View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY

REVIEW

of Financial and Business Conditions

wmm

‘ ✓

\

If

R ich m on d * - o

F ifth

Reserve

va.

Federal

...... ' 4

D is t r ic t

Federal Reserve Bank, Richmond 13, Va.______________ __________________ November 30, 1946

Business Conditions
TDRICE controls were removed on most commodities
remaining under control on November 9th and the
business operators in the Fifth District, like those in the
nation, are still feeling their way cautiously in the tran­
sition period to free market prices. Farm and food prices
have shown the greatest rise nationally, but cotton prices
are not far from where they were at the end of June while
tobacco prices, though moderately above last year, have
been trending lower' These are the two important crops
in the Fifth District.
Although overall textile prices had risen 20 percent be­
tween the end of June and November 9th, there has been
a strong effort made by mails and selling agents to hold
the prices of cotton goods at the last ceiling levels and
with cotton prices showing some semblance of stabilization
just above the 30 cent level it is possible that the line
might be held since the late ceiling prices were based on
cotton around 36 cents a pound. Cotton goods prices are
more than 60 percent higher than in 1926 and while the
general price level may hold for some years well above

the 1926 level, it is problematical whether cotton goods can
remain at present levels for an equal period of time.
The price structure even after the recent sharp rise in
selected prices is still under upward pressure, and in many
quarters, it is badly out of balance. Announcements of
rises in manufactured products prices are forthcoming
almost daily, but even so the relative level of manufactured
products prices is low in comparison with the price level
in general. Rises in prices of those products importantly
produced in the Fifth District include rayon and manu­
factures, underwear and hosiery, but these rises may be
expected to stimulate production of these goods. Lumber
prices are well above late ceilings, but reports indicate
they are lower than previous black market levels. Lumber
production, furthermore, is rising quite rapidly and this
may very well put a damper on further increases.
The price level is an important consideration in ap­
praising the outlook for the business level of this District.
While cotton goods and lumber prices seem high by com­
parison and in relation to other manufactured products,

BUSINESS IN DEXES—FIFTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
Average Daily 1935-39=100
Seasonally Adjusted

Bank Debits ............................................................. ......................
Bituminous Coal Production*................................ .....................
Building Contracts Awarded.................................. ......................
Building Permits Issued.......................................... ......................
Cigarette Production................................................ .....................
Cotton Consumption ................................................ .....................
Department Store Sales............................................ .....................
Department Store Stocks...................... .... :.......... . ....................
Furniture Sales— Retail .......................................... .....................
Life Insurance Sales................................................ ....................
Wholesale Trade:
Automotive Supplies** ........................................ ..................
Drugs ..................................................................... ...................
Dry Goods............................................................. ...................
Electrical Goods**................................................ ..................
Groceries ............................................................... .................
Hardware ............................................................. ...................
Industrial Supplies** .......................................... ................
Paper and Its Products**.................................... ...................
Tobacco and Its Products**................................ ......................
*Not seasonally adjusted
**1938-41 = 100




Oct.
1946
278
143
259
192
255
161
285
274
266
263

Sept.
1946
303
153
261
211
234
154
298
262
267
265

304
284
230
58
285
114
286
174
124

286
282
221
54
267
116
275
181
111

Aug.
1946______
298
151r
348r
175
229
154
306r
259
212
272
251
260
193
43
249
122
253
126
107

Oct.
1945
222
90
206
160
222
134
251r
196
193
178
182
248
165
39
215
85
139
120
98

% Change
Oct. 1946 from
Sept. 46
Oct. 45
_ 8
. + 25
— 7
+ 59
— 1
+ 26
— 9
-f 20
9
+ 15
+
5
+ 20
+
— 4
-f 14
5
+ 40
■+
0
+ 38
— 1
-f 48
6
1
4
7
7
2
4
+
— 4
+ 12
+
+
+
+
+

4- 67
+ 15
+ 39
+ 49
+ 33
+ 34
+ 106
+ 45
+ 27

2

MONTHLY REVIEW

they have not as yet shown indication of reducing the
level of demand for these products. There have, how­
ever, been numerous indications of an unwillingness on
the part of many consumers to continue purchasing poor
quality merchandise.
Thus far in 1946 current business indicators of the
District have continued to mirror a rising trend, though
it must be pointed out that sales of Department stores
have risen at a rate that certainly cannot be sustained
much longer. This does not mean, however, that trade
levels must necessarily fall but that their rate of expansion
may tend to flatten out. Department store sales in this
District in both September and October failed to rise by
normal seasonal proportions and the adjusted index fell
moderately from the summer peak.
In some lines of wholesale trade such as hardware,
automotive, industrial and electrical supplies, the pipe
lines are far from filled, and at the same time little has
been done in the way of filling the existing consumer
demand for these products.
Textiles: The output o f cotton textiles .in the Fifth
District, as measured by cotton consumption, is still in a
rising trend; the October level of consumption after
seasonal correction was 5 percent above September and
20 percent ahead of October last year. Cotton mills of
the District continue to improve their employment levels,
and further acquisitions of workers may witness the addi­
tion of third shifts. In this period of transition from
controlled to free prices, there has been considerable
hesitancy on the part of mills to sell goods for delivery
beyond the first quarter of next year, but some mills are
selling through June at the late ceiling prices and there
are some indications that such selling might broaden if
some of the tension can be relieved in the spot market for
goods and yarn. Mill stocks o f finished goods are no
more than one to two weeks supply.
Coal: The bituminous coal outlook is not good as of
the 23rd of November, and while it should not necessarily
be expected that a work stoppage would last for any con­
siderable period of time, a shutdown of a few weeks will
cause considerable slackening in industrial activity through­
out the country. The cotton textile industry of this
District, however, would not be badly affected by a coal
strike unless it was of long duration, since much of the
industry derives it’s power from hydro-electric installa­
tions. Transportation, however, would be quickly af­
fected by the coal strike and reduce business activity of
the District all along the line, and particularly hamper the
movement of goods for the Christmas trade.
Construction: It is noted in some quarters that can­
cellations of some construction contracts for industrial




buildings have taken place. This could happen in con­
siderable volume without materially affecting the level of
on site activity since contract awards were large and the
near prospect of their being placed under construction
rather small. Furthermore, the supply of building mate­
rials is still woefully short, and the need for industrial
capacity pressing; while at the same time priority is given
to residential building. It would be very surprising,
therefore, if contract cancellation would be large enough
to reduce on site activity in the construction industry in
the immediate future. Building permits in the Fifth
District continue to hold at a high level, while the contract
awards have declined notably from the spring peak. Some
of this decrease in contract awards is no doubt due to the
inability to secure permission to build and to the avoid­
ance of costs arising from delays in completion of struc­
tures.
Cigarettes: Production of cigarettes in the third quar­
ter of 1946 was 3 percent below the second quarter output
but 14 percent higher than in the third quarter of 1945.
Since July our seasonally adjusted index of cigarette out­
put has been rising, but the three months average JulySeptember is below the level of the previous three months.
Production in October, however, established a new high
record, and our seasonally adjusted index returned to the
peak reached in May.
Furniture: The large potential requirements for house­
hold furniture are finding reflection in a rising level of
shipments of respondents to the Southern Furniture Manu­
facturers’ Association. Although orders booked in sub­
sequent months have not equaled the June peak, unfilled
orders are still at an unusually high level and point to
continued high level of furniture production.
Lumber: Rising requirements for lumber together
with a low level of mill and yard stocks has given impetus
to the production of lumber. The mills of the Fifth
District have been more successful in expanding their
output than have the mills in the nation as a whole. In
the first eight months of 1946, Fifth District miills pro­
duced 3,619 million board feet of lumber which amount
exceeded the output in the same months last year by 36
percent. This compares with a gain of 12 percent for
the nation. The Fifth District accounted for 16.2 per­
cent of the Nation’s output in the first eight months of
1946 compared with 13.2 percent in a like period of 1945.
Taken all together the factors in the business outlook,
baring a prolonged coal strike, appear to point toward
some further expansion, although the sharp rise in com­
modity prices is bound to have many disturbing effects
and may lead sooner or later to some recession in business.

MONTHLY REVIEW

3

American Cotton Exports1
Exports of American cotton are expected to total 3.0
million running bales this season, the year beginning
August L Last season exports totaled 3.5 million bales.
That level was the highest since 1939, but otherwise the
lowest since the early 1880’s. In examining the export
prospects for American cotton in the years ahead it is
helpful to review the history o f our exports; also, to note
some o f the forces that have affected exports of cotton in
years past.
It is an oft-told story how cotton used to be the leading
export product of the United States, and how it was
largely responsible for the “ favorable” balance of pay­
ments which serviced our foreign obligations during the
years before World War I. In 1790, three years before
Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin, only 379 bales
(equivalent 500 lbs. gross weight) of cotton were ex­
ported. The first year in which exports exceeded 100,000
bales was 1806. Twenty years later they first exceeded
500,000 bales, and in 1837 they pushed above the 1 million
bale mark. Exports first exceeded 2 million bales in 1848
and in 1859 they reached the pre-Civil War High of 3.5 mil­
lion bales. This level was not again attained until 1879. Ex­
ports exceeded 4 million bales in both 1880 and 1882, but
beginning in 1885 and running through 1937-38, a period
of 53 years, exports held above 4 million bales in all years
and in both 1911 and 1926 totaled nearly 11 million bales.
American cotton exports ranged between 62 and 72
per cent of production every year from 1869 through 1913,
a period of 45 years. During the 20 years 1914-33 in­
clusive, exports equalled or exceeded 62 per cent in only
3 years and fell below 50 per cent on 5 occasions. In the
12 years since 1933, exports were between 50 per cent and
60 per cent in 3 seasons, between 25 per cent and 50 per
cent in 4 seasons and under 25 per cent in 5 seasons.
Against the background of such a high level o f exports,
it is not surprising that the falling-off of exports in 193839 to the lowest level in more than half a century caused
FiG. I
COTTON* EXPORTS FROM UNITED STATES AS A PERCENTAGE OF
WORLD TOTAL EXPORTS, 1920-1945

considerable alarm in cotton circles. Looking backward,
however, it is evident that the export position of American
cotton was weakening; in fact, it had been weakening for




quite some time. During the 5 years 1909-13 American
cotton comprised 69 per cent of the cotton entering inter­
national trade. This was higher than the percentage in
any post World War I year. From Figure 1 it is seen
that the U. S. accounted for only 48 per cent of the world
exports of raw cotton in 1922. This was mainly because
of the restricted U. S. production which was occasioned
largely by boll weevil damage. However, with this ex­
ception, exports of cotton from the U. S. accounted for
from 52 to 68 per cent of the world total from 1920
through 1933. From 1934 through 1945, the latest year
for which complete data are available, American exports
comprised from 17 to 49 per cent of the world total, the
higher level having occurred in 1939 when the exportation
of American cotton was first aided with an export subsidy
program.
Before the Civil War, foreign spinners were so com­
pletely dependent on American cotton that the falling-off
of cotton exports during the war wrought real hardship in
many areas. Under the stimulus of exceedingly high prices
foreign production expanded very materially. Even after
U. S. cotton again re-entered world trade these new pro­
ducers found cotton a profitable enterprise and were re­
luctant to give up all of their increased production.
Importing countries favored expanded production out­
side the U. S. as a means o f avoiding repetition of the
catastrophe which resulted from the cutting-off of U. S.
exports. For many years the efforts of foreign spinning
interests to promote cotton production outside the U. S.
and thus lessen their dependence on any one source met
with only moderate success. Following World War I,
however, these efforts coupled with the fostering of cotton
production by the Governments of many agricultural coun­
tries resulted in a marked expansion of foreign cotton
production. One reason their efforts met with such sue
cess was the abnormally high price of American cotton
which in turn was attributable to the reduction in the size
of the American crop caused by the boll weevil.
In some foreign countries this expansion in cotton pro­
duction was accompanied by an increase in their domestic
cotton textile production. Except in so far as total
cotton textile consumption increased in these countries,
their increased domestic textile production either reduced
the export outlets for textiles of countries such as the
U. K. or increased the quantity of cotton textiles avail­
able for export in competition with textiles from raw
cotton importing countries. This type of development
was one of the factors which contributed to a decline in
cotton imports into the U. K. from an average of 4.2
million bales during the 5 years 1909-13 to an average of
2.8 million bales in 1935-39.
This is further illustrated by Figure 2 which shows the
exports of cotton to foreign countries as a percentage of
total cotton consumption in foreign countries. This long­
time down trend in the proportionate importance of inter­
national trade in raw cotton reflects what is often called
the shift of cotton mills to the fields.
iN o attem pt is m ade in this article to appraise the need fo r a sizeable ex­
port outlet fo r A m erican cotton. F o r brevity’ s sake it m erely has been
assumed that a sizeable export trade in cotton is desirable.

4

MONTHLY REVIEW
FIG. 2
COTTON« EXPORTS TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES AS A PERCENTAGE OF
FOREIGN CONSUMPTION, 1920-1945

YEAR BEGINNING

AUGUST
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOM

The severe depression in the early 1930's and factors
associated therewith had very definite repercussions on
the competitive position of American cotton abroad. In
Brazil changes in the prices of cotton and coffee were such
as to make the expansion of cotton production in Southern
Brazil relatively quite profitable. In the U. S., tariff rates
had been revised upward. This, coupled with our strong
creditor position since World War I made it harder for
our former customers to obtain desired amounts of dollar
exchange. Consequently, a larger and larger proportion
of available foreign exchange was used for the purchase
of goods which could not be easily obtained elsewhere, and
the more readily available articles such as cotton were
obtained from other countries.
Germany, Italy, and Japan were three countries which
had a strong desire to become more self sufficient economi­
cally. Since they were unable to produce enough cotton
to meet their needs for textile fibers, they actively encour­
aged the synthetic fiber industries in their countries.
Most of this increased synthetic fiber production was in
the form of rayon staple fiber. In these three countries
total rayon production increased from the equivalent of
about 16,000 bales of cotton in 1920 to the equivalent of
nearly 3.0 million bales in 1938. During the same period
rayon production in other foreign countries increased from
the equivalent o f 38,000 bales to the equivalent of 814,000
bales. Most of these increases occurred in the 1930’s.
O f course, not all of this rayon was consumed at the ex­
pense of cotton, but large amounts o f it did take the place
of cotton.
As a further means of bolstering their domestic econo­
mies, some foreign countries resorted to direct controls
over the use of foreign exchange. Also, some countries
made it a general practice to resort to bilateral trading.
In most, if not all, instances this worked to the disadvan­
tage of American cotton exports. For example, during
the 5-year period 1934-38, Germany imported 1,253,000
bales of cotton as against 1,743,000 bales during the pre­
ceding 5 years. Between these periods, German imports
of American cotton dropped from an average of 1,317,000
bales to an average of 411,000 bales while imports of
Brazilian increased from 6,000 bales to 248,000 bales, and




the combined imports of cotton into Germany from all
other foreign countries increased from 369,000 bales to
466,000 bales.
It has already been noted that the U. S. entered the
inter-war period in a strong creditor position as contrasted
with its traditional debtor position before the war. The
full effect of this changed status was not brought home
immediately to American cotton because of the extensive
foreign credits which were granted during the middle and
latter 1920’s.
With the coming of the crash in 1929, cotton prices
dropped very sharply despite the efforts of the Federal
Farm Board to support the market. During the early
1930’s, cotton interests were prone to blame their plight
on the general business recession, and thus to minimize or
completely ignore the elements of weakness which had
been developing for some years in the export position of
American cotton.
Commencing in 1933, the United States adopted a
policy of production control. As a means of furthering
its policy for price supports which was first adopted in
1929 Congress also adopted a policy of price supporting
loans to farmers. This resulted in a price that made it
advantageous for farmers in this country to increase pro­
duction on their reduced acreage by means of increasing
yields. It also helped to bring about a world price of
cotton which encouraged farmers in many foreign coun­
tries to expand production. Although this was by no
means the sole factor affecting cotton production in the
various countries, Table 1 reveals the changes which
occurred.
COTTON:

P R O D U C TIO N IN SPEC IFIED C O U N TRIE S,
A V E R A G E S , 1928-32 A N D 1936-40
______ 1936-40 average______

AREA
1928-32
A ctual P ercentage increase
___________________________________ average___________________ over 1928-32 avg.

1,000

W orld
U nited States
Foreign countries
L arge
India
Russia
China
Brazil
E gypt
Medium
P eru
M exico
A rgen tina
U ganda
A n glo-E gy p tia n
Chosen
Turkey
Iran
B elgian Congo
Small

Sudan

1,000

bales

bales

P e r cent

26,448
14,667
11,781
10,173
4,118
1,530
2,521
504
1,500
1,261
255
203
145
171
143
135
85
77
47
347

31,763
13,534
18,229
15,084
4,686
3,580
2,793
2,106
1,919
2,348
384
332
260
289
257
180
272
188
184
797

20
—8
55
48
14
134
11
318
28
86
51
64
79
69
80
33
220
144
291
130

In 1938-39 U. S. exports of cotton declined to 3.3
million bales, the lowest in over 50 years. Not only was
such a low level of exports alarming, but the domestic
carry-over of American cotton which had increased from
4.4 million bales on August 1, 1937 to 11.4 million a year
later rose even further to the all-time high of nearly 13.0
million bales on August 1, 1939. Four days before the
opening o f the new season the Government announced its
first export subsidy on raw cotton. (This program is not
to be confused with the 1941 and 1944 export subsidy
programs which are referred to later in this article). The
initial subsidy rate of 1.50 cents per lb. which was in
effect from July 27 to December 5, 1939 was made appli­

MONTHLY REVIEW

cable to the export of 4.8 million bales. The rate was
reduced several times during December and the subsidy
on raw cotton was discontinued on January 30, 1940.
Under the program a total of 5,787,559 bales of cotton
were exported. Most of this cotton was actually exported
in the 1939-40 season. Also during 1939 some 600,000
bales of Government owned cotton were exchanged for
rubber in a barter arrangement between the United States
and the United Kingdom. During 1939-40 cotton ex­
ports totaled 6.5 million bales.
In 1941 the United States changed its loan policy by
increasing the Government loan level on cotton to 85 per
cent of parity. This raised the price of American cotton
to such an extent that at one time Brazilian cotton was
being delivered to Canadian mills at from 3 to 4 cents
below the delivered price of American cotton. This re­
sulted in Canadian mills, which up to 1938 had received
little if any cotton from Brazil, switching so heavily that
during the first half of the 1941-42 season Brazilian cotton
comprised 72 per cent of all cotton consumed by Canadian
mills. As a means of enabling American cotton to regain
its traditionally dominant position in the Canadian market
and to strengthen its export position generally, the U. S.
inaugurated two programs. The first was to sell Govern­
ment-owned cotton for export at 13*4 cents per pound
which was then several cents below the domestic market
price. The other program was a subsidy on exports of
cotton to Canada. The export subsidy rate was raised
from time to time but ranged between 2 and 3 cents per
pound. The subsidy program which commenced Sep­
tember 29, 1941 ran through March 13 following, by
which time the world ocean shipping situation had become
so tight as to render impossible the export of Brazilian
cotton to Canada. Under this subsidy program 233,000
bales were exported.
The development of Lend-Lease in 1941 was even more
important, so far as the export of American cotton during
the war years was concerned, than these other two Gov­
ernment export programs. The United Kingdom was the
principal recipient of cotton under Lend-Lease and such
cotton accounted for a sizeable proportion of our exports
during the time it was in effect.
Still another Governmental program that has con­
tributed very materially to the level of American raw
cotton exports is the export subsidy program which is
now in effect. This program was provided for in the
Surplus Property Act. Under the export program which
was announced November 15, 1944, registered sales in
an amount totaling 3.8 million bales had been made
through November 15, 1946. Under this program the
subsidy rate has been 4.00 cents per pound.
Several other Government programs assist the ex­
portation of American cotton although this is not neces­
sarily one of their major objectives. Among these pro­
grams were Army shipments of some raw cotton into ex­
enemy controlled areas as a means of aiding in the resto­
ration of their respective domestic economies. O f the
same general nature are exports of raw cotton by U N R R A
and Government credits such as loans by the ExportImport Bank.
It is indeed gratifying that exports of cotton from the
U. S. totaled 3.5 million bales (excluding War Depart­
ment shipments) in 1945-46. This was considerably more




5

than in any of the preceding five years when total exports
of cotton from the U. S. ranged from 1.1 to 2.0 million
bales. It is also gratifying to know that exports are ex­
pected to total about 3.0 million bales this season. These
figures represent a sizeable recovery from the low war­
time level, and yet they compare unfavorably with the
pre-war situation.
Unfortunately many o f the factors which caused the
export position of American cotton to deteriorate during
the interwar period are still operating. American cotton
prices are still being supported out of line with the prices
of important competitive growths. An increasing pro­
portion of foreign cotton consumption is occurring in
countries that produce their own raw cotton. Although
foreign rayon production declined during the later war
years, production in some countries is now at record high
levels and recovery in rayon production is expected in
other countries. The U. S. is in an even “ stronger”
creditor position than after World War I, and many
countries may need to conserve their dollar exchange for
the purchase of those things which cannot so readily be
obtained elsewhere as cotton.
In summary, therefore, it seems fair to conclude that
despite the more favorable current level of cotton exports
.than during the war years, the outlook for American cot­
ton exports over a period of several years is unfavorable.
As long as we have a “ surplus” of cotton and are willing
to subsidize its exports; as long as we are willing to loan
foreign countries the money with which to buy cotton at
the subsidized price; as long as we are in a position to
encourage use of cotton in Germany and Japan rather
than production and use of synthetic fiber, we can post­
pone feeling the full effect of our domestic cotton price
policy. Although some of these factors which are cur­
rently aiding in the exportation of American cotton may
outlive others, each will be seen to be of a political
nature and thus subject to the forces which govern politi­
cal decisions generally. If the U. S. is to retain a size­
able export trade in raw cotton in the event these meas­
ures end, it will be necessary for us to resort to some
form of multilateral action, such as an international com­
modity agreement on cotton, or to revert to the time
honored methods of offering our cotton for export at
competitive world prices while at the same time willing
to accept payment in the form of exports from other
countries. So much is at stake for American cotton in­
terests and society generally, that the implications of con­
templated Government policies should be carefully studied
to insure that we not unwittingly surrender our export
trade in raw cotton if it be in our national interest for it
to be preserved.
There are several reasons why it may be impossible to
insure a level of cotton exports that will be satisfactory to
many in this country. One of these reasons is that the
growth of the cotton textile industry in raw cotton pro­
ducing countries and the growth of synthetic fiber pro­
duction in both cotton producing and cotton importing
countries may reduce the level of international trade in
raw cotton. Also, the conditions of trade and the bal­
ance of payment may be such as to induce importing
countries to obtain their cotton elsewhere, and use their
dollar exchange for the purchase of goods that cannot so
easily be obtained elsewhere.

MONTHLY REVIEW

6

Banking
The rate of increase of the total loans o f the weekly
reporting member banks of the Fifth Federal Reserve
District fell off somewhat during the four weeks ended
November 13: loans increased to $453 million, a gain of
$7 million for the four weeks as compared with net new
loans of $21 million during the preceding four-week
period. Once again strong gains were made in com­
mercial, industrial and agricultural loans, which increased
by $8 million to $236 million, while real estate loans ac­
celerated their increase, rising from $67 million to $71
million. Other types of loans either remained constant
or showed a decrease, loans to brokers and dealers for
purchasing or carrying securities decreasing by one-third
from their mid-October figure of $9 million. “ Other
loans/’ which include consumer loans to individuals,
showed a decrease of $2 million to a figure of $93 million.
Investments continued their decline which commenced
last March with the initiation o f the Treasury’s redemp­
tion program, the total falling from $1,586 million on
October 16 to $1,533 million on November 13. The de­
crease was accounted for almost entirely by the smaller
holdings of certificates of indebtedness; bills and notes
decreased somewhat, while bonds held increased. A com­
plete record of holdings of Governments for the fourweek period is presented herewith:

(A m ou nts in m illions o f dollars)
Bills

C. o f I.

N otes

Blonds

Total

16
23
30

24
19
19

309
303
298

133
130
129

1,032
1,037
1,037

1,498
1,489
1,483

N ovem ber 6
13

18
21

250
255

126
126

1,044
1,044

1,438
1,446

DATE
October

The effects of war loan account calls and of redemptions
may be noted. The week ended November 6 marked the
first week in which heavy war loan account withdrawals
were accompanied by an increase in bond holdings; this
may possibly be accounted for by the fact that sufficient
time elapsed after redemption payments to allow of port­
folio adjustment within the same week, although during
that week there was considerable pressure upon reserves.
Total deposits of member banks of the Fifth District—
as measured by the average daily total deposits other than
interbank— have continued to show month-to-month in­
creases while those of member banks in the country as a
whole have fallen. As is shown in the table, the ratio
of Fifth District deposits to those of the United States
stood at 4.85 for the last half of October, a total gain of
.13 during the past three months. This has been ac­
counted for by gains in Virginia and North and South
Carolina; Maryland, West Virginia, and the District of
Columbia have lost deposits at about the same rate as the
national decrease.

HOLDINGS OF U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS




FIFTH DISTRICT MEMBER BANKS

MILLIONS OF
OOLLARS

7

MONTHLY REVIEW

Currency demands and Treasury transactions placed
substantial drains upon member bank reserves in this Dis­
trict during the four weeks ended November 13 although
the net change was a slight increase. Commercial and
financial transactions provided a sufficient inflow of funds
to the District banks to offset the drains, to decrease Fed­
eral Reserve credit extended locally, and to allow of a
small increase in reserves for the period. To some extent
these transactions included the withdrawal of interbank
balances carried outside this District as well as inflows of
funds to cover purchases in commodity markets within the
District. A complete statement of factors affecting mem­
ber bank reserves follow s:
(M illions o f dollars)

— 6
+ 106
— 67

+
+

♦Less than $500 thousand.

H

o l d in g s

of

U

n it e d

S tates

G overnment

O b l ig a t io n s

Member banks of the Fifth Federal Reserve District
increased their holdings of United States Government
obligations by more than seven times from the last semi­
annual call date prior to the war to the first one following
the ending of the war. On June 30, 1941, total holdings
amounted to $422 million, increased to $3,558 million on
December 31, 1945, and subsequently declined to $3,354
million on June 29, 1946. The chart presents a graphic
picture of the increase over the prewar level and the com­
position of portfolios at semi-annual call dates.
Beginning with December 1943 it has been possible to
derive average maturity figures of the holding of com­
mercial banks in this District on the basis of aggregate
figures supplied by the Treasury Department from the
monthly surveys of ownership of United States Govern­
ment obligations. These show a constant trend toward
the shortening of maturities in bank portfolios during the
later years of the war, followed by a reversal for the last
two call report dates. The table below gives the average
maturities in months for the call dates on which they are
available:
Dec.
1943

June
1944

Dec.
1944

66.0

63.3

L oans, I nvestm ents
M

and

June
1945

D e p o s it s

em ber

of

(A m ou nts in m illions o f dollars)
Change fro m
June 29, *46

Sept. 30, *46
T O T A L L O A N S A N D IN V E S T M E N T S

4,525

+

3

Loans (including overd rafts)
United States Governm ent direct and
guaranteed obligations
Obligations o f States and political
subdivisions
Other bonds, notes, and debentures
C orporate stocks (including Federal
R eserve Bank stock)
Demand deposits o f individuals, p a rt­
nerships, and corporations

1,051

+

97

3,247

— 108

9
3,267

+
+

5
3

+

*

+ 188

Dec.
1945

June
1946

64.6

65.7

F i f t h D is t r ic t

Banks

The net change in earning assets during the three
months was quite small but the aggregate figure conceals
substantial changes that occurred in distribution of various
types of assets as among banks. Loans greatly acceler­
ated their rate of increase over the first six months of the
year while the overall increase was 10 per cent, reserve
city banks showed net new loans equal to 8 per cent of
their June 29 total while other banks showed an increase
of 12 per cent. Holdings of United States Government
securities fell by 5 per cent among reserve city banks and
by 1 per cent for other banks, giving an aggregate decrease
of 3 per cent. State and municipal obligations increased
at a slightly higher rate in the portfolios of non-reserve
city banks, while almost the entire gain in corporate obli­
gations was concentrated in reserve city banks.
Demand deposits of individuals, partnerships, and cor­
porations increased by 6 per cent as compared with an
increase of 2 per cent for the United States. Reserve
city banks increased their deposit liability in this category
by 5 per cent while other banks of the Fifth District
showed a 7 per cent gain.
average

Preliminary compilations of certain items of the con­
dition reports of Fifth District member banks for Sep­

d a il y

total

d e p o s it s * o f

Last half o f Sept.
$ millions
% o f U . S.
Maryland
Reserve city banks
Country banks
District o f Columbia
Reserve city banks
Country banks
V irgin ia
Reserve city banks
Country banks

mem ber

banks

Last half o f October
$ millions
% o f U . S.

1,061
684
376

.98
.63
.35

1.052
675
377

.98
.63
.35

946
924
22

.87
.85
.02

945
924
22

.88
.86
.02

1,357
339
1,018

1.25
.31
.94

1,357
324
1,033

1.26
.30
.96

W est V irgin ia

567

.52

572

.53

N orth Carolina
Reserve city banks
Country banks

832
361
471

.77
.33
.44

852
364
488

.79
.34
.45

South Carolina
F ifth D istrict




93
125

*Less than $500 thousand.

Changes fo r 4 weeks
ended N ovem ber 13, 1946
Reserve Bank credit extended locally
Comm ercial and financial transactions
Treasury transactions
Currency transactions
Other factors
N et change in reserve balances

tember 30 are given in the table below, together with
changes from the preceding call report date.

428

.40

439

.41

5,191

4.80

5,217

4.85

♦Excluding interbank demand deposits.
Details m ay not add to totals due to rounding.

8

MONTHLY REVIEW

F E D E R A L R E S E R V E B A N K OF RICHM OND

DE B ITS TO IN D IV ID U A L A CCOU N TS

(A ll Figures in Thousands

(000 omitted)

N ovem ber 13
Change in A m t. from
ITE M S
1946
10-16-46
11-14-45
Total Gold R eserves............... ...........$1,160,439
+ 117,154
+ 42,541
Other Reserves .........................
+
1,518
+
5,946
Total Reserves .....................
. + 118,672
+ 48,487
Bills Discounted .......................
+
6,938
—
853
Industrial A dvances ...............
0
—
65
Gov. Securities, T ota l.............
— 74,704
+ 34,116
Bonds ......................................
—
1,170
— 14,422
N otes ........................................
+
7,210
— 70,448
Certificates ............................ ...........
436,092
— 28,111
— 14,275
Bills ..........................................
— 52,633
+ 133,261
Total Bills & Securities........... ........... 1,413,204
— 68,766
+ 33,198
U ncollected Items ...................
—
3,204
+ 53,720
Other Assets ............................. ...........
29,534
+
1,152
+ 11,046
Total Assets ......................... ........... 2,860,497
+ 47,854
+ 146,451
Fed. Res. N otes in C ir............
Deposits, Total .........................
Members’ Reserves .............
U. S. Treas. Gen. A c c t ........
Foreign ..................................
Other Deposits .....................
D ef. A vailability Items .........
Other Liabilities .....................
Capital A ccoun ts .....................
Total Liabilities .................

.......... $1,788,094
...........
824,309
742,568
...........
...........
50,925
...........
28,035
...........
2,781
..........
214,125

+
+
+
+
+
—
+
+
+
+

...........
33,291
........... 2,860,497

24,039
21,239
419
16,942
4,166
288
2,081
107
388
47,854

+
+
+
+
—
—
+
+
+
+

66,745
19,697
6,347
23,834
5,642
4,842
53,744
82
6,183
146,451

41 R E PO RTIN G M EM BER B A N K S — 5th D ISTRIC T
(A ll Figures in Thousands)
N ovem ber 13
1946
ITEM S
Total Loans ...................................... . .$ 454,064
Bus. & A gri. L o a n s.....................
71,085
Real Estate L oa n s .........................
A ll Other L oa n s............................
Total Security H old in gs................. , , 1,534,019
21,492
U. S. Treasury Bills .....................
U. S. Treasury Certificates
..
255,216
126,125
U. S. Treasury N otes ...................
U. S. Gov. Bonds ......................... . . 1,044,484
87
O bligations Gov. G u aran teed ...
Other Bonds, Stocks & Sec........
86,615
204,461
Cash Items in Process o f Col........ . .
142,502*
Due from B an k s................................
44,599
C urrency & C oin ................................
354,852
Reserve with F . R . B a n k ...............
73,263
2,807,760

Change in A m t. from
10-16-46
11-14-45
6,783
+ 123,004
+
8,763
+
+ 85,121
3,981
+
+ 21,525
5,961
+ 16,358
— 51,621
190,640
— 31,718
—
2,196
— 54,237
— 55,617
—
6,898
153,681
+ 28,078
+ 12,846
0
66
— 1,136
+ 22,364
+ 51,867
+ 22,726
3,253
12,029
+
5,548
3,388
+
+
1,980
9,866
—
—
927
324
34,600
— 16,218

Total Demand D ep osits................... . .$2,165,737
Deposits o f Individuals ............... . . 1,466,334
122,975
Deposits o f U. S. Gov...................
89,632
Deposits o f State & Local Gov.
450,817*
Deposits o f Banks ....................... .. .
35,979
Certified & Officers’ Checks
396,607
Total Tim e D ep osits.........................
383,397
Deposits o f Individuals.................
13,210
Other Tim e D eposits.....................
5,000
Liabilities fo r B orrow ed M o n e y ..,
92,333
All Other L iabilities...........................
148,083
Capital A ccounts ................................
Total Liabilities .................................. . 2,807,760

___ 19,684

___ 79,992

7,811
36,643
— 3,737
6,221
+
6,664
+
1,847
+
1,851
+
4
800
+
—
143
962
+
— 16,218

+ 98,898
— 153,065
3,200
+
34,782
5,757
+
+ 38,925
+ 39,009
84
— 6,000
— 3,110
+ 15,577
— 34,600

+

.
District o f Columbia
W ashington .......................
M aryland
Baltim ore ............................
Cumberland ............ ..........
F rederick ............................
H agerstow n ........................
North Carolina
Asheville ...........................
Charlotte ............................
Durham ..............................
Greensboro .......................
K inston ................................
Raleigh ................................
W ilm ington .......................
W ilson ..................................
W inston-Salem .................
South Carolina
Charleston .........................
Columbia ...........................
Greenville ............................
S partanburg . . .................
V irginia
Charlottesville ...................
Danville ..............................
L yn chburg .........................
N ew p ort N e w s .................
N orfolk ................................
Portsm outh .......................
R ichm ond ............................
Roanoke ..............................
W est V irgin ia
Bluefield ..................... .
Charleston .........................
Clarksburg .......................
H untington .......................
Parkersburg .....................
District Totals

..................... $

599,118

% chg.
from
Oct. 1945

10 mos.
1946

+ 10

$ 6,111,535

+11

8,131,643
189,748
147,554
221,044

+ 3
+30
+20
+28

384,749
1,742,929
1,047,176
528,408
163,771
741,356
326,781
199,507
957,214

+
+
+
+
+
+
—
+
+

36
26
25
31
31
28
9
18
35

17
45
45
55

491,333
713.121
575.122
337,135

+
+
+
+

19
34
38
39

+ 8

+10
+ 31
+ 20

864,105
20,318
16,191
25,167

+ 35

43,977
210,336
179,352
58,411
37,890
90,666
35,291
56,397
132,216

+ 40
- -3 9
— 27
--5 0
--3 1
— 35

—1
+ 29
+ 37

51,589
85,132
77,697
44,081

+
+
+
+

22,134
55,848
33,937
27,539
144,517
18,287
503,617
73,564

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

35
45
31
15
13
24
53

219,190
253,269
296,868
237,273
1,352,935
169,565
3,822,981
630,004

36,141
114,913
25,990
48,178
24,038

+
+
+
+
+

40
35
31
35
33

289,921
1,037,657
226,933
418,946
210,592

+ 22

$32,176,260

3,756,637

% chg.
fro m
10 m os. ’ 45

+ 8

+
22
+ 34

+ 2
+12
+ 2

+11

+ 40

+18

+ 19
+ 28

+11
+ 11
+14

COTTON CON SU M PT IO N A N D ON H A N D — B A LE S
O ctober
October
1946
1945
F ifth D istrict S tates:
Cotton c o n s u m e d .................
441,478
366,301
Cotton G row ing S tates:
Cotton consumed ...........
811,434
667,484
Cotton on hand Oct. 31 in
consum ing establishments 1,680,533 1,645.316
storage & com presses . . . .
5,812,139 9,610,474
United States:
Cotton consumed .................
931,229
759,763
Cotton on hand Oct. 31 in
consum ing establishments 2,018,941 1,910,875
5,887,999 9,727,799
storage & com p resses.. . .
Spindles active, U . S ................. 21,753,942 21,443,371

A ug. 1 to Oct. 31
1946
1945
1,238,677

1,068,926

2,283,710

1,938,542

2,605,189

2,198,656

COTTON C O N S U M P T IO N -F IF T H DISTRICT
In Bales
M O NTH S
October
September
October
10 Months
10 Months

*Net figures, reciprocal balances being eliminated.

Oct.
1946

N . Carolina
1946....................
242,321
1946....................
212,325
1945....................
198,080
1946.................... 2,129,744
1945.................... 2,053,954

S. Carolina
180,377
160,991
151,948
1,596,392
1,564,395

V irgin ia
18,780
17,518
16,273
174,685
180,682

D istrict
441,478
390,834
366,301
3,900,821
3,799,031

C O M M ERCIAL F A IL U R E S
N um ber Failures
D istrict U .S .

M O N TH S
October
September
O ctober
10 Months
10 Months

1946....................
1946....................
1945....................
1946...................
1945....................

S ou rce: Dun & Bradstreet




2
3
1
20
16

123
96
62
885
708

T otal Liabilities
D istrict
U .S .
‘ $

15,000
94,000
9,000
$ 363,000
1,518,000

$ 6,400,000
4,800,000
3,114,000
$40,733,000
27,303,000

DEPOSITS IN M U T U A L SAV IN G S B AN K
8
Baltimore Banks
Oct. 31, 1946
Total Deposits .........$376,497,711

Sept. 30, 1946
$375,476,030

Oct. 31, 1945
$337,725,426

9

MONTHLY REVIEW

B U ILD IN G PE R M IT FIGU RES

C ON STR U C TIO N C O N TR A C T S A W A R D E D

Total V aluation
Oct. 1946
Oct. 1945
M ARYLAND
Baltimore ....................................
Cumberland ................................
Frederick ......................................
H agerstown ................................
Salisbury ......................................
V IR G IN IA
Danville ........................................
Lynchburg ..................................
N orfolk ........................................ .
Petersburg ..................................
Portsmouth ..................................
Richmond ....................................
Roanoke ........................................
W E S T V IR G IN IA
Charleston ....................................
Clarksburg ..................................
Huntington ..................................
N O R T H C A R O L IN A
Asheville ......................................
Charlotte ......................................
Durham ........................................
Greensboro ..................................
H igh P oint ..................................
Raleigh ........................................
Rocky Mount ..............................
Salisbury ......................................
W inston-Salem .........................
S O U TH C A R O L IN A
Charleston .....................................
Columbia ......................................
Greenville ....................................
Spartanburg ................................
D IS T R IC T OF COLU M B IA
W ashington ..................................

$

$

3,302,705
43,225
36,050
103,135
86,746

2,881,056
65,800
46,150
58,365
29,690

69,872
122,133
232,880
118,100
116,270
1,343,090
209,936

210,689
162,753
282,340
4,900
69,125
987,479
201,079

312,857
52,495
206,570

387,079
70,828
620,142

195,350
449,500
250,065
286,230
166,444
239,027
118,875
71,995
172,534

286,692
303,222
258,790
305,605
160,515
101,400
116,400
69,685
123,283

133,365
117,160
143,450
98,530

167,276
88,125
23,626
70,062

Sept.
STATES
1946
Maryland ..................... $26,322,000
Dist. o f Colum bia___
3,328,000
V irginia .......................
9,961,000
W est V irgin ia ........... 5,389,000
N orth C a r o lin a ........... 15,588,000
South Carolina ........... 2,928,000
F ifth D istrict .........$63,516,000
S ou rce: F . W . Dodge Corp.

% Change
fro m
Sept. 1945
9 mos. ’46
+279
$238,022,000
+109
50,416,000
+ 97
155,285,000
+221
57,383,000
+ 66
147,109,000
+184
91,843,000
+148
$740,058,000

% Change
from
9 mos. ’ 45
+219
+ 80
+ 87
+262
+193
+552
+179

R E T A IL F U R N IT U R E SALE S

3,620,173

2,245,524

$ 12,418,762
$150,339,983

$ 10,397,680
$ 54,342,977

P ercentage Changes in October and 10 Mos. 1946
C ompared with Compared with
October 1945
10 Mos. 1945
+ 39
+ 49
+ 20
+ 52
+ 39
+ 58
+ 26
+ 55
+ 28
+ 52
+ 43
+ 54
+ 33
+ 53

ST AT E S
Maryland (5 )* .........................
Dist. o f Columbia ( 5 ) * ...........
V irgin ia (2 1 )* .........................
W est V irgin ia (1 0 )* .............
N orth Carolina ( 1 5 ) * .............
South Carolina (1 4) * .............
F ifth D istrict (7 0 )* ...........

IN D IV ID U A L C ITIE S
Baltimore, Md., '( 5 ) * ...............
W ashington, D. C., ( 5 ) * .........
Lynchburg, V a., ( 3 ) * .............
Richmond, V a., ( 7 ) * ...............
Charleston, W . V a. ( 3 ) *
..
Charlotte, N . C., ( 4 ) * .............
Columbia, S. C., ( 4 ) * ...............

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

39
20
53
38.
12
33
72

+
+
+
+
+
+
+

49
52
75
62
58
68
72

♦Number o f rep orting stores
District Totals ..................................
10 Months ..........................................

W H O L E S A L E T R A D E — 209 FIRM S

RAYON YAR N DATA
Oct. 1946

Sept. 1946

Oct. 1945

R ayon Y arn Shipments, L b s . . . . . , 57,400,000
Staple Fiber Shipm ents, L b s.......... . .14,000,000

53,900,000
14,000,000

53.200.000
15.100.000

9,000,000
R ayon Y a rn Stocks, L bs..................
Staple Fiber Stocks, L b s................ , , 2,600,000

8.900.000
2.600.000

7.300.000
4.600.000

Source : R ayon O rganon

A U C TIO N TOBACCO M A R K E TIN G
Produ cers’ T obacco Sales, Lbs. P rice per Cwt.
STATES
O ctober 1946
October 1945
1946
1945
South Carolina ............... 9,346,000
782,956
$38.75
$40.42
N orth Carolina ............... 282,984,024
244,383,558
53.09
44.71
V irgin ia ........................... 58,348,278
55,575,374
51.69
44.41
T otal ..............................350,696,302
300,741,888
$52.47
$44.64
Season Through .........902,027,199
851,510,575
51.51
43.78

LIN ES

N et Sales
October 1946
com pared with
Oct.
Sept.
1945
1946

Auto Supplies ( 1 0 ) * ...........
Drugs & Sundries ( 1 0 ) * . ..
Dry Goods ( 5 ) * .....................
E lectrical Goods ( 4 ) * .........
Groceries (7 3 )* ...................
H ardware ( 1 3 ) * ...................
Industrial Supplies (6 ) * ..
P aper & Products ( 7 ) * . . .
T obacco & Products (9 ) *.
Miscellaneous (7 2 )* ...........
D istrict A vg. ( 2 0 9 ) * .. .

+ 13
+ 15
+ 64
+ 103
+ 33
+ 66
+ 75
+ 35
+ 25
+ 32
+ 38

+ 25
+ 5
f-23
- 9
-20
-31
-17
-16
1-19
+ 15
+ 19

Stock
R atio Oct.
Oct. 31, 1946
collections
com pared with
to a cc’ts
Oct. 31 Sept. 30 outstand’g
1946
Oct. 1
1945
+ 39
+
6
+ 110

0
0
— 3

+
+
+

21
69
45

+ *5
— 1
0

+ *21
+ 27
+ 36

+ *2
+ 3
+ 1

126
116
87
92
108
114
103
94
171
134
127

S ou rce: Departm ent o f Comm erce
♦Number o f rep orting firms.

D E P A R T M E N T STO R E T R A D E
TOBACCO M A N U FAC TU RIN G
Oct.
1946
Smoking & chewing tobacco
(Thousands o f l b s .) .........
21,822
Cigarettes (Thousands) ..32,777,855
Cigars (Thousands) .........
588,067
Snuff (Thousands o f lbs.)
3,809

% Change
from
10 mos.
Oct. 1945
1946

—20
+ 5
+ 15
+ 1

178,312
271,083,323
4,823,628
33,099

% Change
from
10 mos. ’ 45
— 24

+20
+ 18

—10

SOFT C O A L PRODU CTION IN TH O U SAN D S OF TONS
Oct.
1946
REG ION S
14,078
W est V irgin ia . . .
V irginia ............... . . 1,715
165
Maryland ............. . .
F ifth District . ..15,958
United States . . . .56,000
% in D is tr ic t.. . .
28.5




Oct.
1945
8,748
1,414
163
10,325
39,192
26.3

%
Chg.
+ 61
+ 21
+ 1
+ 55
+ 43

10 Mos.
1946
118,395
14,272
1,702
134,369
446,899
30.1

10 Mos.
%
1945
Chg.
126,524 — 6
15,249 — 6
1,446 + 18
143,219 — 6
478,430 — 7
29.9

Richm ond
P ercentage
+ 14
Percentage
+ 27
P ercentage
+ 69
P ercentage
+ 27

Baltim ore
W ashington
Other Cities
change in Oct. 1946 sales, com pared with sales
+15
+ 7
+18
change in 10 mos. sales 1946, com pared with 10
+19
+17
+25
chg. in stocks on Oct. 31, ’ 46, com pared with
+33
+25
+47
chg. in outstanding orders Oct. 31, ’ 46, from
+14
+ 1
+16

D istrict
in Oct. 1945:
+12
mos. in 1945:
+20
Oct. 31, ’ 45:
+36
Oct. 31, ’ 45:
+13

P ercentage change in receivables Oct. 31, ’ 46, from those on Oct. 31, ’ 45:
+ 66
+48
+45
+45
+49
Percentage o f current receivables as o f O ctober 1 collected in O ctober:
51
55
57
59
55
Percentage o f instalm ent receivables as o f Oct. 1 collected in O c t .:
34
38
30
36
33
Maryland Dist. o f Col. V irg in ia W . V irgin ia No. Carolina So. Carolina
Percentage change in Oct. 1946 sales from Oct. 1945 sales by S ta tes:
+ 18
+ 7
+15
+22
+23
+ 7
Percentage change in 10 mos. sales 1946 from 10 mos. sales 1945 :
+ 24
+17
+24
+29
+30
+15

10

MONTHLY REVIEW
BUSINESS IN DEXES—FIFTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
Average Daily 1935-39=100
Seasonally Adjusted

Bank Debits ...................................................................
Bituminous Coal Production*.....................................
Building Contracts Awarded........................................
Building Permits Issued...............................................
Cigarette Production.....................................................
Cotton Consumption .....................................................
Department Store Sales..................................................
Department Store Stocks..............................................
Furniture Orders...........................................................
Furniture Shipments ............................................... .
Furniture Unfilled Orders...........................................
Furniture Sales— Retail...............................................
Life Insurance Sales.....................................................
Wholesale Trade:
Automotive Supplies**.............................................
Drugs ..........................................................................
Dry Goods...................................................................
Electrical Goods**..................................................... 54
Groceries ....................................................................
Hardware ...................................................................
Industrial Supplies** ...............................................
Paper and Its Products**.........................................
Tobacco and Its Products**.....................................

Sept.
1946

Aug.
1946

July
1946

Sept.
1945

303
153
261
211
234
154
298
262
185
210
438
267
265

298
15 lr
348r
175
229
154
306
259
206
242
437
212
272

259
153
330
184
216
140
307
263r
117
244
409
249
297

243
142
106
83
207
134
225
200
119
126
362
167
153

286
282
221

251
260
193

239
280
213
55
246
112
237
137
116

195
230
148
40
197
81
137
115
94

43
267
116
275
181
I ll

249
122
253
126
107

% Change
Sept. 1946 from
Aug. 46
Sept. 45
+ 25
+ 2
+ 1
8
— 25
+ 146
+ 154
+ 21
+ 2
+ 13
0
+ 15
3
+ 32
+ 31
+ 1
10
+ 55
— 13
+ 67
0
21
+ 26
60
73
14
8
15
26
7
5
+ 9
+ 44
+
+
+
+
+

+

4

+ 47
+ 23
+ 49
+ 35
+ 36
+ 43
+101
+ 57

+ 18

*Not seasonally adjusted
**1938-41 = 100

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL BUSINESS CONDITIONS
(Compiled by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System)

Output and employment at factories were maintained at
record peacetime levels in October. The total value of
goods distributed was maintained at a high level but below
the level of production, and inventories increased further.
Prices in wholesale and retail markets generally advanced
considerably following the lifting of controls.

most other durable goods industries was maintained at
about the September level. During the first three weeks
of November steel output rose slightly to an average
scheduled rate of 91 per cent of capacity, but in the fourth
week output dropped sharply owing to a cessation of opera­
tions at most bituminous coal mines on November 21 as a
result of work stoppages.

I n d u s t r ia l P r o d u c t io n

Output at factories and mines, as measured by the
Board’s seasonally adjusted index, increased slightly
further in October and was at a level of 182 per cent of the
1935-39 average as compared with 180 in September.
Production was maintained at this level in November up to
the beginning of work stoppages in bituminous coal mines.
Production of nondurable manufactures in October was
at a postwar peak rate of 169 per cent of the 1935-39
average. Output of manufactured food products rose
sharply, reflecting chiefly the exceptionally large volume of
meat production after the middle of October when Federal
price controls were removed. The number of animals
slaughtered under Federal inspection declined somewhat
from late October levels during the first half of November.
Output of textile products advanced in October to a level
of 170 per cent of the 1935-39 average and there were also
small gains in activity in some other nondurable goods in­
dustries.
Output o f durable manufactures increased slightly in
October as activity in the nonferrous metals and machinery
industries continued to advance. The number of pas­
senger cars and trucks produced increased further to a rate
14 per cent above the 1935-39 average and continued to
advance in the first two weeks o f November. Activity in




C o n s t r u c t io n

Value of construction contracts awarded, as reported by
the F. W . Dodge Corporation, declined further in October
to a level two-fifths below the May peak, but they were
still about double the 1939 average. Awards for resi­
dential building decreased by one-fifth in October, more
than offsetting an increase in the value of contracts
awarded for factory construction.
D

is t r ib u t io n

Department store sales, which usually increase from Sep­
tember to October, showed little change this year, and the
Board’s seasonally adjusted index declined to 258 per cent
of the 1935-39 average as compared with 269 for Sep­
tember and 290 for August. Sales increased seasonally,
however, in the first half of November and were 22 per
cent larger than a year ago. Department store stocks con­
tinued to rise in October and the Board’s seasonally ad­
justed index reached a new high of 235 per cent of the
1935-39 average, notwithstanding a further marked de­
crease in stocks in the New York City area as a result of a
trucking strike.
During October and the early part of November rail­
road carloadings of livestock were in exceptionally large

11

MONTHLY REVIEW

volume and shipments of most other classes of railroad
revenue freight were also maintained at high levels.
C o m m o d i t y P r ic e s

Following the initial sharp increases in prices of many
basic commodities in October and the early part of Novem­
ber, after the lifting of controls, prices of some agricultural
products, like cotton, corn, and poultry products, declined,
while prices of wheat, flour, and sugar advanced. Initial
advances in prices of nonferrous metals, steel scrap, and
rayon were maintained, and in the latter part of November
prices of some of these industrial materials advanced
further. There were also reported in this period substan­
tial increases in wholesale prices of a number of finished
manufactured products.
Retail prices of foods and numerous miscellaneous pro­
ducts increased considerably further in October and No­
vember. Most of the increases occurred after the middle
of October, at which time the consumers’ price index was




2 per cent higher than in September and 15 per cent above
the level at the end of the war.
B a n k C r e d it

Commercial and industrial loans at reporting banks in
101 leading cities showed further sharp increases ift Octo­
ber and the first three weeks of November. Real estate
and consumer loans also continued to increase steadily.
Government security holdings declined further, reflecting
principally Treasury debt retirement. Deposits of busi­
nesses and individuals have shown little further change.
Member bank reserves showed little over-all change
during October and the first three weeks of November.
Losses of funds by member banks as a result of an outflow
of currency and a transfer of deposits from member banks
to Reserve Banks due to Treasury operations were about
equal to the funds banks obtained by borrowing at Reserve
Banks and from an inflow of gold. Government security
holdings at Reserve Banks fluctuated considerably in Oc­
tober but were little changed over the period.