View original document

The full text on this page is automatically extracted from the file linked above and may contain errors and inconsistencies.

M e s e s iird iii D e p a ir t m e m iit

July 12,1974

Tin© F@od Stom p F&ctoiry
"I remember when the food-stamp
program began here. There'd be an
envelope and the bank employees
would all gather round and take a
look and say: 'So those are food
stamps.' Then one person would
spend a couple of days a month
working on processing the stamps."
That was the way it was, according
to the officer in charge of foodstamp processing at the Federal
Reserve Bank of San Francisco. But
no more. Practically every major
county has many more people en­
rolled in the food-stamp program
than the entire nation did when the
plan began in 1961. One out of
every fourteen Americans is bene­
fiting from the food-stamp program,
and more needy people enroll in
the plan every month. In dollar
volume, the program is expanding
sharply because of the semi­
annual cost-of-living adjustments
mandated under terms of the 1973
farm legislation.
So from a relative handful of stamps
that benefited 50,000 impoverished
Americans when the original pilot
program was unveiled 13 years ago,
food stamps have boomed into a
billion-dollar business. By mid-1975,
under present budget plans, 15.8
million Americans will be receiving
stamps valued at $7.2 billion. Along
with this expansion, of necessity,
has grown the massive machinery
that must operate at rapid speed to
process the estimated 250 million
food stamps cashed in each month.

1
Digitized for FR A SER


Without super-efficiency, the foodstamp program could bog down,
with dire effects for those millions
of people who count on the pro­
gram to help them lead healthy and
productive lives. Yet, as the program
expands, the commercial banks and
the Federal Reserve System must
deal with an increasingly huge
mountain of paper. For they are
the prime agents— the "food-stamp
factory"—that disburse, collect,
verify and dispose of millions of
food stamps.
How stamps work
Under the food-stamp program a
household pays a certain amount for
an allotment of food coupons hav­
ing a greater monetary value. The
amount a household pays is deter­
mined by the size of the household
and its income after certain deduc­
tions have been allowed. For in­
stance, families with no income get
stamps free. A family of four with
income of $450 pays $118 for $150
worth of stamps. The average re­
cipient pays for about 55 percent of
the total value of food stamps re­
ceived. Stamps may be redeemed
for food, or plants and seeds to
grow food, and in Alaska even hunt­
ing and fishing equipment. Certain
items such as alcoholic beverages
and tobacco are excluded.

In cooperation with the Food and
Nutrition Service of the U.S. Depart­
ment of Agriculture, state and local
welfare agencies organize the pro­
gram on a county-by-county basis.

(continued on page 2)

Opinions expressed in this newsletter do not
necessarily reflect the views of the management of the
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, nor of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Food retailers and certain meal ser­
vices are authorized to accept and
redeem coupons. The Food Nutri­
tion Service approves all outlets that
may distribute the stamps to par­
ticipants, while welfare agencies
certify those who qualify for food
stamps.
We may gain an idea of the immen­
sity of the stamp-handling system
when we realize that about 80 per­
cent of the banks in the San Fran­
cisco Federal Reserve District accept
food stamps. This means that almost
5,000 banks and branches in the
nine-state area are involved in the
plan. By next month, an estimated
2 million persons will be enrolled in
the food-stamp program in this
District. Already, last year, the San
Francisco Fed processed 325 million
stamps valued at over $600 m illion.
With 1.3 million already participat­
ing, California leads the nation in
food-stamp activity. This amounts to
one Californian out of every 14—
and in San Francisco, one out of
eight. These poverty-level Califor­
nians in a typical month receive 73
million food stamps valued at over
$40 million. While other Western
states fall far below California, the
involvement is still considerable.
There are 262,000 enrolled in Wash­
ington and smaller numbers in
other states.
Stamps and the banks
About 180,000 retailers and meal
services accept stamps and redeem
them through the commercial­2

2
Digitized for FR A SER


banking system. The process for
banks is time-consuming and bur­
densome. Before accepting any cou­
pon for redemption, each bank is
required to confirm that the back
of the coupon shows either the
authorization number or the name
of the authorized dealer or whole­
sale-food concern. Food coupons
must also bear the cancellation of
the first bank receiving them,
marked "Paid" or "Cancelled", to­
gether with bank name and identificatic n number. Stamps cannot be
endorsed with the bank's normal
endorsement for checks or can­
celled by perforation. Banks do not
get reimbursed for any of this activ­
ity, despite the obvious cost in
man-hours alone.
The Federal Reserve, in its capacity
as Fiscal Agent for the United States,
got into the food-stamp business at
the very beginning of the program.
Food stamps are treated as cash, so
that security precautions are strin­
gent, and the Fed's expenses thus
reflect the exacting procedures built
into the operations.
Food stamps come to the Fed
through the commercial-banking
system already sorted by denomina­
tion into 50 cent, $2 and $5 items.
At the Fed these bundles must be
both package and piece counted.
(Every bundle has 10 packages of
100 stamps each.) Each stamp must
be cancelled with a mark showing
the name and number of the Fed
office or branch. Throughout the
process, rigorous multiple-custody
procedures are followed, including

five separate verifications of the
amounts of stamps. Finally the
stamps are destroyed— again under
careful guard.
The cost of this custodial care comes
high, especially since stamps are
used once and then destroyed— un­
like currency, which can be used
over and over for an average of 18
months and often much longer. For
the Federal Reserve System as a
whole, the cost of stamp operations
may reach $31/2 million
this year.

humans.) There are disagreements,
however, over the best and most
efficient way to meet these needs.
And the pinch has been aggravated
by the severe inflation that has
squeezed all Americans, since sharp
price increases are now ballooning
the costs of the food-stamp pro­
gram. The stamp allocation for a
family of four now stands at $150 a
month, compared with $120 just a
year ago.

The operations at the San Francisco
office— one of five Fed offices for
the Western states— illustrates the
nature of the process. A staff of 16
is assigned to food stamps at this
installation, to handle the stamps
deposited by some 200 com m ercial
banks and branches. But the work­
load keeps rising every day, so that
stamp volume now averages about
550,000 daily. Last year the San
Francisco office verified over 113
million stamps valued at $212
million.

However, there is one possible
alternative to food stamps. The
Administration has proposed mak­
ing direct cash payments to needy
persons in amounts equal to the
bonus value of the food stamps they
would have received. The plan
would allow each state the option of
continuing the present program or
going the cash route. This would
signal, if not the end to food stamps,
then certainly a decided slowdown.
The argument here is that direct
payments would restore dignity and
responsibility to recipients and pro­
vide them with a greater choice over
their spending.

What are the options?
For a system as involved and expen­
sive as the food-stamp program,
there are understandably widely
divergent points of view concerning
its cost-effectiveness and utility. No
one disputes the need to alleviate
the hunger and desperation that are
the lot of Americans with povertylevel incomes. (Only last month, a
Senate committee on nutrition
heard reports that a third of the pet
food sold in city slums is eaten by

Despite these factors, the continued
existence of the food-stamp pro­
gram seems assured in view of the
overwhelming need for a helping
hand for the millions of Americans
below the poverty line. Meanwhile
the stamp factory— the commercial
banks and the Federal Reserve Sys­
tem— is gearing up to meet the con­
tinued avalanche of stamps resulting
from the constant expansion of the
program.
Ron Getz

3

Digitized for FR A SER


uoiSinqse/w • qBjn • uoSaJO • epeAa|\| . oi|epi
UBM BH

.

B jU J O p | B 3

•

B U O Z JJV

BANKING DATA—TWELFTH FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICT
(Dollar amounts in millions)

Selected Assets and Liabilities
Large Com m ercial Banks

Amount
Outstanding
6 /2 6 /7 4

Change
from
6 /1 9 /7 4

Change from
year ago
Dollar
Percent

+
+
+
+
+
+

+ 9,429
+ 9,001
+
58
+ 3,165
+ 2,839
+ 838
- 807
+ 1,235
+ 7,238
+ 618
16
+ 6,252
- 300
+ 6,778
- 382
+ 4,522

Loans (gross) adjusted and investments*
Loans gross adjusted—
Securities loans
Commercial and industrial
Real estate
Consumer instalment
U.S. Treasury securities
Other Securities
Deposits (less cash items)— total*
Demand deposits adjusted
U.S. Government deposits
Time deposits— total*
Savings
Other time I.P.C.
State and political subdivisions
(Large negotiable CD's)

83,584
65,530
1,287
23,317
19,454
9,348
5,074
12,980
79,060
21,752
1,037
54,838
17,919
27,417
6,658
14,189

Weekly Averages
of Daily Figures

Week ended
6 /2 6 /7 4

461
568
93
146
80
28
58
— 49
+ 261
+ 112
+
67
+ 211
+
84
+ 265
—
153
+ 274

+
+
+
+
+
+
—

+
+
+
—

+
—

+
—

+

12.72
15.92
4.72
15.71
17.09
9.85
13.72
10.52
10.08
2.92
1.52
12.87
1.65
32.84
5.43
46.78

Week ended
6 /1 9 /7 4

Comparable
year-ago period

21
141
162

76
186
-111

+ 1,163

+ 1,607

+ 808

-

+

496

+ 169

Member Bank Reserve Position
Excess Reserves
Borrowings
Net free ( + ) / Net borrowed ( - )

-

78
259
181

-

-

Federal Funds— Seven Large Banks
Interbank Federal funds transactions
Net purchases ( + ) / Net sales ( —)
Transactions: U.S. securities dealers
Net loans ( + ) / Net borrowings ( - )

167

* Includes items not shown separately.

Information on this and other publications can be obtained by calling or writing the
Administrative Services Department, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, P.O. Box 7702,
San Francisco, California 94120. Phone (415) 397-1137.
Digitized for FR A SER


•

B>|SB| V