n d G eo r g ia h a s
M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

I

Above Average

More than 50 percent

97

Major Labor Market Areas (central county indicated by number)
Small Standard Metropolitan Areas (central county indicated by number)
METROPOLITAN AREAS

Georgia

Alabama

15.
*16.
*17.
*18.
*19.
*20.

*1.
2.
3.
*4.
5.
6.

Birmingham
Gadsden
Huntsville
Mobile
Montgomery
Tuscaloosa

Florida
7.
*8.
*9.
10.
11.
12.
*13.
14.

Fort Lauderdale
Jacksonville
Miami
Orlando
Pensacola
Tallahassee
Tampa-St. Petersburg
West Palm Beach

Albany
Atlanta
Augusta
Columbus
Macon
Savannah

Louisiana
*21.
22.
23.
24.
*25.
*26.

Baton Rouge
Lafayette
Lake Charles
Monroe
New Orleans
Shreveport

Mississippi
*27. Jackson
Tennessee
*28.
*29.
*30.
*31.

Chattanooga
Knoxville
Memphis
Nashville

*Major Labor Market Area


J U L Y 1968


95

th e la r g e s t n u m b er ( 3 6 ) . N e a r ly a ll o f th e sm a ller
a rea s a n d th e M is s is s ip p i D e lt a a re ru ral c o u n ­
t ie s so m e d is ta n c e from fa st-g r o w in g u rb a n areas.

L o c a tio n o f F ast G ro w in g C o u n tie s
Sixth District States
(1962-66 Job Growth Exceeding 50 Percent)
Types of Counties

J o b G row th b y C o u n ty S iz e
I f o n e th in k s o f th e le s s p o p u la te d c o u n tie s a s
m o re rural, th e n h e co u ld c o n c lu d e th a t jo b s in
ru ral c o u n tie s grew fa ste r d u rin g th e 1 9 6 2 -6 6
p e rio d , a s in d ic a te d b y m e a n g row th r a tes o f
c o u n tie s o f d iffe r e n t s iz e s in th e ch a rt. H o w ev e r,
d iffe r e n c e s b e tw e e n th e gro w th r a te s from c o u n ty
to c o u n ty a re greater for th e sm a lle r c o u n tie s a s
a grou p th a n for th e larg er o n e s. T h is is in d i­
c a te d b y th e co efficien ts o f v a r ia tio n (t h e s ta n ­
d a rd d e v ia tio n a s a p e r c e n t o f th e m e a n ) o f th e
g row th r a tes for d iffe r e n t c o u n ty siz e s. E x tr e m e ly
h ig h or lo w r a tes o f e m p lo y m e n t grow th a re m o re
lik e ly to c h a ra cterize th e sm a ll c o u n tie s. In p art,
th e g reater v a r ia b ility in th e jo b g row th b e tw e e n
sm a ll c o u n tie s r e su lts from th e c o n c e n tr a tio n o f
e m p lo y m e n t in a few e sta b lis h m e n ts . I f th e fo r­
tu n e s o f e v e n o n e co m p a n y in a s m a ll c o m m u n ity
a re u n u s u a lly g o o d or b ad , th e r e is lit t le sc o p e
for th e c o m p e n s a tio n o f g a in s or lo s s e s b y o th e r
e sta b lis h m e n ts in th e area.
T h e im p o r ta n t e x c e p tio n to th e c o u n ty s iz e a n d
jo b grow th tren d is in c o u n tie s la r g e e n o u g h th a t
th e p re ssu r e s o f r u ra l-ty p e u n e m p lo y m e n t are
m in im a l a n d sm a ll en o u g h th a t th e c o m m u n ity
is n o t p la g u e d w ith e x te n s iv e p o v e r ty a r ea s w ith
h ig h u n e m p lo y m e n t. T h e s e c o u n tie s w ith 255 0 ,0 0 0 jo b s a n d a p o p u la tio n in th e 5 0 -1 2 5 ,0 0 0
ra n g e a re cen tra l c o u n tie s o f sm a ll m e tr o p o lita n
a r ea s or frin g e c o u n tie s o f th e la r g e m e tr o p o lita n
areas.
J o b G row th by C o u n ty L o c a tio n
A lth o u g h th e sm a lle r c o u n tie s grew fa ster, o n
Small counties, on average, had a large increase in jobs, but
the growth was far from uniform.
Mean Percent Increase

0

10

0

20

20

30

40

50

60

40

60

80

100

120

C oefficient of Variation, Percent

96 for FRASER
Digitized


In Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA’s)
Adjacent to SMSA’s
Proximate to SMSA’s
Counties in or near SMSA’s
In or adjacent to medium-size cities
Rural
Total

Number

Percent

9
36
21
(66)
15
16

9
37
22
(68)
15
16

97

100

a v era g e, a n e x a m in a tio n o f th e fa s te s t a n d th e
s lo w e s t g ro w in g c o u n tie s in d ic a te s th a t g e n e r a lly
th e fa s te s t g ro w in g c o u n tie s w ere n e a r p o p u la ­
tio n c e n te r s a n d th e s lo w e s t w ere d e fin ite ly rural.
T h e ta b le sh o w s th a t 6 6 , or n e a r ly 7 0 p e r c en t,
o f th e c o u n tie s w ith a n in c r e a s e o f m o r e th a n
5 0 p e r c e n t in jo b s w e re p a r t o f or c lo s e to m e tr o ­
p o lita n a rea s. T h e p r o x im a te c o u n tie s a re a d ­
ja c e n t to o th e r fa s t g ro w in g c o u n tie s n e x t to
p o p u la tio n c e n te r s. T h u s , th e y w o u ld r e fle ct th a t
th e fa s t sp r e a d o f jo b s e n c o m p a s se d m o re th a n ju s t
th e a d ja c e n t c o u n tie s. N e a r ly a ll o f th e s e c o u n ­
tie s h a d a sm a ll n u m b er o f jo b s b u t w ere lo c a te d
n ea r th e p e r ip h e r y o f m e tr o p o lita n a rea s. O f th e
16 fa st g ro w in g ru ral c o u n tie s, 13 h a d a 196 2 e m ­
p lo y m e n t o f le s s th a n 2 ,0 0 0 s o th a t th e o p e n in g
o f ju s t a fe w m e d iu m -s iz e firm s in th e s e c o m m u ­
n it ie s w o u ld d r a m a tic a lly a ffe c t th e g row th rate.
O f th e 2 2 c o u n tie s w ith fe w e r jo b s in 1 9 6 6 th a n
in 1962, o n ly o n e h a d m o r e th a n 2 ,0 0 0 jo b s a n d
s e v e n h a d b e tw e e n 1 ,0 0 0 a n d 2 ,0 0 0 jo b s. T h e
d e c lin e in A n d e r so n C o u n ty , T e n n e s s e e (t h e
la r g e s t c o u n ty r e g is te r in g a jo b d e c l i n e ) , r e su lte d
from a c u tb a c k in a c tiv ity b y th e A to m ic E n e r g y
C o m m issio n a t O ak R id g e . O f th e r e m a in in g
c o u n tie s, 10 lo s t jo b s b e c a u se o f d e c lin in g m a n u ­
fa c tu r in g a n d m in in g jo b s a n d 10 b e c a u se o f a
lo ss in tra d e a n d se r v ic e jo b s. M o s t o f th e s iz ­
a b le d e c lin e s in jo b s in th e s e c o m itie s c o u ld b e
tr a ced to th e c lo s in g o r r e d u c tio n in e m p lo y m e n t
b y th e la r g e s t firm in th e c o u n ty .
T h e h ig h r a te o f v a r ia b ility in th e e m p lo y m e n t
g row th o f s m a ll c o u n tie s r e su lts fro m th e fa s t
gro w th o f sm a ll c o u n tie s n ea r b u r g e o n in g p o p u ­
la tio n c e n te r s a n d th e d e c lin e in jo b s in is o la te d
rural c o u n tie s.
W ith in m e tr o p o lita n a re a s, th e r in g or n o n ­
c e n tra l c o u n tie s grew fa ste r th a n th e ir corre­
sp o n d in g ce n tr a l or m o s t p o p u lo u s c o u n tie s. O f
th e 2 2 rin g c o u n tie s in th e m a jo r la b o r m a rk et
a rea s, 17 h a d a fa ste r g row th r a te th a n th e c e n ­
tral c o u n ty w ith w h ic h th e y w e r e a ss o c ia te d . F o r
a ll m u lti-c o u n ty m a jo r la b o r m a rk ets, jo b s grew
3 8 p e r c e n t in th e r in g c o u n tie s a n d 2 3 p e r c e n t
M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

in th e ce n tr a l co u n tie s. T h u s, th e fa s t jo b grow th
is ta k in g p la c e in rin g c o u n tie s, a n d th e se c tio n s
o f c o n c e n tr a te d u n e m p lo y m e n t are in cen tra l
c o u n tie s.
N o t o n ly w ere m o s t fa ste r g ro w in g c o u n tie s
lo c a te d n ea r m e tr o p o lita n a rea s, b u t m o s t m e tro ­
p o lita n a rea s h a d a d jo in in g c o u n tie s w ith fa st
grow th rates. F o u r te e n o f th e 18 la rg e m e tr o p o li­
ta n a rea s c o n ta in a fa s t g ro w in g c o u n ty e ith e r
w ith in or a d ja c e n t to it s b ord ers. M o reo v er, th e
p r e se n c e o f fa s t g row in g p erip h e ra l c o u n tie s n ea r
p o p u la tio n c e n te r s w a s n o t d e p e n d e n t u p o n fa st
g ro w th in th e cen tra l c o u n ty . T h e la r g e s t n u m b er
o f fa s t gro w in g c o u n tie s w a s lo c a te d n ea r A tla n ta ,
J a c k so n , N a s h v ille , a n d N e w O rlea n s. Y e t th e
c e n tra l c o u n ty for a ll o f th e s e a r ea s h a d a b e lo w
a v e ra g e grow th rate. O f th e c e n tr a l c o u n tie s, o n ly
L im e sto n e C o u n ty , A la b a m a ( H u n t s v ille ) , a n d
R ic h m o n d C o u n ty , G eo rg ia ( A u g u s t a ) , h a d a
g row th ra te greater th a n th e 3 4 p e r c e n t m e a n o f
a ll co u n tie s. B o th th e fa s te s t a n d s lo w e s t g ro w in g
la r g e c o u n tie s (L im e sto n e , A la b a m a , a n d A n d e r­
so n , T e n n e s s e e , r e s p e c tiv e ly ) w ere h e a v ily in flu ­
e n c e d b y c h a n g e s in F e d e r a l in s ta lla tio n s in th e s e
c o u n tie s.

u la tio n c e n te r s d u r in g th e 1 9 6 2 -6 6 p e rio d r e su lte d
in la rg e p a r t from th e sp r e a d o f jo b s o u ts id e th e
p r e se n tly d efin e d b o u n d a r ie s o f th e p o p u la tio n
cen ters.
T h u s, th e S ix th D is t r ic t p a tte r n s o f jo b g row th
a n d a r ea s o f su b s ta n tia l u n e m p lo y m e n t in d ic a te
th a t m a n y o f th e fo r c e s in a r ea s o f u n e m p lo y ­
m e n t a n d u n d e r e m p lo y m e n t in th e n a tio n a re
a ls o p r e se n t in th e D is t r ic t sta te s. S tu d ie s o f
th e n a tio n a l p ro b lem b y th e U .S . D e p a r tm e n t o f
L abor a n d o th e r G o v e rn m en t a n d p r iv a te g ro u p s
r e v e a l th a t m a n y o f th e im p o v e r ish e d p e r so n s
are u n e m p lo y e d b e c a u se o f p e rso n a l c h a r a c te r is­
tic s, su c h a s p oor ed u c a tio n , la c k o f jo b sk ills,
a n d /o r p o o r h e a lth . T h e u n e m p lo y m e n t p ro b lem
ca n b e h e lp e d b y b e tte r sc h o o ls, jo b tr a in in g p ro ­
gram s, a n d h e a lth fa c ilitie s .
S u c h m e a su r e s, h o w ev er, m a y n o t b e th e s o le
so lu tio n to th e p ro b lem s o f h ig h u n e m p lo y m e n t
area s. S in c e th e a re a s o f g re a te st e m p lo y m e n t
o p p o r tu n itie s a re n o t th o s e o f g r e a te st u n e m p lo y ­
m en t, e ffe c tiv e m e a n s m u s t b e fo u n d to b rin g th e
u n e m p lo y e d w ork er a n d th e jo b to g eth er. B e tte r
p u b lic tra n sp o r ta tio n , jo b in fo r m a tio n , a n d m o re
e ffe c tiv e r e c ru itm e n t a re e ss e n tia l.
R

T h e fa ste r grow th o f c o u n tie s o u ts id e th e p o p ­

B a n k A n n o u n c e m e n ts
The Ban k of W oodstock, Woodstock, Georgia, a non­
member bank, began to rem it at par on June 1 fo r
checks drawn on it when received from the Federal
Reserve Bank.
On June 18 the First Peoples Bank, Fort W alton
Beach, Florida, opened as a newly organized non­
member bank and began to rem it at par. Officers are
Gary E. Lee, president, and Roger B. Taylor, vice
president and cashier. Capital is $250,000; surplus
and other cap ital funds, $150,000.

J U L Y for
1 9 6FRASER
8
Digitized


ic h a r d

L ong

R E V IS E D P U B L IC A T IO N S

A Review of Georgia’s Economy, 1960-68,
r e v ise d M a y 1968.

A Review of M ississippi’s Economy, 196068, r e v ise d J u n e 1968.
Statistics on the Developing South, r e v ise d
J u n e 1968.
N o w a v a ila b le u p o n r e q u e st to th e R e se a r c h
D e p a r tm e n t, F e d e r a l R e se r v e B a n k o f A t­
la n ta , A tla n ta , G eo rg ia 3 0 3 0 3 .

97

S i x t h D is t r ic t S t a t is t ic s
S e a s o n a lly A d ju sted
(All d ata are in d e x e s, 1 9 5 7 - 5 9 =
One
M onth
Ago

L a te s t M onth
(1968)

Two
M onths
Ago

1 0 0 , u n le s s in d ic a te d o th e r w ise .)

One
Y ear
Ago

O ne
Two
M onth M onths
Ago
Ago

One
Year
Ago

161
156
107
80

160
155
105
83

159
154
102
96

157
150
103
83

. May
. May

2.6
41.5

2.7
40.2

2.9
40.8

2.7
42.2

. Ju n e
. Ju n e

295
227
222

289
221
213

261
198
191

L a te s t M onth
(1968)

SIXTH DISTRICT
. May

INCOME AND SPENDING
P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, A nnual R ate) . Apr. 64,347 64 ,2 5 5 r 6 3 ,8 4 4 r 58,260
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s ..............................May
, May
225
219
221
201
Farm C ash R e c e i p t s ...................................Mar.
Mar.
154
146
158
139
C r o p s .............................................
. Mar.
183
154
167
137
L i v e s t o c k ...................................................... .Mar.
Mar.
148
152
156
145
In s ta lm e n t C re d it a t B anks* (Mil. $)
New L o a n s ................................................. .May
May
329
322
330
301
R e p a y m e n ts
.............................................May
. May
270
293
269
277
. May
177p
168r
178
163
Retail S a le s
...................................

U n e m p lo y m e n t R ate
(P e rc e n t of W ork Force) . .
Avg. W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (H rs.)
FINANCE AND BANKING

289
223
22 8 r

PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT
141
140
172
133
156
114
104
122
131
109
181
141
130
61

140
139
170
133
156
113
104
121
130
109
177
141
132
64

141
140
171
134
156
114
105
121
133
109
181
141
133
67

137
136
168
130
151
114
103
119
128
108
180
137
125
61

3. 7

3. 7

3. 3

3. 8

1.8
41.1
207
240
180
151
107
225

1.9
40.3
147
194
107
149
109
227

2.0
41.0
184
222
151
155
116
219

2.2
40 .8
165r
191r
143
145
113
223

FINANCE AND BANKING
L oans*
All M em ber B a n k s ...................................
Large B a n k s ............................................
D eposits*
All M em ber B a n k s .................................. .
L arge B a n k s ............................................ .
B an k D e b i ts * / * * ............................................ ,

Ju n e

276
242

273
241

274
242

251
225

Ju n e
Ju n e
May

208
178
223

208
181
227r

207
182
225

189
169
199

P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, A nnual R ate) . Apr.
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s ............................. , May
F arm C a sh R e c e i p t s .................................. , M ar.

8,790
199
150

8 ,701r
200
150

ALABAMA
INCOME
8 ,377r
197
156

7,742
181
146

PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT
N onfarm E m p l o y m e n t ...............................
M a n u fa c tu rin g
....................................... .
N o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g .................................. .
C o n s t r u c t i o n ....................................... ,
F arm E m p lo y m e n t .......................................
U n e m p lo y m e n t R ate
(P e rc e n t of W ork F o r c e ) ....................
Avg. W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (Hrs.) . . .

May
May
May
May
Apr.

127
127
126
116
69

126
127
126
114
62

127
128
127
116
68

125
125
125
115
68

May
May

4.6
40.6

4.5
41.1

4.4
41.4

4.4
41.1

M em ber B ank L o a n s ................................... Ju n e
M em ber B ank D e p o s i t s ........................., J u n e
B an k Debits**
............................................. May

256
197
202

251
199
211

P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, A nnual Rate) . Apr. 12,448
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s ......................... . May
224
Farm C ash R e c e i p t s .............................. . Mar.
147

12,409r 12,486r 11,252
216
220
203
134
159
135

PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT
N onfarm E m p l o y m e n t .........................
M a n u fa c tu rin g
...................................
N o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g ..............................
C o n s t r u c t i o n ...................................
Farm E m p lo y m e n t ...................................
U n em p lo y m en t R ate
(P e rc e n t of W ork F orce) . . . .
Avg. W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (H rs.) . .

.
.
.
.
.

May
May
May
May
Apr.

141
134
144
143
52

140
133
144
148
56

141
133
145
152
58

137
132
139
139
51

. May
. May

3.3
40.8

3.3
40.1

3.2
40.7

3.4
40.3

. June
. Ju n e
. May

288
226
251

284
227
249r

288
226
256

260
203
223

P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, A nnual R ate) . Apr.
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s ......................... ..... May
F arm C ash R e c e i p t s ................................... Mar.

9,926
203
151

9 ,9 2 3 r
194
161

196
183

9,153
185
138

FINANCE AND BANKING
M em b er B ank L o a n s ..............................
M em b er B an k D e p o s i t s .........................
B ank D e b i ts * * .............................................
LOUISIANA
INCOME

PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT
N o n farm E m p l o y m e n t ..............................
M a n u fa c tu rin g
................................... .... .
N o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g .................................. .
C o n s t r u c t i o n ....................................... .
F arm E m p lo y m e n t .........................................
U n e m p lo y m e n t R ate
(P e rc e n t of W ork F o r c e ) ....................
Avg. W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (H rs.) . . .

May
May
May
May
Apr.

131
121
133
149
59

131
121
133
160
60

131
121
133
153
61

128
118
130
146
58

May
May

4.7
43.1

4.5
41.2

4.3
42.5

4.5
41.8

M em b er B an k L o a n s * .............................. Ju n e
M em b er B an k D e p o s i t s * ......................... Ju n e
Bank D e b i ts * / * * ............................................., May

233
170
182

232
169
184

235
169
182

224
160
173

5 ,0 3 8 r
251
143

5 ,009r
258
182

FINANCE AND BANKING

M ISSISSIPPI
INCOME
P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, A nnual R ate) . Apr.
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s .............................. May
Farm C ash R e c e i p t s ................................... Mar.

4,965
259
132

4,569
220
144

PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT

FINANCE AND BANKING

FLORIDA

00

P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, A nnual R ate) . Apr. 18,167
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s .............................. May
277
Farm C ash R e c e i p t s ................................... Mar.
188

O
cn

INCOME
264
163

N onfarm E m p l o y m e n t ..............................
M a n u fa c tu rin g
........................................
N o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g ...................................
C o n s t r u c t i o n ........................................
Farm E m p lo y m e n t ........................................
U n em p lo y m en t R ate
(P e rc e n t of Work F o r c e ) ....................
Avg.
W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (H rs.) . . .
17,856r 16,289
254
200
216

235
183
180

267
164

252
141

PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT
N onfarm E m p lo y m en t

GEORGIA

o
o
-vj

N o n farm E m p l o y m e n t ......................... . May
M a n u fa c tu rin g
................................... . May
A pparel
..................................................
C h e m i c a l s ............................................. . May
F a b ric a te d M e t a l s .............................. . May
F o o d ........................................................... . May
Lbr., W ood Prod., F urn. & Fix. . . . May
P a p e r ...................................................... . May
P rim ary M e t a l s ................................... . May
T ex tiles
................................................. . May
T ra n sp o rta tio n E q u ip m e n t
. . . . May
N o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g ................................... . May
C o n s t r u c t i o n ........................................ . May
Farm E m p lo y m e n t ................................... . Apr.
U n e m p lo y m e n t R ate
(P e rc e n t of W ork Force) . . . .
. Ma y
In su re d U n em p lo y m en t
( P e rc e n t of Cov. E m p . ) .................... . May
Avg. W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (H rs.) . . . May
C o n stru c tio n C o n t r a c t s * .................... . May
R e s i d e n t i a l ............................................. . May
All O t h e r .................................................. . May
E le ctric P ow er P ro duction**
. . . . May
C o tton C o n s u m p ti o n * * ......................... . May
P e tro l. Prod, in C o a stal La. a n d Miss.* * J u n e

. ......................... May

Digitized for98
FRASER


157

156

154

151

May
May
May
May
Apr.

142
151
138
141
51

142
150
138
143
64

143
151
140
155
59

138
145
135
141
51

May
May

4.7
40.9

4.3
39.8

4.1
41.1

5.2
40.3

M em b er B an k L o a n s * .............................. Ju n e
M em ber B ank D e p o s i t s * ......................... Ju n e
B an k D e b i ts * / * * ............................................. May

328
239
211

327
240
228

327
237
246

298
222
207

FINANCE AND BANKING

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W

L a te s t M onth
(1968)

One
M onth
Ago

Two
M onths
Ago

O ne
Y ear
Ago

O ne
L a te s t M onth
(1968)
N o n m a n u f a c t u r i n g .........................
C o n s t r u c t i o n ..............................
Farm E m p lo y m e n t .............................. . . Apr.
U n e m p lo y m e n t R ate
(P e rc e n t of W ork Force) . . . . . May
Avg. W eekly Hrs. in Mfg. (H rs.) . . . May

TENNESSEE
INCOME
P e rso n a l In co m e (Mil. $, Ann. R ate)
Apr. 10,051
M a n u fa c tu rin g P a y r o l l s ......................... . May
215
F arm C ash R e c e i p t s .............................. . Mar.
144

10,115r 10,099r
213
215
107
125

9,255
188
133

Two
M onth
Ago

One
M o n th s
Ago

Y ear
Ago

134
163
66

135
172
63

136
183
70

132
150
65

3.6
40.6

4.0
39.7

3.4
40.7

4.3
39.9

272
191
252

271
194
252

266
194
253

248
181
223

FINANCE AND BANKING
PRODUCTION AND EMPLOYMENT
N o n farm E m p l o y m e n t .........................
M a n u fa c tu rin g
...................................

. May
. May

139
148

139
148

140
149

*For S ix th D istrict a re a only. O th e r to ta ls fo r e n tire six s ta te s .

136
144

M em b er B an k L o a n s * ....................
M em ber B ank D eposits* . . . .
B ank D e b i t s * / * * ..............................
p-P relim in ary e stim a te .

‘ Daily a v e ra g e b asis.

D e b its to D e m a n d D e p o s it A c c o u n ts
Insured C om m ercial B an k s in t h e S ixth D istrict
(In T h o u sa n d s o f D ollars)

May
1968

April
1968

P e rc e n t C h an g e

P e rc e n t C h a n g e

Y ear-to-D ate
5 m os.
May 1968 from 1968
May
April May from
1967
1968 1967 1967

Y ear-to-D ate
5 m os.
May 1968 fro m 1968
April May fro m
1968 1967 1967

STANDARD METROPOLITAN
STATISTICAL AREAS!
B irm in g h am
. . .
G ad sd en .........................
H u n t s v i l l e ....................
M obile
.........................
M o n tg o m ery
. . . .
T u s c a l o o s a ....................

....................
L a k e la n d
M onroe C ounty . . .

1,712,518
66,519
192,494
566,870
354,149
116,406

l,6 2 7 ,5 2 5 r
63,207
190,022
452,422
337 ,6 2 4
94,142

1,678,728
61,956
185,981
500,144
302,689
100,199

+5
+5
+1
+5
+5
+24

+2
+7
+4
+ 13
+ 17
+ 16

+7
+7
+5
+ 11
+ 12
+10

827,759
1,653,747
2,860,487
639,764
225,175
168,022

883,062
l,6 8 9 ,2 0 3 r
2,952,952
663,884
212,413
151,815

656,910
1,542,624
2 ,295,598
575,725
206,202
153,405

-6
-2
-3
-4
+6
+ 11

+26
+7
+25
+6
+9
+ 10

+20
+7
+23
+15
+ 10
+ 11

1,603,757
504,521

1,654,067
534,995

1,339,764
426,243

-3
-6

+20
+ 18

+20
+ 18

A lbany
.........................
A tlan ta
.........................
A u g u s t a .........................
C o l u m b u s ....................
M acon
.........................
Savannah
....................

100,542
5,776,176
334,140
249,277
278,998
326,651

99,185
5 ,442,724r
346,529
241,981
284,832
294,596

89,034
+1
5,062,575r
+6
306,997
-4
219,488
+3
257,436
-2
286,015 + 11

+13
+ 14
+9
+ 14
+9
+ 14

+
+
+
+
+
+

B aton R ouge . . . .
L a fay e tte
....................
Lake C h a rle s . . . .
New O rlea n s . . . .

642,031
143,018
161,850
2,659,028

632,861
135,744
157,237
2,529,585

596,576
139,096
146,902
2,547,273

+1
+5
+3
+5

+8
+3
+ 10
+5

+ 10
+ 13
+ 10
+7

.........................

624,512

672,106

683,714

-7

-9

+ 10

C h a tta n o o g a
. . . .
Knoxville
....................
N ash v ille
....................

660,204
526,793
1,999,288

657,254
517,465
1,884,674

596,533
469,963
1,717,254

+0
+2
+6

+ 11
+12
+ 16

+9
+ 10
+ 14

A n n i s t o n .........................
D othan
.........................
S e l m a ..............................

77,691
70,142
47,519

71,896
67,420
46,352

63,967
64,983
43,619

+8
+4
+3

+21
+8
+9

+2
+ 10
+8

B artow
.........................
B r a d e n t o n ....................
B revard C ounty . . .
D aytona B each . . .
Ft. M yers—
N. Ft. M yers . . .
G a i n e s v i l l e ....................

40,643
78,513
242,011
100,727

36,857
88,024
237,569
103,041

38,387
70,597
236,947
89,899

+ 10
-1 1
+2
-2

+6
+ 11
+2
+ 12

-2
+ 17
+9
+8

107,914
101,935

103,884
96,150

80,554
86,797

+4
+6

+34
+ 17

+33
+ 16

Ft. L a u d e rd a le —
Hollywood
. . . .
Ja c k s o n v ille
. . . .
M i a m i ..............................
O r l a n d o .........................
P e n s a c o la
....................
T a lla h a s se e
. . . .
T am pa—
S t. P e te rs b u rg . .
W. P alm B each . . .

Jackson

May
1968

13
14
11
13
13
11

OTHER CENTERS

• In c lu d e s only b a n k s in th e S ixth D istrict p o rtio n of th e s ta te .

J U L Y 1968



St. A u g u stin e . . . .
St. P e te rs b u rg . . .
S a r a s o t a .........................
T am p a
.........................
W inter Haven
. . .
A th en s
.........................
B r u n s w i c k ....................
E l b e r t o n .........................
G a i n e s v i l l e ....................
LaG range

....................

R o m e .............................
V a l d o s t a .........................
A bbeville
....................
A l e x a n d r i a ....................
H a m m o n d ....................
New I b e r i a ....................
P la q u em in e
. . . .
T h i b o d a u x ....................
Biloxi-G ulfport
. .
H a ttie sb u rg
. . .
M eridian
....................
N a t c h e z .........................
P a s c a g o u la —
M oss P o in t
. .
V i c k s b u r g ....................
Yazoo City . . . .
B r i s t o l ..............................
Jo h n so n City . . .
K ing sp o rt
....................

April
1968

May
1967

130,921
40,155
61,694
23,955
366,895
124,009
852,483
77,813

132,070
42,040
65,507
23,029
404,840
146,555
845,750
73,301

119,731
36,608
57,925
19,508
318,595
104,433
700,827
64,103

-1
-4
-6
+4
-9
-1 5
+1
+6

+9
+10
+7
+23
+15
+19
+22
+21

+8
+8
+9
+8
+1
+26
+25
+13

86,312
45,159
103,001
15,697
73,709
29,989
23,279
25,855
79,749
59,167

87,889
45,487
105,450
15,692
73,575
38,448
21,813
23,063
80,666
58,583

73,905
40,193
79,008
17,719
73,227
34,507
23,799
25,187
72,473
54,515

-2
-1
-2
+0
+0
-2 2
+7
+12
-1
+1

+17
+12
+30
-1 1
+1
-1 3
-2
+3
+10
+9

+17
+14
+24
-5
-0
+5
-1
+7
+10
+8

10,928
149,012
6,697
40,942
35,697
20,252
26,278

12,433r
146,326
6,293
38,029
37,604
12,398
25,531

11,265
132,229
6,499
42,644
34,414
12,340
22,477

-1 2
+2
+6
+8
-5
+63
+3

-3
+13
+3
-4
+4
+64
+17

+9
+4
+5
+2
+4
+24
+9

113,005
64,257
42,678
69,877
40,237

115,158
59,362
37,646
61,240
39,870

105,827
55,126
31,927
69,029
36,344

-2 2
+8
+13
+14
+1

+7
+17
+34
+1
+11

+11
+9
+19
+3
+7

67,088
40,651
35,962

65,189
42,982
34,202

56,374
41,294
35,297

+3
-5
+5

+19
-2
+2

+21
+5
+8

80,403
85,547
176,367

80,829
81,556
177,628

81,461
76,929
159,675

-1
+5
-1

-1
+11
+10

-2 0
+8
+11

XTH DISTRICT, Total 35,136,382

34,682,842r 31 ,291,337r

+1

+12

+13

A la b a m a !
.................... 4,504,409
F l o r i d a } : ......................... 10,769,734
G eo rg ia!
.................... 9,087,249
L o u isian a* !
. . . . 4,494,855
1,481,577
M ississip p i* ! . . .
4,800,558
T e n n e sse e * !
. . .

4,330,621 r
ll,2 2 2 ,9 1 5 r
8,753,777r
4,306,510r
1,486,756
4,582,042

+4
-4
+4
+4
-4
+5

+12
+16
+13
+5
+2
+14

+12
+ 17
+13
+7
+10
+13

4,015,301
9,257,929
8,076,527r
4,266,583
1,452,306
4,222,691

tP a rtia lly e sti

99

D is tric t B u s in e s s C o n d itio n s
L
1
— Billions of D ollars
— A nnual R ate
— S e a s . Adj.

— 1 9 5 7 - 5 9 :1 0 0
— S e a s. Adj.

I
Personal Income

Nonfarm Employment

Unemployment Rate

Average Weekly Hours *
Mfg. Payrolls

1965

‘Seas. adj. figure; not an index.

1966

1967

1968

fNew series.

R ising m an u factu rin g payrolls and c o n su m er sp e n d in g buoyed a g en era lly rob u st D istrict e c o n o m y re­
cen tly , th u s m u tin g so m e sig n s of slu g g is h n e s s . H igher c a sh r e c e ip ts s u g g e s t farm ers are a lso con trib u t­
ing to g a in s. A sharp pick-up in bank lo a n s during June sh o u ld h elp fin a n ce h e ig h te n e d e c o n o m ic
a ctivity. C onstruction h a s im proved, d e sp ite high fin a n cin g and labor c o s t s . A w ea k e n in g in u n em p lo y ­
m en t s u g g e s ts th a t all se c to r s are not p articip a tin g in th e e x p a n sio n .
M anufacturing jo b s, th e average w orkw eek, and
payrolls perked up in May, fo llo w in g m ed io cre per­
fo r m a n ces in th e two p reviou s m o n th s. P r o d u c tio n
o f ste e l a n d cru d e p etro le u m in cr e a sed . T h e u n ­
e m p lo y m e n t r a te ro se s lig h tly , b e c a u se th e w o rk ­
fo rce a d v a n ced m ore r a p id ly th a n to ta l job s.
A sharp rise in au to m o b ile s a le s ap p aren tly
b o o sted retail sp e n d in g in May. F o llo w in g a go o d
first q u arter p erfo rm a n ce, n e w car s a le s tu rn ed
d o w n w ard in A p ril, b u t reb o u n d e d str o n g ly in
M a y a n d su rp a ssed ea r lie r a v e r a g e m o n th ly
g a in s. O u tsta n d in g co n su m er cred it, refle c tin g
th e im p r o v e m e n t in sa le s, a lso ro se in M a y .
During first quarter 1 9 6 8 , c a sh r e c e ip ts from
farm s a le s rose sig n ifica n tly ab ove th o se o f a year
earlier. L arge rev e n u e s from F lo r id a ’s c itr u s sa le s
a c c o u n te d for m u ch o f th e ga in , b u t o th e r sta te s
sh a red in th e a d v a n ce. G e n e r a lly , w e a th e r c o n ­
d itio n s rem a in good , a n d h a r v e stin g o f sm a ll
g ra in s is n ear c o m p le tio n . P r ic e s o f fe ed e r c a lv e s,
h o g s, co tto n , a n d b ro ilers a ll str e n g th e n e d , c a u s­

100 for FRASER
Digitized


in g th e in d e x o f p r ic e s to r e m a in w e ll a b o v e la s t
y e a r ’s.
Large D istrict b an k s e x p e r ie n c e d a su rge in loan
d em an d during June. B u s in e s s le n d in g a c c o u n te d
for a m a jo r p o r tio n o f th e a d v a n c e . I n th e n o n ­
b u sin e ss se cto r rea l e s t a te lo a n s, c o n su m e r in ­
sta lm e n t lo a n s, a n d se c u r ity lo a n s sh o w e d th e
g r e a te st grow th . L a rg e b a n k s c o n tr a c te d th eir
in v e s tm e n t p o rtfo lio s, m a in ly b y r e d u c in g h o ld ­
in g s o f T r e a su r y b ills. R u n -o ffs o f la r g e d e n o m i­
n a tio n c e r tific a te s o f d e p o s it w e r e m o d er a te .
D istrict co n str u c tio n co n tr a c ts sh o w ed renew ed
vitality in May. D o lla r v o lu m e o f r e sid e n tia l c o n ­
tr a c tin g ro se to a n e w a ll-tim e h ig h , le d b y sev e ra l
la rg e a p a r tm e n t p ro je c ts in F lo r id a . In c r e a se d
c o n tr a c tin g o f u tilitie s , m a n u fa c tu r in g p la n ts, a n d
office a n d b a n k b u ild in g s w a s a ls o e v id e n t. C o n ­
str u c tio n la b o r c o sts h a v e r ise n sh a r p ly in re c e n t
m o n th s, a n d fin a n c in g c o sts r e m a in a t v e r y h ig h
le v e ls.
NOTE: Data on which statements are based have been adjusted
whenever possible to eliminate seasonal influences.

M O N T H L Y R E V IE W