View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

November 23, 1 979

Iran ian Con necti on
Iran's government last week moved to
withdraw its deposits from U.S. banks, and
thereby added an economic dimension to an
already tense political situation. President
Carter immediately ordered a freeze on officiallranian deposits in U.s. banks, and
bankers everywhere began to pay close attention to the new moves on the Iranian chessboard. Economic analysts meanwhile reassessedthe growth prospects of a nation
which, until recently, had been a major U.S.
trade and financial partner.
Within the past year, Iran's hopes for
a modernized economy have been shattered.
The burst of energy which followed the
1 973-74 oil-price upsurge-what one
American observer called Iran's "uncoordinated leap forward"-has been followed
by an equally uncoordinated leap backward
into severe recession. Gone are the dreams
of becoming the Asian version of West
Germany before the turn of the century. And
gone are the dreams of the many Western
corporations which had hoped to benefit
from this era of modernization.

Problems.of growth
In the petroleum boom of the mid-1 970's,
Iran recorded high growth rates for several
years in a row, highlighted by 1 973's
1 2-percent growth in real output. Within
a half-decade, the oil sector's share of total
G N P rose from one-fifth to almost one-third,
while the farm sector's share dropped from
roughly one-fifth to one-tenth. The rural
unemployed and underemployed poured
into the oil centers to work on large-scale
petroleum and petrochemical complexes,
and more of them pou red into Teh ran to work
on massive commercial and luxury-housing
developments, along with a new international airport and a $2 billion-dollar
subway system.
Yet the pressures of the oil boom, along with
Iran's highly skewed population distribution

-only one half of the population is over
15 years of age-forced the government
to calion foreign workers to meet its labor
requirements. Korean truck drivers, Indian
doctors, Afghan laborers, Filipino service
workers, and Japanese and European professional and technical workers-plus more
than 45,000 Americans-became critical
components in Iran's development drive.
But the oil boom, together with low agricultural productivity, created severe strains
on an unprepared economy. Imports soared,
fueled by Iranians' growing appetite for
foreign producer and consumer goods,
as well as the country's growing dependence
on foreign-produced staples such as meat,
dairy products, eggs, rice and wheat. Farm
imports alone went from practically zero
in 1 973 to about $1.5 billion in 1 978.
Consumer prices rose 1 0 to 15 percent a year
throughout the 1 973-76 period, and then
jumped by 27 percent in 1977.

Problemsof no growth
In a mid-1 979 report from Tehran, the U.S.
embassy staff reported that Iran's economy
was still mainly paralyzed as a result of the
past year's revolutionary turmoil. The new
government inherited an industrial economy
which was already badly disrupted by prerevolution strikes, sagging productivity and
large wage increases. Only agriculture
remained relatively stable amid the turmoil,
while construction and most manufacturing
activities appeared paralyzed.
The Embassy report said, "the infrastructural
fabric of water, electricity, telecommunications, post, petroleum supplies (and record
traffic) is essentially sound, and supports
one's expectations that all else should likewise be normaL" But most major industries
appeared to be operating at less than half
normal levels. This suggests a sharp decline
this year in real GN P, which apparently
dropped about 20 percent in the period

___._------_.-------------._._----------

_.....

.•..

airport projects, and a lavish SO,OOO-person
complex of office and residential buildings
on the outskirts of Tehran. The new government meanwhile expanded its powers
by nationalizing the banks and insurance
companies in June, and followed that in July
by taking over the metal-producing and
transportation-machinery industries, as well
as other industries and mines that have made
"illegal benefits" in the past.

March 1 978-March 1 979 (year 1 357 in the
Islamic calendar). Still, Iran has been able
to remain afloat on its ocean of oil, even
though production at midyear was running
40 percent below year-earlier levels
at an average of four million barrels/day.
Indeed, with oil prices soaring, revenue
could match or even exceed year-ago levels.
Unemployment has remained a major
problem, although its magnitude has been
disguised by the government's policy
of maintaining employment at previous
levels regardless of production requirements.
Many factories have kept virtually the same
complement of employees as a year ago, and
now pay those workers higher wages while
producing perhaps two-thirds less than a year
ago. In this environment, inflation continues
very high. Shortages of materials, continued
wage increases, declining labor productivity,
and the likelihood of increased government
spending for job-creating projects all suggest
that the inflation rate will return to 1 977's
high rate.

Impact on the West
All of these developments have had serious
implications for the major industrial powers,
the United States in particular. The sharpest
impact, of course, has been felt in the petroleum market. Before the shut-off of Iranian oil
imports, Iran satisfied roughly 5 percent
of U.S. oil-import demand-about 300,000
barrels/day-but Administration officials
claim that loss could be offset if American
drivers reduced their travel by 3 miles a day.
In any event, world oil prices will increase
an estimated 82 percent betweer late 1978
and late 1 979, which by itselfwould account
for two percentage points of the 10-percent
rise in the U.S. G N P price index over the past
year. Moreover, many U.S. export industries
-from arms producers to agriculturists, and
from building contractors to nuclear-reactor
manufacturers-have seen their contracts
swept away with the disappearance of the old
regime.

During the new government's first half-year
in power, it cancelled or suspended many
contracts with foreign firms. Civilian
contracts worth perhaps $38 billion were
cancelled, including such projects as nuclear
plants, petroleum facilities, rail-highway-

Iran has cancelled rough Iy $15 bi II ion
of military-related contracts with the U.S.,
plus many related services. The largest
contract involved a $3.6-billion orderfor
1 60 F-16 fighter planes, and other major
cancellations affected a $1 .2-billion orderfor
AWACS planes (airborne warning and control systems) and a $1 .4-bill ion order for

2

of about $3 billion in early 1 979, are slowly
reducing their exposure. As in the case
of other foreign banks, they are booking little
new debt." In any event, the amou nts at stake
are considerably-less than the $8 billion
in Iranian frozen assets,which as the President's freeze order noted, "will be available
to satisfy lawful claims of citizens and entities
of the United States against the Government
of Iran."

Spruance class destroyers. The U.K. also
suffered about $5 billion in cancellations,
primarily for the production of l, 300 new
Chieftain tanks. Many of the cancellations
affected other N ATO countries as well,
because of losses on subcontracts or because
of higher prices for military items which they
as well as the Iranians had ordered.
U.S. nonmilitary exports to Iran, which
reached $3.7 billion in 1978, have fallen
to only about one-third of last year's pace.
Sti II, farm exports rose 8 percent in the crop
year ending September 30, to $490 million,
as Iran continued as a major customer of the
U.S. for food and feed supplies. Indeed,
the u.s.contributed about three-fourths
of the wheat, rice and vegetable oils which
Iran imported to feed its population this past
year. These sales amounted to only about
1 Y2percent of U.S. agricultural exports, but
they represented significant business to some
U.s.grain and feed producers. Iran has
already announced that it will shift some
wheat purchases to other suppliers,
so a reduction in U.S. exports could occur
in the new crop year, even if the political
situation improves.

Return to growth?
Iran's political and economic future remains
uncertain, but once past the present crisis,
itcould still achieve substantial growth. With
oil reserves of 63 billion barrels (second only
to Saudi Arabia), with the world's secondlargest known gas reserves, and with substantial mineral wealth, its foreign-exchange
earning potential could support a major longterm development program.
Again, the recent oil boom, with all its distortions, created a major expansion of the
nation's capital plant, higher levels of literacy
and labor skills, and income levels capable
of supporting expanded domestic industries.
Iran's dreams of becoming the Germany
of the Middle Eastmay lie shattered, but the
nation could stifl gain a respectable place
in the middle rank of industrial powers
if it surmounts its present problems.

On the banking scene, the situation today
is far different from the heady days of the oil
boom, when Iran was one of the most favored
customers of the major international banks.
As late as May 1978, an international consortium lent $300 million to the National
Iranian Gas Compa"ny at a rock-bottom
interest rate-for the first five years, only
% percent above Libor (London interbank
offer rate, the base international lending rate).
But now, bank portfolio examiners are
closely watching this and all other Iranian
loans. The Embassy's mid-1 979 survey said
"U. S. banks, with direct outstandings in Iran

William Burke

3

.LSl:Il::I
u018U!4Sl:?M"
4l:?ln.. uo8aJO .. l:?pl:?i\aN
.. 04l:?pl
!!l:?Ml:?H l:?!UJoJ!Il:?:::>l:?uozpV" l:?>ISl:?IV
II

CG> \ill\2?<tJI

'J!li?:::>
IO::>SpUi?J:I
Ui?5
ZSL'ON l1W1Hd
GIVd
:J!)V1 50d 'S'O
llVW S5Vl:::>IS1I1:I

:u.

BANKINGDATA-TWELfTH FEDERAL
RESERVE
DISTRICT
(Dollaramountsin millions)
SelectedAssetsandLiatJilities
LargeCommercialBanks

Amount
Outstanding
11/7/79
134,936
111,920
31,279
41,979
23,822
1,534
7,384
15,632
44,289
31,861
29,116
56,688
48,342
20,855
Weekended
1/7/79

Changefrom
Change
yearago@
from
Dollar
Percent
10/31/79
- 173
+ 16,895
+ 14.3
+ 16,320
+ 17.1
143
+ 12.1
- 111
+ 3,372
+ 26.5
+ 260
+ 8,782
NA
24
NA
- 171
NA
NA
766
9.4
12
18
+ 9.4
+ 1,341
- 890
+ 2,495
+ 6.0
858
+ 640
+
+ 2.8
1,390
4.6
148
+ 17.2
+ 8,316
+ 50
9
+ 9,412
+ 24.2
+
+ 1,863
+ 9.8
+ 118
Comparable
Weekended
year-agoperiod
10/31/79

Loans(gross,adjusted)and investments*
Loans(gross,adjusted)- total#
Commercialand industrial
Realestate
Loansto individuals
Securitiesloans
U.s. Treasurysecurities*
Othersecurities*
Demanddeposits- total#
Demanddeposits- adjusted
Savingsdeposits- total
Timedeposits- total#
Individuals,part.& corp.
(LargenegotiableCD's)
Weekiy Averages
of Daily figures
MemberBankReservePosition
+ 21
ExcessReserves
(+ )/Deficiency(- )
+ 151
+ 11
+ 125
+ 50
Borrowings
202
- 114
- 29
Netfreereserves
(+ )/Net borrowed(-)
51
FederalFunds- Sevenlarge Banks
- 138
+ 707
Net interbanktransactions
+ 584
[Purchases
(+ )/Sales(-)]
+ 185
+ 222
+ 117
Net, U.s. Securitiesdealertransactions
[Loans(+)/Borrowings(-)]
* Excludestradingaccountsecurities.
# Includesitemsnotshownseparately.
@ Historicaldata arenot strictly comparabledueto changesin the reportingpanel;however,adjustments
havebeenappliedto 1978datato removeasmuchaspossiblethe effectsof the changesin coverage.In
i1d4ition,for someitems,historicaldataarenot availabledueto definitionalchanges.
Editorialcommentsmay beaddressed
to the editor (William Burke)or to the author.... Freecopiesof
this and other FederalReservepublicationscan be obtainedby callingor writing the Publiclnfonnation
Section,FederalReserveBank of SanFrancisco,P.O. Box 7702, San Francisco94120. Phone(415)
544-2184.