View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

September 28, 1973

RMmg Up fte J Gairv®
When the devalued dollar made its
debut two years ago, most ob­
servers expected that the nation's
balance of payments would soon
shift from deficit to surplus. It
didn't happen, and newspaper
readers were soon made familiar
with the J-curve phenomenon,
whereby devaluation leads initially
to a worsening of the trade balance,
and lasting improvement occurs
only after a prolonged delay.
While many factors affect the bal­
ance of trade and obscure the ef­
fects of exchange-rate changes,
there was indeed an early wors­
ening of the trade balance. The
merchandise-trade account, which
had first shifted into deficit in early
1971, went from a $2.7-billion deficit
for that year as a whole to a $6.9billion deficit in 1972. Initially, im­
ports rose in dollar value, reflecting
the appreciation of foreign curren­
cies relative to the dollar, while
exports (priced in dollars) improved
somewhat due to boom conditions
abroad but otherwise tended to be
little affected by the dollar's decline.
Now, two years later, the delayed
upsurge in exports is occurring and
the U.S. trade balance is beginning
to ride the J curve upward. The
lower prices of U.S. products (in
foreign currencies) have increased
their appeal overseas, while the
higher prices of foreign goods have
begun to discourage domestic
demand for such products despite

the continued needs of the U.S.
boom.
As a result, the merchandise-trade
account is rapidly shifting from last
year's $6.9-billion deficit toward
balance, despite some weakness in
August, and in 1974 could even post
a substantial surplus. The basic
balance—which includes long-term
capital flows, transfer payments and
services as well as the trade account
—should continue its shift toward
balance, building on the much-im­
proved performance of first-half
1973.
Export boom vs. imports
Merchandise exports continued to
rise appreciably in the second
quarter—to a $66.8-billion annual
rate, or more than two-fifths larger
than the year-ago figure— and the
improvement apparently is con­
tinuing in the third quarter. The
earlier upsurge in farm exports has
recently been complemented by a
rise in nonfarm commodities, which
accounted for three-fourths of the
second-quarter gain. Still, farm
exports should remain strong into
1974, on the basis of the calorie
needs of many disaster stricken
developing countries and the pro­
tein requirements of the increas­
ingly affluent countries of Europe
and Japan. Bumper crops of grains
and soybeans are anticipated in this
country, and whatever is not
needed at home should be snapped
up by foreign buyers.
(continued on page 2)




Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not
necessarily reflect the views of the management of the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, nor of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Exports have benefitted from this
year's depreciation of the dollar and
from the continuing effects of ear­
lier currency adjustments. The ex­
port expansion may slow down in
1974, however, as traders complete
their adjustment to the new ex­
change-rate relationships and as
other countries cool their econ­
omies in order to curb inflation.
The developing strength in exports,
while a factor of expansion in an
already overstimulated domestic
economy, could help offset any
weakness which might appear in
the economy during the coming
year. Over the past decade, jobs
related to merchandise exports
have increased more than 30
percent— half again as fast as total
private employment. This sector
should become an even more dy­
namic element now that the dollar
is no longer overvalued.
In view of the insatiable demands of
the continuing domestic boom,
imports rose to a $68.0-billion an­
nual rate in the second quarter, or
more than one-fourth higher than a
year ago. Import growth has begun
to slow, however, at the same time
that exports have been booming.
Consequently, although the mer­
chandise-trade account remained in
deficit during the April-June period
(for the ninth consecutive quarter),
it has been moving rapidly toward
surplus, as was noted above.
The import expansion has been re­
strained by the high dollar prices of



foreign goods, due to two devalua­
tions of the dollar within two years.
Moreover, as time goes on, imports
may be retarded by the expected
deceleration in the American
economy and the consequent de­
creased demand for foreign products—
with the major exception of products
needed to ease the energy crisis.
Other accounts
The trade account and the J curve
do not tell the whole story, since
other accounts have also been im­
proving. The travel-and-transportation account should continue to be
a large deficit item, although less so
than in recent years. Receipts from
foreign tourists could rise strongly,
on the basis of the depreciated
dollar and growing prosperity
abroad. U.S. travel abroad mean­
while will be slowed by the higher
prices of foreign currencies, and by
rising prices abroad. In addition,
such payments may be curtailed
next year by the slower growth in
income here as the economy cools.
The investment income account
could continue very strong, in large
part because the earnings made on
our substantial foreign investments
are now worth considerably more
than before in terms of dollars.
Receipts also may benefit from in­
creased repatriation of earnings
from abroad, partly as a reflection
of the growing confidence in the
dollar. On the other hand, overseas
profits (and repatriated earnings)
may be hurt in any slowdown of the
international economy.

The expected increase in invest­
ment income from abroad will have
as a partial offset a rising volume of
payments to foreigners, reflecting
the expansion of foreign investment
in the increasingly attractive U.S.
economy. Payment outflows cur­
rently are also being boosted by the
very high level of U.S. interest rates.
Lagged effects
On balance, the nation seems at last
to be experiencing the lagged ef­
fects of the exchange-rate adjust­
ments that have taken place over
the past two years. Moreover, while
the dollar has recently recovered
some of the ground lost against
most major foreign currencies from
late May to early July, its value is
still well below the rates that pre­
vailed in the early spring. Indeed, at
recently prevailing rates, the dollar
appears undervalued in terms of
most other currencies, and the

strong competitive stimulus that
this gives U.S. business should help
strengthen the trade account for
some time to come.
However, the present exchangerate advantage should tend to be
reduced as the trade account im­
proves and as the dollar strengthens
under a regime of floating rates.
The improvement in the trade bal­
ance should in turn contribute to a
restoration of confidence in the
dollar and to a rising demand for
dollars.
Dollar assets, both long-and short
term, should appeal to foreign
investors at presently prevailing
bargain prices and rates of return.
This should further strengthen the
dollar against foreign currencies,
and thus reduce the exchange-rate
price advantage associated with an
overdepreciated dollar.
Ernest C. Olson

Foreign Investment in Asia
Copies will soon be available of the monograph,.Foreign Investment in Asia,
by Donald R. Sherk, Professor of Economics at Simmons College in Boston.
The study sets forth the present patterns and types of U.S. and Japanese
private investment in Asia, projects the investment trends through the 1970s,
and discusses the host-country benefits and costs associated with these
investments. In addition, it points out the potential areas of conflict implicit
in these trends, and offers some suggestions for multilateral cooperation that
are designed to maximize the regional economic contribution of the
investment flow s... . Copies of this monograph—single copies only— are
available upon request to the Administrative Service Department, Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702, San Francisco 94120. Phone
(415) 397-1137.

Digitizeg for FRASER


u o i S u il is h m

• ijetn • uo8a.io • eppA^N • °MBP1
• eiuJOi!|B3 • e u o zu y • e>jse|y

m

neMen

BANKING DATA—TWELFTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
(Dollar amounts in millions)
Selected Assets and Liabilities
Large Commercial Banks
Loans adjusted and investments *
Loans adjusted— total*
Secu rities loans
Com mercial and industrial
Real estate
Consum er instalment
U.S. Treasury securities
Other securities
Deposits (less cash items)— total*
Demand deposits adjusted
U.S. Governm ent deposits
Time deposits— total*
Savings
Other time I.P.C.
State and political subdivisions
(Large negotiable CD 's)
Weekly Averages
of Daily Figures
Member Bank Reserve Position
Excess reserves
Borrowings
Net free ( + ) / Net borrowed ( - )
Federal Funds— Seven Large Banks
Interbank Federal funds transactions
Net purchases ( + )/ Net sales ( - )
Transactions: U.S. securities dealers
Net loans (+ )/ Net borrowings ( - )

Amount
Outstanding
9/12 / 73
75,436
58,361
1,782
20,269
17,279
8,621
5,221
11,854
73,212
21,765
445
49,667
17,380
23,365
5,911
12,428

Change
from
9 / 5 / 73
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
—

+

801
710
660
50
43
12
28
63
481
322
200
58
46
12
0
193

W eekended
9/12 / 73
-

Change from
year ago
Dollar
Percent
+ 10,714
+ 11,002
87
+
+ 3,512
+ 3,030
+ 1,327
881
+
593
+ 9,870
+ 1,446
132
+
+ 8,269
842
+ 7,158
816
+
+ 6,828
W eekended
9 / 5 / 73

16.55
23.23
5.13
20.96
21.26
18.19
14.44
5.27
15.58
7.12
42.17
19.97
4.62
44.17
16.13
121.93

+
+
+
+
+
+
-

+
+
+
+
+
-

+
+
+

Com parable
year-ago period

9
184
- 193

55
225
-1 7 0

-

28
9
37

+ 241

-7 5 2

+

257

+ 905

+ 122

+

700

in c lu d e s items not shown separately.
inform ation on this and other publications can be obtained by callin g or w riting the
Adm inistrative Services Departm ent. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O . Box 7702,
Digitized for F R A S e R rancisco, California 94120. Phone (415) 397-1137.