View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

February 9,1973

The news evidently hasn't reached
the deeper canyons of Wall Street
yet, but the Council of Economic
Advisers now has made official what
most economists have been saying
for months— 1973 will be a vintage
year in the nation's annals.
According to the annual Economic
Report, real GNP will grow by 63/4
percent during the year, or slightly
ahead of the 1972 pace, thus making
for the strongest back-to-back
performance of the past two
decades. In terms of current
dollars, the GNP increase will be
10 percent, from $1,152 billion to
$1,267 billion.
The President's advisers believe that
the script for the first half-year has
already been written, with the
forces which generated the 1972
boom remaining actively at work
within the business system. But
they have another story for the
second half: "It is both probable
and desirable that the rate of
expansion will and should abate
toward its sustainable long-run
path." Still, practically all parts of
the system will be synchronized in a
broadly distributed growth pattern
throughout the year.
Old-fashioned boom
The foundation for the strong 1973
forecast is an old-fashioned
investment boom, with business
fixed investment in particular rising
14 percent for the second year in a
row. The expanding economy
already has generated increased
needs for production facilities, and
also has provided business with

a substantial part of the funds
required for capital-goods
purchases. In addition to rising
profits, the actual and potential
availability of funds has been
augmented by liberalized
depreciation provisions, the
investment tax credit, and the
ceiling on dividend increases— plus
(at least to date) favorable financial
conditions in the markets for debt
and equity capital.
The forecast for a sharp expansion
in fixed investment, moreover, is
based on such evidence as the
strength in forward investment
commitments and the substantial
buildup in unfilled-order backlogs
held by producers of capital goods.
Also favorable is the recent step-up
in contract awards for factory
buildings, which had been lagging
earlier.
Stockroom activity
Another component of the
investment forecast is a very strong
buildup in inventories, the most
expansive since the early stages of
the Vietnam war. In the Council's
estimates, inventories will rise by
about $121/2 billion in 1973—
roughly in line with the late '72
surge but several times faster than
the earlier'72 pace. This year's
inventory increase, like last year's,
will be supported by a strong
expansion of final sales.
Today, unlike a year ago, stock-sales
ratios are quite low in manufactur­
ing and trade— indeed, lower than
at any other time of the past
half-decade. A structural factor also
(continued page 2)




favors stockbuilding, that is, the
increased demand for heavy
equipment with long production
lead times. Besides, with delivery
delays much more common now
than they were a year ago,
purchasing agents may accelerate
their stockbuilding in some cases
and provide more fuel to the
inventory boom.
Other supports
The Council visualizes consumer
spending rising 9 V2 percent in 1973
— even faster than in 1972— on the
basis of the very sharp increase in
disposable income generated by
rising payrolls and social-security
benefits, plus the windfall gains
resulting from the income-tax
refund. This income gain should
be so large as to permit both a
spending boom and a substantial
increase in consumer savings.
The President's advisers, like
everyone else, expect little if any
change in residential building, as a
consequence of the industry's
spectacular success in meeting the
heavy demand for housing during
the last two years. But they see
few signs of a significant downturn,
with new household formations and
replacement demand both
providing strong underpinnings for

2

Digitized for F R A S E R


the market, and with substantial
amounts of mortgage funds still
available.
Unemployment— how low?
The CEA forecast embodies a
decline in the unemployment rate
to 4V2 percent by the end of the
year, in line with the expected rapid
growth of real CNP. This forecast is
quite realistic, since it suggests no
more of a drop in the next eleven
months than we've seen in the past
three. Indeed, the forecast may be
overly conservative, in view of
impending labor-force develop­
ments (cited by the Council itself)
which will shift certain factors that
have kept the jobless rate so high
and so rigid for such a long time.
Until 1972, the growth of the civilian
labor force far outpaced its
1 % -percent long-term trend line.
For half a decade, labor-participa­
tion rates remained unexpectedly
high, partly because of a boom in
labor demand generated by the
Vietnam war, and partly because of
a large supply of women jobseekers,
which reflected a sharp drop in
fertility rates in the late 1960's. But
with these factors now stabilizing or
declining in importance, the growth
of the civilian labor force should
return to trend, so that further gains
in employment would impact
immediately on the unemployment
rate.

C= 3
Prices— how slow?
The Council admits that its forecast
of a 3-percent rise in the general
price level is on the low side of the
range favored by most private
forecasters. It bases its forecast on
a slowdown in food prices, a tight
limitation on Federal spending, and
a high level of compliance with
Phase III controls. If anything goes
wrong in any of those areas, then
its forecast will begin to look rather
wobbly.
Arresting the rapid rise in food
prices is a key element in the 1973
stabilization program, partly because
of the direct importance of food for
family budgets, and also because of
the link between the rate of increase
of food prices and the size of wage
increases demanded in labor
contract negotiations. One major
solution, aside from cursing the foul
weather that cut so deeply into 1972
supplies, is to modify agricultural
policy. In the past, policy has
leaned strongly in the direction of
limiting output and stocks relative
to the rising domestic and foreign
demand for food.
Favoring a price slowdown is the
improved position of many
workers today as compared to the
period of accelerating inflation in
the late 1960's. Workers covered
by the major collective-bargaining
contracts expiring this year appear

Digitizld for FRASER


to have maintained or even
improved their relative position in
the wage structure, whereas in the
earlier period they found
themselves trying to catch up with
the accelerating trend of prices.
Zone of potential
The Council appears certain that
"The economy will approach the
zone of its potential by the end of
the year." Thus, the key point is not
whether, but how rapidly, output
and employment (and prices) will
expand. A year ago, the Council
saw the economic problem in terms
of accelerating the expansion; today
it must deal with the mirror image,
the task of deceleration. The policy
goal is an approach to a steady rate
of increase in CNP, consonant with
the potential growth rate of the
economy and with reasonable price
stability.
This problem involves a slowdown
from the very rapid 8V2-percent
annual rate of growth of real GNP
recorded in the fourth quarter of
1972, back towards the normal
41A-percent annual rise in GNP
potential. The Council is betting
that the task can be handled
successfully, despite what the
doubters in Wall Street are saying.
William Burke

ucnSinijse/vv • qe;n • u o §3 j o • epeAaN • oqepi
JJB M B H

•

E jU J O p | B 3

.

B U O Z JJV

BANKING DATA— TWELFTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
(D o llar amounts in m illions)
Selected Assets and Liabilities
Large Com m ercial Banks
Loans adjusted and investments*
Loans adjusted— total*
Com m ercial and industrial
Real estate
Consum er instalm ent
U.S. Governm ent securities
O ther securities
Deposits (less cash items)— total*
Dem and deposits adjusted
U.S. Governm ent deposits
Tim e deposits— total*
Savings
O ther tim e I.P.C.
State and political subdivisions
(Large negotiable C D 's)

Am ount
O utstanding
1/24/73

Change
from
1/17/73

68,593
50,285
17,755
15,152
7,733
7,134
11,174
66,807
20,365
1,109
44,145
18,170
17,238
6,439
6,927

Change from
year ago
D o llar
Percent

— 138
+. 2
+ 98
+ 24
+ 24
— 129
— 11
— 298
— 900
+430
+134
— 9
+158
— 2
+ 20

+ 7 ,2 9 4
+ 7 ,0 8 9
+ 2 ,0 0 5
+ 2,391
+ 1 ,2 6 1
+ 260
—
55
+ 6 ,1 9 6
+ 1 ,5 1 6
+
30
+ 4 ,4 1 3
+ 425
+ 2 ,8 3 4
+ 608
+ 1 ,7 7 6

+ 1 1 .9 0
+ 1 6 .4 1
+ 1 2 .7 3
+ 1 8 .7 4
+ 1 9 .4 8
+ 3.78
— 0.49
+ 1 0 .2 2
+ 8.04
+ 2.78
+ 1 1 .1 1
+ 2.40
+ 1 9 .6 8
+ 1 0 .4 3
+ 3 4 .4 8

W eekly Averages of D aily Figures
W eek ended
W eek ended
Com parable
1/24/73
1/17/73
»year-ago period
M ember Bank Reserve Position
Excess reserves
Borrow ings
Net free ( + ) / Net borrow ed (— )
Federal Funds— Seven Large Banks
Interbank Federal funds transactions
Net purchases ( + ) / Net sales (— )
Transactions: U.S. securities dealers
Net loans ( + ) / Net borrow ings (— )

5
209
— 214

+

+366

+223

+238

— 81

+150

+ 2 77

0
96
— 96

—

63
2
61

‘ Includes items not shown separately.
Inform ation on this and other publications can be obtained by callin g or w riting the
Adm inistrative Services Departm ent. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O . Box 7702,
Digitized for F R A S E R Francisco, C alifo rn ia 94120. Phone (415) 397-1137.


•

B>|SB|V