View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

FRBSF

WEEKLY LETTER

Number 91-27, July 26, 1991

Real Estate Loan
Problems in the West
Real estate loans have been a source of losses
for banks in many areas of the country since
before the recession began. Recently, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation Chairman William Seidman raised concerns about problem
real estate loans in California, which has focused
attention on the qual ity of real estate loans at
western banks, especially those headquartered
in California.
In this Letter problem loan ratios are evaluated
to gauge the severity of the recent deterioration
in western banks' real estate loan portfolios,
vvhich include about half of all bank loans.
Clearly, the problems experienced in the region
reflect the impacts of the recession and the real
estate slump. However, the evidence also suggests that asset quality deterioration has been less
severe in the West than in the nation as a whole,
and that current indicators are not out of line
with those at the end of the last recession.

Commercial real estate problems

in the West, as measured by problem loan ratios,
is still better than that reported by the industry as
a whole. In March 1991 problem loan ratios were
5.66 and 5.82 percent for western and California
banks, respectively, compared to 8.8 percent for
the nation.
Furthermore, the historical time series for
problem real estate loans at large banks (with
over $100 million in assets) shown in the chart
also helps to put the current figures in perspective. Despite the upturn in problem realestate
loans in the West after June 1990, problem loan
ratios for the region also remain well below that
experienced at the end of the last recession
in 1982.

Problem Real Estate Loans*

Percent

11
10
9

,

'.'.
,".
....
,'"~"'"

8

Banks' equity capital and loan loss reserves
provide a cushion against losses on real estate,
commercial, and consumer loans and against
the risk of earnings disruptions arising from asset
quality problems. However, while banks nationwide have added about $19 billion in equity
capital and loan loss reserves since year-end
1989, their "problem" loans (defined as loans
30 days or more past due or no longer accruing
interest) have increased by nearly double that
amount.

'Annual data 1983-1988; quarterly data 1989-1991

In the three quarters since June 1990, such
problem real estate loans in the western region
have nearly doubled as a percent of total real
estate loans. Despite this increase, asset quality

The data for March 1991 for the first time also
provide a breakdown of real estate loans by category for all banks. These data clearly indicate the

WESTERn BAnKinG

\ •...•.

Twelfth District

....

7
6

--~

\

5

US'" ... _ - - - -

4

3
2
1

California

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

Western Banking is a quarterly review of banking
developments in the Twelfth Federal Reserve District. it is published in the Weekly Letter on the fOUith
Friday of January, April, July, and October.

o

FRBSF
sources and magnitude of real estate loan problems. Nationally, only 3.2 percent of single family loans are reported as problem loans in March;
in the western region, the number is even smaller
- L9 percent. Commercial real estate and construction loans, however, both in the nation and
in the region, have deteriorated much more.
About 13 percent of all bank loans in the nation,
or $240 billion, are secured by commercial real
estate. Western banks ($43.7 billion) and California banks ($30.7 billion) hold about the same
share of their loan portfolio in commercial real
estate loans as do banks nationally. In March,
U.S. banks reported that 9.39 percent, or $22.5
billion, of their commercial real estate loans
were past due or on nonaccrual status. These
ratios also are high in the region (6.75 percent)
and in California (7.28 percent), but are still well
below the industry average; these ratios are less
than half the problem loan ratios reported in the
depressed Northeast region.
Commercial real estate loan problems are
likely to remain a major drag on asset quaiity
and earnings, because overbuilding in this sector
has resulted in high vacancy rates and falling
rental rates in many markets. Salomon Brothers,
for example, estimated that there is roughly an
ll-year supply of commercial office space nationally. Thus many analysts expect that commercial
real estate loans may continue to deteriorate
even if the economy turns around quickly.
Construction loan problems

Construction financing traditionally has been
a relatively high risk activity, reflecting the nature
of the construction industry itself. Nationally,
banks' troubled loan figures for March bear this
out. Problem construction loans, at $22.8 billion,
exceeded the amount of troubled commercial
real estate loans, even though outstanding construction and land development lending for the
U.s., at $121 billion, is only half the level of
commercial real estate lending.
Further deterioration in construction loan quality
could have a disproportionate impact on banks'
performance in the West, because construction
lending is a larger part of banks' loan portfolios
in this region than in the nation. In March 1991,
construction lending accounted for 6.5 percent

of total loans for the U.s., 9.1 percent for the
region, and 9.7 percent in California.
Still, western banks are reporting lower levels
of problem construction loans than banks nationally. In March U.S. banks reported that 18.8 percent of their construction loans were problem
loans, whereas banks in the region and California
reported 13.4 and 14.2 percent, respectively. In
contrast, New England banks reported problem
loan ratios more than twice the ratio for
California.
Given many analysts' prognoses for a weak
recovery in construction and housing, and the
likelihood that the high level of problem loans
today may result in increased loan charge-off
rates in the future, even the lower level of deterioration reported in this region will be a major
challenge.
Big picture

Clearly, banks in California and the West have
experienced a significant increase in problem
real estate loans since the onset of the recession.
And, depending on the strength and timing of
the recovery, nationally as well as in this region,
problem loans could continue to rise until improved business conditions are reflected in the
cash flows and on the balance sheets of banks'
borrowers. Certainly, recent actions by several
large western banks to boost loan loss reserves
in the second quarter suggest that a recovery
in asset quality will follow a normal patternlagging a turnaround in the economy, rather
than moving with it.
Still, problem loan ratios suggest that real
estate loan deterioration has been less severe
in the West than in the nation as a whole or in
the depressed northeastern states. And, by comparison to the end of the 1982 recession, real
estate loan deterioration in this region has not
been so severe. Thus, while California may now
be an area of concern, at least through the first
three quarters of the recession, real estate loans
at the state's banks continued to outperform
the nation.

Gary C. Zimmerman
Economist

REGIONAL BANK DATA
HARCH 31, 1991
(Not Seasonal! y Adjusted, Preliminary Data)
DISTRICT

ALASKA

--------

ARIZONA

.. _------

CALIF.

---- .. ---

HAWAII

IDAHO

........ ---- .. --_ ...... -

NEVADA

OREGON

UTAH

WASH •

ASSETS AND lIA8lLITIES -. $ MILLION
ASSETS

TOTAL
FOREIGN
DOMESTIC

497,723
37,956
459,767

4,348
1
4,347

33,855
N/A
33,855

341,677
35,855
305,822

17,945
1,865
16,080

8,938
N/A
8,938

14,753
N/A
14,753

25,202
15
25,187

11,862
59
11,803

39,144
162
38,982

LOANS

TOTAL
FOREIGN
DOMESTIC
REAL ESTATE
COMMERCIAL
CONSUMER
AGR I CULTURE
INTERNATIONAL

364,141
33,605

1,925
6
1,919
758
689
287
4
N/A

22,017
N/A
22,017
7,080
3,598
4,458
408
10

258,899
32,163
226.736
124;314
54,362
31,870
2,676
169

10,660
1,293
9,366
4,708
2,819
1,255
18
0

5,839
N/A
5,839
1,674
1,451
1,656
605
N/A

10,729
N/A
10,729
2,606
1,353
6,267
15
N/A

16,956
N/A
16,956
6,200
5,223
3,462
402
N/A

7,416
N/A
7,416
2,899
1,654
2,067
142
N/A

29,700
142
29,558
12,805
7,603
6,192
1,063
0

SECURITIES

TOTAL
U.S. T.S.
SECONDARY MARKET
OTHER SEC.

330,536
163,044
78,753
57,515
5,332
179
44,479
12,723
20,382
11,374

1,849
929
455
465

4,351
1,299
1,893
1,159

21,602
5,939
10,588
5,075

3,884
1,362
1,637
884

1,738
393
873
472

1,798
556
640
602

3,318
651
1,676
991

2,373
471
1,355
547

3,567
1,122
1,266
1,179

464,465
426,509
398,222
34,864
363,359

3,834
3,833
3,278
0
3,278

31,431
31,431
29,530
N/A
29,530

319,807
283,953
273,213
32,865
240,348

16,857
14,992
15,172
1,681
13,490

8,347
8,347
6,996
N/A
6,996

13,585
13,585
8,668
N/A
8,668

23,219
23,204
19,814
2
19,812

11,049
10,990
9,517
59
9,458

36,336
36,174
32,036
256
31,779'

77,063
286,296
35,423
74,343
33,354
86,114
56,750

874
2,404
247
420
411
722
582

4,541
24,989
2,721
6,005
2,046
12,096
2,107

54,946
185,402
22,237
51,021
22,357
47,606
42,039

2,185
11,305
1,343
2,046
1,530
1,819
4,565

1,182
5,814
828
1,105
438
2,798
641

1,956
6,712
959
2,032
1,216
1,389
1,115

3,158
16,654
2,457
3,725
1,556
7,001
1,888

1,668
7,790
1,199
1,570
871
3,337
807

6,552
25,227
3,433
6,419
2,929
9,347
3,006

43,785
33,258
7,745
194,429
35,515

508
514
36
543
11

1,315
2,424
638
11,999
356

28,208
21,869
5,675
143,792
34,293

1,155
1,088
159
5,692
54

1,261
592
89
2,139
42

4,147
1,167
270
2,114
96

2,685
1,983
273
9,523
363

1,354
812
154
3,043
30

3,152
2,808
451
15,583
271

LOAN LOSS RESERVE (ALL 8ANKS)
NET CHARGEOFFS, TOTAL
REAL ESTATE
COMMERCIAL
CONSUMER
AGRICUL TURE

2.13
1.21
0.36
0.71
2.57
-.28

1.88
0.08
-.04
0.00
0.66
N/A

2.90
1.25
1.30
1.79
1.91
2.12

2.19
1.29
0.32
0.60
2.95
-.88

1.49
0.07
0.01
-.00
0.52
-3.90

1.52
0.38
0.05
0.49
0.69
0.38

2.51
3.27
0.03
4.93
4.41
-.06

1.61
1.00
0.52
1.24
1.35
0.28

2.07
1.11
0.68
1.80
1.63
0.20

1.52
0.48
0.37
0.32
1.09
-.27

PAST DUE & NON-ACCRUAL, TOTAL
REAL ESTATE
COMMERCIAL
CONSUMER
AGRICULTURE

5.41
5.66
6.52
3.88
6.74

5.46
5.16
7.10
2.81
34.80

5.97
10.40
13.50
1.67
9.85

5.83
5.82
7.03
3.49
7.87

1.52
1.42
2.06
2.25
9.92

1.90
2.10
1.98
1.63
3.56

8.78
3.51
8.42
11.40
1.19

3.33
4.00
3.76
1.66
5.17

4.30
6.39
4.46
2.47
3.78

3.57
4.62
3.04
2.20
4.73

lIA81L1T1ES TOTAL
DOMESTIC
TOTAL
FOREIGN
DOMESTIC

DEPOSITS

DEMAND
TIME AND SAVINGS
NOW
MMDA
SAVINGS
SMALL TIME
LARGE TIME
OTHER 80RROWINGS
EQUITY CAPITAL
LOAN LOSS RESERVE
LOAN COMMITTMENTS
LOANS SOLD

INCOME

TOTAL
INTEREST
FEES & CHARGES

13,569
11,280
647

111
95
5

847
673
46

9,324
7,795
436

432
387
10

227
200
12

607
441
15

654
540
41

317
271
18

1,049
878
64

EXPENSES

TOTAL
INTEREST
SALARIES
LOAN LOSS PROVISION
OTHER

11,732
5,993
2,241
838
2,661

89
45
22
2
20

826
400
165
60
200

8,086
4,191
1,553
555
1,788

355
215
70
9
60

189
111
30
5
43

478
164
53
98
163

550
278
116
44
112

276
144
44
21
67

883
445
188
43
207

1,830
664
1,165

22
6
16

21
-3
24

1,230
488
741

78
28
50

38
13
25

130
32
98

104
33
72

41
15
26

166
52
114

0.95
14.0
4.29

1.46
12.3
4.61

0.29
3.96
3.34

0.87
13.5
4.24

1.12
18.3
3.88

1.17
17.1
4.09

2.68
33.5
7.60

1.19
14.4
4.39

0.88
12.8
4.29

1.18
16.2
4.48

INCOME BEFORE TAXES
TAXES
NET INCOME
ROA (%)
ROE (%)
NET INTEREST MARG I N (%)

Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views of the management of the Federal Reserve Bank of
San Francisco, or of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Editorial comments may be addressed to the editor (Judith Goff) or to the author..•. Free copies of Federal Reserve
publications can be obtained from the Public Information Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702,
San Francisco 94120. Phone (415) 974-2246.

OUI:'6

v:::> 'OJSpueJ:I ueS
WLL xog 'O'd

O)SI)UOJ:I UOS

JO
aAJaSa~

~uo8

IOJapa:l

~uew~Jodea lpJoese8

DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS REQUIRED TO HOLD RESERVES

~ITH

THE FEDERAL RESERVE ON A

~EEKLY

BASIS

PERCENT OF COMBINED MARKET TOTAL FOR MAY 1991, BY REGION
DISTRICT

ALASKA

DEPOS IT TYPE

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

TOTAL DEPOSITS
DEMAND

52 43 5
91 4 5
64 29 7
.51 32 17
65 33 2
34 63 3
4749 3

73
99
59
37
89

4 23

77

0 1
6 35
3 61
8 2
8 15

89 5 6
94 0 6
88 3 9
71 3 26
95 4 1
88 9 4

94

3 3

91

46
91
59
49
60
25
42

69 28 3
91 3 6
72 27 2
53 38 9
80 20 0
43 54 3
82 17 1

NO~

SAVINGS
MMDA
SMALL TIME
LARGE TIME

ARIZONA

3

6

CALIF

50

HA~All

4

4 5
35 6
39 13
38 2
73 3
54 3

IDAHO'

NEVADA

OREGON

UTAH

~ASH

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

CB SL CU

87 9
90 1
88 8
78 11
94 6
85 14
85 10

70 26 4
99 1 0
77 15 9
66 17 17
82 16 2
4948 3
6633 0

82 12 7
94 1 5
85 8 7
60 20 20
91 5 4
76 18 5
89 8 3

78
88
84
58
82

8 14

5636 8
91 5 4
65 23 12
44 20 36
6830 2
43 53 4
4752 1

4
9

3
11

0
2
5

3 9

3
5
6
77 13
82 9

13
37
12
10

9

CB = COMMERCIAL 8ANKS; SL = SAVINGS & LOANS AND SAVINGS BANKS; CU = CREDIT UNIONS; MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING

TYPE OF ACCOUNT OR LOAN
ARIZ
CALIF
IDAHO
OREGON
~ASH
DATE
US
DISTRICT
HA~AII
UTAH
.... ---_ ..... _--- ..... -----------_. __ . __ ._--------_ .... ----_ ...... --_ ... _----_ ... _.....
...... - ... _-------- .... _----.-----5.65
5.63
5.33
5.31
MONEY MARKET DEPOS IT ACCOUNTS
MAR91
5.58
5.52
5.29
5.58
5.43
APR91
5.46
5.41
5.17
5.55
5.29
5.61
5.25
5.30
5.52
MAY91
5.28
5.05
5.33
5.13
5.56
5.11
5.33
5.56
5.29

_-_.-_

92 TO 182 DAYS CERTIFICATES

MAR91
APR91
MAY91

6.28
6.11
5.91

5.99
5.88
5.78

5.61
5.50
5.46

6.10
5.97
5.83

5.90
5.81
5.64

5.94
5.91
5.89

6.13
5.98
5.85

5.88
5.84
5.73

6.36
6.18
6.01

2'1/2 YEARS AND OVER CERTIFICATES

MAR91
APR91
MAY91

7.04
6.95
6.90

6.66
6.68
6.66

6.30
6.30
6.30

6.83
6.88
6.89

6.95
6.95
6.95

7.03
7.05
7.15

6.68
6.89
6.83

6.73
6.74
6.61

6.91
6.84
6.75

7.75
47
9.24
40
9.84
10

8.54
153
9.02
43
8.67
8

9.43
167
10.27
37
8.74
6

8.64
188
8.99
43
8.63
9

8.50
162
10.51
53
NfA
NfA

9.09
135
NfA
NfA
10.32
11

8.55
102
7.79
29
9.87
12

8.18
78
10.17
38
6.42
6

8.11
118
NfA
NfA
9.65
8

11.28
15.16
18.22

11.83
15.14
18.50

12.63
16.50
18.00

12.59
19.27
18.82

NfA
NfA
NfA

COMMERCIAL, SHORT' TERM"
COMMERCIAL, LONG-TERM"
LOANS TO FARMERS"

AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.
AVE.

RATE
MAT. (DAYS)
RATE
MAT. (MONTHS)
RATE
MAT. (MONTHS)

12.00
10.74
11.00
10.95
12.50
13.90
15.51
12.38
NfA
19.24
19.48
17.97
--- .................... - .. .............................................................................. .................................... ............ .... ........ ................ -_ .................... ..........
SOURCES: SURVEY OF TERMS OF BANK LENDING AND TERMS OF CONSUMER CREDIT; MOST COMMON INTEREST, RATES ON SELECTED ACCOUNTS.
" DATA ARE COMPOUNDED ANNUAL RATES.
CONSUMER, AUTOMOBILE
CONSUMER, PERSONAL
CONSUMER, CRED IT CARDS

-_

-_

AVE. RATE
AVE. RATE
AVE. RATE

-_

-_

-_ -_

-_

-_