View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

MONTHLY REVIEW, AUGUST 1962

106

Foreign Exchange M arkets, January-June 1962
Short-term capital flows continued to exert a marked
impact on the foreign exchange markets during the first
half of 1962, although such flows on the whole appeared
to be smaller than the massive movements of funds that
dominated the exchanges during much of 1961.1 Early in
the year short-term capital returned to London and New
York, as Continental commercial banks reversed opera­
tions undertaken shortly before to increase their liquid
domestic assets for year-end statement purposes. The
funds were reinvested not only in New York money mar­
ket assets and short-term sterling assets but also in rela­
tively high-yielding Euro-dollar deposits. These capital
movements resulted in some weakening of the exchange
rates of a number of major Continental currencies and a
strengthening of sterling.
Later in the year, and particularly following the wide­
spread stock market breaks of late May, funds once more
began to flow in volume to the Continent. Monetary con­
ditions had tightened in several Continental countries and
eased in the United Kingdom. Moreover, doubt regarding
the future exchange value of the Canadian dollar had
grown more pervasive and had led to a massive outflow of
funds from Canada until decisive action was taken just
before midyear. Thus, the Canadian dollar came under
severe pressure, while exchange rates for most of the
major Continental currencies strengthened; sterling, al­
though easier, remained well above par, owing in part to
a considerable improvement in Britain’s trade balance.
FEDERAL RESERVE A N D TR E A SU R Y
FO R E IG N E X C H A N G E O P E R A T IO N S

The various pressures noted above generated currents
of uncertainty in exchange markets, where traders were
well aware that reduced, but nevertheless substantial, un­
derlying payments imbalances persisted between the major
financial countries. Accordingly, official intervention by
United States authorities remained devoted to the task of

dampening potentially disruptive short-term disturbances
and thus to assist in maintaining international exchange
rate stability over the longer term. The Treasury had car­
ried the brunt of the tactical defense of the dollar in the
foreign exchange markets in 1961. It soon became clear,
however, that the Federal Reserve System could and
should share in this endeavor. Therefore, on February 13,
1962 the System associated itself directly in the effort.
The Federal Open Market Committee authorized the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York to undertake transac­
tions in foreign currencies for System Open Market Ac­
count in accordance with the Committee’s instructions.2
The Committee noted that operations would be de­
signed “to help safeguard the value of the dollar in inter­
national exchange markets'5. They would, in addition,
“aid in making the existing system of international pay­
ments more efficient and in avoiding disorderly conditions
in exchange markets”. The Committee also set down in
the following terms the specific aims of System operations:
(1) To ofTset or compensate, when appropriate, the
effects on U. S. gold reserves or dollar liabilities
of those fluctuations in the international flow of
payments to or from the United States that are
deemed to reflect temporary disequilibrating
forces or transitional market unsettlements;
(2) To temper and smooth out abrupt changes in
spot exchange rates and to moderate forward
premiums and discounts judged to be dis­
equilibrating;
(3) To supplement international exchange arrange­
ments such as those made through the Interna­
tional Monetary Fund; and
(4) In the long run, to provide a means whereby
reciprocal holdings of foreign currencies may
contribute to meeting needs for international
liquidity as required in terms of an expanding
world economy.

2 The C om m ittee’s action was made public as a part o f the
H ouse of Representatives’ hearings on a recent international agree­
ment to enlarge the resources o f the International M onetary Fund;
see Bretton W oods A greements A c t A m en d m ent, Hearings before
1
Earlier articles on this subject are “Foreign Exchange M arkets, the Com m ittee on Banking and Currency, House o f Representa­
tives, 87th Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 10162, February
January-June 1961”, this Review, July 1961, pp. 114-16 and “For­
27-28, 1962, W ashington, United States Governm ent Printing
eign Exchange Markets, July-Decem ber 1961”, this R e v ie w , Janu­
Office, 1962.
ary 1962, pp. 2-5.




FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
RECIPROCAL CURRENCY AGREEMENTS, 1962

Agreement concluded with

Am ount
in m illions
of dollars

Date
of agreement

Bank of France ............................................
Bank of England ............................................
Netherlands Bank ............................................
National Bank of Belgium .........................
Bank of Canada ..............................................
Bank for International Settlements ..............
Swiss National Bank ......................................
German Federal Bank ...................................

50
50
50
50
250
100
100
50

March 4
May 30
June 14
June 20
June 26
July 16
July 16
August 2

Total .........................................................

700

Against this background, the System moved to acquire
foreign currency balances. First, small amounts of several
convertible currencies were purchased from the United
States Treasury. Then, more substantial resources became
available through a series of reciprocal currency swap
arrangements concluded with the central banks of France,
England, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Canada, as well
as— after midyear— Switzerland and Germany, and with
the Bank for International Settlements (see table). Such
agreements provided, to the occasionally nervous ex­
change markets, forceful demonstrations of the growing
degree of international financial cooperation. Using its
newly gained resources, the System on several occasions
during the first half of 1962 operated in the New York for­
eign exchange market to moderate temporary disturbances.
At the same time, the New York Reserve Bank, in its
role of fiscal agent, continued to carry out Treasury op­
erations in convertible currencies. Taking advantage of
the generally stronger position of the United States dollar
early in the year, the Treasury liquidated at maturity its
outstanding forward commitments in German marks, re­
duced further its forward Swiss franc obligations, and
repaid its outstanding Swiss franc borrowing. On the other
hand, the Treasury entered the Italian lira market, bor­
rowing in the process the equivalent of $75 million from
official Italian sources against certificates of indebtedness.
THE DEFENSE OF THE C A N A D IA N DO LLAR

The broadening of international cooperation in defense
of exchange stability was also convincingly demonstrated
during June 1962 in the case of the Canadian dollar,
when international assistance was quickly mobilized to
meet the Canadian Government’s request for resources
sufficient to withstand an attack upon the Canadian dol­
lar. In scope and manner, this assistance recalled the
massive cooperative effort that had helped ward off inten­




107

sive pressures upon the world’s major currencies following
the March 1961 revaluations of the German mark and
Dutch guilder.
During the first four months of 1962 the Canadian
authorities maintained the United States dollar value of
the Canadian dollar— without a par value since November
1950— at about $0.95^4 by supplying substantial amounts
of United States dollars to the market. During this pe­
riod, however, there were growing expectations in the
exchange markets that the value of the Canadian dollar
would decline, and this led to a substantial build-up of
so-called “leads and lags” in commercial payments ad­
verse to Canada. Foreign firms sold Canadian dollar
earnings promptly upon receipt, or even in advance of
receipt (through the forward market). Canadian firms at
the same time delayed conversion of foreign currency
earnings into Canadian dollars as long as possible and
anticipated their foreign currency requirements through
forward purchases of such currencies. Thus, a continuous
excess supply of Canadian dollars was offered on the ex­
change market, with the pressure increasing steadily.
Toward the end of April, the pressure was reinforced
by substantial outright speculation against the Canadian
dollar. Then, on May 2, the Canadian authorities, with
the approval of the International Monetary Fund, re­
established a par value for the Canadian dollar at $0,925,
a rate some 2% cents below the level they had been main­
taining (see chart). Confidence was not restored in the
succeeding weeks, however, and the rate for the Canadian
dollar dropped to $0.9174, where it was held by Bank of
Canada sales of United States dollars. When the drain on
Canada’s reserves accelerated in mid-June, the Canadian
Government acted decisively to defend the new par value
without resort to exchange or capital controls. Interna­
tional assistance in the form of loans and credits totaling
$1,050 million was made available to Canada by the IMF,
the Export-Import Bank, the Federal Reserve System,
and the Bank of England. The Canadian Government
then announced, on June 24, not only this massive aid
package, but also the adoption of forceful measures de­
signed to reduce Canada’s payments deficit. These steps
brought to an immediate end the attack on the Canadian
dollar. By early July, the rate had risen to $0.92% as
funds again flowed into Canada, and it was clear that the
initial goals of the stabilization program had been achieved.
THE E U R O P E A N C UR R E N C IE S

The influence of relative interest rates on international
short-term capital movements, and thus on exchange rates,
continued very much in evidence during the first half of

108

MONTHLY REVIEW, AUGUST 1962

1962. During the first quarter of the year, interest rates
in the United Kingdom remained close to the levels to
which they had been raised during the sterling crisis of
July 1961. With comparable interest rates lower in most
other industrial countries, the resultant incentive to move
short-term funds to Britain— on both a covered and an
uncovered basis— led to a considerable movement of
capital into British assets, especially from Continental
countries. (Foreign investors were also placing funds in
longer term British securities.) This inflow, coupled with
strong commercial demand for sterling due to an improve­
ment in Britain’s current balance-of-payments accounts
and favorable seasonal factors, brought a steady strength­
ening of sterling rates and a marked gain in British inter­
national reserves, much of which was used to prepay
Britain’s IMF debt.
In March the Bank of England reduced its discount
rate (to 5 per cent in two steps from 6 per cent), mainly
in order to lessen the pull of London interest rates on
short-term capital. Although sterling continued to rise
after the first of these reductions—reaching $2.8180 on
March 15, the highest since April 1959— it subsequently

EXCHANGE RATES IN THE FIRST HALF OF 1962
M o n t h l y a v e r a g e s of n o o n b u y in g r a t e s ;

ce n ts p e r u n it o f fo r e ig n c u rre n cy
C e n ts

Cents

282.00

20.408

Fran c
U n ite d K in g d o m

20.255
20.104

i

i

i

i

I

1

23.283
G e rm a n y

22.867

......L

i

t

22.472

Japan

J
N o te :

M

M

J

U p p e r a n d lo w e r b o u n d a r ie s of ch a rts re p re se n t o ffic ia l b u y in g

a n d s e llin g ra te s for d o lla r s a g a i n s t the v a r io u s curre ncie s.

(F o r C a n a d a

the se b e c a m e e ffe c tiv e M a y 2, w h e n a p a r v a lu e w a s re -e s ta b lis h e d .)
--------------- --- p a r v a lu e of currency.
S o u rce :

B o a r d of G o v e r n o r s o f the F e d e ra l R e se r v e S y s te m .




eased somewhat to about $2.81 VS. Following a further
bank rate reduction (to AVi per cent) in April, sterling
began to decline slowly, as the inflow of capital first
tapered off and then was apparently partly reversed while
commercial payments moved seasonally against sterlingarea countries. By the end of June the rate had moved
down to $2.80% , almost a full cent below the high but
still well above par. As United Kingdom interest rates
declined, the discount on forward sterling narrowed, mov­
ing from approximately 2.70 per cent for three-month
forward sterling in January to 0.80 per cent at the end of
June.
The counterpart to rising sterling rates in the first
quarter of the year was a moderate weakening of several
major Continental currencies. As commercial banks in
Switzerland, Germany, and the Netherlands reversed yearend repatriations of short-term assets and reinvested in
Euro-dollar deposits and sterling assets, the currencies of
those countries declined somewhat. The Swiss franc in
particular declined steadily through April, as the influence
of Switzerland’s current and long-term capital account
deficits became more apparent in the absence of sub­
stantial net short-term capital inflows. Nevertheless, the
low point for the Swiss franc for the year to date ($0.23)
was still well above the franc’s gold parity. Similarly, the
first-quarter declines in the German mark and Dutch
guilder brought these currencies down only to par or very
slightly below, as in both countries the fundamental pay­
ments position remained strong. The French franc and
Italian lira were less affected by movements of short-term
funds than other major currencies, partly because stricter
controls on such capital movements have been retained in
those countries and partly because their domestic money
markets are more limited. Both currencies stayed close to
their ceilings against the dollar throughout the first half
of the year, reflecting the large international payments
surpluses of these countries.
Therefore, despite some easing of Continental exchange
rates during the first quarter of 1962, these rates con­
tinued to be relatively strong in terms of the United States
dollar. To be sure, the deficit in the United States balance
of payments dropped substantially in the first quarter of
1962, compared with the final quarter of 1961. Never­
theless, the deficit remained at a $1.9 billion seasonally
adjusted annual rate.
The deficit was further reduced during the second
quarter, but the effect of this improvement on dollar ex­
change rates was largely offset by the development of a
somewhat uneasy atmosphere in the exchange markets in
the wake of the Canadian crisis and the stock market de­
clines of May and June. Funds once again moved into

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

Switzerland seeking the traditional “safe haven” of the
Swiss franc. During June this flow was bolstered by the
repatriation of funds by Swiss commercial banks seeking
domestic liquidity for midyear statement purposes. Con­
sequently, the Swiss franc rose to, and remained at or
near, the Swiss National Bank’s current buying rate for
dollars, and a substantial volume of dollars was added to
Swiss official reserves. Furthermore, a return flow of
capital to the Netherlands had already produced a marked
rise in the guilder rate early in the second quarter, with
Dutch banks repatriating funds to ease a domestic
liquidity shortage. Finally, the German mark began to
rise to above par for similar reasons, and the French franc
and the Italian lira remained at about their ceilings
throughout the quarter. Thus, at midyear, sterling and
the German mark were well above par while the other
major Continental currencies were near or at their ceilings.
OTHER CURRENCY D EVELO PM EN TS

The Japanese yen, under considerable pressure during
the latter half of 1961, showed a firmer undertone, as
Japan’s balance-of-payments position improved markedly
in the first half of 1962. Although the slightly higher rates
for the yen recorded early in the year were not sustained
beyond the first quarter, Japan’s international reserves
continued to increase through June, as the country’s trade
balance improved and there was a continued, though
somewhat reduced, inflow of both short- and long-term
capital. In Brazil there was a further depreciation of the
cruzeiro, and three times during the period the Bank of
Brazil raised its official buying and selling rates for dollars.
As a result, the selling rate on June 30 was 365 cruzeiros

109

to the dollar. Chile introduced a dual exchange rate system
on January 15. The official market is open only to com­
mercial banks and only for exports, imports, and some
nonmerchandise transactions; the rate in this market—
currently 1.053 escudos per dollar— is set by the central
bank. All other transactions must be settled through the
“broker’s market” in which the rate is permitted to fluc­
tuate freely (and in June was about 1.65 escudos to the
dollar). Also during the first half of 1962 the Argentine
peso began to fluctuate more freely and depreciated
rapidly, reaching 130 pesos to the dollar in the open mar­
ket before recovering somewhat in July under the influ­
ence of stringent measures to restrain imports.

M O N E Y A N D E C O N O M IC B A L A N C E

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York has just
published a 32-page booklet, Money and Economic
Balance. Intended as an aid to high school teachers,
it is also of interest to the layman seeking a simpli­
fied explanation of the role of money in our econ­
omy and how our money’s value changes. It gives a
capsule explanation of the business cycle and de­
scribes how the Federal Reserve System analyzes
the business situation and uses its powers over bank
credit and money creation to promote balance in
our economy. Copies are available, free, upon re­
quest, from the Public Information Department,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 33 Liberty
Street, New York 45, N. Y.

The Business Situation
The rate of economic expansion slowed markedly in
June, but early evidence pointed to some improvement
in July. Part of the sluggishness in June reflected the
temporary influences of a strike at the Ford Motor Com­
pany and a continued runoff of steel inventories that had
been stockpiled in anticipation of a steel strike. In July,
with the Ford dispute settled, auto assemblies advanced
counterseasonally, and reports from the steel industry




suggested that ingot production was bottoming out. In
addition, consumer spending in July, including purchases
of new cars, appeared to have strengthened.
The economy continues, however, to operate well be­
low capacity levels. Moreover, some of the June figures—
especially new orders for durable goods and the number
of housing starts— raise questions about the strength of
underlying demand in the months ahead. Some stimulus

110

MONTHLY REVIEW, AUGUST 1962

C h a rt I

RECENT CHANGES IN GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT
AND ITS COMPONENTS
S e a s o n a l l y a d ju s te d a n n u a l ra te s

C h a n g e s fro m fo urth q u a rt e r
1961 to first q u a rte r 1962

-4

| H | C h a n g e s from first q u a rte r
to s e c o n d q u a rt e r 1962

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

B illio n s of d o lla r s
S o u rce s: U n it e d S ta te s D e p a rtm e n t of C o m m e r c e ; C o u n c il of E co n o m ic A d v is e r s .

may be provided by the Treasury Department’s newly
issued depreciation rules, and there has been increased
discussion of an early tax cut that would encourage addi­
tional spending and that would be consistent with a gen­
eral tax reform aimed at enhancing the long-term growth
prospects of the economy.
S P E N D I N G P A T T E R N S IN T H E S E C O N D Q U A R T E R

Taking the second quarter as a whole, gross national
product rose by $7.0 billion to a seasonally adjusted an­
nual rate of $552.0 billion, according to preliminary esti­
mates by the Council of Economic Advisers.1 The in­
crease was only slightly larger than the relatively modest
advance scored in the first quarter (see Chart I). This
reflects, however, a sizable reduction in inventory invest­
ment, as steel users worked off the stocks accumulated
early in the year before the wage settlement had been
reached. The second-quarter increase in final demand
1 The usual midyear revision of the national income accounts
has lowered the earlier estimates of GNP for each of the four
preceding quarters by some $3-4 billion.




(GNP less the change in inventories) was $10.2 billion,
nearly double the first-quarter rise and the largest in­
crease in the current upswing save for the fourth quarter
of 1961. Moreover, the sharp advance occurred in spite
of a relatively small rise in government purchases of
goods and services.
About half of the increase in final demand was ac­
counted for by higher consumption expenditures. The
$4.8 billion rise in consumer outlays was somewhat
greater than the first-quarter increase, largely owing to
a reversal of the first quarter’s decline in spending for
durables. Despite some slowdown in May and June, pur­
chases from automotive dealers— which are the most vola­
tile component of durables consumption— were compara­
tively high for the spring as a whole.
Spending for residential construction turned around
sharply from the first quarter’s decline, as the better
weather that began in March permitted building activity
to shake off its winter doldrums. With a continued rise
in apartment house building, total outlays for residential
construction moved up by more than 10 per cent to the
highest level since the second quarter of 1959.
Final demands by the business sector were also up
markedly in the second quarter. Outlays for fixed invest­
ment increased by more than 4 per cent, in contrast to
the first-quarter rise of less than 1 per cent. The advance
was about in line with what had been expected from the
May survey of plant and equipment spending plans taken
by the Commerce Department and the Securities and Ex­
change Commission.
RECENT

DEVELOPMENTS

Despite these rather impressive over-all gains during
the second quarter, the pace slackened in June. The scant
rise of 0.3 per cent in industrial production, for example,
was smaller than in any of the preceding four months
(see Chart II). Much of the slowdown reflected the two
special influences noted earlier— a IV 2 per cent decline
in iron and steel production, resulting from the adjust­
ment of steel inventories, and a 5 per cent decrease in
the output of motor vehicles and parts stemming from the
Ford strike. Outside the steel and auto industries, produc­
tion rose by about 0.9 per cent. Although this increase
was somewhat smaller than occurred in the preceding
month, it was not very different from the average rate of
gain since January. In July, production of steel ingots
appeared to have declined only slightly, after seasonal
adjustment. And, auto assemblies rose counterseasonally,
with Ford stepping up its production schedules for both
July and August.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

A somewhat disturbing development in June was the
4 per cent decrease (seasonally adjusted) in new orders
received by manufacturers of durable goods. This forwardlooking series has now declined in four of the past five
months, following a continuous advance from January
1961 through January 1962 (see Chart II). In part, of
course, both the rise and the decline reflect corresponding
movements in steel orders, which swelled late last fall
and early this year and then fell off sharply once the steel
labor settlement was in sight. In June, however, declines
were relatively widespread in industries other than steel,
although part of this slack apparently was attributable to
the failure of defense orders to show their usual fiscalyear-end bulge.
The diminished rate of advance in June was also ap­
parent in nonagricultural employment (as measured by
the payroll survey), which increased only slightly follow­
ing a moderate gain in the preceding month. In manufac­
turing industries, employment was virtually unchanged,
and average weekly hours (seasonally adjusted) clocked
by production workers declined for the second month in
a row (see Chart II). In July, according to the Census
Bureau’s household survey, total employment showed a
little improvement, and the unemployment rate (unem­
ployment as a percentage of the civilian labor force) fell
to 5.3 per cent. However, a large part of this decline re­
flected a reduction in the labor force. Thus far this year,
the civilian labor force has grown at a significantly lower
rate than was implied in the Labor Department’s long­
term projections.
As a result of the shorter workweek in manufacturing
industries, wages and salaries in these industries moved
downward in June, the first decline since January. Pay­
rolls in other industries continued to rise, but the increase
in total personal income in June was only half the moder­
ate gain of the previous month. At the same time, retail
sales declined for the second consecutive month (see
Chart II). Sales of durables fell by 1V2 per cent, while




111

volume in most types of nondurables stores also declined.
Evidence on sales in July, however, suggests an improve­
ment in consumer spending. Unit sales of new cars
bounced back to, and may even have surpassed, their high
spring levels, while department store sales increased by
more than 3 per cent.

112

MONTHLY REVIEW, AUGUST 1962

The M oney M ark et in July

The money market was moderately firm over most of
July. Nation-wide reserve availability was higher on aver­
age than in June, but during much of the period ex­
cess reserves were lodged in general in country banks.
Toward the end of the month, a somewhat easier tone
emerged, as the distribution of reserves moved in favor
of the money market banks. The effective rate on Federal
funds was in a 2% to 3 per cent range over most of the
period. Rates posted by the major New York City banks
on call loans to Government securities dealers held gen­
erally within a 3 to 3 Vi per cent range over most of the
period and declined to a 2% to 3 per cent range as the
money market turned somewhat easier for a few days.
Treasury bill rates rose fairly sharply over the first two
thirds of the month. The market supply was expanded by
continued additions of $200 million to the weekly auc­
tions, and $2 billion of one-year bills was sold at a special
auction on July 10 to replace an equal amount maturing
on July 15. Over the final third of the period, however, bill
rates declined, and by the close of the month yields on
shorter term issues had fallen to levels somewhat below
those prevailing at the start. Prices of Treasury notes and
bonds declined over the month as a whole, as losses regis­
tered early in the period were only partly offset by inter­
mittent gains later in the month. The markets for cor­
porate and tax-exempt bonds were unusually quiet during
most of the period, and prices moved fractionally lower in
both sectors.
After the close of business on July 26, the Treasury
announced that it would refund in a single cash operation
$7.5 billion of securities maturing on August 15 and
raise about $1 billion of new money. Investors were
offered the following three new issues for cash: (1) $6.5
billion of one-year
per cent certificates, priced
at par; (2) $1.5 billion of 4 per cent e ^ -y e a r bonds
maturing February 15, 1969, priced at par; and (3) up to
$750 million of 4V4 per cent thirty-year bonds, maturing
August 15, 1992 and callable after August 15, 1987,
priced at 101 to yield 4.19 per cent. Subscription books
for the three new issues were open on one day, Monday,
July 30. Commercial banks were permitted to pay for
the bonds by credit to Tax and Loan Accounts.




M EM BER B A NK RESERVES

Operating transactions provided a small volume of
member bank reserves on balance over the four statement
weeks in July. Reserves were drained by movements in
gold and foreign accounts and by a substantial outflow of
currency into circulation around the holiday early in the
month, which was only partly offset by an inflow in the
last two weeks. However, the net impact of movements
in float, together with other factors, more than offset
these losses. Indeed, throughout the month float was

CHANGES IN FACTORS TENDING TO INCREASE OR DECREASE
MEMBER BANK RESERVES, JULY 1962
In millions of dollars; ( + ) denotes increase,
(—) decrease in excess reserves
D a ily averages— week ended

Net

Faotor
July

4

Changes

July
II

July

July

18

25

— 69
— 71
+ 190
4- 65
— 53

4- 300
— 317
— 42
4- 194

4 - 62

4- 129

— 74

— 3
— 87

— 104

— 109
— 33

Operating transactions
Treasury operations* ..............................
Federal Reserve float..........................
Currency in circulation......................
Gold and foreign account.......................
Other deposits, etc..................................

— 170
— 274

+ 85
+ 129
— 297

+ 163
15 + 1123
—

— 39
4 - 412
-j- 64
— 135
+ 96

Total .....................................

— 248

— 83

-f- 398

+ 474
4- 90

- f 163
— 85

— 15

— 65
— 7

—

4 - 27

+

+
1
— 4

+
^
— 24

+ 1

4-

3

+ 2

+ 283
— 105

— 80
— 19

— 182
+ 133

_ 113
4- 24

— 92
4- 33

Total reservest ...................................
Effect of change in required reservest.......

178

— 99

— 49
65

— 89
4- 103

— 59
4- 142

Excess reservest ......................................

- f 50

4- 14

4 - 83

Daily average level of member bank:
Borrowings from Reserve Banks......... .
Excess reservest .......................................
Free reserves! ......................................

543
423

+ 17

Direct Federal Reserve credit transactions

Government securities:
Direct market purchases or sales.......
Held under repurchase agreements.,,.,
Loans, discounts, and advances:
Member bank borrowings..................
Other ..................................................
Bankers’ acceptances:
Bought outright ..................................
Under repurchase agreem ents...........

3

+ 108
11

-f

10

Total .....................................
Member bank reserves

With Federal Reserve Banks.............
Cash allowed as reservest.................

- f 102

120

+
55
546
491

163
562
399

Note: Because of rounding, figures do not necessarily add to totals.
* Includes changes in Treasury currency and cash,
t These figures are estimated,
t Average for four weeks ended July 25, 1962.

59
576
517

991:

557$
458$

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

especially unpredictable in part because of the labor dis­
pute in the airlines. System Account open market opera­
tions absorbed reserves on balance between the last state­
ment week in June and the final week in July, as average
outright holdings of Government securities declined by $3
million and average holdings under repurchase agree­
ments fell by $87 million. From Wednesday, June 27,
through Wednesday, July 25, System Account holdings
of Government securities declined by $203 million.
Over the four statement weeks in July, free reserves
averaged $458 million, compared with $368 million in
the four statement weeks ended June 27. Average excess
reserves rose by $90 million to $557 million, while aver­
age borrowings from the Federal Reserve Banks were
unchanged at $99 million.
TH E G O V E R N M E N T SE C U R IT IES M A R K E T

Treasury bill rates rose fairly steadily until July 18,
as the Treasury continued to add $100 million to the
regular weekly auctions of both three- and six-month bills
and rolled over $2 billion of one-year bills maturing July
15. In addition, uncertainty regarding the implications for
credit policy of the balance-of-payments problem, coupled
with the slow rate of economic recovery, continued to
influence the market. In each of the first three weekly
auctions during the month, average issuing rates advanced
on both three- and six-month issues, reaching 2.983 per
cent and 3.134 per cent, respectively, in the July 16 auc­
tion. These rates were 19 and 26 basis points higher,
respectively, than those reached in the auction of June
25 and were the highest since mid-1960. The advance in
bill rates was interrupted several times, however, by inter­
mittent buying by commercial banks and other investors.
Considerable investor interest developed at the special
auction of one-year bills on July 10, when the average
issuing rate was set at 3.257 per cent.
Beginning July 18, the rate advance was reversed when
a strong demand appeared from both commercial bank
and nonbank sources. In the regular auction on July 23,
average issuing rates were set at 2.892 per cent and 3.103
per cent for three- and six-month bills, respectively, about
9 and 3 basis points below a week earlier. Following the
auction, the market for Treasury bills continued to gain
strength, and rate declines were particularly marked in
short-dated maturities, where scarcities had developed. In
the final auction of the month on July 30, average issuing
rates, at 2.874 per cent and 3.075 per cent on three- and
six-month bills, respectively, were about 2 and 3 basis
points below the previous week. Over the month as a
whole, three-month bill rates declined by about 4 basis




113

points while rates on six-month bills rose by approxi­
mately 11 basis points.
Prices of Treasury notes and bonds moved lower on
balance until July 19 in quiet trading. A number of un­
certainties pervaded the market. Among these were ques­
tions concerning the terms of the Treasury refinancing in
August, the strength of the economic advance, and dis­
cussion of possible changes in fiscal and monetary policy.
In this cautious atmosphere, dealers attempted to lighten
their inventories. Yet, from July 10 through July 13 prices
moved moderately higher in quiet trading, partially reflect­
ing the enthusiastic reception accorded a large Aaa-rated
new corporate issue at a 4.45 per cent yield and a more
optimistic official appraisal of the balance-of-payments
outlook. The cautious tone reappeared around midmonth,
however, when press discussions focused attention on
possible changes in monetary and fiscal policy.
On July 19 the market turned around, as increased de­
mand emerged, particularly for short and intermediate
maturities. Subsequent price gains also reflected lighter
dealer inventories as well as the absence of any significant
volume of offerings. With the approach of the date of the
Treasury’s announcement of its terms for the refunding,
activity slackened and prices fluctuated within a narrow
range. The Treasury’s announcement on July 26 was
favorably received, and a good investor response to the
new issues was expected. Following the announcement,
prices of outstanding notes and bonds adjusted somewhat
lower, as some offerings appeared against subscriptions
for the new issues. Over the month as a whole, prices of
Treasury notes and bonds ranged from % 2 higher to VA
points lower.
OTH ER SE C U R IT IES M A R K E T S

The markets for corporate and tax-exempt bonds were
unusually quiet over the month, and uncertainty and cau­
tion were the dominant sentiments. Investor attitudes
largely reflected the same influences that were prevalent in
the market for United States Government securities. In
this atmosphere, new offerings, while moderate in volume,
met mixed investor receptions. New corporate issues
marketed during the month amounted to approximately
$220 million, compared with $470 million in June 1962
and $425 million in July 1961. The largest corporate
public offering of the month was a $50 million Aaa-rated
telephone company issue of AVi per cent debentures matur­
ing in 2002. Nonrefundable for five years and reoffered to
yield 4.45 per cent, these securities were quickly sold out
and moved to a slight premium. On the other hand, a
utility company offering of $25 million to yield 4.30 per

114

MONTHLY REVIEW, AUGUST 1962

cent was regarded as closely priced and met a poor recep­
tion. The total volume of tax-exempt bonds floated during
the month came to $590 million, as against $730 million
in June 1962 and $422 million in July 1961. The largest
new tax-exempt offering during the period was a $103.7
million issue of A-rated local government serial bonds.
Reoffered to yield from 1.75 per cent in 1963 to 3.70
per cent in 1992, this offering met a fair initial reception.
Prices of seasoned corporate and tax-exempt obligations
changed little on balance over the month. Prices declined
somewhat in both sectors of the market during the early
part of the period, but then edged upward toward the
middle of the month when a few new issues were accorded




good receptions. Over most of the remainder of the
month, the market for corporate bonds maintained a firm
tone, although prices fell following the Treasury financing
announcement toward the end of the month. Prices of
tax-exempt securities moved slightly lower, as dealers
made small price concessions in an effort to lighten their
still heavy inventories. The Blue List of advertised dealer
offerings fell to $479 million at the end of July from $538
million a month earlier. Over the month as a whole,
Moody’s average yield on seasoned Aaa-rated corporate
bonds rose by 7 basis points to 4.36 per cent, while the
average yield on similarly rated tax-exempt issues rose by
3 basis points to 3.11 per cent.

FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK

Publications of the Federal R eserve Bank o f N e w Y o rk
The following publications are available free (except where a charge is indicated) from the Public
Information Department, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York 45, N. Y. Copies of charge
publications are available at half price to educational institutions.
D O M E STIC M O N E T A R Y E C O N O M IC S

1. m o n e y : m a s t e r o r s e r v a n t ? (1954) by Thomas O. Waage. A 48-page booklet explaining
in nontechnical language the role of money and banking in our economy. Includes a description of the
structure of our money economy, tells how money is created, and how the Federal Reserve System in­
fluences the cost, supply, and availability of credit, as it seeks to encourage balanced economic growth
at high levels of employment.

2. t h e m o n e y s i d e o f “ t h e s t r e e t ” (1959) by Carl H. Madden. A 104-page booklet giving
a layman’s account of the workings of the New York money market and seeking to convey an under­
standing of the functions and usefulness of the short-term wholesale money market and of its role in the
operations of the Federal Reserve. 70 cents per copy.
3. FEDERA L RESERVE O PERATIO NS IN T H E M ONEY A N D G O V E R N M E N T SECURITIES M ARKETS
(1956) by Robert V. Roosa. A 105-page booklet describing how Federal Reserve operations are con­
ducted through the Trading Desk in execution of the directions of the Federal Open Market Committee.
Discusses the interrelation of short-term technical and long-range policy factors in day-to-day operations.
Has sections on the role of the national money market, its instruments and institutions, trading procedures in
the Government securities market, what the Trading Desk does, the use of projections and the “feel”
of the market, and operating liaison with the Federal Open Market Committee.
4. d e p o s i t v e l o c i t y a n d i t s s i g n i f i c a n c e (1959) by George Garvy. An 88-page booklet dis­
cussing the behavior of deposit velocity, over the business cycle and over long periods, with emphasis on
the institutional and structural forces determining its behavior. 60 cents per copy.
IN T E R N A T IO N A L . E C O N O M IC S

5.

THE

Q U E ST

FO R

BALANCE

IN

THE

I N T E R N A T I O N A L P A Y M E N T S SY S T E M

(Reprinted from

Annual Report 1961, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.) A 17-page article reviewing steps taken
to strengthen the international financial system, the matter of dealing with basic payments difficulties,
and the continuing task of achieving financial stability and economic balance.
6. t h e n e w y o r k f o r e i g n e x c h a n g e m a r k e t (1959) by Alan R. Holmes. A 56-page booklet
primarily concerned with a description of the New York foreign exchange market as it exists today. In­
cludes material on forward exchange and interest arbitrage. 50 cents per copy.
7. FOREIGN C EN T R A L B A N K IN G : T H E IN ST R U M E N T S O F M O N ETARY POLICY (1957) by Peter
G. Fousek. A 116-page booklet describing the development of central banking techniques abroad dur­
ing the postwar period. Includes discussions on discount policy, open market operations, reserve re­
quirements, liquidity ratios, and selective and direct credit controls. The final chapter describes foreign
money markets, and outlines many of the measures taken in various foreign countries since the end
of World War II to broaden these markets.
8. M ONETARY POLICY UN DER T H E IN T E R N A T IO N A L GOLD STA N D A R D , 1880-1914 (1959) by
Arthur I. Bloomfield. A 62-page booklet analyzing in the light of current monetary and banking theory,
the performance and policies of central banks within the framework of the pre-1914 gold standard.
50 cents per copy.