View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M ONTHLY

R E V IE W

O f Financial, A gricultural, T ra d e and Industrial
C onditions in the S ix th Federal R eserve D istrict
F E D E R A L

R E S E R V E

Vol. 20 No. 4

B A N K

O F

ATLANTA, GA., APRIL SO, 1935

NATIONAL SUMMARY OF BUSINESS CONDITIONS
Prepared by Federal Reserve Board
Volume of industrial production, which usually increases
somewhat at this season, showed little change in March.
Building activity in the residential field increased in March
and the first half of April, reflecting in part seasonal factors.
Wholesale prices of farm products and foods, after declining
in March, showed a considerable increase in the first three
weeks of April.
Production
The Federal Reserve Board’s adjusted index of
and
industrial production, which makes allowance
Employment for changes in the number of working days and
for usual seasonal variations, was 88 per cent
of the 1923-25 average in March as compared with 89 per cent
in February and 90 in January. Steel production, after de­
clining in the latter part of February showed little change
during March and the first three weeks of April. Output of
automobiles increased further and was larger than in the cor­
responding period of any other year since 1929. In the cotton
textile industry daily average output declined in March and,
according to trade reports, showed a further considerable de­
crease in the early part of April. Activity in the meat pack­
ing industry in March, as in other recent months, was at a
lower level than a year ago. Output of bituminous coal de­
clined sharply in the early part of April, following an increase
earlier in the year.
Factory employment and payrolls increased between the
middle of February and the middle of March by somewhat
more than the usual seasonal amount. The most marked
increases were in industries producing machinery, furniture,

1930

1931

1932

1933

1934

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

1935

I n d e x n u m b e r o f in d u s t r ia l p r o d u c t io n , a d ju st e d f o r s e a s o n a l v a r ia t io n .
(1 9 2 3 -1 9 2 5 a v e r a g e = 1 0 0 . )
L a t e s t f ig u r e M a r c h P r e l i m i n a r y 88.




™ 3 S S j 5 S .‘5 S £ S “

and clothing, while employment in industries producing textile
fabrics and foods showed a decline.
Value of construction contracts awarded for residential
building increased in March and the first half of April, ac­
cording to reports by the F. W. Dodge Corporation, while
contracts for public projects continued at a lower level than
a year ago.
Distribution Distribution of commodities by rail showed little
change in March; in the early part of April,
however, shipments declined, reflecting a sharp reduction in
loadings of coal. Department store sales increased from
February to March by more than the estimated seasonal
amount.
Commodity The general level of wholesale commodity prices,
Prices
as measured by the index of the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, advanced from 78.8 per cent of the
1926 average in the week ending March 23 to 80.3 per cent
in the week ending April 26, reflecting chiefly advances in the
prices of farm products and foods. The increase in the gen­
eral index followed a decline from a level of 79.6 per cent in
the early part of March.
Bank During the four weeks ended April 17 member bank
Credit balances with the Federal Reserve Banks increased
by $140,000,000 and excess reserves rose to $2,100,000,000. This increase reflected gold imports of $120,000,000
and disbursement of $105,000,000 by the Treasury from the
balances with the reserve banks offset in part by an increase
of $60,000,000 in the demand for currency.
Total loans and investments of weekly reporting member
banks in leading cities increased by $150,000,000 in the four

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

1929

A T L A N T A

Three m onth moving averages of F . W . Dodge data for 37 E astern
States adjusted fo r seasonal variation. March P relim inary. Total 107.5:
Residential 28.6; All O ther 78.9.

2

M O N T H L Y

R E V IE W

Indexes of the U nited States Bureau of Labor Statistics. By months
1929 to 1931; by weeks 1932 to date. (1926=100.) L atest figures April
13; F arm Products 81.8; Foods 85.3; O ther Commodities 77.3.

Wednesday figures for reporting member banks in 90 cities.
figures are for Wednesday, A pril 17.

weeks ended April 17. Loans on securities declined somewhat
during this period, while other loans and holdings of invest­
ments increased. Net demand deposits of these banks in­
creased by $380,000,000.
The rate for call money on the New York Stock Exchange
was reduced in April to % per cent from the 1 per cent level
that had been in effect for more than a year. Quotations for
90-day time money were also lowered to
per cent and there
was a reduction in rates on acceptances of the longer maturi­
ties.

than in March last year. Residential contracts in March were
two and one-half times as large as in February, and greater
than in March last year by 132.6 per cent, and for the first
quarter were a little more than twice the total for that quar­
ter last year. Consumption of cotton in the three states of
this District for which figures are available increased slightly,
but on a daily average basis declined 4.3 per cent, from
February to March, and was 12.5 ner cent less than a year
ago. Orders booked by reporting cotton mills in the District
declined substantially over the month and continued in smaller
volume than a year earlier. Total production of pig iron in
Alabama increased 35.4 per cent, and daily average output
increased 22.3 per cent, over February, and was slightly less
than in March last year. For the first quarter Alabama pro­
duction of iron has been 21.7 per cent less than in that part
of 1934.
Reserve The total volume of reserve bank credit outstanding
Bank
at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, repreCredit
sented by its holdings of bills and securities, reg­
istered a slight decline from March 13 to April 10,
and was then 7.8 millions greater than a year ago. Half of
the small decline between March 13 and April 10 was in dis­
counts, the remainder being in United States Securities, pur­
chased bills and industrial advances. Total discounts on April
10 were $668,000 less than a year earlier, purchased bills
smaller by $555,000, but holdings of United States securities
greater by about 8 millions of dollars. Member bank reserve
accounts declined about 5 millions from March 13 to April 10,
but were slightly larger than a year ago, and total reserves
held by the bank declined 7.6 millions since March 13 and on
April 10 were 19.6 millions less than on the corresponding
Wednesday last year. Federal Reserve note circulation was
1.4 millions greater on April 10 than four weeks earlier, but
1.7 millions less than a year ago.
Principal items in the weekly statement are compared in
the table, which is followed by another table setting out sim­
ilar comparisons for the twelve Federal Reserve Banks com­
bined.

SIXTH DISTRICT SUMMARY
Sixth District business statistics for March indicate in­
creases over February in retail and wholesale trade, in build­
ing activities, in pig iron production in Alabama, and in loans
and deposits at weekly reporting member banks in selected
cities, but department store sales were somewhat less than a
year ago because of the earlier date of Easter last year,
wholesale trade was only slightly larger, and although build­
ing permits issued at principal cities were greater, contracts
awarded in the District as a whole were less.
Department store sales increased 22.2 per cent from Febru­
ary to March, and on a daily average basis rose 18.8 per cent.
However, after adjustment for the usual seasonal change and
the later date of Easter this year, the adjusted index for this
District increased from 80 per cent of the 1923-1925 average
in February to 90.9 per cent in March which is higher, except
for September, 1934, than for any other month since July,
1931. Stocks on hand, and collections, also increased. Whole­
sale trade increased 10.7 per cent from February to March
and was 1.1 per cent above March last year, but for the first
quarter of the year sales show a decrease of 1.5 per cent
compared with that period a year ago. Debits to individual
accounts at 26 clearing house centers of the District were 15.3
per cent greater in March than February, and 5.4 per cent
greater than a year ago.
From March 13 to April 10 the volume of reserve bank
credit outstanding at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
declined slightly, member bank reserve account declined 5.1
millions, but Federal Reserve note circulation increased 1.4
millions, but total bills and securities were 7.8 millions greater
than a year ago, member bank reserve deposits were 1.1 mil­
lions greater, but note circulation 1.7 millions less. At weekly
reporting member banks loans to customers increased 3.3 mil­
lions between March 13 and April 10, and investments in­
creased 5.4 millions, and total loans and investments were
22.6 millions greater than a year ago. Time deposits held
by these banks declined slightly, but demand deposits were
39.8 millions greater than on the same Wednesday last year.
Building permits issued during March at twenty reporting
cities of the District increased 38.1 per cent over February
and were 64.1 per cent greater than in March, 1934. Con­
struction contracts awarded in the District as a whole in­
creased 46.9 per cent over February, but were 37 per cent less




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
(000 Omitted)
April 10
Mar. 13
1935
1935
Bills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. Obligations
All O thers................................
Total Discounts..............
Bills Bought in Open M a rk et. .
Industrial Advances...................
U. S. Securities...........................
Total Bills and Securities
Total Reserves............................
Member Bank Reserve Account
Total Deposits............................
F. R. Notes in actual circulation
F. R. Bank Notes in actual cirReserve R atio....................... ..

$

65
136
201
191
1,072
94,224
95,688
130,377
84,259
91,407
126,819
59.7%

$

129
93
222
198
1,075
94,235
95,730
138,026
89,398
100,877
125,381
61.0%

L atest

April 11
1934
$

222

647
869
746

’86‘,245
87,860
149,975
83,145
93,761
128,531
1,254
67.5%

M O N T H L Y

$

2,818
3,201
6,019
5,307
21,256
2,430,431

$

3,217 $
3,208
6,425
5,505
19,869
2,430,361

April 11
1934
9,276
33,975
43,251
17,059

2,463!6i3
2,847,134
4,286,830
4,904,137
3,169,329

2 ,4 6 2 ,i60
5,824,135
4,588,213
4,913,766
3,136,652

2,431,979
562
2,492.851
4,645,596
3,560,025
3,737,748
3,025,812

72.4%

100
72.3%

88,336
68.7%

Member Total loans and investments of 17 weekly reporting
Bank
member banks located in Atlanta, Birmingham,
Credit
Jacksonville, Nashville, Chattanooga, Mobile and
Savannah, increased 8.7 millions of dollars between
March 13 and April 10, and were 22.6 millions greater than
on the same Wednesday last year. Loans by these banks
increased 3.3 millions since March 13, holdings of United
States securities increased 1.6 millions, and Other securities
increased 3.8 millions. Compared with the corresponding re­
port date a year ago, loans on April 10 show an increase of
10.6 millions, United States securities a decrease of 7.2 mil­
lions, and Other securities an increase of 19.1 millions.
Demand deposits, which stood on March 13 at the highest
point in the series which began January, 1932, increased the
following Wednesday to $209,178, but declined slightly by
April 10, but were then 39.8 millions greater than a year ago.
Time deposits held by these banks declined slightly from
March 13 to April 10, and were 2.4 millions less than a year
ago. Balances held by these banks for correspondents de­
clined about 2.1 millions between March 13 and April 10 and
were 5.1 millions greater than a year earlier, while those
maintained with correspondents declined 13.3 millions since
March 13 and were 3.8 millions less than a year ago.
In the tables which follow are shown comparisons of prin­
cipal items in the weekly report, monthly averages of weekly
figures over the past year for some of these items, and com­
parisons of savings deposits reported by a list of banks
located throughout the District.
CONDITION OF M EM BER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
(000 Omitted)
April 10
Mar. 13
April 11
1935
1935
1934
Loans:
On Securities...........................
All Others................................
Total Loans....................
U. S. Securities...........................
Other Securities..........................
Total Investm ents..........
Total Loans and Invest­
ments ...........................
Time Deposits............................
Demand Deposits.......................
Due to Banks..............................
Due from Banks.........................
Borrowings from F. R. B a n k ...

$ 50,917
141,305
192,222
95,141
67,159
162,300

$ 51,489

137,458
188,947
93,515
63,368
156,883

$ 61,369
120,121
181,490
102,330
48,066
150,396

354,522
128,418
209,055
87,312
81,071

345,830
128,921
205,983
89,382
94,373

331,886
130,855
169,267
82,248
84,859

MONTHLY AVERAGES OF W EEKLY FIGURES OF
17 REPO RTIN G M EM BER BANKS IN SELECTED CITIES
(000 Omitted)
Total
Borrowings
Invest­ Loans and Demand
Time
Loans
From
ments Investments Deposits Deposits F. R. Bank
1934
January. . . . $187,795 $148,305
162,054
February.. . . 187,358
155,608
M arch........ . 184,851
152,679
April........... 180,670
151,172
M ay............ 178,019
156,522
June............ 177,687
169,780
Ju ly ............ 167,294
167,502
August........ 166,546
163,759
September.... 167,243
176,456
159,810
October
November. . . 187,788
156,775
December. . . 193,141
162,168
1935
162,038
January. . . . 187,215
F eb ru ary .. . . 188,683
163,058
161,445
190,559
M arch........




8

SAVINGS DEPOSITS
(000 Omitted)

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
(000 Omitted)
April 10
Mar. 13
1935
1935
Bills Discounted:
Secured by Govt. Obligations
All O thers................................
Total Discounts..............
Bills Bought in Open M ark et. .
Industrial Advances...................
U. S. Securities...........................
Other Securities..........................
Total Bills and Securities
Total Reserves............................
Member Bank Reserve Account
Total Deposits............................
F. R. Notes in actual circulation
F. R. Bank Notes in actual cir­
culation ....................................
Reserve R atio.............................

R E V IE W

$336,100
349,412
340,460
333,349
329,191
334,209
336,513
334,048
331,002
336,266
344,563
355,309

$151,935
158,695
161,794
168,070
167,404
169,196
172,707
172,917
179,195
180,374
189,297
196,394

$130,048
131,505
130*406
130,649
132,911
130,786
131,560
129,194
127,402
128,944
130,313
128,492

349,253
351,741
352,004

190,945
193,894
204,498

127,012
130,053
128,723

$2,060
441
161

Birmingham.
Jacksonville..
Knoxville.. . .
Nashville... .
New Orleans.
Other Cities..
T otal............

Number
of
Banks

March
1935

February
1935

3
3
3
4
4
5
35
57

$ 30,961
16,272
15,034
5,099
23,485
32,344
67,102
190,297

$ 30,747
15,888
14,709
5,033
23,063
31,994
67,323
188,757

March
1934

Percentage Change
Mar. 1935 compared
with
Feb. 1935 Mar. 1934

$ 29,530
17,329
12,457
2,947
21,616
26,207
60,691
170,777

+ 0 .7
+ 2 .4
+ 2 .2
+ 1.3
+ 1.8
+ 1.1
—0.3
+ 0 .8

+ 4.8
— 6.1
+ 20.7
+ 7 3 .0
+ 8.6
+ 2 3 .4
+ 10.6
+ 11.4

Debit® to
individual
Accounts

Total debits to individual accounts at 26 clearing house centers of the Sixth District increased
15.3 per cent from February to March, and were
5.4
per cent greater than in March last y
the same time a year ago, bank debits increased 12.8 per cent
from February to March and during the six years prior to
1933, when no figures were compiled for March on account of
the banking holiday, the average increase from February to
March was 8.1 per cent. Monthly totals compared in the
table are derived from weekly reports by pro-rating figures
for those weeks which do not fall entirely within a single
calendar month.
(000 Omitted)
March 1935
Alabama—4 Cities.................
Birmingham........................
D othan................................

$

Montgomery.......................

106,740
59,789
2,250
23,998
20,703

Feb. 1935
$

94,485
53,578
1,877
20,935
18,095

March 1934
$

131,411
86,814
1,928
24,065
18,604

127,121
61,873
34,998
6,020
24,230

114,069
55,759
30,589
5,565
22,156

114,921
56,673
30,026
5,720
22,502

226,480
3,026
149,389
18,984
1,918
10,029
795
10,855
1,525
26,391
2,773

201,147
2,661
134,080
14,063
1,708
12,297
681
9,610
1,386
22,240
2,421

207,238
2,404
133,757
17,512
1,907
9,940
773
10,406
1,709
26,204
2,626

193,902

160,474

181,060

Vicksburg............................

38,792
3,994
21,268
7,656
5,874

33,013
3,641
17,312
6,883
5,177

33,164
3,770
18,024
6,826
4,544

Tennessee—3 Cities...............
Chattanooga........................
Knoxville.............................
Nashville..............................

125,074
30,294
20,947
73,833

106,559
22,631
18,549
65,379

108,049
26,906
19,929
61,214

Florida—4 Cities....................
Jacksonville.........................
Pensacola.............................
Tampa.............................. .. .
Georgia— 10 Cities.................
Augusta...............................
Brunswick...........................
Columbus............................
Newnan...............................
Savannah.............................
Louisiana—New Orleans
Mississippi—4 Cities..............
H attiesburg.........................

Total—26 Cities.........

$

818,109

$

709,747

$

775,843

AGRICULTURE
Weather conditions during March and early April were
not favorable for farm work and the progress of crops, some
parts of the District having too much rain, while in Florida
rainfall averaged below normal, delaying planting in some
sections and resulting in increased dropping of citrus fruit
and retarding of bloom. Recovery of truck crops, including
potatoes, from cold damage was hindered by lack of moisture.
During most of March temperatures were well above normal
for the season. In Tennessee this resulted in rapid develop­
ment of winter grains and pastures, and the excessive rainfall
has caused considerable delay in the preparation of land for
spring planting, and has greatly delayed farm gardens.
The April 1 estimate of the Florida citrus crop indicates a
total of 15.5 million boxes of oranges, an increase of one
million boxes over the March estimate, and compared with
18.1 million boxes last season. Larger production this year
than last is indicated in the estimates for Louisiana, Alabama
and Mississippi. The April estimate of the Florida grapefruit
crop is the same as for March, 12.5 million boxes, compared
with 10.7 million boxes last year.
The condition of peaches on April 1 was higher in Georgia,
Alabama and Mississippi than at the same time least year,
but lower in Florida and Louisiana, and the condition of early

M O N T H L Y

4

potatoes was higher in Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana and Mis­
sissippi but lower in Florida. The acreage planted to potatoes
in Florida increased from 23,500 acres in 1934 to 24,800 acres
this year, but because of cold damage in February resulting
in low condition, the estimated production is 2,579,200 bushels,
against 3,125,500 bushels last year. Tennessee’s wheat crop
was reported in good to excellent condition on April 1, stands
were almost perfect and with plenty of moisture the plants
were growing rapidly.
Farm Stocks The April report of the United States Departof Grain
ment of Agriculture indicates that stocks of
wheat, corn and oats on the farms throughout
the United States on April 1 were, respectively, 19.4 per cent,
47.9 per cent, and 24.4 per cent, smaller than on the corre­
sponding date last year. In contrast to these decreases for
the country as a whole, farm stocks of wheat in this District
were 56.5 per cent, stocks of oats 32.0 per cent, and stocks of
com 12.3 per cent, greater than a year ago. Figures for the
six states of this District are compared in the table.
(000 Bushels)
W heat
Corn
1935
1934
1935
1934
A la b a m a ....
3
1
Florida..............................................
91
21
Georgia........
Louisiana.........................................
Mississippi........................................
T ennessee...
305
233
Six S tates....
United States

399
93,699

255
116,298

21,896
2,207
14,824
3,676
15,815
23,022
81,440
438,180

14,684
1,395
15,200
3,378
12,722
25,158
72,537
841,498

Shipments:
New Orleans............................
Savannah.................................
Stocks:
New Orleans............................
Stocks.......................................

1934

125
12
447
45
33
258
916
208,185

SUGAR MOVEMENT— (Pounds)
Raw Sugar
March 1935
Feb. 1935
Receipts:
New Orleans............................ 93,130,079
Savannah................................. 43,130,025
M eltings:
New Orleans............................ 97,241,243
Savannah................................. 13,541,731
Stocks :
New Orleans............................ 47,892,419
Savannah................................. 101,586,333

Oats

1935

22
2
425
26
10
209
694
275,425

March 1934

49,262,197
63,257,882

90,154,908
22,965,805

65,554,418
43,856,153

92,726,349
18,528,614

50,050,210
71,998,039

38,842,732
106,154,966

79,419,779
33,734,442

66,639,941
37,692,840

60,149,274
17,922,077

30,865,184
5,033,024

27,908,608
6,956,964

37,756,537
9,445,862

Refined Sugar

RICE MOVEMENT—NEW ORLEANS
March 1935

Feb. 1935

March 1934

Rough Rice—Barrels:
R e c e ip ts.................................
Shipments................................
Stocks.......................................

86,097
17,360
101,263

98,323
73,775
32,526

48,019
46,202
45,266

Clean Rice—Pockets:
Receipts...................................
Shipments................................
Stocks.......................................

40,920
32,620
145,885

94,387
102,553
137,585

74,276
64,492
174,003

R IC E M ILLERS ASSOCIATION STATISTICS
March
Receipts of Rough Rice:
Season 1934-35.....................
Season 1933-34.......................

Aug. to March

824,774
496,099

7,368,154
7 ,007 ,305

R E V IE W

Distribution of Milled Rice:
Season 1934-35.......................
Season 1933-34.......................

909,714
746,470

6,612,288
5,831,037

Rough

Stocks*

March 31, 1935.......................
March 31, 1934.......................

Clean

1,185,973
800,550

1,364,242
1,638,853

Fertilizer Sales of fertilizer tax tags in the six states
Tag Sales located wholly or partly in the Sixth District
slightly more than doubled from February to
March, and were 10.1 per cent greater than in March last
year and were the largest for any month in about four years.
In the past two years the peak of fertilizer tag sales has
come in March, while in 1932 it was in April. Forvthe eight
months, August through March, tag sales in these states have
been 10.3 per cent greater than in that part of the previous
season. Figures compared in the table are from those com­
piled by the National Fertilizer Association.
March
1935

(Short Tons)
February
1935

Alabama.......................
Florida..........................
Georgia.........................
Louisiana.....................
Mississippi...................
Tennessee....................

215,000
43,064
290,490
27,855
62,829
15,792

64,600
51,046
151,275
19,800
16,962
15,023

T o ta l................

655,030

318,706

M arch
1934
142,450
39,775
304,801
13,800
79,425
14,683

Aug. 1 to Mar. 31
1934-35
1933-34
306,550
341,649
480,393
79,056
97,751
50,849

234,050
295,292
464,094
64,828
126,600
44,184

594,934 1,356,248 1,229,048

TRADE
Retail Department store sales in the Sixth District increased
Trade from February to March by considerably more than
the usual seasonal amount, but were slightly smaller
than a year ago. Stocks on hand at the end of March were
somewhat larger than a month or a year earlier, and collec­
tions also improved over the month and were slightly better
than a year ago.
March sales by 60 reporting firms were 22.2 per cent
greater in dollar volume than in February, but 4.8 per cent
less than in March, 1934. On a daily average basis, however,
the increase over February was 18.8 per cent, and the de­
crease compared with March last year was only 1 per cent.
After adjustment for the usual seasonal trend and the chang­
ing date of Easter, which is twenty days later this year than
last, the adjusted index of department store sales increased
from 80 per cent of the 1923-25 average in February to 90.9
per cent in March, which, excepting for September last year,
is higher than for any other month since July, 1931. First
quarter sales this year by these 60 reporting department
stores were 1.6 per cent greater than in that part of 1934.
Stocks of merchandise at the end of March averaged 5.3
per cent larger than a month earlier, and 6.4 per cent greater
than a year ago, and the rate of stock turnover, although
higher than for February, was slightly below that for March
last year. The collection ratio rose from 31.3 per cent in Feb­
ruary to 34.1 per cent in March, compared with 34.0 per cent
for March, 1934. For regular accounts the March ratio was
37.2 per cent, and for installment accounts 16.9 per cent.
Percentage comparisons shown in the table are based upon
figures reported in actual dollars and make no allowance for
changes in the level of prices. Index numbers on page 8 are
based upon reports from a smaller number of firms whose
figures have been reported over a long period of years.

RETA IL TRADE IN T H E SIX TH D ISTRICT DURING MARCH 1935
Based on confidential reports from 60 department stores
C o m p a r is o n o f N e t S a l e s

C o m p a r is o n o p S t o c k s

Mar. 1935
Year to date Mar. 28, 1935
with:
with:
with:
Same month Previous Same period Same month Previous
Last Year
a year ago
M onth
Month
a year ago
............
Birmingham (6)................ ............
Chattanooga (4).............. .............
Jacksonville (3).............................

— 4.5
— 9.0
+1.4
— 2.5

Nashville (4)...................... ............
............
Other Cities (29)............... ............
D ISTRICT (60)................ . . . . . .

—
—
—
—

3.5
3.4
9.8
4. 8

+ 32.2
+ 4 1 .0
+ 42.7
+ 22.2
— 9.7
+ 4 5 .3
+ 13.8
+ 2 9.0
+ 2 2.2

+ 2.8
— 4.4
+ 1.9
+ 5.1
+ 12.1
+ 3.6
— 1.8
— 1.9
+ 1.6

+ 7.7
+10.7
+ 11.8
+ 1.9
+ 2 7 .0
— 0.4
+ 1.3
+ 5.4
+ 6.4

+ 7 .6
+ 6 .3
+ 3 .1
+ 8 .3
—8.5
+ 5 .1
+ 9 .0
+ 4 .3
+ 5 .3

C o l l e c t i o n R a t io

S tock T u rn o ver

March
1935
1934
.39
.30
.29
.20
.46
.25
.24
.27
.30

DigitizedNOTE:
for FRASER
The rate of stock turnover is the ratio of sales during given period to average stocks on hand.


.43
.36
.29
.20
.55
.28
.24
.32
.33

Jan. to Mar. Inc.
1935
1934
1.08
.78
.78
.55
1.37
.66
.68
.71
.82

1.07
.83
.80
.52
1.47
.67
.66
.78
.83

Mar.
1935

Feb.
1935

Feb.
1934

31.0
34.6
35.8

27.9
32.1
29.4

30.9
43.0
32.0

32] 4
39.1
34.3
34.1

29 .’ i
36.2
32.6
31.3

32^0
38.7
32.9
34.0

M O N T H L Y

Wholesale March sales by 95 reporting wholesale firms in
Trade
the Sixth District increased 10.7 per cent over
February, and were 1.1 per cent greater than in
March last year. First quarter sales were, however, 1.5 per
cent less than in that quarter a year ago. Gains over the
month were shown in sales by all reporting lines except sta­
tionery, and over March a year ago in sales of hardware, fur­
niture, electrical supplies, stationery and drugs. Stocks de­
clined slightly over the month but were 6.1 per cent greater
than a year ago. Comparisons of reported figures are shown
in the table.
WHOLESALE TRADE IN MARCH 1935
Sixth Federal Reserve District*
Percentage Comparisons
Number
March 1935 with: Jan.-M arch Inc.
of Firms
February
March
with same
1935
1934
period last year
All Lines Combined:
Sales..................................
Stocks...............................
Groceries:
Sales.................................
Jacksonville.............
New Orleans............
Vicksburg................
Other Cities............
Stocks...............................
Dry Goods:
Sales.................................
Nashville..................
O therC ities.............
Stocks...............................
Hardware:
Sales..................................
Nashville..................
New Orleans............
O therC ities.............
Stocks..............................
Furniture:
S ales.................................
A tlan ta.....................
O th erC ities............
Stocks..............................
Electrical Supplies:
Sales.................................
New Orleans............
Other Cities.............
Stocks..............................
Drugs:
Sales.................................
Stationery:
Sales.................................

95
29

+ 10.7
— 1.1

+1.1
+6.1

— 1.5
..........

21
3
4
3
11
3

+5.1
— 0.7
+2.9
+ 22.9
+3.5
— 4.6

— 3. 0
— 15.1
— 4.8
— 2.5
+5.8
— 0.3

— 9. 2
— 4. 0
— 5. 0

15
3
12
7

+ 14.9
+ 2 0.0
+13.3
— 0.3

— 15.5
+11.2
—21.8
— 2.4

—22.4
— 6.4
—26.2

25
3
5
18
9

+ 12.5
+29.1
+8.6
+ 11.6
— 1.5

+ 5.6
+ 23.7
— 4.1
+7.7
— 0.1

+ 1.6
+ 11.6

— 7.8
+ 4.5

9
4
5
6

+8.1
— 4.2
+ 1 2.8
+5.3

+0.5
— 7.7
+3.5
+13.1

+ 4.1
+ 1.3
+ 5.2

12
4
8
3

+ 2 8 .2
+ 13.4
+ 34.3
— 4.6

+ 46.6
+39.9
+49.1
+55.4

+26.9
+ 24.1
+28.1

8

+3.5

'+1.5

+ 4.9

3

— 3.1

+1.3

+ 5.9

COLLECTION RATIO**
March
1935

— 1.2
+ 8.1

March
1934

February
1935

Groceries................
Dry Goods............
H ardw are..............
Furniture......... ..
Electrical Supplies.
Drugs.....................

69.5
38.8
40.1
35.0
80.1
35.7

70.6
38.3
37.8
28.9
67.0
37.6

82.6
42.5
34.6
29.2
63.6
31.3

T o ta l..........

4 9 .6

4 7 .4

4 9 .0

* Based on confidential reports from 95 firms.
** The collection ratio is the percentage of accounts and notes receivable out­
standing at the beginning of the month which were collected during the month.

Life
March sales of new, paid-for, ordinary life insurInsurance ance in the six states located jvholly or partly in
the Sixth District were about the same as in
February, and 3.7 per cent less than in March, 1934. At the
same time last year there was an increase from February to
March amounting to 17.2 per cent. For the first quarter of
the year, however, total sales have been 16 per cent greater
than in that part of 1934. Comparisons for the month, and
for the quarter, for these six states are shown in the table.
The figures are from those compiled by the Life Insurance
Sales Research Bureau.
March
1935

(000 Omitted)
February March
January-M arch Inc.
1935
1934
1935
1934

Alabam a. . . .
Florida.........
Georgia........
Louisiana---Mississippi. .
Tennessee. . .

$ 3,994
4,730
6,425
4,570
2,466
5,390

$ 4,372
4,937
6,073
4,764
1,917
5,464

$ 3,850
4,642
6,549
4,653
2,561
6,383

T o ta l........
United States.

27,575
545,450

27,527
533,784

28,638
570,835




$

12,587
14,539
20,440
16,556
6,893
18,100
89,115
1,724,568

$

Percent
Change

10,030
12,471
18,498
11,674
6,579
17,544

+ 25.5
+ 16.6
+ 10.5
+ 4 1 .8
+ 4.8
+ 3.2

76,796
1,514,125

+ 16.0
+ 13.9

5

R E V IE W

COMMERCIAL FAILURES
(From statistics compiled by Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.)
Sixth District
United States
Number
Liabilities
Number
Liabilities
March 1935.....................
February 1935................
March 1934.....................
January-M arch 1935.. .
January-M arch 1934... .

28
33
33
94
108

$

245,594
248,054
569,978
697,188
1,735,280

976 $ 18,522,840
1,005
18,737,657
1,102
27,227,511
3,165
56,084,194
3,515
79,577,657

INDUSTRY
Building
The total value of buildings for which permits
and
were issued during March at twenty reporting
Construction cities in the Sixth District increased 38.1 per
cent over February, and was 64.1 per cent
greater than for March, 1934. The March total is the largest
for any month since January last year, and except for that
month since October, 1932. Fifteen cities reported gains over
February, and seventeen reported increases over March last
year. The combined total for the first three months of 1935
is 4 per cent larger than for that quarter in 1934, nearly
three times that in the first quarter of 1933, and the largest
first quarter total since 1930. Comparisons for the month are
shown in the table.
BUILDING PER M ITS
Number
Value
March
March
1935
1934
1935
1934
Alabama
Aniston..................
Birmingham..........
Mobile....................
Montgomery.........
Florida
Jacksonville...........
M iami....................
Miami Beach........
Orlando..................
T am pa....................
Georgia
A tlanta..................
Augusta..................
Columbus..............
Macon....................
Savannah...............
Louisiana
New Orleans..........
Alexandria.............
Tennessee
Chattanooga..........
Johnson C ity ........
Knoxville...............
Nashville................
Total 20 Cities. . . .

39
455
41
122

10 $ 15,535
120 700,592
28
23,275
33,372
131

600
409
47
62
194

497
286
55
64
179

253
33
117
136
25

3,665
72,618
78,489
27,117

+ 323.9
+864.8
— 70.3
+ 23. 1

181,223
256,283
346,035
34,959
38,529

159,590
111,998
516,050
14,547
23,952

+ 13.6
+ 128.8
— 32.9
+ 140.3
+ 60.9

199
37
60
130
19

187,659
19,708
62,264
32,257
13,437

124,793
8,421
14,311
31,178
5,750

+ 50.4
+ 134.0
+335.1
+ 3.5
+ 133.7

79
8

76
67

148,222
16,052

63,855
12,630

+ 132.1
+ 27.1

227
5
51
138

188
2
37
107

52,706
2,000
230,248
138,758

49,798
2,300
86,407
136,356

+ 5.8
— 13.0
+ 166.5
+ 1.8

2 ,239$2,533,144$1,543,825

+ 64.1

3,041

$

Percentage
Change in
Value

The value of building and construction contracts awarded
in the Sixth District, indicated in statistics compiled by the
F. W. Dodge Corporation and subdivided into District totals
by the Federal Reserve Board’s Division of Research and Sta­
tistics, increased 46.9 per cent from February to March, and
was larger than for any other month since April last y^ar,
but was 37 per cent less than in March, 1934. Residential
awards in the District in March were two and one-half times
the total for February and considerably more than double
those in March last year. The total of residential awards in
March was larger than for any other month since May, 1930.
Other classes of contracts increased 20 per cent from Febru­
ary to March, but were smaller than a year ago by 54.8 per
cent.
For the first quarter of 1935, residential contract awards
exceeded those in that part of last year by 102.6 per cent, but
other awards were smaller by 40.7 per cent, and the total of
all contracts was 47.7 per cent less than in the first three
months of 1934.
State totals for March increased over February, except for
Alabama, but were less than a year ago except for Tennessee.
For the first quarter all six states showed declines compared
with the first quarter last year.
Total awards in the 37 states east of the Rocky Mountains
increased 64 per cent from February to March, residential
awards 93.8 per cent, non-residential awards 45.6 per cent,
and those for public works and utilities 66.3 per cent. Com­
pared with a year ago, however, residential awards were 14.7
per cent greater, but other classes were less, and the total
was smaller by 31 per cent. Comparisons for the month are
shown in the table.

6

M O N T H L Y

BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION
March 1935
Sixth District—T o tal................ $ 12,780,069
Residential..............................
4,486,748
All Others................................
8,293,321
State Totals:
Alabama..................................
Florida.....................................
Georgia....................................
Louisiana.................................
Mississippi...............................
Tennessee................................

712,100
1,932,400
4,651,400
4,215,100
852,700
2,408,700

United States (37 Eastern States)
T o ta l........................................ 123,043,500
Residential.............................. 32,207,400
Non-Residential...................... 44,581,600
Public Works and Utilities.. . 46,254,500

CONTRACTS AWARDED
Feb. 1935
March 1934
$

8,701,970 $ 20,291,594
1,788,259
1,929,310
6,913,711
18,362,284
1,705,200
1,643,900
1,626,500
3,546,300
631,700
1,178,500
75,047,100
16,616,800
20,612,800
27 ,817 ,500

846,700
5,374,700
5,527,900
8,310,100
2,155,800
1,866,900
178,345,800
28,076,100
57,329,100
92,940,600

Lumber Weekly statements of the Southern Pine Association
and press reports indicate some improvement dur­
ing the latter half of March in the demand for lumber, and
in shipments. During the six weeks ending April 6, orders
booked by reporting mills averaged 13.5 per cent greater
than during the same period a year ago, and production was
4.3 per cent larger, but unfilled orders averaged 21.3 per cent
less. During this six weeks period orders averaged 9.8 per
cent greater than production, while at the same time last
year they were less than one per cent larger. Weekly figures
compared in the table are from those compiled by the Sou­
thern Pine Association.
Week
Ended

Number
of Mills

March 2 ....... ......144
March 9 ....... ......145
March 1 6 ....
149
March 2 3 ....
157
March 3 0 ....
140
April 6 ............... 146

(In Thousands of Feet)
Orders
Production
1935
1934
1935
1934
29,393
19,397
22,198
31,349
24,624
26,074

18,570
20,660
22,848
33,899
23,760
15,147

22,480
21,647
22,665
26,272
22,862
23,485

20,736
20,123
24,617
25,459
19,562
23,122

Unfilled Orders
1935
1934
55,300
54,746
60,540
54,374
54,178
57,513

68,425
60,158
71,621
90,117
75,407
75,998

Cotton
Total consumption of cotton by American mills
Consumption increased only slightly from February to
March, and because of the difference in the
number of working days, daily average consumption declined
7.1 per cent. March consumption was 11.7 per cent less than
a year ago, and smaller than for that month of any year
since 1921. In the cotton growing states March consumption
increased 2 per cent in total, but declined 5.9 per cent in daily
average from February, and was 9.9 per cent less than a year
ago, and in other states total consumption declined 4.8 per
cent, and daily average 12.1 per cent from February, and was
18.6 per cent less than in March, 1934. Cumulative totals for
the eight months, August through March, indicate the con­
sumption in the United States of 3,634,027 bales, a decline of
7.9 per cent compared with that part of the previous season.
In the cotton states the decrease for this seven months period
wag 7.5 per cent, and in other states 9.5 per cent.
Exports of cotton from the United States in March were
18.6 per cent less than in February and 42.,2 per cent less
than a year ago, and the smallest for March since 1918. For
the eight months of the season exports have been 41.4 per
cent less than in that part of the season before.
Census Bureau figures for the month are compared in the
table.
COTTON CONSUMPTION, EXPORTS, STOCKS AND ACTIVE SPINDLES
U N ITED STATES—Bales
Mar. 1935
Feb. 1935
Mar. 1934
Cotton Consumed......................
Stocks...........................................
In Consuming Establishments
In Public Storage and at
Compresses..........................
E xports........................................
Digitized
for Spindles—N
FRASER um ber........
Active



481,135
8,901,975
1,117,069

478,291
9,534,186
1,161,117

544,870
9,499,269
1,650,908

7,784,906
317,798
24,571,314

8,373,059
390,294
24,925,168

7,848,361
550,104
26,525,454

R E V IE W

COTTON GROWING STATES—Bales
Cotton Consumed......................
Stocks...........................................
In Consuming Establishments
In Public Storage and at
Compresses..........................
Active Spindles—N um ber........

388,134
8,460,466
875,237

380,643
9,094,697
927,792

430,552
8,778.441
1,280,351

7,585,229
17 ,274,884

8,166,905
17 ,436,902

7,498,090
17,964,358

OTHER STATES—Bales
Cotton Consumed.................... ..
Stocks...........................................
In Consuming Establishments
In Public Storage and at
Compresses..........................
Active Spindles—N um ber........

93,001
441,509
241,832

97,648
439,489
233,325

114,318
720,828
370,557

199,677
7,296,430

206,164
7,488,266

350,271
8,561,096

Consumption of cotton in the three states of this District
for which separate figures are available increased 3.7 per
cent from February to March, but was 12.5 per cent less than
a year ago, but on a daily average basis March consumption
was 4.3 per cent less than in February and 9.1 per cent less
than in March, 1934. For the eight months of the season,
August through March, consumption in these states was 11.3
per cent less than in that part of the season before. Census
Bureau figures for these states are compared in the table.
COTTON CONSUMPTION—Bales
March
February March
Aug. 1 to M arch 31
1935
1935
1934
1934-35
1933-34
Alabama......................
Georgia........................
Tennessee....................

51,940
85,620
10,243

48,623
83,339
10,609

55,242
101,951
11,711

363,903
630,940
82,127

400,848
732,358
80,579

T o ta l................

147,803

142,571

168,904

1,076,970

1,213,785

Cotton
Production at reporting cloth and yarn mills
Manufacturing in this District increased somewhat in March
over February and was also larger than a
year ago, but orders booked by these mills declined substan­
tially compared with both of those comparative periods. Em­
ployment averaged 1.8 per cent greater in March than in
February, but was 4.6 per cent less than a year ago. Reported
figures are compared in the table.
Cloth
Mar. 1935 compared
with:
Feb. 1935
Mar. 1934

Unfilled Orders.......
Stocks on H a n d .. . .
Number on payroll.

+ 9.5
+ 3.5
—39.8
— 11.7
+ 3.4
+ 1.9

+ 4.0
— 10.5
—20.1
—29.9
+ 4 6 .6
— 4.6

Yarn
Mar. 1935 compared
with:
Feb. 1935
Mar. 1934
+ 9.8
+ 10.1
—57.0
—38.5
— 11.5
+ 1.7

+ 7.2
+ 15.5
—43.0
— 6.1
+ 26.7
— 4.6

Cotton Seed
Receipts of seed at cotton seed oil mills in
and Cotton Seed this District declined from February to
Products
March, but crushings increased slightly be­
cause of the longer month. For the eight
months of the season, receipts and crushings, and production
of the principal cotton seed products continue to be larger
than for the same part of last season. Stocks of crude oil
were smaller, but stocks of other principal products larger,
at the close of March than a year ago. For the country as a
whole, however, receipts, crushings and production have been
smaller, but stocks, except of crude oil, larger, than a year
ago. In the first two columns of the table are compared com­
bined totals for Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi,
and in the last two columns are totals for the country as a
whole. The figures are from those compiled by the United
States Census Bureau.

M O N T H L Y

Sixth District*
Aug. 1 to Mar. 31
1934-35
1933-34
Cotton Seed, Tons:
Received a t M ills... 1,297,944
Crushed.................... 1,161,403
On Hand Mar. 31. .
204,473
Production:
Crude Oil, L bs........ 375,349,731
Cake & Meal, tons..
508,221
308,330
Hulls, to n s...............
Linters, Bales..........
252,426
Stocks a t Mills Mar. 31:
Crude Oil, L bs........ 13,226,203
Cake & Meal, tons..
122,047
Hulls, to n s...............
54,139
Linters, Bales..........
52,337

United States
Aug. 1
1934-35

to Mar. 31
1933-34

3,319,314
3,180,486
361,489

3,962,029
3,678,319
504,131

313,021,622 987,854,903
419,801
1,444,513
263,991
821,179
186,608
712,844

1,143,337,767
1,666,148
979,385
694,024

1,145,387
965,327
208,830

27,120,180
83,829
16,194
43,706

42,326,106
311,279
157,561
178,312

111, 365,263
265,348
77,174
144,608

* Georgia, Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Electric Because of the shorter month, there was a decline
Power of 5.8 per cent in the production of electric power
for public use in the six states located wholly or
partly in the Sixth District from January to February, but
February production was 14.9 per cent greater than in that
month a year ago. On a daily average basis, however, Feb­
ruary production was 4.3 per cent greater than in January.
Production by use of water power accounted for 66.3 per cent
of the total in February, 67.1 per cent in January, and 52 per
cent in February, 1934. For the first two months of 1935
total production has been 15.3 per cent greater than in that
period a year ago. Figures compared in the table are from
those compiled by the United States Geological Survey.
PRODUCTION OF E LE C TR IC POWER (000 k. w. Hours)
Feb. 1935
Jan. 1935
Feb. 1934
Alabam a......................................
Florida..........................................
Georgia........................................
Louisiana.....................................
Mississippi...................................
Tennessee....................................

174,425
60,621
96,766
88,797
3,833
103,421

180,920
62,963
103,619
88,348
4,598
120,002

165,492
61,167
67,335
97,107
3,855
64,261

T o ta l................................

527,863

560,450

459,217

By use of : W ater Power...........
Fuels.........................
Fuels consumed in production
of Electric Power:
Coal—Tons.............................
Fuel Oil—Tons.......................
N atural Gas—000 cu. ft........

350,177
177,686

376,174
184,276

238,679
220,538

11,645
206,488
1,775,898

11,933
220,815
1,867,754

28,179
211,818
2,011,666

Bituminous
Coal Mining

Preliminary figures compiled by the United
States Bureau of Mines indicate that total pro­
duction of bituminous coal in the United States
increased 12.9 per cent from February to March, and was 1
per cent greater than in March last year. March was, how­
ever, 8.8 per cent longer in number of working days than Feburary, but 3.7 per cent shorter than March, 1934, so that daily
average production increased 3.8 per cent over the month, and
was 4.8 per cent greater than a year ago. For the first quar­
ter of 1935 total production was 5 per cent greater than in
that part of 1934. Preliminary figures for the month are
compared in the table.
Production—Tons
Total
Daily Average
March 1935 .................................
38,848,000
February 1935 ............................
34,423,000
March 1934 .................................
38,470,000
January-M arch 1935................. 109,664,000
January-M arch 1934................. 104,447,000

Pig Iron
Production

Number of
Working Days

1,494,000
26
1,440,000
23.9
1,425,000
27
............... ................ . . .
............... ................ . . .

Statistics compiled and published by the Iron
Age indicate that total production of pig iron in
the United States increased 10 per cent from
February to March, and was 9.3 per cent greater than in
March, 1934. Because of the longer month, however, the
daily average rate declined 0.6 per cent from February to
March. There was an increase of two in the number of active
furnaces
at the end of March, over a month earlier.



7

R E V IE W

In Alabama March production of pig iron increased 35.4
per cent in total and 22.3 per cent in daily average, over Feb­
ruary, to the highest level since June last year, but was 4.1
per cent less than in March a year ago. The number of Ala­
bama furnaces increased from 8 to 9, at the close of March,
compared with 10 active a year ago. March shipments are re­
ported slightly larger than in February. Press reports indi­
cate that jobbers and consumers are buying only in limited
quantities for early requirements. The quotation continues at
$14.50 per ton. Reports indicate an active market for sheets
and wire products. Pressure pipe orders have increased some­
what in early April.
In the first quarter of 1935, production of pig iron in the
United States was 18.5 per cent greater than in that part of
1934, nearly three times the output in the first quarter of
1933, and 67.2 per cent greater than in the same part of 1932,
and in Alabama first quarter production this year has been
21.7 per cent less than a year ago, 241.9 per cent greater than
two years ago, and 11.7 per cent greater than three years
ago. Production figures are compared in the table.
Production—Tons
Total
Daily Average
United States:
March 1935.......................
February 1935..................
September 1934................
March 1934.......................
January-M arch 1935. . . . . . .
January-M arch 1934. . . . ..
Alabama:
March 1935.......................
February 1935..................
September 1934................
March 1934.......................
January-M arch 1935.......
January-M arch 1934.......

Furnaces
Active*

1,770,028
1,608,552
898,043
1,619,534
4,855,916
4,098,433

57,098
57,448
29,935
52,243

98
96
62
96

119,918
88,539
57,842
125,020
277,995
354,869

3,868
3,162
1,928
4,033

9
8
5
10

* First of following month.

Naval March receipts and stocks of both turpentine and
Stores rosin at the three principal markets of the District
increased somewhat over those for February, and
were also larger than for March last year. Press reports indi­
cate that the new crop is moving to market freely and in
heavier volume €han a year ago. Quotations on the Savannah
market for turpentine declined from 50% cents per gallon on
March 9 to 46% cents on April 6, but rose to 48^4 cents a
week later, and the average of quotations on the thirteen
grades of rosin declined from $4.94 per 280 pounds on March
9 to $4.63 on April 6, and increased to $4.71 on April 13.
Receipts of both commodities were somewhat smaller for the
Naval Stores year, ending March 31, than in the previous
season. Receipts and stocks at the three principal markets
for the past nineteen years are shown in the table.
Turpentine (1)
Receipts
Stocks

Season:
1934-35................ ..........
.

242,489
258,208

1931-32................ ..........
1930-31................ ..........

328,099
385,093

1928-29................ ..........

343,130

..........
..........

310,883
286,035

1923-24............................
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........

318,683
266,629
253,712
262,426
184,876
152,828
276,413
315,744

(1)
(2)

Barrels of 50 Gallons.
Barrels of 500 Pounds.

88,081
46,010
63,679
73,640
45,232
40,068
48,396
40,338
24,668
26,866
22,831
23,487
14,592
19,280
29,299
4,819
99,500
139,466
109,640

Rosin (2)
Receipts
Stocks
974,922
1,009,402
865,733
1,182,780
1,319,212
1,396,212
1,214,228
1,401,374
1,108,452
1,019,371
1,136,219
1,150,998
1,013,062
850,578
829,198
671,241
557,076
962,418
1,115,879

255,622
142,574
237,350
347,591
266,056
149,232
100,722
123,074
81,013
117,182
174,197
226,775
222,501
282,428
301,972
103,443
243,813
345,547
353,507

8

M O N T H L Y

R E V IE W

MONTHLY INDEX NUMBERS COMPUTED BY FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA
MONTHLY AVERAGE 1923-1928=100
Jan .
1935

Feb.
1935

M arch
1935

Jan.
1934

Feb.
1934

111.9
45.2
55.1
53.3
51.6
60.5

129.9
55.1
55.4
60.5
62.0
70.4

162.9

104.5
46.2
53.4
47.0
53.1
58.7

121.2

73.0
81.1
65.1
83.6

149.2
62.8
69.7
71.1
61.4
76.6

152.9
61.2
70.1
•71.2
70.5
80.0

175.2
72.2
82.0
90.1
72.3
90.9

139.3
64.2
67.6
62.7
63.2
74.3

142.6
65.3
69.2
67.1
69.7
77.7

167.7
68.5
72.9
84.3
67.6

79.9
41.8
42.6
56.7
48.3
53.6

88.4
46.2
48.8
62.1
54.8
59.5

97.4
47.2
50.3
65.3
59.7
63.5

73.1
39.2
38.0
52.6
52.7
51.6

84.2
39.5
43.8
57.4
55.9
55.9

90.2
37.4
45.0
65.5
58.9
58.7

86.8
46.4
47.9
65.2
53.1
58.9

92.1
48.1
50.3
65.4
54.8
60.7

95.5
46.3
47.5
64.0
57.4
81.7

79.5
43.8
42.7
60.5
57.9
56.7

87.7
41.1
45.2
60.4
55.9
57.0

88.4
36.7
42.5
64.2
56.6
57.0

Stationery (3 firms)............................................................................
Drugs (8 firms)...................................................................................

56.2
52.8
47.5
61.2
46.1
55.7
41.9
83.9

55.2
50.4
52.1
54.2
52.6
71.4
40.7
79.2

61.1
52.9
59.8
61.0
56.8
91.6
39.4
82.0

59.0
51.5
70.0
64.1
38.6
55.9
36.2
79.0

54.9
50.4
64.5
51.5
54.1
55.3
40.0
73.9

60.0
53.6
70.8
57.6
56.6
63.1
38.9
80.9

LIFE INSURANCE SALES—SIX S T A T E S -T O T A L ........
Alabama..............................................................................................
Florida............................. ..................................................................

81.0
62.2
82.3

65.6
64.5
83.4

Louisiana.............................................................................................
Mississippi...........................................................................................
Tennessee............................................................................................

86.6

66.2

114.0
57.4
77.0

75.2
43.8
58.1

65.7
58.9
79.9
70.1
72.1
56.4
57.3

57.7
47.5
59.2
62.8
61.2
46.1
57.7

57.7
47.6
73.1
67.5
49.6
45.8
58.5

67.6
52.8
78.4
71.4
73.4
58.6
67.8

BUILDING PER M ITS—TWENTY C IT IE S............................
A tlanta................................................................................................
Birmingham........................................................................................

14.9
6.9
9.6
24.4
8.7
10.5
18.9

16.3
19.4
7.3

22.5

23.3
38.8

9.5
19.8

47.3
31.1
21.9
11.5
21.5

34.3
50.3
2.4
24.7

14.6
20.9
4.8
31.8

13.7

12.1

32.9
27.9
36.2

24.8
12.7
32.8

36.4
32.0
39.4

14.5
137.9

78.8
77.6
79.9
77.7

79.5
79.1
82.7
77.4

79.3
78.3
81.9
77.3
85.4
69.4
72.9
85.7
84.9
81.5
80.7
69.2

72.2
58.7
64.3
78.3
89.5
76.5
73.1
85.5
86.3
74.4
80.8
67.5

93.4
113.4
53.9
109.9
151.1
102.9

98.6
118.7
58.9
120.7
151.4
98.0

92.6
109.6
59.1
113.6
142.9

DEPARTM ENT STORE TRADE—SIX TH D ISTR IC T
Daily Average Sales—U n a d ju ste d
Atlanta (3 firms).................................................................................
Birmingham (4 firms)........................................................................
Nashville (4 firms)..............................................................................
D ISTRICT (34 firms).......................................................................

68.6

58.8
54.7
57.0
61.3
68.4

M arch
1934

168.0
69.2
69.3
80.9
64.9
84.4

Daily Average Sales—A djusted*
Atlanta (3 firms).............................. ................................................
Birmingham (4 firms)........................................................................
Chattanooga (4 firms).......................................................................
Nashville (4 firms)............................. ................................................
New Orleans (5 firms).......................................................................
D ISTRICT (34 firms).......................................................................

86.1

M o n th ly S tocks—U n ad ju sted
Atlanta (3 firms)................................................................................
Birmingham (3 firms)...................................................................... .
Chattanooga (3 firms).......................................................................
Nashville (4 firms)............. ...............................................................
New Orleans (4 firms).......................................................................
DISTRICT (27 firms).......................................................................
M o n th ly Stocks—A djusted*
Atlanta (3 firms). . ............................................................................
Birmingham (3 firms)........................................................................
Chattanooga (3 firms).......................................................................
Nashville (4 firms).............................................................................
New Orleans (4 firms).......................................................................
DISTRICT (27 firms) .....................................................................
WHOLESALE TRADE—SIX TH DISTRICT—TOTAL........
Dry Goods (15 firms)........................................................................
Furniture (9 firms).............................................................................

New Orleans........................................................................................
Fifteen Other Cities...........................................................................
CONTRACT AWARDS—SIX TH DISTRICT—TO TA L. . . .

WHOLESALE PRICES—UNITED STATES f
ALL COM M ODITIES....................................................................
Foods...................................................................................................
Other Commodities............................................................................
Hides and leather products......................................................
Textile products.........................................................................
Fuel and lighting........................................................................
Metals and metal products......................................................
Chemicals and drugs..................................................................
Housefumishing goods..............................................................
Miscellaneous..............................................................................

20.2
8.0

86.2

86.0

70.3
72.9
85.8
84.9
79.3
81.2
70.7

70.1
72.5
85.8
85.0
80.4
80.7
70.1
92.9

2.1

88.8

8.1

4.0
16.0

4.9
19.4
21.5
5.0
18.0

33.4
7.8
50.6

57.8
13.8
87.2

73.6
61.3
68.7
78.7
89.8
76.9
72.4
87.0

73.7
61.3
67.3
78.5
88.7
76.5
71.4
87.1
86.4
75.7
81.4 '
69.3

10.0

86.6
75.5
81.0
68.5

105.8
125.7

COTTON CONSUMPTION—UNITED STATES...................
Cotton-Growing States......................................................................
All Other States..................................................................................
Georgia........................................................................................
Alabama............................ . .......................................................
Tennessee....................................................................................

106.2
127.4
64.1
124.5
157.9

121.6

56.6
106.9
141.4
106.6

100.0

130.8
160.7
117.7

COTTON EX PO RTS—UNITED STA TES...............................

90.7

76.0

61.9

144.0

122.4

107.1

PIG IRON PRODUCTION—United S tates..............................
Alabama......................................

49.5
29.9

53.8
38.1

59.2
51.6

40.7
50.2

42.3
48.7

54.2
53.8

♦Adjusted for Seasonal Variation.




fCompiled by Bureau of Labor Statistics.

111.2

1926-100.

66.2