View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FRBSF

WEEKLY LETTER

Number 93-30, September 10, 1993

Summer Special Edition:
Touring the West
Summer marks the peak tourist and travel season in
the United States. And a number of areas in the
Twelfth District are more dependent on tourism,
travel, and related industries than the national
average. Conditions in these industries are of particular interest in District areas that are afflicted
by weakness in other sectors of their economies.

travel through June is down 9.5 percent from eastbound (Asia) visitors and 4.6 percent for westbound (mainland U.S.) visitors. While tourism
provided an economic boom in the 1980s, development officials are now exploring the promotion
of high-tech and communications industries to
provide a more diversified economic base.

How is District tourism faring? This Letter reviews
conditions in the tourist and travel industry in
certain key regions of the District. Like other indicators of economic activity in the District, the
tourist industry is performing sluggishly in southern California and Hawaii while it is setting records in Idaho and Utah. These trends are shown
to be directly reflected in employment, amplifying, rather than offsetting, other economic trends
in the regions.

Sluggish conditions also exist in California. Hotel
employment in the state has dropped 8.0 percent
since August 1990-a loss of 15,000 jobs. The
decline is due in part to the state's severe economic recession, which has dampened business
travel. In addition, Los Angeles has shown only
a slight recovery from the trauma of the civil
disturbances in May 1992. Hotel occupancy in
the city this past May was 58.4 percent, barely
above the 57.2 rate of a year earlier. Tourism in
San Diego also is reported to have suffered from
the downturn in the defense industry as well as
the southern California recession. Conference
and business travel is down, as are spur-of-themoment trips by southern California residents.

Current developments and trends
Tourism and travel conditions in the Twelfth
District bear a striking resemblance to the variety
of current economic conditions in District states.
Economic conditions are weak in California,
sluggish in Hawaii and western Washington, but
among the strongest in the nation in the-intermountain region. Travel and tourism conditions
correlate closely with these economic trends,
with industry performance ranging from depressed or sluggish in Hawaii and southern
California, to robust in Idaho and Utah.
One barometer of trends in the travel and tourism
industry is hotel employment. Hawaii's tourist
slump is evident in the sharp drop in hotel employment since it peaked in April 1992-3,000 jobs
lost, or 7.4 percent of total employment, offsetting most of the gain realized in the previous two
years or so. Reflecting the slump, unemployment
has risen to the 4 to 5 percent range (4.8 percent
in July) from the 2 to 3 percent range seen in 1991
and preceding years. Tourism in Hawaii has suffered for a number of reasons: the recessions in
Japan and California, the drop in tourism following the Gulf War, and Hurricane Iniki's devastation of the island of Kauai. For 1993, year-to-date

Contacts report that established tourist attractions, such 'as San Francisco and Orange County,
have fared better than other regions, in part because of new attractions, like Toontown at Disneyland. Reflecting the recession, contacts report
that the fastest growing segment of the California
amusement industry is the family fun centersfeaturing miniature golf, batting cages, video
games, water slides, etc.-that offers relatively
low-cost entertainment.
The states showing the most robust tourist conditions in the District are Idaho and Utah. In
Idaho, inquiries for vacation information were
up 12.5 percent in the first three months of 1993.
So far in 1993, visitors to Salt Lake City are up
8.6 percent from a year earlier. Reflecting the
boom in recent years, hotel employment since
January 1989 has risen 18.6 percent in Idaho and
22.8 percent in Utah. Year-to-date hotel and
motel tax revenues in Idaho and Utah (Salt Lake
area) are up 11.5 and 7.8 percent, respectively.

FABSF
These states benefited from abundant snows last
winter which provided excellent skiing conditions. The precipitation also improved this summer's conditions for water recreation, ranging
from marinas to white water rafting. Also, "ecotourism:' focusing on wilderness areas, national
forests, and state forest preserves, is a growing
segment of the market in Idaho. A similar story
holds in Utah, where national park attendance
is at record levels.
Furthermore, just as economic recession is negatively affecting the travel and tourism industry in
California, contacts report that robust economic
conditions are aiding the travel and tourism industry of the intermountain regions. Growing
industries, such as computer software, are attracting significant conferences and meetings, which
promote the areas to business travelers as tourist
destinations.
Finally, dwelling on good conditions brings us to
Nevada. For several years expansion in the Las
Vegas casino industry has provided so many construction jobs that construction now accounts for
7 percent of Nevada's employment, well above
the national average of 4.2 percent. Although
negatively affected by the drop in travel during
the Gulf War, hotel employment has rebounded
in the past year and stands 15 percent above the
January 1989 level. The state is facing competition from the legalization of gambling in other
states and the expansion of gambling on Native
American reservations. To meet this competition,
new developments are designed to broaden the
state's appeal by focusing on entertainment for
the whole family. For example, three new resort/theme park hotels with 10,000 rooms will
open in the coming winter. The largest of these
three developments is already sold out for the
first six months of 1994.

Is tourism important?
The size of the tourism-related industries relative
to the rest of the region's economy is as impoitant as its rate of growth. One measure of importance is the employment in these industries as
a share of total employment. We therefore aggregated these tourist-related industries into two
distinct tourist sectors, and measured their employment shares. First, a "primary" measure
aggregates employment in hotel, amusement
and recreation, and auto rentals. This measure
is viewed as a conservative, direct measure of
the effects of tourism in an economy. Second, a
broader measure is calculated that includes em-

ployment in eating and drinking establishments,
air, water, and intercity transport, and transportation services.
This "secondary" measure obviously includes
some nontourist elements of a regional economy
(for example, demand for eating and drinking establishments by local residents). However, it still
excludes some segments of tourist activity including spending at retail establishments (which
are not easily broken out between tourist and
nontourist spending). These measures are then
viewed as providing information as to the relative ranking of the importance of tourism across
regions, as opposed to the absolute importance
of tourism within a region.
The results of this exercise are shown in Figure 1.
Most District states have tourism and travel sectors that are larger than the nation's, but not by
much. The primary shares in Idaho, Oregon,
California, Utah, and Washington are in the 2
to 3 percent range versus a national average of
2.1 percent. Adding in the secondary sector
yields a similar result, with the total shares for
these states in the 8 to 9 percent range versus a
national average of 8.2 percent. Arizona and
Alaska exhibit somewhat larger sectors, with the
primary share accounting for over 3 percent of
employment and the total share accounting for
between 10 and 11 percent.
The striking exceptions in the District are Hawaii
and Nevada. The primary measure accounts for
8 percent and 24 percent of these two states,
respectively. Adding in the secondary measure
yields total shares of 18 percent for Hawaii and
30 percent for Nevada. An even higher percentage is seen in Las Vegas, where the primary and
total shares for Clark County are 28 percent and
34 percent, respectively. These totals are striking
both compared to other District states and compared to a similarly tourist-dependent state like
Florida. The comparable employment for Florida
is 4 percent for the primary share and Ii percent
for the total share.

Interpretation
How should we view these results? One interpretation is that developments in travel and
tourism are crucial for the economies of Hawaii
and Nevada. When this industry is healthy in
these regions, the states do well. This is corroborated by the current good times in Nevada, one
of the strongest growing states in the nation, and
the economic weakness in Hawaii.

Emp. Share

For California, the industry accounts for almost
exactly the national average. The California economy is much more heavily based on manufacturing, construction, and trade than on these tourist
sectors. This suggests that while the current
mixed conditions in the California industry are
not necessarily good news, the California slump
is being driven by conditions in sectors other
than tourism.

Tourism Share of Employment

(percent)

30

25
20
15
10

5
oJ-.---I

U.S.

I--..

L-

ID

OR

CA

•

----I=--__---'

UT

WA

Primary

0

AZ

AK

Secondary

L-.-.

FL

HI

NV

I

!n states vvhere tourism and travel are a small
share, good conditions in the industry both reflect the underlying health of the economy, and
are "icing on the cake:' The Idaho and Utah
economies would likely still be strong performers
even without their tourism boom. The attractions
of these states as destination points only add to
their economic prosperity.

For certain regions in California, however, the
tourist and travel industry is more important. The
employment shares in the primary sector for San
Diego, Orange, and San Francisco are around
3 percent versus the state average of 2.3 percent.
Total shares for these regions are around 10 percent versus the state average of 8.6 percent. In
contrast, Los Angeles's primary share is only
1.8 percent. Adding in the secondary sector, however, brings Los Angeles back to the state average. The touristand travel slump in San Diego
and Los Angeles, therefore, both reflects the underlying regional economic dovvnturn, and is a
further source of economic weakness. In contrast, stronger conditions in Orange County and
San Francisco are helping these areas weather
the current economic slump.
Brian A. Cromwell
Economist

Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Editorial comments may be addressed to the editor or to the author•... Free copies of Federal Reserve publications can be
obtained from the Public Information Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702, San Francisco 94120.
Phone (415) 974-2246, Fax (415) 974-3341.

@l t.r\
'S~UI ueaq'\os 41 lM
~ ~ Jaded pap'\oaJ uo palulJd

OU176 \I) 'O:lspueJJ ueS
lOLL

O)SI)UOJ~

JO

X09

·Ud

UOS

~U08

aAJaSa~ IOJapa~

~uaw~Jodaa 4)JOasatl

Index to Recent Issues of FRBSF Weekly Letter

DATE

NUMBER

2/19
2/26
3/5

93-07
93-08
93-09

3/12

93-10

3/19
3/26
4/2
4/9
4/16
4/23
4130
5/7
5/14
5/21
5/28
6/4
6/18
6/25
7/16
7/23
8/8
8/20
9/3

93-11
93-12
93-13
93-14
93-15
93-16
93-17
93-18
93-19
93-20
93-21
93-22
93-23
93-24
93-25
93-26
93-27
93-28
93-29

TITLE

AUTHOR

The Twelfth District Agricultural Outlook
Saving-Investment Linkages in the Pacific Basin
A Single Market for Europe?
Risks in the Swaps Market
On the Changing Composition of Bank Portfolios
Interest Rate Spreads as Indicators for Monetary Policy
The Lonesome Twin
Why Has Employment Grown So Slowly?
Interpreting the Term Structure of Interest Rates
California Banking Problems
Is Banking on the Brink? Another Look
European Exchange Rate Credibility before the Fall
Computers and Productivity
Western Metal Mining
Federal Reserve Independence and the Accord of 1951
China on the Fast Track
Interdependence: U.S. and japanese Real Interest Rates
NAFTA and u.s. jobs
japan's Keiretsu and Korea's Chaebol
Interest Rate Risk at U.s. Commercial Banks
Whither California?
Economic Impacts of Military Base Closings and Realignments
Bank Lending and the Transmission of Monetary Policy

Dean
Kim
Glick/Hutchison
Laderman
Neuberger
Huh
Throop
Trehan
Cogley
Zimmerman
Levonian
Rose
Schmidt
Schmidt
'vValsh
Cheng
Hutchison
Moreno
Huh/Kim
Neuberger
Sherwood-Call
Sherwood-Call
Trehan

The FRBSF Weekly Letter appears on an abbreviated schedule in june, july, August, and December.